1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \usepackage{rotating}
4: \textwidth6.5in \textheight9in \evensidemargin0pt \oddsidemargin0pt
5: %The following command is needed for papers submitted to the archive
6: \topmargin-1.1cm
7:
8: %\newcommand{\gtap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
9: %\newcommand{\ltap}{{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}
10: \def\br(#1,#2){\left\langle#1#2\right\rangle}
11: \def\sq(#1,#2){\left[#1#2\right]}
12: \def\s(#1,#2){s_{#1 #2}}
13: \def\t(#1,#2,#3){s_{#1 #2 #3}}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16: \begin{titlepage}
17:
18: \hspace*{\fill}\parbox[t]{5cm}
19: {hep-ph/0611348 \\
20: FERMILAB-Pub-06/368-T \\
21: CP3-06-16 \\
22: ILL-(TH)-06-07 \\
23: %PRELIMINARY DRAFT \\
24: \today} \vskip2cm
25: \begin{center}
26: {\Large \bf Production of a $W$ Boson and Two Jets \\
27: \bigskip with One $b$-quark Tag} \\
28: \medskip
29: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
30: {\large {\bf J.~Campbell},$^1$
31: {\bf R.~K.~Ellis},$^2$
32: {\bf F.~Maltoni},$^3$
33: and {\bf S.~Willenbrock}$^4$} \\
34: \bigskip\bigskip\medskip
35: $^{1}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow \\
36: Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom \\
37: \bigskip
38: $^{2}$Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory \\
39: P.~O.~Box 500, Batavia, IL\ \ 60510 \\ \bigskip
40: $^{3}$Institut de Physique Th\'{e}orique and \\
41: Centre for Particle Physics and Phenomenology (CP3) \\
42: Universit\'{e} Catholique de Louvain\\[1mm]
43: Chemin du Cyclotron 2 \\
44: B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium \\
45: \bigskip
46: $^{4}$Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign \\
47: 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL\ \ 61801 \\ \bigskip
48: \end{center}
49:
50: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
51:
52: \begin{abstract}
53: The production of a $W$ boson and two jets, at least one of which
54: contains a $b$ quark, is a principal background to single-top
55: production, Higgs production, and signals of new physics at hadron
56: colliders. We present a next-to-leading-order (NLO) calculation of
57: the cross section at the Fermilab Tevatron and the CERN Large Hadron
58: Collider. The NLO cross section differs substantially from that at
59: LO, and we provide a context in which to understand this result.
60: \end{abstract}
61:
62: \end{titlepage}
63:
64: \section{Introduction}%
65: \label{sec:intro}
66:
67: Many signals for new physics at hadron colliders involve an
68: electroweak gauge boson ($\gamma,Z,W$) and jets, one or more of
69: which contain a heavy quark ($c,b$). The prime example is the
70: discovery of the top quark via the signal $W+4j$, where two of the
71: jets contain $b$ quarks \cite{Abe:1995hr,Abachi:1995iq}. It is
72: important to understand the backgrounds to these signals in as much
73: detail as possible \cite{Acosta:2001ct}. We have recently completed
74: a next-to-leading-order (NLO) calculation of $Z$ production in
75: association with one or two jets, one (or more) of which contain a
76: heavy quark
77: \cite{Campbell:2000bg,Campbell:2003dd,Campbell:2005zv}.\footnote{The
78: inclusive production of a $Z$ with one or more heavy quarks is
79: presented in Ref.~\cite{Maltoni:2005wd}.} In this paper we present
80: a NLO calculation of $W$ production in association with two jets,
81: one or more of which contain a $b$ quark. The case of $W$
82: production in association with one or more jets containing a charm
83: quark is more complicated due to the additional contributions coming
84: from $s\to Wc$.
85:
86: The production of a $W$ boson in association with two jets, one or
87: more of which contain a heavy quark, is particularly interesting as
88: it is the principal background to both single-top production
89: \cite{Acosta:2004bs,Abazov:2005zz,Abazov:2006uq} and Higgs
90: production (via $q\bar q'\to Wh$)
91: \cite{Abazov:2004jy,Acosta:2005ga}, which are currently being sought
92: at the Fermilab Tevatron. Single-top production occurs via both a
93: $t$-channel process, $qb\to q't$
94: \cite{Willenbrock:1986cr,Yuan:1989tc,Ellis:1992yw}, and an
95: $s$-channel process, $q\bar q'\to t\bar b$
96: \cite{Cortese:1991fw,Stelzer:1995mi}. In both cases the final state,
97: after top decay, comprises a $W$ boson and two jets, one
98: ($t$-channel) or both ($s$-channel) of which contain a $b$ quark. In
99: the case of Higgs production, the final state (after the decay $h\to
100: b\bar b$) comprises a $W$ and two jets, both of which contain a $b$
101: quark \cite{Stange:1993ya,Stange:1994bb}. However, even if both jets
102: contain a $b$ quark, it is more efficient to tag only one of them
103: \cite{Acosta:2005ga}. Thus in all cases the principal background is
104: $W$ plus two jets, one (or more) of which contain a heavy quark. The
105: signals for single top
106: \cite{Bordes:1994ki,Smith:1996ij,Stelzer:1997ns,Chetyrkin:2000mq,
107: Harris:2002md,Cao:2004ky,Cao:2004ap,Sullivan:2004ie,
108: Campbell:2004ch,Cao:2005pq,Frixione:2005vw} and Higgs
109: \cite{Han:1991ia,Brein:2003wg,Ciccolini:2003jy} are known at NLO and
110: beyond; our goal is to provide a calculation of the principal
111: background at NLO.
112:
113: At leading order (LO), there are two processes that produce a $W$
114: boson and two jets, at least one of which contains a $b$ quark.
115: These are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}. The process $q\bar q'\to
116: Wb\bar b$ yields two $b$ jets, and is already known at NLO
117: \cite{Ellis:1998fv,Campbell:2003hd,FebresCordero:2006sj}. In
118: contrast, the process $bq\to Wbq'$ yields just one $b$ jet. For a
119: signal with just one $b$ tag, these two processes are comparable at
120: the Tevatron, while at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) the
121: latter process is dominant \cite{Mangano:2001xp}.
122:
123: \begin{figure}[ht]
124: \begin{center}
125: \epsfxsize=5cm \epsfbox{wbb.eps} \hspace*{1cm}
126: \epsfxsize=5cm \epsfbox{wbj.eps} \\
127: (a) \hspace*{6cm} (b)
128: \end{center}
129: \caption{Leading-order processes for the production of a $W$ boson
130: and two jets, at least one of which contains a $b$ quark.}
131: \label{fig:Wbb}
132: \end{figure}
133:
134: The process $bq\to Wbq'$ requires further consideration, as it
135: contains a $b$ quark in the initial state. The $b$ distribution in
136: the proton is derived perturbatively via the
137: Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolution
138: equations \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz}. Alternatively, one
139: may eschew a $b$ distribution function, and use a gluon in the
140: initial state, which then splits to $b\bar b$, with one $b$
141: participating in the hard scattering while the other remains at low
142: transverse momentum; this is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj}
143: \cite{Mangano:2001xp}. However, there are two advantages to working
144: with a $b$ distribution function. First, initial-state collinear
145: logarithms, of order $[\alpha_S\ln(M_W/m_b)]^n$, are summed to all
146: orders, yielding a more convergent perturbative expansion. Second,
147: the LO process is simpler, which makes the NLO calculation
148: tractable.
149:
150: \begin{figure}[ht]
151: \begin{center}
152: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=7cm \epsfbox{wbbj.eps}
153: \vspace*{-.8cm}
154: \end{center}
155: \caption{An alternative way of calculating the process in
156: Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b).} \label{fig:Wbbj}
157: \end{figure}
158:
159: A $b$ distribution function is useful when the scale of the process
160: is much greater than the $b$ mass. In beauty production at HERA,
161: the scale is not much greater than the $b$ mass, and the appropriate
162: description is $\gamma^*g\to b\bar b$ \cite{Grab:2006qb}. Thus
163: there is no direct measurement of the $b$ distribution function at
164: this time. Single-top production ($t$-channel) may provide the
165: first such measurement.
166:
167: The paper is organized as follows. In Section~\ref{sec:Wbj} we
168: outline the NLO calculation and discuss some of the finer points.
169: The issue of correctly treating the $b$-quark mass arises in a novel
170: way, and we discuss this in some detail. The results of the
171: calculation are presented in Section~\ref{sec:results}.
172:
173: \section{$Wbj$ at NLO}\label{sec:Wbj}%
174:
175: The LO cross sections for $Wbj$ and $Wb\bar b$, arising from the
176: processes in Figs.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b) and \ref{fig:Wbb}(a),
177: respectively, are given in parentheses in
178: Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_exclusive}. All jets are required to have
179: $p_T>15$ GeV and $|\eta|<2$ at the Tevatron, while at the LHC we
180: require $p_T>25$ GeV and $|\eta|<2.5$. The jets are required to be
181: separated by $\Delta R_{jj}>0.7$. As mentioned in the Introduction,
182: these cross sections are comparable at the Tevatron, while $Wbj$ is
183: dominant at the LHC. This qualitative result is already well known
184: from the LO calculation of Ref.~\cite{Mangano:2001xp}, which used a
185: gluon in the initial state (Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj}) rather than a $b$
186: quark [Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b)]. Our goal is to calculate these cross
187: sections at NLO.
188:
189: The processes involved in the calculation are as follows:
190: \begin{itemize}
191: \item $q\bar q'\to Wb\bar b$ at tree level [Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(a)] and one loop
192: \item $bq\to Wbq'$ at tree level [Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbb}(b)] and one loop
193: \item $q\bar q'\to Wb\bar bg$ at tree level
194: \item $bq\to Wbq'g$ at tree level
195: \item $gq\to Wb\bar bq'$ at tree level (Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj})
196: \item $bg\to Wbq\bar q'$ at tree level
197: \end{itemize}
198: In all cases $q=u,d,s,c$, and we include Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa
199: (CKM) mixing. The $b$-quark mass is neglected throughout (except
200: where noted). The calculation is simpler than the corresponding
201: calculation for $ZQj$ and $ZQ\overline Q$ because there are several
202: subprocesses that have no contributing analogue, namely $Qg\to ZQg$
203: and $gg\to ZQ\overline Q$ \cite{Campbell:2005zv}. The analogous
204: processes, $bg\to Wtg$ and $gg\to Wt\bar b$, yield a top quark in
205: the final state. We do not consider these, or any other processes
206: that yield a top quark, as part of our calculation of the $Wbj$ and
207: $Wb\bar b$ backgrounds.
208:
209: The NLO calculations in this paper were performed with the
210: Monte-Carlo code MCFM \cite{Ellis:1999ec,MCFM}. The leading-order
211: calculations were performed both with this code and with MadEvent
212: \cite{Maltoni:2002qb}. The NLO corrections are included in the code
213: MCFM by implementing the virtual helicity amplitudes of
214: Ref.~\cite{Bern:1997sc}. These are given in the four-dimensional
215: helicity scheme, which is used throughout the calculation. The
216: strong coupling constant is shifted from this scheme to the
217: $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme \cite{Catani:1996pk}. The real
218: corrections are adapted from Ref.~\cite{Nagy:1998bb} and
219: singularities are handled using the dipole subtraction
220: method~\cite{Catani:1996vz}. Since the matrix elements contain the
221: decay of the gauge boson into massless particles, the code is
222: general enough to provide results for final states from $W^*\to
223: \ell\nu$, including the correlation between the $W^*$ spin and the
224: angular distribution of the leptons. For this paper we specialize to
225: the case of an on-shell $W$ boson.
226:
227: The NLO cross sections are presented in
228: Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_exclusive}. To obtain the NLO cross sections for
229: $Wbj$ and $Wb\bar b$, which involve the radiation of additional
230: partons, two partons are combined into a single jet by adding their
231: four-momenta if $\Delta R_{jj}<0.7$. If the combined partons are
232: both $b$ quarks, then the process contributes to the column labeled
233: $W(b\bar b)j$. This is a $W+2j$ event in which one jet contains two
234: $b$ quarks, which changes the tagging probability for that jet
235: \cite{Acosta:2004nj}. It is calculated with a finite $b$-quark mass
236: ($m_b=4.75$ GeV) in order to regulate the logarithmic divergence
237: present when the heavy quarks are collinear. If all three partons
238: are well separated, then the process contributes to either $Wb\bar
239: bj$ or $Wbjj$.
240: %\footnote{The matrix elements for both $W(b\bar b)j$
241: %and $Wb\bar bj$ are calculated with a finite $b$-quark mass, but
242: %massive phase space is used only in the former.}
243:
244: There is another aspect of the calculation in which the $b$-quark
245: mass cannot be neglected. If the $b$ quark comes from a final-state
246: virtual gluon splitting to $b\bar b$, with the other $b$ quark
247: missed, then the cross section is sensitive to the $b$-quark mass.
248: This can occur in the NLO processes $q\bar q'\to Wb\bar bg$ and
249: $gq\to Wb\bar bq'$, both of which contribute to $Wbj$ when one $b$
250: quark is missed. We therefore calculated these processes with a
251: finite $b$-quark mass. In the case of the process $gq\to Wb\bar
252: bq'$, which involves the splitting $g\to b\bar b$ in the initial
253: state (see Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj}) as well as the final state, this
254: requires that we abandon the dipole subtraction method in favor of
255: subtracting the mass singularity via the truncated $b$ distribution
256: function \cite{Aivazis:1993pi,Collins:1998rz}
257: \begin{equation}
258: \tilde b(x,\mu) =
259: \frac{\alpha_S(\mu)}{2\pi}\ln\left(\frac{\mu^2}{m_b^2}\right)\int_x^1\frac{dy}{y}P_{qg}\left(\frac{x}{y}\right)g(y,\mu)
260: \end{equation}
261: where $P_{qg}(z)={1\over 2}[z^2+(1-z)^2]$ is the DGLAP splitting
262: function. The counterterm is constructed by calculating $\tilde
263: bq\to Wbq'$; this cancels the initial-state logarithmic dependence
264: on the $b$-quark mass in $gq\to Wb\bar bq'$, and yields a cross
265: section in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ factorization scheme.
266:
267: It is interesting to compare the LO result for $Wbj$ with a
268: calculation based on $gq\to Wq'b\bar b$ (Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj})
269: \cite{Mangano:2001xp}, which does not use a $b$ distribution
270: function. With the same parameters as
271: Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_exclusive}, and using $m_b=4.75$ GeV and CTEQ6L1
272: parton distribution functions \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}, we find a cross
273: section of 1.92 pb at the Tevatron. This is to be compared with
274: 1.06 pb using $bq\to Wbq'$, and serves as a rough check of the
275: formalism. Both of these numbers are LO and very scale dependent, so
276: one should expect only qualitative agreement.\footnote{Including the
277: uncertainties due to the independent variation of the
278: renormalization and factorization scales from $M_W/2$ to $2M_W$, the
279: cross sections are $1.92^{+0.84}_{-0.51}\,^{+0.22}_{-0.15}$ pb for
280: $gq\to Wq'b\bar b$ and $1.06^{+0.28}_{-0.20}\,^{+0.03}_{-0.07}$ pb
281: for $bq\to Wbq'$} The result at the LHC ($W^++W^-$) is 81 pb, which
282: is to be compared with the 87.3 pb result obtained using $bq\to
283: Wbq'$ (see Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_exclusive}). In any case, the NLO
284: results presented in this paper should be more accurate than any of
285: these LO results.
286:
287: We checked that the effect of the heavy-quark mass is small if all
288: $b$ quarks are at high $p_T$ by comparing $Wb\bar b$ at tree level
289: with and without a finite quark mass. With the cuts used in this
290: paper, we find a reduction of the $Wb\bar b$ cross section by about
291: 7\% at the Tevatron ($p_T> 15$ GeV) and 2\% at the LHC ($p_T> 25$
292: GeV). This is the same as the result found for the effect of the
293: $b$-quark mass on the full NLO calculation at the Tevatron
294: \cite{FebresCordero:2006sj}, which suggests that the effect of the
295: $b$-quark mass can be divined from a LO calculation. We found that
296: the heavy-quark mass is a similarly small effect for $Wb\bar bj$ at
297: tree level, as expected.
298:
299: We also list in Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_exclusive} the LO (in
300: parentheses) and NLO cross sections for $Wjj$
301: \cite{Campbell:2003hd,Campbell:2002tg}, and the LO cross section for
302: $Wjjj$. We ignore CKM mixing, which is a negligible effect at LO,
303: and is therefore also negligible at NLO. In these cross sections we
304: have included the contribution from light partons as well as heavy
305: quarks ($c,b$). Thus, for example, the fraction of $W+2j$ events in
306: which only one of the jets can be tagged as $b$ jet is given by
307: $[Wbj+W(b\bar b)j]/Wjj$.
308:
309: \section{Results}\label{sec:results}%
310:
311: The results in Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_exclusive} are remarkable. First
312: we see that, at NLO, the cross sections for $Wbj$ and $Wb\bar b$ are
313: comparable at the Tevatron. Thus both final states are important
314: backgrounds to single top and Higgs. At the LHC, $Wbj$ is much
315: larger than $Wb\bar b$. At both machines, the correction to $Wbj$
316: is large (for $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_W$), about a factor of 1.9 at the LHC
317: and a factor of 2.4 at the Tevatron. The correction is larger at
318: the Tevatron because $Wb\bar b$, which is comparable in size, feeds
319: into the $Wbj$ column at NLO when one of the $b$ quarks is outside
320: the fiducial region ($p_T>15$ GeV, $|\eta|<2$).
321:
322: The correction to $Wb\bar b$ is significant at both machines, but
323: more modest than that of $Wbj$, again for $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_W$. At the
324: LHC the cross section for $Wb\bar bj$ is comparable to that of
325: $Wb\bar b$, which calls into question the reliability of
326: perturbation theory. However, $Wb\bar bj$ is also a correction to
327: $Wbj$, and when compared with that LO cross section it is a modest
328: correction. Nevertheless, it does mean that when demanding two $b$
329: quarks in the final state, the processes $Wb\bar b$ and $Wb\bar bj$
330: are comparable at the LHC. The latter is only known at LO and
331: therefore has a large uncertainty. This is reflected by the large
332: scale dependence associated with this process, as discussed in
333: Refs.~\cite{Campbell:2003hd,FebresCordero:2006sj}.
334:
335: Using the results in Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_exclusive}, we construct a
336: set of inclusive cross sections, presented in
337: Table~\ref{tab:Wbj_inclusive}. Displayed this way, the radiative
338: corrections to the cross sections are even more significant,
339: especially for $Wb\bar b+X$ at the LHC, where the NLO cross section
340: is about 2.7 times the LO cross section. However, the proper way to
341: regard this is that a new process enters at NLO, namely $gq\to
342: Wb\bar bq'$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:Wbbj}), which is also a correction to
343: the much larger LO process $bq\to Wbq'$, as discussed in the
344: previous paragraph. We also list the uncertainties from varying the
345: renormalization scale from $M_W/2$ to $2M_W$ while keeping the
346: factorization scale fixed at $M_W$, from varying the factorization
347: scale from $M_W/2$ to $2M_W$ while keeping the renormalization scale
348: fixed at $M_W$, and from varying the parton distribution functions
349: \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The largest uncertainty is from varying the
350: renormalization scale, since the process under consideration is of
351: order $\alpha_S^2$ at leading order.
352:
353: \begin{table}[t]
354: \caption{Exclusive cross sections (pb) for $W$ boson plus two (or
355: more) jets, with at least one $b$ jet, at the Tevatron
356: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$, $p_T>15$ GeV and $|\eta|<2$) and LHC
357: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$, $p_T>25$ GeV and $|\eta|<2.5$). Two
358: final-state partons are merged into a single jet if $\Delta
359: R_{jj}<0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging efficiencies are
360: included. The labels on the columns have the following meaning:
361: $Wbj=$ exactly two jets, one of which contains a $b$ quark; $Wb\bar
362: b=$ exactly two jets, both of which contain a $b$ quark; $W(b\bar
363: b)j=$ exactly two jets, one of which contains two $b$ quarks;
364: $Wbjj=$ exactly three jets, one of which contains a $b$ quark;
365: $Wb\overline bj=$ exactly three jets, two of which contain a $b$
366: quark. For the last set of processes, which include both light and
367: heavy partons in the final state, the labels mean: $Wjj=$ exactly
368: two jets; $Wjjj=$ exactly three jets. For $Wbj$, $Wb\bar b$, and
369: $Wjj$, both the leading-order (in parentheses) and
370: next-to-leading-order cross sections are given. The CTEQ6M parton
371: distribution functions are used throughout, except for the LO cross
372: sections in parentheses, where CTEQ6L1 is used
373: \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The factorization and renormalization scales
374: are chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_W$.
375: %The uncertainties are from the
376: %variation of the renormalization scale, the factorization scale, and
377: %the parton distribution functions, respectively.
378: }
379: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
380: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
381: \medskip
382: \begin{center}
383: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|ccc|cc|}
384: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{} & \multicolumn{5}{c|}{Cross sections (pb) }\\[1pt]
385: \hline
386: Collider & $Wbj$ & $Wb\overline b$ & $W(b\overline b)j$ & $Wbjj$ & $Wb\overline bj$ \\
387: \hline
388: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & (1.06) 2.54 & (2.48) 3.14 & 0.89 & 0.18 & 0.65 \\
389: LHC $W^+$ & (51.7) 96.2 & (9.5) 14.3 & 27.0 & 13.8 & 11.6 \\
390: LHC $W^-$ & (35.6) 66.4 & (6.6) 9.6 & 19.0 & 9.3 & 7.6 \\
391: \hline
392: & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{$Wjj$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Wjjj$} \\
393: \hline
394: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{(261) 290 } & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{39 } \\
395: LHC $W^+ $ & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{(4990) 4170 } & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{1280} \\
396: LHC $W^- $ & \multicolumn{3}{|c}{(3650) 3030 } & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{890} \\
397: \hline
398: \end{tabular}
399: \end{center}
400: \label{tab:Wbj_exclusive}
401: \end{table}
402:
403: \begin{table}[t]
404: \caption{Inclusive cross sections (pb) for $W$ boson plus two (or
405: more) jets, with at least one $b$ jet, at the Tevatron
406: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$, $p_T>15$ GeV and $|\eta|<2$) and LHC
407: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$, $p_T>25$ GeV and $|\eta|<2.5$). Two
408: final-state partons are merged into a single jet if $\Delta
409: R_{jj}<0.7$. No branching ratios or tagging efficiencies are
410: included. The labels on the columns have the following meaning:
411: $Wbj+X=$ at least two jets, one of which contains a $b$ quark;
412: $Wb\bar b+X=$ at least two jets, two of which contain a $b$ quark;
413: $W(b\bar b)j=$ two jets, one of which contains two $b$ quarks. The
414: label $Wjj+X=$ at least two jets, containing both light and heavy
415: partons. For $Wbj+X$, $Wb\bar b+X$, and $Wjj+X$, both the
416: leading-order (in parentheses) and next-to-leading-order cross
417: sections are given. The CTEQ6M parton distribution functions are
418: used throughout, except for the LO cross sections in parentheses,
419: where CTEQ6L1 is used \cite{Pumplin:2002vw}. The factorization and
420: renormalization scales are chosen as $\mu_F=\mu_R=M_W$. The
421: uncertainties are from the variation of the renormalization scale,
422: the factorization scale, and the parton distribution functions,
423: respectively.} \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.2cm}
424: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
425: \medskip
426: \begin{center}
427: \begin{tabular}[5]{|c|ccc|}
428: \hline \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{Cross sections (pb) }\\[1pt]
429: \hline
430: Collider & $Wbj+X$ & $Wb\overline b+X$ & $W(b\overline b)j$ \\
431: \hline
432: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ &(1.06) $2.72^{+0.68}_{-0.50}\,^{+0.01}_{-0.04}\,^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$&(2.49) $3.79^{+0.56}_{-0.47}\,^{+0.12}_{-0.08}\,^{+0.11}_{-0.11}$&$0.89^{+0.36}_{-0.23}\,^{+0.10}_{-0.07}\,^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$\\
433: LHC $W^+$ &(51.7) $110^{+23}_{-18}\,^{+11}_{-17}\,^{+3.6}_{-3.6}$&(9.5) $25.9^{+6.2}_{-5.1}\,^{+0}_{-0.3}\,^{+0.6}_{-0.6}$&$27.0^{+11}_{-7.1}\,^{+0.1}_{-0.3}\,^{+0.9}_{-0.9}$\\
434: LHC $W^-$ &(35.6) $75.7^{+17}_{-12}\,^{+7.3}_{-9.5}\,^{+2.6}_{-2.6}$&(6.6) $17.2^{+4.2}_{-3.3}\,^{+0.2}_{-0.5}\,^{+0.5}_{-0.5}$&$19.0^{+7.7}_{-5.0}\,^{+0.1}_{-0.3}\,^{+0.7}_{-0.7}$\\
435: \hline
436: & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{$Wjj+X$} \\
437: \hline
438: TeV $W^+(=W^-)$ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{(261) $329^{+30}_{-32}\,^{+6}_{-6}\,^{+7}_{-7}$ } \\
439: LHC $W^+ $ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{(4990) $5450^{+410}_{-480}\,^{+70}_{-0}\,^{+190}_{-190}$ } \\
440: LHC $W^- $ & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{(3650) $3920^{+300}_{-310}\,^{+60}_{-10}\,^{+150}_{-150}$ } \\
441: \hline
442: \end{tabular}
443: \end{center}
444: \label{tab:Wbj_inclusive}
445: \end{table}
446:
447: We show in Figs.~\ref{fig:mudep_wbj_tev} and \ref{fig:mudep_wbj_lhc}
448: the renormalization- and factorization-scale dependence at LO and
449: NLO for the inclusive $Wbj+X$ cross section at the Tevatron and the
450: LHC, respectively. At the Tevatron, there is almost no reduction of
451: the renormalization-scale dependence at NLO. This supports our
452: earlier argument that part of the source of the large NLO correction
453: to this process is that the process $Wb\bar bj$ contributes when one
454: of the $b$ jets is missed. Since this is a tree-level process, it
455: has a large renormalization-scale dependence. There is only a mild
456: reduction of the renormalization-scale dependence at the LHC. At
457: both machines there is a mild reduction of the factorization-scale
458: dependence.
459:
460: \begin{figure}[ht]
461: \begin{center}
462: \begin{sideways}
463: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=8cm
464: \epsfbox{mudep_wbj_tev.ps}
465: \end{sideways}
466: \vspace*{-.8cm}
467: \end{center}
468: \caption{Renormalization- and factorization-scale dependence of the
469: inclusive $Wbj+X$ cross section at LO (dashed) and NLO (solid) at
470: the Tevatron. The cross section is normalized to its value at the
471: reference scale $\mu_0=M_W$.} \label{fig:mudep_wbj_tev}
472: \end{figure}
473:
474: \begin{figure}[ht]
475: \begin{center}
476: \begin{sideways}
477: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=8cm
478: \epsfbox{mudep_wbj_lhc.ps}
479: \end{sideways}
480: \vspace*{-.8cm}
481: \end{center}
482: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:mudep_wbj_tev}, but at the LHC.}
483: \label{fig:mudep_wbj_lhc}
484: \end{figure}
485:
486: Using the code MCFM \cite{Ellis:1999ec,MCFM}, we are able to plot
487: any desired distribution at both LO and NLO. For example, we show
488: in Fig.~\ref{fig:highpt-tev} the exclusive NLO differential cross
489: section at the Tevatron for $Wb\bar b$, $Wbj$, and $W(b\bar b)j$,
490: versus the transverse momentum ($p_T$) of the jet with the highest
491: $p_T$. For $Wbj$, the highest-$p_T$ jet contains a $b$ quark $48\%$
492: of the time; for $W(b\bar b)j$, the percentage is $63\%$. The
493: $W(b\bar b)j$ cross section, which first arises at NLO, has a very
494: different shape from the other two, and is only significant at high
495: $p_T$.
496:
497: The lower histogram in Fig.~\ref{fig:highpt-tev} shows the ratio of
498: the NLO and LO cross sections. We see that there is a change in
499: shape of the $Wbj$ and $Wb\bar b$ differential cross sections at
500: NLO, with relatively more events at low $p_T$. There is also an
501: enhancement of the $Wbj$ cross section at high $p_T$, due to the
502: process $q\bar q\to Wb\bar bj$ with one $b$ missed.
503:
504: We show in Fig.~\ref{fig:lepton-tev} the exclusive NLO transverse
505: momentum distribution of the charged lepton from $W$ decay at the
506: Tevatron. We again see a change in shape at NLO, with relatively
507: more events at low $p_T$ for $Wbb$, and relatively more events at
508: high $p_T$ for $Wbj$, the latter again due to the process $q\bar
509: q\to Wb\bar bj$ with one $b$ missed. This plot demonstrates the
510: ability of MCFM to calculate quantities involving the decay products
511: of the $W$ boson while correctly treating the correlation between
512: the angular distribution of the decay products and the $W$ spin. The
513: $W$ boson is treated as on-shell in these plots, but MCFM is
514: flexible enough to allow for off-shell $W$ bosons as well.
515:
516: We show in Fig.~\ref{fig:massinv-tev} the exclusive NLO di-jet
517: invariant mass at the Tevatron. Both $Wb\bar b$ and $Wbj$ are
518: enhanced at low invariant masses at NLO. The process $W(b\bar b)j$
519: is significant at high invariant mass. All three processes are
520: numerically important as backgrounds to the search for a Higgs boson
521: via the process $q\bar q\to Wh\to Wb\bar b$. For example, the
522: integrated cross sections in the region 110 GeV $<m_{jj}<130$ GeV
523: are 130 fb for $Wbj$, 95 fb for $Wb\bar b$, and 75 fb for $W(b\bar
524: b)j$.
525:
526: We show in Figs.~\ref{fig:highpt-lhc},\ref{fig:lepton-lhc},
527: \ref{fig:massinv-lhc} the same distributions at the LHC, but this
528: time for the inclusive cross sections, rather than exclusive. At
529: the LHC, the process $Wbj+X$ is dominant, while $Wbb+X$ and $W(bb)j$
530: are comparable. There is little change in shape of the
531: distributions at NLO, with the exception of the $p_T$ spectrum of
532: the highest $p_T$ jet, which is enhanced at high $p_T$ for $Wb\bar
533: b+X$. The di-jet invariant mass distribution also shows an
534: enhancement at low values of the invariant mass, but not at values
535: relevant for the Higgs search.
536:
537: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
538: %%%%%%%%%% FIGURES %%%%%%%%%%%%
539: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
540:
541: \begin{figure}[ht]
542: \begin{center}
543: \begin{sideways}
544: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=11cm \epsfbox{highpt-tev.ps}
545: \end{sideways}
546: \vspace*{-.8cm}
547: \end{center}
548: \caption{Exclusive NLO differential cross sections at the Tevatron
549: ($\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV $p\bar p$, $p_T>15$ GeV, $|\eta|<2$, $\Delta
550: R_{jj}>0.7$) for $Wbb$ (blue or black) and $Wbj$ (red or gray),
551: versus the transverse momentum ($p_T$) of the highest-$p_T$ jet.
552: Also shown is the distribution for the NLO process $W(b\bar b)j$
553: (magenta or light gray, dot-dashed), in which a jet contains two $b$
554: quarks. The lower histogram shows the ratio of the NLO and LO cross
555: sections.} \label{fig:highpt-tev}
556: \end{figure}
557:
558: \begin{figure}[ht]
559: \begin{center}
560: \begin{sideways}
561: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=11cm \epsfbox{lepton-tev.ps}
562: \end{sideways}
563: \vspace*{-.8cm}
564: \end{center}
565: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:highpt-tev}, but for the charged
566: lepton from $W$ decay.} \label{fig:lepton-tev}
567: \end{figure}
568:
569: \begin{figure}[ht]
570: \begin{center}
571: \begin{sideways}
572: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=11cm
573: \epsfbox{massinv-tev.ps}
574: \end{sideways}
575: \vspace*{-.8cm}
576: \end{center}
577: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:highpt-tev}, but for the di-jet
578: invariant mass.} \label{fig:massinv-tev}
579: \end{figure}
580:
581:
582: \begin{figure}[ht]
583: \begin{center}
584: \begin{sideways}
585: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=11cm \epsfbox{highpt-lhc.ps}
586: \end{sideways}
587: \vspace*{-.8cm}
588: \end{center}
589: \caption{Inclusive NLO differential cross sections at the LHC
590: ($\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV $pp$, $p_T>25$ GeV, $|\eta|<2.5$, $\Delta
591: R_{jj}>0.7$) for $Wbb[+j]$ (blue or black) and $Wbj[+j]$ (red or
592: gray), versus the transverse momentum ($p_T$) of the highest-$p_T$
593: jet. Also shown is the distribution for the NLO process $W(b\bar
594: b)j$ (magenta or light gray, dot-dashed), in which a jet contains
595: two $b$ quarks. The lower histogram shows the ratio of the NLO and
596: LO cross sections.} \label{fig:highpt-lhc}
597: \end{figure}
598:
599: \begin{figure}[ht]
600: \begin{center}
601: \begin{sideways}
602: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=11cm \epsfbox{lepton-lhc.ps}
603: \end{sideways}
604: \vspace*{-.8cm}
605: \end{center}
606: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:highpt-lhc}, but for the charged
607: lepton from $W$ decay.} \label{fig:lepton-lhc}
608: \end{figure}
609:
610: \begin{figure}[ht]
611: \begin{center}
612: \begin{sideways}
613: \vspace*{.2cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=11cm
614: \epsfbox{massinv-lhc.ps}
615: \end{sideways}
616: \vspace*{-.8cm}
617: \end{center}
618: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:highpt-lhc}, but for the di-jet
619: invariant mass. For $Wbb[+j]$, the invariant mass is that of the
620: two $b$ jets; for $Wbj[+j]$, the invariant mass is that of the $b$
621: jet and the other jet with the higher $p_T$.}
622: \label{fig:massinv-lhc}
623: \end{figure}
624:
625: The code MCFM is publicly available \cite{MCFM}, and one can
626: generate any desired distribution. We hope the calculation outlined
627: in this paper is useful to better understand the backgrounds to
628: single-top production, Higgs production, and signals of new physics
629: at the Tevatron and the LHC.
630:
631: \section*{Acknowledgments}
632:
633: \indent\indent We are grateful for conversations and correspondence
634: with C.~Ciobanu, J.~Ellison, A.~Heinson, T.~Junk, T.~Liss,
635: T.~McElmurry, F.~Olness, K.~Pitts, and R.~Schwienhorst. J.~C.\ and
636: S.~W.\ thank the Aspen Center for Physics for hospitality. This
637: work was supported in part by the U.~S.~Department of Energy under
638: contracts Nos.~DE-AC02-76CH03000 and DE-FG02-91ER40677.
639:
640: \begin{thebibliography}{99}%
641:
642: \bibitem{Abe:1995hr}
643: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
644: %``Observation of top quark production in anti-p p collisions,''
645: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2626 (1995)
646: [arXiv:hep-ex/9503002].
647: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503002;%%
648:
649: \bibitem{Abachi:1995iq}
650: S.~Abachi {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
651: %``Observation of the top quark,''
652: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 2632 (1995)
653: [arXiv:hep-ex/9503003].
654: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9503003;%%
655:
656: \bibitem{Acosta:2001ct}
657: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
658: %``Study of the heavy flavor content of jets produced in association with W
659: %bosons in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
660: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 052007 (2002)
661: [arXiv:hep-ex/0109012].
662: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0109012;%%
663:
664: \bibitem{Campbell:2000bg}
665: J.~M.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
666: %``Radiative corrections to Z b anti-b production,''
667: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 114012 (2000)
668: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006304].
669: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006304;%%
670:
671: \bibitem{Campbell:2003dd}
672: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
673: %``Associated production of a Z boson and a single heavy-quark jet,''
674: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 074021 (2004)
675: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312024].
676: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312024;%%
677:
678: \bibitem{Campbell:2005zv}
679: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis, F.~Maltoni and S.~Willenbrock,
680: %``Production of a Z boson and two jets with one heavy-quark tag,''
681: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 73}, 054007 (2006)
682: [arXiv:hep-ph/0510362].
683: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510362;%%
684:
685: \bibitem{Maltoni:2005wd}
686: F.~Maltoni, T.~McElmurry and S.~Willenbrock,
687: % ``Inclusive production of a Higgs or Z boson in association with heavy
688: % quarks,''
689: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 074024 (2005)
690: [arXiv:hep-ph/0505014].
691: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505014;%%
692:
693: \bibitem{Acosta:2004bs}
694: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
695: %``Search for electroweak single top quark production in p anti-p collisions
696: %at s**(1/2) = 1.96-TeV,''
697: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 012005 (2005)
698: [arXiv:hep-ex/0410058].
699: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410058;%%
700:
701: \bibitem{Abazov:2005zz}
702: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
703: % ``Search for single top quark production in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2)
704: % = 1.96-TeV,''
705: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 622}, 265 (2005)
706: [arXiv:hep-ex/0505063].
707: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0505063;%%
708:
709: \bibitem{Abazov:2006uq}
710: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
711: %``Multivariate searches for single top quark production with the D0
712: %detector,''
713: arXiv:hep-ex/0604020.
714: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0604020;%%
715:
716: \bibitem{Abazov:2004jy}
717: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
718: %``A search for $W b\bar{b}$ and $W H$ production in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at
719: %$\sqrt{s} = 1.96$ TeV,''
720: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 091802 (2005)
721: [arXiv:hep-ex/0410062].
722: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0410062;%%
723:
724: \bibitem{Acosta:2005ga}
725: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
726: %``Search for Higgs bosons decaying into b anti-b and produced in association
727: %with a vector boson in proton antiproton collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
728: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 95}, 051801 (2005)
729: [arXiv:hep-ex/0503039].
730: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0503039;%%
731:
732: \bibitem{Willenbrock:1986cr}
733: S.~S.~D.~Willenbrock and D.~A.~Dicus,
734: %``Production Of Heavy Quarks From W Gluon Fusion,''
735: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 34}, 155 (1986).
736: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D34,155;%%
737:
738: \bibitem{Yuan:1989tc}
739: C.~P.~Yuan,
740: %``A New Method To Detect A Heavy Top Quark At The Tevatron,''
741: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 41}, 42 (1990).
742: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D41,42;%%
743:
744: \bibitem{Ellis:1992yw}
745: R.~K.~Ellis and S.~J.~Parke,
746: %``Top quark production by W gluon fusion,''
747: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 46}, 3785 (1992).
748: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D46,3785;%%
749:
750: \bibitem{Cortese:1991fw}
751: S.~Cortese and R.~Petronzio,
752: %``The Single top production channel at Tevatron energies,''
753: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 253}, 494 (1991).
754: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B253,494;%%
755:
756: \bibitem{Stelzer:1995mi}
757: T.~Stelzer and S.~Willenbrock,
758: %``Single top quark production via q anti-q $\to$ t anti-b,''
759: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 357}, 125 (1995)
760: [arXiv:hep-ph/9505433].
761: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9505433;%%
762:
763: \bibitem{Stange:1993ya}
764: A.~Stange, W.~J.~Marciano and S.~Willenbrock,
765: %``Higgs bosons at the Fermilab Tevatron,''
766: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 1354 (1994)
767: [arXiv:hep-ph/9309294].
768: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9309294;%%
769:
770: \bibitem{Stange:1994bb}
771: A.~Stange, W.~J.~Marciano and S.~Willenbrock,
772: %``Associated production of Higgs and weak bosons, with H $\to$ b anti-b, at
773: %hadron colliders,''
774: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 4491 (1994)
775: [arXiv:hep-ph/9404247].
776: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9404247;%%
777:
778: \bibitem{Bordes:1994ki}
779: G.~Bordes and B.~van Eijk,
780: %``Calculating QCD corrections to single top production in hadronic
781: %interactions,''
782: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 435}, 23 (1995).
783: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B435,23;%%
784:
785: \bibitem{Smith:1996ij}
786: M.~C.~Smith and S.~Willenbrock,
787: %``QCD and Yukawa Corrections to Single-Top-Quark Production via q qbar $\to$
788: %t bbar,''
789: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 6696 (1996)
790: [arXiv:hep-ph/9604223].
791: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604223;%%
792:
793: \bibitem{Stelzer:1997ns}
794: T.~Stelzer, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Willenbrock,
795: %``Single-top-quark production via W-gluon fusion at next-to-leading order,''
796: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 5919 (1997)
797: [arXiv:hep-ph/9705398].
798: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705398;%%
799:
800: \bibitem{Chetyrkin:2000mq}
801: K.~G.~Chetyrkin and M.~Steinhauser,
802: %``Three-loop non-diagonal current correlators in QCD and NLO corrections to
803: %single top quark production,''
804: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 502}, 104 (2001)
805: [arXiv:hep-ph/0012002].
806: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012002;%%
807:
808: \bibitem{Harris:2002md}
809: B.~W.~Harris, E.~Laenen, L.~Phaf, Z.~Sullivan and S.~Weinzierl,
810: %``The fully differential single top quark cross section in next-to-leading
811: %order QCD,''
812: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 054024 (2002)
813: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207055].
814: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207055;%%
815:
816: \bibitem{Cao:2004ky}
817: Q.~H.~Cao and C.~P.~Yuan,
818: %``Single top quark production and decay at next-to-leading order in hadron
819: %collision,''
820: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 054022 (2005)
821: [arXiv:hep-ph/0408180].
822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408180;%%
823:
824: \bibitem{Cao:2004ap}
825: Q.~H.~Cao, R.~Schwienhorst and C.~P.~Yuan,
826: %``Next-to-leading order corrections to single top quark production and decay
827: %at Tevatron. I: s-channel process,''
828: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 054023 (2005)
829: [arXiv:hep-ph/0409040].
830: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409040;%%
831:
832: \bibitem{Sullivan:2004ie}
833: Z.~Sullivan,
834: %``Understanding single-top-quark production and jets at hadron colliders,''
835: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 114012 (2004)
836: [arXiv:hep-ph/0408049].
837: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408049;%%
838:
839: \bibitem{Campbell:2004ch}
840: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis and F.~Tramontano,
841: %``Single top production and decay at next-to-leading order,''
842: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 094012 (2004)
843: [arXiv:hep-ph/0408158].
844: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408158;%%
845:
846: \bibitem{Cao:2005pq}
847: Q.~H.~Cao, R.~Schwienhorst, J.~A.~Benitez, R.~Brock and C.~P.~Yuan,
848: %``Next-to-leading order corrections to single top quark production and decay
849: %at the Tevatron. II: t-channel process,''
850: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 094027 (2005)
851: [arXiv:hep-ph/0504230].
852: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504230;%%
853:
854: \bibitem{Frixione:2005vw}
855: S.~Frixione, E.~Laenen, P.~Motylinski and B.~R.~Webber,
856: %``Single-top production in MC@NLO,''
857: JHEP {\bf 0603}, 092 (2006)
858: [arXiv:hep-ph/0512250].
859: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512250;%%
860:
861: \bibitem{Han:1991ia}
862: T.~Han and S.~Willenbrock,
863: %``QCD correction to the p p $\to$ W H and Z H total cross-sections,''
864: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 273}, 167 (1991).
865: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B273,167;%%
866:
867: \bibitem{Brein:2003wg}
868: O.~Brein, A.~Djouadi and R.~Harlander,
869: %``NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgs-strahlung processes at hadron
870: %colliders,''
871: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 579}, 149 (2004)
872: [arXiv:hep-ph/0307206].
873: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307206;%%
874:
875: \bibitem{Ciccolini:2003jy}
876: M.~L.~Ciccolini, S.~Dittmaier and M.~Kramer,
877: %``Electroweak radiative corrections to associated W H and Z H production at
878: %hadron colliders,''
879: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 073003 (2003)
880: [arXiv:hep-ph/0306234].
881: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306234;%%
882:
883: \bibitem{Ellis:1998fv}
884: R.~K.~Ellis and S.~Veseli,
885: %``Strong radiative corrections to W b anti-b production in p anti-p
886: %collisions,''
887: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 011501 (1999)
888: [arXiv:hep-ph/9810489].
889: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810489;%%
890:
891: \bibitem{Campbell:2003hd}
892: J.~Campbell, R.~K.~Ellis and D.~L.~Rainwater,
893: %``Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for W + 2jet and Z + 2jet production
894: %at the CERN LHC,''
895: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 094021 (2003)
896: [arXiv:hep-ph/0308195].
897: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308195;%%
898:
899: \bibitem{FebresCordero:2006sj}
900: F.~Febres Cordero, L.~Reina and D.~Wackeroth,
901: %``NLO QCD corrections to W boson production with a massive b-quark jet pair
902: %at the Tevatron p anti-p collider,''
903: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 034007 (2006)
904: [arXiv:hep-ph/0606102].
905: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0606102;%%
906:
907: \bibitem{Mangano:2001xp}
908: M.~L.~Mangano, M.~Moretti and R.~Pittau,
909: %``Multijet matrix elements and shower evolution in hadronic collisions: W b
910: %anti-b + (n)jets as a case study,''
911: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 632}, 343 (2002)
912: [arXiv:hep-ph/0108069].
913: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108069;%%
914:
915: \bibitem{Aivazis:1993pi}
916: M.~A.~G.~Aivazis, J.~C.~Collins, F.~I.~Olness and W.~K.~Tung,
917: %``Leptoproduction of heavy quarks. 2. A Unified QCD formulation of charged
918: %and neutral current processes from fixed target to collider energies,''
919: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 3102 (1994)
920: [arXiv:hep-ph/9312319].
921: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9312319;%%
922:
923: \bibitem{Collins:1998rz}
924: J.~C.~Collins,
925: %``Hard-scattering factorization with heavy quarks: A general treatment,''
926: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 094002 (1998)
927: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806259].
928: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806259;%%
929:
930: \bibitem{Grab:2006qb}
931: C.~Grab [H1 and ZEUS Collaborations],
932: %``Beauty production at HERA,''
933: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 37}, 773 (2006).
934: %%CITATION = APPOA,B37,773;%%
935:
936: \bibitem{Ellis:1999ec}
937: R.~K.~Ellis {\it et al.} [QCD Tools Working Group],
938: %``Report of the QCD tools working group,''
939: arXiv:hep-ph/0011122.
940: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011122;%%
941:
942: \bibitem{MCFM}
943: J.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis, MCFM - Monte Carlo for FeMtobarn
944: processes, http://mcfm.fnal.gov/.
945:
946: \bibitem{Maltoni:2002qb}
947: F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer,
948: %``MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph,''
949: JHEP {\bf 0302}, 027 (2003)
950: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208156].
951: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208156;%%
952:
953: \bibitem{Bern:1997sc}
954: Z.~Bern, L.~J.~Dixon and D.~A.~Kosower,
955: %``One-loop amplitudes for e+ e- to four partons,''
956: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 513}, 3 (1998)
957: [arXiv:hep-ph/9708239].
958: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9708239;%%
959:
960: \bibitem{Catani:1996pk}
961: S.~Catani, M.~H.~Seymour and Z.~Trocsanyi,
962: %``Regularization scheme independence and unitarity in QCD cross sections,''
963: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 6819 (1997)
964: [arXiv:hep-ph/9610553].
965: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610553;%%
966:
967: \bibitem{Nagy:1998bb}
968: Z.~Nagy and Z.~Trocsanyi,
969: %``Next-to-leading order calculation of four-jet observables in electron
970: %positron annihilation,''
971: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 014020 (1999)
972: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 62}, 099902 (2000)]
973: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806317].
974: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806317;%%
975:
976: \bibitem{Catani:1996vz}
977: S.~Catani and M.~H.~Seymour,
978: %``A general algorithm for calculating jet cross sections in NLO QCD,''
979: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 485}, 291 (1997)
980: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 510}, 503 (1997)]
981: [arXiv:hep-ph/9605323].
982: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605323;%%
983:
984: \bibitem{Acosta:2004nj}
985: D.~Acosta {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
986: %``Measurements of bottom anti-bottom azimuthal production correlations in
987: %proton antiproton collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
988: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 092001 (2005)
989: [arXiv:hep-ex/0412006].
990: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0412006;%%
991:
992: \bibitem{Pumplin:2002vw}
993: J.~Pumplin, D.~R.~Stump, J.~Huston, H.~L.~Lai, P.~Nadolsky and W.~K.~Tung,
994: %``New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD
995: %analysis,''
996: JHEP {\bf 0207}, 012 (2002)
997: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201195].
998: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201195;%%
999:
1000: \bibitem{Campbell:2002tg}
1001: J.~Campbell and R.~K.~Ellis,
1002: %``Next-to-leading order corrections to W + 2jet and Z + 2jet production at
1003: %hadron colliders,''
1004: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 113007 (2002)
1005: [arXiv:hep-ph/0202176].
1006: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202176;%%
1007:
1008: \end{thebibliography}%
1009:
1010: \end{document}
1011: