1: %\documentclass[draft]{ws-procs9x6}
2: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
3:
4:
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %%Definitions
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: \def\slash#1{#1 \hskip-0.50em /}
9: \def\Slash#1{#1 \hskip-0.65em /}
10: \def\Eqbox#1{\colorbox{white}{\parbox{0.9\textwidth}{\vspace{-0.3em}\beq #1 \eeq\vspace{-0.4em}}}}
11: \def\beq{\vspace{-0.3em}\color{magenta}\begin{eqnarray*}}
12: \def\eeq{\end{eqnarray*}\color{blue}\vspace{-0.3em}}
13: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray*}}
14: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray*}}
15: \def\bfgamma{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}
16: \def\bfnabla{\mbox{\boldmath $\nabla$}}
17: \def\bfSigma{\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}
18: \def\bfsigma{\mbox{\boldmath $\sigma$}}
19: \def\bfPi{\mbox{\boldmath $\Pi$}}
20: \def\lQ{\Lambda_{\rm QCD}}
21: \def\al{\alpha}
22: \def\als{\alpha_{\rm s}}
23: \def\lla{\langle\!\langle}
24: \def\rra{\rangle\!\rangle}
25: \def\siml{{\ \lower-1.2pt\vbox{\hbox{\rlap{$<$}\lower6pt\vbox{\hbox{$\sim$}}}}\ }}
26: \def\simg{{\
27: \lower-1.2pt\vbox{\hbox{\rlap{$>$}\lower6pt\vbox{\hbox{$\sim$}}}}\ }}
28: \def\vs{V^{(0)}_s}
29: \def\vo{V^{(0)}_o}
30: \newcommand{\one}{1\!\!{\rm l}}
31: \newcommand{\onec}{1\!\!{\rm l}_c}
32: \newcommand{\ones}{1\!\!{\rm l}_s}
33: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
34: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
35: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
36: \newcommand{\MS}{\overline{\rm MS}}
37: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
38:
39:
40:
41:
42: \begin{document}
43:
44: \title{SYSTEMS of TWO HEAVY QUARKS with EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORIES}
45:
46: \author{N. BRAMBILLA}
47:
48: \address{Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universit\`a di Milano and INFN
49: \\
50: Milano, Italy\\
51: $^*$E-mail: nora.brambilla@mi.infn.it\\}
52:
53:
54: \begin{abstract}
55: I discuss results and applications of QCD nonrelativistic effective
56: field theories for systems with two heavy quarks.
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \keywords{QCD, Effective Field Theories, Heavy Quarks}
60:
61: \bodymatter
62: \vspace{-1.5mm}
63: \section{Introduction}\label{sec1}
64: Systems made by to heavy quarks play an important role in several
65: high energy experiments. The diversity, quantity
66: and accuracy of the data currently being collected is impressive
67: and includes:
68: data on quarkonium formation from BES at BEPC, E835 at Fermilab,
69: KEDR (upgraded) at VEPP-4M, and CLEO-III, CLEO-c;
70: clean samples of charmonia produced in B-decays, in photon-photon
71: fusion and in initial state radiation, from the B-meson factory
72: experiments, BaBar at SLAC and Belle at KEK, including the unexpected
73: observation of large amounts of associated $(c\overline{c})(c\overline{c})$ production;
74: the CDF and D0 experiments at Fermilab measuring heavy quarkonia
75: production from gluon-gluon fusion in $p\bar{p}$ annihilations at
76: 2~TeV; the Selex experiment at Fermilab with the preliminary observation of
77: possible candidates for doubly charmed baryons;
78: ZEUS and H1, at DESY, studying charmonia production in photon-gluon
79: fusion; PHENIX and STAR, at RHIC, and NA60, at CERN, studying charmonia
80: production, and suppression, in heavy-ion collisions.
81: In the near future, even larger data samples are expected from the
82: BES-III upgraded experiment, while the B factories and the
83: Fermilab Tevatron will continue to supply
84: valuable data for several years. Later on, new facilities will become
85: operational (LHC at CERN, Panda at GSI, hopefully a Super-B factory,
86: a Linear Collider, etc.) offering fantastic challenges and opportunities in this field.
87: A comprehensive review of the experimental and theoretical
88: status of heavy quarkonium physics may be found in the Cern Yellow Report prepared by
89: the Quarkonium Working Group
90: \cite{qwg}. See also the talks at the last QWG meeting at BNL (cf. http://www.qwg.to.infn.it/).
91:
92: On the theory side, systems made by two heavy quarks are a rather unique laboratory.
93: They are characterized by the existence of a hierarchy of energy scales in correspondence
94: of which one can define a hierarchy of nonrelativistic effective field theries (EFT),
95: each EFT has less degrees of freedom left dynamical and is simpler. Some of these
96: physical scales are large and may be treated in perturbation theory.
97: The occurrence of these two facts makes two heavy quark systems accessible in QCD.
98: In particular the factorization of high and low energy scales realized
99: in the EFTs allows us to study low energy QCD effects in a systematic and under control
100: way. Ultimately the simplest EFT defined at the ultrasoft energy, pNRQCD, allows us to study
101: the Quantum Mechanics of a non-Abelian field theory.
102:
103: \section{Scales and EFTs}
104: %Heavy quarkonium provides a non-relativistic system
105: %potentially very similar to a QED bound state,
106: %with the difference that the low-energy scales
107: %will be sensitive to $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$.
108: %Therefore
109: The description of hadrons containing
110: two heavy quarks is a rather challenging problem,
111: which adds to the complications of the bound state in field theory
112: those coming from a nonperturbative QCD low-energy dynamics.
113: A simplification is provided by the nonrelativistic nature
114: %of heavy quarkonium,
115: suggested by the large mass of the heavy quarks
116: and manifest in the spectrum pattern.
117: Systems made by two heavy quarks are thus characterized
118: by three energy scales, hierarchically ordered by the quark velocity
119: $v \ll 1$: the mass $m$ (hard scale), the momentum transfer $mv$ (soft scale),
120: which is proportional to the inverse of the typical size of the system $r$,
121: and the binding energy $mv^2$ (ultrasoft scale), which is proportional to the
122: inverse of the typical
123: time of the system. In bottomonium $v^2 \sim 0.1$, in charmonium $v^2 \sim 0.3$.
124: In perturbation theory $v\sim \als$. Feynman diagrams will get contributions
125: from all momentum regions associated with these scales.
126: Since these momentum regions depend on $\als$, each Feynman diagram contributes
127: to a given observable with a series in $\als$ and a non trivial counting.
128: For energy scales close to $\lQ$, the scale at which
129: nonperturbative effects become dominant, perturbation theory breaks down
130: and one has to rely on nonperturbative methods.
131: Regardless of this, the non-relativistic hierarchy
132: $ m \gg mv \gg mv^2 $ will persist also below the $\lQ$ threshold.
133:
134: The wide span of energy scales involved makes also a lattice calculation in full QCD
135: extremely challenging.
136: %since one needs a space-time grid that is large compared
137: %to the largest length of the problem, $1/mv^2$, and a lattice spacing that
138: %is small compared to the smallest one, $1/m$.
139: %To simulate, for instance, a $b\bar{b}$
140: %state where $m/mv^2\sim 10$, one needs lattices as large as $100^4$, which are extremely
141: %time computing demanding.
142: We may, however, take advantage of the existence of a hierarchy of scales
143: by substituting QCD with simpler but equivalent EFTs.
144: %A modern approach to treat heavy quarkonium is provided by nonrelativistic
145: %Effective Field Theories that take full advantage of the hierarchy of non-relativistic
146: %scales.
147: A hierarchy of EFTs may be constructed by systematically integrating out
148: modes associated to energy scales not relevant for the two quark system.
149: Such integration is made in a matching procedure that
150: enforces the equivalence between QCD and the EFT at a given
151: order of the expansion in $v$
152: %$v$ and $\als$
153: and achieves a factorization between the high energy and the low energy contributions.
154: By integrating out the hard modes one obtains Nonrelativistic QCD. In such EFT soft
155: and ultrasoft scales are left dynamical and still their entanglement complicates
156: calculation and power counting. We will focus here on the simplest EFT you can write
157: down for two heavy quark systems, where only ultrasoft degrees of freedom remain dynamical.
158: This is potential NRQCD \footnote{for an alternative and equivalent EFT (in the case in which $\lQ$ is
159: the smallest scale) see \cite{vnrqcd}. }.
160:
161:
162: %\vspace{-5mm}
163: \section{pNRQCD}
164: %\vspace{-2mm}
165: % In NRQCD the role of the potential and the
166: % quantum mechanical nature of the problem are not yet maximally
167: % exploited. A higher degree of simplification may be achieved
168: %building another EFT
169: %where only the ultrasoft degrees of freedom remain dynamical.
170: % while the rest is integrated out.
171: pNRQCD \cite{pnrqcd1,pnrqcd2,reveft} is the EFT for two heavy quark systems that follows from NRQCD
172: by integrating out the soft scale. Here the role of the potential and the
173: quantum mechanical nature of the problem are realized in the fact that the Schr\"odinger
174: equation appears as zero problem for two quark states.
175: %$\Lambda = 1/r \sim m v$.
176: We may distinguish two situations:
177: 1) weakly coupled pNRQCD when $mv \gg \lQ$,
178: where the matching from NRQCD to pNRQCD may be performed in
179: perturbation theory;
180: 2) strongly coupled pNRQCD when $ mv \sim \lQ$,
181: where the matching has to be nonperturbative.
182: Recalling that $r^{-1}
183: \sim mv$, these two situations correspond to systems with inverse
184: typical radius smaller than or of the same order as $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$.
185:
186: %\vspace{-7mm}
187: \subsection{Weakly coupled pNRQCD}
188: The effective degrees of
189: freedom are: low energy $Q\bar{Q}$ states (that can be decomposed into a singlet
190: and an octet field under colour transformations)
191: with energy of order $ \Lambda_{\rm QCD},mv^2$ and
192: momentum ${\bf p}$ of order $mv$,
193: plus ultrasoft gluons
194: % $A_\mu({\bf R},t)$
195: with energy and momentum of order
196: $\lQ,mv^2$.
197: All the gluon fields are multipole expanded (i.e. expanded in
198: $r$).
199: The Lagrangian is then given by terms of the type
200: \begin{equation}
201: {c_k(m, \mu) \over m^k} \times V_n(r
202: \mu^\prime, r\mu) \times O_n(\mu^\prime, mv^2, \lQ)\; r^n .
203: \end{equation}
204: where the potential matching
205: coefficients $V_n$ encode the non-analytic behaviour in $r$.
206: At leading order in the multipole expansion,
207: the singlet sector of the Lagrangian gives rise to equations of motion of the
208: Schr\"odinger type.
209: %We point out that:
210: Each term in the pNRQCD Lagrangian has a definite power counting;
211: retardation (or non-potential) effects
212: start at the NLO in the multipole expansion and are systematically
213: encoded in the theory, they are typically related to nonperturbative effects
214: \cite{pnrqcd2,reveft}.
215: %and there is a systematic
216: %procedure to calcolate corrections in $v$ to physical observables;
217: %higher order perturbative (bound state)
218: %calculations in this framework become much simpler \cite{pnrqcdpert,US}.
219: %In particular the EFT can be used for a very efficient
220: Resummation of
221: large logs (typically logs of the ratio of energy and momentum scales) can
222: be obtained
223: using the renormalization group (RG) adapted to the case of correlated scales \cite{rg};
224: Poincar\'e invariance is not lost, but shows up
225: in some exact relations among the matching coefficients \cite{poincare0}.
226: %In the following we will simply list some among the most relevant applications
227: %of the EFT in this regime, for the details see the quoted references.\par
228: The renormalon subtraction
229: may be implemented systematically.
230: %The renormalon subtraction
231: % allows us to obtain convergent perturbative series and to
232: %define power corrections
233: \cite{reveft}
234: %and is one of the
235: %reasons for the success of the applications listed below
236: %(for any details see the quoted references).
237: \vskip 0.05truecm
238: \leftline{\bf Applications of weakly coupled pNRQCD}
239: \noindent
240: {\bf QCD Singlet Static potential.}
241: The singlet and octet potentials are well defined matching coefficients
242: to be calculated in the perturbative matching. In \cite{US}
243: a determination
244: of the singlet potential at three loops leading log has been obtained
245: and correspondingly also a determination of $\alpha_V$ showing how
246: this quantity starts to depend on the infrared behaviour of the theory at three loops.
247: The perturbative calculation of the static potential at (almost) three loops and with
248: the RG improvement has been compared to the lattice calculation of the potential and found
249: in good agreement up to about 0.25 fm \cite{pertlat}.
250: \par\noindent
251: {\bf $b$ and $c$ masses.}
252: \par\noindent
253: Heavy quarkonium is one of the most suitable system to extract a precise
254: determination of the mass of the heavy quarks $b$ and $c$.
255: Perturbative determinations of the
256: $\Upsilon(1S)$ and $J/\psi$ masses have been used to extract the $b$ and $c$
257: masses. The main uncertainty in these determinations
258: comes from nonperturbative contributions (local and nonlocal condensates \cite{pnrqcd2})
259: together with possible effects due to
260: subleading renormalons \cite{reveft}.
261: %Table \ref{tableMSmasses} shows some recent determinations.
262: % of the $b$ and $c$ masses
263: %from the quarkonium ground-state masses.
264: %For a discussion about the errors and the difference
265: %among the given results see \cite{reveft}.
266: %for the best determination of the mass of the bottom
267: %and the charm see \cite{qwg} in the Standard Model chapter.
268: A recent analysis performed by the QWG \cite{qwg}
269: and based on all the previous determinations indicates
270: % that the mass extraction from heavy quarkonium
271: %involves
272: an error of about 50 MeV both for the bottom
273: ($1\% $ error) and in the charm ($4 \% $ error) mass.
274: \par\noindent
275: {\bf Perturbative quarkonium spectrum.}\par \noindent
276: {\bf $B_c$ mass}. Table \ref{TabBc} shows some
277: recent determinations of the $B_c$ mass in perturbation theory at NNLO
278: accuracy compared with a recent
279: lattice study \cite{Allison:2004be} and the value of the CDF experimental $B_c$ mass.
280: This would support
281: the assumption that nonperturbative contributions to the quarkonium ground state are of the
282: same magnitude as NNLO or even NNNLO corrections, which would be consistent with a
283: $ mv^2 \simg\lQ$ power counting.
284: {\bf Hyperfine splittings.}
285: $c\bar{c}$, $b \bar{b}$, $B_c$ ground state hyperfine splittings have been recently calculated
286: at NLL in \cite{Kniehl:2003ap}. The prediction for $\eta_b$ mass is
287: $M(\eta_b) = 9421 \pm 10\,{(\rm th)} \,{}^{+9}_{-8}\, (\delta\als)~{\rm MeV}$.
288: The logs resummation seems to be important.
289: If the experimental error in future measurements of $M(\eta_b)$
290: will not exceed few Mev, the bottomonium hyperfine separation will become a
291: competitive source of $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ with an estimated accuracy of
292: $\pm 0.003$.
293: % The result in the charmonium case is consistent with
294: %the experimental value. This, again, supports the assumption that nonperturbative contributions
295: %for the quarkonium ground state are consistent with a $E\simg\lQ$ power counting.
296: %In the bottomonium case there are not yet experimental data.
297: %We note, however, that NNLO corrections may be potentially important for this
298: %observable, also considering that at this order
299: %new type of corrections will appear for the first time:
300: %\begin{itemize}
301: %\item{non-perturbative corrections, which are parametrically of NNLO in the situation $\lQ \sim E$.}
302: %\item{corrections to the mass. In order to show the possible impact of this type of
303: %corrections, in Fig.~\ref{Figmassdep} we display the hyperfine splittings at
304: %NLO accuracy calculated using $1/2$ of the bottomonium and charmonium vector ground state
305: %masses and the $\MS$ masses. The difference between the two determinations (taken around
306: %the maximum in $\mu$) is about 70\% in the charmonium
307: %case and about 30\% in the bottomonium case.}
308: %\end{itemize}
309: %{\bf Higher bottomonium resonances} have been investigated in the framework of
310: %perturbative QCD most recently in \cite{Brambilla:2001fw,Brambilla:2001qk,Recksiegel:2002za}.
311: %The calculation of \cite{Brambilla:2001fw} is accurate at NNLO, that one of
312: %\cite{Brambilla:2001qk} includes finite charm-mass effects, while
313: %\cite{Recksiegel:2002za} is a numerical calculation
314: %of the spectrum that includes also NLO spin-dependent potentials.
315: %This last calculation also relies on some assumptions about the long-range
316: %behaviour of the static potential. The results are summarized in Table \ref{Tabhbs}.
317: %The surprising result of these studies is that some gross features of the
318: %lowest part of the bottomonium spectrum, like the approximate equal
319: %spacing of the radial levels, are reproduced by a perturbative calculation
320: %that implements the leading-order renormalon cancellation. If this is coincidental or reflects the
321: %(quasi-)Coulombic nature of the states will be decided by further
322: %studies. A recent NLO calculation of the 1$P$ bottomonium fine splittings
323: %has been performed in \cite{Brambilla:2004wu}.
324: %The results are summarized in Fig.~\ref{Fig1P}.
325: %Figure \ref{figrho} plots $\rho$, the ratio of the fine splittings considered
326: %in Fig.~\ref{Fig1P}, as a function of the normalization scale $\mu$
327: %(see \cite{Brambilla:1999ja} and references therein for early studies of this quantity).
328: %It seems to indicate either the existence of large NLL/NNLO
329: %corrections (as it happens in the hyperfine splittings of the 1$S$ levels)
330: %or sizeable nonperturbative corrections.
331: %somehow hidden in the error bands of Fig.~\ref{Fig1P}
332: \par\noindent
333: {\bf Radiative transitions (M1).}
334: A theory of M1 transitions in heavy quarkonium has been recently formulated
335: using pNRQCD \cite{M1}.
336: This may shed some light on recent CLEO results on radiative M1 transitions
337: in the $\eta_b$ search that have ruled out several models. No large anomalous
338: quarkonium magnetic moment is generated.
339: %can be useful in the search of the $\eta_b$.
340: % that was going on at Fermilab and Cleo and in perspective at LHC.
341: %\par\noindent
342: %{\bf Electromagnetic widths}
343: \par\noindent
344: {\bf Seminclusive radiative decays of $\Upsilon(1S)$.}
345: In \cite{radup} the end-point region of the photon spectrum in semi-inclusive radiative decays of
346: heavy quarkonium has been discussed using Soft-Collinear Effective Theory and pNRQCD.
347: Including the octet contributions a good understanding of the experimental data is obtained.
348: \par\noindent
349: %{\bf Top-antitop production near threshold at ILC.}
350: %In \cite{ttbar} the total cross section for top quark pair production
351: %close to threshold in e+e- annihilation is investigated at NNLL in vNRQCD.
352: %The summation of logarithms leads to a convergent expansion for the normalization of
353: %the cross section, and small residual scale dependence.
354: %This makes precise extractions of the strong coupling, the top mass
355: %and the top width feasible.
356: \par\noindent
357: %{\bf Determinations of $\als$.}
358: %Heavy quarkonia leptonic and non-leptonic inclusive decays
359: % rates may provide means to extract $\alpha_s$. The present
360: % PDG determination of $\alpha_s$ from heavy quarkonium pulls down
361: % the global $\alpha_s$ average noticeably, due to an error
362: % that has been largely underestimated \cite{qwg}. Using the latest development
363: % in the calculation of relativistic corrections and in the treatment
364: % of perturbative series in $\alpha_s$ it will be possible to obtain
365: % a more appropriate determination of $\alpha_s$ from heavy quarkonium.
366: %\par\noindent
367: {\bf Gluelump spectrum. }
368: In pNRQCD \cite{pnrqcd2,Bali:2003jq} the full structure of the gluelump spectrum has been studied,
369: obtaining model independent predictions on the shape, the pattern, the degeneracy
370: and the multiplet structure of the hybrid static energies for small $Q\bar{Q}$
371: distances that well match and interpret the existing lattice data.
372: \par\noindent
373: {\bf Properties of baryons made of two or three heavy quarks.}
374: Recently the SELEX experiment has detected first signals from three-body bound states made
375: of two heavy quarks and a light one. The two heavy quark part of such systems may be treated
376: in pNRQCD and a precise predication for the hyperfine interaction may be obtained \cite{3qeft}.
377: %These systems are theoretically quite interesting
378: %due to the interplay of HQET and NRQCD in the construction of a suitable EFT.
379: %
380: %Triggered by these experimental data in \cite{3qeft}
381: % EFT Lagrangians describing $QQQ$ states and $QQq$ states have been constructed
382: % and some model independent predictions on the spectra (hyperfine separations)
383: %have been obtained.
384:
385: %\begin{table}[th]
386: %\addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
387: %\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
388: %\hline
389: %~~~Ref.~~~ & ~~~~~~order~~~~~~ & ~~~~~~~~~~~~ $m_b^{\overline{\rm MS}}(m_b^{\overline{\rm MS}})$ (GeV)
390: %~~~~~~~~~~~~
391: %\\
392: %\hline
393: %\cite{Beneke:1999fe} & NNLO& $4.24 \pm 0.09$
394: %\\
395: %\cite{Hoang:1998uv} & NNLO& $4.21 \pm 0.09$
396: %\\
397: %\cite{Pineda:2001zq} & NNLO & $4.210 \pm 0.090 \pm 0.025$
398: %\\
399: %\cite{Brambilla:2001qk} & NNLO & $4.190 \pm 0.020 \pm 0.025$
400: %\\
401: %\cite{Penin:2002zv} & NNNLO &$4.349 \pm 0.070$
402: %\\
403: %\cite{Lee:2003hh} & NNNLO & $4.20 \pm 0.04$
404: %\\
405: %\cite{Contreras:2003zb} & NNNLO & $4.241 \pm 0.070$
406: %\\
407: %\hline
408: %\hline
409: %Ref. & order & $m_c^{\overline{\rm MS}}(m_c^{\overline{\rm MS}})$ (GeV)
410: %\\
411: %\hline
412: %\cite{Brambilla:2001fw} & NNLO & $1.24 \pm 0.020$ \\
413: %\hline
414: %\end{tabular}
415: %\caption{\label{tableMSmasses} Collection of recently obtained values of
416: %$m_b^{\overline{\rm MS}}(m_b^{\overline{\rm MS}})$ and $m_c^{\overline{\rm MS}}(m_c^{\overline{\rm MS}})$
417: %from the $\Upsilon$(1S) and $J/\Psi$ masses.}
418: %\end{table}
419:
420:
421: \begin{table}[ht]
422: \begin{tabular}{|c|cccc|}
423: \hline
424: \multicolumn{5}{|c|}{$B_c$ mass ~(MeV)}\\
425: \hline
426: \cite{bcexp} (expt) &\cite{Allison:2004be} (lattice) & \cite{Brambilla:2000db} (NNLO)
427: & \cite{Brambilla:2001fw} (NNLO)& \cite{Brambilla:2001qk} (NNLO)\\
428: \hline
429: $6287\pm 4.8 \pm 1.1 $ &$6304\pm12^{+12}_{-0}$ & 6326(29) & 6324(22) & 6307(17)
430: \\
431: \hline
432: \end{tabular}
433: \caption{Different perturbative determinations of the $B_c$ mass compared with the experimental
434: value and a recent lattice determination.}
435: \label{TabBc}
436: \end{table}
437:
438: \vspace{-10mm}
439:
440: \subsection{Strongly coupled pNRQCD}
441: In this case the
442: matching to pNRQCD is nonperturbative \cite{pnrqcdnonpert}.
443: In the situation where the other degrees of freedom
444: (like those associated
445: with heavy-light meson pair threshold production and heavy hybrids)
446: develop a mass gap of order $\lQ$,
447: the quarkonium singlet field $\rm S$ remains as the only low energy dynamical
448: degree of freedom in the pNRQCD Lagrangian (if no ultrasoft pions are considered),
449: which reads \cite{pnrqcdnonpert,sw,pnrqcd2,reveft}:
450: \begin{equation}
451: \quad {L}_{\rm pNRQCD}= {\rm Tr} \,\Big\{ {\rm S}^\dagger
452: \left(i\partial_0-{{\bf p}^2 \over
453: 2m}-V_S(r)\right){\rm S} \Big \} .
454: \end{equation}
455: In this regime we recover the quark potential singlet model from
456: pNRQCD. The matching potential $V_S$ (static and relativistic corrections)
457: is nonperturbative: the real part controls
458: the spectrum and the imaginary part controls the inclusive decays. The potential is calculated
459: in the nonperturbative matching procedure between NRQCD and pNRQCD \cite{pnrqcdnonpert,reveft}.
460: Advantages of this approach include:
461: factorization of hard (in the NRQCD matching coefficients) and soft scales
462: (contained in Wilson loops or nonlocal gluon correlators);
463: the low energy objects being only glue dependent,
464: %are all expressed in terms of Wilson loops
465: confinement investigations,
466: on the lattice
467: %\cite{latticeval}
468: and in QCD vacuum models become feasible \cite{rev};
469: the existence of a power counting indicating leading and subleading terms
470: in quantum-mechanical
471: perturbation theory;
472: the quantum mechanical divergences (like the ones coming from iterations
473: of spin delta potentials) are absorbed by NRQCD matching coefficients.
474: %the definitive disappearance of
475: % fake problems like the ``Lorentz structure of the potentials''.
476: The potentials evaluated on the lattice once used in the
477: Schr\"odinger equation produce the spectrum.
478: The calculations involve only QCD parameters (at some scale and in some
479: scheme).
480:
481: \leftline{\bf Applications of strongly coupled pNRQCD}
482: \noindent
483: {\bf Nonperturbative potentials and Spectrum.}
484: % The final result for the potential (static and
485: %relativistic corrections) appears factorized in a part containing the
486: %high energy dynamics (and calculable in perturbation theory) which is
487: % inherited from the NRQCD matching coefficients, and a part containing the low energy dynamics
488: %given in terms of Wilson loops and chromo-electric and chromo-magnetic
489: % insertions in the Wilson loop \cite{pnrqcdnonpert}.
490: %Such low
491: %energy contributions can be calculated on the lattice \cite{latticeval} or
492: %evaluated in QCD vacuum models \cite{rev}.
493: Recently the multilevel algorithm has been applied to the lattice evaluation
494: of field strength insertion inside the Wilson loop average, producing
495: very precise data for the spin dependent potentials and a first evaluation of the nonperturbative potential
496: at order $1/m$ \cite{koma}. This is the first step towards a precise determination of
497: the nonperturbative matching potentials on the lattice.
498: %The expression obtained for the potential {\it is} the QCD expression, in particular
499: %all the perturbative contributions to the potential
500: %at the hard scale are correctly taken into account.
501: %This solves the problem of consistency with perturbative one-loop calculations
502: % that was previously encountered in the Wilson loop approach. Moreover,
503: %further contributions, including a $1/m$ nonperturbative potential,
504: % appear with respect to the
505: %Wilson loop original results \cite{rev,before3q}. The full expressions for the potentials
506: %is given in \cite{pnrqcdnonpert}. Comprehensive phenomenological applications of these
507: %full results are still missing.
508: \par\noindent
509: {\bf Decays.}
510: The inclusive quarkonium decay widths
511: in pNRQCD can be factorized with respect to the wave function
512: (or its derivatives) calculated in zero,
513: which is suggestive of the early potential models results:
514: $
515: %\be
516: \Gamma ({\rm H}\to{\rm LH}) = F(\als,\lQ) \, \cdot \, \vert \psi (0)\vert^2 .
517: %\label{pfac}
518: %\ee
519: $
520: Similar expressions hold for the electromagnetic decays.
521: However,
522: the coefficient $F$ depends here both on $\als$ and $\lQ$. In particular
523: all NRQCD matrix elements, including the octet
524: ones, can be expressed through pNRQCD as products of universal
525: nonperturbative factors by the squares of the quarkonium wave functions
526: (or derivatives of it) at the origin. The nonperturbative factors are typically
527: integral of nonlocal electric or magnetic correlators and thus
528: depends on the glue but not on the quarkonium state \cite{sw}.
529: %The presence of this
530: %nonperturbative correlators is indicated by the $\lQ$ dependence of $F$ in
531: % (\ref{pfac}).
532: Typically $F$ contains both the NRQCD matching coefficients at the
533: hard scale $m$ and the nonperturbative correlators at the low energy scale $\lQ$.
534: The nonperturbative correlators, being state independent, are in a
535: smaller number than the nonperturbative NRQCD matrix elements
536: and thus the predictive power is increased in going from NRQCD to pNRQCD.
537: % In \cite{sw} the inclusive decay widths into light hadrons,
538: %photons and lepton pairs of all $S$-wave and $P$-wave states (under threshold)
539: %have been calculated up to ${O}(mv^3\times (\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^2/m^2,v^2))$
540: %and ${O}(mv^5)$. A large reduction in
541: %the number of unknown nonperturbative parameters has been achieved and,
542: %therefore,
543: Thus, having fixed the nonperturbative parameters on charmonium decays,
544: new model-independent QCD predictions can be obtained for the bottomonium decay
545: widths \cite{sw}.
546: \vspace{-5mm}
547: %\section{Conclusions and Future Perspectives}
548: %\section{Acknowledgments}
549: %I would like to thank the Organizers for the very interesting conference.
550: \vskip -2.3truecm
551: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
552: \bibitem{qwg}
553: %\cite{Brambilla:2004wf}
554: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2004wf}
555: N.~Brambilla {\it et al.},
556: %``Heavy quarkonium physics,''
557: CERN Yellow Report, CERN-2005-005, arXiv:hep-ph/0412158.
558: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412158;%%
559:
560:
561: \bibitem{nrqcd1}
562: %\cite{Caswell:1985ui}
563: %\bibitem{Caswell:1985ui}
564: W.~E.~Caswell and G.~P.~Lepage,
565: %``Effective Lagrangians For Bound State Problems In QED, QCD, And Other Field
566: %Theories,''
567: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 167} (1986) 437.
568: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B167,437;%%
569:
570: \bibitem{nrqcd2}
571: %\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}
572: %\bibitem{Bodwin:1994jh}
573: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten and G.~P.~Lepage,
574: %``Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy
575: %quarkonium,''
576: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51} (1995) 1125
577: %[Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 55} (1997) 5853].
578: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9407339].
579: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9407339;%%
580:
581:
582: \bibitem{vnrqcd}
583: %%\cite{Hoang:2002ae}
584: %%\bibitem{Hoang:2002ae}
585: % A.~H.~Hoang,
586: % %``Heavy quarkonium dynamics,''
587: % arXiv:hep-ph/0204299;
588: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204299;%%
589: %\cite{Manohar:1999xd}
590: %\bibitem{Manohar:1999xd}
591: A.~V.~Manohar and I.~W.~Stewart,
592: %``Renormalization group analysis of the QCD
593: %quark potential to order v**2,''
594: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 014033 (2000);
595: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9912226];
596: %%CITATION =\cite{Hoang:2002yy}
597: %\bibitem{Hoang:2002yy}
598: A.~H.~Hoang and I.~W.~Stewart,
599: %``Ultrasoft renormalization in non-relativistic QCD,''
600: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 114020 (2003).
601: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0209340].
602: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209340;%%
603: % HEP-PH 9912226;%%
604:
605:
606:
607:
608: %\bibitem{nreftn}
609: %%\cite{Brambilla:2000cs}
610: %%\bibitem{Brambilla:2000cs}
611: % N.~Brambilla,
612: % %``A short introduction to non-relativistic effective field theories,''
613: % arXiv:hep-ph/0012026.
614: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012026;%%
615:
616:
617: \bibitem{pnrqcd1}
618: %\cite{Pineda:1997bj}
619: %\bibitem{Pineda:1997bj}
620: A.~Pineda and J.~Soto,
621: %``Effective field theory for ultrasoft momenta in NRQCD and NRQED,''
622: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 64}, 428 (1998);
623: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9707481].
624: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707481;%%
625:
626: \bibitem{pnrqcd2}
627: %\cite{Brambilla:1999xf}
628: %\bibitem{Brambilla:1999xf}
629: N.~Brambilla, A.~Pineda, J.~Soto and A.~Vairo,
630: %``Potential NRQCD: An effective theory for heavy quarkonium,''
631: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 566}, 275 (2000).
632: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9907240].
633: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907240;%%
634:
635:
636:
637: \bibitem{reveft}
638: %\cite{Brambilla:2004jw}
639: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2004jw}
640: N.~Brambilla, A.~Pineda, J.~Soto and A.~Vairo,
641: %``Effective field theories for heavy quarkonium,''
642: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 77}, 1423 (2005)
643: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0410047].
644: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0410047;%%
645:
646:
647:
648: \bibitem{latticenrqcd}
649: %\cite{Gray:2005ur}
650: %\bibitem{Gray:2005ur}
651: A.~Gray et al.
652: % I.~Allison, C.~T.~H.~Davies, E.~Gulez, G.~P.~Lepage, J.~Shigemitsu and M.~Wingate,
653: %``The Upsilon spectrum and m(b) from full lattice QCD,''
654: arXiv:hep-lat/0507013.
655: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0507013;%%
656:
657:
658: %\bibitem{decrev}
659: %%\cite{Vairo:2003gh}
660: %%\bibitem{Vairo:2003gh}
661: %A.~Vairo,
662: %%``A theoretical review of heavy quarkonium inclusive decays,''
663: %arXiv:hep-ph/0311303.
664: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311303;%%
665:
666: %\bibitem{chen}
667: % G.T. Bodwin and Y.Q. Chen, Phys. Rev. {\bf D64}, 114008 (2001);
668: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106095;%%
669: %Phys. Rev. {\bf D60}, 054008 (1999).
670:
671:
672: %\bibitem{prod}
673: %%\cite{Kramer:2001hh}
674: %%\bibitem{Kramer:2001hh}
675: % M.~Kramer,
676: % %``Quarkonium production at high-energy colliders,''
677: % Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 47}, 141 (2001).
678: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0106120].
679: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106120;%%
680:
681: \bibitem{poincare0}
682: %\cite{Brambilla:2003nt}
683: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2003nt}
684: N.~Brambilla, D.~Gromes and A.~Vairo,
685: %``Poincare invariance constraints on NRQCD and potential NRQCD,''
686: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 576}, 314 (2003);
687: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0306107];
688: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306107;%%
689: %\cite{Brambilla:2001xk}
690: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2001xk}
691: %N.~Brambilla, D.~Gromes and A.~Vairo,
692: %``Poincare invariance and the heavy-quark potential,''
693: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 076010 (2001);
694: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0104068];
695: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104068;%%
696: %\cite{Brambilla:1998vm}
697: %\bibitem{Brambilla:1998vm}
698: %N.~Brambilla and A.~Vairo,
699: %``Some aspects of the quark-antiquark Wilson loop formalism in the NR{QCD}
700: %framework,''
701: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 74}, 201 (1999).
702: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9809230].
703: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809230;%%
704:
705:
706:
707: \bibitem{pnrqcdpert}
708: N. Brambilla, A. Pineda, J. Soto and A. Vairo,
709: Phys. Lett. {\bf B470}, 215 (1999);
710: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9910238;
711: %\cite{Kniehl:1999ud}
712: %\bibitem{Kniehl:1999ud}
713: B.~A.~Kniehl and A.~A.~Penin,
714: %``Ultrasoft effects in heavy quarkonium physics,''
715: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 563}, 200 (1999).
716: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9907489].
717: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907489;%%
718:
719:
720:
721: \bibitem{US}
722: %\cite{Brambilla:1999qa}
723: %\bibitem{Brambilla:1999qa}
724: N.~Brambilla et al.,
725: %``The infrared behaviour of the static potential in perturbative {QCD},''
726: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 091502 (1999).
727: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9903355].
728: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903355;%%
729:
730:
731: \bibitem{rg}
732: %\cite{Pineda:2001et}
733: %\cite{Pineda:2001ra}
734: %\bibitem{Pineda:2001ra}
735: A.~Pineda,
736: %``Renormalization group improvement of the NRQCD Lagrangian and heavy quarkonium spectrum,''
737: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074007 (2002);
738: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0109117];
739: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109117;%%
740: %\cite{Pineda:2000gz}
741: %\bibitem{Pineda:2000gz}
742: A.~Pineda and J.~Soto,
743: %``The renormalization group improvement of the QCD static potentials,''
744: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495}, 323 (2000).
745: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0007197].
746: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007197;%%
747:
748: %%\cite{Brambilla:2001fw}
749: \bibitem{Brambilla:2001fw}
750: N.~Brambilla, Y.~Sumino and A.~Vairo,
751: %%``Quarkonium spectroscopy and perturbative QCD: A new perspective,''
752: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 513}, 381 (2001).
753: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0101305].
754: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101305;%%
755:
756: %%\cite{Brambilla:2001qk}
757: \bibitem{Brambilla:2001qk}
758: N.~Brambilla, Y.~Sumino and A.~Vairo,
759: %%``Quarkonium spectroscopy and perturbative QCD: Massive quark loop effects,''
760: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 034001 (2002).
761: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0108084].
762: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108084;%%
763:
764: %%\cite{Brambilla:2000db}
765: \bibitem{Brambilla:2000db}
766: N.~Brambilla and A.~Vairo,
767: %%``The B/c mass up to order alpha(s)**4,''
768: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 094019 (2000).
769: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0002075].
770: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002075;%%
771:
772: %%\cite{Recksiegel:2002za}
773: %\bibitem{Recksiegel:2002za}
774: %S.~Recksiegel and Y.~Sumino,
775: %%``Improved perturbative QCD prediction of the bottomonium spectrum,''
776: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 014004 (2003).
777: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0207005].
778: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207005;%%
779:
780:
781:
782: %%\cite{Beneke:1999fe}
783: %\bibitem{Beneke:1999fe}
784: %M.~Beneke and A.~Signer,
785: %%``The bottom MS-bar quark mass from sum rules at next-to-next-to-leading
786: %%order,''
787: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 471}, 233 (1999).
788: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/9906475].
789: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906475;%%
790:
791: %%\cite{Hoang:1998uv}
792: %\bibitem{Hoang:1998uv}
793: %A.~H.~Hoang,
794: %%``Bottom quark mass from Upsilon mesons,''
795: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014039 (1999).
796: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/9803454].
797: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803454;%%
798:
799: %%\cite{Pineda:2001zq}
800: %\bibitem{Pineda:2001zq}
801: %A.~Pineda,
802: %%``Determination of the bottom quark mass from the Upsilon(1S) system,''
803: %JHEP {\bf 0106}, 022 (2001).
804: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0105008].
805: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105008;%%
806:
807: %%\cite{Lee:2003hh}
808: %\bibitem{Lee:2003hh}
809: %T.~Lee,
810: %%``Heavy quark mass determination from the quarkonium ground state energy: A
811: %%pole mass approach,''
812: %JHEP {\bf 0310}, 044 (2003).
813: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0304185].
814: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304185;%%
815:
816: %%\cite{Contreras:2003zb}
817: %\bibitem{Contreras:2003zb}
818: %C.~Contreras, G.~Cvetic and P.~Gaete,
819: %%``Calculations of binding energies and masses of heavy quarkonia using
820: %%renormalon cancellation,''
821: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 034008 (2004).
822: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0311202].
823: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311202;%%
824:
825:
826: %%\cite{Penin:2002zv}
827: %\bibitem{Penin:2002zv}
828: %A.~A.~Penin and M.~Steinhauser,
829: %%``Heavy quarkonium spectrum at O(alpha(s)**5 m(q)) and bottom / top quark
830: %%mass determination,''
831: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 538}, 335 (2002).
832: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0204290].
833: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204290;%%
834:
835:
836:
837: %\cite{Allison:2004be}
838: \bibitem{Allison:2004be}
839: I.~F.~Allison et al.
840: % C.~T.~H.~Davies, A.~Gray, A.~S.~Kronfeld, P.~B.~Mackenzie and J.~N.~Simone
841: % [HPQCD Collaboration],
842: %``Mass of the B/c meson in three-flavor lattice QCD,''
843: arXiv:hep-lat/0411027.
844: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0411027;%%
845:
846: \bibitem{pertlat}
847: %\cite{Pineda:2002se}
848: %\bibitem{Pineda:2002se}
849: A.~Pineda,
850: %``The static potential: Lattice versus perturbation theory in a
851: %renormalon-based approach,''
852: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 29}, 371 (2003);
853: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0208031];
854: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208031;%%
855: %\cite{Sumino:2005cq}
856: %\bibitem{Sumino:2005cq}
857: Y.~Sumino,
858: %``Static QCD potential at r < Lambda(QCD)**(-1): Perturbative expansion and
859: %operator-product expansion,''
860: arXiv:hep-ph/0505034.
861: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505034;%%
862:
863:
864: \bibitem{bcexp}
865: %\cite{Acosta:2005us}
866: %\bibitem{Acosta:2005us}
867: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
868: %``Evidence for the exclusive decay B/c+- $\to$ J/psi pi+- and measurement of
869: %the mass of the B/c meson,''
870: arXiv:hep-ex/0505076.
871: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0505076;%%
872:
873:
874: %\cite{Kniehl:2003ap}
875: \bibitem{Kniehl:2003ap}
876: B.~A.~Kniehl, A.~A.~Penin, A.~Pineda, V.~A.~Smirnov and M.~Steinhauser,
877: %``M(eta/b) and alpha(s) from nonrelativistic renormalization group,''
878: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 242001 (2004);
879: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0312086];
880: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312086;%%
881: %\cite{Penin:2004xi}
882: %\bibitem{Penin:2004xi}
883: A.~A.~Penin, A.~Pineda, V.~A.~Smirnov and M.~Steinhauser,
884: %``M(B/c*) - M(B/c) splitting from nonrelativistic renormalization group,''
885: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 593}, 124 (2004).
886: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0403080].
887: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403080;%%
888:
889: %%\cite{Brambilla:2004wu}
890: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2004wu}
891: % N.~Brambilla and A.~Vairo,
892: % %``The 1P quarkonium fine splittings at NLO,''
893: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 034020 (2005).
894: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0411156].
895: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0411156;%%
896:
897:
898: \bibitem{M1}
899: %\cite{Brambilla:2005zw}
900: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2005zw}
901: N.~Brambilla, Y.~Jia and A.~Vairo,
902: %``Model-independent study of magnetic dipole transitions in quarkonium,''
903: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 054005 (2006)
904: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0512369].
905: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512369;%%
906:
907:
908:
909:
910: %\cite{Bali:2003jq}
911: \bibitem{Bali:2003jq}
912: G.~S.~Bali and A.~Pineda,
913: %``QCD phenomenology of static sources and gluonic excitations at short
914: %distances,''
915: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 094001 (2004).
916: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0310130].
917: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310130;%%
918:
919:
920:
921: \bibitem{radup}
922: %\cite{GarciaiTormo:2005ch}
923: %\bibitem{GarciaiTormo:2005ch}
924: X.~Garcia i Tormo and J.~Soto,
925: %``Semi-inclusive radiative decays of Upsilon(1S),''
926: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 054014 (2005).
927: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0507107];
928: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507107;%%
929: %\cite{GarciaiTormo:2005bs}
930: %\bibitem{GarciaiTormo:2005bs}
931: % X.~Garcia i Tormo and J.~Soto,
932: %``Radiative decays and the nature of heavy quarkonia,''
933: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 96}, 111801 (2006)
934: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0511167].
935: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0511167;%%
936:
937:
938:
939:
940: \bibitem{3qeft}
941: %\cite{Brambilla:2005yk}
942: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2005yk}
943: N.~Brambilla, A.~Vairo and T.~Rosch,
944: %``Effective field theory Lagrangians for baryons with two and three heavy
945: %quarks,''
946: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 034021 (2005);
947: %arXiv:hep-ph/0506065];
948: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506065;%%
949: %\cite{Fleming:2005pd}
950: %\bibitem{Fleming:2005pd}
951: S.~Fleming and T.~Mehen,
952: %``Doubly Heavy Baryons, Heavy Quark-DiQuark Symmetry and NRQCD,''
953: arXiv:hep-ph/0509313.
954: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0509313;%%
955:
956:
957: %\bibitem{ttbar}
958: %%\cite{Hoang:2001mm}
959: %%\bibitem{Hoang:2001mm}
960: % A.~H.~Hoang, A.~V.~Manohar, I.~W.~Stewart and T.~Teubner,
961: % %``The threshold t anti-t cross section at NNLL order,''
962: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 014014 (2002);
963: %% [arXiv:hep-ph/0107144];
964: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107144;%%
965: %\cite{Hoang:2000ib}
966: %\bibitem{Hoang:2000ib}
967: % % A.~H.~Hoang, A.~V.~Manohar, I.~W.~Stewart and T.~Teubner,
968: % %``A renormalization group improved calculation of top quark production near
969: % %threshold,''
970: % Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 1951 (2001).
971: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0011254].
972: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011254;%%
973:
974:
975: \bibitem{rev}
976: %\cite{Brambilla:1999ja}
977: %\bibitem{Brambilla:1999ja}
978: N.~Brambilla and A.~Vairo,
979: %``Quark confinement and the hadron spectrum,''
980: arXiv:hep-ph/9904330;
981: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904330;%%
982: %%\cite{Brambilla:1998bt}
983: %%\bibitem{Brambilla:1998bt}
984: % N.~Brambilla,
985: % %``Quark dynamics and flux tube structure in q anti-q bound states,''
986: % arXiv:hep-ph/9809263.
987: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809263;%%
988:
989:
990:
991: \bibitem{pnrqcdnonpert}
992: %\cite{Pineda:2000sz}
993: %\bibitem{Pineda:2000sz}
994: A.~Pineda and A.~Vairo,
995: %``The QCD potential at O(1/m**2): Complete spin-dependent and spin-independent result,''
996: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 054007 (2001)
997: %[Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 64}, 039902 (2001)];
998: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0009145],
999: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009145;%%
1000: %\cite{Brambilla:2000gk}
1001: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2000gk}
1002: N.~Brambilla et al.
1003: %``The QCD potential at O(1/m),''
1004: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 014023 (2001);
1005: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0002250];
1006: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002250;%%
1007: %\bibitem{sw1}
1008: %\cite{Brambilla:2003mu}
1009: %\bibitem{Brambilla:2003mu}
1010: %N.~Brambilla, A.~Pineda, J.~Soto and A.~Vairo,
1011: %``The (m Lambda(QCD))**1/2 scale in heavy quarkonium,''
1012: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 580}, 60 (2004).
1013: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0307159].
1014: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307159;%%
1015:
1016:
1017:
1018:
1019: \bibitem{sw} N. Brambilla, D. Eiras, A. Pineda, J. Soto and A. Vairo, Phys. Rev. {\bf D67}, 034018 (2003);
1020: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208019;%%
1021: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 012003 (2002).
1022: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109130;%%
1023:
1024: \bibitem{koma}
1025: %\cite{Koma:2006si}
1026: %\bibitem{Koma:2006si}
1027: Y.~Koma, M.~Koma and H.~Wittig,
1028: %``Nonperturbative determination of the QCD potential at O(1/m),''
1029: arXiv:hep-lat/0607009.
1030: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0607009;%%
1031: %\cite{Koma:2005nq}
1032: %\bibitem{Koma:2005nq}
1033: % M.~Koma, Y.~Koma and H.~Wittig,
1034: % ``Determination of the spin-dependent potentials with the multi-level
1035: % %algorithm,''
1036: PoS {\bf LAT2005}, 216 (2006)
1037: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0510059].
1038: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0510059;%%
1039: %%\cite{Bali:2000gf}
1040: %%\bibitem{Bali:2000gf}
1041: % G.~S.~Bali,
1042: % %``QCD forces and heavy quark bound states,''
1043: % Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 343}, 1 (2001).
1044: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0001312].
1045: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001312;%%
1046:
1047:
1048:
1049: \bibitem{before3q}
1050: %\cite{Brambilla:1993zw}
1051: %\bibitem{Brambilla:1993zw}
1052: N.~Brambilla, P.~Consoli and G.~M.~Prosperi,
1053: %``A Consistent derivation of the quark - anti-quark and
1054: %three quark potentials in a Wilson loop context,''
1055: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 5878 (1994);
1056: %[arXiv:hep-th/9401051];
1057: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9401051;%%
1058: %%\cite{Brambilla:1995px}
1059: %%\bibitem{Brambilla:1995px}
1060: % N.~Brambilla, G.~M.~Prosperi and A.~Vairo,
1061: %%``Three body relativistic flux tube model from QCD Wilson loop approach,''
1062: % Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 362}, 113 (1995).
1063: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/9507300].
1064: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9507300;%%
1065:
1066:
1067:
1068:
1069: %\bibitem{fleming}
1070: %\cite{Fleming:2000ib}
1071: %\bibitem{Fleming:2000ib}
1072: %S.~Fleming, I.~Z.~Rothstein and A.~K.~Leibovich,
1073: %``Power counting and effective field theory for charmonium,''
1074: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 036002 (2001)
1075: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0012062].
1076: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012062;%%
1077:
1078:
1079: \end{thebibliography}
1080: \end{document}
1081: