1: \documentclass[notoc]{JHEP} % pas draft
2: \usepackage{amsmath}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{amssymb,amsfonts}
5: % the only macros used in this file:
6: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
7: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
8: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
9: \def\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
10: \def\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
11: \def\db{\bar{\partial}}
12: \def\Tr{\,{\rm Tr}\, }
13: \def\Trp{\,{\rm Tr'}\, }
14: \def\tr{\,{\rm tr}\, }
15: \def\Im{\,{\rm Im}\, }
16: \def\t{\tau}
17: \def\e{\,{\rm e}}
18: \def\th{\vartheta}
19: \newcommand{\ie}{i.e.\ }
20: \newcommand{\A}{{\cal A}}
21: \newcommand{\B}{{\cal B}}
22: \newcommand{\C}{{\cal C}}
23: \newcommand{\D}{{\cal D}}
24: \newcommand{\E}{{\cal E}}
25: \newcommand{\G}{{\cal G}}
26: \newcommand{\K}{{\cal K}}
27: \renewcommand{\L}{{\cal L}}
28: \newcommand{\M}{{\cal M}}
29: \newcommand{\R}{{\cal R}}
30: \newcommand{\bR}{{\bf R}}
31: \newcommand{\p}{\partial}
32: \newcommand{\Zint}{\mathbb{Z}}
33: \newcommand{\BZ}{\mathbb{Z}}
34: \newcommand{\Real}{\mathbb{R}}
35: \def\arccosh{\,{\rm arccosh}\, }
36: \def\arcsinh{\,{\rm arcsinh}\, }
37: \def\arctanh{\,{\rm arctanh}\, }
38: % Define the wave operator
39: \def\sqr#1#2{{
40: \vcenter{\vbox{\hrule height.#2pt
41: \hbox{\vrule width.#2pt height#1pt \kern#1pt
42: \vrule width.#2pt}
43: \hrule height.#2pt}}}}
44: %\def\square{\mathchoice\sqr34\sqr34\sqr{2.1}3\sqr{1.5}3}
45: %
46: \boldmath
47: \title{D-branes in some near-horizon geometries}
48: \unboldmath
49: \author{C. Bachas\\
50: Laboratoire de Physique Th{\'e}orique
51: de l'Ecole Normale Sup{\'e}rieure\thanks{Unit{\'e} mixte du
52: CNRS et de l'Ecole Normale Sup{\'e}rieure,
53: UMR 8549.} \\
54: 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France\\
55: \email{bachas@physique.ens.fr}}
56:
57: \abstract{I review some properties of D-branes in the SU(2) and
58: SL(2,R) WZW models. I comment on a potential difficulty for the
59: realization of `warped brane worlds' in string theory. This short note is based
60: on a talk given at the Strings'01 conference in Mumbay.
61: }
62:
63: \begin{document}
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66: In this talk I will
67: review some properties of D-branes in the
68: SU(2) and SL(2,R) WZW models. These models enter in some of
69: the earliest, {\it exact} and stable string-theory
70: backgrounds \cite{or,abs,chs,hor},
71: that have returned to center-stage recently in the light of
72: the AdS/CFT correspondence \cite{ma,revN}.
73: Specifically, the level-$k$ SU(2) model describes, together with a Feigin-Fuchs
74: field, the near-horizon geometry of $Q_5 = k+2$ Neveu-Schwarz fivebranes \cite{chs}.
75: The background near the horizon of $Q_5$ NS5-branes and $Q_1$ fundamental
76: strings involves, on the other hand, both an SU(2) and an SL(2,R) WZW model
77: (see for example \cite{ms}).
78: In these settings one hopes, in principle, to go beyond the gauge theory/gravity
79: correspondence, and test the conjectured duality between
80: a full string theory and a field theory.
81:
82:
83: The study of D-branes in these backgrounds is important
84: for a variety of reasons: (a) D-branes are an essential
85: ingredient of the corresponding string theories,
86: and have interesting holographically
87: dual interpretations; (b) despite substancial
88: progress,\footnote{In reference \cite{mo}, in particular, a complete proposal was
89: made for the spectrum of closed-string excitations. A recent review
90: and many more references on the SL(2,R) model is \cite{mar}.}
91: the SL(2,R) WZW model is still only partially understood.
92: The semiclassical analysis of D-branes could help `solve'
93: this important CFT; and (c) these backgrounds are controllable
94: playgrounds, in which to see whether `warped brane world' scenarios \cite{RS}
95: can be realized in string theory.
96:
97: I will barely touch upon these questions in my talk.
98: For lack of space, I will not even
99: mention many works that have analyzed
100: branes in near-horizon
101: geometries with Ramond-Ramond fluxes.
102: My `excuse' is that these do not have, at present,
103: an exact CFT description. Finally, as this talk was being written,
104: there have appeared several papers discussing related issues
105: \cite{MMS,KR2,KR1,PR,GKS,Hi}. I will comment on them succintly in the
106: appropriate places.
107:
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109:
110:
111: \boldmath
112: \section{D-branes in SU(2)}
113: \unboldmath
114:
115: According to Cardy's general prescription \cite{Cardy},
116: applicable to any rational CFT, the basic conformal boundary states
117: of the SU(2) WZW model are
118: \begin{equation}
119: \vert\; n \gg_C \; =\; \sum_{m=1}^{k+1}\;
120: \frac{S_n^{\ m}}{\sqrt{S_1^{\ m}}}\; \vert\; m \gg_I \ .
121: \end{equation}
122: Here $k$ is the level of the current algebra, and
123: $S_n^{\ m}$ is the modular-transformation matrix for the
124: characters $\chi_m$. The representations of the
125: chiral algebra are labelled
126: by the dimension of the highest-weight
127: subspace $m=1,\cdots , k+1$ .
128: The `character'
129: or Ishibashi states $\vert m \gg_I$ only couple
130: to closed-strings
131: in the representation ${\cal H}_m \otimes {\bar {\cal H}}_m $,
132: and with unit stength. Using Verlinde's formula one can transform the
133: cylinder diagram, describing the exchange of closed strings
134: between the $n$ and $n^\prime$ Cardy states, to
135: the open-string (annulus) channel with the result
136: \begin{equation}
137: {\cal A}_{n n^\prime}\; =\;
138: \sum_{r} {\cal N}_{n n^\prime}^{\ r}\; \chi_r(q)\ ,
139: \end{equation}
140: where ${\cal N}_{n n^\prime}^{\ r}$ are the
141: fusion coefficients. These are
142: non-negative integers, as required by the identification
143: of Cardy states with regular D-branes.
144:
145:
146:
147: Although this algebraic construction was known for several years,
148: its geometric meaning has been only clarified recently.
149: A simple but illuminating remark is that the identification
150: of left and right currents on the worldsheet boundary, which is
151: automatically imposed by all Cardy states,
152: translates into Dirichlet conditions for directions normal to
153: conjugacy classes of the group \cite{AS1}.
154: Explicitly, if we parametrize the strip worldsheet by $(\sigma,\tau)$,
155: then the identification $J^a = {\bar J^a}$ implies
156: \begin{equation}
157: \left[ 1+ {\rm Ad}(g) \right]\; g^{-1} \partial_\tau g\; =\;
158: \left[ 1 - {\rm Ad}(g) \right]\;
159: g^{-1} \partial_\sigma g\ .
160: \label{gl}
161: \end{equation}
162: Here ${\rm Ad}(g) L \equiv
163: g L g^{-1}$, so that $\left[ 1 - {\rm Ad}(g) \right]$
164: projects onto the tangent space of the conjugacy class of $g$.
165: It follows that the worldsheet boundaries, parametrized by
166: the coordinate $\tau$,
167: are stuck on conjugacy classes of the group.
168: In the case of SU(2), these
169: are spherical D2-branes.
170:
171:
172: What stops these branes from shrinking to a point is a
173: quantized worldvolume flux $\int F$, whose interaction with the
174: background Neveu-Schwarz $B$-field is described by the
175: Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) action (see for instance \cite{revs}).
176: The semiclassical
177: analysis based on this action \cite{BDS}
178: (see also \cite{Paw}) reproduces many detailed properties
179: of the SU(2) D-branes, and offers a nice geometric interpretation of
180: the algebraic data of this CFT.
181: Furthermore, most of these semiclassical
182: results turn out to be {\it exact}, to all orders in the
183: $\alpha^\prime$ expansion, thanks presumably
184: to the existence of supersymmetric
185: embeddings. I will not review these calculations here -- the reader
186: can consult the original articles.
187:
188:
189: Let me instead focus on the subtle question of how to
190: define the Ramond-Ramond charge of these D-branes. The issue
191: has been elucidated from various angles in references
192: \cite{K1,Eli,K2,K3,K4,K5,K6}. The two natural candidates \cite{BDS}
193: for the charge are:
194: (i) the integral of the two-form
195: ${\cal F} = \hat B + 2\pi\alpha^\prime F$, which is gauge-invariant
196: but not quantized; and (ii) the integral of $F\simeq dA$ which
197: is quantized, but changes under large gauge transformations
198: $\delta B\simeq d\Lambda$.
199: As it turns out,
200: the former gives the local ('source') coupling to RR fields,
201: while the latter, after periodic identification modulo $k+2$, is
202: the invariant charge of a
203: twisted version \cite{BM,K6} of K theory
204: \cite{MM,W1,Wrev}. From the viewpoint of the effective supergravity, the
205: existence of different notions of
206: 'charge' can be attributed to the
207: Chern-Simons terms in the action \cite{K1,K3}.
208:
209:
210: The fact that the flux of
211: $F\simeq dA$ should be quantized was an
212: early source of confusion.
213: One can argue for this
214: by requiring that the $\sigma$-model on a
215: worldsheet $\Sigma$ with boundary be well defined
216: \cite{KS,Eli,K2,K4,K5}.\footnote{I thank Cumrun Vafa for discussions
217: of this point.}
218: Let $\Sigma$ have the topology of a disk, and denote by the same symbol
219: its spacetime embedding. The boundary $\partial\Sigma$ is a loop
220: inside the worldvolume of some D-brane. Let ${\cal D}$ be a disk inside
221: this worldvolume such that $\partial\Sigma = \partial {\cal D}$ , and let
222: ${\cal M}_3$ be a 3-manifold bounded by
223: the two disks, $ \partial{\cal M}_3= \Sigma - {\cal D}$
224: (the minus sign refers to inverse orientation). This is illustrated in
225: figure 1.
226: The $\sigma$-model action can now be written as follows:
227: \begin{equation}
228: S = \int_\Sigma {\rm tr}\; \hat G
229: + \int_{\cal D} {\cal F} + \int_{{\cal M}_3} H \ ,
230: \label{action}
231: \end{equation}
232: where $\hat G$ is the pull-back metric,
233: $H\simeq dB $ is the NS 3-form,
234: and ${\cal F}$ is the gauge-invariant field on the D-brane.
235: The measure is independent of the choice of ${\cal M}_3$ provided
236: the $H$-flux through the three-sphere is quantized, $\int H = k+2$.
237: Likewise, quantization of the $F$-flux threading any closed two-manifold
238: ensures that the measure is independent of the choice of ${\cal D}$.
239: Explicitly, given two disks ${\cal D}$ and ${\cal D}^\prime$, and a
240: `ball' ${\cal B}_3$ such that $\partial{\cal B}_3 = {\cal D}-{\cal D}^\prime$,
241: we must have
242: \begin{equation}
243: \int_{{\cal D}-{\cal D}^\prime} {\cal F} - \int_{{\cal B}_3}
244: H\ =\ n\in Z\ .
245: \end{equation}
246: The ambiguity in the choice of ${\cal B}_3$ implies that
247: we can only associate a
248: flux in
249: $Z_{k+2}$ to any closed two-manifold
250: ${\cal D}-{\cal D}^\prime$ on the D-brane.
251:
252:
253:
254: \FIGURE{\begin{picture}(300,150)(0,0)
255: \put(30,0){\epsfig{file=s1.eps,height=4cm}}
256: \end{picture}
257: \caption{ The spacetime image of the worldsheet $\Sigma$, and a
258: disk ${\cal D}$ on the D-brane worldvolume, which together
259: form the boundary of a 3-manifold
260: ${\cal M}_3 $. These enter in the $\sigma$-model
261: action for open strings, equation \eqref{action}.
262: \label{orientiffolds}}}
263:
264:
265: One can think of
266: the integer $n$ as the number of D-particles,
267: which expand out in the
268: background $B$-field by a
269: generalized `dielectric' effect \cite{Myers}.
270: The boundary RG flow, describing the formation of the $n$-particle
271: bound state, is the same that describes the screening of a
272: magnetic-impurity spin $s=(n-1)/2$ by $k$ species of conduction
273: electrons (the Kondo problem) \cite{Kondo,ARS}.
274: The fact that $n \simeq k+2-n$ can be understood
275: differently in various string theory contexts.
276: Consider for instance
277: $Q_5 \equiv k+2$ NS5-branes, and a D3-brane extending in
278: the transverse dimensions. The D-strings stretching between the
279: D3- and NS5-branes have a chiral, fermionic ground state, so that
280: pulling the D3-brane through the fivebranes creates (destroys)
281: $k+2$ oriented D-strings \cite{HW,cr1,cr2,cr3}.
282: In the near-horizon geometry of the fivebranes,
283: this process changes precisely $n$ to $k+2-n$ \cite{Pelc}.
284:
285:
286: A related argument, explained to me by Juan Maldacena,
287: starts with
288: a D3-brane wrapping the SU(2) manifold.
289: The DBI action includes a term
290: \begin{equation}
291: \int B\wedge \;^*F = - \int H\wedge {\tilde A}\ ,
292: \label{baryo}
293: \end{equation}
294: with ${\tilde A}$ the (magnetic) gauge field dual to $A$.
295: Equation \eqref{baryo}
296: shows that the $H$-flux induces $k+2$ units of magnetic charge,
297: that can be cancelled by $k+2$ D-strings
298: ending on the D-brane. This is analogous to the baryon
299: vertex in AdS5 \cite{baryon}.
300: Now think of the D-strings as Euclidean D-particle trajectories,
301: which terminate on a spherical D-brane at fixed (Euclidean) time.
302: This is an instanton configuration, describing a process in
303: which $k+2$ units
304: of D-particle charge disappear.\footnote{Lifted to M theory,
305: such a process can describe the elastic scattering of
306: a Kaluza-Klein graviton transfering $Q_5$ units of momentum
307: to a bound state of fivebranes. I thank Ed Witten for a discussion of this point.}
308: D-particle number is thus only conserved modulo $k+2$,
309: as advertized.
310:
311:
312:
313: \boldmath
314: \section{D-branes in SL(2,R)}
315: \unboldmath
316:
317: In the SL(2,R) WZW model we lack, at present, an algebraic
318: construction of D-branes as conformal boundary states {\`a} la
319: Cardy (see, however, the recent work \cite{GKS} for some steps
320: in this direction). What has been
321: worked out are the possible `gluing conditions' for
322: worldsheet currents, and their
323: semiclassical interpretation
324: based on the DBI action \cite{S1,BP}.
325: Let me summarize very briefly the results (the reader should
326: consult the references for details):
327:
328:
329: (a) The SL(2,R) group elements can be written
330: \begin{equation}
331: g = {1\over L}
332: \left(
333: \begin{array}{lll}
334: X^0+X^1 &\quad & X^2+X^3\cr
335: X^2-X^3 &\quad & X^0- X^1\cr
336: \end{array}
337: \right) ,
338: \label{param}
339: \end{equation}
340: with the $X^M$ parametrizing a pseudosphere
341: in flat space of signature $(-++-)$. The group manifold
342: is Lorentzian AdS3 of radius $L$.
343: Identifying the currents by an inner automorphism, as in \eqref{gl},
344: leads to two generic types of D-branes
345: corresponding to the elliptic or hyperbolic
346: conjugacy classes of the group \cite{S1}.
347: Their geometry is two-dimensional de Sitter (dS2)
348: or the two-dimensional hyperbolic plane (H2).
349: There are in addition two special cases:
350: pointlike D-instantons (the conjugacy class of the identity)
351: and the half lightcones in AdS3.
352:
353:
354:
355: (b) A third generic class of D-branes is obtained for the gluing
356: conditions \cite{BP}:
357: \begin{equation}
358: J^a T_a \; =\; {\bar J^a}\; \omega_0^{\vphantom 1} T_a {\omega_0^{\vphantom 1}}^{-1}
359: \ \ \ \ {\rm with} \ \ \ \
360: \omega_0^{\vphantom 1} = \left(
361: \begin{array}{ll}
362: 0 & 1 \cr
363: 1 & 0 \cr
364: \end{array}
365: \right) .
366: \end{equation}
367: Here $T_a$ are the generators of the group, and $\omega_0^{\vphantom 1}$ is an
368: outer automorphism. By an extension
369: of the argument of the previous section, one can show that these D-brane
370: worldvolumes are `twined conjugacy classes' \cite{Fr} for which
371: ${\rm tr}(\omega_0^{\vphantom 1} g)$ is fixed. Their geometry is
372: two-dimensional anti-de-Sitter (AdS2). The various D-branes preserving a
373: SL(2,R) symmetry are collected in the table below. There are, in addition,
374: stable non-symmetric branes that I wont discuss.
375:
376: \vskip 0.2cm
377:
378:
379:
380: \begin{table}[htp]
381: \begin{center}
382: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
383: \hline
384: &
385: \\
386: Conjugacy class & D-brane
387: \\
388: &
389: \\
390: \hline\hline
391: &
392: \\
393: $-\infty < \tr (\omega_0 g) <\infty$ & AdS$_2$
394: \\
395: &
396: \\
397: \hline
398: &
399: \\
400: $\vert \tr g \vert < 2$ & $H_2$
401: \\
402: &
403: \\
404: \hline
405: &
406: \\
407: $\vert \tr g \vert > 2$ & dS$_2$
408: \\
409: &
410: \\
411: \hline
412: &
413: \\
414: $\vert \tr g \vert = 2$ & light cone
415: \\
416: &
417: \\
418: \hline
419: &
420: \\
421: $g = {\bf 1}$ & point
422: \\
423: &
424: \\
425: \hline
426: \end{tabular}
427: \end{center}
428: \caption{
429: The different regular and twined conjugacy classes of $SL(2,\bR)$, and
430: the geometry of the corresponding D-brane worldvolumes.}
431: \end{table}
432:
433:
434: (c) The semiclassical analysis \cite{BP} shows that only the AdS2
435: branes are `physical'.
436: The dS2 geometries, in particular, correspond to
437: motions of closed D-strings carrying a
438: supercritical electric field. This is in line
439: with
440: other statements \cite{no1,no2}
441: about the impossibility to realize de Sitter
442: spaces in string theory. The AdS2 branes, on the other hand,
443: are worldvolumes of static (p,q)
444: strings stretching between antipodal points on the AdS boundary.
445: Two of those are drawn schematically in figure 2.
446: The larger the value of $q/p$, the more the string bends towards
447: the AdS boundary.
448:
449:
450: \FIGURE{\begin{picture}(320,150)(0,0)
451: \put(30,0){\epsfig{file=s3.eps,height=5cm}}
452: \end{picture}
453: \caption{The AdS2 D-branes in cylindrical (left) and Poincar{\'e} coordinates (right).
454: The straight brane is the worldvolume of a pure D-string. Binding $q$ fundamental
455: strings to it, makes it bend towards the boundary of the ambient AdS3 spacetime.
456: \label{ads}}}
457:
458: \vskip 0.3cm
459:
460: (d) All of these branes
461: have a supersymmetric embedding \cite{S1,BP}
462: in the
463: AdS3$\times$S3
464: $\times$(T4 or K3)
465: background arising in the near horizon region
466: of a NS5/F1 black string \cite{ms}.
467: For the S3 component of the space, one must use the SU(2)
468: branes of the previous section. The
469: AdS2$\times$S2 branes, in particular, describe the
470: junction of a (p,q) string with the NS5/F1 string of the
471: background \cite{BP}. Adding momentum along this latter string amounts
472: to modding out AdS3 by a discrete isometry, exactly as for
473: the BTZ black hole. This
474: breaks all the supersymmetries of the D-brane.
475:
476: The worldvolume theory of the AdS2$\times$S2 branes is an interesting
477: deformation of N=4 super Yang-Mills. The theory has N=2 supersymmetries,
478: and it approaches in appropriate limits
479: the non-commutative
480: theory on the `fuzzy' sphere \cite{ARS},
481: and a curved
482: version of the NCOS theory \cite{NCOS,NCO}.
483: It would be interesting to study S-duality in this context.
484: Steps towards deriving the full open-string
485: spectrum on the AdS2 branes
486: have been taken recently in references \cite{PR,Hi}.
487: In the case $q=0$, in particular, the spectrum is the `holomorphic
488: half' of the closed-string spectrum
489: proposed for the SL(2,R) WZW model
490: in reference \cite{mo}.
491:
492:
493: Another very interesting question concerns the interpetation
494: of the AdS D-branes in the dual spacetime CFT. Their holographic
495: `images' turn out to be
496: conformal defects separating different CFTs on either side
497: \cite{KR2,prep}. One can also extend the
498: geometric considerations of this talk
499: so as to incorporate orientifolds \cite{prep1},
500: recovering in particular the algebraic results of \cite{or1,or2}.
501: I will not discuss these issues here any further --
502: I will zoom instead, in the concluding section,
503: on the intriguing interplay of
504: effective versus induced geometry.
505:
506:
507: \vfil\eject
508:
509: \boldmath
510: \section{Brane worlds and `radius locking'}
511: \unboldmath
512:
513:
514: The AdS2$\times$S2 branes of the previous
515: section have higher-dimensional
516: analogs in other near-horizon geometries. A particularly
517: interesting example are the AdS4$\times$S2 branes in the
518: AdS5$\times$S5 geometry with five-form Ramond Ramond background.
519: These have been analyzed recently by Karch and Randall \cite{KR2,KR1},
520: as a step towards the realization of warped `brane world'
521: compactifications in string theory. The question of gravity localization
522: requires to go beyond the probe approximation, and to study the
523: back reaction of the branes on the ambient geometry.
524:
525: Another potential obstruction to the Randall-Sundrum
526: scenario, of purely string-theoretic origin, has been pointed out in
527: reference \cite{BP}. It
528: has to do with the fact that, in the
529: presence of non-trivial fluxes, the induced and effective metrics on the brane
530: can be drastically different. Let me now explain this in some more detail.
531:
532: The radius of the AdS2 branes of the previous
533: section, measured in the induced (closed-string) metric is
534: \begin{equation}
535: {\hat l}_{\rm AdS2}\; = \; L { T_{(p,q)}\over T_{(p,0)} }\; \ge \; L \ ,
536: \end{equation}
537: where $T_{(p,q)}$ is the tension of a (p,q) string, which is
538: always greater or equal
539: than the tension of $p$ pure D-strings. By taking $q\to\infty$
540: one can make ${\hat l}_{\rm AdS2}$ arbitrarily large,
541: so that the brane is much more flat than the ambient geometry.
542: The S2 part of the brane, on the other hand, cannot be bigger than the
543: equator two-sphere. A straightforward calculation gives
544: \begin{equation}
545: {\hat l}_{\rm S2}\; =\; L\;\sin\left({\pi q\over k+2}\right)\; \le\; L ,
546: \end{equation}
547: so that the spherical brane can be arbitrarily more curved than the
548: background geometry.
549: This situation seems, at
550: first sight, paradoxical because unbroken supersymmetry requires
551: the AdS2 and S2 radii to be equal. The point, however, is that the
552: Yang-Mills multiplet couples to
553: an effective open-string metric, which is related to
554: the closed-string metric through the well-known formula \cite{Ab,SW}
555: \begin{equation}
556: G_{\alpha\beta} =
557: \hat g_{\alpha\beta} - {\cal F}_{\alpha\gamma}\; \hat
558: g^{\gamma\delta}\;
559: {\cal F}_{\delta\beta}\ .
560: \end{equation}
561: Measured in the open-string metric the two radii are, indeed, equal to each other
562: and to the background radius (which is the same for AdS3 and S3),
563: \begin{equation}
564: {L}_{\rm S2}\; =\; {L}_{\rm AdS2}\; = L \ ,
565: \label{lok}
566: \end{equation}
567: for all values of p and q. This `locking' of the effective radii
568: to the ambient values has been
569: observed also in a related context in \cite{MMS}.
570: One could have argued for it from the fact that the
571: open- and closed-string spectra are related.
572: Note that the causal structure is determined by the
573: lightcones of the closed-string metric,
574: in accordance with the
575: general arguments of \cite{GH}. In other words nothing travels faster
576: than gravitons.
577:
578:
579: Relation \eqref{lok} shows that it is impossible to fine-tune the
580: {\it effective} geometry of the D-brane to be `flatter'
581: than the bulk geometry.
582: It is unclear whether this phenomenon persists
583: in higher dimensions and for
584: Ramond-Ramond fluxes. The back-reaction of the branes
585: on the ambient metric
586: could also play an important role.
587: If the above conclusion were, however, to persist, it
588: would be an obstruction to
589: the construction of realistic `warped brane worlds'
590: in string theory.
591:
592: \vskip 0.3cm
593:
594: {\bf Aknowledgements}: I am grateful to the organizers for the invitation
595: to speak. I thank Mike Douglas, Marios Petropoulos and Christoph
596: Schweigert for very pleasant collaborations on the contents of this
597: talk. Finally, I aknowledge the
598: support of the European Networks ``Superstring theory'' (HPRN-CT-2000-00122)
599: and ``the quantum structure of spacetime'' (HPRN-CT-2000-00131).
600:
601:
602:
603:
604:
605: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
606: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
607:
608:
609: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
610:
611: %\cite{Balog:1989jb}
612: \bibitem{or}
613: J.~Balog, L.~O'Raifeartaigh, P.~Forgacs and A.~Wipf,
614: ``Consistency Of String Propagation On Curved Space-Times:
615: An SU(1,1) Based Counterexample,''
616: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 325}, 225 (1989).
617: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B325,225;%%
618:
619: %\cite{Antoniadis:1990mn}
620: \bibitem{abs}
621: I.~Antoniadis, C.~Bachas and A.~Sagnotti,
622: ``Gauged Supergravity Vacua In String Theory,''
623: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 235}, 255 (1990).
624: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B235,255;%%
625:
626: %\cite{Callan:1991dj}
627: \bibitem{chs}
628: C.~G.~Callan, J.~A.~Harvey and A.~Strominger,
629: ``World sheet approach to heterotic instantons and solitons,''
630: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 359}, 611 (1991).
631: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B359,611;%%
632:
633: %\cite{Horowitz:1993jc}
634: \bibitem{hor}
635: G.~T.~Horowitz and D.~L.~Welch,
636: ``Exact three-dimensional black holes in string theory,''
637: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 71}, 328 (1993)
638: [hep-th/9302126].
639: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9302126;%%
640:
641: %\cite{Maldacena:1998re}
642: \bibitem{ma}
643: J.~Maldacena,
644: ``The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,''
645: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2}, 231 (1998)
646: [Int.\ J.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 38}, 1113 (1998)]
647: [hep-th/9711200].
648: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9711200;%%
649:
650:
651: %\cite{Aharony:2000ti}
652: \bibitem{revN}
653: O.~Aharony, S.~S.~Gubser, J.~Maldacena, H.~Ooguri and Y.~Oz,
654: ``Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,''
655: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 323}, 183 (2000)
656: [hep-th/9905111].
657: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9905111;%%
658:
659: %\cite{Maldacena:1998bw}
660: \bibitem{ms}
661: J.~Maldacena and A.~Strominger,
662: ``AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle,''
663: JHEP {\bf 9812}, 005 (1998)
664: [hep-th/9804085].
665: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9804085;%%
666:
667:
668: %\cite{Maldacena:2000hw}
669: \bibitem{mo}
670: J.~Maldacena and H.~Ooguri,
671: ``Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model. I,''
672: hep-th/0001053.
673: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0001053;%%
674:
675:
676: %\cite{Petropoulos:1999nc}
677: \bibitem{mar}
678: P.~M.~Petropoulos,
679: ``String theory on AdS(3): Some open questions,''
680: hep-th/9908189.
681: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9908189;%%
682:
683: %\cite{Randall:1999ee}
684: \bibitem{RS}
685: L.~Randall and R.~Sundrum,
686: ``A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,''
687: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83}, 3370 (1999)
688: [hep-ph/9905221];
689: ``An alternative to compactification,''
690: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83}, 4690 (1999)
691: [hep-th/9906064].
692: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9906064;%%
693:
694:
695: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
696:
697:
698: %\cite{Cardy:1989ir}
699: \bibitem{Cardy}
700: J.~L.~Cardy,
701: ``Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules And The Verlinde Formula,''
702: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 324}, 581 (1989).
703: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B324,581;%%
704:
705:
706: %\cite{AS1}
707: \bibitem{AS1}
708: A.~Y.~Alekseev and V.~Schomerus,
709: ``D-branes in the WZW model,''
710: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 061901 (1999)
711: [hep-th/9812193].
712: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9812193;%%
713:
714:
715:
716: \bibitem{revs}
717: C.~P.~Bachas,
718: ``Lectures on D-branes,''
719: hep-th/9806199~;
720: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9806199;%%
721: A.~A.~Tseytlin,
722: ``Born-Infeld action, supersymmetry and string theory,''\hfil\break
723: hep-th/9908105~;
724: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9908105;%%
725: J.~H.~Schwarz,
726: ``Comments on Born-Infeld theory,''
727: hep-th/0103165,\hfil\break in these proceedings.
728: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0103165;%%
729:
730:
731:
732: %\cite{Bachas:2000ik}
733: \bibitem{BDS}
734: C.~Bachas, M.~Douglas and C.~Schweigert,
735: ``Flux stabilization of D-branes,''
736: JHEP {\bf 0005}, 048 (2000)
737: [hep-th/0003037].
738: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0003037;%%
739:
740: %\cite{Pawelczyk:2000ah}
741: \bibitem{Paw}
742: J.~Pawelczyk,
743: ``SU(2) WZW D-branes and their noncommutative geometry from DBI action,''
744: JHEP {\bf 0008}, 006 (2000)
745: [hep-th/0003057].
746: %%CIT
747:
748:
749:
750:
751: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
752:
753: %\cite{Taylor:2000za}
754: \bibitem{K1}
755: W.~Taylor,
756: ``D2-branes in B fields,''
757: JHEP {\bf 0007}, 039 (2000)
758: [hep-th/0004141].
759: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0004141;%%
760:
761:
762: %\cite{Elitzur:2000pq}
763: \bibitem{Eli}
764: S.~Elitzur, A.~Giveon, D.~Kutasov, E.~Rabinovici and G.~Sarkissian,
765: ``D-branes in the background of NS fivebranes,''
766: JHEP {\bf 0008}, 046 (2000)
767: [hep-th/0005052].
768: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0005052;%%
769:
770: %\cite{K2}
771: \bibitem{K2}
772: A.~Alekseev, A.~Mironov and A.~Morozov,
773: ``On B-independence of RR charges,''
774: hep-th/0005244.
775: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0005244;%%
776:
777:
778: %\cite{Marolf:2000cb}
779: \bibitem{K3}
780: D.~Marolf,
781: ``Chern-Simons terms and the three notions of charge,''
782: hep-th/0006117.
783: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0006117;%%
784:
785:
786: %\cite{Stanciu:2000fz}
787: \bibitem{K4}
788: S.~Stanciu,
789: ``A note on D-branes in group manifolds: Flux quantization and D0-charge,''
790: JHEP {\bf 0010}, 015 (2000)
791: [hep-th/0006145].
792: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0006145;%%
793:
794:
795: %\cite{Figueroa-O'Farrill:2001kz}
796: \bibitem{K5}
797: J.~M.~Figueroa-O'Farrill and S.~Stanciu,
798: ``D-brane charge, flux quantization and relative (co)homology,''
799: JHEP {\bf 0101}, 006 (2001)
800: [hep-th/0008038].
801: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0008038;%%
802:
803: \bibitem{K6}
804: S.~Fredenhagen and V.~Schomerus,
805: ``Branes on group manifolds, gluon condensates, and twisted K-theory,''
806: JHEP {\bf 0104}, 007 (2001)
807: [hep-th/0012164].
808: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0012164;%%
809:
810:
811:
812: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
813:
814:
815:
816: %\cite{Bouwknegt:2000qt}
817: \bibitem{BM}
818: P.~Bouwknegt and V.~Mathai,
819: ``D-branes, B-fields and twisted K-theory,''
820: JHEP {\bf 0003}, 007 (2000)
821: [hep-th/0002023].
822: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0002023;%%
823:
824: %\cite{Minasian:1997mm}
825: \bibitem{MM}
826: R.~Minasian and G.~Moore,
827: ``K-theory and Ramond-Ramond charge,''
828: JHEP {\bf 9711}, 002 (1997)
829: [hep-th/9710230].
830: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9710230;%%
831:
832: %\cite{W1}
833: \bibitem{W1}
834: E.~Witten,
835: ``D-branes and K-theory,''
836: JHEP {\bf 9812}, 019 (1998)
837: [hep-th/9810188].
838: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9810188;%%
839:
840:
841: %\cite{Witten:2001cn}
842: \bibitem{Wrev}
843: E.~Witten,
844: ``Overview of K-theory applied to strings,''
845: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 16}, 693 (2001)
846: [hep-th/0007175].
847: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0007175;%%
848:
849: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
850:
851: %\cite{Klimcik:1997hp}
852: \bibitem{KS}
853: C.~Klimcik and P.~Severa,
854: ``Open strings and D-branes in WZNW models,''
855: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 488}, 653 (1997)
856: [hep-th/9609112].
857: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9609112;%%
858:
859:
860:
861: %\cite{Myers:1999ps}
862: \bibitem{Myers}
863: R.~C.~Myers,
864: ``Dielectric-branes,''
865: JHEP {\bf 9912}, 022 (1999)
866: [hep-th/9910053].
867: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9910053;%%
868:
869:
870:
871: %\cite{Affleck:1995ge}
872: \bibitem{Kondo}
873: I.~Affleck,
874: ``Conformal Field Theory Approach to the Kondo Effect,''
875: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 26}, 1869 (1995)
876: [cond-mat/9512099].
877: %%CITATION = COND-MAT 9512099;%%
878:
879:
880: %\cite{Alekseev:1999bs}
881: \bibitem{ARS}
882: A.~Y.~Alekseev, A.~Recknagel and V.~Schomerus,
883: ``Non-commutative world-volume geometries: Branes on SU(2) and fuzzy spheres,''
884: JHEP {\bf 9909}, 023 (1999)
885: [hep-th/9908040].
886: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9908040;%%
887:
888: %\cite{Hanany:1997ie}
889: \bibitem{HW}
890: A.~Hanany and E.~Witten,
891: ``Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics,''
892: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 492}, 152 (1997)
893: [hep-th/9611230].
894: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9611230;%%
895:
896: %\cite{Bachas:1997ui}
897: \bibitem{cr1}
898: C.~P.~Bachas, M.~R.~Douglas and M.~B.~Green,
899: ``Anomalous creation of branes,''
900: JHEP {\bf 9707}, 002 (1997)
901: [hep-th/9705074].
902: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9705074;%%
903:
904:
905: %\cite{Danielsson:1997wq}
906: \bibitem{cr2}
907: U.~Danielsson, G.~Ferretti and I.~R.~Klebanov,
908: ``Creation of fundamental strings by crossing D-branes,''
909: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79}, 1984 (1997)
910: [hep-th/9705084].
911: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9705084;%%
912:
913: %\cite{Bergman:1998gf}
914: \bibitem{cr3}
915: O.~Bergman, M.~R.~Gaberdiel and G.~Lifschytz,
916: ``Branes, orientifolds and the creation of elementary strings,''
917: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 509}, 194 (1998)
918: [hep-th/9705130].
919: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9705130;%%
920:
921:
922: %\cite{Pelc:2000kb}
923: \bibitem{Pelc}
924: O.~Pelc,
925: ``On the quantization constraints for a D3 brane in
926: the geometry of NS5 branes,''
927: JHEP {\bf 0008}, 030 (2000)
928: [hep-th/0007100].
929: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0007100;%%
930:
931:
932: %\cite{Witten:1998xy}
933: \bibitem{baryon}
934: E.~Witten,
935: ``Baryons and branes in anti de Sitter space,''
936: JHEP {\bf 9807}, 006 (1998)
937: [hep-th/9805112].
938: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9805112;%%
939:
940:
941: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
942: \bibitem{S1}
943: S.~Stanciu,
944: ``D-branes in an AdS(3) background,''
945: JHEP {\bf 9909}, 028 (1999)
946: [hep-th/9901122].
947: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9901122;%%
948:
949:
950: \bibitem{BP}
951: C.~Bachas and M.~Petropoulos,
952: ``Anti-de-Sitter D-branes,''
953: JHEP {\bf 0102}, 025 (2001)
954: [hep-th/0012234].
955: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0012234;%%
956:
957:
958: %\cite{Felder:2000ka}
959: \bibitem{Fr}
960: G.~Felder, J.~Frohlich, J.~Fuchs and C.~Schweigert,
961: ``The geometry of WZW branes,''
962: J.\ Geom.\ Phys.\ {\bf 34}, 162 (2000)
963: [hep-th/9909030].
964: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9909030;%%
965:
966:
967:
968: %\cite{deWit:1987xg}
969: \bibitem{no1}
970: B.~de Wit, D.~J.~Smit and N.~D.~Hari Dass,
971: ``Residual Supersymmetry Of Compactified D = 10 Supergravity,''
972: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 283}, 165 (1987).
973: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B283,165;%%
974:
975: %\cite{Maldacena:2001mw}
976: \bibitem{no2}
977: J.~Maldacena and C.~Nunez,
978: ``Supergravity description of
979: field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,''
980: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 16}, 822 (2001)
981: [hep-th/0007018].
982: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0007018;%%
983:
984:
985: %\cite{Seiberg:2000ms}
986: \bibitem{NCOS}
987: N.~Seiberg, L.~Susskind and N.~Toumbas,
988: ``Strings in background electric
989: field, space/time noncommutativity and a new noncritical string theory,''
990: JHEP {\bf 0006}, 021 (2000)
991: [hep-th/0005040].
992: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0005040;%%
993:
994: %\cite{Gopakumar:2000na}
995: \bibitem{NCO}
996: R.~Gopakumar, J.~Maldacena, S.~Minwalla and A.~Strominger,
997: ``S-duality and noncommutative gauge theory,''
998: JHEP {\bf 0006}, 036 (2000)
999: [hep-th/0005048].
1000: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0005048;%%
1001:
1002:
1003:
1004:
1005: \bibitem{prep}
1006: C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf and H. Ooguri, in preparation.
1007:
1008: \bibitem{prep1}
1009: C. Bachas, N. Couchoud and P. Windey, in preparation.
1010:
1011:
1012:
1013: %\cite{Pradisi:1995qy}
1014: \bibitem{or1}
1015: G.~Pradisi, A.~Sagnotti and Y.~S.~Stanev,
1016: ``Planar duality in SU(2) WZW models,''
1017: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 354}, 279 (1995)
1018: [hep-th/9503207].
1019: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9503207;%%
1020:
1021: %\cite{Pradisi:1995pp}
1022: \bibitem{or2}
1023: G.~Pradisi, A.~Sagnotti and Y.~S.~Stanev,
1024: ``The Open descendants of nondiagonal SU(2) WZW models,''
1025: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 356}, 230 (1995)
1026: [hep-th/9506014].
1027: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9506014;%%
1028:
1029:
1030: %\cite{Abouelsaood:1987gd}
1031: \bibitem{Ab}
1032: A.~Abouelsaood, C.~G.~Callan, C.~R.~Nappi and S.~A.~Yost,
1033: ``Open Strings In Background Gauge Fields,''
1034: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 280}, 599 (1987).
1035: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B280,599;%%
1036:
1037: %\cite{Seiberg:1999vs}
1038: \bibitem{SW}
1039: N.~Seiberg and E.~Witten,
1040: ``String theory and noncommutative geometry,''
1041: JHEP {\bf 9909}, 032 (1999)
1042: [hep-th/9908142].
1043: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9908142;%%
1044:
1045:
1046:
1047:
1048: %\cite{Gibbons:2001xe}
1049: \bibitem{GH}
1050: G.~W.~Gibbons and C.~A.~Herdeiro,
1051: ``Born-Infeld theory and stringy causality,''
1052: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 064006 (2001)
1053: [hep-th/0008052].
1054: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0008052;%%
1055:
1056:
1057: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1058: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1059:
1060:
1061: %\cite{Maldacena:2001ky}
1062: \bibitem{MMS}
1063: J.~Maldacena, G.~Moore and N.~Seiberg,
1064: ``Geometrical interpretation of D-branes in gauged WZW models,''
1065: hep-th/0105038.
1066: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0105038;%%
1067:
1068: %\cite{Karch:2001cw}
1069: \bibitem{KR2}
1070: A.~Karch and L.~Randall,
1071: ``Localized gravity in string theory,''
1072: hep-th/0105108.
1073: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0105108;%%
1074:
1075: %\cite{Karch:2000fr}
1076: \bibitem{KR1}
1077: A.~Karch and L.~Randall,
1078: ``Open and closed string
1079: interpretation of SUSY CFT's on branes with boundaries,''
1080: hep-th/0105132.
1081: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0105132;%%
1082:
1083: %\cite{Petropoulos:2001qu}
1084: \bibitem{PR}
1085: P.~M.~Petropoulos and S.~Ribault,
1086: ``Some remarks on anti-de Sitter D-branes,''
1087: hep-th/0105252.
1088: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0105252;%%
1089:
1090: %\cite{Giveon:2001uq}
1091: \bibitem{GKS}
1092: A.~Giveon, D.~Kutasov and A.~Schwimmer,
1093: ``Comments on D-branes in $AdS_3$,''
1094: hep-th/0106005.
1095: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0106005;%%
1096:
1097:
1098: %\cite{Lee:2001xe}
1099: \bibitem{Hi}
1100: P.~Lee, H.~Ooguri, J.~Park and J.~Tannenhauser,
1101: ``Open Strings on $AdS_2$ Branes,''
1102: hep-th/0106129.
1103: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0106129;%%
1104:
1105:
1106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1107:
1108:
1109:
1110:
1111: \end{thebibliography}
1112: \end{document}
1113:
1114:
1115:
1116:
1117:
1118:
1119:
1120:
1121: