1: 

2: \documentstyle[12pt,a4]{article}

3: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5}

4: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

5: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

6: \newcommand{\unop}{1\!{\rm I}}

7: 

8: \title{Classical solutions in the Einstein-Born-Infeld-Abelian-Higgs model}

9: \author{Y. Brihaye, B. Mercier\\

10: Facult\'e des Sciences, Universit\'e de Mons-Hainaut,\\

11: B-7000 MONS, Belgium.}

12: \date{\ }

13: \begin{document}

14: \begin{titlepage}

15: \maketitle

16: \thispagestyle{empty}

17: \begin{abstract}

18: We consider the classical equations of the

19: Born-Infeld-Abelian-Higgs model (with and without coupling to gravity)

20: in an axially symmetric ansatz. 

21: A numerical analysis of the equations reveals that the (gravitating)

22: Nielsen-Olesen vortices are smoothly deformed by the Born-Infeld

23: interaction, characterized by a coupling constant $\beta^2$,

24: and that these solutions cease to exist at a critical value of $\beta^2$.

25: When the critical value is approached, the length of the magnetic field

26: on the symmetry axis becomes infinite.

27: \end{abstract}

28: \vfill

29: \end{titlepage}

30: \newpage

31: \section{Introduction}

32: Recently, various gauge field theories were studied in which the 

33: dynamics of the gauge fields is governed by a Born-Infeld (BI) lagrangian

34: \cite{bi}. The relationship between string theory and BI lagrangian

35: obtained in \cite{tsey1} started an important activity in the topic

36: which is reviewed e.g. in \cite{pol, tsey2}.

37: 

38: Among the various aspects of BI field theory, the construction 

39: of classical solutions occupies a large place. Many investigations

40: were carried out in Abelian \cite{mns} as well as in non-Abelian

41: \cite{kg,gpss} models. Often, the pattern of classical solutions

42: is enriched by the occurence of the BI-term. The case of the SU(2)

43: gauge theory is typical of this type: no static finite

44: energy solutions exist with the minimal Yang-Mills action

45: but solutions exist when the BI term is included \cite{kg}.

46: Lately, various Born-Infeld solitons have been considered

47: in the context of gravity (see. e.g. \cite{tri,wsk}).

48: 

49: 

50: Perhaps the simplest model containing solitons for which the

51: effects of the BI term may be studied is the Abelian-Higgs model

52: \cite{no} in which vortex-solutions are available.

53: Several aspects of BI-vortex solutions have been  considered so far, 

54: namely the construction of self dual equations from the BI

55: lagrangian \cite{shir} and the construction of electrically

56: charged vortex solutions \cite{mns}.

57: Very interesting applications of the vortex solutions are cosmic

58: strings \cite{vil} which are believed to 

59: have played a role in the early phase of the Universe; it is therefore natural to also consider the 

60: effect of gravitation on the BI-vortex solutions.

61: 

62: Here we consider the Abelian-Higgs-Born-Infeld model coupled to gravity

63: and we preform a detailed numerical analysis of the equations in the

64: axially symmetric ansatz.

65: We find that, when the various coupling constants 

66: of the Einstein-Abelian-Higgs equations

67: are such that a magnetically charged

68: soliton exists (i.e. for $\beta^2 = \infty$ where $\beta^2$ denotes the

69: BI coupling constant), then the solution is smoothly deformed 

70: by the BI interaction. When the parameter  $\beta^2$ approaches

71: a critical value, the length of the

72: magnetic field of the solution on its

73: symmetry axis becomes infinite and the solution disappears.

74: 

75: The paper is organized as follows~: in Sect. 2 we describe the

76: Lagrangian, the ansatz and the classical equations. Several known

77: solutions and some of their features are summarized in Sect. 3.

78: Sect. 4 contains our results on the evolution of these 

79: solutions in presence of the Born-Infeld interaction.

80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

81: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

82: 

83: \section{The equations.}

84: We consider the gravitating 

85: Born-Infeld-Abelian Higgs model in four dimensions. It is

86: described by the action \cite{bi,no}

87: \be

88: S = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}{\cal L}

89: \ee

90: \be

91: \label{lagran}

92: {\cal L} = 

93:    {1\over 2} D_{\mu} \phi D^{\mu} \phi^{\ast} 

94: +  \hat \beta^2 (1 - {\cal R}) 

95: - {\lambda \over 4} (\phi^{\ast} \phi-v^2)^2 

96: + {1\over{16 \pi G}} R

97: \ee

98: with 

99: \be

100:   {\cal R} = \sqrt{1 + \frac{F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}}{2 \hat \beta^2}

101:          -\frac{(F_{\mu\nu}\tilde F^{\mu\nu})^2}{16 \hat \beta^4}

102:                    }

103: \ee

104: where $D_{\mu} = \nabla_{\mu} - i e A_{\mu}$ is the gauge

105: covariant derivative, $A_{\mu}$ is the gauge potential

106: of the U(1) gauge symmetry,

107: $F_{\mu\nu}$ is the

108: corresponding field strength and $\phi$ is a complex scalar field with vacuum

109: expectation value $v$. 

110: The Born-Infeld coupling constant

111:  is noted $\hat \beta^2$. The geometry is introduced as usual

112: by means of the Ricci scalar $R$. We use the same

113: notations as in \cite{verbin}.

114: 

115: \par In the following we study the classical equations

116: of the above field theory in the static case and within the

117:  cylindrically symmetric ansatz. The

118: metric and matter fields are parametrized in terms of four functions of the cylindrical radial variable  $r$  :

119: \be

120: ds^2 = N^2(r) dt^2 - dr^2 -  L^2(r) d\varphi^2-N^2(r) dz^2

121: \ee

122: \be

123: \phi = vf(r) e^{i n\varphi}

124: \ee

125: \be

126: A_{\mu} dx^{\mu} = {1\over e} (n-P(r)) d\varphi

127: \ee

128: Here $N, L,P,f$ are the  radial functions of $r$, $n$ is an integer

129: indexing the vorticity of the Higgs field around the $z$-axis. 

130: 

131: 

132: 

133: In the process of establishing the classical equations

134: in terms of the radial functions  it appears convenient

135: to define  dimensionless coupling constants ~:

136: \be

137: \alpha = \frac{e^2}{\lambda} \ \ , \ \  \gamma = 8\pi G v^2 \ \ , 

138: \ \ \beta^2 = \frac{\hat \beta^2}{\lambda v^4} \ \ ,

139: \ee

140: and to rescale the radial variable $r$ and the function $L(r)$ according to

141: \be

142: x = \sqrt{\lambda v^2}r \ \ , \ \ L(x) = \sqrt{\lambda v^2}  L(r)

143: \ee

144: 

145: 

146: \par 

147: With these redefinitions (and in the units $\hbar = c = 1$)

148: the diagonal components of the energy-momentum tensor read

149: \begin{eqnarray}

150: {\cal T}^0_0 &=& \lambda v^4(\epsilon_s+\epsilon_v+\epsilon_w+u)\\

151: {\cal T}^r_r &=& \lambda v^4(-\epsilon_s+\epsilon_v-\tilde\epsilon_v+\epsilon_w+u)\\

152: {\cal T}^{\varphi}_{\varphi} &=& \lambda v^4(\epsilon_s+\epsilon_v-\tilde \epsilon_v-\epsilon_w

153: +u)\\

154: {\cal T}^z_z &=& {\cal T}^0_0

155: \end{eqnarray}

156: where the different densities are

157: expressed in the dimensionless variable and

158: functions~:

159: \be

160: \epsilon_s = {1\over 2}(f')^2\quad , \quad \epsilon_w = {P^2f^2\over {2L^2}}\quad , \quad u = {1\over 4} (1-f^2)^2

161: \ee

162: \be

163: \epsilon_v = \beta^2({\cal R}-1)\quad , \quad \tilde \epsilon_v = {(P')^2\over

164: {\alpha L^2 {\cal R}}}\quad , \quad {\cal R} \equiv \sqrt{1+{(P')^2\over{\alpha\beta^2L^2}}}

165: \ee

166: the prime indicates the derivative with respect to $x$.

167: The corresponding components of the Ricci tensor are given explicitely

168: e.g. in \cite{verbin}.

169: 

170: Then, after an algebra, the classical equations 

171: corresponding to the above lagrangian

172: and ansatz can be shown to be consistent and lead

173:  to the following

174: system of four equations for the functions $N,L,P,f$~:

175: \be

176: \label{eq1}

177: {(LNN')'\over{N^2L}} = \gamma \left(

178: \beta^2 (1-{\cal R}) 

179: + \frac{P'^2}{\alpha L^2} \frac{1}{{\cal R}}

180: -{1\over 4}(1-f^2)^2

181: \right)

182: \ee

183: \be

184: \label{eq2}

185: {(N^2L')'\over{N^2L}} = \gamma \left( 

186: \beta^2 (1-{\cal R}) 

187: - {P^2f^2 \over{L^2}} 

188: - {1\over 4} (1-f^2)^2\right)

189: \ee

190: \be

191: \label{eq3}

192: {L\over{N^2}} (\frac{N^2 P'}{L{\cal R}})' = \alpha f^2 P

193: \ee

194: \be

195: \label{eq4}

196: {(N^2Lf')'\over{N^2L}} = f(f^2-1) + f {P^2\over {L^2}}

197: \ee

198: %%with

199: %%\be

200: %%          {\cal R} = \sqrt{1 + \frac{(P')^2}{\alpha \beta^2 L^2}}

201: %%\ee

202: 

203: The problem posed by these differential equations is 

204: further specified by the following set of boundary conditions

205: \begin{eqnarray}

206: \label{cn} N(0) &=& 1\qquad , \qquad N'(0) = 0\\

207: \label{cl} L(0) &=& 0 \qquad , \qquad L'(0) = 1\\

208: \label{cp} P(0) &=& n \qquad , \qquad \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} P(x) = 0 \label{condp} \\

209: \label{cf} f(0) &=& 0 \qquad , \qquad \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}f(x) = 1

210: \end{eqnarray}

211: which are necessary to guarantee the regularity of the configuration 

212: on the symmetry axis

213: and the finiteness of the inertial mass  defined next.

214: 

215: 

216: 

217: The classical solutions can be characterized, namely,

218:  by their magnetic field

219: \be

220: \label{magnetic}

221: B(r) = -{1\over{eL(r)}} {dP\over{dr}}(r) = -{\gamma\over{\alpha}}

222: ({e\over{8\pi G}}) {P'(x)\over{L(x)}},

223: \ee

224: and by their inertial mass and Tolman mass by unit length \cite{verbin}

225: \begin{eqnarray}

226: {\cal M}_{in} &=& \int \sqrt{-g_3} \ {\cal T}^0_0 \ dx_1dx_2\\

227: {\cal M}_{t_0} &=& \int \sqrt{-g_4} \ 

228: ({\cal T}^0_0 - {\cal T}^r_r- {\cal T}^{\varphi}_{\varphi}- {\cal T}^z_z) \ dx_1dx_2

229: \end{eqnarray}

230: which in turn can be reduced to one dimensional integrals~:

231: \begin{eqnarray}

232: G{\cal M}_{in} &=& {\gamma\over 8} M_{in}\\

233: &=& {\gamma\over 8} \int^{\infty}_0 dx NL(\epsilon_s + \epsilon_w + \epsilon_v + u).\\

234: G{\cal M}_{t_0}&=& {\gamma\over 8} M_{t_0}\\

235: &=& {\gamma\over 8} \int^{\infty}_0 dx N^2L (\tilde \epsilon_v-\epsilon_v-u).

236: \end{eqnarray}

237: In the flat case ($\gamma = 0$) the classical energy $E$

238: of the solutions

239: is obtained directly in terms of the inertial mass~: 

240: $E= (2 \pi v^2) M_{in}$. 

241: 

242: 

243: \vspace{0.5cm}

244: 

245: \section{Some special cases.}

246: In this section we briefly 

247: review a few particular solutions of the system above

248: and comment on their main properties.

249: 

250: \subsection{Nielsen-Olesen vortices.}

251: 

252: We first consider the equations 

253: for the case $\gamma=0, \beta=\infty$.

254: This case corresponds to the flat Maxwell-Higgs system; Eqs. 

255: (\ref{eq1}), (\ref{eq2}) are 

256: solved by $N(x) = 1, L(x) = x$. The solutions 

257: of the remaining equations are embeddings  of the celebrated

258: two-dimensional Nielsen-Olesen vortices \cite{no} into 

259: the three-dimensional space. 

260: They exist for all values of $\alpha$ and $n$

261:  and possess the following behaviour around the origin

262: \be

263: \label{noor}

264: P(x) = n - \frac{a_0}{2} x^2+O(x^{2+2n})

265:  \ \ \ , \ \ \ 

266: f(x) = b_0 x^n + O(x^{n+2})

267: \ee

268: and asymptotically

269: \be

270: \label{nobord}

271: P(x) = a_{\infty} e^{-x \sqrt{\alpha}}

272: \ \ \ , \ \ \ 

273: f(x) = 1-f_{\infty} e^{-x \sqrt{2}}  \ \ .

274: \ee

275: The parameters $a_0, b_0, a_{\infty}, f_{\infty}$ are determined numerically. For fixed $n$,

276: the classical energy, say $E(\alpha,n)$, of the solution

277: decreases monotonically when $\alpha$ increases. The

278: value $\alpha=2$ is very particular because first order equations exist

279: \cite{taubes} which imply (\ref{eq3}), (\ref{eq4})

280: (they are usually called self dual equations).

281: \par In relation to the self dual case, $\alpha=2$, the Nielsen-Olesen

282: solutions enjoy the following remarkable property :

283: \begin{eqnarray}

284: \label{sd}

285: {1\over n} E(\alpha,n)&>& E(\alpha,1)\qquad {\rm for} \qquad \alpha< 2\nonumber\\

286: {1\over n} E(\alpha,n) &=& E(\alpha,1)\qquad {\rm for} \qquad \alpha=2\nonumber\\

287: {1\over n} E(\alpha,n) &<& E(\alpha,1)\qquad {\rm for} \qquad \alpha > 2

288: \end{eqnarray}

289: as illustrated by Fig. 1 for $n=1,2$. This supports the idea 

290: \cite{rebbi} that, in the domain $\alpha > 2$, the n-vortice solutions

291: (with $n>2$) are stable against decay into $n$

292: separated solutions with unit vorticity (remembering the exponential decay

293: (\ref{nobord}) of the solutions under consideration).

294: 

295: \vspace{0.5cm}

296: 

297: \subsection{ The Melvin solution.}

298: \par Cancelling the Higgs field and the Higgs potential in the initial

299: lagrangian, we are left with the Einstein-Maxwell lagrangian. The

300: corresponding equations can be obtained from (\ref{eq1})-(\ref{eq4}) after

301: an appropriate rescaling of $x$ and $L$~:

302: \be

303: x\rightarrow {x\over{\sqrt{\gamma}}}\quad , \quad L \rightarrow

304: \sqrt{\gamma\over{\alpha}} L

305: \ee

306: and setting $\gamma=0$ afterwards

307: (then Eq.(\ref{eq4}) decouples). 

308: A solution of these equation was discovered by

309: Melvin \cite{melvin}. It is namely characterized by 

310: the following (asymptotic) power law behaviours of the various fields   

311: \be

312: N(x\rightarrow \infty) = Ax^{2\over 3}\quad , \quad L(x\rightarrow \infty)

313: = B x^{-{1\over 3}}\quad , \quad P(x\rightarrow \infty) = Cx^{-{2\over 3}}

314: \ee

315: where $A,B,C$ are constants (the numerical evaluation gives $A\approx

316: 2.25, B\approx 0.44)$. The corresponding masses are $M_{in} = M_{t_0}

317: = 2$.

318: 

319: \vspace{0.5cm}

320: 

321: \subsection{Gravitating vortices} 

322: \par The solutions corresponding to the Maxwell case

323: (i.e. $\beta^2 = \infty$)  were studied at length in \cite{verbin,bl}. We just mention

324: that global solutions (i.e. defined for $x\in [0,\infty])$ exist only on a 

325: finite domain in the (quarter of) plane $\alpha,\gamma$.

326: More precisely they exist for

327: \be

328: \label{domain}

329: 0 \leq \gamma \leq \gamma_{c}(\alpha,n)

330: \ee

331: %%%On Fig. 2, we present a plot of the critical values %%$\gamma_{cr}(\alpha,n)$ for $n=1$ and $n=2$.

332: The function $\gamma_c(\alpha,n)$ increases monotonically with $\alpha$

333: and, around the self-dual value $\alpha= 2$ it roughly behaves accordingly to

334: $\gamma_c(\alpha,n) = 2/n + \kappa(\alpha-2) \ , \ \kappa \approx 0.15$.  

335: In fact, for fixed $\alpha$, there exist two branches of solutions

336: for the set of $\gamma$ in the domain (\ref{domain}).

337: Following \cite{verbin} we refer  to the two branches as to  

338: the string and the Melvin branches. 

339: 

340: For $\gamma > \gamma_{c}(\alpha,n)$, solutions  still do

341: exist but they are closed 

342: \cite{verbin}; i.e. they are only defined for $x\in [0,x_{max}]$.

343:  We will not

344: be concerned with these type of solutions in the present paper.

345: 

346: \section{Numerical results.}

347: We solved numerically the system (\ref{eq1})-(\ref{eq4}) for numerous values

348: of the coupling constants $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$, studying in particular the

349: response of the three types of solutions mentioned above to

350: the Born-Infeld interaction. We now discuss then results in the same

351: order as before.

352: 

353: \subsection{The Nielsen-Olesen-Born-Infeld vortices}

354: We start by considering $\gamma = 0$. The formula  

355: (\ref{nobord}) still holds for $\beta < \infty$ and,

356: as expected, the Nielsen-Olesen solutions are smoothly deformed by the 

357: Born-Infeld term.  Fig. 2

358: shows the classical energy 

359: by means of $M_{in}(\alpha,\beta,n)/n$ as a function of $\beta^2$

360: for several values of $\alpha$ and $n$. It clearly indicates that the inertial

361: mass depends only little on $\beta$.

362: The corresponding values $E_m$ in the Maxwell limit ($\beta^2 = \infty$)

363: are indicated nearby. The main feature demonstrated by this figure

364: is that the solutions exist only for a finite range of the parameter $\beta$,

365: i.e. for  

366: \be

367: \beta_{c}(\alpha,n)< \beta < \infty

368: \ee

369: confirming the result of \cite{mns}. 

370: An in-depth analysis about the reasons

371: for this critical phenomenon is provided by Fig. 3 where

372: the  numerical evaluation of the parameters $a_0, b_0$ for the solutions are

373: plotted as functions of $\beta^2$. Our numerical analysis strongly indicates

374: that 

375: \be

376: \label{lim}

377: \lim_{\beta\rightarrow \beta_{c}} a_0 = \infty

378: \ee

379: so that, very likely, no solutions exist for $\beta < \beta_{c}$.

380:  This critical behaviour is, however, not reflected by the value of the

381: classical energy and by the parameter $b_0$ which remain finite for 

382: $\beta\rightarrow \beta_{c}$.

383: \par Physically, this phenomenon is 

384: reflected by the magnetic field of the solution. 

385: Indeed, from the definition (\ref{magnetic}),

386:  it is immediate to see that $B(0)$

387: (i.e. the value of the magnetic field on the symmetry axis of the solution) is directly 

388: related to $a_0$; Eq. (\ref{lim}) can therefore be rephased in saying that the magnetic

389: field on the z-axis becomes infinite when the critical value of $\beta$ is approached.

390:  This phenomenon is further illustrated  by Fig. 4 where the

391:  magnetic function $B(x)$ is compared for several values of $\beta^2$

392:  in the case $\alpha=1, n=1$. 

393: 

394: Refering to the relations (\ref{sd}), a natural question is to 

395: analyse how the domain of stability of the

396: $n>2$-vortices (i.e. $2<\alpha<\infty$) develops with the Born-Infeld interaction. 

397: An important element of  answer is given by Fig. 1. 

398: Clearly the effect of the Born-Infeld term is that the 

399: stable phase appears for lower values of $\alpha$. 

400: In terms of the Higgs particle mass $M_H = \lambda v$

401: (remember $\alpha = {e^2\over{\lambda}}$)

402: this means that the stable phase persists

403: up to a  higher value of the Higgs particle mass.

404: 

405: 

406: 

407: 

408: \par This result motivates an  analysis

409: of the effect of the Born-Infeld term in the

410: Georgi-Glashow model for multi-monopole solutions. 

411: It is known  that in this model, self dual equations exist

412: for $\lambda=0$ (i.e. for a massless Higgs particle) and that

413: multimonopoles solutions are unstable for $\lambda > 0$ \cite{manton}.

414: 

415: 

416: It is likely that the Born-Infeld

417: interaction generates a small domain of the Higgs mass

418: parameter where the mass of the two-monopole

419: is lower than twice the mass of the single monopole, thus leading to a stable phase.

420: Such a phenomenon was observed recently in the gravitating Georgi-Glashow model \cite{hkk}.

421: Due to gravity, a region of the parameter space exists where the multimonopoles seem to be stable against decay into monopoles.

422: 

423: 

424: 

425: \subsection{The Melvin-Born-Infeld Solution.}

426: \par The Melvin solution gets smoothly deformed by the Born-Infeld term. Decreasing

427: $\beta^2$ we observed that the solution disappears for $\beta^2_{c}\approx 6.4$; again

428: the phenomenon is related to the fact that the value $B(0)$ tends to infinity for

429: $\beta^2\rightarrow \beta^2_{c}$. The profiles of $N(x), L(x)$ and of the magnetic

430: field for the Melvin solution and its deformation for $\beta^2 = 7$ are compared on Fig. 5 (the dotted line for $B$ has $B(0)\approx 40$).

431: 

432: 

433: \subsection{The Born-Infeld gravitating strings.}

434: The study of the equations (\ref{eq1}-\ref{eq4}) for generic values

435: of $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ is a vast task. Here, we have attempted to

436: confirm the features which occured for the flat case. 

437: We limit ourselves to the case $\alpha = 2$ but we expect that the

438: results   are qualitatively

439: the same for the other values of this coupling constant. 

440: Our numerical analysis of the equations

441:  confirms that, for $\gamma$ fixed, the solutions

442: on the string branch as well as the ones on the Melvin branch

443: terminate at finite values of $\beta^2$.

444: Fig. 6 shows the domains of existence of the two types of solutions

445: in the $\beta^2, \gamma$ plane.

446: The figure clearly reveals that the value $\beta_c^2$, where the 

447: string branch terminates (the lower curve) varies only little with

448: $\gamma$ and that is is smaller than its counterpart,

449: say $\tilde \beta^2_c$, for the Melvin branch

450: (upper curve).

451: 

452: Taking e.g.  $\alpha=2, \gamma=1$ we find

453: \be

454:      \beta^2_{c} \approx 0.4   \ \ \ , \ \ \ 

455:       \tilde \beta^2_{c} \approx 5.1

456: \ee

457: respectively for the solution of the string and of the Melvin branches.

458: The inertial mass deviates only slightly from the  exact value

459: $M_{in}=2$ in the Maxwell limit, the Tolman mass decreases slowly

460: from $M_{to}\approx 0.62$ in the Maxwell limit to $M_{to}\approx 0.4$ 

461: for $\beta^2 = \tilde \beta^2_{c}$. 

462: 

463: For both branches, the value $B(0)$ of the magnetic field

464: on the z-axis becomes very large (probably infinite

465: but our numerical analysis

466: does not allow us to be absolutely sure) 

467: when the critical value of $\beta^2$ is approached.

468: Other quantities, e.g. the inertial and Tolman masses remain finite.

469: 

470: We finally mention that the string branch 

471: (which exists for $0\leq \gamma \leq

472: 2$ in the case $\alpha = 2$) extends slightly into the region $\gamma > 2$

473: when the Born-Infeld term is present.

474: 

475: 

476: \section{Final remarks}

477: To finish, we would like to present a generalization

478: of the result in \cite{shir} to the gravitating case.

479: The self-dual potential and the corresponding equations

480: (i.e.  setting $\lambda=e^2/2$ in Eq.(\ref{lagran}) and $\alpha = 2$ in 

481: Eqs.(\ref{eq1})-(\ref{eq2})) can be replaced by a  $\beta^2$-depending one

482: for which first order equations exist which imply the classical (second order) 

483: axially-symmetric equations. 

484: In  the reduced  variables, this can be achieved by the following substitution

485: \be

486: \label{potsd}

487: %%  V(\phi) = \hat \beta^2 \Biggl(   1- 

488: %%%\sqrt{ 1 - {e^2 \over 2 \hat \beta^2} (\phi^{\ast} \phi-v^2)^2 }

489: %%%                         \Biggl)

490: V(f) = \frac{1}{4}(f^2-1)^2 \longrightarrow 

491:   V_{sd}(f) =  \beta^2 \Biggl(   1- 

492: \sqrt{ 1 - {1 \over 2  \beta^2} (f^2-1)^2 }

493:                          \Biggl)

494: \ee

495: With this potential the self dual equations read

496: \be

497: N(x)=1 \ \ , \ \ L'= 1 + \frac{\gamma}{2}( P(1-f^2) + \theta) \ \  , \ \  

498: \frac{P'}{L} = \frac{1}{f} \frac{\partial V_{sd}}{\partial f} \ \ , \ \ 

499: f' = \frac{P \ f}{L}

500: \ee

501: and imply the full axially symmetric equations of the theory.

502: Further exact solutions and algebraic properties 

503:  can be obtained with this modified theory.

504: 

505: 

506: %%%%%%%%****************************

507: %%%%%%%% J'AI COMMENCE CI-DESSUS

508: %%%%%%%%**************************

509: %%%%%%%%*************************

510: \vskip 2 cm 

511: {\bf Acknowledgements}\hfill\break

512:  One of us (Y.~B.) gratefully acknowledges conversations 	

513:  with B.~Hartmann and with F.A.~Schaposnik. 

514:                                                        

515: 

516: \newpage

517: \begin{thebibliography}{7}

518: \bibitem{bi}M. Born and M. Infeld, Proc. R. Soc. London A 143 (1934) 410.

519: \bibitem{tsey1} E.S. Fradkin and A.A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. 163b (1985) 123.

520: \bibitem{pol} J. Polchinski, {\it Tasi Lectures on D-Branes}, hep-th/9611050.

521: \bibitem{tsey2} A.A. Tseytlin, {Born-Infeld action, supersymmetry and string theory},              hep-th/9908105.  

522: \bibitem{mns} E. Moreno, C. Nunez, F.A. Schaposnik, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 369.

523: \bibitem{kg} D. Gal'tsov and R. Kerner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5955. 

524: \bibitem{gpss} N. Grandi, R.L. Pakman, F.A. Schaposnik and G. Silva, Phys. Rev. D472 (2000) 125002.

525: \bibitem{tri} P.K. Tripathy, Phys. Lett. B458 (1999) 252, Phys. Lett. B463

526: (1999) 1.

527: \bibitem{wsk} M. Wirschins, A. Sood and J. Kunz, hep-th/0004130, Phys. Rev.

528: D (to appear)

529: \bibitem{no} H.B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B61 (1973) 45.

530: \bibitem{shir}K. Shiraishi and S. Hirenzaki, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A6 (1991) 2635.

531: \bibitem{vil} A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rep. 121 (1985) 263.

532: \bibitem{verbin} M. Christensen, A.L. Larsen and Y. Verbin, Phys. Rev.

533: D60 (1999) 12501-2.

534: \bibitem{taubes} C. H. Taubes, Commun. Math. Phys. 72 (1980) 277.

535: \bibitem{rebbi} L. Jacobs and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. B 19 (1979) 4486.

536: \bibitem{melvin} M. A. Melvin, Phys. Lett. 8 (1964) 65.

537: 

538: \bibitem{bl} Y. Brihaye and M. Lubo, Phys. Rev. D62  (2000) 085004. 

539: \bibitem{manton} N. S. Manton, Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 525. 

540: 

541: \bibitem{hkk} B. Hartmann, J. Kunz and B. Kleihaus, hep-th:/0009195,

542:  Phys. Rev. Lett. (to appear).

543: 

544: \end{thebibliography}

545: 

546: \newpage

547: \centerline{Figures Captions}

548: \begin{description}

549: \item [\ ] {\bf{Figure 1}}\\

550: The ratio  $E/n$ is plotted as a function of $\alpha$

551: for the Maxwell and Born-Infeld vortices and for $n=1,2$. 

552: \item [\ ] {\bf{Figure 2}}\\

553: The ratio $E/n$ for the Born-Infeld vortices is plotted

554: as a function of $\beta^2$ for different values of $\alpha$ and $n$.

555: On each branch, $E_m$ gives the energy of the Maxwell solution.

556: \item [\ ] {\bf{Figure 3}}\\

557: The parameters $a_0,b_0$ entering in the solutions via Eq. (\ref{noor})

558: are reported as functions of $\beta^2$ for different values of

559: $\alpha$ and of $n$.

560: \item [\ ] {\bf{Figure 4}}\\

561: The profiles of the magnetic field $B(x)$ is presented for

562: several values of $\beta^2$ approaching the critical value 

563: $\beta_c^2\approx 0.318$.

564: \item [\ ] {\bf{Figure 5}} \\

565: The profiles of the functions $L,N,B$ for Melvin solution

566: (solid lines) and Melvin-Born-Infeld solution (dotted lines).

567: On the dotted line $B(0) \approx 42$.

568: \item [\ ] {\bf{Figure 6}} \\

569: The domain of the gravitating string and Melvin branches of solutions

570: for $\alpha = 2$.

571: 

572: \end{description}

573: 

574: 

575: 

576: 

577: \end{document}

578: