1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \hoffset=-1.5cm
3: \voffset=-2cm
4: %\pagestyle{empty}
5: \textwidth=16cm
6: \textheight=23cm
7: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
8: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
9: \usepackage{epsfig}
10: \begin{document}
11:
12:
13: \bigskip
14: \bigskip
15: \bigskip
16:
17: \begin{center}
18: {\bf SOFT-HARD DECOMPOSITION IN QCD JET PHYSICS}
19: \end{center}
20:
21: \bigskip
22:
23: \begin{center}
24: {\bf I.M.~Dremin$^{(a)}$, A.V.~Leonidov$^{(a,b)}$ }
25: \end{center}
26:
27: \begin{center}
28:
29: \medskip
30:
31: {\it (a) Theoretical Physics Department, P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute,\\ 119991 Leninsky pr. 53, Moscow, Russia}
32:
33: \medskip
34:
35: {\it (b) Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics\\ 117259 B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow, Russia}
36: \end{center}
37:
38: \bigskip
39:
40:
41: \begin{abstract}
42: The paper generalizes the results on soft - hard decomposition of the
43: characteristics of QCD jets obtained in \cite{D05} by taking into account the
44: effects of fermions and running coupling constant.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47:
48: \newpage
49:
50: %\section{Introduction}
51:
52: Physics of QCD jets is one of the most actively developing topics in application of Quantum Chromodynamics to phenomenology of multiparticle
53: production. The philosophy and practice of corresponding analysis is described
54: in \cite{DKMT91}, see also the reviews \cite{D94,KO97,DG01}. One of
55: the central issues in QCD applications to multiparticle production is distinguishing between the soft nonperturbative and (semi)hard perturbative
56: mechanisms of particle production \cite{DL95,L05}. Soft gluons play a very special role in applications of QCD parton model to multiparticle
57: production. This was a main motivation behind the analysis of \cite{D05}, where dynamics corresponding to perturbative evolution of QCD jets was
58: separated into soft and hard components according to the energy carried by an offspring parton. Such decomposition allows to make a separate analysis
59: of multiplicity distributions arising from soft and hard kinematical subspaces and suggest experimental observables allowing to verify the
60: theoretical picture. In \cite{D05} only gluon contribution was considered. In addition,
61: a simplifying assumption of a fixed (energy independent) QCD coupling constant
62: was made. In the present work we lift these two assumptions and study the soft-hard decomposition of QCD jets in a full picture that includes
63: fermions and the effects of running coupling constant.
64:
65: %\section{Soft - hard decomposition in QCD jets}
66:
67: The central object allowing to give a concise and parsimonious description of
68: the evolution of multiplicities of QCD jets is a generating function. It is
69: constructed from the probabilities of creating $n$ partons in a jet $P_n$:
70: \begin{equation}
71: G(z)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P_n(1+z)^n.
72: \end{equation}
73: Introducing generating function allows to write a transparent system of integro-differential equations describing
74: the evolution of QCD jets:
75: \begin{eqnarray}
76: \frac{d G_{G}}{dy} \; = \;\int_{0}^{1}dxK_{G}^{G}(x)\gamma _{0}^{2}[G_{G}(y+\ln x)G_{G} (y+\ln (1-x)) - G_{G}(y)] \nonumber \\
77: \;+\;n_{f}\int_{0}^{1}dxK_{G}^{F}(x)\gamma _{0}^{2} [G_{F}(y+\ln x)G_{F}(y+\ln (1-x)) - G_{G}(y)], \label{eeg} \\
78: \frac{d G_{F}}{dy} \; = \; \int_{0}^{1}dxK_{F}^{G}(x)\gamma _{0}^{2}[G_{G}(y+\ln x) G_{F}(y+\ln (1-x)) - G_{F}(y)] , \label{eeq}
79: \end{eqnarray}
80: where $y=\ln(p \, \theta /Q_0)$ is a parameter of jet evolution, $p$ is initial energy, $\theta$ is a jet opening
81: angle, $Q_0={\rm const}$, $\alpha_S$ is a strong coupling constant, $n_f$ is a number of quark flavors,
82: \begin{equation}
83: \gamma_0^2 = \frac{ 2 N_c \alpha_S}{\pi}; \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
84: \alpha_S(y)=\frac{2 \pi}{\beta_0 y} \left ( 1 - \frac{\beta_1 \ln 2y}{\beta_0^2 y} \right);
85: \end{equation}
86: \begin{equation}
87: \beta_0 = \frac{11 N_c - 2 N_f}{3};\;
88: \,\,\, \beta_1 = \frac{17 N^2_c - N_f (5N_c+3 C_F)}{3}.
89: \end{equation}
90: The kernels of the evolution equations (\ref{eeg}) and (\ref{eeq}) read
91: \begin{eqnarray}
92: K_{G}^{G}(x) \; = \; \frac {1}{x} - (1-x)[2-x(1-x)], \nonumber \\
93: K_{G}^{F}(x) \; = \; \frac {1}{4N_c}[x^{2}+(1-x)^{2}], \nonumber \\
94: K_{F}^{G}(x) \; = \; \frac {C_F}{N_c}\left[ \frac {1}{x}-1+\frac {x}{2}\right], \label{K}
95: \end{eqnarray}
96: where $x$ and $1-x$ are the shares of energy carried by the created partons,
97: $N_c=3$ is a number of colors and $C_{F}= (N_{c}^{2}-1)/2N_{c}=4/3$.
98:
99: The main idea of \cite{D05} is to separate soft and hard contributions to jet multiplicity
100: $\langle n(y)\rangle=\langle n^S(y)\rangle+\langle n^H(y)\rangle$ by introducing a
101: cutoff $x_0 \ll 1$ in integration over
102: the phase space in the evolution equations (\ref{eeg}) and (\ref{eeq}). The
103: soft contribution $\langle n^S\rangle$ is that coming from integration in the interval
104: $[0,x_0]$ and the hard one $\langle n^H\rangle $ -- in the interval $[x_0,1]$.
105: Because of complete equivalence of two gluons emitted by their parent gluon,
106: the kernels of the equations are symmetrical for the substitution of $x$ by
107: $1-x$ in the initial formulation of the problem. It is, however, possible
108: to use this symmetry (see \cite{DKMT91}) and get the unsymmetrical kernels
109: (\ref{K}) at the expense of labeling one of the gluons as an offspring gluon.
110: Then the contributions $\langle n^S\rangle $ and $\langle n^H\rangle $ can be
111: easily separated. They differ in such formulation and correspond to mean
112: multiplicities of sets of jets with energies less than $x_0p$ and larger
113: than $x_0p$. There is no such problem for jets in
114: two-jet events of $e^+e^-$-annihilation because their energies are fixed from
115: the very beginning. However, subjets in these events, jets in three-jet events
116: or jets in hadronic reactions vary in energies. Therefore, it is important
117: to know the energy behavior of soft and hard sets of such jets. The above
118: proposal solves this problem.
119:
120: In \cite{D05} only gluon evolution at fixed coupling constant was considered. Our aim in the
121: present paper is to generalize the calculations of \cite{D05} by taking into account the contributions of fermions and running coupling constant. The
122: calculations we have to perform mirror those in \cite{CDGNT00, DLN00}. The
123: only difference is the above-mentioned restriction in the integration over
124: the phase space in computing the soft contribution to jet multiplicity. Let us
125: remind that a convenient way of taking into account the effects of
126: running coupling \cite{D93} in the equations describing the evolution of the moments of jet multiplicity distributions with energy is to Taylor
127: expand the generating functions $G$ in the evolution equations in $y$, perform integration over $x$ and collect all contributions of the same order
128: in the right hand-- and left hand-- sides of the resulting equations.
129: Performing, in complete analogy with \cite{CDGNT00, DLN00}, this calculation
130: for the average soft multiplicities $\langle n^S_G\rangle $ and
131: $\langle n^S_F\rangle $ we get the following expressions for their second
132: derivatives:
133: \begin{eqnarray}
134: \frac{d^2 \langle n_G^S\rangle }{dy^2} = \gamma_0 ^2 [\langle n_G\rangle x_0 +
135: 2(u\langle n_G\rangle -\langle n_G \rangle ^{'})w_1-(2u \, \langle n_G\rangle ^{'}
136: -\langle n_G\rangle ^{''})w_2 +
137: \frac{\langle n_G\rangle ^{'''}} {2}w_3 \nonumber
138: \end{eqnarray}
139: $$
140: + \frac{n_{f}}{4N_C}[(u\langle n_G\rangle -\langle n_G\rangle^{'}
141: - 2u\langle n_F\rangle + 2\langle n_F\rangle ^{'})w_{4}+ 2(u\langle n_G\rangle ^{'}
142: - 3u\langle n_F\rangle ^{'} + \langle n_F\rangle ^{''})w_5 + \langle n_F\rangle ^{'''}w_6]],
143: $$
144: \begin{eqnarray}
145: r_0 \frac{d^2 \langle n^S_F\rangle }{dy^2} \; = \; \gamma_0^2
146: [\langle n_G\rangle x_0
147: +(u \, \langle n_G\rangle -\langle n_G\rangle ^{ '})w_7 +
148: (2u \, \langle n_G\rangle ^{'} - \langle n_G\rangle ^{ ''})w_8
149: - \frac{1}{2}\langle n_G\rangle ^{ '''}w_9 \nonumber\\
150: \; + \; (u \, \langle n_G\rangle ^{ '}+u \, \langle n_F\rangle ^{'}-
151: \langle n_F\rangle ^{ ''})w_{10}-\frac{1}{2}\langle n_F\rangle ^{ '''}w_{11}], \label{nf}
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: where $u=2B\gamma_0^2$, $B=\beta_0/8N_C$, $\beta_0=(11N_C-2N_f)/3$, $w_1(x_0) \ldots w_{11}(x_0)$ are the functions of the cutoff $x_0$ listed in
154: the Appendix.
155:
156:
157: The multiplicities of soft jets $\langle n_G^S\rangle $ and $\langle n_F^S\rangle$
158: can be obtained as the perturbative expansions in powers of $\gamma_0$:
159: \begin{eqnarray}\label{nn}
160: \langle n_G^S\rangle = \langle n_G\rangle [x_0-b_1\gamma_0-b_2\gamma_0^2 -b_3\gamma_0^3],\\ \langle n_F^S\rangle = \langle n_F\rangle
161: [x_0-d_1\gamma_0-d_2\gamma_0^2 -d_3\gamma_0^3].
162: \end{eqnarray}
163: \begin{equation}
164: \gamma \; = \langle n_G\rangle ^{'} /\langle n_G\rangle \;= \gamma_0(1-a_1
165: \gamma_0-a_2\gamma_0^2-a_3 \gamma_0^3)+O(\gamma_0^5), \label{gamma} \\
166: \end{equation}
167: \begin{equation}
168: r \; =\langle n_G\rangle/\langle n_F\rangle \;= r_0(1-r_1 \gamma_0-r_2
169: \gamma_0^2-r_3\gamma_0^3)+O(\gamma_0^4), \\ \label{r}
170: \end{equation}
171: $r_0=C_V/C_F = 9/4, \gamma_0^{'}\approx -B\gamma _0^3$.
172:
173: The numerical values of $a_i, r_i$ are given in \cite{CDGNT00}.
174: Using these relations one easily gets the second derivative of
175: $\langle n_G^S\rangle$ as
176: \begin{equation}
177: \frac {\langle n_G^S\rangle ^{''}}{\langle n_G\rangle \gamma_0^2}= x_0-(b_1+(2a_1+B) x_0)\gamma_0-[b_2-(3B+2a_1)b_1-(2a_1B+a_1^2-2a_2)x_0]\gamma_0^2+
178: O(\gamma_0^3) \label{n''}
179: \end{equation}
180: and the similar expression for $\langle n_F^S\rangle ^{''}/\langle n_F\rangle $ with $b_i$ replaced by $d_i$. The terms of the same order of
181: $\gamma_0 $ must be equal on both sides of the equations. From this requirement one gets coefficients $b_i(x_0)$ and $d_i(x_0)$.
182: \begin{eqnarray}
183: b_1 (x_0)=2w_1(x_0)+\frac{n_f}{4N_c}\frac {r_0-2}{r_0}w_4(x_0)-(2a_1+B) x_0, \\ \label{b1}
184: b_2 (x_0)=- \left( 3(a_1+B)^2+ 2a_2 \right) x_0+2(a_1+B)w_1(x_0)-w_2(x_0) +\\
185: \frac{n_f}{4N_c}[(a_1+B-\frac{2(a_1+B+r_1)} {r_0})w_4(x_0)-\frac{w_5(x_0)}{r_0}], \\ \label{b2}
186: d_1(x_0)=w_7(x_0)-(2a_1+B)x_0 , \\ \label{d1}
187: d_2(x_0)=-(3(a_1+B)^2+2a_2)x_0+(a_1+B-r_1)w_7(x_0)+w_8(x_0)+\frac{w_{10}(x_0)}{r_0}. \label{d2}
188: \end{eqnarray}
189: The numerical values of $b_i, d_i$ at $N_f=3$ for different $x_0$ are shown in Table 1:
190: \begin{center}
191: {\bf Table 1}
192:
193: \medskip
194:
195: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
196: \hline
197: $x_0$ & $b_1$ & $b_2$ & $d_1$ & $d_2$ \\ \hline
198: 0.1 & 0.095 & -0.417 & 0.004 & -0.42 \\ \hline
199: 0.2 & 0.03 & -0.447 & 0.003 & -0.748 \\ \hline
200: 0.3 & -0.181 & -0.53 & -0.014 & -1.276 \\ \hline
201: \end{tabular}
202: \end{center}
203: It is seen that the role of the second correction increases at lower values of $x_0$. The expressions for the terms of the third order of $\gamma _0$
204: are rather lengthy and we do not show them here. The results for gluodynamics are easily obtained if $N_F$ is put equal to zero in expressions for
205: $b_i$.
206:
207: \begin{figure}[h]
208: \begin{center}
209: \epsfig{file=plotg.eps,height=16cm,width=14cm}
210: \end{center}
211: \caption{ Energy dependence of the ratio of soft to total multiplicities in gluon jet $ \langle n^S_G \rangle /
212: \langle n_G \rangle $ for various cutoffs $x_0 \, = \, 0.1$ (solid line, red) $x_0 \, = \, 0.2$ (dashed line,
213: blue) and $x_0= \, 0.4$ (dotted line, brown).} \label{ngns}
214: \end{figure}
215:
216: The soft jet multiplicities behave asymptotically as the total multiplicities.
217: Some perturbative corrections in powers of $y^{-1/2}$ (or $\gamma _0$)
218: appear at lower energies. Soft multiplicities are generally proportional to
219: their softness parameter $x_0$ at small $x_0$ with terms like $x_0\ln x_0$
220: appearing in some $f_i$. All these conclusions can be tested in experiment.
221:
222: Let us note that in the fixed coupling case considered in \cite{D05} the soft
223: jet multiplicities are proportional to the total multiplicity at all energies.
224: The proportionality factor depends only on $x_0$. It implies that the dependence
225: of their ratio at lower energies demonstrated in Fig. 1 is due to the running
226: property of the coupling strength in QCD.
227:
228: This work has been supported in part by the RFBR grants 04-02-16445, 04-02-16880, 06-02-17051.\\
229:
230:
231: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
232:
233: \bibitem{D05}
234: I.M.~Dremin, {\it Pis'ma\ v\ ZhETF}\ {\bf 81} (2005), 391; {\it JETP Letters}\, {\bf 81} (2005), 307;
235: arXiv:hep-ph/0501203
236:
237: \bibitem{DKMT91}
238: Yu.L.~Dokshitzer, V.A.~Khoze, A.H.~Mueller and S.I.~Troyan, "Basics of Perturbative QCD", ed. J.~Tran~Thanh~Van, Gif-sur-Yvette, Edition Frontiers,
239: 1991
240:
241: \bibitem{D94}
242: I.M.~Dremin, {\it UFN}\, {\bf 164} (1994), 785; {\it Physics-Uspekhi}\, {\bf 37} (1994), 715
243:
244: \bibitem{KO97}
245: V.A.~Khoze, W.~Ochs, {\it Int.\ Journ.\ Mod.\ Phys.}\ {\bf A12} (1997), 2949
246:
247: \bibitem{DG01}
248: I.M.~Dremin, J.W.~Gary, {\it Phys.\ Rep.}\, {\bf 349} (2001), 301
249:
250: \bibitem{DL95}
251: I.M.~Dremin, A.V.~Leonidov, {\it UFN}\ {\bf 165} (1995), 759
252:
253: \bibitem{L05}
254: A.V.~Leonidov, {\it UFN}\ {\bf 175} (2005), 323
255:
256: \bibitem{CDGNT00}
257: A.~Capella, I.M.~Dremin, J.W.~Gary, V.A.~Nechitailo, J.~Tran Thanh Van, {\it Phys.\ Rev.}\ {\bf D61} (2000), 074009
258:
259: \bibitem{DLN00}
260: I.M.~Dremin, C.S.~Lam, V.A.~Nechitailo, {\it Phys.\ Rev.}\ {\bf D61} (2000), 074020
261:
262: \bibitem{D93}
263: I.M.~Dremin, {\it Phys.\ Lett.}\ {\bf B313} (1993), 209
264:
265:
266: \end{thebibliography}
267:
268: \newpage
269:
270: \begin{center}
271: {\bf Appendix}
272: \end{center}
273:
274:
275: \begin{eqnarray}
276: w_1(x_0) \; = \; \int^{x_0}_0 dx \, V(x) =\int^{x_0}_0 dx \, (1-\frac{3}{2}x +
277: x^2-\frac{x^3}{2}) =x_0-\frac{3}{4}x_0^2 + \frac{x_0^3}{3}-\frac{x_0^4}{8}, \nonumber \\
278: w_2(x_0) \; = \; \int^{x_0}_0 dx \, [\frac{\ln(1-x)}{x}-2V(x) \, \ln x(1-x)], \nonumber \\
279: w_3(x_0) \; = \; \int^{x_0}_0 dx \, [\frac{\ln^2(1-x)}{x}-2V(x) \, (\ln^2x+\ln^2(1-x))], \nonumber \\
280: w_4(x_0) \; = \; x_0-x_0^2+\frac{2}{3}x_0^3, \nonumber \\
281: w_5(x_0) \; = \; x_0(\ln x_0-1)-x_0^2(\ln x_0-\frac{1}{2})+2x_0^3(\frac{\ln x_0}{3}-\frac{1}{9}), \nonumber \\
282: w_6(x_0) \; = \; \frac{2}{27}x_0^3(9\ln^2x_0-3\ln x_0+2)-\frac{x_0^2}{2}(\ln^2 x_0-\frac{1}{2}\ln x_0+\frac{1}{2}) +x_0(\ln^2 x_0 -2\ln x_0+2),
283: \nonumber \\
284: w_7(x_0) \; = \; \int^{x_0}_0 dx \, \Phi(x) =\int^{x_0}_0 (1-\frac{x}{2})dx=x_0-\frac{x_0^2}{4}, \nonumber \\
285: w_8(x_0) \; = \; x_0(\ln x_0-1)-\frac{x_0^2}{4}(\ln x_0-\frac{1}{2}),\nonumber \\
286: w_9(x_0) \; = \; x_0(\ln^2x_0-2\ln x_0+2) -\frac{x_0^2}{8}[2\ln^2 x_0-2\ln x_0 + 1 ], \nonumber \\
287: w_{10}(x_0) \; = \; \int^{x_0}_0 dx \, [\Phi(x)-\frac{1}{x}]\, \ln(1-x), \nonumber \\
288: w_{11}(x_0) \; = \; \int^{x_0}_0 dx \, [\Phi(x)-\frac{1}{x}]\, \ln^2(1-x) \, , \nonumber \\
289: \end{eqnarray}
290: The functions $V(x)$ and $\Phi(x)$ are defined in $w_1, w_7$.
291:
292:
293: \end{document}
294: