1: \documentclass[aps,prl,superscriptaddress,twocolumn,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5: \title{$\mathbf{D}$--$\mathbf{\bar D}$
6: MIXING AND NEW PHYSICS:\\
7: GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ON THE MSSM}
8:
9: \author{M.~Ciuchini}
10: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Roma Tre
11: and INFN, Sezione di Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 84, I-00146
12: Roma, Italy}
13: \author{E.~Franco}
14: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Roma ``La
15: Sapienza'' and INFN,
16: Sezione di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, I-00185 Rome, Italy}
17: \author{D.~Guadagnoli}
18: \affiliation{Physik-Department T31, TU-M{\"u}nchen, D-85748 Garching,
19: Germany}
20: \author{V.~Lubicz}
21: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Roma Tre
22: and INFN, Sezione di Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 84, I-00146
23: Roma, Italy}
24: \author{M.~Pierini}
25: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
26: WI 53706, USA}
27: \author{V.~Porretti}
28: \affiliation{Departament de F\'{\i}sica Te\`orica and IFIC, Universitat de
29: Val\`encia-CSIC, E-46100, Burjassot, Spain}
30: \author{L.~Silvestrini}
31: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Roma ``La
32: Sapienza'' and INFN,
33: Sezione di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, I-00185 Rome, Italy}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: Combining the recent experimental evidence of $D$--$\bar
37: D$ mixing, we extract model-independent information on the mixing
38: amplitude and on its CP-violating phase. Using this information, we
39: present new constraints on the flavour structure of up-type squark
40: mass matrices in supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model.
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \maketitle
44:
45: The study of meson oscillations represents one of the most powerful probes
46: of New Physics (NP) currently available. The $K$ and $B_d$ systems are
47: very well studied experimentally and all the measurements performed up
48: to now are compatible with the Standard Model (SM) expectation,
49: although there is still room for NP which could be revealed with
50: improved theoretical tools and experimental facilities hopefully
51: available in the future~\cite{UTnp06,CDR}.
52:
53: As far as the $B_s$ is concerned, the experimental evidence of
54: oscillation was found only recently at the TeVatron~\cite{DMS}. While
55: the oscillation frequency is already very well known, information on
56: the phase of the mixing amplitude is still quite vague, leaving ample
57: room for experimental improvements expected from hadronic colliders.
58:
59: All this experimental information allows to put model-independent
60: constraints on NP contributions to the mixing amplitudes involving
61: down-type quarks~\cite{UTnp06}. These constraints already induce highly
62: non-trivial bounds on the flavour structure of many extensions of the
63: SM. In particular, considering the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard
64: Model (MSSM), the flavour properties of the down-type squark mass
65: matrices have already been thoroughly analyzed~\cite{susydf2}.
66:
67: On the other hand, up to now no evidence was found of oscillations of
68: mesons involving up-type quarks. Correspondingly, the off-diagonal
69: entries of up-type squark mass matrices were only weakly
70: bounded~\cite{ddbarsusy,nirraz}. It is remarkable that one of the proposed
71: mechanisms to explain the flavour structure of the MSSM and to
72: suppress the unwanted SUSY contributions to Flavour-Changing Neutral
73: Current (FCNC) processes, namely alignment of quark and squark mass
74: matrices~\cite{alignment}, naturally produces sizable effects in the
75: up-type sector. In the absence of stringent experimental information,
76: these models were not tightly constrained~\cite{nirraz}.
77:
78: Very recently, BaBar~\cite{babarDD} and Belle~\cite{bellexy,belleycp}
79: independently reported evidence for $D$--$\bar D$ mixing. In this
80: letter we use this information, combined with previous constraints on
81: D mixing~\cite{otherxy,otherycp,cleo,RMall}, to put model-independent bounds on the
82: mixing amplitude and to constrain the relevant entries of the up-type
83: squark mass matrices. To fulfil this task we use the mass-insertion
84: approximation. Treating off-diagonal sfermion mass terms as
85: interactions, we perform a perturbative expansion of FCNC amplitudes
86: in terms of mass insertions. The lowest non-vanishing order of this
87: expansion gives an excellent approximation to the full result, given
88: the tight experimental constraints on flavour changing mass
89: insertions. It is most convenient to work in the super-CKM basis, in
90: which all gauge interactions carry the same flavour dependence as SM
91: ones. In this basis, we define the mass insertions
92: $\left(\delta^u_{12}\right)_{AB}$ as the off-diagonal mass terms
93: connecting up-type squarks of flavour $u$ and $c$ and helicity $A$ and
94: $B$, divided by the average squark mass.
95:
96:
97: Let us first discuss the recent experimental novelties. BaBar studied
98: $D^0 \to K^+ \pi^-$ and $\bar D^0 \to K^- \pi^+$ decays as a function
99: of the proper time of the $D$ mesons. Assuming no CP violation in
100: mixing, which is safe in the SM, this analysis allows
101: to measure the parameters $x^{\prime 2}$ and $y^\prime$, defined in terms
102: of the mixing parameters $x$ and $y$ through the relations:
103: $$ x^\prime = ~x \cos \delta_{K\pi} + y \sin \delta_{K\pi},\quad
104: y^\prime = -x \sin \delta_{K\pi} + y \cos \delta_{K\pi} ,
105: $$
106: where $\delta_{K\pi}$ is the relative strong phase between the
107: Cabibbo-suppressed $D^0 \to K^+ \pi^-$ decays and the Cabibbo-favoured
108: $D^0 \to K^- \pi^+$ ones. This phase has been recently measured by
109: CLEO-c~\cite{cleo}. From a fit to $D^0$ and $\bar D^0$ decays, BaBar
110: is able to exclude the point $x^{\prime 2} = y^\prime = 0$ (which
111: corresponds to the no-mixing scenario) with a $3.9\sigma$ significance
112: (including systematic effects). In addition, the BaBar collaboration
113: fitted separately the parameters $x^{\prime 2}_\pm$ and $y^\prime_\pm$
114: of $D^0 \to K^\pm \pi^\mp$ decays allowing for CP violation.
115:
116: Belle directly determines $x$ and $y$, studying the $D^0 \to K^0_S
117: \pi^+ \pi^-$ Dalitz plot. In this way, one can separately measure the
118: mixing parameters and the strong phase. Even though this analysis is
119: not precise enough to claim the observation of $D$--$\bar D$ mixing,
120: it allows to disentangle mixing parameters from the strong phase
121: $\delta_{K\pi}$, when $D^0 \to K^0_S \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $D^0 \to K \pi$
122: results are combined.
123:
124: Belle also found evidence of $D$--$\bar D$ mixing, observing a
125: deviation from zero (at $3.2\sigma$ including the systematic error) of
126: $y_\mathrm{CP} = \frac{\tau(D^0 \to K^- \pi^+)}{\tau(D^0 \to
127: f_\mathrm{CP})}-1$ and in addition measured the CP asymmetry
128: $A_\Gamma=(\Gamma(D\to KK)-\Gamma(\bar D\to KK))/(\Gamma(D\to
129: KK)+\Gamma(\bar D\to KK))$.
130:
131: We assume that CP violation can occur in mixing but not in decay
132: amplitudes, since the latter are dominated by SM tree-level
133: contributions. Therefore, we assume that $\Gamma_{12}$ is real. Our
134: aim is to determine the parameters $\vert M_{12}\vert e^{-i \Phi_{12}}$ and
135: $\Gamma_{12}$ from the available experimental data. One can write
136: the following relations~\cite{Raz}:
137: \begin{eqnarray}
138: && \vert M_{12} \vert = \frac{1}{\tau_D } \sqrt{\frac{x^2+\delta^2
139: y^2}{4(1-\delta^2)}}\,,\quad
140: \vert \Gamma_{12} \vert= \frac{1}{\tau_D }\sqrt{\frac{y^2+\delta^2
141: x^2}{1-\delta^2}}\,, \nonumber \\
142: && \sin \Phi_{12} = \frac{\vert \Gamma_{12}\vert^2 + 4 \vert
143: M_{12}\vert^2 - (x^2+y^2)\vert q/p\vert^2/\tau_D^2}{4 \vert M_{12}
144: \Gamma_{12}\vert}\,, \nonumber \\
145: &&\phi = \arg (y+i \delta x)\,,\quad
146: y^\prime_\pm =
147: \left\vert
148: \frac{q}{p}
149: \right\vert^{\pm 1}(y^\prime\cos \phi \mp x^\prime \sin
150: \phi)\,, \nonumber \\
151: && x^{\prime 2}_\pm = \left\vert
152: \frac{q}{p}
153: \right\vert^{\pm 2}(x^\prime\cos \phi \pm y^\prime \sin
154: \phi)^2\,,\quad R_M =\frac{x^2+y^2}{2}\,,\nonumber \\
155: && y_\mathrm{CP} =
156: \left(
157: \left\vert
158: \frac{q}{p}
159: \right\vert + \left\vert
160: \frac{p}{q}
161: \right\vert
162: \right) \frac{y}{2} \cos \phi- \left(
163: \left\vert
164: \frac{q}{p}
165: \right\vert - \left\vert
166: \frac{p}{q}
167: \right\vert
168: \right) \frac{x}{2}\sin \phi\,, \nonumber \\
169: && A_\Gamma = \left(
170: \left\vert
171: \frac{q}{p}
172: \right\vert - \left\vert
173: \frac{p}{q}
174: \right\vert
175: \right) \frac{y}{2} \cos \phi- \left(
176: \left\vert
177: \frac{q}{p}
178: \right\vert + \left\vert
179: \frac{p}{q}
180: \right\vert
181: \right) \frac{x}{2}\sin \phi\,, \nonumber
182: \end{eqnarray}
183: where $\delta=\vert p \vert^2 - \vert q \vert^2$ and $\phi$ is the phase of the mixing parameter $q/p$. We fit for $\vert
184: M_{12}\vert$, $\vert \Gamma_{12}\vert$ and $\Phi_{12}$ using the
185: experimental inputs listed in Table~\ref{tab:exp}, taking into account
186: the correlations between $y^\prime_\pm$ and $x^{\prime 2}_\pm$ in the
187: BaBar results. Notice that all observables can be written in terms of
188: $\vert M_{12}\vert$, $\vert \Gamma_{12}\vert$ and $\Phi_{12}$.
189:
190: \begin{table}[!tb]
191: \begin{center}
192: \begin{tabular}{lcr}
193: \hline
194: Parameter & Value & Ref. \\
195: \hline
196: $x^{\prime 2}_+$ & $(-0.24 \pm 0.43 \pm 0.30)\cdot 10^{-3}$ &
197: \cite{babarDD} \\
198: $x^{\prime 2}_-$ & $(-0.20 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.29)\cdot 10^{-3}$ &
199: \cite{babarDD} \\
200: $y^\prime_+$ & $(9.8 \pm 6.4 \pm 4.5)\cdot 10^{-3}$ & \cite{babarDD} \\
201: $y^\prime_-$ & $(9.6 \pm 6.1 \pm 4.3)\cdot 10^{-3}$ & \cite{babarDD} \\
202: $x$ & $(7.9 \pm 3.4)\cdot 10^{-3}$ & \cite{bellexy,otherxy} \\
203: $y$ & $(3.4 \pm 2.8)\cdot 10^{-3}$ & \cite{bellexy,otherxy} \\
204: $\phi$ ($^\circ$) & $-12 \pm 18$ & \cite{bellexy,otherxy} \\
205: $\vert q/p \vert$ & $0.88 \pm 0.31$ & \cite{bellexy}\\
206: $y_\mathrm{CP}$ & $(11.2 \pm 3.2)\cdot 10^{-3}$ & \cite{belleycp,otherycp} \\
207: $A_\Gamma$ & $(-1.7 \pm 3.0)\cdot 10^{-3}$ & \cite{belleycp,otherycp} \\
208: $\cos\delta_{K\pi}$ & $1.09\pm 0.66$ & \cite{cleo} \\
209: $R_M$ & $(21\pm 11)\cdot 10^{-3}$ & \cite{RMall} \\
210: $\tau_D$ (ps) & $0.4101 \pm 0.0015$ & \cite{pdg} \\
211: \hline
212: \end{tabular}
213: \end{center}
214: \caption{Experimental results used in our analysis. For $A_\Gamma$,
215: $y_\mathrm{CP}$ and $R_M$ we have used the Heavy Flavor Averaging
216: Group (HFAG) averages as of May 2007. For $x$, $y$ and $\phi$ we
217: have performed our own combination of experimental results as the
218: HFAG averages are obtained assuming no CP violation.}
219: \label{tab:exp}
220: \end{table}
221:
222: The results of the simultaneous fit are quoted in
223: Tab.~\ref{tab:combres} and shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:1D}. Our
224: results are slightly different from the HFAG
225: May 2007 averages because they are obtained allowing for CP violation,
226: while the HFAG results assume no CP violation. In
227: Fig.~\ref{fig:combres}, the two-dimensional constraints on the $y$ vs
228: $x$, $\phi$ vs $\vert q/p \vert$ and $\Phi_{12}$ vs $\vert M_{12}
229: \vert$ are given. We notice that, since the measured value of
230: $y_\mathrm{CP}$ is large, the phase $\phi$ is constrained to be close
231: to zero. However, due to the large value of $\Gamma_{12}$, the
232: constraint on $\Phi_{12}$ is less stringent. Some of the results
233: collected in Tab.~\ref{tab:combres} can be compared with the existing
234: literature. Concerning the upper bound on $\vert M_{12} \vert$, we
235: find an improvement of almost an order of magnitude with respect to
236: the analysis of ref.~\cite{Raz}, while for $x$ the improvement with
237: respect to ref.~\cite{Golowich} is about a factor of three.
238:
239: The calculation of $\vert M_{12} \vert$ is plagued by long-distance
240: contributions~\cite{petrov}. To take them into account, we proceed in
241: the following way. We assume that the full amplitude $M_{12}$ is the
242: sum of the NP amplitude $A_\mathrm{NP} e^{i \phi_\mathrm{NP}}$ and of
243: a SM real amplitude containing both short- and long-distance
244: contributions, $A_\mathrm{SM}$. We take $A_\mathrm{SM}$ to be flatly
245: distributed in the range $[-0.02,0.02]$ ps$^{-1}$, so that it can
246: saturate the experimental bound in Tab.~\ref{tab:combres}, and derive
247: from the $\Phi_{12}$ vs
248: $\vert M_{12}\vert $ distribution the p.d.f. for $A_\mathrm{NP}$ vs
249: $\phi_\mathrm{NP}$, barring accidental order-of-magnitude cancellations
250: between SM and NP
251: contributions. The results, reported in Tab.~\ref{tab:npres} and shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:combres}, provide a
252: new constraint that should be fulfilled by any extension of the SM.
253: We see that the lack of knowledge of the SM contribution causes a
254: dilution of the bound on $\phi_\mathrm{NP}$. Clearly, if a reliable
255: estimate of $A_\mathrm{SM}$ were available, the constraint would be
256: much more effective. Notice also that if $\vert M_{12}\vert$ is
257: dominated by NP, then $\phi_\mathrm{NP}\sim\Phi_{12}$ and the NP phase
258: can be experimentally accessed.
259:
260: \begin{table}[!tb]
261: \begin{center}
262: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
263: \hline
264: Parameter & 68\% prob. & 95\% prob. \\
265: \hline
266: $x$ & $(6.2 \pm 2.0)\cdot 10^{-3}$ &
267: $[0.0022,0.0105]$\\
268: $y$ & $(5.5 \pm 1.4)\cdot 10^{-3}$ &
269: $[0.0027,0.0084]$\\
270: $\delta_{K\pi}$ & $(-31 \pm 39)^\circ$ &
271: $[-103^\circ,28^\circ]$\\
272: $\phi$ & $(1 \pm 7)^\circ$ &
273: $[-15^\circ,17^\circ]$\\
274: $|\frac{q}{p}|-1$ & $-0.02 \pm 0.11$ &
275: $[-0.27,0.25]$\\
276: $\vert M_{12}\vert$ (ps$^{-1}$) & $(7.7 \pm 2.4)\cdot 10^{-3}$
277: & $[0.0030,0.0127]$ \\
278: $\Phi_{12}$ ($^\circ$) & $(2 \pm 14) \cup (179 \pm 14)$ &
279: $[-30,36]\cup[144,210]$\\
280: $\vert \Gamma_{12} \vert$ (ps$^{-1}$) & $(13.6 \pm 3.5)\cdot 10^{-3}$
281: & $[0.0068,0.0207]$\\
282: \hline
283: \end{tabular}
284: \end{center}
285: \caption{Results on mixing and CP violation parameters.}
286: \label{tab:combres}
287: \end{table}
288:
289: \begin{figure}[htb!]
290: \begin{center}
291: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_x}
292: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_y}
293: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_Hdelta}
294: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_Hphi}
295: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_qopm1}
296: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_M12}
297: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_Hphi12}
298: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{DDmix_Input_G12}
299: \caption{%
300: Probability density functions of the combined fit from
301: Tab.~\protect\ref{tab:exp}. Dark (light) regions correspond to
302: $68\%$ ($95\%$) probability.}
303: \label{fig:1D}
304: \end{center}
305: \end{figure}
306:
307: \begin{figure}[htb!]
308: \begin{center}
309: \includegraphics[width=0.22\textwidth]{DDyvsx}
310: \includegraphics[width=0.22\textwidth]{DDphivsqop}
311: \includegraphics[width=0.22\textwidth]{DDphi12vsM12}
312: \includegraphics[width=0.22\textwidth]{HNP}
313: \includegraphics[width=0.22\textwidth]{npplot_DD_Input_HNP_A}
314: \includegraphics[width=0.22\textwidth]{npplot_DD_Input_HNP_phi}
315: \caption{%
316: Probability density functions of the combined fit from
317: Tab.~\protect\ref{tab:exp}, projected on $y$ vs $x$ (top left),
318: $\phi$ vs $\vert q/p \vert-1$ (top right), $\Phi_{12}$ vs $\vert
319: M_{12} \vert$ (center left), $A_\mathrm{NP}$ vs $\phi_\mathrm{NP}$
320: (center right), $A_\mathrm{NP}$ (bottom left) and $\phi_\mathrm{NP}$ (bottom right).
321: Dark (light) regions correspond to $68\%$ ($95\%$)
322: probability.}
323: \label{fig:combres}
324: \end{center}
325: \end{figure}
326:
327: \begin{table}[!tb]
328: \begin{center}
329: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
330: \hline
331: & 68\% prob. & 95\% prob. \\
332: \hline
333: $A_\mathrm{NP}$ (ps$^{-1}$) & $[0,0.006]$ & $[0,0.02]$ \\
334: $\phi_\mathrm{NP}$ ($^\circ$) & $[-180,-149]\,\cup $
335: & $[-180,-112]\cup [-68,180]$\\
336: & $[-31,39]\cup [141,180]$ & \\
337: \hline
338: \end{tabular}
339: \end{center}
340: \caption{Allowed ranges for the NP amplitude.}
341: \label{tab:npres}
342: \end{table}
343:
344: \begin{table}[!tb]
345: \begin{center}
346: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
347: \hline
348: $B_1=0.87\pm0.03$ & $B_2=0.82\pm0.03$ & $B_3=1.07\pm0.09$ \\
349: $B_4=1.08\pm0.03$ & $B_5=1.46\pm0.09$ & \\
350: \hline
351: \end{tabular}
352: \end{center}
353: \caption{B parameters defined as in ref.~\cite{bpar} interpolated at
354: the physical $D$ meson mass, renormalized at the scale $\mu=2.8$ GeV
355: in the Landau-RI scheme.}
356: \label{tab:bpar}
357: \end{table}
358:
359: \begin{table}[!htb]
360: \begin{center}
361: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
362: \hline
363: $m_{\tilde q}$& $m_{\tilde g}$&$
364: \left\vert
365: \left(
366: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{LL,RR}
367: \right\vert$ & $
368: \left\vert
369: \left(
370: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{LR,RL}
371: \right\vert$ & $
372: \left\vert
373: \left(
374: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{LL=RR}
375: \right\vert$ \\
376: \hline
377: 350 & 350 & 0.033 & 0.0056 & 0.0020 \\
378: 500 & 500 & 0.049 & 0.0080 & 0.0029 \\
379: 1000 & 1000 & 0.10 & 0.016 & 0.0062 \\
380: 500 & 1000 & 0.14 & 0.011 & 0.0044 \\
381: 500 & 350 & 0.032 & 0.0068 & 0.0025 \\
382: \hline
383: \end{tabular}
384: \end{center}
385: \caption{Upper bounds at $95\%$ probability for $\left\vert
386: \left(
387: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{AB}
388: \right\vert$ for various values of squark and gluino masses (in GeV).}
389: \label{tab:SUSY}
390: \end{table}
391:
392: We now turn to the MSSM and consider the bounds on $ \left(
393: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{AB}$ that can be obtained from the
394: determination of $A_\mathrm{NP}$ and $\phi_\mathrm{NP}$ discussed
395: above. To this aim, we focus on gluino exchange and use the full
396: Next-to-Leading expression for the Wilson coefficients~\cite{SUSYNLO}
397: and for the renormalization group evolution down to the hadronic scale
398: of $2.8$ GeV~\cite{NLORGE}. For the matrix elements, we extrapolate the
399: results of ref.~\cite{bpar} as given in Table~\ref{tab:bpar} (see also
400: ref.~\cite{Lin:2006vc} for another recent calculation of $B_1$).
401:
402: To select the allowed regions on the Re$\left( \delta_{12}^u
403: \right)_{AB}$--Im$\left( \delta_{12}^u \right)_{AB}$ planes, we use
404: the method described in ref.~\cite{BsBsbarsusy}. The results are
405: presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:SUSY} for a reference value of $350$ GeV
406: for squark and gluino masses. We consider three cases. First, a
407: dominant $LL$ mass insertion. The case of a dominant $RR$ insertion is
408: completely identical. Second, a dominant $LR$ insertion. In this case,
409: chirality-flipping four-fermion operators are generated. These
410: operators are strongly enhanced by the renormalization group evolution
411: \cite{bagger}, so that these mass insertions are more strongly
412: constrained than $LL$ or $RR$ ones. Constraints on $RL$
413: insertions are identical. Finally, we can switch on simultaneously
414: $\left( \delta_{12}^u \right)_{LL}=\left( \delta_{12}^u \right)_{RR}$.
415: In this case, we also generate chirality-flipping operators, so that
416: the constraint is much stronger than the case in which $\left(
417: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{LL} \gg \left( \delta_{12}^u \right)_{RR}$.
418:
419: In Table \ref{tab:SUSY} we report the bounds on the absolute value of
420: the mass insertions for several values of gluino and squark masses.
421: Our bounds are typically a factor of $\sim 3$ more stringent than
422: those of ref.~\cite{nirraz}.
423:
424: It is very interesting that SUSY models with quark-squark alignment
425: generically predict $\left( \delta_{12}^u \right)_{LL}\sim
426: 0.2$~\cite{nirraz}. We conclude that, to be phenomenologically viable,
427: they need squark and gluino masses to be above $\sim 2$ TeV.
428: Therefore, they probably lie beyond the reach of the LHC.
429:
430: In this Letter, we have analyzed the first experimental evidence of
431: $D$--$\bar D$ mixing recently obtained by the BaBar and Belle
432: collaborations. Combining the experimental results we obtained new
433: constraints on the mixing amplitude and on NP contributions. We
434: have then considered the MSSM and derived new bounds on off-diagonal
435: squark mass terms connecting up and charm squarks. Finally, we have
436: briefly commented on the impact of these new constraints on SUSY
437: models with quark-squark alignment.
438:
439: \begin{figure}[htb!]
440: \begin{center}
441: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{u12_ll_350}
442: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{u12_lr_350}
443: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{u12_llrr_350}
444: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{absu12_ll_350}
445: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{absu12_lr_350}
446: \includegraphics[width=0.23\textwidth]{absu12_llrr_350}
447: \caption{%
448: Selected regions in the Re$\left(
449: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{AB}$--Im$\left(
450: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{AB}$ planes and probability density
451: functions for Abs$\left(
452: \delta_{12}^u \right)_{AB}$ for $AB=LL$, $AB=LR$, $AB=LL=RR$.
453: Dark (light) regions correspond to
454: $68\%$ ($95\%$) probability. See the text for details.}
455: \label{fig:SUSY}
456: \end{center}
457: \end{figure}
458:
459: We acknowledge partial support from RTN European contracts
460: MRTN-CT-2004-503369 ``The Quest for Unification'', MRTN-CT-2006-035482
461: ``FLAVIAnet'', MRTN-CT-2006-035505 ``Heptools'' and
462: fundings from spanish MEC and FEDER under grant FPA2005-01678.
463:
464: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
465:
466: \bibitem{UTnp06}
467: M.~Bona {\it et al.} [UTfit Collaboration],
468: %``The UTfit collaboration report on the unitarity triangle beyond the
469: %standard model: Spring 2006,''
470: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97} (2006) 151803
471: [arXiv:hep-ph/0605213].
472: %%CITATION = PRLTA,97,151803;%%
473:
474: \bibitem{CDR} SuperB,
475: Conceptual Design Report, INFN/AE-07/2, SLAC-R-856, LAL 07-15,
476: available at \texttt{http://www.pi.infn.it/SuperB/?q=CDR}.
477:
478: \bibitem{DMS}
479: A.~Abulencia {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
480: %``Observation of $B0_{s}$ - $\bar{B}0$( $s^{)}$ Oscillations,''
481: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97} (2006) 242003
482: [arXiv:hep-ex/0609040].
483: %%CITATION = PRLTA,97,242003;%%
484: V.~M.~Abazov {\it et al.} [D0 Collaboration],
485: %``First direct two-sided bound on the $B0_{s}$ oscillation frequency,''
486: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97} (2006) 021802
487: [arXiv:hep-ex/0603029].
488: %%CITATION = PRLTA,97,021802;%%
489:
490: \bibitem{susydf2}
491: M.~Ciuchini {\it et al.},
492: %``Delta M(K) and epsilon(K) in SUSY at the next-to-leading order,''
493: JHEP {\bf 9810}, 008 (1998)
494: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808328];
495: %%CITATION = JHEPA,9810,008;%%
496: T.~Besmer, C.~Greub and T.~Hurth,
497: %``Bounds on flavor violating parameters in supersymmetry,''
498: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 609}, 359 (2001)
499: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105292];
500: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105292;%%
501: D.~Becirevic {\it et al.},
502: %``B/d anti-B/d mixing and the B/d --> J/psi K(S) asymmetry in general SUSY
503: %models,''
504: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 634}, 105 (2002)
505: [arXiv:hep-ph/0112303].
506: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B634,105;%%
507: G.~L.~Kane, P.~Ko, H.~b.~Wang, C.~Kolda, J.~h.~Park and L.~T.~Wang,
508: %``B/d $\to$ Phi K(S) and supersymmetry,''
509: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 035015 (2004)
510: [arXiv:hep-ph/0212092];
511: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212092;%%
512: R.~Harnik, D.~T.~Larson, H.~Murayama and A.~Pierce,
513: %``Atmospheric neutrinos can make beauty strange,''
514: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 094024 (2004)
515: [arXiv:hep-ph/0212180].
516: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212180;%%
517: E.~Gabrielli, K.~Huitu and S.~Khalil,
518: %``Comparative study of CP asymmetries in supersymmetric models,''
519: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 710}, 139 (2005)
520: [arXiv:hep-ph/0407291];
521: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0407291;%%
522: J.~Foster, K.~i.~Okumura and L.~Roszkowski,
523: %``New constraints on SUSY flavour mixing in light of recent measurements at
524: %the Tevatron,''
525: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 641}, 452 (2006)
526: [arXiv:hep-ph/0604121];
527: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B641,452;%%
528: P.~Ball and R.~Fleischer,
529: %``Probing new physics through B mixing: Status, benchmarks and prospects,''
530: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 48}, 413 (2006)
531: [arXiv:hep-ph/0604249].
532: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C48,413;%%
533:
534: \bibitem{ddbarsusy}
535: F.~Gabbiani, E.~Gabrielli, A.~Masiero and L.~Silvestrini,
536: %``A complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions
537: %of the standard model,''
538: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 477}, 321 (1996)
539: [arXiv:hep-ph/9604387].
540: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B477,321;%%
541:
542: \bibitem{nirraz}
543: Y.~Nir and G.~Raz,
544: %``Quark squark alignment revisited,''
545: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 035007 (2002)
546: [arXiv:hep-ph/0206064].
547: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,035007;%%
548:
549: \bibitem{alignment}
550: Y.~Nir and N.~Seiberg,
551: %``Should squarks be degenerate?,''
552: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 309}, 337 (1993)
553: [arXiv:hep-ph/9304307];
554: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B309,337;%%
555: M.~Leurer, Y.~Nir and N.~Seiberg,
556: %``Mass matrix models: The Sequel,''
557: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 420}, 468 (1994)
558: [arXiv:hep-ph/9310320].
559: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B420,468;%%
560:
561: \bibitem{babarDD}
562: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
563: arXiv:hep-ex/0703020.
564: %%CITATION = HEP-EX/0703020;%%
565:
566: \bibitem{belleycp}
567: M.~Staric {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
568: %``Evidence for $D^0 - \bar{D}^0$ Mixing,''
569: arXiv:hep-ex/0703036.
570: %%CITATION = HEP-EX/0703036;%%
571:
572: \bibitem{bellexy}
573: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [BELLE Collaboration],
574: %``Measurement of D0-D0bar mixing in D0->Ks pi+ pi- decays,''
575: arXiv:0704.1000 [hep-ex].
576: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0704.1000;%%
577:
578: \bibitem{cleo}
579: D.~M.~Asner {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
580: %``D0 anti-D0 quantum correlations, mixing, and strong phases,''
581: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 21}, 5456 (2006)
582: [arXiv:hep-ex/0607078].
583: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A21,5456;%%
584:
585: \bibitem{otherxy}
586: D.~M.~Asner {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
587: %``Search for D^0 - barD^0 Mixing in the Dalitz Plot Analysis of D^0 -->
588: %K_S^0 pi^+ pi^-,''
589: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 012001 (2005)
590: [arXiv:hep-ex/0503045].
591: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D72,012001;%%
592:
593: \bibitem{otherycp}
594: J.~M.~Link {\it et al.} [FOCUS Collaboration],
595: %``A measurement of lifetime differences in the neutral D meson system,''
596: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 485}, 62 (2000)
597: [arXiv:hep-ex/0004034];
598: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B485,62;%%
599: S.~E.~Csorna {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
600: %``Lifetime differences, direct CP violation and partial widths in D0 meson
601: %decays to K+ K- and pi+ pi-,''
602: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 092001 (2002)
603: [arXiv:hep-ex/0111024];
604: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D65,092001;%%
605: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
606: %``Limits on $D^0 \bar{D}^0$ mixing and CP violation from the ratio of
607: %lifetimes for decay to $K^- \pi^+$, $K^- K^+$ and $\pi^- \pi^+$,''
608: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 121801 (2003)
609: [arXiv:hep-ex/0306003];
610: %%CITATION = PRLTA,91,121801;%%
611: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
612: %``A measurement of lifetime difference in D0 meson decays,''
613: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 162001 (2002)
614: [arXiv:hep-ex/0111026].
615: %%CITATION = PRLTA,88,162001;%%
616:
617: \bibitem{RMall}
618: E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration],
619: %``Search for D0 - anti-D0 mixing in semileptonic decay modes,''
620: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 77}, 2384 (1996)
621: [arXiv:hep-ex/9606016];
622: %%CITATION = PRLTA,77,2384;%%
623: C.~Cawlfield {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
624: %``Limits on neutral D mixing in semileptonic decays,''
625: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 077101 (2005)
626: [arXiv:hep-ex/0502012];
627: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D71,077101;%%
628: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
629: %``Search for $D^0 - \bar{D}^0$ mixing using semileptonic decay modes,''
630: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 091102 (2004)
631: [arXiv:hep-ex/0408066];
632: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,091102;%%
633: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
634: %``Search for D0 anti-D0 mixing using semileptonic decays at Belle,''
635: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 72}, 071101 (2005)
636: [arXiv:hep-ex/0507020];
637: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D72,071101;%%
638: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
639: %``Search for D0 - anti-D0 mixing using doubly flavor tagged semileptonic
640: %decay modes,''
641: arXiv:0705.0704 [hep-ex];
642: %%CITATION = ARXIV:0705.0704;%%
643: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
644: %``Search for D0 anti-D0 mixing and branching-ratio measurement in the decay
645: %D0 --> K+ pi- pi0,''
646: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97}, 221803 (2006)
647: [arXiv:hep-ex/0608006];
648: %%CITATION = PRLTA,97,221803;%%
649: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BABAR Collaboration],
650: %``Search for D0 anti-D0 mixing in the decays D0 --> K+ pi- pi+ pi-,''
651: arXiv:hep-ex/0607090;
652: %%CITATION = HEP-EX/0607090;%%
653: D.~M.~Asner {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
654: %``D0 anti-D0 quantum correlations, mixing, and strong phases,''
655: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 21}, 5456 (2006)
656: [arXiv:hep-ex/0607078].
657: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A21,5456;%%
658:
659: \bibitem{Raz}
660: G.~Raz, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 057502
661: [arXiv:hep-ph/0205113].
662: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,057502;%%
663:
664: \bibitem{pdg}
665: W.~M.~Yao {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group],
666: %``Review of particle physics,''
667: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 33}, 1 (2006).
668: %%CITATION = JPHGB,G33,1;%%
669:
670: \bibitem{Golowich}
671: E.~Golowich, S.~Pakvasa and A.~A.~Petrov,
672: % ``New physics contributions to the lifetime difference in D0 - anti-D0
673: % mixing,''
674: arXiv:hep-ph/0610039.
675: %% CITATION = HEP-PH/0610039;%%
676:
677: \bibitem{petrov}
678: For a recent review, see A.~A.~Petrov,
679: %``Charm mixing in the standard model and beyond,''
680: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 21}, 5686 (2006)
681: [arXiv:hep-ph/0611361].
682: %%CITATION = IMPAE,A21,5686;%%
683:
684: \bibitem{SUSYNLO}
685: M.~Ciuchini, E.~Franco, D.~Guadagnoli, V.~Lubicz, V.~Porretti and
686: L.~Silvestrini,
687: JHEP {\bf 0609} (2006) 013
688: [arXiv:hep-ph/0606197].
689: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0609,013;%%
690:
691: \bibitem{NLORGE}
692: M.~Ciuchini, E.~Franco, V.~Lubicz, G.~Martinelli,
693: I.~Scimemi and L.~Silvestrini,
694: %``Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to Delta(F) = 2 effective
695: %Hamiltonians,''
696: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 523}, 501 (1998)
697: [arXiv:hep-ph/9711402];
698: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B523,501;%%
699: A.~J.~Buras, M.~Misiak and J.~Urban,
700: % ``Two-loop QCD anomalous dimensions of flavour-changing four-quark
701: % operators within and beyond the standard model,''
702: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 586}, 397 (2000)
703: [arXiv:hep-ph/0005183].
704: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B586,397;%%
705:
706: \bibitem{bpar}
707: D.~Becirevic, V.~Gimenez, G.~Martinelli, M.~Papinutto and J.~Reyes,
708: %``B-parameters of the complete set of matrix elements of Delta(B) = 2
709: %operators from the lattice,''
710: JHEP {\bf 0204}, 025 (2002)
711: [arXiv:hep-lat/0110091].
712: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0204,025;%%
713:
714: \bibitem{Lin:2006vc}
715: H.~W.~Lin, S.~Ohta, A.~Soni and N.~Yamada,
716: %``Charm as a domain wall fermion in quenched lattice QCD,''
717: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 74}, 114506 (2006)
718: [arXiv:hep-lat/0607035].
719: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D74,114506;%%
720:
721: \bibitem{BsBsbarsusy}
722: M.~Ciuchini, E.~Franco, A.~Masiero and L.~Silvestrini,
723: %``b --> s transitions: A new frontier for indirect SUSY searches,''
724: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 075016 (2003)
725: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 68}, 079901 (2003)]
726: [arXiv:hep-ph/0212397];
727: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D67,075016;%%
728: M.~Ciuchini and L.~Silvestrini,
729: %``Upper bounds on SUSY contributions to b --> s transitions from B/s -
730: %anti-B/s mixing,''
731: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 97}, 021803 (2006)
732: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603114].
733: %%CITATION = PRLTA,97,021803;%%
734:
735: \bibitem{bagger}
736: J.~A.~Bagger, K.~T.~Matchev and R.~J.~Zhang,
737: %``QCD corrections to flavor-changing neutral currents in the supersymmetric
738: %standard model,''
739: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 412}, 77 (1997)
740: [arXiv:hep-ph/9707225].
741: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B412,77;%%
742:
743:
744:
745: \end{thebibliography}
746:
747: \end{document}
748: