1:
2: \documentclass[12pt,cite,epsf,epsfig]{article}
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \renewcommand{\today}{}
7: \setlength\textwidth{6.5 in} \setlength\topmargin{0.0cm}
8: \setlength\textheight{9.0 in} \addtolength\evensidemargin{-5.cm}
9: \addtolength\oddsidemargin{-1.55cm} \font\tenrm=cmr10
10: \setlength{\parindent}{0pt} \setlength{\parskip}{6pt}
11: \fontsize{12}{18}
12:
13:
14: \begin{document}
15: \author{S. Dev\thanks{dev5703@yahoo.com},
16: Sanjeev Kumar\thanks{sanjeev3kumar@gmail.com}, Surender
17: Verma\thanks{ s\_7verma@yahoo.co.in} and Shivani
18: Gupta\thanks{shiroberts\_1980@yahoo.co.in}}
19: \title{Phenomenology of Two-Texture Zero Neutrino Mass Matrices}
20: \date{Department of Physics, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla 171005, INDIA}
21:
22: \maketitle
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: The generic predictions of two-texture zero neutrino mass matrices
26: in the flavor basis have been examined especially in relation to
27: the degeneracies between mass matrices within a class and
28: interesting constraints on the neutrino parameters have been
29: obtained. It is shown that the knowledge of the octant of
30: $\theta_{23}$, the sign of $\cos\delta$ and neutrino mass
31: hierarchy can be used to lift these degeneracies.
32: \end{abstract}
33:
34:
35:
36: \section{Introduction}
37:
38: Mass matrices provide important tools for the investigation of the
39: underlying symmetries and the resulting dynamics. The first step
40: in this direction is the reconstruction of the neutrino mass
41: matrix in the flavor basis. However, the reconstruction results in
42: a large variety of possible structures of mass matrices depending
43: strongly on the mass scale, mass hierarchy and the Majorana
44: phases. However, the relatively weak dependence on some
45: oscillation parameters ($\theta_{23}$ and $\delta$) results in the
46: degeneracy of possible neutrino mass matrices. The mass matrix for
47: Majorana neutrinos contains nine physical parameters including the
48: three mass eigenvalues, three mixing angles and the three
49: CP-violating phases. The two squared-mass differences ($\Delta
50: m^2_{12}$ and $\Delta m^2_{13}$) and the two mixing angles
51: ($\theta_{12}$ and $\theta_{23}$) have been measured in solar,
52: atmospheric and reactor experiments. The third mixing angle
53: $\theta_{13}$ and the Dirac-type CP-violating phase $\delta$ are
54: expected to be measured in the forthcoming neutrino oscillation
55: experiments. The possible measurement of the effective Majorana
56: mass in neutrinoless double $\beta$ decay searches will provide an
57: additional constraint on the remaining three neutrino parameters
58: viz. the neutrino mass scale and two Majorana-type CP-violating
59: phases. While the neutrino mass scale will be independently
60: determined by the direct beta decay searches and cosmological
61: observations, the two Majorana phases will not be uniquely
62: determined from the measurement of effective Majorana mass even if
63: the absolute neutrino mass scale is known. Under the
64: circumstances, it is natural to employ other theoretical inputs
65: for the reconstruction of the neutrino mass matrix. The possible
66: form of these additional theoretical inputs are limited by the
67: existing neutrino data. Several proposals have been made in the
68: literature to restrict the form of the neutrino mass matrix and to
69: reduce the number of free parameters which include presence of
70: texture zeros \cite{1,2,3,4,5}, requirement of zero determinant
71: \cite{6}, the zero trace condition \cite{7} to name just a few.
72: However, the current neutrino oscillation data are consistent only
73: with a limited number of texture schemes \cite{1,2,3,4,5}. In
74: particular, the current neutrino oscillation data disallow all
75: neutrino mass matrices with three or more texture zeros in the
76: flavor basis. Out of the fifteen possible neutrino mass matrices
77: with two texture zeros, only seven are compatible with the current
78: neutrino oscillation data. The seven allowed two texture zero mass
79: matrices have been classified into three categories. The two class
80: A matrices of the types $A_1$ and $A_2$ give normal hierarchy (NH)
81: of neutrino masses. The class B matrices of types $B_1$, $B_2$,
82: $B_3$ and $B_4$ yield a quasi-degenerate (QD) spectrum of neutrino
83: masses. The single class C matrix corresponds to inverted
84: hierarchy (IH) of neutrino masses.
85:
86:
87: In the absence of a significant breakthrough in the theoretical
88: understanding of the fermion flavors, the phenomenological
89: approaches are bound to play a crucial role in interpreting new
90: experimental data on quark and lepton mixing. These approaches are
91: expected to provide useful hints towards unraveling the dynamics
92: of fermion mass generation, CP violation and identification of
93: possible underlying symmetries of the lepton flavors from which
94: realistic models of lepton mass generation and flavor mixing could
95: be, hopefully, constructed.
96:
97: Even though the grand unification on its own does not shed any
98: light on the flavor problem, the Grand Unified Theories (GUTs)
99: provide the optimal framework in which possible solutions to the
100: flavor problem could be embedded. This is because the GUTs predict
101: definite group theoretical relations between the fermion mass
102: matrices. For this purpose, it is useful to find out possible
103: leading order forms of the neutrino mass matrix in a basis in
104: which the charged lepton mass matrix is diagonal. Such forms of
105: neutrino mass matrix provide useful hints for model building which
106: will eventually shed important light on the dynamics of lepton
107: mass generation and flavor mixing. For example, a
108: phenomenologically favored texture of quark mass matrix has been
109: presented earlier \cite{8}. In the spirit of quark-lepton
110: similarity, the same texture has been prescribed for the charged
111: lepton and Dirac neutrino mass matrices. The same texture for the
112: right handed neutrino mass matrix in the see-saw mechanism might
113: follow from universal flavor symmetry hidden in a more fundamental
114: theory of mass generation. Thus, the texture zeros in different
115: positions of the neutrino mass matrix, in particular and fermion
116: mass matrices, in general could be consequence of an underlying
117: symmetry \cite{9,10}. Such universal textures of fermion mass
118: matrices can, theoretically, be obtained in the context of GUTs
119: based on SO(10) \cite{11}. Moreover, neutrino mass matrices with
120: texture zeros have important implications for leptogenesis
121: \cite{12}.
122:
123:
124: In the present work, we examine phenomenological implications of
125: all possible neutrino mass matrices with two texture zeros.
126: Neutrino mass matrices within a class were thought to have
127: identical phenomenological consequences \cite{1,2,3} leading to
128: degeneracy of mass matrices within a class. Thus, there is a
129: two-fold degeneracy in class A while the neutrino mass matrices of
130: class B exhibit an eight-fold degeneracy since normal/inverted
131: hierarchies are practically indistinguishable because of
132: quasi-degenerate spectrum of neutrino masses in this class. We
133: study this degeneracy in detail and discuss possible ways to lift
134: this degeneracy. It is found that the deviation of atmospheric
135: mixing from maximality and the quadrant of the Dirac-type
136: CP-violating phase $\delta$ can be used to distinguish the mass
137: matrices within a class. We, also, note that the determination of
138: hierarchy will have important implications for class B neutrino
139: mass matrices. The prospects for the measurement of $\theta_{13}$
140: for class A neutrino mass matrices are quite optimistic since a
141: definite lower bound on $\theta_{13}$ is obtained for this class.
142: For neutrino mass matrices of class B, CP-violation will be near
143: maximal if $\theta_{13}$ is large. Definite lower bounds on the
144: effective Majorana mass $M_{ee}$ are obtained for neutrino mass
145: matrices of class B and C. Class D of neutrino mass matrices is
146: disallowed in our analysis.
147:
148:
149:
150:
151: \section{Neutrino mass matrix}
152:
153:
154: The neutrino mass matrix, $M$, can be parameterized in terms of
155: three neutrino mass eigenvalues ($m_{1}$, $m_{2}$, $m_{3}$), three
156: neutrino mixing angles ($\theta_{12}$, $\theta_{23}$,
157: $\theta_{13}$) and one Dirac-type CP violating phase, $\delta$. If
158: neutrinos are Majorana particles then there are two additional CP
159: violating phases $\alpha$, $\beta$ in the neutrino mixing matrix.
160: The complex symmetric mass matrix $M$ can be diagonalized by a
161: complex unitary matrix $V$:
162: \begin{equation}
163: M=VM_{\nu}^{diag}V^{T}
164: \end{equation}
165: where $M_{\nu}^{diag}=Diag \{m_1,m_2,m_3\}$. The neutrino mixing
166: matrix $V$ \cite{13} can be written as
167: \begin{equation}
168: V\equiv U P=\left(
169: \begin{array}{ccc}
170: c_{12}c_{13} & s_{12}c_{13} & s_{13}e^{-i\delta} \\
171: -s_{12}c_{23}-c_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta} &
172: c_{12}c_{23}-s_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta} & s_{23}c_{13} \\
173: s_{12}s_{23}-c_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta} &
174: -c_{12}s_{23}-s_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta} & c_{23}c_{13}
175: \end{array}
176: \right)\left(
177: \begin{array}{ccc}
178: 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & e^{i\alpha} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & e^{i(\beta+\delta)}
179: \end{array}
180: \right),
181: \end{equation}
182: where $s_{ij}=\sin\theta_{ij}$ and $c_{ij}=\cos\theta_{ij}$. The
183: matrix $V$ is called the neutrino mixing matrix or PMNS matrix.
184: The matrix $U$ is the lepton analogue of the CKM quark mixing
185: matrix and $P$ contains the two Majorana phases.
186:
187: The elements of the neutrino mass matrix can be calculated from
188: Eq. (1). Some of the elements of $M$, which can be equated to zero
189: in the various allowed texture zero schemes, are given by
190: \begin{equation}
191: M_{ee}=c_{13}^{2}c_{12}^{2}m_{1}+c_{13}^{2}s_{12}^{2}m_{2}e^{2i\alpha
192: }+s_{13}^{2}m_{3}e^{2i\beta },
193: \end{equation}
194: \begin{equation}
195: M_{e \mu}=c_{13}\{ s_{13}s_{23} e^{i \delta} ( e^{2 i \beta}
196: m_3-s^2_{12} e^{2 i \alpha} m_2 ) -c_{12}c_{23}s_{12} (m_1-e^{2 i
197: \alpha} m_2 ) -c^2_{12} s_{13} s_{23} e^{i \delta} m_1\},
198: \end{equation}
199: \begin{equation}
200: M_{e \tau}=c_{13}\{ s_{13}c_{23} e^{i \delta} ( e^{2 i \beta}
201: m_3-s^2_{12} e^{2 i \alpha} m_2 ) +c_{12}s_{23}s_{12} (m_1-e^{2 i
202: \alpha} m_2 ) -c^2_{12} s_{13} c_{23} e^{i \delta} m_1\},
203: \end{equation}
204: \begin{equation}
205: M_{\mu\mu}=m_1(c_{23}s_{12}+e^{i\delta}c_{12}s_{13}s_{23})^2+
206: e^{2i\alpha}m_2(c_{12}c_{23}-e^{i\delta}s_{12}s_{13}s_{23})^2+
207: e^{2i(\beta+\delta)}m_3c^2_{13}s^2_{23}
208: \end{equation}
209: and
210: \begin{equation}
211: M_{\tau\tau}=m_1(s_{23}s_{12}-e^{i\delta}c_{12}s_{13}c_{23})^2+
212: e^{2i\alpha}m_2(c_{12}s_{23}+e^{i\delta}s_{12}s_{13}c_{23})^2+
213: e^{2i(\beta+\delta)}m_3c^2_{13}c^2_{23}.
214: \end{equation}
215: It will be helpful to note from Eqs. (4-7) that the transformation
216: \begin{equation}
217: T\hspace{12pt}:\hspace{12pt}\theta_{23}\rightarrow
218: \frac{\pi}{2}-\theta_{23}, \delta\rightarrow\delta+\pi
219: \end{equation}
220: transforms $M_{e\mu}$ to $-M_{e\tau}$ and $M_{\mu\mu}$ to
221: $M_{\tau\tau}$. Therefore, if $M_{e\mu}$ vanishes for
222: $\theta_{23}$ and $\delta$, then $M_{e\tau}$ vanishes for
223: $\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta_{23}$ and $\delta+\pi$. Similarly, if
224: $M_{\mu\mu}$ vanishes for $\theta_{23}$ and $\delta$, then
225: $M_{\tau\tau}$ vanishes for $\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta_{23}$ and
226: $\delta+\pi$. This fact can be, gainfully, used for distinguishing
227: the subcategories of neutrino mass matrices within a class.
228:
229:
230:
231: \section{Two texture zeros}
232:
233: The neutrino mass matrix, $M$, in the charged lepton basis is
234: given by Eq. (1). Out of the fifteen possible patterns for two
235: texture zeros in $M$, the seven possibilities \cite{1,2}, which
236: are found to be consistent with the current neutrino oscillation
237: data, are listed in Table 1. In addition, we have, also, included
238: the two mass matrices of class D in the list. These mass matrices
239: were disallowed in some of the earlier analyses \cite{1,2}.
240: However, it was found in a subsequent detailed numerical analysis
241: by Guo and Xing \cite{3} that the neutrino mass matrices of class
242: D are, marginally, allowed. The expressions for the vanishing
243: elements in different two-zero texture schemes have been listed in
244: Eqs. (4-7).
245:
246:
247: \begin{table}[tb]
248: \begin{center}
249: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
250: \hline
251: Type & Constraining Eqs. \\
252: \hline
253: $A_1$ & $M_{ee}=0$, $M_{e\mu}=0$ \\
254: $A_2$ & $M_{ee}=0$, $M_{e\tau}=0$ \\
255: $B_1$ & $M_{e\tau}=0$, $M_{\mu\mu}=0$ \\
256: $B_2$ & $M_{e\mu}=0$, $M_{\tau\tau}=0$ \\
257: $B_3$ & $M_{e\mu}=0$, $M_{\mu\mu}=0$ \\
258: $B_4$ & $M_{e\tau}=0$, $M_{\tau\tau}=0$ \\
259: $C$ & $M_{\mu\mu}=0$, $M_{\tau\tau}=0$ \\
260: $D_1$ & $M_{\mu\mu}=0$, $M_{\mu\tau}=0$ \\
261: $D_2$ & $M_{\tau\tau}=0$, $M_{\mu\tau}=0$ \\
262: \hline
263: \end{tabular}
264: \end{center}
265: \caption{Allowed two texture zero mass matrices.}
266: \end{table}
267:
268: The transformation T defined in Eq. (8) transforms neutrino mass
269: matrices of type $A_1$ to $A_2$ and neutrino mass matrices of type
270: $B_1$ ($B_4$) to $B_2$ ($B_3$). Therefore, the predictions for
271: neutrino mass matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$ will be identical
272: for all neutrino parameters except $\theta_{23}$ and/or $\delta$.
273: Similarly, the predictions of neutrino mass matrices for all the
274: four types of mass matrices in class B will be identical for all
275: neutrino parameters except $\theta_{23}$ and/or $\delta$. However,
276: the different types of mass matrices will have different
277: predictions for the octant of $\theta_{23}$ and the sign of
278: $\cos\delta$.
279:
280: The two texture zeros in the neutrino mass matrix give two complex
281: equations viz.
282: \begin{equation}
283: M_{ab}=0,M_{pq}=0
284: \end{equation}
285: where $a$, $b$, $p$ and $q$ can take values $e$, $\mu $ and
286: $\tau$. Eqs. (9) can, also, be written as
287: \begin{equation}
288: m_{1}U_{a1}U_{b1}+m_{2}U_{a2}U_{b2}e^{2i\alpha
289: }+m_{3}U_{a3}U_{b3}e^{2i(\beta +\delta )}=0
290: \end{equation}
291: and
292: \begin{equation}
293: m_{1}U_{p1}U_{q1}+m_{2}U_{p2}U_{q2}e^{2i\alpha
294: }+m_{3}U_{p3}U_{q3}e^{2i(\beta +\delta )}=0
295: \end{equation}
296: where $U$ has been defined in Eq. (2). These two complex equations
297: involve nine physical parameters $m_{1}$, $m_{2}$ , $m_{3}$,
298: $\theta _{12}$, $\theta _{23}$, $\theta _{13}$ and CP-violating
299: phases $\alpha $, $\beta $, and $\delta $. The two mixing angles
300: $(\theta _{12}$, $\theta _{23})$ and two mass-squared differences
301: $(\Delta m_{12}^{2}$, $\Delta m_{23}^{2})$ are known from the
302: solar, atmospheric and reactor neutrino experiments. The masses
303: $m_{2}$ and $m_{3}$ can be calculated from the mass-squared
304: differences $\Delta m_{12}^{2}$ and $\Delta m_{23}^{2}$ using the
305: relations
306: \begin{equation}
307: m_{2}=\sqrt{m_{1}^{2}+\Delta m_{12}^{2}}
308: \end{equation}
309: and
310: \begin{equation}
311: m_{3}=\sqrt{m_{2}^{2}+\Delta m_{23}^{2}}.
312: \end{equation}
313: Thus, we have two complex relations relating five unknown
314: parameters viz. $m_1$, $\theta_{13}$, $\alpha$, $\beta$ and
315: $\delta$. Therefore, if one out of these five parameters is
316: assumed, other four parameters can be predicted. Thus, neutrino
317: mass matrices with two texture zeros in the flavor basis have
318: strong predictive power.
319:
320: Solving Eqs. (10) and (11) simultaneously, we obtain
321: \begin{equation}
322: \frac{m_{1}}{m_{3}}e^{-2i\beta }=\frac{%
323: U_{p3}U_{q3}U_{a2}U_{b2}-U_{a3}U_{b3}U_{p2}U_{q2}}{
324: U_{a1}U_{b1}U_{p2}U_{q2}-U_{a2}U_{b2}U_{p1}U_{q1}} e^{2i\delta }
325: \end{equation}
326: and
327: \begin{equation}
328: \frac{m_{1}}{m_{2}}e^{-2i\alpha }=\frac{
329: U_{p2}U_{q2}U_{a3}U_{b3}-U_{a2}U_{b2}U_{p3}U_{q3}}{
330: U_{a1}U_{b1}U_{p3}U_{q3}-U_{a3}U_{b3}U_{p1}U_{q1}}.
331: \end{equation}
332: Using Eqs. (14) and (15), the two mass ratios
333: $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2},\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right)$ and Majorana phases
334: ($\alpha $, $\beta $) can be written as
335: \begin{equation}
336: \left(\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)=\left| \frac{
337: U_{p2}U_{q2}U_{a3}U_{b3}-U_{a2}U_{b2}U_{p3}U_{q3}}{
338: U_{a1}U_{b1}U_{p3}U_{q3}-U_{a3}U_{b3}U_{p1}U_{q1}}\right| ,
339: \end{equation}
340: \begin{equation}
341: \left(\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right)=\left| \frac{
342: U_{p3}U_{q3}U_{a2}U_{b2}-U_{a3}U_{b3}U_{p2}U_{q2}}{
343: U_{a1}U_{b1}U_{p2}U_{q2}-U_{a2}U_{b2}U_{p1}U_{q1}}\right| ,
344: \end{equation}
345: \begin{equation}
346: \alpha =-\frac{1}{2}arg\left( \frac{%
347: U_{p2}U_{q2}U_{a3}U_{b3}-U_{a2}U_{b2}U_{p3}U_{q3}}{
348: U_{a1}U_{b1}U_{p3}U_{q3}-U_{a3}U_{b3}U_{p1}U_{q1}}\right)
349: \end{equation}
350: and
351: \begin{equation}
352: \beta =-\frac{1}{2}arg\left( \frac{
353: U_{p3}U_{q3}U_{a2}U_{b2}-U_{a3}U_{b3}U_{p2}U_{q2}}{
354: U_{a1}U_{b1}U_{p2}U_{q2}-U_{a2}U_{b2}U_{p1}U_{q1}}\right)-\delta.
355: \end{equation}
356: Eqs. (18) and (19) give the Majorana phases $\alpha$ and $\beta$
357: in terms of $\theta_{13}$ and $\delta$ since $\theta_{12}$ and
358: $\theta_{23}$ are known experimentally. Similarly, Eqs. (16) and
359: (17) give the mass ratios
360: $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2},\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right)$ as functions of
361: $\theta_{13}$ and $\delta$. Since, $\Delta m^2_{12}$ and $\Delta
362: m^2_{23}$ are known experimentally, the values of mass ratios
363: $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2},\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right)$ from Eqs. (16) and
364: (17) can be used to calculate $m_1$. This can be done by inverting
365: Eqs. (12) and (13) to obtain the two values of $m_1$, viz.
366: \begin{equation}
367: m_{1}=\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right) \sqrt{\frac{ \Delta
368: m_{12}^{2}}{1-\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right) ^{2}}}
369: \end{equation}
370: and
371: \begin{equation}
372: m_{1}=\left(\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right) \sqrt{\frac{\Delta m_{12}^{2}+
373: \Delta m_{23}^{2}}{ 1-\left(\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right)^{2}}},
374: \end{equation}
375: The two values of $m_{1}$ obtained above from the mass ratios
376: $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)$ and $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right)$,
377: respectively, must be equal. Thus, we can constrain
378: ($\theta_{13}$, $\delta$) plane using the experimental inputs for
379: $\Delta m^2_{12}$, $\Delta m^2_{23}$, $\theta_{12}$ and
380: $\theta_{23}$. The Dirac-type CP violating phase, $\delta $, is
381: given full variation from $0^{0}$ to $360^{0}$ and $\theta _{13}$
382: is varied from zero to its upper bound from CHOOZ experiment. We
383: use the current best fit values of the oscillation parameters with
384: 1, 2 and 3 $\sigma$ \cite{14} errors given below:
385: \begin{eqnarray}
386: \Delta m_{12}^{2}
387: &=&7.9_{~-0.3,~0.6,~0.8}^{~+0.3,~0.6,~1.0}~\times 10^{-5}~eV^{2}~,
388: \nonumber \\ \Delta m_{23}^{2} &=&\pm
389: 2.6_{~-0.2,~0.4,~0.6}^{~+0.2,~0.4,~0.6}~\times 10^{-3}~eV^{2}~,
390: \nonumber
391: \\ s_{12}^{2} &=&0.30_{~-0.02,~0.04,~0.06}^{~+0.02,~0.06,~0.10}~,
392: \\ s_{23}^{2}
393: &=&0.50_{~-0.05,~0.12,~0.16}^{~+0.06,~0.13,~0.18}~, \nonumber \\
394: s_{13}^{2} &<&~0.012,~0.025,~0.040~. \nonumber
395: \end{eqnarray}
396: Here, $'+'$ ($'-'$) sign with the value of $\Delta m^2_{23}$ is
397: for normal (inverted) hierarchy. The analysis \cite{14}
398: incorporates not only the latest long baseline data for $\Delta
399: m^2_{13}$ from the MINOS collaboration \cite{15} but also the
400: updated KamLAND and SNO data \cite{16}. We vary the oscillation
401: parameters within their 1, 2 and 3 $\sigma$ C.L. ranges with
402: uniform distributions and calculate their predictions at various
403: confidence levels. However, we report the correlations plots at 1
404: $\sigma$ C.L.. We, also, calculate the Jarlskog rephasing
405: invariant quantity \cite{18}
406: \begin{equation}
407: J=s_{12}s_{23}s_{13}c_{12}c_{23}c_{13}^2 \sin \delta
408: \end{equation}
409: for the allowed parameter space.
410:
411: In our numerical analysis outlined above, the two squared-mass
412: differences ($\Delta m^2_{12}$ and $\Delta m^2_{23}$) enter as two
413: independent experimental inputs while the earlier analyses
414: \cite{1,2,3} require the ratio of two known mass-squared
415: differences
416: \begin{equation}
417: R_{\nu}\equiv \frac{\Delta m^2_{12}}{\Delta m^2_{23}}
418: =\frac{1-(\frac{m_1}{m_2})^2}{\left|1-\frac{(\frac{m_1}{m_2})^2}
419: {(\frac{m_1}{m_3})^2}\right|}
420: \end{equation}
421: to lie in the experimentally allowed range in order to constrain
422: the other neutrino parameters. Our analysis makes direct use of
423: the two mass-squared differences and has more constraining power
424: whereas the earlier analyses which make use of the ratio $R_{\nu}$
425: lose some of the constraining power because this procedure does
426: not use the full experimental information currently available with
427: us in the shape of two mass-squared differences. Moreover, since
428: $R_{\nu}$ is a function of mass ratios, it does not depend upon
429: the absolute neutrino mass scale. It is obvious that the two mass
430: ratios $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)$ and
431: $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_3}\right)$ may yield the experimentally
432: allowed values of $R_{\nu}$ [Eq. (24)] for mutually inconsistent
433: values of $m_1$ [Eqs. (20) and (21)]. Such mass ratios were
434: allowed in the earlier analyses based upon $R_{\nu}$ \cite{1,2,3}.
435: However, our analysis selects only those mass ratios for which the
436: values of $m_1$ obtained from Eqs. (20) and (21) are identical and
437: the ratio $R_{\nu}$ for these values of the mass ratios is
438: automatically restricted to lie in the allowed experimental range.
439: Moreover, the definition of $R_{\nu}$
440: \begin{equation}
441: R_{\nu}\equiv \frac{\Delta m^2_{12}}{\Delta m^2_{23}}
442: =\frac{|m_2^2-m_1^2|}{|m_3^2-m_2^2|}
443: \end{equation}
444: used in many earlier analyses does not make use of the knowledge
445: of solar mass hierarchy to constrain the neutrino parameter space.
446: Our analysis disallows the class D of two-texture zero neutrino
447: mass matrices which has been marginally allowed by Guo and Xing
448: \cite{3}.
449:
450:
451:
452:
453: \section{Results and discussion}
454:
455: In this section, we shall present the results of our numerical
456: analysis for neutrino mass matrices of classes A, B and C based
457: upon the approach described in the previous section. However, it
458: will be helpful to know the Taylor series expansion of Eqs.
459: (16-19) in the powers of $s_{13}$ to appreciate the numerical
460: results. The zeroth order terms of the Taylor series expansion
461: have been tabulated in Table 2.
462:
463: \begin{table}[tb]
464: \begin{center}
465: \begin{tabular}{||c||c|c|c|c||}
466: \hline
467: Type & $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$ & $\frac{m_1}{m_3}$ & $\alpha$ & $\beta$ \\
468: \hline\hline
469: $A_1$ & $\tan^2 \theta_{12}$ & $\tan\theta_{12}\tan\theta_{23}\sin\theta_{13}$ & $n+\frac{1}{2}\pi$ & $\beta+\frac{\delta}{2}=n\pi$ \\
470: \hline
471: $A_2$ & $\tan^2 \theta_{12}$ & $\frac{\tan\theta_{12}\sin\theta_{13}}{\tan\theta_{23}}$ & $n+\frac{1}{2}\pi$ & $\beta+\frac{\delta}{2}=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ \\
472: \hline
473: $B_1$ & 1 & $\tan^2\theta_{23}$ & $n\pi$ & $\beta+\delta=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ \\
474: \hline
475: $B_2$ & 1 & $\frac{1}{\tan^2\theta_{23}}$ & $n\pi$ & $\beta+\delta=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ \\
476: \hline
477: $B_3$ & 1 & $\tan^2\theta_{23}$ & $n\pi$ & $\beta+\delta=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ \\
478: \hline
479: $B_4$ & 1 & $\frac{1}{\tan^2\theta_{23}}$ & $n\pi$ & $\beta+\delta=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ \\
480: \hline
481: $C$ & $\frac{1}{\tan^2 \theta_{12}}$ & $\frac{1}{\tan\theta_{12}\tan2\theta_{23}\sin\theta_{13}}$ & $n+\frac{1}{2}\pi$ & - \\
482: \hline
483: $D_1$ & $\frac{1}{\tan^2 \theta_{12}}$ & $\frac{\tan\theta_{23}}{\tan\theta_{12}\sin\theta{13}}$ & $n\pi$ & $\beta+\frac{\delta}{2}=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ \\
484: \hline
485: $D_2$ & $\frac{1}{\tan^2 \theta_{12}}$ & $\frac{1}{\tan\theta_{23}\tan\theta_{12}\sin\theta{13}}$ & $n+\frac{1}{2}\pi$ & $\beta+\frac{\delta}{2}=n\pi$ \\
486: \hline
487: \end{tabular}
488: \caption{Zeroth order approximations for neutrino mass matrices
489: with two texture zeros.}
490: \end{center}
491: \end{table}
492:
493:
494: \subsection{Class A}
495: It can be seen from Table 2 that both the mass ratios
496: $\frac{m_1}{m_2},\frac{m_1}{m_3}\ll 1$ for neutrino mass matrices
497: of class A. So, neutrino mass matrices of class A give
498: hierarchical spectrum of neutrino masses. This case has, already,
499: been analyzed analytically \cite{5} and, here, we shall discuss
500: the earlier results only for the sake of completeness.
501:
502: The results for $m_1$, $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\theta_{13}$ and $J$
503: for class A mass matrices have been summarized in Table 3 at
504: various confidence levels. These quantities are the same for mass
505: matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$. It can be seen from Table 3
506: that the 3 $\sigma$ lower bound on $\theta_{13}$ is $3.3^0$. The
507: range for the Majorana-type CP-violating phase $\beta$ at 1
508: $\sigma$ C.L. is found to be $-80^0$ - $80^0$. However, if the
509: neutrino oscillation parameters are allowed to vary beyond their
510: present 1.2 $\sigma$ C.L. ranges, the full range for $\beta$
511: ($-90^0$ - $90^0$) is allowed. At one standard deviation, the
512: allowed range of $\delta$ is ($-150^0$ - $150^0$) for type $A_1$
513: and ($30^0$ - $330^0$) for type $A_2$ and the allowed range of
514: $\theta_{23}$ is ($41.8^0$ - $48.2^0$) for type $A_1$ and $A_2$
515: [Table 4]. Just like $\beta$, no constraint on $\delta$ is
516: obtained above 1.2 $\sigma$ C.L. The accuracies of the oscillation
517: parameters required to distinguish between the theoretical
518: predictions of neutrino mass matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$
519: depend on the upper bound on $\theta_{13}$. With the current
520: precision of the oscillation parameters, the neutrino mass
521: matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$ can be distinguished at 1
522: $\sigma$, 2 $\sigma$ and 3 $\sigma$ C.L. for
523: $\theta_{13}<5.7^0,5.2^0$ and $4.8^0$ respectively.
524:
525:
526: \begin{table}[tb]
527: \begin{center}
528: \begin{tabular}{|c|ccccc|}
529: \hline
530: C.L.& $m_1(10^{-3}eV)$& $\alpha(\deg)$ & $\beta(\deg)$ & $\theta_{13}(\deg)$& $J$ \\
531: \hline
532: $1$ &$2.6$ - $4.5$ & $83$ - $97$ & $-80$ - $80 $ & $5.2$ - $6.3$ & $-0.025$ - $0.025$ \\
533: $2$ &$2.1$ - $8.9$ & $77$ - $103$ & $-90$ - $90 $ & $4.2$ - $9.1$ & $-0.037$ - $0.037$ \\
534: $3$ &$1.7$ - $13.4$ & $73$ - $107$ & $-90$ - $90 $ & $3.3$ - $11.5$& $-0.046$ - $0.046$ \\
535: \hline
536: \end{tabular}
537: \end{center}
538: \caption{The predictions for neutrino mass matrices of class A.}
539: \end{table}
540:
541:
542: \begin{table}[tb]
543: \begin{center}
544: \begin{tabular}{|c|cc|}
545: \hline
546:
547: 1 $\sigma$ predictions & $\delta$ & $\theta_{23} $ \\
548: \hline
549: $A_1$ &$-150^0$ - $150^0$ & $41.8^0$ - $48.2^0$ \\
550: $A_2$ &$30^0$ - $330^0$ & $41.8^0$ - $48.2^0$ \\
551: \hline
552: \end{tabular}
553: \end{center}
554: \caption{The predictions for $\delta$ and $\theta_{23}$ for
555: neutrino mass matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$.}
556: \end{table}
557:
558: Fig. 1 (identical for $A_1$ and $A_2$) depicts the correlation
559: plots of $m_1$, $\alpha$, $\beta$ and $J$ at one standard
560: deviation. Fig. 1(a) shows $\alpha$ as a function of $m_1$ and
561: Fig1(b) shows $\beta$ as a function of $\alpha$. The large spread
562: in the ($m_1$,$\alpha$) plot is due to the errors in the neutrino
563: oscillation parameters. However, there is a very strong
564: correlation between $\alpha$ and $\beta$ as indicated in Table 2.
565: Such a correlation between the Majorana phases was noted earlier
566: \cite{3}. However, full ranges ($-90^0$ - $90^0$) are allowed for
567: the two Majorana phases in that analysis \cite{3}. In contrast, we
568: obtain a very narrow range for the Majorana phase $\alpha$ around
569: $90^0$ [Cf. Table 3]. Similarly, the Majorana phase $\beta$ is,
570: also, constrained if the oscillation parameters are limited to
571: their 1 $\sigma$ ranges. Fig. 1(c) depicts the correlation between
572: $J$ and $m_1$.
573:
574: In Fig. 2, we depict the correlation plots of $\alpha$ and $\beta$
575: with $\delta$ for matrices of types $A_1$ (left panel) and $A_2$
576: (right panel). We, also, show the correlation plots of $\delta$
577: and $\theta_{23}$ with one another as well as with $\theta_{13}$
578: in Fig. 2. The Dirac-type CP-violating phase $\delta$ is,
579: strongly, correlated with the Majorana-type CP-violating phase
580: $\beta$ [Cf. Table 2]. It can be seen from ($\alpha$,$\delta$)
581: correlation plots [Fig. 2(a) and 2(b)] and ($\beta$,$\delta$)
582: correlation plots [Fig. 2(c) and 2(d)] that there are small
583: deviations in the values of $\alpha$ around $90^0$ and the
584: correlation between $\beta$ and $\delta$ is, almost, linear. The
585: fact that $\delta+2\beta\simeq 0^0$ for $A_1$ type mass matrices
586: and $\delta+2\beta\simeq 180^0$ for $A_2$ type mass matrices [cf.
587: Table 2] is apparent from the ($\beta$,$\delta$) correlation plots
588: [Fig. 2(c) and 2(d)]. The ($\beta$,$\delta$) correlation was noted
589: earlier by Xing \cite{2} in its approximate form in a different
590: parameterization. The ($\delta$, $\theta_{23}$) plots, clearly,
591: illustrate the point that the neutrino mass matrices of types
592: $A_1$ and $A_2$ prefer different regions on the ($\delta$,
593: $\theta_{23}$) plane. This is contrary to the analysis done by
594: Xing \cite{3} where no constraints on $\delta$ and $\theta_{23}$
595: have been obtained. In fact, this feature is crucial for
596: distinguishing mass matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$ which were
597: found to be degenerate in the earlier analyses \cite{1,2,3}. The
598: constraints on $\delta$ and $\theta_{23}$ are very sensitive to
599: the values of $\theta_{13}$. For the values of $\theta_{13}$
600: smaller than $1 \sigma$ CHOOZ bound, the constraints on $\delta$
601: and $\theta_{23}$ become stronger which can be seen from the
602: ($\theta_{13}$, $\theta_{23}$) and ($\theta_{13}$,$\delta$)
603: correlation plots [Figures 2(g-j)]. For example, if
604: $\theta_{13}>5.6^0$, then $\theta_{23}>46^0$ (above maximal) for
605: type $A_1$ and $\theta_{23}<44^0$ (below maximal) for type $A_2$.
606: It can, also, be seen from the ($\theta_{13}$, $\theta_{23}$)
607: correlation plots in Fig. 2 that the deviation of $\theta_{23}$
608: from maximality is larger for smaller values of $\theta_{13}$.
609: Therefore, if future experiments measure $\theta_{13}$ below its
610: present $1\sigma$ bound, the neutrino mass matrices of types $A_1$
611: and $A_2$ will have different predictions for $\delta$ and
612: $\theta_{23}$ with no overlap. However, it would be difficult to
613: differentiate between matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$ if
614: $\theta_{13}$ is found to be above its present $1\sigma$ range. As
615: noted earlier, different quadrants for $\delta$ are selected for
616: neutrino mass matrices of types $A_1$ and $A_2$. It can, also, be
617: seen in Fig. 2 that the points $\delta=0,\pi$ are ruled out
618: implying that neutrino mass matrices of class A are necessarily
619: CP-violating. This feature is, also, apparent in Fig. 2 which
620: depict $J$ as a function of $\delta$ for types $A_1$ [Fig. 2(k)]
621: and $A_2$ [Fig. 2(l)].
622:
623: \subsection{Class B}
624:
625: It can be seen from Table 2 that the mass ratios $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$
626: and $\frac{m_1}{m_3}$ are approximately equal to one for neutrino
627: mass matrices of class B. So, neutrino mass matrices of class B
628: give quasi-degenerate spectrum of neutrino masses. For neutrino
629: mass matrices of class $B$, the ratio $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$, upto
630: first order in $s_{13}$, is given by
631: \begin{eqnarray}
632: B_1\hspace{12pt}:\hspace{22pt}\frac{m_1}{m_2}=1+\frac{c_{23}}
633: {c_{12}s_{12}s^3_{23}}s_{13}\cos\delta, \nonumber\\
634: B_2\hspace{12pt}:\hspace{22pt}\frac{m_1}{m_2}=1-\frac{s_{23}}
635: {c_{12}s_{12}c^3_{23}}s_{13}\cos\delta, \nonumber\\
636: B_3\hspace{12pt}:\hspace{11pt}\frac{m_1}{m_2}=1-\frac{c_{23}\tan^2\theta_{23}}
637: {c_{12}s_{12}s^3_{23}}s_{13}\cos\delta, \nonumber\\
638: B_4\hspace{12pt}:\hspace{13pt}\frac{m_1}{m_2}=1+\frac{s_{23}\cot^2\theta_{23}}
639: {c_{12}s_{12}c^3_{23}}s_{13}\cos\delta.
640: \end{eqnarray}
641: Since, the mass ratio $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$ is always smaller than
642: one, we find that $\cos\delta$ should be negative for $B_1$ and
643: $B_4$ and positive for $B_2$ and $B_3$, a result that can be
644: gainfully used to distinguish between mass matrices of class B.
645: Hence, $B_1$ and $B_4$ (or $B_2$ and $B_3$) will have identical
646: predictions for $\delta$. Similarly, it can be seen that $B_1$ and
647: $B_3$ (or $B_2$ and $B_4$) will have, almost, identical
648: predictions for $\theta_{23}$ if it is near maximality. However,
649: $B_1$ and $B_4$ (or $B_2$ and $B_3$) can be distinguished from
650: each other by their predictions for the octant of $\theta_{23}$
651: and $B_1$ and $B_3$ (or $B_2$ and $B_4$) can be distinguished from
652: each other by their predictions for the quadrant of $\delta$.
653: Thus, the four-fold degeneracy in class B is, now, lifted.
654: Moreover, it follows from Eqs. (26) that the second term should be
655: suppressed by $s_{13}\cos\delta$ if neutrino mass spectrum is
656: quasi-degenerate ($m_1 \sim m_2$). For large $\theta_{13}$, the
657: Dirac phase $\delta$ should be peaked around $90^0$ or $270^0$ to
658: keep the term $s_{13}\cos\delta$ small. However, for small
659: $\theta_{13}$, no additional constraint on $\delta$ is obtained.
660: The fact that $\cos\delta$ should be negative for $B_1$ and $B_4$
661: type mass matrices and positive for $B_2$ and $B_3$ type mass
662: matrices for the correct sign of $\Delta m^2_{12}$ results in the
663: elimination of two quadrants of $\delta$ for each of these
664: subgroups irrespective of the values of the oscillation parameters
665: and their errors. In fact, the earlier analyses \cite{2,3} do not
666: constrain the Dirac phase $\delta$ at all for these subgroup of
667: mass matrices. In the analysis by Xing \cite{2}, the mass ratios
668: $\frac{m_1}{m_3}$ and $\frac{m_2}{m_3}$ were examined and this
669: important constraint on $\delta$ coming from the mass ratio
670: $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)$ was comletely missed as a result.
671: Another detailed numerical analysis by Guo and Xing \cite{3} based
672: upon $R_{\nu}$ defined in Eq. (25) does not make use of the solar
673: mass hierarchy as a result of which no constraints on $\delta$
674: were obtained for neutrino mass matrices of class B.
675:
676:
677: \begin{table}[tb]
678: \begin{center}
679: \begin{tabular}{|c|ccc|}
680: \hline
681: C.L. & $\alpha$ & $M_{ee}$ & $J$ \\
682: \hline
683: 1 $\sigma$ & $-2.0^0$-$2.0^0$ & $\ge 0.064eV$ & $-0.025$-$0.025$ \\
684: 2 $\sigma$ & $-7.7^0$-$7.7^0$ & $\ge 0.037eV$ & $-0.036$-$0.036$ \\
685: 3 $\sigma$ & $-22^0$-$22^0$ & $\ge 0.023eV$ & $-0.045$-$0.045$ \\
686: \hline
687: \end{tabular}
688: \end{center}
689: \caption{The predictions for neutrino mass matrices of class B.}
690: \end{table}
691:
692: Now, we present the numerical results of our analysis for mass
693: matrices of class B. The allowed range of $\delta$ is ($90^0$ -
694: $270^0$) for types $B_1$ and $B_4$ and ($-90^0$ - $90^0$) for
695: types $B_2$ and $B_3$. In other words, $\cos \delta$ is negative
696: for types $B_1$ and $B_4$ and positive for types $B_2$ and $B_3$,
697: as expected. This important result is valid irrespective of the
698: ranges of the neutrino oscillation parameters entering in the
699: analysis and is a consequence of the fact that the sign of $\Delta
700: m^2_{12}$ is positive. If $\theta_{23}<45^0$, $B_1$ and $B_3$ give
701: normal hierarchy while $B_2$ and $B_4$ give inverted hierarchy.
702: Similarly, if $\theta_{23}>45^0$, then $B_1$ and $B_3$ give
703: inverted hierarchy while $B_2$ and $B_4$ give normal hierarchy.
704: Again, this important result is true irrespective of the values of
705: the neutrino oscillation parameters (and their errors) and follows
706: from the dependence of mass ratio $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_3} \right)$
707: on $\tan^2\theta_{23}$ [Cf. Table 2]. As noted earlier, the four
708: types of neutrino mass matrices within class B differ in their
709: predictions for $\delta$ and $\theta_{23}$. There is no lower
710: bound on $\theta_{13}$ in class B. The Majorana-type CP-violating
711: phase $\beta$, also, remains unconstrained. The predictions for
712: $\alpha$, $M_{ee}$ and $J$ for class B mass matrices have been
713: summarized in Table 5. These quantities are the same for mass
714: matrices of types $B_1$, $B_2$, $B_3$ and $B_4$. It can, also, be
715: seen that $\alpha$ is restricted to a very small range around zero
716: and definite lower bounds on $M_{ee}$ are obtained. It is
717: important to note that $\theta _{23}=45^0$ is disallowed for mass
718: matrices of class B.
719:
720: In Fig. 3, the correlation plots for all eight possible cases of B
721: type mass matrices ($B_{1}$, $B_{2}$, $B_{3}$ and $B_{4}$ with
722: normal as well as inverted hierarchy) have been shown for
723: $\alpha$, $\beta $, $\delta$, $\theta _{13}$, $m_{1}$, $M_{ee}$
724: and $J$. These plots show that B type mass matrices exhibit
725: eightfold degeneracy in the sense that eight different types of
726: mass matrices have identical predictions for these parameters.
727: Figures 3(a-d) depict the correlations of $\alpha$, $\beta$, $J$
728: and $M_{ee}$ with $\theta_{13}$. It can be seen from Fig. 3(a)
729: that an upper bound on $\theta_{13}$ constrains $\alpha$ to a very
730: narrow range. Even at three standard deviations, the allowed range
731: of $\alpha$ is $-22^{0}\leq \alpha \leq 22^{0}$ [Cf. Table 5].
732: However, no constraints are obtained on the Majorana phase $\beta$
733: [Fig. 3(b)]. The correlation plot of $J$ with $\theta_{13}$ shows
734: a linear behaviour which is a consequence of $\theta _{13}$ being
735: small and $\delta$ being near $90^{0}$ or $270^{0}$ for most of
736: the allowed neutrino parameter space. Since, $M_{ee} \simeq m_1$,
737: we give the correlation plots for $M_{ee}$ instead of $m_1$ in
738: Fig. 3(d) where it can be seen that the absolute neutrino mass
739: scale and 1-3 mixing angles are anti-correlated with each other.
740: Next, we depict the correlations of the quantities $M_{ee}$ and
741: $J$ with the Majorana phases $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in figures
742: 3(e-h). The effective Majorana mass $M_{ee}$ diverges at
743: $\alpha=0$ and $\beta=0$ and so these points are not allowed. A
744: lower bound on $M_{ee}$ is required to constrain the Majorana
745: phase $\beta$ which, otherwise, remains unconstrained for mass
746: matrices of class B [Fig. 3(f)]. It can be seen from Fig. 3(g)
747: that $J$ and $\alpha$ are directly correlated with each other.
748: This is due to the fact that $\alpha$ is constrained to a very
749: narrow range around zero degree so that $\sin\alpha\simeq\alpha$.
750: The correlation between the two Majorana phases $\alpha$ and
751: $\beta$ is depicted in Fig. 3(i) which shows that $\beta$ will be
752: nearly zero for large $\alpha$ and vice-versa. Fig. 3(j) depicts
753: the correlation between $J$ and $M_{ee}$. One can see that maximal
754: CP-violation is possible near the lowest possible value of
755: $M_{ee}$ in class B. It may be worthwhile to mention that the
756: earlier analysis \cite{3} fails to obtain any constraints on the
757: ranges of CP-violating phases ($\alpha$, $\beta$ and $\delta$) for
758: the reasons discussed earlier.
759:
760:
761:
762:
763: Fig. 4 depicts the correlations which lift the degeneracy between
764: the neutrino mass matrices of types $B_{1}$ ($B_{4}$) and $B_{2}$
765: ($B_{3}$). Since, the range of Dirac-type CP-violating phase,
766: $\delta$, is different for $B_{1}$ ($B_{4}$) and $B_{2}$
767: ($B_{3}$), the eightfold degeneracy in B type mass matrices has,
768: now, been reduced to four-fold. The left panel depicts the
769: correlation plots for both $B_{1}$ and $B_{4}$ and the right panel
770: depicts the correlation plots for $B_{2}$ and $B_{3}$. It can be
771: seen from Fig. 4(a,b) that the range of Dirac-type CP-violating
772: phase, $\delta$, is $ 90^{0}\leq \delta \leq 270^{0}$
773: ($-90^{0}\leq \delta \leq 90^{0}$) for $B_{1}$ and $B_{4}$
774: ($B_{2}$ and $B_{3}$) type mass matrices, as expected. Also, there
775: is a strong correlation between Majorana-type CP violating phase,
776: $\beta$, and Dirac-type CP-violating phase, $\delta$ reinforcing
777: the zeroth order result $\left(
778: \beta+\delta=\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\pi \right)$ given in Table
779: 2. It can be seen from Fig. 4(c,d) that $\theta _{13}$ remains
780: unconstrained in all cases because full range of $\theta _{13}$ is
781: allowed at $\delta =90^{0}$ and $270^{0}$. However, as we deviate
782: from these values of $\delta$, $\theta _{13}$ decreases rapidly to
783: very small values. So, if the CP violation is found to be
784: non-maximal, $\theta _{13}$ will be constrained to very small
785: values. However, if CP violation is found to be nearly maximal,
786: $\theta _{13}$ can be large. Thus, the suppression factor
787: $s_{13}\cos\delta$ in the first order correction term in the
788: Taylor expansion for $\left(\frac{m_1}{m_2}\right)$ is small as
789: expected from the zeroth order approximation for this class.
790:
791:
792: Fig. 5 depicts the correlations of $M_{ee}$ and $\alpha$ with
793: $\theta_{23}$. The correlation plots with $\theta _{23}$ can be
794: used to further reduce the remaining four-fold degeneracy in B
795: type mass matrices to a two-fold degeneracy which will be lifted
796: by the determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy. The left
797: panel (right panel) depicts the correlation plots for $B_{1}(NH)$
798: and $B_{2}(IH)$ ($B_{1}(IH)$ and $ B_{2}(NH)$). The correlation
799: plots of $M_{ee}$ and $\alpha$ with $\theta_{23}$ for $B_{3}(NH)$
800: and $B_{4}(IH)$ (or $B_{3}(IH)$ and $B_{4}(NH)$) will be, almost,
801: identical to the plots given in Fig. 5 because $B_1$ and $B_3$ (or
802: $B_2$ and $B_4$) have, almost, identical predictions for
803: $\theta_{23}$ and, therefore, are not given here. It can be seen
804: from Fig. 5(a,b) that the effective Majorana mass $M_{ee}$ is
805: strongly correlated with $\theta_{23}$. Moreover, maximal value of
806: $\theta _{23}$ is not allowed by the current neutrino oscillation
807: data since $M_{ee}$ diverges at $\theta_{23}=\frac{\pi}{4}$.
808: Larger the deviation of $\theta _{23}$ from maximality, smaller is
809: the value of $M_{ee}$. Also, a large value of $\alpha$ implies
810: large deviations of $\theta _{23}$ from maximality. The extent of
811: the deviation of 2-3 mixing from maximality is governed by the
812: magnitude of the upper bound on $M_{ee}$ while the direction of
813: the deviation from maximality is governed by the quadrant of
814: $\delta$ and the neutrino mass hierarchy.
815:
816:
817:
818: \subsection{Class C}
819: It can be seen from Table 2 that the mass ratio $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$
820: is greater than one at zeroth order. However, the higher order
821: terms in the Taylor series expansion of the ratio
822: $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$ may make it smaller than one. Detailed numerical
823: analysis shows that this actually happens and the mass matrices of
824: class C are marginally allowed. The Taylor series expansion for
825: $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$ to first order in $s_{13}$ is given by
826: \begin{equation}
827: \frac{m_1}{m_2}=\frac{1}{\tan^2\theta_{12}}\left( 1-\frac{\tan
828: 2\theta_{23}}{s_{12}c_{12}}s_{13}\cos\delta \right).
829: \end{equation}
830: For $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$ to be smaller than one, the term $(\tan
831: 2\theta_{23} \cos\delta)$ should be positive. Therefore, when
832: $\theta_{23}<45^0$, we must have $-90^0<\delta<90^0$. Similarly,
833: when $\theta_{23}>45^0$, we must have $90^0<\delta<270^0$. Just
834: like class B, the correlation between the octant of $\theta_{23}$
835: and the quadrant of $\delta$ obtained here for class C is
836: independent of the ranges of the neutrino oscillation parameters
837: and is a generic feature of two texture zero mass matrices. The
838: points $\delta=90^0$, $270^0$ and $\theta_{13}=0^0$ are not
839: allowed because the first order correction term vanishes at these
840: points. The mixing angle $\theta_{23}$ should approach $45^0$ as
841: $\delta$ approaches $90^0$ or $270^0$ and $\theta_{13}$ approaches
842: $0^0$ so that the term $(s_{13}\tan 2\theta_{23} \cos\delta)$ can
843: make the ratio $\frac{m_1}{m_2}$ smaller than one. The mass ratio
844: $\frac{m_1}{m_3}$ is greater than one at the zeroth order.
845: Therefore, neutrino mass matrices of type C may be expected to be
846: consistent with inverted hierarchy only. However, we shall see in
847: the detailed numerical analysis that the normal hierarchy is,
848: also, allowed marginally.
849:
850: \begin{table}[tb]
851: \begin{center}
852: \begin{tabular}{|c|ccc|}
853: \hline
854: & $\beta$ & $J$ & $M_{ee}$ \\
855: \hline
856: 1 $\sigma$ & $-14^0$-$14^0$ & $-0.024$-$0.024$ & $\geq 0.016$ eV \\
857: 2 $\sigma$ & $-16^0$-$16^0$ & $-0.034$-$0.034$ & $\geq 0.013$ eV \\
858: 3 $\sigma$ & $-18^0$-$18^0$ & $-0.045$-$0.045$ & $\geq 0.009$ eV \\
859: \hline
860: \end{tabular}
861: \end{center}
862: \caption{The predictions for $\beta$, $J$ and $M_{ee}$ for
863: neutrino mass matrices of class C.}
864: \end{table}
865:
866: For mass matrices of type C, with inverted hierarchy, the allowed
867: ranges for the parameters $\beta$, $J$ and $M_{ee}$ are given in
868: Table 6. All other parameters remain unconstrained. The
869: correlation plots between various parameters have been depicted in
870: Figs. 6-8. In Fig. 6, we have given the correlations of $\alpha$,
871: $\beta$, $\theta_{13}$, $\theta_{23}$, $M_{ee}$ and $J$ with
872: $\delta$. As discussed earlier, the values $\delta =90^{0}$ and
873: $270^{0}$ are not allowed [Fig. 6(a)]. Therefore, maximal
874: CP-violation is not allowed for mass matrices of class C. For the
875: maximal values of $\delta$, $\alpha$ should be equal to zero.
876: Therefore, the point $\alpha=0^0$ is, also, not allowed. However,
877: all other values of $\alpha$ are allowed. It can be seen from Fig.
878: 6(b) that the Majorana phase $\beta$ is a periodic function of
879: $\delta$ with a period of $180^0$ and $\beta$ can be zero at
880: $\delta=0^0$ or $180^0$. However, the points ($\beta=0^0$,
881: $\delta=90^0$) and ($\beta=0^0$, $\delta=270^0$) are disallowed.
882: The correlation between $\delta$ and $\theta_{13}$ has been
883: depicted in Fig. 6(c). The correlation between $\delta$ and
884: $\theta_{23}$ has been depicted in Fig. 6(d) where it can be seen
885: that the maximal 2-3 mixing is not allowed. However, the mixing
886: angle $\theta_{23}$ will be below maximality if $\cos \delta$ is
887: positive ($-90^0$-$90^0$) and above maximality if $\cos \delta$ is
888: negative ($90^0$-$270^0$). These conclusions are, completely, in
889: agreement with the results obtained from the Taylor series
890: expansion. Fig. 6(e) depicts the correlation between $M_{ee}$ and
891: $\delta$ which yields a lower bound of about 0.02 eV on $M_{ee}$
892: for $\delta=0^0$ or $180^0$ for neutrino mass matrices of class C.
893: As $\delta$ deviates from the values $0^0$ and $180^0$, $M_{ee}$
894: increases and diverges as $\delta$ becomes maximal. The
895: correlation between $J$ and $\delta$ has been shown in Fig. 6(f).
896:
897: In Fig. 7, we have shown the correlations of $\alpha$, $\beta$,
898: $\theta_{23}$ and $J$ with $\theta_{13}$. In Fig. 7(a),
899: ($\theta_{13}$,$\alpha$) correlation has been depicted. Full range
900: ($-90^0$-$90^0$) for $\alpha$ is allowed for $\theta_{13}=0$.
901: However, it can be seen from Fig. 7(a) that a lower bound on
902: $\theta_{13}$ of about $4^0$ will constrain $\alpha$ to the range
903: ($-65^0$-$65^0$). As noted earlier, $\beta$ is, already,
904: constrained to a small range around zero. However, it can be seen
905: from Fig. 7(b) that $\beta$ can be further constrained if
906: $\theta_{13}$ is found to be larger than $3^0$. A lower bound on
907: $\theta_{13}$ larger than $3^0$ will disallow a finite range of
908: $\beta$ around zero. From the ($\theta_{13}$, $\theta_{23}$)
909: correlation plot [Fig. 7(c)], it can be seen that larger the value
910: of $\theta_{13}$, larger will be the deviation of $\theta_{23}$
911: from maximality. The point ($\theta_{13}=0^0$, $\theta_{23}=45^0$)
912: is not allowed. The disallowed range of $\theta_{23}$ around
913: $45^0$ increases with increase in $\theta_{13}$. For example, the
914: disallowed range of $\theta_{23}$ at $\theta_{13}=6^0$ is
915: approximately $44^0-46^0$. For small values of $\theta_{13}$, $J$
916: is proportional to $\theta_{13}$ and the constant of
917: proportionality is determined by $\sin\delta$ [Cf. Eq. (23) ].
918: These features can be seen graphically in the correlation plot
919: between $J$ and $\theta_{13}$ depicted in Fig. 7(d).
920:
921: Some other important correlation plots have been shown in Fig. 8.
922: It can be seen from the ($\alpha$, $\beta$) correlation plot [Fig.
923: 8(a)] that the two Majorana phases can not vanish simultaneously.
924: The correlation between $M_{ee}$ and $\alpha$ has been shown in
925: Fig. 8(c) where it can be seen that an upper bound on $M_{ee}$
926: will reject a considerable range of $\alpha$. The ($M_{ee}$,
927: $\beta$) correlation plot has been given in Fig. 8(d). It can be
928: seen that the allowed range of $\beta$ (which is $-15^0$-$15^0$
929: for small values of $M_{ee}$) can be further constrained if
930: $M_{ee}$ is found to be larger than 0.03 eV. Fig. 8(e) depicts the
931: correlation between $M_{ee}$ and $\theta_{23}$. It can be seen
932: that $M_{ee}$ diverges for maximal 2-3 mixing. A lower bound on
933: $M_{ee}$ can be used to constrain $\theta_{23}$.
934:
935:
936: For $C$ type mass matrices, with normal hierarchy Dirac-type
937: CP-violation phase, $\delta$, can have only two values
938: $\delta=90^{0}$ or $180^{0}$. Majorana-type CP-violating phases
939: ($\alpha$ and $\beta$) and $\theta_{13}$ remain unconstrained.
940: There is a strong correlation between $\theta_{13}$ and
941: $\theta_{23}$ in this case. Larger the allowed range of
942: $\theta_{13}$, larger will be the deviation of $\theta_{23}$ from
943: maximality. The neutrino mass matrices of class C were examined
944: analytically in \cite{10} where some of the results reported here
945: for class C have been obtained.
946:
947:
948: \subsection{Eightfold degeneracy}
949:
950: The forthcoming neutrino experiments will aim at measuring the
951: neutrino mass hierarchy, Dirac type CP violating phase $\delta$
952: and the deviations of the atmospheric mixing angle from maximality
953: \cite{19}. The results of these experiments will fall in one of
954: the following eight categories of phenomenological interest:
955: \begin{enumerate}
956: \item NH, $\theta_{23}<45^0$ and $90^0<\delta<270^0$,
957: \item NH, $\theta_{23}>45^0$ and $-90^0<\delta<90^0$,
958: \item NH, $\theta_{23}<45^0$ and $-90^0<\delta<90^0$,
959: \item NH, $\theta_{23}>45^0$ and $90^0<\delta<270^0$,
960: \item IH, $\theta_{23}>45^0$ and $90^0<\delta<270^0$,
961: \item IH, $\theta_{23}<45^0$ and $-90^0<\delta<90^0$,
962: \item IH, $\theta_{23}>45^0$ and $-90^0<\delta<90^0$,
963: \item IH, $\theta_{23}<45^0$ and $90^0<\delta<270^0$.
964: \end{enumerate}
965: The eight cases given above are degenerate for the present
966: neutrino oscillation data because of the octant degeneracy of
967: $\theta_{23}$ (i.e. if $\theta_{23}<45^0$ or $\theta_{23}>45^0$),
968: the intrinsic degeneracy in the sign of $\cos\delta$ and the
969: two-fold degeneracy in the sign of $\Delta m^2_{23}$. This
970: degeneracy known as the eightfold degeneracy in the neutrino
971: parameter space has been studied extensively in the literature
972: \cite{19,20,21,22}. A specific project named
973: Tokai-to-Kamioka-Korea (T2KK) two detector complex which will
974: receive neutrino superbeams from J-PARC has been proposed
975: \cite{22} to resolve these degeneracies. The intrinsic degeneracy
976: in the sign of $\cos\delta$ will be resolved by the spectrum
977: information at T2KK and the degeneracy in the sign of $\Delta
978: m^2_{23}$ will be resolved by observing the difference in the
979: earth matter effects between the intermediate and far detectors.
980: The $\theta_{23}$ octant degeneracy will be resolved by observing
981: the difference in $\Delta m^2_{12}$ oscillation effects between
982: the intermediate and far detectors at T2KK. In addition, neutrino
983: factories \cite{23} and beta-beam experiments \cite{24} have the
984: potential to resolve the eightfold degeneracy.
985:
986:
987:
988: \section{Conclusions}
989:
990:
991:
992:
993: \begin{table}[tb]
994: \begin{center}
995: \begin{tabular}{|c|ccc|ccc|}
996: \hline
997: Categories & &Degeneracies& & &Matrices& \\
998: \hline
999: & sign of $\Delta m^2_{23}$ & sign of $\cos2\theta_{23}$ & sign of $\cos\delta$& $A$ & $B$ & $C$ \\
1000: \hline
1001: 1 & $+$ & $+$ & $-$ & $A_2$ & $B_1 (NH)$ & $\times$ \\
1002: 2 & $+$ & $-$ & $+$ & $A_1$ & $B_2 (NH)$ & $\times$ \\
1003: 3 & $+$ & $+$ & $+$ & $\times$ & $B_3 (NH)$ & $\times$ \\
1004: 4 & $+$ & $-$ & $-$ & $\times$ & $B_4 (NH)$ & $\times$ \\
1005: 5 & $-$ & $-$ & $-$ & $\times$ & $B_1 (IH)$ & $\times$ \\
1006: 6 & $-$ & $+$ & $+$ & $\times$ & $B_2 (IH)$ & $C(IH)$ \\
1007: 7 & $-$ & $-$ & $+$ & $\times$ & $B_3 (IH)$ & $C(IH)$ \\
1008: 8 & $-$ & $+$ & $-$ & $\times$ & $B_4 (IH)$ & $\times$ \\
1009: \hline
1010: \end{tabular}
1011: \end{center}
1012: \caption{The consequences of resolving the eightfold experimental
1013: degeneracies for the neutrino mass matrices with two texture zeros.}
1014: \end{table}
1015:
1016:
1017:
1018: If neutrinoless double beta decay searches give positive results
1019: and $M_{ee}$ is measured experimentally or the atmospheric/reactor
1020: neutrino oscillation experiments confirm inverted hierarchy, the
1021: neutrino mass matrices of class A will be ruled out. A generic
1022: prediction of this class of models is a lower bound on
1023: $\theta_{13}$ [Table 3]. If the forthcoming neutrino oscillation
1024: experiments measure $\theta_{13}$ below $3.3^0$, the neutrino mass
1025: matrices of class A will, again, be ruled out. If $M_{ee}$ is
1026: found to be non-zero, the mass matrices of class B or C may be
1027: allowed. The eight different types of mass matrices in class B can
1028: be distinguished from one another by the future experiential data
1029: by the resolution of the eightfold degeneracy of the neutrino
1030: parameter space. The observation of correlations between various
1031: neutrino parameters like $\theta_{13}$, $\theta_{23}$, $\delta$
1032: and $M_{ee}$ etc. will confirm the neutrino mass matrices with two
1033: texture zeros. Moreover, the CP-violation in lepton number
1034: conserving and non-conserving processes will be correlated in a
1035: definite way and there will be only one independent CP-violating
1036: measure for both types of processes.
1037:
1038:
1039: Main conclusions of the present study have been summarized in
1040: Table 7 which shows how the resolution of the degeneracies of
1041: neutrino parameter space will resolve the degeneracies of the
1042: neutrino mass matrices. As an illustration for the use of Table 7,
1043: we look at the results obtained for category 1 for which the signs
1044: of $\Delta m^2_{23}$ and $\cos \theta_{23}$ are positive and the
1045: sign of $\cos \delta$ is negative. For this category, the neutrino
1046: mass matrices of type $A_2$ and $B_1$ (for normal hierarchy only)
1047: may explain the neutrino data whereas the mass matrices of class C
1048: are ruled out. Other possibilities summarized in Table 7 may be
1049: understood similarly. It is found that the degeneracies in the
1050: neutrino parameter space are inextricably linked to the
1051: degeneracies in the neutrino mass matrix and by finding the
1052: hierarchy, octant of $\theta_{23}$ and sign of $\cos\delta$, the
1053: future experiments will settle the fate of neutrino mass matrices
1054: with two texture zeros. The resolution of the eightfold degeneracy
1055: in the neutrino parameter space will, also, resolve the eightfold
1056: degeneracy of the neutrino mass matrices of class B as can be seen
1057: from figures 4 and 5. Figures 4 and 5, also, illustrate the
1058: decoupling of degeneracies in the sense that two mass matrices can
1059: be degenerate in their $\delta$ predictions but may have different
1060: predictions for $\theta_{23}$ or vice-versa. A similar decoupling
1061: of degeneracies occur in neutrino oscillation experiments with
1062: matter effects \cite{21} where an experiment may be insensitive to
1063: the sign of $\cos\delta$ but can resolve the degeneracy in the
1064: sign of $\cos2\theta_{23}$ or it can be insensitive to the sign of
1065: $\cos2\theta_{23}$ but can resolve the degeneracy in the sign of
1066: $\cos\delta$.
1067:
1068:
1069: \section{Acknowledgments}
1070:
1071: The research work of S. D. and S. V. is supported by the Board of
1072: Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Department of Atomic Energy,
1073: Government of India \textit{vide} Grant No. 2004/ 37/ 23/ BRNS/
1074: 399. S. K. acknowledges the financial support provided by Council
1075: for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of
1076: India. We would like to thank Manmohan Gupta for critical reading
1077: of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.
1078:
1079:
1080:
1081: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1082:
1083: \bibitem{1} Paul H. Frampton, Sheldon L. Glashow and Danny
1084: Marfatia, \textit{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B 536}, 79 (2002); Bipin R.
1085: Desai, D. P. Roy and Alexander R. Vaucher, \textit{Mod. Phys.
1086: Lett} \textbf{A 18}, 1355 (2003).
1087:
1088: \bibitem{2} Zhi-zhong Xing, \textit{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B 530}
1089: 159 (2002).
1090:
1091: \bibitem{3} Wanlei Guo and Zhi-zhong Xing, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 67},
1092: 053002 (2003).
1093:
1094: \bibitem{4} Alexander Merle and Werner Rodejohann, \textit{Phys. Rev.}
1095: \textbf{D 73}, 073012 (2006); S. Dev and Sanjeev Kumar,
1096: hep-ph/0607048.
1097:
1098: \bibitem{5} S. Dev, Sanjeev Kumar, Surender Verma and Shivani Gupta,
1099: hep-ph/0611313.
1100:
1101: \bibitem{6} G. C. Branco, R. Gonzalez Felipe, F. R. Joaquim and T. Yanagida,
1102: Phys. Lett. \textbf{B 562} 265 (2003); Bhag C. Chauhan, Joao
1103: Pulido and Marco Picariello, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 73},
1104: 053003 (2006).
1105:
1106: \bibitem{7} Xiao-Gang He and A. Zee, hep-ph/0302201 v2.
1107:
1108: \bibitem{8} Suraj. N. Gupta and Subhash Rajpoot, ``Quark Mass Matrices and the Top
1109: Quark Mass'', Wayne State University Preprint, September 1990; S.
1110: N. Gupta and J. M. Johnson, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 44},
1111: 2110 (1991); S. Rajpoot, \textit{Mod. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{A 7},
1112: 309 (1992); H. Fritzsch and Z.Z. Xing, \textit{Phys. Lett.}
1113: \textbf{B 353}, 114 (1995).
1114:
1115: \bibitem{9} P. H. Frampton, M. C. Oh and T. Yoshikawa, \textit{Phys. Rev.}
1116: \textbf{D 66}, 033007 (2002).
1117:
1118: \bibitem{10} Walter Grimus and Luis Lavoura, \textit{J. Phys.}
1119: \textbf{G 31}, 693-702 (2005).
1120:
1121: \bibitem{11} H. C. Goh, R. N. Mohapatra and
1122: Siew-Phang Ng, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 68}, 115008 (2003).
1123:
1124: \bibitem{12} S. Kaneko, M. Katsumata and M. Tanimoto, \textit{JHEP}
1125: \textbf{0307}, 025 (2003).
1126:
1127: \bibitem{13} G. L. Fogli \textit{et al},hep-ph/0506083 v1.
1128:
1129: \bibitem{14}M. Maltony, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola and J. W. F.
1130: Valle, hep-ph/0405172 v5.
1131:
1132: \bibitem{15} J. Nelson, Talk at Neutrino 2006, 13–19 June 2006, Santa Fe, New Mexico,
1133: http://neutrinosantafe06.com.
1134:
1135: \bibitem{16} B. Aharmim \textit{et al.} [SNO collaboration], Phys. Rev. C 72, 055502
1136: (2005), nucl-ex/0502021.
1137:
1138: \bibitem{17}T. Araki et al. [KamLAND Collaboration], hep-ex/0406035; Talk by
1139: G. Gratta at Neutrino 2004, 14–19 June 2004, Paris,
1140: http://neutrino2004.in2p3.fr.
1141:
1142: \bibitem{18} C. Jarlskog \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{55}, 1039
1143: (1985).
1144:
1145: \bibitem{19} E. Abouzaid \textit{et al}, Report of the APS
1146: Neutrino Study Reactor Working Group, 2004.
1147:
1148: \bibitem{20} Hisakazu Minakata, Hiroshi Nunokawa, Stephen Parke,
1149: \textit{Phys. Rev.}
1150: \textbf{D 66}, 093012 (2002).
1151:
1152: \bibitem{21} Takaaki Kajita, Hisakazu Minakata, Shoei Nakayama, and Hiroshi
1153: Nunokawa, \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D 75}, 013006 (2007).
1154:
1155: \bibitem{22} Hisakazu Minakata, hep-ph/0701070.
1156:
1157: \bibitem{23} Raj Gandhi and Walter Winter, hep-ph/0612158;
1158: A. M. Gago and J. Jones Perez, hep-ph/0611110.
1159:
1160: \bibitem{24} E. Fernandez-Martinez, hep-ph/0605101; A. Donini and
1161: E. Fernandez-Martinez, \textit{Phys.Lett.} \textbf{B 641}
1162: 432(2006), hep-ph/0603261.
1163:
1164:
1165: \end{thebibliography}
1166:
1167:
1168: \newpage
1169:
1170:
1171: \begin{figure}
1172: \begin{center}
1173: \epsfig{file=fig1.eps,height=20cm,width=15cm}
1174: \end{center}
1175: \caption{ Correlation plots for neutrino mass matrices of class A
1176: at one standard deviation.}
1177:
1178: \end{figure}
1179:
1180: \begin{figure}
1181: \begin{center}
1182: \epsfig{file=fig2.eps,height=20cm,width=15cm}
1183: \end{center}
1184: \caption{ Correlation plots for neutrino mass matrices of type
1185: $A_1$ (left panel) and $A_2$ (right panel).}
1186: \end{figure}
1187:
1188: \begin{figure}
1189: \begin{center}
1190: \epsfig{file=fig3.eps,height=20cm,width=15cm}
1191: \end{center}
1192: \caption{ $1\sigma$ correlation plots for $B_{1}$, $B_{2}$, $B_{3}$ and $%
1193: B_{4} $ type mass matrices with normal as well as inverted
1194: hierarchies.}
1195: \end{figure}
1196:
1197:
1198: \begin{figure}
1199: \begin{center}
1200: \epsfig{file=fig4.eps,height=20cm,width=15cm}
1201: \end{center}
1202: \caption{ The left panel shows the correlation plots for $B_{1}$
1203: or $B_{4}$ while right panel shows the correlation plots for
1204: $B_{2}$ or $B_{3}$ type mass matrices.}
1205: \end{figure}
1206:
1207: \begin{figure}
1208: \begin{center}
1209: \epsfig{file=fig5.eps,height=15cm,width=15cm}
1210: \end{center}
1211: \caption{ Variation of $M_{ee}$ and $\alpha $ with $\theta_{23}$.
1212: The left [right] panel plots are for $B_{1}(NH)$, $B_{2}(IH)$ [
1213: $B_{3}(IH)$, $B_{4}(NH)$] type mass matrices.}
1214: \end{figure}
1215:
1216: \begin{figure}
1217: \begin{center}
1218: \epsfig{file=fig6.eps,height=20cm,width=15cm}
1219: \end{center}
1220: \caption{The correlation plots for CP-violating phase $\delta$ for
1221: neutrino mass matrices of type C with inverted hierarchy.}
1222: \end{figure}
1223:
1224: \begin{figure}
1225: \begin{center}
1226: \epsfig{file=fig7.eps,height=20cm,width=15cm}
1227: \end{center}
1228: \caption{The correlation plots for the mixing angle $\theta_{13}$
1229: for neutrino mass matrices of type C with inverted hierarchy.}
1230: \end{figure}
1231:
1232: \begin{figure}
1233: \begin{center}
1234: \epsfig{file=fig8.eps,height=20cm,width=15cm}
1235: \end{center}
1236: \caption{Some other important correlation plots for neutrino mass
1237: matrices of type C with inverted hierarchy.}
1238: \end{figure}
1239:
1240: \end{document}
1241: