1: %%
2: %% S.Kulagin & R.Petti
3: %% Neutrino inelastic inclusive scattering off nuclei
4: %%
5: \documentclass[%
6: aps,
7: prd,
8: 12pt,
9: %a4paper,
10: %letterpaper,
11: %preprint,
12: onecolumn,
13: tightenlines,
14: showpacs,
15: nofootinbib,
16: floatfix,
17: amssymb,
18: amsmath
19: ]{revtex4}
20: %%
21: %% PACKAGES:
22: %%
23: %\usepackage{amssymb}
24: \usepackage{bm}
25: \usepackage[dvips]{color,graphicx}
26: \usepackage{epsfig}
27: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
28: %\usepackage{showkeys}
29: %\usepackage{axodraw}
30: %\usepackage{here}
31: \allowdisplaybreaks[4]
32: %%
33: %% MACROS AND KEYSTROKES DEFINITIONS:
34: %%
35: \def \nn {\nonumber}
36: %\def \ie {{\em i.e.\/} }
37: \def \ie {i.e.}
38: \def \etal {{\it et al.\/}}
39: %\def \eg {{\em e.g.}}
40: \def \eg {e.g.}
41: \newcommand{\ud} {\mathrm{d}}
42: \newcommand{\gev} {\:\mathrm{GeV}}
43: \newcommand{\Mev} {\:\mathrm{MeV}}
44: \newcommand{\gevsq} {\:\mathrm{GeV}^2}
45: \newcommand{\ksqmax} {k^2_{\mathrm{max}}}
46: \newcommand{\tmax} {t_{\mathrm{max}}}
47: \newcommand{\dirac}[1]{{\not{\!{#1}}}}
48: \renewcommand{\Im}{\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}}
49: \renewcommand{\Re}{\mathop{\mathrm{Re}}}
50: \newcommand{\Tr}{\mathop{\mathrm{Tr}}}
51: \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}}
52: \newcommand{\ceps}{\varepsilon}
53: \newcommand{\epsth}{\varepsilon_{\mathrm{th}}}
54: \newcommand{\Bra}[1]{\left\langle{#1}\left|}
55: \newcommand{\Ket}[1]{\right|{#1}\right\rangle}
56: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle{#1}|}
57: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{|{#1}\rangle}
58: \newcommand{\average}[1]{\left\langle{#1}\right\rangle}
59: \newcommand{\la}{\left\langle}
60: \newcommand{\ra}{\right\rangle}
61: \newcommand{\eq}[1]{Eq.(\ref{#1})}
62: \newcommand{\Eqs}[2]{Eqs.~(\ref{#1}) and (\ref{#2})}
63: \newcommand{\eqs}[1]{Eqs.(\ref{#1})}
64: \newcommand{\sqw}{\sin^2{\theta_W}}
65: \newcommand{\sigmabar}{\bar{\sigma}}
66: \newcommand{\sigmaeff}{\bar\sigma_T}
67: \newcommand{\as}{\alpha_{\scriptscriptstyle S}}
68: \newcommand{\sgls}{S_{\mathrm{GLS}}}
69: \newcommand{\sadler}{S_{\mathrm{A}}}
70: \newcommand{\FA}[2]{F_{#1}^{{#2}A}}
71: \newcommand{\Fp}[2]{F_{#1}^{{#2}p}}
72: \newcommand{\Fn}[2]{F_{#1}^{{#2}n}}
73: \newcommand{\anu}{\bar{\nu}}
74: \newcommand{\PMF}{\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{MF}}}
75: \newcommand{\Pcor}{\mathcal{P}_{\mathrm{cor}}}
76: \newcommand{\FLpcac}{ F_L^{\textsc{pcac}} }
77: \newcommand{\FLac}{ F_L^{\textsc{ac}} }
78: \newcommand{\FTac}{ F_T^{\textsc{ac}} }
79: \newcommand{\FLvc}{ F_L^{\textsc{vc}} }
80: \newcommand{\FTvc}{ F_T^{\textsc{vc}} }
81: \newcommand{\shrinkvspace}{\vspace{-3ex}}
82: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
83: \begin{document}
84: %
85: %% REVTEX style title page:
86: %%
87: \title{%
88: Neutrino inclusive inelastic scattering off nuclei
89: }
90:
91: \author{S.~A.~Kulagin}
92: %\email[]{kulagin@ms2.inr.ac.ru}
93: \affiliation{Institute for Nuclear Research, 117312 Moscow, Russia}
94: %
95: \author{R.~Petti}
96: %\email[]{Roberto.Petti@cern.ch}
97: \affiliation{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia SC 29208, USA }
98: %\affiliation{CERN, CH-1211 Gen\'eve 23, Switzerland}
99:
100: %%\date{\today}
101:
102: \begin{abstract}
103:
104: \noindent
105: We present a detailed description of high-energy neutrino and antineutrino
106: inelastic inclusive scattering off nuclei in terms of nuclear structure
107: functions. In our approach we take into account a QCD description of the
108: nucleon structure functions as well as a number of basic nuclear effects
109: including nuclear shadowing, Fermi motion and binding, nuclear pion excess
110: and off-shell correction to bound nucleon structure functions. These
111: effects prove to be important in the studies of charged-lepton deep-inelastic scattering.
112: We discuss similarities and dissimilarities in the
113: calculation of nuclear effects for charged-lepton and neutrino scattering
114: caused by nonconserved axial current in neutrino scattering.
115: We examine the Adler and the
116: Gross-Llewellyn-Smith sum rules for nuclear structure functions
117: and find a remarkable cancellation between nuclear shadowing and off-shell
118: corrections in these sum rules.
119: We present calculations of differential cross
120: sections for inclusive neutrino and antineutrino scattering in comparison
121: with recent data on different target materials.
122:
123: \end{abstract}
124:
125: %\begin{keyword}
126: %Nuclear effects, structure functions, parton distributions, neutrino cross sections
127: %\end{keyword}
128:
129: \pacs{13.60.Hb, 25.30.Pt, 24.85.+p}
130: \maketitle
131:
132:
133: \section{Introduction}
134: \label{sec:intro}
135:
136: The interest in the study of neutrino interactions with nuclei at intermediate
137: and high energy has grown considerably in recent years (see, e.g., \cite{nuint}).
138: New experimental results on neutrino cross-sections are also obtained
139: for different nuclear targets \cite{nutev-xsec,nomad-xsec,chorus-xsec}.
140: %
141: The presence of an axial-vector component in the weak
142: current and the quark flavor selection distinguish neutrino interactions
143: from charged-lepton (CL) and hadron collisions. This feature makes the
144: neutrino ($\nu$) and antineutrino ($\bar{\nu}$) data a unique source of information
145: on the nucleon and nuclear structure. The understanding of neutrino propagation in matter
146: is also important for astrophysics, cosmology and even geology applications.
147:
148: The use of heavy nuclear targets in neutrino experiments is motivated
149: by the need to collect a statistically significant number of interactions.
150: For this reason, the understanding of nuclear effects is of primary
151: importance for a correct interpretation of experimental results and for
152: the evaluation of the corresponding uncertainties. An example of such synergy
153: is provided by the precision electroweak measurements from neutrino interactions.
154: %
155: The role of nuclear corrections to neutrino structure functions has recently been
156: emphasized~\cite{nutev-nucl} in the context of the anomalous measurement
157: of the weak mixing angle ($\sin^2 \theta_{W}$) reported by the NuTeV collaboration~\cite{nutev-sin2w}.
158:
159: An accurate account of nuclear effects is not only
160: important in the determination of electroweak parameters in neutrino
161: scattering experiments, but also for the understanding of neutrino masses
162: and mixing. The next generation experiments would imply precision
163: measurements to disentangle small oscillation signals from neutrino and antineutrino
164: interactions on nuclei. This in turn would require us to improve our knowledge
165: of $\nu(\bar{\nu})$-nucleus cross-sections in order to reduce systematic uncertainties.
166:
167: The availability of high-intensity neutrino beams from the recent
168: NuMI~\cite{numi} and JPARC~\cite{JPARC} facilities offers new opportunities
169: for detailed studies of cross sections and nuclear effects in neutrino interactions.
170: One such example is MINER$\nu$A~\cite{minerva}, a dedicated experiment at Fermilab which will
171: collect data in few years. On a longer time scale, the construction of a neutrino
172: factory~\cite{nufact} would then allow a further step forward, finally reaching the ultimate
173: precision of the neutrino probe.
174:
175: In this work we present a calculation of inelastic neutrino-nucleus
176: structure functions (SF) and differential cross sections in a wide
177: kinematical range of the Bjorken variable $x$ and momentum transfer
178: squared $Q^2$.
179: Our goal is to develop a quantitative model incorporating existing data,
180: which would be useful in interpreting $\nu(\bar{\nu})$ experiments.
181:
182: Scattering experiments with charged leptons show that even in the deep-inelastic
183: scattering (DIS) region, for which the energy and momentum transfer are larger
184: than the nucleon mass $M$, nuclear SF differ from a simple sum over bound nucleons and
185: a significant nuclear effect is present even in the scaling regime (see, e.g., \cite{Arneodo:1994wf}).
186: %
187: As evidenced by numerous studies (see \cite{p-w-rev,thomas-rev} and also \cite{KP04}),
188: the lepton-nucleus DIS is characterized by different mechanisms in different kinematical
189: regions of the Bjorken variable $x$.
190: %
191: In a recent paper~\cite{KP04} we studied the charged-lepton DIS off
192: nuclear targets and developed a quantitative model for nuclear structure
193: functions, taking into account major nuclear effects including nuclear
194: shadowing, Fermi motion and binding, nuclear pion excess and off-shell
195: correction to bound nucleon structure functions. This approach showed a
196: very good agreement with data on the EMC effect for light and heavy nuclei
197: for both the $x$ and $Q^2$ dependence.
198: In the present paper we extend this approach to neutrino-nucleus inelastic
199: scattering.
200:
201: Although nuclear scattering mechanisms for high-energy charged leptons and
202: neutrinos are similar in many respects
203: (especially in the impulse approximation),
204: there are important differences due to the presence of the axial-vector
205: current in neutrino interactions. The interference between the vector and
206: the axial-vector currents introduces $C$-odd terms in neutrino cross
207: sections, which are described by SF $F_3$.
208: In the calculation of nuclear corrections, we separate
209: the contributions to different SF according to their $C$-parity.
210: We examine in detail the dependence of nuclear effects on $C$-parity and
211: show that it is particulary important in the nuclear shadowing region.
212: Results are then used to predict nuclear structure functions for
213: neutrino and antineutrino interactions, respectively.
214:
215: In contrast to the electromagnetic current, the axial current is not conserved, and for this reason the
216: neutrino structure functions in the region of low $Q^2$ and small $x$ are
217: rather different from those of electroproduction. In particular, the
218: neutrino longitudinal SF $F_L$ (as well as $F_2$) does not vanish at low
219: $Q^2$. Its value is determined by the divergence of the axial-vector current
220: which is linked to the virtual pion cross-section (Adler relation \cite{Adler:1964yx}).
221: We discuss the derivation of this relationship for structure functions and
222: examine corrections to that. We also address the phenomenological
223: implications of this relation in the description of low-$Q^2$ and low-$x$
224: neutrino differential cross sections. The nuclear shadowing effect on
225: the virtual pion cross section results in a significant suppression of
226: the corresponding nuclear structure functions.
227:
228: The paper is organized as follows. In Sec.~\ref{sec:basic} we introduce
229: the general formalism of neutrino inclusive inelastic scattering, define
230: the structure functions and present the differential cross sections for
231: charged-current (CC) and neutral-current (NC) neutrino scattering. In
232: Sec.~\ref{sec:sf:high-q} we summarize our model of the nucleon SF in the
233: region of high $Q^2$; in Sec.~\ref{sec:sf:low-q} we deal with the
234: low-$Q^2$ region and discuss the separation of the axial current
235: contribution from the vector component. In Sec.~\ref{sec:nuke} we discuss
236: the nuclear effects in neutrino DIS. Particular attention is paid to the
237: calculation of neutrino $C$-even and $C$-odd structure functions. In
238: Sec.~\ref{sec:ASR} and \ref{sec:GLS} we examine the Adler and the
239: Gross--Llewellyn-Smith sum rules for nuclear targets. In
240: Sec.~\ref{sec:res} we present the results of numerical analysis of SF and
241: differential cross sections for a number of nuclear targets and compare
242: our predictions with the recent data
243: \cite{nomad-xsec,nutev-xsec,chorus-xsec}.
244:
245:
246: \section{General formalism of neutrino inclusive scattering}
247: \label{sec:basic}
248:
249:
250: To leading order in the weak coupling constant, neutrino scattering is
251: described by the standard one-boson exchange process.
252: Neutrino interactions can be mediated by the charged $W^\pm$ boson
253: (\emph{charged curent} or CC) or by the neutral $Z$ boson (\emph{neutral
254: curent} or NC).
255: In the Standard Model (SM) the leptonic and hadronic charged currents can
256: be written as
257: %
258: \begin{subequations}
259: \label{cc}
260: \begin{align}
261: \label{cc:l}
262: j_\lambda^- &= \bar e O_\lambda^L\nu_e + \bar \mu
263: O_\lambda^L\nu_\mu, \\
264: J_\lambda^- &= \bar d' O_\lambda^L u + \bar s' O_\lambda^L c,
265: \label{cc:h}
266: \end{align}
267: \end{subequations}
268: %
269: where $O_\lambda^L=(1-\gamma_5)\gamma_\lambda$, and
270: $d'=d\,\cos\theta_C+s\,\sin\theta_C$,
271: $s'=-d\,\sin\theta_C+s\,\cos\theta_C$
272: are the superpositions of $d$- and $s$-quark
273: states and $\theta_C$ is a Cabibbo angle ($\sin^2 \theta_C \approx 0.05$).
274: For simplicity, we neglect contributions from the third generation
275: of quarks and leptons. The superscript $L$ in Eqs.(\ref{cc}) indicates that
276: only left doublets participate in the CC weak interaction.
277:
278: The neutral current can be written as
279: %
280: \begin{subequations}\label{NC}
281: \begin{align}
282: \label{NC:l}
283: j_\lambda^0 &= \sum_{\ell} \bar\ell(g_V^l-g_A^l\gamma_5)\gamma_\lambda
284: \ell, \\
285: \label{NC:h}
286: J_\lambda^0 &= \sum_{q} \bar q(g_V^q-g_A^q\gamma_5)\gamma_\lambda q,
287: \end{align}
288: \end{subequations}
289: %
290: where the sum is taken over all types of leptons ($\ell=e,\nu_e,\mu,\nu_\mu$)
291: and quarks ($q=u,d,c,s$). The vector and axial charges of quarks and
292: leptons in the SM in terms of the weak mixing angle $\theta_W$ can be found in,
293: e.g., \cite{IoKhLi84}.
294:
295: \subsection{Charged-curent neutrino scattering}
296: \label{sec:cc}
297:
298: We first consider the CC (anti)neutrino inelastic inclusive scattering.
299: In inclusive scattering, the final hadronic state is not
300: detected and the differential cross section can be written as
301: (see, e.g., \cite{IoKhLi84})
302: %
303: \begin{equation}
304: \ud^3 \sigma_{\text{CC}} =
305: \frac{{2\pi G_F^2}/{(4\pi)^3}}{(1+Q^2/M_W^2)^2}
306: L_{\mu\lambda} W_{\mu\lambda}
307: \frac{\ud^3k'}{(p\cdot k)E'} ,
308: \label{CC:xsec}
309: \end{equation}
310: %
311: where $G_F$ is the Fermi weak coupling constant; $M_W$ is the $W$-boson mass;
312: $p$ is the target four-momentum; $k=(E,\bm{k})$ and $k'=(E',\bm{k'})$ are four-momenta of the
313: incoming and outgoing lepton, respectively; $q=k-k'$ is
314: four-momentum transfer and $Q^2=-q^2$.
315: %
316: The tensors $L_{\mu\lambda}$ and $W_{\mu\lambda}$
317: describe the interaction of the $W$ boson with leptons and hadrons, respectively.
318: If the polarization of
319: the outgoing lepton is not detected, then the leptonic tensors for
320: neutrino and antineutrino scattering are
321: %
322: %\begin{subequations}\label{CC:L}
323: \begin{align}
324: \label{CC:L}
325: L_{\mu\lambda}^{(\nu,\bar \nu)} &=
326: % 2\Tr\left[
327: %(1-\gamma_5)\dirac{k}\gamma_\mu\dirac{k'}\gamma_\lambda
328: %\right]
329: %\notag \\
330: %&
331: %=
332: 8\left(
333: k_\mu k'_\lambda + k_\lambda k'_\mu - k\cdot k' g_{\mu\lambda }
334: \pm i\,\varepsilon_{\mu\lambda}(k,k') \right),
335: %\\
336: %L_{\mu\lambda}^{(\bar\nu)} &= L_{\lambda\mu}^{(\nu)},
337: \end{align}
338: %\end{subequations}
339: %
340: where the sign $+(-)$ corresponds to the neutrino (antineutrino).
341: We use the contracted notation
342: $\ceps_{\mu\lambda}(a,b)=\ceps_{\mu\lambda\alpha\beta}a^\alpha b^\beta$.
343: %
344: The hadronic tensor $W_{\mu\lambda}$ is the sum of CC matrix
345: elements over all possible final hadronic states.
346: For the neutrino we have
347: %
348: \begin{align}
349: W_{\mu\lambda}^{(\nu)}(p,q) &= \frac{1}{4\pi}\sum_{f}
350: (2\pi)^4\delta(p+q-p_f)
351: \bra{p}{J_\mu^+}^\dagger(0)\ket{f}\bra{f}J_\lambda^+(0)\ket{p},
352: \label{CC:W}
353: \end{align}
354: %
355: where the current in the SM is given by \eq{cc:h}.
356: The antineutrino tensor corresponds to the exchange of the $W^-$ boson and is given
357: by a similar equation with the current $J_\lambda^+$ replaced by $J_\lambda^-$.
358:
359:
360: For the scattering from an unpolarized target, there are five independent
361: structure functions in the hadronic tensor (\ref{CC:W}) for either
362: the neutrino or antineutrino (see, e.g., \cite{IoKhLi84})
363: %
364: \begin{equation}
365: \begin{split}
366: W_{\mu\lambda }(p,q) &=
367: %-\widetilde g_{\mu\lambda }\, F_1
368: \left( \frac{q_\mu q_\lambda}{q^2} - g_{\mu\lambda}\right) F_1
369: +
370: %\widetilde p_\mu \widetilde p_\lambda \frac{F_2}{p\cdot q}
371: \left(p_\mu - q_\mu\frac{p\cdot q}{q^2}\right)
372: \left(p_\lambda - q_\lambda\frac{p\cdot q}{q^2}\right)
373: \frac{F_2}{p\cdot q}
374: \\
375: &
376: + i\,\varepsilon_{\mu\lambda}(p,q)\frac{F_3}{2p\cdot q}
377: +\frac{q_\mu q_\lambda}{Q^2}F_4
378: +\frac{q_\mu p_\lambda + q_\lambda p_\mu}{p\cdot q}F_5 .
379: \end{split}
380: \label{CC:SF}
381: \end{equation}
382: %
383: We use the normalization of states
384: $\langle p|p'\rangle = 2E_{\bm{p}}(2\pi)^3 \delta(\bm{p}-\bm{p}')$
385: for both the bosons and fermions.
386: In this normalization the hadronic tensor (\ref{CC:W})
387: and the structure functions are dimensionless.
388: %
389: The terms with $F_1$ and $F_2$ are similar to those in charged-lepton
390: scattering. They originate from vector-vector and
391: axial-axial correlations in \eq{CC:W}. The antisymmetric term ($F_3$)
392: describes parity-violating vector-axial and axial-vector transitions.
393: The terms $F_4$ and $F_5$ are present because of nonconservation of the axial current.
394:
395:
396: The neutrino and antineutrino structure functions are apparently
397: different. We will also consider the sum and the difference of neutrino and
398: antineutrino structure functions, which have definite $C$-parity
399: %
400: %\begin{subequations}
401: \begin{align}\label{SF:C}
402: F_i^{\nu \pm \bar\nu} &= F_i^\nu \pm F_i^{\bar\nu},
403: %\\
404: %F_i^{\nu-\bar\nu} &= F_i^\nu - F_i^{\bar\nu}.
405: \end{align}
406: %\end{subequations}
407: %
408:
409:
410: Contracting the leptonic and hadronic tensors, we obtain the explicit form of
411: the differential cross section in terms of the structure functions.
412: Using the usual variables $x=Q^2/(2p\cdot q)$
413: and $y=p\cdot q/p\cdot k$ we have
414: %
415: \begin{align}
416: \label{CC:xsec:xy}
417: \frac{\ud^2\sigma^{(\nu,\bar\nu)}_{\mathrm{CC}}}{\ud x\ud y} &=
418: \frac{G_F^2 (p\cdot k)/\pi}{(1+Q^2/M_W^2)^2}
419: \sum_{i=1}^5 Y_i F_i^{(\nu,\bar\nu)}.
420: \end{align}
421: %
422: The kinematical factors $Y_i$ read as follows
423: %
424: \begin{subequations}\label{Y}
425: \begin{eqnarray}
426: Y_1 &=& y^2x \frac{{Q'}^2}{Q^2} \left(1-\frac{{m'}^2}{2Q^2}\right),\\
427: Y_2 &=& \left(1-\frac{y{Q'}^2}{2Q^2}\right)^2 -
428: \frac{y^2{Q'}^2}{4Q^2}\left(1+\frac{p^2Q^2}{(p\cdot q)^2}\right),\\
429: Y_3 &=& \pm\, xy \left(1-\frac{y{Q'}^2}{2Q^2}\right),\\
430: Y_4 &=& \frac{y{Q'}^2}{4Q^2}\frac{{m'}^2}{p\cdot k}, \\
431: Y_5 &=& -\frac{{m'}^2}{p\cdot k},
432: \end{eqnarray}
433: \end{subequations}
434: %
435: where the sign $+(-)$ refers to neutrino
436: (antineutrino) scattering, $m'$ is the mass of the outgoing charged
437: lepton and ${Q'}^2=Q^2+{m'}^2$. We keep the lepton mass terms for
438: completeness. Although these terms are tiny in $\nu_e$ and $\nu_\mu$
439: scattering, they are not negligible in $\nu_\tau$ scattering. The
440: contributions from the structure functions $F_4$ and $F_5$ to the neutrino
441: production cross section are suppessed at high energy by a small ratio
442: ${m'}^2/p\cdot k$.
443:
444:
445: The structure functions can be related to the virtual
446: boson helicity cross sections by projecting \eq{CC:SF} onto the states with
447: definite polarizations of an intermediate vector boson
448: [for simplicity, we suppress explicit notation for (anti)neutrino hadronic
449: tensor]
450: %
451: \begin{equation}
452: W_h = {e^\mu_h}^* W_{\mu\nu}{e^\nu_h},
453: \label{SF:hel}
454: \end{equation}
455: %
456: where $e^\mu_h$ is the polarization vector of the virtual boson in the helicity
457: state $h$ ($h=\pm 1$ corresponds to two transverse polarizations, and
458: $h=0$ to the longitudinal polarization).
459: The relation between the helicity structure functions $W_h$ and
460: $F_{1,2,3}$ can be derived from \eq{CC:SF} using an
461: explicit form of polarization vectors
462: and the orthogonality and normalization conditions for polarization
463: vectors (see, e.g., \cite{IoKhLi84,KP04}). We have
464: %
465: \begin{subequations}\label{hel:123}
466: \begin{align}
467: W_{\pm 1} &= F_1 \pm \gamma F_3,
468: \\
469: W_0 &= \gamma^2 F_2/(2x)-F_1.
470: \end{align}
471: \end{subequations}
472: %
473: One concludes from
474: \eqs{hel:123} that $F_1$ is the transverse structure function averaged
475: over transverse polarizations and $F_3$ is determined by the right-left
476: asymmetry in helicity structure functions $W_{+1} - W_{-1}$.
477: Below, we also use $F_T=2xF_1$, $F_L=2xW_0$ and $R=F_L/F_T$.
478:
479: %%
480: \subsection{Neutral-current neutrino scattering}
481: \label{sec:nc}
482: %%
483:
484:
485: The NC hadronic tensor is given by \eq{CC:W}, in which the charged
486: current must be replaced by the neutral current. The leptonic tensor
487: in this case is given by \eq{CC:L} with the overall factor $1/2$, reflecting the
488: fact that the neutrino can only be left-polarized (and the antineutrino,
489: right-polarized). As a result, the NC cross section has the overall
490: factor $1/2$ compared to \eq{CC:xsec:xy},
491: %
492: \begin{eqnarray}
493: \label{NC:xsec:xy}
494: \frac{\ud^2\sigma^{(\nu,\bar\nu)}_{\text{CC}}}{\ud x\ud y} &=&
495: \frac{G_F^2 (p\cdot k)/(2\pi)}{(1+Q^2/M_Z^2)^2}
496: \sum_{i=1}^5 Y_i F_i^Z,
497: \end{eqnarray}
498: %
499: where $M_Z$ is the mass of the $Z$ boson and
500: the kinematical factors $Y_i$ are obtained from
501: Eqs.(\ref{Y}) by taking the limit $m'\to0$. Therefore, the structure
502: functions $F_{4}$ and $F_{5}$ do not contribute to the NC cross
503: section.
504: We also comment that neutrino and antineutrino NC structure functions of the type $i$
505: are identical, because the neutrino and antineutrino in NC scattering couple
506: to the same hadronic current.
507:
508: %%
509: \subsection{Neutrino structure functions at high $Q^2$}
510: \label{sec:sf:high-q}
511: %%
512:
513: At high $Q^2$, above the
514: resonance region, the structure functions are usually described in QCD as
515: a series in $Q^{-2}$ on the basis of the operator product expansion of
516: the correlator of the weak currents (twist expansion) \cite{OPE}. The
517: leading twist (LT) terms correspond to quasifree scattering off quarks
518: corrected for gluon radiation effects. In this approximation the structure
519: functions are given in terms of parton distributions or PDFs
520: (see, e.g., \cite{handbook,IoKhLi84}). The PDFs
521: are universal high-momentum transfer characteristics of the target. The
522: PDFs have a nonperturbative origin and their dependence on the Bjorken
523: variable $x$ can not be calculated in perturbative QCD. However, the
524: dependence of PDFs on momentum transfer is governed by the perturbation
525: theory in strong coupling constant $\as$ at the scale $Q^2$ (DGLAP
526: evolution equations \cite{DGLAP}). Currently, the coefficient and the
527: splitting functions, which determine the QCD evolution, are known up to
528: two-loop approximation (NNLO approximation) \cite{C-NNLO,P-NNLO}.
529:
530:
531: Along with the LT terms, the higher
532: order $Q^{-2}$ terms have to be taken into account (higher twists or HT).
533: The HT terms can be of two different sources: (i) the kinematical target mass
534: terms which can be approximately resummed and absorbed into the LT terms
535: according to \cite{GeoPol76,Nacht} and (ii) the dynamical HT terms which
536: are related to quark-gluon correlation effects.
537: In summary, the structure function of type $i$ can be written as a power
538: series
539: %
540: \begin{equation}
541: F_i(x,Q^2) = F_i^{\text{TMC}}(x,Q^2)
542: + H_i^{(4)}/Q^{2}
543: % + {H_i^{(6)}(x,Q^2)}Q^{-4}
544: + \cdots,
545: \end{equation}
546: %
547: where $F_i^{\text{TMC}}$ is the LT structure function
548: corrected for the target mass
549: effects and $H_i^{(t)}$ are the functions of $x$ and $Q^2$ describing the
550: strength of the HT terms of twist $t$. In this paper the target mass
551: corrections are computed using the approach of Ref.\cite{GeoPol76}. In
552: order to keep the correct threshold behaviour of structure functions for $x
553: \to 1$, we expand $F_i^{\text{TMC}}$ in a power series in
554: $Q^{-2}$ and keep the terms to the order $Q^{-2}$~\cite{KP04}.
555:
556: In the numerical analysis the LT structure
557: functions are computed using both the PDFs and the coefficient
558: functions to the NNLO approximation.
559: We use the PDFs and HT of Ref.\cite{a02}, obtained from
560: a new fits optimized at low $Q^2$ and including additional data.
561: %
562: It should be noted that unlike the PDFs the
563: HT terms are not universal and generally depend on the type of the
564: structure function $i$ as well as on the type of interaction.
565: In order to evaluate HT in neutrino DIS, we assume that the ratio $H_i/F_i^{\rm LT}$
566: is similar for CL and neutrino structure functions as a working hypothesis.
567: That allows us to use the phenomenological HT terms extracted from the fits
568: to CL DIS data. We also assume no HT terms for $F_3$ in the calculations of
569: nuclear structure functions and differential cross sections presented in
570: Sec.~\ref{sec:res}.
571:
572: In the calculation of neutrino cross sections for the structure function $F_5$
573: we use the Albright--Jarlskog relation $2xF_5=F_2$ \cite{AJ75}. Recently,
574: it was argued that this relation survives QCD higher order corrections and
575: the target mass corrections \cite{KR02}. For $F_4$ we will use the
576: relation $F_4=F_2/(2x)-F_1$ which replaces the Albright--Jarlskog relation
577: $F_4=0$ for massless quarks if the target mass corrections are taken into
578: account \cite{KR02}.
579:
580:
581: %%
582: \subsection{Neutrino structure functions at low $Q^2$}
583: \label{sec:sf:low-q}
584: %%
585:
586: We note that even for high-energy scattering in the fixed-target
587: experiments the events with small Bjorken $x$ typically have the
588: values of $Q^2$ below $1\gevsq$. In this Section we discuss the
589: vector- and the axial-current contributions to neutrino structure
590: functions at low $Q^2$ and outline the model which will be used in our
591: studies of neutrino differential cross sections.
592: In this context it is useful to review the requirements which follow from
593: conservation of the vector current and partial conservation of the axial current.
594: It follows from \Eqs{SF:hel}{CC:W} that the structure functions
595: $F_T$ and $F_L$ can be written as
596: %
597: \begin{equation}
598: \label{SF:TL}
599: F_{T,L} = \frac{\gamma}{\pi} Q^2 \sigma_{T,L},
600: \end{equation}
601: %
602: where $\sigma_{T(L)}$ refers to the total cross section
603: induced by the transverse (longitudinal) component of
604: the weak current $J_\lambda$,
605: %
606: \begin{equation}
607: \label{sigma:TL}
608: \sigma_{T,L} =
609: \frac{1}{4 j}\sum_{f}(2\pi)^4\delta(p+q-p_f)
610: |\bra{p}e_{T,L}\cdot J(0)\ket{f}|^2,
611: \end{equation}
612: %
613: where $j=\left((p\cdot q)^2-p^2 q^2\right)^{1/2}$ is the invarint flux of
614: the virtual boson with four-momentum $q$ on the target with four-momentum $p$
615: (for the nucleon at rest $j=M|\bm{q}|$, with $M$ the nucleon mass) and the
616: sum is taken over all possible final states.
617: The transverse cross section does
618: not vanish in the limit $Q^2\to 0$; therefore $F_T$ vanishes as
619: $Q^2$ in this limit. This holds for both the vector- and the axial-current
620: contributions.
621:
622: In the longitudinal channel the low-$Q$ behavior of the vector- and
623: axial-current parts are different. We first consider the contribution from
624: the \emph{vector current}.
625: The conservation of the vector current (CVC) suggests $q_\mu W_{\mu\nu}=0$ for the vector-current
626: part of the hadronic tensor. From this condition we conclude that $\FLvc$
627: vanishes faster than $\FTvc$ at low $Q^2$ and $\FLvc/\FTvc\sim Q^2/q_0^2$,
628: similar to the charged-lepton case.
629:
630:
631: In contrast to the vector current, the axial current is not
632: conserved and, according to the hypothesis of partial conservation of the axial current (PCAC),
633: its divergence is proportional
634: to the pion field \cite{Adler:1964yx},
635: %
636: \begin{equation}
637: \label{pcac}
638: \partial A^\pm = f_\pi m_\pi^2 \varphi^\pm,
639: \end{equation}
640: %
641: where $m_\pi$ is the pion mass and $f_\pi=0.93 m_\pi$ is the pion decay
642: constant and $\varphi^\pm$ is the pion field in the corresponding charge
643: state. The PCAC relation can be used to compute the axial current
644: contribution to the longitudinal structure function
645: $\FLac$ in the region of low momentum transfer.
646: In this context it is useful to explicitly separate
647: the pion contribution to the axial current,
648: %
649: \begin{equation}
650: \label{A:prim}
651: A_\mu = -f_\pi\partial_\mu\varphi + A_\mu',
652: \end{equation}
653: %
654: where the operator $A'$ describes the contributions from heavy hadron states, i.e. the
655: contributions from axial-vector meson states, $\rho\pi$ continuum, etc.
656: %
657: It is important to notice that the pion derivative term
658: does not contribute to the structure functions \cite{Kopeliovich:1992ym}. This
659: is because the matrix elements of $\partial_\mu\varphi$ are proportional
660: to the momentum transfer $q_\mu$. These terms give a vanishing contribution
661: when contracted with the boson polarization vectors because of the
662: orthogonality condition $e_h\cdot q=0$ for any helicity state $h$.
663: Therefore, the axial-vector
664: operator $A_\mu$ can be replaced by $A_\mu'$ everywhere in \eqs{CC:W}.
665: The PCAC relation for $A'$ follows from \eq{pcac}:
666: %
667: \begin{equation}
668: \label{pcac:prim}
669: \partial {A'}^\pm = f_\pi j_\pi^\pm,
670: \end{equation}
671: %
672: where $j_\pi^\pm=(\partial^2+m_\pi^2)\varphi^\pm$ is the pion current.
673: In order to calculate $F_L$ we separate the contribution of
674: the axial current to the hadronic tensor (\ref{CC:W}), contract it
675: with the polarization vector $e_0$ and replace $A$ with $A'$.%
676: \footnote{To this end a covariant form of longitudinal vector
677: $e_0^\mu = \left(q^\mu+p^\mu Q^2/p\cdot q\right)/Q$
678: is useful.}
679: Using \eq{pcac:prim} we have
680: %
681: \begin{equation}
682: \label{FL:ac}
683: \FLac = \gamma^{3} \FLpcac
684: + 2\gamma^3\frac{Q^2 f_\pi \sigma'_\pi}{\pi |\bm{q}|}
685: + \widetilde{F}_L^{\textsc{ac}},
686: \end{equation}
687: %
688: where $\FLpcac=f_\pi^2\sigma_\pi/\pi$ and $\sigma_\pi=\sigma_\pi(s,Q^2)$
689: is the total cross section for scattering of a virtual pion with
690: four-momentum $q$ and the center-of-mass energy squared $s=(p+q)^2$
691: %
692: \begin{equation}
693: \label{xsec:pi}
694: \sigma _\pi = \frac{1}{4 j}\sum_{f}(2\pi)^4\delta(p+q-p_f)
695: |\bra{p} j_\pi(0)\ket{f}|^2.
696: \end{equation}
697: %
698: The flux $j$ is defined in \eq{sigma:TL}. Note also that $\pi^+$ cross
699: section corresponds to the neutrino, and $\pi^-$ to the antineutrino. The quantity
700: $\sigma'_\pi$ describes the interference between the divergence of the
701: axial current and the operator $A'_z$ in the hadronic tensor
702: %
703: \begin{equation}
704: \label{sig:prim}
705: \sigma'_\pi = \frac{1}{4 j}\sum_{f'}(2\pi)^4\delta(p+q-p_{f'})
706: \Im\left( \bra{p} j_\pi(0)\ket{f'}\bra{f'} {A'_z(0)}^\dagger \ket{p}\right).
707: \end{equation}
708: %
709: The last term in \eq{FL:ac} is similar to $\FLvc$ and vanishes as $Q^4$.
710:
711: It follows from the relation $F_2 = (F_L+F_T)/\gamma^2$ and (\ref{FL:ac})
712: that the structure function $F_2$ at low $Q^2$ is dominated by the
713: $\FLpcac$ term.
714: The PCAC contribution to the neutrino cross sections at small values of $Q^2$
715: was experimentally tested in \cite{PCAC:BEBC}.
716: On the other hand, the PCAC term should vanish at high $Q^2$.
717: In order to interpolate between low and high $Q^2$, we introduce a
718: form factor $f_{\textsc{pcac}}(Q^2)$
719: %
720: \begin{equation}
721: \label{FL:PCAC:2}
722: \FLpcac = \frac{f_\pi^2\sigma _\pi}{\pi}f_{\textsc{pcac}}(Q^2).
723: \end{equation}
724: %
725: In the numerical analysis we assume a
726: dipole form $f_{\textsc{pcac}}(Q^2)=(1+Q^2/M_{\textsc{pcac}}^2)^{-2}$
727: with $M_{\textsc{pcac}}$ the mass scale controlling
728: the PCAC mechanism. Since the pion pole does not contribute
729: to the structure functions, the scale $M_{\textsc{pcac}}$ is not
730: determined by the pion mass, but rather it is related to higher mass states like
731: $a_1$ meson, $\rho \pi$ continuum etc.
732: In the present paper we fix the numerical value of $M_{\textsc{pcac}}$ phenomenologically
733: using low-$Q^2$ cross section data from the CHORUS experiment~\cite{chorus-xsec}
734: (see Sec.~\ref{sec:res:xsec}).
735:
736:
737: \section{Nuclear aspects of neutrino scattering}
738: \label{sec:nuke}
739:
740: In this Section we summarize the theoretical framework used in this
741: paper to calculate the (anti)neutrino structure functions and
742: cross sections for nuclear targets.
743: A similar approach was recently applied in the studies of charged-lepton
744: nuclear DIS~\cite{KP04}.
745: In Sec.~\ref{sec:nuke:incoh} we review calculations of nuclear structure
746: functions in the impulse approximation with off-shell corrections, in
747: Sec.~\ref{sec:PI} we discuss nuclear pion correction, in
748: Sec.~\ref{sec:nuke:coh} we deal with nuclear effects from
749: coherent nuclear interactions of hadronic component of an intermediate boson,
750: which are relevant at small $x$.
751:
752:
753:
754: \subsection{Incoherent scattering from bound nucleons}
755: \label{sec:nuke:incoh}
756:
757: In the region of large Bjorken $x$ the nuclear DIS is usually treated in
758: impulse approximation, \ie as an incoherent sum over bound protons and
759: neutrons.
760: In this approximation the nuclear structure functions can be written in terms
761: of the convolution of the nuclear spectral function and off-shell nucleon
762: structure functions.
763: In the target rest frame we have (for a derivation and
764: more details see \cite{KP04,Ku89,KPW94,Ku98})
765: %
766: \begin{subequations}
767: \label{FA}
768: \begin{align}
769: F_T^A(x,Q^2) &= \sum_{\tau=p,n}\int [\ud p]
770: {\mathcal P}^\tau(\varepsilon,\bm{p})\,
771: \left(1+\frac{\gamma p_z}{M}\right)
772: \left(
773: F_T^\tau + \frac{2{x'}^2\bm{p}_\perp^2}{Q^2}F_2^\tau
774: \right),
775: \label{FA-T}
776: \\
777: F_L^A(x,Q^2) &= \sum_{\tau=p,n}\int [\ud p]
778: {\mathcal P}^\tau(\varepsilon,\bm{p})\,
779: \left(1+\frac{\gamma p_z}{M}\right)
780: \left(
781: F_L^\tau + \frac{4{x'}^2\bm{p}_\perp^2}{Q^2}F_2^\tau
782: \right),
783: \label{FA-L}
784: \\
785: \gamma^2 F_2^A(x,Q^2) &=
786: \sum_{\tau=p,n}\int [\ud p]
787: {\mathcal P}^\tau(\varepsilon,\bm{p})\,
788: \left(1+\frac{\gamma p_z}{M}\right)
789: \left({\gamma'}^2 +\frac{6{x'}^2 \bm{p}_\perp^2}{Q^2} \right)
790: F_2^\tau. %(x',Q^2;p^2).
791: \label{FA-2}
792: \\
793: xF_3^A(x,Q^2) &=
794: \sum_{\tau=p,n}\int [\ud p]
795: {\mathcal P}^\tau(\varepsilon,\bm{p})\,
796: \left(1+\frac{p_z}{\gamma M}\right)
797: x'F_3^\tau. %(x',Q^2;p^2).
798: \label{FA-3}
799: \end{align}
800: \end{subequations}
801: %
802: where the integration is taken over the four-momentum of the bound nucleon
803: $p=(M+\ceps,\,\bm{p})$ and $[\ud p]=\ud\ceps\,\ud^3\bm{p}/(2\pi)^4$.
804: The axis $z$ is chosen such that
805: $q=(q_0,\bm{0}_\perp,-|\bm{q}|)$,
806: $\bm{p}_\perp$ is the transverse nucleon momentum, and
807: $\gamma=|\bm{q}|/q_0$.
808: The energy and momentum distribution of bound nucleons is
809: described by the proton (neutron) nuclear spectral function
810: $\mathcal{P}^{p(n)}(\varepsilon,\bm{p})$ which is normalized to the
811: proton (neutron) number in a nucleus.
812: %
813: In the integrand $F_i^{p(n)}$ are the structure
814: functions of bound proton (neutron), which
815: depend on the Bjorken variable $x'=Q^2/(2p\cdot q)$, momentum transfer
816: square $Q^2$ and generally on the nucleon invariant mass squared
817: $p^2=(M+\ceps)^2-\bm{p}^2$.
818: %
819: The relation between the $F_T$, $F_L$ and $F_2$ of the off-shell nucleon
820: is similar to (\ref{hel:123}), \ie ${\gamma'}^2 F_2=F_T+F_L$ with
821: ${\gamma'}^2=1+4{x'}^2p^2/Q^2$. Note that $\gamma'=\gamma$ for the
822: vanishing momentum of the bound nucleon. It should be also noted that the
823: transverse motion of the bound nucleon in the target causes the mixture of
824: different structure functions in \Eqs{FA-T}{FA-L} to order
825: $\bm{p}_\perp^2/(M|\bm{q}|)$.
826:
827:
828: \subsubsection{Isoscalar and isovector contributions}
829: \label{sec:I01}
830:
831: Since complex nuclei typically have different numbers of protons and
832: neutrons, the nuclear structure functions generally have both the
833: \emph{isoscalar} and the \emph{isovector} parts.
834: In order to separate the isoscalar and isovector contributions in
835: Eqs.(\ref{FA}), we write the isoscalar
836: ($\mathcal{P}^{p+n}=\mathcal{P}^p+\mathcal{P}^n$)
837: and isovector ($\mathcal{P}^{p-n}=\mathcal{P}^p-\mathcal{P}^n$)
838: nuclear spectral functions as
839: %
840: \begin{subequations}
841: \label{spfn:01}
842: \begin{eqnarray}
843: \label{spfn:0}
844: \mathcal{P}^{p+n} &=& A \mathcal{P}_0,\\
845: \mathcal{P}^{p-n} &=& (Z-N)\mathcal{P}_1,
846: \label{spfn:1}
847: \end{eqnarray}
848: \end{subequations}
849: %
850: where the reduced spectral functions $\mathcal{P}_{0}$ and
851: $\mathcal{P}_{1}$ are normalized to unity.
852: %
853: Using \eq{spfn:01} we explicitly write Eqs.(\ref{FA}) in
854: terms of isoscalar and isovector contributions
855: %
856: \begin{equation}
857: \label{nuke:FA}
858: F_i^A/A = \left\langle F_i^N \right\rangle_0 +
859: \frac{\beta}{2}\left\langle F_i^{p-n} \right\rangle_1,
860: \end{equation}
861: %
862: where $F_i^N=\tfrac12(F_i^p+F_i^n)$, $F_i^{p-n}=F_i^p-F_i^n$ for the
863: structure function of type $i$ and
864: the parameter
865: $\beta=(Z-N)/A$ describes the excess of protons over neutrons in a nucleus.
866: The quantities $\left\langle F \right\rangle_{0}$ and
867: $\left\langle F \right\rangle_{1}$ are the
868: contracted notations of the integration in
869: Eqs.(\ref{FA}) with reduced spectral
870: functions $\mathcal{P}_0$ and $\mathcal{P}_1$, respectively.
871: The model of $\mathcal{P}_0$ and $\mathcal{P}_1$, which is used in
872: numerical applications in this paper, is discussed in more
873: detail in Ref.\cite{KP04}.
874:
875: %%
876: %% C-EVEN & C-ODD CC SF
877: %%
878:
879: Equation (\ref{nuke:FA}) is generic and can be applied to any structure function.
880: We now discuss in more detail the $\nu \pm \bar\nu$
881: combinations of neutrino structure functions with definite $C$-parity (see \eq{SF:C}).
882: Let us first consider symmetric $\nu + \bar\nu$ combination. From \eq{nuke:FA} we have
883: %
884: \begin{equation}
885: \label{nuke:C-even}
886: F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A}/A = \left\langle F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)N} \right\rangle_0
887: + ({\beta}/{2})\left\langle F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(p-n)} \right\rangle_1
888: \end{equation}
889: %
890: for any type $i$ of the structure function.
891:
892: In the absence of heavy quark contributions we have
893: $F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)p}=F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)n}$ because of the isospin
894: symmetry. For this reason the isovector term in
895: \eq{nuke:C-even} should vanish.
896: %
897: However, we should remark that the isospin relations for structure
898: functions for neutrino CC scattering are violated by the mixing of different
899: quark generations and the $c$-quark mass effect, even in the presence of
900: exact isospin symmetry on the PDF level. This effect results in the
901: nonzero difference $F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(p-n)} \propto \sin^2\theta_C$ with
902: $\theta_C$ the Cabbibo mixing angle. Since the parameter $\beta$ is
903: small, this effect is suppressed in \eq{nuke:C-even} and, therefore, it is
904: a good approximation to keep only the isoscalar term in \eq{nuke:C-even}.
905:
906: Let us now discuss the $\nu{-}\bar\nu$ asymmetry in the nuclear structure
907: functions. From \eq{nuke:FA} we have for the nuclear structure function
908: of the type $i$
909: %
910: \begin{equation}
911: \label{nuke:C-odd}
912: F_i^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A}/A =
913: \left\langle F_i^{(\nu-\bar\nu)N} \right\rangle_0 +
914: ({\beta}/{2})\left\langle F_i^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(p-n)} \right\rangle_1.
915: \end{equation}
916: %
917: The application of this equation to $F_2$ and $xF_3$ requires somewhat
918: more attention. We first consider $F_2^{\nu-\bar\nu}$ (a similar discussion also
919: applies to $F_T$ and $F_L$). This structure function is $C$-odd and
920: dominated by the isovector quark distributions. In the absence of the Cabbibo
921: mixing effect we have
922: $F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)p}=-F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)n}$. It follows from this
923: relation that the first term in the right side of \eq{nuke:C-odd} vanishes
924: and the nuclear structure function is determined by the second (isovector)
925: term. Nuclear effects in this case are illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:non0}.
926:
927: However, the isospin relations for structure functions
928: are violated by the heavy quark effect and
929: the Cabbibo mixing angle, as was discussed above. This effect generates a
930: nonzero value of $F_2^{(\nu{-}\bar\nu)N}\propto\sin^2\theta_C$.
931: Surprisingly, this effect should not be
932: neglected in the analysis of nuclear corrections for $\nu-\bar \nu$
933: asymmeries even in the first approximation. This is because the isovector
934: contribution in \eq{nuke:C-odd} is suppressed by the factor $\beta$ and
935: thus the relative effect of $F_2^{(\nu{-}\bar\nu)N}$ is enhanced.
936: %
937: This effect is further discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:res}, where we present
938: the results of numerical calculation of nuclear structure functions.
939:
940:
941: Let us discuss \eq{nuke:C-odd} in application to $xF_3$.
942: Note that $xF_3^{\nu-\bar\nu}$ is $C$ even
943: and includes the contribution from the
944: light quarks, which determines the isovector nuclear correction in
945: \eq{nuke:C-odd}, and the $s$-quark contribution to
946: the isoscalar part in \eq{nuke:C-odd}. In fact, the difference
947: $xF_3^{(\nu{-}\bar\nu)N}$ is driven by the $s$-quark distribution [recall
948: that in the parton model $xF_3^{(\nu{-}\bar\nu)N}=x(s+\bar s)$]. Because
949: $\beta$ is a small parameter, the relative contribution from the isoscalar
950: term in \eq{nuke:C-odd} is enhanced and we conclude that the asymmetry
951: $xF_3^{\nu-\bar\nu}$ in nuclei is dominated by the strange quark
952: contribution.
953:
954:
955: \begin{figure}[htb]
956: \begin{center}
957: \shrinkvspace
958: %\epsfig{file=non0Pb_non0p.eps,width=12.0cm}
959: \epsfig{file=non0Pb_non0p.eps,width=10.0cm}
960: \caption{%
961: The isovector nuclear effect
962: $\langle F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)p}\rangle_1/F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)p}$ calculated for
963: ${}^{207}$Pb at $Q^2=5\gevsq$ with and without off-shell correction using
964: the isovector nuclear spectral function of Ref.\cite{KP04}. The labels on
965: the curves correspond to effects due to Fermi motion and nuclear binding
966: (FMB) and off-shell correction (OS), which was calculated using
967: \eq{delf:fit}.
968: }
969: \label{fig:non0}
970: \shrinkvspace
971: \shrinkvspace
972: \end{center}
973: \end{figure}
974:
975:
976:
977: \subsubsection{Off-shell effects}
978: \label{sec:OS}
979:
980: The structure functions of the bound proton and neutron can differ from
981: those of the free proton and neutron. In the approach discussed, this
982: effect is related to analytical continuation of the structure functions to
983: the off-shell region and the dependence on the nucleon invariant mass $p^2$.
984: One can separate the two sources of $p^2$ dependence:
985: % i) $p^2$ dependence
986: % originating to order $p^2/Q^2$ because of target mass correction
987: (i) the target mass correction leading to the terms of the order $p^2/Q^2$
988: and
989: (ii)
990: off-shell dependence of LT structure functions (or parton distributions).
991: The off-shell dependence of the target mass effect is evaluated by the
992: replacement $M^2\to p^2$ in the expressions of Ref.\cite{GeoPol76}.
993: In order to facilitate the discussion of the off-shell dependence of the LT
994: structure functions, we note that characteristic momenta and energies of
995: the bound nucleon are small compared to the nucleon mass, and the nucleon
996: virtuality $v=(p^2-M^2)/M^2$ is a small parameter.
997: We then expand the LT structure functions in
998: this parameter and keep the terms to the first order in $v$,
999: %
1000: \begin{align}
1001: \label{SF:OS}
1002: F_2^{\mathrm{LT}}(x,Q^2,p^2) &=
1003: F_2^{\mathrm{LT}}(x,Q^2)\left( 1+\delta f_2(x,Q^2)\,v \right),\\
1004: \label{delf}
1005: \delta f_2 &= \partial\ln F_2^{\mathrm{LT}}/\partial\ln p^2,
1006: \end{align}
1007: %
1008: where the first term on the right in \eq{SF:OS} is the structure
1009: function of the on-mass-shell nucleon and the derivative is evaluated
1010: at $p^2=M^2$. Similar expressions can be written for other
1011: structure functions.
1012:
1013: The off-shell correction $\delta f_2$ was studied phenomenologically
1014: in \cite{KP04} by analyzing the data on the ratios of structure
1015: functions of different nuclei (EMC effect). As a result it was found
1016: that $\delta f_2$ is independent of $Q^2$ with a good accuracy and can
1017: be parametrized as
1018: %
1019: \begin{equation}
1020: \label{delf:fit}
1021: \delta f_2 = C_N (x-x_1)(x-x_0)(1+x_0 - x)
1022: \end{equation}
1023: %
1024: with the parameters extracted from the fit
1025: $C_N=8.10\pm0.30(\mathrm{stat.})\pm0.53(\mathrm{syst.})$,
1026: $x_0=0.448\pm0.005(\mathrm{stat.})\pm0.007(\mathrm{syst.})$,
1027: and $x_1=0.05$.
1028:
1029: Although the off-shell function (\ref{delf}) generally
1030: depends on the structure function type,
1031: it was assumed in Ref.\cite{KP04} that
1032: the relative off-shell effect is common for all types of
1033: structure functions (or partons) and described by the off-shell
1034: function (\ref{delf:fit}). It was tested that this assumption leads to
1035: fairly good cancellation between off-shell and nuclear shadowing effects
1036: in the normalization of the valence quark distribution. In this paper the
1037: off-shell function by \eq{delf:fit} is applied in our calculations of
1038: nuclear (anti)neutrino structure functions. The interplay between off-shell (OS) and
1039: nuclear shadowing (NS) corrections in the DIS sum rules is further studied in
1040: Sec.~\ref{sec:GLS} and \ref{sec:ASR}, where we discuss the
1041: Gross--Llewellyn-Smith and the Adler sum rules for nuclear targets.
1042:
1043:
1044: \subsection{Nuclear pion correction}
1045: \label{sec:PI}
1046:
1047: % The incoming lepton can scatter from the meson fields in nuclei that
1048: % gives rise to mesonic contribution to nuclear structure functions.
1049: The lepton scattering off the meson fields in nuclei
1050: gives rise to mesonic contribution to the nuclear structure functions
1051: (for a review see, e.g., \cite{p-w-rev,thomas-rev}).
1052: %
1053: We note that because of binding the nucleons do not
1054: carry all of the nuclear light-cone momentum and the meson
1055: contribution is important for balancing the missing momentum. At high $Q^2$
1056: the mesonic correction to nuclear structure functions can
1057: approximately be taken into account using the convolution model
1058: and the kinematics of the Bjorken limit neglecting power corrections. Then
1059: the pion correction to $F_2^A$ can be written as
1060: %
1061: \begin{equation}
1062: \label{SF:picor}
1063: \delta_\pi F_2^{A}(x,Q^2) = \sum_{\pi}\int_x\ud y\,
1064: f_{\pi/A}(y)F_2^\pi(x/y,Q^2),
1065: \end{equation}
1066: %
1067: where $f_{\pi/A}(y)$ is the distribution of nuclear pion excess%
1068: \protect\footnote{The contribution from the nucleon meson cloud should
1069: be subtracted since it is accounted for in the nucleon structure
1070: function.}
1071: %
1072: and $F_2^\pi$ is the pion structure function and the sum is taken over
1073: different pion states $\pi=\pi^+,\pi^-,\pi^0$. Similar equations can be
1074: written for the pion correction to $F_{T}$ and $F_{L}$ with the same pion
1075: distribution function.
1076: We also note that the pion correction vanishes for
1077: $F_3$. In the numerical analysis we also assume no off-shell effect in the
1078: virtual pion structure function, which would be the second order correction
1079: because (\ref{SF:picor}) is a small correction by itself.
1080:
1081:
1082: We apply \eq{SF:picor} to $\nu\pm\bar\nu$ combinations of
1083: neutrino structure functions.
1084: It is convenient to separate the isoscalar and isovector contributions in
1085: the sum over pion states in \eq{SF:picor}. We also apply the isospin
1086: relations for the CC neutrino-pion SFs ($F_2^{(\nu+\bar\nu)\pi}$ is
1087: isoscalar and independent of the pion charge state, and
1088: $F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)\pi^+}=-F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)\pi^-}$).%
1089: %
1090: \footnote{We neglect here the violation of the isospin relations because of
1091: the Cabbibo mixing angle (see Sec.~\ref{sec:I01}).}
1092: %
1093: We then have for the nuclear pion correction
1094: %
1095: \begin{subequations}\label{picor:C}
1096: \begin{align}
1097: \label{picor:C-even}
1098: \delta_\pi F_2^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A}(x,Q^2) &=
1099: \int_x\ud y\,f_{\pi/A}^0(y)F_2^{(\nu+\bar\nu)\pi^+}(x/y,Q^2),
1100: \\
1101: \label{picor:C-odd}
1102: \delta_\pi F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A}(x,Q^2) &=
1103: \int_x\ud y\,f_{\pi/A}^1(y)F_2^{(\nu-\bar\nu)\pi^+}(x/y,Q^2),
1104: \end{align}
1105: \end{subequations}
1106: %
1107: where $f_{\pi/A}^0=f_{\pi^+/A}+f_{\pi^-/A}+f_{\pi^0/A}$
1108: and $f_{\pi/A}^1=f_{\pi^+/A}-f_{\pi^-/A}$
1109: are the isoscalar and the isovector pion distributions in a nucleus.
1110: %
1111: In the applications discussed below, we neglect possible isovector
1112: contributions and use a model isoscalar pion distribution function, which
1113: obeys the constraints due to the nuclear light-cone momentum balance equation
1114: and equations of motion of the pion field in the nucleus (for more details
1115: see \cite{KP04,Ku89}).
1116:
1117:
1118: \subsection{Coherent nuclear effects (shadowing and antishadowing)}
1119: \label{sec:nuke:coh}
1120:
1121:
1122: At small $x$, at which the DIS longitudinal distance
1123: $L_I=1/(Mx)$ is large compared to typical nuclear sizes, the nuclear DIS can
1124: be viewed as a two-step process in which the intermediate boson first
1125: fluctuates into a quark-antiquark pair (or hadronic configuration) which
1126: then scatters off the nucleus.
1127: As an average lifetime of this fluctuation
1128: is large (of order $L_I$), it can undergo multiple interactions with bound
1129: nucleons (for a recent review see, \eg, \cite{p-w-rev}).
1130: In this section we discuss nuclear effects in
1131: neutrino scattering associated with this mechanism
1132: and derive corrections for different SF types for $\nu$ and $\bar\nu$
1133: interactions.
1134:
1135: The structure functions at small $x$ can be presented
1136: as a superposition of contributions from different hadronic states the
1137: virtual boson fluctuates to. For the helicity structure functions $W_0$ and
1138: $W_{\pm}$, as defined in \eq{hel:123}, we have
1139: %
1140: \begin{equation}
1141: W_h = \sum_i w_h(i) \sigma_h(i,s),
1142: \label{sum-h}
1143: \end{equation}
1144: %
1145: where $\sigma_h$ is the total cross section of scattering of the
1146: hadronic state $i$ with the given helicity $h=0,\pm 1$ off the target
1147: nucleon (or nucleus) with the center-of-mass energy $s=Q^2(1/x-1)+M^2$,
1148: and $w_h$ describes the weight of the given hadronic state in the wave
1149: function of the intermediate boson.
1150:
1151:
1152: We first consider the transverse structure functions with $h=\pm 1$
1153: and approximate the sum over hadronic states in \eq{sum-h} by
1154: a factorized form \cite{KP04}
1155: %
1156: \begin{equation}
1157: W_h(x,Q^2) = w_h(x,Q^2) \sigmabar_h(s),
1158: \label{sum-h-aprx}
1159: \end{equation}
1160: %
1161: where $\sigmabar_h$ is an \emph{effective} cross section averaged over
1162: hadronic configurations and $w_h$ is the remaining normalization factor for
1163: the given helicity $h$. At low $Q^2$ and small $x$ the effective cross
1164: section can be approximated by average vector meson cross section in the
1165: vector meson dominance model (VMD) (see, \eg, \cite{Bauer:iq}).
1166: As $Q^2$ increases, the averaging in (\ref{sum-h-aprx}) involves
1167: the rising number of active hadronic states.
1168:
1169:
1170: In the longitudinal case ($W_0$) we explicitly separate the PCAC term,
1171: \eq{FL:PCAC:2}, and assume that the rest, $\widetilde F_L$, can be expressed
1172: by an equation similar to \eq{sum-h-aprx} with an effective longitudinal cross
1173: section.
1174:
1175:
1176: In this paper we are concerned with the
1177: calculation of nuclear corrections to the structure
1178: functions and cross sections.
1179: %
1180: In the following we will assume that the normalization
1181: factors $w_h$ and the pion
1182: decay constant $f_\pi$ are not affected by nuclear effects. Then for the
1183: transverse structure functions with $h=\pm 1$ the relative nuclear
1184: correction is determined by the corresponding
1185: correction to the effective cross section,
1186: %
1187: \begin{equation}
1188: \delta\mathcal{R}_h
1189: = \frac{\delta W_h^A}{Z W_h^p + N W_h^n}
1190: = \frac{\delta\sigmabar_h^A}{Z \sigmabar_h^p + N \sigmabar_h^n},
1191: \label{relcor}
1192: \end{equation}
1193: %
1194: where $\delta W_h^A$ is the nuclear structure function
1195: of helicity $h$ with the incoherent term subtracted,
1196: $\delta W_h^A = W_h^A - Z W_h^p - N W_h^n$,
1197: and a similar definition is used for $\delta\sigmabar_h^A$.
1198: %
1199: For the longitudinal structure function the corresponding relation to
1200: the cross section will be discussed in Sec.\ref{sec:MS:L}.
1201:
1202:
1203: \subsubsection{Multiple scattering corrections to helicity amplitudes}
1204: \label{sec:MS}
1205:
1206: In order to calculate nuclear modifications of effective cross
1207: sections $\delta\sigma$ we apply the multiple scattering theory
1208: \cite{Glauber:1955qq,Gribov:1968gs}. Let $a^{p(n)}$ be the proton
1209: (neutron) effective scattering amplitude in forward direction. We will
1210: choose the normalization of the scattering amplitude such that the optical
1211: theorem reads $\Im a(s)=\sigma(s)/2$ with $\sigma$ the total cross
1212: section. For the following discussion it is convenient to write the
1213: forward scattering amplitude as
1214: %
1215: \begin{equation}\label{amp}
1216: a=(i+\alpha)\sigma/2,
1217: \end{equation}
1218: %
1219: where $\alpha=\Re a/\Im a$.
1220: The nuclear scattering amplitude $a^A$ can be written as
1221: %
1222: \begin{equation}\label{amp:A}
1223: a^A = Z\,a^p + N\,a^n + \delta a^A,
1224: \end{equation}
1225: %
1226: where the first two terms on the right side are
1227: the incoherent contributions from bound protons and neutrons.%
1228: %
1229: \footnote{The incoherent term is discussed in detail in
1230: Sec.\ref{sec:nuke:incoh} together with nuclear binding, Fermi motion and
1231: off-shell effects. Here we focus on multiple scattering corrections.}
1232: %
1233: The term $\delta a^A$ is the multiple scattering correction (MS), which can
1234: be written as
1235: %
1236: \begin{align}\label{mult:A}
1237: %\begin{split}
1238: %\delta a^A &= i a^2\mathcal{C}_2^A(a),
1239: & \delta a^A = i\int_{z_1<z_2}\hspace{-1.5em}
1240: \ud^2\bm{b}\ud z_1\ud z_2\,e^{i k_L(z_1-z_2)}
1241: a\cdot\rho(1)\, a\cdot\rho(2)
1242: %\\
1243: %& \phantom{==}
1244: %\exp\left[i\int_{z_1}^{z_2}\ud z'\left(a\cdot\rho(\bm{b},z') - k_L \right)\right],
1245: %\exp\left[
1246: \,e^{S(1,2,a)},
1247: %\right],
1248: \\
1249: %
1250: \label{mult:phi}
1251: & S(1,2,a) = i\int_{z_1}^{z_2}\ud z'
1252: % \left(
1253: a\cdot\rho(\bm{b},z'), %%- k_L
1254: % \right)
1255: %\end{split}
1256: \end{align}
1257: %
1258: where $a\cdot\rho=a^p\rho^p+a^n\rho^n$ and $\rho^{p}(\rho^{n})$ is the proton
1259: (neutron) nuclear density normalized to the proton (neutron) number
1260: and the integration is performed along the collision axis, which is
1261: chosen to be the $z$ axis, and over the transverse positions of nucleons
1262: (impact parameter $\bm{b}$).
1263: %
1264: We also use a contracted notation of the nucleon position on
1265: the collision axis $\rho(1)=\rho(\bm{b},z_1)$, etc.
1266: The exponential factor in \eq{mult:A} accounts for multiple
1267: scattering effects (see, \eg, \cite{Bauer:iq}) and
1268: for double scattering approximation $e^S$ should be replaced by 1.
1269:
1270:
1271: Amplitude (\ref{amp:A}) describes the scattering of virtual hadron
1272: configuration of the intermediate boson $W^*$ off a nucleus. In
1273: intermediate states in the MS series one considers the scattering of
1274: on-mass-shell hadronic states, and for this reason there appears a
1275: nonzero longitudinal momentum transfer $k_L$. The quantity $L_c=1/k_L$
1276: is the longitudinal coherence length of this state.
1277: % or mean time of life of such configuration.
1278: If $m$ is the mass of intermediate state,
1279: then $k_L=Mx(1+m^2/Q^2)$.
1280: Since the cross section in \eq{sum-h-aprx} reffers to the effective
1281: intermediate hadronic state, we treat $m^2=m_{\rm eff}^2$ as a parameter.
1282:
1283:
1284: Note that \eq{mult:A} was derived in the optical approximation
1285: assuming that the nuclear wave function factorizes into the product of
1286: the single particle wave functions. In this approximation possible
1287: effects of correlation between bound nucleons are neglected. We
1288: comment in this context that the correlations are relevant only if the
1289: coherence length $L_c$ is comparable to the short-range
1290: repulsive part of the nucleon-nucleon force, which is about 0.5\:Fm.
1291: However, this region is limited to relatively large $x$ at
1292: which shadowing is a small correction (see discussion in Ref.\cite{p-w-rev}).
1293: %
1294: The transverse momentum dependence of elastic scattering amplitudes
1295: was also neglected, that is justified by a small transverse size of
1296: the meson-nucleon amplitude compared to the nuclear radius.
1297:
1298:
1299: We now apply \eq{mult:A} to describe nuclear effects generated by
1300: scattering of charged intermediate
1301: $W^+$ and $W^-$ bosons. Let us first consider the contributions from
1302: the light ($u$ and $d$) quarks. In this case the scattering amplitude
1303: obeys the requirements of the isospin symmetry and we can write the relations
1304: $a(W^\pm p)=a(W^\mp n)=a^0\pm\tfrac12a^1$,
1305: where $a^0$ and $a^1$ are the scattering amplitudes corresponding to the
1306: isoscalar and isovector nucleon configuration. Using these relations we have
1307: %
1308: \begin{equation}\label{a.rho}
1309: a(W^\pm)\cdot \rho = \left(a^0 \pm \tfrac12{\beta} a^1\right)\rho_A,
1310: \end{equation}
1311: %
1312: where $\rho_A=\rho_p + \rho_n$ is the (isoscalar) nucleon density and
1313: $\beta=(\rho_p - \rho_n)/\rho_A$ is the relative proton--neutron density
1314: asymmetry. In order to facilitate the discussion of isovector effects,
1315: we assume similar shapes of the proton and neutrion densities.
1316: Then $\beta=(Z-N)/A$ is independent of the nucleon coordinate for
1317: nuclear interior. We also benefit from the fact that $\beta$ is a small
1318: parameter for heavy nuclei, and expand the multiple scattering series
1319: (\ref{mult:A}) in $\beta$ and keep the terms to first order in $\beta$.
1320: Then for the scattering of $W^+$ and $W^-$ bosons we obtain
1321: %
1322: \begin{equation}\label{mult:01}
1323: \delta a^A(W^\pm) = \mathcal{T}^A(a^0)\pm
1324: \tfrac12{\beta} a^1\mathcal{T}^A_1(a^0),
1325: \end{equation}
1326: %
1327: where
1328: %
1329: \begin{subequations}\label{mult:T}
1330: \begin{align}
1331: \mathcal{T}^A(a) &= ia^2\mathcal{C}_2^A(a),\\
1332: \mathcal{T}^A_1(a) &=\tfrac{\partial}{\partial a} \mathcal{T}^A(a)
1333: = 2i a\,\mathcal{C}_2^A(a) - a^2\mathcal{C}_3^A(a),
1334: \end{align}
1335: \end{subequations}
1336: %
1337: and the quantities $\mathcal{C}_{2,3}^A$ incorporate the multiple
1338: scattering effects and read as follows:
1339: %
1340: \begin{subequations}
1341: \begin{align}
1342: %\begin{split}
1343: %%%
1344: %%% C2
1345: %%%
1346: \label{C2A}
1347: \mathcal{C}_2^A(a) &= \int_{z_1<z_2}\hspace{-1.5em}
1348: \ud^2\bm{b}\ud z_1\ud z_2\, e^{ik_L(z_1-z_2)}
1349: \rho_A(1)\rho_A(2)
1350: %\\
1351: %& \phantom{==}
1352: %\exp\left[
1353: %i\int_{z_1}^{z_2}\ud z'\left(a \rho_A(\bm{b},z') - k_L \right)
1354: %i\Phi(1,2,a,k_L)
1355: % \right],
1356: e^{S(1,2,a)},
1357: \\
1358: %%%
1359: %%% C3
1360: %%%
1361: \label{C3A}
1362: \begin{split}
1363: \mathcal{C}_3^A(a) &= -i \tfrac{\partial}{\partial a}\mathcal{C}_2^A(a) =
1364: \\
1365: & \protect\phantom{=}
1366: %\int_{z_1<z_2<z_3}\negthickspace\negthickspace\negthickspace
1367: \int_{z_1<z_2<z_3}\hspace{-3em}
1368: \ud^2\bm{b}\ud z_1\ud z_2\ud z_3\, e^{ik_L(z_1-z_3)}
1369: \rho_A(1)\rho_A(2)\rho_A(3)
1370: %\\
1371: %&
1372: %\protect\phantom{\int_{z_1<z_2<z_3}}
1373: %\exp\left[
1374: %i\int_{z_1}^{z_3}\ud z'\left(a \rho_A(\bm{b},z') - k_L \right)
1375: %i \Phi(1,3,a,k_L)
1376: % \right],
1377: \, e^{S(1,3,a)},
1378: \end{split}
1379: %\end{split}
1380: \end{align}\end{subequations}
1381: %
1382: where the $e^S$ factor is given by \eq{mult:phi} with $a\cdot\rho$
1383: replaced by $a\rho_A$.
1384: The rate of multiple scattering interactions is controlled by
1385: the value of the mean free path of hadronic fluctuation in a nucleus
1386: $l_f=(\rho_A\sigma)^{-1}$.
1387: If $l_f$ is large compared with the nuclear radius (i.e.
1388: at low nucleon density or/and small effective cross
1389: section), then the $e^S$ factor can be neglected and the
1390: coefficients $\mathcal{C}_2^A$ and $\mathcal{C}_3^A$ determine the
1391: double ($\sim \rho^2$) and the tripple ($\sim \rho^3$) scattering
1392: terms in the MS series. If $l_f$ is small enough
1393: then the $e^S$ factor should be taken into account.
1394:
1395: We find from \eq{mult:01} that nuclear correction to
1396: the sum of $W^+$ and $W^-$ scattering amplitudes
1397: is determined by the isoscalar
1398: amplitude $a^0$, and the nuclear $W^+ - W^-$ asymmetry is
1399: proportional to $\beta a^1$.
1400: Note that this asymmetry also depends on $a^0$ through multiple scattering
1401: effects. The implications to (anti)neutrino structure functions are
1402: discussed in the next section.
1403:
1404:
1405: \subsubsection{Dependence of nuclear effects on $C$-parity and isospin}
1406:
1407:
1408: Up to now the helicity dependence of nuclear correction was
1409: implicit. In this section we apply the results of
1410: Sec.\ref{sec:MS} to the combinations of helicity amplitudes which
1411: correspond to the structure functions of interest. Recall that $F_T$
1412: is given by the average $(W_{+1}+W_{-1})/2$, and $F_3$ is
1413: determined by the asymmetry $W_{+1}-W_{-1}$. We will assume that
1414: the helicity is conserved in the MS series so that \eq{mult:A} generalizes to
1415: scattering amplitude with given helicity $a_h$.%
1416: \footnote{However, the helicity-flip processes can occur because of spin
1417: effects, which are not considered here.}
1418:
1419: The neutrino and antineutrino cross section correspond to the interaction of
1420: $W^+$ and $W^-$, respectively. It will be convenient to discuss the
1421: $\nu+\bar\nu$ average and $\nu-\bar\nu$ asymmetry since these combinations
1422: have definite $C$-parity. We use the notation
1423: $a_T^I=\tfrac12(a_{+1}^I+a_{-1}^I)$ for the average transverse amplitude
1424: with the isospin $I=0,1$ and $a_\Delta^I=\tfrac12(a_{+1}^I-a_{-1}^I)$ for
1425: the corresponding asymmetry. Note that the amplitudes $a_T^0$ and
1426: $a_\Delta^1$ are $C$-even, while $a_\Delta^0$ and $a_T^1$ are $C$-odd.%
1427: %
1428: \footnote{The symmetry of the effective amplitude $a_h^I$
1429: becomes apparent if we recall the correspondence with the structure functions:
1430: $F_T^{\nu+\bar\nu} \sim \Im a_T^0$,
1431: $F_T^{\nu-\bar\nu} \sim \Im a_T^1$,
1432: $F_3^{\nu+\bar\nu} \sim \Im a_\Delta^0$,
1433: $F_3^{\nu-\bar\nu} \sim \Im a_\Delta^1$.}
1434:
1435:
1436: Let us first consider the $\nu+\bar\nu$ sum of amplitudes
1437: and use \eq{mult:01} for helicity $h=+1$ and $h=-1$.
1438: In particular, we consider the helicity average ($T$) and asymmetry ($\Delta$).
1439: Taking into account that $|a_\Delta^0|\ll |a_T^0|$ in the low-$x$ region,
1440: we expand $\mathcal{T}^A(a_{\pm 1}^0)$ about $a_T^0$ to order
1441: $(a_\Delta^0)^2$ and obtain
1442: %
1443: \begin{subequations}\label{mult:pl}
1444: \begin{align}
1445: \label{mult:pl:T}
1446: \delta a^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A}_T &= 2\,\mathcal{T}^A(a_T^0),\\
1447: \delta a^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A}_\Delta &= 2\,a_\Delta^0\mathcal{T}^A_1(a_T^0).
1448: \label{mult:pl:D}
1449: \end{align}
1450: \end{subequations}
1451: %
1452:
1453: %%
1454: %% NU+NUBAR CASE
1455: %%
1456:
1457: Using these equations we compute ratios (\ref{relcor}) for
1458: effective cross sections.
1459: We recall that in
1460: the Born approximation $a^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A}=A\,2a^0$ for either
1461: helicity state $T$ or $\Delta$ and, therefore, the ratio \eq{relcor} is
1462: $\delta\mathcal{R}^{\nu+\bar\nu}=\Im\delta a^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A}/(2A\Im a^0)$.
1463: Using Eqs.(\ref{mult:pl}) and (\ref{amp}) we obtain
1464: %
1465: \begin{subequations}\label{delR:pl}
1466: \begin{align}
1467: \label{delR:pl:T}
1468: \delta\mathcal{R}_T^{\nu+\bar\nu} &=
1469: \sigma_T^0 \Re \left[(i+\alpha_T^0)^2\mathcal{C}_2^A(a_T^0)\right]/(2A),
1470: \\
1471: \delta\mathcal{R}_\Delta^{\nu+\bar\nu} &=
1472: \Im \left[(i+\alpha_\Delta^0)\mathcal{T}_1^A(a_T^0)\right]/A,
1473: \label{delR:pl:D}
1474: \end{align}
1475: \end{subequations}
1476: %
1477: where $\sigma_T^0=2\Im a_T^0$ is the effective cross section corresponding to
1478: the transverse isoscalar amplitude and $\alpha_h^I=\Re a_h^I/\Im a_h^I$.
1479: %
1480: If the real part of the amplitude is small, then the MS
1481: correction is negative because of destructive interference of
1482: forward scattering amplitudes on the upstream nucleons that causes
1483: \emph{shadowing} of virtual hadron interactions. On the other hand, if the
1484: real part is large then the interference in the double scattering term is
1485: constructive, which would lead to an \emph{antishadowing} effect.
1486: %
1487: It should be remarked that $\delta\mathcal{R}_\Delta^{\nu+\bar\nu}$
1488: (the relative nuclear correction to the structure function $F_3^{\nu+\bar\nu}$)
1489: depends on the $C$-even cross section $\sigma_T^0$. The result is also
1490: affected by the interference of the real parts of the amplitudes in the
1491: $C$-even and $C$-odd channels. If we only keep the double scattering term
1492: in \Eqs{delR:pl:T}{delR:pl:D}, we arrive at the following relation:
1493: %
1494: \begin{equation}\label{Del:T}
1495: \delta\mathcal{R}_\Delta^{\nu+\bar\nu}/\delta\mathcal{R}_T^{\nu+\bar\nu}
1496: = 2\frac{1-\alpha_\Delta\alpha_T}{1-\alpha_T^2},
1497: \end{equation}
1498: %
1499: where $\alpha_T$ and $\alpha_\Delta$ refer to $I=0$ amplitudes.
1500: Factor 2 in \eq{Del:T} is a generic enhancement of the double
1501: scattering correction for the cross section asymmetry which has a
1502: combinatorial origin (in the context of $F_3$ it was discussed in
1503: \cite{Kulagin:1998wc,KP04}).
1504: Ratio (\ref{Del:T}) can be futher enhanced if the real
1505: parts of the $C$-odd and $C$-even amplitudes have different sign (this
1506: is indeed a realistic case as will be discussed below).
1507:
1508: %%
1509: %% NU-NUBAR CASE
1510: %%
1511:
1512: We now discuss the $\nu-\bar\nu$ asymmetry.
1513: We apply \eq{mult:01} to the amplitudes $a_T$ and $a_\Delta$.
1514: Similar to the $\nu+\bar\nu$ case,
1515: we expand $\mathcal{T}_1^A(a_{\pm 1}^0)$ about the
1516: average amplitude $a_T^0$ in a series in $a_\Delta^0$ up to the first
1517: order term. We obtain
1518: %
1519: \begin{subequations}\label{mult:mn}
1520: \begin{align}
1521: \label{mult:mn:T}
1522: \delta a^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A}_T &= \beta\left[
1523: a_T^1 \mathcal{T}^A_1(a_T^0)+
1524: \tfrac14 a_\Delta^1 a_\Delta^0\mathcal{T}^A_2(a_T^0)
1525: \right],\\
1526: \delta a^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A}_\Delta &= \beta\left[
1527: a_\Delta^1 \mathcal{T}^A_1(a_T^0) +
1528: a_T^1 a_\Delta^0\mathcal{T}^A_2(a_T^0)
1529: \right],
1530: \label{mult:mn:D}
1531: \end{align}
1532: \end{subequations}
1533: %
1534: where $\mathcal{T}^A_2(a)=\tfrac{\partial}{\partial a}\mathcal{T}^A_1(a)$
1535: [see \eqs{mult:T}].
1536: Note that the first equation in (\ref{mult:mn}) is $C$-odd and the second $C$-even.
1537: The quadratic terms $a^1 a^0$ in (\ref{mult:mn}) produce a
1538: correction to the leading term of order $|a_\Delta^0/a_T^0|$.
1539: Taking into account the correspondence between effective amplitudes and
1540: the structure functions, we find that by order of magnitude
1541: $|a_\Delta^0/a_T^0|$ is the ratio of valence to sea quark distribution
1542: in the proton. This ratio is small in the region of small $x$ ($x\ll
1543: 0.1$), where coherent nuclear effects are most important.
1544: For this reason in the following discussion we keep
1545: only the first term in the right side of (\ref{mult:mn}). In this
1546: approximation the structure of \eqs{mult:mn} is similar to that of
1547: \eq{mult:pl:D}.
1548:
1549: Using \eqs{mult:mn} we calculate the relative corrections to the
1550: cross sections. For this purpose we recall that in the Born approximation
1551: $a^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A}=(Z-N)a^1$ for either helicity state $T$ or $\Delta$.
1552: Then the ratio
1553: $\delta\mathcal{R}^{\nu-\bar\nu}=\Im\delta a^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A}/[(Z-N)\Im a^1]$
1554: can be written as
1555: %
1556: \begin{align}
1557: \label{delR:mn}
1558: \delta\mathcal{R}_{T,\Delta}^{\nu-\bar\nu} &=
1559: \Im \left[(i+\alpha_{T,\Delta}^1)\mathcal{T}_1^A(a_T^0)\right]/A,
1560: \end{align}
1561: %
1562: where $\alpha_{T}^1$ and $\alpha_{\Delta}^1$ are the $\Re/\Im$ ratios for the amplitudes
1563: $a_T^1$ and $a_\Delta^1$, respectively.
1564:
1565:
1566: Note also that in terms of $(I,C)$ classification
1567: $\delta\mathcal{R}_T^{\nu+\bar\nu} = \delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,+)}$,
1568: $\delta\mathcal{R}_\Delta^{\nu+\bar\nu} = \delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,-)}$,
1569: $\delta\mathcal{R}_{T}^{\nu-\bar\nu}=\delta\mathcal{R}^{(1,-)}$,
1570: and $\delta\mathcal{R}_{\Delta}^{\nu-\bar\nu}=\delta\mathcal{R}^{(1,+)}$.
1571: %
1572: Figure~\ref{fig:deltaRIC} illustrates the $x$ dependence of the
1573: ratios $\delta\mathcal{R}^{(I,C)}$ for different isospin and $C$-parity
1574: states.
1575:
1576: %% NUCLEAR SHADOWING FOR DIFFERENT I,C
1577:
1578: \begin{figure}[htb]
1579: \begin{center}
1580: %\shrinkvspace
1581: \hspace{-1.5em}
1582: \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{ns_i.eps}%
1583: \hspace{-1.0em}
1584: \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{ns_c.eps}
1585: \caption{%
1586: The ratio $\delta\mathcal{R}^{(I,C)}$ calculated for different isospin and
1587: $C$-parity scattering states for ${}^{207}$Pb at $Q^2=1\gevsq$ using the
1588: parameters of the scattering amplitudes from Sec.~\ref{sec:aeff}.
1589: The labels on the curves mark the values of the isospin $I$ and
1590: $C$-parity, $(I,C)$.
1591: }
1592: \label{fig:deltaRIC}
1593: \shrinkvspace
1594: \end{center}
1595: \end{figure}
1596:
1597: \subsubsection{Coherent nuclear correction to $F_T$ and $F_3$}
1598:
1599: We now apply these results to neutrino structure functions.
1600: We recall that the discussion given above
1601: applies to the $u$- and $d$-quark contribution and make
1602: use of the isospin symmetry relations for the effective amplitude.
1603: In order to take into account the strange quark contribution,
1604: we explicitly separate the ligh-quark ($u$ and $d$) and
1605: the $s$-quark contributions to neutrino structure functions $i=T,3$
1606: %
1607: \begin{subequations}\label{F:01s}
1608: \begin{align}
1609: \label{F:pl}
1610: F_i^{\nu+\bar\nu} &= F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(0)} + F_i^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(s)},
1611: \\
1612: F_i^{\nu-\bar\nu} &= F_i^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(1)} + F_i^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(s)},
1613: \label{F:mn}
1614: \end{align}
1615: \end{subequations}
1616: %
1617: where the superscripts indicate the contribution from the ligh quarks
1618: with total isospin 0 or 1, or the $s$-quark contribution. Although this
1619: separation is quite general, we illustrate the terms in \eqs{F:01s}
1620: in the parton model. For the transverse structure function we have
1621: $F_T^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(0)}=x(u+d+\bar u+\bar d)$,
1622: $F_T^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(1)}=x(d-u+\bar u-\bar d)$. The $s$-quark contribution
1623: is relevant for the $C$-even $F_T^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(s)}=x(s+\bar s)$. The
1624: $C$-odd $F_T^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(s)}$ is proportional to $s-\bar s$ and can be
1625: neglected. Similarly, for $xF_3$ we have
1626: $xF_3^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(0)}=x(u+d-\bar u -\bar d)$,
1627: $xF_3^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(1)}=x(d-u-\bar u+\bar d)$, and
1628: $xF_3^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(s)}=x(s+\bar s)$. The $C$-odd
1629: $xF_3^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(s)}$ is similar to $F_T^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(s)}$ and can be
1630: neglected.
1631:
1632:
1633: In general, the $s$-quark terms should be corrected differently
1634: from those of light quarks. Taking into account \eqs{F:01s} we have for
1635: coherent nuclear correction to the structure functions $F_T$ and $xF_3$ per
1636: one nucleon
1637: %
1638: \begin{subequations}\label{delFA}
1639: \begin{align}
1640: \label{delFA:0+}
1641: \delta F_T^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A} &= \delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,+)} F_T^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(0)}
1642: +
1643: \delta\mathcal{R}^{(s,+)} F_T^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(s)},\\
1644: \label{delFA:0-}
1645: \delta F_3^{(\nu+\bar\nu)A} &= \delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,-)}F_3^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(0)}, \\
1646: \label{delFA:1-}
1647: \delta F_T^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A} &= \beta\delta\mathcal{R}^{(1,-)}F_T^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(1)}, \\
1648: \label{delFA:1+}
1649: \delta F_3^{(\nu-\bar\nu)A} &= \beta\delta\mathcal{R}^{(1,+)} F_3^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(1)} +
1650: \delta\mathcal{R}^{(s,+)} F_3^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(s)},
1651: \end{align}
1652: \end{subequations}
1653: %
1654: where the structure functions in the right side should be taken for the
1655: free proton and the ratios $\delta\mathcal{R}$ are given by
1656: \Eqs{delR:pl}{delR:mn}.
1657: Note that the $s$-quark contribution in
1658: \eq{delFA:1+} is isoscalar and for this reason it is not suppressed by the factor $\beta$.
1659: {}From \eqs{delFA} we derive coherent nuclear corrections to the
1660: (anti)neutrino structure functions.
1661: We define the ratio
1662: $\delta\mathcal{R}^{\nu}_i (A/N)=\delta F_i^{\nu A}/\delta F_i^{\nu N}$
1663: describing the nuclear correction of the neutrino structure
1664: function of type $i$ in the units of the isoscalar nucleon structure function
1665: $F_i^{\nu N}=(F_i^{\nu p}+F_i^{\nu n})/2$
1666: [and similar definitions for the antineutrino ratio
1667: $\delta\mathcal{R}^{\bar\nu}_i (A/N)$]. We have
1668: %
1669: \begin{subequations}
1670: \label{delRA}
1671: \begin{align}
1672: \label{delR:nu}
1673: \delta\mathcal{R}^{\nu(\bar\nu)}_T (A/N) &=
1674: \delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,+)}
1675: \pm
1676: \beta\delta\mathcal{R}^{(1,-)}
1677: \frac{F_T^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(1)}}
1678: {2 F_T^{\nu(\bar\nu)N}}
1679: +
1680: (\delta\mathcal{R}^{(s,+)}-\delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,+)})
1681: \frac{F_T^{(\nu+\bar\nu)(s)}}
1682: {2 F_T^{\nu(\bar\nu)N}},
1683: \\
1684: \label{delR:antinu}
1685: \delta\mathcal{R}^{\nu(\bar\nu)}_3 (A/N) &=
1686: % \frac{\delta F_3^{\nu(\bar\nu)A}}
1687: % {F_3^{\nu(\bar\nu)N}} &=
1688: \delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,-)}
1689: \pm
1690: \beta\delta\mathcal{R}^{(1,+)}
1691: \frac{F_3^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(1)}}
1692: {2\, F_3^{\nu(\bar\nu)N}}
1693: \pm
1694: (\delta\mathcal{R}^{(s,+)}-\delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,-)})
1695: \frac{F_3^{(\nu-\bar\nu)(s)}}
1696: {2\, F_3^{\nu(\bar\nu)N}},
1697: \end{align}
1698: \end{subequations}
1699: %
1700: where the sign $+(-)$ corresponds to neutrino (antineutrino).
1701: In numerical applications in Sec.~\ref{sec:res}
1702: we will assume similar nuclear effects for $I=0$
1703: light quarks and the $s$-quark,
1704: $\delta\mathcal{R}^{(s,+)}=\delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,+)}$.
1705:
1706:
1707: %%
1708: %% SHADOWING FOR FL AND F2
1709: %%
1710:
1711: \subsubsection{Coherent nuclear corrections to $F_L$ and $F_2$}
1712: \label{sec:MS:L}
1713:
1714: We now discuss coherent nuclear corrections to the longitudinal structure
1715: function.
1716: Nuclear modification of the PCAC term is
1717: driven by the corresponding correction to the virtual pion cross
1718: section, and we have $\delta F^{\rm PCAC}_L/F^{\rm PCAC}_L=\delta
1719: \sigma_{\pi A}/(A\sigma_{\pi N})=\delta\mathcal R_\pi(A/N)$.
1720: %
1721: The nuclear correction to the pion cross section can be analyzed along the
1722: lines discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:MS}. We consider the isoscalar $\pi
1723: N$ scattering amplitude $a_\pi^0=(a_{\pi^+p}+a_{\pi^-p})/2$ and the
1724: isovector asymmetry $a_\pi^1=a_{\pi^+p}-a_{\pi^-p}$.
1725: Nuclear corrections to these amplitudes are given by equations similar to
1726: (\ref{delR:pl:T}) and (\ref{delR:mn}), and we have
1727: %
1728: \begin{subequations}\label{delR:pi}
1729: \begin{align}
1730: \delta\mathcal R_\pi^0 &= \sigma_\pi^0 \Re
1731: \big[
1732: \left(i+\alpha_\pi^0\right)^2 \mathcal C_2^A(a_\pi^0)
1733: \big]/(2A),
1734: \\
1735: \delta\mathcal R_\pi^1 &= \Im
1736: \left[
1737: \left(i+\alpha_\pi^1\right)\mathcal T_1^A(a_\pi^0)
1738: \right]/A,
1739: \end{align}
1740: \end{subequations}
1741: %
1742: where $\sigma_\pi^0$ is the $\pi N$ cross section in the isoscalar
1743: state and $\alpha_\pi=\Re a_\pi /\Im a_\pi$ for the pion amplitude in the
1744: corresponding isospin state. In numerical applications we calculate
1745: $\delta\mathcal R_\pi$
1746: using $\pi$N scattering amplitude of \cite{piN} (see
1747: Appendix~\ref{sec:piN}). Since the PCAC relation involves the cross
1748: section of the virtual pion with four-momentum $q$, the longitudinal
1749: momentum transfer in \eq{mult:A} is
1750: $k_L^\pi=Mx(1+m_\pi^2/Q^2)$.
1751:
1752: The ratios $\delta\mathcal R_\pi$ for the cross sections of $\pi^+$
1753: and $\pi^-$ mesons can be readily obtained from \eqs{delR:pi}, and we have
1754: %
1755: \begin{equation}
1756: \delta\mathcal R_{\pi^\pm} =
1757: \delta\mathcal R_{\pi}^0 \pm
1758: \left(
1759: \beta\delta\mathcal R_{\pi}^1-\delta\mathcal R_{\pi}^0
1760: \right)
1761: \frac{(\sigma_{\pi^+}-\sigma_{\pi^-})}{2\sigma_{\pi^\pm}},
1762: \end{equation}
1763: %
1764: where the sign $+(-)$ corresponds to $\pi^+(\pi^-)$ scattering.
1765:
1766: The nuclear corrections to the structure function $\widetilde F_L$,
1767: which include the vector-current contribution and non-PCAC terms of the axial current, can be
1768: treated similarly to the transverse structure function $F_T$. In
1769: particular, we assume that the relative correction to $\widetilde F_L$ is
1770: determined by the effective cross section in the longitudinal
1771: state and $\delta\widetilde{\mathcal R}_L =
1772: \delta\widetilde{F}_L^A/\widetilde{F}_L=\delta\sigmabar_L^A/\sigmabar_L$.
1773: %
1774: Taking into account both contributions, we have for the relative nuclear
1775: correction to $F_L$
1776: %
1777: \begin{equation}
1778: \delta \mathcal R_L(A/N) =
1779: % (\gamma^3 F_L^{\rm PCAC}/F_L) \delta \mathcal R_\pi(A/N) +
1780: % (\widetilde{F}_L/F_L) \delta \widetilde{\mathcal R}_L(A/N)
1781: r^{\rm PCAC} \delta \mathcal R_\pi(A/N) +
1782: (1-r^{\rm PCAC}) \delta \widetilde{\mathcal R}_L(A/N),
1783: \label{delR:L}
1784: \end{equation}
1785: %
1786: where $r^{\rm PCAC}=\gamma^3 F_L^{\rm PCAC}/F_L$
1787: should be computed for the isoscalar nucleon.
1788:
1789:
1790: Nuclear correction to $F_2$ can then be calculated in terms of the
1791: corresponding corrections for $F_L$ and $F_T$ using relation
1792: (\ref{hel:123}). We have for the relative correction
1793: %
1794: \begin{equation}
1795: \delta\mathcal R_2(A/N) =
1796: \frac{\delta\mathcal R_T^A + R\,\delta\mathcal R_L^A}{1+R},
1797: \label{delR:2}
1798: \end{equation}
1799: %
1800: where $R=F_L/F_T$, and $F_L$ and $F_T$ are the structure functions
1801: of the isoscalar nucleon.
1802:
1803:
1804: %%
1805: %% EFFECTIVE AMPLITUDES AND CROSS SECTIONS
1806: %%
1807:
1808: \subsubsection{Effective scattering amplitude and cross section}
1809: \label{sec:aeff}
1810:
1811: We now discuss the model of the effective scattering amplitude for
1812: different isospin and helicity states $a_h^I$ which is used in our
1813: calculations. This amplitude determines the rate of nuclear multiple
1814: scattering corrections as discussed above. In Ref.\cite{KP04} the $C$-even
1815: amplitude $a_T^0$ was studied phenomenologically using charged-lepton
1816: data on the ratios $F_2^A/F_2^{A'}$,
1817: and it was shown that a good description of data for a wide region
1818: of nuclear targets can be achieved using a constant $\alpha_T^0$
1819: and the effective cross section parametrized as
1820: %
1821: \begin{equation}
1822: \sigmabar_T=\sigma_0/(1+Q^2/Q_0^2).
1823: \label{xsec:ph}
1824: \end{equation}
1825: %
1826: The values of the parameters were fixed to $\sigma_0=27\:$mb and
1827: $\alpha_T=-0.2$ in order to reproduce the low-$Q^2$ limit
1828: \cite{Bauer:iq}. The scale parameter $Q_0^2$, which describes transition to
1829: high $Q^2$, was determined to be
1830: $Q_0^2=1.43\pm0.06({\rm stat})\pm 0.20({\rm syst})\gevsq$.
1831:
1832:
1833: In this paper we test the hypothesis that the $C$-even effective amplitude
1834: $a_T^0$ also applies to the (anti)neutrino scattering and determine
1835: $F_T^{\nu+\bar\nu}$.
1836: The other amplitudes ($a_\Delta^0,\ a_T^1,\ a_\Delta^1$)
1837: are not directly constrained by the CL DIS data.
1838: These quantities determine nuclear corrections to different
1839: combinations of neutrino and antineutrino structure functions
1840: as discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:nuke:coh}.
1841: %
1842: It is important to note that only Re/Im ratios of these amplitudes
1843: are relevant for the calculation of nuclear corrections to
1844: the (anti)neutrino structure functions.
1845: %
1846: In order
1847: to evaluate Re/Im ratios we apply the Regge pole approach, which proved
1848: to be very useful in analyses of high-energy hadron scattering (see,
1849: \eg, \cite{Collins:1977jy}), and approximate the
1850: scattering amplitudes by a single Regge pole
1851: with proper quantum numbers. We recall that Re/Im of the Regge
1852: pole amplitude in forward direction is determined by its
1853: intercept $\alpha_R(0)$ and the signature (the latter corresponds to $C$
1854: parity of the scattering amplitude)
1855: $\mathrm{Re/Im}=-(C+\cos\pi\alpha_R(0))/\sin\pi\alpha_R(0)$. The Regge
1856: poles of $\omega$, $\rho$, and $A_2$ mesons have appropriate quantum
1857: numbers (see Table~\ref{tab:regge};
1858: as known from hadron scattering phenomenology \cite{Collins:1977jy}
1859: these Regge trajectories have an intercept close to 0.5).
1860: %
1861: In our calculations of (anti)neutrino nuclear
1862: scattering discussed below, we use the amplitude $a_T^0$ derived from
1863: the analysis of charged-lepton nuclear data \cite{KP04}.
1864: The Re/Im ratio for the amplitudes $a_\Delta^0$
1865: and $a_T^1$ are fixed from the studies of the Adler
1866: and the Gross--Llewellyn-Smith sum rules for nuclear structure functions
1867: (see Sec.~\ref{sec:ASR} and \ref{sec:GLS}).
1868:
1869: %%% REGGE TABLE
1870:
1871: \begin{table}[htb]
1872: \shrinkvspace
1873: \begin{tabular}{l|clll}
1874: Amplitude && $a_\Delta^0$ & $a_T^1$ & $a_\Delta^1$ \\
1875: \hline\hline
1876: Regge pole $(I^C)$ && $\omega(0^-)$ & $\rho(1^-)$ & $A_2(1^+)$ \\
1877: \hline
1878: Re/Im && $1.15\;(1)$ & $1.35\;(1)$ & $(-1)$ \\
1879: \hline
1880: \end{tabular}
1881: \caption{Regge poles contributing to the effective amplitude in
1882: different isospin and $C$ parity states.
1883: Shown are the values of the Re/Im ratio extracted from analysis of nuclear
1884: corrections to the Adler and the GLS sum rules (see
1885: Sec.~\ref{sec:ASR} and \ref{sec:GLS}) and those
1886: calculated with the intercept $\alpha_R(0)=0.5$ common for
1887: all Regge poles (in parenthesis).
1888: \label{tab:regge}
1889: }
1890: %\shrinkvspace
1891: \end{table}
1892:
1893:
1894: The effective cross section $\sigmabar_L$ for longitudinally
1895: polarized intermediate sates, which describes nuclear corrections to
1896: $\widetilde F_L$ (see Sec.~\ref{sec:MS:L}), includes
1897: contributions from the vector and the axial currents. We separate the PCAC
1898: contribution to $F_L$, \eq{FL:PCAC:2}, and treat it explicitly as described
1899: in Sec.~\ref{sec:sf:low-q} and \ref{sec:MS:L}. The remaining part
1900: $\widetilde F_L$ is described by the vector and non-PCAC terms of the axial
1901: current. We assume that $\widetilde F_L$ is similar to $F_L$ in CL
1902: scattering.
1903: %
1904: In order to quantitatively evaluate $\sigmabar_L$, we assume the relation
1905: $\sigmabar_L/\sigmabar_T=\widetilde{F}_L/F_T=\widetilde R$, which allows
1906: to calculate $\sigmabar_L$ in terms of $\sigmabar_T$ and $\widetilde R$.
1907: This relation follows from (\ref{sum-h-aprx}) if the normalization factors
1908: are independent of helicity. This can be justified in the VMD model at low
1909: $Q^2$ \cite{KP04} and we also apply this relation to the region of high
1910: $Q^2$. For $Q^2>1\gevsq$ for $\widetilde R$ we use
1911: the ratio $F_L/F_T$ calculated using phenomenological PDFs and HT terms of
1912: \cite{a02}. In order to obtain $\widetilde R$ at $Q^2<1\gevsq$ we
1913: extrapolate from large $Q^2$, assuming $\widetilde R\propto Q^2$ at $Q^2\to 0$.
1914:
1915:
1916: It should be also commented that the nuclear MS effect in the transition region
1917: of $x$ from 0.01 to 0.1 and $Q^2$ below $1\gevsq$ is affected by the value
1918: of the mass of effective intermediate state $m_{\rm eff}$ through $k_L$
1919: [see \eq{mult:A}]. In our studies of the charged-lepton data we used the
1920: value $m_{\rm eff}=0.9M$ which nicely fits the shadowing data. We also apply
1921: this parameter in the calculation of the vector-current contribution
1922: in neutrino scattering. Apparently, for the axial current this parameter
1923: could be different because of different set of intermediate states. In
1924: order to account for this effect we use a simple
1925: ansatz of rescaling $m_{\rm eff}$ with the ratio of $a_1$- and
1926: $\rho$-meson masses, $m_{\rm eff}m_{a_1}/m_\rho$.
1927: %
1928: Figure~\ref{fig:deltaR:mef} illustrates the dependence of the ratios
1929: $\delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,+)}$ and $\delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,-)}$ on the
1930: parameter $m_{\rm eff}$. Note that this dependence is noticeable for the
1931: transition region of $0.01<x<0.1$ and for low $Q^2$.
1932:
1933: %% NUCLEAR SHADOWING FOR DIFFERENT m_eff
1934:
1935: \begin{figure}[htb]
1936: \begin{center}
1937: %\shrinkvspace
1938: \hspace{-1.5em}
1939: \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{ns_even_mef.eps}%
1940: \hspace{-0.9em}\includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{ns_odd_mef.eps}
1941: \caption{%
1942: The ratios $\delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,+)}$ and $\delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,-)}$
1943: calculated for ${}^{207}$Pb at $Q^2=1\gevsq$ using the scattering
1944: amplitudes from Sec.~\ref{sec:aeff} and different values of the parameter
1945: $m_{\rm eff}$.
1946: }
1947: \label{fig:deltaR:mef}
1948: \shrinkvspace
1949: %\shrinkvspace
1950: \end{center}
1951: \end{figure}
1952:
1953:
1954:
1955: \shrinkvspace
1956: \subsection{The Adler sum rule for nuclei}
1957: \label{sec:ASR}
1958:
1959: The Adler sum rule relates the integrated difference of the
1960: isovector combination $F_2^{\nu - \bar\nu}$ to the isospin of the target:
1961: %
1962: \begin{equation}
1963: \label{ASR}
1964: \sadler=\int_0^{M_A/M}\hspace{-2em}\ud x\ F_2^{\bar\nu -\nu}(x,Q^2)/(2x)
1965: = 2\,I_z,
1966: \end{equation}
1967: %
1968: where the upper integration limit, the ratio of the nuclear and the
1969: nucleon masses $M_A/M$, is the kinematical maximum of the Bjorken variable
1970: $x=Q^2/(2Mq_0)$ for the nuclear target, and $I_z$ is the
1971: projection of
1972: the target isospin vector on the quantization axis ($z$ axis).
1973: For the proton $\sadler^{p}=1$, and for the neutron $\sadler^{n}=-1$.
1974: %
1975: In the quark parton model the Adler sum is the difference between the
1976: number of valence $u$ and $d$ quarks of the target. The Adler sum rule
1977: survives the strong interaction effects because of CVC.
1978: However, in the derivation of the Adler sum rule the effects of
1979: nonconservation of the axial current as well as the Cabibbo mixing angle are
1980: neglected (for more detail see, \eg, \cite{IoKhLi84}).
1981:
1982: For an isoscalar nucleus the Adler sum rule is trivial since the integrand
1983: in \eq{ASR} vanishes.
1984: %
1985: For a generic nucleus of $Z$ protons and $N$ neutrons the Adler
1986: sum rule reads (we consider the nuclear structure functions per one
1987: nucleon)
1988: %
1989: \begin{equation}
1990: \label{ASR:A}
1991: \sadler^A=(Z-N)/A=\beta.
1992: \end{equation}
1993: %
1994: We now discuss in turn the contributions to $\sadler$ from different
1995: nuclear effects. Let us first consider the Fermi motion and binding (FMB) corrections to
1996: $F_2^{\nu-\bar\nu}$ from \eq{nuke:C-odd}.
1997: We will consider the kinematics of high $Q^2$ and
1998: neglect power $Q^{-2}$ terms in nuclear convolution. By performing the
1999: direct integration by $x$ of \eq{nuke:C-odd} in the case of $F_2$
2000: and using the isospin relations for the proton and neutron structure
2001: functions, we obtain
2002: %
2003: \begin{subequations}
2004: \begin{align}
2005: \label{ASR:FMB}
2006: \sadler &=
2007: \beta \int \frac{\ud x}{2x}\average{F_2^{(\bar\nu-\nu)p}}_1 =
2008: \beta + \delta S_{\rm A}^{\rm OS},
2009: \\
2010: \label{dASR:OS}
2011: \delta S_{\rm A}^{\rm OS} &=
2012: \beta \int_0^1\frac{\ud x}{2x}\,F_2^{(\bar\nu-\nu)p}(x,Q^2)
2013: \delta f_2(x)\average{v}_1,
2014: \end{align}
2015: \end{subequations}
2016: %
2017: where $\average{v}_1=\average{p^2-M^2}_1/M^2$ is the nucleon virtuality
2018: averaged with the isovector spectral function $\mathcal P_1$. Note that
2019: the FMB correction cancels out in (\ref{ASR:FMB}) in the impulse approximation.
2020: The integral in \eq{dASR:OS} describes the variation of the Adler sum for
2021: the off-shell proton [the structure functions in (\ref{dASR:OS}) should be
2022: taken for the on-shell proton]. In the derivation of the OS correction to
2023: the Adler sum rule (\ref{dASR:OS}) we assume a universal off-shell
2024: function $\delta f_2$, i.e.
2025: common for proton and neutron and independent from the probe (neutrino or antineutrino).
2026:
2027: The nuclear pion correction to the Adler sum rule is computed
2028: using \eq{picor:C-odd}. We have
2029: %
2030: \begin{equation}
2031: \label{dASR:pi}
2032: \delta S_{\rm A}^\pi =
2033: 2\left(
2034: n_{\pi^+/A} - n_{\pi^-/A}
2035: \right),
2036: \end{equation}
2037: %
2038: where $n_{\pi/A}=\int\ud y\, f_{\pi/A}(y)$ is the average nuclear pion
2039: excess of the given pion type. These quantities also determine the
2040: pion excess correction to the total nuclear charge. From the
2041: charge conservation we have $n_{\pi^+/A} = n_{\pi^-/A}$ and, therefore,
2042: $\delta S_{\rm A}^\pi=0$.
2043:
2044: The nuclear shadowing effect in the Adler sum can be computed using the
2045: results of Sec.~\ref{sec:nuke:coh}.
2046: We integrate the shadowing correction $\delta F_2^{\bar\nu-\nu}$ [see
2047: \eqs{delFA}] and obtain
2048: %
2049: \begin{equation}
2050: \delta S_{\rm A}^{\rm NS} =
2051: \beta \int_0^1\frac{\ud x}{2x}\,F_2^{(\bar\nu-\nu)p}(x,Q^2)
2052: \delta\mathcal R_2^{(1,-)},
2053: \label{dASR:NS}
2054: \end{equation}
2055: %
2056: where $\delta\mathcal R_2^{(1,-)}$ is given in terms of
2057: $\delta\mathcal R_T^{(1,-)}$ and $\delta\mathcal R_L^{(1,-)}$
2058: by \eq{delR:2}.
2059:
2060: It follows from \Eqs{ASR:A}{ASR:FMB} that the total nuclear correction to
2061: the Adler sum rule should vanish. This requirement provides an important
2062: constraint on the isovector part of nuclear structure functions. We
2063: verify that our approach is consistent with the Adler sum rule and
2064: explicitly calculate the OS and NS corrections as a function of $Q^2$
2065: using the off-shell function $\delta f_2$ by \eq{delf:fit} and effective
2066: cross section (\ref{xsec:ph}) derived from analysis of nuclear DIS with
2067: charged leptons \cite{KP04}.
2068: %
2069: It should be remarked that the quantity $\delta\mathcal R_T^{(1,-)}$ is
2070: also determined by $\alpha_T^1$, the $\Re/\Im$ ratio of the isospin 1
2071: transverse effective amplitude [see \eq{delR:mn}].
2072: This quantity is not constrained by charged-lepton data.
2073: We assume $\alpha_T^1$ to be energy- and $Q^2$-independent.
2074: In order to constrain this parameter we apply the requirement of
2075: minimization of the total nuclear correction to the Adler sum rule
2076: $\delta S_{\rm A}=\delta S_{\rm A}^{\rm OS} + \delta S_{\rm A}^{\rm NS}$.
2077: In particular, we start from $\alpha_T^1=1$, as suggested by simple Regge
2078: arguments in Sec.~\ref{sec:aeff}, and try to adjust this parameter in
2079: order to minimize $\delta S_{\rm A}$ for all $Q^2$. We found
2080: that $\alpha_T^1=1.35$ provides a good cancellation between the OS and NS
2081: corrections (see Fig.~\ref{fig:ASR}).
2082:
2083: %% NUCLEAR EFFECTS IN ASR
2084:
2085: \begin{figure}[htb]
2086: \begin{center}
2087: \hspace{-2.0em}
2088: \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{asr_Fe.eps}%
2089: \hspace{-0.2em}\includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{xsec_Fe.eps}
2090: \caption{%
2091: Relative off-shell (OS), nuclear shadowing (NS) and total nuclear
2092: correction to the Adler sum rule calculated for iron (left panel).
2093: The right panel shows phenomenological cross section by
2094: \eq{xsec:ph} with the error band and effective cross section computed by
2095: requiring exact cancellation between OS and NS effects in nuclear Adler
2096: sum rule (1) and in the normalization of nuclear valence quark
2097: distribution (2)
2098: (see text for more details). }
2099: \label{fig:ASR}
2100: \end{center}
2101: \shrinkvspace
2102: %\shrinkvspace
2103: \end{figure}
2104:
2105:
2106: We also remark that phenomenological cross section (\ref{xsec:ph}) should
2107: be applied in the limited region of $Q^2$. This is because this quantity
2108: was constrained by nuclear shadowing data in DIS which are limited to the
2109: region $Q^2<20\gevsq$ \cite{KP04}.
2110: In order to evaluate the effective cross section at higher values of $Q^2$
2111: we take the requirement $\delta S_{\rm A}=0$ as equation on the cross
2112: section and solve it numerically. The result of calculation for iron is
2113: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ASR}. Also shown is the effective cross section
2114: obtained from a similar calculation for the normalization of the nuclear
2115: quark valence number (see Sec.~\ref{sec:GLS}). Both approaches give
2116: consistent results. We also examined this approach for different
2117: nuclei and found similar results for effective cross section at high $Q^2$.
2118:
2119: For convenience, we provide a parametrization which reasonably fits
2120: the numerical solution to the effective cross section for $Q^2>4\gevsq$
2121: %
2122: \begin{equation}
2123: \label{xsec:as}
2124: %\sigma^{\rm as}_T(Q^2)=0.593+18.483 \ln(Q^2/0.370)^{-1.854},
2125: \sigma^{\rm eff}_T(Q^2)=0.59+18.48 \ln(Q^2/0.37)^{-1.85},
2126: \end{equation}
2127: %
2128: where the cross section is in mb and $Q^2$ in $\gevsq$.
2129: In applications discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:res}
2130: for the cross section, we use \eq{xsec:ph} for
2131: $Q^2<15\gevsq$ and \eq{xsec:as} for higher values of $Q^2$.
2132:
2133:
2134: \subsection{The Gross--Llewellyn-Smith sum rule for nuclei}
2135: \label{sec:GLS}
2136:
2137: The Gross--Llewellyn-Smith (GLS) sum is the integrated
2138: structure function $F_3^{\nu+\bar\nu}$,
2139: %
2140: \begin{equation}
2141: \label{GLS}
2142: \sgls^A = \frac12\int_0^{M_A/M}\hspace{-2em}\ud x\,
2143: F_3^{\nu+\bar\nu}(x,Q^2),
2144: \end{equation}
2145: %
2146: where we write the GLS sum per one nucleon for a generic nuclear
2147: target. In the quark parton model the GLS sum gives the number of
2148: valence quarks (baryon number) of the target $\sgls^A=3$
2149: \cite{Gross:1969jf}.
2150: However, in QCD the direct relation between the baryon current and $\sgls$
2151: only holds in the leading twist and leading order in $\as$.
2152: In contrast to the Adler sum rule,
2153: $\sgls$ depends on $Q^2$ and is affected by QCD radiative
2154: corrections, target mass, and the higher-twist effects.
2155:
2156: In this section we discuss the GLS
2157: integral for nuclear targets. We explicitly separate nuclear corrections to
2158: the GLS integral as $\sgls^A=\sgls^N + \delta \sgls$, where
2159: $\sgls^N$ refers to the GLS integral for the nucleon (proton).
2160: We first consider nuclear corrections to the GLS sum in the LT
2161: approximation.
2162: %
2163: The correction due to nuclear binding and Fermi motion calcel out in
2164: this approximation as follows from the direct integration of
2165: \eq{FA-3} (see also \cite{Ku98}). The nuclear pion correction to
2166: $F_3^{\nu+\bar\nu}$ also vanishes.
2167: %
2168: However, both, the nuclear shadowing (NS) and the off-shell (OS)
2169: corrections to GLS, are generally present. We compute the OS correction
2170: to $F_3$
2171: using \Eqs{SF:OS}{delf} and assuming common
2172: off-shell function $\delta f_2(x)=\delta f_3(x)$
2173: (see discussion in Sec.~\ref{sec:OS}).
2174: The NS correction is given by \eq{delFA:0-}. We write these corrections
2175: for high-$Q^2$ kinematics and neglect power terms in the structure
2176: functions
2177: %
2178: \begin{subequations}\label{GLS:cor}
2179: \begin{align}
2180: \label{GLS:OS}
2181: \delta \sgls^{\rm OS} &= \frac12\int_0^1\hspace{-1ex}\ud x\,
2182: F_{3,{\rm LT}}^{(\nu+\bar\nu)p}(x,Q^2)
2183: \delta f(x) \average{v}_0,
2184: \\
2185: \label{GLS:NS}
2186: \delta \sgls^{\rm NS} &= \frac12\int_0^1\hspace{-1ex}\ud x\,
2187: F_{3,{\rm LT}}^{(\nu+\bar\nu)p}(x,Q^2)
2188: \delta\mathcal{R}^{(0,-)}_T(x,Q^2),
2189: \end{align}
2190: \end{subequations}
2191: %
2192: where $\average{v}_0=\average{p^2-M^2}_0/M^2$ is the bound nucleon
2193: virtuality averaged with the isoscalar nuclear spectral function
2194: $\mathcal{P}_0$.
2195:
2196: The subscript LT indicates that the structure functions
2197: are calculated in the leading twist approximation in QCD. As mentioned
2198: above, in LO approximation in $\alpha_S$, $\tfrac12 F_{3,{\rm
2199: LT}}^{(\nu+\bar\nu)}$ reduces to the valence quark distribution $u_{\rm
2200: val}+d_{\rm val}$ and the GLS integral gives the baryon number in the
2201: target. For this reason the total nuclear correction to the GLS integral
2202: should cancel out.
2203: The phenomenological OS and NS corrections driven by
2204: \Eqs{delf:fit}{xsec:ph} indeed largely cancel in the GLS integral, as was
2205: shown in Ref.\cite{KP04} (see Fig.~5 in Ref.\cite{KP04}).
2206: %
2207: It should be remarked that phenomenological cross section effectively
2208: incorporates contributions from all twists since it is extracted from
2209: data.
2210: Futhermore, at practice the application of \eq{xsec:ph} should be
2211: limited to $Q^2<20\gevsq$ (see also Sec.~\ref{sec:ASR}).
2212: %
2213: Higher twists are known to be important at low $Q^2$ and
2214: for this reason we should not expect the exact cancellation between
2215: (\ref{GLS:OS}) and (\ref{GLS:NS}) at low $Q^2$.
2216:
2217:
2218: At high $Q^2$ the LO QCD approximation to structure functions becomes more
2219: accurate and the total nuclear correction to the GLS sum rule should
2220: cancel out for normalization reason. We evaluate the
2221: effective cross section, which provides this cancellation,
2222: from the equation $\delta S_{\rm GLS}=0$.
2223: This equation is solved
2224: numerically using the LO approximation for the structure function $xF_3$
2225: and phenomenological off-shell function by \eq{delf:fit}.
2226:
2227:
2228: It should be remarked that the quantity $\delta\mathcal R_T^{(0,-)}$,
2229: which determines the nuclear shadowing correction to the GSL sum rule,
2230: also depends on $\alpha_\Delta^0$, the $\Re/\Im$ ratio of the
2231: transverse C-odd and isospin 0 effective amplitude [see
2232: \eq{delFA:0-}], which is not well known.
2233: We assume $\alpha_\Delta^0$ to be independent of energy and $Q^2$.
2234: In order to fix its value we follow an iterative procedure. In
2235: particular, we start from $\alpha_\Delta^0=1$, as suggested by simple
2236: Regge arguments in Sec.~\ref{sec:aeff}, and calculate effective cross
2237: section $\sigma^{\rm eff}_T(Q^2)$ from equation $\delta S_{\rm GLS}=0$.
2238: Then the value of $\alpha_\Delta^0$ is ajusted in order to match
2239: $\sigma^{\rm eff}_T(Q^2)$ at high $Q^2$ with the cross section
2240: calculated from the Adler sum rule in Sec.~\ref{sec:ASR}. We found that
2241: for $\alpha_\Delta^0=1.15$ the two solutions are in a reasonable
2242: agreement. The results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ASR} (right panel)
2243: together with the results of similar calculation using the Adler sum rule.
2244:
2245:
2246:
2247: \section{Numerical applications}
2248: \label{sec:res}
2249:
2250: In this section we apply the approach developed in this paper to
2251: calculate SFs and cross sections for the targets relevant to recent
2252: neutrino scattering experiments. In Sec.~\ref{sec:res:pcac} we
2253: present results for the PCAC contribution to the neutrino SF,
2254: in Sec.~\ref{sec:res:sf} we discuss the results for heavy
2255: nucleus/nucleon ratios of different structure functions, in
2256: Sec.~\ref{sec:res:sr} we deal with the numerical analysis of DIS sum rules for
2257: nuclear targets, and in Sec.~\ref{sec:res:xsec} we present our results for
2258: nuclear differential cross sections.
2259:
2260: \subsection{Low-$Q^2$ limit}
2261: \label{sec:res:pcac}
2262:
2263:
2264: Figure~\ref{fig:pcacF2} illustrates the magnitude of the PCAC
2265: contribution to $F_2$ for the nucleon and a few nuclear targets
2266: calculated by \eq{FL:PCAC:2}.
2267: In this calculation we use the Regge parameterization of $\pi N$
2268: forward scattering amplitude and the total pion-nucleon cross section
2269: of Ref.\cite{piN} (see Appendix~\ref{sec:piN}).
2270: %
2271: Note that the values of $F_2$ for heavy nuclear targets are
2272: systematically smaller because of the nuclear shadowing effect for the
2273: pion cross section (see Sec.~\ref{sec:nuke:coh}).
2274: %
2275: In Table~\ref{tab:F2Q0} we list the values of $F_2$ corresponding
2276: to the limit $Q^2\to0$ and $x\to0$ for the same targets as in
2277: Fig.~\ref{fig:pcacF2}. Our results are consistent with the value extracted
2278: by the CCFR experiment on an iron target~\cite{CCFR-PCAC}.
2279:
2280: %%% TABLE OF VALUES OF F2PCAC
2281:
2282: \begin{table}[htb]
2283: \begin{center}
2284: %\shrinkvspace
2285: \begin{tabular}{l|llll|l}
2286: \hline
2287: Target &\ $\tfrac12$(p+n) &\ ${}^{12}$C &\ ${}^{56}$Fe &\ ${}^{207}$Pb &\ CCFR (${}^{56}$Fe) \\ \hline
2288: $F_2$ &\ 0.325 &\ 0.268 &\ 0.235 &\ 0.204 &\ $0.210 \pm 0.02$\\ \hline
2289: \end{tabular}
2290: \caption{%
2291: The value of $F_2$ in the limit of vanishing $Q^2$ %and $x$
2292: for neutrino interactions on different targets. The numbers are extracted
2293: at $x=10^{-5}$. The determination from CCFR~\cite{CCFR-PCAC} is also given for comparison.
2294: \label{tab:F2Q0}
2295: }
2296: \shrinkvspace
2297: %\shrinkvspace
2298: \end{center}
2299: \end{table}
2300:
2301:
2302: %%%
2303: %%% FPCAC PLOT
2304: %%%
2305: %\begin{figure}[htb]
2306: \begin{figure}[p]
2307: \begin{center}
2308: \shrinkvspace
2309: \epsfig{file=pcac_F2x0.00001.eps,width=0.51\textwidth}%
2310: \vspace{-1ex}\epsfig{file=pcac_F2x0.01.eps,width=0.51\textwidth}
2311: \caption{%
2312: The PCAC term of the neutrino structure function $F_2$ ($\gamma
2313: F_{L}^{\textsc{pcac}}$) calculated for $x=10^{-5}$ (left plot) and
2314: $x=10^{-2}$ (right plot) as a function of $Q^2$ for a few different targets
2315: (labels on the curves). A value $M_{\textsc{pcac}}=0.8$ GeV is assumed
2316: (see Section~\ref{sec:res}).
2317: }
2318: \label{fig:pcacF2}
2319: %\shrinkvspace
2320: %\end{center}
2321: %\end{figure}
2322: %%
2323: %% R PLOT
2324: %%
2325: %\begin{figure}[htb]
2326: %\begin{figure}[h]
2327: %\begin{center}
2328: %\shrinkvspace
2329: \epsfig{file=pcac_Rx0.045.eps,width=0.51\textwidth}%
2330: \epsfig{file=pcac_Rx0.125.eps,width=0.51\textwidth}
2331: \caption{%
2332: %
2333: Comparison of the ratio $R=F_L/F_T$ calculated for the isoscalar
2334: nucleon for the charged lepton (dashed-dotted line) and neutrino (solid
2335: line) cases at fixed values of $x$. The left panel corresponds to
2336: $x=0.045$, and the right panel to $x=0.125$. Also shown are the results for
2337: different nuclear targets (${}^{12}$C, ${}^{56}$Fe and ${}^{207}$Pb from
2338: top to bottom). A value $M_{\textsc{pcac}}=0.8$~GeV is assumed (see
2339: Section~\ref{sec:res} for more details). Determinations from
2340: SLAC~\cite{Whitlow:1990gk}, CCFR~\cite{Yang:2001xc} and CHORUS~\cite{chorus-xsec}
2341: are given for comparison.
2342: %
2343: }
2344: \label{fig:pcacR}
2345: \shrinkvspace
2346: \end{center}
2347: \end{figure}
2348:
2349: The PCAC term determines the low-$Q^2$ limit of $F_L$, and $F_T$ should
2350: vanish as $Q^2$ in the limit of $Q^2\to 0$.
2351: In order to describe the structure functions in intermediate region, we
2352: apply a smooth interpolation between the
2353: high $Q^2$ regime, which is described in QCD in terms of LT and HT
2354: contributions, as discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:sf:high-q}, and the $Q^2\to0$
2355: predictions derived from CVC and PCAC arguments.
2356: We use $Q^2_{m} = 1\gevsq$ as the matching point between high- and
2357: low-$Q^2$ regimes.
2358:
2359:
2360: It is instructive to compare the low-$Q^2$ behavior of
2361: $R=F_L/F_T$ for charged-lepton and neutrino scattering. In both cases
2362: $F_T\propto Q^2$ as $Q^2\to0$. However, if $F_L\propto Q^4$ for the
2363: electromagnetic current, for the weak current $F_L\to \FLpcac$, and thus
2364: $F_L$ does not vanish in the low-$Q^2$ limit.
2365: Then the behavior of $R$ at $Q^2\ll 1\gevsq$ is very different for
2366: charged-lepton and neutrino scattering. In order to illustrate this effect
2367: we calculate $R$ as a function of $Q^2$ for two different $x$ (the
2368: $x$-bins of neutrino data \cite{nomad-xsec,nutev-xsec,chorus-xsec}) for
2369: the isoscalar nucleon and a number of nuclei.
2370: The results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:pcacR}.
2371:
2372:
2373: \subsection{Nuclear structure functions}
2374: \label{sec:res:sf}
2375:
2376: Figure~\ref{fig:F2sum} shows the result of calculation of
2377: the $C$-even structure function $F_2^{\nu + \bar{\nu}}$ of ${}^{207}$Pb.
2378: %
2379: The resulting EMC effect resembles that of CL $F_2$ (see Ref.\cite{KP04} for more details).
2380: At large $x$ the nuclear correction is driven by FMB and OS effects. We
2381: recall that the off-shell effect, which modifies the structure
2382: functions of bound nucleon, is important to change the slope of the
2383: EMC ratio, bringing it close to data.
2384: At intermediate $x$ values we observe some
2385: cancellation between the nuclear pion excess and the nuclear shadowing
2386: correction. The latter is the dominant effect for $x<0.05$, providing a
2387: suppression of the nuclear structure function.
2388:
2389: The corresponding nuclear
2390: corrections for the difference $F_2^{\nu - \bar{\nu}}$ are shown in
2391: Fig.~\ref{fig:F2diff} after normalizing them to $\beta = (Z-N)/A$.
2392: There are two distinct
2393: contributions to the difference $F_2^{\nu - \bar{\nu}}$ for nuclear
2394: targets [see Eq.(\ref{nuke:C-odd})]. The pure isovector contribution
2395: [second term in Eq.(\ref{nuke:C-odd})] is shown in
2396: Fig.~\ref{fig:non0}. A comparison with Fig.~\ref{fig:F2diff} indicates that
2397: the dominant contribution to the difference $F_2^{\nu - \bar{\nu}}$
2398: for nuclei is actually coming from the isoscalar part [first term in
2399: Eq.(\ref{nuke:C-odd})], which is due to the Cabibbo mixing
2400: and the heavy quark production effects.
2401:
2402: It must be also noted that coherent nuclear effects
2403: are particularly pronounced in the $C$-odd channel, as can be seen from
2404: Fig.~\ref{fig:F2diff} (the shadowing effect at small $x$). The
2405: antishadowing effect at $x\sim 0.05$ is a combined effect due to nuclear
2406: smearing (FMB) and a constructive interference in the coherent nuclear
2407: correction due to the real part of the effective amplitude.
2408:
2409: %%% CONTRIBUTIONS TO F2 (SUM)
2410:
2411: %\begin{figure}[htb]
2412: \begin{figure}[p]
2413: \begin{center}
2414: \shrinkvspace
2415: %\hspace*{-0.50cm}\epsfig{file=F2sumPb_F2sump.eps,width=0.55\textwidth}\hspace*{-0.50cm}\epsfig{file=F2difPb_F2difp.eps,width=0.55\textwidth}
2416: \epsfig{file=F2sumPb_F2sump.eps,width=12.0cm}
2417: \caption{%
2418: Different nuclear effects on the ratio
2419: $\tfrac{1}{A}F_2^{(\nu+\bar{\nu})A}/F_2^{(\nu+\bar{\nu})p}$ calculated for
2420: ${}^{207}$Pb at $Q^2=5\gevsq$. The labels on the curves
2421: correspond to effects due to Fermi motion and nuclear binding (FMB),
2422: off-shell correction (OS), nuclear pion excess (PI) and coherent nuclear
2423: processes (NS).
2424: }
2425: \label{fig:F2sum}
2426: %\shrinkvspace
2427: %\end{center}
2428: %\end{figure}
2429: %
2430: %%% CONTRIBUTIONS TO F2 (DIFF)
2431: %
2432: %\begin{figure}[hbt]
2433: %\begin{center}
2434: %\shrinkvspace
2435: %\shrinkvspace
2436: \epsfig{file=F2difPb_F2difp.eps,width=12.0cm}
2437: \caption{%
2438: Different nuclear effects on the ratio
2439: $\tfrac{1}{A}F_2^{(\nu-\bar{\nu})A}/(\beta F_2^{(\nu-\bar{\nu})p})$ calculated for
2440: ${}^{207}$Pb at $Q^2=5\gevsq$. The labels on the curves
2441: correspond to effects due to Fermi motion and nuclear binding (FMB),
2442: off-shell correction (OS) and coherent nuclear processes (NS).
2443: }
2444: \label{fig:F2diff}
2445: \shrinkvspace
2446: \end{center}
2447: \end{figure}
2448:
2449: \begin{sidewaysfigure}[p]
2450: \begin{center}
2451: \epsfig{file=F2nuFe_F2pn.eps,width=10.0cm}%
2452: \epsfig{file=xF3nuFe_xF3pn.eps,width=10.0cm}
2453: \epsfig{file=F2nuPb_F2pn.eps,width=10.0cm}%
2454: \epsfig{file=xF3nuPb_xF3pn.eps,width=10.0cm}
2455: \caption{%
2456: Our predictions for the ratios of CC neutrino nuclear structure
2457: functions normalized to one nucleon and those of the isoscalar nucleon
2458: $(p+n)/2$ (left panel for $F_{2}$ and right panel for $xF_{3}$). The ratios
2459: were calculated for ${}^{56}$Fe (upper panels) and ${}^{207}$Pb (lower
2460: panels) as a function of $x$ at $Q^2=1,\ 5$, and $10\gevsq$.
2461: }
2462: \label{fig:nuratios2}
2463: \end{center}
2464: \end{sidewaysfigure}
2465:
2466: Using the approach described in previous sections we calculate the ratios
2467: $\mathcal{R}_2^\nu=F_2^{\nu A}/F_2^{\nu (p+n)/2}$ and
2468: $\mathcal{R}_3^\nu=F_3^{\nu A}/F_3^{\nu (p+n)/2}$ for CC neutrino interactions for
2469: the Fe and Pb targets. The results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:nuratios2}.
2470: %
2471: The bulk behavior of $\mathcal R_2^\nu$ is similar to that of $\mathcal
2472: R_2^\mu$ in CL scattering (see \cite{KP04}) for both the $x$ and
2473: $Q^2$ dependencies.
2474: Note that for heavy nuclei with an
2475: excess of neutrons over protons $\mathcal R_2^\nu > \mathcal R_2^\mu$ for
2476: $x>0.1$. This is because the neutron excess correction is positive for
2477: the neutrino case, while this correction is negative for CL scattering. Indeed,
2478: this correction is given by the second term in \eq{nuke:FA}. Because
2479: $F_2^{\mu(p-n)} > 0$ and $F_2^{\nu(p-n)} < 0$, we obtain the different sign
2480: of the neutron excess correction in these cases. It should be also
2481: remarked that this correction is negative for antineutrino SFs, similar to
2482: the CL case. As a result there is a cancellation for the neutron excess
2483: correction in the sum $F_2^{\nu + \bar{\nu}}$, as can be seen in
2484: Fig.~\ref{fig:F2sum}. It is interesting to note that in the antineutrino
2485: case different nuclear effects cancel to a high degree in the region $x\sim
2486: 0.1$ (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:xsec1}).
2487:
2488: It is also instructive to compare nuclear effects for neutrino SFs $F_2$
2489: and $xF_3$.
2490: One observes from Fig.~\ref{fig:nuratios2} that at large $Q^2$
2491: ($=10\gevsq$) the ratios $\mathcal R_2^\nu$ and $\mathcal R_3^\nu$ turn
2492: out to be similar (although not identical) in the entire kinematical region of $x$.
2493: We recall in this context that the effect of coherent nuclear interactions
2494: at small $x$ is quite different for $F_2$ and $xF_3$ (see
2495: Sec.~\ref{sec:nuke:coh}). Futhermore, the nuclear pion correction to
2496: $xF_3$ cancels out, and the antishadowing effect for $F_2$ and $xF_3$ is
2497: generated by different mechanisms (the combined effect of the real part of
2498: the $C$-odd effective amplitude and the off-shell correction for $xF_3$
2499: and the interplay between pion and off-shell effect for $F_2$).
2500: Nevertheless, at high $Q^2$ the total nuclear correction to $xF_3$ is
2501: very similar to that for $F_2$.
2502:
2503: The differences between $\mathcal R_2$ and $\mathcal R_3$ are more
2504: pronounced at lower $Q^2$, indicating different $Q^2$ dependence of nuclear
2505: effects for these structure functions. The shadowing and antishadowing
2506: effects for $F_3$ become stronger in this region as illustrated in
2507: Fig.~\ref{fig:nuratios2}.
2508:
2509: Also one should remark that the target mass correction to the structure
2510: functions strongly affects the EMC ratio in the region of large $x$ and
2511: low $Q^2\sim 1\gevsq$. This effect causes a noticeable $Q^2$ dependence
2512: of the EMC ratio at $x>0.6$.
2513: %
2514: We also note that in Fig.~\ref{fig:nuratios2} the curves for $Q^2=1\gevsq$
2515: are given for the region $W > 1.25\gev$ and for this reason the region
2516: $x>0.6$ is not shown.
2517:
2518:
2519: \subsection{Neutrino DIS sum rules}
2520: \label{sec:res:sr}
2521:
2522: As discussed in Sections~\ref{sec:ASR} and
2523: \ref{sec:GLS}, we observe a remarkable cancellation between the off-shell
2524: and the nuclear shadowing corrections. This cancellation, which becomes
2525: more accurate at high $Q^2$ where the leading twist dominates, can be
2526: attributed to underlying symmetry through the conservation of the isospin
2527: (Adler) and the nuclear valence quark number (GLS) in nuclear targets.
2528: Assuming exact cancellation we evaluate the effective
2529: cross-section describing the nuclear shadowing at high-$Q^2$.
2530: Both the Adler and GLS sum rules can be used for this purpose, providing
2531: consistent results. In this paper we choose the Adler integral since the
2532: corresponding isospin relation is accurate to all orders. Furthermore, the
2533: evaluation of the Adler sum rule for nuclear targets involves the
2534: off-shell function $\delta f_2$, which was determined from charged-lepton DIS data.
2535:
2536:
2537: We can then evaluate the GLS integral $\sgls(Q^2)$ for different nuclear targets.
2538: Results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:gls}. The nucleon
2539: integral $\sgls^N(Q^2)$ is calculated using the NNLO coefficient functions
2540: and the NNLO PDFs of~\cite{a02}. We observe that the nuclear correction
2541: $\delta \sgls$ decreases progressively
2542: by increasing $Q^2$ and ranges from about 2\% at $Q^2=2\gevsq$ to less
2543: than 0.3\% at $Q^2=20\gevsq$. The results for different targets are
2544: similar and noticeable differences are present only at the lowest $Q^2$
2545: values. We also note the general $Q^2$ dependence for ${}^{56}$Fe is in
2546: agreement with the CCFR measurement~\cite{CCFR:GLS}. The values of
2547: $\sgls^N$ and $\delta \sgls$ are listed in Table~\ref{tab:gls} for a
2548: number of nuclear targets and fixed value of $Q^2=10\gevsq$.
2549:
2550: %%%%% GLS PLOT
2551:
2552: \begin{figure}[htb]
2553: \begin{center}
2554: %\shrinkvspace
2555: \shrinkvspace
2556: %\epsfig{file=gls_qsq.eps,width=10.0cm}
2557: \epsfig{file=gls_qsq.eps,width=0.7\textwidth, height=0.6\textwidth}
2558: \caption{%
2559: The GLS integral for different nuclear targets as a
2560: function of $Q^2$. The nucleon $xF_3$ is calculated in LT NNLO
2561: approximation with the target mass correction as described in
2562: Sec.~\ref{sec:sf:high-q}. The bottom panel shows variations with respect to
2563: the result obtained for average isoscalar nucleon. Data points are the
2564: CCFR extraction of the GLS integral for iron \cite{CCFR:GLS}.
2565: }
2566: \label{fig:gls}
2567: \shrinkvspace
2568: %\shrinkvspace
2569: \end{center}
2570: \end{figure}
2571:
2572: %%%%% GLS TABLE
2573:
2574: \begin{table}[hbt]
2575: \begin{center}
2576: %\shrinkvspace
2577: \begin{tabular}{lc|clc|ccc|cc}
2578: Target &&& Comment &&& $\sgls$ &&& $\delta \sgls$ \\ \hline\hline
2579: p &&& free proton &&& $2.726$ &&& 0 \\ \hline
2580: D &&& full calculation &&& $2.717$ &&& $-0.009$ \\ \hline
2581: ${}^{12}$C &&& full calculation &&& $2.707$ &&& $-0.019$ \\ \hline
2582: ${}^{56}$Fe &&& full calculation &&& $2.710$ &&& $-0.016$ \\ \hline
2583: ${}^{207}$Pb &&& full calculation &&& $2.717$ &&& $-0.009$ \\ \hline
2584: \end{tabular}
2585: \caption{
2586: The GLS sum rule calculated for different nuclei at
2587: $Q^{2}=10\gevsq$. The nucleon structure functions were calculated in LT
2588: NNLO approximation using the PDFs of Ref.\cite{a02}. We use the lower
2589: cutoff $x_{\rm min}=10^{-5}$ in the calculation of the GLS integral.
2590: \label{tab:gls}
2591: }
2592: \shrinkvspace\shrinkvspace
2593: \end{center}
2594: \end{table}
2595:
2596:
2597: Power corrections due to target mass effect are included in the
2598: calculation. Apart from the target mass effect the dynamical power
2599: corrections should generally be present. The contribution of such terms to
2600: the GLS integral was evaluated in \cite{BraunKolesnichenko:1987} using QCD
2601: sum rule approach, predicting a negative correction of $-0.1$ at
2602: $Q^2=3\gevsq$.
2603: %
2604: We also comment that phenomelogical studies of HT terms in
2605: $F_3$ using CCFR data were reported in \cite{kataev} with, however,
2606: high statistical uncertainties. In this context we note the current
2607: analysis of combined (anti)neutrino cross-section data \cite{AKP07} that
2608: would allow to greatly reduce statistical uncertainty in the neutrino HT
2609: terms.
2610:
2611:
2612: The nuclear effects somewhat modify the $Q^2$ evolution of the
2613: GLS integral. This is mainly due to the explicit $Q^2$ dependence
2614: of effective cross section describing the
2615: nuclear shadowing effect.
2616: As can be seen from Fig.~\ref{fig:gls} the correction
2617: is negative and of the order of 2\% at low $Q^2$. This must be
2618: compared with the variation related to the running $\alpha_s$, which
2619: is about 10\% between 2 and 20 $\gevsq$. Nuclear corrections should be then
2620: taken into account for precise extractions of $\alpha_s$
2621: from the GLS sum rule (see also \cite{hep-ph/0009150}). The effect of nuclear corrections
2622: would indeed reduce the measured value of the strong coupling constant, by
2623: reducing the $Q^2$ slope in the GLS integral.
2624:
2625:
2626: \subsection{Comparison with cross section data}
2627: \label{sec:res:xsec}
2628:
2629: %%%
2630: %%% Large figures
2631: %%%
2632: \begin{sidewaysfigure}[p]
2633: \begin{center}
2634: \epsfig{file=xsec_E45_x0.015.eps,width=10.0cm}%
2635: \epsfig{file=xsec_E45_x0.175.eps,width=10.0cm}
2636: \epsfig{file=xsec_E45_x0.300.eps,width=10.0cm}%
2637: \epsfig{file=xsec_E45_x0.650.eps,width=10.0cm}
2638: \caption{%
2639: The ratio of (anti)neutrino nuclear and the isoscalar nucleon differential
2640: cross sections calculated for ${}^{12}$C, ${}^{56}$Fe and ${}^{207}$Pb
2641: targets at $E=45\gev$.
2642: The electroweak correction is taken into account
2643: using Ref.\cite{Arbuzov-Bardin}.
2644: }
2645: \label{fig:xsec1}
2646: \end{center}
2647: \end{sidewaysfigure}
2648:
2649: \begin{sidewaysfigure}[p]
2650: \begin{center}
2651: \epsfig{file=NOMAD_E20.eps,width=12.0cm}%
2652: \hspace*{-0.30cm}\epsfig{file=NOMAD_E60.eps,width=12.0cm}
2653: \caption{Comparison of our predictions (open symbols) with NOMAD data
2654: (full symbols) for neutrino differential cross-sections on ${}^{12}$C at
2655: $E=20\gev$ (left plot) and $E=60\gev$ (right plot).
2656: See text for details.
2657: }
2658: \label{fig:NOMAD}
2659: \end{center}
2660: \end{sidewaysfigure}
2661:
2662: \begin{sidewaysfigure}[p]
2663: \begin{center}
2664: \epsfig{file=CHORUS_E35.eps,width=12.0cm}%
2665: \hspace*{-0.30cm}\epsfig{file=CHORUS_E90.eps,width=12.0cm}
2666: \caption{Comparison of our predictions (open symbols) with CHORUS data
2667: (full symbols) for neutrino (circles) and antineutrino
2668: (triangles) differential cross-sections on ${}^{207}$Pb at
2669: $E=35\gev$ (left plot) and $E=90\gev$ (right plot).
2670: See text for details.
2671: }
2672: \label{fig:CHORUS}
2673: \end{center}
2674: \end{sidewaysfigure}
2675:
2676: \begin{sidewaysfigure}[p]
2677: \begin{center}
2678: \epsfig{file=NuTeV_E85.eps,width=12.0cm}%
2679: \hspace*{-0.30cm}\epsfig{file=NuTeV_E170.eps,width=12.0cm}
2680: \caption{Comparison of our predictions (open symbols) with NuTeV data
2681: (full symbols) for neutrino (circles) and antineutrino
2682: (triangles) differential cross-sections on ${}^{56}$Fe at
2683: $E=85\gev$ (left plot) and $E=170\gev$ (right plot).
2684: See text for details.
2685: }
2686: \label{fig:NuTeV}
2687: \end{center}
2688: \end{sidewaysfigure}
2689:
2690: Using the results on nuclear structure functions we calculate
2691: the neutrino and antineutrino inelastic inclusive differential
2692: cross-sections. Figure~\ref{fig:xsec1} summarizes our results for the
2693: corresponding nuclear dependence.
2694: We note a cancellation between different nuclear effects for antineutrino
2695: at $x\sim 0.1\div 0.2$. As a result, the antineutrino cross section
2696: is not very sensitive to the target material in this region.
2697: Note also the cancellation of nuclear effects for $x\sim 0.3$ for the
2698: isoscalar target ($^{12}$C). Nuclear effect in this region is driven by
2699: the neutron excess.
2700:
2701:
2702: We can then compare our predictions with the available data on
2703: differential cross sections for different targets. Table~\ref{tab:nudata}
2704: summarizes the most recent and precise measurements on ${}^{12}$C (NOMAD),
2705: ${}^{56}$Fe (NuTeV) and ${}^{207}$Pb (CHORUS).\footnote{We use the
2706: cross-section data for all our studies and not structure function data
2707: provided by experiments. This procedure minimizes potential biases related
2708: to different model assumptions used in extractions of structure
2709: functions by individual experiments.}
2710: It must be noted that when comparing
2711: with data the predictions have to include electroweak (EW) corrections
2712: related to virtual loop diagrams, soft photon emission and hard photon
2713: emission. The effect of such processes is to shift the measured kinematic
2714: variables and hence to modify the differential cross sections. To this end,
2715: in this paper we use the recent one-loop calculations of
2716: Ref.~\cite{Arbuzov-Bardin} (see also Ref.~\cite{Dittmaier}). We also
2717: implicitly assume that EW and nuclear corrections factorize so that they
2718: can be applied to the final nuclear structure functions.\footnote{We note
2719: that the magnitude of EW corrections in some specific kinematic regions
2720: can be comparable with nuclear corrections.}
2721:
2722: %\begin{table}[htbp]
2723: \begin{table}
2724: \begin{center}
2725: \begin{tabular}{lc|ccc|ccc|ccc|ccc|ccc|ccc|ccc}
2726: Experiment &&& Beam &&& Target &&& Statistics &&& $E$ values &&& $x$ values &&& $y$ values &&& Number of \\
2727: &&& &&& &&& &&& $[{\rm GeV}]$ &&& &&& &&& points \\ \hline\hline
2728: NOMAD\cite{nomad-xsec} &&& $\nu$ &&& ${}^{12}$C &&& 750k &&& 20$\div$200 &&& 0.015$\div$0.65 &&& 0.15$\div$0.85 &&& 563 \\
2729: NuTeV\cite{nutev-xsec} &&& $\nu$ &&& ${}^{56}$Fe &&& 860k &&& 35$\div$340 &&& 0.015$\div$0.75 &&& 0.05$\div$0.95 &&& 1423 \\
2730: &&& $\bar{\nu}$ &&& ${}^{56}$Fe &&& 240k &&& 35$\div$340 &&& 0.015$\div$0.75 &&& 0.05$\div$0.85 &&& 1195 \\
2731: CHORUS\cite{chorus-xsec} &&& $\nu$ &&& ${}^{207}$Pb &&& 930k &&& 25$\div$170 &&& 0.020$\div$0.65 &&& 0.10$\div$0.80 &&& 607 \\
2732: &&& $\bar{\nu}$ &&& ${}^{207}$Pb &&& 160k &&& 25$\div$170 &&& 0.020$\div$0.65 &&& 0.10$\div$0.80 &&& 607 \\ \hline
2733: \end{tabular}
2734: \caption{The list of neutrino and antineutrino data samples (after analysis
2735: cuts) corresponding to the cross-section measurements used in this paper.
2736: \label{tab:nudata}
2737: }
2738: \shrinkvspace
2739: \end{center}
2740: \end{table}
2741:
2742:
2743: In Figs.~\ref{fig:NOMAD} %,~\ref{fig:CHORUS} and~
2744: to \ref{fig:NuTeV} we report the
2745: comparisons between mesurements and our calculations for several values of the
2746: (anti)neutrino energy ranging from 20 GeV to 170 GeV. In this calculations
2747: we use both the nucleon parton distributions and the HT terms obtained from
2748: the fits to charged-lepton DIS data \cite{a02}. In the presented results the
2749: LT structure functions were evaluated in the NNLO approximation. In order
2750: to evaluate the HT contribution to neutrino structure functions $F_2$ and $F_T$ we use the
2751: phenomenological charged-lepton HT terms rescaled according to the
2752: corresponding ratio of neutrino to the CL structure function in the LT
2753: approximation. No HT contribution is included for $xF_3$. A more detailed
2754: study of (anti)neutrino data in the context of QCD fits and of the
2755: extraction of HT terms will be published elsewhere~\cite{AKP07}.
2756: %
2757: Note that the approach discussed was successfully applied in the analysis of
2758: charged-lepton nuclear data (the nuclear EMC effect) \cite{KP04}. The
2759: comparison with neutrino data provides an independent verification of our
2760: model and also allows a compatibility check between (anti)neutrinos and
2761: charged leptons.
2762:
2763: In general, we observe good agreement between data and our predictions
2764: for all nuclei. We note that this also includes the lowest $Q^2$ data
2765: points, which in the case of CHORUS are at $Q^2\sim 0.25 \gevsq$. The
2766: $Q^2$ dependence in the low $x$ bins is also reproduced, as can be seen
2767: from the $y$ distributions and by comparing different (anti)neutrino
2768: energies. The existing cross-section data in the low $x$ and low $Q^2$
2769: region support the presence of the PCAC term
2770: in the longitudinal structure function. A value of the scale
2771: $M_{\textsc{pcac}}=0.8$ GeV seems to provide the best agreement with data.
2772:
2773:
2774: After verifying the consistency of our cross-section model with (anti)neutrino data,
2775: it is interesting to use the model to examine the compatibility of data
2776: from different experiments and nuclear targets. At small and intermediate
2777: values of $x$ the three experiments are in agreement for both the neutrino
2778: and antineutrino samples. At large values of $x>0.45$ the NuTeV
2779: data seem to be systematically above calculations for most
2780: neutrino energies. On the other hand, the corresponding predictions for
2781: ${}^{12}$C and ${}^{207}$Pb at large $x$ are in agreement with NOMAD and
2782: CHORUS data, respectively.
2783:
2784: The low-$Q^2$ and low-$x$ behaviour of the (anti)neutrino cross section is
2785: dominated by the divergence of the axial current and PCAC relation.
2786: However, as discussed in Section~\ref{sec:sf:low-q}, the scale
2787: controlling the PCAC contribution to the longitudinal structure function
2788: is not well known.
2789: The use of heavy targets introduces additional uncertainties.
2790: The MINER$\nu$A
2791: experiment~\cite{minerva}, recently proposed at Fermilab and currently
2792: under construction, has the possibility to address
2793: PCAC effect (as well as other nuclear effects) in heavy
2794: nuclei. To this end, the possibility to have cryogenic hydrogen and
2795: deuterium targets would greatly enhance the corresponding physics
2796: potential.
2797:
2798:
2799: \section{Summary}
2800: \label{sec:sum}
2801:
2802: We discussed inelastic inclusive scattering of high-energy (anti)neutrino
2803: off nuclei and developed a quantitative model for nuclear structure
2804: functions using an
2805: approach which takes into account the QCD treatment of the nucleon
2806: structure functions and addresses the basic nuclear effects including
2807: nuclear shadowing, Fermi motion and nuclear binding, nuclear pions and
2808: off-shell corrections to bound nucleon structure functions.
2809:
2810:
2811: The presence of both the axial and the vector currents in neutrino
2812: interactions results in contributions with different $C$-parity to
2813: neutrino cross sections.
2814: The interference between the vector and the axial current is described by
2815: the structure function $F_3$ which is not present in charged-lepton
2816: scattering.
2817: %
2818: We discussed in detail how the nuclear effects depend on the structure
2819: function type ($F_2$ vs $xF_3$) and on the $C$-parity of structure
2820: functions ($C$-even $\nu+\bar\nu$ and $C$-odd $\nu-\bar\nu$
2821: combinations).
2822:
2823: The axial-vector current plays a special role in neutrino scattering in the region
2824: of low $Q^2$ and low $x$. In this region the cross sections are dominated
2825: by contributions from the divergence of the axial current which is linked
2826: to the virtual pion cross section via the Adler relation.
2827: Using PCAC we examined the derivation of low $Q^2$ and low $x$ limit for
2828: neutrino structure functions and discussed
2829: the scale in $Q^2$ at which the Adler relation
2830: can be applied. We studied this problem phenomenologically using low-$Q^2$
2831: and low-$x$ neutrino cross-section data.
2832:
2833: We examined the Adler and the
2834: Gross--Llewellyn-Smith sum rules for nuclear structure functions.
2835: A remarkable cancellation between nuclear shadowing and
2836: off-shell corrections was found, underlying the conservation of isospin and
2837: valence quark number in nuclei. This fact was
2838: used to constrain the effective scattering amplitude
2839: controlling the nuclear shadowing for different $C$-parity and isospin
2840: states.
2841:
2842: We applied our results to calculate nuclear structure functions
2843: for the targets and kinematical conditions typical for recent neutrino
2844: experiments.
2845: Our predictions for the (anti)neutrino inelastic differential
2846: cross-sections agree well with the recent data on ${}^{12}$C \cite{nomad-xsec},
2847: ${}^{56}$Fe \cite{nutev-xsec}, and ${}^{207}$Pb \cite{chorus-xsec}.
2848:
2849:
2850: We conclude by commenting that the nuclear corrections prove to be
2851: particularly important for QCD phenomenology of $\nu(\bar{\nu})$ data on
2852: heavy targets, where they significantly affect the fit results~\cite{AKP07}.
2853:
2854:
2855: \section*{Acknowledgments}
2856: %{\small
2857: We thank S. Alekhin, A. Butkevich, A. Kataev, and S. Mishra for
2858: useful discussions and comments, J. Panman for
2859: providing the tables of CHORUS cross-section data, M.
2860: Tzanov for useful information about the NuTeV cross sections, and the NOMAD
2861: Collaboration for the use of their preliminary data.
2862: S.K. was partially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research
2863: Project No. 06-02-16659 and 06-02-16353 and by INTAS Project No. 03-51-4007.
2864: R.P. thanks USC for supporting this research.
2865: %}
2866:
2867:
2868: \appendix
2869: \section{Parameterization of the pion--nucleon scattering amplitude}
2870: \label{sec:piN}
2871:
2872: The parametrization of the pion--nucleon forward scattering amplitude based
2873: on a Regge fit to $\pi N$ scattering data is given in Ref.\cite{piN}:
2874: %
2875: \begin{align}
2876: \label{amp:pi}
2877: a_{\pi^\pm p} &= a_\pi^0 \pm \frac12 a_\pi^1,
2878: \\
2879: a_\pi^0(s) &= \frac{X}{2} s^\epsilon
2880: \left[i-\cot\left(\frac{\pi}{2}(1+\epsilon)\right)\right]
2881: + \frac{Y_1}{2} s^{-\eta_1}
2882: \left[i-\cot\left(\frac{\pi}{2}({1-\eta_1})\right)\right],
2883: \\
2884: a_\pi^1(s) &= -Y_2 s^{-\eta_2}
2885: \left[i+ \tan\left(\frac{\pi}{2}({1-\eta_2})\right)\right].
2886: \end{align}
2887: %
2888: In \eq{amp:pi} the amplitude $a_\pi^{0(1)}$ corresponds to the pion coupling
2889: to the isoscalar (isovector) nucleon configuration and
2890: the sign $+(-)$ corresponds to the $\pi^+(\pi^-)$ meson.
2891: The pion-neutron scattering amplitude is derived from isospin relations
2892: $a_{\pi^\pm n} = a_{\pi^\mp p}$.
2893: The parameters are
2894: %
2895: \begin{align}
2896: X &= 12.08 \pm 0.29, &\epsilon &=0.0933\pm 0.0024,\\
2897: Y_1 &= 26.2\pm 0.74, &\eta_1 &=0.357\pm 0.015,\\
2898: Y_2 &= 0.560\pm 0.017, &\eta_2 &=0.560\pm 0.017.
2899: \end{align}
2900: %
2901: We also note that the forward scattering amplitude is normalized as
2902: $\Im a_\pi=\sigma_\pi/2$ with $\sigma_\pi$ the total cross section, and
2903: the units of the parameters $X$ and $Y_{1,2}$ are such that $a_\pi$ is
2904: measured in mb if $s$ is in GeV$^2$.
2905:
2906:
2907: %%% REFERENCES
2908: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
2909:
2910: \bibitem{nuint}
2911: ``NuInt05, proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Neutrino-Nucleus
2912: Interactions in the Few-GeV Region, Okayama, Japan, 26-29 September 2005'',
2913: F.~Cavanna, J.~G.~Morfin and T.~Nakaya, Eds.,
2914: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 159} (2006).
2915:
2916: \bibitem{nutev-xsec}
2917: M.~Tzanov [NuTeV Collaboration],
2918: arXiv:hep-ex/0507040.
2919: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0507040;%%
2920:
2921: \bibitem{nomad-xsec}
2922: R.~Petti [NOMAD Collaboration],
2923: arXiv:hep-ex/0602022.
2924: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0602022;%%
2925:
2926: \bibitem{chorus-xsec}
2927: G. \"{O}neng\"{u}t \etal [CHORUS Collaboration],
2928: Phys. Lett. B. {\bf 632}, 65 (2006).
2929: %%CITATION = PLB,632,65;%%
2930:
2931: \bibitem{nutev-nucl}
2932: G.~A. Miller and A.~W. Thomas, arXiv:hep-ex/0204007;
2933: %
2934: S.~Kovalenko \emph{et al}., %%, I.~Schmidt and J.~J.~Yang,
2935: %``Nuclear effects on the extraction of sin**2(Theta(W)),''
2936: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 546}, 68 (2002)
2937: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207158];
2938: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207158;%%
2939: S.~Kumano,
2940: %``Modified Paschos-Wolfenstein relation and extraction of weak mixing angle sin**2(theta(W)),''
2941: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 111301 (2002)
2942: [arXiv:hep-ph/0209200];
2943: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209200;%%
2944: M.~Hirai \etal, %, S.~Kumano and T.~H.~Nagai,
2945: %``Nuclear parton distribution functions and their uncertainties,''
2946: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 70}, 044905 (2004)
2947: [arXiv:hep-ph/0404093];
2948: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C70,044905;%%
2949: S.~A.~Kulagin,
2950: %``Paschos-Wolfenstein relationship for nuclei and the NuTeV sin**2(theta(W)) measurement,''
2951: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 091301 (2003)
2952: [arXiv:hep-ph/0301045];
2953: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301045;%%
2954: S.~A.~Kulagin,
2955: %``On the Paschos-Wolfenstein relationship for nuclei,''
2956: arXiv:hep-ph/0406220.
2957: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0406220;%%
2958: S.~J.~Brodsky \etal, %%, I.~Schmidt and J.~J.~Yang,
2959: %``Nuclear Antishadowing in Neutrino Deep Inelastic Scattering,''
2960: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 116003 (2004)
2961: [arXiv:hep-ph/0409279].
2962: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409279;%%
2963:
2964: \bibitem{nutev-sin2w}
2965: G.~P.~Zeller \etal, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 091802 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ex/0110059].
2966:
2967:
2968: \bibitem{numi}
2969: J.~Hylen \etal, Fermilab Report No. TM-2018 (1997);
2970: L.~Bartoszek \etal, arXiv:hep-ex/0408121;
2971:
2972: \bibitem{JPARC}
2973: Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex,
2974: %Tokai (Japan),\\
2975: %URL:
2976: http://jkj.tokai.jaeri.go.jp/.
2977:
2978: \bibitem{minerva}
2979: D.~Drakoulakos {\it et al.} [Minerva Collaboration],
2980: %``Proposal to perform a high-statistics neutrino scattering experiment using
2981: %a fine-grained detector in the NuMI beam,''
2982: arXiv:hep-ex/0405002.
2983: %%CITATION = HEP-EX/0405002;%%
2984:
2985:
2986: \bibitem{nufact}
2987: M.~L.~Mangano {\it et al.},
2988: %``Physics at the front-end of a neutrino factory: A quantitative appraisal,''
2989: arXiv:hep-ph/0105155;
2990: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105155;%%
2991: A.~Blondel {\it et al.},
2992: %``ECFA/CERN studies of a European neutrino factory complex,''
2993: CERN-2004-002;
2994: %%CITATION = ECFA-04-230;%%
2995: M.~M.~Alsharoa {\it et al.} [Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Collaboration],
2996: %``Recent progress in neutrino factory and muon collider research within the
2997: %Muon collaboration,''
2998: Phys.\ Rev.\ ST Accel.\ Beams {\bf 6}, 081001 (2003)
2999: [arXiv:hep-ex/0207031].
3000: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0207031;%%
3001:
3002: \bibitem{Arneodo:1994wf}
3003: M.~Arneodo,
3004: %``Nuclear effects in structure functions,''
3005: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 240}, 301 (1994).
3006: %%CITATION = PRPLC,240,301;%%
3007:
3008:
3009: \bibitem{p-w-rev}
3010: G.~Piller and W.~Weise,
3011: %``Nuclear deep-inelastic lepton scattering and coherence phenomena,''
3012: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 330}, 1 (2000)
3013: [arXiv:hep-ph/9908230].
3014: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908230;%%
3015:
3016: \bibitem{thomas-rev}
3017: D. F. Geesaman, K. Saito, and A. W. Thomas,
3018: Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 45} 337 (1995).
3019:
3020: \bibitem{KP04}
3021: %\bibitem{Kulagin:2004ie}
3022: S.~A.~Kulagin and R.~Petti,
3023: %``Global study of nuclear structure functions,''
3024: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 765}, 126 (2006)
3025: [arXiv:hep-ph/0412425].
3026: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0412425;%%
3027:
3028: \bibitem{Adler:1964yx}
3029: S.~L.~Adler,
3030: % ``Tests Of The Conserved Vector Current And Partially Conserved Axial-Vector
3031: % Current Hypotheses In High-Energy Neutrino Reactions,''
3032: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 135}, B963 (1964).
3033: %%CITATION = PHRVA,135,B963;%%
3034:
3035: \bibitem{IoKhLi84}
3036: B.~L.~Ioffe, V.~A.~Khoze and L.~N.~Lipatov,
3037: {\it Hard Processes. Vol. 1: Phenomenology, Quark-Parton Model},
3038: (North-Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam, 1984).
3039:
3040: \bibitem{OPE}
3041: K.~G.~Wilson,
3042: %``Nonlagrangian models of current algebra,''
3043: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 179}, 1499 (1969);
3044: %%CITATION = PHRVA,179,1499;%%
3045: %
3046: E.~V.~Shuryak and A.~I.~Vainshtein,
3047: %``Theory Of Power Corrections To Deep Inelastic Scattering In Quantum
3048: %Chromodynamics. 1. Q**2 Effects,''
3049: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 199}, 451 (1982).
3050: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B199,451;%%
3051:
3052: \bibitem{handbook}
3053: R.~Brock {\it et al.} [CTEQ Collaboration],
3054: %``Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0,''
3055: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 67}, 157 (1995).
3056: %%CITATION = RMPH
3057:
3058: \bibitem{DGLAP}
3059: L.~N.~Lipatov,
3060: %``The parton model and perturbation theory,''
3061: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 20}, 94 (1975)
3062: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 20}, 181 (1974)];
3063: %%CITATION = YAFIA,20,181;%%
3064: %
3065: G.~Altarelli and G.~Parisi,
3066: %``Asymptotic Freedom In Parton Language,''
3067: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 126}, 298 (1977);
3068: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B126,298;%%
3069: %
3070: Y.~L.~Dokshitzer,
3071: %``Calculation Of The Structure Functions For Deep Inelastic Scattering And E+
3072: %E- Annihilation By Perturbation Theory In Quantum Chromodynamics. (In
3073: %Russian),''
3074: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 46}, 641 (1977)
3075: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 73}, 1216 (1977)].
3076: %%CITATION = ZETFA,73,1216;%%
3077:
3078: \bibitem{C-NNLO}
3079: %\bibitem{vanNeerven:1991nn}
3080: W.~L.~van Neerven and E.~B.~Zijlstra,
3081: %``Order Alpha-S**2 Contributions To The Deep Inelastic Wilson Coefficient,''
3082: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 272}, 127 (1991);
3083: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B272,127;%%
3084: %\bibitem{Zijlstra:1992qd}
3085: E.~B.~Zijlstra and W.~L.~van Neerven,
3086: %``Order Alpha-S**2 QCD Corrections To The Deep Inelastic Proton Structure
3087: %Functions F2 And F(L),''
3088: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 383}, 525 (1992).
3089: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B383,525;%%
3090:
3091: \bibitem{P-NNLO}
3092: %\bibitem{Moch:2004pa}
3093: S.~Moch, J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren and A.~Vogt,
3094: %``The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The non-singlet case,''
3095: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 688}, 101 (2004)
3096: [arXiv:hep-ph/0403192];
3097: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B688,101;%%
3098: %\bibitem{Vogt:2004mw}
3099: A.~Vogt, S.~Moch and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,
3100: %``The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: The singlet case,''
3101: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 691}, 129 (2004)
3102: [arXiv:hep-ph/0404111].
3103: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B691,129;%%
3104:
3105:
3106: \bibitem{GeoPol76}
3107: H.~Georgi and H.~D.~Politzer,
3108: %``Freedom At Moderate Energies: Masses In Color Dynamics,''
3109: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 14}, 1829 (1976).
3110: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D14,1829;%%
3111:
3112: \bibitem{Nacht}
3113: O.~Nachtmann,
3114: %``Positivity constraints for anomalous dimensions,''
3115: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 63}, 237 (1973).
3116: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B63,237;%%
3117:
3118: \bibitem{a02}
3119: S.~Alekhin,
3120: %``Parton distributions from deep-inelastic scattering data,''
3121: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 014002 (2003);
3122: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0211096].
3123: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D68,014002;%%
3124: S. Alekhin, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 74}, 054033 (2006).
3125:
3126: \bibitem{kataev}
3127: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,
3128: %``Higher twists and alpha(s)(M(Z)) extractions from the NNLO {QCD} analysis
3129: %of the CCFR data for the xF3 structure function,''
3130: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 573}, 405 (2000)
3131: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905310];
3132: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B573,405;%%
3133: %
3134: % A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,
3135: %``Fixation of theoretical ambiguities in the improved fits to the xF3 CCFR
3136: %data at the next-to-next-to-leading order and beyond,''
3137: Phys.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ {\bf 34}, 20 (2003)
3138: [Fiz.\ Elem.\ Chast.\ Atom.\ Yadra {\bf 34}, 43 (2003)]
3139: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106221].
3140: %%CITATION = FECAA,34,43;%%
3141:
3142:
3143: \bibitem{AKP07}
3144: S.~Alekhin, S.~A. Kulagin and R.~Petti, arXiv:0710.0124 [hep-ph].
3145:
3146: \bibitem{AJ75}
3147: C.~H.~Albright and C.~Jarlskog,
3148: %``Neutrino Production Of M+ And E+ Heavy Leptons. 1,''
3149: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 84}, 467 (1975).
3150: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B84,467;%%
3151:
3152: \bibitem{KR02}
3153: S.~Kretzer and M.~H.~Reno,
3154: %``Tau neutrino deep inelastic charged current interactions,''
3155: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 113007 (2002)
3156: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208187].
3157: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,113007;%%
3158:
3159: \bibitem{Kopeliovich:1992ym}
3160: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich and P.~Marage,
3161: % ``Low Q**2, high neutrino nu physics (CVC, PCAC, hadron dominance),''
3162: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 8}, 1513 (1993);
3163: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A8,1513;%%
3164: B.~Z.~Kopeliovich,
3165: % ``PCAC and shadowing of low energy neutrinos,''
3166: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 139}, 219 (2005)
3167: [arXiv:hep-ph/0409079].
3168: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0409079;%%
3169:
3170:
3171: \bibitem{PCAC:BEBC}
3172: G.~T.~Jones {\it et al.},
3173: %[Birmingham-CERN-London-Munich-Oxford-London Collaboration],
3174: %``EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE PCAC HYPOTHESIS IN CHARGED CURRENT NEUTRINO AND
3175: %ANTI-NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS ON PROTONS,''
3176: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 37}, 25 (1987).
3177: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C37,25;%%
3178:
3179: %\bibitem{Cudell:1999tx}
3180: \bibitem{piN}
3181: J.~R.~Cudell \etal,
3182: %, V.~Ezhela, K.~Kang, S.~Lugovsky and N.~Tkachenko,
3183: %``High-energy forward scattering and the pomeron: Simple pole versus
3184: %unitarized models,''
3185: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 034019 (2000)
3186: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 63}, 059901 (2001)]
3187: [arXiv:hep-ph/9908218].
3188: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D61,034019;%%
3189:
3190:
3191:
3192: \bibitem{Ku89}
3193: S.~A.~Kulagin,
3194: %``DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING ON NUCLEI: IMPULSE APPROXIMATION AND MESONIC
3195: %CORRECTIONS,''
3196: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 500}, 653 (1989).
3197: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A500,653;%%
3198:
3199: %\cite{Kulagin:1994fz}
3200: \bibitem{KPW94}
3201: %\bibitem{Kulagin:1994fz}
3202: S.~A.~Kulagin, G.~Piller and W.~Weise,
3203: %``Shadowing, binding and off-shell effects in nuclear deep inelastic
3204: %scattering,''
3205: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 50}, 1154 (1994)
3206: [arXiv:nucl-th/9402015].
3207: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9402015;%%
3208:
3209: \bibitem{Ku98}
3210: S.~A.~Kulagin,
3211: %``Nuclear effects in F3 structure function for finite and asymptotic Q**2,''
3212: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 640}, 435 (1998)
3213: [arXiv:nucl-th/9801039].
3214: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A640,435;%%
3215:
3216:
3217: \bibitem{Glauber:1955qq}
3218: R.~J.~Glauber,
3219: %``Cross-Sections In Deuterium At High-Energies,''
3220: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 100}, 242 (1955).
3221: %%CITATION = PHRVA,100,242;%%
3222:
3223: \bibitem{Gribov:1968gs}
3224: V.~N.~Gribov,
3225: %``Interaction Of Gamma Quanta And Electrons With Nuclei At High-Energies,''
3226: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 30}, 709 (1970)
3227: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 57}, 1306 (1969)].
3228: %%CITATION = SPHJA,30,709;%%
3229:
3230: \bibitem{Bauer:iq}
3231: T.~H.~Bauer, R.~D.~Spital, D.~R.~Yennie and F.~M.~Pipkin,
3232: %``The Hadronic Properties Of The Photon In High-Energy Interactions,''
3233: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 50}, 261 (1978)
3234: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 51}, 407 (1979)];
3235: %%CITATION = RMPHA,50,261;%%
3236: C.~A.~Piketty and L.~Stodolsky,
3237: %``Diffraction model of high-energy leptonic interactions,''
3238: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 15}, 571 (1970).
3239: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B15,571;%%
3240:
3241: %\cite{Kulagin:1998wc}
3242: \bibitem{Kulagin:1998wc}
3243: S.~A.~Kulagin,
3244: %``Nuclear shadowing in neutrino deep inelastic scattering,''
3245: arXiv:hep-ph/9812532.
3246: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/9812532;%%
3247:
3248: \bibitem{Collins:1977jy}
3249: P.~D.~B.~Collins,
3250: {\it An Introduction To Regge Theory And High-Energy Physics}
3251: (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1977).
3252: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=555355}{SPIRES entry}
3253:
3254: \bibitem{Gross:1969jf}
3255: D.~J.~Gross and C.~H.~Llewellyn Smith,
3256: %``High-Energy Neutrino - Nucleon Scattering, Current Algebra And Partons,''
3257: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 14}, 337 (1969).
3258: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B14,337;%%
3259:
3260:
3261: \bibitem{CCFR:GLS}
3262: J.~H.~Kim {\it et al.},
3263: %``A measurement of alpha(s)(Q**2) from the Gross-Llewellyn Smith sum rule,''
3264: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81} (1998) 3595
3265: [arXiv:hep-ex/9808015].
3266: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9808015;%%
3267:
3268: \bibitem{BraunKolesnichenko:1987}
3269: V.~M.~Braun and A.~V.~Kolesnichenko,
3270: %``Power corrections to Bjorken and Gross-Llewellyn Smith sum rules in QCD'',
3271: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 283}, 723 (1987).
3272: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B283,723;%%
3273:
3274: \bibitem{hep-ph/0009150}
3275: S.~A.~Kulagin and A.~V.~Sidorov,
3276: %``Nuclear effects and higher twists in F3 structure function,''
3277: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A {\bf 9}, 261 (2000)
3278: [arXiv:hep-ph/0009150].
3279: %%CITATION = EPHJA,A9,261;%%
3280:
3281: \bibitem{Arbuzov-Bardin}
3282: A.~B.~Arbuzov, D.~Y.~Bardin and L.~V.~Kalinovskaya,
3283: %``Radiative corrections to neutrino deep inelastic scattering revisited,''
3284: JHEP {\bf 0506}, 078 (2005)
3285: [arXiv:hep-ph/0407203].
3286: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0506,078;%%
3287:
3288: \bibitem{Dittmaier}
3289: K.~P.~Diener, S.~Dittmaier and W.~Hollik,
3290: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 073005 (2004).
3291:
3292: \bibitem{CCFR-PCAC}
3293: B.~T.~Fleming {\it et al.} [CCFR Collaboration],
3294: %``A first measurement of low x low Q**2 structure functions in neutrino
3295: %scattering,''
3296: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 5430 (2001).
3297: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0011094].
3298: %%CITATION = PRLTA,86,5430;%%
3299:
3300: \bibitem{Whitlow:1990gk}
3301: L.~W.~Whitlow \etal,
3302: %, S.~Rock, A.~Bodek, E.~M.~Riordan and S.~Dasu,
3303: %``A Precise extraction of R = sigma-L / sigma-T from a global analysis of the
3304: %SLAC deep inelastic e p and e d scattering cross-sections,''
3305: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 250}, 193 (1990).
3306: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B250,193;%%
3307:
3308: \bibitem{Yang:2001xc}
3309: U.~K.~Yang {\it et al.} [CCFR/NuTeV Collaboration],
3310: %``Extraction of R = sigma(L)/sigma(T) from CCFR nu/mu Fe and anti-nu/mu Fe
3311: %differential cross sections,''
3312: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 251802 (2001).
3313: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0104040].
3314: %%CITATION = PRLTA,87,251802;%%
3315:
3316: \end{thebibliography}
3317:
3318:
3319: \end{document}
3320: %%%
3321: