1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%     NEAR-EXTREMAL CHARGED         %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%     BLACK HOLE EVAPORATION        %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%      JUN 05, 2000     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REVISED VERSION NOV 3, 2000  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7: \documentstyle[a4,12pt,amssymb,float,epsfig,psfig,times]{article}

8: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

9: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

10: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

11: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

12: \newcommand{\ie}{{\it i.e.}}

13: \def\Nu{{\cal{V}}}

14: \def\pr{\pi_{\rho}}

15: \def\pf{\pi_{\phi}}

16: \def\pz{\pi_0}

17: \def\p1{\pi_1}

18: \def\a{\alpha}

19: \def\b{\beta}

20: \def\d{\delta}

21: \def\l{\lambda}

22: \def\f{\phi}

23: \def\k{\kappa}

24: \def\r{\rho}

25: \def\e{\eta}

26: \def\ep{\epsilon}

27: \def\t{\theta}

28: \def\g{\gamma}

29: \def\z{\zeta}

30: \def\pmas{\partial_+}

31: \def\pmen{\partial_-}

32: \def\v{\vskip}

33: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

34: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

35: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

36: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

37: \begin{document}

38: 

39: \begin{titlepage}

40: \vspace*{\stretch{0}}

41: \begin{flushright}

42: {\tt FTUV-00-0605\\

43:      IFIC/00-34\\

44:      hep-th/0006035}

45: \end{flushright}

46: 

47: \vspace*{0.5cm}

48: 

49: \begin{center}

50: {\Large\bf Quantum evolution of near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om

51: black holes}

52: \\[0.5cm]

53: A. Fabbri$^{\rm a}$\footnote{\tt fabbria@bo.infn.it},

54: D. J. Navarro$^{\rm b}$\footnote{\tt dnavarro@ific.uv.es} and

55: J. Navarro-Salas$^{\rm b}$\footnote{\tt jnavarro@ific.uv.es}

56: \\[0.5cm]

57: {\footnotesize

58: a) Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universit\`a di Bologna and INFN

59: sezione di Bologna,\\

60: Via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

61: \\[0.5cm]

62: b) Departamento de F\'{\i}sica Te\'orica and IFIC, Centro Mixto Universidad

63: de Valencia-CSIC.\\

64: Facultad de F\'{\i}sica, Universidad de Valencia, Burjassot-46100, Valencia,

65: Spain.}

66: \end{center}

67: \bigskip

68: \begin{abstract}

69: We study the near-horizon AdS$_2\times$S$^2$ geometry of evaporating

70: near-extre\-mal Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes interacting with null matter.

71: The non-local (boundary) terms $t_{\pm}$, coming from the effective theory

72: corrected with the quantum Polyakov-Liouville action, are treated as dynamical

73: variables. We describe analytically the evaporation process which turns out to

74: be compatible with the third law of thermodynamics, i.e., an infinite amount

75: of time is required for the black hole to decay to extremality. Finally we

76: comment briefly on the implications of our results for the information loss

77: problem.

78: \end{abstract}

79: \vspace*{\stretch{1}}

80: \begin{flushleft}

81: PACS number(s): 04.70.Dy, 04.62.+v

82: \end{flushleft}

83: \vspace*{\stretch{0}}

84: \end{titlepage}

85: \newpage

86: 

87: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}

88: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

89: 

90: \section{Introduction}

91: 

92: Since Hawking discovered that black holes decay by emission of thermal

93: radiation \cite{h1}, a lot of work has been done on quantum aspects of black

94: holes aiming to improve our understanding of the quantization of the

95: gravitational field. Hawking's result provided a physical meaning

96: to the formal analogy between the classical laws of black hole dynamics and

97: those of thermodynamics. But, in turn, it has been the origin of some

98: intriguing puzzles. Indeed, it was Hawking himself the first who pointed out

99: that the information can be lost as a pure quantum state collapses

100: gravitationally into a black hole which then evaporates into a mixed state

101: \cite{h2}. An opposite scheme has been suggested by 't Hooft \cite{th} to

102: maintain quantum coherence. Since then, several alternatives have been

103: proposed (see the reviews \cite{ppb}) in order to avoid the information loss

104: although the problem is still

105: unsolved. A final answer requires a complete and consistent theory of quantum

106: gravity. Despite the recent achievements of String Theory to explain the

107: Bekenstein-Hawking formula for extremal and near-extremal black holes

108: \cite{sv,cm,ms}, this theory is still far to describe the evaporation process

109: of a

110: black hole. However, restricting the situation to the scattering of low-energy

111: particles with zero angular momentum off extremal black holes one can get a

112: more tractable problem. This was the main reason to analyse dilatonic black

113: holes \cite{ghs,cghs}. The problem can be reduced then to study a

114: two-dimensional effective theory which turns out to be solvable

115: \cite{rst1,rst2,bpp,mik1,mik2,fr,cn}. However, the dilatonic black holes have

116: very special

117: properties which make it hard to extrapolate the physical picture of their

118: evaporation process. Near extremality they have a constant temperature, so the

119: decay of near-extremal black holes is governed by a Hawking radiation with a

120: mass independent temperature. Although this makes the mathematical treatment

121: of the non-locality of the effective action easier, the general situation

122: is more involved. In fact, for near-extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om (RN) black

123: holes, the temperature depends on the mass and this makes elusive an exact

124: analytical framework. The aim of this paper is to show that one can get exact

125: quantum results of the dynamical evolution of near-extremal RN black holes in a

126: region very close to the horizon.\\

127: 

128: The paper is organised as follows. In section 2 we shall show that

129: near-extremal RN black holes, in the S-wave approximation and near the horizon,

130: can be described by the Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) model \cite{jt}. In section

131: 3 we shall consider the formation of a near-extremal black hole by throwing a

132: low-energy neutral particle into an extremal one and, in section 4, we shall

133: describe the Hawking radiation within the near-horizon scheme. In section 5 we

134: shall analyse the back reaction effects obtained when the classical equations

135: are modified with terms proportional to $\hbar$ coming from the

136: effective Liouville-Polyakov action. We find that a near-extremal black hole

137: evaporates within a finite proper time and after the end-point, the evaporating

138: solution exactly and smoothly matches with the extremal black hole geometry.

139: Therefore one could expect that extremal RN black holes are really stable

140: end-points of Hawking evaporation. However a further quantum correction changes

141: this picture and suggests that only an exact treatment of back reaction can

142: produce a reliable result. In section 6 we shall provide the exact results,

143: outlined in \cite{fnn}, coming from equations admitting a series

144: expansion in powers of $\hbar$. We find that the evaporation process requires

145: an infinite amount of time, in agreement with previous results based on the

146: adiabatic approximation \cite{st}. Finally, in section 7, we shall state our

147: conclusions and comment on the implications of our results for the information

148: loss problem.

149: 

150: 

151: \setcounter{equation}{0}

152: \section{Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes near extremality and 

153: Jackiw-Teitelboim theory}

154: 

155: The RN black hole has been widely studied in literature. Recently, its interest

156: has increased as an example of AdS$_2$ arising as a near-horizon geometry. In

157: this section we shall review some of these features and show the close

158: connection with Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) theory. The RN metric is given by

159: \be

160: \label{rn1}

161: d\bar{s}^2 = -U(r) dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{U(r)} + r^2 d\Omega^2 \, ,

162: \ee

163: where

164: \be

165: \label{ur}

166: U(r) = \frac{(r-r_+)(r-r_-)}{r^2} = 1 - \frac{2l^2m}{r} +

167: \frac{l^2q^2}{r^2} \, ,

168: \ee

169: $l^2$ is Newton's constant and

170: \be

171: \label{horizons}

172: r_{\pm} = l^2 m \pm l\sqrt{l^2m^2 - q^2} \, ,

173: \ee

174: are the two roots of $U(r)$. Taking into account (\ref{horizons}), there are

175: three cases to consider: for $lm<|q|$ there is no horizon and the singularity

176: at $r=0$ is naked\footnote{This case is similar to the one $m<0$ of the

177: Schwarzschild black hole.}. For $lm>|q|$, $r_{\pm}$ are the respective inner

178: ($r_-$) and outer ($r_+$) horizons and the thermodynamical variables, entropy

179: and temperature, associated to the outer horizon are given by

180: \be

181: S = \frac{\pi r_+^2}{l^2} \, , \qquad T_H = \frac{\k_+}{2\pi} \, ,

182: \ee

183: where

184: \be

185: \label{surfgravity}

186: \k_+ = \frac{r_+-r_-}{2r_+^2} \, ,

187: \ee

188: is the surface gravity on the outer (event) horizon.

189: Finally, for the critical value of the mass $m=m_0=l^{-1}|q|$, both inner and

190: outer horizons merge to $r_0=l^2m_0=l|q|$. This is the extremal black

191: hole with a vanishing temperature.\\

192: 

193: Now we consider small perturbations near extremality $m=m_0+\Delta m$, keeping

194: the charge $q$ unchanged. The inner and outer horizons (\ref{horizons}), to

195: leading order in $\sqrt{\Delta m}$ read

196: \be

197: \label{nehorizons}

198: r_{\pm} = lq \pm l \sqrt{2ql\Delta m} \, ,

199: \ee

200: where from now on we assume $q=|q|$. The extremal black hole is recovered for

201: $\Delta m=0$. Near extremality the entropy deviation $\Delta S=S_H-S_0$ and

202: temperature are given by

203: \bea

204: \label{neentropy}

205: \Delta S &=& 4\pi \sqrt{\frac{lq^3\Delta m}{2}} \, , \\

206: \label{netemperature}

207: T_H &=& \frac{1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{2\Delta m}{lq^3}} \, .

208: \eea

209: 

210: The RN metric (\ref{rn1}) comes from the Einstein-Maxwell action

211: \be

212: I = \frac{1}{16\pi l^2} \int d^4x \sqrt{-\bar{g}^{(4)}} 

213: (\bar{R}^{(4)} - l^2 (\bar{F}^{(4)})^2) \, .

214: \ee

215: Assuming spherical symmetry, dimensional reduction leads to the

216: following effective two-dimensional theory

217: \be

218: \label{effective}

219: I = \int d^2x \sqrt{-g} (R\f + l^{-2} V(\f)) \, .

220: \ee

221: To get the above expression we have performed a conformal reparametrization

222: of the metric 

223: \be

224: \label{rescaled}

225: ds^2=\sqrt{\f} d\bar{s}^2 \, ,

226: \ee

227: where

228: \be

229: \label{coordinate}

230: \f=\frac{r^2}{4l^2} \, ,

231: \ee

232: and

233: \be

234: V(\f) = (4\f)^{-\frac{1}{2}} - q^2(4\phi)^{-\frac{3}{2}} \, .

235: \ee

236: The extremal configuration is recovered for the zero of the potential

237: $V(\f_0)=0$. Moreover expanding (\ref{effective}) around $\f_0=\frac{q^2}{4}$

238: \bea

239: \label{e1}

240: \f = \f_0 + \tilde{\f} \, , \\

241: \label{e2}

242: m = m_0 + \Delta m \, ,

243: \eea

244: we get

245: \be

246: \label{jtaction}

247: I = \int d^2x \sqrt{-g} (R \tilde{\f} + l^{-2} \tilde{V}(\tilde{\f})) +

248: {\cal{O}}(\tilde{\f}^2) \, ,

249: \ee

250: where $\tilde{V}(\tilde{\f})$ is given by

251: \be

252: \tilde{V}(\tilde{\f}) =  V^{\prime}(\f_0) \tilde{\f} = \frac{4}{q^3} 

253: \tilde{\f} \, ,

254: \ee

255: and the leading order term is just the JT theory. We can also

256: get this result studying the behavior of the metric (\ref{rescaled}) near

257: extremality. The general solution of (\ref{effective}) is \cite{gkm}

258: \bea

259: \label{m1}

260: ds^2 &=& -(J(\f)-lm) dt^2 + (J(\f)-lm)^{-1} dx^2 \, , \\

261: \label{m2}

262: \tilde{\f} &=& \frac{x}{l} \, ,

263: \eea

264: where $J(\f)=\int^{\f} d\bar{\f} V(\bar{\f})$. The thermodynamical variables,

265: in terms of the two-dimensional effective theory, read \cite{mk}

266: \bea

267: S &=& 4\pi \f_+ \, , \\

268: T_H &=& \frac{1}{4\pi} \left| \frac{dU(r)}{dr} \right|_{r_+} = \frac{1}{2\pi}

269: \frac{V(\f_+)}{2l} \, ,

270: \eea

271: where $J(\f_{\pm})-l\Delta m=0$ and we take into account that

272: \be

273: \sqrt{\f}U(r(\f)) = J(\f) - lm \, .

274: \ee

275: 

276: Expanding (\ref{m1}), (\ref{m2}) around $\f_0$ we get\footnote{A slightly

277: different near-horizon approach, in which the expansion is taken around the

278: outer horizon $r_+$, has been considered in \cite{mms,ss}}

279: \bea

280: \label{jtmetric}

281: ds^2 &=& -(\tilde{J}(\tilde{\f})-l\Delta m) dt^2 + (\tilde{J}(\tilde{\f})-

282: l\Delta m)^{-1} d\tilde{x}^2 + {\cal{O}}(\tilde{\f}^3) \, , \\

283: \tilde{\f} &=& \frac{\tilde{x}}{l} \, ,

284: \eea

285: where

286: \be

287: \tilde{J}(\tilde{\f}) = \frac{2}{q^3} \tilde{\f}^2 \, .

288: \ee

289: The leading order terms in the above expansion are AdS$_2$ geometries, which

290: are the solutions of the JT theory. Moreover, the mass deviation $\Delta m$ is

291: just the conserved parameter of JT theory

292: \be

293: \label{adm}

294: l \Delta m = \tilde{J}(\tilde{\f}) - l^2 |\nabla \tilde{\f} |^2 \, .

295: \ee

296: Therefore the JT theory describes both extremal ($\Delta m=0$) and

297: near-extremal RN black holes.\\

298: 

299: Let us now see how the deviations from extremality of the thermodynamical

300: variables are given in terms of JT magnitudes. After the near-horizon

301: approximation (\ref{e1}), (\ref{e2}), we get

302: \bea

303: \label{jtentropy}

304: \Delta S &=& 4\pi \tilde{\f}_+ \, , \\

305: \label{jttemperature}

306: T_H &=& \frac{1}{2\pi} \frac{\tilde{V}(\tilde{\f})}{2l} \, ,

307: \eea

308: where $\tilde{\f}_+$ is the positive root of $J(\tilde{\f})-l\Delta m=0$

309: \be

310: \tilde{\f}_+ = \sqrt{\frac{ql\Delta m}{2}} \, ,

311: \ee

312: and for the above value, (\ref{jtentropy}), (\ref{jttemperature}) coincide with

313: the near-extremal values (\ref{neentropy}), (\ref{netemperature}). This is

314: nothing but JT thermodynamics\footnote{A realisation of the AdS$_2$/CFT$_1$

315: correspondence in the JT theory accounts for the deviation from extremality of

316: the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of RN black holes \cite{nnn1,nnn2}.} All these

317: features can be resumed in the following table\\

318:  

319: \begin{center}

320: \begin{tabular}{|l|l|}

321: \hline

322: Near-extremal black hole & Jackiw-Teitelboim theory \\ \hline

323: & \\

324: radius deviation $r-r_0$ & $\frac{2l}{q}\tilde{\f}$ \\

325: mass deviation $\Delta m$ & JT mass $\tilde{m}$ \\

326: inner and outer horizons & AdS$_2$ horizons \\

327: entropy deviation $\Delta S$ & $S_{JT}$ \\

328: $T_H$ & $T_{JT}$ \\ \hline

329: \end{tabular}

330: \end{center}

331: 

332: \v1cm

333: 

334: To finish this section we review some aspects of the matter-coupled theory

335: given by the action

336: \be

337: \label{jtactionm}

338: \int d^2x \sqrt{-g} \left( R \tilde{\f} + 4\l^2 \tilde{\f} -

339: \frac{1}{2} |\nabla f|^2 \right) \, ,

340: \ee

341: where the field $f$ models the matter degrees of freedom. Note that the field

342: $f$ propagates freely as it happens in the original 4d theory in a region very

343: close to the horizon. In conformal gauge $ds^2=-e^{2\r}dx^+dx^-$, the equations

344: of motion derived from the above action are

345: \bea

346: \label{eq1}

347: 2\pmas \pmen \r + \l^2 e^{2\r} &=& 0 \, , \\

348: \label{eq2}

349: \pmas \pmen \tilde{\f} + \l^2 \tilde{\f} e^{2\r} &=& 0 \, , \\

350: \label{eq3}

351: \pmas \pmen f &=& 0 \, , \\

352: \label{eq4}

353: -2\partial^2_{\pm} \tilde{\f} + 4 \partial_{\pm} \rho \partial_{\pm} 

354: \tilde{\f} - T^f_{\pm \pm} &=& 0 \, ,

355: \eea

356: where $T^f_{\pm \pm}= (\partial_{\pm} f)^2$ is the stress tensor of matter

357: fields. The general solution can be written in terms of four chiral

358: functions $A_{\pm}(x^{\pm})$, $a_{\pm}(x^{\pm})$ \cite{cinn} \cite{f}

359: \bea

360: \label{jtconf1}

361: ds^2 &=& -\frac{\pmas A_+ \pmen A_-}{(1+\frac{\lambda^2}{2} A_+ A_-)^2}

362: dx^+ dx^- \, , \\

363: \label{jtconf2}

364: \tilde{\phi} &=& -\frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{\pmas a_+}{\pmas A_+} +

365: \frac{\pmen a_-}{\pmen A_-} \right) + \frac{\lambda^2}{2} 

366: \frac{A_+ a_- + A_- a_+}{1+\frac{\lambda^2}{2} A_+ A_-} \, ,

367: \eea

368: obeying the constrain equations

369: \be

370: \label{gc}

371: \partial_{\pm}^2 \left( \frac{\partial_{\pm} a_{\pm}}

372: {\partial_{\pm} A_{\pm}} \right) -

373: \frac{\partial_{\pm}^2 A_{\pm}}{\partial_{\pm} A_{\pm}} \;

374: \partial_{\pm} \left( \frac{\partial_{\pm} a_{\pm}}{\partial_{\pm}

375: A_{\pm}} \right) = T^f_{\pm \pm} \, .

376: \ee

377: In the absence of matter fields, these solutions are parametrized by a

378: diffeomorphism invariant quantity, related with the mass, which for this case

379: reads (see (\ref{adm}))

380: \be

381: \label{localmass}

382: \tilde{m} = \frac{2}{lq^3} \tilde{\f}^2 - l^2 | \nabla \tilde{\f} |^2 \, .

383: \ee

384: When $T^f_{--}=0$, $\tilde{m}$ is a chiral function ($\pmen \tilde{m}$=0)

385: having the physical meaning of local mass \cite{cfn2}

386: \be

387: \label{econservation}

388: \tilde{m}(x^+) = \tilde{m}_0 -2l^2 \int dx^+ e^{-2\r} \pmen \tilde{\f} \,

389: T^f_{++} \, ,

390: \ee

391: where $\tilde{m}_0$ is the primordial mass of the black hole in the absence of

392: matter fields.\\

393: 

394: Finally, we would like to stress the fact that the four chiral functions

395: $A_{\pm}(x^{\pm})$, $a_{\pm}(x^{\pm})$ define two free fields with a quadratic

396: stress-tensor equals to the left hand side of (\ref{gc}) \cite{cinn}. Moreover

397: the transformation from the gravity variables to the free fields is a canonical

398: transformation which makes the underlying conformal symmetry of the theory

399: more transparent.

400: 

401: 

402: \setcounter{equation}{0}

403: \section{Making a near-extremal black hole}

404: 

405: In this section we shall study the process which makes a black hole leave

406: extremality due to infalling null neutral matter. This can be done

407: analytically by means of a Vaidya-type metric

408: \be

409: \label{rn2}

410: d\bar{s}^2 = -\left( 1 - \frac{2l^2m(v)}{r} + \frac{l^2q^2}{r^2} \right) dv^2

411: + 2 dr dv + r^2 d \Omega^2 \, ,

412: \ee

413: generated by the following stress tensor for the infalling matter

414: \be

415: \bar{T}_{vv}^{(4)}=\frac{\partial_v m(v)}{4\pi r^2} \, .

416: \ee

417: It is possible to match an extremal black hole solution with a near-extremal

418: one by means of a shock wave along the line $v=v_0$. The corresponding mass

419: function is given by

420: \be

421: m(v) = l^{-1}q + \Delta m \Theta(v-v_0) \, ,

422: \ee

423: where $\Theta$ is the step function and the stress tensor is

424: \be

425: \bar{T}_{vv}^{(4)} = \frac{\Delta m}{4\pi r^2} \delta(v-v_0) \, .

426: \ee

427: In terms of the two-dimensional effective theory (\ref{jtaction}), where

428: $\l^2=l^{-2}q^{-3}$, the stress tensor of matter fields read

429: \be

430: T^f_{\mu\nu} = 4\pi r^2 \bar{T}_{\mu\nu}^{(4)} \, ,

431: \ee

432: and the shock wave turns into

433: \be

434: \label{shock}

435: T^f_{vv} = \Delta m \delta(v-v_0) \, .

436: \ee

437: 

438: Now we go back to the metric (\ref{rn2}) and make use of the near-horizon

439: approximation considered in previous section. After the conformal

440: reparametrization (\ref{rescaled}) and performing the expansion (\ref{e1}),

441: (\ref{e2}), the metric (\ref{rn2}) becomes

442: \be

443: \label{rn2h}

444: ds^2 = -\left( \frac{2\tilde{x}^2}{l^2q^3}-l\Delta m \Theta(v-v_0)\right) dv^2

445: + 2d\tilde{x} dv \, ,

446: \ee

447: where $\tilde{x}=l\tilde{\f}$. The Penrose diagram of this process is

448: represented in Fig.1

449: \begin{figure}[H]

450: \centerline{\psfig{figure=penrose.ps,width=3.in,angle=-45}}

451: \end{figure}

452: \begin{center}

453: \makebox[12cm]{\parbox{12cm} {\small Fig.1. Penrose diagram corresponding to

454: the creation of a near-extremal RN black hole from the extremal one. Dashed

455: lines are the black hole horizons and the shaded strip is the near-horizon

456: AdS$_2$ geometry. The arrow line represents the infalling shock wave. The

457: shaded region between the AdS$_2$ boundaries is described by Kruskal

458: coordinates in Fig.3.}}

459: \end{center}

460: \v1cm

461: 

462: In terms of the coordinates $x^{\pm}$ defined by

463: \bea

464: \label{tr1}

465: x^+ &=& v \, , \\

466: \label{tr2}

467: x^- &=& v + \frac{l^2q^3}{\tilde{x}} \, ,

468: \eea

469: for $v<v_0$, and

470: \bea

471: \label{tr3}

472: v &=& x_0^+ + \sqrt{\frac{2lq^3}{\Delta m}} {\mathrm arctanh}

473: \sqrt{\frac{\Delta m}{2lq^3}} (x^+-x_0^+) \, , \\

474: \label{phi}

475: \tilde{x} &=& lq^3 \frac{1-\frac{\Delta m}{2lq^3} (x^+-x_0^+)(x^--x_0^+)}

476: {x^--x^+} \, ,

477: \eea

478: for $v>v_0$ (where $x_0^+=v_0$) the metric (\ref{rn2h}) turns out

479: \be

480: \label{jt1}

481: ds^2 = - \frac{2l^2q^3 dx^+ dx^-}{(x^--x^+)^2} \, ,

482: \ee

483: which corresponds to the solution (\ref{jtconf1}) of JT theory with the

484: following gauge fixing

485: \bea

486: \label{gauge+}

487: A_+ &=& x^+ \, , \\

488: \label{gauge-}

489: A_- &=& \frac{-2}{\l^2 x^-} \, ,

490: \eea

491: where $\l^2=l^{-2}q^{-3}$. The corresponding dilaton functions are

492: \bea

493: \label{jt2}

494: \tilde{\f} &=& \frac{lq^3}{x^--x^+} \, , \qquad v<v_0 \, ,\\

495: \label{jt3}

496: \tilde{\f} &=& lq^3 \frac{1-\frac{\Delta m}{2lq^3} (x^+-x_0^+)

497: (x^--x_0^+)}{x^--x^+} \, , \qquad v>v_0 \, ,

498: \eea

499: which are respectively recovered from (\ref{jtconf2}) when

500: \be

501: a_+ = -lq^3 \, , \qquad a_- = 0\, ,

502: \ee

503: for $v<v_0$ and

504: \be

505: \label{aclass}

506: a_+ = -\frac{1}{2} x_0^+ \Delta m (x^+ + \Delta^+) \, , \qquad

507: a_- = -\frac{1}{2} x_0^+ \Delta m (\frac{-2}{\l^2x^-} + \Delta^-) \, ,

508: \ee

509: for $v>v_0$, where

510: \bea

511: \label{d+}

512: \Delta^+ &=& -x_0^+ + \frac{2}{l\Delta m \l^2 x_0^+} \, , \\

513: \label{d-}

514: \Delta^- &=& \frac{2}{\l^2 x_0^+} \, .

515: \eea

516: We see explicitly how the JT theory describes both

517: extremal and near-extremal geometries, being the horizon structure described

518: by the dilatonic function $\tilde{\f}$. It is worth to remark that the

519: near-extremal configuration (\ref{jt3}) leads to the extremal one (\ref{jt2})

520: in the limit $\Delta m=0$ and that both dilatonic functions match continuously

521: along $x^+=x_0^+$. So matching the discontinuity of $-2\partial^2_+ \tilde{\f}

522: + 4\partial_+ \rho \partial_+ \tilde{\f}$ along $x_0^+$, we recover the shock

523: wave (\ref{shock}).\\

524: 

525: Finally, let us consider the description of the near-extremal black hole in

526: the near-horizon approximation. The outer and inner

527: horizons $r_{\pm}$ are given in $x^{\pm}$ coordinates by the curves

528: \be

529: \tilde{\f} = \tilde{\f}_{\pm} = \pm \sqrt{\frac{q^3l\Delta m}{2}} \, ,

530: \ee

531: which is equivalent to the standard condition $\partial_+ \tilde{\f}=0$ of

532: two-dimensional dilaton gravity. We get

533: \be

534: x^- = x_0^+ \pm a \, ,

535: \ee

536: where

537: \be

538: a = \sqrt{\frac{2lq^3}{\Delta m}} \, .

539: \ee

540: 

541: \v1cm

542: \begin{figure}[H]

543: \centerline{\psfig{figure=kruskal.ps,width=3.in,angle=-90}}

544: \end{figure}

545: \begin{center}

546: \makebox[12cm]{\parbox{12cm}{\small \noindent Fig.2. Kruskal diagram of

547: near-extremal RN black hole. The two timelike boundaries of near-horizon

548: geometry AdS$_2$ are represented by the vertical line $x^-=x^+$. The infalling

549: shock wave emerges from one boundary (left side of $x^-=x^+$ line) and,

550: crossing the outer and inner horizons, reaches the other boundary (right side

551: of $x^-=x^+$ line).}}

552: \end{center}

553: \v1cm

554: 

555: Moreover we are also interested on the curve $r=r_0$ (the old horizon

556: of the extremal black hole which is no longer a horizon) when the

557: near-extremal black hole is created. In

558: $x^{\pm}$ coordinates, this curve is given by $\tilde{\f}=0$ (see (\ref{e1}))

559: \be

560: (x^+-x_0^+)(x^--x_0^+) = a^2 \, .

561: \ee

562: The corresponding Kruskal diagram is given in Fig.2. As illustrated in this

563: figure, the two timelike boundaries of AdS$_2$ are representated in

564: coordinates $x^{\pm}$ by the same curve $x^-=x^+$.

565: 

566: \setcounter{equation}{0}

567: \section{Hawking radiation}

568: 

569: We shall focus now on the presence of Hawking's radiation in this model. To

570: obtain the Hawking radiation we start writing the metric (\ref{rn2}) in

571: light-cone coordinates $(v,u)$

572: \be

573: \label{rn3}

574: d\bar{s}^2 = -U(r) du dv + r^2 d\Omega^2 \, ,

575: \ee

576: where $U(r)$ is given by (\ref{ur}) and

577: \bea

578: \label{t}

579: \frac{v+u}{2} &=& t \, , \\

580: \label{r}

581: \frac{v-u}{2} &=& r^{\ast} \, ,

582: \eea

583: where $r^{\ast}$ is the tortoise coordinate

584: \be

585: r^{\ast} = \int \frac{dr}{U(r)} = r + \frac{1}{2\k_+} \ln |r-r_+| -

586: \frac{1}{2\k_-} \ln |r-r_-| \, .

587: \ee

588: After the conformal reparametrization (\ref{rescaled}) we get

589: \be

590: ds^2 = -(J(\f)-lm) du dv \, ,

591: \ee

592: where now

593: \be

594: u = v - 2l \int \frac{d\f}{J(\f)-lm} \, .

595: \ee

596: Performing the `near-horizon' approximation (\ref{e1}), (\ref{e2}), the above

597: expression turns out

598: \be

599: \label{uv}

600: u = v - 2 \int \frac{d\tilde{x}}{2\l^2\tilde{x}^2-l\Delta m

601: \Theta(v-v_0)} \, .

602: \ee

603: The extremal black hole before the shock wave ($v<v_0$) is given by

604: \be

605: \label{v-}

606: ds^2 = -2\l^2\tilde{x}^2 du dv \, ,

607: \ee

608: and the near-extremal black hole created after the shock wave ($v>v_0$)

609: \be

610: \label{v+}

611: ds^2 = -(2\l^2\tilde{x}^2-l\Delta m) d\bar{u} dv \, .

612: \ee

613: Integrating (\ref{uv}) for both cases we get the following relations for the

614: coordinate $u$ before and after the shock wave

615: \bea

616: \label{u-}

617: u &=& v + \frac{1}{\l^2 \tilde{x}} \, , \\

618: \label{u+}

619: \bar{u} &=& v + \sqrt{\frac{2}{l\Delta m \l^2}} {\mathrm arctanh}

620: \sqrt{\frac{2\l^2}{l\Delta m}} \tilde{x} \, .

621: \eea

622: Imposing the continuity of solutions (\ref{v-}) and (\ref{v+}) along $v=v_0$

623: (and taking also into account $\tilde{x}(v_0,u)=\tilde{x}(v_0,\bar{u})$) we

624: obtain the relation between the coordinate $u$ before and after the shock wave

625: \be

626: \label{ubaru}

627: u = v_0 + a \> {\mathrm cotanh} \frac{\bar{u}-v_0}{a} \, .

628: \ee

629: From this relation we can work out immediately the outgoing energy flux

630: measured by an observer near the horizon in terms of the Schwarzian derivative

631: between the coordinates $u$ and $\bar{u}$

632: \be

633: \langle T^f_{\bar{u}\bar{u}} \rangle = -\frac{\hbar}{24\pi} \{ u, \bar{u} \} =

634: \frac{\hbar}{12\pi a^2} \, .

635: \ee

636: We observe that this flux is constant and coincides with thermal value of

637: Hawking flux for near-extremal RN black holes

638: \be

639: \langle T^f_{\bar{u}\bar{u}} \rangle = \frac{\pi}{12} T_H^2 =

640: \frac{\hbar \Delta m}{24\pi lq^3} \, ,

641: \ee

642: where $T_H$ is Hawking's temperature (\ref{netemperature}). This fact can be

643: understood easily since

644: the AdS$_2\times$S$^2$ geometries associated to (\ref{v-}) and (\ref{v+})

645: represent indeed the near-horizon geometry of the RN geometries (\ref{rn2})

646: due to the shock wave (\ref{shock}). So the constant thermal flux for every

647: value of $\bar{u}$ corresponds to the flux measured by an inertial observer

648: at future null infinity approaching the event horizon of the RN black hole.

649: 

650: 

651: \setcounter{equation}{0}

652: \section{Back reaction to leading order in $\hbar$}

653: 

654: In this section we shall start our analysis of the back reaction of

655: near-extremal black holes in the near-horizon effective theory. The starting

656: point must be the matter-coupled classical action (\ref{jtaction}) corrected

657: with the Polyakov-Liouville term \cite{p}

658: \bea

659: \label{poly}

660: \tilde{I}_{{\mathrm eff}} &=& \int d^2x \sqrt{-g} \left(R \tilde{\phi} + 4 

661: \lambda^2 \tilde{\phi} -\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^N |\nabla f_i|^2\right) - 

662: \frac{N\hbar}{96\pi} \int \sqrt{-g} R \; \square^{-1} R \nonumber \\

663: &+& \xi \frac{N\hbar}{12\pi} \int d^2x \sqrt{-g} \lambda^2 \, ,

664: \eea

665: where we have considered the presence of $N$ scalar fields $f_i$ in order to

666: define the semiclassical theory in the large $N$ limit. Nevertheless we have

667: to point out the important fact that, for the JT theory, the exact quantum

668: effective action is locally equivalent to the one-loop corrected theory

669: \cite{kum} and, therefore, we could maintain $N=1$.\\

670: 

671: The Polyakov-Liouville action in (\ref{poly}) has a cosmological term \cite{p}

672: and we shall fix it in such a way that the extremal black hole solution remains

673: a solution of the quantum theory. This is, in some sense, analogous to the

674: manner in which the local counterterm of the RST model \cite{rst1,rst2} is

675: introduced. This argument implies that $\xi=1$. Therefore the unconstrained

676: equations remain as the classical ones

677: \bea

678: \label{qeq1}

679: 2\pmas \pmen \r + \l^2 e^{2\r} &=& 0 \, , \\

680: \label{qeq2}

681: \pmas \pmen \tilde{\f} + \l^2 \tilde{\f} e^{2\r} &=& 0 \, , \\

682: \label{qeq3}

683: \pmas \pmen f_i &=& 0 \, ,

684: \eea

685: so the solutions (\ref{jtconf1}), (\ref{jtconf2}) are not modified. In

686: contrast, the constrain equations (\ref{eq4}) get modified according to

687: \be

688: \label{qeq4}

689: -2\partial^2_{\pm} \tilde{\f} + 4 \partial_{\pm} \rho \partial_{\pm} 

690: \tilde{\f} = T^f_{\pm \pm} - \frac{N\hbar}{12\pi} \left( (\partial_{\pm} \r )^2

691: -\partial_{\pm}^2 \r + t_{\pm} \right) \, ,

692: \ee

693: where the functions $t_{\pm}(x^{\pm})$ are related with the boundary

694: conditions of the theory and depend on the quantum state of the system. They

695: transform according the Schwarzian derivative to make covariant the equation

696: (\ref{qeq4}). In terms of the four chiral functions appearing in

697: (\ref{jtconf1}), (\ref{jtconf2}), the above constraints read

698: \be

699: \label{const}

700: \partial_{\pm}^2 \left( \frac{\partial_{\pm} a_{\pm}}

701: {\partial_{\pm} A_{\pm}} \right) -

702: \frac{\partial_{\pm}^2 A_{\pm}}{\partial_{\pm} A_{\pm}} \;

703: \partial_{\pm} \left( \frac{\partial_{\pm} a_{\pm}}{\partial_{\pm}

704: A_{\pm}} \right) = T^f_{\pm\pm} + \frac{N\hbar}{12\pi} \left(

705: \frac{1}{2} \{ A_{\pm}, x^{\pm} \} - t_{\pm} \right) \, .

706: \ee

707: The crucial point to go on the analysis is to choose the adequate functions

708: $t_{\pm}(x^{\pm})$. For the CGHS theory \cite{rst1,rst2,bpp} the correct

709: choice is $t_{\pm}(x^{\pm})=\frac{1}{4(x^{\pm})^2}$, where $x^{\pm}$ are

710: Kruskal coordinates, since this corresponds to vanishing

711: $t_{\pm}(\sigma^{\pm})$ in

712: null Minkowskian coordinates $\sigma^{\pm}$. In our case we should choose

713: $t_v(v)=t_u(u)=0$ and, according to (\ref{tr1}) and (\ref{tr2}), we

714: have\footnote{This type of behaviour for the functions $t_{\pm}$ was pointed out in

715: \cite{cfn}.}

716: \be

717: \label{boco}

718: t_+(x^+) = \frac{a^2 \Theta(x^+-x^+_0)}{(a^2-(x^+-x_0^+)^2)^2} \, .

719: \ee

720: Moreover, the coordinate $x^-$ always coincides with the null coordinate $u$ as

721: a consequence of the matching condition for the metric and dilaton with the

722: gauge fixing conditions (\ref{gauge+}) and (\ref{gauge-}).

723: \be

724: t_-(x^-) = 0 \, .

725: \ee

726: With the above choice, the constraints (\ref{const}) for the evaporating

727: solution ($x^+>x^+_0$) become

728: \bea

729: \partial^3_+ a_+ &=& -\frac{N\hbar}{12\pi} \frac{a^2}{(a^2-(x^+-x_0^+)^2)^2}

730: \, , \\

731: 3\pmen a_- + 4x^- \partial^2_- a_- + (x^-)^2 \partial^3_- a_- &=&

732: \phantom{-} 0 \, ,

733: \eea

734: equations which can easily integrated to get the following solutions

735: \bea

736: a_+ &=& C(x^+ + \Delta^+) + \zeta_+ (x^+)^2 - \frac{N\hbar}{\pi} P(x^+) \, , \\

737: a_- &=& C(\frac{-2}{\l^2x^-} + \Delta^-) + \zeta_- (x^-)^{-2} \, ,

738: \eea

739: where $C$, $\zeta_{\pm}$ and $\Delta^{\pm}$ are integration constants and the

740: function $P(x^+)$ is

741: \be

742: \label{p}

743: P(x^+) = \frac{x^+-x_0^+}{48} - \frac{a^2 - (x^+-x_0^+)^2}{48a}

744: {\mathrm arctanh} \frac{x^+-x_0^+}{a} \, .

745: \ee

746: It is interesting to point out that the above function vanishes at $x^+_0$ and

747: the quantum solution is the classical one (\ref{aclass}) plus the correction

748: introduced through $P(x^+)$. This is so for $C=-\frac{1}{2}x_0^+\Delta m$,

749: $\zeta_{\pm}=0$ and $\Delta^{\pm}$ given by (\ref{d+}) and (\ref{d-}). The

750: dilaton function for $x^+>x_0^+$ is then

751: \be

752: \label{evaporating}

753: \tilde{\f} = lq^3 \frac{1-\frac{(x^+-x_0^+)(x^--x_0^+)}{a^2}}{x^--x^+} +

754: \frac{N\hbar}{2\pi} \frac{(x^--x^+) P^{\prime}(x^+) + 2P(x^+)}{x^--x^+} \, ,

755: \ee

756: which matches along $x^+=x_0^+$ with the extremal one, which continues being

757: solution at the semiclassical level

758: \be

759: \tilde{\f} = \frac{lq^3}{x^--x^+} \, .

760: \ee

761: 

762: A remarkable property of these solutions is that the dynamical

763: evolution can be followed analytically. As before, the curve $\tilde{\f}=0$

764: represents the location of the `extremal radius'

765: \be

766: \label{phizero}

767: x^- = \frac{lq^3 + \frac{lq^3x_0^+}{a^2} (x^+-x_0^+) -

768: \frac{N\hbar}{2\pi} x^+ P^{\prime} + \frac{N\hbar}{\pi} P}{\frac{lq^3}{a^2}

769: (x^+-x_0^+) - \frac{N\hbar}{2\pi} P^{\prime}} \, .

770: \ee

771: And for the apparent horizon $\partial_+\tilde{\f}=0$ in the spacetime of the

772: evaporating black hole, we get the following equation

773: \be

774: \label{apph}

775: lq^3 \left( 1 - \frac{(x^--x_0^+)^2}{a^2} \right) + \frac{N\hbar}{2\pi}

776: \left( \frac{1}{2} (x^--x^+)^2 P^{\prime \prime} + (x^--x^+) P^{\prime} +

777: P \right) = 0 \, .

778: \ee

779: The main property of both above curves is that, unlike the classical case and

780: unexpectedly, they intersect before reaching the AdS boundary at a finite

781: advanced time $x^+=x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$ given implicitly by the below relation

782: obtained by substituting (\ref{phizero}) in (\ref{apph})

783: \be

784: {\mathrm arctanh} \frac{x_{{\mathrm int}}^+-x_0^+}{a} = \frac{48lq^3}{Na} -

785: \frac{x_{{\mathrm int}}^+-x_0^+}{\sqrt{a^2-(x_{{\mathrm int}}^+-x_0^+)^2}}

786: \, .

787: \ee

788: 

789: \begin{figure}[H]

790: \centerline{\psfig{figure=finite.ps,width=4.in,angle=-90}}

791: \end{figure}

792: \begin{center}

793: \makebox[12cm]{\parbox{12cm}

794: {\small Fig.3. Kruskal diagram of semiclassical evolution of

795: RN black hole. The outer apparent horizon shrinks until meets both inner

796: horizon and extremal radius curve at a finite advanced time. This is the

797: end-point of evaporation and a static solution can be matched so that the

798: extremal radius curve becomes the horizon of extremal black hole remnant.}}

799: \end{center}

800: \v1cm

801: 

802: A graphic description of this process is represented in Fig.3.

803: At this point the extremal radius curve $\tilde{\f}=0$ is null and both outer

804: and inner horizons meet. This means that we have arrived at the end-point of

805: the evaporation and, since we are dealing with analytic expressions, one can

806: check explicitly that the evaporating solution (\ref{evaporating}) matches

807: smoothly along $x^+=x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$ with a static solution for

808: $x^+>x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$

809: \be

810: \label{remnant}

811: \tilde{\f} = -k \frac{(x^+-x_{{\mathrm int}}^-)(x^--x_{{\mathrm int}}^-)}

812: {x^--x^+} \, ,

813: \ee

814: where

815: \be

816: k = \frac{\frac{lq^3}{a^2} (x_{{\mathrm int}}^+-x_0^+) - \frac{N\hbar}{2\pi} 

817: P^{\prime}(x_{{\mathrm int}}^+)}{x_{{\mathrm int}}^+ - x_{{\mathrm int}}^-}

818: \, ,

819: \ee

820: which turns out to be just the extremal black hole. A conformal coordinate

821: transformation brings the metric and $\tilde{\f}$ into the form (\ref{v-}) of

822: the extremal solution

823: \bea

824: \label{v3}

825: v &=& \frac{1}{\l^2k(x^+-x_{{\mathrm int}}^-)} \, , \\

826: \label{u3}

827: u &=& \frac{1}{\l^2k(x^--x_{{\mathrm int}}^-)} \, .

828: \eea

829: 

830: We must note that, in contrast with the studies of

831: dilatonic black holes \cite{rst1,rst2,bpp}, the matching of the evaporating

832: solution here is along the line $x^+=x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$ and not

833: $x^-=x_{{\mathrm int}}^-$. There is a physical reason for this, the line

834: $x^+=x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$ in our effective theory represents, as we have

835: stressed before, points very near to the apparent horizon of the 

836: evaporating RN black hole. Moreover, the matching is smooth and $T^f_{++}$

837: vanishes at $x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$ in contrast with the dilatonic black holes,

838: for which there is an emanating thunderpop of negative energy

839: \cite{rst1,rst2}.\\

840: 

841: Concerning the mass curve for the evaporating solution (\ref{evaporating}) in

842: $x_0^+ < x^+ < x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$, it corresponds to a chiral energy

843: distribution which accounts for the neutral mass lost by the near-extremal

844: black hole during its evaporation. Taking into account (\ref{localmass}) we

845: get

846: \bea

847: \label{lmass}

848: \tilde{m}(x^+) &=& \Delta m - \frac{N\hbar}{12\pi a} {\mathrm arctanh}

849: \frac{x^+-x_0^+}{a} - \nonumber \\

850: && \frac{N^2\hbar^2}{1152\pi^2 lq^3} \left[ \frac{(x^+-x_0^+)^2}

851: {a^2-(x^+-x_0^+)^2} - {\mathrm arctanh}^2 \frac{x^+-x_0^+}{a} \right] \, ,

852: \eea

853: that just vanishes at the end-point $x^+=x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$ as it is showed

854: in Fig.4.\\

855: 

856: To end this section we would like to comment on the boundary condition

857: (\ref{boco}). It was derived through the Schwarzian derivative of the classical

858: relations (\ref{tr1})), (\ref{tr2}). This should be considered as a first

859: approximation since the evaporating solution modifies the classical relation

860: (\ref{tr2}). Plugging (\ref{lmass}) and (\ref{evaporating}) into (\ref{rn2h})

861: we get the following relation to leading order in $\hbar$

862: \be

863: v = x_0^+ + a \> {\mathrm arctanh} \frac{x^+-x_0^+}{a} -

864: \frac{a^2N\hbar}{96lq^3} \left( \frac{a^2}{a^2-(x^+-x_0^+)^2}-

865: {\mathrm arctanh}^2 \frac{x^+-x_0^+}{a} \right) \, .

866: \ee

867: As a consequence of this, the function $t_+(x^+)$ get modified

868: \be

869: t_{x^+} = \frac{a^2}{(a^2-(x^+-x_0^+)^2)^2} - \frac{a^4N\hbar}{24lq^3}

870: \frac{x^+-x_0^+}{(a^2-(x^+-x_0^+)^2)^3} \, .

871: \ee

872: We should remark that this quantum correction for the function $t_+(x^+)$ does

873: not happen in the CGHS model, due to the fact that the temperature is

874: independent of the mass. In our case the back reaction is more involved and

875: produces this type of effect. Solving the equations (\ref{qeq1}-\ref{qeq4})

876: again in terms of the quantum corrected function $t_+(x^+)$ ($t_-(x^-)$ remains

877: zero) and repeating the process described in this section we arrive to a new

878: dynamical function $\tilde{\f}$ and evaporating mass $\tilde{m}(x^+)$

879: describing the evaporation. But what one surprisingly finds is an unphysical

880: evolution with periods of antievaporation. This suggests that only an exact

881: treatment of the boundary functions $t_+(x^+)$ can produce a correct result.

882: This will be considered in the next section.

883: 

884: \v1cm

885: \begin{figure}[H]

886: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=mass.eps,width=3in,angle=0}}

887: \end{figure}

888: \begin{center}

889: \makebox[12cm]{\parbox{12cm}

890: {\small Fig.4. Dynamical evolution of the mass deviation from extremality of

891: the evaporating near-extremal black hole. We set $x_0^+=0$, $\Delta m=2$,

892: $l=q=1$ and $N=48$ in (\ref{lmass}). It vanishes at $x_{{\mathrm int}}^+$

893: indicating the end-point of the evaporation. Even though the evaporation could

894: seem to continue for negative values of the mass, the static extremal solution

895: can be matched at this point.}}

896: \end{center}

897: \v1cm

898: 

899: \setcounter{equation}{0}

900: \section{Back reaction for dynamical $t_{\pm}$ functions}

901: 

902: We shall now modify the scheme used in the previous section to work out the

903: gravitational back reaction. The crucial point is to consider the functions

904: $t_{\pm}(x^{\pm})$, appearing in the equations (\ref{qeq4}), as dynamical

905: objects to be determined at the end together with the solutions for the dilaton

906: and the metric. We should do it requiring the physical consistence of the

907: procedure. To start with, it is clear that $t_-(x^-)$ does not get any quantum

908: correction since the coordinate $x^-$ remains equal to the $u$ coordinate of

909: the extremal solution. Therefore we have

910: \be

911: \label{t6}

912: t_-(x^-) = 0 \, .

913: \ee

914: The advantage of (\ref{t6}) is that, irrespective to the form of $t_+(x^+)$,

915: the general solutions for the metric (even in the presence of arbitrary

916: incoming classical matter $T^f_{++}$) is given by \cite{cnn}

917: \be

918: \label{rnevaporating}

919: ds^2 = -\left( \frac{2\tilde{x}^2}{l^2q^3}-l\tilde{m}(v) \right) dv^2 +

920: 2d\tilde{x} dv \, ,

921: \ee

922: where $\tilde{m}(v)=m-m_0$ is the deviation of evaporating mass from

923: extremality. This metric can be brought into the gauge-fixed form

924: (\ref{jt1}) by means of the transformation

925: \bea

926: v &=& v(x^+) \, , \\

927: \tilde{x} &=& l \tilde{\f} (x^{\pm}) \, ,

928: \eea

929: where

930: \be

931: \frac{dv}{dx^+} = \frac{-lq^3}{\pmen \tilde{\f} (x^--x^+)^2} \, .

932: \ee

933: This requires that $\pmen \tilde{\f} (x^--x^+)^2$ is a chiral function of

934: $x^+$ and this follows from the constrain equation

935: \be

936: -2\pmen^2 \tilde{\f} + 4 \pmen \r \pmen \tilde{\f} = 0 \, .

937: \ee

938: Since in the advanced time coordinate $v$ the function $t_v(v)$ vanishes, in

939: the coordinate $x^+$ it is

940: \be

941: \label{bc1}

942: t_+(x^+) = \frac{1}{2} \{ v, x^+ \} \, .

943: \ee

944: Now we find convenient to introduce the function $F(x^+)$ such that

945: \be

946: \label{vchange}

947: \frac{dv}{dx^+} = \frac{lq^3}{F(x^+)} \, .

948: \ee

949: In gauge (\ref{gauge+}), (\ref{gauge-}), the equations

950: (\ref{qeq1}-\ref{qeq4}) can be integrated leading to 

951: \be

952: \label{evphi}

953: \tilde{\phi} = \frac{F(x^+)}{x^--x^+} + \frac{1}{2}  F'(x^+) \, ,

954: \ee

955: where the function $F(x^+)$ satisfies the following differential equation

956: \be

957: \label{diffequation}

958: F'''= \frac{N\hbar}{24\pi} \left( -\frac{F''}{F} +

959: \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{F'}{F} \right)^2 \right) \, .

960: \ee

961: Physical considerations concerning

962: the matching along $x^+=x^+_0$ between the extremal and the evaporating

963: solutions provide the boundary conditions for the above differential equation.

964: Namely, from the continuity of the function $\tilde{\f}$ (\ref{evphi})

965: along $x^+_0$ we get

966: \be

967: F(x_0^+) = lq^3 \, , \qquad F^{\prime}(x_0^+) = 0 \, ,

968: \ee

969: whereas, from the discontinuity of the shock-wave stress tensor $T^f_{++}=

970: \Delta m \delta (x^+-x^+_0)$, we obtain

971: \be

972: F^{\prime \prime} (x_0^+) = -\Delta m \, .

973: \ee

974: It is not difficult to relate the deviation of the evaporating mass

975: $\tilde{m}(x^+)$ with the function $F(x^+)$

976: \be

977: \label{exactmass}

978: \tilde{m}(x^+) = \frac{24\pi }{lq^3 N\hbar} F^2  F''' \, .

979: \ee

980: Moreover the boundary function $t_+(x^+)$ (\ref{bc1}) can be written as

981: \be

982: \label{tp}

983: t_+(x^+) = \frac{lq^3\tilde{m}(x^+)}{2F^2} \, ,

984: \ee

985: which makes clear the dynamical content of the function $t_+(x^+)$. To compute

986: the evaporating mass $\tilde{m}(x^+)$ we need to solve equation

987: (\ref{diffequation}) but, fortunately, in terms of the advanced time coordinate

988: the problem is simpler. Derivating (\ref{exactmass}) with respect to $x^+$,

989: one can readily arrive to

990: \be

991: \label{massx}

992: \pmas \tilde{m}(x^+)=-\frac{N\hbar}{24\pi lq^3}\frac{\tilde{m}(x^+)}{F} \, ,

993: \ee

994: which can be readily integrated in coordinate $v$

995: \be

996: \label{massv}

997: \tilde{m}(v)=\Delta m e^{-\frac{N\hbar}{24\pi lq^3}(v-v_0)} \, ,

998: \ee

999: leading to an infinite evaporation time.

1000: 

1001: \v1cm

1002: \begin{figure}[H]

1003: \centerline{\psfig{figure=infinite.ps,width=4.in,angle=-90}}

1004: \end{figure}

1005: \begin{center}

1006: \makebox[12cm]{\parbox{12cm}

1007: {\small Fig.5. Kruskal diagram of semiclassical evolution of

1008: RN black hole. The outer apparent horizon shrinks until it meets both inner

1009: horizon and extremal radius curve at the AdS boundary.}}

1010: \end{center}

1011: \v1cm

1012: 

1013: Now let us go back to the $x^{\pm}$

1014: frame. As seen in last section, the physical information about the dynamical

1015: evolution of the near-extremal black hole is encoded in the function

1016: (\ref{evphi}). The evolution of the `extremal radius' is represented by the

1017: curve $\tilde{\f}=0$

1018: \be

1019: \label{aor}

1020: x^-=x^+ - \frac{2F}{F'} \, ,

1021: \ee

1022: and the curve $\partial_+ \tilde{\f} =0$ accounts for the inner and outer

1023: apparent horizons

1024: \be

1025: \label{por}

1026: x^-=x^+ -\frac{F'}{F''} \pm\frac{\sqrt{F'^2 -2F F''}}{F''} \, .

1027: \ee 

1028: These three curves meet only when 

1029: \be

1030: \label{ep}

1031: F'(x^+_{int})^2 - 2F(x^+_{int}) F''(x^+_{int}) = 2lq^3m(x^+_{int}) = 0 \, ,

1032: \ee

1033: and it takes place at a finite value $x^+_{int}$ at the end of the

1034: evaporation. Since $v \rightarrow +\infty$ as $x^+ \rightarrow x^+_{int}$,

1035: taking into account (\ref{vchange}) we also get that $F(x^+_{int})=0$. And from

1036: this feature it follows immediately, see (\ref{aor}) and (\ref{por}), that 

1037: $x^+_{int}=x^-_{int}$ and then the intersection point belongs to the AdS

1038: boundary so that it gives an infinite amount of proper time in accordance with

1039: (\ref{massv}). We can also show that

1040: $F'''(x^+_{int})=F'(x^+_{int})=0$ and since for all of these three curves

1041: (\ref{aor}), (\ref{por}), we have

1042: \be

1043: \frac{dx^-}{dx^+} \stackrel{x^+ \rightarrow x^+_{int}}{\longrightarrow}

1044: 0 \, ,

1045: \ee

1046: one can conclude that the three curves meet at the end-point becoming a null

1047: line. The complete physical process is represented in Fig.5.\\

1048: 

1049: To finish this analysis we consider the numerical solution to the differential

1050: equation (\ref{diffequation}). From the numerical plot of the function

1051: $F(x^+)$ and its derivatives (see Fig.6a), apart from the properties found

1052: before ($F(x^+_{int})=F'(x^+_{int})=F'''(x^+_{int})=0$), it also follows that

1053: that $F''(x^+_{int})$ is nonzero while further derivatives vanish. Thus

1054: locally close to the intersection point $F(x^+)$ behaves as a parabola with 

1055: exponentially suppressed corrections. The numerical plot of $\tilde{\f} =0$

1056: and $\partial_+ \tilde{\f} =0$ coincides exactly with that of Fig.5. The

1057: saddle point in  the outer apparent horizon curve $r_+$ signals the transition

1058: from the strong to the weak back-reaction regimes as discussed in \cite{lo}.

1059: At the end-point the curves $\tilde{\f}=0$ and $\partial_+\tilde{\f}=0$ are

1060: null and the

1061: dilaton function is well represented asymptotically by the extremal solution

1062: \be 

1063: \tilde{\f} = \frac{F^{\prime \prime}(x^+_{int})}{2}

1064: \frac{(x^+-x_{{\mathrm int}}^+)(x^--x_{{\mathrm int}}^+)}{x^--x^+} +

1065: {\cal{O}}(e) \, ,

1066: \ee

1067: where ${\cal{O}}(e)$ are exponentially small high order terms. So the

1068: evaporating black hole approaches asymptotically to the extremal configuration

1069: without actually coming back to the extremal state in a finite continuous

1070: process. This result appears to be well motivated from a thermodynamical point

1071: of view, in particular from Stefan's law  $\frac{dm}{dt}\sim -4\pi r_+^2 T_H^4$

1072: which predicts that a near-extremal evaporating black hole does never come back

1073: to the extremal state \cite{ddr}. This feature is closely related to Nernst's

1074: version of

1075: the third law of thermodynamics which states that the temperature of a system

1076: cannot be reduced to zero in a finite number of operations. Israel \cite{isr}

1077: showed that the same conclusions must be true in the case of the RN black hole

1078: provided that the stress energy tensor of the infalling matter satisfies the

1079: weak energy condition (WEC). It is well known that in the Hawking process the

1080: WEC is violated close to the horizon; nevertheless our exact results do not

1081: violate the third law. We think that this is an encouraging sign towards

1082: generalising its validity to more general (quantum) frameworks.

1083: 

1084: \v1cm

1085: \begin{figure}[H]

1086: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=num1.eps,width=2.5in,angle=0}

1087: \epsfig{figure=num2.eps,width=2.5in,angle=0}}

1088: \end{figure}

1089: \begin{center}

1090: \makebox[12cm]{\parbox{12cm}

1091: {\small Fig.6. Numerical plots for some solutions to the differential equation

1092: (\ref{diffequation}), $x_0^+=0$, $\Delta m=2$, $l=q=1$ and $N=48$. (a) Plot of

1093: the function $F(x^+)$ (continuous line) and its second derivative (dashed

1094: line). The zero of $F$ corresponds to the value $x^+_{int}$ while the second

1095: derivative is non-zero at this point. (b) Plot of the dynamical evolution of

1096: the mass deviation. It approaches smoothly to zero as it reaches $x^+_{int}$.}}

1097: \end{center}

1098: \v1cm

1099: 

1100: 

1101: 

1102: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1103: \section{Conclusions and final comments}

1104: 

1105: In this paper we have studied an effective model which describes the physics

1106: of near-extremal RN black holes in a region very close to the horizon. We have 

1107: focused our analysis on the evaporation process produced when a low-energy

1108: shock wave excites the extremal black hole and the non-extremal configuration

1109: decays via Hawking emission. We have shown that a self-consistent treatment

1110: of the gravitational back reaction requires to consider the non-local

1111: contributions $t_+(x^+)$ of the effective action as dynamical variables. So

1112: doing this we find a physical picture of the evaporation process compatible

1113: with the third law of thermodynamics. An infinite amount of time is necessary

1114: for the black hole to go back to extremality and this `happens' in the $AdS_2$

1115: boundary of the near horizon geometry. We have to remark that we have obtained

1116: a rather accurate description near the horizon. For the in-falling observer

1117: the function $t_+(x^+)$ (\ref{tp}) is proportional to the flux of negative

1118: energy across the horizon and, therefore, responsible of the black hole

1119: radiation. However our scheme do not describe directly the effects of the back

1120: reaction on the radiation measured by an asymptotic observer (not very close to

1121: the horizon). This makes our results compatible with the principle of

1122: complementarity \cite{th,stu,svv}.\\

1123: 

1124: Finally we would like to comment on the implications of considering a

1125: continuous distribution of incoming matter $T^f_{vv}$. The equation

1126: (\ref{massx}) in terms of the $v$ coordinate is then

1127: \be

1128: \label{masseq}

1129: \partial_v \tilde{m}(v) = -\frac{N\hbar}{24\pi lq^3} \tilde{m}(v) +

1130: T^f_{vv} \, .

1131: \ee

1132: We observe that the evaporating mass $\tilde{m}(v)$, and hence the function

1133: $t_+(x^+)$, contains detailed information of the classical matter. In other

1134: words, the information of the stress tensor $T^f_{vv}$ is also codified in the

1135: quantum incoming flux\footnote{This is not possible for the CGHS theory since

1136: the temperature is independent of the mass.}

1137: \be

1138: -\frac{N\hbar}{12\pi} t_+(x^+) \, .

1139: \ee

1140: Note that this is true because all the higher-order quantum corrections to

1141: $t_+(x^+)$ have been taken into account, otherwise we could not get

1142: (\ref{masseq}). In the approximation of section 5 the information is lost. The

1143: functions $t_+(x^+)$, at leading order, does not see the details of $T^f_{vv}$.

1144: Moreover the full solution, in contrast with the models \cite{rst1,rst2,bpp},

1145: seems

1146: to depend on all higher-order momenta of the classical stress tensor. All this

1147: means that the information might not be lost. However to get definite

1148: conclusions we should be able to describe the outgoing radiation at infinity

1149: and this is out of the reach of the near-horizon scheme of this paper.

1150: Nevertheless energy conservation suggests that an analogous mechanism to that

1151: storing the information in $t_+(x^+)$ across the horizon should radiate the

1152: information out to infinity.

1153: 

1154: 

1155: \section*{Acknowledgements}

1156: 

1157: This research has been partially supported by the CICYT and DGICYT, Spain.

1158: D. J. Navarro acknowledges the Ministerio de Educaci\'on y Cultura for a FPI

1159: fellowship. A.F. thanks R. Balbinot for useful discussions. D.J.N. and J.N-S.

1160: also wish to thank J. Cruz and P. Navarro for comments.

1161: 

1162: 

1163: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1164: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1165: 

1166: \bibitem{h1}

1167: S. W. Hawking, {\it Comm. Math. Phys.} {\bf 43} (1975) 199.

1168: 

1169: \bibitem{h2}

1170: S. W. Hawking, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D14} (1976) 2460.

1171: 

1172: \bibitem{th}

1173: G. 't Hooft, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B335} (1990) 138.

1174: 

1175: \bibitem{ppb}

1176: J. Preskill, hep-th/9209085; D. N. Page, hep-th/9305040; T. Banks, {\it Nucl.

1177: Phys. Proc. Suppl.} {\bf 41} (1995) 21, hep-th/9412131.

1178: 

1179: \bibitem{sv}

1180: A. Strominger and C. Vafa, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B379} (1996) 99,

1181: hep-th/9601029.

1182: 

1183: \bibitem{cm}

1184: C.G. Callan and J.M. Maldacena, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B472} (1996) 591,

1185: hep-th/9602043.

1186: 

1187: \bibitem{ms}

1188: J. Maldacena and A. Strominger, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 77} (1996) 428,

1189: hep-th/9603195.

1190: 

1191: \bibitem{ghs}

1192: D. Garfinkle, G.T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D43}

1193: (1991) 3140.

1194: 

1195: \bibitem{cghs}

1196: C. G. Callan, S. B. Giddings, J. A. Harvey and A. Strominger, {\it Phys. Rev.}

1197: {\bf D45} (1992) 1005, hep-th/9111056; 

1198: 

1199: \bibitem{rst1}

1200: J.G. Russo, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D46} (1992)

1201: 3444, hep-th/9206070.

1202: 

1203: \bibitem{rst2}

1204: J.G. Russo, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D47} (1993)

1205: 533, hep-th/9209012.

1206: 

1207: \bibitem{bpp}

1208: S. Bose, L. Parker and Y. Peleg, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 76} (1996)

1209: 861, gr-qc/9508027.

1210: 

1211: \bibitem{mik1}

1212: A. Mikovic, {\it Class. Quant. Grav.} {\bf 13} (1996) 209, gr-qc/9508009.

1213: 

1214: \bibitem{mik2}

1215: A. Mikovic and V. Radovanovic, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B481} (1996) 719,

1216: hep-th/9606098.

1217: 

1218: \bibitem{fr}

1219: A. Fabbri and J. G. Russo, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D53} (1996) 6995,

1220: hep-th/9510109.

1221: 

1222: \bibitem{cn} 

1223: J. Cruz and J. Navarro-Salas, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B387} (1996) 51,

1224: hep-th/9607155.

1225: 

1226: \bibitem{jt}

1227: R. Jackiw, in {``Quantum Theory of Gravity''}, edited by S.M. Christensen

1228: (Hilger, Bristol, 1984), p. 403; C. Teitelboim, in op. cit., p. 327.

1229: 

1230: \bibitem{fnn}

1231: A. Fabbri, D. J. Navarro and J. Navarro-Salas, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}

1232: {\bf 85} (2000) 2434, hep-th/0004027.

1233: 

1234: \bibitem{st}

1235: A. Strominger and S.P. Trivedi, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D48}, 5778 (1993),

1236: hep-th/9302080.

1237: 

1238: \bibitem{gkm}

1239: J. Gegenberg, G. Kunstatter and D. Louis-Martinez, {\it Phys. Rev.}

1240: {\bf D51} (1995) 1781, gr-qc/9408015.

1241: 

1242: \bibitem{mk}

1243: D. Louis-Martinez and G. Kunstatter, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D49} (1994)

1244: 5227.

1245: 

1246: \bibitem{mms}

1247: J. Maldacena, J. Michelson and A. Strominger, {\it JHEP} {\bf 9902} (1999) 011,

1248: hep-th/9812073.

1249: 

1250: \bibitem{ss}

1251: M. Spradlin and A. Strominger, {\it JHEP} {\bf 9911} (1999) 021,

1252: hep-th/9904143.

1253: 

1254: \bibitem{nnn1}

1255: J. Navarro-Salas and P. Navarro, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B579} (2000) 250,

1256: hep-th/9910076.

1257: 

1258: \bibitem{nnn2}

1259: D.J. Navarro, J. Navarro-Salas and P. Navarro, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B580}

1260: (2000) 311, hep-th/9911091 

1261: 

1262: \bibitem{cinn}

1263: J. Cruz, J. M. Izquierdo, D. J. Navarro and J. Navarro-Salas, {\it Phys.

1264: Rev.} {\bf D58} (1998) 044010, hep-th/9704168.

1265: 

1266: \bibitem{f}

1267: A. T. Filippov, {Mod. Phys. Lett.} {\bf A11} (1996) 1691, hep-th/9605008.

1268: 

1269: \bibitem{cfn2}

1270: J. Cruz, A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D60} (1999)

1271: 107506, gr-qc/9902084.

1272: 

1273: \bibitem{p}

1274: A. M. Polyakov, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B103} (1981) 207.

1275: 

1276: \bibitem{kum}

1277: W. Kummer, H. Liebl and D.V. Vassilevich, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B493} (1997)

1278: 491, gr-qc/9612012.

1279: 

1280: \bibitem{cfn}

1281: J. Cruz, A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B449} (1999)

1282: 30, hep-th/9811246.

1283: 

1284: \bibitem{cnn}

1285: J. Cruz, J. Navarro-Salas and M. Navarro, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D58} (1998)

1286: 087501, gr-qc/9806106.

1287: 

1288: \bibitem{lo}

1289: D.A. Lowe and M. O'Loughlin, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D48} (1993) 3735,

1290: hep-th/9305125.

1291: 

1292: \bibitem{ddr}

1293: S. Das, A. Dasgupta and P. Ramadevi, {\it Mod. Phys. Lett.} {\bf A 12} (1997)

1294: 3607, hep-th/9608162.

1295: 

1296: \bibitem{isr}

1297: W. Israel, {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 57}, 397 (1986).

1298: 

1299: \bibitem{stu}

1300: L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D48} (1993)

1301: 3743, hep-th/9306069.

1302: 

1303: \bibitem{svv}

1304: K. Schoutens, H. Verlinde and E. Verlinde, {\it ``Black hole evaporation and

1305: quantum gravity''}, hep-th/9401081.

1306: 

1307: 

1308: \end{thebibliography}

1309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1310: 

1311: \end{document}

1312: