1: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \pagestyle{plain} \topmargin=-0.8in \hoffset=-1.0cm \voffset=1cm
4: \textwidth=160mm \textheight=220mm
5: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \title{Effects of the littlest Higgs model with T-parity on Higgs boson production at high energy $e^{+}e^{-}$ colliders }
9:
10:
11: \author{Chong-Xing Yue and Nan Zhang \\
12: %\address{
13: {\small Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian
14: 116029, China}\thanks{E-mail:cxyue@lnnu.edu.cn}\\}
15: \date{\today}
16:
17: \maketitle
18: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
19: \begin{abstract}
20: The Higgs boson production processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
21: ZH$, $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}H$, and
22: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$ are very important for
23: studying Higgs boson properties and further testing new physics
24: beyond the standard model($SM$) in the high energy linear
25: $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider($ILC$). We estimate the contributions of the
26: littlest Higgs model with T-parity($LHT$ model) to these processes
27: and find that the $LHT$ model can generate significantly
28: corrections to the production cross sections of these processes.
29: We expect the possible signals of the $LHT$ model can be
30: detected via these processes in the future $ILC$ experiments.
31:
32: \end{abstract}
33:
34:
35: \newpage
36:
37:
38: The discovery and study of Higgs boson is one of the most important
39: goals of present and future high energy collider experiments[1]. The
40: physics of the Higgs boson will be explored by high energy
41: experiments at the upgraded Tevatron collider at Fermlab and in the
42: near future at the large hadron collider at $CERN$($LHC$). The $LHC$
43: will make the first exploration of the TeV energy range, and will be
44: able to discover Higgs boson in the full mass range, provided it
45: exists[2]. After discovery of the Higgs boson at the $LHC$, one of
46: the most pressing tasks is a proper determination of its properties
47: since it is very important to study the mechanism of
48: electroweak symmetry breaking($EWSB$), the underlying origin of
49: mass, and test the new physics beyond the standard model ($SM$). The
50: $LHC$ will be able to finish a few measurement on the couplings of
51: the Higgs boson to fermions and gauge bosons but the most precise
52: measurements will be performed in the clean environment of a future
53: high energy linear $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider($ILC$)[3]. Furthermore,
54: discoveries at the $LHC$ may also point to physics scales beyond the
55: reach of the $ILC$, this area could be accessed later by a multi-TeV
56: $e^{+}e^{-}$collider[4].
57:
58: The main production mechanism of the Higgs boson $H$ at the $ILC$
59: are the Higgs-strahlung process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow ZH$[5] and
60: the $WW$ fusion process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
61: \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}W^{*}W^{*} \rightarrow\bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}
62: H$[6]. The cross section for the Higgs-strahlung process decreases
63: as $s^{-1}$($\sqrt{s}$ is the center-of-mess energy) and dominates
64: at low energies, while the cross section for the $WW$ fusion process
65: rise as $log(s/m^{2}_{H})$ and dominates at high energies. The $ZZ$
66: fusion process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
67: e^{+}e^{-}Z^{*}Z^{*}\rightarrow e^{+}e^{-}H $ can also contribute to
68: the Higgs boson production. However, the cross section is suppressed
69: by an order of magnitude compared to that for the $WW$ fusion
70: process, due to the ratio of the $W^{\pm}e\nu_{e}$ coupling to the
71: $Ze\bar{e}$ coupling, 4$C^{2}_{W}\simeq3$. From the production cross
72: sections for the Higgs-strahlung and $WW$ fusion processes, the
73: absolute values of the Higgs couplings to the electroweak gauge
74: bosons $Z$ and $W $, and also the Higgs couplings to quark and
75: leptons can be determined to a few percent in a model independent
76: way[1,3].
77:
78: The top quark, with a mass of the order of the electroweak scale, is
79: the heaviest particle yet discovered. The coupling of Higgs boson to
80: top quark pair, which is the largest one among the Yukawa couplings,
81: should play a key role in a theory generating fermion masses and is
82: particularly sensitive to the underlying physics. Thus, studying the
83: Yukawa coupling $Ht\bar{t}$ is of particular interest. For a light
84: Higgs boson, precise determination of this coupling can be performed
85: at the $ILC$ via the associated production process
86: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$[7]. A precision of around 5\% can
87: be reached at an $ILC$ with $\sqrt{s}$=800$\sim$1000GeV and the
88: integrated luminosity ${\cal L}_{int}\simeq1000fb^{-1}$[3,4].
89:
90: The aim of this letter is to consider the processes
91: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow ZH$, $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
92: \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}H$, and $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$ in the
93: context of the littlest Higgs model with T-party i. e. $LHT$
94: model[8], and see whether the effects of this model on these
95: processes can be detected in the future $ILC$ experiments.
96:
97: To solve the so-called hierarchy or fine-tuning problem of the $SM$,
98: the little Higgs models were proposed as kind of $EWSB$ mechanism
99: accomplished by a naturally light Higgs sector[9]. The key feature
100: of this kind of models is that the Higgs boson is a pseudo-Goldstone
101: boson of a global symmetry which is spontaneously broken at some
102: higher scale $f$. So far, a number of specific models have been
103: proposed, which differ in the assumed higher symmetry and in the
104: representation of the scalar multiplets. The littlest Higgs($LH$)
105: model[10] is one of the simplest and phenomenologically viable
106: models, which realizes the little Higgs idea. Most phenomenological
107: analysis about the little Higgs models are given in the context of
108: the $LH$ model[11,12].
109:
110: It has been shown that the $LH$ model suffers from severe
111: constraints from precision electroweak measurement, which could only
112: be satisfied by fine-tuning the model parameters[11,13]. To avoid
113: this problem, T-parity is introduced into the $LH$ model, which is
114: called $LHT$ model[8]. In the $LHT$ model, all the $SM$ particles
115: are assigned with an even T-parity, while all the new particles are
116: assigned with an odd T-parity, except for the little Higgs partner
117: of the top quark. Thus, the $SM$ gauge bosons can not mix with the
118: new gauge bosons, and the electroweak precision observables are not
119: modified at tree level. It has been shown that loop corrections to
120: precision electroweak obserbables are much small and the scale
121: parameter $f$ can be decreased to 500GeV[8,14]. Thus, the $LHT$
122: model can produce rich phenomenology in the present and future high
123: energy experiments[15,16,17,18].
124:
125: In the $LHT$ model, all the $SM$ particles are T-even, while most of
126: the new particles appeared at the TeV scale are T-odd, except for
127: the heavy vector-like top quark T$^{+}$. Thus, the couplings of the
128: electroweak gauge bosons to light fermions are not modified from
129: their corresponding $SM$ couplings at tree level. However, since the
130: new T-odd fermions and T-even heavy top quark T$^{+}$ are introduced
131: into the $LHT$ model, the couplings of the electroweak gauge bosons
132: to top quark and the couplings of the Higgs bosons to ordinary
133: particles are corrected at tree level [15,16]. The expressions of
134: the couplings $HVV(V=W$ or $Z)$, $Ht\bar{t}$, $Zt\bar{t}$, and
135: $ZtT^{+}$, which are related to the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
136: \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}H$, $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow ZH$, and
137: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$, can be written as:
138:
139: \begin{eqnarray}
140: g_{HV_{\mu}V_{\nu}}&=&\frac{2M^{2}_{V}}{\nu}[1-\frac{1}{4}\frac{\nu^{2}}{f^{2}}-\frac{1}{32}\frac{\nu^{4}}
141: {f^{4}}]g_{\mu\nu}
142: ;\\
143: g_{Ht\bar{t}}&=&-\frac{m_{t}}{\nu}[1-(\frac{3}{4}-C_{\lambda}^{2}+C_{\lambda}^{4})\frac{\nu^{2}}{f^{2}}]
144: ;\\
145: g^{L}_{Zt\bar{t}}&=&\frac{e}{S_{W}C_{W}}[\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}S_{W}^{2}-\frac{C_{\lambda}^{4}}{2}
146: \frac{\nu^{2}}{f^{2}}],\hspace{0.5cm}
147: g^{R}_{Z\bar{t}t}=-\frac{e}{S_{W}C_{W}}\frac{2}{3}S_{W}^{2};\\
148: g^{L}_{Ht\bar{T}^{+}}&=&-\frac{m_{t}}{f}S_{\lambda}^{2},\hspace{0.5cm}
149: g^{R}_{Ht\bar{T}^{+}}=\frac{m_{t}}{\nu}\frac{C_{\lambda}}{S_{\lambda}};\\
150: g^{L}_{Zt\bar{T}^{+}}&=&-\frac{e}{2S_{w}C_{w}}C_{w}^{2}\frac{\nu}{f}\sqrt{1-C_{\lambda}^{4}\frac
151: {\nu^{2}}{f^{2}}},\hspace{0.5cm}g^{R}_{Zt\bar{T}^{+}}=0.
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: Where $\nu\simeq$246 is the electroweak scale,
154: $S_{W}=Sin\theta_{W}$, $\theta_{W}$ is the Weinberg angle, $f$ is
155: the scale parameter. The mixing parameter
156: $C^{2}_{\lambda}=\frac{\lambda^{2}_{1}}{\lambda^{2}_{1}+\lambda^{2}_{2}}$($S_{\lambda}^{2}
157: =1-C^{2}_{\lambda}$), in which $\lambda_{1}$ and $\lambda_{2}$ are
158: the Yukawa coupling parameters.
159: \begin{figure}[htb]
160: \begin{center}
161: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps,width=270pt,height=250pt} \vspace{-1.0cm}
162: \caption{The relative correction parameter $R$ as a function of the scale
163: parameter $f$.} \label{ee}
164: \end{center}
165: \end{figure}
166:
167: From above discussions, we can see that the $LHT$ model can generate
168: corrections to the production cross sections for the processes
169: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}H$ and
170: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow ZH$ via the modification of the couplings
171: $HWW$ and $HZZ$. The value of the relative correction parameters
172: $R_{1}=\frac{\sigma^{LHT}(H)-\sigma^{SM}(H)}{\sigma^{SM}(H)}$ and
173: $R_{2}=\frac{\sigma^{LHT}(ZH)-\sigma^{SM}(ZH)}{\sigma^{SM}(ZH)}$ are
174: easily calculated, in which $\sigma^{SM}(H)$ and $\sigma^{SM}(ZH)$
175: represent the corresponding cross sections predicted by the $SM$.
176: From Eq.(1), we can see that there is $R_{1}=R_{2}$, thus we have
177: taken $R=R_{1}=R_{2}$ and plotted $R$ as a function of the scale
178: parameter $f$ in Fig.1.
179:
180: For the $LH$ model, the extra contributions to the process
181: $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}H$ come from the heavy
182: gauge bosons $W^{\pm}_{H}$, the modification of the relations among
183: the $SM$ parameters and the precision electroweak input parameters,
184: and the correction terms of the $SM$ $W_{e}\nu_{e}$ and $HWW$
185: couplings[19]. Considering the constraints of the electroweak
186: precision data on the $LH$ model, the scale parameter $f$ should be
187: in the range of 1TeV$\sim$3TeV[13]. If we take $f$$\geq$2TeV, the
188: relative correction of the $LH$ model to the production cross
189: section for the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
190: \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}H$ is smaller than 5\%. Thus, the effects of the
191: $LHT$ model on this process are easy to be detected than those of
192: the $LH$ model in the future $ILC$ experiments. The contributions of
193: the $LH$ model to the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow ZH$ mainly come
194: from the heavy photon $B_{H}$ [20]. For reasonable values of the
195: mixing parameter $c'$ and the mass parameter $M_{B_{H}}$, the
196: relative corrections of the $LH$ model to the production cross
197: section for the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow ZH$ can be
198: significantly large. Thus, the contributions of the $LHT$ model to
199: this process can be larger or smaller than those of the $LH$ model.
200:
201: In the $SM$, the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$ proceeds
202: mainly through Higgs boson emission off top quarks, while emission
203: from intermediate $Z$ boson plays only a minion role, which has been
204: extensively studied in Ref.[7]. The contributions of the $LH$ model
205: to this process mainly come from the new gauge bosons $B_{H}$ and
206: $Z_{H}$. In sizable regions of the parameter space preferred by the
207: electroweak precision data, the absolute value of the relative
208: correction parameter
209: $R_{3}=\delta\sigma(t\bar{t}H)/\sigma^{SM}(t\bar{t}H)$ can be larger
210: than 5\%[21]. For the $LHT$ model, the T-odd new gauge bosons can
211: not contribute to this process at tree level. Thus, the
212: contributions of the $LHT$ model to the production cross section of
213: the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$ only come from the
214: heavy T-even top-quark T$^{+}$ and the correction terms to the $SM$
215: couplings $Zt\bar{t}, Ht\bar{t},$ and $HZZ$.
216:
217: \begin{figure}[htb]
218: \begin{center}
219: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,width=270pt,height=250pt} \vspace{-1.0cm}
220: \caption{The relative correction parameter $R_{3}$ as a function of the mixing parameter $C_{\lambda}$
221: \hspace*{1.8cm}for four values of the scale parameter $f$.}
222: \label{ee}
223: \end{center}
224: \end{figure}
225:
226: Similar to Ref.[21], we can give the production cross section of the
227: process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$ in the context of the
228: $LHT$ model. The relative correction parameter $R_{3}$ generated by
229: the $LHT$ model is plotted as a function of the mixing parameter
230: $C_{\lambda}$ for four values of the scale parameter $f$ in $Fig.2$.
231: One can see from $Fig.2$ that, as long as $f\leq$1TeV, the absolute
232: value of $R_{3}$ is larger than 7\%, which might be detected in the
233: future $ILC$ experiments.
234:
235: Since the scale parameter $f$ of the $LHT$ model can be allowed to
236: be lower than 1TeV, this model can produce rich phenomenology in the
237: present and future experiments. In this letter, we estimate the
238: corrections of the $LHT$ model to the production cross sections of
239: the processes $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow ZH$, $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow
240: \bar{\nu_{e}}\nu_{e}H$, and $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow t\bar{t}H$, which
241: are very important for studying Higgs properties and test new
242: physics beyond the $SM$. Our numerical results show that, with
243: reasonable values of the free parameters, the $LHT$ model can
244: generate significantly contributions to these processes, which might
245: approach the observable threshold of the near-future $ILC$
246: experiments.
247:
248:
249:
250: \vspace{0.5cm} \noindent{\bf Acknowledgments}
251:
252: C. X. Yue would like to thank the {\bf Abdus Salam } International
253: Centre for Theoretical Physics(ICTP) for partial support. This work
254: was supported in part by Program for New Century Excellent Talents
255: in University(NCET-04-0290), the National Natural Science Foundation
256: of China under the Grants No.10475037 and 10675057.
257:
258:
259: \vspace{0.5cm}
260:
261: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
262: \bibitem{1}
263: For reviews, See: M. Carena and H. E. Haber, \emph{Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.} {\bf
264: 50} (2003)63; C. Buttar et al. [Standard Model and Higgs Working Group], \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0604120}.
265: \bibitem{2}
266: ATLAS Detector and Physics Performance Technical Design Report,
267: http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/TDR/access.html;
268:
269: CMS Physics Technical Design Report,
270: http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/cpt/tdr/;
271: F. Gianotti and M. L. Mangano, {\em
272: hep-ph}/{\bf0504221}.
273: \bibitem{3}
274: T. Abe et al. [American Linear Collider Working Group], {\em hep-ex}/{\bf0106057};
275: J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra et al.
276: [{\it ECFA/DESY LC} Physics Working Group], {\em hep-ph}/{\bf
277: 0106315}; K. Abe et al. [{\em ACFA} Linear Collider Working Group],
278: {\em hep-ph}/{\bf 0109166}; G. Laow et al.,
279: {\em ILC} Techinical Review Committee, second report, 2003,
280: SLAC-R-606.
281: \bibitem{4}
282: E. Accomando et al. [CLIC Physics Working Group], {\em
283: hep-ph}/{\bf0412251}.
284:
285: \bibitem{5}
286: J. R. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, D. V. Nanopoulos, {\em Nucl. Phys. B}{\bf106}(1976)292;
287: B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, {\em Phys. Rev.
288: D}{\bf16}(1977)1519; B. L. Ioffe, V. A. Khoze, {\em Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.
289: }{\bf9}(1978)50; V. D. Barger et al. {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf49}(1994)79;
290: \bibitem{6}
291: D. R. T. Jones and S. T. Petcov, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf84}(1979)440; R. N. Cahn and S.
292: Dawson, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf136}(1984)196; G. L. Kane, W.
293: W . Repko and W. B. Rolnick, {\em Phys. Lett. B}{\bf148}(1984)367; G. Altarelli, B. Mele and F.
294: Pitolli, {\em Nucl. Phys. B}{\bf287}(1987)205; W. Kilian, M.
295: Kramer and P. M. Zerwas, {\em Phys.
296: Lett. B}{\bf373}(1996)135.
297: \bibitem{7}
298: K. J. F. Gaemers and G. J. Gounaris, {\it Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 77}(1978)379;
299: A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski and P. M. Zerwas, {\it Z. Phys. C}{\bf 54}(1992)255;
300: S. Dittmaier et al., {\it Phys. Lett. B}{\bf
301: 441}(1998)383; S. Dawson and L. Reina, {\it Phys. Rev.
302: D}{\bf 57}(1998)5851; {\it Phys. Rev.
303: D} {\bf59}(1999)054012;
304: {\it Phys. Rev.
305: D}{\bf60}(1999)015003; H. Baer, S. Dawson, L.
306: Reina, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 61}(2000)013002;
307: S. Dittmaier et al., {\it Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 478}(2000)247;
308: S. H. Zhu, {\it hep-ph}/{\bf 0212273}; B. A. Kniehl, F. Madricardo and M.
309: Steinhauser, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf66}(2002)054016; Y. You et al., {\it Phys. Lett.
310: B}{\bf 571}(2003)85; G. Belanger et al., {\it Phys. Lett.
311: B}{\bf 571}(2003)163; X. H. Wu, C. S. Li and J. J. Liu, {\it hep-ph}/{\bf 0308012};
312: A. Denner et al., {\it Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 575}(2003)290; {\it Nucl. Phys. B}{\bf
313: 680}(2004)85; P. Hafliger, M. Spira, {\it Nucl. Phys. B}
314: {\bf 719}(2005)35; Sun Hao et al., {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
315: 71}(2005)075005; Peng Wu et al., {\it Phys. Lett.
316: B}{\bf 618}(2005)209.
317: \bibitem{8}
318: H. C. Cheng and I. Low, {\em JHEP} {\bf 0309}(2003)051; {\em JHEP} {\bf
319: 0408}(2004)061; I. Low, {\em JHEP} {\bf 0410}(2004)067.
320: \bibitem{9}
321: For recent review see: M. Schmaltz and D. Tucker-Smith, Ann.
322: {\it Rev. Nucl. Parti Sci.} {\bf 55}(2005)229; T. Han, H. E.
323: Logan, and L. T. Wang, {\em JHEP} {\bf 0601}(2006)099.
324: \bibitem{10}
325: N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, E. Katz, A. E.
326: Nelson, {\em JHEP }{\bf 0207}(2002)034.
327: \bibitem{11}
328: T. Han, H. E. Logan, B. McElrath and L. T. Wang,
329: {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 67}(2003)095004.
330: \bibitem{12}
331: M. Perelstein, \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0512128}.
332: \bibitem{13}
333: Mu-Chun Chen and S. Dawson, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
334: 70}(2004)015003; R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, M. Oertel,
335: {\em JHEP }{\bf 0402}(2004)032; Chong-Xing Yue and Wei Wang,
336: {\it Nucl. Phys. B}{\bf 683}(2004)48; W. Kilian and J. Reuter,
337: {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf70}(2004)015004; J. L. Hewett, F. J. Petriello and T. G. Rizzo, {\em JHEP }{\bf
338: 0310}(2003)062;
339: C. Cs$\acute{a}$ki, J.Hubisz, G. D. Kribs, P. Meade, and J. Terning,
340: {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 67}(2003)115002; C. Cs$\acute{a}$ki, J.Hubisz, G. D. Kribs,
341: P. Meade, and J. Terning,
342: {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
343: 68}(2003) 035009; T. Gregoire, D. R. Smith and J. G. Wacker, {\it Phys. Rev.
344: D}{\bf
345: 69}(2004)115008.
346: \bibitem{14}
347: J. Hubisz, P. Meade, A. Noble, and M. Perelstein, {\em JHEP}
348: {\bf 0601}(2006)135.
349: \bibitem{15}
350: J. Hubisz and P. Meade, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 71}(2005)035016.
351: \bibitem{16}
352: C. R. Chen, K. Tobe and C.-P. Yuan, {\it Phys. Lett. B}{\bf 640}(2006)263.
353: \bibitem{17}
354: M. Asano et al, \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0602157}; A. Martin,
355: \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0602206}; A. Birkedal, A. Noble, M. Perelstein,
356: and A. Spray, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 74}(2006)035002
357: ;
358: C. S. Chen, Kingman Cheung, and T.- C. Yuan,
359: \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0605314}.
360: \bibitem{18}
361: H. C. Cheng, I. Low, and L. T. Wang, {\it Phys. Rev. D}{\bf
362: 74}(2006)055001;
363: C. O. Dib, R. Rosenfeld, A. Zerwekh, {\em JHEP} {\bf
364: 0605}(2006)074; J. Hubisz, S. J. Lee, and G. Paz, {\em JHEP }{\bf 0606}(2006)041;
365: M. Blanke et al., \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0605214}; A. J. Buras, A.
366: Poschenrieder, S. Uhlig, W. A. Bardeen,
367: \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0607189}; A. Freitas and D. Wyler,
368: \emph{hep-ph}/\textbf{0609103}.
369: \bibitem{19}
370: Chong-Xing Yue, Wei Wang, Zheng-Jun Zong, Feng Zhang, {\em Eur. Phys. J. C}{\bf42}(2005)331;
371: \bibitem{20}
372: Chong-Xing Yue, Shun-Zhi Wang, Dong-Qi Yu, {\em Phys. Rev. D}{\bf 68}(2003)115004.
373: \bibitem{21}
374: Chong-Xing Yue, Wei Wang, Feng Zhang, {\em Commun. Theor.
375: Phys.} {\bf45}(2006)511.
376: \end{thebibliography}
377: \null
378: \end{document}
379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
380: