1: %% This document created by Piers Kennedy. May, 2001.
2:
3: \documentstyle[aps,graphicx]{revtex}
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: %TCIDATA{TCIstyle=Article/art2.lat,aps,revtex}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \title{{\Large \bf The Woods-Saxon Potential in the Dirac Equation}}
9: \author{{\large \bf Piers Kennedy}}
10: \address{Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Sussex, Brighton
11: BN1 9QJ,~UK\\
12: email: kapv4@pact.cpes.susx.ac.uk}
13: \maketitle
14:
15: \begin{quotation}
16: The two-component approach to the one-dimensional Dirac equation is
17: applied to the Woods-Saxon potential. The scattering and bound state
18: solutions are derived and the conditions for a transmission resonance (when
19: the transmission coefficient is unity) and supercriticality (when the
20: particle bound state is at $E=-m$) are then derived. The square
21: potential limit is discussed. The recent result that a finite-range symmetric
22: potential barrier will have a transmission resonance of zero-momentum
23: when the corresponding well supports a half-bound state at $E=-m$ is
24: demonstrated.
25: \end{quotation}
26:
27: \section*{Introduction}
28:
29: There is a well-known theorem for low momentum scattering in the
30: Schr\"{o}dinger equation in one-dimension by an even
31: potential well \cite{Senn}, \cite{SdB}: as momentum $k$ tends to zero,
32: the reflection
33: coefficient $L(k)$ tends to unity unless the potential $V(x)$ supports
34: a
35: zero energy resonance \cite{Newton}. In this case $L(k)\rightarrow 0$
36: and correspondingly
37: the transmission coefficient $T(k)\rightarrow 1$. Bohm \cite{Bohm}
38: calls
39: this a transmission resonance. Recently we \cite{DKC} have generalised
40: this
41: result to the Dirac equation. Since the Dirac equation covers
42: anti-particle
43: scattering as well as particle scattering, the generalisation gives two
44: distinct results since the $k\rightarrow 0$ limit in the Dirac equation
45: corresponds both to particle states where the energy $E=m$ and
46: anti-particle
47: states where $E=-m$ and $m$ is the particle mass. The result that
48: anti-particles can have transmission resonances when they scatter off
49: potential wells is equivalent to particles having transmission
50: resonances
51: when scattering off potential barriers. This is itself related to the
52: result
53: on barrier penetration found by Klein \cite{Klein} and now called the
54: Klein
55: Paradox.
56:
57: Our result \cite{DKC} shows that transmission resonances at $k=0$ in
58: the
59: Dirac equation occur for a potential barrier $V=U_{c}(x)$ when the
60: corresponding potential well $V=-U_{c}(x)$ just supports a bound state
61: at $%
62: E=-m$: this is called a supercritical state. While transmission
63: resonances
64: for a square barrier in the Dirac equation have been known for some
65: time
66: \cite{CA} and their relationship to supercritical states for a square
67: well was pointed out more recently \cite{CDI} we are not aware of any
68: other
69: analytic solution of the Dirac equation for which they can be
70: demonstrated.
71: Nevertheless Dosch et al \cite{DJM} showed in 1971 that a transmission
72: resonance does exist for the Woods-Saxon potential, which is a smoothed
73: out
74: form of the square well/barrier. In this note, we take this example
75: further.
76: We solve the Dirac equation for the Woods-Saxon potential well to
77: demonstrate the supercritical states and we find complete solutions for
78: the
79: reflection and transmission amplitudes for scattering off a Woods-Saxon
80: potential barrier. We then are able to demonstrate the correspondence
81: between the supercritical states and the transmission resonances
82: analytically. We also consider the limit where the Woods-Saxon
83: potential
84: becomes a square well/barrier.
85:
86:
87: \section*{The one particle Dirac equation in one dimension}
88: In the one-dimensional Dirac equation, solutions can be greatly
89: simplified by adopting a two-component approach; both the positive and
90: negative energy solution states are retained without the added complication of
91: spin. Starting with the relativistic free particle Dirac equation
92: ($\hbar=c=1$):
93: \begin{equation}
94: (i \, \gamma^{\mu}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}} - m)\psi=0
95: \end{equation}
96: In the presence of an external potential $V(x)$ and taking the gamma
97: matrices $\gamma_x$ and $\gamma_0$ to be the Pauli matrices $i \sigma_x$
98: and $\sigma_z$ respectively, the Dirac equation in one dimension can be
99: written as
100: \begin{equation}
101: (\sigma_x \frac{d}{dx} - (E-V(x)) \sigma_z + m {\bf 1})\psi(x)={\bf 0}
102: \end{equation}
103: The four-spinor, $\psi$, is decomposed into two spinors, $u_1$ and
104: $u_2$, so that
105: \begin{equation}
106: \psi(x)=\left(
107: \begin{array}{c}
108: u_1(x)\\
109: u_2(x)
110: \end{array} \right)
111: \end{equation}
112: Thus the problem is to solve the coupled differential equations:
113: \begin{eqnarray}
114: u_1^{\prime}=-(m+E-V(x))u_2(x)\nonumber \\
115: u_2^{\prime}=-(m-E+V(x))u_1(x)
116: \end{eqnarray}
117: Following a similar procedure to that used by Fl\"ugge \cite{F},
118: introduce the following combinations
119: \begin{equation}
120: \phi(x)=u_1(x)+iu_2(x) \qquad , \qquad \chi(x)=u_1(x)-iu_2(x)
121: \end{equation}
122: Substituting these into (4) and re-arranging gives:
123: \begin{eqnarray}
124: \phi^{\prime}(x)=-im \chi(x) +i(E-V(x))\phi(x)\\
125: \chi^{\prime}(x)=im \phi(x) -i(E-V(x))\chi(x)
126: \end{eqnarray}
127: The two components, $\phi(x)$ and $\chi(x)$, satisfy:
128: \begin{eqnarray}
129: \phi^{\prime \prime}(x)+[(E-V(x))^2-m^2+iV^{\prime}(x)]\phi(x)=0\\
130: \chi^{\prime \prime}(x)+[(E-V(x))^2-m^2-iV^{\prime}(x)]\chi(x)=0
131: \end{eqnarray}
132: In the following the full solutions for $\phi(x)$ will be presented. In
133: order to establish $\chi(x)$, use will be made of (6).
134:
135: \section*{The Woods-Saxon Potential}
136: The Woods-Saxon potential is defined as
137: \begin{equation}
138: V(x)= W \left( \frac{\theta (-x)}{1+e^{-a(x+L)}}+\frac{\theta
139: (x)}{1+e^{a(x-L)}} \right)
140: \end{equation}
141: with $W$ real and positive for a barier or negative for a well; $a$ and
142: $L$ are real and positive. $\theta(x)$ is the Heaviside step function.
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: \begin{figure}[tbph]
145: %h=here,t=top,b=bottom,p=separate figure page
146: \par
147: \begin{center}
148: \leavevmode
149: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{wsplot.eps} \medskip
150: \caption{The Woods-Saxon potential barrier for $L=10$ with $a=5$ (solid
151: line) and $a=0.5$ (dotted line).}
152: \end{center}
153: \end{figure}
154: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
155:
156: At this stage it is worth mentioning that we will be interested in
157: potentials where $aL \gg 1$; from the above figure it can be seen that, for
158: this condition, the potential has a less pronounced cusp at $x=0$ - the
159: potential now closely resembles a square barrier with smooth walls. As
160: stated in \cite{DJM} this does not introduce any essential physical
161: restriction on the problem and is significant only in that it allows exact
162: solutions to be established (albeit in an approximation).
163:
164: \section*{Scattering States}
165: First, consider the scattering solutions for $x<0$ with $|E|>m$. On
166: making the substitution $y=-e^{-a(x+L)}$, equation (8) becomes
167: \begin{equation}
168: a^2 y \frac{d}{dy} \left[ y \frac{d \phi_L}{dy} \right]+ \left[ \left(
169: E - \frac{W}{1-y} \right)^2-m^2-\frac{iayW}{(1-y)^2} \right] \phi_L=0
170: \end{equation}
171: Splitting off fitting powers of $y$ and$(1-y)$ by setting
172: $\phi_L=y^{\mu}(1-y)^{-\lambda}f(y)$ and substituting into the above equation
173: reduces it to the hypergeometrical equation
174: \begin{equation}
175: y(1-y)f^{\prime
176: \prime}(y)+[(1+2\mu)-y(1+2\mu-2\lambda)]f^{\prime}(y)-[(\mu-\nu-\lambda)
177: (\mu+\nu-\lambda)]f(y)=0
178: \end{equation}
179: where the primes denote derivatives with respect to y and the following
180: abbreviations have been used
181: \begin{eqnarray}
182: \mu=\frac{ip}{a} \quad , \quad \nu=\frac{ik}{a} \quad , \quad
183: \lambda=\frac{iW}{a}\nonumber\\
184: p^2=(E-W)^2-m^2 \quad , \quad k^2=E^2-m^2
185: \end{eqnarray}
186: Note that as we are considering scattering states, $|E|>m$ which
187: ensures that $k$ is real, and W is real and positive. $p$ is real for
188: $m<E<W-m$ (the Klein range) and $E>W+m$ and imaginary for $W-m<E<W+m$. Of
189: principal interest are the energies which lie in the Klein range and
190: potentially lead to Klein tunnelling - where fermions can tunnel through
191: strong potentials without exponential suppression \cite{KTKP}.
192: Equation (12) has the general solution
193: \begin{equation}
194: f(y)=D_1 \, y^{-2\mu} \,
195: {_2F_1}(-\mu-\nu-\lambda,-\mu+\nu-\lambda,1-2\mu;y)+D_2 \,
196: {_2F_1}(\mu-\nu-\lambda,\mu+\nu-\lambda,1+2\mu;y)
197: \end{equation}
198: So
199: \begin{eqnarray}
200: \phi_L(y)=D_1 \, y^{-\mu}(1-y)^{-\lambda} \,
201: {_2F_1}(-\mu-\nu-\lambda,-\mu+\nu-\lambda,1-2\mu;y)\nonumber\\
202: +D_2 \,y^{\mu}(1-y)^{-\lambda}
203: {_2F_1}(\mu-\nu-\lambda,\mu+\nu-\lambda,1+2\mu;y)
204: \end{eqnarray}
205: For this to be a physically acceptable solution to the problem, it must
206: satisfy the appropriate boundary conditions as $x \to -\infty$. The
207: solutions as $x \rightarrow -\infty \Rightarrow y \rightarrow - \infty$
208: can be determined using the following formula for the asymptotic
209: behaviour of the hypergeometric function \cite{AS}:
210: \begin{equation}
211: {_2F_1}(a,b,c;y)=\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(b-a)}{\Gamma(b)\Gamma(c-a)}(-y)^{-a}+
212: \frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(a-b)}{\Gamma(a)\Gamma(c-b)}(-y)^{-b}
213: \end{equation}
214: and noting that in the limit $x \to -\infty$, $(-y)^{\mp \nu}
215: \rightarrow e^{\pm ik(x+L)}$. Therefore in this limit, $\phi_L(x)$ can be
216: written
217: \begin{equation}
218: \lim_{x \to -\infty} \, \phi_L(x)=Ae^{ik(x+L)}+Be^{-ik(x+L)}
219: \end{equation}
220: From equation (6) the other component, $\chi(x)$ is
221: \begin{equation}
222: \chi(x)=\frac{1}{im}[i(E-V(x))\phi(x)-\phi^{\prime}(x)]
223: \end{equation}
224: Substituting equation (17) into the above gives us
225: \begin{equation}
226: \lim_{x \to -\infty} \, \chi_L(x)=A \left( \frac{E-k}{m} \right)
227: e^{ik(x+L)}+B\left( \frac{E+k}{m} \right) e^{-ik(x+L)}
228: \end{equation}
229: where in both cases
230: \begin{equation}
231: A=D_1 \, \frac{\Gamma(1-2\mu) \Gamma(-2\nu)}{\Gamma(-\mu-\nu-\lambda)
232: \Gamma(1-\mu-\nu+\lambda)}e^{-i \pi \mu}+D_2 \, \frac{\Gamma(1+2\mu)
233: \Gamma(-2\nu)}{\Gamma(\mu-\nu-\lambda) \Gamma(1+\mu-\nu+\lambda)}e^{i \pi
234: \mu}
235: \end{equation}
236: and
237: \begin{equation}
238: B=D_1 \, \frac{\Gamma(1-2\mu) \Gamma(2\nu)}{\Gamma(-\mu+\nu-\lambda)
239: \Gamma(1-\mu+\nu+\lambda)}e^{-i \pi \mu}+D_2 \, \frac{\Gamma(1+2\mu)
240: \Gamma(2\nu)}{\Gamma(\mu+\nu-\lambda) \Gamma(1+\mu+\nu+\lambda)}e^{i \pi
241: \mu}
242: \end{equation}
243: The choice of combinations of the wave function components (5) can be
244: re-written :
245: \begin{equation}
246: u_1(x)=\frac{1}{2}(\phi(x)+\chi(x)) \qquad , \qquad
247: u_2(x)=\frac{1}{2i}(\phi(x)-\chi(x))
248: \end{equation}
249: Upon substitution of equations (17) and (19) into the above it can be
250: seen that the wave function, $\psi(x)$, comprises of an incident and
251: reflected wave far to the left of the barrier which is the desired form to
252: establish reflection and transmission amplitudes.
253:
254: Now consider the solutions for $x>0$. The analysis will differ slightly
255: from \cite{DJM} by making a more appropriate substitution to lead to
256: the desired transmitted wave function far to the right of the barrier.
257: This substitution will also lead to the correct wave functions when the
258: bound state solutions are considered. On choosing $z^{-1}=1+e^{a(x-L)}$,
259: equation (8) becomes
260: \begin{equation}
261: a^2 z(1-z) \frac{d}{dz}\left[ z(1-z) \frac{d \phi_R}{dz} \right]+ [( E
262: - Wz)^2-m^2-iaz(1-z)W] \phi_R=0
263: \end{equation}
264: Putting $\phi_R=z^{-\nu}(1-z)^{-\mu}g(z)$ and substituting into the
265: above gives the hypergeometrical equation
266: \begin{equation}
267: z(1-z)g^{\prime
268: \prime}(z)+[(1-2\nu)-z(2-2\mu-2\nu)]g^{\prime}(z)-[(1-\mu-\nu-\lambda)
269: (-\mu-\nu+\lambda)]g(z)=0
270: \end{equation}
271: The general solution to the above is
272: \begin{equation}
273: g(z)=d_1 \, {_2F_1}(1-\mu-\nu-\lambda,-\mu-\nu+\lambda,1-2\nu;z)+d_2
274: \,z^{2\nu}\, {_2F_1}(1-\mu+\nu-\lambda,-\mu+\nu+\lambda,1+2\nu;z)
275: \end{equation}
276: So
277: \begin{eqnarray}
278: \phi_R=d_1 \,z^{-\nu}(1-z)^{-\mu}\,
279: {_2F_1}(1-\mu-\nu-\lambda,-\mu-\nu+\lambda,1-2\nu;z)+\nonumber\\
280: d_2 \,z^{\nu}(1-z)^{-\mu}\,
281: {_2F_1}(1-\mu+\nu-\lambda,-\mu+\nu+\lambda,1+2\nu;z)
282: \end{eqnarray}
283: Also as $x \rightarrow \infty$, $z \rightarrow 0$ and $z^{-\nu}
284: \rightarrow e^{ik(x-L)}$. Therefore in order to have a plane wave travelling
285: to the right as $x \rightarrow \infty$, $d_2=0$. So
286: \begin{equation}
287: \phi_R=d_1 \,z^{-\nu}(1-z)^{-\mu}\,
288: {_2F_1}(1-\mu-\nu-\lambda,-\mu-\nu+\lambda,1-2\nu;z)
289: \end{equation}
290: and
291: \begin{equation}
292: \lim_{x \to \infty}\phi_R=d_1 \, e^{-ikL}e^{ikx}
293: \end{equation}
294: whilst the other component
295: \begin{equation}
296: \lim_{x \to \infty}\chi_R=d_1 \left( \frac{E-k}{m} \right) \,
297: e^{-ikL}e^{ikx}
298: \end{equation}
299: In order to find the energy eigenvalues, the wave functions $\phi_L$
300: and $\phi_R$ must be matched at $x=0$. As $x \rightarrow 0$, $y
301: \rightarrow 0$ and $z \rightarrow 1$ ($aL \gg 1$), so
302: \begin{equation}
303: \phi_L \rightarrow D_1 \, e^{-i \pi \mu}e^{aL \mu}e^{a \mu x}+D_2 \,
304: e^{i \pi \mu}e^{-aL \mu}e^{-a \mu x}
305: \end{equation}
306: and
307: \begin{equation}
308: \phi_R \rightarrow d_1 \, e^{-a \mu x}e^{aL \mu}
309: \frac{\Gamma(2\mu)\Gamma(1-2\nu)}{\Gamma(1+\mu-\nu-\lambda)
310: \Gamma(\mu-\nu+\lambda)}+d_1 \,
311: e^{a \mu x}e^{-aL \mu}
312: \frac{\Gamma(-2\mu)\Gamma(1-2\nu)}{\Gamma(1-\mu-\nu-\lambda)
313: \Gamma(-\mu-\nu+\lambda)}
314: \end{equation}
315: where use has been made of the following continuation identity for the
316: hypergeometric function in $\phi_R$:
317: \begin{eqnarray}
318: {_2F_1}(a,b,c;z)=\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(c-a-b)}{\Gamma(c-a)
319: \Gamma(c-b)}\,{_2F_1}(a,b,a+b-c+1;1-z)+ \qquad \qquad \qquad \nonumber\\
320: \qquad \qquad \qquad
321: (1-z)^{c-a-b}\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(a+b-c)}{\Gamma(a) \Gamma(b)}\,
322: {_2F_1}(c-a,c-b,c-a-b+1;1-z)
323: \end{eqnarray}
324: Comparing the coefficients of $e^{\pm a \mu x}$ and eliminating $d_1$
325: gives
326: \begin{equation}
327: \frac{D_2}{D_1}=e^{-2i\pi \mu}e^{4aL \mu}
328: \frac{\Gamma(2\mu)\Gamma(1-\mu-\nu-\lambda)\Gamma(-\mu-\nu+\lambda)}
329: {\Gamma(-2\mu)\Gamma(1+\mu-\nu-\lambda)\Gamma(\mu-\nu+\lambda)}
330: \end{equation}
331: The electrical current density for the one-dimensional equation (2) is
332: defined as
333: \begin{eqnarray}
334: j=\overline{\psi}(x) \gamma_x \psi(x)&=&-\psi(x)^{\dagger} \sigma_2
335: \psi(x)\nonumber\\
336: &=&i\left( u_1^{*}u_2-u_2^{*}u_1 \right) \\
337: &=&\frac{1}{2}\left( |\phi(x)|^2-|\chi(x)|^2 \right)\nonumber
338: \end{eqnarray}
339: where use has been made of the choice of combinations for the wave
340: functions (5). The current as $x \to -\infty$ is $j_L=j_{in}-j_{refl}$
341: where $j_{in}$ is the incident current and $j_{refl}$ is the reflected
342: current. Similarly as $x \to \infty$ we have that the current
343: $j_R=j_{trans}$ where $j_{trans}$ is the transmitted current.
344: Substituting equations (17), (19), (28) and (29) into (34) we find that
345: \begin{equation}
346: \begin{array}{cl}
347: j_L =&|A|^2\frac{\displaystyle k}{\displaystyle m^2}(E-k) -
348: |B|^2\frac{\displaystyle k}{\displaystyle m^2}(E+k)\\[0.3cm]
349: j_R =&|d_1|^2\frac{\displaystyle k}{\displaystyle m^2}(E-k) \end{array}
350: \end{equation}
351: From the conservation of charge we have that $j_L=j_R$ which together
352: with the relection coefficient, $R$, and the transmission coefficient,
353: $T$
354: \begin{equation}
355: R=\frac{j_{refl}}{j_{in}}=\frac{|B|^2}{|A|^2}\left(\frac{E+k}{E-k}\right)
356: \qquad , \qquad T= \frac{j_{trans}}{j_{in}} = \frac{|d_1|^2}{|A|^2}
357: \end{equation}
358: we obtain the unitarity condition:
359: \begin{equation}
360: R+T=1
361: \end{equation}
362: For the purpose of comparison with \cite{DJM} the following expressions
363: for the reflection and transmission amplitudes are useful :
364: \begin{equation}
365: r= \left( \frac{m+E+k}{m+E-k} \right) e^{-2ikL}\frac{B}{A}\qquad ,
366: \qquad t=e^{-2ikL}\frac{d_1}{A}
367: \end{equation}
368: The reflection amplitude is found to be
369: \begin{equation}
370: r\,=\,\frac{e^{-2ikL}}{\Omega}\frac{(m+E+k)B(2\nu,-\mu-\nu-\lambda)}
371: {(m+E-k)B(-2\nu,1-\mu+\nu+\lambda)}\times \left[
372: 1-e^{4ipL}\frac{B(2\mu,-\mu-\nu+\lambda) B(2\mu,-\mu+\nu+\lambda)}
373: {B(-2\mu,\mu+\nu-\lambda) B(-2\mu,\mu-\nu-\lambda)}\right]
374: \end{equation}
375: where
376: \begin{equation}
377: \Omega=1-e^{4aL\mu} \left[
378: \frac{(\mu+\nu)^2-\lambda^2}{(\mu-\nu)^2-\lambda^2}
379: \right]\frac{B^2(2\mu,-\mu-\nu+\lambda)}{B^2(-2\mu,\mu-\nu-\lambda)}
380: \end{equation}
381: and $B(a,b)=\frac{\displaystyle \Gamma(a)\Gamma(b)}{\displaystyle
382: \Gamma(a+b)}$ is the Beta function.
383: Note that this equation yields identical results to the $r$ given in
384: \cite{DJM}.
385: The transmission amplitude is found to be
386: \begin{equation}
387: t\,=\,\frac{e^{-2ikL+2a \mu
388: L}}{\Omega}\left(\frac{(\mu+\nu)^2-\lambda^2}{4 \mu \nu} \right)
389: \frac{\Gamma^2(-\mu-\nu-\lambda)\Gamma^2(-\mu-\nu+\lambda)}{\Gamma^2(-2\mu)
390: \Gamma^2(-2\nu)}
391: \end{equation}
392: Using equations (39) and (41), the unitary condition (37) can be
393: established; the algebra is quite involved and some care must be taken for
394: the two cases where $p$ is real and imaginary.
395: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
396: \begin{figure}[tbph]
397: %h=here,t=top,b=bottom,p=separate figure page
398: \par
399: \begin{center}
400: \leavevmode
401: \includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{wstrans.eps} \medskip
402: \caption{The transmission coefficient for the relativistic Woods-Saxon
403: potential barrier. The left hand plot illustrates $T$ for varying
404: energy, $E$, with $L=10$, $a=5$, $m=0.4$ and $W=1.2$. The right hand plot is
405: for varying barrier height, $W$, with $L=10$, $a=5$, $m=0.2$ and
406: $E=2m$. Both plots illustrate the tunnelling without reflection predicted by
407: Dosch, Jensen and M\"uller.}
408: \end{center}
409: \end{figure}
410: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
411:
412: In order to establish the condition for a transmission resonance,
413: $T=1$, to occur, it is more convenient to look at the reflection amplitude
414: for $r=0$. In this instance, only the square-bracketed term on the right
415: of (41) needs to be considered; although poles of the gamma-functions
416: could make $r$ zero, $\mu$, $\nu$ and $\lambda$ are all purely imaginary
417: for energies in the Klein range and do not give the negative integer
418: required for this to happen. Consequently, transmission resonances occur
419: when
420: \begin{equation}
421: 1-e^{4ipL}\frac{B(2\mu,-\mu-\nu+\lambda) B(2\mu,-\mu+\nu+\lambda)}
422: {B(-2\mu,\mu+\nu-\lambda) B(-2\mu,\mu-\nu-\lambda)}=0
423: \end{equation}
424: \section*{Bound States}
425: In order to study the bound states, use can be made of the wave
426: function derived for $x>0$, but the analysis can be simplified for $x<0$ by
427: making the substitution $y^{-1}=1+e^{-a(x+L)}$ which leads to the
428: following equation:
429: \begin{equation}
430: a^2 y(1-y) \frac{d}{dy}\left[ y(1-y) \frac{d \phi_L}{dy} \right]+ [( E
431: + Wy)^2-m^2-iay(1-y)W] \phi_L=0
432: \end{equation}
433: where $W \rightarrow -W$ in equation (10) for potential wells. Putting
434: $\phi_L=y^{\sigma}(1-y)^{\gamma}h(y)$ leads to the hypergeometric
435: equation
436: \begin{equation}
437: y(1-y)h^{\prime
438: \prime}(y)+[(1+2\sigma)-y(2+2\sigma+2\gamma)]h^{\prime}(y)-
439: [(1+\sigma+\gamma-\lambda)(\sigma+\gamma+\lambda)]h(y)=0
440: \end{equation}
441: where
442: \begin{eqnarray}
443: \sigma = \frac{\kappa}{a} \quad , \quad \kappa=m^2-E^2 \quad ,\quad
444: \gamma=\frac{ip^{\prime}}{a}
445: \quad , \quad p^{\prime \, 2}=(E+W)^2-m^2
446: \end{eqnarray}
447: As $x \rightarrow -\infty$, $y \rightarrow 0$ so choose the solution
448: \begin{equation}
449: h(y)={_2F_1}(1+\sigma+\gamma-\lambda,\sigma+\gamma+\lambda,1+2\sigma;y)
450: \end{equation}
451: and therefore
452: \begin{equation}
453: \phi_L=
454: A^{\prime}y^{\sigma}(1-y)^{\gamma}{_2F_1}(1+\sigma+\gamma-\lambda,\sigma+
455: \gamma+\lambda,1+2\sigma;y)
456: \end{equation}
457: For $x>0$, use equation (26) with $W \rightarrow -W$ so $\lambda
458: \rightarrow -\lambda$ and $\mu \to \gamma$ and also $k \rightarrow i \kappa$
459: so $\nu \rightarrow -\sigma$ then choose the solution
460: \begin{equation}
461: \phi_R=
462: B^{\prime}z^{\sigma}(1-z)^{-\gamma}{_2F_1}(1+\sigma-\gamma+\lambda,\sigma-
463: \gamma-\lambda,1+2\sigma;z)
464: \end{equation}
465: Once again, in order to find the energy eigenvlaues these two wave
466: functions must be matched at $x=0$ where both $y$, $z \rightarrow 1$ ($aL
467: \gg 1$). By making use of the continuation formula (32) the component
468: $\phi$ can be written
469: \begin{equation}
470: \phi_L \rightarrow A^{\prime} e^{-\gamma a x}e^{-\gamma a L}
471: \frac{\Gamma(-2\gamma) \Gamma(1+2\sigma)}{\Gamma (1-\gamma +\sigma -\lambda)
472: \Gamma (-\gamma + \sigma + \lambda)}+
473: A^{\prime} e^{\gamma a x}e^{\gamma a L} \frac{\Gamma(2\gamma)
474: \Gamma(1+2\sigma)}{\Gamma (1+\gamma +\sigma -\lambda) \Gamma (\gamma +
475: \sigma + \lambda)}
476: \end{equation}
477: and
478: \begin{equation}
479: \phi_R \rightarrow B^{\prime} e^{-\gamma a x}e^{\gamma a L}
480: \frac{\Gamma(2\gamma) \Gamma(1+2\sigma)}{\Gamma (1+\gamma +\sigma +\lambda)
481: \Gamma (\gamma + \sigma - \lambda)}+
482: B^{\prime} e^{\gamma a x}e^{-\gamma a L} \frac{\Gamma(-2\gamma)
483: \Gamma(1+2\sigma)}{\Gamma (1-\gamma +\sigma -\lambda) \Gamma (-\gamma + \sigma
484: - \lambda)}
485: \end{equation}
486: Comparing terms in $e^{\pm \gamma ax}$ and eliminating $A^{\prime}$ and
487: $B^{\prime}$ ultimately leads to
488: \begin{equation}
489: \frac{B(-2\gamma,\gamma+\sigma-\lambda)^2}{B(2\gamma,-\gamma+\sigma+\lambda)^2}
490: =e^{4\gamma
491: a L} \frac{(\sigma-\gamma)^2-\lambda^2}{(\sigma+\gamma)^2-\lambda^2}
492: \end{equation}
493: So
494: \begin{equation}
495: \frac{B(-2\gamma,\gamma+\sigma-\lambda)}{B(2\gamma,-\gamma+\sigma+\lambda)}
496: =\pm
497: e^{2\gamma a L}
498: \sqrt{\frac{(\sigma-\gamma)^2-\lambda^2}{(\sigma+\gamma)^2-\lambda^2}}
499: \end{equation}
500: where the even solutions are determined by the positive square root and
501: the odd solutions by the negative square root. These equations need to
502: be solved numerically to find the energy eigenvalues for the bound
503: states. It is also possible to plot the upper and lower components of the
504: bound state wave function $\psi(x)$:
505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
506: \begin{figure}[tbph]
507: %h=here,t=top,b=bottom,p=separate figure page
508: \par
509: \begin{center}
510: \leavevmode
511: \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{wsbwfs.eps} \medskip
512: \caption{The upper (left) and lower (right) components of the first
513: even bound state wave function for the sub-critical Woods-Saxon potential
514: well where $a=10$, $L=2$, $m=1$ and $W=2$. The energy of the bound
515: state is $E=0.759$.}
516: \end{center}
517: \end{figure}
518: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
519:
520: \section*{Supercriticality}
521: As the potential well deepens for increasing $W$, the energy eigenvalue
522: of any given bound state will also decrease. When this energy reaches
523: $E = -m$, the bound state merges with the negative energy continuum and
524: the potential is said to be supercritical. When $E \to -m$, $\kappa \to
525: 0$ and consequently $\sigma \to 0$. Writing
526: \begin{equation}
527: \gamma_c=\frac{i}{a}p_c \qquad , \qquad p_c^2=W^2-2mW
528: \end{equation}
529: the energy eigenvalue equation (51) becomes
530: \begin{equation}
531: \frac{B(-2\gamma_c,\gamma_c-\lambda)^2}{B(2\gamma_c,-\gamma_c+\lambda)^2}
532: =e^{4\gamma_c
533: a L}
534: \end{equation}
535: Once again the even and odd supercritical energy eigenvalues can be
536: determined by taking the positive and negative square roots respectively.
537:
538: \section*{Square Well Limit : Bound States}
539: Using
540: \begin{equation}
541: B(a,b)=\left( \frac{a+b}{b} \right)
542: \left( \frac{a+b+1}{a} \right) B(a+1,b+1)
543: \end{equation}
544: we find that
545: \begin{equation}
546: B(\mp 2 \gamma,\pm \gamma +\sigma \mp \lambda)= \mp \frac{(\mp
547: \gamma+\sigma \mp \lambda)(1 \mp \gamma+\sigma \mp \lambda)}{2\gamma(\pm
548: \gamma+\sigma \mp \lambda)}B(1 \mp 2\gamma,1 \pm \gamma +\sigma \mp \lambda)
549: \end{equation}
550: Therefore in the square well limit $a \to \infty$,
551: $\gamma,\sigma,\lambda \to 0$ and
552: \begin{equation}
553: \frac{B(-2 \gamma,\gamma +\sigma -\lambda)}{B(2 \gamma,-\gamma +\sigma
554: +\lambda)} \to
555: -\frac{(-\gamma+\sigma-\lambda)(-\gamma+\sigma+\lambda)}{(\gamma+\sigma-\lambda)
556: (\gamma+\sigma+\lambda)}
557: \end{equation}
558: where we have used $B(1,1)=1$. Substituting this into (51) we obtain
559: \begin{equation}
560: e^{4ip^{\prime}L} =
561: \frac{(\sigma-\gamma)^2-\lambda^2}{(\sigma+\gamma)^2-\lambda^2}
562: = \frac{(\kappa-ip^{\prime})^2+W^2}{(\kappa+ip^{\prime})^2+W^2}
563: \end{equation}
564: Rationalising we find that
565: \begin{equation}
566: e^{4ip^{\prime}L} =\left( \frac{\kappa^2-p^{\prime
567: 2}+W^2}{2mW}-\frac{i\kappa p^{\prime}}{mW} \right)^2
568: \end{equation}
569: Choosing the positive root and solving for the real and imaginary parts
570: one eventually obtains
571: \begin{equation}
572: tan \, 2p^{\prime} L =\frac{2 \kappa p^{\prime}}{p^{\prime
573: 2}-\kappa^2-W^2}
574: \end{equation}
575: which after much laborious algebra gives for the even solutions
576: \begin{equation}
577: tan \, p^{\prime} L = \frac{mW+\kappa^2-EW}{\kappa p^{\prime}}
578: = \sqrt\frac{(m-E)(E+W+m)}{(m+E)(E+W-m)}
579: \end{equation}
580: and for the odd solutions
581: \begin{equation}
582: tan\,p^{\prime} L = -\frac{mW-\kappa^2+EW}{\kappa p^{\prime}}
583: = -\sqrt\frac{(m+E)(E+W-m)}{(m-E)(E+W+m)}
584: \end{equation}
585: (these are precisely the equations for even and odd bound states in the
586: square well \cite{CDI} with $W=V$).
587:
588: \section*{Zero Momentum Resonances and Supercriticality}
589:
590: It was first pointed out in \cite{PDKMSc} that the conditions for
591: supercriticality and zero-momentum resonances were the same for the square,
592: Gaussian and Woods-Saxon potentials. Indeed for the square potential
593: well, $V(x)$, where $V(x)=0$ for $|x| \geq a$ and $V(x)=-U$ $\leq 0$ for
594: $|x| <a$, the condition for supercriticality is $2p^{\prime}a=N \pi$
595: where $p^{\prime 2} =U^2-2mU$ \cite{KTKP}. The Dirac equation (4) is
596: invariant under charge conjugation: that is to say under the transformation
597: \begin{equation}
598: E\rightarrow -E\quad U\rightarrow -U\quad u_1\rightarrow u_2\quad
599: u_2\rightarrow u_1
600: \end{equation}
601: Consequently the condition for a supercritical particle at $E=-m$ in a
602: square well is the same as that for a supercritical antiparticle at
603: $E=m$ in a square barrier. It can also be shown that for a transmission
604: resonance to occur, $2pa=N \pi$ where $p^2=(E-V)^2-m^2=k^2+V^2-2VE$. In
605: the zero-momentum limit, $k \to 0$, this is seen to be identical to the
606: condition for a supercritical antiparticle. In other words when a
607: potential well of finite range is strong enough to contain a supercritical
608: state, then a particle of arbitrarily small momentum will be able to
609: tunnel right through the potential barrier created by inverting the well
610: without reflection \cite{DKC}. From (42), the condition for a
611: transmission resonance to occur for the Woods-Saxon potential is
612: \begin{equation}
613: e^{4ipL}=\frac{B(-2\mu,\mu+\nu-\lambda)
614: B(-2\mu,\mu-\nu-\lambda)}{B(2\mu,-\mu-\nu+\lambda) B(2\mu,-\mu+\nu+\lambda)}
615: \end{equation}
616: When $E \to m$ (for a low-momentum particle), we find that $p^2 \to
617: W^2-2mW=p_c$ so that $\mu \to \gamma_c$ and also $k \to 0 \Rightarrow \nu
618: \to 0$. So (64) becomes
619: \begin{equation}
620: e^{4ip_c L}=
621: \frac{B(-2\gamma_c,\gamma_c-\lambda)^2}{B(2\gamma_c,-\gamma_c+\lambda)^2}
622: \end{equation}
623: As expected, this is precisely the condition required for the potential
624: barrier to be supercritical (54) once the \lq flipping\rq\, procedure
625: on the potential well as described above is considered. The components
626: of the zero-momentum resonance/half-bound state wave function,
627: $\psi(x)$, can be plotted and have the following appearance:
628: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
629: \begin{figure}[tbph]
630: %h=here,t=top,b=bottom,p=separate figure page
631: \par
632: \begin{center}
633: \leavevmode
634: \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{wszmwfs.eps} \medskip
635: \caption{The upper (left) and lower (right) components of the first
636: zero momentum wave function for the supercritical Woods-Saxon potential
637: barrier where $a=10$, $L=2$, $m=1$ and $W=2.274$.}
638: \end{center}
639: \end{figure}
640: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
641: Comparison with the zero momentum wave functions for the square and
642: Gaussian barriers \cite{DKC} highlights the existence of two turning
643: points which occur in the top component of the wave function for the smooth
644: Gaussian potential only. Once again these correspond to the points $\pm
645: x_K$ where $V(\pm x_K)=E+m=2m$ at zero momentum and are not manifest
646: for the square barrier whose walls are discontinuous.
647:
648: \section*{Acknowledgement}
649: The author wishes to thank Professor Norman Dombey for many helpful
650: discussions and suggested improvements to the paper.
651:
652: \begin{references}
653:
654: \bibitem{Senn} Senn, P., Am. J. Phys. {\bf 56}, 916 (1988).
655:
656: \bibitem{SdB} Sassoli de Bianchi, M., J. Math. Phys. {\bf 35}, 2719
657: (1994).
658:
659: \bibitem{Newton} Newton, R. G., {\it Scattering Theory of Waves and
660: Particles}, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1982).
661:
662: \bibitem{Bohm} Bohm, D.,\textsl{Quantum Mechanics}, (Prentice Hall,
663: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1951).
664:
665: \bibitem{DKC} Dombey, N., Kennedy, P. and Calogeracos, A., Phys. Rev.
666: Lett. {\bf 85}, 1787 (2000).
667:
668: \bibitem{Klein} Klein, O., Z. Phys. {\bf 53}, 157 (1929).
669:
670: \bibitem{CA} Coulter, B. L. and Adler, C. G., \textsl{Am. J. Phys.},
671: $\bf 39$, $305$ (1971).
672:
673: \bibitem{CDI} Calogeracos, A., Dombey, N., and Imagawa, K., Yadernaya
674: Fiz. {\bf 159}, 1331 (1996); Phys. At. Nuc., {\bf 159}, 1275 (1996).
675:
676: \bibitem{DJM} Dosch, H. G., Jensen, J. H. D. and M\"uller, V. F.,
677: \textsl{Phys. Norvegica}, $\bf 5$, $151$ (1971).
678:
679: \bibitem{F} Fl\"ugge, S., \textsl{Practical Quantum Mechanics},
680: (Springer-Verlag, $1974$). \textsl{Problem 207}.
681:
682: \bibitem{KTKP} Calogeracos, A. and Dombey, N., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A
683: {\bf 14}, 631 (1999); Phys. Rep. {\bf 315}, 41 (1999).
684:
685: \bibitem{AS} Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., \textsl{Handbook of
686: Mathematical Functions}, (Dover, New York, $1965$).
687:
688: \bibitem{PDKMSc} Kennedy, P., \textsl{A Numerical Investigation of
689: Potential Wells and Barriers in the One-Dimensional Dirac Equation}, M.Sc.
690: dissertation, University of Sussex (1999).
691:
692: \end{references}
693: \end{document}
694: