1: \documentclass[a4paper]{jpconf}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{epsf,epsfig,psfrag}
6:
7: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
8: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
9: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
10: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
11:
12:
13: \begin{document}
14: \title{Neutrino oscillations: theory and phenomenology \footnote{
15: Talk given at the XXII International Conference on Neutrino
16: Physics and Astrophysics ``Neutrino 2006'', Santa Fe, June 13-19,
17: 2006}}
18: %\title{Theory and phenomenology of neutrino oscillations}
19:
20: \author{E K Akhmedov \footnote{
21: On leave from the National Research Center ``Kurchatov Institute'',
22: Moscow, Russia }
23: }
24:
25: \address{Department of Theoretical Physics, Royal Institute of
26: Technology, AlbaNova University Center, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden }
27:
28: \ead{akhmedov@ictp.trieste.it}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: A brief overview of selected topics in the theory and phenomenology of
32: neutrino oscillations is given. These include: oscillations in vacuum and
33: in matter; phenomenology of 3-flavour neutrino oscillations and effective
34: 2-flavour approximations; CP and T violation in neutrino oscillations in
35: vacuum and in matter; matter effects on $\nu_\mu \leftrightarrow \nu_\tau$
36: oscillations; parametric resonance in neutrino oscillations inside the
37: earth; oscillations below and above the MSW resonance; unsettled issues in
38: the theory of neutrino oscillations.
39:
40:
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: %**************************************************************************
44: \section{A bit of history...}
45:
46: The idea of neutrino oscillations was first put forward by Pontecorvo in
47: 1957 \cite{Pont}. Pontecorvo suggested the possibility of $\nu\leftrightarrow
48: \bar{\nu}$ oscillations, by analogy with ~$K^0\bar{K}^0$ oscillations
49: (only one neutrino species -- $\nu_e$ -- was known at that time).
50: Soon after the discovery of muon neutrino, Maki, Nakagawa and Sakata
51: \cite{MNS} suggested the possibility of neutrino flavour transitions (which
52: they called ``virtual transmutations'').
53:
54:
55: \begin{figure}[h]
56: \hbox{\hfill
57: \hspace*{1.8cm}
58: {\includegraphics[height=3.0cm,angle=90]{pontec2.eps}}
59: {\includegraphics[height=6.0cm,angle=90]{kosh1a.eps}}
60: {\includegraphics[height=3.43cm]{nakagawa4.eps}}
61: \hfill}
62: \label{founders}
63: \caption{Bruno Pontecorvo (1913 - 1993), Shoichi Sakata
64: (1911 - 1970), Ziro Maki (1929 -- 2005) and Masami Nakagawa (1932 - 2001).
65: }
66: \end{figure}
67:
68:
69: \section{Theory}
70: \subsection{Neutrino oscillations in vacuum}
71: Neutrino oscillations are a manifestation of leptonic mixing. For massive
72: neutrinos, weak (flavour) eigenstates do not in general coincide with mass
73: eigenstates but are their linear combinations; the diagonalization of the
74: leptonic mass matrices leads to the emergence of the leptonic mixing matrix
75: in the expression for the charged current interactions, the relevant part of
76: the leptonic Lagrangian being
77: \be
78: -{\cal L}_{w+m}~=~\frac{g}{\sqrt{2}}(\bar{e}_L\gamma_\mu
79: \,V_L^\dag U_L\, \nu_L)\,W^\mu~+~{\rm diag.~~mass~~terms}\,.
80: \ee
81: Here $V_L$ and $U_L$ are the left-handed unitary transformations
82: that diagonalize the mass matrices of charged leptons and neutrinos.
83: The leptonic mixing matrix $U=V_L^\dag U_L$ relates the
84: left-handed components of the neutrino mass eigenstates
85: and flavour eigenstates according to
86: \be
87: |\nu^{\rm fl}_a\rangle = \sum_i U_{ai}^*\,|\nu^{\rm mass}_i\rangle
88: \qquad(a=e,\mu,\tau;~i=1,2,3)\,.
89: \ee
90: For relativistic neutrinos, the oscillation probability in vacuum is
91: \be
92: P(\nu_a\to\nu_b; L) = \left|\sum_i U_{bi}\; e^{-i \frac{m_i^2}{2p} L} \;
93: U_{ai}^*\right|^2\,.
94: \ee
95: For 2-flavour (2f) oscillations, which are a good first approximation in
96: many cases, one has
97: \be
98: |\nu_e\rangle ~=~ \cos\theta\, |\nu_1\rangle +\sin\theta\, |\nu_2\rangle
99: \,,\,\,\,
100: \ee
101: \be
102: |\nu_\mu\rangle \,=\,-\sin\theta\,|\nu_1\rangle +\cos\theta\,|\nu_2\rangle\,,
103: \ee
104: and eq.~(1) yields the 2f transition probability
105: \be
106: P_{\rm tr} = \sin^2 2\theta \sin^2 \left(\frac{\Delta m^2}{4E}\,L\right)\,.
107: \ee
108: The modes of neutrinos oscillations depend on the character of neutrino
109: mass terms:
110: \begin{itemize}
111:
112: \item Dirac mass terms ($\bar{\nu}_L m_D N_R + h.c.$):
113: active - active oscillations
114: $\nu_{aL}~\leftrightarrow~ \nu_{bL}$
115: $(a,b = e,\,\mu,\,\tau)$ \\
116: ~ Neutrinos are Dirac particles.
117:
118:
119: \item Majorana mass terms ($\bar{\nu}_L m_L (\nu_L)^c + h.c.$): active -
120: active oscillations $\nu_{aL}~\leftrightarrow~ \nu_{bL}$. \\
121: Neutrinos are Majorana particles.
122:
123: \item Dirac~+~Majorana mass terms ($\bar{\nu}_L m_D N_R + \bar{\nu}_L m_L
124: (\nu_L)^c + \bar{N}_R M (N_R)^c + h.c.$): active - active oscillations
125: $\nu_{aL}~\leftrightarrow \nu_{bL}$; active - sterile oscillations
126: $\nu_{aL}~\leftrightarrow~ (N_{bR})^c \equiv (N^c_b)_{L}$. \\
127: Neutrinos are Majorana particles.
128:
129: \end{itemize}
130: Would an observation of active - sterile neutrino oscillations mean that
131: neutrinos are Majorana particles? Not necessarily! In principle, one can
132: have active - sterile oscillations with only Dirac - type mass terms at the
133: expense of introducing additional species of sterile neutrinos with opposite
134: lepton number $L$.
135:
136:
137: \subsection{Neutrino oscillations in matter -- The ~MSW ~effect \cite{MSW}}
138:
139: Matter can change the pattern of neutrino oscillations drastically.
140: In particular, a resonance enhancement of oscillations and resonance flavour
141: conversion become possible (Wolfenstein, 1978; Mikheyev \& Smirnov,
142: 1985 \cite{MSW}).
143: %
144: \begin{figure}[h]
145: \hbox{\hfill
146: \hspace*{2.3cm}
147: \includegraphics[height=3.0cm]{wolfenst1.eps}
148: \hspace*{0.3cm}
149: \includegraphics[height=5.25cm,angle=90]{mikhsm4.eps}
150: \hfill}
151: \label{fig:MSW}
152: \caption{Lincoln Wolfenstein, Stanislav Mikheyev and Alexei Smirnov}
153: \end{figure}
154:
155:
156: Matter effect on neutrino oscillations is due to the coherent forward
157: scattering of neutrinos on the constituents of matter (fig. \ref{fig:nuint}).
158: The neutral current interactions, mediated by the $Z^0$ boson exchange, are
159: the same for active neutrinos of all three flavours (modulo tiny radiative
160: corrections) and therefore do not affect neutrino oscillations.
161: In contrast to this, charged current interactions, mediated by the $W^\pm$
162: exchanges, are only possible for electron neutrinos because there
163: are no muons or tauons in normal matter. This yields an effective potential
164: of the electron neutrinos
165: \[
166: ~~~~~~V_{e}^{\rm CC} \equiv V = \sqrt{2}\,G_F\,N_e\,,
167: \]
168: which leads to a modification of the nature of neutrino oscillations in
169: matter.
170: \begin{figure}[h]
171: %\hbox{\hfill
172: \hspace*{1.0cm}
173: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{nuint.eps}
174: %\hfill}
175: \hspace*{2pc}
176: \begin{minipage}[c]{10pc}
177: \vspace*{-2.0cm}
178: \caption{\label{fig:nuint}{Neutrino interactions in matter}}
179: \end{minipage}
180: \label{nuint}
181: \end{figure}
182: %
183: The 2f neutrino evolution equation in matter is
184: \be
185: \hspace*{-1.5cm}
186: i\frac{d}{dt}\left(\begin{array}{c}
187: \nu_e \\
188: \nu_\mu
189: \end{array} \right)=
190: \left(\begin{array}{cc}
191: -\frac{\Delta m^2}{4E}\cos 2\theta + V &
192: \frac{\Delta m^2}{4E}\sin 2\theta \\
193: \frac{\Delta m^2}{4E}\sin 2\theta &
194: \frac{\Delta m^2}{4E}\cos 2\theta
195: \end{array}
196: \right)
197: \left(\begin{array}{c}
198: \nu_{e} \\
199: \nu_{\mu}
200: \end{array} \right)\,.
201: \label{evol}
202: \ee
203: %
204: The mixing angle in matter $\theta_m$, which diagonalizes the Hamiltonian on
205: the r.h.s. of eq.~(\ref{evol}), is different from the vacuum mixing
206: angle $\theta$:
207: \be
208: \sin^2 2\theta_m = \frac{\sin^2 2\theta\cdot
209: (\frac{\Delta m^2}{2E})^2}
210: {[\frac{\Delta m^2}{2E}\cos 2\theta - \sqrt{2} G_F N_e]^2+
211: (\frac{\Delta m^2}{2E})^2 \sin^2 2\theta}\,.
212: \ee
213: The flavour eigenstates can now be written as
214: \be
215: |\nu_e\rangle ~=~ \cos\theta_m\, |\nu_{1m}\rangle +\sin\theta_m\,
216: |\nu_{2m}\rangle\,,~~
217: \ee
218: \vspace*{-6mm}
219: \be
220: |\nu_\mu\rangle \,=\, -\sin\theta_m\,|\nu_{1m}\rangle +\cos\theta_m\,
221: |\nu_{2m}\rangle\,,\,
222: \ee
223: where $|\nu_{1m}\rangle$ and $|\nu_{2m}\rangle$ are the eigenstates of
224: the neutrino Hamiltonian in matter (matter eigenstates). The Mikheyev -
225: Smirnov - Wolfenstein (MSW) resonance condition is
226: \be
227: \sqrt{2} G_F N_e = \frac{\Delta m^2}{2E}\cos 2\theta\,.
228: \ee
229: At the resonance $\theta_m = 45^\circ$ ($\sin^2 2\theta_m=1$), i.e.
230: the mixing in matter becomes maximal.
231:
232: If the matter density changes slowly enough (adiabatically) along the
233: neutrino trajectory, neutrinos can undergo a flavour conversion (see fig.
234: \ref{convers}). In the adiabatic regime the transitions between the matter
235: eigenstates $|\nu_{1m}\rangle$ and $|\nu_{2m}\rangle$ are strongly suppressed,
236: i.e. these states evolve independently. However, their flavour composition,
237: which is determined by the mixing angle $\theta_m$, varies with density:
238: $\theta_m(N_e\gg (N_e)_{\rm res})\approx 90^\circ$, $\theta_m(N_e =
239: (N_e)_{\rm res})= 45^\circ$, $\theta_m(N_e\ll (N_e)_{\rm res})\approx
240: \theta$. Therefore the state produced at high densities as, e.g.,
241: $\nu_e\approx \nu_{2m}$ will end up at low densities as a superposition of
242: $\nu_e$ and $\nu_\mu$ with the weights $\sin^2 \theta$ and $\cos^2 \theta$,
243: respectively.
244: %
245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
246: \begin{figure}[h]
247: %%\hbox{\hfill
248: \includegraphics[width=6.0cm,height=4.5cm]{res.eps}
249: %%\hfill}
250: \hspace*{6.0mm}
251: \begin{minipage}[c]{16pc}
252: \vspace*{-4.5cm}
253: \caption{\label{convers}
254: {Adiabatic neutrino flavour conversion.
255: Solid curves show the energy levels of neutrino matter eigenstates,
256: dashed curves illustrate level crossing in the absence of mixing.
257: Black and white filling corresponds to the weights of neutrino
258: flavour eigenstates in given matter eigenstates.} }
259: \end{minipage}
260: \vspace*{-2.0mm}
261: \end{figure}
262: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
263: %
264: The adiabaticity (slow density change) condition can be written as
265: \be
266: \frac{\sin^2 2\theta}{\cos 2\theta}\frac{\Delta m^2}{2E} L_\rho\gg 1\,,
267: \ee
268: where $L_\rho$ -- electron density scale height: $L_\rho = |(1/N_e)d
269: N_e/d x|^{-1}$.
270:
271: A simple and useful formula for 2f conversion probability, averaged over
272: production/detection positions (or small energy intervals), was derived
273: in \cite{Parke}:
274: \be
275: \overline{P}_{\rm tr}~=~\frac{1}{2}~-
276: ~\frac{1}{2}\cos 2\theta_i \cos 2\theta_f\,(1~-~2P')\,.
277: \ee
278: Here $\theta_i$ and $\theta_f$ are the mixing angles in matter in the
279: initial and final points of the neutrino path, and $P'$ is the hopping
280: probability, which takes into account possible deviations from adiabaticity:
281: In the adiabatic regime $P'\ll 1$, whereas in the extreme non-adiabatic
282: regime $P'=\sin^2(\theta_i-\theta_f)$.
283:
284: The evolution equation for the neutrino system can be also written as
285: \be
286: \frac{d\vec{S}}{dt} = 2 (\vec{B}\times\vec{S})\,,\qquad
287: \mbox{where}\qquad
288: \vec{S} = \{{\rm Re}(\nu_e^*\nu_\mu)\,,~{\rm Im}(\nu_e^*\nu_\mu)\,,
289: ~\nu_e^* \nu_e-1/2\}\,,
290: \ee
291: \be
292: \vec{B} = \{(\Delta m^2/4E)\sin 2\theta_m\,,~~0\,, ~~V/2-(\Delta m^2/4E)
293: \cos 2\theta_m\}\,.
294: \ee
295: The first equation here coincides with the equation for spin precession in
296: a magnetic field. This analogy can be used for a graphical illustration of
297: neutrino oscillations in matter (see fig. \ref{geom}).
298:
299:
300:
301:
302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
303: \begin{figure}[h]
304: \hbox{\hfil
305: \hspace*{0.05cm}
306: \includegraphics[width=4.3cm,height=4.5cm]{graf1a.eps}
307: \hspace*{0.01cm}
308: \includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=3.7cm]{graf2a.eps}
309: \hspace*{0.01cm}
310: \includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=3.7cm]{graf3.eps}
311: \hfill}
312: \caption{\label{geom}
313: Analogy between neutrino oscillations in matter and spin
314: precession in a magnetic field. Left panel: oscillations in constant-density
315: matter, middle and right panels -- adiabatic and non-adiabatic conversions
316: in matter of varying density (adopted from \cite{Sm1}). }
317: \end{figure}
318: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
319:
320: Another analogy of neutrino flavour conversion in matter is provided by a
321: system of two coupled pendula \cite{pend} (see fig. \ref{mechan}). When the
322: right pendulum gets a kick, it starts oscillating, but the left pendulum is
323: almost at rest because the eigenfrequencies of the two pendula are very
324: different. With the length $l_2$ of the right pendulum slowly decreasing,
325: its eigenfrequency approaches that of the left one, and when $l_2=l_1$
326: the two frequencies coincide (the resonance occurs): both pendula oscillate
327: with the same amplitude. When the length of the right pendulum decreases
328: further, the amplitude of its oscillations decreases too, while the left
329: pendulum starts oscillating with a large amplitude. This adiabatic transfer of
330: the oscillation energy from one pendulum to another is analogous to the
331: adiabatic neutrino flavour conversion.
332:
333:
334:
335:
336:
337:
338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
339: \begin{figure}[h]
340: %%\hbox{\hfil
341: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pend2b.eps}
342: \hspace*{0.4cm}
343: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pend3b.eps}
344: \hspace*{0.4cm}
345: \includegraphics[width=3.5cm]{pend4b.eps}
346: %%\hfill}
347: \hspace*{0.8pc}
348: \begin{minipage}[c]{8pc}
349: \vspace*{-3.5cm}
350: \caption{\label{mechan}
351: Mechanical analogue of neutrino flavour conversion
352: in matter -- two coupled pendula of variable lengths. }
353: \end{minipage}
354: \end{figure}
355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
356:
357: Analysis of the solar neutrino data and the results of the KamLAND and CHOOZ
358: reactor neutrino experiments has convincingly demonstrated that the (large
359: mixing angle) MSW effect is responsible for the flavour conversion of solar
360: neutrinos, thus resolving the long-standing problem of the deficiency
361: of the observed flux of solar neutrinos. This is illustrated by the analysis
362: of the Bari group, in which the strength of the matter-induced
363: potential of electron neutrinos was considered a free parameter
364: (fig. \ref{MSWresults}). For more on MSW effect, see the talk of
365: A. Friedland \cite{Fried}.
366:
367:
368:
369: \begin{figure}[h]
370: %\hbox{\hfill
371: \includegraphics[width=4.8cm,angle=270]{msw1.ps}
372: %\hfill}
373: \hspace*{2pc}
374: \begin{minipage}[t]{16pc}
375: \vspace*{1.0cm}
376: \caption{\label{MSWresults}
377: Results of the analysis of the solar, CHOOZ and KamLAND data
378: with the standard matter-induced potential rescaled by a factor $a_{MSW}$,
379: treated as a free parameter. The value $a_{\rm MSW} \approx 1$ is strongly
380: favoured \cite{Bari}. }
381: \end{minipage}
382: \end{figure}
383:
384: \section{Phenomenology}
385:
386: All the available neutrino data except those of the LSND experiment can
387: be explained in terms of oscillations between the 3 known neutrino species
388: -- $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$ and $\nu_\tau$. If the LSND results are correct, they
389: would most likely require the existence $\ge 1$ light sterile neutrinos
390: $\nu_s$ (though some exotic scenarios also exist: CPT violation, violation of
391: Lorentz invariance, mass-varying neutrinos, shortcuts in extra dimensions,
392: decaying neutrinos, etc.).
393: The MiniBooNE experiment was designed to confirm or refute the LSND claim,
394: and the results are expected very soon. One should remember, however, that
395: even if the LSND result is not confirmed, this would not rule out the
396: existence of light sterile neutrinos and ~$\nu_{\rm a}\leftrightarrow
397: \nu_{\rm s}$ oscillations, which is an intriguing possibility with important
398: implications for particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology. From now
399: on I will concentrate on 3-flavour (3f) oscillations of active neutrinos. For
400: more on sterile neutrinos, see the talk of A. Kusenko \cite{Kus}.
401:
402:
403: \subsection{3-flavour neutrino mixing and oscillations}
404:
405: For 3 neutrino species the mixing matrix depends in general on 3 mixing
406: angles $\theta_{12}$, $\theta_{23}$ and $\theta_{13}$, one Dirac-type
407: CP-violating phase $\delta_{\rm CP}$, and two Majorana-type CP
408: violating phases $\sigma_{1,2}$. The Majorana-type phases can be factored
409: out in the mixing matrix according to $U=U_0 K$,
410: $K = {\rm diag}(1\,, e^{i \sigma_1}\,, e^{i \sigma_2})$. The factor $K$
411: does not affect neutrino oscillations and so will be omitted hereafter.
412: Renaming $U_0\to U$, the relevant part of the leptonic mixing matrix can be
413: written in the standard parameterization as
414: \be
415: U =
416: \left(
417: \begin{array}{ccc}
418: c_{12} c_{13} &
419: s_{12} c_{13} & s_{13} e^{-i \delta_{\rm CP}} \\ -s_{12}
420: c_{23} - c_{12} s_{13} s_{23} e^{i \delta_{\rm CP}}
421: & c_{12} c_{23} - s_{12} s_{13} s_{23} e^{i \delta_{\rm CP}} & c_{13}
422: s_{23} \\ s_{12} s_{23} - c_{12} s_{13} c_{23} e^{i \delta_{\rm CP}} &
423: -c_{12} s_{23} - s_{12} s_{13} c_{23} e^{i \delta_{\rm CP}} & c_{13}
424: c_{23}
425: \nonumber
426: \end{array}
427: \right)\,,
428: \ee
429: where
430: $s_{ij}=\sin\theta_{ij}$ and $c_{ij}=\cos\theta_{ij}$.
431:
432: Neutrino oscillations probe the neutrino mass squared differences, which
433: satisfy $\Delta m_{\rm sol}^2\equiv \Delta m_{21}^2\ll \Delta m_{32}^2
434: \simeq \Delta m_{31}^2\equiv \Delta m_{\rm atm}^2$. Accordingly,
435: there are two possible orderings of the neutrino masses: normal hierarchy,
436: when the mass eigenstate $\nu_3$, separated from $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ by the
437: largest mass gap, is the heaviest one, and inverted hierarchy, when
438: $\nu_3$ is the lightest state (see fig. \ref{hier}).
439:
440: \vspace*{7mm}
441: \hspace*{12mm}
442: Normal hierarchy: \hspace*{2.8cm} Inverted hierarchy:
443: \vspace*{3mm}
444:
445:
446: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
447: \begin{figure}[h]
448: %\hbox{\hfill
449: \epsfxsize=5.5cm\epsfbox{fg1.eps}
450: \hspace{4mm}
451: \epsfxsize=5.55cm\epsfbox{fg2.eps}
452: %\hfill}
453: \hspace*{1pc}
454: \begin{minipage}[c]{8pc}
455: %\vspace*{-3.0cm}
456: \vspace*{-3.5cm}
457: \caption{\label{hier}
458: Normal and inverted neutrino mass orderings. The different
459: fillings show the relative weights of different flavour eigenstates in
460: given mass eigenstates. }
461: \end{minipage}
462: \end{figure}
463:
464:
465: \subsection{2f and effective 2f approximations}
466:
467: In many cases 2f description of neutrino oscillations gives a good first
468: approximation. The reasons for this are
469: (i) the hierarchy of $\Delta m^2$: $\Delta m_{\rm sol}^2 \ll \Delta m_{\rm
470: atm}^2$, and (ii) the smallness of ~$|U_{e3}|$.
471: There are exceptions, however: when oscillations due to the solar frequency
472: ($\propto \Delta m_{\rm sol}^2$) are not frozen, the probabilities $P(\nu_\mu
473: \leftrightarrow \nu_\tau)$, $P(\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\mu)$ and $P(\nu_\tau
474: \rightarrow \nu_\tau)$ do not have a 2f form \cite{series}. However, even
475: for the probabilities of oscillations involving $\nu_e$, the corrections due
476: to 3-flavourness can be as large as $\sim 10\%$, i.e. are at the same level as
477: the accuracy of the present-day data, and so cannot be ignored. In addition,
478: there is a number of very interesting pure 3f effects in neutrino oscillations.
479: Therefore, 3f analyses are now a must.
480:
481:
482:
483: For oscillations driven by $\Delta m_{\rm sol}^2$, the third neutrino mass
484: eigenstate $\nu_3$ essentially decouples. However, there is still a ``memory''
485: of this state through unitarity, which results in the emergence of
486: various powers of $c_{13}$ in the expressions for transition
487: probabilities. An example is the survival probability of solar $\nu_e$
488: \cite{Lim} (the same expression also applies for the survival probability
489: of reactor $\bar{\nu}_e$ observed in KamLAND) :
490: \be
491: P_D(\nu_e\to \nu_e) ~\simeq~ c_{13}^4 P_{2ee}(\Delta m_{21}^2,
492: ~\theta_{12},
493: ~c_{13}^2 V) ~+~ s_{13}^4\,.\qquad
494: \label{solar}
495: \ee
496: The term $s_{13}^4$ is tiny and can be safely neglected. Another example is the
497: day-night effect for solar $\nu_e$: while the day-time survival probability
498: $P_D(\nu_e) \propto c_{13}^4$, the difference of the night-time and day-time
499: probabilities $P_N(\nu_e)-P_D(\nu_e)\propto c_{13}^6$ \cite{BOS,ATV}.
500: Deviations from 2f expressions (which correspond to the limit $\theta_{13}\to
501: 0$) may be substantial: for the maximal currently experimentally allowed
502: values of $\sin^2 2\theta_{13}$ one has $(1-c_{13}^4)\simeq 0.1$,
503: $(1-c_{13}^6)\simeq 0.13$.
504:
505:
506: For oscillations of reactor $\bar{\nu}_e$, the survival probability can to
507: a very good accuracy be written as
508: \be P_{\bar{e}\bar{e}} \simeq 1-\sin^2 2\theta_{13} \cdot \sin^2
509: \left(\frac{\Delta m_{31}^2}{4E} L\right) -c_{13}^4 \sin^2 2\theta_{12}
510: \cdot \sin^2\left(\frac{\Delta m_{21}^2}{4E}L\right) \,.
511: \label{reac}
512: \ee
513: Since the average energies of reactor antineutrinos $\bar{E}\sim 4$ MeV,
514: for experiments with relatively short baseline ($L\lesssim 1$ km), such as
515: CHOOZ, Palo Verde and Double CHOOZ, one has
516: $(\Delta m_{21}^2/4E)\,L \ll 1$. Eq. (\ref{reac}) then reduces to
517: \be
518: P(\bar{\nu}_e\to\bar{\nu}_e; L) = 1- \sin^2 2\theta_{13} \cdot
519: \sin^2\left(\frac{\Delta m_{31}^2}{4E} \;L\right)\,,
520: \ee
521: i.e. takes the 2f form. Note that the ``solar'' term $\sim \sin^2
522: 2\theta_{12}$ in (\ref{reac}) cannot be neglected if $\theta_{13} \lesssim
523: 0.03$, which is about the reach of currently discussed future reactor
524: experiments.
525:
526: For the unique long-baseline reactor neutrino experiment KamLAND ($\bar{L}
527: \simeq 170$ km) one has $(\Delta m_{21}^2/4E)\,L \gtrsim 1$, $(\Delta
528: m_{31}^2/4E)\,L\gg 1$, and the $\bar{\nu}_e$ survival probability takes
529: the effective 2f form as in eq.~(\ref{solar}).
530: Note that matter effects in KamLAND should be of order a few per cent,
531: i.e. can be comparable with 3f corrections due to $\theta_{13}\ne 0$.
532:
533: \subsection{Genuine 3f effects in neutrino oscillations}
534:
535: These are, first of all, CP and T violation. CP violation results
536: in $P(\nu_a\to \nu_b)\ne P(\bar{\nu}_a\to \bar{\nu}_b)$, whereas T violation
537: leads to $P(\nu_a\to \nu_b)\ne P(\nu_b\to \nu_a)$.
538: Under the standard assumptions of locality and normal relation between
539: spin and statistics, quantum field theory conserves CPT.
540: CPT invariance of neutrino oscillations in vacuum gives $P(\nu_a\to\nu_b)
541: = P(\bar{\nu}_b \to\bar{\nu}_a)$. Therefore CP violation implies T
542: violation
543: and vice versa.
544:
545: One can consider the following probability differences as measures of CP
546: and T violation:
547: \be
548: \Delta P_{ab}^{\rm CP} \equiv P(\nu_a\to \nu_b)-P(\bar{\nu}_a\to
549: \bar{\nu}_b)\,,\qquad
550: \Delta P_{ab}^{\rm T}\, \equiv\, P(\nu_a\to \nu_b)-P(\nu_b\to\nu_a)\,.
551: \ee
552: {}From CPT invariance, for oscillations in vacuum one has
553: \be
554: \Delta P_{ab}^{\rm CP} = \Delta P_{ab}^{\rm T}\,,
555: \quad\quad\quad\quad
556: \Delta P_{aa}^{\rm CP} = 0\,.
557: \ee
558: In the 3f case there is only one Dirac-type CP-violating phase
559: $\delta_{\rm CP}$ and therefore only one CP and T violating probability
560: difference:
561: \be
562: \Delta P_{e\mu}^{\rm CP} ~=~ \Delta P_{\mu\tau}^{\rm CP} ~=~
563: \Delta P_{\tau e}^{\rm CP} ~\equiv~ \Delta P\,, \quad \mbox{where}
564: \ee
565: \[
566: \Delta P ~=~ {} -\, 4 s_{12}\,c_{12}\,s_{13}\,c_{13}^2\,s_{23}\,c_{23}\,
567: \sin\delta_{\rm CP}
568: \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad
569: \]
570: \be
571: \quad\quad\quad \times \left[\sin\left(\frac{\Delta m_{12}^2}{2E}\,L
572: \right)+ \sin\left(\frac{\Delta m_{23}^2}{2E}\,L\right)+ \sin\left(
573: \frac{\Delta m_{31}^2}{2E}\,L\right)\right]\,.
574: \ee
575: This probability difference vanishes when one or more of the following
576: conditions are satisfied:
577: at least one $\Delta m_{ij}^2 = 0$;
578: at least one $\theta_{ij} = 0$ or $90^\circ$;
579: $\delta_{\rm CP}=0$ or $180^\circ$;
580: in the regime of complete averaging;
581: in the limit $L\to 0$ ($\Delta P\to 0$ as $L^3$).
582: Obviously, the effects of CP and T violating are very difficult to observe!
583: For more on that, see the talk of O. Mena \cite{Mena}.
584:
585:
586: {\em CP violation and T violation in $\nu$ oscillations in matter}.
587: Normal matter (with number of particles $\ne$ number of antiparticles)
588: violates C, CP and CPT, which leads to a fake (extrinsic) CP violation in
589: neutrino oscillations. It exists even in the 2f limit and may complicate
590: the study of the fundamental (intrinsic) CP violation.
591:
592: The situation with T-violation in matter is different: matter with density
593: profile symmetric w.r.t. the midpoint of neutrino trajectory does not
594: induce any fake T violation. Asymmetric profiles do, but only for $N>2$
595: flavors \cite{deGouv,Tviol}. Matter-induced T violation is an interesting pure
596: 3f effect; it may fake fundamental T violation and complicate its study
597: (extraction of $\delta_{\rm CP}$ from the experiment). However, it is absent
598: when either $U_{e3}=0$ or $\Delta m_{\rm sol}^2=0$ (2f limits) and thus is
599: doubly suppressed by both these small parameters. Therefore its effects in
600: terrestrial experiments are expected to be very small \cite{Tviol}.
601:
602:
603:
604: {\em Matter effects on $\nu_\mu \leftrightarrow \nu_\tau$ oscillations}.
605: In the 2f limit, matter does not affect $\nu_\mu \leftrightarrow \nu_\tau$
606: oscillations (because the matter-induced potentials $V(\nu_\mu)$ and
607: $V(\nu_\tau)$ coincide up to tiny radiative corrections). However, this
608: is not true in the full 3f framework \cite{3fnumunutau}. In particular, for
609: oscillations inside the earth there are ranges of baselines and neutrino
610: energies for which the matter effect can be very large (fig. \ref{matteff},
611: left panel, $E\sim 5$ -- 10 GeV). If one ignores them, one may end up
612: with a negative expected flux of oscillated $\nu_\mu$ in atmospheric neutrino
613: experiments (fig. \ref{matteff}, right panel).
614:
615: \begin{figure}[h]
616: %\hbox{\hfill
617: \includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{fgr1.eps}
618: \hspace*{0.2cm}
619: \includegraphics[width=4.8cm]{fgr2.eps}
620: %\hfill}
621: \hspace*{0.8pc}
622: \begin{minipage}[c]{12pc}
623: \vspace*{-3.7cm}
624: \caption{\label{matteff} Left panel: $P_{\mu\tau}$. Right panel: oscillated
625: flux of atmospheric $\nu_\mu$. $\Delta m_{31}^2=2.5\times 10^{-3}$ {\rm
626: eV}$^2$, $\sin^2\theta_{13}=0.026$, $\theta_{23}=\pi/4$, $\Delta m_{21}^2=0$,
627: $L=9400$ {\rm km}. Red (dark) curves -- with matter effects, green (light)
628: curves -- without matter effects on $P_{\mu\tau}$. }
629: \end{minipage}
630: \end{figure}
631:
632:
633:
634:
635: \subsection{Parametric resonance in neutrino oscillations in matter}
636:
637: The MSW effect is not the only possible way matter can influence neutrino
638: oscillations. Another interesting possibility is a parametric enhancement of
639: neutrino oscillations in matter \cite{ETC,Akhm1}. Parametric resonance in
640: oscillating systems with varying parameters occurs when the rate of the
641: parameter change is correlated in a certain way with the values of the
642: parameters themselves. A well-known mechanical example is a pendulum with
643: vertically oscillating suspension point (fig. \ref{parammech}): when the
644: frequency $\Omega$ and amplitude $A$ of these oscillations are in a special
645: correlation with the eigenfrequency $\omega$ and amplitude $a$ of the pendulum,
646: the pendulum can turn upside down and start oscillating around the vertical,
647: normally unstable, equilibrium point.
648: %
649: \begin{figure}[h]
650: %\hbox{\hfil
651: \hspace*{0.3cm}
652: \includegraphics[width=3.0cm]{parpend1a.eps}
653: \hspace*{0.3cm}
654: \includegraphics[width=3.0cm]{parpend2a.eps}
655: %\hfill}
656: \hspace*{1.0cm}
657: \begin{minipage}[c]{18pc}
658: \vspace*{-3.5cm}
659: \caption{\label{parammech} Parametric resonance in oscillations of a pendulum
660: with vertically oscillating point of support. For small-amplitude oscillations
661: the resonance condition is $\Omega_{\rm res} = 2\omega/n$ $(n=1, 2, 3...)$.
662: }
663: \end{minipage}
664: \end{figure}
665: Neutrino oscillations in matter can undergo parametric enhancement if the
666: length and size of the density modulation is correlated in a certain way with
667: neutrino parameters. This enhancement is completely different from the MSW
668: effect; in particular no level crossing is required. An example admitting an
669: exact analytic solution is the ``castle wall'' density profile
670: \cite{Akhm1,Akhm2} (see fig. \ref{fig:paramres}).
671: The resonance condition in this case can be written as \cite{Akhm2}
672: \be
673: X_3\equiv -(\sin\phi_1 \cos\phi_2\cos 2\theta_{1m}+\cos\phi_1
674: \sin\phi_2\cos 2\theta_{2m}) = 0\,,
675: \label{X3}
676: \ee
677: where $\phi_{1,2}$ are the oscillation phases acquired in layers 1 and 2
678: and $\theta_{m 1,2}$ are the corresponding mixing angles in matter.
679: %
680: \begin{figure}[h]
681: \hbox{\hfil
682: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm,height=4.5cm]{fgr5.eps}
683: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm,height=4.5cm]{fgr4.eps}
684: \hfill}
685: \caption{\label{fig:paramres} Parametric resonance in the case of a ``castle
686: wall'' density profile.
687: Coordinate dependence of the potential $V$ (left panel)
688: and of the transition probability $P$ (right panel). }
689: % when condition (\ref{X3}) is satisfied.}
690: \end{figure}
691: %*********************************************************************
692:
693: The earth's density profile seen by neutrinos with core-crossing
694: trajectories can be well approximated by a piece of this castle wall
695: profile (fig.~\ref{prem}).
696: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
697: \begin{figure}[h]
698: %\hbox{\hfil
699: \hspace*{0.005cm}
700: {\includegraphics[width=6.2cm]{prem-shells-1b.eps}}
701: %\hfill}
702: \hspace*{0.4cm}
703: \begin{minipage}[c]{20pc}
704: \vspace*{-3.5cm}
705: \caption{\label{prem} The earth density profile according to the PREM model
706: \cite{PREM} and its approximation by a piece of the ``castle wall'' profile. }
707: \end{minipage}
708: \end{figure}
709: %
710: Interestingly, the parametric resonance condition (\ref{X3}) can be satisfied
711: for oscillations of core-crossing neutrinos in the earth for a rather wide
712: range of zenith angles both at intermediate energies \cite{LS,P,Akhm2} and
713: high energies \cite{AMS1} (see figs. \ref{illustr}, \ref{coord}).
714: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
715: \begin{figure}[h]
716: %\hbox{\hfil
717: \hspace*{-0.4cm}
718: \includegraphics[width=6.4cm,height=4.8cm]{fa1b.eps}
719: \hspace*{-0.95cm}
720: \includegraphics[width=5.9cm,height=4.8cm]{fig.zenithN.eps}
721: %\hfill}
722: \hspace*{0.2cm}
723: \begin{minipage}[c]{10pc}
724: \vspace*{-4.4cm}
725: \caption{\label{illustr} Parametric resonance in oscillations of core-crossing
726: neutrinos. Left panel: $\cos\Theta=-0.89$, $\sin^2 2\theta_{13}=0.01$; right
727: panel: $\sin^2 2\theta_{13}=0.15$, small window shows the values of $X_3$.
728: }
729: \end{minipage}
730: \end{figure}
731: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
732: %
733: \begin{figure}[h]
734: %\hbox{\hfil
735: \includegraphics[width=9.8cm]{fig.panel-A.eps}
736: %\hfill}
737: \hspace*{0.3cm}
738: \begin{minipage}[c]{14pc}
739: \vspace*{-4.6cm}
740: \caption{\label{coord} Coordinate dependence of the transition
741: probability $P_2=1-P_{ee}$ (upper panels) and of the total adiabatic
742: oscillation phase $\Phi$ (lower panels) for a number of values of $E$ and
743: $\cos\Theta_\nu$. The shaded areas show the earth's density profiles seen
744: by the neutrinos. Figure courtesy of M. Maltoni.
745: }
746: \end{minipage}
747: \end{figure}
748: %
749: The parametric resonance of neutrino oscillations in the earth can be
750: observed in future atmospheric or accelerator experiments if $\theta_{13}$ is
751: not too much below its current upper limit.
752:
753: \subsection{Some recent developments}
754: When $V \ll \Delta m^2/2E$ (oscillations of low-$E$ neutrinos in matter or,
755: equivalently, oscillations in low-density matter), matter effects on neutrino
756: oscillations are small and can be considered in perturbation theory. This
757: gives simple and transparent formulas describing, in particular, oscillations
758: of solar and supernova neutrinos in the earth. The earth matter effects can be
759: expressed through the regeneration factor $f_{reg}=P_{2e}^{\oplus}-
760: P_{2e}^{vac}$, where $P_{2e}$ is the probability for $\nu_2$ to become $\nu_e$
761: upon traversing the earth. In the 3f framework one has \cite{ATV}
762: \be
763: P_{2e}^\oplus-P_{2e}^{vac}=\frac{1}{2}\,c_{13}^4\,\sin^2
764: 2\theta_{12}\,\int_0^L\! dx \,V(x) \sin\left[2\int\limits_x^{L}\!\omega(x')
765: \,dx'\right]\,,
766: \label{P2e}
767: \ee
768: where
769: \be
770: \omega(x)=\sqrt{[\cos 2\theta_{12}\,\delta-c_{13}^2 V(x)/2]^2+\delta^2
771: \sin^2 2\theta_{12}}\,,\qquad \delta=\frac{\Delta m_{21}^2}{4E}\,.
772: \label{omega}
773: \ee
774: The 2f ($\theta_{13}=0$) version of these equations was derived in \cite{IS}
775: (see also \cite{dHLS}).
776:
777: The regeneration factor as the function of the cosine of the nadir angle
778: $\Theta_z$ is shown in fig. \ref{reg}. As can be seen in the left panel, in
779: the case of perfect energy resolution one could expect a significant increase
780: of the regeneration factor for core-crossing trajectories. However,
781: experimentally no such an increase was observed in the $\cos\Theta_z$
782: dependence of the day-night signal difference for solar neutrinos, which is
783: rather flat. As was shown in \cite{IS}, this comes about because of the
784: finite energy resolution $\Delta E$ of the detectors, which leads to a
785: suppression of the effects of the earth density variations that are far from
786: the detector (see the right panel of fig. \ref{reg}), the attenuation length
787: being $d\simeq l_{\rm osc}(E/\Delta E)$.
788:
789:
790: \begin{figure}[h]
791: \hbox{\hfill
792: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=4.5cm]{reg.eps}
793: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=4.5cm]{snocc2.eps}
794: \hfill}
795: \caption{\label{reg} Left panel: earth regeneration factor for $E=10$ MeV
796: neutrinos, perfect energy resolution. Black (solid) curve -- numerical
797: calculation, red (dashed) curve -- analytic result. Right panel: regeneration
798: factors averaged over three different intervals of energy \cite{dHLS}. }
799: \end{figure}
800:
801:
802:
803: Oscillations of high energy neutrinos in matter or, equivalently, oscillations
804: in dense matter ($V > \delta \equiv\Delta m^2/4E$), can also be very
805: accurately described analytically. The transition probability for oscillations
806: in a matter of an arbitrary density profile is given by \cite{AMS1}
807: \be
808: P~=~\delta^2 \sin^2 2\theta\left|\int_0^L dx e^{-2 i \phi(x)}\right|^2,
809: \qquad \quad
810: \phi(x)=\int_0^x dx' \omega(x')\,.
811: \label{highE}
812: \ee
813: The accuracy of this approximation is quickly increasing with neutrino
814: energy (see the right panel of fig. \ref{illustr}, where the exact results
815: are shown by solid curves and the analytic results, by dashed curves).
816: Eq.~(\ref{highE}) also allows a simple analytic interpretation of the two
817: prominent parametric peaks in the core region, seen in this figure \cite{AMS1}.
818:
819:
820:
821:
822:
823: \section{Unsettled issues?}
824:
825: The theory of neutrino oscillations is quite mature and well developed now.
826: However, it is far from being complete or finished, and a number of basic
827: questions are still being debated.
828: Below I list some of these
829: questions (given in italics), along with my short answers to them:
830: \footnote{
831: Detailed discussion could not be given for the lack of time.}
832: \begin{itemize}
833:
834: \item
835: {\em Equal energies or equal momenta? }
836:
837:
838: -- Neither equal $E$ nor equal $p$ assumptions normally used in the
839: derivations of the oscillation \hspace*{2.5mm}probability are exact. But for
840: relativistic neutrinos, both give the correct answer.
841:
842:
843: \item
844: {\it Evolution in space or in time? }
845:
846: -- This is related to the previous question. For relativistic neutrinos both
847: are correct and \hspace*{2.5mm} equivalent. Fortunately, in practice we
848: only deal with relativistic neutrinos. In the non-\hspace*{2.5mm} relativistic
849: case the very notion of the oscillation probability is ill-defined (the
850: probability \hspace*{2.5mm} depends on both the
851: production and detection processes).
852:
853: \item
854: {\em Claim: evolution in time is never observed}
855:
856: -- Incorrect. ~Examples: ~K2K, MINOS (and now also CNGS) experiments, which
857: use the \hspace*{2.5mm} neutrino time of flight in order to suppress the
858: background.
859:
860: \item
861: {\em Is wave packet description necessary? }
862:
863: -- Yes, if one wants to rigorously justify the standard oscillation
864: probability formula. Once \hspace*{2.5mm} this is done, the wave
865: packets can be forgotten unless the issues of coherence become \hspace*{2.5mm}
866: important.
867:
868:
869: \item
870: {\em Do charged leptons oscillate? }
871:
872: -- No, they don't.
873:
874: \item
875: {\em Is the standard oscillation formula correct? }
876:
877: -- Yes, it is. In particular, there is no extra factor of two in the
878: oscillation phase, which \hspace*{2.5mm} is sometimes claimed to be there.
879: However, it would be theoretically interesting and \hspace*{2.5mm} important
880: to study the limits of applicability of the standard approach.
881:
882: \end{itemize}
883: \vspace*{2mm}
884:
885: A number of subtle issues of the neutrino oscillation theory still remain
886: unsettled (e.g., rigorous wave packet treatment, oscillations of
887: non-relativistic neutrinos, etc). At present, this is (rightfully) of little
888: concern for practitioners.
889:
890: What are interesting future tasks for the theory and phenomenology of neutrino
891: oscillations? These include the search for the best strategies for measuring
892: neutrino parameters, study of subleading effects and effects of non-standard
893: neutrino interactions and of the domains of applicability and limitations of
894: the current theoretical framework. Future experimental results may also bring
895: some new surprises and pose more challenging problems for the theory!
896:
897: \ack
898: The author was supported by the Wenner-Gren
899: Foundation as the Axel Wenner-Gren visiting professor at the Royal
900: Institute of Technology.
901:
902: \section*{References}
903: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
904:
905: \bibitem{Pont} Pontecorvo B 1957
906: %``Inverse Beta Processes And Nonconservation Of Lepton Charge,''
907: {\em Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.} {\bf 34} 247
908: [1958 {\em Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP} {\bf 7} 172]
909: %%CITATION = SPHJA,7,172;%%
910: \bibitem{MNS}
911: Maki Z, Nakagawa M and Sakata S 1962
912: %``Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,''
913: {\em Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.} {\bf 28} 870
914: %%CITATION = PTPKA,28,870;%%
915: \bibitem{MSW} Wolfenstein L 1978
916: %``Neutrino oscillations in matter,''
917: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ D} {\bf 17} 2369;
918: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D17,2369;%%
919: \nonum
920: Mikheev S P and Smirnov A Y 1985
921: %``Resonance enhancement of oscillations in matter and solar neutrino
922: %spectroscopy,''
923: {\em Yad.\ Fiz.} {\bf 42} 1441
924: [{Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.} {\bf 42} 913]
925: %%CITATION = SJNCA,42,913;%%
926:
927: \bibitem{Parke} Parke S J 1986
928: %``Nonadiabatic level crossing in resonant neutrino oscillations,''
929: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} {\bf 57} 1275
930: %%CITATION = PRLTA,57,1275;%%
931: \bibitem{Sm1} Smirnov A Y 2005
932: %Talk given at Nobel Symposium Neutrino Physics, Haga Slott,
933: %Enkoping, Sweden, 19-24 Aug 2004
934: %``The MSW effect and matter effects in neutrino oscillations,''
935: {\em Phys.\ Scripta} T {\bf 121} 57 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0412391]}
936: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412391;%%
937:
938: \bibitem{pend} Mikheyev S P and Smirnov A Y 1986 in
939: {\it Proc. 12th Intern. Conf. on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics},
940: %Sendai, Japan, Jun 3-8, 1986}
941: Kitagaki T and Yuta H eds., World Scientific, Singapore, p. 177;
942: \nonum Weinberg S 1987
943: %``Opportunities For Particle Physics: Solar Neutrinos And Superstrings,''
944: {\em Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.} A {\bf 2} (1987) 301
945: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A2,301;%%
946:
947: \bibitem{Bari} Fogli G L, Lisi E, Palazzo A and Rotunno A M 2003
948: %``Solar neutrino oscillations and indications of matter effects in the sun,''
949: {\em Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 67} 073001 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0211414]};
950: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211414;%%
951: \nonum
952: Fogli G L, Lisi E, Marrone A and Palazzo A 2004
953: %``Evidence for Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effects in solar neutrino
954: %flavor transitions,''
955: {\em Phys.\ Lett} B {\bf 583} 149 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0309100]};
956: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0309100;%%
957: \nonum
958: Fogli G and Lisi E 2004
959: %``Evidence for the MSW effect,''
960: {\em New J.\ Phys.} {\bf 6} (2004) 139
961: %%CITATION = NJOPF,6,139;%%
962:
963: \bibitem{Fried} Friedland A, talk at this Conference
964: \bibitem{Kus} Kusenko A, talk at this Conference,
965: %``Sterile neutrino states,''
966: {\tt arXiv:hep-ph/0609158}
967: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0609158;%%
968:
969: \bibitem{series}
970: Akhmedov E K {\em et al.} 2004
971: %, Johansson R, Lindner M, Ohlsson T and Schwetz T 2004
972: % ``Series expansions for three-flavor neutrino oscillation
973: %probabilities in matter,''
974: {\em JHEP} {\bf 0404} 078 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0402175]}
975: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402175;%%
976:
977: \bibitem{Lim} Lim C S 1987
978: % ``RESONANT SOLAR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION VERSUS LABORATORY NEUTRINO
979: %OSCILLATION EXPERIMENTS,''
980: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=bnl-39675}{SPIRES entry}
981: {\it Presented at BNL Neutrino Workshop, Upton, N.Y., Feb 5-7, 1987},
982: preprint BNL-39675
983:
984: \bibitem{BOS} Blennow M, Ohlsson T and Snellman H 2004
985: %``Day-night effect in solar neutrino oscillations with three flavors,''
986: {\em Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 69} 073006 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0311098]}
987: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311098;%%
988:
989: \bibitem{ATV} Akhmedov E K, Tortola M A and Valle J W F 2004
990: % ``A simple analytic three-flavour description of the day-night effect
991: %in the solar neutrino flux,''
992: {\em JHEP} {\bf 0405} 057 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0404083]}
993: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404083;%%
994:
995: \bibitem{Mena} Mena O, talk at this Conference,
996: %``Getting the most from NOvA and T2K,''
997: {\tt arXiv:hep-ph/0609031}
998: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0609031;%%
999:
1000: \bibitem{deGouv} de Gouv\^ea A 2001
1001: % ``The oscillation probability of GeV solar neutrinos of all active
1002: %species,''
1003: {\em Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 63} 093003 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0006157]}
1004: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006157;%%
1005:
1006: \bibitem{Tviol} Akhmedov E K, Huber P, Lindner M and Ohlsson T 2001
1007: %``T violation in neutrino oscillations in matter,''
1008: {\em Nucl.\ Phys.} B {\bf 608} 394 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0105029]}
1009: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105029;%%
1010:
1011: \bibitem{3fnumunutau}
1012: Akhmedov E K 2003
1013: %``Neutrino oscillations beyond two flavours,''
1014: {\em Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.} {\bf 118} 245 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0207342]};
1015: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207342;%%
1016: %Gandhi R, Ghoshal P, Goswami S, Mehta P and Uma Sankar S 2005
1017: \nonum
1018: Gandhi R {\em et al,} 2005
1019: %``Large matter effects in nu/mu --> nu/tau oscillations,''
1020: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} {\bf 94} 051801 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0408361]}
1021: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408361;%%
1022:
1023: \bibitem{ETC}
1024: Ermilova V K, Tsarev V A and Chechin V A 1986 {Kr. Soob. Fiz.}
1025: [{\em Short Not. Lebedev Institute}] {\bf 5}, 26
1026:
1027: \bibitem{Akhm1} Akhmedov E K 1988
1028: %``On neutrino oscillations in a nonhomogeneous medium,''
1029: {\em Yad.\ Fiz.} {\bf 47} 475
1030: [{\em Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.} {\bf 47} (1988) 301]; preprint
1031: IAE-4470/1, 1987
1032:
1033: \bibitem{Akhm2} Akhmedov E K 1999
1034: % ``Parametric resonance of neutrino oscillations and passage of solar and
1035: %atmospheric neutrinos through the earth,''
1036: {\em Nucl.\ Phys.} B {\bf 538} 25 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/9805272]}
1037: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805272;%%
1038:
1039: \bibitem{PREM}
1040: Dziewonski A M and Anderson D L 1981
1041: %``Preliminary Reference Earth Model,''
1042: {\em Phys.\ Earth Planet.\ Interiors} {\bf 25} 297
1043: %%CITATION = PEPIA,25,297;%%
1044:
1045:
1046:
1047: \bibitem{LS}
1048: Liu Q Y and Smirnov A Y 1998
1049: % ``Neutrino mass spectrum with nu/mu --> nu/s oscillations of atmospheric
1050: %neutrinos,''
1051: {\em Nucl.\ Phys.} B {\bf 524} 505 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/9712493]};
1052: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712493;%%
1053: \nonum
1054: Liu Q Y, Mikheyev S P and Smirnov A Y 1998
1055: %``Parametric resonance in oscillations of atmospheric neutrinos?,''
1056: {\em Phys.\ Lett.} B {\bf 440} 319 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/9803415]}
1057: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803415;%%
1058:
1059:
1060: \bibitem{P} Petcov S T 1998
1061: % ``Diffractive-like (or parametric-resonance-like?) enhancement of the earth
1062: % (day-night) effect for solar neutrinos crossing the earth core,''
1063: {\em Phys.\ Lett.} B {\bf 434} 321 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/9805262]}
1064: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805262;%%
1065:
1066: \bibitem{AMS1} Akhmedov E K, Maltoni M and Smirnov A Y 2005
1067: % ``Describing oscillations of high energy neutrinos in matter precisely,''
1068: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} {\bf 95} 211801 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0506064]}
1069: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506064;%%
1070:
1071: \bibitem{IS} Ioannisian A N and Smirnov A Y 2004
1072: %``Neutrino oscillations in low density medium,''
1073: {\em Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} {\bf 93} (241801 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0404060]}
1074: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404060;%%
1075:
1076: \bibitem{dHLS}
1077: de Holanda P C, Liao W and Smirnov A Y 2004
1078: %``Toward precision measurements in solar neutrinos,''
1079: {\em Nucl.\ Phys.} B {\bf 702} 307 {\tt [arXiv:hep-ph/0404042]}
1080: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404042;%%
1081:
1082:
1083: %\bibitem{}
1084:
1085: \end{thebibliography}
1086:
1087:
1088:
1089: \end{document}
1090: %*********************************************************************
1091:
1092: