1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc2.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc2.tex 1.2 2000/07/24 09:12:51 spepping Exp spepping $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
6: \usepackage{espcrc2}
7:
8: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
9: % \documentstyle[twoside,fleqn,espcrc2]{article}
10:
11: % if you want to include PostScript figures
12:
13: %% hhh
14:
15: \usepackage{epsfig}
16: \usepackage{rotating}
17: % \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
18: %
19: \usepackage{ifthen,array}
20: \usepackage{setspace}
21: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
22: \usepackage{moreverb}
23: \usepackage{rotating}
24: % ? \usepackage{amsfonts}
25: % \usepackage{bbm}
26:
27: %% hhh
28:
29: \usepackage{graphicx}
30: % if you have landscape tables
31: %% ?? \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
32:
33: % put your own definitions here:
34:
35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% defs start %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
36: \def\e6{$E(6)$}
37: \def\10{$SO(10)$}
38: \def\21{$SU(2) \otimes U(1) $}
39: \def\lr{$SU(2)_L \otimes SU(2)_R \otimes U(1)$}
40: \def\422{$SU(4) \otimes SU(2) \otimes SU(2)$}
41: \def\321{$SU(3) \otimes SU(2) \otimes U(1)$}
42: \def\lsim{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$\;<$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim\;$}}}
43: \def\gsim{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$\;>$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim\;$}}}
44: \def\lfv{lepton flavour violation }
45: \def\lnv{lepton number violation }
46: \def\meff{\langle m_{\nu} \rangle}
47: \newcommand{\ed}{\end{document}}
48: \DeclareMathAlphabet{\mathsc}{OT1}{cmr}{m}{sc}
49: \newcommand{\bne}{\hbox{$\bar \nu_e$ }}
50: \newcommand{\nue}{\hbox{$\nu_e$ }}
51: \newcommand{\nm}{\hbox{$\nu_\mu$ }}
52: \newcommand{\bnm}{\hbox{$\bar \nu_\mu$ }}
53: \newcommand{\nt}{\hbox{$\nu_\tau$ }}
54: %\newcommand{\bnt}\hbox{$\bar \nu_\tau$ }}
55:
56: \newcommand{\CL} {C.L.}
57: \newcommand{\dof} {d.o.f.}
58: \newcommand{\gof}{g.o.f.}
59: \newcommand{\EtAl} {{\it et al.\/}}
60: \newcommand{\eVq} {\rm{eV}^2}
61: \newcommand{\Sol} {\mathsc{sol}}
62: \newcommand{\Atm} {\mathsc{atm}}
63: \newcommand{\JSQ} {{Just-So$^2$}}
64:
65: \newcommand{\Sbl} {\mathsc{sbl}}
66: \newcommand{\Kl} {\mathsc{KamLAND}}
67: \newcommand{\Nev} {\mathsc{nev}}
68: \newcommand{\Lsnd} {\mathsc{lsnd}}
69: \newcommand{\Chooz}{\mathsc{chooz}}
70:
71: \newcommand{\thl}{\theta_\Lsnd}
72: \newcommand{\sql}{\sin^2 2\thl}
73:
74: \newcommand{\Dcq} {\Delta\chi^2}
75: \newcommand{\Dms} {\Delta m^2_\Sol}
76: \newcommand{\Dma} {\Delta m^2_\Atm}
77: \newcommand{\Dml}{\Delta m^2_\Lsnd}
78: \newcommand{\Eps} {\varepsilon}
79: \newcommand{\Epp} {\varepsilon'}
80:
81: \newcommand{\snocc}{SNO$_\mathrm{CC}^\mathrm{rate}$ }
82: \newcommand{\snotot}{SNO$_\mathrm{CC,NC}^\mathrm{SP,DN}$ }
83:
84: \newcommand{\pnu}[1] {\overset{\smash{\scriptscriptstyle (-)}}{\nu}_{\hskip-3pt #1}}
85: \newcommand{\eps}{\epsilon_{13}}
86: \newcommand{\si}{S_{13}}
87:
88: \def \znbb {$0\nu\beta\beta$ }
89: \def \nbb {$\beta\beta_{0\nu}$ }
90:
91: \def \tnbb {2\nu\beta\beta}
92: \def\meff{\langle m_{\nu} \rangle}
93: \def\rp{$R_p \hspace{-1em}/\;\:$}
94:
95: \def\VEV#1{\left\langle #1\right\rangle}
96: \let\vev\VEV
97: \def\ZP{$Z^\prime$ }
98: \def\e6{$E(6)$}
99: \def\10{$SO(10)$}
100: \def\21{$SU(2) \otimes U(1) $}
101: \def\lr{$SU(3) \otimes SU(2)_L \otimes SU(2)_R \otimes U(1)_{B-L}$ }
102: \def\422{$SU(4) \otimes SU(2) \otimes SU(2)$ }
103: \def\321{$SU(3) \otimes SU(2) \otimes U(1)$ }
104:
105: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% defs end %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
106:
107: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.068}
108:
109: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
110: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
111: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
112:
113: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
114: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
115:
116: % declarations for front matter
117: \title{Concluding talk at NOW 2006}
118:
119: \author{J. W. F. Valle\address{AHEP Group, Instituto de F\'isica
120: Corpuscular -- C.S.I.C./Universitat
121: de Val\`encia\\
122: \small\it Edificio Institutos de Paterna, Apt 22085, E-46071,
123: Val\`encia, Spain}%
124: \thanks{Work supported by MEC grants FPA2005-01269 and
125: FPA2005-25348-E, by Generalitat ACOMP06/154, and by the EC RTN
126: Contract MRTN-CT-2004-503369 and ILIAS/N6 Contract
127: RII3-CT-2004-506222. Thanks to M. Tortola, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz.} }
128: \begin{document}
129:
130: \begin{abstract}
131: This writeup summarizes the status of neutrino oscillations,
132: including recent fluxes and experimental data, as of summer 2006.
133: %
134: A discussion is given on the current status of absolute scale of
135: neutrino mass from tritium, \znbb and cosmological observations, as
136: well as the prospects for the next generation of experiments,
137: including \lfv searches, and their theoretical significance.
138: %
139: \vspace{.3pc}
140: \end{abstract}
141: %% keywords {neutrino oscillations, neutrino mass, astroparticle physics}
142: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
143: \maketitle
144:
145: \section{Intoduction}
146:
147: With almost 30 plenary talks and 70 parallel session talks the task of
148: summarizing all of them all into a single talk is an impossible
149: mission. I will try instead simply to highlight some aspects of the
150: talks that touched my own prejudices.
151:
152: The progress in the physics of neutrino oscillations in the last few
153: years has been truly remarkable.
154: %
155: Oscillations are now established, implying that neutrinos have masses,
156: as first suggested by theorists in the early eighties, both on general
157: grounds~\cite{Weinberg:1980bf,schechter:1980gr} and on the basis of
158: various versions of the seesaw mechanism~\cite{Valle:2006vb}.
159: %
160: This is a profound discovery that marks the beginning of a new age in
161: neutrino physics.
162:
163: A gold rush towards precision results has been initiated, whose aim is
164: to probe $\theta_{13}$, to study leptonic CP violation and determine
165: the nature of neutrinos. Hopefully this will shed light on the
166: ultimate origin the universe and certainly that of neutrino mass.
167:
168: \section{Data}
169:
170:
171: Thanks to the accumulation of events over a wide range of energy, and
172: to the measurement of the dip in the L/E (neutrino flight length L
173: over neutrino energy E) distribution of the muon neutrino
174: disappearance probability, the interpretation of the atmospheric data
175: has finally turned into an unambiguous signal of $\nu_\mu
176: \leftrightarrow \nu_\tau$ oscillations, marking the beginning of a new
177: era.
178:
179: The interpretation of solar data {\sl per se} is still ambiguous, with
180: viable alternative explanations involving spin flavour
181: precession~\cite{barranco:2002te,miranda:2000bi} or non-standard
182: neutrino interactions~\cite{guzzo:2001mi}.
183: %
184: Results on (or relevant to) solar neutrinos were presented here by
185: Broggini, Maneira, Pulido, Raghavan, Ranucci, Serenelli and Smy.
186: %
187: Reactor neutrino data from KamLAND not only confirm the solar neutrino
188: deficit but also observe the spectrum distortion as expected for
189: oscillations. Reactors have played an important role in establishing
190: the robustness of the neutrino flavor oscillation interpretation {\sl
191: vis a vis} the existence of solar density
192: fluctuations~\cite{Burgess:2003su} in the solar radiative zone as
193: produced by random magnetic fields~\cite{Burgess:2003fj}, and also
194: with respect to the effect of convective zone magnetic fields, should
195: neutrinos posses nonzero neutrino transition magnetic
196: moments~\cite{Miranda:2003yh}. Within the oscillation picture KamLAND
197: has also identified large mixing angle oscillation as its ``unique''
198: solution, ``solving'', in a sense, the solar neutrino problem. Note
199: however that the interpretation of solar data {\sl vis a vis} neutrino
200: non-standard interactions~\cite{Miranda:2004nb} is not yet so robust.
201:
202: A lot more is to come from the upcoming reactor experiments starting
203: with Double-Chooz, and a new series of proposed experiments such as
204: Daya-bay, RENO, Kaska, Angra, nicely reviewed in the talk by Cabrera.
205:
206: Accelerators K2K \& MINOS confirm the atmospheric neutrino deficit as
207: well as a distortion of the energy spectrum consistent with the
208: oscillation hypothesis. More is to come from MINOS and the upcoming
209: experiments CNGS/OPERA, T2K, NOVA, as reported here by Gugliemi,
210: Kajita, Kato, Kopp, Rebel, Sioli, and others.
211:
212: \section{Oscillation parameters}
213:
214: The basic tool to interpret neutrino data is the lepton mixing matrix,
215: whose simplest unitary 3-dimensional form is given as a product of
216: effectively complex $2\times 2$ matrices~\cite{schechter:1980gr}
217: %
218: \begin{equation}
219: \label{eq:2227}
220: K = \omega_{23} \omega_{13} \omega_{12}
221: \end{equation}
222: where each factor is given as
223: %
224: \begin{equation}
225: \label{eq:w13}
226: \omega_{13} = \left(\begin{array}{ccccc}
227: c_{13} & 0 & e^{i \Phi_{13}} s_{13} \\
228: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
229: -e^{-i \Phi_{13}} s_{13} & 0 & c_{13}
230: \end{array}\right)\,,
231: \end{equation}
232: %
233: in the most convenient ordering chosen in the PDG~\cite{Yao:2006px}
234: (here $c_{ij} \equiv \cos\theta_{ij}$ and $s_{ij} \equiv
235: \sin\theta_{ij}$).
236: %
237: The two Majorana phases associated to 12 and 23 can be eliminated
238: insofar as neutrino oscillations are concerned, since they only
239: affect lepton-number violating processes, like \znbb. Thus one can
240: take the 12 and 23 factors as real, $ \omega_{23} \to r_{23}$ and $
241: \omega_{12} \to r_{12}$. There is then a unique CP phase $\Phi_{13}$,
242: analogous to the KM phase $\delta$ of quarks, that will be studied in
243: future oscillation experiments, such as T2K and NOVA.
244: %
245: Currently, however, oscillations have no sensitivity to this phase
246: and we will neglect it in the analysis of current data.
247:
248: In such approximation oscillations depend on the three mixing
249: parameters $\sin^2\theta_{12}, \sin^2\theta_{23}, \sin^2\theta_{13}$
250: and on the two mass-squared splittings $\Dms \equiv \Delta m^2_{21}
251: \equiv m^2_2 - m^2_1$ and $\Dma \equiv \Delta m^2_{31} \equiv m^2_3 -
252: m^2_1$ characterizing solar and atmospheric neutrinos. The fact that
253: $\Dms \ll \Dma$ implies that one can set $\Dms \to 0$ in the analysis
254: of atmospheric and accelerator data, and $\Dma$ to infinity in the
255: analysis of solar and reactor data.
256:
257: \subsection{Present status}
258: \label{sec:present-status}
259:
260: The current three--neutrino oscillation parameters are summarized in
261: Fig.~\ref{fig:global}. Equivalent results by the Bari group are in
262: excellent agreement with those reported here, both
263: pre~\cite{Fogli:2005cq} and post-MINOS~\cite{Fogli:2006yq}. The
264: analysis employs the latest Standard Solar
265: Model~\cite{Bahcall:2005va} which we heard here in the talk by
266: Serenelli, and includes all new neutrino oscillation data from SNO
267: salt~\cite{Aharmim:2005gt}, K2K~\cite{Ahn:2006zz} and
268: MINOS~\cite{Michael:2006rx}, described in Appendix C of
269: hep-ph/0405172 (v5)~\cite{Maltoni:2004ei}~\footnote{ In addition to
270: good calculations of the neutrino
271: fluxes~\cite{Bahcall:2004fg,Honda:2004yz}, cross sections and
272: response functions, we need an accurate description of neutrino
273: propagation in the Sun and the Earth, including matter
274: effects~\cite{mikheev:1985gs,wolfenstein:1978ue}. }.
275:
276: The upper panels of the figure show $\Delta \chi^2$ as a function of
277: the three mixing parameters $\sin^2\theta_{12}, \sin^2\theta_{23}, \,
278: \sin^2\theta_{13}$ and two mass squared splittings $\Delta m^2_{21},
279: \Delta m^2_{31}$, minimized with respect to the undisplayed
280: parameters. The lower panels give two-dimensional projections of the
281: allowed regions in five-dimensional parameter space. In addition to
282: a confirmation of oscillations with $\Dma$, accelerator neutrinos
283: provide a better determination of $\Dma$ as one can see by comparing
284: dashed and solid lines in Fig.~\ref{fig:global}. The recent MINOS
285: data~\cite{Michael:2006rx} lead to an improved determination and a
286: slight increase in $\Dma$.
287: %
288: As already mentioned, reactors~\cite{araki:2004mb} have played a
289: crucial role in selecting large-mixing-angle (LMA)
290: oscillations~\cite{pakvasa:2003zv} out of the previous ``zoo'' of
291: possible solar neutrino oscillation
292: solutions~\cite{Gonzalez-garcia:2000sq,fogli:2001vr}.
293: %
294: \begin{figure}[t] \centering
295: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth,height=7cm]{F-fig.summary06-comp.eps}
296: \caption{\label{fig:global} %
297: Current 90\%, 95\%, 99\%, and 3$\sigma$ \CL\ neutrino
298: oscillation regions for 2 \dof\, as of summer 2006,
299: from~\cite{Maltoni:2004ei}. In top panels $\Delta \chi^2$ is
300: minimized with respect to undisplayed parameters.}
301: \end{figure}
302: Table~\ref{tab:summary} gives the current best fit values and allowed
303: 3$\sigma$ ranges of oscillation parameters.
304: \begin{table}[t] \centering \catcode`?=\active \def?{\hphantom{0}}
305: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|} \hline parameter & best
306: fit & 3$\sigma$ range \\ \hline\hline $\Delta
307: m^2_{21}\: [10^{-5}~\eVq]$ & 7.9?? & 7.1--8.9 \\
308: $\Delta m^2_{31}\: [10^{-3}~\eVq]$ & 2.6?? & 2.0--3.2 \\
309: $\sin^2\theta_{12}$ & 0.30? & 0.24--0.40 \\
310: $\sin^2\theta_{23}$ & 0.50? & 0.34--0.68 \\
311: $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ & 0.00 & $\leq$ 0.040 \\
312: \hline
313: \end{tabular} \vspace{2mm}
314: \caption{\label{tab:summary} Neutrino oscillation parameters as of Summer 2006,
315: from Ref.~\cite{Maltoni:2004ei}.}
316: \end{table}
317:
318: Note that CP violation disappears in a three--neutrino scheme when two
319: neutrinos become degenerate or when one of the angles
320: vanishes~\cite{schechter:1980bn}. As a result CP violation is doubly
321: suppressed, first by $\alpha \equiv \Dms/\Dma$ and also by the small
322: value of $\theta_{13}$.
323: %
324: \begin{figure}[t] \centering
325: % \includegraphics[height=3.5cm,width=.95\linewidth]{alpha-theta13.eps}
326: \includegraphics[height=4cm,width=.48\linewidth]{F-fcn.alpha06.eps}
327: \includegraphics[height=4cm,width=.48\linewidth]{th13-06.eps}
328: \caption{\label{fig:alpha}%
329: $\alpha \equiv \Dms / \Dma$ and $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ bound from the
330: updated analysis given in Ref.~\cite{Maltoni:2004ei}.}
331: \end{figure}
332: %
333: The left panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:alpha} gives the parameter $\alpha$,
334: while the right panel shows the impact of different data samples on
335: constraining $\theta_{13}$. One sees that for larger $\Dma$ values
336: the bound on $\sin^2\theta_{13}$ is dominated by CHOOZ, while for low
337: $\Dma$ the solar and KamLAND data become quite relevant.
338:
339:
340: \subsection{Robustness}
341: \label{sec:robustness}
342:
343:
344: Reactor neutrino data have played a crucial role in testing the
345: robustness of solar oscillations vis a vis astrophysical
346: uncertainties, such as magnetic fields in the
347: radiative~\cite{Burgess:2003su,Burgess:2003fj} and convective
348: zone~\cite{miranda:2000bi,guzzo:2001mi,barranco:2002te}, leading to
349: stringent limits on neutrino magnetic transition
350: moments~\cite{Miranda:2003yh}.
351: %
352: KamLAND has also played a key role in identifying oscillations as
353: ``the'' solution to the solar neutrino problem~\cite{pakvasa:2003zv}
354: and also in pinning down the LMA parameter region among previous wide
355: range of oscillation
356: solutions~\cite{Gonzalez-garcia:2000sq,fogli:2001vr}.
357:
358: However, there is still some fragility in the interpretation of the
359: data in the presence of sub-weak strength ($\sim \varepsilon G_F$)
360: non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI) (Fig.~\ref{fig:nuNSI}).
361: Indeed, most neutrino mass generation mechanisms imply the existence
362: of such dimension-6 operators. They can be of two types:
363: flavour-changing (FC) and non-universal (NU). Their presence leads to
364: the possibility of resonant neutrino conversions even in the absence
365: of neutrino masses~\cite{valle:1987gv}.
366: %
367: \begin{figure}[t] \centering
368: \includegraphics[height=3cm,width=.55\linewidth]{diagram-fc.eps}
369: \caption{\label{fig:nuNSI} %
370: Non-standard neutrino interactions arise, e.~g., from the
371: non-unitary structure of charged current weak interactions
372: characterizing seesaw-type schemes~\cite{schechter:1980gr}.}
373: \end{figure}
374: %
375: While model-dependent, the expected NSI magnitudes may well
376: fall within the range that will be tested in future precision
377: studies~\cite{Huber:2004ug}.
378: %
379: For example, in the inverse seesaw model~\cite{Deppisch:2004fa} the
380: non-unitary piece of the lepton mixing matrix can be sizeable, hence
381: the induced non-standard interactions. Relatively sizeable NSI
382: strengths may also be induced in supersymmetric unified
383: models~\cite{hall:1986dx} and models with radiatively induced neutrino
384: masses~\cite{zee:1980ai,babu:1988ki}.
385:
386: The determination of atmospheric neutrino parameters $\Dma$ and
387: $\sin^2\theta_\Atm$ is hardly affected by the presence of NSI on
388: down-type quarks~\cite{fornengo:2001pm}.
389:
390: In contrast, the determination of solar neutrino parameters is not
391: quite robust against the existence of NSI~\cite{Miranda:2004nb}, even
392: if reactor data are included.
393: %
394: The issue can only be resolved by future low and intermediate energy
395: solar neutrino data mentioned by Raghavan, with enough precision to
396: sort out the detailed profile of the solar neutrino conversion
397: probability.
398:
399: \subsection{Future prospects}
400: \label{sec:future-prospects}
401:
402: Upcoming reactor and accelerator long baseline experiments aim at
403: improving the sensitivity on $\sin^2\theta_{13}$~\cite{Huber:2004ug}.
404: %
405: The value of $\theta_{13}$ is a key input and the start of an
406: ambitious long-term effort towards probing CP violation in neutrino
407: oscillations~\cite{Alsharoa:2002wu,apollonio:2002en,albright:2000xi}.
408: %
409: Prospects of accelerator and reactor neutrino oscillation experiments
410: for the coming years have been extensively discussed in the literature
411: and there have been several talks at this conference, for example
412: those of Declais, Huber, Kajita, Kato, Kopp, Lindner, Nunokawa and
413: Schwetz. Here I simply illustrate in Fig.~\ref{fig:t13fut} the
414: anticipated evolution of the $\theta_{13}$ discovery reach for the
415: global neutrino program, see details in Ref.~\cite{Albrow:2005kw}.
416: %
417: \begin{figure}[t] \centering
418: \includegraphics[height=6cm,width=.7\linewidth]{disclimitbandnova.eps}
419: \caption{\label{fig:t13fut} The hunt for $\theta_{13}$: artist's view
420: of anticipated sensitivities on $\theta_{13}$ given in
421: Ref.~\cite{Albrow:2005kw}.}
422: \end{figure}
423:
424: One important comment is that even a small residual non-standard
425: interaction in this ``solar'' (e-tau) channel has dramatic
426: consequences for the sensitivity loss for $\theta_{13}$ at a neutrino
427: factory~\cite{huber:2001de}.
428: %
429: To make these experiments meaningful it is a must to have a near
430: detector capable of sorting out for NSI with high sensitivity.
431:
432: In contrast, future neutrino factories will probe flavor changing
433: non-standard neutrino-matter interactions in the ``atmospheric''
434: (mu-tau) channel with sensitities which are substantially improved
435: with respect to current ones~\cite{huber:2001zw}. For example, a 100
436: GeV NUFACT can probe these at the level of $|\epsilon| < \mathrm{few}
437: \times 10^{-4}$ at 99 \% C.L.
438:
439: Improving the sensitivities on NSI constitutes at a near detector is a
440: necessary pre-requisit. In short, probing for NSI is an important item
441: and a window of opportunity for neutrino physics in the precision age.
442:
443: To close this section let me mention that day/night effect studies in
444: large water Cerenkov solar neutrino experiments such as UNO, Hyper-K
445: or LENA has also been suggested as an alternative way to probe
446: $\theta_{13}$~\cite{Akhmedov:2004rq}.
447:
448: \section{Lepton flavour violation}
449: \label{sec:lept-flav-viol}
450:
451: The discovery of neutrino oscillations demonstrates that lepton
452: flavour conservation is not a fundamental symmetry of nature. It is
453: therefore natural to expect that it may show up elsewhere, for example
454: \(\mu\to e\gamma\) or nuclear $\mu^-- e^-$ conversion, as seen in
455: Fig.~\ref{fig:Diagrams}.
456: %
457: \begin{figure}[h]
458: \centering
459: \includegraphics[clip,height=4.5cm,width=0.8\linewidth]{mue-conv.eps}
460: \caption{Contributions to the nuclear $\mu^-- e^-$ conversion: (a)
461: long-distance and (b) short-distance. For numerical results see
462: Ref.~\cite{Deppisch:2004fa,Deppisch:2005zm}}
463: \label{fig:Diagrams}
464: \end{figure}
465: Indeed, in seesaw-type schemes of neutrino mass, \lfv is induced
466: either from neutral heavy lepton
467: exchange~\cite{Bernabeu:1987gr,Ilakovac:1994kj} as discussed here by
468: Vogel, or through the exchange of charginos (neutralinos) and
469: sneutrinos (charged sleptons) as discussed here by Masiero
470: ~\cite{Hall:1985dx,borzumati:1986qx,casas:2001sr,Antusch:2006vw} (see
471: top panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:mueg}).
472: %
473: \begin{figure}[h] \centering
474: \includegraphics[height=4cm,width=.8\linewidth]{mueg.ps}
475: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth,height=5cm]{mue-muegamma.eps}
476: \vglue -1cm
477: \caption{\label{fig:mueg} Supersymmetric Feynman diagrams for \lfv
478: and correlation between mu-e conversion and \(Br(\mu\to e\gamma)\)
479: in the supersymmetric inverse seesaw model of
480: Ref.~\cite{Deppisch:2004fa}.}
481: \end{figure}
482: As illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:mueg} the rates for both processes can
483: be sizeable and fall within the sensitivity of upcoming experiments.
484: The calculation in Fig.~\ref{fig:mueg} is performed in the framework
485: of the generalized supersymmetric seesaw model of
486: Ref.~\cite{Deppisch:2004fa} to where I address you if you wish to
487: understand the interplay of neutral heavy
488: lepton~\cite{Bernabeu:1987gr} and supersymmetric contributions.
489: %
490: If the neutral heavy leptons are in the TeV range (a situation not
491: realizable in the minimal seesaw mechanism), the \(Br(\mu\to
492: e\gamma)\) rate can be enhanced even in the {\sl absence} of
493: supersymmetry. In this case the neutral heavy leptons that mediate
494: \lfv may be directly produced at accelerators~\cite{Dittmar:1990yg}.
495:
496: Fig.~\ref{fig:mueg} also illustrates the correlation between nuclear
497: $\mu^--e^-$ conversion and $\mu^-\to e^-\gamma$ decay in the inverse
498: seesaw model for the nuclei Au, Ti, Al. The shaded area and vertical
499: line denote the current bound and future sensitivity (PSI) on
500: $Br(\mu\to e\gamma)$, respectively. The horizontal lines denote the
501: current bound (Au/SINDRUM II) and expected future sensitivities
502: (Al/MECO, Ti/PRISM) on $R(\mu^-N\to eN)$. More details in
503: Ref.~\cite{Deppisch:2005zm}.
504:
505: Note also that since \lfv and CP violation can occur in the massless
506: neutrino limit, hence the allowed rates need not be suppressed by the
507: smallness of neutrino
508: masses~\cite{Bernabeu:1987gr,Ilakovac:1994kj,branco:1989bn,rius:1990gk}.
509:
510: \section{Absolute scale of neutrino mass}
511: \label{sec:neutr-double-beta}
512:
513: Neutrino oscillations are insensitive to absolute masses and can not
514: probe whether neutrinos are Dirac or Majorana. Current data can not
515: determine whether the spectrum is normal or inverted, as illustrated
516: in Fig.~\ref{fig:Which}.
517: \begin{figure}[h]
518: \centering
519: \includegraphics[clip,width=.46\linewidth,height=3.5cm]{nuschemes.eps}
520: \includegraphics[height=3.5cm,width=.51\linewidth]{plot-mi-m3.eps}
521: \caption{Which spectrum?}
522: \label{fig:Which}
523: \end{figure}
524: To settle the issue one needs kinematical tests, such as beta decay
525: studies~\cite{Drexlin:2005zt}, as discussed here by Sisti and
526: Weinheimer. The upcoming high precision neutrino mass experiment
527: KATRIN scales up both the size \& source intensity, aiming at a
528: sensitivity one order of better than that of the current Mainz-Troitsk
529: experiments.
530:
531: Neutrinoless double beta decay and other \lnv processes, such as
532: neutrino transition electromagnetic
533: moments~\cite{schechter:1981hw,Wolfenstein:1981rk}
534: \cite{pal:1982rm,kayser:1982br} can probe the basic nature of
535: neutrinos.
536:
537: The significance of neutrinoless double beta decay stems from the
538: fact that, in a gauge theory, irrespective of the mechanism that
539: induces \znbb, it necessarily implies a Majorana neutrino
540: mass~\cite{Schechter:1982bd}, as illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:bbox}.
541: %
542: \begin{figure}[h]
543: \centering
544: \includegraphics[width=6cm,height=3.2cm]{blackbox.eps}
545: \caption{Neutrinoless double beta decay and Majorana mass are
546: equivalent~\cite{Schechter:1982bd}.}
547: \label{fig:bbox}
548: \end{figure}
549: Thus it is a basic issue. Quantitative implications of the
550: ``black-box'' argument are model-dependent, but the theorem itself
551: holds in any ``natural'' gauge theory.
552:
553: %%%%
554:
555: Now that oscillations are experimentally confirmed we know that \znbb
556: must be induced by the exchange of light Majorana neutrinos, the
557: so-called "mass-mechanism". The \znbb amplitude depends on the 3
558: masses, 2 mixing angles, and 2 CP phases. Hence it involves the
559: absolute scale of neutrino mass, as well as the Majorana
560: phase~\cite{schechter:1980gr}, neither of which can be probed in
561: oscillations~\cite{bilenky:1980cx,Schechter:1981gk,doi:1981yb}.
562: %
563: The phenomenological situation was described here by Avignone,
564: Bettini, Fiorini, Pavan, Simkovik, Vala and Vogel. It clearly
565: distinguishes between normal and inverted hierarchical spectra, as
566: seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:nbbfut}: in the former hierarchy case there is
567: in general no lower bound on the \znbb rate, since there can be a
568: destructive interference amongst the neutrino amplitudes. In contrast,
569: the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy implies a ``lower'' bound for the
570: \znbb amplitude.
571: \begin{figure}[h]
572: \centering
573: \includegraphics[clip,width=.8\linewidth,height=5.4cm]{nh_paper.eps}
574: \includegraphics[clip,width=.8\linewidth,height=5.4cm]{ih_paper.eps}
575: % \includegraphics[clip,width=.7\linewidth,height=12cm]{mni.eps}
576: \caption{\znbb amplitude versus current oscillation data,
577: from Ref.~\cite{Bilenky:2004wn}.}
578: \label{fig:nbbfut}
579: \end{figure}
580: The best current limit on $\meff$ comes from the Heidelberg-Moscow
581: experiment. The current claim~\cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2004wj} (see
582: also Ref.~\cite{Aalseth:2002dt}) and the sensitivities of the upcoming
583: experiments are indicated in the compilation, courtesy of Simkovik,
584: displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:nbbfut}. It shows the estimated average
585: mass parameter characterizing the neutrino exchange contribution to
586: \znbb versus the lightest and heaviest neutrino masses. The
587: calculation takes into account the current neutrino oscillation
588: parameters in \cite{Maltoni:2004ei} and state-of-the-art nuclear
589: matrix elements~\cite{Bilenky:2004wn}.
590: %
591: The upper (lower) panel corresponds to the cases of normal (inverted)
592: neutrino mass spectra. In these plots the ``diagonals'' correspond to
593: the case of quasi-degenerate
594: neutrinos~\cite{babu:2002dz}~\cite{caldwell:1993kn}~\cite{ioannisian:1994nx}.
595:
596: \begin{figure}[h] \centering
597: \includegraphics[width=.6\linewidth,height=3.5cm]{plotRmaxcomplexc1.eps}
598: \caption{\label{fig:bbn-a4} %
599: Lower bound on $|\vev{m_{ee}}|/\Dma$ vs $|\mathrm{cos}
600: (\phi_1)|$ where $\phi_1$ is a Majorana phase. The lines in dark
601: (red) and grey (green) correspond to normal and inverse
602: hierarchy. Model of Ref.~\cite{Hirsch:2005mc}.}
603: \end{figure}
604: We now give two examples of model \znbb expectations. First,
605: Ref.~\cite{Hirsch:2005mc} proposes a specific normal hierarchy model
606: for which a lower bound on \znbb can be placed, as a function of the
607: value of the Majorana violating phase $\phi_1$, as indicated in
608: Fig.~\ref{fig:bbn-a4}. Second, the $A_4$ model~\cite{babu:2002dz}
609: gives a lower bound on the absolute Majorana neutrino mass
610: $m_{\nu}\gsim 0.3$ eV and may therefore be tested in \znbb searches.
611:
612: %%% ggg
613:
614: The absolute scale of neutrino masses will be tested by its effect on
615: the cosmic microwave background and the large scale structure of the
616: Universe, as discussed here by Elgaroy, Palazzo, Pastor and
617: Viel~\cite{Lesgourgues:2006nd,Hannestad:2006zg,Fogli:2006yq}, and
618: illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:sergio}.
619: \begin{figure}[h] \centering
620: \includegraphics[height=4cm,width=.45\textwidth]{plot-Sergio.eps}
621: \caption{\label{fig:sergio} %
622: Sensitivity of cosmology to neutrino mass, see
623: Ref.~\cite{Lesgourgues:2006nd}.}
624: \end{figure}
625:
626: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
627:
628:
629: \section{Neutrinos as probes }
630: \label{sec:neutrinos-as-probes}
631:
632: Not only neutrino properties can be probed via cosmology and
633: astrophysics, but also, once well-determined, they can be used as
634: astro-probes (Sun, Supernovae, pulsars, etc), cosmo-probes even
635: geo-probes. Here there were many related talks by Elgaroy, Mangano,
636: Pastor, Villante, and Viel. Neutrinos affect nucleosynthesis,
637: large scale structure, the CMB and possibly the generation of
638: the matter anti-matter asymmetry.
639:
640: Like photons, cosmic rays and gravitational waves, neutrinos are one
641: of the basic messengers of the Big Bang capable of probing early
642: stages of its evolution. In the leptogenesis scenarios (discussed here
643: by Akhmedov, di Bari, Ma and Petcov) neutrinos could probe the
644: Universe even down to epochs prior to the electroweak phase
645: transition.
646:
647: Neutrinos are also basic probes is astrophysics. Having only weak
648: interactions, they are ideal to monitor the interior of stars, such as
649: the the Sun.
650:
651: Supernova neutrinos were discussed by Cardall, Fleurot, Lunardini and
652: Vagins. The measurement of a large number of neutrinos from a future
653: galactic supernova neutrino signal will give us important information
654: on supernova parameters. Here I give a simplified plot (small
655: $\theta_{13}$ approximation) taken from Ref.~\cite{Minakata:2001cd} as
656: an illustration of the potential to probe astrophysics from a precise
657: knowledge of neutrino properties.
658: \begin{figure}[h] \centering
659: \includegraphics[height=4cm,width=.48\linewidth]{sn87a.eps}
660: \includegraphics[width=.49\linewidth,height=4.2cm]{EavEb.eps}
661: \vglue -.5cm
662: \caption{\label{fig:sn} Improved supernova parameter determination
663: attainable from the neutrino signal from 10 kpc galactic supernova
664: within future neutrino telescopes Hyper-K versus Super-K.}
665: \end{figure}
666:
667: Let me also mention that new effects in neutrino conversions at the
668: core of supernovae (neutron-rich regime) are expected when neutrinos
669: have non-standard
670: interactions~\cite{valle:1987gv,Nunokawa:1996tg,Nunokawa:1996ve}.
671: These could induce new inner resonant conversions, over and above
672: those that arise from oscillations.
673:
674: Before closing this section, let me mention that neutrinos are ideal
675: probes of the high energy Universe, discussed here by Billoir, Karle,
676: Flaminio, Stanev and Sigl. For example, one expects high energy
677: neutrinos from AGNs and GRBs. Typically the accelerated primaries make
678: pions, leading to comparable fluxes of neutrinos and gammas due to
679: isospin. In contrast to gamma-rays, the neutrino spectrum is
680: essentially unmodified. One set of observables to monitor are the
681: flavor ratios, which are sensitive both to neutrino oscillations as
682: well as neutrino non-standard interactions.
683:
684: Here I give a very useful roadmap-plot presented by Sigl (see his talk
685: at these proceedings for details). This plot makes extrapolations as
686: to what high energy neutrino fluxes could be on the basis of the
687: gamma-flux constraints (e.~g. by EGRET) at lower energies.
688: \begin{figure}[h] \centering
689: \includegraphics[height=6.5cm,width=\linewidth]{roadmap-plot.ps}
690: \vglue -.8cm
691: \caption{\label{fig:road}
692: Sigl's map to high energy astrophysics.}
693: \end{figure}
694:
695: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
696:
697: \section{Origin of neutrino mass}
698: \label{sec:origin-neutrino-mass}
699:
700: This is one of the most well-kept secrets of nature. Gauge theories
701: prefer Majorana neutrinos (see historical talk by
702: Esposito)~\cite{Weinberg:1980bf,schechter:1980gr} irrespective the
703: detailed mechanism of neutrino mass generation. While possible, the
704: emergence of Dirac neutrinos would constitute a surprise, indicating
705: the existence of an accidental lepton number symmetry whose
706: fundamental origin should be understood. There are some ideas for
707: generating light Dirac neutrinos. For example, theories involving
708: large extra dimensions offer a novel scenario to account for small
709: Dirac neutrino masses. Within this picture, right-handed neutrinos
710: propagate in the bulk, while left-handed neutrinos, being a part of
711: the lepton doublet, live only on the Standard Model (SM) branes. In
712: this picture neutrinos get naturally small Dirac masses via mixing
713: with a bulk fermion.
714:
715: However neutrinos are more likely Majorana.
716:
717: In contrast to SM charged fermions, neutrinos do not get masses after
718: the electroweak symmetry breaks through by the nonzero vacuum
719: expectation value (vev) of the Higgs scalar doublet, since they come
720: in just one chiral species. There is, however, an effective lepton
721: number violating dimension-five operator $LL\Phi\Phi$ (where L denotes
722: any of the lepton doublets and $\Phi$ the Higgs) which can be added to
723: the SM~\cite{Weinberg:1980bf}. After the Higgs mechanism this
724: operator induces Majorana neutrino masses, thus providing a natural
725: way to account for their smallness, irrespective of their specific
726: origin. Little more can be said from first principles about the
727: mechanism giving rise to this operator, its associated mass scale or
728: its flavour structure. Its strength may be suppressed by a large scale
729: in the denominator (top-down) scenario, as in seesaw
730: schemes~\cite{Valle:2006vb}. Alternatively, the strength may be
731: suppressed by small parameters (e.g. scales, Yukawa couplings) and/or
732: loop-factors (bottom-up scenario) with no need for a large scale, as
733: also reviewed in Ref.~\cite{Valle:2006vb}.
734:
735: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
736:
737: \def\baselinestretch{1}
738: %\bibliographystyle{h-physrev4}
739: %\bibliography{valle-ref,nu-rev06,parke-ref}
740:
741: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
742:
743: \bibitem{Weinberg:1980bf}
744: S.~Weinberg,
745: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D22}, 1694 (1980).
746: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,1694;%%
747:
748: \bibitem{schechter:1980gr}
749: J.~Schechter and J.~W.~F. Valle,\\
750: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D22}, 2227 (1980);\\
751: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2227;%%
752: %``Neutrino Decay And Spontaneous Violation Of Lepton Number,''
753: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 25}, 774 (1982).
754: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,774;%%
755:
756: \bibitem{Valle:2006vb}
757: For a recent seesaw review see
758: J.~W.~F. Valle, lectures at the Corfu Summer Institute on Elementary
759: Particle Physics [hep-ph/0608101].
760: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0608101;%%
761:
762: \bibitem{barranco:2002te}
763: J.~Barranco {\em et~al},\\
764: Phys. Rev. {\bf D66}, 093009 (2002)
765: %[hep-ph/0207326 v3 KamLAND-updated version].
766: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207326;%%
767:
768: \bibitem{miranda:2000bi}
769: O.~G. Miranda {\em et~al.},
770: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B595}, 360 (2001), [hep-ph/0005259].
771: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005259;%%
772:
773: \bibitem{guzzo:2001mi}
774: M.~Guzzo {\em et~al,}
775: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B629}, 479 (2002)
776: %[hep-ph/0112310 v3 KamLAND-updated version].
777: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112310;%%
778:
779: \bibitem{Burgess:2003su}
780: C.~P. Burgess {\em et~al.},
781: \newblock JCAP {\bf 0401}, 007 (2004); %, [hep-ph/0310366].
782: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0310366;%%
783: \newblock Astrophys J {\bf 588} L65 (2003)%, [hep-ph/0209094].
784: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209094;%%
785:
786: \bibitem{Burgess:2003fj}
787: C.~P. Burgess {\em et~al},
788: \newblock Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. {\bf 348}, 609 (2004)
789: % [astro-ph/0304462].
790: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0304462;%%
791:
792: \bibitem{Miranda:2003yh}
793: O.~G. Miranda {\em et~al},
794: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93} 051304 (2004); %, [hep-ph/0311014].
795: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311014;%%
796: Phys. Rev. {\bf D70} 113002 (2004)%, [hep-ph/0406066].
797: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406066;%%
798:
799: \bibitem{Miranda:2004nb}
800: O.~G. Miranda, M.~A. Tortola and J.~W.~F. Valle,
801: \newblock JHEP {\bf 10}, 008 (2006) %, [hep-ph/0406280].
802: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406280;%%
803:
804: \bibitem{Yao:2006px}
805: Particle Data Group, W.~M. Yao {\em et~al.},
806: \newblock J. Phys. {\bf G33}, 1 (2006).
807: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%
808:
809: \bibitem{Fogli:2005cq}
810: G.~L.~Fogli, E.~Lisi, A.~Marrone, A.~Palazzo,
811: %``Global analysis of three-flavor neutrino masses and mixings,''
812: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 57} (2006) 742
813: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0506083].
814: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0506083;%%
815:
816: \bibitem{Fogli:2006yq}
817: G.~L. Fogli {\em et~al.},
818: %``Observables sensitive to absolute neutrino masses: A reappraisal after
819: %WMAP-3y and first MINOS results,''
820: \newblock hep-ph/0608060.
821: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0608060;%%
822:
823: \bibitem{Bahcall:2005va}
824: J.~N. Bahcall, A.~M. Serenelli and S.~Basu,
825: \newblock astro-ph/0511337.
826: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0511337;%%
827:
828: \bibitem{Aharmim:2005gt}
829: SNO collaboration, B.~Aharmim {\em et~al.},
830: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf C72}, 055502 (2005) %, [nucl-ex/0502021].
831: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0502021;%%
832:
833: \bibitem{Ahn:2006zz}
834: K2K collaboration, M.~H. Ahn,
835: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D74}, 072003 (2006) %hep-ex/0606032.
836: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0606032;%%
837:
838: \bibitem{Michael:2006rx}
839: D.~G.~Michael {\it et al.} [MINOS Collaboration],
840: %``Observation of muon neutrino disappearance with the {MINOS} detectors and
841: %the {NuMI} neutrino beam,''
842: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97} (2006) 191801
843: % [hep-ex/0607088].
844: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0607088;%%
845:
846: \bibitem{Maltoni:2004ei} M.~Maltoni {\em et~al.},
847: \newblock New J. Phys. {\bf 6}, 122 (2004),
848: \newblock Appendix C in hep-ph/0405172 (v5) provides updated results
849: as of Summer 2006; previous references to other groups therein.
850:
851: \bibitem{Bahcall:2004fg}
852: J.~N. Bahcall and M.~H. Pinsonneault,
853: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 121301 (2004)%, [astro-ph/0402114].
854: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0402114;%%
855:
856: \bibitem{Honda:2004yz}
857: M.~Honda, T.~Kajita, K.~Kasahara and S.~Midorikawa,
858: \newblock astro-ph/0404457.
859: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0404457;%%
860:
861: \bibitem{mikheev:1985gs}
862: S.~P. Mikheev and A.~Y. Smirnov,
863: \newblock Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 42}, 913 (1985).
864: %%CITATION = SJNCA,42,913;%%
865:
866: \bibitem{wolfenstein:1978ue}
867: L.~Wolfenstein,
868: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D17}, 2369 (1978).
869: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D17,2369;%%
870:
871: \bibitem{araki:2004mb}
872: KamLAND collaboration, T.~Araki {\em et~al.},
873: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 081801 (2004).
874: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0406035;%%
875:
876: \bibitem{pakvasa:2003zv}
877: S.~Pakvasa and J.~W.~F. Valle,
878: hep-ph/0301061, Proc. Indian National Acad. of Sci.,
879: Vol. 70A, No.1, p.189 - 222 (2004) %%, Eds. D. Indumathi {\em et~al.}
880: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301061;%%
881:
882: \bibitem{Gonzalez-garcia:2000sq}
883: M.~C. Gonzalez-Garcia {\em et~al},
884: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D63}, 033005 (2001) %, [hep-ph/0009350].
885: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009350;%%
886:
887: \bibitem{fogli:2001vr}
888: G.~L. Fogli, E.~Lisi, D.~Montanino and A.~Palazzo,
889: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D64}, 093007 (2001) %, [hep-ph/0106247].
890: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106247;%%
891:
892: \bibitem{schechter:1980bn}
893: J.~Schechter and J.~W.~F. Valle,
894: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D21}, 309 (1980).
895: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D21,309;%%
896:
897: \bibitem{valle:1987gv}
898: J.~W.~F. Valle,
899: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B199}, 432 (1987).
900: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B199,432;%%
901:
902: \bibitem{Huber:2004ug}
903: P.~Huber, M.~Lindner, Rolinec, T.~Schwetz, W.~Winter,
904: Phys. Rev. {\bf D70} 073014 (2004)%, [hep-ph/0403068].
905: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403068;%%
906:
907: \bibitem{Deppisch:2004fa}
908: F.~Deppisch and J.~W.~F. Valle,
909: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D72}, 036001 (2005), [hep-ph/0406040].
910: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406040;%%
911:
912: \bibitem{hall:1986dx}
913: L.~J. Hall, V.~A. Kostelecky and S.~Raby,
914: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B267}, 415 (1986).
915: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B267,415;%%
916:
917: \bibitem{zee:1980ai}
918: A.~Zee,
919: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B93}, 389 (1980).
920: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B93,389;%%
921:
922: \bibitem{babu:1988ki}
923: K.~S. Babu,
924: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B203}, 132 (1988).
925: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B203,132;%%
926:
927: \bibitem{fornengo:2001pm}
928: N.~Fornengo {\em et~al.},
929: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D65}, 013010 (2002); % [hep-ph/0108043].
930: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108043;%%
931: For 3-neutrino case see
932: A.~Friedland, C.~Lunardini and M.~Maltoni,
933: %``Atmospheric neutrinos as probes of neutrino matter interactions,''
934: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70} (2004) 111301
935: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0408264].
936: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408264;%%
937:
938: \bibitem{Alsharoa:2002wu}
939: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory, M.~M. Alsharoa {\em et~al.},
940: \newblock Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams {\bf 6}, 081001 (2003), [hep-ex/0207031].
941: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0207031;%%
942:
943: \bibitem{apollonio:2002en}
944: M.~Apollonio {\em et~al.},
945: \newblock hep-ph/0210192,
946: \newblock CERN Yellow Report on the Neutrino Factory.
947: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210192;%%
948:
949: \bibitem{albright:2000xi}
950: C.~Albright {\em et~al.},
951: \newblock hep-ex/0008064,
952: \newblock Report to the Fermilab Directorate.
953: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0008064;%%
954:
955: \bibitem{Albrow:2005kw}
956: M.~G. Albrow {\em et~al.},
957: \newblock hep-ex/0509019.
958: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0509019;%%
959:
960: \bibitem{huber:2001de}
961: P.~Huber, T.~Schwetz and J.~W.~F. Valle,
962: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 101804 (2002); %, [hep-ph/0111224].
963: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111224;%%
964: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D66}, 013006 (2002)%, [hep-ph/0202048].
965: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202048;%%
966:
967: \bibitem{huber:2001zw}
968: P.~Huber and J.~W.~F. Valle,
969: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B523}, 151 (2001), [hep-ph/0108193].
970: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108193;%%
971:
972: \bibitem{Akhmedov:2004rq}
973: E.~K. Akhmedov, M.~A. Tortola and J.~W.~F. Valle,
974: \newblock JHEP {\bf 05}, 057 (2004) %, [hep-ph/0404083].
975: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404083;%%
976:
977: \bibitem{Deppisch:2005zm}
978: F.~Deppisch, T.~S.~Kosmas and J.~W.~F.~Valle,
979: %``Enhanced mu- e- conversion in nuclei in the inverse seesaw model,''
980: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 752} (2006) 80 %[hep-ph/0512360].
981: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512360;%%
982:
983: \bibitem{Bernabeu:1987gr}
984: J.~Bernabeu {\em et~al.},
985: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B187}, 303 (1987);
986: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B187,303;%%
987: M.~C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J.~W.~F. Valle,
988: \newblock Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A7}, 477 (1992).
989: %%CITATION = MPLAE,A7,477;%%
990:
991: \bibitem{Ilakovac:1994kj}
992: A.~Ilakovac and A.~Pilaftsis,
993: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B437}, 491 (1995), [hep-ph/9403398].
994: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403398;%%
995:
996: \bibitem{Hall:1985dx}
997: L.~J. Hall, V.~A. Kostelecky and S.~Raby,
998: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B267}, 415 (1986).
999: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B267,415;%%
1000:
1001: \bibitem{borzumati:1986qx}
1002: F.~Borzumati and A.~Masiero,
1003: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 57}, 961 (1986).
1004: %%CITATION = PRLTA,57,961;%%
1005:
1006: \bibitem{casas:2001sr}
1007: J.~A. Casas and A.~Ibarra,
1008: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B618}, 171 (2001), [hep-ph/0103065].
1009: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103065;%%
1010:
1011: \bibitem{Antusch:2006vw}
1012: S.~Antusch, E.~Arganda, M.~J. Herrero and A.~Teixeira,
1013: \newblock hep-ph/0607263.
1014: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0607263;%%
1015:
1016: \bibitem{Dittmar:1990yg}
1017: M.~Dittmar {\em et~al.},
1018: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B332}, 1 (1990);
1019: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B332,1;%%
1020: P.~Abreu {\it et al.} [DELPHI Collab],
1021: %``Search for neutral heavy leptons produced in Z decays,''
1022: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 74} (1997) 57 \& C {\bf 75} (1997) 580].
1023: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C74,57;%%
1024:
1025: \bibitem{branco:1989bn}
1026: G.~C. Branco, M.~N. Rebelo and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1027: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B225}, 385 (1989).
1028: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B225,385;%%
1029:
1030: \bibitem{rius:1990gk}
1031: N.~Rius and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1032: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B246}, 249 (1990).
1033: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B246,249;%%
1034:
1035: \bibitem{Drexlin:2005zt}
1036: KATRIN collaboration, G.~Drexlin,
1037: \newblock Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 145}, 263 (2005).
1038: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,145,263;%%
1039:
1040: \bibitem{schechter:1981hw}
1041: J.~Schechter and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1042: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D24}, 1883 (1981),
1043: \newblock Err. D25, 283 (1982).
1044: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D24,1883;%%
1045:
1046: \bibitem{Wolfenstein:1981rk}
1047: L.~Wolfenstein,
1048: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B107}, 77 (1981).
1049: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B107,77;%%
1050:
1051: \bibitem{pal:1982rm}
1052: P.~B. Pal and L.~Wolfenstein,
1053: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D25}, 766 (1982).
1054: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,766;%%
1055:
1056: \bibitem{kayser:1982br}
1057: B.~Kayser,
1058: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D26}, 1662 (1982).
1059: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D26,1662;%%
1060:
1061: \bibitem{Schechter:1982bd}
1062: J.~Schechter and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1063: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D25}, 2951 (1982).
1064: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,2951;%%
1065:
1066: \bibitem{bilenky:1980cx}
1067: S.~M. Bilenky, J.~Hosek and S.~T. Petcov,
1068: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B94}, 49 (1980).
1069:
1070: \bibitem{Schechter:1981gk}
1071: J.~Schechter and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1072: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D23}, 1666 (1981).
1073: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D23,1666;%%
1074:
1075: \bibitem{doi:1981yb}
1076: M.~Doi {\em et~al.},%, T.~Kotani, H.~Nishiura, K.~Okuda and E.~Takasugi,
1077: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B102}, 323 (1981).
1078: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B102,323;%%
1079:
1080: \bibitem{Bilenky:2004wn}
1081: S.~M. Bilenky, A.~Faessler and F.~Simkovic,
1082: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D70}, 033003 (2004) %, [hep-ph/0402250].
1083: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402250;%%
1084:
1085: \bibitem{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2004wj}
1086: H.~V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus {\it et al.}
1087: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B586}, 198 (2004), [hep-ph/0404088].
1088: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0404088;%%
1089:
1090: \bibitem{Aalseth:2002dt}
1091: C.~E. Aalseth {\em et~al.},
1092: \newblock Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A17}, 1475 (2002), [hep-ex/0202018].
1093: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0202018;%%
1094:
1095: \bibitem{babu:2002dz}
1096: K.~S. Babu, E.~Ma and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1097: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B552}, 207 (2003), [hep-ph/0206292].
1098: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206292;%%
1099:
1100: \bibitem{caldwell:1993kn}
1101: D.~O. Caldwell and R.~N. Mohapatra,
1102: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D48}, 3259 (1993).
1103: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D48,3259;%%
1104:
1105: \bibitem{ioannisian:1994nx}
1106: A.~Ioannisian and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1107: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B332}, 93 (1994), [hep-ph/9402333].
1108: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9402333;%%
1109:
1110: \bibitem{Hirsch:2005mc}
1111: M.~Hirsch {\em et~al.},
1112: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D72}, 091301 (2005), [hep-ph/0507148].
1113: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507148;%%
1114:
1115: \bibitem{Lesgourgues:2006nd}
1116: J.~Lesgourgues and S.~Pastor,
1117: \newblock Phys. Rep. {\bf 429}, 307 (2006), [astro-ph/0603494].
1118: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603494;%%
1119:
1120: \bibitem{Hannestad:2006zg}
1121: S.~Hannestad,
1122: \newblock hep-ph/0602058.
1123: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602058;%%
1124:
1125: \bibitem{Minakata:2001cd}
1126: H.~Minakata, H.~Nunokawa, R.~Tomas and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1127: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B542}, 239 (2002) %, [hep-ph/0112160].
1128: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112160;%%
1129:
1130: \bibitem{Nunokawa:1996tg}
1131: H.~Nunokawa {\em et~al.},
1132: \newblock Phys. Rev. {\bf D54}, 4356 (1996), [hep-ph/9605301].
1133: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605301;%%
1134:
1135: \bibitem{Nunokawa:1996ve}
1136: H.~Nunokawa, A.~Rossi and J.~W.~F. Valle,
1137: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B482}, 481 (1996) %, [hep-ph/9606445].
1138: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606445;%%
1139:
1140: \end{thebibliography}
1141: %\bibliography{lgenesis-ref}
1142:
1143: \end{document}
1144: