1: \documentclass[epj,nopacs,final,english]{svjour}
2:
3: %% Load packages
4: \usepackage{amsmath,cite,babel}
5: \usepackage{graphicx,axodraw}
6: \usepackage{array}
7:
8: %%\input{commands.in}
9: %% Some definitions to make life easier
10: \newcommand{\newc}{\newcommand}
11: \newc{\gev}{\,GeV}
12: \newc{\mev}{\,MeV}
13: \newc{\ra}{\rightarrow}
14: \newc{\rpv}{$\mathrm{\not\!R_p}$}
15: \newc{\rp}{$\mathrm{R_p}$}
16: \newc{\real}{\mathcal{R}e}
17: \newc{\alsm}{{\displaystyle \sum_{\alpha=1,2}}}
18: \newc{\besm}{{\displaystyle \sum_{\beta=1,2}}}
19: \newc{\al}{\alpha}
20: \newc{\sgn}{\mr{sgn}\,}
21: \newc{\be}{\beta}
22: \newc{\ga}{\gamma}
23: \newc{\de}{\delta}
24: \newc{\sla}{\!\!\!\!\!\not\:\:\!}
25: \newc{\slab}{\!\!\!\!\!\not\,\,\,}
26: \newc{\slac}{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\not\,\,\,\,}
27: \newc{\met}{$\not\!\!E_T$}
28: \newc{\cw}{\cos\theta_W}
29: \newc{\sw}{\sin\theta_W}
30: \newc{\ssw}{\sin^2\theta_W}
31: \newc{\ccw}{\cos^2\theta_W}
32: \newc{\cbe}{\cos\beta}
33: \newc{\sbe}{\sin\beta}
34: \newc{\ort}{\frac1{\sqrt{2}}}
35: \newc{\sh}{\hat{s}}
36: \newc{\uh}{\hat{u}}
37: \newc{\tha}{\hat{t}}
38: \newc{\sa}{\sin\al}
39:
40: \newc{\ca}{\cos\al}
41: \newc{\mz}{M_{\mr{Z}}}
42: \newc{\mw}{M_{\mr{W}}}
43: \newc{\bv}{$\mathrm{\not\!B}$}
44: \newc{\lv}{$\mathrm{\not\!L}$}
45: \newc{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
46: \newc{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
47: \newc{\ie}{{\it i.e.\/}\ }
48: \newc{\lam}{\lambda}
49: \newc{\cht}{\tilde{\chi}}
50: \newc{\glt}{\tilde{g}}
51: \newc{\upt}{\tilde{u}}
52: \newc{\qkt}{\tilde{q}}
53: \newc{\elt}{\tilde{\ell}}
54: \newc{\hgt}{\tilde{H}}
55: \newc{\nut}{\tilde{\nu}}
56: \newc{\dnt}{\tilde{d}}
57: \newc{\ftl}{\mr{\tilde{f}}}
58: \newc{\psb}{\bar{\psi}}
59: \newc{\rtt}{2^{1/2}}
60: \newc{\mut}{\tilde{\mu}}
61: \newc{\mr}{\mathrm}
62: \newc{\bath}{\bar{\theta}}
63: \newc{\tht}{\theta}
64: \newc{\JC}{{\bf J}}
65: \newc{\lra}{\longrightarrow}
66: \newc{\eg}{{\it e.g.\ }}
67: \newc{\barr}{\begin{eqnarray}}
68: \newc{\earr}{\end{eqnarray}}
69: \newc{\me}{\mathcal{M}}
70: \newc{\mesqbar}{\bar{\me}}
71: \newc{\dbm}{\partial_\mu}
72: \newc{\dbmu}{\stackrel{\leftrightarrow\ }{\partial^\mu}}
73: \newc{\sgm}{\sigma_\mu}
74: \newc{\captionB}[2]{\caption[{#1}]{{\small {#2}}}}
75: \newc{\ahref}[2]{#2}
76: \hyphenation{KARMEN}
77: \hyphenation{HERWIG}
78: \hyphenation{PYTHIA}
79: \hyphenation{JETSET}
80: \hyphenation{SUSYGEN}
81: \hyphenation{ARIADNE}
82:
83: \newc{\bpc}{\begin{picture}}
84: \newc{\epc}{\end{picture}}
85: \newc{\mesq}{|\me|^2}
86: \newc{\hel}[1]{\lambda_{#1}}
87: \newc{\diff}[1]{\frac{d^{3}p_{#1}}{(2\pi)^3 2E_{#1}}}
88: \newc{\mep}[4]{\me^{#1 #2\ra #3 #4}_{\hel{#3}\hel{#4}}}
89: \newc{\mepc}[4]{\me^{* #1 #2\ra #3 #4}_{\hel{#3}\hel{#4}}}
90: \newc{\Hw}{\textsf{Herwig++ }}
91:
92: \title{\textbf{Simulation of Beyond Standard Model Physics in Herwig++}}
93: \author{Martyn Gigg \and Peter Richardson}
94: \institute{Institute of Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics \\
95: University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK. \\
96: \email{m.a.gigg@durham.ac.uk, peter.richardson@durham.ac.uk} }
97: \abstract{
98: We present a new approach for the simulation of Beyond Standard Model (BSM)
99: physics
100: within the \Hw event generator. Our approach is more generic than previous
101: methods with the aim of minimising the effort of implementing
102: further new physics models. Spin correlations, which are important for
103: BSM models due to new heavy fermions and bosons, are discussed and
104: their effects demonstrated for the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
105: (MSSM) and Randall-Sundrum Model using our new framework.
106: \keywords{Monte Carlo -- Beyond Standard Model -- Supersymmetry --
107: Spin Correlations -- Hadronic Colliders}
108: }
109:
110: %%\preprint{IPPP/07/08 \\ DCPT/07/16}
111:
112: \begin{document}
113: \maketitle
114:
115: \section{Introduction}
116: In the arena of modern particle physics Monte Carlo event
117: generators have become essential tools for analysing experimental data. They
118: are necessary in order to compare the behaviour of theoretical predictions under
119: the conditions present within a collider experiment by giving a realisitic
120: description of the final-state particles which interact with the detector
121: including any experimental cuts. It is essential that these generators
122: reproduce Standard Model physics as accurately as possible since these processes
123: will provide a background to any new physics signals that might be present
124: at future colliders as well as being of interest in their own right. New physics
125: models will also need to be incorporated
126: into a Monte Carlo simulation in order for their implications to be fully
127: understood.
128:
129: There are a wide variety of new physics models
130: and while one could implement each model independently in its own event
131: generator it is more efficient to have a general purpose event
132: generator that can
133: handle a variety of these models but can also offer the full event simulation
134: framework, \ie hard process, decay, parton shower and hadronization. This is the
135: approach that will be described in this paper using the
136: \Hw\!\!~\cite{Gieseke:2003hm,Gieseke:2006ga} event generator.
137:
138: \Hw is a new event generator, written in C++, based on the well tested
139: HERWIG \cite{Corcella:2002jc,Corcella:2000bw,Moretti:2002eu} program.
140: It is not simply a translation of the old FORTRAN code in to C++, it includes
141: significant improvements to both the physics models and simulation framework.
142: The object oriented
143: aspect of the C++ language will allow future additions and modifications to
144: be incorporated more easily. One area where improvements are needed
145: is in the simulation of Beyond Standard Model (BSM) physics. In the past
146: each model was hard coded in the generator making the
147: addition of new models a time consuming process. We wish to minimise the
148: effort required in order to add new physics models to \Hw\!\!.
149: Our approach is to factorize the problem in to smaller pieces and reuse
150: as much information that has already been calculated as possible.
151:
152: For example in gluino production our method would first calculate the
153: $2\ra 2$ production matrix element then choose a decay mode for the
154: gluino based on the branching ratios and generate the decay products.
155: In addition, since the gluino is a coloured object, there
156: will be QCD radiation which is simulated more easily in our factorized
157: approach as it is simply another step between the production and decay of
158: the particle. While factorizing the problem in this manner makes many
159: things easier it does
160: introduce complications when considering spin correlations. Additional
161: information must be passed between each step to ensure that the final decay
162: products are correctly distributed including correlations between the production
163: and various decays.
164:
165: Other packages, such as MadGraph~\cite{Maltoni:2002qb},
166: CompHEP~\cite{Pukhov:1999gg},
167: Sherpa~\cite{Gleisberg:2003xi} and Omega~\cite{Moretti:2001zz}
168: with WHiZard~\cite{Kilian:2001qz}
169: exist which are capable of producing a
170: wide class of BSM physics processes\footnote{A general list of programs for BSM
171: physics can be found at http://www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/montecarlo/BSM/} but they have
172: limitations. The main problem is the efficiency with which the
173: variety of possible processes can be generated. The above programs all
174: treat the processes as $2\ra n$ scattering which requires the exact
175: production and decay chain to be specified from the beginning. While this
176: does mean that effects such as spin correlations are included automatically,
177: it limits the number of processes that can be generated in a reasonable
178: amount of time. For example in order to study two different decay modes
179: of the gluino, with the above generators, one would have to calculate the
180: production step twice whereas our method would simply be able to pick
181: another decay mode without recalculating the hard subprocess.
182:
183: To minimise the amount of work needed for every new model, our approach will
184: require only a set of Feynman rules, the
185: specification of any new non-Standard Model particles and their properties.
186: In addition there is
187: a mechanism to read in parameters from a Les Houches~\cite{Skands:2003cj}\footnote{Currently only SLHA1 is supported.} file
188: for a supersymmetric (SUSY) model. The new physics models currently implemented
189: are the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) with CP, R-parity and
190: flavour conservation and a Randall-Sundrum~\cite{Randall:1999ee} type
191: model with the lowest Kaluza-Klein excitation coupling to Standard Model matter.
192:
193: Section~\ref{sec:spin} introduces how spin correlations are dealt with since
194: these will be important when dealing with heavy fermions and vector bosons.
195: Some details on the technical structure of the code will be given in
196: section~\ref{sec:tech} along with some physics of the models implemented thus far.
197: A comparison with the FORTRAN code for some physical distributions will
198: be presented in section~\ref{sec:dist} to demonstrate the consistency of
199: our approach.
200:
201: \section{Spin Correlations}\label{sec:spin}
202: Many new physics models predict the existence of new particles that are
203: as yet undetected by experiment. Heavy spin-$\frac{1}{2}$, spin-1
204: and spin-2 particles will be produced which will decay to lighter
205: states. Their non-zero spin gives correlations between the production
206: and decay steps which must be taken into account in order for the final-state
207: angular distributions to be correct. An algorithm for dealing with these
208: correlations
209: is demonstrated in~\cite{Richardson:2001df,Collins:1987cp,Knowles:1988hu}.
210: It will briefly be described below for the process
211: $e^+ e^- \ra t \bar{t}$ where the top quark subsequently decays, via a W-boson,
212: to a b quark and a pair of light fermions.
213:
214: Initially the outgoing momenta are generated according to the usual cross-section
215: integral,
216: \beq\label{eqn:sigma}
217: \frac{(2\pi)^4}{2s}\int \diff{t} \diff{\bar{t}} \mep{e^+}{e^-}{t}{\bar{t}}
218: \mepc{e^+}{e^-}{t}{\bar{t}}
219: \eeq
220: where $\mep{e^{+}}{e^{-}}{t}{\bar{t}}$ is the matrix element for the initial
221: hard process and $\lambda_{t,\bar{t}}$ are the helicity of the $t$ and $\bar{t}$
222: respectively. One of the outgoing particles is then picked at random,
223: say the top and a spin density matrix calculated
224: \beq\label{rho}
225: \rho^{t}_{\hel{t}\hel{t}^{'}}=\frac{1}{N}
226: \me^{e^+ e^- \ra t \bar{t}}_{\hel{t}\hel{\bar{t}}}
227: \me^{* e^+ e^- \ra t \bar{t}}_{\hel{t}^{'} \hel{\bar{t}}},
228: \eeq
229: with $N$ defined such that $\rm{Tr}\,\rho = 1$.
230:
231: The top is decayed and the momenta of the decay products distributed
232: according to
233: \beq
234: \frac{(2\pi)^4}{2m_t}\int \diff{b} \diff{W^+} \rho^{t}_{\hel{t}\hel{t}^{'}}
235: \me^{t\ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}\hel{W^+}} \me^{*t\ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}^{'}\hel{W^+}}.
236: \eeq
237: where the inclusion of the spin density matrix ensures the correct correlation
238: between the top decay products and the beam.
239:
240: A spin density matrix for the $W^+$ is calculated because the $b$ is stable
241: \beq
242: \rho^{W^+}_{\hel{W^+}\hel{W^+}^{'}} = \frac{1}{N}
243: \rho^{t}_{\hel{t}\hel{t}^{'}}
244: \me^{t \ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}\hel{W^+}}
245: \me^{*t \ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}^{'}\hel{W^+}^{'}},
246: \eeq
247: and the $W$ decayed in the same manner as the top with the inclusion of the
248: spin density matrix here ensuring the correct correlations between the $W$ decay
249: products, the beam and the bottom quark.
250:
251: The decay products of the $W$ are stable fermions so the decay chain terminates
252: here and a decay matrix for the $W$
253: \beq
254: D^{W^+}_{\hel{W^+}\hel{W^+}^{'}} = \frac{1}{N}
255: \me^{t\ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}\hel{W^+}}
256: \me^{*t\ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}\hel{W^+}^{'}},
257: \eeq
258: is calculated. Moving back up the chain a decay matrix for the top quark is
259: calculated using the decay matrix of the $W$,
260: \beq
261: D^{t}_{\hel{t}\hel{t}^{'}} = \frac{1}{N}
262: \me^{t\ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}\hel{W^+}}
263: \me^{*t\ra bW^+}_{\hel{t}^{'}\hel{W^+}^{'}}
264: D^{W^+}_{\hel{W^+}\hel{W^+}^{'}}.
265: \eeq
266: Since the top came from the hard subprocess we must now deal with the
267: $\bar{t}$ in a similar manner but instead of using $\delta_{\lambda_i \lambda_i}$
268: when calculating the initial spin density matrix, the decay matrix of the top
269: is used and the $\bar{t}$ decay is generated accordingly. The
270: density matrices pass information from one decay chain to the
271: associated chain thereby preserving the correct correlations.
272:
273: \begin{figure*}
274: \begin{center}
275: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope-beamA.ps}
276: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope-beamB.ps}
277: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope-beamC.ps}
278: \caption{Angle between the beam and the outgoing lepton in $e^+e^-\ra
279: t\bar{t}\ra b\bar{b} l^{+}\nu_l l^{-}\bar{\nu_l} $ in the lab frame for
280: a centre-of-mass energy of 500 GeV with (a) unpolarised incoming beams,
281: (b) negatively polarised electrons and positively polarised positrons and
282: (c) positively polarised electrons and negatively polarised electrons.}
283: \label{fig:e-beam}
284: \end{center}
285: \end{figure*}
286:
287: The production and decay of the top, using the spin correlation algorithm,
288: is demonstrated in figures~\ref{fig:e-beam},~\ref{fig:e-top} and~\ref{fig:e+e-}.
289: The hard subprocess and subsequent decays were generated using our new method.
290: The results from the full matrix element
291: calculation are also included to show that the algorithm has
292: been correctly implemented. The separate plots illustrate the different
293: stages of the algorithm at work. Figure~\ref{fig:e-beam} gives the angle
294: between the beam and the outgoing lepton. The results from the simulation agree
295: well with the full matrix element calculation which demonstrates the
296: consistency of the algorithm for the decay of the $\bar{t}$.
297:
298: \begin{figure*}
299: \begin{center}
300: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope-topA.ps}
301: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope-topB.ps}
302: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope-topC.ps}
303: \caption{Angle between the lepton and the top quark in $e^+e^-\ra
304: t\bar{t}\ra b\bar{b} l^{+}\nu_l l^{-}\bar{\nu_l} $ in the lab frame for
305: a centre-of-mass energy of 500 GeV with (a) unpolarised incoming beams,
306: (b) negatively polarised electrons and positively polarised positrons and
307: (c) positively polarised electrons and negatively polarised electrons.}
308: \label{fig:e-top}
309: \end{center}
310: \end{figure*}
311:
312: \begin{figure*}
313: \begin{center}
314: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope+e-A.ps}
315: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope+e-B.ps}
316: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tope+e-C.ps}
317: \caption{Angle between the outgoing lepton and anti-lepton in $e^+e^-\ra
318: t\bar{t}\ra b\bar{b} l^{+}\nu_l l^{-}\bar{\nu_l} $ in the lab frame for
319: a centre-of-mass energy of 500 GeV with (a) unpolarised incoming beams,
320: (b) negatively polarised electrons and positively polarised positrons and
321: (c) positively polarised electrons and negatively polarised electrons.}
322: \label{fig:e+e-}
323: \end{center}
324: \end{figure*}
325:
326: Figure~\ref{fig:e-top} gives the angle between the top quark and the produced
327: lepton. This shows the same agreement as the previous figure and demonstrates
328: the correct implementation of the spin density matrix for the $\bar{t}$ decay.
329: Finally figure~\ref{fig:e+e-} gives the results for the angle between the
330: final-state lepton/anti-lepton pair showing the correct implementation of the
331: decay matrix that encodes the information about the $\bar{t}$ decay.
332: Again there is good agreement between our
333: numerical results and the full matrix element calculation giving us
334: confidence about the implementation of the spin correlation algorithm.
335:
336: The above procedure is well suited for implementation in an event generator,
337: as demonstrated, where one would like additional processes to occur
338: between the hard production and decay such as showering of a coloured
339: particle. The algorithm as presented here is implemented in \Hw and will
340: be used extensively during the simulation of many BSM physics~models.
341:
342: \section{Technical Details}\label{sec:tech}
343: Instead of following the paradigm of implementing a specific model we have
344: chosen a more generic approach to the problem,
345: which is intended to be as model independent as possible.
346: This will allow a wider variety of models to be implemented
347: within the event generator framework. The structure of the code relies heavily
348: on the inheritance facilities available in the C++ language which
349: allow independent structures to have a common heritage.
350:
351: Due to the existing structure it was sufficient only to consider generation
352: of the hard subprocess and decay of the subsequent
353: unstable particles since the showering and hadronizing are
354: handled (almost) independently of the model details. Both the hard process
355: and decay require a knowledge of the Feynman rules, couplings and masses within
356: the model and these are currently implemented for the MSSM and Randall-Sundrum
357: model.
358:
359: In \Hw the Feynman rules are encoded in \textsf{Vertex} classes.
360: They form part of the structure that enables the calculation of matrix
361: elements using the \textsf{HELAS} formalism~\cite{Murayama:1992gi}. These classes
362: provide the couplings to the particles defined within the model and so they
363: must be provided with every new model which is
364: implemented. The way in which the vertices have been set up minimises this
365: effort and will be described in the next section.
366:
367: \subsection{Vertices}
368: For a given combination of spins interacting at a vertex, if we assume the
369: perturbative form of the interaction, there is a specific Lorentz structure
370: and a limit on the number of possible couplings for any given interaction.
371: This is carried into the implementation of the vertices
372: by defining a base class that holds all common functionality and
373: inheriting from this class to define a specific spin structure. The
374: spin structure must then be further specialised into the exact vertex
375: required by specifying the coupling and the particles that are able to
376: interact at it.
377:
378: As an example, consider the $\chi_i^0 \chi_j^0 Z^0$ vertex in the MSSM as
379: shown in figure~\ref{fig:nnzrule}.
380: \begin{figure}
381: \begin{center}
382: \bpc(300,100)(25,-25)
383: \ArrowLine(100,75)(130,45)
384: \ArrowLine(130,45)(100,15)
385: \Photon(130,45)(190,45){5}{5}
386: \Vertex(130,45){1}
387: \Text(85,80)[l]{$\chi_j^0$}
388: \Text(85,10)[l]{$\chi_i^0$}
389: \Text(195,45)[l]{$Z^0$}
390: \Text(55,-14)[l]{ $i\frac{g}{2\cos\theta_W} \gamma^{\mu}
391: \left[O^{'L}_{ij}(1-\gamma_5) + O^{'R}_{ij}(1+\gamma_5)\right]$}
392:
393: \epc
394: \caption{Feynman rule for the $\chi_i^0 \chi_j^0 Z^0$ vertex where
395: the $O^{'}_{ij}$ are a combination of neutralino mass matrices.}
396: \label{fig:nnzrule}
397: \end{center}
398: \end{figure}
399:
400: A more general rule than that given in the figure is:
401: \beq
402: ic \gamma^{\mu}\left[\frac{a^L}{2}(1-\gamma_5) + \frac{a^R}{2}(1+\gamma_5)
403: \right],
404: \eeq
405: where $c$ is the overall normalisation and $a^{\{L,R\}}$ are the left and right
406: couplings respectively.
407: We would choose $c=g/\cw$, $a^L=O^{'L}_{ij}$ and $a^R=O^{'R}_{ij}$.
408: The overall coupling $c$ is stored in the base class and
409: the inherited class for the specific spin stores the left and right
410: couplings, since they may not always be required. Finally the
411: actual vertex class implements a function to calculate the value of the
412: couplings.
413:
414: In addition to storing the couplings, the spin specific vertices have
415: functions that can be used to either evaluate the vertex as a complex
416: number or return an appropriate off-shell wave function. The ability
417: to calculate not just the entire vertex but off-shell components
418: underlies the \textsf{HELAS}~\cite{Murayama:1992gi} formalism for the
419: calculation of
420: matrix elements. As an example consider decay of the top as in
421: section~\ref{sec:spin}.
422: The \textsf{HELAS} approach factorizes the problem into two parts.
423: First a vector wave function for an off-shell
424: $W^+$ is calculated for a specified helicity of the top and bottom quarks. This
425: is used as an input, along with the spinors for the light fermions, at the
426: second vertex to calculate the final matrix element for that helicity
427: combination. To obtain the spin-summed
428: matrix element the procedure is repeated for all possible helicities of the
429: external particles.
430: This dramatically reduces the amount of code required for numerical
431: evaluation of the vertices. It is also has the additional benefit of providing
432: basis states\footnote{In this case the spinors for the quarks
433: and light fermions.} for the particles that can be stored and
434: passed between the production and decay to ensure the spin correlations are
435: consistently implemented. Our implementation and the formulation are described
436: in more detail in appendix~\ref{app:HELAS}.
437:
438: \subsection{Decayers}
439: The decay of the top described in section~\ref{sec:spin}
440: is handled by a class that is solely responsible for this decay.
441: When just considering the Standard
442: Model this is reasonable since the top is the only heavy fermion\footnote{Heavy in this context means that it decays before it hadronizes.} present.
443: However, in the case of new physics models
444: there will be a wealth of heavy particles which decay
445: and creating a class for each decay would be inefficient. Instead we have
446: implemented a set of classes for each set of possible external spin states
447: and each of these classes, called
448: \textsf{Decayers}, is responsible for a specific external spin configuration
449: in a decay. At the present time only two body decays have been considered\footnote{Any three body decays read from a decay table are handled with a
450: phase-space decayer and therefore will not include spin correlation
451: informatation.}.
452: Appendix~\ref{app:decayers} contains a list of the currently implemented
453: \textsf{Decayer} classes.
454:
455: The standard way in which \Hw handles particle decay modes is with a
456: text file listing each mode, along with branching ratios and the object that
457: will handle the decay. We have instead taken
458: the approach of constructing the decay modes and \textsf{Decayer} objects
459: automatically. All that is left to the user is to specify the particle(s)
460: which will be decayed. The steps for creating the decay modes and
461: \textsf{Decayer} objects are:
462: \begin{enumerate}
463: \item specify the particles for which decay modes are required;
464: \item analyse each vertex to find whether the particle can interact, if it
465: cannot skip to the next vertex in the list until one is found that
466: is able to;
467: \item find the decay products and test whether the decay would
468: be kinematically possible, if not skip to the next possible mode;
469: \item if an object already exists that can handle the decay then assign
470: it to handle the mode else create a new \textsf{Decayer} and assign this
471: to handle the decay.
472: \end{enumerate}
473: The created \textsf{Decayer} object contains the appropriate code for
474: calculating the matrix element for all possible helicity combinations which
475: can be used in the spin correlation algorithm from section~\ref{sec:spin}.
476:
477: There is an additional point to consider when dealing with SUSY models.
478: These models contain additional parameters, such as mixing matrices, that
479: are necessary for vertex calculations. A mechanism has been implemented
480: to read this information from a SUSY Les Houches Accord
481: file~\cite{Skands:2003cj}.
482: In principle the file can contain decay modes along with branching ratios.
483: If this is the case then the decay mode is not created automatically it is
484: just assigned an appropriate \textsf{Decayer}.
485:
486: In order to be able to decay the particles we must first produce them along
487: with their associated momenta.
488: The next section will describe how this procedure is accomplished within
489: the new framework.
490:
491: \subsection{Hard Processes}\label{sec:hardproc}
492: In the hard process the initial momenta of the outgoing particles from
493: a hard collision are calculated via a leading-order matrix element as in
494: equation~\ref{eqn:sigma}. There will be additional PDFs involved if the incoming
495: particles are composite. In \Hw the mechanism for this is again ``factorized''
496: into pieces concerned with the phase-space evaluation and pieces concerned with
497: the calculation of $\mesq$. Here we only concern ourselves with the
498: $2\ra2$ cross sections and as a result the existing structure only requires
499: us to implement calculations of $\mesq$ for the new processes.
500:
501: Figure~\ref{fig:topol} shows the possible topologies for a $2\ra2$ process
502: at tree level. Obviously some processes will not involve all topologies.
503: As in the case for the \textsf{Decayers} our approach is not to create
504: a class for each possible process but instead create classes based on the
505: external spins of the particles involved. The user simply specifies the
506: incoming states and an outgoing particle, all of the possible diagrams
507: with this outgoing particle are then created along with the appropriate
508: \textsf{MatrixElement} object. The
509: object is responsible for calculating the spin-averaged matrix
510: element. In the \textsf{HELAS} approach the matrix element is first calculated by
511: computing the complex amplitude for each diagram of a given helicity combination.
512: The diagram
513: contributions are then summed and the modulus squared taken. This is
514: done for each helicity and the sum of each helicity gives the spin-summed
515: $\mesq$. In the case of strong processes it is easier to separate the colour
516: structure from the evaluation of the matrix element. In a given process the
517: diagrams can be split into ``colour flows'', which are a combination of
518: diagrams with the same colour structure, reducing the amount of computation
519: required.
520:
521: \begin{figure*}
522: \begin{center}
523: \begin{picture}(300,195)
524: %% s-channel
525: \Line(15,185)(45,155) \LongArrow(26,181)(36,171)
526: \Text(6,192)[l]{$p_a$}
527: \Line(45,155)(15,125) \LongArrow(26,129)(36, 139)
528: \Text(6,118)[l]{$p_b$}
529: \Line(45,155)(95,155)
530: \Line(95,155)(125,185) \LongArrow(106,171)(116,181)
531: \Text(130,190)[l]{$p_c$}
532: \Line(95,155)(125,125) \LongArrow(106,139)(116,129)
533: \Text(130,120)[l]{$p_d$}
534: \Text(70,105)[]{``s-channel'' }
535: %% t-channel
536: \SetOffset(25,0)
537: \Line(140,185)(250,185)
538: \LongArrow(153,190)(168,190) \LongArrow(214,190)(229,190)
539: \Text(128,185)[l]{$p_a$} \Text(264,185)[r]{$p_c$}
540: \Line(195,185)(195,125)
541: \Line(140,125)(250,125) \Text(128,125)[l]{$p_b$} \Text(264,125)[r]{$p_d$}
542: \LongArrow(153,120)(168,120) \LongArrow(214,120)(229,120)
543: \Text(195,105)[]{``t-channel'' }
544: %% u-channel
545: \SetOffset(25,-110)
546: \Line(140,185)(250,185)
547: \LongArrow(153,190)(168,190) \LongArrow(214,190)(229,190)
548: \Text(128,185)[l]{$p_a$} \Text(264,185)[r]{$p_d$}
549: \Line(195,185)(195,125)
550: \Line(140,125)(250,125) \Text(128,125)[l]{$p_b$} \Text(264,125)[r]{$p_c$}
551: \LongArrow(153,120)(168,120) \LongArrow(214,120)(229,120)
552: \Text(195,105)[]{``u-channel'' }
553: %% four point
554: \SetOffset(0,-110)
555: \Line(40,185)(70,155) \LongArrow(51,181)(61,171)
556: \Text(28,187)[l]{$p_a$}
557: \Line(70,155)(40,125) \LongArrow(51,129)(61,139)
558: \Text(28,123)[l]{$p_b$}
559: \Line(70,155)(100,185) \LongArrow(81,171)(91,181)
560: \Text(107,185)[l]{$p_c$}
561: \Line(70,155)(100,125) \LongArrow(81,139)(91,129)
562: \Text(107,125)[l]{$p_d$}
563: \Text(70,105)[]{``four-point'' }
564: \end{picture}
565: \end{center}
566: \caption{Tree-level topologies for a $2\ra2$ process. The arrows denote
567: the flow of momenta.}
568: \label{fig:topol}
569: \end{figure*}
570:
571: To demonstrate this procedure consider the process $gg\ra\tilde{g}\tilde{g}$.
572: The diagrams that contribute are shown in figure~\ref{fig:cflows}. If the
573: amplitude, stripped of the colour information, for the $i$th diagram is
574: denoted by $\me_i$ the full amplitude for the 3 diagrams is given by,
575: \begin{subequations}
576: \begin{eqnarray}
577: g_1 & = &\phantom{-} if^{aci} if^{bid} \me_1, \label{eqn:ggf1}\\
578: g_2 & = &\phantom{-} if^{adi} if^{bic} \me_2, \label{eqn:ggf2}\\
579: g_3 & = & -if^{aib} if^{icd} \me_3, \label{eqn:ggf3}
580: \end{eqnarray}
581: \end{subequations}
582: where $g_i$ denotes the full amplitude and $f^{abc}$ denotes the
583: anti-symmetric structure constants.
584:
585: The factors of $i$ associated with
586: the structure constants are present because of the way the vertex
587: rules are defined within the code. The vertices in \Hw are stripped of their
588: colour information and therefore require the extra factors of $i$ to be
589: included, where appropriate, with the colour matrices to give the correct sign.
590: \begin{figure}
591: \begin{center}
592: \bpc(200,300)
593: %%t-channel
594: \SetOffset(0,110)
595: \Gluon(35,185)(90,185){4}{6}
596: \Text(0,190)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\mu}^a (p_1)$}
597: \ArrowLine(90,185)(145,185) \Text(170,186)[]{$\bar{u}^c(p_3)$}
598: \Gluon(35,125)(90,125){-4}{6}
599: \Text(0,130)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\nu}^b (p_2)$}
600: \ArrowLine(90,125)(90,185) \Text(95,155)[l]{$\tilde{g}^i$}
601: \ArrowLine(145,125)(90,125) \Text(170,126)[]{$v^d(p_4)$}
602: \Vertex(90,185){2} \Vertex(90,125){2}
603: \Text(90,105)[]{(1)}
604: %%u-channel
605: \SetOffset(0,0)
606: \Gluon(35,185)(90,185){4}{6}
607: \Text(0,190)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\mu}^a (p_1)$}
608: \ArrowLine(145,185)(90,185) \Text(170,186)[]{$v^d(p_4)$}
609: \Gluon(35,125)(90,125){-4}{6}
610: \Text(0,130)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\nu}^b (p_2)$}
611: \ArrowLine(90,185)(90,125) \Text(95,155)[l]{$\tilde{g}^i$}
612: \ArrowLine(90,125)(145,125) \Text(170,126)[]{$\bar{u}^c(p_3)$}
613: \Vertex(90,185){2} \Vertex(90,125){2}
614: \Text(90,105)[]{(2)}
615: %%s-channel
616: \SetOffset(-55,-10)
617: \Gluon(90,90)(120,60){4}{6}
618: \Text(55,90)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\mu}^a (p_1)$}
619: \Gluon(90,30)(120,60){4}{6}
620: \Text(55,30)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\nu}^b (p_2)$}
621: \Gluon(120,60)(180,60){4}{8} \Text(150,73)[]{$g^i$}
622: \ArrowLine(180,60)(210,90) \Text(215,90)[l]{$\bar{u}^c(p_3)$}
623: \ArrowLine(210,30)(180,60) \Text(215,30)[l]{$v^d(p_4)$}
624: \Vertex(120,60){2} \Vertex(180,60){2}
625: \Text(150,20)[]{(3)}
626: \epc
627: \end{center}
628: \caption{Diagrams contributing to the process $gg\ra\tilde{g}\tilde{g}$
629: where lowered Greek letters denote space-time indices and raised
630: Roman letters denote colour indices in the adjoint representation. $u,v$
631: are the spinors for the gluinos and $\varepsilon_{\mu,\nu}$ are the
632: polarisation vectors of the gluons. The momenta $(p_1, p_2)$ are incoming
633: and $(p_3,p_4)$ are outgoing.}
634: \label{fig:cflows}
635: \end{figure}
636:
637: The combination of structure constants in equation~\ref{eqn:ggf3} can be
638: rewritten using the Jacobi identity to give
639: \beq\label{eqn:ggf3j}
640: g_3 = \left(f^{aci}f^{bid} - f^{bci}f^{aid}\right)\me_3,
641: \eeq
642: making it apparent that the colour structure of the $s$-channel gluon
643: exchange diagram is simply a combination of the other two colour
644: structures. The full colour amplitude can therefore be written as
645: \beq\label{eqn:fullcolamp}
646: \me_T = -\left[c_1(\me_1 - \me_3) + c_2(\me_2 + \me_3)\right],
647: \eeq
648: where $c_i$ denotes the combination of structure constants from above and
649: the combination of diagram amplitudes will be known as ``colour flows''
650: denoted by $f_i$.
651: Note that the overall minus sign can be dropped
652: since it simply corresponds to a phase that will not contribute to the final
653: answer. In order to calculate $\mesq$ the constants $c_i$ need to be squared.
654: For the process being considered
655: $|c_1|^2=|c_2|^2=N_c^2(N_c^2-1)$ and $c_1c^*_2=c_2c^*_1=N_c^2(N_c^2-1)/2$ where
656: $N_c$ is the number of colours.
657: The spin-summed matrix element, averaged over initial colours and
658: polarisations, is then
659: \beq\label{eqn:fullme2}
660: |\mesqbar|^2=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{(N_c^2-1)^2}\sum_{\lambda}
661: C_{ij}f_{i}^{\lambda}f_{j}^{* \lambda}
662: \eeq
663: where $C_{ij}$ is a matrix containing the squared colour factors
664: and $f^{\lambda}_i$ is the $i$th colour flow for the set
665: of helicities $\lambda$.
666:
667: As well as calculating $\mesq$ for a given process each \textsf{MatrixElement}
668: object is also responsible for setting up the colour structure of the hard
669: process which is required to generate the subsequent QCD radiation and
670: hadronization. Depending on the colours of the internal and external
671: states involved there may be more than one possible colour structure for
672: each diagram. For the example in figure~\ref{fig:cflows}
673: each diagram has 4 possible colour topologies since the both the gluon and
674: gluino carry a colour and an anti-colour line in the large $N_c$ limit.
675: When an event is generated, if this case presents itself, a colour structure
676: is picked at random from the $N_t$ possiblities. While this does rely on
677: using the large $N_c$ limit we believe it to be an good approximation for
678: the colour structures that we are dealing with.
679:
680: The possible Majorana nature of external states also gives rise to
681: complications when calculating the matrix element. If the incoming states are
682: a spinor and a barred-spinor then in the case where a $u$-channel diagram
683: is required two additional spinors must be calculated. The reason
684: for this is that, using the notation of figure~\ref{fig:topol},
685: when $c$ and $d$ are crossed their fermion flow can no longer be reversed
686: since the initial fermions
687: set the direction in which these arrows point. The two additional spinors
688: required are a spinor for the original outgoing barred state and a
689: barred spinor for the original outgoing spinor state with care being taken
690: to associate the new spinors with the correct helicity.
691:
692: Appendix~\ref{app:matrix} contains a list of the currently implemented
693: \textsf{MatrixElement} classes\footnote{This includes all of the spin combinations needed in the MSSM and RS model. Additional cases will be implemented when required
694: for a new type of model.}.
695: The example given above demonstrates a
696: possible SUSY gaugino
697: production process that is taken into account with our new mechanism.
698: We have also implemented another mechanism for the simulation of resonances.
699: This will be described now using an example from the Randall-Sundrum model.
700:
701: \subsection{Resonant Processes}
702: Often we are interested in the study of $s$-channel resonances which decay to
703: Standard Model particles rather than the production of a new particle in a
704: $2\ra2$ process. We therefore include a mechanism to study this type of
705: proccess. We will take as an example here the virtual
706: exchange of a graviton, the lowest lying state of a Kaluza-Klein tower.
707: The graviton is predicted by various models with extra dimensions where gravity
708: is allowed to propagate in the bulk, an example process is shown in
709: figure~\ref{fig:gravEx}.
710: \begin{figure}
711: \begin{center}
712: \bpc(100,70)(90,25)
713: \Gluon(90,90)(120,60){4}{6}
714: \Text(55,90)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\mu}^a (p_1)$}
715: \Gluon(90,30)(120,60){4}{6}
716: \Text(55,30)[l]{$\varepsilon_{\nu}^b (p_2)$}
717: \Photon(120,60)(180,60){4}{8}
718: \Photon(120,60)(180,60){-4}{8}
719: \Text(150,73)[]{$G^{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}$}
720: \ArrowLine(180,60)(210,90) \Text(215,90)[l]{$\bar{u}^c(p_3)$}
721: \ArrowLine(210,30)(180,60) \Text(215,30)[l]{$v^d(p_4)$}
722: \Vertex(120,60){2} \Vertex(180,60){2}
723: \epc
724: \end{center}
725: \caption{Resonant graviton exchange from gluon fusion to produce 2
726: fermions.}
727: \label{fig:gravEx}
728: \end{figure}
729: The same matrix element classes which are used to calculate the hard
730: processes are used to calculate the resonant processes. Now, however, there is
731: less computation since each \textsf{MatrixElement} will contain only a
732: single $s$-channel diagram and hence a single colour flow.
733:
734: The next section will detail some physical distributions for the two models
735: discussed previously.
736:
737: \section{Results}\label{sec:dist}
738: The following sections will show some distributions produced using the new
739: BSM code in \Hw\!\!. As there are currently only two models implemented these
740: will form the basis of the distributions considered.
741:
742: \subsection{Graviton Resonances}
743: The LHC may give us the possibility of detecting narrow graviton resonances
744: at the TeV scale through various hard subprocesses. To test our
745: implementation of the RS Model we have picked three processes involving
746: graviton exchange, $gg\ra G\ra e^+e^-$, $u\bar{u}\ra G\ra e^+e^-$ and
747: $u\bar{u}\ra G \ra \gamma \gamma$.
748: The plots of the angular distribution of the outgoing fermion/boson with
749: respect to the beam axis in the centre-of-mass frame are shown in
750: figure~\ref{fig:GRes}. There is good agreement here with the analytical
751: result from the matrix element and the numerical simulation indicating
752: the correct implementation of the graviton Feynman rules and
753: new matrix elements.
754:
755: \begin{figure}
756: \begin{center}
757: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{rsgg2ff.ps}
758: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{rsff2ff.ps}
759: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{rsff2pp.ps}
760: \caption{Angular distributions for fermion and boson production through
761: a resonant graviton. The graviton has a mass of 1 TeV.
762: The black line denotes the analytical result and the crosses
763: show the simulation data for (a) $gg\ra G\ra e^+e^-$
764: (b) $u\bar{u}\ra G\ra e^+e^-$ and (c) $u\bar{u}\ra G \ra \gamma \gamma$.}
765: \label{fig:GRes}
766: \end{center}
767: \end{figure}
768:
769: These distributions show the characteristic behaviour of an exchanged
770: spin-2 particle. The angular dependence of an exchanged spin-1 boson
771: on the other hand is notably different and therefore this kind of
772: distribution is extremely useful in identifying the two cases and
773: eliminating possible background spin-1 exchange when searching for
774: this new mode~\cite{Allanach:2002gn} in future experiments. This kind of
775: behaviour may be important for the LHC since
776: Randall-Sundrum type models predict the possibility of narrow graviton
777: resonances at the TeV-scale~\cite{Allanach:2000nr}. Discovery of the kind of behaviour shown in
778: figure~\ref{fig:GRes}
779: would certainly be a very strong indication of the
780: existence of some type of extra dimensions model.
781:
782: \subsection{Squark Decay}\label{sec:sqDecay}
783: The spin correlation algorithm discussed in section~\ref{sec:spin} was
784: shown to work in the case of $t\bar{t}$ production and decay. One of the
785: simplest cases to consider for a SUSY model is the different decay modes
786: of a left-handed squark. Considering the decay of the squark via the two
787: modes (a) $\tilde{q}_L\ra \tilde{\chi}^0_2q\ra\tilde{l}^-_R l^+ u$ and
788: (b) $\tilde{q}_L\ra \tilde{\chi}^0_2q\ra\tilde{l}^+_R l^- u$ and plotting
789: the mass distribution of the produced quark and (anti-)lepton allows
790: the effect of spin correlations to be shown.
791:
792: The plots in figure~\ref{fig:qldecay} were produced at Snowmass point
793: 5~\cite{Allanach:2002nj} where $\tan\beta=5$, $\text{sign}(\mu)=+$, $M_0=150\,
794: \textrm{GeV}$,
795: $M_{2}=300\,\textrm{GeV}$ and
796: $A_0=-1000\,\textrm{GeV}$.
797: This parameter set gives the following particle
798: spectrum using \textsf{SOFTSUSY} 2.0.8~\cite{Allanach:2001kg}
799: $M_{\tilde{u}_L}=672.82\,\textrm{GeV}$,
800: $M_{\tilde{\chi}^0_2}=231.29\,\textrm{GeV}$ and
801: $M_{\tilde{l}_R}=192.87\,\textrm{GeV}$.
802:
803: There is a stark difference in the quark-lepton mass distribution for the
804: two decay modes considered above. The difference is due to the helicities of
805: the external particles. At the mass scale of the squark the quark can be
806: considered massless and left-handed while the produced lepton and anti-lepton
807: will be right-handed. When back-to-back the lepton-quark system will have
808: net spin-1 and as such can not be produced in a scalar decay while the
809: anti-lepton-quark system will have spin-0 and is able to proceed.
810:
811: The end-point in both of the distributions is due to a kinematical cut-off
812: where the invariant mass of the quark-lepton pair is at a maximum. The value
813: of this end-point can be calculated by considering the mass-squared when
814: the pair is back-to-back. The value is given in~\cite{Allanach:2000kt} as
815: \beq
816: (m)^2_{\text{max}} =\frac{ \left(m^2_{\tilde{u}_l} - m^2_{\tilde{\chi}^0_2}\right)
817: \left(m^2_{\tilde{\chi}^0_2} - m^2_{\tilde{e}_R}\right)}{m^2_{\tilde{\chi}_2^0}}.
818: \eeq
819: Using the values for the sparticles above one finds a value for the cut-off
820: of 348.72\,GeV which is consistent with the plots in figure~\ref{fig:qldecay}.
821:
822: \begin{figure*}
823: \begin{center}
824: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.3\textwidth]{qlpMassDist.ps}
825: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.3\textwidth]{qlmMassDist.ps}
826: \caption{The invariant mass distribution of (a) the anti-lepton-quark and
827: (b) lepton-quark produced in $\tilde{u}_L\ra\tilde{\chi}_2^0 u \ra
828: e^{\pm}\tilde{e}_R^{\mp} u$.}
829: \label{fig:qldecay}
830: \end{center}
831: \end{figure*}
832:
833: \subsection{Gaugino Production}
834: Supersymmetry predicts the existence of Majorana fermions and it is
835: necessary to ensure that their spin correlations are implemented correctly in
836: our new framework. We consider three production processes and the angular
837: distributions of the leptons produced in the subsequent decays.
838: The SUSY spectrum for each was again generated using \textsf{SOFTSUSY} and the
839: masses for the points used in each process are given in the relevant section.
840:
841: %% Neutralino %%
842: \subsubsection{$e^+e^-\ra \chi_2^0\chi_1^0$}
843: Here we consider the production of the lightest and next-to-lightest
844: neutralinos with the $\chi_2^0$ decaying via the two modes
845: (i) $\chi_2^0\ra\tilde{l}_R^+ l^-\ra l^+l^-\chi_1^0$,
846: (ii) $\chi_2^0\ra Z^0\chi_1^0\ra l^-l^+ \chi_1^0$ at SPS point 1b. The
847: relevant sparticle masses are $M_{\chi_2^0}=306.55\,\text{GeV}$,
848: $M_{\chi_1^0}=161.78\,\text{GeV}$, $M_{\tilde{l}_R}=253.82\,\text{GeV}$.
849: Figure~\ref{fig:n2n1lepton} shows how the polarisation of the beam affects
850: the angular distribution of the lepton produced from the $\chi_2^0$ decay.
851:
852: \begin{figure*}
853: \begin{center}
854: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12n2embeamA.ps}
855: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12n2embeamB.ps}
856: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12n2embeamC.ps}
857: \caption{The angle between the lepton produced in
858: $e^+e^-\ra\chi_2^0\chi_1^0\ra\tilde{l}_R^+ l^-$ and the beam in the
859: lab frame for a centre-of-mass energy of 500 GeV and
860: (a) unpolarised incoming beams, (b) negatively polarised electrons and
861: positively polarised positrons and (c) positively polarised electrons and
862: negatively polarised positrons. The black histogram is from HERWIG and the
863: crosses from \Hw\!\!.}
864: \label{fig:n2n1lepton}
865: \end{center}
866: \end{figure*}
867:
868: The lepton shows a correlation with the beam polarisation due to the
869: neutralino being a fermion and preserving spin information when decaying.
870: Figures~\ref{fig:n2n1Zlept} and~\ref{fig:n2n1sleptlept} show the angular
871: dependence of the final-state lepton for the case of an intermediate
872: $Z^0$ boson and $\tilde{l}_R$ respectively. As is to be expected for an
873: intermediate slepton the incoming beam polarisation has little effect on the
874: angular distribution of the final-state lepton due to its scalar nature\footnote{There is some residual effect due to the correlation of the $\tilde{l}_R$ direction with the beam in the $\chi_2^0$ decay.}.
875: The plots are in good agreement with the HERWIG results.
876:
877: \begin{figure*}
878: \begin{center}
879: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12ZembeamA.ps}
880: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12ZembeamB.ps}
881: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12ZembeamC.ps}
882: \caption{The angle between the lepton produced in
883: $e^+e^-\ra\chi_2^0\chi_1^0\ra Z^0 \chi_1^0\ra l^-l^+\chi_1^0$ and the
884: beam in the lab frame for a centre-of-mass energy of 500 GeV and
885: (a) unpolarised incoming beams, (b) negatively polarised electrons and
886: positively polarised positrons and (c) positively polarised electrons and
887: negatively polarised positrons. The black histogram is from HERWIG and the
888: crosses from \Hw\!\!.}
889: \label{fig:n2n1Zlept}
890: \end{center}
891: \end{figure*}
892:
893: \begin{figure*}
894: \begin{center}
895: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12slembeamA.ps}
896: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12slembeamB.ps}
897: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{n2n12slembeamC.ps}
898: \caption{The angle between the lepton produced in
899: $e^+e^-\ra\chi_2^0\chi_1^0\ra\tilde{l}_R^- l^+\ra l^- l^+ \chi_1^0$
900: and the beam in the lab frame for a centre-of-mass energy of 500 GeV and
901: (a) unpolarised incoming beams, (b) negatively polarised electrons and
902: positively polarised positrons and (c) positively polarised electrons and
903: negatively polarised positrons. The black histogram is from HERWIG and the
904: crosses from \Hw\!\!.}
905: \label{fig:n2n1sleptlept}
906: \end{center}
907: \end{figure*}
908:
909: %% Charginos %%
910: \subsubsection{$e^+e^-\ra \chi_i^+\chi_i^-$}
911: We now consider the production of chargino pairs and their associated decays.
912: Two possible decay modes of the $\chi_i^\pm$ are (a)
913: $\chi_i^\pm\ra W^\pm \chi_1^0$ and (b) $\chi_i^\pm\ra \tilde{\nu}_\alpha l^\pm$.
914: Here we use the $W$ decay mode for the lightest chargino and the
915: sneutrino decay mode for the heaviest chargino in order to consider
916: final-states with differing spins. The mass spectrum was
917: generated for SPS point 1a where $M_{\chi_2^+}=377.39\,\text{GeV}$,
918: $M_{\chi_1^+}=181.53\,\text{GeV}$, $M_{\tilde{\nu}_L}=185.42\,\text{GeV}$ and
919: $M_{\chi_1^0}=97.00\,\text{GeV}$.
920:
921: Figure~\ref{fig:c1c1Wlept} shows the angle of the produced electron for the
922: production of the lightest chargino. As is to be expected the beam polarisation
923: affects the lepton distribution because of the intermediate $W$ boson
924: carrying the spin correlations through to the final-state. The effects are
925: similar in the case of the sneutrino decay of the heaviest chargino shown in
926: figure~\ref{fig:c2c2sneu}. The lepton
927: accompanied with the $\tilde{\nu}_L$ still shows correlations with the beam
928: on account of the chargino being a fermion. If the lepton had come from the
929: decay of a scalar then there would have been no such correlation.
930:
931: \begin{figure*}
932: \begin{center}
933: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{c1c12WembeamA.ps}
934: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{c1c12WembeamB.ps}
935: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{c1c12WembeamC.ps}
936: \caption{The angle between the lepton produced in
937: $e^+e^-\ra\chi_1^+\chi_1^-\ra W^+ W^-\chi_1^0 \chi_1^0 \ra l^- l^+ \nu_l
938: \bar{\nu}_l$
939: and the beam in the lab frame for a centre-of-mass energy of 500 GeV and
940: (a) unpolarised incoming beams, (b) negatively polarised electrons and
941: positively polarised positrons and (c) positively polarised electrons and
942: negatively polarised positrons. The black histogram is from HERWIG and the
943: crosses from \Hw\!\!.}
944: \label{fig:c1c1Wlept}
945: \end{center}
946: \end{figure*}
947:
948: \begin{figure*}
949: \begin{center}
950: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{c2c22embeamA.ps}
951: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{c2c22embeamB.ps}
952: \includegraphics[angle=90,clip,width=0.25\textwidth]{c2c22embeamC.ps}
953: \caption{The angle between the lepton produced in
954: $e^+e^-\ra\chi_2^+\chi_2^-\ra \tilde{\nu}_L l^+ \tilde{\nu}_L l^- $
955: and the beam in the lab frame for a centre-of-mass energy of 1 TeV and
956: (a) unpolarised incoming beams, (b) negatively polarised electrons and
957: positively polarised positrons and (c) positively polarised electrons and
958: negatively polarised positrons. The black histogram is from HERWIG and the
959: crosses from \Hw\!\!.}
960: \label{fig:c2c2sneu}
961: \end{center}
962: \end{figure*}
963:
964: \subsection{Tau Decays}
965: \subsubsection{One Prong Decays}
966: The tau has a number of leptonic and hadronic
967: decay modes. A more detailed analysis of these decays shows
968: interesting features in the distribution of energy to the decay products.
969: A typical tau decay involving several mesons has the form
970: $\tau^{\pm}\ra (nm^\pm)(qm^0) \nu_\tau$ where $nm^\pm$ denotes $n\geq 1$
971: charged mesons, \ie the number of prongs, and $qm^0$ denotes $q \geq 0$
972: neutral mesons. Here we will consider the one prong decay
973: $\tau^\pm\ra \rho^\pm \nu_\tau\ra \pi^\pm \pi^0\nu_\tau$ where the $\tau$
974: is produced from the decay of a $\tilde{\tau}_1$. Figure~\ref{fig:Tau1Prong}
975: shows our results for the fraction of visible energy carried away by the
976: charged meson in the two cases where the $\tilde{\tau}_1$ is
977: (a) 100\% left-handed and (b) 100\% right-handed.
978:
979: There is a stark difference in the energy distribution for two possible
980: mixings of the $\tilde{\tau}_1$ in figure~\ref{fig:Tau1Prong} due to the
981: resulting helicity of the decaying $\rho$. For the case where the
982: $\tilde{\tau}_1$ is entirely $\tilde{\tau}_L$ the $\rho$ has a higher
983: probability of being transversely
984: polarised, from the results of~\cite{Bullock:1991fd}, which favours
985: the equal splitting of energy between the two pions as confirmed by
986: the first plot. A $\tilde{\tau}_1$ that is entirely $\tilde{\tau}_R$ however,
987: will give rise to mostly longitudinally polarised $\rho$ mesons that prefer to
988: distribute their energy unequally and favour a distribution where
989: one meson receives most of the visible energy from the $\tau$ decay. This
990: is again confirmed in our second plot. The \Hw results are plotted together
991: with those from HERWIG with the TAUOLA decay package~\cite{Jadach:1993hs}
992: that is designed specifically for the decay of polarised $\tau$ leptons.
993:
994: \begin{figure*}
995: \begin{center}
996: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.32\textwidth]{Tau1ProngLeft.ps}
997: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.32\textwidth]{Tau1ProngRight.ps}
998: \caption{Energy fraction, $z$, carried away by the charged meson in the one prong
999: $\tau$ decay $\rho^\pm\ra\pi^\pm\pi^0$ for (a) left-handed $\tilde{\tau}_1$
1000: and (b) right-handed $\tilde{\tau}_1$. The black histogram shows the
1001: results from HERWIG with the TAUOLA~\cite{Jadach:1993hs} decay package and
1002: the crosses indicate the \Hw results.}
1003: \label{fig:Tau1Prong}
1004: \end{center}
1005: \end{figure*}
1006:
1007: \subsubsection{Squark Decay}
1008: The use of the effects described above in the study of SUSY models has long
1009: been recognised. In~\cite{Choi:2006mt} a mechanism for the determining
1010: the spin properties of particles involved in SUSY cascade decays using $\tau$
1011: polarisation was suggested. The method involves analysing invariant mass
1012: distributions of different particle pairs along the decay chain
1013: $\tilde{q}_\alpha\ra q \chi_2^0 \ra \tau^\pm_{\text{near}} \tilde{\tau}^\mp_1\ra
1014: \tau_{\text{far}}^\mp\chi_1^0$
1015: with the $\tau$ decay restricted to $\tau^\pm\ra \pi^\pm \nu_\tau$. The
1016: various normalised invariant mass distributions are shown in
1017: figure~\ref{fig:tauInvMass} for $\tilde{q}_\alpha=\tilde{q}_L$ at SPS point
1018: 1a where $M_{q_L}=558.4\,\text{GeV}$, $M_{\chi_2^0}=180.96\,\text{GeV}$,
1019: $M_{\tilde{\tau}_1}=134.56\,\text{GeV}$ and $M_{\chi_1^0}=97.00\,\text{GeV}$.
1020: Since an experiment would be unable to distinguish a near or far $\tau$/$\pi$
1021: their distributions are combined. The normalisation is to the maximum of the
1022: invariant mass. For $m_{\tau\tau}$
1023: \begin{equation}
1024: \left(m_{\tau\tau}^2\right)_{\text{max}}=\left(m^2_{\tilde{\chi}_2^0} - m^2_{\tilde{\tau}_1}\right)
1025: \left(1 - m^2_{\tilde{\chi}_1^0}/m^2_{\tilde{\tau}_1}\right), \nonumber
1026: \end{equation}
1027: which is equal to $(m_{\pi\pi}^2)_{\text{max}}$. In the case of the $q\tau$ plots
1028: the maximum of
1029: \vspace{-2mm}
1030: \begin{eqnarray}
1031: \left(m_{\tilde{q}_L}^2 - m^2_{\tilde{\chi}_2^0}\right)
1032: \left(1 - m^2_{\tilde{\tau}_1}/m^2_{\tilde{\chi}_2^0}\right),
1033: \nonumber \\
1034: \!\!\!\!\left(m_{\tilde{q}_L}^2 - m^2_{\tilde{\chi}_2^0}\right)
1035: \left(1 - m^2_{\tilde{\chi}_2^0}/m^2_{\tilde{\tau}_1}\right), \nonumber
1036: \end{eqnarray}
1037: is taken and again this equals $(m_{q\pi}^2)_{\text{max}}$.
1038:
1039: The differences in shape of the charge conjugate plots in
1040: figure~\ref{fig:tauInvMass} for the $\tau$ and $\pi$ are
1041: due to the different helicities of the $\tau$ and $\pi$ as explained in
1042: section~\ref{sec:sqDecay}. The kinks in these distributions show the change
1043: from near to far leptons or pions making up the main components of the event.
1044: These kind of
1045: invariant mass distributions serve as a good indication of the spin
1046: properties of the particles involved in cascade decays. This information
1047: is important when trying to confirm an exact model of new physics since
1048: it is possible for two different BSM models to imitate each other in certain
1049: decays even though the new particles introduced into each model have
1050: different spin assignments~\cite{Smillie:2005ar}.
1051:
1052: \begin{figure*}
1053: \begin{center}
1054: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{tautauInvMass.ps}
1055: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{qtaupInvMass.ps}
1056: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{qtaumInvMass.ps}
1057: \end{center}
1058: \begin{center}
1059: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{pipiInvMass.ps}
1060: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{qpipInvMass.ps}
1061: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=0.25\textwidth]{qpimInvMass.ps}
1062: \caption{Normalised invariant mass distributions
1063: $x_{ij}=m_{ij}/(m_{ij})_{max}$ for various pairs of decay products
1064: along the chain $\tilde{q}_\alpha\ra q \chi_2^0 \ra \tau^\pm_{near}
1065: \tilde{\tau}^\mp_1\ra \tau_{far}^\mp\chi_1^0$ where the $\tau$ decays
1066: via $\tau \ra \pi\nu_{\tau}$ only.
1067: The black histogram denotes the results from HERWIG with the TAUOLA
1068: package and the crosses are the results from \Hw\!\! for
1069: (a) $\tau\tau$, (b) $q\tau^+$\!, (c) $q\tau^-$\!, (d) $\pi\pi$\!,
1070: (e) $q\pi^+$ and (f) $q\pi^-$.}
1071: \label{fig:tauInvMass}
1072: \end{center}
1073: \end{figure*}
1074:
1075: Again our results are plotted along with those from HERWIG using the
1076: TAUOLA package. There is excellent agreement
1077: between the two sets of results and the distributions follow those of figure 3
1078: in~\cite{Choi:2006mt}.
1079:
1080: \section{Conclusions}\label{sec:concl}
1081: We have described a new method for including new physics models in the \Hw
1082: event generator which is more general than the previous approach. It allows
1083: new models to be implemented with a minimal amount of work. For the models
1084: implemented the results are in good agreement with either analytical answers
1085: or those from the HERWIG event generator. Any new model will automatically
1086: have spin correlations included since the algorithm demonstrated in
1087: section~\ref{sec:spin} is formulated independently of any specific model and
1088: has been shown to agree with expected results.
1089:
1090: In the future we plan to implement other BSM physics models in \Hw which will
1091: enable comparative studies of the phenomenological consequences of these
1092: models to be carried out under the framework of the same generator.
1093: The current release, 2.0, of \Hw\!\!~\cite{Gieseke:2006ga}
1094: does not include any of the features discussed in this paper, it will
1095: however appear in version 2.1 of the event generator.
1096:
1097: \begin{acknowledgement}
1098: We would like to thank our callaborators on the \Hw project for many useful
1099: comments. This work was supported in part by the Science and Technology
1100: Facilities Council and the European Union Marie Curie Research Training
1101: Network MCnet under contract MRTN-CT-2006-035606.
1102: \end{acknowledgement}
1103:
1104: \appendix
1105: \section{Helicity Code}\label{app:HELAS}
1106:
1107: In the FORTRAN HERWIG program the helicity amplitudes were calculated using the
1108: formalism of Kleiss and Stirling~\cite{Kleiss:1985yh}. However this meant that:
1109: \begin{itemize}
1110: \item all the matrix elements had to be calculated in the same frame;
1111: \item it was impossible to interface the correlations in the parton shower
1112: and those in the decay of unstable fundamental particles;
1113: \item each matrix element had to be separately calculated.
1114: \end{itemize}
1115: In \textsf{Herwig++} we choose to use to use an approach based on the \textsf{HELAS}
1116: formalism for the calculation of matrix elements. This approach has a number
1117: of advantages:
1118: \begin{itemize}
1119: \item we can use the spinors and polarisation vectors calculated when the particle
1120: is produced to calculate their decays in a different frame, after an appropriate
1121: Lorentz transformation, so that each step of the calculation can be done
1122: in the most relevant frame;
1123: \item more complicated matrix elements can be calculated from the basic
1124: building blocks rather than coded from scratch;
1125: \item the inclusion of particles other than scalars, spin-$\frac12$ fermions
1126: and massless spin-$1$ bosons, which is complicated in the Kleiss and Stirling
1127: formalism, is relatively simple.
1128: \end{itemize}
1129:
1130: The implementation of the \textsf{HELAS} formalism in \textsf{Herwig++} is based on two
1131: fundamental types of objects, \textsf{WaveFunctionBase} and \textsf{VertexBase}.
1132:
1133: The \textsf{WaveFunctions} contain the momentum and a pointer to the
1134: properties of the particles together with the basis state for a given particle
1135: spin.\textsf{WaveFunctionBase} stores the momentum of the
1136: particle and a pointer to the \textsf{ParticleData} object for the particle.
1137: The inheriting \textsf{ScalarWaveFunction}, \textsf{SpinorWaveFunction},
1138: \textsf{SpinorBarWaveFunction}, \textsf{VectorWaveFunction},
1139: \textsf{RSSpinorWaveFunction}, \textsf{RSSpinorBarWaveFunction} and
1140: \textsf{TensorWaveFunction} classes then contain storage of the
1141: wavefunctions for spin-0, -$\frac12$, -1, -$\frac32$ and -2 particles together
1142: with methods to calculate the wavefunctions for a given helicity state.
1143:
1144: The \textsf{Vertices} contain methods to combine the wavefunctions
1145: for a specific vertex to give either off-shell wavefunctions, which can be used
1146: in further calculations, or the matrix element. The \textsf{VertexBase} class
1147: contains storage of the particles which interact at a given vertex. A number
1148: of classes then inherit from this class and implement the calculation of the
1149: matrix element and off-shell wavefunctions for a given Lorentz structure of the
1150: vertex in terms of arbitrary couplings which are calculated by
1151: virtual member functions.
1152:
1153: This strategy is essentially identical to that adopted in the original
1154: \textsf{HELAS}
1155: approach. However, the new structure has the benefit that the user need only
1156: decide which vertex to use with the structure then supplying the relevant
1157: couplings, whereas these had to be specified by the hand when using
1158: the \textsf{HELAS} library.
1159:
1160: \subsection{Conventions}
1161:
1162: To numerically evaluate the matrix elements using the
1163: \textsf{HELAS} formalism we need a specific choice of the Dirac matrices,
1164: we currently support two options. The conventional low-energy choice, used
1165: in for example~\cite{Haber:1994pe}
1166: \begin{eqnarray}
1167: &\gamma^{\rm HABER}_i=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1168: 0 & \sigma_i \\
1169: -\sigma_i & 0
1170: \end{array}\right),\hspace{3mm}
1171: \gamma^{\rm HABER}_0=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1172: 1 & 0 \\
1173: 0 & -1
1174: \end{array}\right), \nonumber \\
1175: &\gamma^{\rm HABER}_5=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1176: 0 & 1 \\
1177: 1 & 0
1178: \end{array}\right),
1179: \end{eqnarray}
1180: and the original choice of \textsf{HELAS} which is more appropriate at high energies
1181: \begin{eqnarray}
1182: & \gamma^{\rm HELAS}_i=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1183: 0 & \sigma_i \\
1184: -\sigma_i & 0
1185: \end{array}\right),
1186: \gamma^{\rm HELAS}_0=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1187: 0 & 1 \\
1188: 1 & 0
1189: \end{array}\right), \nonumber \\
1190: & \gamma^{\rm HELAS}_5=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1191: -1 & 0 \\
1192: 0 & 1
1193: \end{array}\right).
1194: \end{eqnarray}
1195: These two representations are related by the transformation
1196: \begin{equation}
1197: \psi_{\rm HELAS} = S \psi_{\rm Haber}\quad\mbox{where}\quad
1198: S=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1199: 1 & -1 \\
1200: 1 & 1
1201: \end{array}\right).
1202: \end{equation}
1203: A number of container classes are implemented in the \textsf{ThePEG}
1204: framework~\cite{Lonnblad:2006pt}, on which \textsf{Herwig++} is built, to store
1205: the basis states for the different spins:
1206: \begin{itemize}
1207: \item \textsf{LorentzSpinor}:
1208: storage of the spinor, $u$ or $v$, for a spin-$\frac12$ fermion;
1209: \item \textsf{LorentzSpinorBar}:
1210: storage of the barred spinor, $\bar{u}$ or $\bar{v}$, for a spin-$\frac12$ fermion;
1211: \item \textsf{LorentzPolarizationVector}:
1212: storage of the polarization vector, $\epsilon^\mu$, for a spin-$1$ boson;
1213: \item \textsf{LorentzRSSpinor}:
1214: storage of the spinor, $u^\mu$ or $v^\mu$, for a spin-$\frac32$ fermion;
1215: \item \textsf{LorentzRSSpinorBar}:
1216: storage of the barred spinor, $\bar{u}^\mu$ or $\bar{v}^\mu$, for a spin-$\frac32$
1217: fermion;
1218: \item \textsf{LorentzTensor}:
1219: storage of the polarization tensor, $\epsilon^{\mu\nu}$, for a spin-$2$ boson.
1220: \end{itemize}
1221: In addition to providing storage of the basis state these classes
1222: implement the Lorentz transformations, both boosts and rotations, for the objects.
1223: In the case of fermions the Dirac basis used to calculate the spinor, together
1224: with whether the spinor is $u$ or $v$ type is also stored. Methods to convert
1225: between the two supported Dirac matrix definitions are implemented together with
1226: the transformation between $u$ and $v$ spinors for Majorana particles.
1227:
1228: \subsection{Lorentz Transformations}
1229: \label{app:lorentz}
1230: In addition to the storage of the basis states we need to be able to
1231: transform them between different Lorentz frames.
1232:
1233: The Lorentz transformation for a spinor is given by
1234: \begin{equation}
1235: \psi'(x') = \psi'(ax) = S(a)\psi(x),
1236: \end{equation}
1237: where $a^\nu_\mu=\frac{\partial x^{\prime\nu}}{\partial x^\mu}$.
1238: For a Lorentz boost along the direction specified
1239: by the unit vector $\hat{\bf{n}}$ with a magnitude $\beta$ the transformation is
1240: given by
1241: \begin{equation}
1242: S_{\rm{boost}} = \cosh\left(\frac\chi2\right)+\sinh\left(\frac\chi2\right)\hat{n}_i\gamma^0\gamma^i,
1243: \end{equation}
1244: where $\tanh\chi=\beta$.
1245: For a rotation by an angle $\phi$ about the unit vector $\hat{\bf{n}}$ the Lorentz
1246: transformation is given by
1247: \begin{equation}
1248: S_{\rm{rotation}} = \cos\left(\frac\phi2\right)+\sin\left(\frac\phi2\right)\epsilon^{ijk}\hat{n}_k\gamma^i\gamma^j.\label{eqn:spinorrot}
1249: \end{equation}
1250: The Lorentz transformations for a four vector is given by
1251: \begin{equation}
1252: \epsilon^\mu(x') = L(a)^\mu_\nu\epsilon^\nu(x).
1253: \end{equation}
1254: If we wish to boost by a factor $\beta$ along
1255: a unit vector $\hat{\bf n}$ the transformation is
1256: \begin{eqnarray}
1257: L^\mu_\nu = \left(
1258: \begin{array}{cccc}
1259: \gamma & -\gamma\beta\hat{n}_1 & -\gamma\beta\hat{n}_2 & -\gamma\beta\hat{n}_3\\
1260: -\gamma\beta\hat{n}_1 & 1-\hat{n}_1\hat{n}_1\omega & \phantom{1}-\hat{n}_1\hat{n}_2\omega & \phantom{1}-\hat{n}_1\hat{n}_3\omega \\
1261: -\gamma\beta\hat{n}_2 & \phantom{1}-\hat{n}_2\hat{n}_1\omega & 1-\hat{n}_2\hat{n}_2\omega & \phantom{1}-\hat{n}_2\hat{n}_3\omega \\
1262: -\gamma\beta\hat{n}_3 & \phantom{1}-\hat{n}_3\hat{n}_1\omega & \phantom{1} -\hat{n}_3\hat{n}_2\omega &1-\hat{n}_3\hat{n}_3\omega \\
1263: \end{array}
1264: \right),\hspace{5mm}
1265: \end{eqnarray}
1266: where $\omega=1-\gamma$ and $\gamma=\frac1{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}$.
1267: The Lorentz transformation for a rotation by an angle $\delta$ about
1268: a unit vector $\hat{\bf n}$ is
1269: \begin{eqnarray}
1270: L^\mu_\nu = & \nonumber \\
1271: &\hspace{-8mm} \left(
1272: \begin{array}{cccc}
1273: 1 & 0& 0& 0\\
1274: 0 & \lambda\hat{n}_1\hat{n}_1 + c_\delta
1275: & \lambda\hat{n}_1\hat{n}_2 - s_\delta\hat{n}_3
1276: & \lambda\hat{n}_1\hat{n}_3 + s_\delta\hat{n}_2\\
1277: 0 & \lambda\hat{n}_2\hat{n}_1 + s_\delta\hat{n}_3
1278: & \lambda\hat{n}_2\hat{n}_2 + c_\delta
1279: & \lambda\hat{n}_2\hat{n}_3 - s_\delta\hat{n}_1\\
1280: 0 & \lambda\hat{n}_3\hat{n}_1 - s_\delta\hat{n}_2
1281: & \lambda\hat{n}_3\hat{n}_2 + s_\delta\hat{n}_1
1282: & \lambda\hat{n}_3\hat{n}_3 + c_\delta
1283: \end{array}
1284: \right),\hspace{2mm}
1285: \end{eqnarray}
1286: where $c_\delta=\cos\delta$, $s_\delta=\sin\delta$ and $\lambda=1-\cos\delta$.
1287: The transformations for the higher-spin particles can then be constructed as products
1288: of the spin-$\frac12$ and spin-$1$ transformations, \ie
1289: \begin{subequations}
1290: \begin{eqnarray}
1291: \psi^\mu(x') &=& L(a)^\mu_\nu S(a)\psi^\nu(x),\\
1292: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}(x') &=& L(a)^\mu_\alpha L(a)^\nu_\beta \epsilon^{\al\be}.
1293: \end{eqnarray}
1294: \end{subequations}
1295:
1296: \subsection{WaveFunctions}
1297:
1298: \subsubsection{ScalarWaveFunction}
1299:
1300: The \textsf{ScalarWaveFunction} class inherits from the \textsf{WaveFunctionBase}
1301: class and implements the storage of the wavefunction of a scalar particle
1302: as a complex number. For external particles this is just 1, however it
1303: can assume different values when the \textsf{WaveFunction} is the result
1304: is an off-shell internal line from a \textsf{Vertex} class.
1305:
1306: \subsubsection{SpinorWaveFunction and SpinorBarWaveFunction}
1307:
1308: As with the \textsf{ScalarWaveFunction} the \textsf{SpinorWaveFunction}
1309: and \textsf{SpinorBarWaveFunction} classes inherit from the \textsf{WaveFunctionBase}
1310: class. The spinor is stored as either a \textsf{LorentzSpinor} or
1311: \textsf{LorentzSpinorBar}. In addition the calculation of the
1312: spinors for external particles is implemented.
1313: The spinors are calculated in terms of two-component spinors, as
1314: in~\cite{Murayama:1992gi}
1315: \begin{subequations}
1316: \begin{eqnarray}
1317: \chi_+(p) &=& \frac1{\sqrt{2|{\bf p}|\left(|{\bf p}|+p_z\right)}}
1318: \left(\begin{array}{c}|{\bf p}|+p_z\\ p_x+ip_y\end{array}\right),\\
1319: \chi_-(p) &=& \frac1{\sqrt{2|{\bf p}|\left(|{\bf p}|+p_z\right)}}
1320: \left(\begin{array}{c}-p_x+ip_y\\|{\bf p}|+p_z\end{array}\right),
1321: \end{eqnarray}
1322: where $p_{x,y,z}$ are the $x$, $y$ and $z$ components of the momentum respectively,
1323: $E$ is the energy of the particle and $|{\bf p}|$ is the magnitude of the three
1324: momentum.
1325: \end{subequations}
1326: For the \textsf{HELAS} choice of the Dirac representation the spinors are given by
1327: \begin{subequations}
1328: \begin{eqnarray}
1329: u(p) = \left(\begin{array}{c}\phantom{-\lambda}\omega_{-\lambda}(p)\chi_{\lambda}(p)\\
1330: \phantom{-\lambda}\omega_{\lambda}(p)\chi_{\lambda}(p)
1331: \end{array}\right),\\
1332: v(p) = \left(\begin{array}{c}-\lambda\omega_{\lambda}(p)\chi_{-\lambda}(p)\\
1333: \phantom{-}\lambda\omega_{-\lambda}(p)\chi_{-\lambda}(p)
1334: \end{array}\right),
1335: \end{eqnarray}
1336: \end{subequations}
1337: where $\omega_\pm(p)=\sqrt{E\pm|{\bf p}|}$ and the helicity $\lambda=\pm1$.
1338: Similarly for the low energy definition
1339: \begin{subequations}
1340: \begin{eqnarray}
1341: u(p) = \left(\begin{array}{c}\phantom{-\lambda}\omega_{+}(p)\chi_{\lambda}(p)\\
1342: \phantom{-}\lambda\omega_{-}(p)\chi_{\lambda}(p)
1343: \end{array}\right),\\
1344: v(p) = \left(\begin{array}{c}\phantom{-\lambda}\omega_{-}(p)\chi_{-\lambda}(p)\\
1345: -\lambda\omega_{+}(p)\chi_{-\lambda}(p)
1346: \end{array}\right).
1347: \end{eqnarray}
1348: \end{subequations}
1349:
1350: \subsubsection{VectorWaveFunction}
1351:
1352: The \textsf{VectorWaveFunction} class inherits from the \textsf{WaveFunctionBase}
1353: class and implements the storage of the polarization vector using the
1354: \textsf{LorentzPolarizationVector} class.
1355: The polarization vectors of a spin-1 particle can be calculated using,
1356: as in~\cite{Murayama:1992gi}
1357: \begin{subequations}
1358: \begin{eqnarray}
1359: \epsilon^\mu_1(p) &=& \frac1{|{\bf p}|p_T}\left(0,p_xp_z,p_yp_z,-p_T^2\right),\\
1360: \epsilon^\mu_2(p) &=& \frac1{p_T} \left(0,-p_y,p_x,0\right),\\
1361: \epsilon^\mu_3(p) &=& \frac{E}{m|{\bf p}|}\left(\frac{|{\bf p}|^2}{E},p_x,p_y,p_z\right),
1362: \end{eqnarray}
1363: \end{subequations}
1364: where $m$ is the mass and $p_T=\sqrt{p_x^2+p_y^2}$.
1365: We include two choices of the polarization vectors
1366: \begin{subequations}
1367: \begin{eqnarray}
1368: \epsilon^\mu(p,\lambda= \pm 1) &=& \frac1{\sqrt{2}}\left(\mp\epsilon^\mu_1(p)
1369: -i\epsilon^\mu_2(p)
1370: \right),\\
1371: \epsilon^\mu(p,\lambda=\phantom{\pm}0) &=& \epsilon^\mu_3(p),
1372: \end{eqnarray}
1373: which is the choice used in \textsf{HELAS}. However, while this option is
1374: available in the \textsf{Herwig++} by default we include the additional phase
1375: factor $\exp(i\lambda\phi)$ as in \cite{Haber:1994pe} in order to make the inclusion of
1376: spin correlations in the parton shower easier.
1377: \end{subequations}
1378:
1379: \subsubsection{RSSpinorWaveFunction and RSSpinorBarWaveFunction}
1380:
1381: Although there are currently no fundamental spin-$\frac32$ particles included in
1382: \textsf{Herwig++} the Rarita-Schwinger spinors for spin-$\frac32$
1383: particles are included
1384: both to allow the simulation of spin-$\frac32$ hadronic resonances and for the
1385: possible future inclusion of the gravitino. The \textsf{RSSpinorWaveFunction}
1386: and \textsf{RSSpinorBarWaveFunction} inherit from the \textsf{WaveFunctionBase}
1387: class and implement the storage of the Rarita-Schwinger spinors
1388: using the \textsf{LorentzRSSpinor} and \textsf{LorentzRSSpinorBar} classes
1389: respectively.
1390:
1391: The spinors are calculated using the Clebsch-Gordon decomposition:
1392: \begin{subequations}
1393: \begin{eqnarray}
1394: \psi^\mu(p,\lambda=-2) &=& \epsilon^\mu(p,-1)\psi(p,-1); \\
1395: \psi^\mu(p,\lambda=-1) &=& \sqrt{\frac13}\epsilon^\mu(p,-1)\psi(p,1) \\
1396: & & + \sqrt{\frac23}\epsilon^\mu(p,0)\psi(p,-1);\\
1397: \psi^\mu(p,\lambda=1) &=& \sqrt{\frac13}\epsilon^\mu(p,1)\psi(p,-1)\\
1398: & & + \sqrt{\frac23}\epsilon^\mu(p,0);\\
1399: \psi^\mu(p,\lambda=2) &=& \epsilon^\mu(p,1)\psi(p,1).
1400: \end{eqnarray}
1401: \end{subequations}
1402: For massive particles the spinors are calculated in the rest frame of the
1403: the particle and then boosted to the required frame in order that
1404: the Clebsch-Gordon decomposition can be easily applied. For massless spin-$\frac32$
1405: particles, which only have the $\pm2$ helicity states, the spinors are calculated
1406: in the same frame as the momentum.
1407:
1408: \subsubsection{TensorWaveFunction}
1409:
1410: The \textsf{TensorWaveFunction} class inherits from the \textsf{WaveFunctionBase}
1411: class and implements the storage of the
1412: polarization tensor for spin-$2$ particles using the \textsf{LorentzTensor} class.
1413:
1414: The wavefunction is calculated using the Clebsch-Gordon decomposition:
1415: \begin{subequations}
1416: \begin{eqnarray}
1417: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}(p,\lambda=-2) &=& \epsilon^\mu(p,-1)\epsilon^\nu(p,-1);\\
1418: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}(p,\lambda=-1) &=& \sqrt{\frac12}\left[
1419: \epsilon^\mu(p,-1)\epsilon^\nu(p,0)\right. \\
1420: & & \hspace{10mm} +\left.\epsilon^\mu(p,0)\epsilon^\nu(p,-1)\right];\\
1421: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}(p,\lambda=0) &=& \sqrt{\frac12}[
1422: \epsilon^\mu(p,1)\epsilon^\nu(p,-1)
1423: +\epsilon^\mu(p,-1)\epsilon^\nu(p,1) \nonumber\\
1424: & &\hspace{10mm}+2\epsilon^\mu(p,0)\epsilon^\nu(p,0)];\\
1425: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}(p,\lambda=1) &=& \sqrt{\frac12}\left[
1426: \epsilon^\mu(p,1)\epsilon^\nu(p,0)\right.\\
1427: & & \hspace{10mm}\left.+\epsilon^\mu(p,0)\epsilon^\nu(p,1)\right];\\
1428: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}(p,\lambda=2) &=& \epsilon^\mu(p,1)\epsilon^\nu(p,1).
1429: \end{eqnarray}
1430: \end{subequations}
1431: Here this is applied in the frame in which the momentum is specified.
1432:
1433: \subsection{Vertices}
1434:
1435: The \textsf{Vertices} all inherit from the \textsf{VertexBase} class.
1436: In general for all the vertices
1437: all the particles and momenta are defined to be incoming.
1438:
1439: \subsubsection{Scalar Vertices}
1440:
1441: There are a number of vertices involving scalar bosons.
1442:
1443: \begin{description}
1444: \item[FFSVertex] The vertex for the coupling of a fermion and antifermion to
1445: a scalar boson is defined to have the perturbative form
1446: \begin{equation}
1447: ic\bar{f_2}a^\lambda P_\lambda f_1\phi_3,
1448: \end{equation}
1449: where $c$ is the overall normalisation, $a^\lambda$ are the left/right couplings,
1450: $P_\lambda$ are the helicity projection operators,
1451: $f_1$ is the wavefunction for the fermion, $\bar{f_2}$ is the wavefunction
1452: for the antifermion and $\phi_3$ is the wavefunction for the scalar boson.
1453:
1454: \item[GeneralSVVVertex] In addition to the perturbative form for the vertex
1455: coupling a scalar and two vector bosons described below we include a general
1456: form for this interaction so that effective vertices, for example $h^0\to gg$, can be
1457: implemented. The form of the vertex is
1458: \begin{eqnarray}
1459: &ic\left[a_{00}g^{\mu\nu}+a_{22}p_2^\mu p_2^\nu+a_{23}p_2^\mu p_3^\nu
1460: +a_{32}p_3^\mu p_2^\nu+a_{33}p_3^\mu p_3^\nu \right. \nonumber \\
1461: &\hspace{3mm}\left. +a_{\epsilon}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}p_{2\alpha} p_{3\beta}\right]
1462: \epsilon_{2\mu}\epsilon_{3\nu}\phi_1,
1463: \end{eqnarray}
1464: where $p_{2,3}$ are the momenta of the vector bosons,
1465: $\epsilon_{2,3}$ are the wavefunctions of the vector bosons,
1466: $\phi_1$ is the wavefunction of the scalar boson,
1467: $c$ is the overall coupling and
1468: $a_{ij}$ are the couplings of the different terms.
1469:
1470: \item[SSSVertex] The vertex for the coupling of three scalar bosons is defined
1471: to have the perturbative form
1472: \begin{equation}
1473: ic\phi_1\phi_2\phi_3,
1474: \end{equation}
1475: where $\phi_{1,2,3}$ are the wavefunctions for the scalar bosons and
1476: $c$ is the coupling.
1477:
1478: \item[SSSSVertex] The vertex for the coupling of four scalar bosons is defined
1479: to have the perturbative form
1480: \begin{equation}
1481: ic\phi_1\phi_2\phi_3\phi_4,
1482: \end{equation}
1483: where $\phi_{1,2,3,4}$ are the wavefunctions for the scalar bosons and
1484: $c$ is the coupling.
1485:
1486: \item[VSSVertex] The vertex for the coupling of a vector boson and two scalar
1487: bosons is defined to have the perturbative form
1488: \begin{equation}
1489: -ic\left(p_2-p_3\right)\cdot\epsilon_1\phi_2\phi_3,
1490: \end{equation}
1491: where $\epsilon_1$ is the wavefunction of the vector boson,
1492: $\phi_{2,3}$ are the wavefunctions for the scalar bosons and
1493: $p_{2,3}$ are the momenta of the scalar bosons and
1494: $c$ is the coupling.
1495:
1496: \item[VVSSVertex] The vertex for the interaction of two vector and two
1497: scalar bosons is defined to have the perturbative form
1498: \begin{equation}
1499: icg^{\mu\nu}\epsilon_{1\mu}\epsilon_{2\nu}\phi_3\phi_4,
1500: \end{equation}
1501: where $\epsilon_{1,2}$ are the wavefunctions of the vector bosons and
1502: $\phi_{3,4}$ are the wavefunctions for the scalar bosons and
1503: $c$ is the coupling.
1504:
1505: \item[VVSVertex]The vertex for the interaction of two vector and
1506: a scalar boson is defined to have the perturbative form
1507: \begin{equation}
1508: icg^{\mu\nu}\epsilon_{1\mu}\epsilon_{2\nu}\phi_3,
1509: \end{equation}
1510: where $\epsilon_{1,2}$ are the wavefunctions of the vector bosons and
1511: $\phi_3$ is the wavefunction for the scalar boson and
1512: $c$ is the coupling.
1513: \end{description}
1514:
1515: \subsubsection{Vector Vertices}
1516:
1517: There are a number of vertices involving vector bosons.
1518: \begin{description}
1519: \item[FFVVertex] The interaction of a fermion, antifermion and a vector boson
1520: is taken to have the perturbative form
1521: \begin{equation}
1522: ic\bar{f_2}\gamma^\mu a^\lambda P_\lambda f_1\epsilon_{3\mu},
1523: \end{equation}
1524: where $c$ is the overall normalisation, $a^\lambda$ are the left/right couplings,
1525: $f_1$ is the wavefunction for the fermion, $\bar{f_2}$ is the wavefunction
1526: for the antifermion and $\epsilon_3$ is the wavefunction for the vector boson.
1527:
1528: \item[VVVVertex] The interaction of three vector bosons is
1529: taken to have the perturbative form
1530: \begin{eqnarray}
1531: &ig\left[ (p_1-p_2)^\gamma g^{\alpha\beta }
1532: +(p_2-p_3)^\alpha g^{\beta \gamma}\right. \nonumber \\
1533: &\hspace{5mm}\left. +(p_3-p_1)^\beta g^{\alpha\gamma}
1534: \right]\epsilon_{1\alpha}\epsilon_{2\beta}\epsilon_{3\gamma},
1535: \end{eqnarray}
1536: where $\epsilon_{1,2,3}$ are the wavefunctions of the vector bosons
1537: and $p_{1,2,3}$ are the momenta of the vector bosons.
1538:
1539: \item[VVVVVertex] The interaction of four vector bosons is taken to have the form
1540: \begin{equation}
1541: ic^2\left[
1542: 2\epsilon_1\cdot\epsilon_2\epsilon_3\cdot\epsilon_4-
1543: \epsilon_1\cdot\epsilon_3\epsilon_2\cdot\epsilon_4-
1544: \epsilon_1\cdot\epsilon_4\epsilon_2\cdot\epsilon_3
1545: \right],
1546: \end{equation}
1547: where $\epsilon_{1,2,3,4}$ are the wavefunctions of the vector bosons
1548: and $p_{1,2,3,4}$ are the momenta of the vector bosons. For the quartic gluon
1549: vertex this is the contribution of one colour structure. The others can
1550: be obtained by an appropriate reordering of the input wavefunctions.
1551:
1552: \end{description}
1553:
1554: \subsubsection{Tensor Vertices}\label{app:TensorVert}
1555: There are a number of vertices involving spin-2 particles. The form
1556: of the Feynman rules follows that of~\cite{Han:1998sg}.
1557: \begin{description}
1558: \item[FFTVertex] The interaction of a pair of fermions with a tensor is taken to
1559: have the perturbative form
1560: \begin{eqnarray}
1561: & \hspace{-4mm}-\frac{i\kappa}8\bar{f_2}\left[
1562: \gamma_\mu(p_1-p_2)_\nu+\gamma_\nu(p_1-p_2)_\mu \right. \nonumber \\
1563: & \hspace{4mm}\left. -2g_{\mu\nu}(p\!\!\!\!\!\not\,\,_1-p\!\!\!\!\!\not\,\,_2)
1564: +4g_{\mu\nu}m_{f}
1565: \right]f_1\epsilon^{\mu\nu}_3
1566: \end{eqnarray}
1567: where $\kappa$ is the defined as $2/\Lambda_{cut-off}$, $p_{1,2}$ are the
1568: momenta of the fermions, $f_1$ is the fermion wavefunction, $\bar{f}_2$ is
1569: the antifermion wavefunction and $\epsilon_3^{\mu\nu}$ is the polarisation tensor
1570: for the spin-2 particle.
1571: \item[VVVTVertex] The interaction of three vector bosons with a tensor is taken to
1572: have the perturbative form
1573: \begin{eqnarray}
1574: &\hspace{-4mm} g\frac\kappa2\left[
1575: C_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma}(p_1-p_2)_\lambda
1576: +C_{\mu\nu,\rho\lambda}(p_3-p_1)_\sigma \right. \nonumber \\
1577: & \left. +C_{\mu\nu,\sigma\lambda}(p_2-p_3)_\rho
1578: +F_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma\lambda}
1579: \right]\epsilon_1^\rho\epsilon^\sigma_2\epsilon^\lambda_3
1580: \epsilon^{\mu\nu}_4
1581: \end{eqnarray}
1582: where $\kappa$ is
1583: $2/\Lambda_{cut-off}$, $p_{1,2,3}$ are the momenta of the vector bosons,
1584: $\epsilon_{1,2,3}^\mu$ are the polarisation vectors and $\epsilon_4^{\mu\nu}$
1585: is the polarisation tensor. The $C$ and $F$ symbols are defined as
1586: \begin{eqnarray}
1587: C_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma} & = &g_{\mu\rho}g_{\nu\sigma}+g_{\mu\sigma}g_{\nu\rho}
1588: -g_{\mu\nu}g_{\rho\sigma}, \\
1589: F_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma\lambda} & = &
1590: g_{\mu\rho}g_{\sigma\lambda}(p_2-p_3)_\nu
1591: +g_{\mu\sigma}g_{\rho\lambda}(p_3-p_1)_\nu \nonumber \\
1592: && \hspace{5mm}+g_{\mu\lambda}g_{\rho\sigma}(p_1-p_2)_\nu
1593: +(\mu\leftrightarrow\nu).
1594: \end{eqnarray}
1595: \item[VVTVertex] The interaction of two vector bosons with a tensor is taken to
1596: have the perturbative form
1597: \beq
1598: -\frac{i\kappa}2\left[(m^2_v+p_1\cdot p_2)C_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma}+D_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma}\right]
1599: \epsilon_1^\rho\epsilon_2^\sigma \epsilon_3^{\mu\nu},
1600: \eeq
1601: where $\kappa$ is the defined as $2/\Lambda_{cut-off}$, $m_v$ is the mass of
1602: the gauge boson $p_{1,2}$ are the
1603: momenta of the vector bosons, $\epsilon_{1,2,3}^\mu$ are the polarisation
1604: vectors and $\epsilon_3^{\mu\nu}$ is the polarisation tensor.
1605: The $C$ symbol is defined as above and $D$ is defined as
1606: \begin{eqnarray}
1607: D_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma} & = &
1608: g_{\mu\nu}k_{1\sigma}k_{2\rho}
1609: -\left[g_{\mu\sigma}k_{1\nu}k_{2\rho}+
1610: g_{\mu\rho}k_{1\sigma}k_{2\nu}\nonumber \right. \\
1611: && \left. -g_{\rho\sigma}k_{1\mu}k_{2\nu} +(\mu\leftrightarrow\nu)\right].
1612: \end{eqnarray}
1613: \item[FFVTVertex] The interaction of a pair of fermions with a vector boson
1614: and a tensor is taken to have the perturbative form
1615: \beq
1616: \frac{ig\kappa}4\bar{f_2}(C_{\mu\nu,\rho\sigma}-g_{\mu\nu}g_{\rho\sigma})
1617: \gamma^\sigma f_1\epsilon_3^\rho\epsilon_4^{\mu\nu}
1618: \eeq
1619: where $\kappa$ is the defined as $2/\Lambda_{cut-off}$, $\epsilon_{3}^\rho$ is
1620: the polarisation vector for the boson, $f_1$ is the fermion wavefunction,
1621: $\bar{f}_2$ is the antifermion wavefunction and
1622: $\epsilon_4^{\mu\nu}$ the polarisation
1623: tensor for the spin-2 particle. The $C$ symbol is defined above.
1624: \item[SSTVertex] The interaction of a pair of scalars with a tensor is taken to
1625: have the perturbative form
1626: \beq
1627: -\frac{i\kappa}2\left[m^2_Sg_{\mu\nu}-p_{1\mu}p_{2\nu}-p_{1\nu}p_{2\mu}
1628: +g_{\mu\nu}p_1\cdot p_2\right]\epsilon^{\mu\nu}_3\phi_1\phi_2
1629: \eeq
1630: where $\kappa$ is the defined as $2/\Lambda_{cut-off}$, $\Lambda_{cut-off}$ is
1631: the ultraviolet cutoff scale, $m_S$ is the mass of
1632: the scalar, $p_{1,2}$ are the momenta of the scalars, $\epsilon_3^{\mu\nu}$
1633: the polarisation tensor for the spin-2 particle and $\phi_{1,2}$ are the
1634: scalar wavefunctions.
1635: \end{description}
1636:
1637: \section{\textsf{MatrixElement} Classes}\label{app:matrix}
1638: Table~\ref{tab:matrix} gives a list of the implemented $2\ra2$
1639: \textsf{MatrixElement} classes with a description of the types
1640: of hard subprocess they can handle. $\Psi$ stands for a fermion, $V$ a
1641: vector boson and $\phi$ a scalar. Charge conjugate modes are handled by the class
1642: responsible for standard mode.
1643: \begin{table}
1644: \centering
1645: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
1646: \hline
1647: Class Name & Process Type \\
1648: \hline
1649: MEff2ff & $\Psi\mbox{ }\Psi^{'}\ra \Psi^{''}\mbox{ }\Psi^{'''}$ \\
1650: \hline
1651: MEff2ss & $\Psi\mbox{ }\Psi^{'}\ra \phi\mbox{ }\phi^{'}$ \\
1652: \hline
1653: MEff2vv & $\Psi\mbox{ }\Psi^{'}\ra V\mbox{ }V^{'}$ \\
1654: \hline
1655: MEfv2fs & $\Psi\mbox{ }V\ra \Psi\mbox{ }\phi $ \\
1656: \hline
1657: MEvv2ss & $V\mbox{ }V^{'}\ra \phi\mbox{ }\phi^{'}$ \\
1658: \hline
1659: MEvv2ff & $V\mbox{ }V^{'}\ra \Psi\mbox{ }\Psi^{'}$ \\
1660: \hline
1661: MEfv2vf & $\Psi\mbox{ }V^{}\ra V^{'}\mbox{ }\Psi^{'}$ \\
1662: \hline
1663: MEvv2vv & $V\mbox{ }V^{'}\ra V^{''}\mbox{ }V^{'''}$ \\
1664: \hline
1665: \end{tabular}
1666: \caption{The \textsf{MatrixElement} classes.}
1667: \label{tab:matrix}
1668: \end{table}
1669:
1670: \section{\textsf{Decayer} Classes}\label{app:decayers}
1671: Table~\ref{tab:decclasses} is a list of the implemented two-body \textsf{Decayer}
1672: classes with a description of the types of decay that they are designed to
1673: handle. $\Psi$ stands for a fermion, $V$ a vector boson, $\phi$ a scalar and
1674: $T$ a tensor. Charge conjugate modes are handled by the class responsible for
1675: standard decay mode.
1676:
1677: \begin{table}
1678: \begin{center}
1679: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
1680: \hline
1681: Class Name & Decay Type \\
1682: \hline
1683: FFSDecayer & $\Psi\ra \Psi^{'}\mbox{ }\phi$ \\
1684: \hline
1685: FFVDecayer & $\Psi\ra \Psi^{'}\mbox{ }V$ \\
1686: \hline
1687: SFFDecayer & $\phi\ra \Psi\mbox{ }\Psi^{'}$ \\
1688: \hline
1689: SVVDecayer & $\phi\ra V\mbox{ }V^{'}$\\
1690: \hline
1691: SSSDecayer & $\phi\ra \phi^{'}\mbox{ }\phi^{''}$ \\
1692: \hline
1693: SSVDecayer & $\phi\ra \phi\mbox{ }V$ \\
1694: \hline
1695: TFFDecayer & $T\ra \Psi\mbox{ } \Psi^{'}$ \\
1696: \hline
1697: TSSDecayer & $T\ra \phi\mbox{ } \phi^{'}$ \\
1698: \hline
1699: TVVDecayer & $T\ra V\mbox{ }V^{'}$ \\
1700: \hline
1701: VFFDecayer & $V\ra \Psi\mbox{ } \Psi^{'}$ \\
1702: \hline
1703: VSSDecayer & $V\ra \phi\mbox{ } \phi^{'}$ \\
1704: \hline
1705: VVVDecayer & $V\ra V^{'}\mbox{ }V^{''}$ \\
1706: \hline
1707: \end{tabular}
1708: \end{center}
1709: \caption{The two-body \textsf{Decayer} classes.}
1710: \label{tab:decclasses}
1711: \end{table}
1712:
1713: \vspace{10mm}
1714:
1715: \section{Implemented Vertices}\label{app:vert}
1716: Below is a list of vertices and associated Feynman rules, for BSM physics, as
1717: they are currently implemented. The rules involving colour are written with
1718: the colour dependence explicitly pulled to the front since this is not
1719: included in the code for a specific vertex as explained in
1720: section~\ref{sec:hardproc}. If a structure constant $f^{abc}$ is involved
1721: an additional factor of $i$ is pulled out along with it due to the
1722: commutator relation $\left[ t^a,t^b \right]=if^{abc} t^c$.
1723:
1724: \subsection{RSModel}
1725: The Feynman rules as implemented in \Hw are given in section~\ref{app:TensorVert}.
1726:
1727: \subsection{MSSM}\label{app:mssm}
1728: We give the Feynman rules for the MSSM as implemented in \Hw\!\!. The sfermion
1729: mixing matrices are denoted by $Q^{k}_{\alpha\beta}$ and $L^k_{\alpha\beta}$
1730: for the squarks and leptons respectively where $k$ is the generation number,
1731: $\alpha$ the left/right eigenstate and $\beta$ the mass eigenstate.
1732: $N_{ij}$, $U_{ij}$ and $V_{ij}$ are the
1733: neutralino and chargino mixing matrices respectively.
1734: The primed matrices in the neutralino rules are related to the unprimed ones
1735: via
1736: \begin{subequations}
1737: \begin{eqnarray}
1738: N'_{i1} & = & N_{i1}\cw + N_{i2}\sw, \\
1739: N'_{i2} & = & N_{i2}\cw - N_{i1}\sw, \\
1740: N'_{i3} & = & N_{i3}, \\
1741: N'_{i4} & = & N_{i4}.
1742: \end{eqnarray}
1743: \end{subequations}
1744: %%% Gauge bosons and sfermions diagram
1745: \begin{figure}
1746: \begin{center}
1747: \bpc(100,80)(50,10)
1748: \Photon(15,50)(75,50){-4}{8}
1749: \DashArrowLine(75,50)(105,80){5} \Text(105,83)[l]{{ $\tilde{f}_{\alpha}(p_1)$}}
1750: \DashArrowLine(105,20)(75,50){5} \Text(105,20)[l]{{ $\tilde{f}_{\beta}^{'*}(p_2)$}}
1751: \Text(140,50)[l]{$\displaystyle{ic}
1752: \Gamma^{\tilde{f}\tilde{f}^{'}}_{\alpha\beta}
1753: \left(p_1 + p_2 \right)^{\mu}$}
1754: \Text(-5,50)[l]{$V^\mu$}
1755: \epc
1756: \end{center}
1757: \caption{Feynman rule for the interaction of a gauge boson with a pair
1758: of sfermions. The definition of $\Gamma$ for the various types of
1759: gauge boson and sfermion is given in table ~\ref{tab:gaugeSFcp}.
1760: The momenta are to be taken as in the direction of the arrows.}
1761: \end{figure}
1762: %%% Gauge bosons and sfermions table
1763: \begin{table}
1764: \begin{center}
1765: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1766: \begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|c|}
1767: \hline
1768: $V^\mu$ & ${\tilde{f}\tilde{f}^{'}}$ & {\large $c$} &
1769: {\large$\Gamma^{\tilde{f}\tilde{f}^{'}}_{\alpha\beta}$} \\
1770: \hline
1771: \hline
1772: $\gamma$ & $\tilde{q}\tilde{q}^{'} $ & $\displaystyle{-ee_q}$ &
1773: $\delta^{\tilde{q}\tilde{q}^{'}}
1774: _{\alpha\beta}$ \\
1775: \hline
1776: $\gamma$ & $\tilde{l}\mbox{ \!}\tilde{l}^{'} $ & $\displaystyle{e}$ &
1777: $\delta^{\tilde{l}\mbox{ \!}\tilde{l}^{'}}
1778: _{\alpha\beta}$ \\
1779: \hline
1780: $g$ & $\tilde{q}\tilde{q}^{'} $ & $\displaystyle{-gt^{a}}$ &
1781: $\delta^{\tilde{q}\tilde{q}^{'}}
1782: _{\alpha\beta}$ \\
1783: \hline
1784: $Z^0$ & $\tilde{u}_\alpha\tilde{u}_\beta$ & $\frac{g}{\cos\theta_W}$ &
1785: $\frac{1}{2}\left(-Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i}_{1\beta}
1786: + 2e_u \ssw \delta_{\alpha\beta}\right)$ \\
1787: \hline
1788: $Z^0$ & $\tilde{d}_\alpha\tilde{d}_\beta$ & $\frac{g}{\cos\theta_W}$ &
1789: $\frac{1}{2}\left(Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{1\beta}
1790: + 2e_d \ssw \delta_{\alpha\beta}\right)$ \\
1791: \hline
1792: $Z^0$ & $\tilde{l}_\alpha\tilde{l}_\beta$ & $\frac{g}{\cos\theta_W}$ &
1793: $\frac{1}{2}\left(L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{1\beta}
1794: - 2\ssw \delta_{\alpha\beta}\right)$ \\
1795: \hline
1796: $Z^0$ & $\tilde{\nu}_\alpha\tilde{\nu}_\beta$ & $\frac{g}{\cos\theta_W}$ &
1797: $-\frac{1}{2}\delta_{11}$ \\
1798: \hline
1799: $W^-$ & $\tilde{q}_\alpha\tilde{q}^{'}_\beta$ & $\frac{-g}{\sqrt{2}}$ &
1800: $Q_{1\alpha}^{2i}Q_{1\beta}^{2i-1} $\\
1801: \hline
1802: $W^-$ & $\tilde{\nu}\tilde{l}_\beta$ & $\frac{-g}{\sqrt{2}}$ &
1803: $L^{2i-1}_{1\beta} $\\
1804: \hline
1805: \end{tabular}
1806: \end{center}
1807: \caption{Couplings for the gauge bosons and sfermions.}
1808: \label{tab:gaugeSFcp}
1809: \end{table}
1810:
1811: %% diagram for gauge boson and gaugino
1812: \begin{figure}
1813: \begin{center}
1814: \bpc(100,80)(50,10)
1815: \Photon(15,50)(75,50){-4}{8}
1816: \ArrowLine(75,50)(105,80) \Text(105,80)[l]{{ $f_{i}(p_1)$}}
1817: \ArrowLine(105,20)(75,50) \Text(105,20)[l]{{ $f_{j}(p_2)$}}
1818: \Text(-5,50)[l]{$V^\mu$}
1819: \Text(130,50)[l]{$\displaystyle{ic}\gamma^{\mu}\left[a_L P_L +
1820: a_R P_R\right]$}
1821: \epc
1822: \caption{Feynman rule for the interaction of a gauge boson and a pair of
1823: gauginos. The couplings are defined in table~\ref{tab:gaugeMFcp}.}
1824: \end{center}
1825: \end{figure}
1826:
1827: %%table for bosons and gauginos
1828: \begin{table*}
1829: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1830: \begin{center}
1831: \begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|c|c|}
1832: \hline
1833: $V^\mu$ & ${\tilde{f}\tilde{f}^{'}}$ & {\large $c$} &
1834: {\large $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{L}}$ } & {\large $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{R}}$ } \\
1835: \hline
1836: \hline
1837: $\gamma$ & $\tilde{\chi}^{+}_i \tilde{\chi}^{-}_{j} $ & $-e$ & $1$
1838: & $1$ \\
1839: \hline
1840: $W^+$ & $\tilde{\chi}^{0}_i \tilde{\chi}^{+}_j$ & $g$
1841: & $-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}N_{i4}V^*_{j2} + N_{i2}V^*_{j1}$ &
1842: $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}N^*_{i3}U_{j2} + N^*_{i2}U_{j1} $ \\
1843: \hline
1844: $Z^{0} $ & $\tilde{\chi}^0_i \tilde{\chi}^0_j $
1845: & $\frac{g}{\cos\theta_W}$
1846: & $-\frac{1}{2}N_{i3}N^*_{j3} + \frac{1}{2}N_{i4}N^*_{j4}$ &
1847: $-a^*_L$\\
1848: \hline
1849: $Z^{0} $ & $\tilde{\chi}^-_i \tilde{\chi}^+_j $
1850: & $\frac{g}{\cos\theta_W}$
1851: & $-V_{i1}V_{j1}^* - \frac{1}{2}V_{i2}V_{j2}^* $
1852: & $-U_{i1}^*U_{j1} - \frac{1}{2}U_{i2}^*U_{j2} $
1853: \\
1854: & & & $ + \delta_{ij}\sin^2 \theta_W$ & $ +\delta_{ij}\sin^2 \theta_W$ \\
1855: \hline
1856: $ g_a $ & $\tilde{g}_b\mbox{ }\! \tilde{g}_c $
1857: & $\left\{if_{abc}\right\}g_s $ & $1$ & $1$ \\
1858: \hline
1859: \end{tabular}
1860: \caption{Feynman rules for the coupling of a gauge boson to a
1861: pair of electroweak gauginos. All momenta are to be taken as outgoing.}
1862: \label{tab:gaugeMFcp}
1863: \end{center}
1864: \end{table*}
1865: %% neutralino SM fermion diagram
1866: \begin{figure}
1867: \begin{center}
1868: \bpc(100,80)(50,10)
1869: \ArrowLine(15,50)(75,50) \Text(5,60)[l]{{\large $ \tilde{\chi}^0_j$,
1870: $\tilde{g}$}}
1871: \ArrowLine(75,50)(105,80) \Text(108,80)[l]{{\large $f_i$}}
1872: \DashArrowLine(105,20)(75,50){5}
1873: \Text(108,20)[l]{{\large $\tilde{f}_{i\alpha}$}}
1874: \Text(130,50)[l]{$\displaystyle{ic}\left[a_L P_L +
1875: a_R P_R\right]$}
1876: \epc
1877:
1878: \caption{Feynman rule of the coupling of the neutralinos and gluino with
1879: a Standard Model
1880: fermion and an sfermion. Table~\ref{tab:neutcp} gives the definitions of
1881: $a_L$ and $a_R$.}
1882: \end{center}
1883: \end{figure}
1884: %%gaugino SM fermion table 1
1885: \begin{table*}
1886: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1887: \begin{center}
1888: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|l|}
1889: \hline
1890: $f_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{f}_{i\alpha}$ & {\large $c$}
1891: & \\
1892: \hline
1893: \hline
1894: $u_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{u}_{i\alpha}$ & -$\sqrt{2}$
1895: & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{L}}\!:$
1896: $\frac{gm_{u_i}N^*_{j4}}{2M_W\sin\beta}Q^{2i}_{1\alpha} -
1897: Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}\left(ee_u N'^{*}_{j1} -
1898: \frac{ge_u \sin^2 \theta_W N'^*_{j2}}{\cos\theta_W}\right) $ \\
1899: %%\hline
1900: & & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{R}}\!:$
1901: $\frac{gm_{u_i}N_{j4}}{2M_W\sin\beta}Q^{2i}_{2\alpha} +
1902: Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}\left(ee_u N'_{j1} +
1903: \frac{g(\frac{1}{2} - e_u\ssw)N'_{j2}}{\cos\theta_W}\right)$ \\
1904: \hline
1905: $d_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{d}_{i\alpha}$ & -$\sqrt{2}$
1906: & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{L}}\!:$
1907: $\frac{gm_{d_i}N^*_{j3}}{2M_W\cos\beta}Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha} -
1908: Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}\left(ee_d N'^{*}_{j1} -
1909: \frac{ge_d \sin^2 \theta_W N'^*_{j2}}{\cos\theta_W}\right) $ \\
1910: %%\hline
1911: & & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{R}}\!:$
1912: $\frac{gm_{d_i}N_{j3}}{2M_W\cos\beta}Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha} +
1913: Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}\left(ee_d N'_{j1} -
1914: \frac{g(\frac{1}{2} + e_d\ssw)N'_{j2}}{\cos\theta_W}\right)$ \\
1915: \hline
1916: $l_i \mbox{ }\!\tilde{l}_{i\alpha}$
1917: & -$\sqrt{2} $ & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{L}}\!:$
1918: $\frac{gm_{l_i}N^{*}_{j3}}{2M_W\cos\beta}
1919: L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha} + L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}\left(eN'^*_{j1} -
1920: \frac{g\ssw}{\cos\theta_W}N'^*_{j2} \right) $ \\
1921: & & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{R}}\!:$
1922: $\frac{gm_{l_i}N_{j3}}{2M_W\cos\beta}
1923: L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha} - L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}\left(eN'_{j1} +
1924: \frac{g(\frac{1}{2} - \ssw)}{\cos\theta_W}N'_{j2} \right) $ \\
1925: \hline
1926: $\nu_i \mbox{ }\!\tilde{\nu}_i$
1927: & -$\sqrt{2} $ & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{L}}\!:$
1928: 0 \hspace{33pt}$a_{\scriptscriptstyle{R}}\!:$
1929: $\frac{gN'_{j2}}{2\cos\theta_W}$ \\
1930: \hline
1931: $q^b_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{q}^c_{i\alpha}$ &
1932: $\left\{ t^a_{bc}\right\}(-g_s\sqrt{2})$
1933: & $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{L}}\!:$ $-Q^k_{2\alpha}$
1934: \hspace{10pt}$a_{\scriptscriptstyle{R}}\!:$ $Q^k_{1\alpha}$ \\
1935: \hline
1936: \end{tabular}
1937: \caption{Neutralino and gluino couplings. In the case of the
1938: gluino $k=2i$ for up-type quarks and $k=2i-1$ for
1939: down-type quarks.}
1940: \label{tab:neutcp}
1941: \end{center}
1942: \end{table*}
1943:
1944: %% chargino SM fermion diagram
1945: \begin{figure}
1946: \begin{center}
1947: \bpc(300,200)(0,0)
1948: \ArrowLine(75,50)(15,50) \Text(0,50)[l]{{\large $ \tilde{\chi}^+_j $}}
1949: \ArrowLine(75,50)(105,80) \Text(108,80)[l]{{\large $d_i$, $l^-_i$}}
1950: \DashArrowLine(105,20)(75,50){5}
1951: \Text(108,20)[l]{{\large $\tilde{u}_{i\alpha}$, $\tilde{\nu}_i$}}
1952: \Text(160,50)[l]{$\displaystyle{ic}\left[a_L P_L +
1953: a_R P_R\right]C$}
1954: \SetOffset(0,105)
1955: \ArrowLine(15,50)(75,50) \Text(0,50)[l]{{\large $\tilde{\chi}^+_j $}}
1956: \ArrowLine(75,50)(105,80) \Text(108,80)[l]{{\large $u_i$, $\nu_i$}}
1957: \DashArrowLine(105,20)(75,50){5}
1958: \Text(108,20)[l]{{\large $\tilde{d}_{i\alpha}$, $\tilde{l}_{i\alpha}$}}
1959: \Text(160,50)[l]{$\displaystyle{ic}\left[a_L P_L +
1960: a_R P_R\right]$}
1961: \epc
1962: \end{center}
1963: \caption{Feynman rule of the coupling of a chargino with a Standard Model
1964: fermion and an sfermion. $C$ is the charge conjugation matrix.
1965: Table~\ref{tab:chargcp} gives the definitions of
1966: $a_L$ and $a_R$.}
1967: \end{figure}
1968: %%gaugino SM fermion table 2
1969: \begin{table}
1970: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
1971: \begin{center}
1972: %% \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{5mm}
1973: \begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|c|}
1974: \hline
1975: $f_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{f}_{i\alpha}^{'}$ & {\large $c$}
1976: & {\large $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{L}}$ }
1977: & {\large $a_{\scriptscriptstyle{R}}$ } \\
1978: \hline
1979: \hline
1980: $u_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{d}_{i\alpha}$ & $-g$
1981: & $-\frac{m_{u_i}V^*_{j2}}{\sqrt{2}M_W\sin\beta}Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}$
1982: & $U_{j1}Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha} -
1983: \frac{m_{d_i}U_{j2}}{\sqrt{2}M_W\cos\beta}Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}$ \\
1984: \hline
1985: $d_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{u}_{i\alpha}$ & $-g$
1986: & $-\frac{m_{d_i}U^*_{j2}}{\sqrt{2}M_W\cos\beta}Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}$
1987: & $V_{j1}Q^{2i}_{1\alpha} -
1988: \frac{m_{u_i}V_{j2}}{\sqrt{2}M_W\sin\beta}Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}$ \\
1989: \hline
1990: $\nu_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{l}_{i\alpha} $ & $-g$
1991: & 0 & $U_{j1}L_{1\alpha}^{2i-1} -
1992: \frac{m_{l_i}U_{j2}}{\sqrt{2}M_W\cos\beta}L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha} $ \\
1993: \hline
1994: $l_i\mbox{ }\!\tilde{\nu}_{i\alpha}$ & $-g$
1995: & $-\frac{m_{l_i}U^*_{j2}}{\sqrt{2}M_W\cos\beta}$ & $V_{j1}$ \\
1996: \hline
1997: \end{tabular}
1998: \caption{Chargino couplings for the $i^{th}$ fermion generation.}
1999: \label{tab:chargcp}
2000: \end{center}
2001: \end{table}
2002: %% gluon-gluon-squark-squark
2003: \begin{figure}
2004: \begin{center}
2005: \bpc(300,130)(-10,20)
2006: \Gluon(15,130)(60,85){4}{8}
2007: \Text(-2,130)[l]{{\large$\varepsilon^a_{\mu}$}}
2008: \Gluon(15,40)(60,85){-4}{8}
2009: \Text(-2,40)[l]{{\large$\varepsilon^b_{\nu}$}}
2010: \DashLine(60,85)(105,130){5} \Text(110,130)[l]{$\tilde{q}$}
2011: \DashLine(105,40)(60,85){5} \Text(110,40)[l]{$\tilde{q}^*$}
2012: \Text(130,85)[l]{$i\left(\frac{1}{3}\delta_{ab} +
2013: d_{abc}t^c\right)g_s^2\mbox{ }\!g_{\mu\nu}$}
2014: \epc
2015: \caption{Feynman rule for the coupling of two gluons to a pair of
2016: squarks.}
2017: \end{center}
2018: \label{fig:ggsqsqRule}
2019: \end{figure}
2020: %% higgs sfermion diagram
2021: \begin{figure}
2022: \begin{center}
2023: \bpc(300,85)(-20,10)
2024: \DashLine(75,50)(15,50){5} \Text(-20,60)[l]{{\large $h^0, H^0, A^0$}}
2025: \DashLine(75,50)(105,80){5} \Text(108,80)[l]{{\large $\tilde{f}_{i\alpha}$}}
2026: \DashLine(105,20)(75,50){5}
2027: \Text(108,20)[l]{{\large $\tilde{f}^*_{i\beta}$}}
2028: \Text(160,50)[l]{{\large $c\Gamma$ }}
2029: \epc
2030: \end{center}
2031: \caption{Feynman rule for the coupling of a higgs with a pair of
2032: sfermions. The definition of $\Gamma$ for the three neutral Higgs' are given
2033: in table~\ref{tab:smhiggscp},~\ref{tab:higgs2cp} and~\ref{tab:higgs3cp}.}
2034: \end{figure}
2035: %% h0 coupling table
2036: \begin{table*}
2037: \begin{center}
2038: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
2039: \begin{tabular}{|c||l|}
2040: \hline
2041: $\tilde{f}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{f}^*_{i\beta}$
2042: & \hspace{140pt} $\Gamma$ \\
2043: \hline
2044: \hline
2045: $\tilde{u}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{u}^*_{i\beta}$
2046: & $\frac{M_Z\sin(\alpha + \beta)}{\cos\theta_W}
2047: \left[ Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i}_{1\beta}(\frac{1}{2} - e_u\ssw)
2048: + e_u\ssw Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2049: & $-\frac{m_{u_i}^2\cos\alpha}{M_W\sin\beta}
2050: \left[Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i}_{1\beta} +
2051: Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2052: & $- \frac{m_{u_i}}{2M_W\sin\beta}(A_{u_i}\cos\alpha + \mu\sin\alpha)$
2053: $\left[Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i}_{1\beta} +
2054: Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i}_{2\beta} \right]$ \\
2055: \hline
2056: $\tilde{d}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{d}^*_{i\beta}$
2057: & $-\frac{M_Z\sin(\alpha + \beta)}{\cos\theta_W}
2058: \left[ Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{1\beta}(\frac{1}{2} + e_d\ssw)
2059: - e_d\ssw Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2060: & $+\frac{m_{d_i}^2\sin\alpha}{M_W\cos\beta}
2061: \left[Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2062: Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2063: & $+ \frac{m_{d_i}}{2M_W\cos\beta}(A_{d_i}\sin\alpha + \mu\cos\alpha)$
2064: $\left[Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2065: Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2066: \hline
2067: $\tilde{l}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{l}^*_{i\beta}$
2068: & $-\frac{M_Z\sin(\alpha + \beta)}{\cos\theta_W}
2069: \left[ L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{1\beta}(\frac{1}{2} - \ssw)
2070: + \ssw L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2071: & $+\frac{m_{l_i}^2\sin\alpha}{M_W\cos\beta}
2072: \left[L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2073: L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2074: & $+\frac{m_{l_i}}{2M_W\cos\beta}(A_{e_i}\sin\alpha + \mu\cos\alpha)$
2075: $\left[L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2076: L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2077: \hline
2078: $\tilde{\nu}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{\nu}^*_{i\beta}$
2079: & $\frac{M_Z\sin(\alpha + \beta)}{2\cos\theta_W} $ \\
2080: \hline
2081: \end{tabular}
2082: \caption{$h^0$ couplings to sfermion pairs with $c=ig$.}
2083: \label{tab:smhiggscp}
2084: \end{center}
2085: \end{table*}
2086:
2087: %% H0 coupling table
2088: \begin{table*}
2089: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
2090: \centering
2091: \begin{center}
2092: \begin{tabular}{|c||l|}
2093: \hline
2094: $\tilde{f}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{f}^*_{i\beta}$
2095: & \hspace{140pt} $\Gamma$ \\
2096: \hline
2097: \hline
2098: $\tilde{u}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{u}^*_{i\beta}$
2099: & $-\frac{M_Z\cos(\alpha + \beta)}{\cos\theta_W}
2100: \left[ Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i}_{1\beta}(\frac{1}{2} - e_u\ssw)
2101: + e_u\ssw Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2102: & $-\frac{m_{u_i}^2\sin\alpha}{M_W\sin\beta}
2103: \left[Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i}_{1\beta} +
2104: Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2105: & $-\frac{m_{u_i}}{2M_W\sin\beta}(A_{u_i}\sin\alpha - \mu\cos\alpha)$
2106: $\left[Q^{2i}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i}_{1\beta} +
2107: Q^{2i}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i}_{2\beta} \right]$ \\
2108: \hline
2109: $\tilde{d}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{d}^*_{i\beta}$
2110: & $\frac{M_Z\cos(\alpha + \beta)}{\cos\theta_W}
2111: \left[ Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{1\beta}(\frac{1}{2} + e_d\ssw)
2112: - e_d\ssw Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2113: & $-\frac{m_{d_i}^2\cos\alpha}{M_W\cos\beta}
2114: \left[Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2115: Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2116: & $+ \frac{m_{d_i}}{2M_W\cos\beta}(\mu\sin\alpha - A_{d_i}\cos\alpha)$
2117: $\left[Q^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2118: Q^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}Q^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2119: \hline
2120: $\tilde{l}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{l}^*_{i\beta}$
2121: & $\frac{M_Z\cos(\alpha + \beta)}{\cos\theta_W}
2122: \left[ L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{1\beta}(\frac{1}{2} - \ssw)
2123: + \ssw L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2124: & $-\frac{m_{l_i}^2\cos\alpha}{M_W\cos\beta}
2125: \left[L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2126: L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2127: & $+\frac{m_{l_i}}{2M_W\cos\beta}(\mu\sin\alpha - A_{e_i}\cos\alpha )$
2128: $\left[L^{2i-1}_{2\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{1\beta} +
2129: L^{2i-1}_{1\alpha}L^{2i-1}_{2\beta}\right]$ \\
2130: \hline
2131: $\tilde{\nu}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{\nu}^*_{i\beta}$
2132: & $-\frac{M_Z\cos(\alpha + \beta)}{2\cos\theta_W} $ \\
2133: \hline
2134: \end{tabular}
2135: \caption{$H^0$ couplings to sfermion pairs with $c=ig$.}
2136: \label{tab:higgs2cp}
2137: \end{center}
2138: \end{table*}
2139:
2140: %%A0 coupling table
2141: \begin{table}
2142: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
2143: \begin{center}
2144: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|}
2145: \hline $\tilde{f}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{f}^*_{i\beta}$ & $\Gamma$ \\
2146: \hline
2147: \hline
2148: $\tilde{u}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{u}^*_{i\beta}$
2149: & $\frac{m_{u_i}}{2M_W}\left(A_{u_i}\cot\beta + \mu\right)\delta_{\alpha\neq\beta}$ \\
2150: \hline
2151: $\tilde{d}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{d}^*_{i\beta}$
2152: & $\frac{m_{d_i}}{2M_W}\left(A_{d_i}\tan\beta+\mu\right)\delta_{\alpha\neq\beta}$ \\
2153: \hline
2154: $\tilde{l}_{i\alpha}\mbox{ }\!\tilde{l}^*_{i\beta}$
2155: & $\frac{m_{l_i}}{2M_W}\left(A_{e_i}\tan\beta + \mu\right)\delta_{\alpha\neq\beta}$ \\
2156: \hline
2157: \end{tabular}
2158: \caption{$A^0$ couplings to sfermion pairs with $c=g$.}
2159: \label{tab:higgs3cp}
2160: \end{center}
2161: \end{table}
2162:
2163: %%\bibliographystyle{JHEP}
2164: %%\bibliography{Refs}
2165:
2166: \providecommand{\href}[2]{#2}\begingroup\raggedright\begin{thebibliography}{10}
2167:
2168: %\cite{Gieseke:2003hm}
2169: \bibitem{Gieseke:2003hm}
2170: S.~Gieseke, A.~Ribon, M.~H.~Seymour, P.~Stephens and B.~Webber,
2171: \textit{Herwig++ 1.0: An event generator for e+ e- annihilation},
2172: JHEP {\bf 0402} (2004) 005
2173: [arXiv:hep-ph/0311208].
2174: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0402,005;%%
2175:
2176: %\cite{Gieseke:2006ga}
2177: \bibitem{Gieseke:2006ga}
2178: S.~Gieseke {\it et al.},
2179: \textit{Herwig++ 2.0 release note},
2180: arXiv:hep-ph/0609306.
2181: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0609306;%%
2182:
2183: %\cite{Corcella:2002jc}
2184: \bibitem{Corcella:2002jc}
2185: G.~Corcella {\it et al.},
2186: \textit{HERWIG 6.5 release note}
2187: arXiv:hep-ph/0210213.
2188: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210213;%%
2189:
2190: %\cite{Corcella:2000bw}
2191: \bibitem{Corcella:2000bw}
2192: G.~Corcella {\it et al.},
2193: \textit{HERWIG 6: An event generator for hadron emission reactions with
2194: interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes)},
2195: JHEP {\bf 0101} (2001) 010
2196: [arXiv:hep-ph/0011363].
2197: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0101,010;%%
2198:
2199: %\cite{Moretti:2002eu}
2200: \bibitem{Moretti:2002eu}
2201: S.~Moretti, K.~Odagiri, P.~Richardson, M.~H.~Seymour and B.~R.~Webber,
2202: \textit{Implementation of supersymmetric processes in the HERWIG event
2203: generator},
2204: JHEP {\bf 0204} (2002) 028
2205: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204123].
2206: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0204,028;
2207:
2208: %\cite{Maltoni:2002qb}
2209: \bibitem{Maltoni:2002qb}
2210: F.~Maltoni and T.~Stelzer,
2211: \textit{MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph},
2212: JHEP {\bf 0302} (2003) 027
2213: [arXiv:hep-ph/0208156].
2214: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208156;%%
2215:
2216: %\cite{Pukhov:1999gg}
2217: \bibitem{Pukhov:1999gg}
2218: A.~Pukhov {\it et al.},
2219: \textit{CompHEP: A package for evaluation of Feynman diagrams and
2220: integration over
2221: multi-particle phase space. User's manual for version 33},
2222: arXiv:hep-ph/9908288.
2223: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908288;%%
2224:
2225: %\cite{Gleisberg:2003xi}
2226: \bibitem{Gleisberg:2003xi}
2227: T.~Gleisberg, S.~Hoche, F.~Krauss, A.~Schalicke, S.~Schumann and J.~C.~Winter,
2228: \textit{SHERPA 1.$\alpha$, A Proof-of-Concept Version},
2229: JHEP {\bf 0402} (2004) 056
2230: [arXiv:hep-ph/0311263].
2231: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311263;%%
2232:
2233: %\cite{Moretti:2001zz}
2234: \bibitem{Moretti:2001zz}
2235: M.~Moretti, T.~Ohl and J.~Reuter,
2236: \textit{O'Mega: An optimizing matrix element generator},
2237: [arXiv:hep-ph/0102195].
2238: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/0102195;%%
2239:
2240: %\cite{Kilian:2001qz}
2241: \bibitem{Kilian:2001qz}
2242: W.~Kilian,
2243: \textit{WHIZARD 1.0: A generic Monte-Carlo integration and event generation
2244: package for multi-particle processes. Manual},
2245: %%CITATION = LC-TOOL-2001-039;%%
2246:
2247: %\cite{Skands:2003cj}
2248: \bibitem{Skands:2003cj}
2249: P.~Skands {\it et al.},
2250: \textit{SUSY Les Houches accord: Interfacing SUSY spectrum calculators, decay
2251: packages, and event generators},
2252: JHEP {\bf 0407} (2004) 036
2253: [arXiv:hep-ph/0311123].
2254: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0311123;%%
2255:
2256: %\cite{Randall:1999ee}
2257: \bibitem{Randall:1999ee}
2258: L.~Randall and R.~Sundrum,
2259: \textit{A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension},
2260: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83} (1999) 3370
2261: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905221].
2262: %%CITATION = PRLTA,83,3370;%%
2263:
2264: %\cite{Richardson:2001df}
2265: \bibitem{Richardson:2001df}
2266: P.~Richardson,
2267: \textit{Spin correlations in Monte Carlo simulations},
2268: JHEP {\bf 0111} (2001) 029
2269: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110108].
2270: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110108;%%
2271:
2272: %\cite{Collins:1987cp}
2273: \bibitem{Collins:1987cp}
2274: J.~C.~Collins,
2275: \textit{Spin correlations in Monte Carlo event generators},
2276: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 304} (1988) 794.
2277: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B304,794;%%
2278:
2279: %%\cite{Knowles:1988hu}
2280: \bibitem{Knowles:1988hu}
2281: I.~G.~Knowles,
2282: \textit{A linear algorthim for calculating spin correlations in hadronic
2283: collisions},
2284: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 58} (1990) 271.
2285: %%CITATION = CPHCB,58,271;%%
2286:
2287: %\cite{Murayama:1992gi}
2288: \bibitem{Murayama:1992gi}
2289: H.~Murayama, I.~Watanabe and K.~Hagiwara,
2290: \textit{HELAS: HELicity Amplitude Subroutines for Feynman diagram evaluations},
2291: KEK-91-11
2292: \href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=kek-91-11}{SPIRES entry}
2293:
2294: %\cite{Allanach:2002gn}
2295: \bibitem{Allanach:2002gn}
2296: B.~C.~Allanach, K.~Odagiri, M.~J.~Palmer, M.~A.~Parker, A.~Sabetfakhri and B.~R.~Webber,
2297: \textit{Exploring small extra dimensions at the Large Hadron Collider},
2298: JHEP {\bf 0212} (2002) 039
2299: [arXiv:hep-ph/0211205].
2300: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0212,039;
2301:
2302: %%\cite{Allanach:2000nr}
2303: \bibitem{Allanach:2000nr}
2304: B.~C.~Allanach, K.~Odagiri, M.~A.~Parker and B.~R.~Webber,
2305: \textit{Searching for narrow graviton resonances with the ATLAS detector at the
2306: Large Hadron Collider},
2307: JHEP {\bf 0009} (2000) 019
2308: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006114].
2309: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006114;%%
2310:
2311: %\cite{Allanach:2002nj}
2312: \bibitem{Allanach:2002nj}
2313: B.~C.~Allanach {\it et al.},
2314: \textit{The Snowmass points and slopes: Benchmarks for SUSY searches}, ed. N.~Graf,
2315: {\it In the Proceedings of APS / DPF / DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001), Snowmass, Colorado, 30 Jun - 21 Jul
2316: 2001, pp P125}
2317: [arXiv:hep-ph/0202233].
2318: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202233;%%
2319:
2320: %\cite{Allanach:2001kg}
2321: \bibitem{Allanach:2001kg}
2322: B.~C.~Allanach,
2323: \textit{SOFTSUSY: A C++ program for calculating supersymmetric spectra},
2324: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 143} (2002) 305
2325: [arXiv:hep-ph/0104145].
2326: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104145;%%
2327:
2328: %\cite{Allanach:2000kt}
2329: \bibitem{Allanach:2000kt}
2330: B.~C.~Allanach, C.~G.~Lester, M.~A.~Parker and B.~R.~Webber,
2331: \textit{Measuring sparticle masses in non-universal string inspired models at the
2332: LHC},
2333: JHEP {\bf 0009} (2000) 004
2334: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007009].
2335: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007009;%%
2336:
2337: %\cite{Han:1998sg}
2338: \bibitem{Han:1998sg}
2339: T.~Han, J.~D.~Lykken and R.~J.~Zhang,
2340: \textit{On Kaluza-Klein states from large extra dimensions}
2341: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59} (1999) 105006
2342: [arXiv:hep-ph/9811350].
2343: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811350;%%
2344:
2345: %\cite{Choi:2006mt}
2346: \bibitem{Choi:2006mt}
2347: S.~Y.~Choi, K.~Hagiwara, Y.~G.~Kim, K.~Mawatari and P.~M.~Zerwas,
2348: \textit{Tau polarization in SUSY cascade decays},
2349: arXiv:hep-ph/0612237.
2350: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0612237;%%
2351:
2352: %\cite{Jadach:1993hs}
2353: \bibitem{Jadach:1993hs}
2354: S.~Jadach, Z.~Was, R.~Decker and J.~H.~Kuhn,
2355: \textit{The tau decay library TAUOLA: Version 2.4},
2356: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 76} (1993) 361.
2357: %%CITATION = CPHCB,76,361;%%
2358:
2359: %\cite{Bullock:1991fd}
2360: \bibitem{Bullock:1991fd}
2361: B.~K.~Bullock, K.~Hagiwara and A.~D.~Martin,
2362: \textit{Tau polarization as a signal of charged Higgs bosons},
2363: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 67} (1991) 3055.
2364: %%CITATION = PRLTA,67,3055;%%
2365:
2366: %\cite{Smillie:2005ar}
2367: \bibitem{Smillie:2005ar}
2368: J.~M.~Smillie and B.~R.~Webber,
2369: \textit{Distinguishing spins in supersymmetric and Universal Extra Dimension
2370: models at the Large Hadron Collider},
2371: JHEP {\bf 0510} (2005) 069
2372: [arXiv:hep-ph/0507170].
2373: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0510,069;%%
2374:
2375: \bibitem{Kleiss:1985yh}
2376: R.~Kleiss and W.~J.~Stirling,
2377: \textit{Spinor Techniques For Calculating $p\bar{p} \to W^{\pm}/Z^0+\rm{Jets}$},
2378: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 262} (1985) 235.
2379: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B262,235;%%
2380:
2381: \bibitem{Haber:1994pe}
2382: H.~E.~Haber,
2383: \textit{Spin formalism and applications to new physics searches},
2384: arXiv:hep-ph/9405376.
2385: %%CITATION = HEP-PH/9405376;%%
2386:
2387: %%\cite{Lonnblad:2006pt}
2388: \bibitem{Lonnblad:2006pt}
2389: L.~Lonnblad,
2390: \textit{ThePEG, Pythia7, Herwig++ and Ariadne},
2391: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 559} (2006) 246.
2392: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A559,246;%% on which
2393:
2394: \end{thebibliography}\endgroup
2395:
2396: \end{document}
2397: