1: \documentclass[aps,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: %\input{eps}
3: %\documentstyle[aps]{revtex}\input{epsf}
4: \usepackage{graphics}
5: \begin{document}
6: \tighten
7: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
8: \def\half{{1\over 2}}
9: \def \D {\mbox{D}}
10: \def\curl {\mbox{curl}\,}
11: \def \ep {\varepsilon}
12: \def \lleq {\lower0.9ex\hbox{ $\buildrel < \over \sim$} ~}
13: \def \ggeq {\lower0.9ex\hbox{ $\buildrel > \over \sim$} ~}
14: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
15: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
16: \def\ber{\begin{eqnarray}}
17: \def\eer{\end{eqnarray}}
18: \def \apl {ApJ, }
19: \def \aps {ApJS, }
20: \def \pd {Phys. Rev. D, }
21: \def \prl {Phys. Rev. Lett., }
22: \def \pl {Phys. Lett., }
23: \def \np {Nucl. Phys., }
24: \def \l {\Lambda}
25:
26: %%\textheight 21.0cm
27: %%\textwidth 16cm
28: %%\leftmargin -4cm
29: %%\topmargin 0cm
30: %%\topmargin -2cm
31: %\begin{document}
32: %\draft
33: \title{Aspects of Tachyonic Inflation with Exponential Potential}
34: \author{M. Sami}
35: \email{sami@jamia.net}
36: \author{Pravabati Chingangbam}
37: \email{prava@jamia.net}
38: \author{Tabish Qureshi}
39: \email{tabish@jamia.net}
40: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia,
41: New Delhi-110025, INDIA}
42: \pacs{98.80.Cq,~98.80.Hw,~04.50.+h}
43:
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46: We consider issues related to tachyonic inflation with exponential potential.
47: We find exact solution of evolution equations in the slow roll limit in FRW
48: cosmology. We also carry out similar analysis in case of Brane assisted
49: tachyonic inflation. We investigate the phase space behavior of the system
50: and show that the dust like solution is a late time attractor. The difficulties
51: associated with reheating in the tachyonic model are also indicated.
52: \end{abstract}
53: \maketitle
54:
55: \section{INTRODUCTION}
56: M/String theory inspired models are under active consideration in cosmology
57: at present. It has recently been suggested that rolling tachyon condensate, in
58: a class of string theories, may have interesting cosmological consequences.
59: Sen\cite{sen1,sen2} has shown that the decay of D-branes produces a pressureless gas
60: with finite energy density that resembles classical dust. Rolling tachyon
61: matter associated with unstable D-branes has an interesting equation of state
62: which smoothly interpolates between -1 and 0. As the tachyon field rolls
63: down the hill, the universe undergoes accelerated expansion and at a
64: particular epoch the scale factor passes through the point of inflection
65: marking the end of inflation. At late times the energy density of tachyon
66: matter scales as $a^{-3}$. The tachyonic matter, therefore, might provide an
67: explanation for inflation at the early epochs and could contribute to some
68: new form of cosmological dark matter at late
69: times \cite{gibbons,fairbairn,feinstein,paddy1,shiu,paddy2,jatkar,hashimoto,
70: kim,shima,minahan,cornalba,benoum,li}.
71: The evolution of
72: FRW cosmological models and linear perturbations of tachyon matter rolling
73: towards a minimum of its potential is discussed by Frolov, Kofman and Starobinsky \cite{star}.
74: Effective
75: potential for tachyon field is computed in reference \cite{moore}; the
76: expression is exact in $\alpha'$ but tree level in $g_s$. Sen \cite{sen3} has shown
77: that the choice of an exponential potential for the tachyonic field leads to the
78: absence of plane-wave solutions around the tachyon vacuum and
79: exponential decay of the pressure at late times. A homogeneous tachyon
80: field evolves towards its ground state without oscillating about it. Therefore,
81: the conventional reheating mechanism in tachyonic model does not work.
82: Quantum mechanical particle production during inflation provide an alternative
83: mechanism by means of which the universe could reheat. However, the
84: energy density of radiation so created is much smaller than the energy
85: density of the field. In case of non-tachyonic field, this led to the requirement
86: of steep inflaton potential so that the field energy density could decay faster
87: than the radiation energy density and radiation domination could commence.
88: Brane assisted inflation was then invoked to support inflation with steep
89: potentials. A detailed account of reheating via gravitational particle
90: production in brane world scenario is discussed in reference \cite{copeland,sahni}.
91:
92: In this paper we discuss issues of inflation with tachyon rolling down an
93: exponential potential. We find exact solution of slow roll equations in usual
94: 4-dimensional FRW cosmology as well as on the brane. We carry out the
95: phase space analysis for the system under consideration and find out the
96: fixed point and discuss its stability. We also indicate the problems of reheating
97: in the tachyonic model. Effects of tachyons in the context of brane world cosmology
98: are discussed in reference\cite{btachyon}. Dynamics of gauge fields with rolling tachyon on unstable D-branes
99: is studied in reference \cite{minahan2,akira,mehen}.
100:
101: As recently demonstrated by Sen \cite{sen1,sen2}
102: a rolling
103: tachyon condensate in a spatially flat FRW cosmological model is described
104: by an effective fluid with energy momentum tensor
105: $T^{\mu}_{\nu}=diag\left(-\rho,p,p,p\right)$, where the energy density $\rho$
106: and pressure p are given by
107: \begin{equation}
108: \rho={V(\phi) \over {\sqrt{1-\dot{\phi}^2}}}
109: \end{equation}
110: \begin{equation}
111: p=-V(\phi)\sqrt{1-\dot{\phi}^2}
112: \end{equation}
113: The Friedmann equation takes the form
114: \begin{equation}
115: H^2={1 \over 3M_p^2} \rho \equiv {1 \over 3M_p^2}{V(\phi) \over {\sqrt{1-\dot{\phi}^2}}}
116: \end{equation}
117: The equation of motion of the tachyon field minimally coupled to gravity is
118: \begin{equation}
119: {\ddot{\phi} \over {1-\dot{\phi}^2}}+3H \dot{\phi}+{V_{,\phi} \over V({\phi})}=0
120: \end{equation}
121: The conservation equation equivalent to (4) has the usual form
122: $$ {\dot{\rho}_{\phi} \over \rho_{\phi}}+3H (1+\omega)=0 $$
123: where $\omega \equiv {p_{\phi} \over \rho_{\phi}}= \dot{\phi}^2-1$ is the
124: equation of state for the tachyon field. Thus a universe dominated by tachyon
125: field would go under accelerated expansion as long as $\dot{\phi}^2\ <\ {2
126: \over 3}$ which is very different from the condition of inflation for non-tachyonic
127: field, $\dot{\phi}^2\ <\ V(\phi)$.
128: It is obvious that the tachyon field should starts rolling with a small value of
129: $\dot{\phi}$ in order to have a long period of inflation.
130:
131: \subsection{DYNAMICS OF TACHYONIC INFLATION IN FRW COSMOLOGY}
132: The exponential potential
133: $$ V(\phi)=V_0e^{-\alpha \phi} $$
134: has played an important role within the inflationary cosmology. Sen
135: \cite{sen3} has recently argued in support of this potential for the
136: tachyonic system.
137: The field equations (3) and (4) for tachyonic matter with the exponential potential can be solved exactly in the
138: slow roll limit. In this limit
139: \beq
140: {\dot{a}(t) \over a(t)} \simeq \sqrt{{1 \over 3M_p^2} V(\phi)},
141: \eeq
142: and (4) becomes
143: \beq
144: 3 H \dot{\phi}\simeq -{V_{,\phi} \over V(\phi)} = \alpha
145: \eeq
146: Substitution of (5) in (6) leads to
147: \beq
148: \dot{\phi}={ \alpha \over {3\beta}}e^{\alpha \phi \over 2}
149: \eeq
150: where $\beta=\sqrt{ V_0/3M_p^2}$. Equation (7) immediately integrates to yield
151: \beq
152: \phi(t)=-{2 \over \alpha}\ln \left[C-{\alpha^2 \over {6 \beta}} t\right]
153: \eeq
154: where $ C=e^{-\alpha \phi_i \over 2}$ \ and $\phi(t=t_i=0)\equiv \phi_i$.
155: Putting this expression for $\phi(t)$ in (5) we get
156: \beq
157: {a(t) \over a_i}= e^{\beta t\left(C-{\alpha^2 \over {12 \beta}}t \right)}
158: \eeq
159: This equation tells us that the scale factor passes
160: through an inflection point at
161: $$t=t_{end}={6 \beta \over {\alpha^2}}\left(C-{\alpha \over {\sqrt6 \beta}}
162: \right)$$
163: Thus $t_{end}$ marks the end of inflation. From Eq. (8) we find
164: \beq
165: \dot{\phi}_{\it end}=\sqrt{2 \over 3}, \
166: \phi_{end}=-{1 \over \alpha} \ln \left( {\alpha^2 \over {6\beta^2}} \right), \
167: V_{end}={{\alpha^2 M_p^2} \over 2}
168: \eeq
169: The expression for the number of inflationary e-foldings can easily be established
170: \beq
171: {\cal{ N}} = \ln{{a(t)} \over{ a_i}}= \int_{t_i=0}^t { H( t') dt'}=\beta t \left(C-{\alpha^2 \over {12 \beta}}t \right)
172: \eeq
173: Using Eqs. (10) and (11) we find
174: \beq
175: V_{end}={Vi \over {{2\cal N}+1}}
176: \eeq
177: It is interesting to note that the expression (12) is very similar to what one gets
178: in case of a normal scalar field with exponential potential propagating on the
179: Brane. As the condition $\dot{\phi}^2 <\ 2/3\ $ is very different from the
180: condition of inflation for a normal scalar field, the slow roll parameters
181: $\epsilon$ and $\eta$ assume an unusual form in the case of tachyonic field, for
182: instance
183: \beq
184: \epsilon={M_p^2 \over 2} \left({V_{,\phi} \over V}\right)^2{1 \over V}
185: \eeq
186: which resembles the slow roll parameter in brane world cosmology \cite{cline}. As noted
187: by Fairbairn and Tytgat \cite{fairbairn} that for small $\dot{\phi}$ near the top of the potential we can
188: use the canonically normalized field $\phi_c=\sqrt V_0 \phi$ which brings the parameters
189: to their usual form \cite{Liddle}. We will also use this crude approximation to estimate
190: the magnitude of perturbations.The detailed description of perturbations is given by Hwang and Noh \cite{hwang}.The COBE normalized value for the amplitude of scalar
191: density perturbations
192: \beq
193: \delta_H^2\simeq {1 \over {75 \pi^2}}{V_i^2 \over {\alpha^2 M_p^2}}\simeq 4\times 10^{-10}
194: \eeq
195: can be used to estimate $ V_{end}$ as well as $ \alpha$. Here $ V_i$ refers to the value of the
196: potential at the commencement of inflation. Using Eqs. (12) and (14)
197: with ${\cal N} =60$ we obtain
198: \beq
199: V_{end}\simeq 4 \times 10^{-11}M_p^4
200: \eeq
201: At the end of inflation, apart from the field energy density, a small amount of radiation is also
202: present due to particles being produced quantum mechanically during inflation \cite{fordfos}
203: \beq
204: \rho_r = 0.01 \times g_p H_{end}^4 ~~~~~~~(10 \le g_p \le 100)
205: \eeq
206: which shows that the field energy density far exceeds the density in the radiation
207: \beq
208: {\rho_r \over{ \rho_{\phi}}} \simeq 0.01\times g_p {V_{end} \over { 9 M_p^2}}\simeq 4\times g_p \times 10^{-14}
209: \eeq
210:
211: \subsection{TACHYONIC INFLATION ON THE BRANE}
212:
213: The prospects of inflation in Brane World scenario \cite{randall}
214: improve due to the presence of an additional quadratic density term in the
215: Friedmann equation\cite{cline,copeland}. As a result, the class of steep potentials can
216: successfully describe inflation on the brane. In the 4+1 dimensional brane
217: world scenario inspired by Randall-Sundrum model\cite{randall}, the Friedmann
218: equation is modified to\cite{cline}
219: \begin{equation} H^2={1 \over 3M_p^2} \rho_{\phi} \left(1+{\rho_{\phi} \over 2\lambda_b}
220: \right)+ {\Lambda_4 \over 3}+{ {\cal E} \over a^4} \end{equation} where $\cal E$ is
221: an integration constant which transmits bulk graviton influence onto
222: the brane and $\lambda_b$ is the brane tension. For simplicity we set
223: $\Lambda_4$ equal to zero and also drop the last term as
224: inflation would render it so, leading to the expression
225: \begin{equation}
226: H^2={1 \over 3M_p^2} \rho_{\phi} \left(1+{\rho_{\phi} \over 2\lambda_b} \right)
227: \end{equation}
228: where $ \rho_{\phi} $ is given by (1) if one is dealing with universe
229: dominated by a single tachyon field minimally coupled to gravity. The brane
230: effects, in context of inflation, are most pronounced in the high energy limit
231: $V>> \lambda_b$ ; the Friedmann equation in this limit becomes
232: \begin{equation}
233: H={\rho_{\phi} \over{(6\lambda_b M_p^2)^{1/2}}}
234: \end{equation}
235: Analogous to the preceding section equations (6) and (20)
236: can be solved exactly to obtain
237: \beq
238: \phi(t)=-{1 \over \alpha}\ln \left[C-{\alpha^2 \over {3 \beta_b}} t\right]
239: \eeq
240: where $ C=e^{-\alpha \phi_i}\ $ and $\beta_b=\left(V_0^2/6 \lambda_bM_p^2\right)^{1/2}$.
241: The scale factor is given by
242: \beq
243: {a(t) \over a_i}= e^{\beta_b t\left(C-{\alpha^2 \over {6 \beta_b}}t \right)}
244: \eeq
245: At the point of inflection
246: $ t=t_{end}={3 \beta_b \over \alpha^2} \left(C-{\alpha \over {\sqrt3 \beta_b}}\right)$ we have
247: \beq
248: V_{end}= {V_0\alpha \over {\sqrt 3 \beta_b}}=\alpha M_p \sqrt{2 \lambda_b} \quad \ \dot{\phi}_{end}= \sqrt {1 \over 3}.
249: \eeq
250: which is consistent with the expression of the slow roll parameter on the brane
251: $$\epsilon={M_p^2 } \left({V_{,\phi} \over V}\right)^2{2\lambda_b \over V^2}$$
252: The number of e-foldings is related to $ V_{end}$ and $V_i$ as
253: \beq
254: V_{end}=\left({V_i^2
255: \over {{2\cal N}+1}} \right)^{1/2}
256: \eeq
257:
258: Similar to the previous section the COBE normalized value for the
259: amplitude of scalar density perturbations can be used to estimate both
260: $V_{\it end}$ and $\lambda_b$. The ratio of the radiation density (created during
261: inflation) to the field energy density turns out again to be a small number
262: $${\rho_r \over \rho_{\phi}}\simeq g_p\times 10^{-16} $$
263: independent of $ \alpha$.
264:
265:
266: \section{Phase portrait}
267:
268: In this section we carry out phase space analysis\cite{belinsky} for tachyonic
269: field with exponential potential $V=V_0e^{-\alpha \phi}$ evolving
270: in a spatially flat FRW
271: universe. The tachyon field evolution equation and the Friedmann constraint
272: equation can be cast in the form
273: \beq
274: x'=\left(1-x^2 \right)(1-3z x)
275: \eeq
276: \beq
277: y'=-x y
278: \eeq
279: \beq
280: z^2={y \over 3} { 1 \over \sqrt{(1-x^2)}}
281: \eeq
282: where we have introduced the dimensionless variables
283: $$ x = {\dot{ \phi}},\quad y={V(\phi) \over {\alpha^2 M_p^2}},
284: \quad z={{H}\over{\alpha}}$$
285: and prime denotes derivative with respect to the dimensional
286: variable $\eta=\alpha t $. To find out the critical points we set
287: r.h.s of Eqs. (25) and (26) to zero and we obtain
288: two fixed points $(\pm 1,0)$ of which $(-1,0)$ is not physical.
289: In order to study the stability of the critical point we perturb about
290: the critical point
291: \beq
292: x=1-u,\quad y=v
293: \eeq
294: where $u$ and $v$ are infinitesimally close to the critical point $(1,0)$.
295: Putting them in the coupled equations and keeping only linear terms we get
296: \beq
297: u' \simeq -2u
298: \eeq
299: \beq
300: v' \simeq -v
301: \eeq
302: whose solutions are
303: \begin{eqnarray*}
304: u &=& u_0e^{-2\eta}\\
305: v &=& v_0e^{-\eta}
306: \end{eqnarray*}
307: which clearly demonstrates the stability of the critical point.
308: Asymptotically $\ {\dot\phi}(\infty)=1\ $ and $\ V(\infty)=0\ $ implying
309: that $ a(t)\propto
310: t^{2/3}$ and that pressure tends to zero keeping the energy density finite
311: and non-zero \cite{paddy1}. We,
312: therefore, conclude that dust like solution in the tachyonic model is a
313: late time attractor.\
314:
315:
316: \begin{figure}
317: \resizebox{3.0in}{!}{\includegraphics{surface.eps}}
318: \caption{
319: Plot of the phase trajectories on the constraint surface. Trajectories
320: starting anywhere in the phase space end up at the stable critical point (1,0).}
321: \end{figure}
322:
323:
324: \subsection{REHEATING PROBLEM IN THE TACHYONIC MODEL}
325: The tachyonic field could play the dual role of inflaton at the early
326: epochs and of some new form of dark matter at late times. However, as
327: indicated by Kofman and Linde \cite{kofman}, reheating is problematic in these models. As
328: emphasized by Sen \cite{sen1,sen2} a homogeneous tachyon field evolves towards its
329: ground state without oscillating about it. Hence the conventional reheating
330: mechanism in tachyonic model does not work. Quantum mechanical particle
331: production during inflation provides an alternative mechanism by means of
332: which the universe could reheat. But the energy density of
333: radiation so created is much smaller than the energy density in the field. In
334: case of non-tachyonic field, this led to the requirement of a steep inflaton
335: potential so that the field energy density could decay faster then the radiation
336: energy density and radiation domination could commence. Unfortunately, from
337: the general arguments in case of the tachyonic matter, it seems that the field
338: energy density after inflation, always scales slower than radiation. Hence
339: radiation domination will never commence in this model irrespective of the
340: steepness of the tachyonic potential.
341: \begin{figure}[h]
342:
343: \resizebox{!}{2.5in}{\includegraphics{newscale.eps}}
344: \caption{
345: The post inflation evolution of tachyonic field energy density (solid line) is shown as a function of the
346: expansion factor. Immediately after inflation the field density scales as
347: $\ a^{-2}$. The decay law $ \rho_{\phi}\propto a^{-3}$ is shown by the
348: dashed line. It is seen clearly that the energy density in tachyonic
349: field fast approaches $\ a^{-3}$. }
350: \end{figure}
351:
352: \noindent In fact, $\rho_{\phi} \propto a^{-3\dot{\phi}^2}$ for tachyonic field,
353: as
354: $\omega=\dot{\phi}^2-1$ in this case . Thus immediately after the inflation has ended $(
355: \dot{\phi}^2=2/3) $,
356: the field energy density $\rho_{\phi}$ scales as $a^{-2}$.
357: Gibbons has shown that $\dot{\phi}$ is a monotonically increasing function of time with
358: maximum value equal to one. Therefore, at best $\rho_{\phi}$ can scale as
359: $a^{-3}$. This argument is valid irrespective
360: of the form of tachyonic potential provided it belongs to the class of potentials such that
361: $V(\phi) \rightarrow 0$ as $ \phi \rightarrow \infty$.
362: Hence, radiation energy density created at the end of inflation
363: would redshift faster then the energy density in the tachyonic field. We have
364: evolved the tachyonic field equations for exponential potential numerically;
365: Fig.2 displays the field energy density versus the scale factor and shows that
366: tachyonic matter comes to dominate very early after inflation has ended
367: lending
368: support to the analysis of Kofman and Linde\cite{kofman}.
369:
370: To sum up, we have studied tachyonic inflation with exponential
371: potential and found the exact solution of evolution equations in the
372: slow roll limit in FRW cosmology as well as on the brane.
373: We have shown that the dust like solution is a late time attractor of
374: the tachyonic system. We have also pointed out that reheating is
375: problematic in the tachyonic model.
376:
377:
378:
379: \begin{acknowledgements}
380: We are thankful to V. Sahni for useful discussions.
381: \end{acknowledgements}
382: %\section{References}
383: %\begin{references}
384: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
385: %\bibitem[\dagger]{byline} Electronic address:sami@jamia.net,sashasami@yahoo.com
386: \bibitem{sen1} A. Sen, arXiv: hep-th/0203211.
387: \bibitem{sen2} A. Sen, arXiv: hep-th/0203265.
388: \bibitem{gibbons} G. W. Gibbons, arXiv: hep-th/0204008.
389: \bibitem{fairbairn} M. Fairbairn and M.H.G. Tytgat, arXiv: hep-th/0204070.
390:
391: \bibitem{feinstein} A. Feinstein, arXiv: hep-th/0204140.
392: \bibitem{paddy1} T. Padmanabhan, arXiv: hep-th/0204150.
393: \bibitem{shiu} G. Shiu and Ira Wasserman, arXiv: hep-th/0205003bitem.
394: \bibitem{paddy2} T. Padmanabhan and T. Roy Choudhury; arXiv: hep-th/0205055.
395: \bibitem{jatkar} D. Choudhury, D.Ghoshal, D. P. Jatkar and S. Panda, arXiv: hep-th/0204204.
396: \bibitem{hashimoto} K. Hashimoto, arXiv: hep-th/0204203.
397: \bibitem{kim} H. S. Kim, arXiv: hep-th/0204191.
398: \bibitem{shima} S. Sugimoto, S. Terashima, hep-th/0205085.
399: \bibitem{minahan} J. A. Minahan, arXiv: hep-th/0205098.
400: \bibitem{cornalba} L. Cornalba, M. S. Costa and C. Kounnas, arXiv: hep-th/0204261.
401: \bibitem{benoum} H. B. Benaoum, arXiv: hep-th/0205140.
402:
403: \bibitem{li} Xin-zhou Li, Jian-gang Hao and Dao-jun Liu, hep-th/0204152.
404: \bibitem{star} A. Frolov, L. Kofman and A. Starobinsky, arXiv: hep-th/0204187.
405: \bibitem{moore} A. A. Gerasimov, S. L. Shatashvili, JHEP {\bf 0010} 034 (2000) [hep-th/0009103];
406: A. Minahan and B. Zwiebach; JHEP {\bf0103} 038 (2001) [hep-th/0009246];
407: D. Kutasov, M. Marino and G.W. Moore, JHEP {\bf0010} 045 (2000);
408: A. A. Tseytlin, J. Math Phys., {\bf 42} 2854 (2001).
409: \bibitem{sen3} A. Sen, arXiv: hep-th/0204143.
410: \bibitem{copeland} E. J. Copeland, A.R.Liddle and J.E. Lidsey, Phys. Rev. {\bf D64} (2001) 023509,
411: [astro-ph/0006421]; G. Huey and J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Lett.
412: {\bf B514} 217 (2001) [astro-ph/0104006]
413: \bibitem{sahni} V. Sahni, M.Sami, T. Souradeep, Phys. Rev. {\bf D65} (2002) 023518 [gr-qc/0105121 (2001)].
414:
415: \bibitem{btachyon} E. Papantonopoulos and Papa, Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A15}, 2145 (2000) [hep-th/0001183] ; Phys. Rev. {\bf D63}
416: , 103506 (2000) [hep-th/0010014] ;
417: S. H. S. Alexander, Phys. Rev. {\bf D65},023507 [ hep-th/0105032];
418: A. Mazumdar, S. Panda, A. Perez-Lorenzana, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B614}, 101, (2001)[hep-th-0107058];
419: Shinji Mukohyama, arXiv: hep-th/0204084; M. Sami, [hep-th/0205146].
420: \bibitem{minahan2}J. A. Minahan, B. Zwiebach, JHEP {\bf 0102} 034 (2001).
421: \bibitem{akira} A . Ishida and S. Uehara, arXiv: hep-th/0206102.
422: \bibitem{mehen} T. Mehen and Brian Wecht, hep-th/0206212.
423: \bibitem{randall} L.Randall and R. Sundrum , Phys. Rev. Lett.{\bf 83},4690 (1999).
424: L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 3370 (1999).
425: \bibitem{cline}
426:
427: J.M. Cline, C. Grojean and G. Servant, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83} 4245 (1999);
428: N. Kaloper, \pd {\bf 60} 123506 (1999); T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda, and M. Sasaki, \pd
429: {\bf 62}, 024012 (2000); R. Maartens, D. Wands, B. A. Basset and I. P. C.
430: Heard, Phys. Rev.D {\bf 62},
431: 041301 (2000);. Csaki, M. Graesser, C. Kolda, J. Terning, Phys. Lett.
432: {\bf B462} 34 (1999);
433:
434: \bibitem{Liddle} A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth, ``Cosmological Inflation and Large Scale Structure",
435: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
436: \bibitem{hwang} J. c. Hwang and H. Noh, arXiv: hep-th/0206100.
437: \bibitem{fordfos} L.H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D, {\bf 35}, 2955 (1987), B. Spokoiny, Phys. Lett. {\bf B
438: 315}, 40 (1993).
439: \bibitem{belinsky} V. A. Belinsky, L. P. Grishchuk, I. M. Khalatnikov
440: and Ya. B. Zeldovich, Phys. Lett. {\bf 155B}, 232 (1985); E. J.
441: Copeland, A. R. Liddle and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57} 4686 (1998);
442: G. N. Felder, A. Frolov and L. Kofman, arXiv: hep-th/0112165.
443: \bibitem{kofman} L. Kofman and A. Linde, arXiv: hep-th/0205121.
444:
445: \end{thebibliography}
446:
447: \end{document}
448:
449: