1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}

2: \usepackage{iopams}

3: \usepackage{graphics}

4: \usepackage{graphicx}

5: 

6: \def\empile#1\above#2{\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0pt#1}\limits_{#2}}}

7: 

8: \newcommand{\non}{\nonumber\\}

9: \newcommand{\ave}[1]{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}

10: \newcommand{\absol}[1]{\left| #1 \right|}

11: \newcommand{\GeV}{\,\hbox{GeV}}

12: \newcommand{\MeV}{\,\hbox{MeV}}

13: \newcommand{\inline}[1]{\noalign{\hbox{#1}}}

14: 

15: \newcommand{\sll}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.43em\hbox{$l$}}

16: \newcommand{\slepsilon}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\epsilon$}}

17: \newcommand{\slvarepsilon}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\varepsilon$}}\newcommand{\slL}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$L$}}

18: \newcommand{\slP}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$P$}}

19: \newcommand{\slp}{\raise.1ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.63em\hbox{$p$}}

20: \newcommand{\slq}{\raise.1ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$q$}}

21: \newcommand{\slv}{\raise.1ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.63em\hbox{$v$}}

22: \newcommand{\slR}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$R$}}

23: \newcommand{\slQ}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$Q$}}

24: \newcommand{\slK}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$K$}}

25: \newcommand{\slk}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$k$}}

26: \newcommand{\slSigma}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\Sigma$}}

27: \newcommand{\slcalP}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.63em\hbox{$\cal P$}}

28: \newcommand{\slA}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.73em\hbox{$A$}}

29: \newcommand{\slbfA}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.73em\hbox{${\imb A}$}}

30: \newcommand{\slpartial}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$\partial$}}

31: \newcommand{\sla}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$a$}}

32: 

33: \newcommand{\slb}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$b$}}

34: \newcommand{\slc}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$c$}}

35: \newcommand{\slD}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$D$}}

36: \newcommand{\slC}{\raise.15ex\hbox{$/$}\kern-.53em\hbox{$C$}}

37: 

38: \def\p{{\boldsymbol p}}

39: \def\q{{\boldsymbol q}}

40: \def\l{{\boldsymbol l}}

41: \def\k{{\boldsymbol k}}

42: \def\m{{\boldsymbol m}}

43: \def\x{{\boldsymbol x}}

44: \def\y{{\boldsymbol y}}

45: \def\X{{\boldsymbol X}}

46: \def\Y{{\boldsymbol Y}}

47: \def\r{{\boldsymbol r}}

48: \def\z{{\boldsymbol z}}

49: \def\b{{\boldsymbol b}}

50: \def\a{{\boldsymbol a}}

51: \def\cc{{\boldsymbol c}}

52: \def\u{{\boldsymbol u}}

53: \def\v{{\boldsymbol v}}

54: 

55: \def\wt{\widetilde}

56: \def\bs{\boldsymbol}

57: 

58: \def\Ap{A_{p}}

59: \def\Aa{A_{_A}}

60: \def\Apa{A}

61: 

62: 

63: \begin{document}

64: 

65: \title{Heavy flavor production in pA collisions}

66: 

67: \author{H Fujii$^1$, F Gelis$^2$ and R Venugopalan$^3$}

68: 

69: \address{$^1$ Institute of Physics, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan}

70: \address{$^2$ CEA/DSM/SPhT, Saclay, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France}

71: \address{$^3$ Physics Department,  Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA}

72: 

73: 

74: \begin{abstract}

75: Heavy quark production in high-energy proton-nucleus (pA) collisions

76: is described in the framework of the Color Glass Condensate.

77: $k_\perp$ factorization is broken even at leading order albeit a more general factorization in pA holds at this order 

78: in terms of 2, 3 and 4 point correlators of Wilson lines in the nuclear target. The $x$-evolution of these correlators is 

79: computed in the large $A$ and large $N$ mean field limit of the Balitsky-Kovchegov equation. We show results for heavy quark 

80: production at  RHIC and LHC energies.

81: \end{abstract}

82: 

83: 

84: \section{Introduction}

85: 

86: 

87: Heavy flavor production in high energy processes is 

88: usually described in the collinear or $k_\perp$ factorization frameworks

89: of perturbative QCD.

90: Reactions with nuclear targets allow one to study 

91: new important features of 

92: multiple scatterings and parton saturation, which is 

93: characterized by the scale $Q_{sA}^2$\cite{IancuVrev}.

94: For a large nucleus at higher energy,

95: this scale can be large and comparable to the heavy quark mass $m_Q$,

96: so that 

97: $\Lambda^2_{\rm QCD} \ll m_Q^2 \lesssim Q_{sA}^2  \ll s $.

98: In this situation, realized at RHIC and definitely at future LHC,

99: we can investigate saturation physics through heavy quark

100: production with the generalized framework

101: of the Color Glass Condensate (CGC)

102: \cite{BlaizGV2,FujiiGV1,FujiiGVq1,KharzT1,KharzT4,AlbacK}.

103: 

104: %Importance of pA reaction in the context of HIC physics

105: 

106: In nucleus-nucleus collisions, heavy quarks are produced

107: by initial hard interactions and subsequently 

108: propagate in the hot flowing medium which modifies 

109: the $p_\perp$ spectrum of the quarks

110: and the quarkonium yield\cite{PnxElossC}.

111: In order to quantify these in-medium effects in hot matter,

112: proton/deuteron-nucleus (pA) collisions play a decisive role 

113: providing the baseline of the initial nuclear effects.

114: Here, we will compute heavy quark production in high energy pA

115: collisions using the CGC framework that 

116: incorporates both multiple scattering and small $x$ evolution effects.

117: 

118: \section{Quark pair cross section in the large N limit} 

119: 

120: In pA collisions, which is a prototype of a dilute-dense system,

121: the particle production cross-sections are known analytically

122: to the leading order in the strong coupling constant $ \alpha_s$

123: and the proton source $\rho_p$, 

124: but to all orders in the dense nuclear source

125: $g^2 \rho_A=O(1)$\cite{BlaizGV2}.

126: The cross-section of the quark pair production is written

127: in the CGC framework as 

128: \begin{eqnarray}

129: &&\frac{d \sigma_{q \bar{q}}}{d^2\p_\perp d^2\q_\perp dy_p dy_q}

130: =

131: \frac{\alpha_s^2 }{(2\pi)^6 C_F}

132: \non

133: &&\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad\times

134: \int\limits_{\k_{2\perp},\k_\perp}\!\!\!

135: \frac{\Xi(\k_{1\perp},\k_{2\perp},\k_{\perp})}

136: {\k_{1\perp}^2 \k_{2\perp}^2}

137: \;

138: \phi_{_A,y_2}^{q\bar{q},g}(\k_{2\perp},\k_\perp)

139: \;

140: \varphi_{p,y_1}(\k_{1\perp})

141: \; ,

142: \label{eq:cross-section-LN}

143: \end{eqnarray}

144: where $\k_{1\perp}=\p_\perp+\q_\perp - \k_{2\perp}$,

145: and $\k_{1,2\perp}$ and $y_{1,2}=\ln(1/x_{1,2})$ 

146: are the momenta and rapidities of the gluons coming

147: from the proton and the nucleus.

148: A shorthand notation

149: $\Xi(\k_{1\perp},\k_{2\perp},\k_{\perp})$ stands for the

150: matrix element squared, whose explicit form can be found

151: in Refs.~\cite{BlaizGV2,FujiiGV1,FujiiGVq1}.

152: In the leading twist approximation on both the proton and 

153: nuclear sides, this $\Xi$ reduces to the LO hard matrix element in the

154: $k_\perp$ factorization formalism\cite{GelisV1}.

155: The $\varphi_{p,y_1}(\k_{1\perp})$ 

156: is the $k_\perp$-dependent gluon distribution in the

157: proton, which is related to the usual gluon distribution

158: function via:

159: \begin{eqnarray}

160: {1 \over {4\pi^3} }

161: \int^{Q^2} d \k_{\perp}^2 \varphi_{p,y}(\k_{\perp})

162: \equiv

163: xG_p(x,Q^2)

164: \; .

165: \end{eqnarray}

166: The multi-gluon correlations in the large nucleus are encoded

167: in the expression (\ref{eq:cross-section-LN})

168: as the 3-point correlator (large $N$)

169: \begin{eqnarray}

170: \phi_{_A,_Y}^{q \bar{q},g}(\l_\perp,\k_\perp)

171: &\empile{=}\above{\rm LN}&

172: \pi R_A^2 \;

173: \frac{\l^2_\perp N}{4 \alpha_s} \;

174: S_Y(\k_\perp) \;

175: S_Y(\l_\perp-\k_\perp)  ,

176: \label{eq:3ptfn}

177: \end{eqnarray}

178: where $S_Y(\k_\perp)$ is the Fourier transform of 

179: the forward scattering amplitude of the right-moving dipole

180: $S_Y(\x_\perp)=

181: (1/N){\rm tr}\big<{\wt U}(\x_\perp){\wt U}^\dagger(0)\big>_Y $

182: with

183: \begin{eqnarray}

184: {\wt U}(\x_\perp)\equiv {\cal P}_+ \exp\left[-ig^2\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}

185: dz^+ \frac{1}{{\bs\nabla}_{\perp}^2}\,\rho^a_{_A}(z^+,\x_\perp)\; t^a

186: \right] \; .

187: \end{eqnarray}

188: Here $t^a$ is the SU($N$) generator in the fundamental representation.

189: 

190: 

191: On the proton side, the collinear approximation is more appropriate

192: because the typical $\k_\perp$ should be small --

193: $O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD })$ as long as $x_1$ is not too small,

194: especially in the forward rapidity (large $x_1$) region.

195: As noted in Refs.~\cite{GelisV1,BlaizGV2} the collinear limit on the

196: proton side is well-defined thanks to a Ward identity: one obtains 

197: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:formalism} (a))

198: \begin{eqnarray}

199: &&

200: \frac{d\sigma_{q\bar{q}}}{d^2\p_\perp d^2\q_\perp dy_p dy_q}

201: =

202: \frac{\alpha_s^2 }{4(2\pi)^4 C_F}

203: \non

204: &&\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad\times 

205: \int\limits_{\k_\perp}

206: \frac{\Xi^\prime(\k_{2\perp},\k_{\perp})}{\k_{2\perp}^2}

207: \;

208: \phi_{_A,y_2}^{q\bar{q},g}( \k_{2\perp},\k_\perp)

209: \;

210:  x_1 G_p(x_1,Q^2) ,

211: \label{eq:cross-section-LN-coll}

212: \end{eqnarray}

213: where $\k_{2\perp}=\p_\perp + \q_\perp$, and

214: \begin{eqnarray}

215: \Xi^\prime(\k_{2\perp},\k_{\perp})

216: \equiv

217: \lim_{|\k_{1\perp}|\to 0}

218: \int \frac{d\theta_1}{2\pi}

219: \frac{\Xi(\k_{1\perp},\k_{2\perp},\k_{\perp})}{\k_{1\perp}^2} \; .

220: \end{eqnarray}

221: 

222: 

223: 

224: In this work, we numerically solve

225: the Balitsky-Kovchegov (BK) equation 

226: for $S_Y(\k_\perp)$ \cite{Balitsky,Kovchegov}

227: with the McLerran-Venugopalan (MV)

228: model\cite{McLerrV1} initial condition at $x_0$=0.01,

229: and compute the 3-point correlator

230: $\phi_{A,y_2}^{q\bar{q},g}(\k_{2\perp},\k_\perp)$ 

231: (Fig.~\ref{fig:formalism} (b)).

232: This prescription is justified in the large $N$ and large $A$ limit.

233: For large-$x$ extrapolation, see Ref.~\cite{FujiiGVq1}.

234: 

235: \begin{figure}[htb]

236: \begin{center}

237: \resizebox*{!}{2.8cm}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{fig01a.ps}}

238: \qquad\qquad

239: \resizebox*{!}{4cm}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{fig01b.ps}}

240: \end{center}

241: \caption{\label{fig:formalism}

242: (a) Collinear limit on the proton side. Blob stands for the

243:  interactions with the nucleus including multiple scatterings. (b)

244: Nuclear gluon distribution obtained from the BK equation with the MV

245: model initial condition.}

246: \end{figure}

247: 

248: 

249: 

250: \begin{figure}[hbt]

251: \begin{center}

252: \resizebox*{!}{4.7cm}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{fig02a.ps}}

253: \qquad

254: \resizebox*{!}{4.5cm}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{fig02b.ps}}

255: \end{center}

256: \caption{\label{fig:opencharm}

257: (a) Open charm spectrum at $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV at $y$=0, 2 calculated

258: with $\alpha_s$=0.2 and $Q_{sA0}^2$=2GeV$^2$.

259: (b) Nuclear modification factor of $Q_{sA0}^2$=2 GeV$^2$ to 0.22

260: GeV$^2$ for D meson at $\sqrt{s}$=200 and

261: 8500 GeV. In the latter case, results of the BK evolution with $\alpha_s$

262: =0.1 and 0.2 are compared.}

263: \end{figure}

264: 

265: 

266: \section{Open heavy flavor}

267: 

268: In Fig.~\ref{fig:opencharm} (a), we show

269: the single charm spectrum from eq.~(\ref{eq:cross-section-LN-coll})

270: with $Q_{sA}^2$=2 GeV$^2$ at $x=0.01$ and the BK evolution with fixed

271: $\alpha_s$=0.2. CTEQ6LO\cite{CTEQ6} is used for the proton.

272: The D$^0$ spectrum is obtained after convolution with Peterson's

273: fragmentation function $D(z)$ ($\epsilon=0.05$ and $z=p_{D\perp}/ p_{c\perp}$).

274: Preliminary data are taken from STAR~\cite{StarQM04,StarDAOpenC}.

275: %

276: We see that after the convolution

277: the D$^0$ spectrum is a little harder at lower $p_\perp$ than the data

278: while it fits in the higher $p_\perp$ region. 

279: %

280: Note that the b-quark contribution is not included in our calculation.

281: %

282: Fig.~\ref{fig:opencharm} (b) presents

283: the nuclear modification factor

284: of $Q_{sA}^2(x=0.01)$= 2 to 0.22 GeV$^2$,

285: at $\sqrt{s}$= 200 GeV ($y$=0, 2) and 8500 GeV ($y$=0, 2, 4).

286: We see at RHIC energy the Cronin peak moving to higher $p_\perp$ with

287: the rapidity $y$ because the charm pair production is dominated by the

288: moderate $x_2$ region.

289: Instead, at LHC energy we see larger suppression with $y$;

290: Note that fixed coupling $\alpha_s$=0.2 yields too large $\lambda$ of

291: $Q_s^2(x)\sim (1/x)^{\lambda}$ compared with HERA analysis.

292: The saturation effects can be seen even in the B meson productions at this energy.

293: 

294: 

295: \section{Quarkonium}

296: 

297: The J/$\psi$ production cross-section is computed for $Q_{sA0}^2$=2

298: and 0.22 GeV$^2$ in the color evaporation model in

299: Fig.~\ref{fig:jpsi},

300: where we assume that the bound state formation takes place outside of

301: the nucleus, and is thus not modified compared to pp.

302: The J/$\psi$ absorption in the target is not necessary.

303: The cross-section is supressed (enhanced) in the small (large)

304: $p_\perp$ region at RHIC energy due to the multiple scattering of the pair

305: (Fig.~\ref{fig:jpsi} (a))\cite{FujiiM1}.

306: At forward rapidities $dN/dy$

307: is more suppressed due to the multiple

308: scattering {\it and} saturation, which may be compared with

309: the data\cite{PnxDAJpsi}. 

310: Note that in the hatched

311: region $y \lesssim 0.5$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:jpsi} (b), 

312: $dN/dy$ is largely determined by the larger $x_2$ part of $\phi_{A,y_2}^{q\bar{q},g}$,

313: which is extrapolated from the MV model.

314: In Fig.~\ref{fig:jpsi} (c), we show the suppressions of $dN/dy$ for the

315: J/$\psi$ and the charm quark at LHC energy. 

316: We expect that the difference between them 

317: represents the effect of the multiple scattering on the bound state formation.

318: It is interesting to note that this difference depends on the rapidity

319: $y$ only weakly.

320: 

321: 

322: 

323: \begin{figure}[tbh]

324: \begin{center}

325: \resizebox*{!}{3.5cm}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{fig03a.ps}}

326: \resizebox*{!}{3.5cm}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{fig03b.ps}}

327: \resizebox*{!}{3.5cm}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{fig03c.ps}}

328: \end{center}

329: \caption{\label{fig:jpsi}

330: (a) J/$\psi$ spectrum for $Q_{sA0}^2$=2 and 0.22 GeV$^2$ at $\sqrt{s}$= 200 GeV.

331: (b) Nuclear modification factor of J/$\psi$ and charm quark ($\alpha_s$=0.1 and 0.2).

332: Hatched region correspoinds to $x_2 \gtrsim 0.01$.

333: (c) The same as (b) at $\sqrt{s}$= 8500 GeV.}

334: \end{figure}

335: 

336: 

337: 

338: \section*{References}

339: \begin{thebibliography}{*}

340: \bibitem{IancuVrev}

341: For review, see {Iancu E and Venugopalan R} 2003 hep-ph/0303204, and

342: 	references therein

343: 

344: \bibitem{BlaizGV2}

345: {Blaizot J P,  Gelis F and  Venugopalan R} 2004 {\it Nucl. Phys.} A {\bf 743} 57

346: %``quark-antiquark production in pA collisions''

347: 

348: 

349: \bibitem{FujiiGV1}

350: {Fujii H, Gelis F and Venugopalan R} 2005 {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 95} 162002

351: %``Quantitative study of the violation of $k_\perp$-factorization in hadroproduction of quarks at collider energies.''

352: 

353: \bibitem{FujiiGVq1}

354: {Fujii H, Gelis F. and Venugoplan R} 2006 {\it Nucl.~Phys.} A {\bf 780} 146,

355: 	and in preparation

356: 

357: \bibitem{KharzT1}

358: {Kharzeev D and Tuchin K} 2004 {\it Nucl. Phys.} A {\bf 735} 248

359: %hep-ph/0310358.

360: %comments={`` OPEN CHARM PRODUCTION IN HEAVY ION COLLISIONS AND THE

361:         %COLOR GLASS CONDENSATE"})

362: 

363: \bibitem{KharzT4}

364: {Kharzeev D and Tuchin K} 2006 {\it Nucl. Phys.} A {\bf 770}  40

365: %comments={``Signatures of the Color Glass Condensate in J/Psi

366: 	%production off nuclear targets"})

367: 

368: \bibitem{AlbacK}

369: Albacete J and Kovchegov Yu V (these proceedings)

370: 

371: 

372: \bibitem{PnxElossC}

373: {Adler S S {\it et al} (PHENIX Collaboration)}

374: 2006 {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 96} 032301

375: %``Nuclear modification of electron spectra and implications for heavy

376: %quark energy loss in Au+Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV. ``

377: %e-Print Archive: nucl-ex/0510047

378: 

379: 

380: \bibitem{GelisV1}

381: {Gelis F and Venugopalan R} 2004 {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 69} 014019

382: %``Large mass $q\bar {q}$ production from the color glass condensate''

383: 

384: 

385: \bibitem{Balitsky} Balitsky I 1996 {\it Nucl.~Phys.} B {\bf 463} 99

386: 

387: 

388: \bibitem{Kovchegov} Kovchegov Yu V 2000 {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 61} 074018

389: 

390: 

391: \bibitem{McLerrV1}

392: McLerran L and Venugopalan R, 1994 {\it Phys. Rev.} D {\bf 49} 2233;

393: 	{\it ibid.} {\bf 49} 3352; {\it ibid.} {\bf 50} 2225

394: 

395: \bibitem{CTEQ6}

396: %``New Generation of Parton Distributions with Uncertainties from

397: %	Global QCD Analysis''

398: {Pumplin J, Stump D R, Huston J, Lai H L, Nadolsky P and Tung K}

399: 2002 {\it JHEP} {\bf 0207} 012

400: 

401: \bibitem{StarQM04}

402: {Tai A (STAR Collaborationa)} 2004 {\it J.~Phys.~G: Nucl.~Part.~Phys.} {\bf 30} S809

403: 

404: \bibitem{StarDAOpenC}

405: Adams J {\it et al} (STAR Collaboration) 2005 {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 94} 062301

406: %``Open charm yields in d + Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV.''

407: %e-Print Archive: nucl-ex/0407006

408: 

409: 

410: %quarkonium

411: \bibitem{FujiiM1}

412: {Fujii H and Matsui T} 2002 {\it Phys. Lett.} B {\bf 545} 82;

413: %comments={``SUPERPENETRATION OF {\bf A} HIGH-ENERGY Q ANTI-Q BOUND

414:         %STATE THROUGH RANDOM COLOR FIELDS"})

415: {Fujii H} 2002  {\it Nucl. Phys.} A {\bf 709} 236

416: %comments={``Penetration of a high energy $Q\mathaccent "7016 {Q}$ bound

417:         %state through SU(N) color background"})

418: 

419: \bibitem{PnxDAJpsi}

420: Adler S S {\it et al} (PHENIX Collaboration) 2006 {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}

421: 	{\bf 96} 012304

422: %``Jpsi production and nuclea effects for dAu and pp collisions at

423: %sqrt_s=200 GeV''

424: 

425: 

426: 

427: \end{thebibliography}

428: 

429: \end{document}

430: