1:
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %%% %%%
4: %%% %%%
5: %%% LaTeX File %%%
6: %%% %%%
7: %%% %%%
8: %%% Paper: hep-th/0104082 %%%
9: %%% %%%
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11:
12:
13:
14:
15: \documentstyle[12pt,epsf]{article}
16:
17: %\renewcommand\baselinestretch2 %%-double spacing-%%
18:
19: \topmargin 0pt
20: \advance \topmargin by -\headheight
21: \advance \topmargin by -\headsep
22:
23: \textheight 8.9in
24:
25: \oddsidemargin 0pt
26: \evensidemargin \oddsidemargin
27: \marginparwidth 0.5in
28:
29: \textwidth 6.5in
30:
31:
32: %\setlength{\arraycolsep}{1pt}
33:
34:
35:
36: % For users of A4 paper: The above values are suited for american 8.5x11in
37: % paper. If your output driver performs a conversion for A4 paper, keep
38: % those values. If your output driver conforms to the TeX
39: %standard(1in/1in),%
40: % then you should add the following commands to center the text on A4 paper:
41:
42: % \advance\hoffset by -3mm % A4 is narrower.
43: % \advance\voffset by 8mm % A4 is taller.
44:
45: % DEFINITIONS
46:
47: \def\del{{\delta^{\hbox{\sevenrm B}}}} \def\ex{{\hbox{\rm e}}}
48: \def\azb{A_{\bar z}} \def\az{A_z} \def\bzb{B_{\bar z}} \def\bz{B_z}
49: \def\czb{C_{\bar z}} \def\cz{C_z} \def\dzb{D_{\bar z}} \def\dz{D_z}
50: \def\im{{\hbox{\rm Im}}} \def\mod{{\hbox{\rm mod}}} \def\tr{{\hbox{\rm Tr}}}
51: \def\ch{{\hbox{\rm ch}}} \def\imp{{\hbox{\sevenrm Im}}}
52: \def\trp{{\hbox{\sevenrm Tr}}} \def\vol{{\hbox{\rm Vol}}}
53: \def\rl{\Lambda_{\hbox{\sevenrm R}}} \def\wl{\Lambda_{\hbox{\sevenrm W}}}
54: \def\fc{{\cal F}_{k+\cox}} \def\vev{vacuum expectation value}
55: \def\nodiv{\mid{\hbox{\hskip-7.8pt/}}}
56: \def\ie{{\em i.e.}}
57:
58:
59: \def\ie{\hbox{\it i.e.}}
60:
61:
62: \def\CC{{\mathchoice
63: {\rm C\mkern-8mu\vrule height1.45ex depth-.05ex
64: width.05em\mkern9mu\kern-.05em}
65: {\rm C\mkern-8mu\vrule height1.45ex depth-.05ex
66: width.05em\mkern9mu\kern-.05em}
67: {\rm C\mkern-8mu\vrule height1ex depth-.07ex
68: width.035em\mkern9mu\kern-.035em}
69: {\rm C\mkern-8mu\vrule height.65ex depth-.1ex
70: width.025em\mkern8mu\kern-.025em}}}
71:
72: \def\RR{{\rm I\kern-1.6pt {\rm R}}}
73: \def\NN{{\rm I\!N}}
74: \def\ZZ{{\rm Z}\kern-3.8pt {\rm Z} \kern2pt}
75:
76:
77:
78:
79: \def\np{Nucl. Phys.}
80: \def\pl{Phys. Lett.}
81: \def\prl{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
82: \def\pr{Phys. Rev.}
83: \def\ap{Ann. Phys.}
84: \def\cmp{Comm. Math. Phys.}
85: \def\jmp{J. Math. Phys.}
86: \def\ijmp{Int. J. Mod. Phys.}
87: \def\mpl{Mod. Phys. Lett.}
88: \def\lmp{Lett. Math. Phys.}
89: \def\bams{Bull. AMS}
90: \def\anm{Ann. of Math.}
91: \def\jpsc{J. Phys. Soc. Jap.}
92: \def\topo{Topology}
93: \def\kjm{Kobe J. Math.}
94: \def\phyrep{Phys. Rep.}
95: \def\adm{Adv. in Math.}
96: \def\faa{Funct. Anal. and Appl.}
97: \def\fap{Funkt. Anal. Prilozhen}
98: \def\pnas{Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA}
99: \def\sjnp{Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.}
100: \def\jept{Sov. Phys. JEPT}
101: \def\tmp{Theor. Math. Phys.}
102: \def\nmt{Norsk. Mat. Tidsskrift}
103: \def\qjm{Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2)}
104: \def\rmp{Rev. Math. Phys.}
105: \def\im{Invent. Math.}
106: \def\atmp{Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. }
107: \def\jhep{J. High Energy Phys.}
108: \def\ptp{Prog. Theor. Phys.}
109: \def\jgp{J. Geom. Phys.}
110: \def\atmp{Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.}
111:
112: \newcommand{\CS}{{\scriptstyle {\rm CS}}}
113: \newcommand{\CSs}{{\scriptscriptstyle {\rm CS}}}
114: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
115: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
116: \newcommand{\rc}{\nonumber\\}
117: \newcommand{\bear}{\begin{eqnarray}}
118: \newcommand{\eear}{\end{eqnarray}}
119: \newcommand{\W}{{\cal W}}
120: \newcommand{\F}{{\cal F}}
121: \newcommand{\x}{{\cal O}}
122: \newcommand{\LL}{{\cal L}}
123:
124: \def\mani{{\cal M}}
125: \def\calo{{\cal O}}
126: \def\calb{{\cal B}}
127: \def\calw{{\cal W}}
128: \def\calz{{\cal Z}}
129: \def\cald{{\cal D}}
130: \def\calc{{\cal C}}
131: \def\to{\rightarrow}
132: \def\ele{{\hbox{\sevenrm L}}}
133: \def\ere{{\hbox{\sevenrm R}}}
134: \def\zb{{\bar z}}
135: \def\wb{{\bar w}}
136: \def\nodiv{\mid{\hbox{\hskip-7.8pt/}}}
137: \def\menos{\hbox{\hskip-2.9pt}}
138: \def\dr{\dot R_}
139: \def\drr{\dot r_}
140: \def\ds{\dot s_}
141: \def\da{\dot A_}
142: \def\dga{\dot \gamma_}
143: \def\ga{\gamma_}
144: \def\dal{\dot\alpha_}
145: \def\al{\alpha_}
146: \def\cl{{closed}}
147: \def\cls{{closing}}
148: \def\vev{vacuum expectation value}
149: \def\tr{{\rm Tr}}
150: \def\to{\rightarrow}
151: \def\too{\longrightarrow}
152:
153: %\hyphenation{Dp-branes}
154:
155:
156: %
157: % FONTS
158:
159:
160: %\newfont{\headfont}{cmbx10 scaled 1440}
161: \newfont{\namefont}{cmr10}
162: %\newfont{\initialfont}{cmr10 scaled 1200}
163: \newfont{\addfont}{cmti7 scaled 1440}
164: \newfont{\boldmathfont}{cmbx10}
165: %\newfont{\figfont}{cmr7 scaled 1200}
166: \newfont{\headfontb}{cmbx10 scaled 1728}
167: %
168: \renewcommand{\theequation}{{\rm\thesection.\arabic{equation}}}
169: %
170: \begin{document}
171: %
172: %
173: \begin{titlepage}
174: %
175:
176:
177:
178:
179: \begin{center} \Large \bf Stable Wrapped Branes
180:
181: \end{center}
182:
183: \vskip 0.3truein
184: \begin{center}
185: J. M. Camino
186: \footnote{e-mail:camino@fpaxp1.usc.es},
187: A. Paredes
188: \footnote{e-mail:angel@fpaxp1.usc.es}
189: and
190: A.V. Ramallo
191: \footnote{e-mail:alfonso@fpaxp1.usc.es}
192:
193:
194: \vspace{0.3in}
195:
196: Departamento de F\'\i sica de
197: Part\'\i culas, \\ Universidad de Santiago\\
198: E-15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
199: \vspace{0.3in}
200:
201: \end{center}
202: \vskip 1truein
203:
204: \begin{center}
205: \bf ABSTRACT
206: \end{center}
207:
208: We study some wrapped configurations of branes in the near-horizon
209: geometry of a stack of other branes. The common feature of all the cases
210: analyzed is a quantization rule and the appearance of a finite number of
211: static configurations in which the branes are partially wrapped on
212: spheres. The energy of these configurations can be given in closed form
213: and the analysis of their small oscillations shows that they are stable.
214: The cases studied include D(8-p)-branes in the type II supergravity
215: background of Dp-branes for $0\le p\le 5$, M5-branes in the M5-brane
216: geometry in M-theory and D3-branes in a $(p,q)$ fivebrane background in
217: the type IIB theory. The brane configurations found admit the
218: interpretation of bound states of strings (or M2-branes in M-theory)
219: which extend along the unwrapped directions. We check this fact directly
220: in a particular case by using the Myers polarization mechanism.
221:
222: \vskip4.5truecm
223: \leftline{US-FT-3/01 \hfill April 2001}
224: \leftline{hep-th/0104082}
225: \smallskip
226: \end{titlepage}
227: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
228:
229:
230:
231:
232:
233:
234: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
235: %%%%% M A I N T E X T
236: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
237:
238:
239: \setcounter{equation}{0}
240: \section{Introduction}
241: \medskip
242:
243: In a recent paper \cite{Bachas}, Bachas, Douglas and Schweigert have
244: shown how D-branes on a group manifold are stabilized against shrinking
245: (see also ref. \cite{Pavel}). The concrete model studied in ref.
246: \cite{Bachas} was the motion of a D2-brane in the geometry of the $SU(2)$
247: group manifold. Topologically,
248: $SU(2)$ is equivalent to a three-sphere $S^3$. The D2-brane is embedded
249: in this $S^3$ along a two-sphere $S^2$ which, in a system of spherical
250: coordinates, is placed at constant latitude angle $\theta$.
251: The D2-brane dynamics is determined by the Born-Infeld action, in which a
252: worldvolume gauge field is switched on. An essential ingredient in the
253: analysis of ref. \cite{Bachas} is the quantization condition of the
254: worldvolume flux, which, with our notations, can be written as:
255: \beq
256: \int_{S^2}\,F\,=\,{2\pi n\over T_f}\,\,,
257: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
258: n\in\ZZ\,\,,
259: \label{uno}
260: \eeq
261: where $F$ is the worldvolume gauge field strength and $T_{f}$ is the
262: tension of the fundamental string, which, in terms of the Regge slope
263: $\alpha'$ is $T_{f}\,=\,( 2\pi\alpha\,'\,)^{-1}\,$.
264:
265: By using eq. (\ref{uno}) one can easily find the form of the
266: worldvolume gauge field strength for non-zero $n$, and the corresponding
267: value of the energy of the D2-brane. The minimum of this energy
268: determines the embedding of the brane in the group manifold, which
269: occurs at a finite set of latitude angles $\theta$. It turns out that the
270: static configurations found by this method are stable under small
271: perturbations and exactly match
272: those obtained by considering open strings on group manifolds
273: \cite{KS, KO}. In this
274: latter approach the D-brane configurations are determined by all the
275: possible boundary conditions of the corresponding Conformal Field Theory
276: (CFT). Actually \cite{Ale, FFFS},
277: each possible boundary condition corresponds to a
278: D-brane wrapped on a (twisted) conjugacy class of the group.
279:
280: The underlying CFT imposes quantization conditions on the allowed
281: (twisted) conjugacy classes, which can be interpreted geometrically in
282: terms of the embedding of the D-brane worldvolume in the group manifold.
283: Thus, for example, in the case of the $SU(2)$ group manifold, the
284: non-trivial conjugacy classes are two-spheres embedded in
285: $SU(2)\approx S^3$. The quantization conditions of the corresponding
286: Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) model determine that only a finite number of
287: $S^2\subset S^3$ embeddings are possible and their number is
288: related to the level of the affine $su(2)$ Kac-Moody algebra \cite{Ale,
289: FFFS}. Actually, to each conjugacy class one associates a Cardy boundary
290: state \cite{Cardy} of the WZW model. The mass of the D-brane
291: configuration can be obtained, in this approach, by computing \`a la
292: Polchinski \cite{Polchi} the matrix element between Cardy states of the
293: string theory cylinder diagram, and comparing the result with the one
294: obtained in a gravitational field theory. Apart from a finite shift in
295: the level of the current algebra, the mass obtained in this way is
296: exactly the same as the one computed with the Born-Infeld action and the
297: quantization condition (\ref{uno}). For other aspects of this open string
298: approach and of the flux quantization condition (\ref{uno}) see
299: ref. \cite{all}.
300:
301: The agreement between the Born-Infeld and CFT approaches for the system
302: of ref. \cite{Bachas} is quite remarkable. For this reason the
303: generalization of this result to other backgrounds and brane probes is
304: very interesting. The $SU(2)$ group manifold studied in \cite{Bachas} can
305: be regarded as a component of the transverse part of a Neveu-Schwarz (NS)
306: fivebrane geometry. Thus, the natural generalization to consider is a
307: Ramond-Ramond (RR) background. This case was studied in ref.
308: \cite{PR}, where it was shown that the brane probe must be partially
309: wrapped on some angular directions and extended along the radial
310: coordinate.
311:
312: Following the analysis of ref. \cite{PR}, in this paper we study,
313: first of all, the motion of a D(8-p)-brane in the background of a stack
314: of parallel Dp-branes. The external region of the Dp-brane metric has
315: $SO(9-p)$ rotational symmetry, which is manifest when a system of
316: spherical coordinates is chosen. In this system of coordinates a
317: transverse $S^{8-p}$ sphere is naturally defined and the constant latitude
318: condition on the $S^{8-p}$ determines a $S^{7-p}$ sphere. We shall embed
319: the D(8-p)-brane in this background in such a way that it is wrapped on
320: this $\,S^{7-p}\subset S^{8-p}$ constant latitude sphere and extended
321: along the radial direction. Therefore, as in ref. \cite{Bachas},
322: the brane configuration is characterized by an angle $\theta$, which
323: parametrizes the latitude of the $S^{7-p}$.
324:
325: In order to analyze this Dp-D(8-p) system by means of the Born-Infeld
326: action, we shall establish first some quantization condition which,
327: contrary to (\ref{uno}), will now involve the electric components of the
328: worldvolume gauge field. By using this quantization rule we shall find a
329: finite set of stable brane configurations characterized by some angles
330: $\theta$ which generalize the ones found in ref. \cite{Bachas}. The
331: energy of these configurations will be also computed and, from this
332: result, we shall conclude that semiclassically our D(8-p)-brane
333: configurations can be regarded as a bound state of fundamental strings.
334: On the other hand, we will find a first order BPS differential equation
335: whose fulfillment implies the saturation of an energy bound and whose
336: constant $\theta$ solutions are precisely our wrapped configurations.
337: This BPS equation is the one \cite{Imamura} satisfied by the baryon
338: vertex \cite{Wittenbaryon}, which will allow us to interpret our
339: configurations as a kind of short distance limit (in the radial
340: direction) of the baryonic branes \cite{CGS,Craps,Camino}.
341:
342: Another purpose of this paper is to study a mechanism of flux
343: stabilization in M-theory. We shall consider, in particular, a M5-brane
344: probe in a M5-brane background. By using the Pasti-Sorokin-Tonin (PST)
345: \cite{PST} action for the M5-brane probe, we shall look for static
346: configurations in which the probe is wrapped on a three-sphere. After
347: establishing a flux quantization condition similar to (\ref{uno}), we
348: shall find these configurations and we will show that they closely
349: resemble those found for the D4-D4 system. Actually, our states can be
350: interpreted semiclassically as BPS bound states of M2-branes and they are
351: related to the short distance limit of the baryonic vertex of
352: M-theory \cite{Ali,kappa}.
353:
354: Another example which we will work out in detail is the one in which the
355: background is a stack of fivebranes which have both NS and RR charges,
356: \ie\ a collection of the so-called $(p,q)$ fivebranes \cite{LuRoy}. In
357: this case the probe is a D3-brane and the ``magnetic" quantization
358: condition (\ref{uno}) and our electric generalization must be imposed at
359: the same time. We will show that these two quantization rules are indeed
360: compatible and we will find the stable wrapped configurations of the
361: D3-brane probe. Again, they can be interpreted semiclassically as a
362: collection of strings (actually, in this case, $(q,p)$ strings).
363:
364: If our brane configurations admit an interpretation as bound states of
365: strings (or M2-branes in the case of M-theory), it should be possible to
366: obtain them starting directly from the strings (or M2-branes). We will
367: check this fact in a particular case. Indeed, we will show
368: how one can build up the wrapped D3-brane configurations in the
369: NS fivebrane background by using D-strings
370: in the same background. The mechanism
371: responsible for this transmutation is the one advocated by
372: Myers \cite{Myers}, in which the D-strings move in a noncommutative
373: fuzzy sphere and are polarized by the background.
374:
375: This paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we will study the
376: Dp-D(8-p) system. Section 3 is devoted to the analysis of the flux
377: stabilization in M-theory. The D3-brane in the $(p,q)$ fivebrane
378: background is considered in section 4. In section 5 we summarize our
379: results and explore some directions for future work. The paper is
380: completed with two appendices. In appendix A we collect the functions
381: which determine the location of the wrapped brane configurations in the
382: transverse sphere. In appendix B we show how to obtain the wrapped
383: D3-branes from polarized D-strings.
384:
385:
386: \setcounter{equation}{0}
387: \section{Wrapped branes in Ramond-Ramond backgrounds}
388: \medskip
389:
390: The ten-dimensional metric corresponding to a stack of $N$ coincident
391: extremal Dp-branes in the near-horizon region is given by
392: \cite{supergravity}:
393: \beq
394: ds^2\,=\,\Bigl[\,{r\over R}\,\Bigr]^{{7-p\over 2}}\,\,
395: (\,-dt^2\,+\,dx_{\parallel}^2\,)\,+\,
396: \Bigl[\,{R\over r}\,\Bigr]^{{7-p\over 2}}\,\,
397: (\,dr^2\,+\,r^2\,d\Omega_{8-p}^2\,)\,\,,
398: \label{dos}
399: \eeq
400: where $x_{\parallel}$ represent $p$ cartesian
401: coordinates along the branes, $r$ is a radial coordinate
402: parametrizing the distance to the branes and $d\Omega_{8-p}^2$ is the
403: line element of an unit $8-p$ sphere. We have written the metric in
404: the string frame. The parameter $R$, which we will refer to as
405: the radius, is given by:
406: \beq
407: R^{7-p}\,=\,N\,g_s\,2^{5-p}\,\pi^{{5-p\over 2}}\,
408: (\,\alpha\,'\,)^{{7-p\over 2}}\,\,
409: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)\,\,,
410: \label{tres}
411: \eeq
412: where $N$ is the number of Dp-branes of the stack and $g_s$ is the
413: string coupling constant. The metric (\ref{dos}) is a classical
414: solution of the type II supergravity equations of motion. This
415: solution is
416: also characterized by some non-vanishing values of the dilaton field
417: $\phi(r)$ and of a Ramond-Ramond (RR) (8-p)-form field strength
418: $F^{(8-p)}$, namely:
419: \bear
420: e^{-\tilde\phi(r)}\,&=&\,\Bigl[\,{R\over r}\,
421: \Bigr]^{{(7-p)(p-3)\over 4}}
422: \,\,,\rc\rc
423: F^{(8-p)}\,&=&\,(7-p)\,R^{7-p}\,\epsilon_{(8-p)}\,\,,
424: \label{cuatro}
425: \eear
426: where $\tilde\phi(r)\,=\,\phi(r)\,-\,\phi(r\rightarrow {\infty})$, and we
427: are representing the Dp-brane as a magnetically charged object under the
428: $F^{(8-p)}$ form. In eq. (\ref{cuatro})(and in what follows)
429: $\epsilon_{(n)}$ denotes the volume form of the sphere $S^n$.
430:
431: Let $\theta^1$, $\theta^2$, $\cdots$, $\theta^{8-p}$ be coordinates
432: which parametrize the $S^{8-p}$ transverse sphere.
433: We shall assume that the $\theta$'s are spherical angles on $S^{8-p}$
434: and that $\theta\equiv\theta^{8-p}$ is the polar angle
435: ($0\le\theta\le\pi$). Therefore, the $S^{8-p}$ line element
436: $d\Omega_{8-p}^2$ can be decomposed as:
437: \beq
438: d\Omega_{8-p}^2\,=\,d\theta^2\,+\,(\,{\rm sin}\,\theta)^{2}\,\,
439: d\Omega_{7-p}^2\,\,.
440: \label{cinco}
441: \eeq
442: In these coordinates it is not difficult to find a potential for the
443: RR gauge field. Indeed, let us define the function $C_p(\theta)$
444: as the solution of the differential
445: equation:
446: \beq
447: {d\over d\theta}\, C_p(\theta)\,=\,-(7-p)\,({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{7-p}\,\,,
448: \label{seis}
449: \eeq
450: with the initial condition
451: \beq
452: C_p(0)\,=\,0\,\,.
453: \label{siete}
454: \eeq
455: It is clear that one can find by elementary integration a unique
456: solution to the problem of eqs. (\ref{seis}) and (\ref{siete}). Thus
457: $C_p(\theta)$ can be considered as a known function of the polar angle
458: $\theta$. In terms of $C_p(\theta)$, the RR potential $C^{(7-p)}$
459: can be represented as:
460: \beq
461: C^{(7-p)}\,=\,-R^{(7-p)}\,C_p(\theta)\,\,\epsilon_{(7-p)}\,\,.
462: \label{ocho}
463: \eeq
464: By using eq. (\ref{seis}) it can be easily verified that
465: \footnote{For simplicity, through this paper we choose the orientation
466: of the transverse $S^{8-p}$ sphere such that
467: $\epsilon_{(8-p)}=(\sin\theta)^{7-p}\,d\theta\wedge\epsilon_{(7-p)}$.}:
468: \beq
469: F^{(8-p)}\,=\,d\,C^{(7-p)}\,\,.
470: \label{nueve}
471: \eeq
472: Let us now consider a D(8-p)-brane embedded along the transverse
473: directions of the stack of Dp-branes. The
474: action of such a brane probe is the sum of a
475: Dirac-Born-Infeld and a Wess-Zumino term:
476: \beq
477: S\,=\,-T_{8-p}\,\int d^{\,9-p}\sigma\,e^{-\tilde\phi}\,
478: \sqrt{-{\rm det}\,(\,g\,+\,F\,)}\,+\,
479: T_{8-p}\,\int \,\, F\wedge\,C^{(7-p)}\,\,,
480: \label{diez}
481: \eeq
482: where $g$ is the induced metric on the worldvolume of the D(8-p)-brane
483: and $F$ is a worldvolume abelian gauge field strength. The coefficient
484: $T_{8-p}$ in eq. (\ref{diez}) is the tension of the D(8-p)-brane,
485: given by:
486: \beq
487: T_{8-p}\,=\,(2\pi)^{p-8}\,(\,\alpha\,'\,)^{{p-9\over 2}}\,
488: (\,g_s\,)^{-1}\,\,.
489: \label{once}
490: \eeq
491: The worldvolume
492: coordinates $\sigma^{\alpha}$ ($\alpha\,=\,0\,,\,\cdots\,,\,8-p\,)$ will
493: be taken as:
494: \beq
495: \sigma^{\alpha}\,=\,(\,t\,,\,r\,,\,
496: \theta^1\,,\,\cdots\,,\,\theta^{7-p}\,\,)\,\,.
497: \label{doce}
498: \eeq
499: \begin{figure}
500: \centerline{\hskip -.8in \epsffile{fig1.eps}}
501: \caption{The points of the $S^{8-p}$ sphere with the same polar angle
502: $\theta$ define a $S^{7-p}$ sphere. The angle $\theta$ represents the
503: latitude on $S^{8-p}$, measured from one of its poles.
504: }
505: \label{fig1}
506: \end{figure}
507:
508: With this election the embedding of the brane probe is described by a
509: function $\theta=\theta(\sigma^{\alpha})$. Notice that the
510: hypersurface $\theta\,=\,{\rm constant}$ defines a $S^{7-p}$ sphere on
511: the transverse $S^{8-p}$ (see figure 1). These configurations with
512: constant polar angle represent a D(8-p)-brane wrapped on a $S^{7-p}$
513: sphere and extended along the radial direction. These are the kind of
514: configurations we want to study in this paper. Actually, we will
515: consider first a more general situation in which the polar angle
516: depends only on the radial coordinate, \ie\ when
517: $\theta= \theta(r)$. It is a rather simple exercise to compute the
518: induced metric $g$ in this case. Moreover, by inspecting the form of
519: the RR potential $C^{(7-p)}$ in eq. (\ref{ocho}) and the Wess-Zumino
520: term in the action, one easily concludes that this term acts as a source
521: for the worldvolume electric field $F_{0,r}$ and, thus, it is natural
522: to assume that $F_{0,r}$ is different from zero. If we take this
523: component of $F$ as the only non-vanishing one, the action can be
524: written as:
525: \beq
526: S\,=\,
527: \int_{S^{7-p}}\,d^{7-p}\theta\,\,
528: \int\,drdt\,\,{\cal L}(\theta, F)\,\,,
529: \label{trece}
530: \eeq
531: where the lagrangian density ${\cal L}(\theta, F)$ is given by:
532: \beq
533: {\cal L}(\theta, F)\,=\,-\,T_{8-p}\,R^{7-p}\,\sqrt{\hat g}\,\,\Bigl[\,
534: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{7-p}
535: \,\,\sqrt{1\,+\,r^2\,\theta\,'^{\,2}\,-\,F_{0,r}^2}\,+\,
536: F_{0,r}\,C_p(\theta)\,\Bigr]\,\,.
537: \label{catorce}
538: \eeq
539: In eq. (\ref{catorce}) $\hat g$ is the determinant of the metric of the
540: $S^{7-p}$ and $\theta\,'$ denotes $d\theta/d r$.
541:
542: \medskip
543: \subsection{Quantization condition}
544: \medskip
545:
546: The equation of motion of the gauge field, derived from the
547: lagrangian density of eq. (\ref{catorce}), implies that:
548: \beq
549: {\partial {\cal L}\over \partial F_{0,r}}\,=\,
550: {\rm constant}\,\,.
551: \label{quince}
552: \eeq
553: In order to determine the value of the constant on the right-hand side
554: of eq. (\ref{quince}) let us follow the procedure of ref. \cite{PR}
555: and couple the D-brane to a Neveu-Schwarz (NS) Kalb-Ramond field $B$. As
556: is well-known, this coupling can be performed by substituting $F$ by
557: $F-B$ in ${\cal L}$, \ie\ by doing
558: ${\cal L}(\theta, F)\,\rightarrow {\cal L}(\theta, F-B)$ in eq.
559: (\ref{catorce}). At first order in $B$, this substitution generates a
560: coupling of the D-brane to the NS field $B$ of the form:
561: \beq
562: \int_{S^{7-p}}\,\,d^{7-p}\theta\,\,\,\int\,drdt\,\,
563: {\partial \,{\cal L}\over\partial F_{0,r}}\,\,B_{0,r}\,\,,
564: \label{dseis}
565: \eeq
566: where we have assumed that only the $B_{0,r}$ component of the $B$
567: field is turned on.
568:
569: We shall regard eq. (\ref{dseis}) as the interaction energy of a
570: fundamental string source in the presence of the D-brane. This source
571: is extended along the radial direction and, thus, it is quite natural
572: to require that the coefficient of the $B$ field, integrated over
573: $S^{7-p}$, be an integer
574: multiple of the fundamental string tension, namely:
575: \beq
576: \int_{S^{7-p}}\,\,d^{7-p}\theta\,\,\,
577: {\partial \,{\cal L}\over\partial F_{0,r}}\,=\, n\,T_{f}\,\,,
578: \label{dsiete}
579: \eeq
580: with $n\in\ZZ$. Eq. (\ref{dsiete}) is the quantization condition we
581: were looking for in these RR backgrounds and will play in our analysis
582: a role similar to the one played in ref. \cite{Bachas} by the flux
583: quantization condition (eq. (\ref{uno})). Notice that eq. (\ref{dsiete})
584: constraints the electric components of $F$, whereas eq. (\ref{uno})
585: involves the magnetic worldvolume field\footnote{It is interesting to
586: point out that the left-hand side of eq. (\ref{dsiete}) can be written
587: in terms of the integral over the $S^{7-p}$ sphere of the worldvolume
588: Hodge dual of $\partial \,{\cal L}/\partial
589: F_{\alpha, \beta}$.}. Thus, our quantization rule
590: is a kind of electric-magnetic dual of the one used in ref.
591: \cite{Bachas}. This has a nice interpretation in the case in which $p$
592: is odd, which corresponds to the type IIB theory. Indeed, it is known in
593: this case that the electric-magnetic
594: worldvolume duality corresponds to the S-duality of the
595: background \cite{EMduality}. In particular, when
596: $p=5$, the D5 background can be converted, by means of an S-duality
597: transformation, into a NS5 one, which is precisely the type of
598: geometry considered in ref. \cite{Bachas}.
599:
600: By using the explicit form of the lagrangian density (eq.
601: (\ref{catorce})), the left-hand side of our quantization condition can
602: be easily calculated:
603: \beq
604: \int_{S^{7-p}}\,\,d^{7-p}\theta\,\,\,
605: {\partial \,{\cal L}\over\partial F_{0,r}}\,=\,
606: T_{8-p}\,\Omega_{7-p}\,R^{7-p}\,\Biggl[\,
607: {F_{0,r}\,\,({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{7-p}\,\over
608: \sqrt{1\,+\,r^2\,\theta\,'^{\,2}\, -\,F_{0,r}^2}}\,\,-\,\,
609: C_p(\theta)\,\Biggr]\,\,,
610: \label{docho}
611: \eeq
612: where $\Omega_{7-p}$ is the volume of
613: the unit $(7-p)$-sphere, given by:
614: \beq
615: \Omega_{7-p}\,=\,{2\pi^{{8-p\over 2}}\over
616: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)}\,\,.
617: \label{dnueve}
618: \eeq
619:
620: By using eqs. (\ref{docho}) and (\ref{dsiete}) one can obtain
621: $F_{0,r}$ as a function of $\theta(r)$ and the integer $n$. Let us
622: show how this can be done. First of all, by using eqs.
623: (\ref{once}), (\ref{dnueve}) and (\ref{tres}) it is straightforward to
624: compute the global coefficient appearing on the right-hand side of eq.
625: (\ref{docho}), namely:
626: \beq
627: T_{8-p}\,\Omega_{7-p}\,R^{7-p}\,=\,
628: {NT_f\over 2\sqrt{\pi}}\,
629: {\Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)\over
630: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)}\,\,.
631: \label{veinte}
632: \eeq
633: Secondly,
634: let us define the function ${\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)$ as:
635: \beq
636: {\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)\,=\,C_p(\theta)\,+\,2\,\sqrt{\pi}\,\,
637: {\Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)\over
638: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)}\,\,
639: {n\over N}\,\,.
640: \label{vuno}
641: \eeq
642: Notice that ${\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)$ satisfies the same differential
643: equation as $C_p(\theta)$ (eq. (\ref{seis})) with different initial
644: condition. Moreover, by inspecting eqs. (\ref{dsiete}), (\ref{docho})
645: and (\ref{veinte}), one easily concludes that $F_{0,r}$ can be put in
646: terms of ${\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)$. The corresponding expression is:
647: \beq
648: F_{0,r}\,=\,\sqrt{\,
649: {1\,+\,r^2\,\theta\,'^{\,2}\over
650: {\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)^2\,+\,
651: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{2(7-p)}}}\,\,{\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)\,\,.
652: \label{vdos}
653: \eeq
654: Let us now evaluate the energy of the system. By performing a Legendre
655: transformation, we can represent the hamiltonian $H$ of the
656: D(8-p)-brane as:
657: \beq
658: H\,=\,\int_{S^{7-p}}\,\,d^{7-p}\theta\,\,\,
659: \int dr\,\Big[\, F_{0,r}\,{\partial \,{\cal L}\over\partial
660: F_{0,r}}\,-\, {\cal L}\,\Big]\,\,.
661: \label{vtres}
662: \eeq
663: By using (\ref{vdos}) one can eliminate $F_{0,r}$ from the expression
664: of $H$. One gets:
665: \beq
666: H\,=\,T_{8-p}\,\Omega_{7-p}\,R^{7-p}\,\int dr\,
667: \sqrt{1\,+\,r^2\,\theta\,'^{\,2}}\,\,
668: \sqrt{{\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)^2\,+\,
669: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{2(7-p)}}\,\,.
670: \label{vcuatro}
671: \eeq
672: It is now simple to find the constant $\theta$ configurations which
673: minimize the energy. Indeed, we only have to require the vanishing of
674: $\partial\,H/\partial\theta$ for $\theta^{'}=0$. Taking into account
675: that ${\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)$ satisfies eq. (\ref{seis}), we arrive at:
676: \beq
677: {\partial\,H\over \partial\theta}\,\,\,\Biggr|_{\theta^{'}=0}\,\,\,=
678: \,\,\,(7-p)\,\,T_{8-p}\,\Omega_{7-p}\,R^{7-p}\,\,\,
679: {({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{7-p}\,
680: [\,({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{6-p}\,{\rm cos}\,\theta\,-\,
681: {\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)\,\,]\over
682: \sqrt{{\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)^2\,+\,
683: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{2(7-p)}}}\,\,.
684: \label{vcinco}
685: \eeq
686: Moreover, if we define the function\footnote{The functions
687: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ for different values of $p$ have been listed in
688: appendix A.}:
689: \beq
690: \Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,\equiv\,
691: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{6-p}\,{\rm cos}\,\theta\,-\,
692: {\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)\,\,,
693: \label{vseis}
694: \eeq
695: it is clear by looking at the right-hand side of eq. (\ref{vcinco})
696: that the energy is minimized either when $\theta=0,\pi$ (\ie\ when
697: $\sin\theta=0$) or when $\theta=\bar\theta_{p,n}$, where
698: $\bar\theta_{p,n}$ is determined by the condition:
699: \beq
700: \Lambda_{p,n}(\bar\theta_{p,n})\,=\,0\,\,.
701: \label{vsiete}
702: \eeq
703: The solutions $\theta=0,\pi$ correspond to singular configurations in
704: which the D(8-p)-brane collapses at the poles of the $S^{7-p}$ sphere.
705: For this reason we shall concentrate on the analysis of the
706: $\theta=\bar\theta_{p,n}$ configurations. First of all, we notice that
707: the function $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ has a simple derivative, which
708: can be obtained from its definition and from the differential equation
709: satisfied by ${\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)$. One gets:
710: \beq
711: {d\over d\theta}\,\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,=\,
712: (6-p)\,({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{5-p}\,\,.
713: \label{vocho}
714: \eeq
715: It follows from eq. (\ref{vocho}) that when
716: $p< 6$ then ${d\over d\theta}\,\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,>\, 0$ if
717: $\theta\in (0,\pi)$. This means that, for $p\le 5$,
718: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ is a monotonically increasing function in the
719: interval $0<\theta<\pi$. In what follows we shall
720: restrict ourselves to the case $p\le 5$. In order to check that eq.
721: (\ref{vsiete}) has solutions in this case, let us evaluate the values
722: of $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ at $\theta=0,\pi$. From eqs.
723: (\ref{vseis}), (\ref{vuno}) and (\ref{siete}) we have:
724: \beq
725: \Lambda_{p,n}(0)\,=\,-\,{\cal C}_{p,n}(0)\,=\,
726: -2\sqrt{\pi}\,\,
727: {\Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)\over
728: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)}\,\,
729: {n\over N}\,\,.
730: \label{vnueve}
731: \eeq
732: Moreover for $\theta=\pi$ we can write:
733: \beq
734: \Lambda_{p,n}(\pi)\,=\,-\,{\cal C}_{p,n}(\pi)\,=\,-\,
735: C_{p}(\pi)\,-\,2\sqrt{\pi}\,\,
736: {\Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)\over
737: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)}\,\,
738: {n\over N}\,\,,
739: \label{treinta}
740: \eeq
741: and, taking into account that:
742: \beq
743: C_{p}(\pi)\,=\,-(7-p)\,\int_{0}^{\pi}\,
744: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{7-p}\,d\theta\,\,=\,\,-2\sqrt{\pi}\,\,
745: {\Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)\over
746: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)} \,\,,
747: \label{tuno}
748: \eeq
749: we get:
750: \beq
751: \Lambda_{p,n}(\pi)\,=\,2\sqrt{\pi}\,\,
752: {\Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)\over
753: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)}\,\,
754: (\,1\,-\,{n\over N}\,)\,\,.
755: \label{tdos}
756: \eeq
757: As ${d\over d\theta}\,\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,>\, 0$ for
758: $\theta\in (0,\pi)$, the function $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ vanishes for
759: $0<\theta <\pi$ if and only if $\Lambda_{p,n}(0)\,<0$
760: and $\Lambda_{p,n}(\pi)\,>\,0$. From eq. (\ref{vnueve}) we conclude
761: that the first condition occurs when $n>0$, whereas
762: eq. (\ref{tdos}) shows that
763: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\pi)\,>\,0$ if $n<N$. It follows that there exists only
764: one solution $\bar\theta_{p,n}\in (0,\pi)$ of eq. (\ref{vsiete}) for
765: each
766: $n$ in the interval $0<n<N$. Then, we have found exactly $N-1$
767: angles which correspond to nonsingular wrappings of the D(8-p)-brane
768: on a $S^{7-p}$ sphere. Notice that for $n=0$ ($n=N$) the solution of
769: eq. (\ref{vsiete}) is $\bar\theta_{p,0}=0$ ($\bar\theta_{p,N}=\pi$)
770: (see eqs. (\ref{vnueve}) and (\ref{tdos})). Therefore, we can identify
771: these $n=0,N$ cases with the singular configurations previously
772: found. In general, when $n$ is varied from $n=0$ to $n=N$ the angle
773: $\bar\theta_{p,n}$ increases from $0$ to $\pi$ (\ie\ from one of the
774: poles of the $S^{8-p}$ sphere to the other).
775:
776: It is not difficult to find the energy of these wrapped configurations.
777: Actually we only need to substitute $\theta=\bar\theta_{p,n}$ in
778: eq. (\ref{vcuatro}). Taking into account (see eqs. (\ref{vseis}) and
779: (\ref{vsiete})) that:
780: \beq
781: {\cal C}_{p,n}(\bar\theta_{p,n})\,=\,
782: (\,\sin\bar\theta_{p,n}\,)^{6-p}\,\cos\bar\theta_{p,n}\,\,,
783: \label{ttres}
784: \eeq
785: one easily finds that the energy of these solutions can be written as:
786: \beq
787: H_{p,n}\,=\,\int\,dr\,{\cal E}_{p,n}\,\,,
788: \label{tcuatro}
789: \eeq
790: where the constant energy density ${\cal E}_{p,n}$ is given by:
791: \beq
792: {\cal E}_{p,n}\,=\,
793: {NT_f\over 2\sqrt{\pi}}\,
794: {\Gamma\Bigl(\,{7-p\over 2}\Bigr)\over
795: \Gamma\Bigl(\,{8-p\over 2}\Bigr)}\,\,
796: ({\rm sin}\,\bar\theta_{p,n})^{6-p}\,\,.
797: \label{tcinco}
798: \eeq
799: Similarly, by substituting eq. (\ref{ttres}) in eq. (\ref{vdos}), we
800: can get the worldvolume electric field for our configurations, namely:
801: \beq
802: \bar F_{0,r}\,=\,{\rm cos}\,\bar\theta_{p,n}\,\,.
803: \label{tseis}
804: \eeq
805: Let us now analyze some particular cases of our equations. First of
806: all, we shall consider the $p=5$ case, \ie\ a D3-brane wrapped on a
807: two-sphere under the action of a D5-brane background. The function
808: $\Lambda_{5,n}(\theta)$ is:
809: \beq
810: \Lambda_{5,n}(\theta)\,=\,\theta\,-\,{n\over N}\,\pi\,\,,
811: \label{tsiete}
812: \eeq
813: and the equation $\Lambda_{5,n}(\theta)=0$ is trivially solved by the
814: angles:
815: \beq
816: \bar\theta_{5,n}\,=\,{n\over N}\,\pi\,\,.
817: \label{tocho}
818: \eeq
819: Notice that the set of angles in eq. (\ref{tocho}) is the same as that
820: of ref. \cite{Bachas}. Using this result in eq. (\ref{tcinco}) we get the
821: following energy density:
822: \beq
823: {\cal E}_{5,n}\,=\,{NT_f\over \pi}\,
824: {\rm sin}\,\Big[\,{n\over N}\,\pi\,\Big]\,\,,
825: \label{tnueve}
826: \eeq
827: which is very similar to the result found in ref. \cite{Bachas}. Next,
828: let us take $p=4$, which corresponds to a D4-brane wrapped on a
829: three-sphere in the background of a stack of D4-branes. The corresponding
830: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ function is:
831: \beq
832: \Lambda_{4,n}(\theta)\,=\,-2\,\Big[\,{\rm cos}\,\theta\,+\,
833: 2\,{n\over N}\,-\,1\,\Big]\,\,,
834: \label{cuarenta}
835: \eeq
836: and the solutions of eq. (\ref{vsiete}) in this case are easily found,
837: namely:
838: \beq
839: {\rm cos}\,\bar\theta_{4,n}\,=\,1\,-\,2\,{n\over N}\,\,.
840: \label{cuno}
841: \eeq
842: The corresponding energy density takes the form:
843: \beq
844: {\cal E}_{4,n}\,=\,{n(N-n)\over N}\,\,T_f\,\,.
845: \label{cdos}
846: \eeq
847: Notice that, in this D4-D4 case, the energy density of eq.
848: (\ref{cdos}) is a rational fraction of the fundamental string tension.
849:
850:
851: For general $p$ the equation $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,=\,0$ is much
852: difficult to solve analytically. In order to illustrate this point let
853: us write down the equation to solve in the physically interesting case
854: $p=3$:
855: \beq
856: \bar\theta_{3,n}\,-\,\cos\bar\theta_{3,n}\,\sin\,\bar\theta_{3,n}\,=\,
857: {n\over N}\,\pi\,\,.
858: \label{ctres}
859: \eeq
860: Despite of the fact that we are not able to find the analytical
861: solution of the equation $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,=\,0$ for $p\le 3$,
862: we can get some insight on the nature of our solutions from some general
863: considerations. First of all, it is interesting to point out the
864: following property of the functions $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$:
865: \beq
866: \Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,=\,-\Lambda_{p,N-n}(\pi-\theta)\,\,.
867: \label{extrauno}
868: \eeq
869: Eq. (\ref{extrauno}) can be proved either from the definition of the
870: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$'s or from their expressions listed in appendix A.
871: It follows from this equation that our set of angles
872: $\bar\theta_{p,n}$ satisfy:
873: \beq
874: \bar\theta_{p,N-n}\,=\,\pi\,-\,\bar\theta_{p,n}\,\,.
875: \label{extrados}
876: \eeq
877: By using (\ref{extrados}) in the expression of the energy density
878: ${\cal E}_{p,n}$ (eq. (\ref{tcinco})), one immediately gets the
879: following periodicity relation:
880: \beq
881: {\cal E}_{p,N-n}\,=\,{\cal E}_{p,n}\,\,.
882: \label{extratres}
883: \eeq
884:
885:
886:
887: Another interesting piece of information can be obtained by considering
888: the semiclassical $N\rightarrow\infty$ limit. Notice that
889: $\Lambda_{p,n}$ depends on $n$ and $N$ through their ratio $n/N$ (see
890: eqs. (\ref{vseis})) and (\ref{vuno})). Then, taking $N\rightarrow\infty$
891: with fixed $n$ is equivalent to make $n\rightarrow 0$ for finite $N$. We
892: have already argued that if $n\rightarrow 0$ the angle
893: $\bar\theta_{p,n}\rightarrow 0$. In order to solve the equation
894: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,=\,0$ for small $\theta$, let us expand
895: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ in Taylor series around $\theta=0$. It turns
896: out \cite{Camino} that the first non-vanishing derivative of
897: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ at $\theta=0$ is the $(6-p)^{th}$ one and,
898: actually, near $\theta=0$, we can write:
899: \beq
900: \Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)\,\approx\,\Lambda_{p,n}(0)\,+\,\theta^{6-p}\,
901: +\,\cdots\,\,.
902: \label{ccuatro}
903: \eeq
904: It follows immediately that for $N\rightarrow\infty$ the value of
905: $\bar\theta_{p,n}$ is given by:
906: \beq
907: \big(\,\bar\theta_{p,n}\,\big)^{6-p}\,\approx\,-\Lambda_{p,n}(0)\,\,.
908: \label{ccinco}
909: \eeq
910: Taking into account eq. (\ref{vnueve}) and the general expression of
911: the energy density (eq. (\ref{tcinco})), we can easily verify that:
912: \beq
913: \lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}\,{\cal E}_{p,n}\,=\,n\,T_f\,\,,
914: \label{cseis}
915: \eeq
916: a fact which can be verified directly for $p=4,5$ from our analytical
917: expressions of the energy density (eqs. (\ref{tnueve}) and
918: (\ref{cdos})). It is now clear from eq. (\ref{cseis}) that our
919: configurations can be interpreted as bound states of $n$ fundamental
920: strings. Actually, one can prove quite generally that the following
921: inequality holds:
922: \beq
923: {\cal E}_{p,n}\,\le\,n\,T_f\,\,,
924: \label{extracuatro}
925: \eeq
926: which shows that the formation of our bound states is energetically
927: favored. This is an indication of their stability, which we will
928: verify directly in section 2.3.
929:
930: In order to prove (\ref{extracuatro}), it is very useful again to
931: consider the dependence of the energy on $1/N$. Notice that for
932: $1/N\rightarrow 0$ both sides of eq. (\ref{extracuatro}) are equal (see
933: eq. (\ref{cseis}) ). The energy ${\cal E}_{p,n}$ depends on $1/N$
934: both explicitly and implicitly (through $\bar\theta_{p,n}$). If we
935: consider $1/N$ as a continuous variable, then one has:
936: \beq
937: {d\over d\Big({1\over N}\Big)}\,\,\bar\theta_{p,n}\,\,=\,\,
938: {nNT_f\over (6-p)\,{\cal E}_{p,n}}\,\,\sin\bar\theta_{p,n}\,\,.
939: \label{extracinco}
940: \eeq
941: Eq. (\ref{extracinco}) is obtained by differentiating eq.
942: (\ref{vsiete}) and using eqs. (\ref{vocho}) and (\ref{vnueve}) (the
943: latter determines the explicit dependence of $\Lambda_{p,n}$ on
944: $1/N$). We are now ready to demonstrate (\ref{extracuatro}). For this
945: purpose let us consider the quantity $({\cal E}_{p,n}-n\,T_f)/N$, which
946: we will regard as a function of $1/N$. We must prove that this quantity
947: is always less or equal than zero. Clearly, eq. (\ref{cseis}) implies
948: that $({\cal E}_{p,n}-n\,T_f)/N\rightarrow 0$ for
949: $1/N\rightarrow 0$. Moreover, by using (\ref{extracinco}) it is
950: straightforward to compute the derivative:
951: \beq
952: {d\over d\Big({1\over N}\Big)}\,\,\Bigg[\,
953: {{\cal E}_{p,n}-n\,T_f\over N}\,\Bigg]\,=\,-n\,T_f\,\,
954: (\,1\,-\,\cos\bar\theta_{p,n}\,)\,\,,
955: \label{extraseis}
956: \eeq
957: which vanishes for $N\rightarrow \infty$ and is always negative for
958: finite $N$ and $0<n<N$. Thus, it follows that $({\cal E}_{p,n}-n\,T_f)/N$
959: is negative for finite $N$ and, necessarily, eq. (\ref{extracuatro})
960: holds.
961:
962: As a further check of (\ref{extracuatro}) one can compute the first
963: correction to ${\cal E}_{p,n}-n\,T_f$ for finite $N$. By Taylor
964: expanding ${\cal E}_{p,n}$ in powers of $1/N$, and using eq.
965: (\ref{extracinco}), one can prove that:
966: \beq
967: {\cal E}_{p,n}\,\,-\,\,n\,T_f\,\approx\,\,-
968: \,{6-p\over 2(8-p)}\,\,n\,T_f\,\,\,\Big(\,
969: {\cal C}_{p,n}(0)\,\Big)^{{2\over 6-p}}\,\,+\,\cdots\,\,,
970: \label{extrasiete}
971: \eeq
972: where ${\cal C}_{p,n}(0)$, which is of order $1/N$, has been given in
973: eq. (\ref{vnueve}).
974:
975:
976:
977:
978:
979:
980:
981:
982: \medskip
983: \subsection{BPS configurations and the baryon vertex}
984: \medskip
985: In this section we shall show that the wrapped configurations found
986: above solve a BPS differential equation. With this purpose in mind,
987: let us now come back to the more general situation in which the angle
988: $\theta$ depends on the radial coordinate $r$. The hamiltonian for a
989: general function $\theta(r)$ was given in eq. (\ref{vcuatro}). By
990: means of a simple calculation it can be verified that this hamiltonian
991: can be written as:
992:
993: \beq
994: H\,=\,T_{8-p}\,\Omega_{7-p}\,R^{7-p}\,\int dr\,
995: \sqrt{\,{\cal Z}^2\,+\,{\cal Y}^2}\,\,,
996: \label{csiete}
997: \eeq
998: where, for any function $\theta(r)$, ${\cal Z}$ is a total derivative:
999: \beq
1000: {\cal Z}\,=\,{d\over dr}\,\Big[\,r\Big(\,
1001: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{6-p}\,-\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,
1002: )\,{\rm cos}\,\theta\, \,\Big)\,\Big]\,\,,
1003: \label{cocho}
1004: \eeq
1005: and ${\cal Y}$ is given by:
1006: \beq
1007: {\cal Y}\,=\,{\rm sin}\,\theta\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)\,
1008: -\,r\theta\,'\,\Big[\,({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{6-p}\,-\,
1009: \Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)\,{\rm cos}\,\theta\,\Big]\,\,.
1010: \label{cnueve}
1011: \eeq
1012: It follows from eq. (\ref{csiete}) that $H$ is bounded as:
1013: \beq
1014: H\,\ge\,T_{8-p}\,\Omega_{7-p}\,R^{7-p}\,\int dr\,
1015: \big |\,{\cal Z}\,\big |\,\,.
1016: \label{cincuenta}
1017: \eeq
1018: Since ${\cal Z}$ is a total derivative, the bound on the right-hand
1019: side of eq. (\ref{cincuenta}) only depends on the boundary values of
1020: $\theta(r)$. This implies that any $\theta(r)$ saturating the bound is
1021: also a solution of the equations of motion. This saturation of the
1022: bound clearly occurs when ${\cal Y}\,=\,0$ or, taking into account eq.
1023: (\ref{cnueve}), when $\theta(r)$ satisfies the following first-order
1024: differential equation:
1025: \beq
1026: \theta\,'\,=\,{1\over r}\, \,\,
1027: {{\rm sin}\,\theta\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)\over
1028: ({\rm sin}\,\theta)^{6-p}\,-\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)
1029: \,{\rm cos}\,\theta}\,\,.
1030: \label{ciuno}
1031: \eeq
1032: It is straightforward to verify directly that any solution $\theta(r)$
1033: of eq. (\ref{ciuno}) also solves the second-order
1034: differential equations of motion derived from the hamiltonian of eq.
1035: (\ref{vcuatro}). Moreover, by using eq. (\ref{ciuno}) to evaluate the
1036: right-hand side of eq. (\ref{vdos}), one can demonstrate that the BPS
1037: differential equation is equivalent to the following relation between
1038: the electric field $F_{0,r}$ and $\theta(r)$:
1039: \beq
1040: F_{0,r}\,=\,\partial_r\,(\,r\,{\rm cos}\,\theta\,)\,=\,
1041: {\rm cos}\,\theta\,-\,r\theta\,'\,{\rm sin}\,\theta\,\,.
1042: \label{cidos}
1043: \eeq
1044: Notice now that eq. (\ref{ciuno}) admits solutions with
1045: $\theta={\rm constant}$ if and only if $\theta\,=\,0\,,\,\pi$
1046: or when $\theta$ is a zero of
1047: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)$. Thus our wrapped configurations are
1048: certainly solutions of the BPS differential equation. As a
1049: confirmation of this fact, let us point out that, for constant
1050: $\theta$, the electric field of eq. (\ref{cidos}) reduces to the value
1051: displayed in eq. (\ref{tseis}).
1052:
1053: Eq. (\ref{ciuno}) was first proposed (for $p=3$) in ref. \cite{Imamura} to
1054: describe the baryon vertex (see also refs. \cite{CGS, Craps, Camino})
1055: \footnote{In these studies of the baryon vertex a different choice of
1056: worldvolume coordinates is performed. Instead of taking these
1057: coordinates as in eq. (\ref{doce}), one takes
1058: $\sigma^{\alpha}\,=\,(\,t\,,\,
1059: \theta^1\,,\,\cdots\,,\,\theta^{7-p}\,,\,\theta\,\,)$ and the embedding
1060: of the D(8-p)-brane is described by a function
1061: $r\,=\,r(\sigma^{\alpha})$.}. In ref. \cite{kappa} it was verified, by
1062: looking at the $\kappa$-symmetry of the brane probe, that the condition
1063: (\ref{cidos}) is enough to preserve $1/4$ of the bulk supersymmetry.
1064: Actually, following the results of ref. \cite{Camino}, it is not
1065: difficult to obtain the general solution of the BPS differential equation
1066: (\ref{ciuno}). In implicit form this solution can be written as:
1067: \beq
1068: {[\,\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)\,]^{{1\over 6-p}}\over
1069: {\rm sin}\,\theta}\,=\,C\,r\,\,,
1070: \label{citres}
1071: \eeq
1072: \begin{figure}
1073: \centerline{\hskip -.8in \epsffile{fig2.eps}}
1074: \caption{Representation of a typical solution of the BPS equation
1075: (\ref{citres}) for $C\not= 0$. In this plot $r$ and $\theta$ are the
1076: polar coordinates of the plane of the figure. We have also plotted the
1077: $\theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{p,n}$ curve, which is the solution of
1078: (\ref{citres}) for $C= 0$.}
1079: \label{fig2}
1080: \end{figure}
1081: where $C$ is a constant. Our constant angle solutions
1082: $\theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{p,n}$ can be obtained from eq.~(\ref{citres})
1083: by taking $C=0$, whereas the baryon vertex solutions correspond to
1084: $C\not= 0$. A glance at eq.~(\ref{citres}) reveals that, by
1085: consistency, $\theta$ must be restricted to take values in an interval
1086: such that the function $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)$ has a fixed sign. If,
1087: for example, $\theta\in(0,\bar\theta_{p,n})$, then
1088: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)<0$ and, by redefining the phase of $C$, we
1089: get a consistent solution in which $r$ is a non-negative real number.
1090: Similarly, we could have $\theta\in(\bar\theta_{p,n},\pi)$ since
1091: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta\,)>0$ for these values. In both cases
1092: $\bar\theta_{p,n}$ is a limiting angle. Actually, for
1093: $0<n<N$ one immediately infers from eq. (\ref{citres}) that
1094: $\bar\theta_{p,n}$ is the angle reached when $r\rightarrow 0$. The
1095: baryon vertex solutions behave \cite{CGS,Craps, Camino} as a bundle of
1096: fundamental strings in the asymptotic region $r\rightarrow \infty$ (see
1097: figure 2). The number of fundamental strings is precisely $n$ for the
1098: solution with
1099: $\theta\in(0,\bar\theta_{p,n})$ (and $N-n$ when
1100: $\theta\in(\bar\theta_{p,n},\pi)\,$). Notice that $r\rightarrow
1101: \infty$ when $\theta=0$ ($\theta=\pi$) for the solution with $n$
1102: ($N-n$) fundamental strings, whereas in the opposite limit
1103: $r\rightarrow 0$ the solution displayed in eq. (\ref{citres}) is
1104: equivalent to our $\theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{p,n}$ wrapped
1105: configuration. This is quite suggestive and implies that one can
1106: regard our constant angle configurations as a short distance limit (in
1107: the radial direction) of the baryon vertex solutions.
1108:
1109:
1110: \medskip
1111: \subsection{Fluctuations and stability}
1112: \medskip
1113: We are now going to study fluctuations around the static
1114: configurations found above. Let us parametrize these fluctuations as
1115: follows:
1116: \beq
1117: \theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{p,n}\,+\,\xi\,\,,
1118: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1119: F_{0,r}\,=\,\cos\bar\theta_{p,n}\,+\,f\,\,,
1120: \label{cicuatro}
1121: \eeq
1122: where $\xi$ and $f$ are small quantities which depend on the worldvolume
1123: coordinates $\sigma^{\alpha}$. We are going to prove in this section
1124: that the $\theta=\bar\theta_{p,n}$ solution is stable under the
1125: perturbation of eq. (\ref{cicuatro}). In order to achieve this goal we
1126: must go back to the action written in eq. (\ref{diez}). We shall
1127: evaluate this action for an angle $\theta$ and an electric field as in
1128: eq. (\ref{cicuatro}). Let us represent the perturbation $f$
1129: by means of a potential as $f\,=\,\partial_0a_r\,-\,\partial_ra_0$.
1130: We shall choose a gauge in which the components $a_{\hat i\,}$ of the
1131: potential along the sphere $S^{7-p}$ vanish.
1132: Then we see that, for consistency, we must include in our
1133: perturbation the components of the gauge field strength of the type
1134: $F_{\hat i\,,r}\,=\,\partial_{\hat i\,}a_r$ and
1135: $F_{0,\hat i}\,=\,-\partial_{\hat i\,}a_0$. Under these circumstances
1136: it is not difficult to compute the lagrangian density for the action
1137: (\ref{diez}) up to second order in $\xi$, $f$, $F_{\hat i\,,r}$
1138: and $F_{0,\hat i}$.
1139: After some calculation one gets:
1140: \bear
1141: {\cal L}\,&=&\,-\sqrt {\hat g}\,R^{7-p}\,T_{8-p}\,
1142: \Lambda_{p,n}(0)\,f\,+\,\sqrt {\hat g}\,R^{7-p}\,T_{8-p}\,
1143: (\,\sin\bar\theta\,)^{6-p}\,\times\rc\rc
1144: &\times&{1\over 2}\Bigg\{\,
1145: R^{7-p}\,r^{p-5}\,(\,\partial_0\xi\,)^2\,-\,
1146: r^2\,(\,\partial_r\xi\,)^2\,-\,(\,\partial_{\hat i\,}
1147: \xi\,)^2\,+\,\rc\rc
1148: &+&{R^{p-7}\,r^{5-p}\over
1149: (\sin\bar\theta)^2}\,\big[\,\Bigg({R\over r}\Bigg)^{7-p}\,F_{0,\,\hat
1150: i}^2\,-\, F_{\hat i,\,r}^2\,\big]\,+\,
1151: \,(7-p)\xi^2\,+\,{f^2\over (\sin\bar\theta)^2}\,+\,
1152: 2(7-p)\,\,{f\xi\over \sin\bar\theta}\,\,\Bigg\}\,\,,\rc
1153: \label{cicinco}
1154: \eear
1155: where, to simplify the notation, we have written
1156: $\bar\theta$ instead of $\bar\theta_{p,n}\,$, $\hat g_{\hat i\,\hat j}$
1157: represents the metric of the $S^{7-p}$ sphere and we have denoted:
1158: \beq
1159: (\,\partial_{\hat i\,}\xi\,)^2\,=\,\hat
1160: g^{\hat i\,\hat j}\partial_{\hat i\,}\xi\,
1161: \partial_{\hat j\,}\xi\,\,,
1162: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1163: F_{\hat i,\,r}^2\,=\,\hat g^{\hat i\hat j}F_{\hat i,\,r}\,F_{\hat j,\,r}
1164: \,\,,
1165: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1166: F_{0\,,\hat i}^2\,=\,\hat g^{\hat i\hat j}F_{0\,,\hat i}
1167: \,F_{0\,,\hat j}
1168: \,\,.
1169: \label{ciseis}
1170: \eeq
1171: In eq. (\ref{cicinco}) we have dropped the zero-order term.
1172: Moreover, the first term on the right-hand side of eq.
1173: (\ref{cicinco}) is a first-order term which, however, does not
1174: contribute to the equations of motion. In fact, by computing the
1175: variation of the action with respect to $a_0$, $a_r$ and $\xi$ we get
1176: the following set of equations:
1177: \bear
1178: &&\partial_r\,\Big[\,{f\over \sin\bar\theta}\,
1179: +\,(7-p)\,\xi\,\Big]\,+\,
1180: {1\over r^2\,\sqrt{\hat g}}\,
1181: \partial_{\hat i\,}\,\Big[\,\sqrt{\hat g}\,\hat g^{\hat i\,\hat j}\,
1182: {F_{0,\hat j}\over \sin\bar\theta}\,\Big]\,
1183: \,=\,0\,\,,\rc\rc
1184: &&r^{p-5}\,R^{7-p}\partial_{0}\,\Big[\,{f\over \sin\bar\theta}\,
1185: +\,(7-p)\,\xi\,\Big]\,-\,{1\over \sqrt{\hat g}}\,
1186: \partial_{\hat i\,}\,\Big[\,\sqrt{\hat g}\,\hat g^{\hat i\,\hat j}\,
1187: {F_{\hat j,\,r}\over \sin\bar\theta}\,\Big]\,=\,0\,\,,\rc\rc
1188: &&R^{7-p}r^{p-5}\,\partial_0^2\xi\,-\,
1189: \partial_r(r^2\partial_r\xi)\,-\,\nabla^2_{S^{(7-p)}}\,\xi\,+\,
1190: (p-7)\,\Big[\,\xi\,+\,{f\over \sin\bar\theta}\,\Big]\,=\,0\,\,.\rc
1191: \label{cisiete}
1192: \eear
1193: The first equation in (\ref{cisiete}) is nothing but the Gauss law.
1194: Moreover, if we further fix the gauge to $a_0=0$
1195: (\ie\ $f\,=\,\partial_0a_r$,
1196: $F_{\hat i,\,r}\,=\,\partial_{\hat i\,}a_r$ and
1197: $F_{0,\hat i}\,=\,0$), the second equation in (\ref{cisiete}) can be
1198: written as:
1199: \beq
1200: r^{p-5}\,R^{7-p}\,\Big[\,{\partial_{0}^2a_r\over \sin\bar\theta}\,+\,
1201: (7-p)\,\partial_{0}\xi\,\Big]\,-\,{1\over \sin\bar\theta}\,
1202: \nabla^2_{S^{(7-p)}}\,a_r\,=\,0\,\,,
1203: \label{ciocho}
1204: \eeq
1205: where $\nabla^2_{S^{(7-p)}}$ is the laplacian operator on the
1206: $S^{(7-p)}$ sphere. In order to continue with our analysis,
1207: let us now expand $a_r$ and $\xi$ in spherical harmonics of
1208: $S^{(7-p)}$:
1209: \bear
1210: &&a_r(\,t,r,\theta^1,\cdots,\theta^{7-p}\,)\,=\,
1211: \sum_{l\ge 0, m}\,Y_{l,m}(\,\theta^1,\cdots,\theta^{7-p}\,)\,
1212: \alpha_{l,m}(\,t,r\,)\,\,,\rc\rc
1213: &&
1214: \xi(\,t,r,\theta^1,\cdots,\theta^{7-p}\,)\,=\,
1215: \sum_{l\ge 0, m}\,Y_{l,m}(\,\theta^1,\cdots,\theta^{7-p}\,)\,
1216: \zeta_{l,m}(\,t,r\,)\,\,.\rc
1217: \label{cinueve}
1218: \eear
1219: The spherical harmonics $Y_{l,m}$ are well-defined functions on
1220: $S^{(7-p)}$ which are eigenfunctions of the laplacian on the sphere,
1221: namely:
1222: \beq
1223: \nabla^2_{S^{(7-p)}}\,Y_{l,m}\,=\,
1224: -l(l+6-p)\,Y_{l,m}\,\,.
1225: \label{sesenta}
1226: \eeq
1227: By plugging the mode expansion (\ref{cinueve}) into the equations of
1228: motion (\ref{cisiete}) and (\ref{ciocho}), and using eq.
1229: (\ref{sesenta}), we can obtain some equations for
1230: $\alpha_{l,m}(\,t,r\,)$ and $\zeta_{l,m}(\,t,r\,)$. Actually, if we
1231: define:
1232: \beq
1233: \eta_{l,m}\,\equiv\,
1234: {\partial_{0}\alpha_{l,m}\over\sin\bar\theta}\,+\,(7-p)\,\zeta_{l,m}
1235: \,\,,
1236: \label{suno}
1237: \eeq
1238: then, the Gauss law in this $a_0\,=\,a_{\hat i}\,=\,0$ gauge can be
1239: simply written as:
1240: \beq
1241: \partial_{r}\,\eta_{l,m}\,=\,0\,\,,
1242: \label{sdos}
1243: \eeq
1244: whereas the other two equations of motion give rise to:
1245: \bear
1246: &&R^{7-p}\,r^{p-5}\,\partial_0\,\Big[\,
1247: {\partial_{0}\alpha_{l,m}\over\sin\bar\theta}\,+\,(7-p)\,\zeta_{l,m}
1248: \,\Big]\,+\,l(l+6-p)\, {\alpha_{l,m}\over\sin\bar\theta}\,=\,0\,\,,
1249: \rc\rc
1250: &&R^{7-p}\,r^{p-5}\,\partial_0^2\zeta_{l,m}\,-\,
1251: \partial_r(\,r^2\,\partial_r\,\zeta_{l,m})\,
1252: +\,l(l+6-p)\,\zeta_{l,m}\,+\rc\rc
1253: &&+\,(p-7)\,\Big[\,\zeta_{l,m}\,+
1254: {\partial_{0}\alpha_{l,m}\over\sin\bar\theta}\,\Big]\,=\,0\,\,.
1255: \rc
1256: \label{stres}
1257: \eear
1258: Let us analyze first eqs. (\ref{sdos}) and (\ref{stres}) for
1259: $l=0$. From the first equation in (\ref{stres}) it follows that:
1260: \beq
1261: \partial_0\eta_{0,m}\,=\,0\,\,.
1262: \label{scuatro}
1263: \eeq
1264: Thus, as $\partial_r\eta_{0,m}\,=\,0$ (see eq. (\ref{sdos})), one
1265: concludes that:
1266: \beq
1267: \eta_{0,m}\,=\,{\rm constant}\,\,.
1268: \label{scinco}
1269: \eeq
1270: By using this result and the definition of $\eta_{l,m}$ given in eq.
1271: (\ref{suno}), we can express $\partial_0\,\alpha_{0,m}$ in terms of
1272: $\zeta_{0,m}$ and the additive constant appearing in eq.
1273: (\ref{scinco}). By substituting this relation in the second equation
1274: in (\ref{stres}), we get:
1275: \beq
1276: R^{7-p}\,r^{p-5}\,\partial_0^2\zeta_{0,m}\,-\,
1277: \partial_r(\,r^2\,\partial_r\,\zeta_{0,m})\,+\,
1278: (6-p)(7-p)\,\zeta_{0,m}\,=\,{\rm constant}\,\,.
1279: \label{sseis}
1280: \eeq
1281: It is interesting to rewrite eq. (\ref{sseis}) in the following form.
1282: First of all, we define the wave operator ${\cal O}_p$ that acts on any
1283: function $\psi$ as:
1284: \beq
1285: {\cal O}_p\,\psi\equiv\,R^{7-p}\,r^{p-5}\,\partial_0^2\,\psi\,-\,
1286: \partial_r\,(\,r^2\,\partial_r\psi\,)\,\,.
1287: \label{ssiete}
1288: \eeq
1289: Then, if $m^2_0$ is given by:
1290: \beq
1291: m^2_0\,=\,(6-p)(7-p)\,\,,
1292: \label{socho}
1293: \eeq
1294: eq. (\ref{sseis}) can be written as:
1295: \beq
1296: \Big(\,\,{\cal O}_p\,+\,m^2_0\,\,\Big)\,\zeta_{0,m}\,
1297: =\,{\rm constant}\,\,,
1298: \label{snueve}
1299: \eeq
1300: which means that $\zeta_{0,m}$ is a massive mode with mass $m_0$.
1301: Notice that, as $p<6$, $m^2_0$ is strictly positive.
1302:
1303: For a general value of $l>0$ the equations of motion can be
1304: conveniently expressed in terms of the variables $\eta_{l,m}$ and
1305: $\zeta_{l,m}$. Indeed, by differentiating with respect to the time the
1306: first equation (\ref{stres}), and using the definition (\ref{suno}),
1307: we can put them in terms of $\eta_{l,m}$ and
1308: $\zeta_{l,m}$. Actually, if we define the mass matrix ${\cal M}_p$ as:
1309: \beq
1310: {\cal M}_p\,=\,\pmatrix{
1311: l\,(l+6-p)\,+\,(7-p)\,(6-p)&&p-7\cr\cr
1312: (p-7)\,l\,(l+6-p)&&l\,(l+6-p)}\,\,,
1313: \label{setenta}
1314: \eeq
1315: the equations of motion can be written as:
1316: \beq
1317: \Big(\,\,{\cal O}_p\,+\,{\cal M}_p\,\,\Big)\,
1318: \pmatrix{\zeta_{l,m}\cr\eta_{l,m}}
1319: =\,0\,\,,
1320: \label{stuno}
1321: \eeq
1322: where ${\cal O}_p$ is the wave operator defined in eq. (\ref{ssiete}).
1323: In order to check that our wrapped configurations are stable, we must
1324: verify that the eigenvalues of the matrix ${\cal M}_p$ are
1325: non-negative. After a simple calculation one can show that these
1326: eigenvalues are:
1327: \beq
1328: m_l^2\,=\,\cases{(l+6-p)\,(l+7-p)&for $l=0,1,\cdots \,\,,$\cr\cr
1329: l\,(l-1)&for $l=1,2,\cdots\,\,,$\cr}
1330: \label{stdos}
1331: \eeq
1332: where we have already included the $l=0$ case. Eq. (\ref{stdos})
1333: proves that there are not negative mass modes in the spectrum of
1334: small oscillations for $p<6$, which demonstrates that, as claimed, our
1335: static solutions are stable.
1336:
1337:
1338:
1339:
1340:
1341:
1342: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1343: \section{Flux stabilization of M5-branes}
1344: \medskip
1345:
1346: In this section we are going to describe a mechanism of flux
1347: stabilization in M-theory. We shall consider a particular solution of
1348: the equations of motion of eleven dimensional supergravity which is
1349: the one associated to a stack of $N$ parallel M5-branes. The metric of
1350: this solution takes the form \cite{supergravity}:
1351: \beq
1352: ds^2\,=\,{r\over R}\,(-dt^2\,+\,dx^1\,+\cdots +\,dx_5^2\,)\,+\,
1353: {R^2\over r^2}\,(dr^2\,+\,r^2\,d\Omega_4^2\,)\,\,,
1354: \label{sttres}
1355: \eeq
1356: where the ``radius" $R$ is given by:
1357: \beq
1358: R^3\,=\,\pi\, N\,l_p^3\,\,.
1359: \label{stcuatro}
1360: \eeq
1361: In eq. (\ref{stcuatro}) $l_p$ is the Planck length in eleven
1362: dimensions. The M5-brane solution of D=11 supergravity has also a
1363: non-vanishing value of the four-form field strength $F^{(4)}$, under
1364: which the M5-branes are magnetically charged. This field strength
1365: is given by:
1366: \beq
1367: F^{(4)}\,=\,3\,R^3\,\epsilon_{(4)}\,\,.
1368: \label{stcinco}
1369: \eeq
1370: It is not difficult to find a three-form potential $C^{(3)}$ such that
1371: $F^{(4)}\,=\,dC^{(3)}$. Actually, if we decompose the $S^4$ line
1372: element $d\Omega_4^2$ as in eq. (\ref{cinco}) and use the same
1373: orientation conventions as in section 2, one can readily check that
1374: $C^{(3)}$ can be taken as:
1375: \beq
1376: C^{(3)}\,=\,-R^3\,C_4(\theta)\epsilon_{(3 )}\,\,,
1377: \label{stseis}
1378: \eeq
1379: where $C_4(\theta)$ is the function
1380: defined in eqs. (\ref{seis}) and (\ref{siete}), namely
1381: $C_4(\theta)\,=\,\cos\theta\sin^2\theta\,+\,2(\cos\theta\,-\,1)$.
1382:
1383:
1384: We will put in this background a probe M5-brane, whose action will be
1385: given by the so-called PST formalism \cite{PST}. The fields of this
1386: formalism include a three-form field strength $F$, whose potential is a
1387: two-form field $A$ (\ie\ $F=dA$) and a scalar field $a$ (the PST scalar).
1388: The field strength $F$ can be combined with (the pullback of) the
1389: background potential $C^{(3)}$ to form the field
1390: \footnote{We hope that this field $H$ will not be confused with the
1391: hamiltonian.} $H$ as:
1392: \beq
1393: H\,=\,F\,-\,C^{(3)}\,\,.
1394: \label{stsiete}
1395: \eeq
1396: Let us now define the field ${\tilde H}$ as follows:
1397: \beq
1398: {\tilde H}^{ij}\,=\,{1\over 3!\,\sqrt{-{\rm det}\,g}}\,
1399: {1\over \sqrt{-(\partial a)^2}}\,
1400: \epsilon^{ijklmn}\,\partial_k\,a\,H_{lmn}\,\,,
1401: \label{stocho}
1402: \eeq
1403: where $g$ is the induced metric on the M5-brane worldvolume.
1404: The PST action of the M5-brane probe is:
1405: \bear
1406: S\,&=&\,T_{M5}\,\int\,d^6\sigma\,
1407: \Bigg[\,-\sqrt{-{\rm det}(g\,+\,\tilde H)}\,+\,
1408: {\sqrt{-{\rm det}g}\over 4\partial a\cdot\partial a}\,
1409: \partial_i a\,(^*H)^{ijk}\,H_{jkl}\partial^l a\,
1410: \Bigg]\,+\rc\rc
1411: &&+\,T_{M5}\int\Bigg[\,C^{(6)}\,
1412: +\,{1\over 2}\,F\wedge\,C^{(3)}\,\Bigg]\,\,,
1413: \label{stnueve}
1414: \eear
1415: where $^*H$ denotes the Hodge dual of $H$, $C^{(6)}$ is (the pullback
1416: of) the 6-form potential dual to $C^{(3)}$, and the M5-brane tension is
1417: given by:
1418: \beq
1419: T_{M5}\,=\,{1\over (2\pi)^5\,l_p^6}\,\,.
1420: \label{ochenta}
1421: \eeq
1422:
1423: We will extend our M5-brane probe along the directions transverse to
1424: the M5-branes of the background and along one of the directions
1425: parallel to them. Without loss of generality we will take the latter to
1426: be the $x^5$ direction. Accordingly, our worldvolume coordinates
1427: $\sigma^{\alpha}$ will be taken to be:
1428: \beq
1429: \sigma^{\alpha}\,=\,(\,t,r,x^5,\theta^1,\theta^2,\theta^3)\,\,,
1430: \label{ouno}
1431: \eeq
1432: and the embedding of the M5-brane probe is determined by a function
1433: $\theta\,=\,\theta(\,\sigma^{\alpha}\,)$. As in the case of the RR
1434: background, we shall mainly look for solutions with
1435: $\theta\,=\,{\rm constant}$, which represent a M5-brane wrapped on a
1436: three-sphere and extended along the $r$ and $x^5$ directions.
1437:
1438: As discussed in ref. \cite{PST}, the scalar $a$ is an auxiliary
1439: field which can be eliminated from the action by fixing its gauge
1440: symmetry. The price one must pay for this gauge fixing is the loss of
1441: manifest covariance. A particularly convenient choice for $a$ is:
1442: \beq
1443: a\,=\,x^5\,\,.
1444: \label{odos}
1445: \eeq
1446: In this gauge the components of the worldvolume potential $A$ with
1447: $x^5$ as one of its indices can be gauge fixed to zero \cite{PST}.
1448: Moreover, if we consider configurations of $A$ and of the embedding angle
1449: $\theta$ which are independent of $x^5$, one readily realizes that the
1450: components of the three-forms $F$ and $H$ along $x^5$ also vanish and,
1451: as a consequence, only the square root term of the PST action
1452: (\ref{stnueve}) is non-vanishing. As we will verify soon this
1453: constitutes a great simplification.
1454:
1455:
1456:
1457:
1458: \medskip
1459: \subsection{Quantization condition and M5-brane configurations}
1460: \medskip
1461:
1462: In order to find stable $S^3$-wrapped configurations of the M5-brane
1463: probe, we need to switch on a non-vanishing worldvolume field which
1464: could prevent the collapse to one of the poles of the $S^3$. As in
1465: section 2 (and ref. \cite{Bachas}) the value of this worldvolume field
1466: is determined by some quantization condition which can be obtained by
1467: coupling the M5-brane to an open M2-brane.
1468:
1469: \begin{figure}
1470: \centerline{\hskip -.8in \epsffile{fig3.eps}}
1471: \caption{An M2-brane with worldvolume $\Sigma$ having its boundary on
1472: the worldvolume of an M5-brane. If $\Sigma$ is attached to a submanifold
1473: of the M5-brane worldvolume with the topology of $S^3$, there are two
1474: possible disks $D$ and $D'$ on the $S^3$ whose boundary is $\partial
1475: \Sigma$.}
1476: \label{fig3}
1477: \end{figure}
1478:
1479:
1480: Let us consider an open M2-brane with worldvolume given by a
1481: three-manifold $\Sigma$ whose boundary $\partial\Sigma$
1482: lies on the worldvolume of an
1483: M5-brane. For simplicity we shall consider the case
1484: in which $\partial\Sigma$ has only one
1485: component (see figure 3). Clearly, $\partial\Sigma$ is also the boundary
1486: of some disk $D$ on the worldvolume of the M5-brane. Let $\hat\Sigma$ be a
1487: four-manifold whose boundaries are $\Sigma$ and $D$, \ie\
1488: $\partial\hat\Sigma\,=\,\Sigma\,+\,D$. The coupling of the brane
1489: to the supergravity background and to the M5-brane is described by an
1490: action of the form:
1491:
1492: \beq
1493: S_{int}\,[\,\hat\Sigma, D\,]\,=\,
1494: T_{M2}\,\int_{\hat\Sigma}\,F^{(4)}\,+\,T_{M2}\,\int_{D}\,H\,\,,
1495: \label{otres}
1496: \eeq
1497: where $T_{M2}$ is the tension of the M2-brane, given by:
1498: \beq
1499: T_{M2}\,=\,{1\over (2\pi)^2\,l_p^3}\,\,.
1500: \label{ocuatro}
1501: \eeq
1502: In a topologically trivial situation, if we represent $F^{(4)}$ as
1503: $dC^{(3)}$ and $F=dA$, the above action reduces to the more familiar
1504: expression:
1505: \beq
1506: S_{int}\,=\,T_{M2}\,\int_{\Sigma}\,C^{(3)}\,+
1507: \,T_{M2}\,\int_{\partial D}\,A\,\,.
1508: \label{ocinco}
1509: \eeq
1510:
1511: We shall regard eq. (\ref{otres}) as the definition of the interaction
1512: term of the M2-brane action. Notice that, in general, $\hat\Sigma$ and
1513: $D$ are not uniquely defined. To illustrate this point let us consider
1514: the case in which we attach the M2-brane to a M5-brane worldvolume which
1515: has some submanifold with the topology of $S^3$. This is precisely the
1516: situation in which we are interested in. As illustrated in figure 3, we
1517: have two possible elections for the disk in eq. (\ref{otres}) namely,
1518: we can choose the ``internal" disk $D$ or the ``external" disk
1519: $D'$. Changing $D\rightarrow D'$, the manifold $\hat\Sigma$ changes to
1520: $\hat\Sigma'$, with $\partial \hat\Sigma'\,=\,\Sigma\,+\,D'$ and, in
1521: general, $S_{int}$ also changes. However, in the quantum-mechanical
1522: theory, the action appears in a complex exponential of the form
1523: $\exp[\,i\,S_{int}\,]$. Thus, we should require that:
1524: \beq
1525: e^{iS_{int}\,[\,\hat\Sigma, D\,]}\,=\,
1526: e^{iS_{int}\,[\,\hat\Sigma', D'\,]}\,\,.
1527: \label{oseis}
1528: \eeq
1529: The condition (\ref{oseis}) is clearly equivalent to:
1530: \beq
1531: S_{int}\,[\,\hat\Sigma', D'\,]\,-\,S_{int}\,[\,\hat\Sigma, D\,]\,=\,
1532: 2\pi n\,\,,
1533: \label{osiete}
1534: \eeq
1535: with $n\in\ZZ$. The left-hand side of eq. (\ref{osiete}) can be
1536: straightforwardly computed from eq. (\ref{otres}). Actually,
1537: if $\hat{\cal B}$ is the 4-ball bounded by $D'\cup(-D)\,=\,S^3$,
1538: one has:
1539: \beq
1540: S_{int}\,[\,\hat\Sigma', D'\,]\,-\,S_{int}\,[\,\hat\Sigma, D\,]\,=\,
1541: T_{M2}\,\int_{\hat{\cal B}}\,F^{(4)}\,+\,T_{M2}\,
1542: \int_{\partial\hat{\cal B}}\,H\,\,.
1543: \label{oocho}
1544: \eeq
1545: Using this result in eq. (\ref{osiete}), we get the condition:
1546: \beq
1547: \int_{\hat{\cal B}}\,F^{(4)}\,+\,
1548: \int_{\partial\hat{\cal B}}\,H\,=\,{2\pi n\over T_{M2}}\,,
1549: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1550: n\in\ZZ\,\,.
1551: \label{onueve}
1552: \eeq
1553: If $F^{(4)}$ can be represented as $dC^{(3)}$ on $\hat{\cal B}$, the
1554: first integral on the left-hand side of eq. (\ref{onueve})
1555: can be written as an integral of $C^{(3)}$ over
1556: $\partial\hat{\cal B}\,=\,S^3$. Our parametrization of $C^{(3)}$
1557: (eq. (\ref{stseis})) is certainly non-singular if we are
1558: outside of the poles of the $S^4$. If this is the case we get the
1559: quantization condition:
1560: \beq
1561: \int_{S^3}\,F\,=\,{2\pi n\over T_{M2}}\,\,,
1562: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1563: n\in\ZZ\,\,.
1564: \label{noventa}
1565: \eeq
1566: Eq. (\ref{noventa}), which is the M-theory analogue of eq.
1567: (\ref{uno}), is the quantization condition we were looking for. It is
1568: very simple to obtain a solution of this equation. Let us take
1569: $F$ proportional to the volume element $\epsilon_{(3)}$ of the $S^3$.
1570: Taking into account that the volume of the unit three-sphere is
1571: $\Omega_3\,=\,2\pi^2$ (see eq. (\ref{dnueve})), we can write down
1572: immediately the following solution of eq. (\ref{noventa}):
1573: \beq
1574: F\,=\,{n\over \pi T_{M2}}\,\,\epsilon_{(3)}\,\,.
1575: \label{nuno}
1576: \eeq
1577: We can put this solution in a more convenient form if we use the
1578: following relation between the M2-brane tension and the radius $R$:
1579: \beq
1580: T_{M2}\,=\,{N\over 4\pi R^3}\,\,,
1581: \label{ndos}
1582: \eeq
1583: which follows from eqs. (\ref{stcuatro}) and (\ref{ocuatro}). By using
1584: eq. (\ref{ndos}), one can rewrite eq. (\ref{nuno}) as:
1585: \beq
1586: F\,=\,4R^3\,{n\over N}\,\epsilon_{(3)}\,\,.
1587: \label{ntres}
1588: \eeq
1589: We can use the ansatz (\ref{ntres}) and the potential $C^{(3)}$ of
1590: eq. (\ref{stseis}) to compute the three-form field $H$ of eq.
1591: (\ref{stsiete}). It turns out that the result for $H$ can be written
1592: in terms of the function ${\cal C}_{4,n}(\theta)$ defined in eq.
1593: (\ref{vuno}). One gets:
1594: \beq
1595: H\,=\,R^3\,{\cal C}_{4,n}(\theta)\,\epsilon_{(3)}\,\,.
1596: \label{ncuatro}
1597: \eeq
1598:
1599: Let us now assume that the angle $\theta$ characterizing the M5-brane
1600: embedding only depends on the radial coordinate $r$ and, as
1601: before, let us denote by $\theta'$ to the derivative $d\theta/dr$. As
1602: was mentioned above, in the $a=x^5$ gauge and for this kind of
1603: embedding, only the first term of the PST action (\ref{stnueve}) is
1604: non vanishing and, as a consequence, all the dependence on $H$ of this
1605: action comes through the field $\tilde H$ defined in eq.
1606: (\ref{stocho}). Actually, the only non-vanishing component of
1607: $\tilde H$ is:
1608: \beq
1609: \tilde H_{0r}\,=\,-{i\over (\sin\theta)^3}\,
1610: \sqrt{{R\over r}}\,\sqrt{1\,+\,r^2\theta'^2}\,\,
1611: {\cal C}_{4,n}\,(\theta)\,\,.
1612: \label{ncinco}
1613: \eeq
1614: After a simple calculation one can obtain the induced metric $g$ and,
1615: using eq. (\ref{ncinco}), the lagrangian density of the M5-brane. The
1616: result is:
1617: \beq
1618: {\cal L}\,=\,-T_{M5}\,R^3\,\sqrt{\hat g}\,\,
1619: \sqrt{1\,+\,r^2\theta'^2}\,
1620: \sqrt{\,(\sin\theta)^6\,+\,(\,{\cal C}_{4,n}(\theta)\,)^2}\,\,,
1621: \label{nseis}
1622: \eeq
1623: where $\hat g$ is the determinant of the metric of a unit 3-sphere.
1624: Notice the close similarity of this result and the hamiltonian density
1625: of eq. (\ref{vcuatro}) for $p=4$, \ie\ for the D4-D4 system. Indeed,
1626: it is immediate to check that the solutions with constant $\theta$ are
1627: the same in both systems, \ie\ $\theta=\bar\theta_{4,n}$ with $0<n<N$,
1628: where $\bar\theta_{4,n}$ is given in eq. (\ref{cuno}) (for $n=0,N$
1629: we have the singular solutions with $\theta=0,\pi$). This result is
1630: quite natural since the D4-D4 system can be obtained from the M5-M5
1631: one by means of a double dimensional reduction along the $x^5$
1632: direction. The energy density for these solutions can be easily
1633: obtained from the lagrangian (\ref{nseis}). One gets:
1634: \beq
1635: {\cal E}_n^{M5}\,=\,{n(N-n)\over N}\,T_{M2}\,\,,
1636: \label{nsiete}
1637: \eeq
1638: which, again, closely resembles the D4-D4 energy of eq.
1639: (\ref{cdos}). In particular ${\cal E}_n^{M5}\rightarrow n\,T_{M2}$ as
1640: $N\rightarrow\infty$, which implies that, semiclassically, our
1641: configurations can be regarded as bound states of M2-branes. Moreover,
1642: one can check that eq. (\ref{ciuno}) with $p=4$ is a BPS condition for
1643: the M5-brane system. The integration of this equation can be read from
1644: eq. (\ref{citres}) and represents a baryonic vertex in M-theory
1645: \cite{kappa}, $n$ being the number of M2-branes which form the baryon at
1646: $r\rightarrow\infty$. The $\theta=\bar\theta_{4,n}$ solution can be
1647: obtained as the $r\rightarrow 0$ limit of the M-theory baryon, in
1648: complete analogy with the analysis at the end of section 2.2.
1649:
1650:
1651:
1652:
1653:
1654:
1655: \medskip
1656: \subsection{Fluctuations and stability}
1657: \medskip
1658: We will now perturb our static solution in order to check its
1659: stability. As in section 2.3, we must allow the angle $\theta$ to
1660: deviate from $\bar\theta_{4,n}$ and the worldvolume field strength
1661: $F$ to vary from the value displayed in eq. (\ref{ntres}). The best
1662: way to find out which components of $F$ must be included in the
1663: perturbation is to choose a gauge. As $F$ in eq. (\ref{ntres}) has
1664: only components along the sphere $S^3$, one can represent it by means
1665: of a potential $\bar A_{\hat i\,\hat j}$ which also has component only
1666: on $S^3$ (in what follows indices along $S^3$ will be denoted with a
1667: hat). Accordingly, the perturbation of $F$ will be parametrized as a
1668: fluctuation of the $S^3$-components of the potential $A$. Thus, we put:
1669: \beq
1670: \theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{4,n}\,+\,\xi\,\,,
1671: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1672: A_{\hat i\,\hat j}\,=\,\bar A_{\hat i\,\hat j}\,
1673: +\,\alpha_{\hat i\,\hat j}\,\,,
1674: \label{nocho}
1675: \eeq
1676: where $\xi$ and $\alpha_{\hat i\,\hat j}$ are small. For simplicity
1677: we shall assume that $\xi$ and the $\alpha_{\hat i\,\hat j}$'s do
1678: not depend on $x^5$. Using the parametrization of $A$ in eq.
1679: (\ref{nocho}), it is clear that the $S^3$-components of the three-form
1680: field $H$ can be written as:
1681: \beq
1682: H_{\hat i\,\hat j\,\hat k}\,=\,R^3\,
1683: [\,{\cal C}_{4,n}(\theta)\,+\,f\,]\,\,
1684: \,\,\,{\epsilon_{\hat i\,\hat j\,\hat k}\over \sqrt{\hat g}}\,\,,
1685: \label{nnueve}
1686: \eeq
1687: where $f$ can be put in terms of derivatives of the type
1688: $\partial_{\hat i}\,\alpha_{\hat j\,\hat k}$. In eq. (\ref{nnueve})
1689: $\hat g$ is the determinant of the metric of the $S^3$ and we are
1690: using the convention
1691: $\epsilon^{\hat1\, \hat2\,\hat 3\,}\,=\,
1692: \epsilon_{\hat 1\, \hat 2\,\hat 3\,}/{\hat g}\,=\,1$. As
1693: $\alpha_{\hat i\,\hat j}$ in (\ref{nocho}) depends on $t$ and $r$, it
1694: follows that we have now
1695: non-zero components
1696: $H_{0\hat i\,\hat j}\,=\,\partial_0\,\alpha_{\hat i\,\hat j}$
1697: and $H_{r\hat i\,\hat j}\,=\,\partial_r\,\alpha_{\hat i\,\hat j}$.
1698: Thus, in the gauge (\ref{odos}), the non-vanishing components of
1699: $\tilde H$ are $\tilde H_{0r}$,
1700: $\tilde H_{0\hat i}$ and $\tilde H_{r\hat i}$. To the relevant order,
1701: these components take the values:
1702: \bear
1703: \tilde H_{0r}&=&-i\,\sqrt{{R\over r}}\,\cot\bar\theta\,+\,
1704: \,{i\over (\sin\bar \theta)^2}\,
1705: \,\sqrt{{R\over r}}\,\Big(\,3\xi\,-\,{f\over \sin\bar\theta}
1706: \,\Big)\,
1707: -3i\,\,{\cos\bar\theta \over (\sin\bar\theta)^3}\,\,
1708: \sqrt{{R\over r}}\,\Big(\,2\xi^2\,-\,\xi\,{f\over \sin\bar\theta}
1709: \,\Big)\,\,+\rc\rc
1710: &&\,+\,{i\over 2}\,R^2\,\cot\bar\theta\Bigg[\,\sqrt{{R^3\over r^3}}\,
1711: (\partial_t\xi)^2\,-\,\sqrt{{r^3\over R^3}}\,
1712: (\partial_r\xi)^2\,\Bigg]\,+\,{i\over 2}\,
1713: \sqrt{{R\over r}}{\cos\bar\theta \over
1714: (\sin\bar\theta)^3}\, (\partial_{\hat i}\xi)^2\,\,, \rc\rc
1715: \tilde H_{0\hat i}&=&{i\over 2R\sin\bar\theta}\, \,
1716: \sqrt{{r^3\over R^3}}\,\,\hat g_{\hat i\,\hat j}\,\,
1717: {\epsilon^{\hat j\,\hat l\,\hat m}\,\over \sqrt{\hat g}}\,\,
1718: H_ {r\,\hat l\,\hat m}\,\,,\rc\rc
1719: \tilde H_{r\hat i}&=&{i\over 2R\sin\bar\theta}\,
1720: \sqrt{{R^3\over r^3}}\,\,\hat g_{\hat i\,\hat j}\,\,
1721: {\epsilon^{\hat j\,\hat l\,\hat m}\,\over \sqrt{\hat g}}\,\,
1722: H_ {0\,\hat l\,\hat m}\,\,,
1723: \label{cien}
1724: \eear
1725: with $\bar\theta\equiv \bar\theta_{4,n}$. Using these results we can
1726: compute the lagrangian for the fluctuations. After some calculation
1727: one arrives at:
1728: \bear
1729: {\cal L}\,&=&\,-\,\sqrt{\hat g}\,R^3\,T_{M5}\,\cos\bar\theta\,f\,+\,
1730: \sqrt{\hat g}\,R^3\,T_{M5}\,\big(\,\sin\bar\theta\,\big)^2
1731: \,\,\times\rc\rc
1732: &&\times\,{1\over 2}\,\, \Bigg[\,R^3r^{-1}(\partial_t\xi)^2\,-\,
1733: r^2\,(\partial_r\xi)^2\,-\,(\partial_{\hat i}\xi)^2\,
1734: +\,{1\over 2R^3r(\sin\bar\theta)^2}\,(H_{0\hat j\,\hat k})^2\,-\,\rc\rc
1735: &&-{r^2\over 2R^6(\sin\bar\theta)^2}\,(H_{r\hat j\,\hat k})^2\,-\,
1736: 6\xi^2\,-\,{f^2\over (\sin\bar\theta)^2}\,
1737: +\,6\,{f\xi\over \sin\bar\theta}\,\Bigg]\,\,,\rc
1738: \label{ctuno}
1739: \eear
1740: where $(H_{0\hat j\,\hat k})^2$ and $(H_{r\hat j\,\hat k})^2$ are
1741: contractions with the metric of the $S^3$. In eq. (\ref{ctuno}) we have
1742: kept terms up to second order and we have dropped the zero-order term.
1743:
1744: The analysis of the equations of motion derived from eq.
1745: (\ref{ctuno}) is similar to the one performed in section 2.3. For
1746: this reason we will skip the details and will give directly the final
1747: result. Let us expand $f$ and $\xi$ is spherical harmonics of $S^3$ as
1748: in eq. (\ref{cinueve}) and let $f_{l,m}(t,r)$ and $\zeta_{l,m}(t,r)$
1749: denote their modes respectively. The equations of motion of these
1750: modes can be written as:
1751: \beq
1752: \Bigg(R^3r^{-1}\partial_0^2\,-\,\partial_r\,r^2\,\partial_r\,
1753: +\,{\cal M}_4\,\Bigg)\,
1754: \pmatrix{\zeta_{l,m}\cr\cr
1755: {f_{l,m}\over \sin\bar\theta}}\,=\,0\,\,,
1756: \label{ctdos}
1757: \eeq
1758: where the mass matrix ${\cal M}_4$ is the same as
1759: that corresponding the D4-D4 system (\ie\ the one of eq.
1760: (\ref{setenta}) for $p=4$). Notice that the wave operator on the
1761: left-hand side of eq. (\ref{ctdos}) is formally the same as
1762: ${\cal O}_4$ in eq. (\ref{ssiete}) (although the radius $R$ is not the
1763: same quantity in both cases). Thus, the eigenvalues of the mass matrix
1764: are non-negative and, actually, the same as in the D4-D4 system.
1765: Therefore our static M-theory configurations are indeed stable.
1766:
1767:
1768:
1769: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1770: \section{The D3-brane in a $(p,q)$ fivebrane background}
1771: \medskip
1772:
1773: We are now going to study the motion of a D3-brane probe in a
1774: background of a stack of fivebranes which are charged under both the
1775: NS and RR three-form fields strengths of
1776: type IIB supergravity. This background was obtained in ref.
1777: \cite{LuRoy} by exploiting the S-duality of type IIB supergravity and is
1778: characterized by two coprime integers $p$ and $q$, and we will refer to it
1779: as the $(p,q)$ fivebrane background. It can be regarded as the one
1780: created by an object which is a bound state of $p$ NS5-branes and $q$
1781: D5-branes. In particular, for $(p,q)=(1,0)$ the corresponding NS5-D3
1782: system is the analogue of the one studied in
1783: ref. \cite{Bachas} in the type IIB theory . If, on the other hand, we take
1784: $(p,q)=(0,1)$ we recover the D5-D3 problem studied in section 2.
1785:
1786: In order to describe the background, following ref. \cite{LuRoy}, let us
1787: introduce some notations. First of all we define the quantity:
1788: \beq
1789: \mu_{(p,q)}\,=\,p^2\,+\,(\,q\,-\,p\chi_{0}\,)^2\,g_s^2\,,
1790: \label{cttres}
1791: \eeq
1792: where $\chi_{0}$ is the asymptotic value of the RR scalar. The
1793: ``radius" $R_{(p,q)}$ for a stack of $N$ $(p,q)$ fivebranes is defined
1794: in terms of $\mu_{(p,q)}$ as:
1795: \beq
1796: R^2_{(p,q)}\,=\,N\,\Bigl[\,\mu_{(p,q)}\,\Bigr]^{{1\over 2}}
1797: \,\alpha'\,\,.
1798: \label{ctcuatro}
1799: \eeq
1800: We will use $R_{(p,q)}$ to define the near-horizon harmonic function:
1801: \beq
1802: H_{(p,q)}(r)\,=\,{R^2_{(p,q)}\over r^2}\,\,.
1803: \label{ctcinco}
1804: \eeq
1805: The near-horizon metric, in the string frame, for the stack of
1806: $(p,q)$ fivebranes can be written as:
1807: \beq
1808: ds^2\,=\,\Big[\,h_{(p,q)}(r)\,\Big]^{-{1\over 2}}\,\,
1809: \Bigg[\,\,
1810: \Bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\Bigr]^{-{1\over 4}}\,\,
1811: (\,-dt^2\,+\,dx_{\parallel}^2\,)\,+\,
1812: \Bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\Bigr]^{{3\over 4}}\,\,
1813: (\,dr^2\,+\,r^2\,d\Omega_{3}^2\,)\,\Bigg]\,\,,
1814: \label{ctseis}
1815: \eeq
1816: where the function $h_{(p,q)}(r)$ is given by:
1817: \beq
1818: h_{(p,q)}(r)\,=\,{\mu_{(p,q)}\over
1819: p^2\,\,\Bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\Bigr]^{{1\over 2}}
1820: \,+\,(\,q\,-\,p\chi_{0}\,)^2\,g_s^2\,\,
1821: \Bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\Bigr]^{-{1\over 2}}}\,\,.
1822: \label{ctsiete}
1823: \eeq
1824: To simplify the equations that follow we shall take
1825: from now on $g_s=1$ and $\chi_0\,=\,0$. (The dependence on $g_s$ and
1826: $\chi_0$ can be easily restored). Other fields of this background
1827: include the dilaton:
1828: \beq
1829: e^{-\phi}\,=\,h_{(p,q)}(r)\,\,,
1830: \label{ctocho}
1831: \eeq
1832: and the RR scalar:
1833: \beq
1834: \chi\,=\,{pq\over \mu_{(p,q)}}\,
1835: \Big(\,\Bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\bigr]^{{1\over 2}}\,-\,
1836: \bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\bigr]^{-{1\over 2}}
1837: \,\Big)\,h_{(p,q)}(r)\,\,.
1838: \label{ctnueve}
1839: \eeq
1840: In addition we have non-zero NS and RR three-form field strengths. Let
1841: us call $B$ and $C^{(2)}$ to their two-form potentials respectively.
1842: If we take coordinates on the three-sphere as in eq. (\ref{cinco}),
1843: this potentials can be taken as:
1844: \beq
1845: B\,=\,-pN\alpha'\,C_5(\theta)\,\epsilon_{(2)}\,\,,
1846: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1847: C^{(2)}\,=\,-qN\alpha'\,C_5(\theta)\,\epsilon_{(2)}\,\,,
1848: \label{ctdiez}
1849: \eeq
1850: where $C_5(\theta)$ is the function defined in eqs. (\ref{seis}) and
1851: (\ref{siete}), \ie\
1852: $C_5(\theta)\,=\,\sin \theta\cos\theta\,-\,\theta$.
1853:
1854: The action of a D3-brane probe in the above background is the sum of the
1855: Dirac-Born-Infeld and Wess-Zumino terms. The latter now includes the
1856: coupling of the brane to the RR potential $C^{(2)}$ and to the RR scalar
1857: $\chi$:
1858: \beq
1859: S\,=\,-T_3\,\int d^4\sigma\,e^{-\phi}\,\sqrt{-{\rm det}(g+{\cal
1860: F})}\,+\, T_3\,\int \Big[\,{\cal F}\wedge C^{(2)}\,
1861: +\,{1\over 2}\chi{\cal F}\wedge{\cal F}\,\Big]\,\,,
1862: \label{ctonce}
1863: \eeq
1864: with ${\cal F}$ being:
1865: \beq
1866: {\cal F}\,=\,dA\,-\,B\,=\,F\,-\,B\,\,.
1867: \label{ctdoce}
1868: \eeq
1869:
1870:
1871:
1872:
1873:
1874:
1875: \medskip
1876: \subsection{Quantization conditions}
1877: \medskip
1878: The analysis of the action (\ref{ctonce}) for the $(p,q)$ fivebrane
1879: background was performed in ref. \cite{Llatas} (for the NS5-D3 system
1880: see refs. \cite{Joan,Pelc}). Here we shall choose our
1881: worldvolume coordinates as in (\ref{doce}) and we will look for
1882: solutions of the equations of motion with constant $\theta$. Notice that,
1883: as now our background contains non-zero NS and RR forms, it is natural to
1884: expect that the worldvolume gauge field $F$ has both electric and magnetic
1885: components. The latter can be determined by means of the flux
1886: quantization condition (\ref{uno}), whereas the electric wordlvolume
1887: field is constrained by the condition (\ref{dsiete}). Accordingly we
1888: shall first require that:
1889: \beq
1890: \int_{S^2}\,F\,=\,{2\pi n_1\over T_f}\,\,,
1891: \label{cttrece}
1892: \eeq
1893: with $n_1\in\ZZ$. It is rather simple to solve this condition. We only
1894: have to take $F$ as:
1895: \beq
1896: F\,=\,\pi n_1\alpha'\epsilon_{(2)}\,+\,F_{0,r}dt\wedge dr\,\,,
1897: \label{ctcatorce}
1898: \eeq
1899: where we have assumed that the electric worldvolume field has only
1900: components along the radial direction. By using the definition of
1901: ${\cal F}$ in eq. (\ref{ctdoce}) and the expression of the $B$ field
1902: in eq. (\ref{ctdiez}), one easily verifies that eq. (\ref{ctcatorce})
1903: is equivalent to the following expression for ${\cal F}$:
1904: \beq
1905: {\cal F}\,=\,f_{12}(\theta)\epsilon_{(2)}\,+\,F_{0,r}dt\wedge dr\,\,,
1906: \label{ctquince}
1907: \eeq
1908: with $f_{12}(\theta)$ being:
1909: \beq
1910: f_{12}(\theta)\,\equiv\,pN\alpha'C_5(\theta)\,+\,\pi n_1\alpha'\,\,.
1911: \label{ctdseis}
1912: \eeq
1913: As in our previous examples, let us assume that the angle $\theta$
1914: depends only on the radial coordinate $r$. By substituting the ansatz
1915: (\ref{ctquince}) in eq. (\ref{ctonce}), one can find the form of the
1916: lagrangian density:
1917: \bear
1918: {\cal L}(\theta, F)\,&=&\,-T_3\,\,\sqrt{\hat g}\,\Bigg[\,
1919: \sqrt{r^4\,\Bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\Bigr]^{{3\over 2}}\,(\sin\theta)^4
1920: \,+\,e^{-\phi}\,f_{12}(\theta)^2}\,\times\rc\rc
1921: &&\times\,\sqrt{\Bigl[\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\Bigr]^{{1\over 2}}
1922: (1+r^2\theta'^2)\,-\,e^{-\phi}\,F_{0,r}^2}\,+\,\rc\rc
1923: &&+\,(qN\alpha'C_5(\theta)\,-\,\chi f_{12}(\theta))\,F_{0,r}
1924: \,\Bigg]\,\,,
1925: \label{ctdsiete}
1926: \eear
1927: where $\hat g$ is the determinant of the metric of a unit $S^{2}$.
1928: Next, we make use of the electric quantization condition
1929: (\ref{dsiete}) and require that:
1930: \beq
1931: \int_{S^2}\,
1932: d^2\,\theta\,\,\,
1933: {\partial{\cal L}\over \partial F_{0,r}}\,=\,
1934: n_2\,T_f\,\,,
1935: \label{ctdocho}
1936: \eeq
1937: where $n_2$ is another integer. By plugging the lagrangian density
1938: (\ref{ctdsiete}) into (\ref{ctdocho}), one can obtain $F_{0,r}$ as a
1939: function of $\theta(r)$ and of the integers $n_1$ and $n_2$. Actually,
1940: one can eliminate in this way $F_{0,r}$ from the expression of the
1941: hamiltonian $H$, which can be obtained from ${\cal L}$ by means of a
1942: Legendre transformation (see eq. (\ref{vtres})). The resulting
1943: hamiltonian can be put in the form:
1944: \bear
1945: &&H\,=\,T_3\Omega_2\,\int dr\sqrt{1\,+\,r^2\theta'^2}\,\times\,\rc\rc
1946: &&\times\,\sqrt{R^4_{(p,q)}\,(\sin\theta)^4\,+\,
1947: [\mu_{(p,q)}]^{-1}\big[\,\big(pf_{12}(\theta)+q\Pi(\theta)\big)^2+
1948: H_{(p,q)}(r)\big(qf_{12}(\theta)-p\Pi(\theta)\big)^2\,\big]}\,\,,
1949: \rc\rc
1950: \label{ctdnueve}
1951: \eear
1952: where $\Pi(\theta)$ is the function:
1953: \beq
1954: \Pi(\theta)\,\equiv\,qN\alpha'C_5(\theta)\,+\,\pi n_2\alpha'\,\,.
1955: \label{ctveinte}
1956: \eeq
1957: The solutions of the equations of motion with $\theta={\rm constant}$
1958: can be obtained by solving the equation
1959: $\partial H/ \partial\theta=0$ for $\theta'=0$. A glance at the
1960: right-hand side of eq. (\ref{ctdnueve}) reveals immediately that these
1961: solutions only exist if the $r$-dependent term inside the square root
1962: in (\ref{ctdnueve}) is zero. We thus get the condition:
1963: \beq
1964: qf_{12}(\theta)\,=\,p\Pi(\theta)\,\,,
1965: \label{ctvuno}
1966: \eeq
1967: which, after using eqs. (\ref{ctdseis}) and (\ref{ctveinte}), is
1968: equivalent to the following relation between the integers $n_1$ and
1969: $n_2$:
1970: \beq
1971: qn_1\,=\,pn_2\,\,.
1972: \label{ctvdos}
1973: \eeq
1974: But, as $p$ and $q$ are coprime integers, the only possibility to
1975: fulfill eq. (\ref{ctvdos}) is that $n_1$ and $n_2$ be of the form:
1976: \beq
1977: n_1\,=\,p\,n\,,
1978: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1979: n_2\,=\,qn\,\,,
1980: \label{ctvtres}
1981: \eeq
1982: with $n\in\ZZ$. Thus our two quantization integers $n_1$ and $n_2$ are
1983: not independent and they can be put in terms of another integer $n$.
1984: By using the relations (\ref{ctvtres}), one can rewrite
1985: $f_{12}(\theta)$ and $\Pi(\theta)$ in terms of $n$:
1986: \beq
1987: f_{12}(\theta)\,=\,pN\alpha'\,{\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\,,
1988: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
1989: \Pi(\theta)\,=\,qN\alpha'\,{\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\,\,,
1990: \label{ctvcuatro}
1991: \eeq
1992: where ${\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)$ is the function defined in eq.
1993: (\ref{vuno}). If we now substitute these expressions into the
1994: hamiltonian (\ref{ctdnueve}), we get the following expression of $H$:
1995: \beq
1996: H\,=\,T_3\,\Omega_2\,R_{(p,q)}^2\,\int dr\,
1997: \sqrt{1+r^2\theta'^2}\,
1998: \sqrt{(\sin\theta)^4\,+\,
1999: \Big(\,{\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\Big)^2}\,\,.
2000: \label{ctvcinco}
2001: \eeq
2002: Apart from a global coefficient, this hamiltonian is the same as the
2003: one in eq. (\ref{vcuatro}) for the D5-brane background. Thus, the
2004: energy is clearly minimized for $\theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{5,n}$, where
2005: the $\bar\theta_{5,n}$'s are the angles written in eq.
2006: (\ref{tocho}) . The energy densities for these angles are easily
2007: computed from eq. (\ref{ctvcinco}). One gets:
2008: \beq
2009: {\cal E}_{5,n}^{(p,q)}\,=\,{NT_{(q,p)}\over \pi}\,
2010: \sin\Big[\,{n\over N}\,\pi\Big]\,\,,
2011: \label{ctvseis}
2012: \eeq
2013: where $T_{(q,p)}$ is the tension of the $(q,p)$-string which, for
2014: arbitrary values of $g_s$ and $\chi_0$, is given by:
2015: \beq
2016: T_{(q,p)}\,=\,\sqrt{(q-p\chi_0)^2\,+\,{p^2\over g_s^2}}\,\,\,
2017: T_f\,\,.
2018: \label{ctvsiete}
2019: \eeq
2020: By comparing eqs. (\ref{tnueve}) and (\ref{ctvseis}) it follows that
2021: ${\cal E}_{5,n}^{(p,q)}$ can be obtained from ${\cal E}_{5,n}$ by
2022: substituting $T_f$ by $T_{(q,p)}$. In particular, if
2023: $N\rightarrow\infty$ the energy density ${\cal E}_{5,n}^{(p,q)}$ equals
2024: $nT_{(q,p)}$ and, thus, the configurations we have found can be
2025: regarded as bound states of $n$ $(q,p)$-strings. It is also easy to
2026: get the worldvolume electric field $\bar F_{0,r}$ of our solutions. It
2027: takes the form:
2028: \beq
2029: \bar F_{0,r}\,=\,{(q-p\chi_0)g_s\over
2030: \sqrt{p^2+(q-p\chi_0)^2g_s^2}}\,\,
2031: \cos\,\Big[\,{n\over N}\,\pi\Big]\,\,.
2032: \label{ctvocho}
2033: \eeq
2034: It is also clear from the expression of the hamiltonian in
2035: (\ref{ctvcinco}) that one can represent it as in eq. (\ref{csiete})
2036: and, as a consequence, one can find a bound for the energy whose
2037: saturation gives rise to a BPS condition. As the only difference
2038: between the hamiltonian (\ref{ctvcinco}) and that of eq.
2039: (\ref{vcuatro}) for the D5-brane is a global coefficient, it follows
2040: that the BPS differential equation is just the one displayed in eq.
2041: (\ref{ciuno}) for $p=5$. Its solution is given in eq.
2042: (\ref{citres}) and, again, includes our wrapped configurations as
2043: particular cases. Moreover, these $\theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{p,n}$
2044: configurations can be regarded as the $r\rightarrow 0$ limit of the
2045: general solution. Actually, in ref. \cite{Llatas} the condition
2046: (\ref{ctvuno}) and the form (\ref{ctvcinco}) of the hamiltonian were
2047: obtained by using the S-duality of the worldvolume action. It was also
2048: checked in this reference that the D3-brane configurations which
2049: saturate the bound preserve $1/4$ of the bulk supersymmetry.
2050:
2051:
2052:
2053: \medskip
2054: \subsection{Stability}
2055: \medskip
2056:
2057: The static configurations of the D3-brane studied above are stable
2058: under small perturbations, as one can check following the same steps
2059: as in sections 2.3 and 3.2. First of all, we parametrize the angle
2060: fluctuations as:
2061: \beq
2062: \theta\,=\,\bar\theta_{5,n}\,+\,\xi\,\,,
2063: \label{ctvnueve}
2064: \eeq
2065: whereas the gauge field fluctuates as:
2066: \beq
2067: {\cal F}\,=\,\big[\,f_{12}(\theta)\,+\,g\,\big]\,\epsilon_{(2)}\,+\,
2068: \big[\,\bar F_{0,r}\,+\,f\,\big]\,dt\wedge dr\,\,.
2069: \label{cttreinta}
2070: \eeq
2071: The angle fluctuation $\xi$ and the electric (magnetic) field
2072: fluctuation $f$ ($g$) are supposed to be small and only terms up to
2073: second order are retained in the lagrangian. The corresponding
2074: equations of motion involve now the wave operator
2075: ${\cal O}_5^{(p,q)}$, which acts on any function $\psi$ as:
2076: \beq
2077: {\cal O}_5^{(p,q)}\,\psi\,\equiv\,R^2_{(p,q)}\,\partial_0^2\,\psi\,-\,
2078: \partial_r(r^2\partial_r\psi)\,\,.
2079: \label{cttuno}
2080: \eeq
2081: Notice that ${\cal O}_5^{(p,q)}$ is obtained from ${\cal O}_5$ in eq.
2082: (\ref{ssiete}) by means of the substitution
2083: $R\rightarrow R_{(p,q)}$. Let us combine $\xi$, $f$ and $g$ into the
2084: field $\eta$, defined as:
2085: \bear
2086: \eta&\equiv&{1\over p^2\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\,+\,q^2\sin^2\bar\theta_{5,n}}
2087: \,\,\times\rc\rc
2088: &&\times\Big[\,[\mu_{(p,q)}]^{{1\over 2}}\,
2089: \big(\,q\sin\bar\theta_{5,n}\,f\,-\,{p\over r^2}\,g\,\big)\,+\,
2090: 2q^2\sin^2\bar\theta_{5,n}\,\xi\,\Big]\,\,,
2091: \label{cttdos}
2092: \eear
2093: and let us expand $\xi$ and $\eta$ is spherical harmonics of $S^2$. If
2094: $\zeta_{l,m}$ and $\eta_{l,m}$ denote their modes respectively, one
2095: can prove after some calculation that the equations of motion for
2096: $\zeta_{l,m}$ and $\eta_{l,m}$ can be written as:
2097: \beq
2098: \Big(\,{\cal O}_5^{(p,q)}\,+\,{\cal M}_5\,\Big)\,
2099: \pmatrix{\zeta_{l,m}\cr\eta_{l,m}}\,=\,0\,\,.
2100: \label{ctttres}
2101: \eeq
2102: In eq. (\ref{ctttres}) ${\cal M}_5$ is the matrix defined in eq.
2103: (\ref{setenta}), whose eigenvalues, as proved in section 2.3, are always
2104: non-negative. There is also a decoupled mode $\sigma$, whose
2105: expression in terms of $\xi$, $f$ and $g$ is:
2106: \bear
2107: \sigma&\equiv&
2108: {\sin\bar\theta_{5,n}
2109: \over r[\,
2110: p^2\,H_{(p,q)}(r)\,\,+\,q^2\sin^2\bar\theta_{5,n}\,]}
2111: \,\,\times\rc\rc
2112: &&\times\Big[\,[\mu_{(p,q)}]^{{1\over 2}}\,
2113: \big(\,q\sin\bar\theta_{5,n}\,g\,-\,p\,R^2_{(p,q)}\,f\,\big)\,-\,
2114: 2pq\,R^2_{(p,q)}\sin\bar\theta_{5,n}\,\xi\,\Big]\,\,.
2115: \label{cttcuatro}
2116: \eear
2117: The equation of motion of $\sigma$ can be written as:
2118: \beq
2119: \Big(\,{\cal O}_5^{(p,q)}\,+\,l(l+1)\,\Big)\,\sigma_{l,m}\,=\,0\,\,,
2120: \label{cttcinco}
2121: \eeq
2122: where $\sigma_{l,m}$ are the modes of the expansion of $\sigma$ in
2123: $S^2$-spherical harmonics. It is evident from eq. (\ref{cttcinco})
2124: that the mass eigenvalues of $\sigma_{l,m}$ are non-negative, which
2125: confirms that the configurations around which we are expanding are
2126: stable.
2127:
2128: \medskip
2129: \section{Summary and discussion}
2130: \medskip
2131:
2132: In this paper we have studied certain configurations of branes which
2133: are partially wrapped on spheres. These spheres are placed on the
2134: transverse region of some supergravity background, and their positions,
2135: characterized by a polar angle which measures their latitude in a system
2136: of spherical coordinates, are quantized and given by a very specific set
2137: of values. We have checked that our configurations are stable by analyzing
2138: their behaviour under small fluctuations and, by studying their energy, we
2139: concluded that they can be regarded as a bound state of strings or, in
2140: the case of the M5-M5 system, M2-branes. We have verified this fact
2141: explicitly in appendix B for the case of a wrapped D3-brane in the
2142: background of a NS5-brane. Indeed, we have proved that, by embedding a
2143: D1-brane in a fuzzy two-sphere in the NS5-brane background, one obtains
2144: exactly the same energies and allowed polar angles as for a wrapped
2145: D3-brane in the same geometry. Clearly, a similar description of all the
2146: cases studied here would be desirable and would help to understand
2147: more precisely the r\^ole of noncommutative geometry in the formation of
2148: these bound states. In this sense it is interesting to point out that
2149: the polarization of multiple fundamental strings in a RR background was
2150: studied in ref. \cite{Schiappa}
2151:
2152: Contrary to ref. \cite{Bachas}, the problems treated here do not have a
2153: CFT description to compare with. Thus, we do not know to what
2154: extent we can trust our Born-Infeld results. However, one could argue
2155: that we have followed the same methodology as in ref. \cite{Bachas} and,
2156: actually, our configurations can be connected to the ones in
2157: \cite{Bachas} by string dualities. Moreover, the BPS nature of our
2158: configurations make us reasonably confident of the correctness of our
2159: conclusions.
2160:
2161: The presence of a non-trivial supergravity background is of crucial
2162: importance in our analysis. Indeed, these backgrounds induce worldvolume
2163: gauge fields on the brane probes, which prevent their collapse. The
2164: stabilization mechanisms found here are a generalization of the one
2165: described in refs. \cite{Bachas, Pavel}, and are based on a series of
2166: quantization rules which determine the values of the worldvolume gauge
2167: fields. We have reasons to believe that our results are generic and can
2168: be extended to other geometries such as, for example, the ones generated
2169: by the Dp-D(p-2) bound states \cite{MR}. Another interesting question is
2170: the implications of our results in a holographic description of gauge
2171: theories. In our opinion the study of these topics could enrich
2172: our knowledge of the brane interaction dynamics.
2173:
2174:
2175:
2176:
2177:
2178:
2179: \section{ Acknowledgments}
2180: We are grateful to J. L. Barbon, C. Gomez, J. Mas, T. Ortin and J. M.
2181: Sanchez de Santos for discussions. This work was
2182: supported in part by DGICYT under grant PB96-0960, by CICYT under
2183: grant AEN99-0589-CO2 and by Xunta de Galicia under grant
2184: PGIDT00-PXI-20609.
2185:
2186:
2187:
2188:
2189:
2190:
2191:
2192: \vskip 2cm
2193: {\Large{\bf APPENDIX A}}
2194: \vskip .5cm
2195: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\rm{A}.\arabic{equation}}
2196: \setcounter{equation}{0}
2197: In this appendix we collect the expressions of the functions
2198: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$ for $0\le p\le 5$. They are:
2199: \bear
2200: \Lambda_{0,n}(\theta)&=&-{2\over 5}\,\Big[\,\cos\theta\,\Big(\,
2201: 3\sin^4\theta\,+\,4\sin^2\theta\,+\,8\,\Big)\,+\,8\,\Big(\,
2202: 2\,{n\over N}\,-\,1\Big)\,\Big]\,\,,\rc\rc
2203: \Lambda_{1,n}(\theta)&=&-{5\over 4}\,\Big[\,\cos\theta\,\Big(\,
2204: \sin^3\theta\,+\,{3\over 2}\,\sin\theta\,\Big)\,+\,
2205: {3\over 2}\,\Big(\,{n\over N}\,\pi\,-\,\theta\,\Big)\,\Big]\,\,, \rc\rc
2206: \Lambda_{2,n}(\theta)&=&-{4\over 3}\,\Big[\,\cos\theta\,\Big(\,
2207: \sin^2\theta\,+\,2\,\Big)\,+\,2\,\Big(\,
2208: 2\,{n\over N}\,-\,1\Big)\,\Big]\,\,,\rc\rc
2209: \Lambda_{3,n}(\theta)&=&-{3\over 2}\,\Big[\,\cos\theta\,\sin\theta\,+\,
2210: {n\over N}\,\pi\,-\,\theta\,\Big]\,\,,\rc\rc
2211: \Lambda_{4,n}(\theta)&=&- 2\,\Big[\,\cos\theta\,+\,
2212: 2\,{n\over N}\,-\,1\Big]\,\,,\rc\rc
2213: \Lambda_{5,n}(\theta)&=&\theta\,-\,{n\over N}\,\pi\,\,.
2214: \label{apauno}
2215: \eear
2216: The functions ${\cal C}_{p,n}(\theta)$ and $ C_p(\theta)$ can be
2217: easily obtained from (\ref{apauno}) by using their relation with the
2218: $\Lambda_{p,n}(\theta)$'s (see eqs. (\ref{vseis}) and
2219: (\ref{vuno})).
2220:
2221:
2222:
2223:
2224: \vskip 1cm
2225: {\Large{\bf APPENDIX B}}
2226: \vskip .5cm
2227: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\rm{B}.\arabic{equation}}
2228: \setcounter{equation}{0}
2229: In this appendix we will show how one can represent the wrapped branes
2230: studied in the main text as a bound state of strings. We will make use
2231: of the Myers polarization mechanism \cite{Myers}, in which the strings
2232: are embedded in a noncommutative space. Actually, we will only consider a
2233: particular case of those analyzed in sects. 2-4, namely the one of
2234: section 4 with $p=1$, $q=\chi_0=0$, \ie\ the D3-brane in the
2235: background of the NS5-brane. For convenience we will choose a new set
2236: of coordinates to parametrize the space transverse to the NS5. Instead
2237: of using the radial coordinate $r$ and the three angles $\theta^1$,
2238: $\theta^2$ and $\theta$ (see eq. (\ref{cinco})), we will work with
2239: four cartesian coordinates $z,x^1, x^2, x^3$, which, in terms of the
2240: spherical coordinates, are given by:
2241: \bear
2242: z&=&r\cos\theta\,\,,\cr
2243: x^1&=&r\sin\theta\cos\theta^2\,\,,\cr
2244: x^2&=&r\sin\theta\sin\theta^2\cos\theta^1\,\,,\cr
2245: x^2&=&r\sin\theta\sin\theta^2\sin\theta^1\,\,.
2246: \label{apbuno}
2247: \eear
2248: Conversely, $r$ and $\theta$ can be put in terms of the new
2249: coordinates as follows:
2250: \bear
2251: r\,&=&\,
2252: \sqrt{(z)^2\,+\,(x^1)^2\,\,+(x^2)^2\,\,+(x^3)^2\,\,}\,\,,\cr\cr\cr
2253: \tan\theta&=&{\sqrt{(x^1)^2\,\,+(x^2)^2\,\,+(x^3)^2\,\,}\over z}\,\,.
2254: \label{apbdos}
2255: \eear
2256: In what follows some of our expressions will contain $r$ and $\theta$.
2257: It should be understood that they are given by the functions of
2258: $(\,z,x^i\,)$ written in eq. (\ref{apbdos}). The near-horizon metric
2259: and the dilaton for a stack of N NS5-branes are (see eqs.
2260: (\ref{ctseis}) and (\ref{ctocho})):
2261: \bear
2262: ds^2&=&-dt^2\,+\,dx_{\parallel}^2\,+\,
2263: {N\alpha'\over r^2}\,\,
2264: \Big(\,(dz)^2\,+\,(dx^1)^2\,+\,(dx^2)^2\,+\,(dx^3)^2\,\Big)\,\,,\rc\rc
2265: e^{-\phi}\,&=&\,{r\over \sqrt{N\alpha'}}\,\,.
2266: \label{apbtres}
2267: \eear
2268: Moreover, the non-vanishing components of the $B$ field in the new
2269: coordinates can be obtained from eq. (\ref{ctdiez}). They are:
2270: \beq
2271: B_{x^ix^j}\,=\,N\alpha'\,{C_5(\theta)\over r^3\sin^3\theta}\,\,
2272: \epsilon_{ijk}\,x^k\,\,.
2273: \label{apbcuatro}
2274: \eeq
2275:
2276: According to our analysis of section 4, the wrapped D3-brane in this
2277: background can be described as a bound state of D1-branes. Thus it is
2278: clear that we must consider a system of $n$ D1-branes, moving in the
2279: space transverse to the stack of $N$ Neveu-Schwarz fivebranes. We will
2280: employ a static gauge where the two worldsheet coordinates will be
2281: identified with $t$ and $z$. The Myers proposal for the action of this
2282: system is:
2283: \bear
2284: S_{D1}\,&=&\,-T_1\,\int dtdz\,{\rm STr}\,\Bigg[\,
2285: e^{-\phi}\,\sqrt{-{\rm det}\Big(
2286: P\big[E_{ab}+E_{ai}\,(\,Q^{-1}-\delta\,)^{ij}\,E_{jb}\big]
2287: +\lambda F_{ab}\Big)\,{\rm det}\Big(Q^i_{\,\,j}\Big)\,}\,\,
2288: \Bigg]\,\,,\rc\rc
2289: \label{apbcinco}
2290: \eear
2291: where we are adopting the conventions of ref. \cite{Myers}. In eq.
2292: (\ref{apbcinco}) $\lambda\,=\,2\pi\alpha'\,=\,1/T_f$, $F_{ab}$ is the
2293: worldsheet gauge field strength (which we will assume that is zero in our
2294: case), $P$ denotes the pullback of the spacetime tensors to the D1-brane
2295: worldsheet and STr represents the Tseytlin symmetrized trace of
2296: matrices \cite{STr}. The indices $a,b,\cdots$ correspond to directions
2297: parallel to the worldsheet (\ie\ to $t$ and $z$), whereas $i,j\cdots$
2298: refer to directions transverse to the D1-brane probe. The tensor
2299: $E_{\mu\nu}$ is defined as:
2300: \beq
2301: E_{\mu\nu}\,=\,G_{\mu\nu}\,+\,B_{\mu\nu}\,\,,
2302: \label{apbseis}
2303: \eeq
2304: where $G_{\mu\nu}$ is the background metric. Let $\phi^i$ denote the
2305: transverse scalar fields, which are matrices taking values in the
2306: adjoint representation of $U(n)$. Then $Q^i_{\,\,j}$ is defined as:
2307: \beq
2308: Q^i_{\,\,j}=\,\delta^i_{\,\,j}\,+\,i\lambda\,[\,\phi^i\,,\,\phi^k\,]
2309: \,E_{kj}\,\,.
2310: \label{apbsiete}
2311: \eeq
2312: As in ref. \cite{Myers}, transverse indices are raised with $E^{ij}$,
2313: where
2314: $E^{ij}$ denotes the inverse of $E_{ij}$, \ie\
2315: $E^{ik}E_{kj}\,=\,\delta^i_{\,j}$.
2316:
2317: Let us now make the standard identification between the transverse
2318: coordinates $x^i$ and the scalar fields $\phi^i$, namely:
2319: \beq
2320: x^i\,=\,\lambda\,\phi^i\,\,.
2321: \label{apbocho}
2322: \eeq
2323: Notice that, after the identification (\ref{apbocho}), the $x^i$'s
2324: become noncommutative coordinates represented by matrices. Actually,
2325: as in ref. \cite{Myers}, we will make the following ansatz for the scalar
2326: fields:
2327: \beq
2328: \phi^i\,=\,{f\over 2}\,\alpha^i\,\,,
2329: \label{apbnueve}
2330: \eeq
2331: where $f$ is a c-number to be determined and
2332: the $\alpha^i$'s are $n\times n$ matrices corresponding to the
2333: $n$-dimensional irreducible representation of $su(2)$:
2334: \beq
2335: [\,\alpha^i\,,\,\alpha^j\,]\,=\,2i\epsilon_{ijk}\,\alpha^k\,\,.
2336: \label{apbdiez}
2337: \eeq
2338: As the quadratic Casimir of the $n$-dimensional irreducible
2339: representation of $su(2)$ is $n^2-1$, we can write:
2340: \beq
2341: (\alpha^1)^2\,\,+(\alpha^2)^2\,\,+(\alpha^3)^2\,=\,
2342: (n^2\,-\,1)\,I_n\,\,,
2343: \label{apbonce}
2344: \eeq
2345: where $I_n$ is the $n\times n$ unit matrix. By using eqs.
2346: (\ref{apbocho}) and (\ref{apbnueve}) in (\ref{apbonce}), we get:
2347: \beq
2348: (x^1)^2\,\,+(x^2)^2\,\,+(x^3)^2\,=\,{\lambda^2\,f^2\over 4}\,
2349: (n^2\,-\,1)\,I_n\,\,,
2350: \label{apbdoce}
2351: \eeq
2352: which shows that, with our ansatz, the $x^i$'s are coordinates of a
2353: fuzzy two-sphere of radius $\lambda\,f\,\sqrt{n^2-1}/2$. On the other
2354: hand, if we treat the $x^i$'s as commutative coordinates, it is easy
2355: to conclude from eqs. (\ref{apbuno}) and (\ref{apbdos}) that the
2356: left-hand side of (\ref{apbdoce}) is just $(r\sin\theta)^2$. In view of
2357: this, when the $x^i$'s are non-commutative we should identify the
2358: expression written in eq. (\ref{apbdoce}) with
2359: $(r\sin\theta)^2\,I_n$. Thus, we put:
2360: \beq
2361: {f\over 2}\,=\,{r\sin\theta\over \lambda\sqrt{n^2\,-\,1}}\,\,.
2362: \label{apbtrece}
2363: \eeq
2364: Notice that, as can be immediately inferred from eq. (\ref{apbdos}),
2365: $r$ and $\theta$ depend on the $x^i$'s through the sum
2366: $\sum_i\,(x^i)^2$, which is proportional to the $su(2)$ quadratic
2367: Casimir. Then, as matrices, $r$ and $\theta$ are multiple of the
2368: unit matrix and, thus, we can consider them as commutative
2369: coordinates. This, in particular, means that the elements of the
2370: metric tensor $G_{\mu\nu}$ are also commutative, whereas, on the
2371: contrary, the components of the $B$ field have a non-trivial matrix
2372: structure. By substituting our ansatz in eqs. (\ref{apbtres}) and
2373: (\ref{apbcuatro}), we get the following expression for the transverse
2374: components of the $E_{\mu\nu}$ tensor:
2375: \beq
2376: E_{ij}\,=\,{N\alpha'\over r^2}\,\Big[\,
2377: \delta^i_{\,\,j}\,\,+\,\,{1\over\sqrt{n^2\,-\,1}}\,\,\,
2378: {C_5(\theta)\over \sin^2\theta}\,\,
2379: \epsilon_{ijk}\,\alpha^k\,\Big]\,\,.
2380: \label{apbcatorce}
2381: \eeq
2382: The quantities $Q^i_{\,\,j}$, defined in eq. (\ref{apbsiete}), can be
2383: readily obtained from eq. (\ref{apbcatorce}), namely:
2384: \beq
2385: Q^i_{\,\,j}\,=\,\Big(\,1\,+\,{N\over \pi}\,
2386: {C_5(\theta)\over \sqrt{n^2\,-\,1}}\,\Big)\,\delta^i_{\,\,j}\,-\,
2387: {N\over \pi}\,{C_5(\theta)\over (n^2\,-\,1)^{3/2}}
2388: \,\alpha^j\,\alpha^i\,-\,{N\over \pi}\,
2389: {\sin^2\theta\over n^2-1}\,\,\epsilon_{ijk}\,\alpha^k\,\,.
2390: \label{apbquince}
2391: \eeq
2392: In order to compute the pullback appearing in the first determinant of
2393: the right-hand side of eq. (\ref{apbcinco}), we need to characterize
2394: the precise embedding of the D1-brane in the transverse
2395: non-commutative space. Actually, it is straightforward to write our
2396: ansatz for the $x^i$'s as:
2397: \beq
2398: x^i\,=\,z\,\,{\tan\theta\over \sqrt{n^2\,-\,1}}\,\,\,\alpha^i\,\,.
2399: \label{apbdseis}
2400: \eeq
2401: Moreover, the kind of configurations we are looking for have constant
2402: $\theta$ angle. Thus, eq. (\ref{apbdseis}) shows that, in this case,
2403: the $x^i$'s are linear functions of the worldsheet coordinate $z$. By
2404: using this result it is immediate to find the expression of the first
2405: determinant in (\ref{apbcinco}). One gets:
2406: \beq
2407: -{\rm det}\Big(
2408: P\big[E_{ab}+E_{ai}\,(\,Q^{-1}-\delta\,)^{ij}\,E_{jb}\big]\,
2409: \Big)\,=\,{N\alpha'\over r^2}\,+\,
2410: {\tan^2\theta\over n^2-1}\,\,\,
2411: \alpha^i\,\Big[Q^{-1}\Big]_{ij}\,\alpha^j\,\,,
2412: \label{apbdsiete}
2413: \eeq
2414: where $Q^{-1}$ satisfies
2415: $Q^{ij}\Big[Q^{-1}\Big]_{jk}\,=\,\delta^i_{\,\,k}$ with $Q^{ij}$
2416: being:
2417: \beq
2418: Q^{ij}\,=\,E^{ij}\,+\,i\lambda\,\,[\,\phi^i\,,\,\phi^j\,]\,\,.
2419: \label{apbdocho}
2420: \eeq
2421: As expected on general grounds, a system of D-strings can model a
2422: D3-brane only when the number $n$ of D-strings is very large. Thus, if we
2423: want to make contact with our results of section 4, we should consider
2424: the limit in which $n\rightarrow\infty$ and keep
2425: only the leading terms in the $1/n$ expansion. Therefore, it this
2426: clear that, in this limit, we can replace $n^2-1$ by $n^2$ in all
2427: our previous expressions. Moreover, as argued in ref. \cite{Myers}, the
2428: leading term in a symmetrized trace of $\alpha$'s of the form
2429: ${\rm STr}\big(\,(\alpha^i\alpha^i)^m\,\big)$ is $n(n^2)^m$. Then, at
2430: leading order in $1/n$, one can make the following replacement inside
2431: a symmetrized trace:
2432: \beq
2433: \alpha^i\alpha^i\,\,\rightarrow\,\,n^2\,I_n\,\,.
2434: \label{apbdnueve}
2435: \eeq
2436: With this substitution the calculation of the action (\ref{apbcinco})
2437: drastically simplifies. So, for example, by using (\ref{apbquince}),
2438: one can check that, in the second term under the square root of
2439: (\ref{apbcinco}), we should make the substitution:
2440: \beq
2441: {\rm det} \Big(\,Q^i_{\,\,j}\,\Big)\,\rightarrow\,
2442: \Bigg(\,{N\over \pi n}\,\Bigg)^2\,\,
2443: \Bigg[\,\big(\sin\theta\big)^4\,+\,
2444: \big(\,C_5(\theta)\,+\,{\pi n\over N}\,\big)^2\,\Bigg]\,I_n\,\,.
2445: \label{apbveinte}
2446: \eeq
2447: Moreover, as
2448: ${\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\,=\,C_5(\theta)\,+\,{\pi n\over N}$, eq.
2449: (\ref{apbveinte}) is equivalent to:
2450: \beq
2451: {\rm det} \Big(\,Q^i_{\,\,j}\,\Big)\,\rightarrow\,
2452: \Bigg(\,{N\over \pi n}\,\Bigg)^2\,\,
2453: \Bigg[\,\big(\sin\theta\big)^4\,+\,
2454: \big(\,{\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\,\big)^2\,\Bigg]\,I_n\,\,.
2455: \label{apbvuno}
2456: \eeq
2457:
2458: We must now perform the substitution (\ref{apbdnueve}) on the
2459: right-hand side of eq. (\ref{apbdsiete}). First of all, we must
2460: invert the matrix of eq. (\ref{apbdocho}). Actually, it is not difficult
2461: to obtain the expression of $E^{ij}$. After some calculation one gets:
2462: \beq
2463: E^{ij}\,=\,{r^2\over N\alpha'}\,\,
2464: {\sin^4\theta\over\sin^4\theta\,+\,\Big(\,C_5(\theta)\,)^2}\,\,
2465: \Bigg[\,\delta^i_{\,\,j}\,\,+\,\,
2466: {\Big(\,C_5(\theta)\,)^2\over n^2\sin^4\theta}\,\alpha^i\,\alpha^j
2467: \,\,-\,\,{C_5(\theta)\over n\sin^2\theta}\,\,
2468: \epsilon_{ijk}\,\alpha^k\,\Bigg]\,\,.
2469: \label{apbvdos}
2470: \eeq
2471: Plugging this result on the right-hand side of eq. (\ref{apbdocho}),
2472: and adding the commutator of the scalar fields, one immediately
2473: obtains $Q^{ij}$. By inverting this last matrix one arrives at the
2474: following expression of $[Q^{-1}]_{ij}$:
2475: \beq
2476: [Q^{-1}]_{ij}\,=\,{N\alpha'\over r^2}\,\,\,
2477: {\sin^4\theta\,+\,\Big(\,C_5(\theta)\,)^2\over
2478: (1+a^2)\sin^4\theta}\,\,\Bigg[\,\delta^i_{\,\,j}\,\,
2479: +\,\,{a^2-b\over n^2(1+b)}\,\alpha^i\,\alpha^j\,\,+\,\,
2480: {a\over n}\,\epsilon_{ijk}\,\alpha^k\,\Bigg]\,\,,
2481: \label{apbvtres}
2482: \eeq
2483: where, at leading order, $a$ and $b$ are given by:
2484: \beq
2485: a={N\over \pi n\sin^2\theta}\,\,\Big[\,\sin^4\theta\,+\,
2486: C_5(\theta)\,{\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\,\Big]\,\,,
2487: \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,
2488: b\,=\,{\Big(\,C_5(\theta)\,)^2\over\sin^4\theta}\,\,.
2489: \label{apbvcuatro}
2490: \eeq
2491: By contracting $[Q^{-1}]_{ij}$ with $\alpha^i\alpha^j$ and applying
2492: the substitution (\ref{apbdnueve}), one gets a remarkably simple result:
2493: \beq
2494: \alpha^i\,\Big[Q^{-1}\Big]_{ij}\,\alpha^j\,\rightarrow\,
2495: n^2\,{N\alpha'\over r^2}\,I_n\,\,.
2496: \label{apbvcinco}
2497: \eeq
2498: By using eq. (\ref{apbvcinco}), one immediately concludes that we should
2499: make the following substitution:
2500: \beq
2501: -{\rm det}\Big(
2502: P\big[E_{ab}+E_{ai}\,(\,Q^{-1}-\delta\,)^{ij}\,E_{jb}\big]\,
2503: \Big)\,\,\rightarrow\,
2504: {N\alpha'\over r^2\cos^2\theta}\,I_n\,\,.
2505: \label{apbvseis}
2506: \eeq
2507: It is now straightforward to find the action of the D1-branes in the
2508: large $n$ limit. Indeed, by using eqs. (\ref{apbvuno}) and
2509: (\ref{apbvseis}), one gets:
2510: \beq
2511: S_{D1}\,=\,-T_1\,\int dtdz\,{N\over \pi\cos\theta}\,\,
2512: \sqrt{\big(\sin\theta\big)^4\,+\,
2513: \big(\,{\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\,\big)^2}\,\,.
2514: \label{apbvsiete}
2515: \eeq
2516: From eq. (\ref{apbvsiete}) one can immediately obtain the hamiltonian
2517: of the D-strings. In order to compare this result with the one
2518: corresponding to the wrapped D3-brane, let us change the worldsheet
2519: coordinate from $z$ to $r\,=\,z/\cos\theta$. Recalling that $\theta$
2520: is constant for the configurations under study and using that
2521: $T_1/\pi\,=\,4\pi\alpha'\,T_3\,=\,T_3\Omega_2\,\alpha'$, we get the
2522: following hamiltonian:
2523: \beq
2524: H\,=\,T_3\Omega_2\,N\alpha'\,\int dr\,
2525: \sqrt{\big(\sin\theta\big)^4\,+\,
2526: \big(\,{\cal C}_{5,n}(\theta)\,\big)^2}\,\,,
2527: \label{apbvocho}
2528: \eeq
2529: which, indeed, is the same as in the one in eq. (\ref{ctvcinco}) for
2530: this case. Notice that $n$, which in our present approach is the number
2531: of D-strings, corresponds to the quantization integer of the D3-brane
2532: worldvolume gauge field. It follows that the minimal energy
2533: configurations occur for
2534: $\theta\,=\,\pi n/N$ and its energy density is the one written in eq.
2535: (\ref{ctvseis}). This agreement shows that our ansatz represents
2536: D-strings growing up into a D3-brane configuration of the type studied
2537: in the main text.
2538:
2539: Let us finally point out that the same ansatz of eqs.
2540: (\ref{apbnueve}) and (\ref{apbtrece}) can be used to describe the
2541: configurations in which D0-branes expand into a D2-brane in the NS5
2542: background of eqs. (\ref{apbtres}) and (\ref{apbcuatro}). In this
2543: case, which corresponds to the situation analyzed in ref. \cite{Bachas},
2544: the D2-branes are located at fixed $r$ and one only has to compute the
2545: determinant of the matrix (\ref{apbquince}) in the D0-brane action. By
2546: using eq. (\ref{apbvuno}) one easily finds the same hamiltonian and
2547: minimal energy configurations as those of ref. \cite{Bachas}.
2548:
2549:
2550:
2551:
2552:
2553:
2554:
2555:
2556:
2557:
2558: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
2559:
2560: \bibitem{Bachas} C. Bachas, M. Douglas and C. Schweigert,
2561: {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0005}, 006 (2000), {\rm hep-th/0003037}.
2562:
2563: \bibitem{Pavel} J. Pawelczyk, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0008}, 006 (2000),
2564: {\rm hep-th/0003057}.
2565:
2566:
2567: \bibitem{KS} C. Klimcik and P. Severa, {\sl \np} {\bf B488} (1997) 653,
2568: {\rm hep-th/9609112}.
2569:
2570:
2571: \bibitem{KO} M. Kato and T. Okada, {\sl \np} {\bf B499} (1997) 583,
2572: {\rm hep-th/9612148}.
2573:
2574: \bibitem{Ale} A. Yu. Alekseev and V. Schomerus, {\sl \pr} {\bf D60}
2575: (1999) 061901, {\rm hep-th/9812193}.
2576:
2577:
2578: \bibitem{FFFS} G. Felder, J. Fr\"ohlich, J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert,
2579: {\sl \jgp} {\bf B34} (2000) 162, {\rm hep-th/9909030};
2580: L. Birke, J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert, {\sl \atmp} {\bf 3} (1999) 671
2581: {\rm hep-th/9905038}.
2582:
2583:
2584: \bibitem{Cardy} J. Cardy, {\sl \np} {\bf B324} (1989) 581.
2585:
2586: \bibitem{Polchi} J. Polchinski, {\sl \prl} {\bf 75}
2587: (1995) 4724, {\rm hep-th/9510017};
2588: see also, J. Polchinski, ``TASI Lectures on D-branes",
2589: {\rm hep-th/9611050}.
2590:
2591:
2592: \bibitem{all} K. Gawedzki, ``Conformal field theory: a case study",
2593: {\rm hep-th/9904145};
2594: S. Stanciu, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0001}, 025 (2000), {\rm hep-th/9909163};
2595: {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0010}, 015 (2000), {\rm hep-th/0006145};
2596: A. Yu. Alekseev, A. Recknagel and V. Schomerus,
2597: {\sl \jhep} {\bf 9909}, 023 (1999), {\rm hep-th/9908040};
2598: {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0005}, 010 (2000), {\rm hep-th/0003187};
2599: J. M. Figueroa-O'Farrill and S. Stanciu, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0101}, 006
2600: (2001), {\rm hep-th/0008038};
2601: A. Kling, M. Kreuzer and J.-G. Zhou, {\sl \mpl} {\bf A15} (2000) 2069,
2602: {\rm hep-th/0005148};
2603: T. Kubota and J.-G. Zhou, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0012}, 030
2604: (2000), {\rm hep-th/0010170};
2605: W. Taylor, ``D2-branes in B fields", {\rm hep-th/0004141};
2606: A. Yu. Alekseev, A. Mironov and A. Morozov,
2607: ``On B-independence of RR charges", {\rm hep-th/0005244};
2608: D. Marof, ``Chern-Simons terms and the three notions of charge",
2609: {\rm hep-th/0006117};
2610: A. Yu. Alekseev and V. Schomerus, ``RR charges of D2-branes in the WZW
2611: model", {\rm hep-th/0007096};
2612: J.-G. Zhou, ``D-branes in B fields", {\rm hep-th/0102178}.
2613:
2614:
2615: \bibitem{PR} J. Pawelczyk and S.-J. Rey, {\sl \pl} {\bf B493}
2616: (2000) 395, {\rm hep-th/0007154}.
2617:
2618: \bibitem{Imamura} Y. Imamura, {\sl \np} {\bf B537} (1999)184,
2619: {\rm hep-th/9807179}.
2620:
2621:
2622: \bibitem{Wittenbaryon} E. Witten, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 9807}, 006
2623: (1998), {\rm hep-th/9805112}.
2624:
2625:
2626:
2627: \bibitem{CGS} C. G. Callan, A. G\"uijosa and K. Savvidy, {\sl \np}
2628: {\bf B547} (1999)127, {\rm hep-th/9810092};
2629: C.G. Callan, A. Guijosa, K.G. Savvidy
2630: and O. Tafjord, {\sl \np} {\bf B555} (1999)183, {\rm hep-th/9902197}.
2631:
2632:
2633: \bibitem{Craps}
2634: B. Craps, J. Gomis, D. Mateos and A. Van Proeyen,
2635: {\sl \jhep} {\bf 9904}, 004 (1999), {\rm hep-th/9901060}.
2636:
2637:
2638:
2639:
2640:
2641:
2642:
2643: \bibitem{Camino}
2644: J.M. Camino, A.V. Ramallo and J.M. Sanchez de Santos, {\sl \np}
2645: {\bf B562} (1999)103, hep-th/9905118.
2646:
2647: \bibitem{PST} P. Pasti, D. Sorokin and M. Tonin, {\sl \pl} {\bf B398}
2648: (1997)41, {\rm hep-th/9701037}.
2649:
2650:
2651:
2652: \bibitem{Ali}
2653: M. Alishaiha, ``{\sl (0,2) Theory and String Baryon in M-Theory on
2654: $AdS_7\times S^4$}", hep-th/9811042.
2655:
2656:
2657:
2658: \bibitem{kappa} J. Gomis, A. V. Ramallo, J. Simon and P. K. Townsend,
2659: {\sl \jhep} {\bf 9911} (1999)019, {\rm hep-th/9907022}.
2660:
2661:
2662:
2663:
2664: \bibitem{LuRoy} J. X. Lu and S. Roy, {\sl \pl} {\bf B428} (1998)289,
2665: {\rm hep-th/9802080}.
2666:
2667:
2668:
2669: \bibitem{Myers} R. C. Myers, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 9912}, 022 (1999),
2670: {\rm hep-th/9910053}; N. R. Constable, R. C. Myers and O. Tafjord,
2671: {\sl \pr} {\bf D61} (2000)106009, {\rm hep-th/9911136}.
2672:
2673:
2674:
2675:
2676:
2677: \bibitem{supergravity} For a review see, for example,
2678: K. S. Stelle, ``Lectures on supergravity p-branes",
2679: {\rm hep-th/9701088}; R. Argurio, ``Brane physics in M-Theory",
2680: {\rm hep-th/9807171}.
2681:
2682:
2683: \bibitem{EMduality} G. W Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed,
2684: {\sl \np} {\bf B454} (1995)185, {\rm hep-th/9506035};
2685: {\sl \pl} {\bf B365} (1996)46, {\rm hep-th/9509141}; M. Gaillard and
2686: B. Zumino, ``Selfduality in nonlinear electromagnetism",
2687: {\rm hep-th/9705226}; A. A. Tseytlin, {\sl \np} {\bf B469} (1996)51,
2688: {\rm hep-th/9602064}; M. Aganagic, J. Park, C. Popescu and J. H. Schwarz,
2689: {\sl \np} {\bf B496} (1997)215, {\rm hep-th/9702133}.
2690:
2691:
2692:
2693: \bibitem{Llatas}P. M. Llatas, A. V. Ramallo and J. M. Sanchez de
2694: Santos, {\sl \ijmp} {\bf A15} (2000)4477, {\rm hep-th/9912177}.
2695:
2696:
2697: \bibitem{Joan} J. Sim\'on, ``Supersymmetric worldvolume solitons",
2698: {\rm hep-th/9909005}.
2699:
2700:
2701: \bibitem{Pelc}O. Pelc, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 0008}, 030 (2000),
2702: {\rm hep-th/0007100}.
2703:
2704:
2705: \bibitem{Schiappa} R. Schiappa, ``Matrix strings in weakly curved
2706: background fields", {\rm hep-th/0005145}.
2707:
2708:
2709: \bibitem{MR}J. M. Maldacena and J. G. Russo, {\sl \jhep} {\bf 9909}, 025
2710: (1999), {\rm hep-th/9908134}.
2711:
2712:
2713:
2714:
2715: \bibitem{STr}A. A. Tseytlin, {\sl \np} {\bf B501} (1997)41,
2716: {\rm hep-th/9701125}.
2717:
2718:
2719: \end{thebibliography}
2720:
2721:
2722:
2723:
2724:
2725:
2726:
2727:
2728: \end{document}
2729:
2730:
2731: