1: \documentclass[aps,twocolumn,amssymb,amsmath,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

2: %\documentclass[aps,amssymb,amsmath,nofootinbib,preprint]{revtex4}

3: %\voffset=2cm

4: 

5: \usepackage{bbm}

6: \usepackage{graphicx}

7: \usepackage{subfigure}

8: 

9: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}

10: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}

11: \newcommand{\nn}{~\nonumber\\}

12: \newcommand{\sfr}[2]{{\textstyle\frac{#1}{#2}}}

13: 

14: \usepackage{color}

15: 

16: \newcommand{\intron}[1]{}

17: 

18: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}

19: 

20: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

21: 

22: \begin{document}

23: 

24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

25: 

26: \title{Walking in the SU(N)}

27: 

28: \author{Dennis D.~Dietrich}

29: 

30: \affiliation{Institute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University,

31: Heidelberg, Germany}

32: \affiliation{The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark}

33: 

34: \author{Francesco Sannino}

35: 

36: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Chemistry,

37: University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark}

38: \affiliation{The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark}

39: 

40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

41: 

42: \begin{abstract}

43: 

44: We study the phase diagram as function of the number of colours and

45: flavours of asymptotically free non-supersymmetric theories with matter in

46: higher dimensional representations of arbitrary SU($N$) gauge groups. Since

47: matter in higher dimensional representations screens more than in the

48: fundamental a general feature is that a lower number of flavours is needed

49: to achieve a near-conformal theory. We study the spectrum of the theories

50: near the fixed point and consider possible applications of our analysis to

51: the dynamical breaking of the electroweak symmetry.

52: 

53: \end{abstract}

54: 

55: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

56: 

57: \maketitle

58: 

59: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

60: 

61: \section{Introduction}

62: 

63: In this article we portray the phase diagram, as a function of the number of

64: colours and the number of flavours, of non-supersymmetric gauge field theories 

65: with matter in higher dimensional representations of SU($N$) gauge groups. 

66: Strongly interacting non-Abelian theories generally feature a coupling 

67: constant which varies with the energy scale; it {\it runs}. This is caused by 

68: the antiscreening due to the charged gauge bosons (gluons). This 

69: antiscreening is competing with the screening contribution from matter fields. 

70: There is another feature of strongly interacting theories which comes into 

71: play in this context, that is chiral symmetry breaking. This formation of a 

72: $\langle\bar{\psi}\psi\rangle$ condensate below the chiral symmetry breaking 

73: scale renders the fermions massive and results in their decoupling from the

74: dynamics. In that case the antiscreening of the gluons becomes more

75: important again. With sufficient matter content an infrared fixed point of the

76: coupling constant can be reached, before chiral symmetry breaking is

77: triggered, that is there exists a conformal phase. For a number of flavours

78: slightly below the value for which the conformal phase is present, the

79: coupling constant is evolving slowly. It stays almost constant over a range

80: of energy scales. One says it {\it walks} instead of {\it runs}. These

81: features will be discussed in more detail below. 

82: 

83: We are particularly interested in these walking theories: It is possible

84: that, besides Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), new strongly interacting

85: theories will emerge when exploring the unknown territory beyond the

86: Standard Model (SM) of particle interactions. For example, to avoid

87: unnaturally large quantum corrections to the mass scale of the electroweak

88: theory arising in the Higgs sector of the SM one can replace the elementary

89: Higgs by a strongly coupled sector. This approach has been named

90: technicolour \cite{TC}. The generation of the masses of the standard model fermions

91: requires extended technicolour interactions, which are consistent with

92: the observed amount of flavour-changing neutral currents and lepton number

93: violation for technicolour theories possessing a sufficient amount of 

94: walking

95: \cite{Holdom:1981rm,Yamawaki:1985zg,Appelquist:an,MY,Lane:1989ej}. 

96: The simplest of such models which also passes the electroweak

97: precision tests (like, for example the experimental bounds on the oblique

98: parameters) requires fermions in higher dimensional representations

99: of the technicolour gauge group

100: \cite{Sannino:2004qp,Hong:2004td,Dietrich:2005jn,Dietrich:2005wk}. Matter in

101: a higher dimensional representation screens more strongly than matter in the

102: fundamental representation, whence a smaller number of flavours is required

103: in order to achieve a given amount of screening. In the

104: recent past we have studied the gauge dynamics of fermions transforming

105: according to the two-index representations of SU($N$). Here we extend the

106: analysis to a generic asymptotically free gauge theory with fermions in

107: various higher dimensional representations of the SU($N$) group.

108: Some general structures are unveiled. 

109: 

110: After a general and fairly complete analysis (Sect. II) we explore the

111: various ways these theories can be used to break the electroweak symmetry

112: (Sect. III). Among other things we compute the left-right vector correlator 

113: in perturbation theory. Thanks to the results found in

114: \cite{Appelquist:1998xf,Appelquist:1999dq,Duan:2000dy} and corroborated

115: more recently by AdS/QCD-based computations \cite{Hong:2006si} we know that

116: near the conformal window the perturbative value of the oblique parameter $S$ 

117: provides a conservative estimate, that is an upper bound.

118: Finally, using the four-dimensional renormalisation group approach

119: we explore the spectrum near the fixed point (Sect. IV). In Sect.~V, we

120: summarise the results.

121: 

122: 

123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

124: 

125: \section{Phase diagram}

126: 

127: \subsection{Review of the basic tools}

128: 

129: We start our journey by reviewing the two-loop $\beta$ function for a

130: generic non-Abelian gauge theory with fermionic matter in a given 

131: representation R of SU($N$)\cite{Caswell:1974gg}\footnote{Notice the

132: different normalisation as compared to, for example

133: \cite{Sannino:2004qp}. Conveniently, below, the quadratic Casimir operator

134: will only assume integer values. Nevertheless, many of the subsequent

135: expressions turn out to be identical due to the ratios that are taken.}:

136: %

137: \be

138: \beta(g)

139: &=&

140: -

141: \beta_0\sfr{g^3}{(4\pi)^2}

142: -

143: \beta_1\sfr{g^5}{(4\pi)^4},\\

144: 2N\beta_0

145: &=&

146: \sfr{11}{3}C_2(\mathrm{G})-\sfr{4}{3}T(\mathrm{R}),

147: \label{beta0}

148: ~\\

149: (2N)^2\beta_1

150: &=&

151: \sfr{34}{3}{C_2}^2(\mathrm{G})

152: -

153: \sfr{20}{3}C_2(\mathrm{G})T(\mathrm{R})-4C_2(\mathrm{R})T(\mathrm{R}).

154: \nn

155: \label{beta1}

156: \ee

157: %

158: $C_2(\mathrm{R})$ stands for the quadratic Casimir operator of the

159: representation R,

160: %

161: \be

162: 2NX^a_\mathrm{R}X^a_\mathrm{R}=C_2(\mathrm{R})\mathbbm{1},

163: \ee

164: %

165: where $X^a_\mathrm{R}$ are the generators in the representation R. $C_2(\mathrm{G})$ is the quadratic Casimir

166: operator of the adjoint representation. $T(\mathrm{R})$ is the trace normalisation factor for the representation

167: R. $T(\mathrm{R})$ is connected to the quadratic Casimir operator, $C_2(\mathrm{R})$, by \cite{Jones:1981we}

168: %

169: \be

170: N_fC_2(\mathrm{R})d(\mathrm{R})=T(\mathrm{R})d(\mathrm{G}),

171: \label{tr}

172: \ee

173: %

174: where $d(\mathrm{R})$ denotes the dimension of the representation, R, and,

175: accordingly, $d(\mathrm{G})$ the dimension of the adjoint representation G

176: that is the number of generators. $N_f$ stands for the number of flavours.

177: 

178: A theory's loss of asymptotic freedom shows itself in a change of sign of the first coefficient, $\beta_0$, of

179: the $\beta$ function. Hence, the number of flavours, $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}]$, above which the loss occurs

180: satisfies \mbox{$\beta_0[N_f^\mathrm{I}(\mathrm{R})]\overset{!}{=}0$}. Therefore, from Eqs.~(\ref{beta0}) and

181: (\ref{tr}) we obtain

182: %

183: \be

184: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}]

185: :=

186: \frac{11}{4}\frac{d(\mathrm{G})C_2(\mathrm{G})}{d(\mathrm{R})C_2(\mathrm{R})},

187: \label{nfone}

188: \ee

189: %

190: which is thus proportional to the ratio of the second order indices,

191: $d(\mathrm{R})C_2(\mathrm{R})$, of the adjoint representation G

192: and the representation R, respectively. For matter in the adjoint

193: representation, $R=G$, the number of flavours above which asymptotic freedom

194: is lost is independent of the number of colours and equal to $\frac{11}{4}$.

195: 

196: Already for a smaller number of flavours than the one at which asymptotic

197: freedom is lost, the theory develops a Banks--Zaks infrared fixed point

198: \cite{Banks:1981nn}. It appears as soon as the second coefficient of the

199: $\beta$ function, $\beta_1$, changes sign, that is at

200: $\beta_1[N_f^\mathrm{III}(\mathrm{R})]\overset{!}{=}0$. Eqs.~(\ref{beta1}) and

201: (\ref{tr}) then lead to

202: %

203: \be

204: N_f^\mathrm{III}[\mathrm{R}]

205: =

206: \frac{d(\mathrm{G})C_2(\mathrm{G})}{d(\mathrm{R})C_2(\mathrm{R})}

207: \frac{17C_2(\mathrm{G})}{10C_2(\mathrm{G})+6C_2(\mathrm{R})}.

208: \label{bzfp}

209: \ee

210: This fixed point will not come into play if, before it is reached, the

211: coupling constant $\alpha$ becomes so large that chiral symmetry breaking

212: is triggered.

213: 

214: In this context, in order to determine the number of flavours

215: $N_f^\mathrm{II}[\mathrm{R}]$ above which the theory becomes conformal, we

216: employ the criterion derived in \cite{Appelquist:1988yc,Cohen:1988sq} and

217: follow the discussion in \cite{Sannino:2004qp}: Whether chiral symmetry can

218: be broken depends on the relative order (with respect to the energy scale)

219: of the values of the coupling constant at which a conformal fixed point is

220: encountered, $\alpha_*$, and where chiral symmetry breaks, $\alpha_c$. When

221: following the renormalisation group flow from higher to lower energies the

222: coupling $\alpha$ keeps growing as long as the $\beta$ function remains

223: finite and negative. If the value $\alpha_c$ is reached, the fermions

224: decouple, their screening effect is lost, and only the antiscreening of the

225: gauge bosons remains. In that case the conformal fixed point cannot be

226: reached. If, on the other hand, $\alpha_*$ is met before chiral symmetry is

227: broken, the coupling freezes (because the $\beta$ function becomes zero).

228: Now, in turn, the value $\alpha_c$ of the coupling required for chiral

229: symmetry breaking cannot be attained.

230: 

231: In \cite{Appelquist:1988yc,Cohen:1988sq}, the critical value $\alpha_c$ of

232: the coupling constant for which chiral symmetry breaking occurs is defined

233: as the value for which the anomalous dimension of the quark mass operator

234: becomes unity, $\gamma\overset{!}{=}1$. According to

235: \cite{Appelquist:1988yc}, in ladder approximation the critical value of the

236: coupling is given by \footnote{We investigate here whether chiral symmetry

237: breaking occurs in a {\it walking} theory. Thus, corrections to the ladder

238: approximation like vertex corrections, which take into account the change of

239: the coupling constant, are small. Alternative methods for calculating the

240: conformal window have been provided, e.g. in

241: \cite{Banks:1981nn,MY,Appelquist:1996dq,Braun:2006jd}.}

242: %

243: \be

244: \alpha_c=\frac{2\pi N}{3C_2(\mathrm{R})}.

245: \ee

246: %

247: Compared to that, the two-loop fixed point value of the coupling constant

248: reads \cite{Sannino:2004qp}

249: %

250: \be

251: \frac{\alpha^*}{4\pi}=-\frac{\beta_0}{\beta_1}.

252: \ee

253: %

254: For a fixed number of colours the critical number of flavours for which the

255: order of $\alpha_*$ and $\alpha_c$ changes is defined by imposing 

256: $\alpha_*\overset{!}{=}\alpha_c$, and is given by

257: %

258: \be

259: N_f^\mathrm{II}[\mathrm{R}]

260: &=&

261: \frac{d(\mathrm{G})C_2(\mathrm{G})}{d(\mathrm{R})C_2(\mathrm{R})}

262: \frac{17C_2(\mathrm{G})+66C_2(\mathrm{R})}{10C_2(\mathrm{G})+30C_2(\mathrm{R})}.

263: \label{ncrit}

264: \ee

265: In order to evaluate the above expressions and throughout the article we use

266: the Dynkin indices (the Dynkin labels of the highest weight of an

267: irreducible representation) to uniquely characterise the representations and

268: determine the relevant coefficients. We summarise, for the reader's

269: convenience, the relevant formulae in the appendix \ref{eleven}.

270: 

271: 

272: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

273: 

274: \subsection{Classification of asymptotically free theories}

275: 

276: As we increase the dimension of the representation of the matter fields the

277: screening effect of the matter compensates more and more the anti-screening

278: effect of the gauge bosons. Eventually one loses asymptotic freedom. Here we

279: will render quantitative this fact by constructing all of the theories which

280: are asymptotically free with at least two Dirac flavours.

281: 

282: For two flavours the fundamental, adjoint, as well as two-index symmetric and 

283: antisymmetric representations remain asymptotically free for any number of 

284: colours. We will show below that there are no exceptions from this rule for 

285: more than nine colours. Apart from theories based on these representations 

286: the only remaining variants are the three-index antisymmetric representation 

287: which is asymptotically free with two flavours for six to nine 

288: colours\footnote{For a number of colours less than six the three-index 

289: antisymmetric always coincides with another representation with a smaller 

290: number of indices.} and the four-index antisymmetric with two flavours for 

291: eight colours. For $N\le 9$ all such theories are listed in Table \ref{nine}.

292: 

293: %============================================================================

294: \begin{table}[ht]

295: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c}

296: R&$\bar{\mathrm{R}}$&$N_f^\mathrm{I}$&$N_f^\mathrm{II}$&$N_f^\mathrm{III}$

297: &$\pi S$&$\lambda_*$\\

298: \hline

299: (1)&$\equiv$&11&$7\frac{73}{85}$&$5\frac{27}{49}$&1&3.229\\

300: (2)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$&$\frac{1}{2}$

301: &1,124.\\

302: \hline (10)&(01)&$16\frac{1}{2}$&$11\frac{32}{35}$&$8\frac{1}{19}$&$2\frac{1}{2}$

303: &10.33\\

304: (20)&(02)&$3\frac{3}{10}$&$2\frac{163}{325}$&$1\frac{28}{125}$&1&11.29\\

305: (11)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$&$1\frac{1}{3}$

306: &1,124.\\

307: \hline

308: (100)&(001)&22&$15\frac{361}{385}$&$10\frac{126}{205}$&$4\frac{2}{3}$&20.70\\

309: (200)&(002)&$3\frac{2}{3}$&$2\frac{82}{105}$&$1\frac{71}{201}$&$1\frac{2}{3}$

310: &5.865\\

311: (010)&$\equiv$&11&$8\frac{12}{115}$&$4\frac{52}{55}$&4&127,359.\\

312: (101)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$&$2\frac{1}{2}$

313: &1,124.\\

314: \hline (1000)&(0001)&$27\frac{1}{2}$&$19\frac{58}{61}$&$13\frac{32}{161}$

315: &$7\frac{1}{2}$&35.90\\

316: (2000)&(0002)&$3\frac{13}{14}$&$2\frac{747}{763}$&$1\frac{662}{1463}$

317: &$2\frac{1}{2}$&4.284\\

318: (0100)&(0010)&$9\frac{1}{6}$&$6\frac{191}{237}$&$3\frac{514}{537}$&5

319: &29.00\\

320: (1001)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$&4&1,124.\\

321: \hline

322: (10000)&(00001)&33&$23\frac{283}{295}$&$15\frac{123}{155}$&11&57.57\\

323: (20000)&(00002)&$4\frac{1}{8}$&$3\frac{33}{260}$&$1\frac{53}{100}$

324: &$3\frac{1}{2}$&2.519\\

325: (01000)&(00010)&$8\frac{1}{4}$&$6\frac{3}{20}$&$3\frac{21}{44}$&$7\frac{1}{2}$

326: &5,146.\\

327: (00100)&$\equiv$&$5\frac{1}{2}$&$4\frac{18}{145}$&$2\frac{14}{61}$ &$6\frac{2}{3}$&2,198.\\

328: (10001)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$&$5\frac{5}{6}$

329: &1,124.\\

330: \hline (100000)&(000001)&$38\frac{1}{2}$&$27\frac{584}{605}$&$18\frac{125}{317}$

331: &$30\frac{1}{3}$&87.67\\

332: (200000)&(000002)&$\frac{77}{18}$&$3\frac{2294}{9495}$&$1\frac{2168}{3663}$

333: &$4\frac{2}{3}$&3.061\\

334: (010000)&(000010)&$7\frac{7}{10}$&$5\frac{3186}{4225}$&$3\frac{356}{1825}$

335: &7&4.050\\

336: (001000)&(000100)&$3\frac{17}{20}$&$2\frac{8707}{9650}$&$1\frac{1941}{3890} $&$5\frac{5}{6}$

337: &4.421\\

338: (100001)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$&8&1,124.\\

339: \hline (1000000)&(0000001)&44&$31\frac{1537}{1585}$&$20\frac{828}{829}$&40

340: &128.6\\

341: (2000000)&(0000002)&$4\frac{2}{5}$&$3\frac{1141}{3425}$&$1\frac{851}{1325}$

342: &6&2.752\\

343: (0100000)&(0000010)&$7\frac{1}{3}$&$5\frac{829}{1695}$&$3\frac{7}{723}$

344: &$9\frac{1}{3}$&5.329\\

345: (0010000)&(0000100)&$2\frac{14}{15}$&$2\frac{8738}{39975}

346: %%\frac{7838}{40425}

347: $&$1\frac{1733}{15675}$&$9\frac{1}{3}$

348: &52.90\\

349: (1000001)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$

350: &$10\frac{1}{2}$&1,124.\\

351: %(0001000)&$\equiv$&$2\frac{1}{5}$&$1\frac{117}{175}$&$\frac{272}{335}$&n.a.&2.804\\

352: \hline (10000000)&(00000001)&$49\frac{1}{2}$&$35\frac{326}{335}$&$23\frac{106}{157}$

353: &51&183.4\\

354: (20000000)&(00000002)&$4\frac{1}{2}$&$3\frac{516}{1265}$&$1\frac{1678}{2453}$

355: &$7\frac{1}{2}$&2.526\\

356: (01000000)&(00000010)&$7\frac{1}{14}$&$5\frac{1016}{3395}$

357: &$2\frac{1261}{1435}$&12&6.669\\

358: (10000001)&(10000001)&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$

359: &$13\frac{1}{3}$&1,124.\\

360: %(00100000)&(00000100)&$2\frac{5}{14}$&$1\frac{358}{455}

361: %%\frac{3187}{4130}

362: %$&$\frac{153}{175}$&n.a.&2.179\\

363: %(00010000)&(00001000)&$1\frac{29}{70}$&$1\frac{1706}{22225}$&$\frac{4131}{8225}$&n.a.&129.89\\

364: \end{tabular}

365: \caption{Complete list of asymptotically free SU($N$) theories with at least 

366: one family of fermions and up to nine colours. $\lambda_*$

367: [Eq.~(\ref{walking})] and $\pi S$ [Eq.~(\ref{S})] are calculated for 

368: $N_f<N_f^{II}$ and even.\label{nine}}

369: \end{table}

370: %===========================================================================

371: 

372: %========================================================================

373: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{2}

374: \begin{table*}[ht]

375: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c}

376: &$d(\mathrm{R})$&$C_2(\mathrm{R})$&$N^\mathrm{I}_f$&$N^\mathrm{II}_f$

377: &$N^\mathrm{III}_f$\\

378: \hline

379: {\bf F}&\tiny$N$&\tiny$N^2-1$&$\frac{11}{2}N$

380: &$\frac{2}{5}N\frac{50N^2-33}{5N^2-3}$

381: &$\frac{34N^3}{13N^2-3}$\\

382: %

383: {\bf G}&\tiny$N^2-1$&\tiny$2N^2$&$2\frac{3}{4}$&$2\frac{3}{40}$&$1\frac{1}{16}$\\

384: %

385: S$_n$&$\frac{(N+n-1)!}{n!(N-1)!}$

386: &\tiny$n(N-1)(N+n)$&$\frac{11N(n-1)!(N+1)!}{2(n+N)!}$

387: &$\frac{2N(33n^2(N-1)+33nN(N-1)+17N^2)n!(N+1)!}

388:        {5n[3n^2(N-1)+3nN(N-1)+2N^2](n+N)!}$

389: &$\frac{34N^3(n-1)!(N+1)!(n+N)!^{-1}}

390:        {3n^2(N-1)+3nN(N-1)+10N^2}$\\

391: %

392: {\bf S}$_2$&$\frac{N(N+1)}{2}$&\tiny$2(N-1)(N+2)$

393: &$\frac{11}{2}\frac{N}{N+2}$

394: &$\frac{N}{N+2}\frac{83N^2+66N-132}{20N^2+15N-30}$

395: &$\frac{17N^3}{(N+2)(8N^2+3N-6)}$\\

396: %

397: S$_3$&$\frac{N(N+1)(N+2)}{6}$&\tiny$3(N-1)(N+3)$&$\frac{11N}{(N+2)(N+3)}$

398: &$\frac{4N(-297+2N(99+58N))(N+1)!}{5(-27+N(18+11N))(N+3)!}$

399: &$\frac{68N^3(N+1)!}{(-27+N(18+19N))(N+3)!}$\\

400: %

401: A$_n$&$\frac{N!}{n!(N-n)!}$&\tiny$n(N-n)(N+1)$

402: &$\frac{11}{2}{\scriptstyle N}\binom{N-2}{n-1}^{-1}$

403: &$\binom{N-2}{n-1}^{-1}

404: \frac{(34+66n)N^3-66n(n-1)N^2-66n^2N}{(10+15n)N^2-15n(n-1)N-15n^2}$

405: &$\binom{N-2}{n-1}^{-1} \frac{34N^3}{10N^2 - 3n^2(N+1)+3nN(N+1)}$\\

406: %

407: {\bf A}$_2$&$\frac{N(N-1)}{2}$&\tiny$2(N-2)(N+1)$&$\frac{11}{2}\frac{N}{N-2}$

408: &$\frac{N}{N-2}\frac{83N^2-66N-132}{20N^2-15N-30}$

409: &$\frac{17N^3}{(N-2)(8N^2-3N-6)}$\\

410: %

411: A$_3$&$\frac{N(N-1)(N-2)}{6}$&\tiny$3(N-3)(N+1)$&$\frac{11N}{(N-2)(N-3)}$

412: &$\frac{4N}{(N-2)(N-3)}\frac{116N^2-198N-297}{55N^2-90N-105}$

413: &$n=3$ in A$_n$ above\\

414: %

415: A$_4$&$\frac{N(N-1)(N-2)(N-3)}{24}$&\tiny$4(N-4)(N+1)$

416: &$\frac{33N}{(N-2)(N-3)(N-4)}$

417: &$\frac{6N}{(N-2)(N-3)(N-4)}\frac{149N^2-396N-528}{35N^2-90N-120}$

418: &$n=4$ in A$_n$ above\\

419: %

420: R$_1$&$\frac{(N-1)N^2(N+1)}{12}$&\tiny$4(N^2-4)$&$\frac{33}{2(N^2-4)}$

421: &$\frac{3(149N^2 - 528)}{5(7N^4 - 52N^2 +96)} $

422: &$\frac{51N^2}{11N^4-68N^2 + 96}$\\

423: %

424: R$_2$&$\frac{(N-1)N(N+1)}{3}$&\tiny$3(N^2-3)$&$\frac{11N}{2(N^2-3)}$

425: &$\frac{2N(-297+116N^2)}{5(81-60N^2+11N^4)}$&$\frac{34N^3}{81-84N^2+19N^4}$

426: \\

427: %

428: R$_3$&$\frac{(N+1)N(N-2)}{2}$&\tiny$(3N+1)(N-1)$

429: &$\frac{11N}{(3N+1)(N-2)}$&

430: $\frac{4N(-33-66N+116N^2)}{5(6+27N-N^2-73N^3+33N^4)}$&

431: $\frac{68N^3}{6+27N-17N^2-113N^3+57N^4} $\\

432: %

433: R$_4$&$\frac{(N+1)N^2(N-3)}{4}$&\tiny$4N(N-1)$&$\frac{11}{2N(N-3)}$&

434: $\frac{149N-132}{5N(N-3)(7N-6)}$&

435: $\frac{17}{18-39N+11N^2}$

436: \end{tabular}

437: \caption{

438: Characteristic quantities sorted after representations:

439: F=fundamental, G=adjoint, S$_n$=$n$-index symmetric, A$_n$=$n$-index

440: antisymmetric, R$_1$=(020\dots0), R$_2$=(110\dots0), R$_3$=(10\dots010),

441: R$_4$=(010\dots010). Representations marked in boldface lead to theories

442: that stay asymptotically free with at least two flavours for any number of

443: colours.

444: }

445: \label{table:reps}

446: \end{table*}

447: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}

448: %=======================================================================

449: 

450: That at a large number of colours only the fundamental, adjoint, two-index

451: symmetric, and two-index antisymmetric representations survive is due to the

452: fact that they are the only ones whose dimension grows quadratically or

453: more slowly with the number of colours. It can thus be compensated by the

454: quadratic growth of the dimension of the adjoint representation in the

455: expressions for $N_f^\mathrm{I}$. For any given representation the quadratic

456: Casimir operators grow quadratically with (large) $N$ and their ratio for

457: different representations goes to a constant.

458: 

459: 

460: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

461: 

462: \subsubsection{Only four remaining representations for $N>9$}

463: 

464: In this subsection we prove that\\

465: 

466: {\it There exist no asymptotically free

467: theories with at least two flavours and ten or more colours which are not

468: contained in the fundamental, adjoint, or the two-index

469: representations.}\\

470: 

471: \noindent

472: The utilised methods are general and can be applied to different numbers of

473: Dirac flavours. We will consider also the case of one flavour. We start by

474: analysing the ordering of $N_f^\mathrm{I}(\mathrm{R})$ at fixed $N$ for

475: different representations, R.

476: 

477: 

478: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------

479: 

480: \subsubsection*{Ordering $N_f^\mathrm{I}(\mathrm{R})$ at fixed $N$}

481: 

482: As all coefficients in Eqs.~(\ref{C}) and (\ref{d}) are

483: positive, we have, at a fixed number of colours, $N$ (that is with a fixed

484: number of Dynkin indices),

485: %

486: \be

487: a_j\ge b_j~\forall~j\in\{1;\dots;N\}

488: &\Rightarrow&

489: C_2(\{a_j\})\ge C_2(\{b_j\})

490: \nn

491: &\mathrm{and}&

492: d(\{a_j\})\ge d(\{b_j\}).

493: \nn

494: \ee

495: %

496: Using Eq.~(\ref{nfone}) we find

497: %

498: \be

499: a_j\ge b_j~\forall~j\in\{1;\dots;N\}

500: &\Rightarrow&

501: N_f^\mathrm{I}(\{a_j\})\le N_f^\mathrm{I}(\{b_j\}).

502: \nn

503: \ee

504: %

505: By increasing the value of any of the Dynkin indices the critical number of

506: flavours decreases. The next step is to determine a complete set of theories 

507: with $N_f^\mathrm{I}(R)$ just below two. They are to serve as universal

508: bounds on $N_f^\mathrm{I}(R)$ for all theories.

509: 

510: 

511: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

512: 

513: \subsubsection*{$n\ge 3$-index antisymmetric representations}

514: 

515: Let us start from the $n\ge 3$-index antisymmetric representations,

516: $\mathrm{A}_n(N)$.  We notice from the corresponding expression for

517: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_n(N)]$ in

518: Table \ref{table:reps} that for $N\ge 2n$, \footnote{We are in the

519: right-hand flank of Pascal's triangle. For $N<2n$ the $n$-index

520: antisymmetric representation is covered by an $(n^\prime<n)$-index

521: antisymmetric representation due to the symmetry of the result under

522: conjugation, that is inversion of the order of the Dynkin indices. For

523: example (0010), which is A$_3$, is, in this sense, equivalent to

524: $\overline{(0010)}=(0100)$ which is A$_2$.}

525: %

526: \be

527: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_n(N)]

528: >

529: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_n(N+1)]

530: \ee

531: %

532: and

533: %

534: \be

535: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_{n-1}(N)]

536: >

537: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_n(N)].

538: \ee

539: %

540: We deduce that $N_f^\mathrm{I}$ shrinks if the number of colours, $N$, or

541: the number of indices is increased as long as \mbox{$N\ge 2n$}.

542: 

543: Therefore, given a reference value $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_{n_0}(N_0)]$,

544: %

545: \be

546: (n>n_0~\mathrm{or}~N>N_0)

547: \Rightarrow

548: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_{n}(N)]

549: <

550: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_{n_0}({N_0})].

551: \nn

552: \ee

553: 

554: Picking as reference value $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_3({10})]=1\frac{27}{28}$,

555: we know that

556: %

557: \be

558: N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_n({N})]\le 1\sfr{27}{28}~~\forall~~n\ge 3,~N\ge 10.

559: \ee

560: For a given number of colours, $N$, starting from all antisymmetric

561: representations from A$_3(N)$ to A$_{N-3}(N)$, we can reach other

562: representations by {\it increasing} the values of the Dynkin indices.

563: The Dynkin representation of an $n$-index antisymmetric representation reads

564: \mbox{$(0\dots0\underset{n}{1}0\dots0)$}.

565: Therefore, the only representations that cannot be reached in this way are

566: \mbox{$(a_1a_20\dots0a_{N-2}a_{N-1})$} $\forall~a_1,a_2,a_{N-2},a_{N-1}$.

567: In combination with the findings of the previous subsection this leads to the

568: conclusion that only these latter representations may, but need not, have

569: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_n(N)]>1\sfr{27}{28}$.

570: 

571: 

572: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

573: 

574: \subsubsection*{S$_3$ and (020\dots000)}

575: 

576: As can be seen from Table \ref{nine} we cannot obtain an equally low boundary

577: from the fundamental, (100\dots000), and the two-index antisymmetric

578: representation, (010\dots000). The same holds for the two-index symmetric

579: representation, (200\dots000). Hence, we continue with the three-index

580: symmetric representation, S$_3(N)$=(300\dots000), and the representation

581: R$_1(N)$:=(020\dots000). $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{S}_3(N)]$ and

582: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_1(N)]$ are monotonically decreasing functions of the

583: number of colours. This can be seen from the explicit expressions in

584: Table \ref{table:reps}.

585: As reference values, we can pick

586: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{S}_3(3)]=1\sfr{1}{10}$

587: and $N_f^\mathrm{I}[R_1(4)]=1\sfr{3}{8}$, which are both smaller than the

588: previous reference value

589: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_3({10})]=1\frac{27}{28}$ and are situated at a

590: smaller number of colours as well.

591: The representations of the set

592: \mbox{$\{(a_1a_20\dots0a_{N-2}a_{N-1})$}

593: $\forall~a_1,a_2,a_{N-2},a_{N-1}\in\mathbbm{N}\}$,

594: which cannot be obtained by increasing the Dynkin indices either of S$_3(N)$

595: or of R$_1(N)$ or of their conjugates are given by

596: \mbox{$(a_1a_20\dots0a_{N-2}a_{N-1})$}

597: $\forall$ (\mbox{$a_1,a_{N-1}\in\{0;1;2\}$} and

598: \mbox{$a_2,a_{N-2}\in\{0;1\}$}). This amounts to 36 combinations before

599: making use of symmetry properties under conjugation.

600: 

601: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

602: 

603: \subsubsection*{(110\dots000), (100\dots010), and (010\dots010)}

604: 

605: In the next step, we exploit information on the representations

606: R$_2(N)$=(110\dots000), R$_3(N)$=(100\dots010), and R$_4(N)$=(010\dots010) in order

607: to set limits for

608: most of the remaining representations. To this end, we repeat the same steps

609: as before. First we check that $N_f^\mathrm{I}$ for these representations is

610: a decreasing function of the number of colours. This can be seen directly

611: from the corresponding expressions in Table \ref{table:reps}.

612: Subsequently, we pick reference values for the three cases:

613: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_2(4)]=1\frac{9}{13}$,

614: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_3(4)]=1\frac{9}{13}$,

615: and

616: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_4(4)]=1\frac{3}{8}$, respectively. They are all

617: smaller than $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_3({10})]=1\frac{27}{28}$ and lie at a

618: smaller number of colours. The limits set by these reference values cannot be

619: exceeded for a larger number of colours in these representations. Finally,

620: we eliminate all representations from the remaining 36 that can be

621: generated by adding to the Dykin indices of R$_2$, R$_3$, or R$_4$. This

622: leaves but F, G, A$_2$, and S$_2$ as well as their conjugates

623: $\overline{\mathrm{F}}$, $\overline{\mathrm{A}_2}$, and

624: $\overline{\mathrm{S}_2}$ (G is a real representation), that is seven

625: representations of which four are independent.

626: 

627: Thereby we have shown that beyond ten colours no other representations lead

628: to asymptotically free theories with two flavours but the fundamental, the

629: adjoint, as well as the two-index symmetric and antisymmetric

630: representations. Below ten colours the only exceptions are given by the

631: three-index antisymmetric representation at six to nine colours and the

632: four-index antisymmetric at eight colours. This we

633: have checked by explicit calculation and again by making use of the fact that

634: $N_f^\mathrm{I}$ increases if any Dynkin index is increased.

635: 

636: As $N_f^\mathrm{I}>N_f^\mathrm{II}>N_f^\mathrm{III}$ the above findings are

637: handed down to the lower bound for the conformal window and the existence of

638: a Banks-Zaks fixed point.

639: 

640: 

641: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

642: 

643: \subsubsection{One flavour}

644: 

645: When the requirement is weakened to asymptotic freedom with one flavour,

646: all the above steps can be repeated after choosing new reference values:

647: %

648: %\be

649: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{A}_3({16})]=\frac{88}{91}$,

650: %\nn

651: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{S}_3(5)]=\frac{55}{56}$,

652: %\nn

653: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_1(5)]=\frac{11}{14}$,

654: %\nn

655: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_2(7)]=\frac{77}{92}$,

656: %\nn

657: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_3(6)]=\frac{33}{38}$,

658: %\nn

659: $N_f^\mathrm{I}[\mathrm{R}_4(5)]=\frac{11}{20}$.

660: %\ee

661: %

662: This means that for the one flavour limit, no exceptions are present from 16

663: colours onward.

664: 

665: 

666: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

667: 

668: \subsection{Conformal window}

669: 

670: Evaluating the expression (\ref{ncrit}) for the lower bound of the conformal

671: window for all theories, which are asymptotically free with at least two

672: flavours, leads to the values listed in the fourth column of Table

673: \ref{nine}. For the fundamental, adjoint and two-index symmetric as well as

674: antisymmetric representations there exist theories with at least two

675: flavours, which have not yet entered the conformal phase. This remains true

676: beyond nine colours. From the exceptions below ten colours, the

677: three-index antisymmetric representation at nine colours and the four-index

678: antisymmetric representations are already conformal with less than two

679: flavours.

680: 

681: The minimal number of flavours necessary for a Banks--Zaks fixed point to

682: appear as calculated from Eq.~(\ref{bzfp}) is listed in the fifth column of

683: Table \ref{nine}. For values beyond nine colours, the explicit expressions

684: in Table \ref{table:reps} can be evaluated. The present analysis exhausts

685: the phase diagram for gauge theories with Dirac fermions in arbitrary

686: representations as function of the number of colours and flavours.

687: 

688: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

689: \begin{figure}[h]

690: \resizebox{8.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{Phasediagram.eps}}

691: \caption{Phase diagram for theories with fermions in the (from top to bottom

692: in the plot; colour online): i) fundamental representation (grey), ii)

693: two-index antisymmetric (blue), iii) two-index symmetric (red), iv) adjoint

694: representation (green) as a function of the number of flavours and

695: the number of colours. The shaded areas depict the corresponding conformal

696: windows. The upper solid curve represents $N_f^\mathrm{I}[R(N)]$ (loss of

697: asymptotic freedom), the lower $N_f^\mathrm{II}[R(N)]$ (loss of chiral

698: symmetry breaking). The dashed curves show $N_f^\mathrm{III}[R(N)]$

699: (existence of a Banks--Zaks fixed point). Note how consistently the various

700: representations merge into each other when, for a specific value of $N$,

701: they are actually the same representation.}

702: \end{figure}

703: %--------------------------------------------------------------------

704: 

705: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

706: 

707: \section{Walking technicolour}

708: 

709: Here we will use our findings concerning asymptotically free theories with

710: at least one doublet of fermions to identify all physically acceptable 

711: technicolour models. In technicolour models the dynamical breaking of the 

712: electroweak symmetry from SU$_L$(2)$\times$U$_Y$(1) to U$_\mathrm{em}$(1) is 

713: not generated by an elementary Higgs particle like in the standard model, but 

714: by chiral symmetry breaking in an additional strongly interacting sector. It 

715: is made up of techniquarks transforming under the electroweak and an additional 

716: technicolour gauge group. The scale at which the chiral symmetry of the 

717: technicolour sector breaks is chosen to be the electroweak scale. Three of

718: the emergent Goldstone bosons are absorbed as longitudinal degrees of

719: freedom of the electroweak gauge bosons, which thus become massive. The

720: fermion masses are generated by embedding the electroweak and technicolour 

721: gauge groups in a larger extended technicolour gauge group. The gauge bosons 

722: of the extended technicolour model couple the fermions of the standard model 

723: to the techniquarks and their condensate, which renders the standard model

724: fermions massive.

725: 

726: Like all other mechanisms for electroweak symmetry breaking, technicolour has 

727: to face constraints derived from experimental data. In the case of 

728: technicolour the two main aspects are additional contributions to the

729: vacuum polarisation of the electroweak gauge bosons (oblique parameters) and 

730: flavour changing neutral currents as well as lepton number violation due to 

731: the extended technicolour dynamics. These issues have been discussed in great 

732: detail in the literature (see, for example \cite{Lane:2002wv,Hill:2002ap}). 

733: Experimental data (see, for example \cite{Eidelman:2004wy,unknown:2005em}) 

734: tells us that the above mentioned contributions must be small. Here, let us 

735: only recall that flavour changing neutral currents and lepton number violation 

736: are suppressed in walking technicolour theories, that is technicolour theories 

737: with nearly conformal dynamics. Through non-perturbative effects, 

738: quasi-conformality also helps reducing the techniquarks' contribution to the 

739: oblique parameters 

740: \cite{Sundrum:1991rf,Appelquist:1998xf,Appelquist:1999dq,Duan:2000dy,Hong:2006si}. 

741: (In the absence of quasi-conformal dynamics the $S$ parameter can be larger

742: than its perturbative value.)

743: On top of that, potential additional Goldstone bosons, beyond the three which 

744: are absorbed as the longitudinal degrees of freedom of the electroweak gauge 

745: bosons, become very heavy, thereby alleviating bounds set by them not having

746: been detected to date. Therefore, candidates for realistic technicolour 

747: theories should feature quasi-conformal dynamics and should contribute little 

748: to the oblique parameters already at the perturbative level. In what follows, 

749: we will quantify these criteria.

750: 

751: Already taking into account the experimental limits on the $S$-parameter

752: \cite{Peskin:1990zt} severely constrains the set of candidates.

753: Perturbatively, it is given by

754: %

755: \be

756: S=\frac{1}{6\pi}\frac{N_f}{2}d(\mathrm{R}).

757: \label{S}

758: \ee

759: %

760: The values for $S$ are given in Table \ref{nine}. Drawing the line at 

761: $S<\pi^{-1}$---somewhat arbitrarily but in accordance with the experimental 

762: limits \cite{Eidelman:2004wy,unknown:2005em}---leaves us with three 

763: candidates which, characterised by their Dynkin indices are: (1) with six 

764: flavours, (2) with two flavours, and (20) with two flavours. Doubling the 

765: value of the cut on the $S$ parameter ($S<2\pi^{-1}$) would admit two more: 

766: (11) with two flavours and (200) with two flavours.

767: 

768: The estimate for the lower bound (critical number of flavours) of the 

769: conformal window is based on the point where the critical coupling and the 

770: fixed point value coincide. This critical number of flavours is, in general,

771: not an even integer. A quasi-conformal physical realisation of a technicolour 

772: theory is, however, constructed from complete families of 

773: techniquarks.\footnote{Generalisations with an odd number of Dirac or even 

774: Weyl flavours are conceivable. A corresponding example is given in Sect. IIIC.}

775: 

776: %============================================================================

777: \begin{figure*}[ht]

778: \qquad

779: \subfigure[~Technicolour, fully gauged]{

780: \resizebox{7cm}{!}{\includegraphics{technicolours1.eps}}

781: }

782: \qquad

783: \subfigure[~Technicolour, partially gauged]{

784: \resizebox{7cm}{!}{\includegraphics{technicolours2.eps}}

785: }

786: \qquad

787: \caption{\underline{Technicolour models.} The boxes depict under which gauge

788: groups the different particles transform. The box headlined "SM" represents

789: all standard model particles (excluding an elementary Higgs). N and E stand

790: for a fourth family of leptons, which may or may not have to be included in

791: order to evade a topological Witten anomaly. They have to be included, if

792: the number of techniquark families transforming under the electroweak symmetry

793: times the number of colour degrees of freedom is an odd number.

794: {\it Left panel:} In fully gauged

795: technicolour models, all techniquarks transform under the electroweak symmetry.

796: {\it Right panel:} In partially gauged technicolour a part of the techniquarks are

797: electroweak singlets. It is conceivable that only one (maximal splitting) or

798: several (sub-maximal splitting) families of techniquarks carry electroweak

799: charges. The latter set-up may be an alternative cure from the Witten

800: anomaly not involving additional leptons.}

801: \end{figure*}

802: %===========================================================================

803: 

804: From the difference of the two scales, the amount of walking, that is the 

805: ratio of the scale can be estimated \cite{Hong:2004td,Appelquist:1998xf},

806: %

807: \be

808: \lambda_*\approx\exp(\pi/\sqrt{\alpha_*/\alpha_c-1}).

809: \label{walking}

810: \ee

811: %

812: $\lambda_*$ is the ratio of the scale from which onwards the coupling 

813: constant stays approximately constant divided by the scale for which it 

814: starts running again. For this walking mechanism to be effective it must 

815: typically cover several decades. Setting the cut at $\lambda_*>10^3$ leaves 

816: (2) with two flavours (see Table \ref{nine}). [If the weaker bound on the $S$ 

817: parameter is chosen also (11) with two flavours survives.] Weakening the 

818: requirement on the range of the walking to $\lambda_*>10^2$ leads to no 

819: supplementary candidates.

820: 

821: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

822: 

823: \subsubsection{Two flavours, SU(2), adjoint representation: (2)}

824: 

825: The technicolour theory with two techniquarks in the two-index 

826: symmetric/adjoint representation of SU(2), that is (2), has been studied in 

827: \cite{Dietrich:2005jn,Dietrich:2005wk,Gudnason:2006yj} 

828: and found to be in good agreement with experimental constraints. It has to 

829: contain an additional family of leptons in order to avoid the topological 

830: Witten anomaly\footnote{It does not allow for an odd number of families of 

831: fermions to transform under an SU(2) gauge group [here the SU$_L$(2) of the 

832: electroweak gauge group]. The one family of (2), however, corresponds to 

833: three \mbox{[dim(2)=3]} technicolour copies added to the previously even 

834: number of SM fermion 

835: families.}\cite{Witten:1982fp}. This model has a rich phenomenology owing to 

836: the SU(2$N_f$=4) flavour symmetry in the unbroken phase, which is enhanced 

837: because the matter transforms under the adjoint representation, which is real.

838: The breaking to SO(4) leads to nine Goldstone bosons, three of which become 

839: the longitudinal 

840: degrees of freedom of the electroweak gauge bosons. The remaining six are of 

841: technibaryonic nature and may be very massive due to the intense walking of 

842: the theory. They can contribute to dark matter as might one of the additional 

843: leptons. This always depends on the hypercharge assignment for the particles 

844: beyond the standard model, which here is not fixed totally by requiring the 

845: freedom from gauge anomalies. Since, in the present theory, the fermions

846: transform under the adjoint representation, their technicolour can be

847: neutralised directly by technigluons, which leads to potentially 

848: phenomenologically interesting states. They are expected to have a mass of

849: the order of the confining scale of the theory.

850: For more details on this particular candidate see

851: \cite{Gudnason:2006yj}.

852: 

853: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

854: 

855: \subsubsection{Two flavours, SU(3), adjoint representation: (11)}

856: 

857: The theory with two techniflavours in the adjoint representation of SU(3),

858: (11), features a similarly enhanced flavour symmetry, SU(2$N_f$=4), whose

859: breaking to SO(4) gives rise to a total of nine Goldstone bosons with the same

860: consequences as in the two-colour case. The theory does not have to contain 

861: additional leptons whence the hypercharge assignment is fixed such that the 

862: techniquarks carry half-integer electrical charges with opposite signs. All 

863: objects of

864: two and more techniquarks can be technicolour neutral and the technicolour

865: of even a single techniquark can be neutralised by technigluons. This is in

866: direct analogy to the two-technicolour case.

867: 

868: 

869: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

870: 

871: \subsection{Partially gauged technicolour\label{pgt}}

872: 

873: A small modification of the traditional technicolour approach, which neither

874: involves additional particle species nor more complicated gauge groups, 

875: allows constructing several other viable candidates. It consists in letting 

876: only one doublet of techniquarks transform non-trivially under the electroweak

877: symmetries with the rest being electroweak singlets, as already suggested in 

878: \cite{Dietrich:2005jn} and later used in \cite{Christensen:2005cb}.

879: %

880: Still, all techniquarks transform under the technicolour gauge group. Thereby, 

881: perturbatively, only one techniquark doublet contributes to the oblique 

882: parameter which is thus kept to a minimum for theories which need more

883: than one family of techniquarks to be quasi-conformal. It is the condensation 

884: of that first electroweakly charged family that breaks the electroweak 

885: symmetry. Additionally, the number of ungauged techniquarks, in general, need 

886: not be even. In certain cases, this allows to come closer to conformality

887: (see Sect III B 1).

888: There exist several more partially gauged candidates with $S<\pi^{-1}$ 

889: (see Table \ref{nine}): (1) with seven flavours [instead of six fully gauged

890: flavours], (10) with eleven flavours, (100) with 15 flavours, (010) 

891: with eight flavours, (1000) with 19 flavours, and (10000) with 23 flavours.

892: Of these last-mentioned theories with techniquarks in the

893: fundamental representation, (10\dots0), only those with four or more colours

894: walk over more than two decades. Three decades could be reached from seven 

895: technicolours and 27 techniflavours onwards, which leads to a perturbative

896: contribution to the $S$ parameter of $\pi S\approx 1.2$ from the two

897: electroweakly gauged technifermions.

898: Therefore, the parametrically admissible models in the fundamental

899: representation are rather non-minimalist.

900: 

901: The theory with eight techniquarks in the two-index

902: antisymmetric representation of SU(4), (010), on the other hand, according to

903: Eq.~(\ref{walking}) walks over more than five decades. 

904: 

905: The techniquarks which are uncharged under the electroweak gauge group are

906: natural building blocks for components of dark matter.

907: 

908: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

909: 

910: \subsubsection*{Eight flavours, SU(4), two-index antisymmetric

911: representation: (010)}

912: 

913: Among the partially gauged cases the prime candidate is the theory with eight techniflavours

914: in the two-index antisymmetric representation of SU(4). The techniquarks of 

915: one of the four families carry electroweak charges while the others are 

916: electroweak singlets. Gauge anomalies are avoided if the two electrically 

917: charged techniquarks possess half-integer charges.

918: The technihadron spectrum can contain technibaryons made of only two

919: techniquarks because in the two-index

920: antisymmetric representation of SU(4) a singlet can already be formed in

921: that case [$(010)\otimes(010)\rightarrow(000)\oplus(101)\oplus(020)$].

922: Otherwise technisinglets can also be formed from four techniquarks. All 

923: technihadrons formed from techniquarks without electrical charges

924: can contribute to dark matter.

925: Due to the special charge assignment of the electrically charged particles

926: (opposite half-integer charges) certain combinations of those can also be 

927: contained in electrically uncharged technibaryons. For instance we can 

928: construct the following completely neutral technibaryon:

929: %

930: \be

931: \epsilon_{t_1t_2t_3t_4}Q_L^{{t_1t_2},f}Q_L^{{t_3t_4},f^{\prime}}

932: {\epsilon_{ff^{\prime}}} \ ,

933: \ee

934: %

935: where $\epsilon_{ff^{\prime}}$ saturates the SU(2)$_L$ indices of the two

936: gauged techniquarks and the first antisymmetric tensor $\epsilon$ is summed 

937: over the technicolour indices. We have suppressed the spin indices. If there 

938: is no technibaryon asymmetry the cross section for annihilation would be too

939: big and the present relic density would be negligible. In the presence of a 

940: technibaryon asymmetry, however, this particle would be another candidate for 

941: dark matter (different from those formed from electroweakly neutral

942: techniquarks), hardly detectable in any earth based experiment

943: \cite{Gudnason:2006yj}.

944: 

945: As (010) is a real representation the model's flavour symmetry is enhanced

946: to SU(2$N_f$=16)\footnote{It is slightly explicitly broken by the

947: electroweak interactions. This is, of course, always the case between the

948: techniups and technidowns, but here, additionally, there is a difference, on

949: the electroweak level, between gauged and ungauged techniquark families.}, 

950: which, when it breaks to SO(16), induces 135 Goldstone

951: bosons\footnote{Obviously the Goldstone must receive a sufficiently large

952: mass. This is usually achieved in extended technicolour. Still, they could be

953: copious at LHC.}. 

954: 

955: It is worth recalling that the centre group symmetry left invariant

956: by the fermionic matter is a Z$_2$

957: symmetry. Hence there is a well defined order parameter for confinement

958: \cite{Sannino:2005sk} which can play a

959: role in the early Universe.

960: 

961: 

962: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

963: 

964: \subsection{Beyond the prime candidate}

965: 

966: In view of the uncertainty of the experimental limits for the oblique

967: parameters (see, for example \cite{Dutta:2006cd}) and the approximations made

968: here to determine the degree of walking, not all the other theories, which

969: above have not been identified as prime candidates for a realistic walking

970: technicolour theory, should be considered as being ruled out. While the

971: theories which, in this analysis, stood out as most favoured, would, with the

972: highest likelihood, survive an amelioration of the experimental limits

973: and/or a refinement of the theoretical assessment, others might emerge as

974: being viable candidates as well. For these reasons, we address some of those

975: in the rest of this section. At the end, we will have addressed all settings

976: listed in Table \ref{tc}.

977: 

978: %====================================================================

979: \begin{table}[h]

980: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c}

981: R&$N_f$&flavour symmetry&WA&P-G&$\lg\lambda_*$

982: &$\pi S$\footnote{The contribution to $S$ from additional leptons is not 

983: included. It is of the order $\pi S\approx 1/6$. The contribution to 

984: the $T$ parameter from non-mass-degenerate leptons helps adjusting 

985: to the correlation of the $S$ and $T$ parameters indicated by experimental

986: data \cite{Dietrich:2005jn,Dietrich:2005wk}.}\\

987: \hline (1)&7&SU(14)$\rightarrow$Sp(14)&no&yes&1.3

988: &0.3\footnote{This value results for a partial weak gauging

989: involving only one doublet of the theory. If all possible, that is

990: three doublets are gauged one has $\pi S\approx1$.}\\

991: \bf{(2)}&2&SU(4)$\rightarrow$SO(4)&yes&--&3.1&0.5\\

992: (10)&11&SU$_L$(11)$\times$SU$_R$(11)%$\rightarrow$SU(11)

993: &yes&yes\footnote{In

994: these cases, the global Witten anomaly can be

995: circumvented either by adding one family of leptons or by having two families of techniquarks charged under the

996: electroweak interactions. The value for the $S$ parameter is for the former

997: case. In the latter, it is twice as large.}

998: &1.8&0.5\\

999: (20)&2&SU$_L$(2)$\times$SU$_R$(2)%$\rightarrow$SU(2)

1000: &no&--&1.1&1.0\\

1001: (11)&2&SU(4)$\rightarrow$SO(4)&no&--&3.1&1.3\\

1002: (100)&15&SU$_L$(15)$\times$SU$_R$(15)%$\rightarrow$SU(15)

1003: &no&yes&2.2&0.7\\

1004: (200)&2&SU$_L$(2)$\times$SU$_R$(2)&no&--&0.8&1.7\\

1005: \bf{(010)}&8&SU(16)$\rightarrow$SO(16)

1006: &no&yes&5.1&1.0\\

1007: (101)&2&SU(4)$\rightarrow$SO(4)&yes&--&3.1&2.5\\

1008: (1000)&19&SU$_L$(19)$\times$SU$_R$(19)&yes&yes$^c$&2.4&0.8\\

1009: (0100)&6&SU$_L$(6)$\times$SU$_R$(6)%$\rightarrow$SU(6)

1010: &no&yes&1.5&1.7\\

1011: (10000)&23&SU$_L$(23)$\times$SU$_R$(23)&no&yes&2.7&1.0\\

1012: \end{tabular}

1013: \caption{List of possible technicolour theories. The first two columns give 

1014: the representation and the number of flavours, respectively.

1015: In the next column follows the symmetry breaking pattern.

1016: [SU$_L$($N_f$)$\times$SU$_R$($N_f$) always breaks to SU($N_f$).]

1017: Thereafter, it is marked whether a global Witten anomaly has to be taken care 

1018: of by adding a family of leptons or, where this is possible, by a less 

1019: minimal partial weak gauging of the theory. Finally, the amount of walking 

1020: and the perturbative $S$ parameter are listed. The prime candidates, that is 

1021: the theories with the largest amount of walking at an acceptable size for the 

1022: oblique corrections are marked in boldface.} \label{tc}

1023: \end{table}

1024: %====================================================================

1025: 

1026: \subsubsection{Fundamental}

1027: 

1028: Compared to the prime examples with matter in higher-dimensional

1029: representations, models with fundamental matter must have a comparatively

1030: large number of colours and flavours in order to feature a sufficient amount

1031: of walking. In the partially gauged approach their $S$ parameter reaches

1032: $\pi^{-1}$ for six colours. Phenomenologically, the models with fundamental

1033: techniquarks can be divided into two groups with an even, respectively odd

1034: number of colours (=dimension). Technicolour singlets are always formed by 

1035: $N$ techniquarks.

1036: 

1037: For an even number of colours the model with one electroweakly gauged

1038: techniquark doublet is free of the Witten anomaly. No additional lepton

1039: family has to be included. Opposite half-integer electrical charges for the

1040: technifermions avoid gauge anomalies. Technicolour singlets constructed from

1041: the techniquarks which are gauged under the electroweak interactions carry

1042: integer electrical charges. This also includes uncharged technibaryons which 

1043: can be components of dark matter.

1044: 

1045: For an odd number of colours a single doublet of techniquarks gauged under

1046: the electroweak interactions leads to a Witten anomaly. It can be

1047: circumvented by including one additional lepton family. This allows for a

1048: more general hypercharge assignment \cite{Dietrich:2005jn} than in the case

1049: without leptons.

1050: 

1051: An alternative to an additional lepton family for circumventing a Witten 

1052: anomaly is to gauge two instead of one techniquark doublet, at the cost of

1053: doubling the $S$ parameter. For this non-minimal weak gauging the

1054: hypercharge assignment which corresponds to opposite half-integer electric 

1055: charges for the techniquarks avoids gauge anomalies.  

1056: 

1057: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1058: 

1059: \subsubsection{Two-index symmetric}

1060: 

1061: Two more theories with apparently insufficient walking but which make at

1062: least the weaker 

1063: bounds on the $S$ parameter are the two flavour theories with techniquarks in 

1064: the two-index symmetric representation of SU(3), (20), and SU(4), (200). None 

1065: of the two needs additional leptons. Thus the hypercharge assignment is 

1066: completely fixed. Three respectively four techniquarks are needed to form a 

1067: singlet technibaryon.

1068: 

1069: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1070: 

1071: \subsubsection{Two flavours, SU(4), adjoint}

1072: 

1073: The four technicolour model with two techniflavours in the adjoint

1074: representation has a relatively large perturbative $S$ parameter but walks

1075: over more than three decades which helps reducing it through

1076: non-perturbative corrections. It also requires an additional lepton family

1077: in order to cure the Witten anomaly, which allows for a more general

1078: hypercharge assignment. The enhanced symmetry, SU(2$N_f$=4), breaks to SO(4)

1079: and leaves behind nine Goldstone bosons. They must be rendered massive which

1080: also necessitates a good amount of walking. As for all other adjoint models,

1081: any number of techniquarks can form a singlet and technigluons

1082: can neutralise technicolour as well.

1083: 

1084: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1085: 

1086: \subsubsection{Six flavours, SU(5), two-index antisymmetric}

1087: 

1088: Finally, let us mention the five technicolour model with six techniflavours 

1089: in the two-index antisymmetric representation. For an acceptable $S$ 

1090: parameter, only part of the techniflavours can be gauged under the

1091: electroweak interactions. No additional leptons are required.

1092: This variant does not exhibit a remarkable amount of walking.

1093: 

1094: % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %

1095: 

1096: \subsection{Split technicolour: A review}

1097: 

1098: Since one aim of this work is to provide a catalogue of various possible 

1099: walking type, non-supersymmetric gauge theories, which can be used to 

1100: dynamically break the electroweak symmetry we summarize here also another

1101: possibility already appearing in \cite{Dietrich:2005jn}. There we also 

1102: suggested a way of keeping the technifermions in the fundamental 

1103: representation while still reducing the number of techniflavours needed to be

1104: near the conformal window. Like for the partially gauged case described above 

1105: this can be achieved by adding matter uncharged under the weak interactions. 

1106: The difference to section \ref{pgt} is that this part of matter transforms 

1107: under a different representation of the technicolour gauge group than the 

1108: part coupled directly to the electroweak sector. We choose it to be a 

1109: massless Weyl fermion in the adjoint representation of the technicolour gauge 

1110: group, that is a technigluino. 

1111: The resulting theory has the same matter content as $N_f$-flavour super QCD but without the scalars;

1112: hence the name "split technicolour." We expect the critical number of flavours above which one enters the

1113: conformal window $N_f^\mathrm{II}$ to lie within the range

1114: %

1115: \be

1116: \frac{3}{2}<\frac{N^\mathrm{II}_f}{N}<\frac{11}{2} \ .

1117: \ee

1118: %

1119: The lower bound is the exact supersymmetric value for a non-perturbative

1120: conformal fixed point \cite{Intriligator:1995au}, while the upper bound is

1121: the one expected in the theory without a technigluino. The matter content of

1122: "split technicolour" lies between that of super QCD and the standard

1123: fundamental technicolour theory.

1124: 

1125: For two colours the number of (techni)flavours needed to be near the

1126: conformal window in the split case is at least three, while for three

1127: colours more than five flavours are required. These values are still larger

1128: than the ones for theories with fermions in the two-index

1129: symmetric representation. It is useful to remind the reader that in

1130: supersymmetric theories the critical number of flavours needed to enter the

1131: conformal window does not coincide with the critical number of flavours

1132: required to restore chiral symmetry. The scalars in supersymmetric theories

1133: play an important role from this point of view. We note that a split

1134: technicolour-like theory has been used recently in \cite{Hsu:2004mf}, to

1135: investigate the strong CP problem.

1136: 

1137: Split technicolour shares some features with theories of split

1138: supersymmetry recently advocated and studied in

1139: \cite{Arkani-Hamed:2004fb,{Giudice:2004tc}} as possible extensions of the

1140: standard model. Clearly, we have introduced split technicolour---differently

1141: from split supersymmetry---to address the hierarchy problem. This is why we

1142: do not expect new scalars to appear at energy scales higher than the one of

1143: the electroweak theory.

1144: 

1145: 

1146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1147: 

1148: \section{Near Conformal Spectrum: Refinements.}

1149: 

1150: An interesting question to ask is how the spectrum of light particles looks

1151: near the infrared fixed point. When these theories are used to dynamically 

1152: break the electroweak symmetry this corresponds to asking, whether the

1153: composite Higgs for walking theories is light or heavy with respect to the

1154: electroweak symmetry breaking scale?

1155: 

1156: There is consensus that at least part of the hadronic spectrum becomes light near a conformal fixed point

1157: \cite{Chivukula:1996kg}. This might not be too surprising after all, since one expects the chiral symmetry

1158: breaking scale to vanish at the conformal fixed point. A more delicate issue

1159: is, if part of the spectrum and

1160: more specifically the chiral partner of the pion becomes light faster than the chiral symmetry breaking scale

1161: as we tune the number of flavours toward the fixed point value \footnote{We thank T. Appelquist and K. Lane for

1162: pressing on this relevant point.}.

1163: 

1164: We will use a simple analysis to elucidate why we expect to find a light composite scalar object,

1165: ---light with respect to the chiral symmetry breaking scale---near the conformal fixed point. If, as function of the

1166: number of flavours, there is a smooth phase transition one applies Wilson's

1167: approach and investigates the corresponding renormalisable scalar effective 

1168: Lagrangian. In our analysis we are assuming

1169: that the rest of the composite

1170: spectrum of the theory decouples near this fixed point \footnote{Note that

1171: Chivukula \cite{Chivukula:1996kg}

1172: argued that the rest of the dynamics does not decouple near the same fixed

1173: point.}. This is a standard

1174: assumption if a smooth transition occurs. Here the situation is different

1175: from the case of a thermal

1176: phase transition since fermions do not necessarily decouple at the 

1177: four-dimensional fixed point.

1178: 

1179: 

1180: For a generic number of space-time dimensions $d$ one finds that the fixed point value of the $\phi^4$ coupling constant

1181: $g/4!$ of the scalar effective theory with an $O(N_f)$ global symmetry 

1182: is\footnote{This part is meant to be illustrative. If the reader is 

1183: interested in more details on the fixed point analysis for theories with 

1184: unitary flavour groups these can be found in \cite{Basile:2005hw}.},

1185: %

1186: \be 

1187: g_{\ast} = \frac{48\pi^2}{N_f + 8} (4-d) \ . 

1188: \ee

1189: %

1190: Hence, in four dimensions, the effective fixed point coupling constant vanishes. This is consistent with the

1191: intuitive idea that near a conformal fixed point 

1192: the presence of a non-zero

1193: coupling would lead to the generation of a mass term driving the theory away from conformality. Using the

1194: renormalisation group approach we compare the coupling constant at the chiral symmetry breaking scale 

1195: $\Sigma_0$---that is $g(\Sigma_0)=\bar g$---with the same coupling at a much larger scale $\Lambda$ which we identify with the

1196: scale above which the underlying coupling constant starts running again. We call the latter the bare coupling

1197: $g$ and we have:

1198: %

1199: \be \bar{g} &\sim& \frac{g} { 1 + \frac{N_f + 8}{48\pi^2}g\left(\frac{\alpha_{\ast}}{\alpha_c}-1\right)^{-1/2} }

1200: \sim \nn &\sim& \frac{48\pi^2}{N_f + 8} \left(\frac{\alpha_{\ast}}{\alpha_c}-1\right)^{1/2} \ .

1201: \label{coupling}\ee

1202: %

1203: In the previous equation we used the following relation between the dynamically generated quark mass at zero

1204: momentum, $\Sigma_0$, and the scale $\Lambda$ above which the underlying theory

1205: starts running again:

1206: %

1207: \be \ln\left(\frac{\Sigma_0}{\Lambda}\right) \sim \left(\frac{\alpha_{\ast}}{\alpha_c}-1 \right)^{-1/2} \ . \ee

1208: %

1209: The function $(\alpha_{\ast}/\alpha_c -1)$ embodies the underlying dynamics,

1210: and, hence, is sensitive to the

1211: number of flavours, colours and the fermion representation with respect to the gauge 

1212: group\footnote{Nota Bene: The coefficient in front of 

1213: $(\alpha_{\ast}/\alpha_c -1)$ depends on the underlying fermion

1214: representation with respect to the gauge group which dictates, ultimately, the global symmetry of the problem.}.

1215: The physical mass of the scalar field in units of the vacuum expectation value of the scalar field is given by

1216: %

1217: \be \frac{M^2_{\phi}}{v^2} = 2\bar{g} \sim \left(\frac{\alpha_{\ast}}{\alpha_c} -1 \right)^{1/2}, \ee

1218: %

1219: with $v = \langle \phi \rangle\sim \Sigma_0$. Hence it vanishes near the 

1220: transition faster than the vacuum expectation value, that is the chiral 

1221: symmetry breaking scale. This supports the proposal that the composite

1222: Higgs can be lighter for walking technicolour theories than for ordinary

1223: technicolour theories away from

1224: conformality\footnote{In our previous analysis \cite{Dietrich:2005jn} we 

1225: suggested a dependence of the scalar mass on the number of 

1226: flavours near the fixed point, using trace anomaly arguments. This

1227: result, however, did not take into account the scale dependence of the 

1228: $\phi^4$ coupling.}.

1229: 

1230: There are some caveats related to the analysis above. If the transition is not 

1231: smooth the present analysis is simply not applicable. This is the conclusion

1232: drawn, for example in \cite{Appelquist:1996dq} and in 

1233: \cite{Gies:2002hq,Gies:2005as}. Note that this uncertainty is present in every 

1234: study of a phase transition via effective theories. Another issue is that for 

1235: zero temperature phase transitions fermions are no longer screened near the 

1236: fixed point and should be included in the analysis above. Besides, we could 

1237: have also terms related to the underlying axial anomaly, depending on the 

1238: number of flavours and the global flavour symmetry. However, if the phase 

1239: transition happens near two flavours one expects the axial anomaly, 

1240: which is related to a marginal operator, not to dominate the fixed point 

1241: dynamics. Finally, we have also assumed valid the low energy effective 

1242: description all the way to the scale $\Lambda$.

1243: 

1244: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1245: 

1246: \section{Summary}

1247: 

1248: We have presented a comprehensive analysis of the phase diagram of

1249: non-supersymmetric vector-like and strongly coupled SU($N$) gauge theories 

1250: with matter in various representations of the gauge group. We have considered 

1251: models with fermions in a single representation of the gauge group, but also

1252: the case of a combination of fermions in the fundamental with fermions in the 

1253: adjoint representation. As physical application we considered the dynamical 

1254: breaking of the electroweak symmetry via walking technicolour.

1255: We have then taken into account constraints form electroweak precision 

1256: measurements and, thereby, reduced the number of theories viable for 

1257: correctly describing the dynamical breaking. Still, we

1258: find that a considerable number of strongly coupled theories are 

1259: still excellent candidates for breaking the electroweak symmetry dynamically.

1260: 

1261: 

1262: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1263: 

1264: 

1265: \section*{Acknowledgements}

1266: 

1267: It is a pleasure to thank J.~Schechter, K.~Splittorff, and 

1268: K.~Tuominen for discussions. The work of F.S. is supported by the Marie Curie

1269: Excellence Grant under contract MEXT-CT-2004-013510 as well as the Danish Research

1270: Agency.

1271: 

1272: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1273: 

1274: \appendix

1275: 

1276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1277: 

1278: 

1279: \section{Basic group theory relations \label{eleven}}

1280: 

1281: The Dynkin indices label the highest weight

1282: of an irreducible representation and uniquely characterise the

1283: representations. The Dynkin indices for some of the most common

1284: representations are given in Table \ref{dynkin}. For details on the concept

1285: of Dynkin indices see, for example \cite{Dynkin:1957um,Slansky:1981yr}.

1286: 

1287: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1288: \begin{table}

1289: \begin{tabular}{r|c}

1290: representation&Dynkin indices\\

1291: \hline

1292: singlet&(000\dots 00)\\

1293: fundamental (F)&(100\dots 00)\\

1294: antifundamental ($\bar{\mathrm{F}}$)&(000\dots 01)\\

1295: adjoint (G)&(100\dots 01)\\

1296: $n$-index symmetric (S$_n$)&(n00\dots 00)\\

1297: 2-index antisymmetric (A$_2$)&(010\dots 00)\\

1298: \end{tabular}

1299: \caption{Examples for Dynkin indices for some common representations.}

1300: \label{dynkin}

1301: \end{table}

1302: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1303: 

1304: For a representation, R, with the Dynkin indices

1305: $(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_{N-2},a_{N-1})$ the

1306: quadratic Casimir operator reads \cite{White:1992aa}

1307: %

1308: \be C_2(\mathrm{R}) &=& \sum_{m=1}^{N-1}[ N(N-m)ma_m + m(N-m){a_m}^2 +\nonumber \\&&

1309: \sum_{n=0}^{m-1}2n(N-m)a_na_m ] \label{C} \ee

1310: %

1311: and the dimension of R is given by

1312: %

1313: \be

1314: d(\mathrm{R})

1315: =

1316: \prod_{p=1}^{N-1}

1317: \left\{

1318: \frac{1}{p!}

1319: \prod_{q=p}^{N-1}

1320: \left[

1321: \sum_{r=q-p+1}^p(1+a_r)

1322: \right]

1323: \right\},

1324: \label{d}

1325: \ee

1326: %

1327: which gives rise to the following structure

1328: %

1329: \be d(\mathrm{R}) &=& (1+a_1)(1+a_2)\dots(1+a_{N-1}) \times

1330: \nn && \times (1+\sfr{a_1+a_2}{2}) \dots

1331: (1+\sfr{a_{N-2}+a_{N-1}}{2}) \times

1332: \nn && \times (1+\sfr{a_1+a_2+a_3}{3}) \dots

1333: (1+\sfr{a_{N-3}+a_{N-2}+a_{N-1}}{3}) \times

1334: \nn && \times \dots \times

1335: \nn && \times

1336: (1+\sfr{a_1+\dots+a_{N-1}}{N-1}). \ee

1337: %

1338: The Young tableau associated to a given Dynkin index

1339: $(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_{N-2},a_{N-1})$ is easily constructed. The length of

1340: row $i$ (that is the number of boxes per row) is given in terms of the Dynkin

1341: indices by the expression $r_i = \sum_{i}^{N-1} a_{i}$. The length of

1342: each column is indicated by $c_k$; $k$ can assume any positive integer value.

1343: Indicating the total number of boxes associated to a given Young tableau with 

1344: $b$ one has another compact expression for $C_2(\mathrm{R})$,

1345: %

1346: \be

1347: C_2(\mathrm{R})

1348: = 

1349: N\left[ bN +\sum_i r^2_i  -\sum_ic_i^2 - \frac{b^2}{N} \right]\ ,

1350: \ee

1351: %

1352: and the sums run over each column and row.

1353: 

1354: 

1355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1356: 

1357: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1358: 

1359: \bibitem{TC}

1360: S.~Weinberg,

1361: %``Implications Of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking: An Addendum,''

1362: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 19}, 1277 (1979);

1363: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D19,1277;%%

1364: L.~Susskind,

1365: %``Dynamics Of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking In The Weinberg-Salam Theory,''

1366: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf

1367: 20}, 2619 (1979).

1368: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D20,2619;%%

1369: 

1370: 

1371: %\cite{Holdom:1981rm}

1372: \bibitem{Holdom:1981rm}

1373: B.~Holdom, %``Raising The Sideways Scale,''

1374: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 24}, 1441 (1981).

1375: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D24,1441;%%

1376: 

1377: %\cite{Yamawaki:1985zg}

1378: \bibitem{Yamawaki:1985zg}

1379: K.~Yamawaki, M.~Bando and K.~i.~Matumoto,

1380: %``Scale Invariant Technicolor Model And A Technidilaton,''

1381: Phys.\

1382: Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 56}, 1335 (1986).

1383: %%CITATION = PRLTA,56,1335;%%

1384: 

1385: %\cite{Appelquist:an}

1386: \bibitem{Appelquist:an}

1387: T.~W.~Appelquist, D.~Karabali and L.~C.~R.~Wijewardhana,

1388: %``Chiral Hierarchies And The Flavor Changing Neutral

1389: %Current Problem In Technicolor,''

1390: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 57}, 957 (1986).

1391: %%CITATION = PRLTA,57,957;%%

1392: 

1393: %\cite{Miransky:1996pd}

1394: \bibitem{MY}

1395:   V.~A.~Miransky and K.~Yamawaki,

1396:  % ``Conformal phase transition in gauge theories,''

1397:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5051 (1997)

1398:   [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 56}, 3768 (1997)]

1399:   [arXiv:hep-th/9611142].

1400:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9611142;%%

1401: 

1402: %\cite{Miransky:1989nu}

1403: %\bibitem{Miransky:1989nu}

1404:   V.~A.~Miransky, T.~Nonoyama and K.~Yamawaki,

1405: %  ``On The Phase Diagram Of Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories With Additional

1406: %  Four Fermion Interaction,''

1407:   Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 4}, 1409 (1989).

1408:   %%CITATION = MPLAE,A4,1409;%%

1409: 

1410: 

1411: %\cite{Lane:1989ej}

1412: \bibitem{Lane:1989ej}

1413: K.~D.~Lane and E.~Eichten,

1414: %``Two Scale Technicolor,''

1415: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 222}, 274 (1989).

1416: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B222,274;%% %\cite{Eichten:1979ah}

1417: % \bibitem{Eichten:1979ah}

1418: E.~Eichten and K.~D.~Lane,

1419: %``Dynamical Breaking Of Weak Interaction Symmetries,''

1420: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 90}, 125

1421: (1980).

1422: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B90,125;%%

1423: 

1424: \bibitem{Sannino:2004qp}

1425:   F.~Sannino and K.~Tuominen,

1426:   %`Techniorientifold,''

1427:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 051901

1428:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0405209].

1429:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0405209;%%

1430: 

1431: \bibitem{Hong:2004td}

1432:   D.~K.~Hong, S.~D.~H.~Hsu and F.~Sannino,

1433:   %`Composite Higgs from higher representations,''

1434:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 597} (2004) 89

1435:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0406200].

1436:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406200;%%

1437: 

1438: \bibitem{Dietrich:2005jn}

1439:   D.~D.~Dietrich, F.~Sannino and K.~Tuominen,

1440:   %`Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak

1441:   %precision measurements: Predictions for LHC,''

1442:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72} (2005) 055001

1443:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0505059].

1444:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505059;%%

1445: 

1446: \bibitem{Dietrich:2005wk}

1447:   D.~D.~Dietrich, F.~Sannino and K.~Tuominen,

1448:   %`Light composite Higgs and precision electroweak measurements on the Z

1449:   %resonance: An update,''

1450:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73} (2006) 037701

1451:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0510217].

1452:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510217;%%

1453: 

1454: \bibitem{Appelquist:1998xf}

1455:   T.~Appelquist and F.~Sannino,

1456:   %`The physical spectrum of conformal SU(N) gauge theories,''

1457:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59} (1999) 067702

1458:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9806409].

1459:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806409;%%

1460: 

1461: \bibitem{Appelquist:1999dq}

1462:   T.~Appelquist, P.~S.~Rodrigues da Silva and F.~Sannino,

1463:   %`Enhanced global symmetries and the chiral phase transition,''

1464:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 116007

1465:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9906555].

1466:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906555;%%

1467: 

1468: \bibitem{Duan:2000dy}

1469:   Z.~y.~Duan, P.~S.~Rodrigues da Silva and F.~Sannino,

1470:   %`Enhanced global symmetry constraints on epsilon terms,''

1471:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 592} (2001) 371

1472:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0001303].

1473:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001303;%%

1474: 

1475: %\cite{Hong:2006si}

1476: \bibitem{Hong:2006si}

1477:    D.~K.~Hong and H.~U.~Yee,

1478:   % ``Holographic estimate of oblique corrections for technicolor,''

1479:    Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 015011 (2006)

1480:    [arXiv:hep-ph/0602177];

1481:    %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602177;%%

1482: 

1483: %\cite{Hirn:2006nt}

1484: %\bibitem{Hirn:2006nt}

1485:    J.~Hirn and V.~Sanz,

1486:    %``A negative S parameter from holographic technicolor,''

1487:    Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 97}, 121803 (2006)

1488:    [arXiv:hep-ph/0606086];

1489:    %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606086;%%

1490: 

1491: %\cite{Piai:2006hy}

1492: %\bibitem{Piai:2006hy}

1493:    M.~Piai,

1494:    % ``Precision electro-weak parameters from AdS(5), localized kinetic terms and

1495:    %anomalous dimensions,''

1496:    arXiv:hep-ph/0608241.

1497:    %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0608241;%%

1498: 

1499: 

1500: \bibitem{Caswell:1974gg}

1501:   W.~E.~Caswell,

1502:   %`Asymptotic Behavior Of Nonabelian Gauge Theories To Two Loop Order,''

1503:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 33} (1974) 244.

1504:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,33,244;%%

1505: 

1506: \bibitem{Jones:1981we}

1507:   D.~R.~T.~Jones,

1508:   %`The Two Loop Beta Function For A G(1) X G(2) Gauge Theory,''

1509:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 25} (1982) 581.

1510:   %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,581;%%

1511: 

1512: \bibitem{Banks:1981nn}

1513:   T.~Banks and A.~Zaks,

1514:   %`On The Phase Structure Of Vector - Like Gauge Theories With Massless

1515:   %Fermions,''

1516:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 196} (1982) 189.

1517:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B196,189;%%

1518: 

1519: \bibitem{Appelquist:1988yc}

1520:   T.~Appelquist, K.~D.~Lane and U.~Mahanta,

1521:   %`On The Ladder Approximation For Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking,''

1522:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 61} (1988) 1553.

1523:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,61,1553;%%

1524: 

1525: \bibitem{Cohen:1988sq}

1526:   A.~G.~Cohen and H.~Georgi,

1527:   %`Walking Beyond The Rainbow,''

1528:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 314} (1989) 7.

1529:   %%CITATION = NUPHA,B314,7;%%

1530: 

1531: \bibitem{Lane:2002wv}

1532:   K.~Lane,

1533:   %`Two lectures on technicolour,''

1534:   arXiv:hep-ph/0202255.

1535:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202255;%%

1536: 

1537: \bibitem{Hill:2002ap}

1538:   C.~T.~Hill and E.~H.~Simmons,

1539:   %`Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking,''

1540:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 381} (2003) 235

1541:   [Erratum-ibid.\  {\bf 390} (2004) 553]

1542:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0203079].

1543:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203079;%%

1544: 

1545: \bibitem{Eidelman:2004wy}

1546:   S.~Eidelman {\it et al.}  [Particle Data Group],

1547:   %`Review of particle physics,''

1548:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 592} (2004) 1.

1549:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B592,1;%%

1550: 

1551: \bibitem{unknown:2005em}

1552:     [ALEPH Collaboration and DELPHI Collaboration and L3 Collaboration and

1553: OPAL Collaboration and SLD Collaboration and LEP Electroweak Working Group

1554: and SLD Electroweak Group and SLD Heavy Flavour Group],

1555:   %`Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance,''

1556:   arXiv:hep-ex/0509008.

1557:   %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0509008;%%

1558: 

1559: \bibitem{Sundrum:1991rf}

1560:   R.~Sundrum and S.~D.~H.~Hsu,

1561:   %`Walking technicolour and electroweak radiative corrections,''

1562:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 391} (1993) 127

1563:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9206225].

1564:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9206225;%%

1565: 

1566: %\cite{Chivukula:1996kg}

1567: \bibitem{Chivukula:1996kg}

1568:   R.~S.~Chivukula,

1569:    %``A comment on the zero temperature chiral phase transition in SU(N)  gauge

1570:   %theories,''

1571:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5238 (1997)

1572:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9612267].

1573:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612267;%%

1574: 

1575: \bibitem{Peskin:1990zt}

1576:   M.~E.~Peskin and T.~Takeuchi,

1577:   %`A New Constraint On A Strongly Interacting Higgs Sector,''

1578:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 65} (1990) 964.

1579:   %%CITATION = PRLTA,65,964;%%

1580: 

1581: %\cite{Gudnason:2006yj}

1582: \bibitem{Gudnason:2006yj}

1583:   S.~B.~Gudnason, C.~Kouvaris and F.~Sannino,

1584:   %``Dark matter from new technicolor theories,''

1585:   arXiv:hep-ph/0608055. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D.

1586:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0608055;%%

1587: 

1588: \bibitem{Witten:1982fp}

1589:   E.~Witten,

1590:   %`An SU(2) Anomaly,''

1591:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 117} (1982) 324.

1592:   %%CITATION = PHLTA,B117,324;%%

1593: 

1594: %\cite{Christensen:2005cb}

1595: \bibitem{Christensen:2005cb}

1596:   N.~D.~Christensen and R.~Shrock,

1597:   %``Technifermion representations and precision electroweak constraints,''

1598:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 632}, 92 (2006)

1599:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0509109].

1600:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0509109;%%

1601: 

1602: \bibitem{Sannino:2005sk}

1603:   F.~Sannino,

1604:   %`Higher representations: Confinement and large N,''

1605:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72} (2005) 125006

1606:   [arXiv:hep-th/0507251].

1607:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0507251;%%

1608: 

1609: \bibitem{Dutta:2006cd}

1610:   S.~Dutta, K.~Hagiwara and Q.~S.~Yan,

1611:   %`Electroweak symmetry breaking and precision data,''

1612:   arXiv:hep-ph/0603038.

1613:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0603038;%%

1614: 

1615: %\cite{Intriligator:1995au}

1616: \bibitem{Intriligator:1995au}

1617:   K.~A.~Intriligator and N.~Seiberg,

1618:   %``Lectures on supersymmetric gauge theories and electric-magnetic  duality,''

1619:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 45BC}, 1 (1996)

1620:   [arXiv:hep-th/9509066].

1621:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9509066;%%

1622: 

1623: 

1624: %\cite{Arkani-Hamed:2004fb}

1625: \bibitem{Arkani-Hamed:2004fb}

1626:   N.~Arkani-Hamed and S.~Dimopoulos,

1627:   %``Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures

1628:   %for fine-tuning at the LHC,''

1629:   arXiv:hep-th/0405159.

1630:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0405159;%%

1631: 

1632: 

1633: %\cite{Giudice:2004tc}

1634: \bibitem{Giudice:2004tc}

1635:   G.~F.~Giudice and A.~Romanino,

1636:   %``Split supersymmetry,''

1637:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 699}, 65 (2004)

1638:   [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 706}, 65 (2005)]

1639:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0406088].

1640:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406088;%%

1641: 

1642:   %\cite{Hsu:2004mf}

1643: \bibitem{Hsu:2004mf}

1644:   S.~D.~H.~Hsu and F.~Sannino,

1645:  % ``New solutions to the strong CP problem,''

1646:   Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 605}, 369 (2005)

1647:   arXiv:hep-ph/0408319.

1648:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408319;%%

1649: 

1650: 

1651: %\cite{Basile:2005hw}

1652: \bibitem{Basile:2005hw}

1653:   F.~Basile, A.~Pelissetto and E.~Vicari,

1654:   % ``Finite-temperature chiral transition in QCD with quarks in the fundamental

1655:   %and adjoint representation,''

1656:   PoS {\bf LAT2005}, 199 (2006)

1657:   [arXiv:hep-lat/0509018].

1658:   %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0509018;%%

1659: 

1660: %\cite{Appelquist:1996dq}

1661: \bibitem{Appelquist:1996dq}

1662:   T.~Appelquist, J.~Terning and L.~C.~R.~Wijewardhana,

1663:   %``The Zero Temperature Chiral Phase Transition in SU(N) Gauge Theories,''

1664:   Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 77}, 1214 (1996)

1665:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9602385].

1666:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602385;%%

1667: 

1668: %\cite{Gies:2002hq}

1669: \bibitem{Gies:2002hq}

1670:   H.~Gies and C.~Wetterich,

1671:   %``Universality of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in gauge theories,''

1672:   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 025001 (2004)

1673:   [arXiv:hep-th/0209183].

1674:   %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0209183;%%

1675: 

1676: %\cite{Gies:2005as}

1677: \bibitem{Gies:2005as}

1678:   H.~Gies and J.~Jaeckel,

1679:   %``Chiral phase structure of QCD with many flavors,''

1680:   Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 46}, 433 (2006)

1681:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0507171].

1682:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507171;%%

1683: 

1684: \bibitem{Braun:2006jd}

1685:   J.~Braun and H.~Gies,

1686:   %`Chiral phase boundary of QCD at finite temperature,''

1687:   JHEP {\bf 0606} (2006) 024

1688:   [arXiv:hep-ph/0602226].

1689:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602226;%%

1690: 

1691: \bibitem{Dynkin:1957um}

1692:   E.~B.~Dynkin,

1693:   %`Semisimple Subalgebras Of Semisimple Lie Algebras,''

1694:   Trans.\ Am.\ Math.\ Soc.\  {\bf 6} (1957) 111 and 245 and references

1695:   therein.

1696:   %%CITATION = TAMTA,6,111;%%

1697:   %%CITATION = TAMTA,6,245;%%

1698: 

1699: \bibitem{Slansky:1981yr}

1700:   R.~Slansky,

1701:   %`Group Theory For Unified Model Building,''

1702:   Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 79} (1981) 1.

1703:   %%CITATION = PRPLC,79,1;%%

1704: 

1705: \bibitem{White:1992aa}

1706:   P.~L.~White,

1707:   %`Discrete symmetries from broken SU(N) and the MSSM,''

1708:   Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 403} (1993) 141

1709:   [arXiv:hep-ph/9207231].

1710:   %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9207231;%%

1711: 

1712: \end{thebibliography}

1713: 

1714: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1715: 

1716: \end{document}