1:
2: \documentclass{article}
3:
4: \input{epsf}
5:
6: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
7: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}
8: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}
9: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}
10: \newtheorem{case}[theorem]{Case}
11: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}
12: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}
13: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}
14: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
15: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
16: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}
17: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
18: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
19: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}
20: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
21: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}
22: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}
23: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
24: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
25: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}
26: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}
27: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}
28:
29: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.3in}
30: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.3in}
31: \setlength{\textwidth}{5.9in}
32: \setlength{\textheight}{8.4in}
33: \setlength{\topmargin}{0in}
34: \setlength{\headheight}{0in}
35: \setlength{\headsep}{0in}
36:
37: \newcommand{\mathbb}[1]{{\bf{#1}}}
38: \newcommand{\text}[1]{{{#1}}}
39: \newcommand{\mcal}[1]{{\mathcal{#1}}}
40: \newcommand{\notag}{\nonumber}
41: \newcommand{\func}[1]{{#1}}
42: \newcommand{\binom}[2]{{#1}{#2}}
43: \newcommand{\frak}[1]{{\mathcal{#1}}}
44:
45:
46: \begin{document}
47:
48:
49: \begin{center}
50: {\LARGE Some Computations with Seiberg--Witten Invariant Actions\medskip }
51:
52: Lorenzo Cornalba\smallskip
53:
54: Laboratoire de Physique Th\'{e}orique de l'\'{E}cole Normale Sup\'{e}rieure
55:
56: Paris, France\medskip
57: \end{center}
58:
59: \textit{We show, with a }$2$\textit{--dimensional example, that the low
60: energy effective action which describes the physics of a single }$D$\textit{%
61: --brane is compatible with }$T$\textit{--duality whenever the corresponding }%
62: $U\left( N\right) $\textit{\ non--abelian action is form--invariant under
63: the non--commutative Seiberg--Witten transformations.}
64: \footnote{Contributions to the conference {\it BRANE NEW WORLD and
65: Noncommutative Geometry}, Torino, Villa Gualino, (Italy) October, 2000.}
66:
67:
68: \section{\label{secIntro}Introduction and Basic Setting}
69:
70: It has been shown, by Seiberg and Witten \cite{SW}, that, in the presence of
71: a background magnetic field, the dynamics on $D$--branes can be described in
72: terms gauge fields on a non--commutative space. Most of the subsequent
73: literature has been devoted to the study of the low--energy $\alpha ^{\prime
74: }\rightarrow 0$ limit, which yields a non--commutative Yang--Mills quantum
75: field theory. In \cite{C} the author has considered, on the other hand, the
76: full effective action, to all orders in $\alpha ^{\prime }$, which is
77: considered as a \textit{classical} action which describes, at tree level,
78: the scattering of gluons at weak coupling but arbitrarily high energies. As
79: described in the work of Seiberg and Witten, in the presence of a background
80: $B_{ab}$ field, one can describe the physics on the brane either using
81: ordinary gauge fields or, after an appropriate field redefinition, using
82: non--commutative gauge fields. The form of the action, on the other hand, is
83: the same in the two descriptions. This fact is quite non--trivial, and
84: highly constrains the form of the non--abelian Born--Infeld action, together
85: with all the derivative corrections.
86:
87: In particular, in \cite{C}, the author has shown how to construct explicitly
88: to all orders in $\alpha ^{\prime }$, invariant non--abelian actions in $2$
89: dimensions. We show in this note how these actions, in the special $U\left(
90: 1\right) $ abelian case, are compatible with $T$--duality. This shows that
91: Seiberg--Witten invariance is the correct framework to use in the analysis
92: of the physics on brane world--volumes. In particular, this paper represents
93: a partial step towards an explicitly covariant description of the brane
94: world--volume action, whose invariance group in enhanced from the usual
95: geometrical invariance of diffeomorphisms on the world--volume to a more
96: exotic invariance, of which we still lack a clear geometric understanding.
97:
98: Let us then consider a flat space time, and let us look at the physics of $N$
99: flat $D$--branes with a $2$--dimensional world volume $M$. We let $x$ and $y$
100: be the coordinates on the world--volume $M$, and we will concentrate only on
101: the physics in the $x$--$y$ plane, neglecting the dynamics in the transverse
102: directions in space--time. Finally, we will use throughout a metric $\delta
103: _{ab}$ on $M$ with \textit{Euclidean} signature and we will use units such
104: that $2\pi \alpha ^{\prime }=1$.
105:
106: The physics on the brane world--volume, at weak string coupling, is
107: described by an effective action written in terms of a $U\left( N\right) $
108: gauge--potential $A_{a}$ (with corresponding field--strength $F_{ab}$),
109: which is given as an $\alpha ^{\prime }$ expansion
110: \begin{equation}
111: S=\int d^{2}x\,\mathrm{Tr}\left( 1+\frac{1}{4}F^{2}+\cdots \right) .
112: \label{eq200}
113: \end{equation}
114:
115: Let us, for the moment, consider the case $N=1$, and let us perform a $T$%
116: --duality in the $y$ direction. Following basic facts on $T$--duality \cite
117: {WATI}, we are now considering the physics of a $D$--brane with $1$%
118: --dimensional world--volume, moving in the $x$--$y$ plane. The action then
119: depends on the motion of a point on the Euclidean plane $M$ -- \textit{i.e.}
120: a curve $\Gamma $ in $M$. More precisely, following \cite{WATI}, one must
121: consider the action $S$, dimensionally reduced in the $y$ direction, where
122: we may consider $A_{x}=0$ and where
123: $$
124: A_{y}\left( x\right) \rightarrow Y\left( x\right)
125: $$
126: represents a specific parametrization of the curve $\Gamma $ in the plane $M$%
127: . Let us call $\widetilde{S}$ the $N=1$ dimensionally reduced action, coming
128: from $S$.
129:
130: When we move from $S$ to $\widetilde{S}$, we obtain an action written in
131: terms of a specific parametrization $Y\left( x\right) $ of the path $\Gamma $
132: in the plane $M$. On the other hand, from a purely geometric point of view,
133: the action must be invariant under reparametrizations of $\Gamma $. In
134: particular, given the simplicity of the geometry, it is easy to describe all
135: possible invariant actions $\widetilde{S}$. First of all, let us define the
136: velocity and acceleration
137: $$
138: V=\dot{Y}\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }A=\ddot{Y},
139: $$
140: where the dot represents differentiation with respect to $x$. The invariant
141: length $dl$ on the path $\Gamma $ and the extrinsic curvature $R$ are
142: respectively given by
143: $$
144: dl=\left( 1+V^{2}\right) ^{%
145: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xbd}}%
146: %BeginExpansion
147: {\frac12}%
148: %EndExpansion
149: }\text{\thinspace }dx\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
150: \ \ }R=\frac{A^{2}}{\left( 1+V^{2}\right) ^{3}}.
151: $$
152: Finally, covariant differentiation with respect to arc--length is given by
153: $$
154: \frac{d}{dl}=\left( 1+V^{2}\right) ^{-%
155: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xbd}}%
156: %BeginExpansion
157: {\frac12}%
158: %EndExpansion
159: }\frac{d}{dx}.
160: $$
161: The possible terms which appear in the action are then integrals, with
162: respect to arc--length $dl$, of powers of $R$ and of its covariant
163: derivatives $\frac{d^{n}R}{dl^{n}}$. Examples of possible terms are
164: \begin{equation}
165: \int dl\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }\int dl\,R^{n}\,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
166: \ \ \ \ \ \int dl\,R^{n}\frac{dR}{dl}\frac{dR}{dl}. \label{eq100}
167: \end{equation}
168:
169: The description of the possible structures of $\widetilde{S}$ just given is
170: extremely natural (and in this setting almost trivial). On the other hand,
171: from the point of view of the original $2$--dimensional action $S$, written
172: in terms of the $U\left( 1\right) $ gauge potential $A_{a}$, the fact that
173: one obtains, after $T$--duality, actions written in terms of monomials like (%
174: \ref{eq100}), is a quite remarkable numerical coincidence. Let us, for
175: instance, consider the first term in (\ref{eq100}). As it is well known,
176: this corresponds, from the $2$--dimensional point of view, to the abelian
177: Born--Infeld action. We will denote, in what follows, with $F\equiv F_{xy}$
178: the unique component of the field--strength. Under $T$--duality this
179: corresponds to the velocity
180: $$
181: F\rightarrow_T \,\,V.
182: $$
183: Therefore, the length of the path $\Gamma $ is given by
184: $$
185: \int dl=\int dx\left( 1+V^{2}\right) ^{%
186: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xbd}}%
187: %BeginExpansion
188: {\frac12}%
189: %EndExpansion
190: }\rightarrow \int d^{2}x\left( 1+F^{2}\right) ^{%
191: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xbd}}%
192: %BeginExpansion
193: {\frac12}%
194: %EndExpansion
195: }=\int d^{2}x\,\left( 1+\frac{1}{2}F^{2}-\frac{1}{8}F^{4}+\cdots \right) .
196: $$
197: The fact that the LHS of the above equality has a geometric interpretation
198: imposes restrictions on the $\alpha ^{\prime }$ expansion coefficients which
199: appear on the RHS of the equality. More generally, the $\alpha ^{\prime }$
200: expansion of the low--energy effective action $S$ is constrained by
201: compatibility with the geometric interpretation of $T$--duality.
202:
203: Quite independently from the above considerations, the action $S$ possesses
204: \cite{SW}, in the full non--abelian setting, an other interesting invariance
205: property. If one considers adding a central term to the field--strength $%
206: F_{ab}\rightarrow F_{ab}+\mathbf{1}\cdot B_{ab}$, this has the same effect
207: as rewriting the same action on a new world--volume $\widetilde{M}$, which
208: is a non--commutative deformation of the original Euclidean plane $M$, given
209: by the relation $\left[ x,y\right] =i\theta ^{xy}$. The tensor $\theta $ is
210: given by $\theta =B\left( 1+B^{2}\right) ^{-1}$. Moreover, the metric on the
211: new plane $\widetilde{M}$ is given by $\left( 1+B^{2}\right) $. The new
212: action is now written in terms of a non--commutative Yang--Mills potential
213: (explicitly given in terms of the original $A_{a}$ and $\theta ^{ab}$) and
214: has the \textit{same structure} as $S$. This fact imposes severe constraints
215: on the original $\alpha ^{\prime }$ expansion given in (\ref{eq200}), as was
216: analyzed in detail in \cite{C}, and in particular relates terms of order $%
217: \left( \alpha ^{\prime }\right) ^{L}$ to those of order $\left( \alpha
218: ^{\prime }\right) ^{L-1}$ and $\left( \alpha ^{\prime }\right) ^{L+1}$. We
219: will call the above restriction Seiberg--Witten (SW) invariance of $S$.
220:
221: We will show in this note that the SW invariance of $S$ in the non--abelian
222: setting implies, in a quite non--trivial way, consistency under $T$--duality
223: of the $U\left( 1\right) $ action, as discussed above.
224:
225: \section{Invariant Actions}
226:
227: In this section we review how to construct SW\ invariant action in $2$%
228: --dimensions. We will describe the algorithm, but we will not try to
229: motivate it, since this would imply a long digression. The interested reader
230: can consult \cite{C}, where the full SW invariance is discussed in detail.
231:
232: First we introduce on $M$ complex coordinates $z,\overline{z}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{%
233: 2}}\left( x\pm iy\right) $. Corresponding to these coordinates, we introduce
234: \textit{formal letters }$Z,\overline{Z}$, and we consider the vector space $%
235: W_{L}$ of \textit{cyclic} \textit{words} built with $L$ letters $Z$ and $L$
236: letters $\overline{Z}$. Vectors in $W_{L}$ are then linear combinations of
237: strings of $2L$ letters, where we consider two strings equal if they differ
238: only by a cyclic permutation of the letters. We will call the integer $L$
239: the level, and this will correspond, as we will see below, to the level in
240: the $\alpha ^{\prime }$ expansion (with the $F^{2}$ term at level $2$).
241:
242: We will actually be more interested in the subspace $G_{L}\subset W_{L}$ of
243: so--called \textit{gauge invariant words}, which are defined as follows. Let
244: $a$,\thinspace $a^{\dagger }$ be standard creation and annihilation
245: operators satisfying $\left[ a,a^{\dagger }\right] =1$ and let $O$ be the
246: space of cyclic polynomials in $a,a^{\dagger }$. If we define the map $%
247: r:W_{L}\rightarrow O$ by $Z,\overline{Z} \mapsto a,a^{\dagger }$%
248: , then $G_{L}=\ker r$. Elements in $G_{L}$ correspond to terms in $S$ at
249: level $\left( \alpha ^{\prime }\right) ^{L}$. More precisely, we have the
250: correspondences
251: \begin{eqnarray}
252: F &\rightarrow &Z\overline{Z}-\overline{Z}Z \label{eq300} \\
253: D_{z}\cdots &\rightarrow &i\left[ Z,\cdots \right] \text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
254: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }D_{\overline{z}}\cdots \rightarrow i\left[ \overline{Z}%
255: ,\cdots \right] \notag
256: \end{eqnarray}
257: where $D_{a}$ is the $U\left( N\right) $ covariant derivative. For example,
258: one can check that $\dim G_{2}=1$, and that the unique element is given by $Z%
259: \overline{Z}Z\overline{Z}-ZZ\overline{Z}\overline{Z}$, which, following the
260: above identifications, corresponds to the term $\frac{1}{2}\int d^{2}x\,%
261: \mathrm{Tr}F^{2}$ at level $2$. It is also clear that, given any expression
262: in $S$, one can use the identifications (\ref{eq300}) to rewrite it in terms
263: of words in $Z,\overline{Z}$. The words will automatically be cyclic, since
264: the action $S$ is given by taking the ``trace'' $\int d^{2}x\,\mathrm{Tr}$
265: of a local expression in the field strength. Moreover, the original gauge
266: invariance of the action is reflected in the fact that the resulting words
267: are elements of the subspace $G_{L}$.
268:
269: To construct SW--invariant actions we need to introduce two operators --
270: denoted $\Delta ,\overline{\Delta }$ -- which act naturally on the spaces $%
271: G_{L}$ as
272: $$
273: \Delta :G_{L}\rightarrow G_{L+1}\,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
274: \ \overline{\Delta }:G_{L}\rightarrow G_{L-1}.
275: $$
276: In particular, the operator $\Delta $ is defined as a derivation which acts
277: on the single letters as
278: $$
279: \Delta Z=\frac{1}{4}(ZF+FZ)\,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
280: \Delta \overline{Z}=\frac{1}{4}(\overline{Z}F+F\overline{Z}).
281: $$
282: Similarly $\overline{\Delta }$ is defined by
283: $$
284: \overline{\Delta }F=1.
285: $$
286: More precisely, given a word $w\in G_{L}$, we write it in terms of the
287: field--strength $F$ (and of its covariant derivatives) using the
288: correspondence (\ref{eq300}). We then apply $\overline{\Delta }$ on each $F$
289: as a derivation. It is quite a non--trivial fact \cite{C} that$\,[\overline{%
290: \Delta },\Delta ]=2L-1$.
291:
292: With this notation in place, we can now easily describe SW--invariant
293: actions, following the results of \cite{C}. A general invariant action is
294: given by arbitrary linear combinations of what we will call \textit{%
295: invariant blocks}. An invariant block is itself constructed starting from a
296: \textit{lowest level term} $g_{P}\in G_{P}$, for some integer $P$, and
297: contains terms in the $\alpha ^{\prime }$ expansion of levels $L\geq P$,
298: with $L-P\in 2\mathbb{N}$. The term $g_{P}$ must satisfy the basic equation
299: $$
300: \overline{\Delta }g_{P}=0,
301: $$
302: and the invariant block is then constructed as follows. We construct terms $%
303: g_{L}\in G_{L}$ for $L>P$ as
304: $$
305: g_{L+1}=\Delta g_{L}.
306: $$
307: It follows from $\left[ \overline{\Delta },\Delta \right] =2L-1$ that $%
308: \overline{\Delta }g_{L+1}=c_{L,P}g_{L}$, where
309: $$
310: c_{L,P}=(L+P-1)(L-P+1).
311: $$
312: Construct then coefficients $d_{L}$ for $L-P\in 2\mathbb{N}$ defined by $%
313: d_{P}=1$ and by the recursion relation
314: $$
315: d_{L+2}=-\frac{d_{L}}{c_{L+1,P}}.
316: $$
317: The invariant block constructed from $g_{P}$ is then given by
318: $$
319: \sum_{L-P\in 2\mathbb{N}}d_{L}\,g_{L}.
320: $$
321:
322: \section{Abelian Actions}
323:
324: Up to now, we have discussed how to construct general $U\left( N\right) $
325: actions which are SW invariant. We now wish to analyze in more detail the
326: invariant actions in the abelian $N=1$ case. As is well known, in this case
327: one can classify terms in the action $S$ not only by the level $L$ in the $%
328: \alpha ^{\prime }$ expansion, but also by the number $D$ of derivatives
329: appearing in the various terms. For example, a term like $F^{2}\partial
330: F\partial F$ has $L=5$ and $D=2$. It is not difficult to show from the
331: definitions (see \cite{C}) that the operation $\Delta $ increases $L$ by $1$
332: and \textit{does not decrease} $D$. On the other hand, the operator $%
333: \overline{\Delta }$ decreases $L$ by one unit and \textit{leaves }$D$
334: \textit{unchanged}.
335:
336: Let us now consider an invariant block with a lowest term $g_{P}$ with level
337: $P$ and number of derivatives $D$. We claim that, with very little
338: computation, we can resum all the terms in the invariant block with exactly $%
339: D$ derivatives. To show this, first recall that $\overline{\Delta }%
340: ^{L-P}g_{L}\propto g_{P}$. Since $g_{P}$ contains $D$ derivatives, given the
341: properties of $\Delta ,\overline{\Delta }$ one has
342: $$
343: \left. \overline{\Delta }^{L-P}g_{L}\right| _{D\text{\textrm{derivatives}}%
344: }\propto g_{P}.
345: $$
346: Moreover, since the action of $\overline{\Delta }$ on terms with $D$
347: derivatives is completely known, one can quickly reconstruct the full
348: invariant block. We will give below a concrete example, which will clarify
349: the general discussion.
350:
351: We will show that the $D$ derivative part of an invariant block is
352: explicitly given by the covariant terms described in section \ref{secIntro}
353: (as in equation (\ref{eq100})). A generic covariant term is constructed with
354: $N_{R}$ powers of curvature $R$ and with $N_{D}$ covariant derivatives $%
355: \frac{d}{dl}$. Recalling the correspondences $V\rightarrow F$, $A\rightarrow
356: \partial F$, $\cdots $ it is simple to show that
357: $$
358: P=3N_{R}+\frac{1}{2}N_{D}\,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
359: D=2N_{R}+N_{D}.
360: $$
361: Since $N_{R},N_{D}\geq 0$, we then have that
362: $$
363: \frac{1}{2}D\leq P\leq \frac{3}{2}D.
364: $$
365: In Figure $1$ we show a graph of the possible $P,D$ combinations for lowest
366: level terms, and we show the corresponding covariant terms.
367:
368: \epsfbox{fig.eps}
369:
370: {\bf Figure 1.} Derivative with respect to arc--length $dl$ is denoted by
371: $D$ in the figure.
372:
373: \section{Examples}
374:
375: Let us consider the covariant term
376: \begin{equation}
377: \int dl\,R^{n}=\int dx\frac{A^{2n}}{\left( 1+V^{2}\right) ^{3n-%
378: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xbd}}%
379: %BeginExpansion
380: {\frac12}%
381: %EndExpansion
382: }} \label{eq400}
383: \end{equation}
384: We clearly have that $P=3n$ and $D=2n$. Explicitly one has (we are using the
385: $T$--duality correspondences $F\rightarrow V$, $\cdots $)
386: \begin{eqnarray*}
387: g_{P} &=&A^{2n}\,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
388: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ g_{P+1}=\left( 2P-1\right) VA^{2n}+\cdots \\
389: g_{P+2} &=&2P\left( 2P-1\right) V^{2}A^{2n}+\cdots
390: \end{eqnarray*}
391: and $d_{P}=1$, $d_{P+2}=-\frac{1}{4P}$. Therefore the action starts as
392:
393: $$
394: \int dx\,A^{2n}\left[ 1+\left( -3n+\frac{1}{2}\right) V^{2}+\cdots \right]
395: $$
396: thus reproducing the first terms in (\ref{eq400}), and in particular the
397: non--trivial coefficient $\left( -3n+\frac{1}{2}\right) $. In fact we can
398: show easily that we obtain all the terms in (\ref{eq400}). Generally we have
399: that $g_{L}=k_{L}V^{L-P}A^{2n}$ where the coefficients $k_{L}$ satisfy $%
400: k_{P}=1$ and $\left( L+1-P\right) k_{L+1}=c_{L,P}k_{L}$, or $k_{L+1}=\left(
401: L+P-1\right) k_{L}$. The recursion relation is satisfied by
402: $$
403: k_{L}=\frac{\left( L+P-2\right) !}{\left( 2P-2\right) !}.
404: $$
405: Moreover the coefficients $d_{L}$ are given by
406: $$
407: d_{P+2q}=\left( -\right) ^{q}\frac{1}{2^{2q}}\frac{\left( P-1\right) !}{%
408: \left( P+q-1\right) !q!}.
409: $$
410: Putting all together we see that the action is then given by
411: \begin{eqnarray*}
412: \sum_{q=0}^{\infty }d_{P+2q}g_{P+2q} &=&\sum_{q=0}^{\infty }\left( -\right)
413: ^{q}\frac{1}{2^{2q}}\frac{\left( P-1\right) !}{\left( P+q-1\right) !q!}\frac{%
414: \left( 2P+2q-2\right) !}{\left( 2P-2\right) !}\int dx\,V^{2q}A^{2n} \\
415: &=&\int dx\frac{A^{2n}}{\left( 1+V^{2}\right) ^{3n-%
416: %TCIMACRO{\UNICODE[m]{0xbd}}%
417: %BeginExpansion
418: {\frac12}%
419: %EndExpansion
420: }}.
421: \end{eqnarray*}
422:
423: We have given here an example of the consistency of the construction of SW
424: invariant actions. Many more examples can be given, all with the same basic
425: conclusion, that SW invariance implies consistency under $T$--duality in the
426: abelian case. We leave a more complete discussion to \cite{C2}.
427:
428:
429: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
430: \bibitem{SW} \label{REF}N. Seiberg and E. Witten, ``String theory and
431: noncommutative geometry'', JHEP \textbf{9909}, 032 (1999), \texttt{%
432: hep-th/9908142}.
433:
434: \bibitem{WATI} W. Taylor, ``D--brane Field Theory on Compact Spaces'',
435: Phys. Lett. \textbf{B394} (1997) 283--287.
436:
437: \bibitem{C} L. Cornalba, ``On the General Structure of the Born--Infeld
438: Action'', \texttt{hep-th/0006018}.
439:
440: \bibitem{C2} L. Cornalba,``T--duality without T--duality'', in preparation.
441: \end{thebibliography}
442:
443: \end{document}
444: