hep-th0111207/tb.tex
1: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,groupedaddress,showpacs,amsfonts,floatfix]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
4: 
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{Critical phenomena of thick branes in warped spacetimes}
7: \author{Antonio Campos}
8: \affiliation{Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation,
9:              University of Portsmouth,
10:              Portsmouth PO1 2EG,
11:              United Kingdom}
12: \date{\today}
13: %\begin{abstract}
14: %We have investigated the effects of a generic bulk first-order phase 
15: %transition on the dynamics of thick Minkowski branes in warped 
16: %geometries.
17: %We have found that, as occurs in an Euclidean spacetime,
18: %a film of disordered phase appears between two ordered bulk phases
19: %as the phase transition is approached.
20: %Thus, an interface separating two ordered phases split into 
21: %two interfaces with a disordered phase in between.
22: %A remarkable and distinctive feature is that the critical temperature
23: %of the phase transition is lowered due to pure geometrical effects.
24: %We have studied a variety of critical exponents which describe
25: %the universal aspects of the transition and the evolution of
26: %the transverse-traceless sector of the metric fluctuations. 
27: %\end{abstract}
28: \begin{abstract}
29: We have investigated the effects of a generic bulk first-order phase 
30: transition on thick Minkowski branes in warped geometries.
31: As occurs in Euclidean space, when the system is brought near the 
32: phase transition an interface separating two ordered phases splits 
33: into two interfaces with a disordered phase in between.
34: A remarkable and distinctive feature is that the 
35: critical temperature of the phase transition is lowered due to pure 
36: geometrical effects.
37: We have studied a variety of critical exponents and the evolution of
38: the transverse-traceless sector of the metric fluctuations. 
39: \end{abstract}
40: \pacs{11.10.Kk,04.50.+h,05.70.Jk,11.27.+d}
41: \maketitle
42: 
43: 
44: The physics of branes in higher dimensional theories has 
45: been the subject of renewed interest in the past years,
46: mostly, because they provide a novel approach for 
47: resolving the cosmological constant and the 
48: hierarchy problems \cite{ArkDimDva:1998,RanSun:1999a}.
49: An intriguing feature of this type of scenario is 
50: the possibility of localizing a massless graviton on the
51: brane, and then reproducing effectively four-dimensional gravity at 
52: large distances, due to the warp geometry of the spacetime
53: \cite{RanSun:1999b}.
54: Furthermore, these models have also inspired the idea in which 
55: our universe is the result of the continuous collisions of branes
56: \cite{Ekpyrotic:2001}.
57: A fundamental ingredient of this cosmological model is the 
58: nucleation and splitting of branes.
59: Then, it is interesting to consider the universal aspects of 
60: thick branes \cite{DeWFreGubKar:2000} splitting in a 
61: warped bulk.
62: In this work we present a field theory description for a feasible
63: realization of such a mechanism.
64: Using superpotential techniques
65: \cite{DeWFreGubKar:2000,Superpotential:1999},
66: some exact solutions of the equations of motion for the coupled 
67: scalar field plus gravity system have been studied in 
68: \cite{TB:2000}. 
69: Analytical solutions for giving potentials have been described in 
70: \cite{Exact_sol:1999}.
71: The probability of tunneling has been considered in 
72: \cite{Tunneling:2000} and some geometrical aspects 
73: of brane collisions have been pointed out in 
74: \cite{Per:2001,collisions:2001}. 
75: 
76: In this letter, we provide a qualitative description of the 
77: splitting of thick Minkowski branes due to a first-order phase 
78: transition in a warped geometry. 
79: For this purpose we have considered a generic potential for a 
80: complex scalar field that captures the universal 
81: aspects of the phase transition in the bulk. 
82: As the system is brought near the critical temperature an
83: interface interpolating two bulk phases breaks into two
84: separated interfaces, and a layer of a new phase appears between 
85: them.
86: This effect is known in condensed matter physics as
87: complete wetting \cite{Lip:1982,Lip:1984}.
88: It also appears at the deconfinement phase transition of 
89: SU($3$) Yang-Mills theory \cite{FrePat:1989,TraWie:1992} and 
90: supersymmetric QCD
91: \cite{SUSY-QCD:1998}.
92: Our analysis shows the existence of a new effective critical
93: temperature for complete wetting due to the effective
94: negative bulk cosmological constant.
95: This phenomenon reveals a remarkable relationship between 
96: geometry and the critical behavior of interfaces.
97: We have been able to characterize the universal aspects
98: of this critical phenomenon computing the critical exponents
99: for some relevant quantities.
100: And finally, we have also studied the behavior of the metric 
101: fluctuations.
102: In particular, we have found that the zero mode delocalizes,
103: high energy modes are scarcely affected, and for low energy modes
104: the phase changes and the amplitude starts to grow at the moment
105: of the splitting.
106: It is interesting to point out that we are going to use a numerical
107: approach and thereby our solutions do not depend on any
108: specific superpotential.
109: 
110: We start with a metric of the form 
111: \begin{equation}
112:    ds^2
113:       \ = \ e^{2A(r)}\eta_{ij}dx^idx^j - dr^2,
114: \end{equation}
115: where $i=0, 1, 2, 3$, $\eta_{ij}=(1, -1, -1, -1)$, and 
116: the warp factor $A(r)$ depends only on the coordinate of the 
117: extra dimension $r$. 
118: This choice of metric preserves Poincar{\'e} invariance
119: in the four-dimensional submanifolds of constant $r$.
120: To build up the thick brane we consider an auxiliary 
121: complex scalar field $\Phi$ coupled to gravity through
122: the five-dimensional action
123: \[
124:    S
125:      \ = \ \int d^4x\ dr \sqrt{|g|}
126:            ( - \frac{1}{4} R
127:              + \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu \Phi^\ast
128:                                       \partial_\nu \Phi
129:              - V(\Phi)
130:              - \Lambda
131:            ),                                                       
132: \]
133: where $R$ is the scalar curvature and $\Lambda$ is a bulk 
134: parameter that fixes the minimum of the scalar potential $V(\Phi)$.
135: In flat backgrounds $\Lambda$ is a free parameter that can 
136: always be used to set the minimun of the potential to zero.
137: In contrast, this is not always possible if one is concerned to 
138: find out soliton solutions of the equations of motion
139: in curved spacetimes.
140: Since we are particularly interested in the universal aspects of
141: first-order phase transitions in the bulk we are going
142: to consider the generic scalar field potential
143: \begin{equation}
144:    V(\Phi)
145:       \ = \  a |\Phi |^2
146:             -b \phi_R (\phi_R^2 - 3\phi_I^2)
147:             +c |\Phi |^4,                                           
148: \label{eq:potential}
149: \end{equation}
150: where $\phi_R$ and $\phi_I$ are, respectively, the real and the 
151: imaginary part of the scalar field $\Phi$. 
152: This potential has quartic self-interactions and respects 
153: ${\mathbb Z}_3$ symmetry.
154: The action for a scalar field with a potential of this type 
155: belongs to the same universality class as the effective action
156: for theories describing the ${\mathbb Z}_N$ center symmetry of 
157: a $SU(N)$ gauge field \cite{TraWie:1992}.
158: So, they can be easily realized if the model supports a bulk
159: field with a gauge symmetry.
160: To ensure stability the parameter $c$ must be positive. 
161: For $a > 0$ the potential has a local minimum at $\Phi^{(1)}=0$
162: corresponding to a disordered bulk phase.
163: For $b > 0$ and $a < 9a_c/8$ there are three additional
164: degenerate global minima corresponding to ordered bulk phases, 
165: say $\Phi^{(2)}=\phi_o$, 
166: $\Phi^{(3)}=(-\frac{1}{2} + i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})\phi_o$, and
167: $\Phi^{(4)}=(-\frac{1}{2} - i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})\phi_o$, 
168: where
169: \begin{equation}
170:    \phi_o
171:       \ = \ \frac{3b}{8c}
172:             \left( 1 + \sqrt{1-\frac{8}{9}\frac{a}{a_c}}\,
173:             \right),                                                
174: \label{eq:OP}
175: \end{equation}
176: and $a_c = b^2/4c$.
177: These three minima coexist with the disordered phase when 
178: $a=a_c$.
179: Then fixing $b$ and $c$ lead us to interpret $a$ as a bulk 
180: temperature parameter where $a_c$ is the critical temperature.
181: The actual variation of $a$ will strongly depend on the 
182: particular realization of the effective theory. But, since we 
183: are studying the universal aspects of the phase transition, 
184: we can treat this parameter as an independent variable.
185: Note that the effective five-dimensional cosmological constant
186: is not $\Lambda$ but $\Lambda_{eff} = \Lambda + V(a)$,
187: where $V(a)$ indicates the value of the scalar potential at 
188: the global minima, i.e.
189: $V(\Phi^{(n)})\equiv \phi_o^2 ( a - b \phi_o + c \phi_o^2 )$
190: with $n$ taking values $2$, $3$ or $4$.
191: 
192: The classical equations of motion for planar field configurations 
193: read as follows
194: \cite{DeWFreGubKar:2000},  
195: \begin{eqnarray}
196:    \phi_R''
197:       & = & -4 A'\phi_R' + \frac{\partial V}{\partial \phi_R},      
198: \label{eq:EM_phi_R}
199:           \\
200:    \phi_I''
201:       & = & -4 A'\phi_I' + \frac{\partial V}{\partial \phi_I},      
202: \label{eq:EM_phi_I}
203:           \\
204:    A''
205:       & = & -\frac{2}{3} ( \phi_R'^2 + \phi_I'^2 ),                 
206: \label{eq:EM_A}
207:           \\
208:    3A'^2
209:       & = &  \frac{1}{2} ( \phi_R'^2 + \phi_I'^2 )
210:            - V(\Phi)
211:            - \Lambda,                                               
212: \label{eq:CONSTRAINT}
213: \end{eqnarray}
214: where the prime denotes differentiation with respect to the
215: coordinate $r$.
216: The soliton equations for the flat case are recovered by 
217: taking the warp factor $A(r)$ to be constant \cite{TraWie:1992} 
218: (see \cite{SUSY-QCD:1998} for a supersymmetric generalization).
219: Note also that Eqs.~(\ref{eq:EM_A}) and (\ref{eq:CONSTRAINT}) 
220: imply that $\Lambda < |V(a)|$ and then the effective five-dimensional 
221: cosmological constant $\Lambda_{eff}$ is always negative.
222: We have solved numerically the system of ordinary differential
223: equations (\ref{eq:EM_phi_R})-(\ref{eq:EM_A}) for 
224: $\phi_R(r)$, $\phi_I(r)$, and $A(r)$ with boundary conditions 
225: $\Phi(-\infty)=\Phi^{(4)}$, 
226: $\Phi(-\infty)=\Phi^{(3)}$,
227: $A(0)=A'(0)=0$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:profiles}).
228: Then, Eq.~(\ref{eq:CONSTRAINT}) has been used in order to 
229: fix the parameter $\Lambda$ for different values of the parameter 
230: $a$ as the interface configuration is brought near the phase 
231: transition.
232: Because of the ${\mathbb Z}_3$ symmetry there will be 
233: equivalent solutions for other choices of ordered phases.
234: 
235: \begin{figure}
236: \includegraphics*[totalheight=3.3in,width=0.95\columnwidth]{profiles_wbl.eps}
237: \caption{\label{fig:profiles}Interface profiles for thick domain 
238: walls in a warped geometry with a ${\mathbb Z}_3$-symmetric bulk 
239: first-order phase transition for $b=2$ and $c=1$. 
240: (a) Away from the phase transition a domain wall interpolates
241: two distinct ordered phases. 
242: (b) Close to the critical temperature the wall splits into two 
243: interfaces with an intervining film of disordered phase in between.}
244: \end{figure}
245: 
246: Our results reveals that, equivalently to what happens when 
247: the background spacetime is Euclidean, the ordered-ordered domain
248: wall splits into two separated ordered-disordered interfaces,
249: and a layer of disordered phase appears and completely wets the 
250: two ordered phases as the the phase transition is approached.
251: Although in both cases this behavior looks quite similar
252: there is an important distinctive feature. 
253: For a geometry with a warp factor complete wetting does not occur 
254: for the critical temperature $a_c$ but for a smaller effective 
255: temperature $a_\ast$.
256: As we will see, this effect is closely related to the 
257: fact that asymptotically the spacetime is Anti-deSitter.  
258: In order to understand why this effective critical temperature
259: appears it is necessary to know the behavior of the Euclidean energy
260: $E(r)\equiv \frac{1}{2}(\phi'^2_R+\phi'^2_I) - V(\Phi)$ as the 
261: temperature parameter $a$ increases.
262: It is very easy to see, using the equations of motion 
263: (\ref{eq:EM_phi_R}) and (\ref{eq:EM_phi_I}), that the derivative of this 
264: energy along the orthogonal direction to the domain wall is
265: $E'(r) = -4A'(\phi'^2_R+\phi'^2_I)$.
266: Then, it has a minimun at $r=0$, $E(0)=\Lambda$, and it
267: reaches its maximun value at infinity $E(\pm\infty)=|V(a)|$.
268: In fact, it has the same shape as $3A'^2$ but is displaced 
269: vertically.
270: On the other hand, one also has to take into account that the 
271: stability of a configuration with three coexisting
272: phases implies that an interface of two ordered phases can
273: only be completely wet by a disordered phase.
274: This means that in order to have a disordered phase between
275: our initial ordered phases $\Phi(0)\rightarrow \Phi^{(1)}$
276: and $\Phi'(0)\rightarrow 0$ when $a$ increases.
277: Moreover, $E(0)$ should tend to zero as well as $\Lambda$ 
278: for complete wetting to occur.
279: If the background is Euclidean, the energy is a positive 
280: constant, $E=|V(a)|$, for each value of the temperature 
281: parameter $a$.
282: So, since $E$ is zero for $V(a=a_c)=0$, complete wetting 
283: happens with a critical temperature $a_c$.
284: However, in the warped case and because $\Lambda$ is always 
285: smaller than $|V(a)|$, the coexistence of the three phases 
286: occurs for a critical value $a_\ast < a_c$.
287: This inmediately translates into the fact that 
288: the effective bulk cosmological constant asymptotically 
289: reaches a constant negative value
290: \begin{equation}
291:    \Lambda^\ast_{eff}
292:       \ = \  V(a)|_{a_\ast}
293:       \ < \ 0.
294: \end{equation}
295: Then, one could revert the argument and say that
296: the existence of a nonzero negative cosmological 
297: constant is responsable for lowering the critical 
298: temperature of complete wetting.
299: One would expect intuitively that the value 
300: of $a_\ast$ is very close to the critical value $a_c$. 
301: In this case, it can be easily seen that 
302: $\Lambda^\ast_{eff}$, $a_c$, and $a_\ast$ are related by,
303: \begin{equation}
304:    \Lambda^\ast_{eff}
305:       \ \sim \  - \frac{a_c}{c} (a_c - a_\ast).
306: \end{equation}
307: It is worth noticing that the existence of an effective 
308: critical temperature prevents the global geometry for becoming
309: flat as the phase transition is reached. If the contrary would 
310: have occurred, it would have been a puzzling feature of brane 
311: models.
312: In the example plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:profiles}
313: the critical temperature is $a_c=1$.
314: In this case, we have obtained the effective critical temperature 
315: $a_\ast=0.9223822740$ for $\Lambda < 10^{-7}$ and an effective 
316: bulk cosmological constant $\Lambda^\ast_{eff}\sim -0.08$.
317: 
318: The universal aspects of this critical behavior are 
319: characterized by several critical exponents.
320: In Fig.~\ref{fig:crit_exp} we have plotted the numerical results
321: for the determination of the critical exponents of several
322: parameters of the phase transition.
323: As one would expect from the discussion above, the parameter
324: $\Lambda$ is proportional to the deviation from the effective
325: critical temperature, $(a_\ast - a)/a_\ast \propto \Lambda$.
326: On the other hand, the width of the disordered phase layer, 
327: $r_o$, wetting the two ordered phases diverges logarithmically
328: $r_o \propto -\log (\Lambda)$.
329: In addition, for the order parameters at the center of the
330: wetting layer we obtain $A''(0)\propto\Lambda$, 
331: $\phi_R(0)\propto\Lambda^{1/2}$, and $\phi'_I(0)\propto\Lambda^{1/2}$.
332: In condensed matter physics, this type of critical behaviour 
333: corresponds to systems with short-range interactions \cite{Lip:1984}.  
334: 
335: \begin{figure}
336: \includegraphics*[totalheight=2.7in,width=0.95\columnwidth]{critical_exponents_wbl.eps}
337: \caption{\label{fig:crit_exp}Determination of the critical 
338: exponents for a variety of order parameters of the phase transition.}
339: \end{figure}
340: 
341: Now, let us consider the metric fluctuations with respect to
342: this background solution. 
343: In the axial gauge $h_{i4}=0=h_{44}$ the perturbed metric
344: can be written as
345: \begin{equation}
346:    ds^2
347:       \ = \ e^{2A(r)}(\eta_{ij}+h_{ij})dx^idx^j - dr^2.
348: \end{equation}
349: The transverse and traceless (TT) sector of the perturbations,
350: $\bar{h}_{ij}$, decouples from the scalar field perturbations
351: and satisfies the equation \cite{DeWFreGubKar:2000},
352: \begin{equation}  
353:    \left( \partial^2_r +4A'\partial_r - e^{-2A}\Box
354:    \right) \bar{h}_{ij}\ = \ 0.
355: \end{equation}
356: This equation can be transformed into a 
357: Schr$\ddot{{\rm o}}$dinger-like equation by changing to the
358: coordinate $dz=e^{-A}dr$ and introducing the new variable 
359: $H_{ij}=e^{-ikx}e^{(3A/2)}\bar{h}_{ij}$,
360: \begin{equation}
361:    \partial^2_z H_{ij} 
362:       \ = \ \left( U(z)-k^2 
363:             \right) H_{ij}.
364: \end{equation}
365: Here, the potential is
366: \begin{equation}
367:    U(z)
368:       \ = \   \frac{9}{4}\dot{A}^2 
369:             + \frac{3}{2}\ddot{A}
370:       \ = \   \frac{3}{4} e^{2A}
371:               \left( 2A'' + 5 A'^2
372:               \right),
373: \end{equation}
374: where the dot now stands for the derivative with respect to the 
375: new coordinate $z$. 
376: The zero mode $k=0$ has the analytical solution 
377: $H_{ij}=N_{ij} e^{(3A/2)}$, with $N_{ij}$ a 
378: normalization factor.
379: As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:volcanos}, away from the phase 
380: transition the potential in the Schr$\ddot{{\rm o}}$dinger
381: equation for the TT sector of the metric perturbations has 
382: the shape of a volcano potential.
383: However, after the wall splits off, the shape becomes that 
384: of a double-well-type potential with a depth decreasing
385: as the two walls separate.   
386: One can observe that the critical behavior delocalizes
387: the zero mode, but it does not introduce
388: any gap between the zero mode and the continuum
389: spectrum. 
390: Furthermore, the zero mode is the lowest energy eigenstate
391: and then there are no instabilities coming from tachyonic
392: modes.
393: 
394: \begin{figure}
395: \includegraphics*[height=3.3in,width=0.95\columnwidth]{zero_mode_wbl.eps}
396: \caption{\label{fig:volcanos}Shapes for the volcano 
397: potential (a) and the wave function of the zeromode (b) 
398: for the transverse-traceless part of small gravitational 
399: perturbations. 
400: The critical temperature is approached from bottom to top 
401: in both plots and we have taken an arbitrary normalization
402: for the wave function. 
403: Note that, away from the transition, the zeromode is 
404: bound to the walls in the fifth extra dimension but, as the
405: walls peel off and pull apart, it is delocalized.}
406: \end{figure}
407: 
408: In Fig.~\ref{fig:non-zero}, we have also plotted the wave functions
409: of two different types of nonzero modes.
410: In Fig.~\ref{fig:non-zero}(b), we have considered the case of modes 
411: with energy larger than the maximun of the volcano potential, and 
412: in Fig.~\ref{fig:non-zero}(a), those with a smaller energy.
413: The first thing to note is that the wave functions get broader
414: as the mode has lower energy.
415: Modes with larger energy barely get affected by the splitting
416: of the interfaces.  
417: On the contrary, the phases of the waves for modes with a small 
418: energy change at the moment of the nucleation, increasing their
419: amplitude afterwards.
420: 
421: \begin{figure}
422: \includegraphics*[height=3.3in,width=0.95\columnwidth]{non-zero_modes_wbl.eps}
423: \caption{\label{fig:non-zero}Wave functions for nonzero modes 
424: of metric fluctuations with an arbitrary normalization. 
425: (a) Modes with energy smaller than the maximun of the 
426: volcano potential, and (b) modes with larger energy. 
427: The plots represent different stages of the phase transition
428: in the following order: solid line, dashed line, dot line, and 
429: dashed-dot line. Being the latest the closest to the critical 
430: temperature.}
431: \end{figure}
432: 
433: In conclusion, we have investigated the critical behavior of
434: coexisting interfaces in an asymptotically anti-de Sitter bulk. 
435: Because a film of disordered phase is formed between two ordered
436: phases, this mechanism of complete wetting gives a generic field 
437: theory description of the splitting of a thick domain wall, 
438: which is a fundamental ingredient for the brane cosmological 
439: models discussed in \cite{Ekpyrotic:2001}.
440: Moreover, we have found that naturally an effective critical 
441: temperature shows up due purely to the global geometry.
442: This is a remarkable result because it shows a direct link 
443: between geometry and the universal aspects of a critical process.
444: Nevertheless, there still are a few interesting questions that 
445: deserve a deeper investigation.
446: For instance, what is the behavior of the non-TT and the scalar 
447: field perturbation sectors during the splitting of the thick 
448: brane? 
449: How does the critical behavior found here change if we consider 
450: de Sitter or anti-de Sitter branes instead of Poincar\'e branes? 
451: Is, then, multilocalization of the zero mode possible? 
452: Which is the effect of a bulk scalar field? 
453: 
454: The author is deeply in debt to C.~F.~Sopuerta 
455: %for long discussions on different aspects of brane scenarios 
456: and very thankful to his former collaborators 
457: K.~Holland and U.-J.~Wiese.
458: This work has been supported by the Marie Curie Fellowship 
459: HPMF-CT-1999-00158.
460: 
461: %The author is deeply in debt to C.~F.~Sopuerta for very 
462: %illuminating discussions on geometric and dynamical aspects 
463: %of brane world scenarios and also very thankful to his former 
464: %collaborators K.~Holland and U.-J.~Wiese. 
465: %This work has been supported by the EU 
466: %through the Marie Curie Fellowship HPMF-CT-1999-00158.
467: 
468: 
469: %\bibliography
470: 
471: \begin{thebibliography}{32}
472: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
473: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
474:   \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
475: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
476:   \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
477: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
478:   \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
479: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
480:   \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
481: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
482: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
483: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
484: 
485: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Arkani-Hamed et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Arkani-Hamed,
486:   Dimopoulos, and Dvali}}]{ArkDimDva:1998}
487: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Arkani-Hamed}},
488:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Dimopoulos}},
489:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Dvali}},
490:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{429}},
491:   \bibinfo{pages}{263} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
492: 
493: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Randall and
494:   Sundrum}(1999{\natexlab{a}})}]{RanSun:1999a}
495: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Randall}} \bibnamefont{and}
496:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Sundrum}},
497:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{83}},
498:   \bibinfo{pages}{3370} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}{\natexlab{a}}).
499: 
500: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Randall and
501:   Sundrum}(1999{\natexlab{b}})}]{RanSun:1999b}
502: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Randall}} \bibnamefont{and}
503:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Sundrum}},
504:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{83}},
505:   \bibinfo{pages}{4690} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}{\natexlab{b}}).
506: 
507: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Khoury et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Khoury, Ovrut,
508:   Steinhardt, and Turok}}]{Ekpyrotic:2001}
509: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Khoury}},
510:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~A.} \bibnamefont{Ovrut}},
511:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~J.} \bibnamefont{Steinhardt}},
512:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Turok}}
513:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0103239};
514: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Kallosh}},
515:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Kofman}}, \bibnamefont{and}
516:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~D.} \bibnamefont{Linde}}
517:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0104073};
518: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Bucher}}
519:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0107148};
520: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.}~\bibnamefont{Gen}},
521:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Ishibashi}},
522:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Tanaka}}
523:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0110286}.
524: 
525: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{DeWolfe et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{DeWolfe, Freedman,
526:   Gubser, and Karch}}]{DeWFreGubKar:2000}
527: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{O.}~\bibnamefont{DeWolfe}},
528:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~Z.} \bibnamefont{Freedman}},
529:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~S.} \bibnamefont{Gubser}},
530:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Karch}},
531:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{D62}},
532:   \bibinfo{pages}{046008} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
533: 
534: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Skenderis and Townsend}(1999)}]{Superpotential:1999}
535: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Skenderis}} \bibnamefont{and}
536:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~K.} \bibnamefont{Townsend}},
537:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B468}},
538:   \bibinfo{pages}{46} (\bibinfo{year}{1999});
539: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Behrndt}} \bibnamefont{and}
540:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Cveti$\check{{\rm c}}$}},
541:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B475}},
542:   \bibinfo{pages}{253} (\bibinfo{year}{2000});
543: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Cs\'aki}},
544:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Erlich}},
545:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Grojean}}, \bibnamefont{and}
546:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~J.} \bibnamefont{Hollowood}},
547:   \bibinfo{journal}{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B584}},
548:   \bibinfo{pages}{359} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}{\natexlab{a}}).
549: 
550: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gremm}(2000{\natexlab{a}})}]{TB:2000}
551: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Gremm}},
552:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B478}},
553:   \bibinfo{pages}{434} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}{\natexlab{a}});
554: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Cs\'aki}},
555:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Erlich}},
556:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~J.} \bibnamefont{Hollowood}},
557:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Shirman}},
558:   \bibinfo{journal}{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B581}},
559:   \bibinfo{pages}{309} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}{\natexlab{b}});
560: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Kehagias}} \bibnamefont{and}
561:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Tamvakis}},
562:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B504}},
563:   \bibinfo{pages}{38} (\bibinfo{year}{2001});
564: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Kobayashi}},
565:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Koyama}}, \bibnamefont{and}
566:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Soda}}
567:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0107025}.
568: 
569: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Bonjour et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Bonjour, Charmousis,
570:   and Gregory}}]{Exact_sol:1999}
571: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Bonjour}},
572:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Charmousis}},
573:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Gregory}},
574:   \bibinfo{journal}{Class. Quant. Grav.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{16}},
575:   \bibinfo{pages}{2427} (\bibinfo{year}{1999});
576: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Ichinose}},
577:   \bibinfo{journal}{Class. Quant. Grav.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{18}},
578:   \bibinfo{pages}{421} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}{\natexlab{a}});
579: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Ichinose}}
580:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}{\natexlab{b}}),
581:   \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0107254}.
582: 
583: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gorsky and Selivanov}(2000)}]{Tunneling:2000}
584: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gorsky}} \bibnamefont{and}
585:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Selivanov}},
586:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B485}},
587:   \bibinfo{pages}{271} (\bibinfo{year}{2000});
588: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Ng}} \bibnamefont{and}
589:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Perry}}
590:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0106008};
591: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Gregory}} \bibnamefont{and}
592:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Padilla}}
593:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0107108}.
594: 
595: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Perkins}(2001)}]{Per:2001}
596: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~B.} \bibnamefont{Perkins}},
597:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B504}},
598:   \bibinfo{pages}{28} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
599: 
600: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Neronov}(2001)}]{collisions:2001}
601: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Neronov}}
602:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{hep-th/0109090};
603: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Langlois}},
604:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.} \bibnamefont{Maeda}}, \bibnamefont{and}
605:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Wands}}
606:   (\bibinfo{year}{2001}), \eprint[http://arXiv.org/abs]{gr-qc/0111013}.
607: 
608: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lipowsky}(1982)}]{Lip:1982}
609: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Lipowsky}},
610:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{49}},
611:   \bibinfo{pages}{1575} (\bibinfo{year}{1982}).
612: 
613: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lipowsky}(1984)}]{Lip:1984}
614: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Lipowsky}},
615:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{52}},
616:   \bibinfo{pages}{1429} (\bibinfo{year}{1984}).
617: 
618: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Frei and Patk\'os}(1989)}]{FrePat:1989}
619: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Z.}~\bibnamefont{Frei}} \bibnamefont{and}
620:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Patk\'os}},
621:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B229}},
622:   \bibinfo{pages}{102} (\bibinfo{year}{1989}).
623: 
624: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Trappenberg and Wiese}(1992)}]{TraWie:1992}
625: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Trappenberg}} \bibnamefont{and}
626:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.-J.} \bibnamefont{Wiese}},
627:   \bibinfo{journal}{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B372}},
628:   \bibinfo{pages}{703} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}).
629: 
630: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Campos et~al.}(1998{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{Campos,
631:   Holland, and Wiese}}]{SUSY-QCD:1998}
632: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Campos}},
633:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Holland}}, \bibnamefont{and}
634:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.-J.} \bibnamefont{Wiese}},
635:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{81}},
636:   \bibinfo{pages}{2420} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{a}});
637: \bibinfo{author}{\bibnamefont{{\sl ibid.}}},
638:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B443}},
639:   \bibinfo{pages}{338} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{b}});
640: \bibinfo{author}{\bibnamefont{{\sl ibid.}}},
641:   \bibinfo{journal}{Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{73}},
642:   \bibinfo{pages}{438} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
643: 
644: \end{thebibliography}
645: 
646: 
647: \end{document}
648: 
649: 
650: 
651: 
652: 
653: 
654: 
655: 
656: 
657: 
658: 
659: 
660: 
661: 
662: 
663: 
664: 
665: 
666: 
667: