1: %%%%%% LATEX FORMAT %%%%%

2: \documentstyle[12pt,epsf]{article}

3: 

4: \def\be{\begin{equation}}

5: \def\ee{\end{equation}}

6: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

7: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

8: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

9: \newcommand{\newsection}{\setcounter{equation}{0}\section}

10: 

11: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.22}

12: \topmargin -20 mm 

13: \oddsidemargin 0 mm 

14: \evensidemargin 0 mm

15: \textwidth 166 mm 

16: \textheight 230 mm

17: 

18: \begin{document}

19: 

20: \begin{flushright}

21: hep-th/0108198

22: \end{flushright}

23: 

24: \pagestyle{plain}

25: 

26: \def\e{{\rm e}}

27: \def\haf{{\frac{1}{2}}}

28: \def\tr{{\rm Tr\;}}

29: \def\goes{\rightarrow}

30: \def\ie{{\it i.e.}, }

31: \def\tcl{T_{\rm cl}}

32: \def\Goes {\Rightarrow}

33: \def\CX{{\cal X}}

34: \def\cm{{\rm c.m.}}

35: \def\fp{{\rm f.p.}}

36: \def\ca{{\cal A}}

37: \def\cf{{\cal F}}

38: \def\cd{{\cal D}}

39: \def\cv{{\cal V}}

40: \def\cvsym{{\cal V}_{{\rm sym.}}}

41: \def\cvnonsym{{\cal V}_{{\rm non-sym.}}}

42: \def\iphi{{\bf i}_\Phi}

43: \def\iv{{\bf i_v}} 

44: \def\xgphi{{x\goes\Phi}}

45: 

46: 

47: \begin{center}

48: \vspace{2cm}

49: {\Large {\bf On The Interaction Of D0-Brane Bound States}}\\

50: \vspace{.4cm}

51: 

52: {\Large {\bf And RR Photons}}

53: \vspace{.8cm}

54: 

55: Amir H. Fatollahi 

56: 

57: \vspace{.4cm}

58: 

59: {\it Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita di Roma ``Tor Vergata",}\\ {\it

60: INFN-Sezione di Roma II, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 1,}\\ {\it 00133,

61: Roma, Italy}

62: \vspace{.2cm}

63: 

64: {\it and}

65: \vspace{.2cm}

66: 

67: {\it Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS),}\\ {\it

68: P.O.Box 45195-159, Zanjan, Iran}

69: \footnote{Postal and permanent address.}

70: 

71: \vspace{.4cm}

72: 

73: {\sl fatho@roma2.infn.it}

74: \end{center}

75: \vskip .3 cm

76: 

77: \begin{abstract}

78: We consider the problem of the interaction between D0-brane bound state

79: and 1-form RR photons by the world-line theory. Based on the fact that in

80: the world-line theory the RR gauge fields depend on the matrix coordinates

81: of D0-branes, the gauge fields also appear as matrices in the formulation. 

82: At the classical level, we derive the Lorentz-like equations of motion for

83: D0-branes, and it is observed that the center-of-mass is colourless with

84: respect to the $SU(N)$ sector of the background. Using the path integral

85: method, the perturbation theory for the interaction between the bound

86: state and the RR background is developed. We discuss what kind of field

87: theory may be corresponded to the amplitudes which are calculated by the

88: perturbation expansion in world-line theory. Qualitative considerations

89: show that the possibility of existence of a map between the world-line

90: theory and the non-Abelian gauge theory is very considerable. 

91: \end{abstract}

92: 

93: \vspace{1.0cm}

94: 

95: PACS: 11.25.-w, 11.15.-q

96: 

97: Keywords: D-branes, Noncommutative Geometry, Gauge Theory

98: 

99: \newpage

100: 

101: 

102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

103: \section{Introduction}

104: \setcounter{equation}{0}

105: In recent years a great attention is appeared in formulation and studying

106: field theories on non-commutative spaces. Apart from the abstract

107: mathematical interests, the physical motivation in doing so has been the

108: natural appearances of non-commutative spaces in String Theory. 

109: Correspondingly, it has been understood that String Theory is involved by

110: some kinds of non-commutativities; two important examples are, 1) the

111: coordinates of the bound states of $N$ D$p$-branes \cite{9510017} are

112: presented by $N\times N$ hermitian matrices \cite{9510135}, and 2) the

113: longitudinal directions of D$p$-branes in the presence of NS B-field

114: background appear to be non-commutative \cite{CDS,9908142}, as are seen by

115: the ends of open strings \cite{jabbari}. In the second example, the

116: coordinates in the longitudinal directions of D$p$-branes act as some

117: operators and satisfy the algebra: 

118: \bea\label{algebra}

119: [\hat x^\mu,\hat x^\nu]=i\theta^{\mu\nu},

120: \eea

121: where $\theta^{\mu\nu}$ is a constant anti-symmetric tensor. There are a

122: lot of attempts in the recent literature to study different aspects of the

123: field theories defined on these kinds of non-commutative spaces. As a

124: point, we mention that the above algebra is satisfied just by $\infty

125: \times \infty$ dimensional matrices, and consequently, the concerned

126: non-commutativities should be assumed in all (regions) of the space. Also,

127: since there is a non-zero expectation value for a tensor field as $\langle

128: B^{\mu\nu} \rangle = (\theta^{-1})^{\mu\nu}$ \cite{9908142}, in these

129: spaces generally one should expect the violation of the Lorentz

130: invariance. 

131: 

132: As we recalled in above, there is another kind of non-commutativity

133: concerning the coordinates of D-brane bound states, calling them from now

134: on ``matrix coordinates". In contrast to the case related to the algebra

135: (\ref{algebra}), for the case of D-brane bound states, we have

136: non-commutativity for finite dimensional matrices, and thus the

137: non-commutativity of coordinates is not extended to all of the space. In

138: this case the non-commutativity is `confined' just inside the bound state;

139: saying by simple words: ``The non-commutativity is not seen by an observer

140: far from the bound state". In contrast to the case of infinite extension

141: of non-commutativity, we call this kind {\it confined non-commutativity}. 

142: 

143: By this picture, the natural question is: How can we know about the

144: structure of confined non-commutativity? Since the non-commutativity of

145: bound state is confined, like any other similar situation known in

146: physics, the answer to the above question is gained by analysing and

147: studying the response of the substructure of bound state to the external

148: probes. In this respect one may consider two kinds of the external probes,

149: 1) another D-brane, or 2) quanta of external fields, like gravitons or

150: photons of form fields. To be specific, let us consider things in the

151: special case of D0-branes. Using another D0-brane, as a probe of a system

152: of D0-branes, is a familiar example from the studies related to the

153: M(atrix) model conjecture of M-theory \cite{9610043}. In the M(atrix)

154: model picture, since D0-branes are already assumed to be super-gravitons

155: of the 11-dimensional super-gravity theory in the light-cone gauge, the

156: problem in hand is in fact nothing but `probing' the bound state by

157: another individual `graviton'. There in M(atrix) model, the high amount of

158: supersymmetry, together with the specific form of the commutator potential

159: of matrix coordinates, help to calculate the elements of S-matrix for

160: various scattering processes. The important peculiarity of this case is

161: that, by these kinds of investigations one uses non-commutativity (by

162: things like the commutator potential) to study the effective theory of

163: D0-branes, rather than analysing the `structure' of confined

164: non-commutativity itself \cite{review-matrix}. In other words, generally

165: in this case one ignores the internal dynamics inside the bound state (as

166: target), and essentially considers only the relative dynamics of the

167: target and other D0-brane(s) as probe(s). 

168: 

169: In this work we want to discuss the basic elements of using the second

170: kind of the probes mentioned in above (\ie external fields) to find

171: information about the structure of confined non-commutativity. As it will

172: be clear through the paper, the language which is used by this kind of

173: probe is much closer to the field theory formulation of the problem, in

174: comparison with the approach in which the probe is viewed as another

175: D0-brane. To do this, we need to know the dynamics of the bound state of

176: D0-branes in different backgrounds. Due to the nature of matrix

177: coordinates, the formulation of the dynamics of D0-branes in the

178: background of gravity and various form fields is a nontrivial question.

179: One of the most important progresses in this direction is done by the

180: works \cite{9910053,9910052}. Here we use the results of

181: \cite{9910053,9910052}, restricting ourselves to the simplest case of zero

182: NS B-field and flat metric, but non-zero 1-form RR field. Though the

183: framework here we use is coming from D$p$-branes of String Theory, it is

184: useful to consider the more general case in arbitrary space-time

185: dimensions $d+1$. Also as the first step, we consider the bosonic partners

186: only.

187: 

188: One of the questions which can be addressed in this direction is about the

189: nature of the effective field theory which captures the interaction

190: between the bound state of D0-branes and the `photons' of the 1-form RR

191: field. To be more specific, it will be interesting to derive the effective

192: vertex function for the interaction of a 1-form RR photon with the

193: incoming--outgoing D0-brane bound states. These kinds of questions consist

194: some parts of the discussions of this paper. Also we discuss that the

195: amplitudes of which field theory can be corresponded to the amplitudes

196: which are derived by the world-line formulation of D0-branes in RR

197: background \footnote{The reader can refer to \cite{9907146}, as an attempt

198: to interpret the quantized propagation of D0-branes, while they are

199: interacting with each other via the commutator potential, as the Feynman

200: graphs of a field theory in the light-cone gauge.}. 

201: 

202: The world-line formulation we will use in this work, is very much like

203: that of M(atrix) model conjecture; in particular, it is in the

204: non-relativistic limit. To approach the Lorentz covariant formulation,

205: following finite-$N$ interpretation of \cite{9704080}, it is reasonable to

206: interpret things in the Discrete Light-Cone Quantization (DLCQ) framework. 

207: This point of view should be kept also for the correspondence we consider

208: to an effective field theory for the interacting theory of

209: D0-branes--photons. 

210: 

211: The organization of the remained parts of this paper is as follows.  In

212: Sec.2, based on \cite{9910053,9910052}, we review the main aspects of the

213: world-line formulation of the dynamics of D0-brane bound states in

214: nontrivial backgrounds. These include equations of motion of D0-branes in

215: 1-form background, and also the symmetry aspects of the world-line

216: formulation. In Sec.3, by using the path integral method, we quantize the

217: D0-brane theory. In particular, we write down the expression of the

218: propagator in the first order of perturbation, which can be converted to

219: the amplitudes of the scattering processes by an arbitrary external

220: source. In Sec.4, we discuss the question of ``Which field theory can be

221: corresponded to the world-line theory of D0-branes in 1-form background?". 

222: Sec.5 is devoted to the conclusion and discussions. 

223: 

224: The discussions and ideas concerning in this paper were initiated by the

225: previous works of the author in \cite{0103262} and \cite{0104210}. In

226: particular, the problem we consider in this work interpreted in

227: \cite{0104210} as the world-line formulation of ``electrodynamics on

228: matrix space". Also the subject of `probing confined non-commutativity' is

229: mentioned briefly in the last part of \cite{0104210}. 

230: 

231: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

232: \section{On Dynamics Of D0-Branes In One-Form RR\\ Background}

233: \setcounter{equation}{0}

234: \subsection{First Look: D$p$-Branes In General Background}

235: It is known that the transverse coordinates of bound state of $N$

236: D$p$-branes, rather than numbers, are presented by $N\times N$ hermitian

237: matrices \cite{9510135}; see review \cite{9611050}. Due to the nature of

238: matrix coordinates, the formulation of the dynamics of D$p$-branes in the

239: background of gravity and various form fields is a nontrivial question.

240: One of the most important progresses in this direction is done by the

241: works \cite{9910053,9910052}. In \cite{9910053}, by taking T-duality of

242: String Theory as the guiding principle, an action for the dynamics of the

243: bound states of D$p$-branes in nontrivial background is proposed. The

244: proposed bosonic action for the bound state of $N$ D$p$-branes (in units

245: $2\pi l^2=1$) is the sum of:

246: \bea

247: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!

248: &~&S_{BI}=-T_p\int d^{p+1}\sigma\; \tr\bigg(\e^{-\phi}

249: \sqrt{-\det(P\{E_{IJ}+E_{Ii}(Q^{-1}-\delta)^{ij}E_{jJ}\}+F_{IJ})

250: \det(Q^i_j)}\bigg),\\

251: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!

252: &~&S_{CS}=\mu_p\int\tr\bigg(P\{\e^{i\;\iphi\iphi}(\sum

253: C^{(n)}\e^{B})\}

254: \e^{F}\bigg),

255: \eea

256: with the following definitions \cite{9910053}:

257: \bea

258: &~&E_{\mu\nu}\equiv G_{\mu\nu}+B_{\mu\nu},\;\;\;\;

259: Q^i_j\equiv \delta^i_j+i[\Phi^i,\Phi^j]E_{kj},\\

260: &~&\mu,\nu=0,\cdots,9,\;\;\;I,J=0,\cdots,p,\;\;\;i,j=p+1,\cdots,9.\nonumber

261: \eea

262: In the above $G_{\mu\nu}$ and $B_{\mu\nu}$ are the metric and NS B-field

263: respectively, and $\Phi^i$ are world-volume scalars and $N\times N$

264: hermitian matrices, that describe the position of D$p$-branes in the

265: transverse directions. The $C^{(n)}$ is $n$-form RR field, while $F_{IJ}$

266: is the $U(N)$ field strength. In this action, $P\{\cdots\}$ denotes the

267: pull-back of the bulk fields to the world-volume of the D$p$-branes, and

268: $\tr$is trace on the gauge group. $\iv$ denotes the interior product with

269: a vector ${\bf v}$; for example, $\iphi$ acts on the 2-form $C^{(2)}=\haf

270: C^{(2)}_{ij} dx^i dx^j$ as

271: \bea

272: \iphi C^{(2)}= \Phi^i C^{(2)}_{ij} dx^j,\;\;\;\;\;\;

273: \iphi\iphi C^{(2)}= \Phi^i \Phi^j C^{(2)}_{ij}=\haf [\Phi^i,\Phi^j]

274: C^{(2)}_{ij}.

275: \eea

276: Therefore $(\iphi)^2C^{(n)}$=0 for the commutative case, \ie for one

277: D$p$-brane. 

278: 

279: Some comments on the above action are in order:

280: 

281: {\it i)} All the derivatives in the longitudinal directions should be

282: actually covariant derivatives, \ie $\partial_I\goes D_I=\partial_I

283: +i[A_I,\;]$ \cite{hulldorn}. This point is true also for the pull-back

284: quantities. 

285: 

286: {\it ii)} The pull-back quantities depend on the transverse directions of

287: the D$p$-branes only via their functional dependence on the world-volume

288: scalars $\Phi^i$ \cite{douglas}. Since the matrix coordinates $\Phi$ do

289: not commute with each other, the problem of ordering ambiguity is present.

290: Following some arguments, it is proposed that the coordinates $\Phi$'s

291: appear in the background fields by the ``symmetrization prescription" 

292: \cite{9910053,garousi,9712185,9712159}. The symmetrization on

293: coordinates can be obtained by the so-called ``non-Abelian Taylor

294: expansion". The non-Abelian Taylor expansion for an arbitrary function

295: $f(\Phi^i,\sigma^I)$ is given by

296: \bea\label{NTE}

297: f(\Phi^i,\sigma^I)&\equiv&f(x^i,\sigma^I)|_\xgphi=\exp[\Phi^i\partial_{x^i}] 

298: f(x^i,\sigma^I)|_{x=0}\nonumber\\

299: &=&\sum_{n=0}^\infty

300: \frac{1}{n!} \Phi^{i_1}\cdots \Phi^{i_n} 

301: (\partial_{x^{i_1}}\cdots\partial_{x^{i_n}})

302: f(x^i,\sigma^I)|_{x=0}.

303: \eea

304: In the above expansion the symmetrization is recovered via the symmetric

305: property of the derivatives inside the term $(\partial_{x^{i_1}} \cdots

306: \partial_{x^{i_n}})$. 

307: 

308: {\it iii)} This action involves a single $\tr$, and this $\tr$should be

309: calculated by symmetrization prescription for the non-commutative

310: quantities $F_{IJ}$, $D_I\Phi^i$ and $i[\Phi^i, \Phi^j]$ \cite{tseytlin}

311: \footnote{There is a stronger prescription, with symmetrization between

312: all non-commutative objects $F_{IJ}$, $D_I\Phi^i$, $i[\Phi^i, \Phi^j]$,

313: and the individual $\Phi$'s appearing in the functional dependences of the

314: pull-back fields \cite{9910053,9904095}. We will not use this one in our

315: future discussions for the case of D0-branes, with no essential change in

316: the conclusions.}. 

317: 

318: To become more familiar with the terms in the action of D$p$-branes, let

319: us consider the special case $p=0$ of D0-branes, in which the world-volume

320: consists only the time direction, as $\sigma^0=t$. The dynamics of

321: D0-branes in background of metric $G_{\mu\nu}(x,t)$, the 1-form RR field

322: $C^{(1)}_\mu(x^\nu)\equiv A_\mu(x,t)$ and zero NS B-field, not being

323: precise about the indices and coefficients, in the lowest orders is given

324: by an action like \cite{9910053,9910052}: 

325: \bea\label{SD0-general} 

326: &S&=\int dt\; \tr \bigg(\frac{m}{2} G_{ij}(\Phi,t) D_t\Phi^iD_t \Phi^j + q

327: G_{ij}(\Phi,t)A^i(\Phi,t)  D_t\Phi^j- q A_0(\Phi,t)  \nonumber\\ 

328: &-&\!\!\!\!qG_{0i}(\Phi,t) D_t\Phi^i A_0(\Phi,t)

329: +mG(\Phi,t)G(\Phi,t)[\Phi,\Phi]^2+

330: (1-G_{00}(\Phi,t))+\cdots\bigg),

331: \eea 

332: in which $D_t=\partial_t+i[a_t(t),\;\;]$ acts as covariant derivative on

333: the world-line, and we have set the charge $\mu_0=q$. In above, the

334: functional dependence on the matrix coordinates of D0-branes should be

335: understood.  After all above, we have the action (\ref{SD0-general}) 

336: which can be interpreted as the world-line formulation of the dynamics of

337: D0-branes in nontrivial backgrounds.

338: 

339: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

340: \subsection{Action Of D0-Branes In One-Form Background}

341: In the following considerations in this work, we take the special case of

342: the dynamics of D0-branes in the background of 1-form RR field $(A_0(x,t),

343: A_i(x,t))$, in flat metric and zero NS B-field. Consequently, the low

344: energy bosonic action of $N$ D0-branes, after restoring

345: the string length $l$, is given by

346: \bea\label{SD0}

347: S_{{\rm D0}}= \int dt\; \tr \bigg(\haf m D_tX_i

348: D_t X^i + q D_tX^i A_i(X,t) - q A_0(X,t)+m

349: \frac{[X^i,X^j]^2}{4 (2\pi l^2)^2}+

350: \cdots\bigg),

351: \eea

352: in which we have changed slightly the notation for matrix coordinates

353: from $(2\pi l^2)\Phi^i$ to $X^i$, with the usual expansion

354: \bea\label{expan}

355: X^i=X^i_a T^a, \;\;\;i=1,\cdots, d,\;\;\;a=0,1,\cdots, N^2-1,

356: \eea

357: with $T^a$ as the basis for hermitian matrices (\ie the generators of

358: $U(N)$). Though D$p$-branes of String Theory live in the critical

359: dimensions $D=10$ (or 26), for the case of D0-branes it will be useful to

360: consider the more general case in arbitrary spatial dimensions $d$. We

361: recall that the gauge fields appear in the action by functional dependence

362: on symmetrized products of matrix coordinates $X$'s. The action

363: (\ref{SD0}) can be interpreted as the world-line formulation of

364: ``electrodynamics on matrix space"  \cite{0104210}. Also we mention that

365: in this action the degrees of freedom is enhanced from $d$ in ordinary

366: space, to $d\times N^2$ in space with matrix coordinates. 

367: 

368: The original theory, which may be called bulk theory, is invariant under

369: the usual $U(1)$ transformations such as

370: \bea

371: A_\mu(x,t) \goes

372: A'_\mu(x,t)=A_\mu(x,t)-\partial_\mu\Lambda(x,t),\;\;\;\mu=0,1,\cdots,d

373: \eea

374: In the world-line theory, the transformation takes the form as: 

375: \bea\label{UOT}

376: A_i(X,t)&\goes& A'_i(X,t)=A_i(X,t)+\delta_i\Lambda(X,t),\nonumber\\

377: A_0(X,t)&\goes& A'_0(X,t)=A_0(X,t)-\partial_t\Lambda(X,t)

378: \eea

379: in which $\delta_i$ is the functional derivative $\frac{\delta}{\delta

380: X^i}$. Consequently, one obtains:

381: \bea\label{VSD0}

382: \delta S_{{\rm D0}} 

383: &\sim& q \int dt\; \tr \bigg(

384: \partial_t \Lambda(X,t) +

385: \dot X^i \delta_i\Lambda(X,t) +

386: i a_t[X^i,\delta_i\Lambda(X,t)]\bigg)\nonumber\\

387: &\sim& q \int dt\; \tr \bigg(

388: \frac{d\Lambda(X,t)}{dt}  +

389: i a_t[X^i,\delta_i\Lambda(X,t)]\bigg)\sim 0.

390: \eea

391: In above, the first term gives a surface term, and the second term

392: vanishes by the symmetrization prescription \cite{0103262} \footnote{The

393: general proof of invariance of the full Chern-Simons action is reported in

394: \cite{0105253} recently.}.

395: 

396: The equations of motion for $X$'s and $a_t$ by action (\ref{SD0}), after

397: ignoring for the moment the commutator potential $[X_i,X_j]^2$, will be

398: found to be \cite{0103262,0104210}

399: \bea\label{LORENZ}

400: &~&mD_tD_t X_i=q\bigg(E_i(X,t)

401: +\underbrace{D_tX^jB_{ji}(X,t)}\bigg),\\

402: \label{A0EOM}

403: &~&m[X_i,D_tX^i]=q[A_i(X,t),X^i],

404: \eea

405: with the following definitions

406: \bea

407: \label{ELEC}

408: E_i(X,t)&\equiv&-\delta_i A_0(X,t)-\partial_t A_i(X,t),\\

409: \label{MAGN}

410: B_{ji}(X,t)&\equiv&-\delta_jA_i(X,t)+\delta_iA_j(X,t).

411: \eea

412: In (\ref{LORENZ}), the symbol $\underbrace{D_tX^j B_{ji}(X,t)}$ denotes

413: the average over all of positions of $D_tX^j$ between the $X$'s of

414: $B_{ji}(X,t)$. The above equations for the $X$'s are like the Lorentz

415: equations of motion, with the exceptions that two sides are $N\times N$

416: matrices, and the time derivative $\partial_t$ is replaced by its

417: covariant counterpart $D_t$ \cite{hulldorn}. 

418: 

419: An equation of motion, similar to (\ref{LORENZ}), is considered in

420: \cite{fat241,fat021} as a part of similarities between the dynamics of

421: D0-branes and bound states of quarks--QCD strings in a baryonic state

422: \cite{fat241,fat021,02414}. The point is that, the dynamics of the bound

423: state center-of-mass (c.m.) is not affected directly by the non-Abelian

424: sector of the background, \ie the c.m. is ``white" with respect to $SU(N)$

425: sector of $U(N)$. The c.m. coordinates and momenta are defined by: 

426: \bea\label{CM}

427: X^i_\cm\equiv \frac{1}{N}

428: \tr X^i,\;\;\;\;  P^i_\cm\equiv \tr P^i,

429: \eea

430: where we are using the convention $\tr {\bf 1}_N=N$. To specify the net

431: charge of a bound state, as an extended object, its dynamics should be

432: studied in zero magnetic and uniform electric fields, \ie$B_{ji}=0$ and

433: $E_i(X,t)=E_{0i}$ \footnote{In a non-Abelian gauge theory a uniform

434: electric field can be defined up to a gauge transformation, which is quite

435: well for identification of white (singlet) states.}. Since the fields are

436: uniform, they are not involved by $X$ matrices, and contain just the

437: $U(1)$ part. In other words, under gauge transformations $E_{0i}$ and

438: $B_{ji}=0$ transform to $\tilde{E}_i(X,t)=V^\dagger(X,t)E_{0i}V(X,t)

439: =E_{0i}$ and $\tilde{B}_{ji}= 0$. Thus the action (\ref{SD0}) yields the

440: following equation of motion: 

441: \bea

442: (Nm){\ddot{X}}^i_\cm=Nq E^i_{0(1)},

443: \eea

444: in which the subscript (1) emphasises the $U(1)$ electric field. So the

445: c.m. interacts directly only with the $U(1)$ part of $U(N)$. From the

446: String Theory point of view, this observation is based on the simple fact

447: that the $SU(N)$ structure of D0-branes arises just from the internal

448: degrees of freedom inside the bound state. 

449: 

450: The world-line formulation we have here, is very much similar to the 

451: M(atrix) model conjecture; in particular, it is in the non-relativistic

452: limit. For the case of the dynamics of a charged particle with ordinary

453: coordinates, we can see easily that the light-cone dynamics have a form

454: similar to that we have in action (\ref{SD0}); see Appendix of

455: \cite{fat021}. To approach the Lorentz covariant formulation, following

456: finite-$N$ interpretation of \cite{9704080}, it is reasonable to interpret

457: things here in the DLCQ framework. This also should be applied for the

458: correspondence we consider to an effective field theory for the

459: interacting theory of D0-branes--photons. 

460: 

461: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

462: \subsection{Symmetry Transformations} 

463: Actually, the action (\ref{SD0}) is invariant under the transformations

464: \bea\label{Xat}

465: X^i&\goes&\tilde X^i=U^\dagger X^i U,\nonumber\\

466: a_t(t)&\goes& \tilde a_t(X,t)=U^\dagger a_t(t) U -i

467: U^\dagger \partial_t U,

468: \eea

469: with $U\equiv U(X,t)$ as an arbitrary $N\times N$ unitary matrix;

470: in fact under these transformations one obtains

471: \bea\label{DTF1}

472: D_tX^i&\goes&\tilde

473: D_t\tilde X^i=U^\dagger D_tX^iU,\\

474: \label{DTF2}

475: D_tD_tX^i&\goes&\tilde D_t \tilde D_t

476: \tilde X^i=U^\dagger D_tD_tX^iU.

477: \eea

478: Now, in the same spirit as for the previously introduced $U(1)$ symmetry of

479: eq.(\ref{UOT}), one finds the symmetry transformations: 

480: \bea\label{NAT}

481: X^i&\goes&\tilde X^i=U^\dagger X^i U,\nonumber\\

482: a_t(t)&\goes&\tilde a_t(X,t)=U^\dagger a_t(t) U -i

483: U^\dagger \partial_t U,\nonumber\\

484: A_i(X,t)&\goes& \tilde A_i(X,t)=

485: U^\dagger A_i(X,t)U+iU^\dagger\delta_i U,\nonumber\\

486: A_0(X,t)&\goes& \tilde A_0(X,t)=

487: U^\dagger A_0(X,t)U-iU^\dagger\partial_t U,

488: \eea

489: in which we assume that $U\equiv U(X,t)=\exp(-i\Lambda)$ is arbitrary up

490: to this condition that $\Lambda(X,t)$ is totally symmetrized in the $X$'s.

491: The above transformations on the gauge potentials are similar to those of

492: non-Abelian gauge theories, and we mention that it is just the consequence

493: of enhancement of degrees of freedom from numbers ($x$) to matrices ($X$). 

494: In other words, we are faced with a situation in which ``the rotation of

495: fields" is generated by ``the rotation of coordinates". The above

496: observation on gauge symmetry associated to D0-brane matrix coordinates,

497: on its own is not a new one, and we already know another example of this

498: kind in non-commutative gauge theories; see \cite{0104210}. In addition,

499: the case we see here for D0-branes may be considered as finite-$N$ version

500: of the relation between gauge symmetry transformations and transformations

501: of matrix coordinates \cite{0007023}.

502: 

503: The behaviour of eqs. (\ref{LORENZ}) and (\ref{A0EOM}) under gauge

504: transformation (\ref{NAT}) can be checked. Since the action is invariant

505: under (\ref{NAT}), it is expected that the equations of motion change

506: covariantly. The left-hand side of (\ref{LORENZ}) changes to $U^\dagger

507: D_tD_tX U$ by (\ref{DTF2}), and therefore we should find the same change

508: for the right-hand side. This is in fact the case, since for any function

509: $f(X,t)$ under transformations (\ref{Xat}) we have:

510: \bea

511: f(X,t) &\goes& \tilde{f}(\tilde{X},t)=

512: U^\dagger f(X,t)U,\nonumber\\

513: \delta_i f(X,t)&\goes& 

514: \tilde{\delta}_i\tilde{f}(\tilde{X},t)=

515: U^\dagger \delta_i f(X,t)U,\nonumber\\

516: \partial_t f(X,t)&\goes&

517: \partial_t \tilde{f}(\tilde{X},t)=

518: U^\dagger \partial_t f(X,t) U.

519: \eea

520: In conclusion, the definitions (\ref{ELEC}) and

521: (\ref{MAGN}), lead to

522: \bea\label{gtfs}

523: E_i(X,t) &\goes& \tilde{E_i}(\tilde{X},t)=

524: U^\dagger E_i(X,t)U,\nonumber\\

525: B_{ji}(X,t) &\goes& \tilde{B}_{ji}(\tilde{X},t)=

526: U^\dagger B_{ji}(X,t)U,

527: \eea

528: a result consistent with the fact that $E_i$ and $B_{ji}$ are functionals

529: of $X$'s. We thus see that, in spite of the absence of the usual

530: commutator term $i[A_\mu,A_\nu]$ of non-Abelian gauge theories, in our

531: case the field strengths transform like non-Abelian ones. We recall that

532: these all are consequences of the matrix coordinates of D0-branes. 

533: Finally by the similar reason for vanishing the second term of

534: (\ref{VSD0}), both sides of (\ref{A0EOM}) transform identically.

535: 

536: The last notable points are about the behaviour of $a_t(t)$ and $A_0(X,t)$

537: under symmetry transformations (\ref{NAT}). From the world-line theory

538: point of view, $a_t(t)$ is a dynamical variable, but $A_0(X,t)$ should be

539: treated as a part of background, however they behave similarly under

540: transformations. Also we see by (\ref{NAT}) that the coordinate

541: independence of $a_t(t)$, which is the consequence of dimensional

542: reduction, should be understood up to a gauge transformation. In

543: \cite{0103262} a possible map between the dynamics of D0-branes, and the

544: semi-classical dynamics of charged particles in Yang-Mills background was

545: mentioned. It is worth mentioning that via this possible relation, an

546: explanation for the above notable points can be recognized \cite{0103262}.

547: 

548: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

549: \section{Quantum Theory In One-Form Background}

550: \setcounter{equation}{0}

551: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

552: \subsection{Some General Aspects Of Bound State--Photon Interaction}

553: Before presenting the formulation, it is useful to mention some general

554: aspects of the problem at hand. At first let us recall another

555: representation of the symmetrization on the matrix coordinates. The other

556: useful symmetric expansion is done by using the Fourier components of a

557: function. To gain this Fourier expansion in matrix coordinates (we may

558: call it `non-Abelian Fourier expansion'), one can simply interpret the

559: derivatives of usual coordinates $\partial_{x^i}$ in (\ref{NTE}) as

560: momentum numbers $ik_i$. It is then not hard to see that for an arbitrary

561: function $f(X,t)$ the non-Abelian Fourier expansion will be found to be: 

562: \bea\label{NFE}

563: f(X,t)= \int d^dk\; \bar f (k,t)\;\e^{ik_i X^i},

564: \eea

565: in which $\bar f(k,t)$ are the Fourier components of the function

566: $f(x,t)$ (\ie function by ordinary coordinates) which is defined by the

567: known expression: 

568: \bea

569: \bar f (k,t) \equiv \frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}\int d^dx\; f(x,t)\; \e^{-ik_i x^i}.

570: \eea 

571: Since the momentum numbers $k_i$'s are ordinary numbers, and so commute

572: with each other, the symmetrization prescription is automatically

573: recovered in the expansion of the momentum eigen-functions $\e^{ik_i

574: X^i}$. This picture of symmetrization for matrix coordinates is similar to

575: that we already know for the Weyl ordering in phase space $(\hat q,\hat

576: p)$, with $[\hat q, \hat p]=i$.

577: 

578: Now, by using the symmetric expansion (\ref{NFE}), we can imagine some

579: general aspects of the interaction between D0-brane bound states and RR

580: photons. We recall that the bound state of D0-branes is described by the

581: action (\ref{SD0}) after setting $A_\mu(x,t)  \equiv 0$.  We mention that

582: still the degrees of freedom interact due to the commutator potential. By

583: doing a simple dimensional analysis it can be shown that the size scale of

584: the bound state, for finite number $N$ of D0-branes is finite and is of

585: order of $\ell\sim m^{-1/3} l^{2/3}$ \cite{9603081,fat021}. We recall that

586: the action we are using is coming from the string perturbative

587: calculations, and consequently we have for the size scale the further

588: relation $\ell \ll l$ \cite{9603081,fat021}.

589: 

590: Before proceeding further, we should distinguish the dynamics of the c.m. 

591: from the internal degrees of freedom of the bound state.  As mentioned in

592: before, the c.m. position and momentum of the bound state are presented by

593: the $U(1)$ sector of the $U(N)=SU(N)\times U(1)$, and thus the information

594: related to the c.m. can be gained simply by the $\tr$operation, relation

595: (\ref{CM}). So, the internal degrees of freedom of the bound state, which

596: consist the relative positions of $N$ D0-branes together with the dynamics

597: of strings stretched between D0-branes, are described by the $SU(N)$

598: sector of the matrix coordinates. It is easy to see that the commutator

599: potential in the action has some flat directions, along which the

600: eigen-values can take arbitrary large values. But it is understood that,

601: by considering the quantum effects and in the case that we expect

602: formation of the bound state, we should expect suppression the large

603: values of the internal degrees of freedom \cite{dewit-nicolai}.

604: Consequently, it is expected that the $SU(N)$ sector of matrix coordinates

605: take mean values like $\langle X^i_a \rangle \sim \ell$ ($a=1,\cdots,

606: N^2-1$, not $a=0$ as c.m.), with $\ell$ as the bound state size scale

607: mentioned in above \footnote{There is another way to justify this

608: expectation. It is known that diagonal $SU(N)$ matrices present the

609: relative positions of D0-branes, which are expected to be of order of

610: $\ell$ in a bound state. But due to the symmetry transformation we

611: introduced in previous section, the diagonal and non-diagonal elements in

612: the matrices can mix with each other, representing the same mechanical

613: system.  So, the size scale associated to the diagonal elements should be

614: valid also for the non-diagonal elements.}. We should mention that, though

615: the c.m. is represented by the $U(1)$ sector, but its dynamics is affected

616: by the interaction of the ingredients of bound state with the $SU(N)$

617: sector of external fields, similar to the situation we imagine in the case

618: of the Van der Waals force. 

619: 

620: The important question about the interaction of a bound state (as an

621: extended object) with an external field, is about `the regime in which the

622: substructure of bound state is probed'. As we mentioned in introduction,

623: in our case the quanta of RR fields are the representatives of the

624: external field. The quanta are coming from a `source' and so, as it makes

625: easier things, we ignore its dynamics. The source is introduced to our

626: problem by the gauge field $A_\mu(x,t)$. These fields appear in the action

627: by functional dependence on matrix coordinates $X$'s.  In fact this is the

628: key of how we can probe the substructure of the bound state. According to

629: the non-Abelian Fourier expansion we mentioned in above, we have

630: \bea 

631: A_\mu(X,t)= \int d^dk\; \bar A_\mu (k,t)\e^{ik_i X^i},

632: \eea 

633: in which $\bar A_\mu(k,t)$ is the Fourier components of the fields

634: $A_\mu(x,t)$ (\ie fields by ordinary coordinates). One can imagine the

635: scattering processes which are designed to probe inside the bound state.

636: Such as every other scattering process two limits of momentum modes,

637: corresponding to long and short wave-lengths, behave differently. 

638: 

639: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

640: \begin{figure}[t]

641: \begin{center}

642: \leavevmode

643: \epsfxsize=100mm

644: \epsfysize=60mm

645: \epsfbox{fig1.eps}

646: \caption{Substructure is not seen by the long wave-length modes (a). Due

647: to functional dependence on matrix coordinates, the short wave-length

648: modes can probe inside the bound state (b). $\ell$ and $\bar A_\mu (k,t)$

649: represent the size of the bound state and the Fourier modes,

650: respectively.}

651: \end{center}

652: \end{figure}

653: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

654: 

655: In the limit $\ell |k|\goes 0$ (long wave-length regime), the field

656: $A_\mu$ is not involved by $X$ matrices mainly. It means that the fields

657: appear to be nearly constant inside the bound state, and in rough

658: estimation we have

659: \bea

660: \e^{ik_i X^i} \sim \e^{ik_i X^i_\cm}.

661: \eea

662: So in this limit we expect that the substructure and consequently

663: non-commutativity will not be seen; Figure-1a. As the consequence, after

664: interaction with a long wave-length mode, it is not expected that the

665: bound state jump to another energy level different from the first one. It

666: should be noted that the c.m. dynamics can be affected as well in this

667: case. 

668: 

669: In the limit $\ell |k|=$finite (short wave-length regime), the fields

670: depend on coordinates $X$ inside the bound state, and so the substructure

671: responsible for non-commutativity should be probed; Figure-1b. In fact, we

672: know that the non-commutativity of D0-brane coordinates is the consequence

673: of the strings which are stretched between D0-branes. So, by these kinds

674: of scattering processes, one should be able to probe both D0-branes (as

675: point-like objects), and the strings stretched between them. In this case,

676: it is completely expectable that the energy level of the incoming and

677: outgoing bound states will be different, since the ingredients of bound

678: state substructure can absorb quanta of energy from the incident wave. In

679: this case the c.m. dynamics can be affected in a novel way by the

680: interaction of the substructure with the external fields (the Van der

681: Waals effect). 

682: 

683: In general case, one can gain more information about the substructure of a

684: bound state by analysing the `recoil' effect on the source. To do this,

685: one should be able to include the dynamics of the source in the

686: formulation. Considering the dynamics of source, in the terms of quantized

687: field theory, means that we consider the processes in which the source and

688: the target exchange `one quanta of gauge field' with definite wave-length

689: and frequency, though off-shell, as $A_\mu(x,t) \sim \epsilon_\mu

690: \e^{ik_ix^i-i\omega t}$.  This kind of process is shown in Figure-2.

691: 

692: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

693: \begin{figure}[t]

694: \begin{center}

695: \leavevmode

696: \epsfxsize=45mm

697: \epsfysize=55mm

698: \epsfbox{fig2.eps}

699: \caption{Exchange of one photon between a D0-brane bound state (thick

700: lines) and another source (thin lines).}

701: \end{center}

702: \end{figure}

703: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

704: 

705: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

706: \subsection{Path Integral Quantization}

707: In this subsection we consider the quantisation of D0-brane dynamics,

708: using the path integral method. The theory on the world-line enjoys a

709: gauge symmetry, defined by the transformations (\ref{NAT}). We should fix

710: this symmetry, and here we use simply the temporal gauge, defined by the

711: condition $a_t(t)\equiv 0$. So after the Wick rotation $t\goes -it$ and

712: $A_0\goes -iA_0$, we have the following expression for the path integral

713: of our system:

714: \bea\label{path-int1}

715: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle \sim

716: \int [DX][Da_t]\; \delta(a_t)\; \det|\frac{\delta a_t}{\delta

717: \Lambda}|

718: \;\e^{-S_{{\rm D0}}[X,a_t]},

719: \eea

720: in which $\delta(a_t)$ supports the gauge fixing condition, and

721: $\det|\frac{\delta a_t}{\delta \Lambda}|$ is the determinant which arises

722: by variation of gauge fixing condition, and finally $S_{{\rm D0}}[X,a_t]$

723: is the action (\ref{SD0}) evaluated between $(X_F,t_F)$ and $(X_I,t_I)$,

724: as `Final' and `Initial' conditions.  The variation of gauge fixing

725: condition can be calculated in our case easily, and it is found to be (for

726: $U(X,t)=\exp(-i\Lambda)$): 

727: \bea

728: a_t=0\goes a'_t=\delta a_t=-i U^\dagger\partial_t U= -

729: \partial_t\Lambda(X,t)+ O(\Lambda^2),

730: \eea

731: and consequently we have $\frac{\delta a_t(t)}{\delta \Lambda(t')}

732: =-\partial_t\delta(t-t')$. So, we see that the determinant and

733: consequently the corresponding ghosts are decoupled from our dynamical

734: fields $X$'s \footnote{This case is similar to the so-called axial gauge

735: in extreme limit $\lambda\goes\infty$; page 196 of \cite{sterman}.}. So,

736: up to a normalization factor, we have for the above expression of path

737: integral:

738: \bea\label{path-int2}

739: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle \sim

740: \int [DX] \;\e^{-S_{{\rm D0}}[X,a_t\equiv 0]}.

741: \eea

742: To calculate the path integral in a general background we have to use the

743: perturbation expansion in the powers of charge $q$; this expansion is also

744: valid for the weak external fields $(A_0,A_i)$. So we have

745: \bea\label{path-int3}

746: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle &\sim& \int [DX]

747: \;\e^{-\int_{t_I}^{t_F} dt\; \tr (\haf m \dot{X}_i

748: \dot{X}^i +m\frac{[X^i,X^j]^2}{4 (2\pi l^2)^2})}

749: \nonumber\\

750: &~& \times \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{q^n}{n!}\;

751: \bigg\{i\int_{t_I}^{t_F} dt\; \tr\bigg(\dot{X}^i A_i(X,t) +

752: A_0(X,t)\bigg)\bigg\}^n.

753: \eea

754: As mentioned before, from the point of view of D0-brane dynamics,

755: the commutator potential $[X^i,X^j]^2$ is responsible for the formation of

756: D0-brane bound states \cite{9603081}. Though the problem of

757: finding the full set of eigen-energies and eigen-vectors of the

758: corresponding Hamiltonian is a very hard task, we assume that this full

759: set is at hand. It is logical to separate the c.m.  variables from the

760: internal ones; we show those of c.m. by momenta $P_\cm$ and

761: $|P_\cm\rangle$, and those of internal ones by energy $E_{\{n\}}$ and

762: $|\{n\}\rangle$, in which $\{n\}$ presents all of the quantum numbers

763: associated to the internal dynamics. We recall that the c.m. is free in

764: the case of $q=0$. It is worth to recall that, in general we expect that

765: the eigen-energies have the general form of $E_{\{n\}}=g(\{n\})

766: \ell^{-1}$, with $g(\{n\})$ as a function of quantum numbers $\{n\}$, and

767: as well the condition

768: \bea

769: \langle X | \{n\} \rangle \goes 0, \;\;\;\;\;\; {\rm for}\;\; |X|\gg \ell,

770: \eea

771: for the wave-functions, with $\ell\sim m^{-1/3} l^{2/3}$ the size scale of

772: the bound state we mentioned in before. As any other quantum mechanical

773: system, for the case $q=0$ the general expression of the propagator can be

774: used:

775: \bea\label{propagator}

776: \langle X_2,t_2 | X_1, t_1 \rangle_{q=0} = \sum_{P_\cm} 

777: \sum_{\{n\}} 

778: \langle X_2|P_\cm, \{n\}\rangle \langle P_\cm, \{n\}|X_1\rangle

779: \e^{-(\frac{P_\cm^2}{2Nm}+E_{\{n\}})(t_2-t_1)},

780: \eea

781: with definition $|P_\cm, \{n\}\rangle\equiv |P_\cm\rangle\otimes

782: |\{n\}\rangle$. We now can insert the propagator above in last expression

783: (\ref{path-int3}), with this care that the perturbation expansion have

784: terms involved by velocity $\dot X$. Based on the standard representation

785: of `slicing' we use for the path integrals, finally the following

786: expression for the first order of perturbation will be found (see

787: \cite{ryder}): 

788: \bea\label{path-int4}

789: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle &\sim& 

790: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle_{q=0} \nonumber\\

791: &+&i {\cal N}\lim_{\Delta t \goes 0} \sum_{k=1}^n \int

792: d^dX_{k-1} d^dX_k d^dX_{k+1}\times

793: \langle X_F,t_F | X_{k+1}, t_{k+1} \rangle_{q=0}\times\nonumber\\

794: &~&2\Delta t \cdot\tr\bigg(q \frac{X^i_{k+1} - X^i_{k-1}}{2\Delta t}

795: A_i(X_k,t) +qA_0(X_k,t)\bigg)\times \nonumber\\

796: &~&\langle X_{k-1},t_{k-1} | X_I, t_I \rangle_{q=0}\times \e^{-S_{q=0} [k,k-1;\Delta t]}\;\;

797: \e^{-S_{q=0} [k+1,k;\Delta t]} 

798: \nonumber\\&+& O(q^2),

799: \eea

800: in which $t_j-t_I=j\cdot\Delta t$ and $t_F-t_I=(n+1)\Delta t$. In above

801: $S_{q=0}[j,j+1;\Delta t]$ is the value of the action in the exponential of

802: (\ref{path-int3}) evaluated between the points $(X_j,t_j)$ and

803: $(X_{j+1},t_{j+1})$ ($1\leq j \leq n$) by limit $\Delta t\goes 0$. The

804: normalization constant ${\cal{N}}$ contains sufficient powers of $\Delta

805: t$ to make the final result finite and independent of $\Delta t$. The sum

806: $\sum_k$ is coming from slicing the potential term $\int dt\tr (\dot

807: X\cdot A + A_0)$ in path integral (\ref{path-int3}), and it eventually

808: will change to the time integral $\int dt$ over the intermediate `times'

809: in which the interaction occur. It is worth to recall that the spatial

810: integrals like $\int d^d X$ are in fact as $\int \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1} d^d

811: X_a$. We mention that for the velocity independent term $A_0(X,t)$, the

812: integrals of $d^dX_{k\pm 1}$ can be done to get the new propagators, and

813: after the change $X_k\goes X$, we simply find the expression like

814: \bea

815: \sim i \int_{t_I}^{t_F} dt \int d^dX \;

816: \langle X_F,t_F | X, t \rangle_{q=0}

817: \tr\bigg(qA_0(X,t)\bigg) 

818: \langle X,t | X_I, t_I \rangle_{q=0}

819: + O(q^2),

820: \eea

821: which is the familiar expression for the velocity independent

822: interactions. 

823: 

824: For many practical aims, we should find the S-matrix elements between

825: states with definite momenta and energies; Figure-3. This can be done by

826: the proper transformations on the amplitudes $\langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I

827: \rangle$ in the coordinate space. 

828: 

829: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

830: \begin{figure}[t]

831: \begin{center}

832: \leavevmode

833: \epsfxsize=50mm

834: \epsfysize=55mm

835: \epsfbox{fig3.eps}

836: \caption{The graph for the transition amplitude between states with

837: definite c.m. momenta and energies $(P,E)$, and internal energy specified

838: by the quantum numbers $\{n\}$.}

839: \end{center}

840: \end{figure}

841: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

842: 

843: Due to less knowledge about the propagator (\ref{propagator}), the last

844: expression (\ref{path-int4}) still can not be used for the actual

845: calculations. As mentioned in before, we expect that the spatial

846: integrations $\int d^d X$ find their main contribution from the volume of

847: bound state $V\sim \ell^d$. So as an approximation and to know a little

848: more about the result, we may ignore the commutator potential, but doing

849: integrations in the finite volume $V\sim \ell^d$, or in the case, we

850: simply put $\int d^dX_a\sim \ell^d$, for $a\neq 0 =$c.m. By doing this, we

851: can verify the general aspects about the probing of the substructure of

852: the bound state, discussed in the previous subsection.

853: 

854: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

855: \subsection{Effective Interaction Vertex Of Photon And `Free'\\ D0-Branes}

856: In the considerations of the previous subsection, the background

857: $(A_0(x,t), A_i(x,t))$ was taken to be arbitrary. Here we take the example

858: in which the D0-branes interact with a monotonic incident wave, defined by

859: the condition $\bar{A}_\mu (k',\omega') 

860: =\epsilon_\mu\delta^d(k'-k)\delta(\omega'- \omega) $, with $\epsilon_\mu$

861: as the polarization vector, and the following definition for the Fourier

862: modes: 

863: \bea

864: \bar{A}_\mu(k',\omega')  \equiv \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d+1}}\int d^dx\; dt\; 

865: A_\mu(x,t)\; \e^{-ik_i' x^i+i\omega' t}.

866: \eea

867: So the corresponding gauge field is $A_{\mu}(X,t)\sim\epsilon_\mu

868: \exp(ik_i X^i-i\omega t)$. Besides, here we ignore the commutator

869: potential, and consequently it is assumed that all of the $N^2$ degrees of

870: freedom, including those $N$ ones which describe the position of

871: D0-branes, are free for $q=0$. So we have the following expression for the

872: path integral: 

873: \bea\label{path-int5}

874: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle &\sim& \int [DX]

875: \;\e^{-\int_{t_I}^{t_F} dt\; \tr (\haf m \dot{X}_i

876: \dot{X}^i)}

877: \nonumber\\

878: &~& \times 

879: \bigg\{1+iq \int_{t_I}^{t_F} dt\; \tr\bigg(\dot{X}^i A_i(X,t) +

880: A_0(X,t)\bigg)+O(q^2)\bigg\}.

881: \eea

882: A similar theory for a charged particle in ordinary space is considered in

883: the Appendix-A, to extract the field theory vertex function of the

884: coupling of a `photon' to incoming--outgoing charged particles. So the

885: result of the path integral above, can be considered as the `matrix

886: coordinate' version of the example of the Appendix-A. We continue with an

887: expression like that of (\ref{path-int4}), as:

888: \bea\label{path-int6}

889: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle &\sim& 

890: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle_\fp \nonumber\\

891: &+& i{\cal N}\lim_{\Delta t \goes 0} \sum_{k=1}^n \int

892: d^dX_{k-1} d^dX_k d^dX_{k+1}\times

893: \langle X_F,t_F | X_{k+1}, t_{k+1} \rangle_\fp\times\nonumber\\

894: &~&2\Delta t \cdot\tr\bigg(q \frac{X^i_{k+1} - X^i_{k-1}}{2\Delta t}

895: A_i(X_k,t) +qA_0(X_k,t)\bigg)\times \nonumber\\

896: &~&\langle X_{k-1},t_{k-1} | X_I, t_I \rangle_\fp\times \e^{-S_\fp

897: [k,k-1;\Delta t]}\;\;

898: \e^{-S_\fp [k+1,k;\Delta t]} 

899: \nonumber\\&+& O(q^2),

900: \eea

901: in which $S_\fp$ and $\langle \cdots \rangle_\fp$ are the action and the

902: propagator of free particles, respectively; see Appendix-B for the

903: explicit expressions. The integrations $d^dX_{k\pm 1}$ can be done to get

904: new propagators, and after the change $X_k\goes X$, we find: 

905: \bea\label{path-int7}

906: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle &\sim& 

907: \langle X_F,t_F | X_I, t_I \rangle_\fp\nonumber\\

908: &+& i{\cal N}' \int_{t_I}^{t_F} dt \int d^dX

909: \;\;\langle X_F,t_F | X, t \rangle_\fp\times

910: \nonumber\\

911: &~&\tr\bigg\{q\bigg(\frac{X^i_F - X^i}{t_F-t}+ \frac{X^i-X^i_I}{t-t_I}\bigg)

912: A_i(X,t) +qA_0(X,t)\bigg\}\times \nonumber\\

913: &~&\langle X,t| X_I, t_I \rangle_\fp + O(q^2).

914: \eea

915: 

916: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

917: \begin{figure}[t]

918: \begin{center}

919: \leavevmode

920: \epsfxsize=50mm

921: \epsfysize=55mm

922: \epsfbox{fig4.eps}

923: \caption{The graph for the transition amplitude between states with

924: definite momenta and energies, specified with the set $\{P,E\}$, for all

925: of $N^2$ degrees of freedom. Here we use some thin lines as incoming and

926: outgoing states, to emphasize that these states are free before and after

927: the vertex of interaction.}

928: \end{center}

929: \end{figure}

930: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

931: Up to now the gauge field can be in any arbitrary form. Also, since in

932: this case we have ignored the commutator potential and so the degrees of

933: freedom are free for $q=0$, we can easily use the momentum basis for the

934: incoming-outgoing states; see Figure-4. So for the S-matrix element in

935: momentum-energy basis, we have the expression: 

936: \bea\label{amplitude-1}

937: S_{FI}&\sim& \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1} \delta^d(P_{Fa}-P_{Ia})

938: \delta(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})\nonumber\\

939: &+& (\cdots) \int_{t_I}^{t_F}dt\int d^d X 

940: \int d^dX_I\; d^dX_F

941: \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1}\bigg( \e^{i(E_{Fa}t_F-E_{Ia}t_I)}

942: \e^{-i(P_{Fa}\cdot X_{Fa}-P_{Ia}\cdot X_{Ia})}\bigg)\nonumber\\

943: &~&\langle X_F,t_F | X, t \rangle_\fp\nonumber\\

944: &~&\tr\bigg(

945: iq \epsilon\cdot \bigg(\frac{X_F - X}{t_F-t}+

946: \frac{X-X_I}{t-t_I}\bigg)\e^{ik\cdot X-i\omega t}

947: +iq\epsilon_0 \e^{ik\cdot X-i\omega t}

948: \bigg)  \nonumber\\

949: &~&\langle X,t| X_I, t_I \rangle_\fp+O(q^2),

950: \eea

951: in which $E_a=P_a^2/(2Nm)$ for both $I$ and $F$ states (by convention

952: $\tr(T^aT^b)=N\delta^{ab}$), and the symbol $A\cdot B$ is for the inner

953: product $A_iB^i$. We recall that the subscripts $a$ and $b$ are counting

954: the $N^2$ independent degrees of freedom associated with $N\times N$

955: hermitian matrices $X$ or $P$. Some of the integrations above can be done

956: (see Appendix-B), and the resulting expression will be found to be: 

957: \bea\label{amplitude-2}

958: S_{FI}&\sim&\prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1}\delta^d(P_{Fa}-P_{Ia})

959: \delta(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})\nonumber\\

960: &+&(\cdots)

961: \delta^d (P_{F\cm}-P_{I\cm}-k)

962: \delta\bigg(\sum_{a=0}^{N^2-1}(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})-\omega\bigg)

963: \nonumber\\&\times&

964: \int \prod_{b=1}^{N^2-1} d^d\hat{X}_b \;

965: \e^{i(P_{Ib}-P_{Fb})\cdot \hat{X}_b}

966: \tr\bigg(

967: iq\bigg(\epsilon\cdot (P_F+P_I)+\epsilon_0\bigg) \e^{ik\cdot \hat{X}}

968: \bigg)+ O(q^2),

969: \eea

970: in which the second series of $\delta$-functions have appeared as supports

971: of the total momentum and total energy conservations. The last expression

972: contains $\tr$and integrals over the matrix coordinates $\hat{X}$

973: ($\tr(\hat{X})=0$), and though the improved forms in some special cases

974: ($N$=2 or in large-$N$ limit) are accessible, the result in general case

975: is not known. We mention that such integrals for ordinary coordinates, as

976: that of Appendix-A, can be calculated exactly. We can present the general

977: form of the result as:

978: \bea

979: S_{FI}&\sim&\prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1}\delta^d(P_{Fa}-P_{Ia})

980: \delta(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})\nonumber\\

981: &+& (\cdots)

982: \delta^d (P_{F\cm}-P_{I\cm}-k)

983: \delta\bigg(\sum_{a=0}^{N^2-1}(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})-\omega\bigg)

984: \nonumber\\

985: &~&\bigg(iq \epsilon\cdot

986: V(P_{Ia,Fa},k)+iq\epsilon_0V_0(P_{Ia,Fa},k)\bigg)

987: +O(q^2).

988: \eea

989: in which $V^\mu(P_{Ia,Fa},k)$, as the effective vertex function (see

990: Figure-4), has the general form:

991: \bea

992: &~&V^i=\tr\bigg((P^i_F+P^i_I) H(P_{Ia,Fa},k)\bigg)\nonumber\\

993: &~&V^0=\tr\bigg( H(P_{Ia,Fa},k)\bigg),

994: \eea

995: with $H(P_{Ia,Fa},k)$ as a matrix, depending on $P_{Ia}$, $P_{Fa}$

996: ($a=1,\cdots, N^2-1$, $a\neq\cm$) and $k$. In the case of ordinary

997: coordinates for covariant theory we find simply $V^\mu\sim (p_I+p_F)^\mu$;

998: see Appendix-A. 

999: 

1000: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1001: \section{Which Field Theory?}

1002: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1003: By the studies like those of \cite{9205205}, it is understood that the

1004: world-line theory of a charged particle in ordinary space, in presence of

1005: the gauge field background $A_\mu(x)$ can be corresponded to the second

1006: quantized field theory of interaction of charges and photons, something

1007: similar to the theory we imagine for the case of interaction of electrons

1008: and photons. The corresponding action may be presented as (with $\dot

1009: x=dx/d\tau$) 

1010: \bea\label{ord-space}

1011: S=\int d\tau\; (\haf m \dot x^2 -  q \dot x^\mu A_\mu(x)).

1012: \eea

1013: As an example, in the Appendix-A we derived the field theory vertex

1014: function for the interaction of a photon with the currents of

1015: incoming--outgoing charged particles. In the previous section we developed

1016: the basic elements of the world-line formulation of the interaction of

1017: D0-brane bound states with 1-form RR photons. Particularly, we showed how

1018: various amplitudes can be calculated in principle by the world-line

1019: theory, at least in the perturbative regime. In this section we want to

1020: discuss `which field theory' can be corresponded to the amplitudes,

1021: calculated by the world-line theory. This is like the same relation that

1022: we consider in String Theory, between field theories in space-time and

1023: theories which are living on the world-sheet of strings. As we saw in

1024: previous section, our knowledge about the exact values of the amplitudes

1025: is restricted, and hence the discussion here will be based on some

1026: qualitative considerations. It remains for future studies to check the

1027: relation quantitavely, in particular by comparing the amplitudes as

1028: observable quantities. 

1029: 

1030: Probably one of the most guiding observations is the `matrix' nature of

1031: the gauge fields in the world-line formulation. Due to functional

1032: dependence of the gauge fields on matrix coordinates, the gauge fields

1033: $A^\mu(X)$ in our theory are $N\times N$ hermitian matrices, and so the

1034: gauge fields have the usual expansion in the matrix basis:

1035: \bea\label{comp}

1036: A^\mu(X)=A^\mu_a(X_b)T^a,\;\;\;\;\;\;\; 

1037: A^\mu_a(X_b)\equiv\frac{1}{N} \tr (A^\mu(X) T^a),

1038: \eea

1039: in which $A^\mu_a(X_b)$ are some functions (numbers) depending on the

1040: components of the matrix coordinates. The most famous `matrix' gauge

1041: fields we know are those of non-Abelian gauge theories. Now, it is

1042: tempting to see what kind of relation between these two kinds of matrix

1043: gauge fields can be verified.

1044: 

1045: The best base we found for the possible relation mentioned in above is the

1046: suggested relation of \cite{9908142}, as the map between field

1047: configurations of non-commutative and ordinary gauge theories. The

1048: suggested map preserves the gauge equivalence relation, and it is

1049: emphasised that, due to different natures of the gauge groups, this map

1050: can not be an isomorphism between the gauge groups. Now in our case, it

1051: will be interesting to study the properties of the map between non-Abelian

1052: gauge theory and gauge theory associated with matrix coordinates; on one

1053: side the quantum theory of matrix fields, and on the other side the

1054: quantum mechanics of matrix coordinates. It will be helpful to do some

1055: imaginations in this direction. Since for the consideration we have in

1056: below there is no essential difference between fermions and bosons, we

1057: take the example of the interaction of a fermionic matter field with the

1058: external non-Abelian gauge field $\ca_\mu(x)$, which is described by the

1059: action

1060: \bea

1061: &~&S=\int d^{d+1}x\; \bigg(\bar\psi (i\gamma^\mu 

1062: \partial_\mu -m)\psi-g\tr(J^\mu \ca_\mu)\bigg),\\

1063: &~&\ca^\mu(x)=\ca^\mu_a(x)T^a,\nonumber

1064: \eea

1065: in which the term $J^\mu \ca_\mu$ is responsible for the interaction; it

1066: may be chosen as that of the minimal coupling $J_\mu^a=i\bar\psi\gamma_\mu

1067: T^a \psi$. Gauge invariance specifies the behaviour of the current $J_\mu$

1068: under the gauge transformations to be $J(x)\goes J'(x)=U^\dagger J(x) U$. 

1069: Though here we are treating the gauge field as a fixed background, in

1070: general we can add the kinetic term of gauge fields by the action: 

1071: \bea

1072: &~&S_{{\rm gauge}}=\int d^{d+1}x\;

1073: \tr(\frac{-1}{4}\cf^{\mu\nu}\cf_{\mu\nu}),\\ 

1074: &~&\cf^{\mu\nu}(x)=\cf^{\mu\nu}_a(x)T^a,\;\;

1075: \cf_{\mu\nu}=[\cd_\mu,\cd_\nu],\nonumber

1076: \eea

1077: with definition $\cd_\mu\equiv \partial_\mu-ig\ca_\mu$.  On the world-line

1078: theory side, we have the theory of matrix coordinates. Let us, for the

1079: moment, forget that the world-line theory considered so far is in the

1080: non-relativistic limit, and consider things in a covariant theory. So, one

1081: may have something like the action below in the world-line theory: 

1082: \bea\label{mat-space}

1083: S[X]=\int d\tau\;\tr \bigg(\haf m D_\tau X_\mu D_\tau X^\mu - q D_\tau

1084: X^\mu A_\mu(X)+\cdots\bigg),

1085: \eea

1086: in which to make things easier, we have dropped any kind of potentials,

1087: including the commutator potential of D0-branes. In above, $\tau$ is

1088: parametrizing the world-line, $D_\tau=\partial_\tau+i[a_\tau,\;]$ is the

1089: covariant derivative along the world-line, and $a_\tau$ is the world-line

1090: gauge field \footnote{See \cite{0103262} for an example of these objects

1091: in a covariant theory.}. The gauge field $A(X)$ depends on the symmetrized

1092: products of $X$'s. In the same spirit of the transformations in the

1093: world-line theory of D0-branes, we can take

1094: \bea

1095: X^\mu&\goes&\tilde X^\mu=U^\dagger X^\mu U,\nonumber\\

1096: a_\tau&\goes&\tilde a_\tau=U^\dagger a_\tau U -i

1097: U^\dagger \partial_\tau U,\nonumber\\

1098: A_\mu(X)&\goes& \tilde A_\mu(\tilde X)=

1099: U^\dagger A_\mu(X)U-iU^\dagger

1100: \delta_\mu U,

1101: \eea

1102: as the gauge transformation in the covariant theory, with

1103: $U=\exp(-i\Lambda(X,\tau))$. We mention that, $D_\tau X^\mu$ transforms as

1104: follows under the transformation: $D_\tau X^\mu \goes\tilde D_\tau\tilde

1105: X^\mu=U^\dagger D_\tau X^\mu U$. Following relations (\ref{ELEC}) and

1106: (\ref{MAGN}), we can define the field strength as follows: 

1107: \bea

1108: F_{\mu\nu}(X)\equiv \delta_\mu A_\nu(X) - \delta_\nu A_\mu(X),

1109: \eea

1110: and so the field strength transforms as: $F_{\mu\nu}\goes\tilde

1111: F_{\mu\nu}=U^\dagger F_{\mu\nu} U$; see equation (\ref{gtfs}). Now, we

1112: want to sketch the map between the field theory in space-time and the

1113: world-line theory of a charged particle in a matrix space. It is natural

1114: to assume that the map should relate the objects in two theories as is

1115: shown in the Table-1. 

1116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1117: \begin{table}[t]

1118: \begin{center}

1119: \begin{tabular}{c c c}

1120: Non-Abelian Field Theory & {\large $\Leftrightarrow$} & 

1121: Gauge Theory On Matrix Space\\\hline

1122: $\ca^\mu(x)=\ca^\mu_a(x)T^a$ & {\large $\sim$} & $A^\mu(X) + $

1123: gauge trans. terms\\

1124: $\cf^{\mu\nu}(x)=\cf^{\mu\nu}_a(x)T^a$ & {\large $\sim$} &

1125: $F^{\mu\nu}(X)$\\

1126: $J^\mu(x)=J^\mu_a(x) T^a$ &  {\large $\sim$} & $D_\tau X^\mu$\\

1127: $\Lambda(x)=\Lambda_a(x)T^a$ &{\large $\sim$} & $\Lambda(X)$

1128: \end{tabular}

1129: \caption{The quantities which should be related by the map in two

1130: theories. $\Lambda$ is the symbol for the gauge transformation

1131: parameter in two theories.}

1132: \end{center}

1133: \end{table}

1134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1135: We mention, 1) it is enough that the gauge fields are related up to

1136: a gauge transformation, 2) the objects in both sides are matrices, and 3)

1137: the field strengths and currents of the two theories transform

1138: identically under the gauge transformations. 

1139: 

1140: Since in this case, we have matrices of equal sizes in both sides, it may

1141: be considered as a case in which one is able to find a one-to-one map

1142: between two theories. In particular, the one-to-one correspondence between

1143: the currents of two theories, \ie $J^\mu$ and $D_\tau X^\mu$, suggests to

1144: verify whether such a one-to-one map can be defined or not. The case for

1145: the gauge fields $\ca_\mu(x)$ and $A_\mu(X)$ appears to be a little more

1146: subtle, because, though the gauge fields in both sides are matrices, but

1147: the numbers of the independent functions of gauge fields do not match. In

1148: the side of ordinary gauge fields $\ca_\mu(x)$, we have $N^2\cdot (d+1)$

1149: independent functions. In the matrix coordinates side, we know how to

1150: construct functionals on matrix space: once a function on ordinary space

1151: as $f(x)$ is introduced, we can find its matrix coordinates version $f(X)$

1152: by the non-Abelian Taylor or Fourier expansions, relations (\ref{NTE}) and

1153: (\ref{NFE}). So in the matrix coordinates side, the gauge field $A_\mu(X)$

1154: is constructed just by $1\cdot (d+1)$ functions. In other words, in the

1155: matrix theory side, since the gauge fields $A_\mu(X)$ are matrices due to

1156: their functional dependence on matrix coordinates $X$, all of the

1157: components of the gauge field, defined in (\ref{comp}), are non-zero and

1158: specified in each direction by one function. One nice example is the plane

1159: wave of Subsec.3.3. The counting above will be modified by considering the

1160: gauge symmetry, but the mismatch will not be removed. So by this way of

1161: counting, finding a one-to-one map seems to be out of hand. It remains for

1162: future studies, to see whether such a mismatch between the number of the

1163: functions can find an explanation, to provide the definition of a

1164: one-to-one map \footnote{One suggestion can be looking for a one-to-one

1165: map in the case which the ordinary gauge theory is in the ordered phase. 

1166: From our statistical mechanics experience in transition from disordered

1167: phase, in which the system is described by the most number of data, to

1168: ordered one, we know the situations in which the reduction of the degrees

1169: of freedom is the result of the phase transition. Particularly, the phase

1170: in which all of the components of gauge field $\ca(x)$ and current $J(x)$

1171: appear equivalently, can be considered as a situation in which the

1172: one-to-one map can be defined.}. 

1173: 

1174: In \cite{0104210} a conceptual relation between the above map and the

1175: ideas concerned in special relativity is mentioned; see also

1176: \cite{fat241,fat021,02414}. According to an interpretation of the special

1177: relativity program, it can be meaningful if the `coordinates' and the

1178: `fields' in our physical theories have some kinds of similar characters. 

1179: As an example, we observe that both the space-time coordinates $x^\mu$ and

1180: the electromagnetic potentials $A^\mu(x)$ transform equivalently (\ie as a

1181: $(d+1)$-vector) under the boost transformations. Also, by this way of

1182: interpretation, the super-space formulations of supersymmetric field and

1183: superstring theories are the natural continuation of the special

1184: relativity program. In the case of above mentioned map, it may be argued

1185: that the relation between `matrix coordinates' and `matrix fields' (gauge

1186: fields of a non-Abelian gauge theory) is one of the expectations which is

1187: supported by the spirit of the special relativity program. We recall that

1188: the symmetry transformations of gauge theory on matrix space appeared to

1189: be similar to those of non-Abelian gauge theories, relations (\ref{NAT}) 

1190: and (\ref{gtfs}).

1191: 

1192: Finally, we should recall that, the theory which was considered in

1193: previous sections, was a non-relativistic theory. As noted before, to

1194: approach a covariant theory, the natural assumption is to interpret things

1195: as the light-cone gauge formulation of a covariant theory. It is the same

1196: approach by M(atrix) model conjecture \cite{9610043}, and in particular

1197: its finite-$N$ version \cite{9704080}. Also the map we discussed in above

1198: between the D0-brane theory and gauge theory, should be considered for the

1199: light-cone formulation of the gauge theory side \cite{light-conr-ref}. In

1200: the light-cone gauge formulation the non-relativistic mass $m$ is

1201: interpreted as the unit of longitudinal momentum, as $p_+=m$.  Also we

1202: mention that, to match the amplitudes by world-line formulation with

1203: amplitudes by the field theory, the normalizations of the wave functions

1204: are different between the non-relativistic and light-cone gauge

1205: interpretations. 

1206: 

1207: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1208: \section{Conclusion And Discussion} 

1209: \setcounter{equation}{0} 

1210: In this work we provide the basic elements of the interaction of D0-brane

1211: bound states and 1-form RR photons, by the world-line formulation. At the

1212: classical level, we checked that the action is invariant under the gauge

1213: transformation of the gauge fields in the bulk theory. Also, due to matrix

1214: nature of the coordinates, we see that a new symmetry transformations

1215: exist, which under these new ones the gauge fields transform as gauge

1216: fields of a non-Abelian gauge theory. We interpret this observation as the

1217: case in which ``the fields rotate due to rotation of coordinates". We

1218: derived the Lorentz-like equations of motion, and the covariance of the

1219: equations are checked under the symmetry transformations. It is seen that

1220: the c.m. is `white' or `colourless' with respect to the $SU(N)$ sector of

1221: the background fields. 

1222: 

1223: At the quantum level, we developed the perturbation theory of the

1224: interaction of D0-branes with the RR gauge fields. In particular, using

1225: the path integral method, we write down the expression of the propagator

1226: in the first order of perturbation, which can be converted to the

1227: amplitudes of the scattering processes by an arbitrary external source. 

1228: It is discussed that how the functional dependence of gauge fields

1229: provides the base for probing the substructure of the bound states.

1230: 

1231: We discussed the possibility that the theory on the world-line of

1232: D0-branes can be mapped, maybe by a one-to-one map, to the non-Abelian

1233: gauge field theory.

1234: 

1235: One natural extension of the studies in this work can be for the

1236: supersymmetric case. Particularly in the case of maximal supersymmetry

1237: ($d=9$), we have the D0-branes of M(atrix) model, coupled to the 1-form RR

1238: background. As mentioned in Introduction, in the M(atrix) model picture

1239: D0-branes are assumed to be the super-gravitons of the 11-dimensional

1240: super-gravity in the light-cone gauge, and in particular they play in the

1241: case the role of the `photons' of the 1-form RR field in 10 dimensions. 

1242: The interaction of one D0-brane with a bound state of D0-branes is studied

1243: in the context of M(atrix) model, and according to the M(atrix) model

1244: interpretation, the commutator potential is responsible for the

1245: interaction of the single D0-brane (maybe viewed as one RR photon) and the

1246: bound state. The known results are those of different orders of loop

1247: calculations. It will be interesting to check whether the perturbation

1248: expansion in charge $q$ of this work, can reproduce the loop

1249: expansion results of M(atrix) model.

1250: 

1251: Another extension of the studies of this work, can be for including the

1252: gravitational effects, specificaly by considering non-flat metrics.  The

1253: comparison to the M(atrix) model calculations also can be done in this

1254: case. 

1255: 

1256: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1257: \vspace{.5cm}

1258: 

1259: {\bf Acknowledgement:} The author is grateful to Theory Group of INFN

1260: Section in `Tor Vergata University', specially to A. Sagnotti, for kind

1261: hospitality. The careful readings of manuscript by M. Hajirahimi, and

1262: specially S. Parvizi are acknowledged. The author uses the grant under the

1263: executive letter no. $\frac{3/3746}{79/9/7}$, by the Ministry of Science,

1264: Research and Technology of Iran.

1265: 

1266: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1267: \appendix

1268: \section{Perturbation Theory Of A Charged Particle In

1269: \\Ordinary Space By Path Integral Method}

1270: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1271: As an exercise, and to complete the basics of present paper, here we

1272: review the perturbation theory of a charged particle in electromagnetic

1273: background. Particularly, we extract the vertex function of the coupling

1274: of a photon to incoming--outgoing (bosonic) charged particles. In contrast

1275: to the non-relativistic theory of the paper, here we consider the

1276: covariant example. A good reference for these discussions is \cite{ryder}.

1277: The action we use, initially in Euclidean space-time, is simply

1278: \bea

1279: S=\int d\tau \;(\haf m\dot x^2 - i q \dot x^\mu A_\mu(x)),

1280: \eea

1281: We begin with the expression similar to the formula

1282: (\ref{path-int4}) of the text as:

1283: \bea\label{path-app1}

1284: \langle x_F,\tau_F | x_I, \tau_I \rangle &\sim& 

1285: \langle x_F,\tau_F | x_I, \tau_I \rangle_\fp \nonumber\\

1286: &+&i {\cal N}\lim_{\Delta\tau \goes 0} \sum_{k=1}^n \int

1287: d^{d+1}x_{k-1} d^{d+1}x_k d^{d+1}x_{k+1}\times

1288: \langle x_F,\tau_F | x_{k+1}, \tau_{k+1} \rangle_\fp\times\nonumber\\

1289: &~&2\Delta \tau \cdot\bigg(q \frac{x^\mu_{k+1} - x^\mu_{k-1}}{2\Delta\tau}

1290: A_\mu(x_k,\tau)\bigg)\times 

1291: \langle x_{k-1},\tau_{k-1} | x_I, \tau_I \rangle_\fp\times \nonumber\\

1292: &~&\e^{-S_\fp [k,k-1;\Delta\tau]}\;\;

1293: \e^{-S_\fp [k+1,k;\Delta\tau]} + O(q^2),

1294: \eea

1295: in which the normalization constant ${\cal N}$ contains sufficient powers

1296: of $\Delta\tau$ to regulate the final result, and we have the following

1297: relations:

1298: \bea

1299: &~&\langle x_2,\tau_2 | x_1, \tau_1 \rangle_\fp\sim

1300: \e^{\frac{-m(x_2-x_1)^2}{2(\tau_2-\tau_1)}}\sim

1301: \int d^{d+1}l\;

1302: \exp\bigg(il\cdot(x_2-x_1)-i\frac{l^2}{2m}(\tau_2-\tau_1)\bigg),

1303: \\

1304: &~&S_\fp [j+1,j;\Delta\tau]=\frac{m(x_{j+1}-x_j)^2}{2\Delta\tau},

1305: \eea

1306: with $A\cdot B= A^\mu B_\mu$. Doing integrations $dx_{k\pm 1}$ to replace

1307: new propagators, and after the change $x_k\goes x$, we will find: 

1308: \bea\label{path-app2}

1309: \langle x_F,\tau_F | x_I, \tau_I \rangle &\sim& 

1310: \langle x_F,\tau_F | x_I, \tau_I \rangle_\fp

1311: + i{\cal N}' \int_{\tau_I}^{\tau_F} d\tau \int d^{d+1}x

1312: \;\langle x_F,\tau_F | x, \tau \rangle_\fp\times

1313: \nonumber\\

1314: &~&\bigg\{q\bigg(\frac{x_F - x}{\tau_F-\tau}+

1315: \frac{x-x_I}{\tau-\tau_I}\bigg)\cdot

1316: A(x)\bigg\}\times 

1317: \langle x,\tau| x_I, \tau_I \rangle_\fp + O(q^2),

1318: \eea

1319: From now on we restrict the calculation to the plane wave $A_\mu(x)\sim

1320: \epsilon_\mu \e^{ik_\nu x^\nu}$.  To find the S-matrix elements, it is

1321: usual to go to the momentum space, and we have the expression 

1322: \bea

1323: S_{FI}&\sim& \delta^d(p_F-p_I) \delta(E_F-E_I)+ 

1324: \frac{{\cal N}''\e^{-im^2(\tau_F-\tau_I)/2}}{\tau_F-\tau_I}

1325: \int_{\tau_I}^{\tau_F}

1326: d\tau\int d^{d+1} x \int d^{d+1}x_I \int d^{d+1}x_F\nonumber\\

1327: &~&\e^{-ip_F\cdot x_F} \e^{ip_I\cdot x_I}

1328: \langle x_F,\tau_F | x, \tau \rangle_\fp

1329: \bigg\{

1330: \e^{ik\cdot x} 

1331: \exp\bigg(iq \epsilon\cdot \bigg(\frac{x_F - x}{\tau_F-\tau}+

1332: \frac{x-x_I}{\tau-\tau_I}\bigg)\bigg)

1333: \bigg\}_{{\rm linear\;in}\;\epsilon}

1334: \nonumber\\

1335: &~&\langle x,\tau| x_I, \tau_I \rangle_\fp+O(q^2),

1336: \eea

1337: in which $p_F^2=p_I^2=-m^2$, and to make easier the calculation we have

1338: exponentiated the $\epsilon_\mu$;  so we should keep only the linear term

1339: in $\epsilon$ finally.  By using the momentum representation of the

1340: propagator $\langle \cdots

1341: \rangle_\fp$ we find:

1342: \bea

1343: S_{FI}&\sim& \delta^d(p_F-p_I) \delta(E_F-E_I)\nonumber\\

1344: &+& (\cdots)

1345: \delta^d(p_F-p_I-k) \delta(E_F-E_I-k_0)(iq \epsilon_\mu (p_F+p_I)^\mu)

1346: +O(q^2),

1347: \eea

1348: in which we recognize the field theory result $\epsilon\cdot (p_F+p_I)$

1349: for the vertex function (page 548 of \cite{sterman}). 

1350: 

1351: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1352: \section{Calculation Of S-Matrix Element For Matrix

1353: \\Coordinates In Momentum Basis}

1354: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1355: Here we present the derivation of (\ref{amplitude-2}), starting with

1356: (\ref{amplitude-1}). By using the definitions: 

1357: \bea

1358: &~&\langle X_2,t_2 | X_1, t_1 \rangle_\fp\sim

1359: \int \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1} d^{d+1}L_a\;

1360: \exp\bigg(iL_a\cdot(X_{2a}-X_{1a})-i\frac{L_a^2}{2Nm}(t_2-t_1)\bigg),

1361: \\

1362: &~&S_\fp [j+1,j;\Delta t]=\sum_{a=0}^{N^2-1}

1363: \frac{Nm(X_{j+1,a}-X_{j,a})^2}{2\Delta t},

1364: \eea

1365: we find for (\ref{amplitude-1})

1366: \bea

1367: S_{FI}&\sim& \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1} \delta^d(P_{Fa}-P_{Ia})

1368: \delta(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})

1369: \nonumber\\&+& (\cdots) \int_{t_I}^{t_F}dt\int d^d X 

1370: \int d^dX_I\; d^dX_F

1371: \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1}\bigg( \e^{i(E_{Fa}t_F-E_{Ia}t_I)}

1372: \e^{-i(P_{Fa}\cdot X_{Fa}-P_{Ia}\cdot X_{Ia})}\bigg)

1373: \nonumber\\&~&

1374: \int \prod_{b=0}^{N^2-1} d^{d+1}Q_b\;

1375: \exp\bigg(iQ_b\cdot(X_{Fb}-X_b)-i\frac{Q_b^2}{2Nm}(t_F-t)\bigg)

1376: \nonumber\\&~&

1377: \bigg(

1378: \sum_{c=0}^{N^2-1} 

1379: \bigg\{\exp \bigg(iq \epsilon\cdot \bigg(\frac{X_{Fc} - X_c}{t_F-t}+

1380: \frac{X_c-X_{Ic}}{t-t_I}\bigg)\bigg) 

1381: \bigg\}_{{\rm linear\;in}\;\epsilon}  

1382: \tr\bigg(T^c \e^{ik\cdot X-i\omega t} \bigg)

1383: \nonumber\\&~&

1384: +\tr\bigg(iq\epsilon_0  \e^{ik\cdot X-i\omega t}\bigg) \bigg)

1385: \nonumber\\&~&

1386: \int \prod_{e=0}^{N^2-1} d^{d+1}L_e\;

1387: \exp\bigg(iL_e\cdot(X_e-X_{Ie})-i\frac{L_e^2}{2Nm}(t-t_I)\bigg)

1388: +O(q^2),

1389: \eea

1390: in which to make easier the calculation, we have exponentiated the

1391: $\vec\epsilon$; so we should keep only the linear term in $\epsilon$

1392: finally. In above the symbol $A\cdot B$ is for the inner product $A_iB^i$.

1393: It is worth to recall that the spatial integrals like $\int d^d X$ are in

1394: fact as $\int \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1} d^d X_a$. Here we leave the term

1395: $\epsilon_0$ for the reader. After doing the integrations on $d^dX_{I,F}$,

1396: we have:

1397: \bea

1398: S_{FI}&\sim& \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1} \delta^d(P_{Fa}-P_{Ia})

1399: \delta(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})+ (\cdots) \int_{t_I}^{t_F}dt\int  

1400: \prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1} d^dX_a \e^{i(E_{Fa}t_F-E_{Ia}t_I)}

1401: \nonumber\\&~&

1402: \int \prod_{b=0}^{N^2-1} d^{d+1}Q_b\;d^{d+1}L_b\;

1403: \e^{-i\frac{Q_b^2}{2Nm}(t_F-t)}

1404: \e^{-i\frac{L_b^2}{2Nm}(t-t_I)}

1405: \e^{i(L_b-Q_b)\cdot X_b}

1406: \nonumber\\&~&

1407: \bigg(

1408: \sum_{c=0}^{N^2-1} 

1409: \prod_{e=0}^{N^2-1}

1410: \delta^d\bigg(Q_e-P_{Fe}+\frac{q\epsilon\delta_{ce}}{t_F-t}\bigg)

1411: \delta^d\bigg(L_e-P_{Ie}+\frac{q\epsilon\delta_{ce}}{t-t_I}\bigg)

1412: \nonumber\\&~&

1413: \bigg\{\exp \bigg(iq \epsilon\cdot X_c 

1414: \bigg(\frac{-1}{t_F-t}+\frac{1}{t-t_I}\bigg)\bigg) 

1415: \bigg\}_{{\rm linear\;in}\;\epsilon}  

1416: \tr\bigg(T^c \e^{ik\cdot X-i\omega t} \bigg)\bigg)

1417: \nonumber\\&~&

1418: +O(q^2).

1419: \eea

1420: By using the $\delta$-functions we simply can do the integrations on

1421: $d^dQ$ and $d^dL$. Also, based on the fact that $\exp(ik\cdot

1422: X)=\exp(ik\cdot X_\cm {\bf 1}_N) \exp(ik\cdot\hat{X})$, with

1423: $\tr(\hat{X})= 0$, we can do the integration on $d^d X_0=d^d X_\cm$. By

1424: recalling $E_a=P_a^2/(2Nm)$ for $I$ and $F$ states (convention

1425: $\tr(T^aT^b)=N\delta^{ab}$), and by the limits $t_I\goes -\infty$

1426: and $t_F\goes\infty$, we arrive at: 

1427: \bea

1428: S_{FI}&\sim&\prod_{a=0}^{N^2-1}\delta^d(P_{Fa}-P_{Ia})

1429: \delta(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})\nonumber\\

1430: &+&(\cdots)

1431: \delta^d (P_{F\cm}-P_{I\cm}-k)

1432: \delta\bigg(\sum_{a=0}^{N^2-1}(E_{Fa}-E_{Ia})-\omega\bigg)

1433: \nonumber\\&\times&

1434: \int \prod_{b=1}^{N^2-1} d^d\hat{X}_b \;

1435: \e^{i(P_{Ib}-P_{Fb})\cdot \hat{X}_b}

1436: \sum_{c=0}^{N^2-1} 

1437: \bigg\{\e^{\frac{i}{m}q \epsilon\cdot (P_{Fc}+P_{Ic})}

1438: \bigg\}_{{\rm linear\;in}\;\epsilon}  \!\!\!

1439: \;\tr\bigg(T^c \e^{ik\cdot \hat{X}} \bigg)+ O(q^2).

1440: \eea

1441: 

1442: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1443: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1444: 

1445: \bibitem{9510017} J. Polchinski, ``Dirichlet-Branes And Ramond-Ramond

1446: Charges," Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75} (1995) 4724, hep-th/9510017.

1447: 

1448: \bibitem{9510135} E. Witten, ``Bound States Of Strings And p-Branes,"

1449: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B460} (1996) 335, hep-th/9510135.

1450: 

1451: \bibitem{CDS} A. Connes, M.R. Douglas and A. Schwarz, ``Noncommutative

1452: Geometry And Matrix Theory: Compactification On Tori," JHEP {\bf 9802}

1453: (1998)  003, hep-th/9711162;  M.R. Douglas and C. Hull, ``D-Branes And The

1454: Noncommutative Torus,"  JHEP {\bf 9802} (1998) 008, hep-th/9711165. 

1455: 

1456: \bibitem{9908142} N. Seiberg and E. Witten, ``String Theory And

1457: Noncommutative Geometry,"  JHEP {\bf 9909} (1999) 032, hep-th/9908142.

1458: 

1459: \bibitem{jabbari} H. Arfaei and M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, ``Mixed Boundary

1460: Conditions And Brane-String Bound States," Nucl. Phys. {\bf B526} (1998) 

1461: 278, hep-th/9709054;  M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, ``More On Mixed Boundary

1462: Conditions And D-Branes Bound States," Phys. Lett. {\bf B425} (1998) 48,

1463: hep-th/9712199. 

1464: 

1465: \bibitem{9610043} T. Banks, W. Fischler, S.H. Shenker and L. Susskind, ``M

1466: Theory As A Matrix Model: A Conjecture," Phys. Rev. {\bf D55} (1997) 5112,

1467: hep-th/9610043.

1468: 

1469: \bibitem{review-matrix} T. Banks, ``Matrix Theory," Nucl. Phys. Proc. 

1470: Suppl. {\bf 67} (1998)  180, hep-th/9710231; ``TASI Lectures On Matrix

1471: Theory," hep-th/9911068; D. Bigatti and L. Susskind, ``Review Of Matrix

1472: Theory," hep-th/9712072;  W. Taylor, `` The M(atrix) Model Of M-theory," 

1473: hep-th/0002016; ``M(atrix) Theory: Matrix Quantum Mechanics As A

1474: Fundamental Theory," Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 73} (2001) 419, hep-th/0101126;

1475: R.  Helling, ``Scattering In Supersymmetric M(atrix) Models," Fortschur.

1476: Phys.  {\bf 48} (2000) 1229. 

1477: 

1478: \bibitem{9910053} R.C. Myers, ``Dielectric-Branes," JHEP {\bf 9912} (1999) 

1479: 022, hep-th/9910053. 

1480: 

1481: \bibitem{9910052} W. Taylor and M. Van Raamsdonk, ``Multiple Dp-Branes In

1482: Weak Background Fields," Nucl. Phys. {\bf B573} (2000) 703, hep-th/9910052. 

1483: \bibitem{9907146} S. Parvizi and A.H. Fatollahi, ``D-Particle Feynman

1484: Graphs And Their Amplitudes," hep-th/9907146; A.H. Fatollahi, ``Feynman

1485: Graphs From D-Particle Dynamics," hep-th/9806201.

1486: 

1487: \bibitem{9704080} L. Susskind, ``Another Conjecture About M(atrix)

1488: Theory,"  hep-th/9704080.

1489: 

1490: \bibitem{0103262} A.H. Fatollahi, ``On Non-Abelian Structure From Matrix

1491: Coordinates," Phys. Lett. {\bf B512} (2001) 161, hep-th/0103262.

1492: 

1493: \bibitem{0104210} A.H. Fatollahi, ``Electrodynamics On Matrix Space: 

1494: Non-Abelian By Coordinates," to appear in Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C},

1495: hep-th/0104210. 

1496: 

1497: \bibitem{9611050} J. Polchinski, ``TASI Lectures On D-Branes," 

1498: hep-th/9611050.

1499: 

1500: \bibitem{hulldorn} C.M. Hull, ``Matrix Theory, U-Duality And Toroidal

1501: Compactifications Of M-Theory," JHEP {\bf 10} (1998) 11, hep-th/9711179;

1502: H. Dorn, ``Nonabelian Gauge Field Dynamics On Matrix D-Branes," Nucl.

1503: Phys. {\bf B494} (1997) 105, hep-th/9612120.

1504: 

1505: \bibitem{douglas} M.R. Douglas, ``D-Branes And Matrix Theory In Curved

1506: Space," Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 68} (1998) 381, hep-th/9707228;

1507: ``D-Branes In Curved Space," Adv. Theor. Math.  Phys. {\bf 1} (1998) 198,

1508: hep-th/9703056; M.R. Douglas, A. Kato and H. Ooguri, ``D-Brane Actions On

1509: Kahler Manifolds," Adv. Theor.  Math. Phys. {\bf 1} (1998) 237,

1510: hep-th/9708012. 

1511: 

1512: \bibitem{garousi} M.R. Garousi and R.C. Myers, ``World-Volume Interactions

1513: On D-Branes," Nucl. Phys. {\bf B542} (1999) 73, hep-th/9809100; 

1514: ``World-Volume Potentials On D-Branes," JHEP {\bf 0011} (2000) 032,

1515: hep-th/0010122. 

1516: 

1517: \bibitem{9712185} D. Kabat and W. Taylor, ``Linearized Supergravity From

1518: Matrix Theory," Phys. Lett. {\bf B426} (1998) 297, hep-th/9712185. 

1519: 

1520: \bibitem{9712159} W. Taylor and M. Van Raamsdonk, ``Angular Momentum And

1521: Long-Range Gravitational Interactions In Matrix Theory," Nucl. Phys. {\bf

1522: B532} (1998) 227, hep-th/9712159; M. Van Raamsdonk, ``Conservation Of

1523: Supergravity Currents From Matrix Theory,"  Nucl. Phys. {\bf B542} (1999) 

1524: 262, hep-th/9803003;  W. Taylor and M. Van Raamsdonk, ``Supergravity

1525: Currents And Linearized Interactions For Matrix Theory Configurations With

1526: Fermionic Backgrounds," JHEP {\bf 9904} (1999) 013, hep-th/9812239. 

1527: 

1528: \bibitem{tseytlin} A.A. Tseytlin, ``On Non-Abelian Generalisation Of

1529: Born-Infeld Action In String Theory," Nucl. Phys. {\bf B501} (1997) 41,

1530: hep-th/9701125. 

1531: 

1532: \bibitem{9904095} W. Taylor and M. Van Raamsdonk, ``D0-Branes In Weakly

1533: Curved Backgrounds," Nucl. Phys. {\bf B558} (1999) 63, hep-th/9904095. 

1534: 

1535: \bibitem{0105253} C. Ciocarlie, ``On The Gauge Invariance Of The

1536: Chern-Simons Action For N D-Branes," JHEP {\bf 0107} (2001) 028,

1537: hep-th/0105253.

1538: 

1539: \bibitem{fat241} A.H. Fatollahi, ``D0-Branes As Confined Quarks," talk given

1540: at ``Isfahan String Workshop 2000, May 13-14, Iran," hep-th/0005241.

1541: 

1542: \bibitem{fat021} A.H. Fatollahi, ``D0-Branes As Light-Front Confined

1543: Quarks," Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C19} (2001) 749, hep-th/0002021. 

1544: 

1545: \bibitem{02414} A.H. Fatollahi, ``Do Quarks Obey D-Brane Dynamics?," 

1546: Europhys. Lett. {\bf 53(3)} (2001) 317, hep-ph/9902414; ``Do Quarks Obey

1547: D-Brane Dynamics?II," hep-ph/9905484, to appear in Europhys. Lett. 

1548: 

1549: \bibitem{0007023} A.H. Fatollahi, ``Gauge Symmetry As Symmetry Of Matrix

1550: Coordinates," Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C17} (2000) 535, hep-th/0007023.

1551: 

1552: \bibitem{9603081} U.H. Danielsson, G. Ferretti and B. Sundborg,

1553: ``D-Particle Dynamics And Bound States," Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A11}

1554: (1996) 5463, hep-th/9603081; D. Kabat and P. Pouliot, ``A Comment On

1555: Zero-Brane Quantum Mechanics," Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77} (1996) 1004,

1556: hep-th/9603127.

1557: 

1558: \bibitem{dewit-nicolai} B. de Wit, ``Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics,

1559: Supermembranes And Dirichlet Particles," Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf

1560: B56} (1997) 76, hep-th/9701169; H. Nicolai and R. Helling,

1561: ``Supermembranes And M(atrix) Theory," hep-th/9809103; B. de Wit,

1562: ``Supermembranes And Super Matrix Models,"  hep-th/9902051. 

1563: 

1564: \bibitem{sterman} G. Sterman, ``An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory," 

1565: Cambridge University Press (1994). 

1566: 

1567: \bibitem{ryder} L.H. Ryder, ``Quantum Field Theory," Cambridge University

1568: Press (1985).

1569: 

1570: \bibitem{9205205} M.J. Strassler, ``Field Theory Without Feynman Diagrams:

1571: One-Loop Effective Actions," Nucl. Phys. {\bf B385} (1992) 145,

1572: hep-ph/9205205.

1573: 

1574: \bibitem{light-conr-ref} R. Perry, ``Hamiltonian Light-Front Field Theory

1575: And Quantum Chromodynamics," hep-th/9407056; T. Heinzl, ``Light-Cone

1576: Dynamics Of Particles And Fields," hep-th/9812190; R. Venugopalan,

1577: ``Introduction To Light Cone Field Theory And High Energy Scattering," 

1578: nucl-th/9808023; S.J. Brodsky, H-C Pauli and S. Pinsky, ``Quantum

1579: Chromodynamics And Other Field Theories On The Light Cone,"  Phys. Rept.

1580: {\bf 301} (1998) 299, hep-ph/9705477. 

1581: 

1582: \end{thebibliography}

1583: 

1584: \end{document}

1585: 

1586: 

1587: 

1588: