1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2:
3: \usepackage{array}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{graphics,graphpap}
7:
8: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.2cm}
9: \setlength{\textwidth}{16.5cm}
10: \setlength{\topmargin}{-0.4in}
11: \setlength{\textheight}{23cm}
12: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
13:
14: \addtolength{\jot}{10pt}
15: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-3pt}
16: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{0}
17: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
18:
19: % (* customized commands *)
20:
21: \newcommand\ud{\uparrow\downarrow}
22: \newcommand\du{\downarrow\uparrow}
23: \newcommand{\dnabla}{\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{\nabla}}
24:
25: \newcommand{\qz}{(q\cdot z)}
26: \newcommand{\ms}{\overline{m}_s(\mu)}
27: \newcommand{\db}{\bar{d}}
28: \newcommand{\ub}{\bar{u}}
29: \newcommand{\quark}{\langle \bar q q\rangle}
30: \newcommand{\mixed}{\langle \bar q \sigma gG q\rangle}
31: \newcommand{\squark}{\langle \bar s s\rangle}
32: \newcommand{\qquark}{\langle \bar q q\rangle}
33: \newcommand{\uquark}{\langle \bar u u\rangle}
34: \newcommand{\smixed}{\langle \bar s \sigma gG s\rangle}
35: \newcommand{\umixed}{\langle \bar u \sigma gG u\rangle}
36: \newcommand{\gluon}{\left\langle \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,G^2\right\rangle}
37: \newcommand{\bra}{\langle}
38: \newcommand{\ket}{\rangle}
39: \newcommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}
40: \newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde}
41: \newcommand{\deriv}{\stackrel{\leftrightarrow}{D}}
42: \newcommand{\derleft}{\stackrel{\leftarrow}{D}}
43: \newcommand{\derright}{\stackrel{\rightarrow}{D}}
44:
45: \def\s#1{\setbox0=\hbox{$#1$}%
46: \rlap{\ifdim\wd0>.7em\kern.22\wd0\else\kern.1\wd0\fi /}#1}
47: \newcommand{\matel}[3]{\langle #1|#2|#3\rangle}
48: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}
49: \newcommand{\ga}{\gamma}
50:
51: \def\pslash{\rlap/{\mkern-1mu p}}
52: \def\zslash{\rlap/{\mkern-1mu z}}
53: \makeatletter
54: \def\slash#1{\rlap/{\mkern-2mu {#1}}} % TeXbook, bottom of p360
55: \makeatother
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: %%%%%%%%%% Title page
60: \begin{titlepage}
61: \begin{flushright}
62: \begin{tabular}{l}
63: IPPP/06/62\\
64: DCPT/06/124
65: \end{tabular}
66: \end{flushright}
67: \vskip1.5cm
68: \begin{center}
69: {\Large \bf \boldmath
70: Twist-3 Distribution Amplitudes of $K^*$ and $\phi$ Mesons}
71: \vskip1.3cm
72: {\sc
73: Patricia Ball\footnote{Patricia.Ball@durham.ac.uk} and
74: G.W.~Jones\footnote{G.W.Jones@durham.ac.uk}}
75: \vskip0.5cm
76: {\em IPPP, Department of Physics,
77: University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK}
78:
79: \vskip2cm
80:
81: %{\em Version of \today}
82:
83: \vskip5cm
84:
85: {\large\bf Abstract\\[10pt]} \parbox[t]{\textwidth}{
86: We present a systematic study of twist-3 light-cone distribution
87: amplitudes of $K^*$ and $\phi$ mesons in QCD.
88: The structure of SU(3)-breaking corrections is studied in
89: detail. Non-perturbative input parameters are estimated from QCD sum
90: rules. As a by-product, we update the parameters describing the
91: twist-3 distribution amplitudes of the $\rho$ meson.
92: We also review and update predictions for
93: the twist-2 distribution amplitudes of $\rho$, $K^*$ and $\phi$.
94: }
95:
96: \vfill
97:
98: %{\em submitted to JHEP}
99: \end{center}
100: \end{titlepage}
101:
102: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
103: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}
104: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
105:
106: \newpage
107:
108: \section{Introduction}
109: \setcounter{equation}{0}
110:
111: In recent years SU(3)-symmetry-breaking in processes involving light
112: vector mesons has attracted increasing interest. For some of these processes,
113: for instance the heavy-meson decays $B\to\rho\gamma$ vs.\ $B\to
114: K^*\gamma$, the uncertainty in SU(3) breaking is presently the
115: dominant source of theoretical error \cite{BVgamma,BJZ}. These and related
116: decays, like $B\to (\rho,K^*)\ell^+\ell^-$, are dominated, at
117: short distance, by flavour-changing neutral-current transitions which
118: are heavily suppressed in the Standard Model (SM) (they occur only at
119: loop-level) and hence are very sensitive to potential effects from new
120: physics. All these decays will be studied in detail at the LHC, with the
121: aim, in the case of the discovery of new physics in the TeV range, to
122: elucidate its flavour structure, or,
123: in the case of continued absence of new particles in direct
124: searches, to constrain their possible masses and couplings. In any case, good
125: theoretical control over the SM predictions of such decays
126: is vital. The current theoretical approaches to describe them all
127: rely, in one way or the other, on their interpretation as hard
128: exclusive reactions, with the hard scale
129: set by the heavy quark or meson mass which leads to an expansion in
130: terms of the inverse hard scale.\footnote{This also applies to
131: lattice calculations, see Ref.~\cite{christalk}.}
132:
133: In a perturbative framework, the method of choice for calculating
134: matrix elements of $B\to\,$light meson transitions is QCD
135: factorisation, which enters QCD sum rules on the light cone
136: \cite{LCSR}, QCD factorisation for non-leptonic and radiative $B$
137: decays \cite{QCDF} and perturbative QCD factorisation \cite{pQCD}. One
138: important ingredient in these calculations are light-cone
139: hadron distribution amplitudes (DAs) which describe
140: the momentum-fraction distribution of partons at zero transverse separation
141: in a particular Fock state, with a fixed number of constituents. DAs
142: are ordered by increasing twist;
143: the leading-twist-2 meson DA $\phi_{2;M}$, which describes the momentum
144: distribution of the valence quarks in the meson $M$, is related to the
145: meson's Bethe--Salpeter wave function $\phi_{M,BS}$ by an integral
146: over transverse momenta:
147: $$
148: \phi_{2;M}(u,\mu) = Z_2(\mu) \int^{|k_\perp| < \mu} \!\!d^2 k_\perp\,
149: \phi_{M,BS}(u,k_\perp).
150: $$
151: Here $u$ is the quark momentum fraction, $Z_2$ is the renormalisation
152: factor (in the light-cone gauge) for the quark-field operators in the
153: wave function, and $\mu$ denotes the renormalisation scale. For
154: pseudoscalar mesons, one has one twist-2 DA, whereas for vector mesons
155: there are two, $\phi_{2;M}^\perp$ and $\phi_{2;M}^\parallel$,
156: one for each independent polarisation state of the vector meson, transverse and
157: longitudinal, respectively. In this paper we study the twist-3
158: distribution amplitudes of the vector mesons $\rho$, $K^*$ and $\phi$,
159: with a particular emphasis on SU(3) (and G-parity) breaking
160: effects, and also update earlier results on twist-2 parameters. We do
161: not differentiate between $\rho$ and $\omega$ mesons as
162: their DAs only differ by the numerical values of
163: hadronic parameters which, using the currently available
164: theoretical methods, coincide within errors.
165: Our paper is an extension of Ref.~\cite{BBL06} to vector-meson DAs
166: and finalises the preliminary results for twist-3 parameters quoted
167: earlier in Refs.~\cite{BVgamma,BJZ,frueher}. The results for twist-4
168: DAs will be published elsewhere.
169:
170: The study of vector-meson DAs has attracted
171: less attention than that of pseudoscalar DAs. The leading twist-2 DAs
172: of $\rho$ have been investigated in Ref.~\cite{BB96}, correcting a
173: mistake in the earlier literature \cite{CZreport}.
174: The structure of twist-3 DAs of $\rho$, $K^*$ and $\phi$ and
175: their relation to twist-2 DAs have been studied in Ref.~\cite{BBKT},
176: but did not include all SU(3)-breaking effects. In this
177: paper, we complete the analysis of Ref.~\cite{BBKT} by including all
178: G-parity and SU(3) breaking corrections for $K^*$ and $\phi$ and also
179: providing numerical values of all hadronic parameters.
180:
181: Our paper is organised as follows: in
182: Sec.~\ref{sec:2} we introduce notations and review the status of the
183: twist-2 parameters. In Sec.~\ref{sec:3} we provide parametrisations of
184: all twist-3 DAs to NLO in chiral expansion and including all G-parity
185: breaking contributions. In Sec.~\ref{sec:4} we discuss numerical
186: models for these DAs, based on the results from QCD sum rules.
187: We conclude and summarise in Sec.~\ref{sec:5}. The appendices contain
188: a discussion of the renormalisation-scale dependence of the twist-3
189: parameters, which is also affected by SU(3)-breaking corrections, and
190: the QCD sum rules used to derive numerical values for all parameters.
191:
192: \section{General Framework and Twist-2 DAs}\label{sec:2}
193: \setcounter{equation}{0}
194:
195: In this section we introduce notations and review the status of
196: twist-2 parameters.
197:
198: \subsection{Kinematics and Notations}
199: Light-cone meson DAs are defined in terms of matrix elements of
200: non-local light-ray operators extended along a certain light-like
201: direction $z_\mu$, $z^2=0$, and sandwiched between the vacuum and the
202: meson state.
203: We adopt the generic notation
204: \begin{equation}
205: \phi^\lambda_{t;M}(u),\ \psi^\lambda_{t;M}(u),\ \ldots
206: \end{equation}
207: and
208: \begin{equation}
209: \Phi^\lambda_{t;M}({\underline{\alpha}}),\
210: \Psi^\lambda_{t;M}({\underline{\alpha}}),\
211: \ldots
212: \end{equation}
213: for two-particle and three-particle DAs, respectively. The
214: superscript $\lambda$ denotes the polarisation of the vector meson:
215: $\lambda=\parallel(\perp)$ for longitudinal (transverse)
216: polarisation. The first
217: subscript $t=2,3,4$ stands for the twist; the second one,
218: $M=\rho,K^*,\ldots$, specifies the meson. For definiteness, we will write
219: most expressions for $K^*$ mesons, i.e.\ $s\bar q$ bound states
220: with $q =u,d$. Whenever relevant, we will include quark mass
221: corrections in the form $m_s\pm m_q$, which allows one to obtain the
222: results for $\phi$ by $m_q\to m_s$. We do not include the $\omega$, as
223: all formulas for DAs coincide with those of the $\rho$; the difference
224: is in the numerical values of the hadronic parameters which, at least
225: in the framework of QCD sum rules, coincide with those for the $\rho$
226: except for small differences due to the difference in meson masses.
227: The variable $u$ in the definition of two-particle DAs
228: always refers to the momentum fraction carried by the quark, $u =
229: u_s$, whereas
230: $\bar u \equiv 1-u = u_{\bar q}$ is the antiquark momentum fraction.
231: The set of variables in the three-particle DAs,
232: $\underline{\alpha} = \{\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3\} = \{\alpha_{s},
233: \alpha_{\bar q},\alpha_g\}$, corresponds to the momentum fractions
234: carried by the quark, antiquark and gluon, respectively.
235:
236: To facilitate the light-cone expansion, it is
237: convenient to use light-like vectors $p_\mu$ and $z_\mu$ instead of
238: the meson's 4-momentum $P_\mu$ and the coordinate $x_\mu$:
239: \begin{eqnarray}
240: z_\mu &=&
241: x_\mu-P_\mu\,\frac{1}{m_{K^*}^2}\left[xP -\sqrt{(xP)^2-x^2m^2_{K^*}}\,\right]
242: = x_\mu\left[1-\frac{x^2m_{{K^*}}^2}{4(zp)^2}\right]
243: -\frac{1}{2}p_\mu\,\frac{x^2}{zp}
244: + \mbox{\cal O}(x^4)\,,
245: \nonumber\\
246: p_\mu &=& P_\mu-\frac{1}{2}\,z_\mu\, \frac{m^2_{K^*}}{pz}\,.
247: \label{lc-variables}
248: \end{eqnarray}
249: The meson's polarization vector
250: $e^{(\lambda)}$ can be decomposed into projections
251: onto the two light-like vectors and the orthogonal plane as follows:
252: \begin{eqnarray}
253: e^{(\lambda)}_\mu &=& \frac{e^{(\lambda)}z}{pz}\, p_\mu +
254: \frac{e^{(\lambda)} p}{pz}\, z_\mu +
255: e^{(\lambda)}_{\perp\mu}
256: = \frac{e^{(\lambda)} z}{pz}\left( p_\mu -\frac{m^2_{K^*}}{2pz}\, z_\mu
257: \right)+e^{(\lambda)}_{\perp\mu}\,.
258: \label{polv}
259: \end{eqnarray}
260: We also need the projector $g_{\mu\nu}^\perp$
261: onto the directions orthogonal to $p$ and $z$,
262: \begin{equation}
263: g^\perp_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\nu} -\frac{1}{pz}(p_\mu z_\nu+ p_\nu z_\mu)\,,
264: \end{equation}
265: and will often use the notations
266: \begin{equation}
267: a_z\equiv a_\mu z^\mu, \qquad b_p\equiv b_\mu p^\mu
268: \end{equation}
269: for arbitrary Lorentz vectors $a_\mu$ and $b_\mu$.
270:
271: The dual gluon field strength
272: tensor is defined as $\widetilde{G}_{\mu\nu} =
273: \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{\mu\nu \rho\sigma} G^{\rho\sigma}$. Our
274: convention for the covariant derivative is $D_\mu = \partial_\mu - i g
275: A_\mu$. Sometimes, a different convention for the sign of $g$ is used in the
276: literature, with $D_\mu = \partial_\mu + i g
277: A_\mu$. The sign of $g$ is relevant for all three-particle twist-3
278: DAs, see Tab.~\ref{tab:num}.
279:
280: \subsection{Conformal Expansion and the
281: Structure of SU(3)-Breaking Corrections}
282:
283: A convenient tool to study DAs is provided by conformal expansion, see
284: Ref.~\cite{BKM03} for a review.\footnote{See Ref.~\cite{angi}
285: for an alternative
286: approach not based on conformal expansion.}
287: The underlying idea is similar to partial-wave decomposition in
288: quantum mechanics and allows one to separate
289: transverse and longitudinal variables in the Bethe--Salpeter
290: wave--function. The
291: dependence on transverse coordinates is formulated as scale dependence
292: of the relevant operators and is governed by
293: renormalisation-group equations, the dependence on the longitudinal
294: momentum fractions is described in terms of irreducible
295: representations of the corresponding symmetry group, the collinear
296: conformal group SL(2,$\mathbb R$).
297: %The conformal partial-wave expansion is
298: %explicitly consistent with the equations of motion (EOM) since the latter are
299: %not renormalised. It thus makes maximum use of the symmetry
300: %of the theory to simplify the dynamics.
301:
302: To construct the conformal expansion for an arbitrary multi-particle
303: distribution, one first has to decompose each constituent field into
304: components with fixed Lorentz-spin projection onto the
305: light-cone. Each such component has conformal spin
306: $$
307: j=\frac{1}{2}\, (l+s),
308: $$
309: where $l$ is the canonical dimension and $s$ the (Lorentz-) spin
310: projection. In particular, $l=3/2$ for quarks and $l=2$ for gluons.
311: A quark field is decomposed as $\psi_+ \equiv
312: \Lambda_+\psi$ and $\psi_-=
313: \Lambda_-\psi$ with spin projection operators $\Lambda_+ =
314: \gamma_p\gamma_z/(2pz)$ and
315: $\Lambda_- = \gamma_z\gamma_p/(2pz)$, corresponding to
316: $s=+1/2$ and $s=-1/2$, respectively. For the gluon
317: field strength there are three possibilities:
318: $G_{z\perp}$ corresponds to $s=+1$,
319: $G_{p\perp}$ to $s=-1$, and both
320: $G_{\perp\perp}$ and $G_{zp}$ correspond to $s=0$.
321: Multi-particle states built of fields with definite Lorentz-spin
322: projection can be expanded in
323: irreducible representations of SL(2,$\mathbb R$)
324: with increasing conformal spin.
325: The explicit expression for the DA
326: of an $m$-particle state with the lowest possible conformal spin
327: $j=j_1+\ldots+j_m$, the so-called asymptotic DA, is given by \cite{BF90}
328: \begin{equation}
329: \phi_{as}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\cdots,\alpha_m) =
330: \frac{\Gamma(2j_1+\cdots +2j_m)}{\Gamma(2j_1)\cdots \Gamma(2j_m)}\,
331: \alpha_1^{2j_1-1}\alpha_2^{2j_2-1}\ldots \alpha_m^{2j_m-1}.
332: \label{asym}
333: \end{equation}
334: %Here $\alpha_k$ is the longitudinal momentum fraction of the $k$th
335: %parton in the meson.
336: Multi-particle irreducible representations with higher spin
337: $j+n,n=1,2,\ldots$,
338: are given by polynomials of $m$ variables (with the constraint
339: $\sum_{k=1}^m \alpha_k=1$ ), which are orthogonal over
340: the weight function (\ref{asym}). For the twist-2 and 3 two-particle
341: DAs these are Gegenbauer polynomials, whereas the twist-3
342: three-particle DAs get expanded in Appell polynomials.
343:
344: In this paper we are particularly interested in SU(3)-breaking
345: corrections to DAs. These corrections come from different sources:
346: \begin{itemize}
347: \item SU(3) breaking of hadronic parameters: these effects are
348: partially known for twist-2 parameters, see
349: Refs.~\cite{CZreport,BBKT,BB03}, but have not been studied for
350: twist-3 parameters before;
351: \item G-parity breaking parameters: these are of parametric order
352: $m_s-m_q$ and vanish in the
353: limit of equal quark mass, i.e.\ for $\rho$ and $\phi$. For twist-2
354: DAs, these have been calculated,
355: to lowest order in the conformal expansion in
356: Refs.~\cite{CZreport,BBKT,BB03,BL04,BZ05}; they are unknown for
357: twist-3 DAs;\footnote{The results given in
358: Refs.~\cite{BVgamma,BJZ,frueher} were preliminary versions of those
359: obtained in this paper.}
360: \item explicit quark mass corrections in $m_s\pm m_q$ to DAs and
361: evolution equations: these affect only higher-twist DAs and are
362: induced by the QCD equations of motion (EOM) which relate twist-3
363: DAs to each other and to twist-2 DAs, see Sec.~\ref{sec:3}. The mass
364: corrections to vector meson DAs
365: have been calculated to twist-3 accuracy in Ref.~\cite{BBKT}; the
366: effect on the evolution of DAs under a change of the renormalisation
367: scale so far has only been investigated for
368: pseudoscalar DAs \cite{BBL06}.
369: \end{itemize}
370: We shall study all these effects in this paper.
371:
372: Let us now see how these corrections affect twist-2 DAs.
373:
374: \subsection{Twist-2 Distributions}\label{sec:2.3}
375:
376: The twist-2 DAs $\phi_{2;K^*}^{\parallel,\perp}$ of $K^*$ mesons are
377: defined in terms of the following
378: matrix elements of non-local operators ($\xi = 2u-1$) \cite{BBKT}:
379: \begin{eqnarray}
380: \lefteqn{\hspace*{-2cm}\langle 0 | \bar q(x) \gamma_\mu s(-x) |
381: K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle =
382: f_{K^*}^\parallel m_{K^*} \left\{ \frac{e^{(\lambda)}x}{Px}\,P_\mu
383: \int_0^1 du\, e^{i\xi Px} \left[ \phi_{2;K^*}^\parallel(u) +
384: \frac{1}{4}\, m_{K^*}^2 x^2
385: \phi^\parallel_{4;K^*}(u)\right]\right.}\nonumber\\
386: &&{} + \left( e^{(\lambda)}_\mu -
387: P_\mu\,\frac{e^{(\lambda)}x}{Px}\right) \int_0^1 du\,e^{i\xi
388: Px}\,\phi_{3;K^*}^\perp(u)\nonumber\\
389: &&\left. - \frac{1}{2}\,x_\mu
390: \,\frac{e^{(\lambda)}x}{(Px)^2} \, m_{K^*}^2 \int_0^1 du\,e^{i\xi Px}\,
391: \left[ \psi_{4;K^*}^\parallel(u) + \phi_{2;K^*}^\parallel(u) - 2
392: \phi_{3;K^*}^\perp(u)\right]\right\},\label{2.9}
393: \end{eqnarray}
394: \begin{eqnarray}
395: \lefteqn{
396: \langle 0 | \bar q(x) \sigma_{\mu\nu} s(-x) | K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle
397: =}\hspace*{1cm}
398: \nonumber\\
399: &&{}i f_{K^*}^\perp \left\{ (e_\mu^{(\lambda)} P_\nu - e_\nu^{(\lambda)}
400: P_\mu) \int_0^1 du \, e^{i\xi Px} \left[ \phi_{2;K^*}^\perp(u) +
401: \frac{1}{4}\, m_{K^*}^2 x^2
402: \phi^\perp_{4;K^*}(u)\right]\right.
403: \nonumber\\
404: &&{}
405: + (P_\mu x_\nu - P_\nu
406: x_\mu)\,\frac{e^{(\lambda)}x}{(Px)^2}\,m_{K^*}^2 \int_0^1 du \,
407: e^{i\xi Px} \left[ \phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(u) -
408: \frac{1}{2}\phi_{2;K^*}^\perp(u) -
409: \frac{1}{2}\psi_{4;K^*}^\perp(u)\right]
410: \nonumber\\
411: &&{}\left.
412: + \frac{1}{2}\,(e_\mu^{(\lambda)} x_\nu - e_\nu^{(\lambda)}x_\mu)\,
413: \frac{m_{K^*}^2}{Px} \int_0^1 du \,
414: e^{i\xi Px} \left[ \psi_{4;K^*}^\perp(u)-\phi_{2;K^*}^\perp(u)
415: \right]\right\}.\label{2.10}
416: \end{eqnarray}
417: All other DAs in the above relations are of twist 3 or 4. We have
418: neglected all terms in the light-cone expansion which are of twist
419: 5 or higher.
420: The normalisation of all DAs is given by
421: \begin{equation}
422: \int_0^1 du\, \phi(u) = 1\,.
423: \end{equation}
424: The above DAs are related to those defined in Refs.~\cite{BBKT,BB98} by
425: \begin{equation}
426: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{5pt}
427: \begin{array}[b]{r@{\ =\ }l@{\qquad}r@{\ =\ }l@{\qquad}r@{\ =\ }l}
428: \phi_{2;K^*}^{\parallel(\perp)} & \phi_{\parallel(\perp)}\,, &
429: \phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel & h_\parallel^{(t)}\,, & \psi_{4;K^*}^\parallel &
430: g_3\,,\\[10pt]
431: \phi_{4;K^*}^{\parallel(\perp)} & {\mathbb A}_{(T)}\,, &
432: \phi_{3;K^*}^\perp & g_\perp^{(v)}\,, & \psi_{4;K^*}^\perp &
433: h_3\,.
434: \end{array}
435: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-5pt}
436: \end{equation}
437:
438: The conformal expansion of $\phi_2^{\parallel,\perp}$ reads
439: \begin{equation}\label{eq:confexp}
440: \phi_2^{\parallel,\perp}(u) = 6 u \bar u \left\{ 1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty
441: a_n^{\parallel,\perp} C_n^{3/2}(2u-1)\right\}
442: \end{equation}
443: in terms of the (non-perturbative) Gegenbauer moments
444: $a_n^{\parallel,\perp}$ and the
445: Gegenbauer polynomials $C_n^{3/2}$.
446: To leading-logarithmic accuracy, the
447: $a_n$ renormalise multiplicatively as
448: \begin{equation}
449: a^{\rm LO}_n(\mu^2) = L^{\gamma^{(0)}_n/(2\beta_0)}\, a_n(\mu_0^2),
450: \end{equation}
451: where $L = \alpha_s(\mu^2)/\alpha_s(\mu_0^2)$,
452: $\beta_0=(33-2N_f)/3$, and
453: the anomalous dimensions $\gamma^{(0)}_n$ are given by \cite{andim1}
454: \begin{eqnarray*}
455: \gamma^{\parallel(0)}_n &=& 8C_F \left(\psi(n+2) + \gamma_E - \frac{3}{4} -
456: \frac{1}{2(n+1)(n+2)} \right),\\
457: \gamma^{\perp(0)}_n &=& 8C_F \left(\psi(n+2) + \gamma_E -
458: \frac{3}{4} \right).
459: \end{eqnarray*}
460: To next-to-leading order accuracy, the scale dependence of the
461: Gegenbauer moments is more complicated and reads
462: \cite{Mueller}
463: \begin{equation}
464: a^{\rm NLO}_n(\mu^2) = a_n(\mu_0^2) E_n^{\rm NLO}
465: +\frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi}\sum_{k=0}^{n-2} a_k(\mu_0^2)\,
466: L^{\gamma_k^{(0)}/(2\beta_0)}\, d^{(1)}_{nk},
467: \end{equation}
468: where
469: $$
470: E_n^{\rm NLO} = L^{\gamma^{(0)}_n/(2\beta_0)}\left\{1+
471: \frac{\gamma^{(1)}_n \beta_0 -\gamma_n^{(0)}\beta_1}{8\pi\beta_0^2}
472: \Big[\alpha_s(\mu^2)-\alpha_s(\mu_0^2)\Big]\right\}
473: $$
474: with $\beta_1 = 102-(38/3)N_f$;
475: $\gamma^{(1)}_n$ are the diagonal two-loop anomalous dimensions, which
476: have been calculated, for the vector current, in Ref.~\cite{Floratos},
477: and, for the tensor current, in Ref.~\cite{Haya}.
478: The mixing coefficients $d^{(1)}_{nk}$, $k\le n-2$,
479: are given, in closed form in Ref.~\cite{Mueller}, for the axial
480: vector current; the formulas are valid for
481: arbitrary currents upon substitution of the corresponding one-loop
482: anomalous dimension.
483:
484: For the lowest moments $n=0,1,2$ one has, explicitly:
485: $$
486: \gamma_0^{\parallel(1)} =0\,, \qquad
487: \gamma_1^{\parallel(1)} = \frac{23110}{243} - \frac{512}{81}\, N_f\,,
488: \qquad
489: \gamma_2^{\parallel(1)} = \frac{34072}{243}-\frac{830}{81}\, N_f\,,
490: $$
491: \begin{equation}
492: \gamma_0^{\perp(1)} =\frac{724}{9} - \frac{104}{27}\,N_f\,, \qquad
493: \gamma_1^{\perp(1)} = 124 - 8 N_f\,,\qquad
494: \gamma_2^{\perp(1)} = \frac{38044}{243}-\frac{904}{81}\, N_f\,,
495: \end{equation}
496: and
497: \begin{eqnarray}
498: d^{\parallel(1)}_{20} & = &
499: \frac{35}{9}\,\frac{20-3\beta_0}{50-9\beta_0}
500: \left(1-L^{50/(9\beta_0)-1}\right), \nonumber\\
501: d^{\perp(1)}_{20} & = &
502: \frac{28}{9}\,\frac{16-3\beta_0}{40-9\beta_0}
503: \left(1-L^{40/(9\beta_0)-1}\right).
504: \end{eqnarray}
505:
506: Let us now review the numerical values of the twist-2 parameters, to
507: NLO in conformal spin. The longitudinal decay constants of the charged
508: mesons $\rho^\pm$, $K^{*\pm}$ can be extracted from the branching
509: ratios of $\tau^-\to V^- \nu_\tau$, whereas
510: $f^\parallel_{\rho,\omega,\phi}$ follow from $e^+e^-\to V^0$. A
511: critical discussion of the results, including effects of
512: $\rho$--$\omega$ and $\omega$--$\phi$ mixing, was given in
513: Ref.~\cite{BJZ} from which we quote the following results:
514: \begin{equation}
515: f_\rho^\parallel = (216\pm 3)\,{\rm MeV},\quad f_\omega^\parallel =
516: (187\pm 5)\, {\rm MeV},\quad f_{K^*}^\parallel = (220\pm 5)\,{\rm
517: MeV},\quad f_\phi^\parallel = (215\pm 5)\,{\rm MeV}\,.
518: \end{equation}
519:
520: The transverse decay constants $f^\perp$, on the other hand, cannot be
521: determined from experiment, but have to be calculated using
522: non-perturbative methods. Currently available results include QCD sum
523: rule determinations \cite{BB96,BBKT,BB03,BZ05} and lattice
524: calculations \cite{lattperp}. The corresponding results have been critically
525: reviewed and averaged in Ref.~\cite{BJZ}, with the following results:
526: \begin{equation}
527: f_\rho^\perp = (165\pm 9)\,{\rm MeV},\quad f_\omega^\perp =
528: (151\pm 9)\, {\rm MeV},\quad f_{K^*}^\perp = (185\pm 10)\,{\rm
529: MeV},\quad f_\phi^\perp = (186\pm 9)\,{\rm MeV}\,.
530: \end{equation}
531:
532: Let us now turn to the Gegenbauer moments
533: $a_{1,2}^{\parallel,\perp}$. At present, there are no lattice
534: determinations for any of those, so all available determinations
535: come from QCD sum rules \cite{BBKT,BB03,BL04,BZ05,Bakulev} or quark models
536: \cite{choi}. For mesons with definite G parity
537: (equal mass quarks), i.e.\ $\rho$ and $\phi$ in our case,
538: $a_1^{\parallel,\perp} =0$. For $a_1^{\parallel,\perp}(K^*)$, the
539: results from QCD sum rule calculations converge to \cite{BZ05}
540: \begin{eqnarray}
541: a_1^\parallel(K^*)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.03 \pm 0.02\,,\qquad
542: a_1^\parallel(K^*)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.02\pm 0.02 ,\qquad\nonumber\\
543: a_1^\perp(K^*)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.04 \pm 0.03\,,\qquad
544: a_1^\perp(K^*)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.03\pm 0.03\,.
545: \end{eqnarray}
546:
547: As for $a_2$, $a_2^{\perp,\parallel}(\rho)$ have been determined in
548: Ref.~\cite{BB96} and reinvestigated,recently, in
549: Ref.~\cite{BVgamma}, using the updated hadronic input collected in
550: Tab.~\ref{tab:QCDSRinput}. The resulting values
551: \begin{eqnarray}
552: a_2^\parallel(\rho)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.15 \pm 0.07\,,\qquad
553: a_2^\parallel(\rho)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.10\pm 0.05\,,\qquad\nonumber\\
554: a_2^\perp(\rho)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.14 \pm 0.06\,,\qquad
555: a_2^\perp(\rho)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.11\pm 0.05\,,
556: \end{eqnarray}
557: are slightly smaller than those quoted in Ref.~\cite{BB96}.
558: The value of $a_2^{\parallel,\perp}(K^*)$ has been determined in
559: Ref.~\cite{BBKT,BB03} and reinvestigated in Ref.~\cite{BVgamma}.
560: The result is
561: \begin{eqnarray}
562: a_2^\parallel(K^*)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.11 \pm 0.09\,,\qquad
563: a_2^\parallel(K^*)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.08\pm 0.06\,,\qquad\nonumber\\
564: a_2^\perp(K^*)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.10 \pm 0.08\,,\qquad
565: a_2^\perp(K^*)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.08\pm 0.06\,.
566: \end{eqnarray}
567: The corresponding parameters of the $\phi$ have received far less attention:
568: Ref.~\cite{BBKT} quotes $a_2^{\parallel,\perp}(\phi)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}}
569: = 0\pm 0.1$ and Ref.~\cite{BJZ} $a_2^\perp(\phi)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}}=0.2\pm
570: 0.2$. In this paper, we evaluate the sum rules collected in
571: App.~\ref{app:A}, which include all relevant corrections in $m_s^2$
572: and in particular the radiative corrections to the quark condensate
573: term in $m_s\langle\bar s s\rangle$, and find
574: \begin{eqnarray}
575: a_2^\parallel(\phi)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.18 \pm 0.08\,,\qquad
576: a_2^\parallel(\phi)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.13\pm 0.06\, ,\qquad\nonumber\\
577: a_2^\perp(\phi)^{\mu=1\,{\rm GeV}} & = & 0.14 \pm 0.07\,,\qquad
578: a_2^\perp(\phi)^{\mu=2\,{\rm GeV}} = 0.11 \pm 0.05\,.
579: \end{eqnarray}
580:
581: In summary, it is probably fair to say that all known determinations
582: of $a_{1,2}^{\perp,\parallel}$ point at fairly small values at
583: $1\,$GeV and that within the present accuracy
584: $a^\perp_{1(2)}=a^\parallel_{1(2)}$.
585:
586: Let us now turn to twist-3 DAs.
587:
588: \section{Twist-3 Distributions}\label{sec:3}
589: \setcounter{equation}{0}
590:
591: To twist-3 accuracy, there is a total of four two-particle DAs and three
592: three-particle DAs whose mutual interrelations have been unravelled in
593: Ref.~\cite{BBKT}, including quark mass corrections.
594: The crucial point in constructing higher-twist DAs is the
595: necessity to satisfy the QCD EOM which yield relations between
596: physical effects of different origin: for example, using EOM,
597: the contributions of orbital angular momentum in the
598: valence component of the wave function can be expressed
599: in terms of contributions of higher
600: Fock states. An appropriate framework for implementing these
601: constraints was developed in Ref.~\cite{BF90}: it is based on the derivation
602: of EOM relations for non-local light-ray operators~\cite{string},
603: which are solved order by order in
604: the conformal expansion; see Ref.~\cite{BKM03} for a review and
605: further references. In this way one can construct
606: self-consistent approximations for the DAs, which involve
607: a minimum number of hadronic parameters. The EOM
608: relations relating twist-2 and -3 DAs of vector mesons were derived in
609: Ref.~\cite{BBKT}, including all quark-mass corrections.
610: What is new in the present paper is the inclusion of G-parity breaking
611: corrections to three-particle DAs, which, via the EOM relations, also
612: impact on the two-particle DAs. Based on these relations, we derive,
613: in this section, complete formulas for all
614: twist-3 DAs to NLO in the conformal expansion, including all G-parity
615: breaking effects.
616: A non-zero quark mass also induces a mixing of
617: twist-2 parameters into those of twist-3 under a change of the
618: renormalisation scale. We also derive the corresponding
619: scaling relations.
620:
621: Let us start by defining the relevant DAs. The two-particle twist-3 DAs
622: $\phi_{3;K^*}^{\perp,\parallel}$ have already been defined in
623: Eqs.~(\ref{2.9}) and (\ref{2.10}). There are two more two-particle DAs,
624: $\psi_{3;K^*}^{\perp,\parallel}$, defined as%
625: \footnote{In the notations of Ref.~\cite{BBKT}, $\psi_{3;K^*}^\perp =
626: \{1-(f_{K^*}^\perp/f_{K^*}^\parallel) (m_s+m_q)/m_{K^*}\}
627: g_\perp^{(a)}$, $\psi_{3;K^*}^\parallel =
628: \{1-(f_{K^*}^\parallel/f_{K^*}^\perp) (m_s+m_q)/m_{K^*}\}
629: h_\parallel^{(s)}$.}
630: \begin{eqnarray}
631: \langle 0|\bar q(z) \gamma_{\mu} \gamma_{5}
632: s(-z)|K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle
633: &=& \frac{1}{2}\,f_{K^*}^\parallel
634: m_{K^*} \epsilon_{\mu}^{\phantom{\mu}\nu \alpha \beta}
635: e^{(\lambda)}_{\nu} p_{\alpha} z_{\beta}
636: \int_{0}^{1} \!du\, e^{i \xi p x} \psi_{3;K^*}^\perp(u)\,,\\
637: \langle 0|\bar q(z)s(-z)|K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle
638: & = & {} -i f_{K^*}^\perp(e^{(\lambda)} z) m_{K^*}^{2}
639: \int_{0}^{1} \!du\, e^{i \xi p z} \psi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(u)\,.
640: \end{eqnarray}
641: The normalisation is given by
642: \begin{equation}
643: \int_0^1 du\, \psi_{3;K^*}^{\parallel(\perp)}(u) = 1-
644: \frac{f_{K^*}^{\parallel(\perp)}}{f_{K^*}^{\perp(\parallel)}}\,
645: \frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,,
646: \end{equation}
647: which differs from Ref.~\cite{BBKT}, where all DAs
648: were normalised to 1. The reason is that in \cite{BBKT} we
649: implicitly expanded the normalisation factor
650: $1/\{1-(f_{K^*}^{\parallel(\perp)}/f_{K^*}^{\perp(\parallel)})
651: (m_s+m_q)/m_{K^*}\}$ in powers of $m_s+m_q$, whereas in this paper we
652: keep the full dependence on the quark masses.
653:
654: There are also three three-particle DAs of twist 3:
655: \begin{eqnarray}
656: \langle 0 |
657: \bar q(z) g \widetilde{G}_{\beta z}(vz)\gamma_z\gamma_5 s(-z) |
658: K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle & = & f_{K^*}^\parallel m_{K^*} (pz)^2
659: e^{(\lambda)}_{\perp\beta}
660: \widetilde\Phi_{3;K}^\parallel(v,pz)+\dots\,,
661: \nonumber\\
662: \langle 0 |
663: \bar q(z) g G_{\beta z}(vz)i\gamma_z s(-z) | K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle & = &
664: f_{K^*}^\parallel m_{K^*} (pz)^2
665: e^{(\lambda)}_{\perp\beta} \Phi_{3;K}^\parallel(v,pz)+\dots\,,\nonumber\\
666: \langle 0 |
667: \bar q(z) g G_{z\beta}(vz)\sigma_{z\beta} s(-z) |
668: K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle & = & f_{K^*}^\perp m_{K^*}^2
669: (e^{(\lambda)}z)(pz) \Phi_{3;K^*}^\perp(v,pz)\,,\label{3.4}
670: \end{eqnarray}
671: where the dots denote terms of higher twist and we use the short-hand notation
672: \begin{equation}
673: {\cal F}(v,pz) = \int {\cal
674: D}\underline{\alpha}\,e^{-ipz(\alpha_2-\alpha_1+v\alpha_3)}
675: {\cal F}(\underline{\alpha})
676: \end{equation}
677: with ${\cal F}(\underline{\alpha})$ being a three-particle DA.
678: $\underline{\alpha}$ is the set of parton momentum fractions
679: $\underline{\alpha} = \{\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\alpha_3\}$ and the integration
680: measure ${\cal D}\underline{\alpha}$ is defined as
681: \begin{equation}\label{eq:measure}
682: \int{\cal D}\underline{\alpha} \equiv \int_0^1 d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2
683: d\alpha_3\, \delta(1-\sum \alpha_i)\,.
684: \end{equation}
685:
686: As discussed in Ref.~\cite{BBKT}, all these DAs are interconnected by
687: the QCD EOM. The analysis of these EOM and the resulting
688: relations including quark mass corrections in $m_s\pm m_q$
689: is the subject of Ref.~\cite{BBKT}, so we do not
690: repeat it here, but just quote the results:
691: \begin{eqnarray}
692: \psi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(u) & = & \ub\int_0^u dv\,\frac{1}{\bar v}\,
693: \Upsilon(v) + u \int_u^1 dv\,\frac{1}{v}\, \Upsilon(v)\,,\nonumber\\
694: \phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(u)
695: & = & \frac{1}{2}\,\xi\left[\int_0^u dv\,\frac{1}{\bar v}\,
696: \Upsilon(v) - \int_u^1 dv\,\frac{1}{v}\, \Upsilon(v)\right] +
697: \frac{f_{K^*}^\parallel}{f_{K^*}^\perp}\,\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,
698: \phi_{2;K^*}^\parallel(u)\nonumber\\
699: && {}+\frac{d}{du}\,\int_0^u d\alpha_1\int_0^{\bar u} d\alpha_2
700: \frac{1}{\alpha_3}
701: \,{\Phi}^\perp_{3;K^*}(\underline{\alpha})
702: \end{eqnarray}
703: with
704: \begin{eqnarray}
705: \Upsilon(u) & = & 2\phi_{2;K^*}^\perp(u) -
706: \frac{f_{K^*}^\parallel}{f_{K^*}^\perp}\,\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}} \left[
707: 1 - \frac{1}{2}\,
708: \xi\frac{d}{du}\right]\phi_{2;K^*}^\parallel(u) -
709: \frac{1}{2}\,\frac{f_{K^*}^\parallel}{f_{K^*}^\perp}\,
710: \frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,\frac{d}{du}\,\phi_{2;K^*}^\parallel(u)\nonumber\\
711: & & {}+\frac{d}{du}\,\int_0^u\!\!d\alpha_1\int_0^{\bar
712: u}\!\! d\alpha_2
713: \,\frac{1}{\alpha_3}\left(\alpha_1\,\frac{d}{d\alpha_1} +
714: \alpha_2\,\frac{d}{d\alpha_2}\, - 1\right)
715: \Phi_{3;K^*}^\perp(\underline{\alpha})
716: \end{eqnarray}
717: and
718: \begin{eqnarray}
719: \psi_{3;K^*}^\perp(u)& = & \ub\int_0^u dv\,\frac{1}{\bar v}\,
720: \Omega(v) + u \int_u^1 dv\,\frac{1}{v}\, \Omega(v)\,,\nonumber\\
721: \phi_{3;K^*}^\perp(u)
722: & = & \frac{1}{4}\left[\int_0^u dv\,\frac{1}{\bar v}\,
723: \Omega(v) + \int_u^1 dv\,\frac{1}{v}\, \Omega(v)\right] +
724: \frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{f_{K^*}^\parallel}\,\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,
725: \phi_{2;K^*}^\perp(u)\nonumber\\
726: && {}+\frac{d}{du}\,\int_0^u d\alpha_1\int_0^{\bar u} d\alpha_2
727: \frac{1}{\alpha_3}
728: \,{\Phi}^\parallel_{3;K^*}(\underline{\alpha})\nonumber\\
729: &&{} + \int_0^u d\alpha_1\int_0^{\bar u}
730: d\alpha_2\,\frac{1}{\alpha_3}\left( \frac{d}{d\alpha_1} +
731: \frac{d}{d\alpha_2} \right)
732: \widetilde{\Phi}_{3;K^*}^\parallel(\underline{\alpha})
733: \end{eqnarray}
734: with
735: \begin{eqnarray}
736: \Omega(u) &=& 2\phi_{2;K^*}^\parallel(u) +
737: \frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{f_{K^*}^\parallel}\,\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,
738: \xi\,\frac{d}{du}\,\phi_{2;K^*}^\perp(u)-
739: \frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{f_{K^*}^\parallel}\,\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,
740: \frac{d}{du}\,\phi_{2;K^*}^\perp(u)\nonumber\\
741: & & {}+2\frac{d}{du}\,\int_0^u\!\!d\alpha_1
742: \int_0^{\bar u}\!\! d\alpha_2
743: \,\frac{1}{\alpha_3}\left(\alpha_1\,\frac{d}{d\alpha_1} +
744: \alpha_2\,\frac{d}{d\alpha_2}\right)
745: \Phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(\underline{\alpha})\nonumber\\
746: &&{} +2\,\frac{d}{du}\,\int_0^u\!\!d\alpha_1
747: \int_0^{\bar u}\!\! d\alpha_2
748: \,\frac{1}{\alpha_3}\left(\alpha_1\,\frac{d}{d\alpha_1} -
749: \alpha_2\,\frac{d}{d\alpha_2}\right)
750: \widetilde\Phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(\underline{\alpha})\,.
751: \end{eqnarray}
752:
753: The twist-3 three-particle DAs correspond to the light-cone projection
754: $\gamma_z G_{z\perp}$ and $\sigma_{\perp z} G_{\perp z}$,
755: respectively, which picks up the $s=\frac{1}{2}$ component of the
756: quark fields and the $s=1$ component of the gluonic field strength
757: tensor. According to (\ref{asym}), the (normalised)
758: asymptotic DA is then given by $360\alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3^2$.
759: To NLO in the conformal expansion, each three-particle twist-3 DA involves
760: three hadronic parameters, which we label in the following way:
761: $\zeta,\kappa$ are LO and $\omega,\lambda$ NLO parameters.
762: $\zeta$ and $\omega$ are G-parity conserving, whereas
763: $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ violate G-parity and hence vanish for mesons
764: with quarks of equal mass, i.e.\ $\rho$ and $\phi$. We then have
765: \begin{eqnarray}
766: \Phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(\underline{\alpha})
767: & = & 360\alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3^2 \left\{
768: \kappa_{3K^*}^\parallel + \omega_{3K^*}^\parallel (\alpha_1-\alpha_2) +
769: \lambda_{3K^*}^\parallel \frac{1}{2}\,(7\alpha_3 -
770: 3)\right\},\nonumber\\
771: \widetilde\Phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(\underline{\alpha}) & = &
772: 360\alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3^2 \left\{
773: \zeta_{3K^*}^\parallel + \widetilde\lambda_{3K^*}^\parallel (\alpha_1-\alpha_2) +
774: \widetilde\omega_{3K^*}^\parallel \frac{1}{2}\,(7\alpha_3 -
775: 3)\right\},\nonumber\\
776: \Phi_{3;K^*}^\perp(\underline{\alpha})
777: & = & 360\alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3^2 \left\{
778: \kappa_{3K^*}^\perp + \omega_{3K^*}^\perp (\alpha_1-\alpha_2) +
779: \lambda_{3K^*}^\perp \frac{1}{2}\,(7\alpha_3 -
780: 3)\right\}.\label{3.11}
781: \end{eqnarray}
782: The relation to the parameters used in Ref.~\cite{BBKT} is
783: $\zeta_{3}^A = \zeta^\parallel_{3}$, $\zeta_{3}^V =
784: \omega_{3}^\parallel/14$,
785: $\zeta_{3}^T = \omega_{3}^\perp/14$, $\zeta_3^\parallel\omega^A_{1,0} =
786: \widetilde\omega_{3}^\parallel$; G-parity breaking terms were not
787: considered in Ref.~\cite{BBKT}. For equal mass quarks,
788: $\Phi^{\perp,\parallel}_{3;K^*}$ are antisymmetric under
789: $\alpha_1\leftrightarrow \alpha_2$, whereas
790: $\widetilde\Phi^{\parallel}_{3;K^*}$ is symmetric.
791:
792: All these parameters can be defined in terms of
793: matrix elements of local twist-3 operators. For chiral-odd operators,
794: for instance, one has
795: \begin{eqnarray}
796: \langle 0 | \bar q \sigma_{z\xi} gG_{z\xi}
797: s|K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle & = & f_{K^*}^\perp m_{K^*}^2
798: (e^{(\lambda)}z)(pz)\kappa_{3K^*}^\perp\,, \nonumber\\
799: \langle 0 | \bar q \sigma_{z\xi} [iD_z,gG_{z\xi}] s
800: - \frac{3}{7}\, i\partial_z \bar q \sigma_{z\xi}
801: gG_{z\xi} s | K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle
802: & = & f_{K^*}^\perp m_{K^*}^2 (e^{(\lambda)}z)(pz)^2
803: \,\frac{3}{28}\, \lambda_{3K^*}^\perp\,,
804: \nonumber\\
805: \langle 0 | \bar q i \!\stackrel{\leftarrow}{D}_z\!
806: \sigma_{z\xi} gG_{z\xi} s - \bar q
807: \sigma_{z\xi} gG_{z\xi} i\! \stackrel{\rightarrow}{D}_z\! s
808: | K^*(P,\lambda)\rangle & = & f_{K^*}^\perp m_{K^*}^2 (e^{(\lambda)}z)(pz)^2
809: \,\frac{1}{14}\, \omega_{3K^*}^\perp\,;\label{3.12}
810: \end{eqnarray}
811: the formulas for chiral-even operators are analogous.
812: Numerical values for these parameters can be obtained from QCD sum
813: rules and will be discussed in Section~\ref{sec:4}.
814:
815: Of the parameters in (\ref{3.11}), $\zeta_{3K^*}^\parallel$,
816: $\kappa_{3K^*}^{\perp,\parallel}$, $\omega_{3K^*}^\perp$ and
817: $\lambda_{3K^*}^\perp$ renormalise multiplicatively in
818: the chiral limit, the others
819: mix with each other. For non-zero strange quark mass, there is
820: additional mixing with twist-2 parameters. Here,
821: we write down explicitly only the RG-improved relations for the above
822: 5 parameters; a full discussion, including also $\lambda_3^\parallel$,
823: $\omega_3^\parallel$, is given in App.~\ref{app:A}.
824: The relations can be written in compact form as
825: \begin{equation}
826: P_i(\mu^2) = L^{(\gamma_P)_i/\beta_0}\, P_i(\mu_0^2) + \sum_{j=1}^3
827: C_{ij} \left( L^{(\gamma_Q)_{ij}/\beta_0} -
828: L^{(\gamma_P)_i/\beta_0}\right) Q_{ij}(\mu_0^2)\label{xx}
829: \end{equation}
830: with the LO scaling factor $L=\alpha_s(\mu^2)/\alpha_s(\mu_0^2)$. If
831: there is a flavour threshold $\mu_{\rm th}$
832: between $\mu_0$ and $\mu$ changing the number of active flavours from
833: $n_f$ to $n_f+1$, then one has to replace
834: $$L^{1/\beta_0}\to
835: (\alpha(\mu^2)/\alpha(\mu^2_{\rm th}))^{1/\beta_0(n_f+1)}(\alpha(\mu^2_{\rm
836: th})/\alpha(\mu_0^2))^{1/\beta_0(n_f)}.
837: $$
838: The parameters in (\ref{xx}) are given by:
839: \begin{eqnarray}
840: P & = & \{f_{K^*}^\parallel \zeta_{3K^*}^\parallel,\,f_{K^*}^\parallel
841: \kappa_{3K^*}^\parallel,\,f_{K^*}^\perp \kappa_{3K^*}^\perp,\,f_{K^*}^\perp
842: \omega_{3K^*}^\perp,\,f_{K^*}^\perp \lambda_{3K^*}^\perp\}\,,\nonumber\\
843: Q_{1(2)} &=& \frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{m_{K^*}}\,\{
844: m_s\pm m_q,\,(m_s\mp m_q) a_1^\perp,\,(m_s\pm m_q)a_2^\perp\}\,,\nonumber\\
845: Q_{3,5} &=& \frac{f_{K^*}^\parallel}{m_{K^*}}\,\{
846: m_s-m_q,\,(m_s+m_q) a_1^\parallel,\,(m_s-m_q) a_2^\parallel\}\,,\nonumber\\
847: Q_{4}& =& \frac{f_{K^*}^\parallel}{m_{K^*}}\,\{
848: m_s+m_q,\,(m_s-m_q) a_1^\parallel,\,(m_s+m_q) a_2^\parallel\}\,,
849: \nonumber\\
850: \gamma_P & = & \left\{
851: \frac{77}{9},\,\frac{77}{9},\,\frac{55}{9},\,\frac{73}{9},\,
852: \frac{104}{9}\right\}, \nonumber\\
853: (\gamma_Q)_{1,2} & = & \left\{ \frac{16}{3},\, 8,\,
854: \frac{88}{9} \right\},\qquad
855: (\gamma_Q)_{3,4,5} = \left\{ 4,\, \frac{68}{9},\,
856: \frac{86}{9} \right\},\nonumber\\
857: C & = & \left(
858: \begin{array}{r@{\hskip10pt}r@{\hskip10pt}r}
859: \ds \frac{2}{29} & \ds\frac{6}{25} & 0\\[10pt]
860: \ds -\frac{2}{29} & \ds-\frac{6}{25} & 0\\[10pt]
861: \ds-\frac{4}{19} & \ds \frac{12}{65} & 0\\[10pt]
862: \ds \frac{14}{37} & \ds-\frac{42}{25} & \ds\frac{12}{13}\\[10pt]
863: \ds -\frac{1}{85} & \ds -\frac{1}{5} & \ds-\frac{4}{15}
864: \end{array}
865: \right).
866: \end{eqnarray}
867: Implicit formulas for the remaining 4 parameters in (\ref{3.11}) can
868: be found in App.~\ref{app:A}. Numerical values will be given in the
869: next section.
870:
871: Using (\ref{3.11}), and the corresponding relations
872: for twist-2 DAs, one obtains expressions for the twist-3
873: two-particle DAs, which are valid to NLO
874: in the conformal expansion. As discussed in Ref.~\cite{BBKT}, the
875: structure of this expansion is complicated by the fact that
876: these DAs do not correspond to a fixed projection of the quark fields'
877: Lorentz-spin $s$. The resulting expansion is in $C^{3/2}_n(\xi)$ for
878: $\psi^{\perp,\parallel}_{3;K^*}$ and $C^{1/2}_n(\xi)$ for
879: $\phi^{\perp,\parallel}_{3;K^*}$:
880: \begin{eqnarray}
881: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
882: \phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(u) & = & 3\xi^2 + \frac{3}{2}\,\xi(3\xi^2-1)
883: a_1^\perp + \frac{3}{2}\,\xi^2 (5\xi^2-3)a_2^\perp\nonumber\\
884: &&{} + \left(\frac{15}{2}\,\kappa_{3K^*}^\perp -
885: \frac{3}{4}\,\lambda_{3K^*}^\perp\right) \xi (5\xi^2-3) +
886: \frac{5}{8}\,\omega_{3K^*}^\perp (3-30\xi^2 + 35\xi^4) \nonumber\\
887: &&{}+\frac{3}{2}\,\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,
888: \frac{f^\parallel_{K^*}}{f_{K^*}^\perp}
889: \left\{ 1 + 8\xi a_1^\parallel + 3 (7-30 u\ub )a_2^\parallel + \xi \ln
890: \ub (1+3 a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right.\nonumber\\
891: &&{}\left.\hspace*{3.6cm} - \xi \ln u (1-3
892: a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right\}\nonumber\\
893: &&{}-\frac{3}{2}\,\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,
894: \frac{f^\parallel_{K^*}}{f_{K^*}^\perp}\,
895: \xi \left\{ 2 + 9\xi a_1^\parallel + 2 (11-30 u\ub )a_2^\parallel + \ln
896: \ub (1+3 a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right.\nonumber\\
897: &&{}\hspace*{3.9cm}\left. + \ln u (1-3
898: a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right\},\\
899: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
900: \psi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(u) & = & 6 u\bar u \left\{ 1 + \left(
901: \frac{a_1^\perp}{3} + \frac{5}{3} \kappa_{3K^*}^\perp\!\right)
902: C_1^{3/2}(\xi) + \left( \frac{a_2^\perp}{6} + \frac{5}{18}
903: \omega_{3K^*}^\perp\right) C_2^{3/2}(\xi) -
904: \frac{1}{20}\lambda_{3K^*}^\perp C_3^{3/2}(\xi)\right\}\nonumber\\
905: &&{}+ 3\,
906: \frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,\frac{f_{K^*}^\parallel}{f_{K^*}^\perp}\left\{
907: u\bar u (1 + 2 \xi a_1^\parallel + 3 (7-5u\bar u) a_2^\parallel) + \bar
908: u \ln \bar u (1+3 a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right.\nonumber\\
909: &&{}\left.\hspace*{3.2cm} + u \ln u
910: (1-3 a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right\}\nonumber\\
911: &&- 3\,
912: \frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,\frac{f_{K^*}^\parallel}{f_{K^*}^\perp}\left\{
913: u\bar u (9 a_1^\parallel + 10\xi a_2^\parallel) + \bar
914: u \ln \bar u (1+3 a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right.\nonumber\\
915: &&{}\left.\hspace*{3.2cm} - u \ln u
916: (1-3 a_1^\parallel + 6 a_2^\parallel)\right\},\\
917: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
918: \psi_{3;K^*}^\perp(u) & = & 6 u\bar u \left\{ 1 + \left(
919: \frac{1}{3} a_1^\parallel + \frac{20}{9} \kappa_{3K^*}^\parallel\right)
920: C_1^{3/2}(\xi)
921: \right.\nonumber\\
922: &&\left.\hspace*{0pt} + \left( \frac{1}{6} a_2^\parallel +
923: \frac{10}{9}\zeta_{3K^*}^\parallel + \frac{5}{12}\,
924: \omega_{3K^*}^\parallel-\frac{5}{24}\,
925: \widetilde\omega_{3K^*}^\parallel\!\right)
926: C_2^{3/2}(\xi) +
927: \left(\frac{1}{4}\widetilde\lambda_{3K^*}^\parallel - \frac{1}{8}
928: \lambda_{3K^*}^\parallel\right) C_3^{3/2}(\xi)\right\}\nonumber\\
929: &&{}+ 6\,
930: \frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,\frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{f_{K^*}^\parallel}\left\{
931: u\bar u (2 + 3 \xi a_1^\perp + 2 (11-10u\bar u) a_2^\perp) + \bar
932: u \ln \bar u (1+3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp)\right.\nonumber\\
933: &&{}\left.\hspace*{3.2cm} + u \ln u
934: (1-3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp)\right\}\nonumber\\
935: &&- 6\,
936: \frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,\frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{f_{K^*}^\parallel}\left\{
937: u\bar u (9 a_1^\perp + 10\xi a_2^\perp) + \bar
938: u \ln \bar u (1+3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp)\right.\nonumber\\
939: &&{}\left.\hspace*{3.2cm} - u \ln u
940: (1-3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp)\right\},\\
941: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
942: \phi_{3;K^*}^\perp(u) & = & \frac{3}{4}\,(1+\xi^2) + \frac{3}{2}\,\xi^3
943: a_1^\parallel + \left\{ \frac{3}{7}\,a_2^\parallel + 5
944: \zeta_{3K^*}^\parallel \right\} (3\xi^2-1) + \left\{5\kappa_{3K^*}^\parallel
945: - \frac{15}{16}\,\lambda_{3K^*}^\parallel \right.\nonumber\\
946: &&{} \left. +
947: \frac{15}{8}\,\widetilde{\lambda}_{3K^*}^\parallel \right\} \xi
948: (5\xi^2-3)+ \left\{ \frac{9}{112}\,a_2^\parallel +
949: \frac{15}{32}\,\omega_{3K^*}^\parallel -
950: \frac{15}{64}\,\widetilde\omega_{3K^*}^\parallel \right\} (35\xi^4-30
951: \xi^2+3)\nonumber\\
952: &&{}+\frac{3}{2}\,\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,\frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{
953: f_{K^*}^\parallel} \left\{ 2 + 9 \xi a_1^\perp + 2 (11-30 u \ub)
954: a_2^\perp\right.\nonumber\\
955: &&{}\left.\hspace*{3.5cm} +
956: (1-3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp) \ln u + (1+3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp)
957: \ln \ub \right\}\nonumber\\
958: &&
959: {}-\frac{3}{2}\,\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\,\frac{f_{K^*}^\perp}{
960: f_{K^*}^\parallel} \left\{ 2\xi + 9 (1-2u \ub) a_1^\perp + 2 \xi (11-20 u \ub)
961: a_2^\perp\right.\nonumber\\
962: &&{}\left.\hspace*{3.5cm} +
963: (1+3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp) \ln \ub - (1-3 a_1^\perp + 6 a_2^\perp)
964: \ln u \right\}.
965: \end{eqnarray}
966: These expressions are our final results for the two-particle twist-3
967: DAs and supersede those given in Ref.~\cite{BBKT} where G-parity
968: violating terms in $\kappa_3$ and $\lambda_3$ were not included. The terms
969: multiplying $\ln u$ and $\ln\bar u$ are the first three terms in the
970: conformal expansion of $d/(du) \phi^{\parallel,\perp}_{2;K^*}(0)$ and
971: $d/(du) \phi^{\parallel,\perp}_{2;K^*}(1)$, respectively.
972: Numerical values for the hadronic parameters are given in Tab.~\ref{tab:num}.
973:
974:
975: \section{Models for Distribution Amplitudes}\label{sec:4}
976: \setcounter{equation}{0}
977:
978: \begin{table}[tb]
979: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
980: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{3pt}
981: $$
982: \begin{array}{l || c | c || l | l || c | c }
983: \hline
984: & \multicolumn{2}{c||}{\rho} & \multicolumn{2}{c||}{K^*} &
985: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\phi}\\
986: \cline{2-7}
987: & \mu = 1\,{\rm GeV} & \mu = 2\,{\rm GeV} & \mu = 1\,{\rm GeV} & \mu =
988: 2\,{\rm GeV} & \mu = 1\,{\rm GeV} & \mu = 2\,{\rm GeV}\\
989: \hline
990: a_1^\parallel & 0 & 0 & \phantom{-}0.03(2) & \phantom{-}0.02(2) & 0 & 0
991: \\
992: a_1^\perp & 0 & 0 & \phantom{-}0.04(3) & \phantom{-}0.03(3) & 0 & 0
993: \\
994: a_2^\parallel & 0.15(7) & 0.10(5) & \phantom{-}0.11(9) &
995: \phantom{-}0.08(6) & 0.18(8) & 0.13(6)
996: \\
997: a_2^\perp & 0.14(6) & 0.11(5) & \phantom{-}0.10(8) &
998: \phantom{-}0.08(6) & 0.14(7) & 0.11(5)
999: \\\hline
1000: \zeta_{3V}^\parallel
1001: & 0.030(10) & 0.020(9) & \phantom{-}0.023(8) & \phantom{-}0.015(6) &
1002: 0.024(8) & 0.017(6)
1003: \\
1004: \widetilde\lambda_{3V}^\parallel
1005: & 0 & 0 & \phantom{-}0.035(15)& \phantom{-}0.017(8) & 0 & 0
1006: \\
1007: \widetilde\omega_{3V}^\parallel
1008: & -0.09(3) & -0.04(2) & -0.07(3) & -0.03(2) & -0.045(15) & -0.022(8)
1009: \\
1010: \kappa_{3V}^\parallel
1011: & 0 & 0 & \phantom{-}0.000(1) & -0.001(2) & 0 & 0
1012: \\
1013: \omega_{3V}^\parallel
1014: & 0.15(5) & 0.09(3) & \phantom{-}0.10(4) & \phantom{-}0.06(3) &
1015: 0.09(3) & 0.06(2)
1016: \\
1017: \lambda_{3V}^\parallel
1018: & 0 & 0 & -0.008(4) & -0.004(2) & 0 & 0
1019: \\
1020: \kappa_{3V}^\perp
1021: & 0 & 0 & \phantom{-}0.003(3) & -0.001(2) & 0 & 0
1022: \\
1023: \omega_{3V}^\perp
1024: & 0.55(25) & 0.37(19) & \phantom{-}0.3(1) & \phantom{-}0.2(1) &
1025: 0.20(8) & 0.15(7)
1026: \\
1027: \lambda_{3V}^\perp
1028: & 0 & 0 & -0.025(20) & -0.015(10) & 0 & 0\\\hline
1029: \end{array}
1030: $$
1031: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
1032: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-3pt}
1033: \vspace*{-10pt}
1034: \caption[]{\small Twist-2 and -3 hadronic parameters
1035: at the scale $\mu= 1\,{\rm GeV}$ and scaled to up $\mu= 2\,{\rm GeV}$,
1036: using the evolution equations
1037: (\ref{xx}). The sign of the twist-3 parameters
1038: corresponds to the sign convention for the strong coupling defined by
1039: the covariant derivative $D_\mu = \partial_\mu - i g A^a_\mu t^a$; they
1040: change sign if $g$ is fixed by $D_\mu = \partial_\mu + i g
1041: A^a_\mu t^a$.}\label{tab:num}
1042: \end{table}
1043:
1044: In this section we compile the numerical estimates of all necessary parameters
1045: and present explicit models of the twist-3 two-particle
1046: distribution amplitudes introduced in the last section.
1047: The important point is that these DAs are related to three-particle
1048: ones by exact
1049: QCD equations of motion and have to be used together; this
1050: %The main observation and important point is
1051: %that the QCD equations of motion are satisfied order by order in the
1052: %conformal expansion, which
1053: guarantees the consistency of the approximation.
1054: Our approximation thus introduces a minimum number of non-perturbative
1055: parameters, which are defined as matrix elements of certain local operators
1056: between the vacuum and the meson state, and which we estimate using
1057: QCD sum rules. More
1058: sophisticated models can be constructed in a systematic way by adding
1059: contributions of higher conformal partial waves when estimates of the relevant
1060: non-perturbative matrix elements will become available.
1061:
1062: Our approach involves the implicit assumption that the conformal partial
1063: wave expansion is well convergent. This can be justified rigorously
1064: at large scales, since the anomalous dimensions of all involved
1065: operators increase logarithmically with the conformal spin $J$, but
1066: is non-trivial at relatively low scales of order $\mu \sim (1$--$2)\,$GeV
1067: which we choose as reference scale.
1068: %An upper bound for the contribution
1069: %of higher partial waves can be obtained from the renormalon model.
1070: %
1071: %We believe that this assumption
1072: %is natural and in fact necessary for any model of distribution amplitudes
1073: %at scales where they evolve perturbatively; the
1074: %last word, however, has to come from experiment.
1075:
1076: Since orthogonal polynomials of high orders are rapidly oscillating
1077: functions, a truncated expansion in conformal partial waves is, almost
1078: necessarily,
1079: oscillatory as well. Such a behaviour is clearly unphysical,
1080: but this does not constitute a real problem since physical observables
1081: are given by convolution integrals of distribution amplitudes with
1082: smooth coefficient functions.
1083: A classical example for this
1084: feature is the $\gamma\gamma^*$-meson form factor, which is governed
1085: by the quantity
1086: $$
1087: \int du\,\frac{1}{u}\, \phi(u) \sim \sum a_i,
1088: $$
1089: where the coefficients $a_i$ are exactly the ``reduced matrix elements''
1090: in the conformal expansion.
1091: The oscillating terms are averaged over and strongly suppressed.
1092: Stated otherwise:
1093: models of distribution amplitudes should generally be understood as
1094: distributions (in the mathematical sense).
1095:
1096: We give all relevant numerical
1097: input parameters for our model DAs in
1098: Table~\ref{tab:num}, at the scale $\mu=1\,$GeV, which is appropriate for
1099: QCD sum-rule results, and, using the LO and NLO scaling relations
1100: given in Secs.~\ref{sec:2.3} and \ref{sec:3}, at the scale $\mu=2\,$GeV,
1101: in order to facilitate the comparison with future lattice
1102: determinations of these quantities. The mixing of $K^*$ and $\phi$ parameters
1103: with operators of lower twist depending on $m_s$ is numerically
1104: small. In evaluating the sum rules, we have chosen the values of the
1105: continuum threshold $s_0$ as given in App.~\ref{app:C}. The sum rules
1106: are actually rather insensitive to that parameter, due to the
1107: smallness of the perturbative contribution, but are not very stable in
1108: the Borel parameter $M^2$, which is the reason for the large
1109: uncertainties in Tab.~\ref{tab:num}. The biggest contribution to
1110: G-conserving parameters comes from the gluon condensate. For
1111: G-breaking parameters, on the other hand, this contribution is
1112: suppressed by a factor $m_s^2$ and, as a consequence, all G-breaking
1113: parameters are considerably smaller than the G-conserving ones. The
1114: table also shows that SU(3) breaking is relevant for all parameters.
1115:
1116: At this point we would like to compare our results with those
1117: available in the literature. We have discussed the twist-2 parameters
1118: already in Sec.~{2.3}. As for twist-3, only results for $\rho$ are
1119: available. A long time ago, the chiral-even parameters were
1120: determined, in Ref.~\cite{CZ}, as
1121: \begin{equation}
1122: \zeta^\parallel_{3\rho}(1\,{\rm GeV}) = 0.033\pm0.003\,,\quad
1123: \omega^\parallel_{3\rho}(1\,{\rm GeV}) = 0.2\,,\quad
1124: \tilde\omega^\parallel_{3\rho}(1\,{\rm GeV}) = -0.1\,.
1125: \end{equation}
1126: A comparison with Tab.~\ref{tab:num} shows that these values agree
1127: quite well with ours, although we think that the uncertainty of
1128: $\zeta^\parallel_{3\rho}$ was underestimated in \cite{CZ}. A value for
1129: $\omega^\perp_{3\rho}$ was obtained in Ref.~\cite{BBKT}:
1130: $\omega^\perp_{3\rho}(1\,{\rm GeV}) = 0.3\pm 0.3$, which is a bit
1131: smaller than our result.
1132:
1133: \begin{figure}[tb]
1134: $$
1135: \epsfxsize=0.48\textwidth\epsffile{fig1a.eps}\quad
1136: \epsfxsize=0.48\textwidth\epsffile{fig1b.eps}
1137: $$
1138: \vskip-15pt
1139: \caption[]{\small Left panel: $\phi^\parallel_{3}$ as a function of
1140: $u$ for the central values of hadronic parameters, for $\mu=1\,$GeV.
1141: Red line: $\phi_{3;\rho}^\parallel$, green:
1142: $\phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel$, blue: $\phi_{3;\phi}^\parallel$. Right
1143: panel: same for $\psi^\parallel_{3}$.}\label{fig:1}
1144: $$
1145: \epsfxsize=0.48\textwidth\epsffile{fig2a.eps}\quad
1146: \epsfxsize=0.48\textwidth\epsffile{fig2b.eps}
1147: $$
1148: \vskip-15pt
1149: \caption[]{\small Left panel: $\phi^\perp_{3}$ as a function of
1150: $u$ for the central values of hadronic parameters, for $\mu=1\,$GeV.
1151: Red line: $\phi_{3;\rho}^\perp$, green:
1152: $\phi_{3;K^*}^\perp$, blue: $\phi_{3;\phi}^\perp$. Right
1153: panel: same for $\psi^\perp_{3}$.}\label{fig:2}
1154: \end{figure}
1155: In Fig.~\ref{fig:1} we plot the
1156: longitudinal twist-3 two-particle DAs $\phi^\parallel_{3}$ and
1157: $\psi^\parallel_{3}$ for the $\rho$ meson, assuming massless quarks,
1158: and for the $K^*$ and $\phi$ mesons,
1159: together with the corresponding asymptotic DAs. Figure~\ref{fig:2}
1160: shows the transverse DAs $\phi^\perp_{3}$ and $\psi^\perp_{3}$.
1161: The figures show that quark-mass corrections significantly modify
1162: the end-point behaviour of $\phi_3^{\parallel,\perp}$, where they induce
1163: a logarithmic end-point divergency, even if the contributions of
1164: gluonic operators are
1165: neglected. This is not a problem because, as mentioned above, the DAs
1166: themselves need not be finite, it is only their convolution with
1167: perturbative scattering amplitudes that is meaningful. The figures
1168: also show that the effect of SU(3) breaking (the difference between
1169: the red and the other curves) is quite pronounced for
1170: all DAs, whereas the G-parity breaking terms (the asymmetry of the
1171: green curve) have only minor impact, which is due to the numerical
1172: smallness of the corresponding hadronic parameters.
1173:
1174:
1175: \section{Summary and Conclusions}\label{sec:5}
1176: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1177:
1178: In this paper we have studied the twist-3 two- and three-particle
1179: distribution amplitudes of $K^*$ and $\phi$ mesons in QCD and
1180: expressed them in a
1181: model-independent way by a minimal number of non-perturbative
1182: parameters. The work presented here is an extension of
1183: Refs.~\cite{BBL06,BBKT}
1184: and completes the analysis of SU(3)-breaking
1185: in vector meson distribution amplitudes to twist-3 accuracy.
1186: Our approach consists of two components.
1187: One is the use of the QCD
1188: equations of motion, which allow dynamically dependent
1189: DAs to be expressed in terms of independent ones. The other ingredient
1190: is conformal
1191: expansion, which makes it possible to separate transverse and
1192: longitudinal variables in the wave functions, the former ones being
1193: governed by renormalisation-group equations, the latter ones being
1194: described in terms of irreducible representations of the corresponding
1195: symmetry group.
1196: We have derived expressions for all twist-3 two- and
1197: three-particle distribution amplitudes to next-to-leading order in the
1198: conformal expansion, including both chiral corrections ${\mathcal
1199: O}(m_s+m_q)$ and G-parity-breaking corrections ${\mathcal
1200: O}(m_s-m_q)$; the corresponding formulas are given in
1201: Sec.~\ref{sec:3}.
1202:
1203: We have also done a complete reanalysis of the numerical values of the
1204: relevant twist-3 hadronic parameters from QCD sum rules.
1205: Our sum rules can be compared, in the chiral limit, with
1206: existing calculations for the $\rho$ \cite{BBKT,CZ}.
1207: We have also studied the scale-dependence of all
1208: parameters to leading-logarithmic, or, if possible,
1209: next-to-leading-logarithmic accuracy, taking into account the
1210: mixing with operators
1211: depending on the strange-quark mass $m_s$.
1212: Our final numerical results, at the scales 1 and 2~GeV, are collected
1213: in Tab.\ref{tab:num}.
1214:
1215: Preliminary versions of our results have already been applied in
1216: studies of $B\to (\rho,K^*)\gamma$ decays
1217: \cite{BVgamma,BJZ,frueher}. These processes are also sensitive to
1218: twist-4 distribution amplitudes which we will study in a separate
1219: publication. While the parametrisations given in Sec.~\ref{sec:3} are
1220: general, the actual numerical values for hadronic parameters given in
1221: Sec.~\ref{sec:2.3} and Tab.~\ref{tab:num} are obtained within the
1222: framework of QCD sum rules. We are looking forward to a confirmation
1223: of these values from independent non-perturbative methods, for
1224: instance lattice QCD.
1225:
1226: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1227:
1228: G.W.~Jones acknowledges a PPARC student fellowship. This work was
1229: supported in part by the EU network
1230: contract No.\ MRTN-CT-2006-035482, {\sc Flavianet}.
1231:
1232: \appendix
1233:
1234: \section*{Appendices}
1235: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{section}.\arabic{equation}}
1236: \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{table}}
1237: \setcounter{section}{0}
1238: \setcounter{table}{0}
1239:
1240: \section{Scale-Dependence of Twist-3 Parameters}\label{app:A}
1241:
1242: In this appendix we derive the renormalisation-group improved
1243: expression (\ref{xx}) for twist-3 parameters and also give an implicit
1244: relation for the scaling of the chiral-even parameters $\omega_3$,
1245: $\tilde\omega_3$, $\lambda_3$ and $\tilde\lambda_3$.
1246:
1247: Let us introduce the following notation for the relevant
1248: quark-quark-gluon operators, see Eq.~(\ref{3.11}):
1249: \begin{eqnarray}\label{yy}
1250: O_3^T(z,vz,-z) &=&
1251: \bar q(z)\sigma_{z\nu} g G_{z\nu}(vz) s(-z)\,,\nonumber\\
1252: O_3(z,vz,-z) &=& \bar q(z) g G_{\perp z}(vz)i \gamma_z s(-z),\qquad
1253: \tilde O_3(z,vz,-z) = \bar q(z) g \tilde
1254: G_{\perp z}(vz)\gamma_z\gamma_5 s(-z)\,.\hspace*{25pt}
1255: \end{eqnarray}
1256: In principle it is possible to establish evolution equations for these
1257: non-local operators using the light-ray operator technique developed in
1258: Ref.~\cite{string}. The scale-dependence of the parameters in
1259: (\ref{3.11}) then follows from a projection of the evolution equation
1260: on the corresponding conformal wave. Another approach is to make use
1261: of the results derived in the literature
1262: for the anomalous dimensions of moments of the corresponding nucleon
1263: structure functions. The explicit relations between these anomalous
1264: dimensions, given in Ref.~\cite{andim},
1265: and those needed for our twist-3 parameters
1266: have been established in Ref.~\cite{BBKT}.
1267: Neglecting quark mass corrections, one has, in the notations of
1268: Ref.~\cite{BBKT},
1269: \begin{eqnarray}
1270: [f^\perp_{K^*}\kappa_{3K^*}^\perp](\mu^2) = L^{\Gamma^{T+}_2/\beta_0}
1271: [f^\perp_{K^*}\kappa_{3K^*}^\perp](\mu_0^2)\,,&&
1272: [f^\perp_{K^*}\omega_{3K^*}^\perp](\mu^2) = L^{\Gamma^{T+}_3/\beta_0}
1273: [f^\perp_{K^*}\omega_{3K^*}^\perp](\mu_0^2)\,,\nonumber\\
1274: {}[f^\perp_{K^*}\lambda_{3K^*}^\perp](\mu^2) = L^{\Gamma^{T-}_3/\beta_0}
1275: [f^\perp_{K^*}\lambda_{3K^*}^\perp](\mu_0^2)\,,\nonumber\\
1276: f^\parallel_{K^*}\zeta^\parallel_{3K^*}(\mu^2) = L^{\Gamma^-_2/\beta_0}
1277: f^\parallel_{K^*}\zeta^\parallel_{3K^*}(\mu_0^2)\,,&&
1278: f^\parallel_{K^*}\kappa^\parallel_{3K^*}(\mu^2) = L^{\Gamma^+_2/\beta_0}
1279: f^\parallel_{K^*}\kappa^\parallel_{3K^*}(\mu_0^2)\,,\nonumber\\
1280: f^\parallel_{K^*}\left(\begin{array}{l}
1281: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} - \tilde\omega^\parallel_{3K^*}\\[10pt]
1282: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} + \tilde\omega^\parallel_{3K^*}
1283: \end{array}\right)^{\mu^2}
1284: & = & L^{\Gamma_3^+/\beta_0} f^\parallel_{K^*}
1285: \left(\begin{array}{l}
1286: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} - \tilde\omega^\parallel_{3K^*}\\[10pt]
1287: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} + \tilde\omega^\parallel_{3K^*}
1288: \end{array}\right)^{\mu_0^2}
1289: \,,\nonumber\\
1290: f^\parallel_{K^*}\left(\begin{array}{l}
1291: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\tilde\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} + \lambda^\parallel_{3K^*}\\[10pt]
1292: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\tilde\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} - \lambda^\parallel_{3K^*}
1293: \end{array}\right)^{\mu^2}
1294: &=& L^{\Gamma_3^-/\beta_0} f^\parallel_{K^*}
1295: \left(\begin{array}{l}
1296: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\tilde\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} + \lambda^\parallel_{3K^*}\\[10pt]
1297: \ds\frac{2}{3}\,\tilde\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} - \lambda^\parallel_{3K^*}
1298: \end{array}\right)^{\mu_0^2}\,,\label{A.2}
1299: \end{eqnarray}
1300: where $L$ is the leading-log scaling factor
1301: $L=\alpha_s(\mu^2)/\alpha_s(\mu_0^2)$. The factor $2/3$ comes from the
1302: relative factors in (\ref{3.12}). The anomalous dimensions are
1303: given by
1304: \begin{eqnarray}
1305: \Gamma^{T+}_2 & = & C_A + \frac{7}{3}\,C_F\,,\quad
1306: \Gamma^{T+}_3 = C_A + \frac{23}{6}\, C_F\,,\quad
1307: \Gamma^{T-}_3 = \frac{10}{3}\,C_A + \frac{7}{6}\,C_F\,,\nonumber\\
1308: \Gamma^+_2 & = & 3\, C_A - \frac{1}{3}\,C_F = \Gamma_2^-\,,\nonumber\\
1309: \Gamma_3^+ & = & \left(\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l}
1310: \ds\phantom{-}\frac{7}{3}\, C_A + \frac{8}{3}\,C_F &
1311: \ds -\frac{2}{3}\,C_A + \frac{2}{3}\,C_F\\[10pt]
1312: \ds -\frac{4}{3}\,C_A + \frac{5}{3}\,C_F &
1313: \ds\phantom{-}4C_A +\frac{1}{6}\,C_F
1314: \end{array}\right),\nonumber\\
1315: \Gamma_3^- & = & \left(\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l}
1316: \ds\phantom{-}4\, C_A + \frac{1}{6}\,C_F &
1317: \ds -\frac{4}{3}\,C_A + \frac{5}{3}\,C_F\\[10pt]
1318: \ds -\frac{2}{3}\,C_A + \frac{2}{3}\,C_F &
1319: \ds\phantom{-}\frac{7}{3}\,C_A +\frac{8}{3}\,C_F
1320: \end{array}\right).
1321: \end{eqnarray}
1322:
1323: For massive quarks, the scaling relations receive corrections in
1324: $m_s\pm m_q$, depending on the G-parity of the parameter. These
1325: corrections are induced by mixing of the operators in (\ref{yy}) with
1326: twist-2 operators and can be calculated using the
1327: light-ray-operator technique of Ref.~\cite{string} resulting in the
1328: following compact expressions:
1329: \begin{eqnarray}
1330: O_3^T(z,vz,0)^{\mu^2} &=& O_3^T(z,vz,0)^{\mu_0^2} +
1331: i\,\frac{C_F\alpha_s}{2\pi}\,\ln\,\frac{\mu_0^2}{\mu^2}
1332: \int_0^1 dt \left\{\frac{m_s}{v}\, \Big[O_2(z,vz) - 2
1333: t O_2(z,tvz)\Big]\right.\nonumber\\
1334: &&\left. + \frac{m_q}{1-v}\, \Big[O_2(vz,0) - 2
1335: t O_2((1-(1-v)t)z,0)\Big]\right\} + \dots,\nonumber\\
1336: O_3(z,vz,0)^{\mu^2} &=& O_3(z,vz,0)^{\mu_0^2} +
1337: i\,\frac{C_F\alpha_s}{4\pi}\,\ln\,\frac{\mu_0^2}{\mu^2}
1338: \int_0^1 dt \left\{\frac{m_s}{v}\, \Big[O_2^T(z,vz) - 2
1339: t O_2^T(z,tvz)\Big]\right.\nonumber\\
1340: &&\left. + \frac{m_q}{1-v}\, \Big[O_2^T(vz,0) - 2
1341: t O_2^T((1-(1-v)t)z,0)\Big]\right\} + \dots,\nonumber\\
1342: \tilde O_3(z,vz,0)^{\mu^2} &=& \tilde O_3(z,vz,0)^{\mu_0^2}
1343: + i\,\frac{C_F\alpha_s}{4\pi}\,\ln\,\frac{\mu_0^2}{\mu^2}
1344: \int_0^1 dt \left\{-\frac{m_s}{v}\, \Big[O_2^T(z,vz) - 2
1345: t O_2^T(z,tvz)\Big]\right.\nonumber\\
1346: &&\left. + \frac{m_q}{1-v}\, \Big[O_2^T(vz,0) - 2
1347: t O_2^T((1-(1-v)t)z,0)\Big]\right\} + \dots\label{A.4}
1348: \end{eqnarray}
1349: The twist-2 operators in the above relations are given by
1350: \begin{equation}
1351: O_2(az,bz) = \bar q(az)\gamma_z s(bz)\,,\qquad
1352: O_2^T(az,bz) = \bar q(az)\sigma_{\perp z} s(bz)
1353: \end{equation}
1354: and the dots stand for $O(\alpha_s)$ contributions from the twist-3
1355: operators.
1356:
1357: Taking (\ref{A.2}) and (\ref{A.4}) together, one finds that the G-even
1358: parameters mix with $$f_{K^*}^{\perp(\parallel)} \{ (m_s+m_q),
1359: (m_s-m_q) a_1^{\perp(\parallel)}, (m_s+m_q) a_2^{\perp(\parallel)}\},$$
1360: whereas the G-odd ones mix with $$f_{K^*}^{\perp(\parallel)} \{ (m_s-m_q),
1361: (m_s+m_q) a_1^{\perp(\parallel)}, (m_s-m_q)
1362: a_2^{\perp(\parallel)}\}.$$ For the $\perp$ parameters, and
1363: $\zeta^\parallel_3$ and $\kappa^\parallel_3$, the combination of
1364: (\ref{A.2}) and the projection of (\ref{A.4}) onto the corresponding
1365: partial waves results in the scaling
1366: relations given in (\ref{xx}). For the remaining parameters, one finds
1367: the following relations:
1368: \begin{eqnarray}
1369: \left(
1370: \begin{array}{c}
1371: f_{K^*}^\parallel\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1372: f_{K^*}^\parallel\tilde\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1373: \ds\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp \\[10pt]
1374: \ds\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_1^\perp(K^*) \\[10pt]
1375: \ds\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_2^\perp(K^*)
1376: \end{array}
1377: \right)^{\mu^2}
1378: = L^{\Gamma_\omega/\beta_0}
1379: \left(
1380: \begin{array}{c}
1381: f_{K^*}^\parallel\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1382: f_{K^*}^\parallel\tilde\omega^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1383: \ds\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp \\[10pt]
1384: \ds\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_1^\perp(K^*) \\[10pt]
1385: \ds\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_2^\perp(K^*)
1386: \end{array}
1387: \right)^{\mu_0^2}\,,\nonumber\\
1388: \left(
1389: \begin{array}{c}
1390: f_{K^*}^\parallel\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1391: f_{K^*}^\parallel\tilde\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1392: \ds\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp \\[10pt]
1393: \ds\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_1^\perp(K^*) \\[10pt]
1394: \ds\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_2^\perp(K^*)
1395: \end{array}
1396: \right)^{\mu^2}
1397: = L^{\Gamma_\lambda/\beta_0}
1398: \left(
1399: \begin{array}{c}
1400: f_{K^*}^\parallel\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1401: f_{K^*}^\parallel\tilde\lambda^\parallel_{3K^*} \\[10pt]
1402: \ds\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp \\[10pt]
1403: \ds\frac{m_s+m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_1^\perp(K^*) \\[10pt]
1404: \ds\frac{m_s-m_q}{m_{K^*}}\, f_{K^*}^\perp a_2^\perp(K^*)
1405: \end{array}
1406: \right)^{\mu_0^2}\,.
1407: \end{eqnarray}
1408: The anomalous dimension matrices are given by
1409: \begin{eqnarray}
1410: \Gamma_\omega
1411: & = &
1412: \left(
1413: \begin{array}{r@{\hskip10pt}r@{\hskip10pt}r@{\hskip10pt}r@{\hskip10pt}r}
1414: \ds \frac{179}{18} & \ds \frac{7}{4} & \ds -\frac{7}{9} & \ds
1415: \frac{7}{15} & \ds \frac{2}{3}\\[10pt]
1416: \ds\frac{1}{3} & \ds\frac{77}{6} & \ds-\frac{2}{45} & \ds-\frac{2}{5}
1417: & \ds -\frac{4}{15}\\[10pt]
1418: 0 & 0 & \ds\frac{16}{3} & 0 & 0\\[10pt]
1419: 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0\\[10pt]
1420: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \ds\frac{88}{9}
1421: \end{array}
1422: \right),
1423: \quad
1424: \Gamma_\lambda
1425: =
1426: \left(
1427: \begin{array}{r@{\hskip10pt}r@{\hskip10pt}r@{\hskip10pt}r@{\hskip10pt}r}
1428: \ds \frac{77}{6} & \ds \frac{1}{3} & \ds \frac{2}{45} & \ds
1429: \frac{2}{5} & \ds \frac{4}{15}\\[10pt]
1430: \ds\frac{7}{4} & \ds\frac{179}{18} & \ds\frac{7}{9} & \ds-\frac{7}{15}
1431: & \ds -\frac{2}{3}\\[10pt]
1432: 0 & 0 & \ds\frac{16}{3} & 0 & 0\\[10pt]
1433: 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0\\[10pt]
1434: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \ds\frac{88}{9}
1435: \end{array}
1436: \right).
1437: \end{eqnarray}
1438: The resulting explicit expressions for the twist-3 parameters are
1439: rather bulky, so we do not give them explicitly.
1440:
1441: \section{Sum Rules for Twist-2 Matrix Elements}\label{app:B}
1442: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1443:
1444: In this appendix we list and evaluate the QCD sum rules for twist-2
1445: matrix elements of the $K^*$.
1446: The sum rules for $f_{K^*}^{\parallel,\perp}$, including
1447: SU(3)-breaking corrections, were
1448: calculated in Refs.~\cite{BZ05,govaerts}, those for
1449: $a_{1}^{\parallel,\perp}(K^*)$ in
1450: Ref.~\cite{BZ05}, and those for $a_{2}^{\parallel,\perp}(K^*)$
1451: in Ref.~\cite{BB03},
1452: apart from the perturbative terms in $m_s^2$ and the
1453: radiative corrections to the quark condensate, which are new.
1454:
1455: For the
1456: longitudinal parameters, the sum
1457: rules read:
1458: \begin{eqnarray}
1459: \lefteqn{(f_{K^*}^\parallel)^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2} =
1460: \frac{1}{4\pi^2}\int\limits_{m_s^2}^{s_0}
1461: ds\,e^{-s/M^2} \,\frac{(s-m_s^2)^2 (s+2m_s^2)}{s^3} +
1462: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\, \frac{M^2}{4\pi^2}\left( 1 -
1463: e^{-s_0/M^2}\right)}\nonumber\\
1464: &&{} +\frac{m_s\langle \bar s s\rangle}{M^2}\left(1 +
1465: \frac{m_s^2}{3M^2} -
1466: \frac{13}{9}\,\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\right)+
1467: \frac{4}{3}\,\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi} \, \frac{m_s\langle \bar q
1468: q\rangle}{M^2}+\frac{1}{12M^2}\,
1469: \langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,G^2\rangle
1470: \nonumber\\
1471: &&{} -\frac{16\pi\alpha_s}{9M^4}\,
1472: \langle \bar q q\rangle\langle \bar s s\rangle +
1473: \frac{16\pi\alpha_s}{81M^4}\,\left( \langle \bar q q\rangle^2 +
1474: \langle \bar s s\rangle^2 \right),\\
1475: \lefteqn{a_1^\parallel(K^*) (f_{K^*}^\parallel)^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2} =
1476: \frac{5}{4\pi^2}\,m_s^4\int\limits_{m_s^2}^{s_0}
1477: ds\,e^{-s/M^2} \,\frac{(s-m_s^2)^2}{s^4}}\nonumber\\
1478: \hskip-10pt&&
1479: {}+\frac{5m_s^2}{18M^4}\,\left\langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,G^2\right\rangle
1480: \left( -\frac{1}{2}+ \gamma_E - {\rm
1481: Ei}\left(-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right)+ \ln\,\frac{m_s^2}{M^2} +
1482: \frac{M^2}{s_0}\left( \frac{M^2}{s_0} -1\right) e^{-s_0/M^2}\right)\nonumber\\
1483: &&{}
1484: -\frac{5}{3}\,\frac{m_s\langle \bar s
1485: s\rangle}{M^2}\left\{1 +
1486: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\left[ -\frac{124}{27} +
1487: \frac{8}{9} \left(1-\gamma_E + \ln\,\frac{M^2}{\mu^2} +
1488: \frac{M^2}{s_0}\,e^{-s_0/M^2} + {\rm Ei}\left(-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right)
1489: \right)\right]\right\} \nonumber\\
1490: &&{}-\frac{5}{3}\,\frac{m_s^3\squark}{M^4}+\frac{20}{27}\,
1491: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi} \, \frac{m_s\langle \bar q
1492: q\rangle}{M^2} + \frac{5}{9}\, \frac{m_s\langle\bar s \sigma g Gs\rangle}{M^4}
1493: +\frac{80\pi\alpha_s}{81M^4}\,\left( \langle \bar q q\rangle^2 -
1494: \langle \bar s s\rangle^2 \right),\label{eq:SRa1}\\
1495: \lefteqn{
1496: a_2^\parallel(K^*) (f_{K^*}^\parallel)^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2} = }\nonumber\\
1497: &&{}\frac{7}{4\pi^2}\,m_s^4\int\limits_{m_s^2}^{s_0}
1498: ds\,e^{-s/M^2} \,\frac{(s-m_s^2)^2(2m_s^2-s)}{s^5} +
1499: \frac{7}{72\pi^2}\,\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi} \,M^2 (1-e^{-s_0/M^2})
1500: +\frac{7}{36M^2}\,\left\langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,G^2\right\rangle
1501: \nonumber\\
1502: &&{}+\frac{7}{3}\,\frac{m_s\langle \bar s
1503: s\rangle}{M^2}\left\{1+
1504: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\left[ -\frac{184}{27} +
1505: \frac{25}{18} \left(1-\gamma_E + \ln\,\frac{M^2}{\mu^2} +
1506: \frac{M^2}{s_0}\,e^{-s_0/M^2} + {\rm Ei}\left(-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right)
1507: \right)\right]\right\} \nonumber\\
1508: &&{}+\frac{49}{27}\,\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi} \, \frac{m_s\langle \bar q
1509: q\rangle}{M^2} - \frac{35}{18}\,
1510: \frac{m_s\langle\bar s \sigma g Gs\rangle}{M^4}
1511: +\frac{224\pi\alpha_s}{81M^4}\,\left( \langle \bar q q\rangle^2 +
1512: \langle \bar s s\rangle^2 \right) -
1513: \frac{112\pi\alpha_s}{27M^4}\,\langle \bar q q\rangle \langle \bar s
1514: s\rangle .\label{eq:SRa2}
1515: \end{eqnarray}
1516: For the transverse parameters, one has:
1517: \begin{eqnarray}
1518: \lefteqn{(f_{K^*}^\perp)^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2}
1519: = \frac{1}{4\pi^2}\int\limits_{m_s^2}^{s_0}
1520: ds\,e^{-s/M^2} \,\frac{(s-m_s^2)^2 (s+2m_s^2)}{s^3} }\nonumber\\
1521: &&{}+ \frac{1}{4\pi^2}\int\limits_{0}^{s_0}
1522: ds\,e^{-s/M^2} \,\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\left( \frac{7}{9} +
1523: \frac{2}{3}\,\ln \frac{s}{\mu^2}\right)
1524: -\frac{1}{12M^2}\,\langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,G^2\rangle \nonumber\\
1525: &&{} +\frac{m_s\langle \bar s
1526: s\rangle}{M^2}\left\{1+\frac{m_s^2}{3M^2}+
1527: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\left(-\frac{22}{9} + \frac{2}{3}
1528: \left[ 1-\gamma_E + \ln\,\frac{M^2}{\mu^2} +
1529: \frac{M^2}{s_0}\,e^{-s_0/M^2} + {\rm Ei}\left(-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right)\right]
1530: \right)\right\}\nonumber\\
1531: &&{}
1532: %\left\{ 1-\frac{2m_s^2}{M^2}\left( \frac{7}{6}-\gamma_E + {\rm
1533: % Ei}\left(
1534: %-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right) - \ln\,\frac{\mu^2}{M^2} +
1535: %\frac{M^2}{s_0}\left( 1 - \frac{M^2}{s_0}\right) e^{-s_0/M^2}
1536: %\right)\right\} \nonumber\\
1537: %&&{}
1538: -\frac{1}{3M^4}\,m_s\langle \bar s\sigma gGs\rangle -
1539: \frac{32\pi\alpha_s}{81M^4}\,\left( \langle \bar q q\rangle^2 +
1540: \langle \bar s s\rangle^2 \right),\label{eq:fKT}\\
1541: \lefteqn{a_1^{\perp}(K^*)(f_{K^*}^\perp)^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2} =
1542: \frac{5}{4\pi^2}\,m_s^4\int\limits_{m_s^2}^{s_0}
1543: ds\,e^{-s/M^2} \,\frac{(s-m_s^2)^2}{s^4}+ \frac{10}{9}\,
1544: \frac{m_s\langle\bar s \sigma g Gs\rangle}{M^4}} \nonumber\\[-7pt]
1545: &&{}+\frac{5m_s^2}{9M^4}\,\langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,G^2\rangle
1546: \left( \frac{1}{4}+ \gamma_E - {\rm
1547: Ei}\left(-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right)+ \ln\,\frac{\mu^2}{M^2} +
1548: \frac{M^2}{s_0}\left( \frac{M^2}{s_0} -1\right) e^{-s_0/M^2}\right)\nonumber\\
1549: &&{}-\frac{5}{3}\,\frac{m_s\langle \bar s
1550: s\rangle}{M^2}\left\{1+
1551: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\left[ -\frac{49}{9} +
1552: \frac{4}{3} \left(1-\gamma_E + \ln\,\frac{M^2}{\mu^2} +
1553: \frac{M^2}{s_0}\,e^{-s_0/M^2} + {\rm Ei}\left(-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right)
1554: \right)\right]\right\},\label{eq:a1perp}\\
1555: \lefteqn{
1556: a_2^\perp(K^*) (f_{K^*}^\perp)^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2} = }\nonumber\\
1557: &&{}\frac{7}{4\pi^2}\,m_s^4\int\limits_{m_s^2}^{s_0}
1558: ds\,e^{-s/M^2} \,\frac{(s-m_s^2)^2(2m_s^2-s)}{s^5} +
1559: \frac{7}{90\pi^2}\,\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi} \,M^2 (1-e^{-s_0/M^2})
1560: +\frac{7}{54M^2}\,\left\langle\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\,G^2\right\rangle
1561: \nonumber\\
1562: &&{}+\frac{7}{3}\,\frac{m_s\langle \bar s
1563: s\rangle}{M^2}\left\{1+
1564: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\left[ -\frac{206}{27} +
1565: \frac{16}{9} \left(1-\gamma_E + \ln\,\frac{M^2}{\mu^2} +
1566: \frac{M^2}{s_0}\,e^{-s_0/M^2} + {\rm Ei}\left(-\frac{s_0}{M^2}\right)
1567: \right)\right]\right\} \nonumber\\
1568: && - \frac{49}{18}\,
1569: \frac{m_s\langle\bar s \sigma g Gs\rangle}{M^4}
1570: +\frac{112\pi\alpha_s}{81M^4}\,\left( \langle \bar q q\rangle^2 +
1571: \langle \bar s s\rangle^2 \right).
1572: \end{eqnarray}
1573: For $\rho$ and $\phi$, one has $a_1^{\parallel,\perp}=0$. To obtain
1574: the sum rules for $f_{\phi}^{\parallel,\perp}$ and
1575: $a_2^{\parallel,\perp}(\phi)$, one has to replace the perturbative
1576: contributions to the above sum rules by
1577: \begin{eqnarray}
1578: \mbox{for $(f_{\phi}^{\parallel,\perp})^2$:~~}&&
1579: \frac{1}{4\pi^2}\int_{4m_s^2}^{s_0} ds \,e^{-s/M^2} \frac{(s+2 m_s^2)
1580: \sqrt{ 1-4 m_s^2/s}}{s}\,,\nonumber\\
1581: \mbox{for $a_2^{\parallel,\perp}(\phi)(f_{\phi}^{\parallel,\perp})^2$:~~}&&
1582: -\frac{7}{2\pi^2}\int_{4m_s^2}^{s_0} ds \,e^{-s/M^2} \frac{m_s^4
1583: \sqrt{ 1-4 m_s^2/s}}{s^2}\,.
1584: \end{eqnarray}
1585: In addition, one has to substitute $\langle \bar qq\rangle\to \langle
1586: \bar s s\rangle$ and to double the terms in $m_s\langle
1587: \bar s s\rangle$, $m_s\langle \bar q q\rangle$ and $m_s \langle \bar s
1588: \sigma g G s \rangle$.
1589:
1590: We evaluate the sum rules using the input given in
1591: Table~\ref{tab:QCDSRinput}.
1592: The results are given in Sec.~\ref{sec:2.3} and Tab.~\ref{tab:num}.
1593:
1594: \begin{table}[bt]
1595: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
1596: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{3pt}
1597: $$
1598: \begin{array}{r@{\:=\:}l||r@{\:=\:}l}
1599: \hline
1600: \quark & (-0.24\pm0.01)^3\,\mbox{GeV}^3 & \squark & (1-\delta_3)\,\quark\\
1601: \mixed & m_0^2\,\quark & \smixed & (1-\delta_5)\mixed\\[6pt]
1602: \displaystyle \gluon & (0.012\pm 0.003)\,
1603: {\rm GeV}^4 & \multicolumn{2}{l}{}\\[6pt]\hline
1604: \multicolumn{4}{c}{m_0^2 = (0.8\pm 0.1)\,{\rm GeV}^2,\quad \delta_3
1605: = 0.2\pm 0.2, \quad \delta_5 = 0.2\pm 0.2}\\\hline
1606: \multicolumn{4}{c}{\overline{m}_s(2\,\mbox{GeV}) = (100\pm
1607: 20)\,\mbox{MeV}~~~\longleftrightarrow~~~ \overline{m}_s(1\,\mbox{GeV})
1608: = (133\pm 27)\,\mbox{MeV}}\\
1609: \multicolumn{4}{c}{\overline{m}_q(\mu) = \overline{m}_s(\mu)/R,
1610: \quad R = 24.6\pm 1.2}\\\hline
1611: \multicolumn{4}{c}{\alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.1176\pm 0.002 ~\longleftrightarrow~
1612: \alpha_s(1\,\mbox{GeV}) = 0.497\pm 0.005}\\\hline
1613: \end{array}
1614: $$
1615: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
1616: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-3pt}
1617: \vskip-10pt
1618: \caption[]{\small Input parameters for sum rules at the
1619: renormalisation scale $\mu=1\,$GeV. The value of $m_s$ is obtained
1620: from
1621: unquenched lattice calculations with $n_f=2$ flavours
1622: as summarised in \cite{mslatt}, which agrees with the results from QCD
1623: sum rule calculations \cite{jamin}. $\overline{m}_q$ is taken from
1624: chiral perturbation theory \cite{chPT}.
1625: $\alpha_s(m_Z)$ is the PDG
1626: average \cite{PDG}.}\label{tab:QCDSRinput}
1627: \end{table}
1628:
1629: \section{Sum Rules for Twist-3 Matrix Elements}\label{app:C}
1630: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1631:
1632: The chiral-even twist-3 parameters $\zeta_{3K^*}^\parallel$,
1633: $\widetilde\omega_{3K^*}^\parallel$, $\widetilde\lambda_{3K^*}^\parallel$
1634: can be determined from the correlation function
1635: \begin{equation}\label{C.1}
1636: i g_{\alpha\mu}^{\perp} \int d^4y \,e^{-ipy} \langle 0 | T \bar q(z) g
1637: \widetilde G_{\alpha z} (vz) \gamma_z \gamma_5 s(0) \bar s(y)
1638: \gamma_\mu q(y) | 0 \rangle = (pz)^2 (2-D)
1639: \widetilde\Pi^\parallel_{3;K^*}(v,pz)\,;
1640: \end{equation}
1641: $D$ is the number of dimensions.
1642: %We define $\widetilde G_{\alpha
1643: % z}\gamma_z \gamma_5$ in $D$ dimensions as
1644: %$$
1645: %\widetilde G_{\alpha z}\gamma_z \gamma_5 = -\frac{i}{12}\,
1646: %\left[\eps_{\alpha z \gamma\delta} \eps_{z \lambda\mu\nu}\right]
1647: %G^{\gamma\delta} \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu\,.
1648: %$$
1649: In terms of hadronic contributions, the correlation function is given by
1650: \begin{equation}
1651: \widetilde\Pi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(v,pz) =
1652: \frac{(f_{K^*}^\parallel)^2
1653: m_{K^*}^2}{m_{K^*}^2-p^2} \int{\cal
1654: D}(\underline{\alpha})\,e^{-ipy(\alpha_2+v\alpha_3)}\,
1655: \widetilde\Phi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(\underline{\alpha}) + \dots;
1656: \end{equation}
1657: the dots denote contributions from higher-mass states.
1658: The parameters $\kappa_{3K^*}^\parallel$, $\omega_{3K^*}^\parallel$ and
1659: $\lambda_{3K^*}^\parallel$ can be obtained from an analogous correlation
1660: functions $\Pi_{3;K^*}^\parallel(v,pz)$ with
1661: $$
1662: g\widetilde G_{\alpha z} \gamma_z\gamma_5 \to g G_{\alpha z}
1663: i \gamma_z\,.
1664: $$
1665: For the chiral-odd operator, one has
1666: \begin{equation}
1667: i\int d^4y e^{-ipy} \langle 0 | T \bar q(z) \sigma_{z\mu} g
1668: G_{z\mu}(vz) s(0) \bar s(y) \sigma_{pz} q(y) | 0 \rangle
1669: = i (pz)^3 \Pi^\perp_{3;K^*}(v,pz)\,.
1670: \label{C.3}
1671: \end{equation}
1672: All three correlation functions $\Pi$ can be written as
1673: $$\Pi_{3;K^*}(v,pz) = \int {\cal D}\underline{\alpha}
1674: e^{-i pz (\alpha_2 + v \alpha_3)}\pi_{3;K^*}(\underline{\alpha})\,.
1675: $$
1676: For the functions $\pi_{3;K^*}(\underline{\alpha})$ we find
1677: \begin{eqnarray}
1678: \pi^{\perp }_{3;K^{*}}\left(\underline{\alpha}\right)
1679: &=&
1680: \frac{\alpha_{s}}{2\pi^{3}}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}
1681: \left[p^2\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}-
1682: \frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}\right)\right.
1683: \nonumber \\
1684: &+&m_{s}m_{q}\frac{\alpha_{3}^{2}}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}\bar{\alpha}_{2}}
1685: \left[\bar{\alpha}_{2}\left(\ln\frac{\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}+
1686: \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)-\left\{\alpha_{1}
1687: \leftrightarrow\alpha_{2}\right\}\right]
1688: \nonumber \\
1689: &+&m_{s}^{2}\left\{-\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}-
1690: \frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}\right)-\frac{\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}^{2}}{
1691: \bar{\alpha}_{2}^{2}}\left(\ln\frac{\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}+
1692: \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)\right\}
1693: \nonumber \\
1694: &-&m_{q}^{2}\left\{\alpha_{1}\leftrightarrow\alpha_{2}\right\}]
1695: \nonumber \\
1696: &+&\frac{1}{12}\langle\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}G^{2}\rangle
1697: \frac{\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}\left(\alpha_{1}-\alpha_{2}\right)\delta
1698: \left(\alpha_{3}\right)}{\alpha_{1}m_{q}^{2}+\alpha_{2}m_{s}^{2}-
1699: \alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}p^2}
1700: \nonumber \\
1701: &+&\frac{2}{3p^2}\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}\left\{\right.
1702: \frac{\bar{\alpha}_{3}}{2}\left(1+\alpha_{3}\right)\left(m_{q}
1703: \langle\bar{q}q\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)-m_{s}\langle\bar{s}s
1704: \rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right)
1705: \nonumber \\
1706: &+&\alpha_{3}\left[1+\alpha_{3}\left(1+\ln\left(\alpha_{3}
1707: \bar{\alpha}_{3}\right)+\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)\right]\left(m_{s}
1708: \langle\bar{q}q\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)-m_{q}\langle\bar{s}s
1709: \rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right)\left.\right\}
1710: \nonumber \\
1711: &+&\frac{1}{6
1712: p^4}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{3}\right)\left\{m_{q}\langle\bar{q}
1713: \sigma g G q\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)-m_{s}\langle\bar{s}
1714: \sigma g G s\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right\}
1715: \nonumber \\
1716: &+&\frac{16}{27p^4} \pi \alpha_{s} \delta\!\left( \alpha_{3}\right)
1717: \left\{\langle\bar{q}
1718: q\rangle^{2}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)-\langle\bar{s}s\rangle^{2}
1719: \delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right\},
1720: \\
1721: \pi^{\parallel}_{3;K^{*}}\left(\underline{\alpha}\right)
1722: &=&
1723: \frac{\alpha_{s}}{4\pi^{3}}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\left[\right.p^2
1724: \alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}-
1725: \frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}\right)
1726: \nonumber \\
1727: &+&m_{s}m_{q}\frac{\alpha_{3}^{2}}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}\bar{\alpha}_{2}}
1728: \left\{\bar{\alpha}_{2}\left(\ln\frac{\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}+
1729: \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)-\left\{\alpha_{1}
1730: \leftrightarrow\alpha_{2}\right\}\right\}
1731: \nonumber \\
1732: &+&m_{s}^{2}\left\{-\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}-
1733: \frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}\right)-\frac{\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}^{2}}{
1734: \bar{\alpha}_{2}^{2}}\left(\ln\frac{\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}+
1735: \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)\right\}
1736: \nonumber \\
1737: &-&m_{q}^{2}\left\{\alpha_{1}\leftrightarrow\alpha_{2}\right\}\left.\right]
1738: \nonumber \\
1739: &+&\frac{1}{24}\langle\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}G^{2}\rangle\frac{\alpha_{1}
1740: \alpha_{2}\left(\alpha_{1}-\alpha_{2}\right)\delta\!\left(\alpha_{3}\right)}{
1741: \alpha_{2}m_{s}^{2}+\alpha_{1}m_{q}^{2}-\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}p^2}
1742: \nonumber\\
1743: &+&\frac{1}{3p^2}\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}\left\{\right.\frac{
1744: \bar{\alpha}_{3}}{2}\left(1+\alpha_{3}\right)\left(m_{q}\langle\bar{q}q
1745: \rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)-m_{s}\langle\bar{s}s\rangle\delta
1746: \left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right)
1747: \nonumber \\
1748: &+&\alpha_{3}\left[1+\alpha_{3}\left(\ln\left(\alpha_{3}\bar{\alpha}_{3}
1749: \right)+\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)\right]\left(m_{s}\langle\bar{q}q
1750: \rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)-m_{q}\langle\bar{s}s\rangle\delta
1751: \left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right)\left.\right\}
1752: \nonumber \\
1753: &+&\frac{1}{12 p^4}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{3}\right)\left\{
1754: m_{q}\langle\bar{q}
1755: \sigma g Gq\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)-m_{s}\langle\bar{s}
1756: \sigma g G s\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right\}
1757: \nonumber \\
1758: &+&\frac{8}{27 p^4}\alpha_{s}\pi \delta\!\left( \alpha_{3}\right)
1759: \left(\langle\bar{q}q\rangle^{2}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right) -
1760: \langle\bar{s}s\rangle^{2}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right) \right),
1761: \\
1762: \widetilde{\pi}^{\parallel}_{3;K^{*}}\left(\underline{\alpha}\right)
1763: &=&\frac{\alpha_{s}}{4\pi^{3}}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\left[\right.-
1764: p^2\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}+
1765: \frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}\right)
1766: \nonumber \\
1767: &+&m_{s}m_{q}\frac{\alpha_{3}^{2}}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}\bar{\alpha}_{2}}
1768: \left\{\bar{\alpha}_{1}\left(\ln\frac{\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}-
1769: \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)+\left\{\alpha_{1}
1770: \leftrightarrow\alpha_{2}\right\}\right\}
1771: \nonumber \\
1772: &+&m_{s}^{2}\left\{\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\left(\frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{1}}+
1773: \frac{1}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}\right)+\frac{\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}^{2}}{
1774: \bar{\alpha}_{2}^{2}}\left(\ln\frac{\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{\bar{\alpha}_{2}}+
1775: \frac{1}{2}\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)\right\}
1776: \nonumber \\
1777: &+&m_{q}^{2}\left\{\alpha_{1}\leftrightarrow\alpha_{2}\right\}\left.\right]
1778: \nonumber \\
1779: &+&\frac{1}{24}\langle\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}G^{2}\rangle\frac{\alpha_{1}
1780: \alpha_{2}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{3}\right)}{\alpha_{2}m_{s}^{2}+\alpha_{1}
1781: m_{q}^{2}-\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}p^2}
1782: \nonumber\\
1783: &+&\frac{1}{3p^2}\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}\left\{\right.\frac{
1784: \bar{\alpha}_{3}^{2}}{2}\left(m_{s}\langle\bar{s}s\rangle\delta\!\left(
1785: \alpha_{1}\right)+m_{q}\langle\bar{q}q\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)
1786: \right)
1787: \nonumber \\
1788: &+&\alpha_{3}\left[1-\alpha_{3}\left(2+\ln\left(\alpha_{3}\bar{\alpha}_{3}
1789: \right)+\ln\frac{-p^2}{\mu^{2}}\right)\right]\left(m_{s}\langle\bar{q}q
1790: \rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)+m_{q}\langle\bar{s}s\rangle\delta
1791: \left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right)\left.\right\}
1792: \nonumber \\
1793: &+&\frac{1}{12 p^4}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{3}\right)\left\{ m_{q}\langle
1794: \bar{q}\sigma g
1795: Gq\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)+m_{s}\langle\bar{s}
1796: \sigma g G s\rangle\delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right)\right\}
1797: \nonumber \\
1798: &+&\frac{8}{27 p^4}\alpha_{s}\pi \delta\!\left( \alpha_{3}\right)
1799: \left(\langle\bar{q}q\rangle^{2}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{2}\right)+
1800: \langle\bar{s}s\rangle^{2}\delta\!\left(\alpha_{1}\right) \right)
1801: \nonumber\\
1802: &+&\frac{2}{3 p^4}\alpha_{s}\pi \delta\!\left( \alpha_{1}\right)
1803: \delta\!\left( \alpha_{2}\right)\langle\bar{q}q\rangle\langle\bar{s}s
1804: \rangle.
1805: \end{eqnarray}
1806: Here we have dropped all terms that vanish upon Borelisation. The
1807: above expressions include all terms to second order in the quark
1808: masses. One comment is in order concerning the contribution of the
1809: gluon condensate. Upon integration over $\alpha_i$, and subsequent
1810: expansion in powers of the quark masses, this contribution contains
1811: terms in $m_{s,q}^2 \ln (m_{s,q}^2/(-p^2))$, which are long-distance
1812: effects and must not appear in the short-distance operator product
1813: expansion of the correlation functions (\ref{C.1}) and (\ref{C.3}).
1814: As discussed in Ref.~\cite{logms}, the appearance of these
1815: logarithmic terms is due to the fact that the above expressions are
1816: obtained using Wick's theorem to calculate the condensate
1817: contributions, which implies that the condensates are normal-ordered:
1818: $\langle O
1819: \rangle = \langle 0 |\!:\!O\!:\! |0\rangle$. Recasting the operator
1820: product expansion in terms of
1821: non-normal-ordered operators, all infrared sensitive terms can be
1822: absorbed into the corresponding condensates. Indeed, using \cite{logms}
1823: $$
1824: \langle 0 | \bar s g G s | 0 \rangle = \langle 0| \!:\!\bar s g G
1825: s\!:\!| 0 \rangle +
1826: \frac{m_s}{2}\, \ln\,\frac{m_s^2}{\mu^2} \,\langle 0 |\! :\!
1827: \frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}\, G^2\!:\!| 0\rangle,
1828: $$
1829: and the corresponding formula for $q$ quarks,
1830: all terms in $\ln m_{q,s}^2$ can be absorbed into the mixed
1831: quark-quark-gluon condensate and the resulting short-distance coefficients
1832: can be expanded in powers of $m_{q,s}^2$. In calculating the sum rules, we
1833: hence will use
1834: $$
1835: \ln\,\frac{-p^2}{m_{q,s}^2}\to \ln \frac{-p^2}{\mu^2}\,.
1836: $$
1837:
1838: The QCD
1839: sum rules for the three hadronic parameters $\kappa_{3K^*}^\perp$,
1840: $\omega_{3K^*}^\perp$ and $\lambda_{3K^*}^\perp$ describing the DA
1841: $\Phi^\perp_{3;K^*}$, Eq.~(\ref{3.11}), to NLO in conformal spin then read:
1842: \begin{eqnarray}
1843: \left(f_{K^*}^\perp\right)^2 m_{K^*}^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2}
1844: \kappa_{3K^*}^\perp
1845: & = & \int_0^{s_0} e^{-s/M^2} \int {\cal D}\underline{\alpha}\,
1846: \frac{1}{\pi}\, {\rm Im}_{s}
1847: \pi^\perp_{3;K^*}(\underline{\alpha})\,,
1848: \nonumber\\
1849: \left(f_{K^*}^\perp\right)^2 m_{K^*}^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2}
1850: \,\frac{1}{14}\,\omega_{3K^*}^\perp
1851: & = & \int_0^{s_0} e^{-s/M^2} \int {\cal D}\underline{\alpha}\,
1852: (\alpha_1-\alpha_2)\frac{1}{\pi}\, {\rm Im}_{s}
1853: \pi_{3;K^*}^\perp(\underline{\alpha})\,,
1854: \nonumber\\
1855: \left(f_{K^*}^\perp\right)^2 m_{K^*}^2 e^{-m_{K^*}^2/M^2}
1856: \,\frac{3}{28}\,\lambda_{3K^*}^\perp
1857: & = & \int_0^{s_0} e^{-s/M^2} \int {\cal D}\underline{\alpha}\,
1858: \left(\alpha_3-\frac{3}{7}\right)\frac{1}{\pi}\, {\rm Im}_{s}
1859: \pi_{3;K^*}^\perp(\underline{\alpha})\,.
1860: \end{eqnarray}
1861: %Numerical values for the three particle twist-three parameters for
1862: %$K^*$, $\rho$ and $\phi$ particles are given in Table \ref{tab:kappas}.
1863: The formulas for the other parameters are analogous.
1864:
1865: We evaluate the above sum rules in the Borel window $M^2=1\,{\rm
1866: GeV}^2$ to $2.5\,{\rm GeV}^2$ and using the following values of
1867: the continuum threshold $s_0$:
1868: \begin{eqnarray}
1869: s_0^\parallel (\rho) &=& (1.3\pm 0.3)\,{\rm GeV}^2\,,\quad
1870: s_0^\parallel (K^*) = (1.3\pm 0.3)\,{\rm GeV}^2\,,\quad
1871: s_0^\parallel (\phi) = (1.4\pm 0.3)\,{\rm GeV}^2\,,\quad \nonumber\\
1872: s_0^\perp (\rho) &=& (1.5\pm 0.3)\,{\rm GeV}^2\,,\quad
1873: s_0^\perp (K^*) = (1.6\pm 0.3)\,{\rm GeV}^2\,,\quad
1874: s_0^\perp (\phi) = (1.7\pm 0.3)\,{\rm GeV}^2\,.\hspace*{20pt}
1875: \end{eqnarray}
1876: Numerical results, including the uncertainties from the variation of
1877: $M^2$, $s_0$ and the input parameters of Tab.~\ref{tab:QCDSRinput},
1878: are given in Tab.~\ref{tab:num}.
1879:
1880: \section{Loop Integrals}\label{app:D}
1881: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1882:
1883: For the interested reader, we collect the
1884: loop integrals needed for calculating the correlation
1885: functions in App.~\ref{app:C}.
1886:
1887: At one loop, one has (with $z^2=0$) \cite{BB03}:
1888: \begin{eqnarray}
1889: \int \left[d^L k\right] e^{i f_k kz} \,\frac{(kz)^n}{(k^2)^a
1890: ((k-p)^2)^b} & = & (-1)^{a+b} \left(-p^2\right)^{D/2-a-b} (pz)^n
1891: \,\frac{\Gamma(a+b-D/2)}{\Gamma(a)\Gamma(b)}
1892: \nonumber\\
1893: && \times\int_0^1 dw\,
1894: e^{i(1-w) f_k pz}\, w^{D/2-1-b} (1-w)^{D/2+n-1-a}\,,\label{E.1}
1895: \end{eqnarray}
1896: where the integration measure is defined as
1897: $d^D k = i/(4\pi)^2 \left[d^L k\right]$ and $f_k$ is an arbitrary
1898: numerical factor.
1899:
1900: One also needs the following integral:
1901: \begin{eqnarray}
1902: \lefteqn{\int \left[d^L l\right] e^{i f_l lz} \,\frac{(lp)(lz)^j}{(l^2)^c
1903: ((l-k)^2)^d}}
1904: \nonumber\\
1905: & = & (-1)^{\frac{D-4}{2}} \left(k^2\right)^{D/2-c-d} (kp) (kz)^j
1906: \,\frac{\Gamma(c+d-D/2)}{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(d)}\int_0^1 du\,
1907: e^{i(1-u) f_l kz}\, u^{D/2-1-d} (1-u)^{D/2+j-c}
1908: \nonumber\\
1909: &&{}+(-1)^{\frac{D-4}{2}} \left(k^2\right)^{D/2+1-c-d} (pz)(kz)^{j-1}
1910: \,\frac{\Gamma(c+d-D/2-1)}{2\Gamma(c)\Gamma(d)}
1911: \nonumber\\
1912: &&{}\times\int_0^1 du\,
1913: e^{i(1-u) f_l kz}\, u^{D/2-d} (1-u)^{D/2-1+j-c}\left( j + i f_l
1914: (1-u) (kz)\right)\,.\label{E.2}
1915: \end{eqnarray}
1916: Two-loop integrals are obtained by combining the above one-loop
1917: integrals. To obtain the correlation functions as integrals over
1918: ${\cal D}\underline{\alpha}$, one has to perform a variable
1919: transformation from $(u,w)$ to $(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)$, where the
1920: precise transformation relations are fixed by the ``canonical'' form
1921: of the exponential: $\exp(-ipz \{\alpha_2 + v
1922: (1-\alpha_1-\alpha_2)\})$. Note that (\ref{E.2}) contains an extra
1923: factor $kz$ in the last line which comes from the Taylor expansion of
1924: the exponential. This factor can be made disappear
1925: by partial integration of the final result and hence does not appear
1926: in the explicit formulas for the
1927: correlation functions given in App.~\ref{app:C}.
1928:
1929: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1930:
1931: \bibitem{BVgamma}
1932: P.~Ball and R.~Zwicky,
1933: %``$|$V(td)/V(ts)$|$ from B $\to$ V gamma,''
1934: JHEP {\bf 0604} (2006) 046
1935: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603232].
1936: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0603232;%%
1937:
1938: \bibitem{BJZ}
1939: P.~Ball, G.~W.~Jones and R.~Zwicky,
1940: %``B --> V gamma beyond QCD factorisation,''
1941: arXiv:hep-ph/0612081 (to appear in Physical Review D).
1942: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0612081;%%
1943:
1944: \bibitem{christalk}
1945: C.~Sachrajda, talk given at {\em CKM06}, Nagoya, Dec 2006.
1946: \bibitem{LCSR}
1947: For recent applications, see\\
1948: P.~Ball,
1949: %``B $\to$ pi and B $\to$ K transitions from {QCD} sum rules on the light-cone
1950: JHEP {\bf 9809} (1998) 005
1951: [arXiv:hep-ph/9802394];\\
1952: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802394;%%
1953: P.~Ball and R.~Zwicky,
1954: %``Improved analysis of B $\to$ pi e nu from QCD sum rules on the
1955: %light-cone,''
1956: JHEP {\bf 0110} (2001) 019
1957: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110115];
1958: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110115;%%
1959: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 014015
1960: [arXiv:hep-ph/0406232];
1961: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406232;%%
1962: %``B/(d,s) $\to$ rho, omega, K*, Phi decay form factors from light-cone sum
1963: %rules revisited,''
1964: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 014029
1965: [arXiv:hep-ph/0412079];\\
1966: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412079;%%
1967: P.~Ball and E.~Kou,
1968: %``B $\to$ gamma e nu transitions from QCD sum rules on the light-cone,''
1969: JHEP {\bf 0304} (2003) 029
1970: [arXiv:hep-ph/0301135];\\
1971: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301135;%%
1972: A.~Khodjamirian, T.~Mannel and N.~Offen,
1973: %``B-meson distribution amplitude from the B $\to$ pi form factor,''
1974: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 620} (2005) 52
1975: [arXiv:hep-ph/0504091];
1976: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504091;%%
1977: %``Form factors from light-cone sum rules with B-meson distribution
1978: %amplitudes,''
1979: arXiv:hep-ph/0611193.
1980: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0611193;%%
1981:
1982: \bibitem{QCDF}
1983: M.~Beneke, G.~Buchalla, M.~Neubert and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
1984: %``{QCD} factorization for B --> pi pi decays: trong phases and CP violation
1985: %in the heavy quark limit,''
1986: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83} (1999) 1914
1987: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905312];\\
1988: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905312;%%
1989: M.~Beneke and M.~Neubert,
1990: %``QCD factorization for B --> P P and B --> P V decays,''
1991: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 675} (2003) 333
1992: [arXiv:hep-ph/0308039];\\
1993: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0308039;%%
1994: M.~Beneke, T.~Feldmann and D.~Seidel,
1995: %``Systematic approach to exclusive B --> V l+ l-, V gamma decays,''
1996: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 612}, 25 (2001)
1997: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106067];\\
1998: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106067;%%
1999: S.~W.~Bosch and G.~Buchalla,
2000: %``The radiative decays B --> V gamma at next-to-leading order in QCD,''
2001: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 621}, 459 (2002)
2002: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106081].
2003: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106081;%%
2004:
2005: \bibitem{pQCD}
2006: H.~n.~Li and H.~L.~Yu,
2007: %``Perturbative QCD Analysis Of B Meson Decays,''
2008: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53} (1996) 2480
2009: [arXiv:hep-ph/9411308];\\
2010: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411308;%%
2011: Y.~Y.~Keum, H.~n.~Li and A.~I.~Sanda,
2012: %``Fat penguins and imaginary penguins in perturbative QCD,''
2013: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 504} (2001) 6
2014: [arXiv:hep-ph/0004004].
2015: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004004;%%
2016:
2017: \bibitem{BBL06}
2018: P.~Ball, V.~M.~Braun and A.~Lenz,
2019: %``Higher-twist distribution amplitudes of the K meson in QCD,''
2020: JHEP {\bf 0605} (2006) 004
2021: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603063].
2022: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0603063;%%
2023:
2024: \bibitem{frueher}
2025: P.~Ball and R.~Zwicky,
2026: %``Time-dependent CP asymmetry in B --> K* gamma as a (quasi) null test of the
2027: %standard model,''
2028: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 642} (2006) 478
2029: [arXiv:hep-ph/0609037].
2030:
2031: \bibitem{BB96}
2032: P.~Ball and V.~M.~Braun,
2033: %``The $\rho$ Meson Light-Cone Distribution Amplitudes of Leading Twist
2034: %Revisited,''
2035: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54} (1996) 2182
2036: [arXiv:hep-ph/9602323].
2037: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602323;%%
2038:
2039: \bibitem{CZreport}
2040: V.~L.~Chernyak and A.~R.~Zhitnitsky,
2041: %``Asymptotic Behavior Of Exclusive Processes In QCD,''
2042: Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf 112} (1984) 173.
2043: %%CITATION = PRPLC,112,173;%%
2044:
2045: \bibitem{BBKT}
2046: P.~Ball, V.~M.~Braun, Y.~Koike and K.~Tanaka,
2047: %``Higher twist distribution amplitudes of vector mesons in {QCD}: Formalism
2048: %and twist three distributions,''
2049: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 529} (1998) 323
2050: [arXiv:hep-ph/9802299].
2051: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802299;%%
2052:
2053: \bibitem{BKM03}
2054: V.~M.~Braun, G.~P.~Korchemsky and D.~Mueller,
2055: %``The uses of conformal symmetry in QCD,''
2056: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 51} (2003) 311
2057: [arXiv:hep-ph/0306057].
2058: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0306057;%%
2059:
2060: \bibitem{angi}
2061: P.~Ball and A.~N.~Talbot,
2062: %``Models for light-cone meson distribution amplitudes,''
2063: JHEP {\bf 0506} (2005) 063
2064: [arXiv:hep-ph/0502115].
2065: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0502115;%%
2066:
2067: \bibitem{BF90}
2068: V.~M.~Braun and I.~E.~Filyanov,
2069: %``Conformal Invariance And Pion Wave Functions Of Nonleading Twist,''
2070: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 48} (1990) 239.
2071: %[Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 52}, 126 (1990), Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 52}
2072: % (1990) 199].
2073: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C48,239;%%
2074:
2075: \bibitem{BB03}
2076: P.~Ball and M.~Boglione,
2077: %``SU(3) breaking in K and K* distribution amplitudes,''
2078: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 094006
2079: [arXiv:hep-ph/0307337].
2080: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307337;%%
2081:
2082: \bibitem{BL04}
2083: V.~M.~Braun and A.~Lenz,
2084: %``On the SU(3) symmetry-breaking corrections to meson distribution
2085: %amplitudes,''
2086: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70} (2004) 074020
2087: [arXiv:hep-ph/0407282].
2088: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407282;%%
2089:
2090: \bibitem{BZ05}
2091: P.~Ball and R.~Zwicky,
2092: %``SU(3) breaking of leading-twist K and K* distribution amplitudes: A
2093: %reprise,''
2094: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 633} (2006) 289
2095: [arXiv:hep-ph/0510338];
2096: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510338;%%
2097: %``Operator relations for SU(3) breaking contributions to K and K* distribution
2098: %amplitudes,''
2099: JHEP {\bf 0206} (2006) 034
2100: [arXiv:hep-ph/0601086].
2101: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0601086;%%
2102:
2103: \bibitem{BB98}
2104: P.~Ball and V.~M.~Braun,
2105: %``Higher twist distribution amplitudes of vector mesons in {QCD}: Twist-4
2106: %distributions and meson mass corrections,''
2107: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 543} (1999) 201
2108: [arXiv:hep-ph/9810475].
2109: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810475;%%
2110:
2111: \bibitem{andim1}
2112: D.~J.~Gross and F.~Wilczek,
2113: %``ASYMPTOTICALLY FREE GAUGE THEORIES. 2,''
2114: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 9} (1974) 980;\\
2115: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D9,980;%%
2116: M.~A.~Shifman and M.~I.~Vysotsky,
2117: %``Form-Factors Of Heavy Mesons In QCD,''
2118: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 186} (1981) 475.
2119: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B186,475;%%
2120:
2121: \bibitem{Mueller}
2122: D.~Mueller,
2123: %``Conformal constraints and the evolution of the nonsinglet meson
2124: %distribution amplitude,''
2125: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49} (1994) 2525 and
2126: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,2525;%%
2127: %``The Evolution of the pion distribution amplitude in
2128: %next-to-leading-order,''
2129: % Phys.\ Rev.\
2130: D {\bf 51} (1995) 3855.
2131: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9411338].
2132: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411338;%%
2133:
2134: \bibitem{Floratos}
2135: E.~G.~Floratos, D.~A.~Ross and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
2136: %``Higher Order Effects In Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories: The Anomalous
2137: %Dimensions Of Wilson Operators,''
2138: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 129} (1977) 66
2139: [Erratum, ibid.\ B {\bf 139} (1978) 545];\\
2140: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B129,66;%%
2141: A.~Gonzalez-Arroyo, C.~Lopez and F.~J.~Yndurain,
2142: %``Second Order Contributions To The Structure Functions In Deep Inelastic
2143: %Scattering. I. Theoretical Calculations,''
2144: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 153} (1979) 161.
2145: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B153,161;%%
2146:
2147: \bibitem{Haya}
2148: W.~Vogelsang,
2149: %``Next-to-leading order evolution of transversity distributions and Soffer's
2150: %inequality,''
2151: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57} (1998) 1886
2152: [arXiv:hep-ph/9706511];\\
2153: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706511;%%
2154: A.~Hayashigaki, Y.~Kanazawa and Y.~Koike,
2155: %``Next-to-leading order Q**2-evolution of the transversity distribution
2156: %h1(x,Q**2),''
2157: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56} (1997) 7350
2158: [arXiv:hep-ph/9707208].
2159: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707208;%%
2160:
2161: \bibitem{lattperp}
2162: D.~Becirevic {\it et al.},
2163: %``Coupling of the light vector meson to the vector and to the tensor
2164: %current,''
2165: JHEP {\bf 0305} (2003) 007
2166: [arXiv:hep-lat/0301020];\\
2167: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0301020;%%
2168: V.~M.~Braun {\it et al.},
2169: %``A lattice calculation of vector meson couplings to the vector and tensor
2170: %currents using chirally improved fermions,''
2171: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68} (2003) 054501
2172: [arXiv:hep-lat/0306006].
2173: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0306006;%%
2174:
2175: \bibitem{Bakulev}
2176: A.~P.~Bakulev and S.~V.~Mikhailov,
2177: %``The rho meson and related meson wave functions in {QCD} sum rules with
2178: %nonlocal condensates,''
2179: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 436} (1998) 351
2180: [arXiv:hep-ph/9803298].
2181: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803298;%%
2182:
2183: \bibitem{choi}
2184: H.~M.~Choi and C.~R.~Ji,
2185: %``Distribution amplitudes and decay constants for (pi, K, rho, K*) mesons in
2186: %light-front quark model,''
2187: arXiv:hep-ph/0701177.
2188: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0701177;%%
2189:
2190: \bibitem{string}
2191: I.~I.~Balitsky and V.~M.~Braun,
2192: %``Evolution Equations For QCD String Operators,''
2193: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 311} (1989) 541.
2194: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B311,541;%%
2195:
2196:
2197: \bibitem{CZ}
2198: A.~R.~Zhitnitsky, I.~R.~Zhitnitsky and V.~L.~Chernyak,
2199: %``QCD Sum Rules And Properties Of Wave Functions Of Nonleading Twist. (In
2200: %Russian),''
2201: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41} (1985) 284.
2202: %[Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 41}, 445 (1985)].
2203: %%CITATION = SJNCA,41,284;%%
2204:
2205: \bibitem{andim}
2206: Y.~Koike and K.~Tanaka,
2207: %``Q**2 Evolution Of Nucleon's Chiral Odd Twist - Three Structure Function:
2208: %H(L) (X, Q**2),''
2209: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51} (1995) 6125
2210: [arXiv:hep-ph/9412310];\\
2211: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9412310;%%
2212: Y.~Koike and N.~Nishiyama,
2213: %``Q**2 evolution of chiral-odd twist-3 distribution e(x,Q**2),''
2214: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55} (1997) 3068
2215: [arXiv:hep-ph/9609207];\\
2216: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9609207;%%
2217: Y.~Koike, N.~Nishiyama and K.~Tanaka,
2218: %``Renormalisation of chiral-even twist-3 light-cone wave functions for
2219: %vector mesons in {QCD},''
2220: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 437} (1998) 153
2221: [arXiv:hep-ph/9805460].
2222: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805460;%%
2223:
2224: \bibitem{govaerts}
2225: J.~Govaerts {\it et al.},
2226: %``L = 1 Mesons And The Four Quark Condensates In QCD Sum Rules,''
2227: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 283} (1987) 706.
2228: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B283,706;%%
2229:
2230: \bibitem{mslatt}
2231: F.~Knechtli,
2232: %``Lattice computation of the strange quark mass in QCD,''
2233: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 36} (2005) 3377
2234: [arXiv:hep-ph/0511033].
2235: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0511033;%%
2236:
2237: \bibitem{jamin}
2238: E.~Gamiz {\it et al.},
2239: %``V(us) and m(s) from hadronic tau decays,''
2240: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94} (2005) 011803
2241: [arXiv:hep-ph/0408044];\\
2242: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408044;%%
2243: S.~Narison,
2244: %``Strange quark mass from e+ e- revisited and present status of light quark
2245: %masses,''
2246: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74} (2006) 034013
2247: [arXiv:hep-ph/0510108].
2248: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0510108;%%
2249:
2250: \bibitem{chPT}
2251: H.~Leutwyler,
2252: %``The ratios of the light quark masses,''
2253: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 378} (1996) 313
2254: [arXiv:hep-ph/9602366].
2255: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602366;%%
2256:
2257: \bibitem{PDG}
2258: W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
2259: %``Review of particle physics,''
2260: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33} (2006) 1.
2261: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%
2262:
2263: \bibitem{logms}
2264: S.~C.~Generalis and D.~J.~Broadhurst,
2265: %``The Heavy Quark Expansion And QCD Sum Rules For Light Quarks,''
2266: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 139} (1984) 85;\\
2267: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B139,85;%%
2268: V.~P.~Spiridonov and K.~G.~Chetyrkin,
2269: %``Nonleading Mass Corrections And Renormalisation Of The Operators M Psi-Bar
2270: %Psi And G**2(Mu Nu),''
2271: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 47} (1988) 522
2272: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 47} (1988) 818];\\
2273: %%CITATION = SJNCA,47,522;%%
2274: M.~Jamin and M.~M\"{u}nz,
2275: %``Current correlators to all orders in the quark masses,''
2276: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 60} (1993) 569
2277: [arXiv:hep-ph/9208201].
2278: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9208201;%%
2279:
2280: \end{thebibliography}
2281:
2282: \end{document}
2283: \bibitem{Chernyak:1981jd}
2284: V.~L.~Chernyak, A.~R.~Zhitnitsky and I.~R.~Zhitnitsky,
2285: %``Meson Wave Functions And SU(3) Symmetry Breaking,''
2286: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 204} (1982) 477
2287: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 214} (1983) 547].
2288: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B204,477;%%
2289:
2290: \bibitem{Chernyak:1982it}
2291: V.~L.~Chernyak, A.~R.~Zhitnitsky and I.~R.~Zhitnitsky,
2292: %``Wave Functions Of The Mesons Containing S, C, B Quarks,''
2293: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 38}, 775 (1983).
2294: % [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 38}, 1277 (1983)].
2295: %%CITATION = SJNCA,38,775;%%
2296:
2297: