1: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
2: \documentclass[a4]{article}
3: \usepackage{graphics}
4: \topmargin-16mm
5: \textwidth170mm
6: \textheight250mm
7: \oddsidemargin-8mm
8: \evensidemargin-8mm
9:
10: \sloppy
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Evolution equations for truncated moments of the parton distributions}
15: \author{Dorota Kotlorz\footnote{Opole University of Technology,
16: Division of Physics, Ozimska 75, 45-370 Opole, Poland, e-mail:
17: {\tt dstrozik@po.opole.pl}} \and Andrzej Kotlorz\footnote{Opole University
18: of Technology, Division of Mathematics, Luboszycka 3,
19: 45-036 Opole, Poland, e-mail: {\tt kotlorz@po.opole.pl}}}
20: \date{October 13, 2006}
21: \maketitle
22:
23: \abstract{
24: We derive evolution equations for the truncated Mellin moments of the parton
25: distributions.
26: We find that the equations have the same form as those for the partons
27: themselves. The modified splitting function for n-th moment
28: $P'(n,x)$ is $x^{n}P(x)$, where $P(x)$ is the well-known splitting function
29: from the DGLAP equation.
30: The obtained equations are exact for each n-th moment and for every truncation
31: point $x_0\in (0;1)$. They can be solved with use of standard methods of
32: solving the DGLAP equations.
33:
34: This approach allows us to avoid the problem of dealing with the unphysical
35: region $x\rightarrow 0$. Furthermore, it refers directly to the physical
36: values - moments (rather than to the parton distributions), what enables one to
37: use a wide range of deep-inelastic scattering data in terms of smaller number
38: of parameters.
39:
40: We give an example of an application.\\ \\
41: PACS {12.38.Bx} {Perturbative calculations}, {11.55.Hx} {Sum rules},
42: {Truncated moments}
43:
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46: \label{intro}
47: QCD interactions between partons violate the Bjorken scaling \cite{b1}. The
48: quark and the gluon distribution functions change with $Q^2$ according to
49: the well-known Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolution
50: equations \cite{b2}-\cite{b5}. The DGLAP equations can be solved with use of
51: either the Mellin transform or the polynomial expansion in the $x$-space.
52: The differentio-integral Volterra-like evolution equations change after
53: the Mellin transform into simple differential and diagonal ones in the moment
54: space and can be solved analytically. Then one can again obtain the $x$-space
55: solutions via the inverse Mellin transform. The only problem is knowledge of
56: the input parametrisation for the whole region $0\leq x \leq 1$ what is
57: necessary in the determination of the initial moments of the distribution
58: functions. Using the polynomial expansion method, one deals with the parton
59: distributions only in a limited range of the Bjorken variable:
60: $x\leq z\leq 1$. This is very important because of the experimental
61: constraints. The lowest value of $x$ in present experiments is about $10^{-5}$
62: and the limit $x\rightarrow 0$, which implies that the invariant
63: energy $W^2$ of the inelastic lepton-hadron scattering becomes infinite
64: ($W^2=Q^2(1/x-1)$), will never be attained. Thus the polynomial expansion
65: technique allows one to avoid the problem of the unphysical region.
66:
67: An important role in DIS analyses play different sum rules, which refer to the
68: moments of the parton distributions. One can compare experimental estimations
69: for the moments of structure functions with theoretical predictions. Because
70: experimental data do not cover the whole region of $x$, it is very useful to
71: consider in the theoretical approach truncated moments of structure functions.
72: The DGLAP evolution equations for the truncated moments have been discussed in
73: \cite{b6}-\cite{b10}. The presented methods, based on the approximate formulae
74: are valid only for very small value of the truncation point ($x_0\leq 10^{-2}$)
75: and suffer from large errors as $x_0\geq 0.1$. Besides, the not diagonal
76: evolution equations for truncated moments, obtained in \cite{b6}-\cite{b8},
77: can be solved with a satisfactory precision for $n\geq 2$, while in a case of
78: the first moment the precision is significantly worse.
79:
80: In this paper we derive the evolution equations for the truncated moments of
81: the parton distributions, which are exact for every value of $x_0$ and for
82: each $n$-th moment. We find that the truncated moments satisfy the DGLAP
83: evolution with a modified splitting function $P(x)\rightarrow x^n P(x)$ in
84: the Mellin convolution. This approach enables one to avoid uncertainties from
85: the unmeasurable $x\rightarrow 0$ region and also to use the smaller number of
86: the input parameters.
87:
88: The content of this paper is as follows. In Sect.2 we present the DGLAP
89: evolution equations for the truncated moments of the parton distributions.
90: A detailed derivation is given in the appendix. An example of an application to the
91: determination of the contribution to the Bjorken sum rule is contained in
92: Sect.3. Finally, Sect.5 contains a summary and conclusions.
93:
94: \section{Derivation of the evolution equations for the truncated Mellin moments
95: of the parton densities}
96: \label{sec:2}
97:
98: The $Q^2$ evolution of the quark and the gluon densities is described by
99: the well-known DGLAP equations \cite{b2}-\cite{b5}. Each equation of this
100: system has the form
101: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.1}
102: \frac{dq(x,t)}{dt}=\frac{\alpha_s(t)}{2\pi}\; (P\otimes q)(x,t).
103: \end{equation}
104: In the above formula $q(x,t)$ denotes the parton distribution,
105: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.2}
106: t= \ln\frac{Q^2}{\Lambda_{QCD}^2},
107: \end{equation}
108: $\alpha_s(t)$ is the running coupling and $\otimes$ denotes the Mellin
109: convolution:
110: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.3}
111: (A\otimes B)(x)\equiv\int\limits_{x}^{1} \frac{dz}{z}\,
112: A\left(\frac{x}{z}\right)\,B(z).
113: \end{equation}
114: The splitting function $P(z,t)$ can be expanded in the perturbative series of
115: the $\alpha_s(t)$.\\
116: The $n$-th Mellin moment of the function f(x) is defined as
117: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.4}
118: \bar{f}_{n}=\int\limits_0^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\, f(x).
119: \end{equation}
120: Taking into account the relation
121: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.5}
122: \int\limits_0^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\,(A\otimes B)(x)=
123: \bar{A}_n\,\bar{B}_n,
124: \end{equation}
125: one can find that the moments of the parton distributions obeys the evolution
126: equation
127: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.6}
128: \frac{d\bar{q}_{n}(t)}{dt}=\frac{\alpha_s(t)}{2\pi}\;
129: \gamma_n(t)\, \bar{q}_{n}(t),
130: \end{equation}
131: where the anomalous dimension $\gamma_n(t)$ is a moment of the splitting
132: function P(z,t)
133: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.7}
134: \gamma_n(t)=\int\limits_0^1 dz\, z^{n-1}\, P(z,t).
135: \end{equation}
136: Eq.(\ref{eq.2.6}) can be solved analytically and the parton density $q(x,t)$
137: can be found via the inverse Mellin transform
138: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.8}
139: q(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int\limits_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty} dn\,
140: x^{-n}\, \bar{q}_n(t).
141: \end{equation}
142: The only problem is the knowledge of the input parametrisation for the whole
143: region $0\leq x\leq 1$, what is necessary in the determination of the initial
144: moments $\bar{q}_n(t=t_0)$.
145:
146: Using the truncated moments approach one can avoid the uncertainties from the
147: region $x\rightarrow 0$, which will never be attained experimentally. If we
148: truncate the Mellin moment at $x_0$, we obtain
149: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.9}
150: \bar{f}_{n}(x_0)=\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\, f(x).
151: \end{equation}
152: The evolution equation (\ref{eq.2.1}) implies for the truncated moment of $q$
153: the following formula:
154: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.10}
155: \frac{d\bar{q}_n(x_0,t)}{dt}=
156: \frac{\alpha_s(t)}{2\pi}\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\,(P\otimes q)(x,t),
157: \end{equation}
158: where
159: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.10a}
160: \bar{q}_{n}(x_0,t)=\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\, q(x,t).
161: \end{equation}
162: We derive in the appendix an interesting relation for the truncated moments,
163: namely
164: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.11}
165: \int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\,(P\otimes q)(x)= (P'\otimes \bar{q}_n)(x_0),
166: \end{equation}
167: with
168: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.12}
169: P'(n,z)= z^n\, P(z)
170: \end{equation}
171: Hence eq.(\ref{eq.2.10}) can be written as
172: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.13}
173: \frac{d\bar{q}_n(x_0,t)}{dt}=
174: \frac{\alpha_s(t)}{2\pi}\; (P'\otimes \bar{q}_n)(x_0,t).
175: \end{equation}
176: In this way we have obtained the DGLAP evolution equation for the truncated
177: moments $\bar{q}_n(x_0,t)$, very similar to the original equation
178: (\ref{eq.2.1}) for the partons themselves. In our approach, $P'(n,z)$
179: from (\ref{eq.2.12}) plays a role of the splitting function for truncated
180: moments.
181:
182: Now we can adapt to eq.(\ref{eq.2.13}) known methods of solving the DGLAP
183: evolution equation e.g. \cite{b11},\cite{b12}.
184: Dealing with the truncated moments allows us to study their evolution without
185: making any assumption on the small-$x$ behaviour of the parton densities. One
186: needs to know only the truncated moments of the parton distributions at the
187: initial scale $t_0$ (e.g. from the experimental data), what constrains a number
188: of the input parameters. In our approach we can also test different parton
189: parametrisations comparing the theoretical predictions for sum rules, which
190: involve $\bar{q}_n(x_0,t)$, with the experimental data.
191:
192: \section{An example of an application}
193: \label{sec:3}
194:
195: Eq. (\ref{eq.2.13}) can be rewritten in the full form
196: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.14}
197: \frac{d\bar{q}_n(x_0,t)}{dt}=\frac{\alpha_s(t)}{2\pi}
198: \int\limits_{x_0}^{1}\frac{dz}{z}\,P'\left(n,\frac{x_0}{z},t\right)\,
199: \bar{q}_n(z,t),
200: \end{equation}
201: where
202: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.15}
203: P'\left(n,\frac{x_0}{z},t\right)=
204: \left(\frac{x_0}{z}\right)^n P\left(\frac{x_0}{z},t\right).
205: \end{equation}
206: In order to solve eq.(\ref{eq.2.14}), we use the Chebyshev polynomial
207: expansion of $P'$ and $\bar{q}_n$.
208: The Chebyshev polynomials technique \cite{b13} was successfully used by
209: J.Kwieci\'nski in many QCD treatments e.g. \cite{b14}-\cite{b17}. Using this
210: method one obtains the system of linear differential equations instead of the
211: original integro-differential ones. The Chebyshev expansion provides a robust
212: method of discretising a continuous problem. More detailed description of the
213: Chebyshev polynomials technique is given e.g. in the appendix of \cite{b10}.
214: The Chebyshev polynomial approach in the case of the truncated moments is
215: more effective than in the case of the parton densities themselves.
216: This is because $n$-th moments for $n\geq 1$ are usually nonsingular, when
217: $x_0\rightarrow 0$.
218: Thus we can obtain reliable results for every value of $n\geq 1$, $x_0$ and
219: also $Q^2$, independently of the input parton distributions.
220:
221: Here we would like to present solutions of eq.(\ref{eq.2.13}) for the
222: nonsinglet polarised structure function $g_1$. In this way we are able to
223: determine the contribution to the Bjorken sum rule \cite{b18},\cite{b19}.
224: For simplicity we use LO approximation. In our case
225: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.16}
226: q(x,t)=g_1^{NS}(x,t)=g_1^p(x,t)-g_1^n(x,t),
227: \end{equation}
228: so
229: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.17}
230: \bar{q}_{n}(x_0,t)=\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\, g_1^{NS}(x,t).
231: \end{equation}
232: The results for $\bar{q}_{n}(x_0,t)$ (\ref{eq.2.17}) are shown in Figs.1-3.
233: In Fig.1 we plot the truncated moments as a function of $x_0$.
234: We use two different inputs of $g_1^{NS}(x,t_0)$ at the low scale
235: $Q_0^2=1\; {\rm GeV}^2$:
236: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq.2.18}
237: g_1^{NS}(x,t_0) &\sim& (1-x)^3, \\ \label{eq.2.19}
238: g_1^{NS}(x,t_0) &\sim& x^{-0.5}(1-x)^{3}.
239: \end{eqnarray}
240: The evolution scale $Q^2=10\; {\rm GeV}^2$.
241: Figs.2, 3 show the $Q^2$ dependence of the (\ref{eq.2.17}) at $x_0=0.01$ and
242: $x_0=0.1$, respectively. Here we consider again the both parametrisations
243: (\ref{eq.2.18}),(\ref{eq.2.19}).
244: We can also determine the contribution to the Bjorken sum rule
245: \begin{equation}\label{eq.2.20}
246: \Delta I_{BSR}(x_1,x_2,t)=
247: \int\limits_{x_1}^{x_2} dx\, g_1^{NS}(x,t).
248: \end{equation}
249: For $x_1=0.003$, $x_2=0.7$ and $Q^2=10\; {\rm GeV}^2$ we obtain
250: $6\Delta I_{BSR}=1.23$ and 1.07 for the inputs (\ref{eq.2.18}) and
251: (\ref{eq.2.19}), respectively. These results can be compared to the SMC data
252: \cite{b20}, which yield $6\Delta I_{BSR}(0.003,0.7,10)=1.20\pm 0.24\pm 0.15$.
253: %***** Figure *****
254: \begin{figure}
255: \begin{center}
256: \resizebox{0.7\textwidth}{!}{
257: \includegraphics{kot9f1.eps}
258: }
259: \caption{Truncated $n$-th moments of the spin structure function $g_1^{NS}$ as
260: a function of the truncation point $x_0$.
261: The results are shown for the flat (\ref{eq.2.18}) (red solid) and for the
262: singular (\ref{eq.2.19}) (blue dotted) parametrisation.
263: The evolution scale $Q^2=10\; {\rm GeV}^2$}
264: \label{fig:1}
265: \end{center}
266: \end{figure}
267: %***** Figure *****
268: \begin{figure}
269: \begin{center}
270: \resizebox{0.7\textwidth}{!}{
271: \includegraphics{kot9f2.eps}
272: }
273: \caption{$Q^2$ evolution of the truncated $n$-th moments of $g_1^{NS}$ at
274: $x_0=0.01$. The results are shown for the flat (\ref{eq.2.18}) (red solid)
275: and for the singular (\ref{eq.2.19}) (blue dotted) parametrisation.}
276: \label{fig:2}
277: \end{center}
278: \end{figure}
279: %***** Figure *****
280: \begin{figure}
281: \begin{center}
282: \resizebox{0.7\textwidth}{!}{
283: \includegraphics{kot9f3.eps}
284: }
285: \caption{$Q^2$ evolution of the truncated $n$-th moments of $g_1^{NS}$ at
286: $x_0=0.1$. The results are shown for the flat (\ref{eq.2.18}) (red solid)
287: and for the singular (\ref{eq.2.19}) (blue dotted) parametrisation.}
288: \label{fig:3}
289: \end{center}
290: \end{figure}
291:
292: \section{Summary}
293:
294: In this paper we have derived DGLAP evolution equations for the truncated
295: Mellin moments of the parton distributions. We have found that the equations
296: closely resemble those for the partons themselves. The role of the
297: splitting function for n-th moment plays $P'(n,x)=x^{n}P(x)$, where $P(x)$
298: is the well-known splitting function from the DGLAP equation for the partons.
299: The presented approach has an advantage that it can be successfully used
300: for each n-th moment and for every truncation point $x_0\in (0;1)$.
301: The obtained equations are exact and can be solved with use of standard
302: methods of solving the DGLAP equations. The polynomial expansion technique
303: is in the case of the truncated moments more effective than in the case of
304: the parton densities themselves. This is because $n$-th moments for $n\geq 1$
305: are usually nonsingular functions of $x$, when $x\rightarrow 0$. In this way
306: one can obtain reliable results independently of the input parton
307: distributions.
308:
309: The truncated moments approach refers directly to the physical values - moments
310: (rather than to the parton distributions), what enables one to use a wide range
311: of deep-inelastic scattering data in terms of smaller number of parameters.
312: In this way, no assumptions on the shape of parton distributions are needed.
313: Using the evolution equations for the truncated moments one can also avoid
314: uncertainties from the unmeasurable very small $x\rightarrow 0$ region.
315:
316: An analysis of the $Q^2$ QCD evolution for the truncated moments of the parton
317: densities can be a valuable tool e.g. in the determination of the contribution
318: to different sum rules from the experimentally accessible region. Particularly
319: important is knowledge on the gluon contribution to the spin of the nucleon.
320: Thus the truncated moments approach can be useful and interesting both from the
321: theoretical and the experimental point of view.
322:
323: \appendix
324: \section{Detailed derivation of the evolution equations for the truncated
325: Mellin moments of the parton densities}
326:
327: Here we show how to obtain eq.(\ref{eq.2.11}). The left-hand side of this
328: relation can be rewritten in the full form
329: \begin{equation}\label{eq.A.1}
330: l.h.s.=\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx\, x^{n-1}\int\limits_{x}^1 \frac{dz}{z}\,
331: P\left(\frac{x}{z}\right)\, q(z).
332: \end{equation}
333: Using the Heaviside function
334: \begin{equation}\label{eq.A.2}
335: \Theta(y)=\cases{1 & for~~ $y>0$ \cr 0 & for~~ $y\leq 0$ \cr},
336: \end{equation}
337: we can change the order of integration in (\ref{eq.A.1}), namely
338: \begin{equation}\label{eq.A.3}
339: l.h.s.=\int\limits_{x_0}^1 \frac{dz}{z}\, q(z)\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dx\,
340: x^{n-1}\, \Theta (z-x)\, P\left(\frac{x}{z}\right).
341: \end{equation}
342: Now we introduce instead of $x$ a new variable $u$, defined by
343: \begin{equation}\label{eq.A.4}
344: u=\frac{x_0 z}{x},
345: \end{equation}
346: what implies
347: \begin{equation}\label{eq.A.5}
348: l.h.s.=\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dz\, z^{n-1}\, q(z)\int\limits_{x_0}^{z}
349: \frac{du}{u}\, \left(\frac{x_0}{u}\right)^n \, P\left(\frac{x_0}{u}\right).
350: \end{equation}
351: As before, we use the $\Theta$ function and get
352: \begin{equation}\label{eq.A.6}
353: l.h.s.=\int\limits_{x_0}^1 dz\, z^{n-1}\, q(z)\int\limits_{x_0}^{1}
354: \frac{du}{u}\, \Theta (z-u)\,
355: \left(\frac{x_0}{u}\right)^n \, P\left(\frac{x_0}{u}\right).
356: \end{equation}
357: This allows us to change again the order of integration and obtain the final
358: result
359: \begin{equation}\label{eq.A.7}
360: l.h.s.=\int\limits_{x_0}^{1}\frac{du}{u}\,
361: \left(\frac{x_0}{u}\right)^n \, P\left(\frac{x_0}{u}\right)
362: \int\limits_{u}^1 dz\, z^{n-1}\, q(z)=(P'\otimes \bar{q}_n)(x_0) = r.h.s.,
363: \end{equation}
364: where $P'$ is given by (\ref{eq.2.12}).
365:
366: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
367:
368: \bibitem{b1}
369: J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. \textbf{179}, 1547 (1969)
370: \bibitem{b2}
371: V.N.Gribov, L.N.Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 15}, 438 (1972)
372: \bibitem{b3}
373: V.N.Gribov, L.N.Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 15}, 675 (1972)
374: \bibitem{b4}
375: Yu.L.Dokshitzer, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 46}, 641 (1977)
376: \bibitem{b5}
377: G.Altarelli, G.Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 126}, 298 (1977)
378: \bibitem{b6}
379: S. Forte, L. Magnea, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{448}, 295 (1999) [hep-ph/9812479]
380: \bibitem{b7}
381: S. Forte, L. Magnea, A. Piccione, G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B \textbf{594}, 46
382: (2001) [hep-ph/0006273]
383: \bibitem{b8}
384: A.Piccione, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{518}, 207 (2001) [hep-ph/0107108]
385: \bibitem{b9}
386: D. Kotlorz, A. Kotlorz, Acta Phys. Pol. B \textbf{36}, 3023 (2005)
387: [hep-ph/0510295]
388: \bibitem{b10}
389: D. Kotlorz, A. Kotlorz, [hep-ph/0609283]
390: \bibitem{b11}
391: D. J. Gross, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{8}, 3633 (1973)
392: \bibitem{b12}
393: S. Kumano, T.-H. Nagai, J. Comput. Phys. \textbf{201}, 651 (2004)
394: [hep-ph/0405160] and ref. therin
395: \bibitem{b13}
396: S.E.El-gendi, {\it Chebyshev solution of differential, integral and
397: integro-differential equations}, Comput. J. {\bf 12}, 282 (1969)
398: \bibitem{b14}
399: J.Kwieci\'nski, D.Str\'ozik-Kotlorz, Z. Phys. C {\bf 48}, 315 (1990)
400: \bibitem{b15}
401: B.Bade\l{}ek, J.Kwieci\'nski, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 418}, 229 (1998)
402: \bibitem{b16}
403: J.Kwieci\'nski, B.Ziaja, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 054004 (1999)
404: \bibitem{b17}
405: J.Kwieci\'nski, M.Maul, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 034014 (2003)
406: \bibitem{b18}
407: J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. \textbf{148}, 1467 (1966)
408: \bibitem{b19}
409: J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{1}, 1376 (1970)
410: \bibitem{b20}
411: SMC Collaboration, B. Adeva et al., Phys. Lett. B \textbf{420}, 180 (1998)
412:
413: \end{thebibliography}
414:
415: \end{document}
416: