1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
2: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
3: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
4: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
5: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
6: \def\half{\frac{1}{2}}
7: \def\fn{\footnote}
8: \def\bh{black hole \ }
9: \def\bhs{black hole solutions \ }
10: \def\cL{{\cal L}}
11: \def\cH{{\cal H}}
12: \def\const{{\rm const.\ }}
13: \def\ik{ik}
14: \def\mn{{\mu\nu}}
15: \def\m{\mu}
16: \def\n{\nu}
17: \def\a{\alpha}
18: \def\b{\beta}
19: \def\mag{\rm mag}
20: \def\el{\rm el}
21: \def\Br{Bronnikov {}}
22: \def\AG{Ay\'on-Beato -- Garc\'\i a {}}
23: \def\ned{nonlinear electrodynamics {} }
24: \def\E{\bf E}
25: \def\B{\bf B}
26: \def\H{\bf H}
27: \def\D{\bf D}
28: \def\d{\partial}
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \title{New Type of Regular Black Holes and Particlelike Solutions from
33: Nonlinear Electrodynamics}
34:
35: \author{Alexander Burinskii\\
36: Gravity Research Group, NSI Russian
37: Academy of Sciences,\\
38: B. Tulskaya 52, 113191 Moscow, Russia
39: \thanks{E-mail:bur@ibrae.ac.ru}\\
40: \&\\ Sergi R. Hildebrandt
41: \thanks{Temporary address: Avda. Mar\'\i tima, 49, P041E. Candelaria, 38530.
42: S/C. de Tenerife. Spain. E-mail: hildebrandt@ieec.fcr.es} \\
43: Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC/CSIC)\\
44: Edifici Nexus, Gran Capit\`a 2-4, 08034 Barcelona, Spain\\
45: \\}
46:
47: \date{E-print: hep-th/0202066}
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52: \noindent
53: We show that the Bronnikov theorem
54: on the nonexistence of regular electrically charged black holes
55: can be circumvented. In the frame of nonlinear electrodynamics, we
56: present the exact regular black hole solutions of a hybrid type.
57: They are electrically charged, but contain a `dual' core confining
58: a polarization of magnetic charges.
59:
60: The considered example is based on a modification of the
61: Ay\'on-Beato \& Garc\'\i a solution. It represents a very
62: specific realization of the idea on confinement based on dual
63: electrodynamics and dual superconductivity.
64:
65: PACS numbers: 04.70.Bw, 04.20.Jb, 04.40.-b, 11.27.+d
66:
67: \end{abstract}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70: Last years considerable interest in regular black hole
71: solutions has been renewed \cite{behm,Dym,Bag}\fn{See also list of
72: references in
73: \cite{behm}.}, and in particular, to those based on nonlinear
74: electrodynamics
75: (NED) \cite{ag1,ag2,ag3,Br,nov}. Analyzing the Ay\'on-Beato \& Garc\'\i a
76: black hole solutions from nonlinear electrodynamics \cite{ag1,ag2,ag3},
77: Bronnikov presented three important results \cite{Br}:
78:
79: (i) - a version of no-go theorem claiming the
80: nonexistence of the regular electrically charged black holes and
81: particlelike solitons with regular center
82: \fn{As well as wormholes or horns.};
83:
84: (ii) - the existence of cusps and branches in the Lagrangian used for the
85: \AG
86: solution \cite{ag2}; and
87:
88: (iii) - a class of exact regular magnetically charged black holes and
89: solitonic solutions.
90:
91: He showed that the branch, realized in the \AG solution near the core, does
92: not tend in the weak field limit to the Maxwell theory and presented two
93: theorems leading to the
94: conclusion that regular \bh and solitonic solutions can be only
95: magnetically charged.
96:
97: The unusual properties of the \AG solution obtained by \Br
98: have captured our attention in connection with recent suggestions on a phase
99: transition which has to occur for regular \bh and particlelike solutions in
100: the core region \cite{behm,Dym,Bag}. In this work we show that the
101: conditions of the Bronnikov theorem can be circumvented by dealing with
102: the models having a phase transition near the core of solution, when
103: electric
104: field does not extend to the center of the solution.
105:
106: After some modification of the \AG solutions, we obtain a new type
107: of regular, electrically charged black hole solutions. The main
108: peculiarity
109: of these solutions is a `magnetic' core described by dual electrodynamics.
110: This class of solutions deserves interest not only as an explicit example
111: of the regular electrically charged \bh solution, but also as an example
112: of particlelike solution with a very
113: specific realization of the ideas on quark confinement based on dual
114: electrodynamics \cite{Dir} and dual superconductivity
115: \cite{dual,SW,Ch,MS,KIK}.
116:
117: \section{NED and F-P Dual representations }
118:
119: The action for NED in general relativity is
120: \be
121: S = \frac{1}{16\pi} \int d^4 x\sqrt{-g} [R - \cL(F)], \label{S}
122: \ee
123: where $R$ is the scalar curvature, $F=F_\mn F^\mn$,
124: $F_\mn = \d_\m A_\n - \d_\n A_\m,$ and $\cL (F)$ is a nonlinear function.
125:
126: The equations, following from Eq. (\ref{S}) are
127: \be
128: \nabla_\m (L_F F^\mn)=0,\qquad
129: \nabla_\m \star F^\mn =0. \label{Feq}
130: \ee
131: where $L_F = d\cL/dF$,
132: and the equations $\nabla_\m \star F^\mn =0 $
133: are the Bianchi identities.
134: \fn{We use signature $-+++$.
135: The Hodge star operator is given by
136: $\star F^\mn = \half\eta^{\mn \a\b} F_{\a\b}$,
137: $\eta_{\mn \a\b}$ is completely skew-symmetric,
138: $\eta_{0123}=\sqrt{-g}$.}
139:
140: By introducing the electric intensity $\E$ and magnetic induction $\B$,
141: \be
142: {\E} = \{ F_{i0}\}, \quad
143: {\B} = \{\star F_{i0}\}= \half \eta_{i0}^{\ \ \a\b} F_{\a\b},
144: \label{EB}
145: \ee
146: one can obtain from Bianchi identities $\nabla _\m \star F^\mn =0$
147: the pair of Maxwell equations
148: $\nabla {\B}=0; \qquad \nabla \times {\E}=-\partial{\B}/\partial t .$
149: The dynamic equations $\nabla_\m (L_F F^\mn)=0 $ can be expressed via the
150: tensor
151: \be
152: P^\mn = \partial \cL /\partial F_\mn = L_F F^\mn,
153: \label{P}
154: \ee
155: in the form
156: \be
157: \nabla _\m P^\mn =0;
158: \label{eqP}
159: \ee
160: that, in the terms of the electric induction $\D$
161: and magnetic intensity $\H$,
162: \be
163: {\D} =\{P_{i0}\} = L_F \{F_{i0}\}, \quad
164: {\H} =\{\star P^{0i}\} = L_F \{\star F^{0i}\}, \label{DH}
165: \ee
166: yields the second pair of the Maxwell equations
167: $\nabla \D=0; \qquad \nabla \times \H=\partial\D/\partial t .$
168: These equations show that in NED $L_F$ plays the role of
169: electric susceptibility $\epsilon = L_F$ and the magnetic permeability
170: is given by $\mu = 1/L_F$.
171:
172: Relation (\ref{P}) allows one to rewrite the field equations (\ref{Feq})
173: in an equivalent dual P form
174: \be
175: \nabla_\m (P^\mn )=0, \qquad \nabla_\m \frac 1 {L_F} \star P^\mn =0.
176: \label{Peq}
177: \ee
178: It should be mentioned that it is a dual description of {\it the same
179: physical system}.
180: This description can be obtained from the electromagnetic
181: Lagrangian $\cH(P)$ ( expressed via $P= P_\mn P^\mn= L_F^2 F$ )
182: determined by Legendre transformation \cite{ag2,Br,SGP}
183: \be
184: \cH(P) =2F L_F -\cL.
185: \label{Leg}
186: \ee
187: The following relations can be easily obtained
188: \be
189: \cL=2P H_P -\cH; \qquad H_P= d \cH /d P = 1/ L_F.
190: \label{FPd}
191: \ee
192: {\it The Hodge star duality} operation allows one to give a
193: description of the field intensities via dual components
194: $\tilde F_\mn =\star F_\mn = \half\eta_\mn^{\ \ \a\b} F_{\a\b}$.
195: Since $\star\star=-1$, by using the Hodge dual description
196: the following relations hold:
197: \be
198: F = - \tilde F; \qquad P=-\tilde P;
199: \label{FPtilde}
200: \ee
201: and also
202: \be
203: L_F= - L_{\tilde F};\qquad H_P= - H_{\tilde P};\qquad
204: \tilde L(\tilde F)=L(-F);\qquad\tilde \cH (\tilde P)=\cH(-P);
205: \label{Ltilde}
206: \ee
207: and the equations (\ref{Feq}) take in this description the form
208: \be
209: \nabla_\m (L_F \star \tilde F^\mn)=0, \qquad \nabla_\m \tilde F^\mn =0.
210: \label{Eqtilde}
211: \ee
212: Note that the Hodge dual description changes sign of $L_F$ that can lead
213: to nonphysical values of electric susceptibility $\epsilon <0$
214: \fn{See, for example, \cite{LL}}.
215:
216: Vice versa, if the Lagrangian leads to
217: $L_F<0$ it can be considered as a sign to pass to another, physically
218: valid (Hodge) dual description.
219:
220: \section{Nonexistence of Electrically Charged Regular Black Holes?}
221:
222: The Bronnikov no-go theorem is based on the assumption that the NED
223: Lagrangian has to lead to Maxwell theory at small $F$: $\cL(F) \to F$
224: as $F\to 0$. This is equal to $L_F \to 1$ at small $F$. He shows that real
225: behavior of electrically charged solution near the center leads to
226: finite values of $|FL_F|$ and to divergence of $|F|L_F^2$. Therefore at
227: the center the ratio $\frac {|F|L_F^2}{FL_F}\equiv L_F $ tends to infinity
228: that is non-Maxwellian behavior.
229:
230: This derivation is correct. However, there are two points which throw
231: doubts on the initial postulates. The first one is connected
232: with the assumption that the electromagnetic field is
233: extended up to the center of the solution. At least in flat space there is a
234: remarkable example of the electrically charged solution, present only in
235: the region $r\ge a$. It is the classical Dirac electron model, as a charged
236: sphere. \fn {The Bronnikov theorem 2 tries to exclude this case showing
237: nonexistence of a horn in space-time. However, there can be other
238: (nonmetrical) mechanisms restricting the penetration of the electromagnetic
239: field into region $r<a$, in particular, superconducting properties of
240: core or a special behavior in NED as it will be shown further.}
241: The second argument is connected with the demands of Maxwellian behavior.
242: Indeed, the condition $ L_F \to 1 $ as $ F \to 0 $
243: (to recover Maxwell theory) is reasonable at spatial infinity.
244: However, at the core, although
245: the gravitational field is regular everywhere and becomes {\em weaker} as
246: one approaches the center (the metric tends to flat space-time), the spatial
247: volume is much smaller (on many orders) than in the asymptotic limit
248: where gravity is again weak and where $ L_F \to 1 $ makes sense.
249: Thus both types of boundaries are essentially different.
250: Another argument can be a strong vacuum
251: polarization and the presence of other ( maybe virtual quantum ) fields
252: which
253: have a straight relation to the formation the nonvacuum values of
254: $L_F =\epsilon$.
255: Therefore $\cL(F)$ can have a nonlocal behavior
256: depending not only on the value of $F$ but also on full field configuration
257: and
258: proximity to the core.
259:
260: If one restricts oneself to Lagrangian densities which are {\em local
261: functions} of $ F $, then, Bronnikov is completely right. But
262: assigning essentially the same physics to the core region as to the
263: asymptotic region (in electromagnetic terms) is not convincing enough.
264: Therefore his restrictions for regular solutions are too especial to be
265: accepted in general. This point of view is suggested in fact by the
266: given Bronnikov analysis showing the existence of cusps
267: and branches in the Lagrangian of the \AG solution.
268: In fact, his analysis shows that the \AG Lagrangian has different
269: behavior at the core and far outside the body, although $ F \to 0 $ in both
270: cases.
271:
272: \section{The \AG Solution}
273:
274: The electrically charged regular \bh solution has been given by
275: \AG in \cite{ag2}. Most investigations in nonlinear electrodynamics
276: are connected with the Born-Infeld type of nonlinearity (see, e.g.,
277: \cite{gibras,gibras2,Her,Ts} and references therein). However, as it was
278: mentioned for regular \bhs in \cite{ag2}, the ``...Born-Infeld Lagrangian
279: is useless in this topic, since it gives rise to a singular black
280: hole solution, at least in the case of spherical symmetry \cite{HI}...'',
281: and \AG start from the nonlinear function
282: \be
283: \cH (P) =P/\cosh^2\{s(-2q^2P)^{1/4}\}, \label{AGH} \ee
284: where $s=|q | /2m $
285: ($ q$ is the electric charge and $m$ is the mass of the body).
286: \begin{figure}[ht]
287: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=Lfinit.eps,height=7cm,width=9cm}}
288: \caption{\small Dependence $\cL (F)$ for \AG solution.}
289: \end{figure}
290:
291: Note, that particular form of nonlinearity $\cH (P)$ is not essential,
292: and existence of regular \bhs is determined by the asymptotic
293: properties of this function.
294: What is important is the Maxwellian behavior on large distances,
295: $\cH (P) \equiv P $ at small $P$,
296: and a rapid fall-off of this function by $ P\to\infty $.
297: These demands lead to the existence of an extremum of the
298: function $\cH $, and moreover to the existence of at least one sector where
299: $H_P$ is {\it negative}.
300: For instance, we use for illustration the simplest function of this sort
301: \be
302: \cH(P)= P\exp\{-|P|\}.
303: \label{HP}
304: \ee
305: The corresponding Lagrangian in L description is
306: $\cL(F) = 2H_P P - \cH(P)$, where $P$ has to be expressed via
307: $F=P/L_F^2$, ( see Fig. 1 and upper graph in Fig. 2.) .
308:
309:
310:
311:
312: It yields the system of electromagnetic equations
313: \be
314: \nabla_\m (P^\mn )=0;
315: \label{Peq1}
316: \ee
317: and Einstein equations $G_\m^\n = T_\m^\n$, where the energy-momentum
318: tensor is given by
319: \be
320: T_\m^\n = \half (4L_F F_{\m\a} F^{\n\a} -\delta _\m^\n \cL).
321: \label{T}
322: \ee
323:
324: In the case of spherical symmetry the electrically charged solution of
325: Eq. (\ref{Peq1}) is
326: \be
327: P_{0r} = - P_{r0}= q/r^2
328: \label{P0r}
329: \ee
330: or
331: \be
332: F_{0r} = - F_{r0}=L_F^{-1} q/r^2;
333: \label{F0r}
334: \ee
335: the other components being equal to zero.
336: Thus $P=-2q/r^4.$
337: \begin{figure}[ht]
338: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=Hffmsum.eps,height=7cm,width=9cm}}
339: \caption{\small Graphs of $\cH (P)$ and $F(P)$ for \AG solution and modified
340: solution $F_{mod}(P)$.}
341: \end{figure}
342: The Einstein equations can easily be solved leading to the mass term
343: $M(r)= m [ 1-\tanh(q^2/2mr)]$ and to the metric
344: \be
345: ds^2 = -[1-2M(r)/r ]dt^2 + [1-2M(r)/r ]^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega^2,
346: \label{metric}
347: \ee
348: which is regular by $r$ going to zero.
349:
350: As mentioned by Bronnikov \cite{Br}, the Lagrangian given by the smooth and
351: regular function $\cH(P)$ displays cusps and branches in F description.
352: Appearance of cusps at the points $P_1$ and $P_3$ is connected with
353: multivaluedness of the inverse map $P(F)$ ( see fig.2) and is a general
354: feature of the considered class of nonlinear functions.
355: Very specific behavior of function $L(F)$ by large $P$, on the section
356: $P_2 - P_3 - P_4 $ is determined by the following phenomenon:
357: The magnetic permeability $\mu =H_P$ is going to zero as
358: $P\to P_2$, the point of $\cH$ extremum. Consequently, electric
359: susceptibility $\epsilon =1/H_P$ is divergent at this point. The sphere,
360: determined by the equation $P=P_2$ looks like an ideal conducting surface,
361: and electromagnetic field $F_\mn $ ( and $F$) will tend to zero approaching
362: this surface. The solution, analytically extended inside this sphere
363: departs drastically from a Maxwellian behavior.
364: Nevertheless it still has reasonable properties in many respects. For
365: instance, the electromagnetic field $F_\mn$ and the invariant $F$ go both to
366: zero as the very center of the solution is approached ( although $L_F \to
367: \infty$ at $P_2$ and $P_4$) and the metric is regular everywhere, leading
368: to regular \bhs.
369:
370: In spite of these properties, the physics inside the core looks rather
371: unusual since the value of electric susceptibility $\epsilon =1/H_P$ is
372: negative there and does not correspond to any known physical mediums
373: \cite{LL}. Combining NED and general relativity, one can show
374: from the system of equations (\ref{Peq1}), (\ref{T}) that
375: the corresponding contribution of effective charges to the metric
376: will be of opposite sign in the regions with negative $L_F $,
377: as if the charge would be imaginary valued there.
378:
379: \section{Modification of the \AG Solution}
380:
381: The fact that regularity of \bhs can be reached without troubles in
382: the magnetically charged solutions \cite{Br} suggests the idea to
383: combine the electrically and magnetically charged solutions
384: by using a phase transition near the core to magnetic phase,
385: regularizing the \bh singularity. In this case, the existence of
386: different branches in the \AG solution represents a perfect possibility for
387: realization of this idea by means of matching external and internal
388: solutions with necessary properties. As we shall see, the transfer
389: to dual electromagnetic phase near the core of the \AG solution allows
390: also one to avoid abnormal branch $(P_2-P_3-P_4)$ with negative
391: $L_F$.
392:
393: Looking on the graph $L(F)$ (Fig. 1) one sees that it can only be achieved
394: by
395: replacing this branch by the branch obtained by a mirror
396: map with respect to the $L$ axis, as it is shown in Fig. 3. This replacement
397: takes place in the region of strong field $|P|>|P_2|$, i.e., inside of the
398: sphere $r<r_0 = |\frac{2q}{P_2}|^{1/4}$ surrounding the singular point of
399: $P(r)$.
400:
401: \begin{figure}[ht]
402: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=Lfsum.eps,height=7cm,width=9cm}}
403: \caption{\small Initiate and modified dependencies $L(F)$.}
404: \end{figure}
405:
406: As we shall see this replacement corresponds to ``dual"
407: electrodynamics with a polarization of magnetic charges inside the sphere
408: $r=r_0$, while the solution for $r>r_0$ survives to be the electrically
409: charged \AG one. Matching of the modified internal solution and the external
410: \AG one is smooth with respect to the metric and physical field intensities.
411:
412: The properties of modified Lagrangian $\tilde L(\tilde F)$
413: and the modified relations will be the following.
414:
415: \begin{enumerate}
416: \item The
417: region of definition of Lagrangian $\tilde L$ is extended to positive
418: values
419: of the invariant $\tilde F = B^2 - E^2$, and modified electric
420: susceptibility,
421: $\tilde\epsilon=\tilde L_{\tilde F}= -L_F$, is positive.
422:
423: \item Matching of the new branch with the initial one is smooth and occurs
424: at the point $P_2$ where $F=\tilde F=0$ and
425: $ L(F)|_{P_2}=\tilde L(\tilde F)|_{P_2}$.
426:
427: \item
428: The modified dual intensities are related as
429: \be
430: \tilde P ^\mn = \tilde L _{\tilde F} \tilde F ^\mn ; \quad
431: \tilde P = (\tilde L_{\tilde F} )^2 \tilde F.
432: \ee
433: At the point $P_2$ electric susceptibility is divergent
434: $ L_F|_{P_2}=\tilde L _{\tilde F}|_{P_2} =+\infty $, while the
435: magnetic permeability $\mu=1/L_F$ is bounded and $C^1$.
436:
437: \item
438: As far as in the
439: modified region $\tilde F>0$ we get also $\tilde P >0$.
440: On the other hand
441: $P=H^2-D^2$ is negative in the region $r>r_0$ (as in the case of an
442: electrically charged solution). Therefore the modified function
443: $P(r)$ will be discontinuous. The change of sign of the invariant $P$ at
444: the
445: point $P_2$ is evidence of a transfer to magnetic phase by $r<r_0$.
446:
447: \end{enumerate}
448:
449: Due to the Hodge star
450: operation identity $\star\star = -1$, the equality $\tilde P = -P$ can be
451: resolved as $\tilde P^\mn = \pm \star P^\mn$. Whence, the relation
452: (\ref{EB}) shows that the modified \AG solution (\ref{F0r}) by $r<r_0$
453: describes a field of magnetic induction in radial direction $\bf n $
454:
455: \be
456: {\tilde{\B}} = \mp q {\bf n} \tilde L_{\tilde F} ^{-1}/r^2.
457: \label{Bmod}
458: \ee
459: Magnetic induction $\B$ characterizes the true intensity of the field
460: strength in media \cite{LL}. In modified solution it tends to zero at
461: $r=0$ and at $r=r_0$.
462: Contrary to the standard Maxwell equation $\nabla \B =0$ describing
463: the absence of magnetic charges, we obtain here the magnetic charge
464: distribution
465: \be
466: \nabla \tilde {\B} = J_{mag} = \mp(q/r^2) {\bf n}\nabla \tilde L_{\tilde F}
467: =\mp (q/r^2) \tilde L_{\tilde F\tilde F}\frac {d\tilde F}{dr} , \label{Jmag}
468: \ee
469: displaying realization of dual electrodynamics in the core region and
470: singular concentration of magnetic charges at $r=0$ and $r=r_0$.
471:
472: \begin{figure}[ht]
473: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=Rlf.eps,height=7cm,width=9cm}}
474: \caption{\small Radial dependencies of $L$ and $F$ for modified solution.}
475: \end{figure}
476: The initial and modified dependencies $\cH (P) $, $F(P)$, and $L(F)$ are
477: given in figs. 1 and 3.
478:
479: \subsection{Stress-energy tensor and metric.}
480:
481: We use the Kerr-Schild form of metric \cite{behm,DKS}.
482: \fn{See also \cite{EH} where it was shown that the static solutions of the
483: Einstein equations with spherical symmetry and $T^0_0 = T^1_1$ belong to
484: the Kerr-Schild class.
485: \par
486: In this section we use slightly different units, adapting to the works
487: \cite{DKS, Bag, behm} and setting $G=1$. The reason for this is the
488: possibility of using the Kerr-Schild formalism for further extension
489: to rotating solutions.}
490: In the case of spherical symmetry
491: \be
492: g_\mn=\eta_\mn + [f(r)/r^2] k_\m k_\n , \label{gKS}
493: \ee
494: where $\eta_\mn$ is the auxiliary Minkowski metric and
495: $k_\m = \{1,{\bf n}\}$.
496: Co- and contravariant forms of the metric in the Kerr angular coordinates
497: $\{t, r,\theta, \phi \}$ are given in the Appendix.
498: We have
499: \be F^{01} =-F_{01} ;\quad
500: \tilde F_{23}= r^2 \sin \theta F^{01};\quad
501: \tilde F^{23}= \tilde F_{23}/(r^4 \sin ^2 \theta);
502: \ee
503: which, taking into account Eq. (\ref{F0r}), yield
504: \be \tilde F
505: = 2 \tilde F^{23} \tilde F_{23}= 2 (F_{01})^2 = 2L_F^{-2}q^2/r^4. \ee
506: Similarly, \be \tilde P = 2 \tilde P^{23} \tilde P_{23}= 2 (P_{01})^2 =
507: 2q^2/r^4. \ee
508: The modified energy-momentum tensor inside the core acquires
509: the form
510: \be T_\m^{(in)\n} = - \half (\delta_\m^\n \tilde L -4 \tilde P_{\m\alpha}
511: \tilde P^{\n \alpha}/{\tilde L}_{\tilde F}) =
512: -\half {\it diag} \{\tilde L,\tilde L,\tilde L -2\tilde P /
513: {\tilde L_{\tilde F}},
514: \tilde L-2\tilde P /{\tilde L}_{\tilde F} \}. \label{Tin}
515: \ee
516: Outside the core, by $r>r_0$ it is
517: \be
518: T_\m^{(ext)\n} = - \half (\delta_\m^\n L -4 P_{\m\alpha}
519: P^{\n \alpha}/L_F) = -\half{\it diag} \{ L - 2P / L_F, L- 2P /L_F,L,L \},
520: \label{Tel}
521: \ee
522: where $P=-\tilde P= -2q^2/r^4$.
523: As far as contributions of terms
524: $2P/L_F$ and $2\tilde P /{\tilde L}_{\tilde F}$, together with their first
525: derivative, tend to zero approaching $r_0$, one sees that these expressions
526: match smoothly at $r_0$.
527:
528: \begin{figure}[ht]
529: \centerline{\epsfig{figure=Rlh.eps,height=7cm,width=9cm}}
530: \caption{\small Radial dependencies of $-L$ and $\cH$.}
531: \end{figure}
532:
533: Comparing corresponding expressions for the generalized
534: Kerr-Schild class of metrics \cite{behm}
535: \be
536: T_\m^\n = (8\pi)^{-1}{\it diag}\{-2G,-2G,D+2G,D+2G\}, \label{TKS}
537: \ee
538: where (see the Appendix)
539: \be
540: D= -f''/r^2, \quad G= (f/r)'/r^2 \label{DG}
541: \ee
542: and $'\equiv d /d r$ gives the relations:
543:
544: For external field
545: \be
546: - \cH _{(ext)} (r)= \frac {(f/r)'}{2\pi r^2} =2 \rho (r), \label{Eext}
547: \ee
548: where $\rho(r)$ is the energy density in this region.
549:
550: For the external part of the function $f(r)$
551: \be
552: f(r)=r M_{(ext)}(r),\quad M_{(ext)}(y)
553: =-2\pi \int_{r_0}^{y}{\cH}_{(ext)}(r)r^2
554: dr + C,
555: \label{fext}
556: \ee
557: where $C$ is the integration constant.
558:
559: For function $f(r)$ inside the core,
560: $r<r_0$, we obtain \be \tilde L (r)= \frac {(f/r)'}{2\pi r^2} =2 \rho (r),
561: \label{Eint}
562: \ee
563: that gives rise for the internal region to
564: \be
565: f(r)=r M_{(int)}(r),\quad M_{(int)}(y)=2\pi \int_0^{y}{\tilde L}(r) r^2 dr.
566: \label{fint} \ee
567: Each of the functions $M_{(ext/int)}(y)$ plays the role of the mass confined
568: inside the sphere $y<r$. Constant $C$ can be determined by matching
569: both sectors of $f(r)$ at
570: $r=r_0$ that yields $C=M_{(int)}(r_0)$. This matching is smooth as far as
571: $\cH(r_0)=-\tilde L(r_0)$, thus the metric (\ref{gKS}) is smooth
572: everywhere.
573:
574: By analyzing dependencies
575: $L(r)$ and $\cH(r)$, Figs. 4 and 5., one sees that there is a core region
576: ($r<0.6 r_0$)
577: which does not give contribution to mass at all. The space is flat in this
578: core since $f(r)\approx 0$ there. The region $0.6\le r/r_0 \le 1$ is a
579: transitional one with a dual magnetic phase, whereas the region $1\le r/r_0
580: \le 1.6$ is one with an electric phase. In the region $r>1.6 r_0$ we
581: have $L_F\sim 1$, it is practically a Coulomb phase.
582:
583: Let us estimate characteristic scale $r_0$ for the \AG type of nonlinearity
584: (\ref{AGH}). Radius $r_0$ is determined by the equation $H_P=0$, or by
585: the root of equation $\zeta \tanh (\zeta)=2$.
586: It yields $\zeta=2.066$, and
587: \be
588: r_0=\frac {2^{1/4} q^2}{2m \zeta}=.48 r_e,
589: \label{r0ned}
590: \ee
591: where $r_e=q^2/2m$ is a classical electromagnetic radius.
592:
593: For comparison, in the Born-Infeld theory (in our notations), Lagrangian is
594: \be
595: \cL_{BI}=\frac 1{b^2} (\sqrt{1+2b^2 F}-1),
596: \label{BI}
597: \ee
598: and has a dual Lagrangian
599: \be
600: \cH_{BI}=\frac 1{b^2} (1- \sqrt{1-2b^2 P}).
601: \label{DBI}
602: \ee
603: The typical NED branches are absent here, and the sphere $H_P=0$ shrinks
604: to the point $r=0$. Therefore the considered above type of solutions
605: is absent in Born-Infeld theory.
606:
607: Black holes in Born-Infeld theory were
608: actively studied (see \cite{gibras2} which includes the original
609: references).
610: The Born-Infeld \bh solution has finite total energy
611: $E=m\approx1.236 e^2/r_0$ and a smooth distribution of effective charge
612: $\rho_{eff}=\frac1{4\pi}div \E$ in the region $\sim r_0 =\sqrt {e b}$ .
613: Parameter $b^{-1}=e/r_0^2$ characterizes a critical value of the
614: electromagnetic field.
615:
616: Considering particlelike solutions, one sees that, similarly to NED,
617: the effective radius of the elementary particle in Born-Infeld theory is
618: close to classical electromagnetic one
619: \be
620: r_0 =2.472 r_e \sim 10^{-13} cm.
621: \label{r0BI}
622: \ee
623: However, in contrast to NED, the Born-Infeld solution has a
624: $\delta$-function source at the origin, leading to a conical singularity in
625: curvature. Therefore the Born-Infeld theory, as well as NED, has classical
626: radius $r_e$ as one of the characteristic scales. However, regularizing ( or
627: smearing ) the \bh singularities, both the theories display that their
628: {\it minimal} ( space ) scale is extended up to Planck sizes.
629:
630: On the other hand, the Born-Infeld theory can be derived from open string
631: theory \cite{Ts,gibras2}, and parameter $b$ takes in this case the value
632: $b=2\pi \alpha ^\prime =T^{-1}$ defined by Regge slope $\alpha ^\prime$.
633: On the level of particlelike solutions, it does not contradict with
634: $b^{-1}\sim e/r_0^2$, leading to approximate value of the fine structure
635: constant $\alpha \approx \frac 1 {44}$ ( see, e.g, \cite {gibras2}).
636: However, in the modern superstring theory tension $T_{(ss)}$ defines the
637: critical scale for all field strength, including curvature, and
638: characteristic radius $ r_{crit}=\sqrt {\alpha^\prime_{(ss)}}$ corresponds
639: to the Planck scale.
640: It shows that the scale range of nonlinearity in NED action is much larger
641: than the Planck scale that governs higher order corrections in curvature.
642:
643: \section{Concluding remarks}
644: \noindent The \AG solution contains distribution of
645: electric charges $J^\n_{(e)}= \nabla_\m F^\mn$ near the sphere $r=r_0$ and
646: in
647: the center. In the presented modified solution the charges
648: inside the sphere $r=r_0$ are magnetic $J^\n_{(m)}= \nabla_\m \star \tilde
649: F^\mn$ fulfilling the Dirac idea on dual electrodynamics \cite{Dir}. These
650: charges are confined inside the sphere $r=r_0$, forming a magnetic vacuum
651: polarization. For the external observer this solution exhibits only electric
652: charge.
653: Since vacuum of the core expels electric charges one can speculate that
654: it possesses superconducting properties, whereas the vacuum of the external
655: observer demonstrates the dual superconductivity, expelling the magnetic
656: charges.
657: The considered matching of the electric and magnetic phases corresponds to a
658: sharp phase transition between these vacua ( London limit of
659: superconductivity).
660:
661: The similar baglike structures with a
662: phase transition to dual superconductivity ( approximate solutions ) were
663: recently discussed for regular rotating black holes to supergravity
664: \cite{Bag}. It was assumed that superconductivity is caused by the Higgs (
665: chiral ) fields forming two dual ( supersymmetric ) vacuum states and a
666: smooth domain wall interpolating between them.
667: It is remarkable that nonlinear electrodynamics allows one to
668: get {\it exact and self-consistent} solutions of
669: this sort belonging to the Kerr-Schild class of metrics. However, it could
670: seem wonderful since the Higgs fields providing the vacuum states and phase
671: transition are absent here.
672: On the other hand, the NED Lagrangian $L(F)$ can be represented in the form
673: $(\frac {L(F)}{F})F$ showing that the factor
674: $\frac {L(F)}{F}$ can be identified as a dilaton ( corresponding to a
675: metric on the moduli space in supergravity). It allows one to suppose that
676: NED can be assumed as a limiting case of supergravity when the potential
677: is very sharp and chiral fields are dropped out. The presented exact
678: solution
679: from NED shows that dilaton has to be very essential in the baglike models.
680:
681: A parallelism between the above baglike models and the field models of
682: dual superconductivity should also be mentioned.
683: Indeed, there are known the dual superconductivity models of two type:
684: the models with Higgs fields, leading to solutions with a soft
685: phase transition ( finite thickness of transitional layer ),
686: see, e.g., \cite{Ch,MS}, and the similar to NED models without Higgs
687: fields,
688: see, e.g., \cite{SW,KIK}, demonstrating the sharp phase transition connected
689: with the London limit of superconductivity.
690: The field models of the first type represent in fact a truncation of the
691: four-dimensional supergravity, while the models of the second type
692: represent,
693: apparently, its singular limit. \fn{Note that effective Higgs fields can
694: also
695: be introduced in the models of the second type \cite{KIK}.} However, these
696: questions demand more detailed consideration elsewhere.
697:
698: It would also be very interesting to look on NED from a high dimensional
699: point of view, getting it as a result of compactification or as a four
700: -dimensional slice of a multidimensional spice-time in the spirit of early
701: brane world work \cite{GW}.
702:
703: Finally, taking into account nontrivial topology of the Kerr geometry, its
704: exceptional character with respect to dual rotations \cite{SGP} and
705: relationships to the spinning particlelike solutions ( see, e.g., \cite{Bur}
706: and references therein ), the treatment of corresponding regular {\it
707: rotating}
708: solutions is very important and could bring some surprising results. In
709: particular, the appearance of a closed vortex string on the place of the
710: Kerr
711: singular ring is expected.
712:
713: \section*{Acknowledgments}
714: We are thankful to I. Dymnikova for useful discussions at the early stage
715: of
716: this work and to K. Bronnikov for presenting his paper, very useful
717: discussions, and comments.
718:
719: \section*{Appendix. The Kerr-Schild form of metric in the case of spherical
720: symmetry}
721: The Kerr-Schild form of metric \cite{DKS,behm}
722: in the case of spherical symmetry is
723: \be
724: g_\mn=\eta_\mn + 2h k_\m k_\n , \label{AgKS}
725: \ee
726: where $\eta_\mn$ is the auxiliary Minkowski metric, $h=f(r)/r^2$, and
727: $k_\m = \{1,{\bf n}\}$.
728: In the Kerr angular coordinates $\{t, r,\theta, \phi \}$ we have
729: \begin{equation} g_{\mn} = \left( \begin{array}{cccc} 2h-1&2h&0&0\\
730: 2h&1+2h&0&0 \\
731: 0&0&r^2&0 \\
732: 0&0&0&r^2\sin ^2 \theta
733: \end{array} \right),
734: \label{gK}
735: \end{equation}
736: where $h(r)=f(r)/r^2$,
737: $\sqrt {-g} =r^2\sin\theta$, and the contravariant form
738: of metric is
739: \begin{equation}
740: g^{\mn} =
741: \left( \begin{array}{cccc}
742: -(1+2h)&2h&0&0 \\
743: 2h&1-2h&0&0 \\
744: 0&0&1/r^2&0 \\
745: 0&0&0&(r^2 \sin ^2 \theta) ^{-1}
746: \end{array} \right),
747: \label{gcontK}
748: \end{equation}
749: The energy-momentum tensor for the generalized
750: Kerr-Schild class of metrics is \cite{behm,Bag}
751: \be
752: T_\m^\n = (8\pi)^{-1}{\it diag}\{-2G,-2G,D+2G,D+2G\}, \label{ATKS}
753: \ee
754: where
755: \be
756: D= -f''/r^2, \quad G= (f/r)'/r^2, \label{ADG}
757: \ee
758: the prima means $ d /d r$, and energy density is $\rho=2G/8\pi$.
759:
760: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
761: \bibitem{behm}
762: A. Burinskii, E. Elizalde, S. R. Hildebrandt and G. Magli,
763: ``Regular Sources of the Kerr-Schild Class for Rotating and
764: Nonrotating Black Hole Solutions '', {\it Phys. Rev.}{\bf D65}
765: (2002)064039, gr-qc/0109085.
766: \bibitem{Dym}
767: I. Dymnikova,
768: ``Vacuum Nonsingular Black Hole,''
769: {\it Gen. Relativ. Gravit.} {\bf 24}, 235 (1992).
770: \bibitem{Bag}
771: A. Burinskii, ``Supersymmetric Superconducting Bag as a Core of Kerr
772: Spinning Particle ", hep-th/0008129;
773: ``Rotating Super Black Hole as Spinning Particle'', in {\it Noncommutative
774: Structures in Mathematics and Physics }, edited by S. Duplij and J.Wess
775: ( Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001) p.181, hep-th/0011188;
776: ``Super Black Hole as Spinning Particle: Supersymmetric Baglike Core,''
777: {\it Proc. of XXIV Int. Workshop ``Fundamental Problems of High Energy
778: Physics and Field Theory" }, ( IHEP, Protvino, July 27-29, 2001 )
779: ( in press ), hep-ph/0112078.
780: \bibitem{ag1}
781: E. Ay\'on-Beato and A. Garc\'\i a,
782: ``Regular Black Hole In General Relativity Coupled To Nonlinear
783: Electrodynamics,''
784: {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 80}(1998) 5056, gr-qc/9911046.
785:
786: \bibitem{ag2}
787: E. Ay\'on-Beato and A. Garc\'\i a,
788: ``New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics,''
789: {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 464}(1999) 25, gr-qc/9911174.
790:
791: \bibitem{ag3}
792: E. Ay\'on-Beato and A. Garc\'\i a,
793: ``Nonsingular Charged Black Hole Solution For Nonlinear Source,''
794: {\it Gen. Relat. \& Grav.} {\bf 31}(1999) 629, gr-qc/9911084.
795:
796: \bibitem{Br}
797: K. Bronnikov,
798: ``Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear
799: electrodynamics,''
800: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 63 }(2001)044005, gr-qc/0006014.
801:
802: \bibitem{nov}
803: M. Novello, S.E. Perez Bergliaffa and J.M. Salim,
804: ``Singularities in General Relativity coupled to nonlinear
805: electrodynamics,''
806: {\it Class. Quantum Grav.} {\bf 17 }(2000)3821, gr-qc/0003052;
807:
808: F.Baldovin, M. Novello, S.E. Perez Bergliaffa and J.M. Salim,
809: ``A nongravitational wormhole,''
810: {\it Clas.Quant.Grav.} {\bf 17 }(2000)3265, gr-qc/0003075;
811:
812: M. Novello, V.A. de Lorenci, J.M. Salim and R. Klippert,
813: ``Geometrical aspects of light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics,''
814: {\it Phys. Rev.\/} {\bf D 61}(2000)045001, gr-qc/9911085.
815:
816: \bibitem{Dir}
817: P.A.M. Dirac,
818: ``The Theory of Magnetic Poles,''
819: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 74 }(1948)817.
820:
821: \bibitem{dual}
822: G. Parisi,
823: ``Quark Imprisonment And Vacuum Repulsion,''
824: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 11 }(1975)970.
825:
826: G. 't Hooft , in {\it High Energy Physics, Proceedings of High Energy EPS
827: International Conference}, edited by A. Zichichi ( Editrice Compositori,
828: Bologna, 1976 ).
829:
830: \bibitem{SW}
831: N. Seiberg and E. Witten,
832: `` Monopoles, Duality and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in N=2
833: Supersymmetric QCD'',
834: {\it Nucl. Phys.}{\bf B 431 }(1994)484, hep-th/9408099.
835: \bibitem{Ch}
836: M.N. Chernodub,
837: ``Classical string solutions in effective infrared theory of SU(3)
838: gluodynamics,''
839: {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 474}(2000)73, hep-ph/9910290.
840: \bibitem{MS}
841: S. Maedan and T. Suzuki,
842: ``An Infrared Effective Theory of Quark Confinement Based on
843: Monopole Condensation,''
844: {\it Progr. Theor. Phys.}{\bf 81}(1989) 229.
845: \bibitem{KIK}
846: K.-I. Kondo,
847: ``Abelian-projected effective gauge theory of {QCD} with asymptotic
848: freedom and quark confinement,''
849: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 57}(1998) 7467, hep-th/9709109.
850: \bibitem{SGP}
851: H. Salazar, A. Garc\'\i a and J. Pleba\'nski,
852: ``Duality Rotations And Type D Solutions To Einstein Equations With
853: Nonlinear Electromagnetic Sources,''
854: {\it J. Math. Phys.} {\bf 28}(1987)2171.
855: \bibitem{LL} E. M. Lifshitz, L. P. Pitaevskii and L. D. Landau,
856: {\it Electrodynamics of Continous Media, Theoretical Physics},
857: 2nd. ed. (1985), Vol. 8 ( Elsevier ).
858: \bibitem{gibras}
859: G.W. Gibbons and D.A. Rasheed,
860: ``SL(2,R) Invariance of Non-Linear Electrodynamics Coupled to An Axion
861: and a Dilaton,''{\it Phys.Lett.}{\bf B 365},(1996)46, hep-th/9509141.
862: \bibitem{gibras2}
863: G.W. Gibbons and D.A. Rasheed,
864: ``Electric - magnetic duality rotations in nonlinear
865: electrodynamics,''
866: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B 454}(1995)185, hep-th/9506035;
867: \bibitem{Ts}
868: A.A. Tseitlin, ``Born-Infeld Action, Supersymmetry and String Theory'',
869: hep-th/9908105.
870: \bibitem{Her}
871: G.W. Gibbons and C. A. R. Herdeiro,``The Melvin Universe in Born-Infeld
872: Theory
873: and other Theories of Non-Linear Electrodynamics'',
874: {\it Class. Quantum Grav.}{\bf 18}(2001)1677, hep-th/0101229;
875: \bibitem{HI}
876: B. Hoffmann and L. Infeld, ``On the Choice of the Action Function in the
877: New Field Theory'', {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 51 }(1937)765.
878: \bibitem{DKS}
879: G. C. Debney, R. P. Kerr and A. Schild,
880: ``Solutions of the Einstein and Einstein-Maxwell Equations''
881: {\it J. Math. Phys.} {\bf 10}
882: (1969) 1842.
883: \bibitem{EH}
884: E. Elizalde and S. R. Hildebrandt, ``A Family of Regular Quantum Interiors
885: for Nonrotating Black Holes I: The GRNSS Spacetimes", gr-qc/0103063
886: {\it ( adapted text from Chap. 8, Ph. D. thesis of S.R.H., University of
887: Barcelona, 2001)}; ``The Family of Regular Interiors
888: for Non-rotating Black Holes with $T^0_0=T^1_1$", {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D }
889: (2002) (to appear), gr-qc/0202102.
890: \bibitem{GW}
891: G. W. Gibbons and D. L. Wiltshire,
892: ``Spacetime as a Membrane in Higher Dimensions'', hep-th/0109093 ,
893: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B 287}(1987)717.
894:
895: \bibitem{Bur}
896: A. Burinskii,``Microgeons with Spin''{\it Sov. Phys. JETP},
897: {\bf 39}(1974)193;
898: ``The Problem of the Source of the Kerr-Newman Metric: the Volume Casimir
899: Effect and Superdense Pseudovacuum State'', {\it Phys. Lett. }{\bf B 216}
900: (1989)123;
901: ``Some properties of the Kerr solution to low-energy string theory,''
902: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 52 }(1995)5826, hep-th/9504139;
903: ``Kerr Spinning Particle, Strings and Superparticle Models'',
904: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 57 }(1998)2392, hep-th/9704102;
905: ``Super-Kerr-Newman Solution to Broken N=2 Supergravity''
906: {\it Class. Quantum Grav.}{\bf 16 }(1999)3457, hep-th/9903032;
907:
908: \end{thebibliography}
909:
910: \end{document}
911:
912:
913:
914: