1: \documentclass[aps,12pt,notitlepage,final,oneside,onecolumn,nobibnotes,
2: nofootinbib,superscriptaddress,showpacs,centertags,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \title{Fermion resonance in quantum field theory}
7: \author{\firstname{M.O.} \surname{Gonchar}}
8: %\email{kaloshin@physdep.isu.ru}
9: \author{\firstname{A.E.} \surname{Kaloshin}}
10: \email{kaloshin@physdep.isu.ru}
11: \author{\firstname{V.P.} \surname{Lomov}}
12: \email{lomov@physdep.isu.ru}
13:
14: \affiliation{Russia, Irkutsk State University}
15:
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18: We derive accurately the fermion resonance propagator by means of Dyson
19: summation of the self-energy contribution. It turns out that the
20: relativistic fermion resonance differs essentially from its boson analog.
21: \end{abstract}
22:
23: \pacs{13.60.Rj, 11.80.Et}
24:
25: \maketitle
26:
27: \section{Introduction}
28:
29: The Breit-Wigner formula describing the processes of production
30: and decay of unstable particle is widely used in hadron and
31: nuclear physics. The original formula \cite{BW}, which was applied
32: to scattering of slow neutrons, is a non-relativistic one with
33: energy-independent parameters -- resonance position and width. It
34: is clear that the simplest Breit-Wigner formula is applicable only
35: for narrow states and description of a resonance curve for broad
36: hadron resonances (at high experimental accuracy) needs some
37: improved resonance formula. In hadron phenomenology there exist
38: slightly different methods to describe resonance contribution but
39: practically all methods are based on (effective) quantum field
40: theory.
41:
42: In spite of long history we found with some astonishment that
43: situation with description of fermion resonance is not so evident
44: up to now. Naively one can expect that the fermion resonance
45: contribution to cross-section is the same as the boson one. Such
46: point of view may be found in many papers and
47: reviews, in particular, in \cite{Yao}%
48: \footnote{There is no common opinion concerning the form of the
49: relativistic fermion propagator for resonance. But all variants found by us, e.g.
50: \cite{Pas,Lop,Alv,Ani}, are in fact some simplification of general
51: formula \eqref{BWF}. As for resonance denominator, it is always
52: written in analogy with boson case \eqref{BW} but not in correct
53: form \eqref{BWF}. Of course, there is a possibility to avoid the
54: problem: to use the $W$-dependent partial waves and to forget
55: about symmetry properties $W\to -W$. Such way is used, in
56: particular, in $\pi N$ partial analysis \cite{Hoh,Cut,Arn04}.} .%
57: But this is not the case, as it is seen from our consideration.
58: First of all, the natural variable in fermion case is
59: $W=\sqrt{s}$ but not $s$, so the fermion resonance factor will be
60: $W$-dependent. After renormalization of dressed propagator one can see that the fermion
61: specifics is generated by antisymmetric in $W$ contributions in a self-energy. This property
62: is easily seen with use of the off-shell projection operators instead of $\gamma$-matrices.
63:
64:
65: Below we derive the Breit-Wigner-like formula for fermions in
66: quantum field theory and discuss some its properties. We found
67: that the so obtained dressed propagator \eqref{BWF} has some
68: interesting features specific for fermions.
69:
70: \section{Boson resonance in QFT}
71:
72: Let us first consider a more evident case of the boson resonance.
73: The unstable particle is usually associated with the Breit-Wigner
74: formula for an amplitude
75: \begin{equation}\label{BW}
76: T(a\to R\to b)= g_a \cdot \dfrac{1}{M_R^2 -s -i\Gamma_R M_R} \cdot g_b .
77: \end{equation}
78: Here the factor $G(s)=1/(M_R^2 -s -i\Gamma_R M_R)$ represents relativistic propagator of
79: unstable particle.
80:
81: The similar formula may be obtained in framework of quantum field
82: theory by means of Dyson summation of the self-energy insertions
83: into propagator. Equivalently, we should solve the Dyson-Schwinger
84: equation for dressed nonrenormalized propagator
85: \begin{equation}\label{DS}
86: G=G_0 + G J G_0 .
87: \end{equation}
88: Here $G_0(s)=(M^2 -s)^{-1} $ and $G(s)$ are the bare and total
89: propagators respectively, $J(s)$ is the self-energy contribution
90: (sum of the 1PI diagrams).
91:
92: The equation \eqref{DS} may be rewritten in terms of inverse
93: propagators $S(s)=G^{-1}(s)$%
94: \footnote{If we consider the
95: self-energy $J(s)$ as a known value (i.e.we neglect by dressing of
96: the vertex), then we have so called rainbow approximation, see e.g.
97: review \cite{Mar}. This
98: approximation is sufficient to respect the analytical properties
99: and unitarity and is widely used in resonance physics. Sometimes
100: this approach is not sufficient and people use some
101: post-rainbow approximations. As an example we can remember the
102: well known trick with introducing
103: of the centrifugal barrier factor into width.}
104: \begin{equation}\label{DS1}
105: S = S_0 - J = M^2 -s - J(s) .
106: \end{equation}
107: If to use the on-mass-shell scheme of renormalization, then $M$ is
108: the renormalized mass and one should subtract the self-energy
109: contribution twice at this point
110: \begin{equation}\label{DS2}
111: S^{r} = M^2 -s - [ J(s)- \Re J(M^2) - \Re J^{\prime}(M^2)(s-M^2) ].
112: \end{equation}
113: After it we have formula similar to \eqref{BW} but with "running"
114: mass and width. From QFT point of view the Breit-Wigner formula is
115: rather rough approach, when we neglect by the energy dependence in
116: mass and width (i.e. by the energy dependence in loop contribution
117: $J(s)$). Such simplification is justified only for narrow
118: resonance located far from threshold.
119:
120: \section{Fermion resonance in QFT}
121:
122: \subsection{Dressing and renormalization}
123:
124: Dressing of the fermion propagator looks rather similar:
125: \begin{equation}\label{R12}
126: G_0(p)=\frac{1}{\hat{p}-M}\ \ \Rightarrow \ \
127: G(p)=\frac{1}{\hat{p}-M -\Sigma(p)},
128: \end{equation}
129: where $\Sigma(p)=A(p^2)+\hat{p} B(p^2)$ is a self-energy contribution.
130:
131: To renormalize the obtained expression it is convenient to work
132: with the inverse propagator $S(p)=G^{-1}(p)$. Usually the
133: renormalization condition is formulated as the decomposition of
134: inverse propagator in terms of $\hat{p}-M$
135: \begin{equation}
136: S(p) = \hat{p} - M + o(\hat{p} - M)\quad \text{at}\quad\hat{p}\to M .
137: \end{equation}
138:
139: Useful technical step is to introduce the basis of the off-shell projection operators
140: $\Lambda^{\pm}$
141: \begin{equation}\label{L}
142: \Lambda^{\pm}=\dfrac{1}{2}\big( 1 \pm \frac{\hat{p}}{W} \big),\quad W=\sqrt{p^2},
143: \end{equation}
144: which simplifies all operations with $\gamma$-matrices and makes
145: more clear the renormalization procedure. For illustration, let us
146: use this basis for the self-energy contribution. Evident chain
147: gives:
148: \begin{eqnarray}
149: \Sigma(p)&=&A(p^2)+\hat{p}B(p^2)=(\Lambda^{+}+\Lambda^{-})A(W^2) +
150: W(\Lambda^{+}-\Lambda^{-}) B(W^2)\nonumber \\
151: &=& \Lambda^{+} [A(W^2)+W B(W^2)] + \Lambda^{-} [A(W^2)-W B(W^2)].
152: \end{eqnarray}
153: One can see that coefficients $\Sigma^{\pm}$ in this basis are related by
154: simple substitution
155: $\Sigma^-(W)=\Sigma^+(-W)$ and dressed propagator has this property also.
156:
157: The reversing of propagator is very easy due to simple multiplicative properties of the
158: basis. If the inverse propagator has a decomposition
159: \begin{equation}
160: S(p)=\Lambda^{+} S^+(W)+\Lambda^{-} S^-(W) ,
161: \end{equation}
162: with the symmetry property $S^-(W)=S^+(-W)$, then the propagator $G(p)$ is of the form
163: \begin{equation}\label{}
164: G(p)=\Lambda^{+}\frac{1}{S^+(W)}+\Lambda^{-}\frac{1}{S^-(W)}.
165: \end{equation}
166: So, the explicit form of dressed unrenormalized propagator is evident:
167: \begin{equation}\label{}
168: G(p)=\Lambda^{+}\dfrac{1}{W-M-(A(W^2)+W B(W^2))}+\Lambda^{-}\dfrac{1}{-W-M-(A(W^2)-W B(W^2))}.
169: \end{equation}
170: Thus, using the $\Lambda$-basis we have separated the
171: $\gamma$-matrix structure and should renormalize the scalar
172: coefficients dependent on $W$. More exactly, we need renormalize
173: only $G^+(W)$ component, after that another coefficient $G^-(W)$
174: is obtained by substitution $W\to -W$.
175:
176: For bound state, located below the threshold, the
177: renormalization leads to the following condition for the
178: self-energy contribution:
179: \begin{equation*}
180: S^{+}=W-M+o(W-M) \quad\text{at}\quad W \to M .
181: \end{equation*}
182: One can convince yourself that the final expression, obtained by
183: using the projection operator basis, coincides with the
184: standard one presented in any textbook.
185:
186: If we deal with a resonance located higher the threshold, the
187: renormalization condition takes the form:
188: \begin{equation}
189: S^{+}=W-M+o(W-M)+i\frac{\Gamma}{2} \quad\text{at}\quad W \sim M .
190: \label{renorm}
191: \end{equation}
192: Note that the real part of \eqref{renorm} is some requirement on the
193: subtraction constants of self-energy functions $A(p^2), B(p^2)$:
194: \begin{equation}
195: \label{a3}
196: \begin{split}
197: \Re A(M^2)+M\Re B(M^2)=0, \\
198: 2M \Re A^{\prime}(M^2)+\Re B(M^2)+2M^2 \Re B^{\prime}(M^2)=0 ,
199: \end{split}
200: \end{equation}
201: whereas the imaginary part of the condition \eqref{renorm} simply
202: relates the coupling constant and width%
203: \footnote{It is known that
204: normalization on the pole in complex energy plane is preferable
205: from theoretical point of view \cite{Sir,Pass} but for our purpose
206: the more crude recipe
207: \eqref{renorm} is sufficient.}.
208: \begin{equation}
209: -(\Im A(M^2)+M \Im B(M^2)) = \frac{\Gamma}{2}.
210: \end{equation}
211: Eq. \eqref{a3} fixes the loop subtraction constants and after it
212: the functions $A(W^2), B(W^2)$ are defined completely. Inverse
213: propagator may be written in the form similar to Breit-Wigner formula
214: \eqref{BW} but with "running" mass and width
215: \begin{equation}
216: S^{+}(W) = W-M(W)+\frac{i}{2}\Gamma(W) . \label{BW1}
217: \end{equation}
218: Another component is obtained by the substitution $W\to -W$:
219: \begin{equation}
220: S^{-}(W) = -W-M(-W)+\frac{i}{2}\Gamma(-W) . \label{BW2}
221: \end{equation}
222: If to look at the self-energy contribution, one can see that there
223: are the symmetric and antisymmetric contributions under the $W\to
224: -W$ exchange. Therefore the running mass and width also may be
225: divided into two parts:
226: \begin{equation}
227: M(W)=M^S(W)+M^A(W),\qquad \Gamma(W)=\Gamma^S(W)+\Gamma^A(W)
228: \end{equation}
229: and components of renormalized propagator take the form:
230: \begin{equation}
231: \begin{split}
232: S^{+}&=W-M^S(W)-M^A(W)+\frac{i}{2}(\Gamma^S(W)+\Gamma^A(W)), \\
233: S^{-}&=-W-M^S(W)+M^A(W)+\frac{i}{2}(\Gamma^S(W)-\Gamma^A(W)).
234: \end{split}
235: \end{equation}
236: Let us stress that these components are normalized at different points:
237: \begin{equation}\label{normal}
238: \begin{split}
239: S^+ &\approx W - M + \frac{i}{2} \Gamma \quad\quad \ \ \mbox{at}\ W \sim M \\
240: S^- &\approx -W - M + \frac{i}{2} \Gamma \quad\quad \mbox{at}\ W \sim -M .
241: \end{split}
242: \end{equation}
243:
244: Returning from projection operators to $\hat{p},I$ basis, we
245: obtain the following formula for the resonance propagator:
246: \begin{equation}\label{BWF}
247: G(p)=\dfrac{1}{\Delta}\left[ M^S(W)-\frac{i}{2}\Gamma^S(W)+\hat{p}\left(1-\frac{M^A(W)-
248: \dfrac{i}{2}\Gamma^A(W)}{W} \right)\right],
249: \end{equation}
250: where
251: \begin{equation*}
252: \Delta(W^2)=\left( W-M^A(W)+\dfrac{i}{2}\Gamma^A(W) \right)^2-\left( M^S(W)-\frac{i}{2}\Gamma^S(W) \right)^2.
253: \end{equation*}
254:
255: Let us compare it with boson Breit-Wigner formula for the inverse
256: propagator $S(p^2)$ written in a similar form:
257: \begin{equation}
258: S(s)=s-M^2(s)+iM\Gamma(s)\approx W^2-(M-i\frac{\Gamma}{2})^2=
259: [W-(M-\frac{i}{2}\Gamma)][W+(M-\frac{i}{2}\Gamma)].
260: \end{equation}
261: One can see that the fermion denominator in \eqref{BWF} turns into
262: boson one in absence of antisymmetric contributions:\
263: $M^A=\Gamma^A=0$.
264:
265: Let us compare also the interference pictures near the positive energy pole in elastic
266: amplitude.
267:
268: \noindent\underline{\textbf{Boson amplitude}}
269: \begin{equation}\label{intb}
270: \mathcal{T}=\dfrac{g^2}{M^2 -s -iM\Gamma}\approx\frac{-g^2}{2M}\left(\frac{1}{W-M+i\Gamma/2}
271: +\frac{1}{-W-M + i\Gamma/2} \right)
272: \end{equation}
273:
274: \noindent\underline{\textbf{Fermion amplitude}}
275:
276: For definiteness let us consider the process $\pi N\to
277: N^{\prime}(1/2^+) \to \pi N$ and look at the center mass helicity
278: amplitude $\mathcal{M}_{++}$ at $W\sim M$
279: \begin{equation}\label{intf}
280: \mathcal{M}_{++}= \cos{\frac{\theta}{2}}\ \left[\dfrac{(p^0+m_N)g^2}{-W-(M^S - M^A)+
281: i(\Gamma^S-\Gamma^A)/2} - \dfrac{(p^0-m_N)g^2}{W-M+i\Gamma/2}\right],
282: \end{equation}
283: where $p^0$ is the nucleon c.m.s. energy.
284:
285: One can see that in contrast to boson case the background
286: contribution in vicinity of $W=M$ is not expressed in terms of $M$
287: and $\Gamma$. This feature is generated by $\hat{p}$ contribution in
288: self-energy $\Sigma(p)=A(p^2)+\hat{p} B(p^2)$. As a result instead
289: of two parameters ($M$ and $\Gamma$) the fermion Breit-Wigner is
290: described by four parameters (one can use $M$,$\Gamma$ and complex
291: background).
292:
293: All above formulae are applicable directly to spin-3/2 resonances.
294: The dressed propagator of Rarita-Schwinger field has the form
295: \cite{KL,KL1} (compare with \eqref{R12}):
296: \begin{equation}\label{R32}
297: G^{\mu\nu}(p)=\dfrac{1}{\hat{p}-M -\Sigma(p)}\mathcal{P}_{3/2}^{\mu\nu} + (\text{spin-1/2 terms}),
298: \end{equation}
299: where the operator $\mathcal{P}_{3/2}^{\mu\nu}$ can be found in
300: \cite{Nie}. One can see that all above operations are repeated
301: with the $1/(\hat{p}-M -\Sigma(p))$ factor, which after all takes
302: the form \eqref{BWF}.
303:
304: Figures \ref{fig1},\ref{fig2} demonstrate behaviour of the running
305: mass and width and its separation into symmetric and antisymmetric
306: parts. For illustration we considered production of $1/2^{\pm}$
307: resonance in $\pi N$ collisions with parameters resembling the
308: $N(1440)$ and $N(1535)$ baryons%
309: \footnote{In fact the $N(1440)$, $N(1535)$ do not look as the
310: isolated resonances (see e.g. results of partial analysis
311: \cite{Arn04}).}%
312: . One can see that symmetric and antisymmetric parts of running
313: mass and width are of the same order and this is a typical
314: situation.
315:
316: \subsection{Discussion}
317:
318: We would like to discuss some limit cases in dressed fermion
319: propagator \eqref{BWF}. But first of all let us look at unitarity
320: condition and possible constrains from it. For definiteness, let
321: us consider $J=1/2$ resonance production in the $\pi N\to \pi N$
322: process and construct the partial waves. We use the standard $\pi
323: N$ kinematics \cite{Gaz} and \cite{Hoh,Cut,Arn04}.
324:
325: \vspace*{1em}
326: \noindent\underline{\textbf{Resonance of positive parity}}
327: \vspace*{1em}
328:
329: Effective lagrangian is of the form:
330: \begin{equation*}
331: \Lagr_{int}=ig\big[\bar{N}^\prime(x)\gamma^5
332: N(x)\cdot\varphi(x)+\bar{N}(x)\gamma^5 N^\prime(x)\cdot \varphi^\dag(x)\big]
333: \end{equation*}
334: Corresponding partial waves:
335: \begin{equation}
336: \begin{split}
337: f_{s,+}(W)&=\dfrac{-g^2\dfrac{(p^0+m_N)}{8\pi W}}{W-(M^S+M^A)+i(\Gamma^S+\Gamma^A)/2} =
338: \dfrac{-(\Gamma^S+\Gamma^A)/p}{W-(M^S+M^A)+i(\Gamma^S+\Gamma^A)/2},\\
339: f_{p,-}(W)&=\dfrac{g^2\dfrac{(p^0-m_N)}{8\pi W}}{-W-(M^S-M^A)+i(\Gamma^S-\Gamma^A)/2} =
340: \dfrac{(\Gamma^A-\Gamma^S)/p}{-W-(M^S-M^A)+i(\Gamma^S-\Gamma^A)/2}.
341: \end{split}
342: \end{equation}
343: Here $p^0$, $\vect{p}$ are the c.m.s. energy and momentum of
344: nucleon respectively.
345:
346: \vspace*{1em}
347: \noindent\underline{\textbf{Resonance of negative parity}}
348: \vspace*{1em}
349:
350: Effective lagrangian:
351: \begin{equation*}
352: \Lagr_{int}= g \big[ \bar{N}^\prime(x) N(x)\cdot \varphi(x)+\bar{N}(x) N^\prime(x)\cdot \varphi^\dag(x) \big]
353: \end{equation*}
354: Partial waves:
355: \begin{equation}
356: \begin{split}
357: f_{s,+}(W)&=\dfrac{g^2\dfrac{(p^0+m_N)}{8\pi W}}{-W-(M^S-M^A)+i(\Gamma^S-\Gamma^A)/2} =
358: \dfrac{(\Gamma^A-\Gamma^S)/\abs{\vect{p}}}{-W-(M^S-M^A)+i(\Gamma^S-\Gamma^A)/2},\\
359: f_{p,-}(W)&=\dfrac{-g^2\dfrac{(p^0-m_N)}{8\pi W}}{W-(M^S+M^A)+i(\Gamma^S+\Gamma^A)/2} =
360: \dfrac{-(\Gamma^A+\Gamma^S)/\abs{\vect{p}}}{W-(M^S+M^A)+i(\Gamma^S+\Gamma^A)/2}.
361: \end{split}
362: \end{equation}
363: One can convince yourself that the partial amplitudes constructed
364: using dressed propagator satisfy the unitarity condition (last
365: expressions for partial waves demonstrate it explicitly)
366: \begin{equation*}
367: \Im f = \abs{\vect{p}} \abs{f}^{2}
368: \end{equation*}
369: and it leads to
370: \begin{equation}
371: \Gamma^A(W) > \Gamma^S(W) .
372: \end{equation}
373: So we can conclude that "quasi-bosonic" case $M^A=\Gamma^A=0$ in
374: the dressed propagator \eqref{BWF} is forbidden by unitarity
375: requirement.
376:
377: The obtained field theory resonance contribution \eqref{BWF}
378: contains another interesting case, which may be called as
379: "anti-bosonic": $M^S=\Gamma^S=0$. In this case both partial waves
380: should coincide
381: \begin{equation}\label{ABos}
382: f_{s,+}(W)=f_{p,-}(W)=-\dfrac{\Gamma^A/\abs{\vect{p}}}{W-M^A+i\Gamma^A/2}.
383: \end{equation}
384: This relation can not be true at all energies because these
385: partial waves have different orbital momentum and therefore should
386: have different threshold behaviour. But "anti-bosonic" case can be
387: realized as approximate equality in a resonance vicinity
388: \begin{equation*}
389: f_{s,+}(W)\approx f_{p,-}(W)\quad \text{at}\quad W\sim M .
390: \end{equation*}
391: So we have degenerate resonances of different parity (it resembles
392: the restoration of chiral symmetry) but this physical situation is
393: realized in unusual manner: with using one spinor field $\psi(x)$.
394: In this case both components of a dressed propagator have
395: resonance nature
396: \begin{equation}\label{ABos1}
397: G(p) \approx \Lambda^{+}\dfrac{1}{W-M+i\Gamma/2} - \Lambda^{-}\dfrac{1}{W-M+i\Gamma/2}\quad \text{at}\quad W\sim M .
398: \end{equation}
399:
400: \section{Conclusion}
401:
402: We investigated in detail the QFT improved Breit-Wigner formula for
403: fermions, obtained by means of the Dyson summation. The final
404: expression \eqref{BWF} for dressed propagator looks rather unexpected,
405: in particular, the resonance denominator differs from the well known
406: boson analog. This difference arises due to presence of antisymmetric in $W$
407: contributions in self-energy.
408:
409: One can use the dressed fermion propagator \eqref{BWF} for hadron
410: phenomenology and in this case, after calculation of self-energy and
411: renormalization, we have two parameters: mass and width. But if we want
412: to obtain from \eqref{BWF} some simple parametrization for $W \sim M$
413: region, we need at least four parameters, as it can be seen from
414: the amplitude \eqref{intf}.
415:
416: The essential technical ingredient of our consideration is the
417: using the off-shell projection operators. They simplify
418: essentially all calculations and clarify their physical meaning.
419: Recall that these projection operators were successfully used in
420: calculations of the $\Delta$-isobar propagator both in vacuum
421: \cite{KL,KL1} and media \cite{Kor}.
422:
423: We thank V.M.Leviant for reading the manuscript and useful
424: remarks. This work was supported in part by Russian Foundation of
425: Basic Research grant No 05-02-17722.
426:
427: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
428: \bibitem{BW}
429: G.Breit and E.P.Wigner.
430: \journal{Phys. Rev.} \vol{49} (1936) 519.
431:
432: \bibitem{Yao}
433: W.-M. Yao et al.
434: Review of Particle Physics \journal{J.Phys.} \vol{G33}
435: (2006) 1.
436:
437: \bibitem{Pas}
438: V.Pascalutsa and O.Sholten. \journal{Nucl. Phys.} \vol{A593}
439: (1995) 658.
440:
441: \bibitem{Lop}
442: G.Lopez Castro and A.Mariano. \journal{Nucl. Phys.} \vol{A697}
443: (2002) 440.
444:
445: \bibitem{Alv}
446: L.Alvarez-Ruso et al. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \vol{C70} (2004)
447: 015207.
448:
449: \bibitem{Ani}
450: A.V.Anisovich et al. \journal{Eur. Phys. J.} \vol{A24} (2005) 111.
451:
452: \bibitem{Hoh}
453: G.H\"{o}hler.
454: Pion-Nucleon Scattering, Landoldt-B\"{o}rnstein
455: Vol. \vol{I/9b2}, edited by H.Schopper, Springer Verlag, 1983.
456:
457: \bibitem{Cut}
458: R.E.Cutkosky et. al.
459: \journal{Phys. Rev.} \vol{D49} (1979) 2839.
460:
461: \bibitem{Arn04}
462: R.A.Arndt et. al.
463: \journal{Phys. Rev.} \vol{C69} (2004) 035213.
464:
465: \bibitem{Mar}
466: P. Maris and C. D. Roberts.
467: \journal{Int. J. Mod. Phys.} \vol{E12} (2003) 297.
468:
469: \bibitem{Sir}
470: A. Sirlin.
471: \journal{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \vol{67} (1991) 2127.
472:
473: \bibitem{Pass}
474: M.Passera and A. Sirlin.
475: \journal{Phys. Rev.} \vol{D58} (1998) 113010.
476:
477: \bibitem{KL}
478: A.E. Kaloshin and V.P. Lomov.
479: \journal{Mod.Phys.Lett.} \vol{A19} (2004) 135.
480:
481: \bibitem{KL1}
482: A.E. Kaloshin and V.P. Lomov.
483: \journal{Yad. Fiz.} \vol{69} (2006) 563.
484:
485: \bibitem{Nie}
486: P. van Nieuwenhuizen.
487: \journal{Phys. Rep.} \vol{68} (1981) 189.
488:
489: \bibitem{Gaz}
490: S.Gasiorovicz. Elementary particle physics. John Wiley\&Sons Inc.,
491: New York-London-Sydney, 1966.
492:
493: \bibitem{Kor}
494: C.L. Korpa and A.E.L. Dieperink.
495: \journal{Phys. Rev.} \vol{C70} (2004) 015207.
496: \end{thebibliography}
497:
498: \newpage
499:
500: \begin{figure}
501: \centering
502: \includegraphics*[width=8cm]{fig11}
503: \includegraphics*[width=8cm]{fig12}
504: \caption{\label{fig1}Running mass and width and their components for resonance of
505: positive parity.}
506: \end{figure}
507:
508: \begin{figure}
509: \centering
510: \includegraphics*[width=8cm]{fig21}
511: \includegraphics*[width=8cm]{fig22}
512: \caption{\label{fig2}Running mass and width and their components for resonance of
513: negative parity.}
514: \end{figure}
515:
516: \end{document}
517:
518:
519:
520:
521: \bibitem{Nag}
522: M.M.Nagels et al. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \vol{C70} (2004) 015207.
523: