1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass[letterpaper]{JHEP}
3: %\documentclass[draft]{JHEP}
4: \usepackage[dvips]{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7:
8:
9: \title{Macroscopic open strings and gravitational confinement}
10: \author{Ruth Gregory\\ Centre for Particle Theory,
11: University of Durham,\\ South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K.}
12:
13: \abstract{
14: We consider classical solutions for strings ending on magnetically
15: charged black holes in four-dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory. We
16: examine the classical superstring and the global vortex, which can
17: be viewed as a nonsingular model for the superstring. We show how
18: both of these can end on a Kaluza-Klein monopole in the absence of
19: self-gravity. Including gravitational back-reaction gives rise to
20: a confinement mechanism of the magnetic flux of the black hole along
21: the direction of the string. We discuss the relation of this work
22: to localized solutions in ten dimensional supergravity.
23: }
24:
25:
26: \keywords{supergravity solutions, black holes, topological defects}
27: %\pacs{PACS numbers: 11.25.-w, 04.40.-b, 11.27.+d, 04.50.+h \hfill DTP/02/61,}
28: \preprint{DCPT/02/61, hep-th/0208100}
29:
30: \def\real{I\negthinspace R}
31: \def\zed{Z\hskip -3mm Z }
32: \def\half{\textstyle{1\over2}}
33: \def\third{\textstyle{1\over3}}
34: \def\quarter{\textstyle{1\over4}}
35: \def\sech{\,{\rm sech}\,}
36: \def\ie{{\it i.e.,}}
37:
38: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
39: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
40: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
41: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
42: \newcommand{\bml}{\begin{mathletters}}
43: \newcommand{\eml}{\end{mathletters}}
44:
45: \begin{document}
46:
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49:
50: The interplay between macroscopic soliton solutions in field theory,
51: and microscopic quantum physics has always been a fruitful and fascinating
52: one. Solitons, while generally `heavy' and `classical' in nature,
53: nonetheless are an important and indeed integral
54: part of the particle spectrum of the theory. The effort to fully
55: integrate these objects into quantum theory has led to a deeper
56: understanding of existing theories. In particular the study of
57: the `solitonic' D-branes \cite{DBr} has revolutionized the
58: study of string theory.
59:
60: There are two different perspectives from which one can view
61: a D-brane; one is an inherently stringy point of view,
62: which is that of applying Dirichlet, rather
63: than Neumann, boundary conditions to open strings \cite{Dirich}.
64: On the other hand, a somewhat more `classical' perspective views
65: the brane as a possibly extended solution of low energy string supergravity
66: carrying Ramond-Ramond (RR) charge \cite{SUsol}.
67: Combining these two approaches has led to many new insights, such as
68: a better understanding of black hole entropy \cite{ENT} and the adS/CFT
69: correspondence \cite{ADS}.
70:
71: There are also classical solutions carrying Neveu-Schwarz
72: charge, the NS5-brane and the string. This latter solution is often
73: viewed as a macroscopic fundamental superstring \cite{MAC}.
74: Viewing strings and D-branes classically as black brane solutions
75: to supergravity, one can ask a whole range of interesting gravitational
76: questions, such as what happens when two branes meet?
77: There are many known solutions for intersecting branes (see \cite{Jerome}
78: and references therein), however these often `de-localized' in the
79: sense that the solution depends only on the mutually orthogonal directions.
80: A genuinely localized intersection has proved somewhat elusive,
81: although one can construct near-horizon solutions (e.g.\ \cite{NH}),
82: and semi-localized solutions \cite{LINT}, indeed,
83: in some cases localization is thought not to be possible \cite{bald}.
84:
85: If however this rather nice
86: correspondence between supergravity solutions and the
87: stringy picture is neat and closed, then there surely should exist
88: solutions of fundamental strings terminating on D-branes.
89: This statement has some secondary
90: implications. If it is indeed possible to find a classical solution for
91: a string terminating on a D-brane, then it should in principle
92: be possible for a macroscopic fundamental string to split, in a manner
93: similar to the four-dimensional cosmic string \cite{split, smooth},
94: since it can nucleate a D/anti D-brane
95: pair along its length. This could have potential implications
96: for the dynamics of a superstring network in the early universe,
97: where additional interactions
98: of string splitting and rejoining would also have to be taken into account.
99:
100: To explore this question we consider a rather simpler one. Rather
101: than examining the ten-dimensional problem, for which one might expect
102: that fully localised intersecting brane solutions would be a
103: necessary precursor, we look at two rather simpler toy models: a classical
104: superstring, and its nonsingular field-theoretic cousin -- the global
105: vortex -- in four-dimensional Kaluza-Klein (KK) gravity.
106: This `ministring' can be viewed either as a truncation of
107: the IIA superstring, or the dimensional reduction of a membrane from
108: five-dimensional gravity \cite{AETW}.
109: These strings can split by the nucleation of the four-dimensional
110: equivalent of D0 or D6 branes, which are now the electric and
111: magnetic KK black holes \cite{KKBH}.
112: The D0 brane is a gravitational wave travelling around the internal
113: circle, and is singular, however, the `D6' brane is the KK
114: monopole\cite{KKM}, and is constructed from the Taub-NUT instanton,
115: which, at least for unit monopole charge, is completely regular from
116: the five-dimensional point of view.
117:
118: In what follows we start by taking a rather empirical approach, initially
119: ignoring the gravitational back reaction of the string (working in the limit
120: in which the string is arbitrarily light compared to the monopole) first
121: exhibiting a string worldsheet which satisfies charge conservation
122: in the sense of the NSNS and RR form fields that live in the spacetime.
123: Similarly, for the global string, initially, we solve only the field equations
124: on the KK monopole background, before coupling in gravity.
125: Even this background or `probe' solution already gives important clues about
126: the gravitational backreaction.
127:
128: \section{Background solutions}
129:
130: In order to find a configuration corresponding to a classical superstring
131: ending on a monopole, consider its interpretation as a double-dimensional
132: reduction of a supermembrane. We are then looking for a configuration
133: involving a membrane in five dimensions terminating on the core of the
134: KK monopole which is nonsingular from the five dimensional point of view,
135: therefore the membrane cannot have any ends. Fortunately, because of
136: the Hopf-fibration of the KK monopole, it is
137: easy to see how to wrap the membrane so that it has no ends,
138: yet appears to terminate from the dimensionally reduced point of view:
139: one wraps the membrane around the fifth dimension along
140: the `south' direction of the Taub-NUT
141: instanton, but not along the `north' direction.
142: This is a regular configuration
143: with no boundaries (other than that at infinity) and yet from the four
144: dimensional point of view looks like a string with an end.
145: This problem has in fact been well studied in
146: the M-theory context \cite{BGr,wrap}, where there are families
147: of static M2-branes given by holomorphic curves on the (hyper-K\"ahler)
148: Taub-NUT manifold. These have the lower dimensional interpretation of
149: D2 branes in the background of a D6 brane with fundamental string charge.
150: The configuration we have is a five dimensional version of the
151: limit of one of the curves
152: presented in \cite{BGr} in which a D2-brane is dragged past the
153: KK-monopole leaving a fundamental string
154: connecting the core of the monopole to infinity.
155:
156: This clearly represents a geometric solution to the problem, but can it be
157: consistently coupled in to gravity and the 3-form field that also exists
158: in the toy 5-dimensional gravity?
159: To answer this, consider a nonsingular field-theoretic model
160: of the classical superstring -- the global vortex -- which is a
161: topological defect solution to the U(1) theory defined by the lagrangian
162: \bea
163: {\cal L} &=& |\nabla_\mu\Phi|^2 - {\lambda\over 4} (|\Phi|^2 - \eta^2)^2
164: \nonumber \\
165: &=& \eta^2 \left \{ (\nabla_\mu X)^2 + X^2 (\nabla_\mu \chi)^2 -
166: {\lambda\eta^2\over4} (X^2-1)^2 \right \}
167: \eea
168: writing $\Phi = \eta X e^{i\chi}$. This represents a nonsingular
169: version of the string since the scalar Goldstone boson, $\chi$, is
170: canonically conjugate to the Kalb-Ramond two-form, $B_{\mu\nu}$, of the
171: string (or the three-form $C_{\mu\nu\lambda}$ of the membrane) in four
172: (five) dimensions.
173: Suppose we consider this U(1) theory in five dimensions in the background
174: of the KK monopole:
175: \be\label{KKMmet}
176: ds^2 = dt^2 - \left (1 + {E\over r} \right ) d{\bf r}^2
177: - \left (1 + {E\over r} \right )^{-1} \left [
178: dx^5 + E (1 - \cos\theta) d\varphi \right ]^2
179: \ee
180: where $d{\bf r}^2$ represents \real$^3$ in spherical polar coordinates
181: $(r,\theta,\varphi)$.
182: In order to obtain a vortex ending on the KK monopole, we must
183: choose the phase, $\chi$, to be nonsingular along one of the polar axes.
184: It is not difficult to see that the choice $\chi = x^5/2E$ satisfies
185: this requirement. Along the North polar axis, $\Phi$ is regular without
186: requiring $X=0$, whereas along the South polar axis the metric (\ref{KKMmet})
187: has a coordinate singularity, and we must transform
188: to coordinates which are nonsingular in the southern hemisphere:
189: ${\tilde x}^5 = x^5 + 2E\varphi$, which is the analogue of the Wu-Yang gauge
190: patching for the Dirac monopole \cite{WY}.
191: Hence $\chi = {\tilde x}^5/2E - \varphi$,
192: in the vicinity of this axis,
193: which corresponds to a vortex with winding number $-1$.
194:
195: Having decided there is a sensible choice for the phase of the scalar
196: field, one might reasonably ask whether this corresponds to a genuine
197: solution for the vortex. This necessitates solving the $X$-equation
198: \bea
199: {\left [ r^2 X_{,r} \right ]_{,r} \over r^2} &+&
200: {\left [ \sin\theta X_{,\theta} \right ]_{,\theta} \over r^2 \sin\theta}
201: = {\half} \left ( 1 + {E\over r} \right ) X (X^2-1) \nonumber \\
202: &+& {X\over4} \left [ {1\over E^2} \left ( 1 + {E\over r} \right )^2 +
203: {\tan^2 ({\theta\over 2}) \over r^2} \right ] = 0
204: \eea
205: where we have chosen to set the vortex width $1/\sqrt{\lambda}\eta=1$.
206: Fortunately, in the limit $E\gg1$, this can be approximately solved
207: analytically, using an analogue of the thin-string approximation used
208: in \cite{AGK}\ to obtain solutions for vortices in a black hole
209: background, by noting that if we set $X = X(R) = X(2\sqrt{r(r+E)}\cos(
210: {\theta\over2}))$, then the $X$-equation reduces to
211: \bea
212: &-&X''\left [ 1 + {R^2 (3r+2E)\over 4(r+E)^3} \right ]
213: - {X'\over R} \left [ 1 + {R^2 (5r+6E)\over8(r+E)^3} \right ]
214: \nonumber \\
215: &+& {X^2\over R^2} \left [ 1 + {R^2(r+2E) \over 4E^2(r+E)}
216: \right ] + {\half}X(X^2-1) = 0
217: \eea
218: which is simply the equation for the scalar field of a global vortex in
219: flat space with O($E^{-2}$) corrections.
220: Note however, that unlike the flat space global vortex, these corrections mean
221: that this vortex does not tend asymptotically to the vacuum, but rather
222: $X\to 1 - {1\over E^2}$. Obviously this is just an analytic approximation,
223: and one can integrate the equations numerically, two illustrations of which
224: are shown in figure 1. The plots represent the contours of the $X$-field,
225: ($X=0.1,0.2....$) and show how the vortex spreads as $E$ is reduced. Below
226: $E\simeq 1.7$ the $X=0.9$ contour ceases to exist, and the ripple is a
227: manifestation of its marginal nature.
228:
229: \FIGURE{
230: \includegraphics[height=5cm]{E17.eps}
231: \includegraphics[height=5cm]{E10.eps}
232: \caption{$X$-contour lines in the monopole background. The plots are in
233: ``real space'' with the $\varphi$ direction suppressed. The ripple in the
234: $X=0.9$ contour on the first plot occurs because that contour is marginal
235: and about to disappear as $E$ drops in value.}
236: \label{fig:end}
237: }
238:
239: Having used the global vortex as an illustration, one can now read off the
240: form of the superstring, since in five dimensions a
241: 3-form field is dual to a scalar field, therefore we simply dualise
242: the solution for $\chi$ in the global vortex to find the four form
243: field strength appropriate to the membrane:
244: \bea
245: &&F_4 = Q \bigl [ E\sin\theta \left ( 1 + {r\over E} \right )
246: ^2 dt\wedge dr \wedge d\theta\wedge d\varphi \nonumber \\
247: &+& \tan({\textstyle{\theta\over2}}) dt\wedge dr \wedge d\theta \wedge
248: [ dx^5 + E(1-\cos\theta)d\varphi] \bigr ]
249: \eea
250: When reduced to four spacetime dimensions, this gives rise to the fields
251: \bea
252: H &=& \tan ({\textstyle{\theta\over2}}) dt \wedge dr \wedge d\theta \\
253: {\tilde F}_4 &=& E\sin\theta \left ( 1 + {r\over E} \right )^2
254: dt\wedge dr \wedge d\theta\wedge d\varphi
255: \eea
256: where $H = dB$ is the `NSNS' two form field strength, and ${\tilde F}_4
257: = F_4 + A \wedge H$ is the `RR' four form (with $A$ the RR 1-form).
258:
259: Notice how $|{\tilde F}_4^2|$ actually tends to a constant at infinity.
260: The reason for this
261: is that in order for the fields to wrap around the internal dimension in such
262: a way that they close off at the north pole in a regular fashion, yet
263: still correspond to a string at the south pole, they must wind
264: around the internal direction, the size of which tends to a
265: constant at infinity, therefore the part of the field which winds around
266: that direction will contribute a constant amount.
267: Alternatively, from the four-dimensional point of view, the interaction
268: of the H-field generated by the string with the A-field coming from the
269: KK reduction via the Chern Simons term causes a long range effect if we wish
270: the fields to conspire to make the configuration regular on the north
271: pole, but have a source on the south pole. In other words, bulk terms
272: matter for classical superstrings.
273:
274: In each case the superstring and the global vortex can
275: be painted on to the KK monopole background in order to give a configuration
276: corresponding to a terminating string, however the field configuration has
277: a nonvanishing local energy density at infinity. This will have
278: significant implications for the gravitational back reaction of such
279: configurations which we will now discuss.
280:
281: \section{Gravitational back reaction}
282:
283: Once we include the gravitational back reaction of the string, we
284: can no longer assume that the background will be similar to the KK-monopole.
285: Indeed, there are two very good reasons for supposing that the
286: spacetime will be radically different from the monopole, and therefore
287: that a conventional linearized analysis will not apply. The first
288: is the presence of these bulk terms -- the long range fields that
289: are present in order to allow the string to end. The other reason
290: is the asymmetry of the configuration. Usually, when one linearizes
291: around a background configuration one assumes that when the source
292: is switched on, the spacetime is perturbed in some localised sense.
293: Here however, we are adding a string along one polar axis of the monopole.
294: In the case of a standard local cosmic string ending on a black hole,
295: the solution is altered from the static Schwarzschild solution to
296: the C-metric \cite{KW}, which although static, contains acceleration horizons
297: at large radius. In both ways of thinking, the addition of the
298: string has had a long range effect.
299:
300: In order to investigate the gravitational back reaction, instead of
301: performing a perturbation analysis, we will consider a more general metric
302: \be\label{kkred}
303: ds^2 = e^{2\phi\over\sqrt{3}}g_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu -
304: e^{-4\phi\over\sqrt{3}}[dx^5 + A_\mu dx^\mu]^2
305: \ee
306: Of course, this metric will not be entirely general, the four-dimensional
307: component will be axisymmetric and static, and the electromagnetic
308: potential will be appropriate to a magnetic solution,
309: $A_\mu = A \partial_\mu \varphi$, such that $A=0$ along the north axis
310: of symmetry, which will, as before, be the axis pointing away from
311: the terminating string.
312:
313: To look for a membrane solution in the five-dimensional
314: metric which is nonsingular
315: on this axis, we try $F_4=\star 2Q\ dx^5$. Substituting
316: the metric (\ref{kkred}) in the five dimensional action
317: and integrating out over $x^5$ yields the four-dimensional action
318: \be\label{action}
319: S = \int d^4 x \sqrt{g} \bigl [ -R + 2 (\nabla \phi)^2 - {\quarter}
320: e^{-2\sqrt{3}\phi} F^2
321: + 2Q^2A_{\mu}^2 - 2Q^2e^{2\sqrt{3}\phi}
322: \bigr ]
323: \ee
324: where the factors of $e^{2\phi/\sqrt{3}}$ in (\ref{kkred}) have been
325: chosen to put the four dimensional action in the so-called Einstein
326: frame, in which the gravitational part of the action appears
327: in the Einstein-Hilbert form.
328: In addition to the usual KK terms, this action also contains
329: a mass term for the KK U(1)-field, and a `cosmological' Liouville potential
330: for the dilaton. This action (\ref{action}),
331: in the absence of the $Q^2 A_\mu^2$ term, has been analysed
332: with the result that there is a ``no go'' theorem
333: for spherically symmetric black holes \cite{PW} -- there are no
334: spherically symmetric black hole solutions which are
335: asymptotically flat or de-Sitter.
336: However, this action and our situation has two crucial differences,
337: the presence of the mass term for the gauge field, and the lack of
338: spherical symmetry -- a vortex terminating on a black hole is
339: manifestly not spherically symmetric.
340:
341: An obvious candidate for a non-spherically symmetric metric is
342: of course the dilatonic C-metric of Dowker et.\ al.\ \cite{DGKT}.
343: This consists of a black hole under uniform acceleration generated
344: by a conical deficit extending towards infinity and is a solution for
345: the action (\ref{action}) above with $Q^2=0$.
346: The key features of the geometry are this conical singularity and an
347: acceleration horizon generated by the acceleration of the black hole.
348: For $RA\ll1$, the conical singularity has a deficit
349: angle of order $RA$, and the acceleration horizon is at a radius of order
350: $A^{-1}$. Meanwhile, the effects of the Liouville potential will become
351: relevant at a scale of order $Q^{-1}$, therefore, the dilatonic C-metric
352: can only be appropriate as an asymptotic solution if the
353: acceleration horizon occurs well before the Liouville and electromagnetic
354: mass terms are relevant: \ie\ if $A^{-1} \ll Q^{-1}$.
355:
356: In order to explore this question in greater detail, consider the global vortex.
357: In Einstein gravity, the global vortex spacetime is
358: slightly subtle, since in order to have a regular spacetime one
359: strictly needs to introduce a time dependence or negative
360: cosmological constant \cite{RG}. Nonetheless, in order to explore the
361: relative importance of the various terms we will look for a global
362: vortex solution by maintaining the form of the
363: Goldstone field $\chi = x^5/R$ (where $2\pi R$ is the periodicity
364: of $x^5$), then integrating out over $x^5$ gives the four-dimensional
365: effective action
366: \bea\label{efflv}
367: S_{eff} = \int\sqrt{g} \Biggl [ &-&R + 2(\nabla\phi)^2
368: - {\quarter} e^{-2\sqrt{3}\phi} F^2 - \eta^2 {X^2\over R^2}
369: e^{2\sqrt{3}\phi} \nonumber \\
370: &+& \eta^2 \left ( (\nabla X)^2 + {X^2\over R^2} A_\mu^2
371: -{\lambda \eta^2 \over4}e^{2\phi/\sqrt{3}}(X^2-1)^2 \right )\Biggr]
372: \eea
373: The first three terms are the standard KK gravity terms. The last
374: three terms (grouped together with the factor of $\eta^2$)
375: come from the kinetic and potential terms of the $\Phi$ field.
376: However, the kinetic term of the Goldstone $\chi$-field gives
377: two contributions (as seen in the $Q^2$ terms of (\ref{action})),
378: one of which is the gauge field term and the other the Liouville term
379: of $X^2 e^{2\sqrt{3}\phi}$. The reason for putting this term seperately
380: is to emphasize the grouping of the $\eta^2$-terms. These are very close
381: to the lagrangian terms for a local U(1)-vortex, indeed,
382: if we identify $1/R$ with $e$, then apart from the Liouville
383: term, this is precisely the lagrangian
384: of a dilatonic {\it local} vortex, with Bogomolnyi parameter
385: $\beta = 1/2e^2\eta^2 = R^2/2\eta^2$. (Note that this is reminiscent
386: of the KK vortices of Dvali, Kogan and Shifman \cite{DKS},
387: however they {\it broke} the U(1) $\partial_5$ Killing symmetry
388: with a braneworld, whereas we have not.)
389: The gravitational interactions
390: of such vortices were studied in \cite{GS}, where it was shown
391: that they could be used to smooth out conical deficits in standard
392: `vacuum' spacetimes {\it including} those with dilatonic black holes.
393:
394: Briefly, in \cite{GS} it was shown that a dilatonic local vortex, like
395: the standard cosmic string, has a conical deficit in the vicinity of
396: the core, which smooths out the apex of the cone. However, the main
397: difference between dilatonic and Einstein strings is that, depending on
398: how the local vortex couples to the dilaton, it is now possible for
399: spacetime to be non asymptotically locally flat far from the core,
400: with the dilaton providing the curvature. Only those vortices which
401: couple canonically to the dilaton (\ie\ in the string frame if we have
402: string gravity, or the KK frame for KK gravity) avoid this fate. In
403: general in Einstein gravity, it is always possible to use a local cosmic
404: string to smooth out the conical deficits present in a metric \cite{smooth},
405: for example the C-metric which represents two accelerating black holes
406: being pulled away from each other by conical deficits extending
407: to infinity. In dilaton gravity, it was shown in \cite{GS} that a dilaton
408: vortex threading a black hole would, if noncanonically coupled, add
409: dilaton charge to the black hole and asymptote the vortex metric. However,
410: for the dilatonic C-metrics, the conical deficit could {\it only}
411: be smoothed if the coupling of the vortex to the dilaton was canonical.
412: Fortunately, the coupling in (\ref{efflv}) is precisely canonical.
413:
414: Now, the
415: analytic analysis in \cite{GS} was undertaken supposing $\beta \simeq O(1)$,
416: whereas we have $\beta = R^2/2\eta^2$, with $R\gg1$ (large KK monopole
417: mass) and in addition $\eta\ll1$ (as $\eta^2$ really stands for $8\pi G\eta^2$
418: in vortex units, and we are expanding around the low string mass limit).
419: Therefore, we are in a relatively little explored parameter space of
420: the local vortex (some work was done on large $\beta$ vortices interacting
421: with non-dilatonic black holes in \cite{BEG}).
422: However, by combining results and intuition
423: from local vortices with black holes, as well as the global vortex itself,
424: we can in the absence of the `Liouville' term describe the spacetime.
425:
426: There will be three main regions: $r\ll R$, $R\ll r\ll R\eta^{-1}$,
427: and $r\gg R\eta^{-1}$, where $r$ is to be understood in a qualitative
428: sense as representing the distance scale on which one is examining
429: the spacetime. Roughly speaking these three scales represent the
430: scale on which spacetime is inherently five-dimensional in nature;
431: where the solution is four-dimensional in nature but the Liouville
432: term is not yet relevant;
433: and finally the long range effects of all the terms in the action.
434:
435: The immediate effect of the vortex core is to provide a snub-nosed conical
436: deficit. This effect is strongly localized around the core of the vortex,
437: and therefore ought not to be particularly affected by the Hopf fibration
438: of the magnetic black hole. There will therefore be a region around
439: the south polar axis which is a conical deficit in the $\varphi$ polar angle.
440: At intermediate scales, we are well outside the vortex core, and
441: in a four-dimensional r\'egime, yet still well below the scale
442: at which the Liouville and mass terms are relevant. Since the vortex
443: couples in the KK frame, we expect from \cite{GS} that the dilatonic
444: metric of \cite{DGKT} will describe the metric at this scale (with the
445: vortex smoothing out the core of the conical deficit). Finally, at
446: large scales the electromagnetic flux confines, and in the absence of
447: the Liouville term we would simply have a vacuum C-metric.
448:
449: Such is the spacetime in the absence of the Liouville term. Now let us
450: consider inclusion of this term, which becomes relevant at $O(R\eta^{-1})$.
451: First of all,
452: if this scale is outside the acceleration horizon of the C-metric, then
453: it is clearly irrelevant. The acceleration horizon of the C-metric is at
454: $r\sim O(A^{-1})$, where $RA\sim \eta^2$ is the deficit angle of the
455: C-metric. Thus $A^{-1} = O(R\eta^{-2}) \gg R\eta^{-1}$ for $\eta\ll1$.
456: Therefore the Liouville scale is well within the acceleration horizon --
457: a conclusion we expect to be true for the string/membrane as well.
458: For the global vortex, note that it is precisely this Liouville
459: term which is inherently a global vortex term. If we were simply
460: looking for a five dimensional global vortex membrane, then we could
461: always consider reducing over the angular variable which represented
462: the winding of the Goldstone field. This would give rise to precisely
463: that Liouville term. For a simple cylindrically symmetric vortex in
464: the absence of the electromagnetic field,
465: it is this term which is responsible for the singularity in the static metric
466: for the vortex \cite{CK}. However, to render the global vortex
467: nonsingular, one can add a negative cosmological constant, or
468: worldbrane curvature \cite{RG}, the latter of which
469: causes a compactification of spacetime which becomes a small
470: deformation of the de Sitter hyperboloid \cite{GS2}.
471:
472: Applying these results to the case at hand, one would therefore
473: expect that the unchecked Liouville term could well render
474: the acceleration horizon of the C-metric singular, however, one
475: can remove this singularity by adding a small negative cosmological
476: constant, or time-dependence to the metric. Since adding time-dependence
477: means that the metric will now depend on three variables, a rather
478: difficult problem, we will simply assume that a tiny negative cosmological
479: constant has been added to cancel the Liouville term in an analogous
480: way to the self-gravitating global vortex, and we are left with a vacuum
481: C-metric with a minutely small acceleration.
482:
483: \section{Discussion}
484:
485: So, overall the geometry has three different approximate descriptions:
486: First, the near-field, or core, which for the global string
487: is a snub-nosed cone -- for the superstring, this will
488: simply be its local near-core metric. Second there will be a mid-field
489: approximation in which the geometry and dilaton will have the form
490: of the dilatonic C-metric. Finally, on the large scale, the mass
491: term for the electromagnetic field will cause that flux to confine
492: as well, and (with the proviso of a checking-term in either
493: the action or the intrinsic worldbrane geometry)
494: we will have a standard C-metric.
495:
496: We can ask how these conclusions are altered if we try to
497: explore a different range of parameter space, either by lowering
498: the compactification radius $R$, or increasing the gravitational
499: strength of the global vortex $\eta^2$. The plots in figure \ref{fig:end}
500: show that for the global vortex at least, we can lower $R$ to a similar
501: order of magnitude as the vortex width before we run into trouble.
502: Similarly, analytic arguments on the existence of vortex solutions
503: in \cite{GS2} show that we can raise $\eta^2$ to $O(1)$ without
504: destroying the general conclusions discussed here. We therefore expect
505: that these qualitative results hold true even for strings ending on
506: monopoles with a similar mass.
507:
508: Clearly this is only a toy model, and cannot directly be used
509: to draw any conclusions for the ten-dimensional problem, however,
510: there are some interesting features which crop up here that might have some
511: analogue in the higher dimensional case. One is the presence of the
512: bulk terms giving the cosmological term in the action. This was a feature
513: of the finite size of the compactification radius in five-dimensions.
514: While we might expect this effect to be ameliorated in higher
515: dimensions, in that it may not lead to a cosmological term, we
516: might expect that the energy density of the various RR and NSNS
517: fields will not fall-off as rapidly as for the superstring itself.
518: The other curious feature we have seen is the mass term for the RR-field,
519: which causes confinement of the magnetic flux. Again, this effect could
520: be lessened, but it does give an interesting potential picture for the
521: distortion of the flux around the intersection point. In fact, if one
522: plots the magnetic flux of the near horizon solution for the string ending
523: on the monopole one does see some evidence of this.
524:
525: The other main way in which a higher dimensional problem will differ
526: is in the number of degrees of freedom of the solution. By working
527: in only four dimensions, the problem reduced to an effectively
528: two-dimensional question: the distance from the monopole core, and the
529: angle from the string. We can view any classical supergravity problem
530: as a dimensional reduction over the `inessential' coordinates (\ie\ those
531: that represent symmetries of the metric) down to the space on which
532: the metric depends. For two variables we can always express this space
533: as conformally flat. However, as soon as the string ends on an extended brane,
534: there are three physical variables - the distance along the string
535: from the endpoint, the distance along the brane from where the string
536: touches, and finally, the mutually orthogonal distance from the system.
537: Unfortunately, we cannot write a three-dimensional problem in
538: a conformally flat, or even necessarily diagonal fashion. This shows
539: up in the perturbative analysis of \cite{plot}. Since our
540: universe is however four dimensional up to fairly high energies,
541: it is reasonable to make a four-dimensional approximation to the problem.
542:
543: However, it is amusing that the act of ending the string on the black hole
544: causes its flux to confine, and therefore removes all
545: evidence of its charge from the asymptotic observer, and leaves
546: it with only a `label' attached to the end of the string.
547: Whereas Nielsen and Olesen \cite{NO} originally used the U(1) abelian
548: Higgs model to construct a physical realisation of the Nambu-Goto string;
549: by considering a field theoretic realisation of an open
550: superstring, a flux confinement mechanism switches on,
551: and the string ends up as a truly confined flux tube with (abelian --
552: as we have a unit charged monopole) `quarks' at each end.
553:
554: \section*{\bf Acknowledgements.}
555:
556: I would like to thank Peter Bowcock, Simon Ross and Douglas Smith for
557: useful discussions, and particularly Filipe Bonjour for assistance with the
558: numerical work. This work was supported by the Royal Society.
559:
560: \begin{thebibliography}{88}
561:
562: \bibitem{DBr}
563: %\cite{Polchinski:1996fm}
564: %\bibitem{Polchinski:1996fm}
565: J.~Polchinski, S.~Chaudhuri and C.~V.~Johnson,
566: {\it ``Notes on D-Branes,''}
567: arXiv:hep-th/9602052.\\
568: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9602052;%%
569: %\cite{Polchinski:1996na}
570: %\bibitem{Polchinski:1996na}
571: J.~Polchinski,
572: {\it ``TASI lectures on D-branes,''}
573: arXiv:hep-th/9611050.
574: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9611050;%%
575:
576: \bibitem{Dirich}
577: %\cite{Dai:ua}
578: %\bibitem{Dai:ua}
579: J.~Dai, R.~G.~Leigh and J.~Polchinski,
580: %``New Connections Between String Theories,''
581: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 4}, 2073 (1989).\\
582: %%CITATION = MPLAE,A4,2073;%%
583: %\cite{Green:et}
584: %\bibitem{Green:et}
585: M.~B.~Green,
586: %``Space-Time Duality And Dirichlet String Theory,''
587: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 266}, 325 (1991).\\
588: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B266,325;%%
589: %\cite{Polchinski:1995mt}
590: %\bibitem{Polchinski:1995mt}
591: J.~Polchinski,
592: %``Dirichlet-Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges,''
593: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 4724 (1995)
594: [arXiv:hep-th/9510017].
595: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9510017;%%
596:
597: \bibitem{SUsol}
598: %\cite{Gibbons:1987ps}
599: %\bibitem{Gibbons:1987ps}
600: G.~W.~Gibbons and K.~i.~Maeda,
601: %``Black Holes And Membranes In Higher Dimensional
602: %Theories With Dilaton Fields,''
603: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 298}, 741 (1988).\\
604: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B298,741;%%
605: %\cite{Horowitz:cd}
606: %\bibitem{Horowitz:cd}
607: G.~T.~Horowitz and A.~Strominger,
608: %``Black Strings And P-Branes,''
609: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 360}, 197 (1991).
610: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B360,197;%%
611:
612: \bibitem{ENT}
613: %\cite{Maldacena:1996ky}
614: %\bibitem{Maldacena:1996ky}
615: J.~M.~Maldacena,
616: {\it ``Black holes in string theory,''}
617: arXiv:hep-th/9607235.
618: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9607235;%%
619:
620: \bibitem{ADS}
621: %\cite{Maldacena:1997re}
622: %\bibitem{Maldacena:1997re}
623: J.~M.~Maldacena,
624: %``The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,''
625: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2}, 231 (1998)
626: [Int.\ J.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 38}, 1113 (1999)]
627: [arXiv:hep-th/9711200].\\
628: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9711200;%%
629: %\cite{Gubser:1998bc}
630: %\bibitem{Gubser:1998bc}
631: S.~S.~Gubser, I.~R.~Klebanov and A.~M.~Polyakov,
632: %``Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,''
633: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 428}, 105 (1998)
634: [arXiv:hep-th/9802109].\\
635: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9802109;%%
636: %\cite{Witten:1998qj}
637: %\bibitem{Witten:1998qj}
638: E.~Witten,
639: %``Anti-de Sitter space and holography,''
640: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2}, 253 (1998)
641: [arXiv:hep-th/9802150].
642: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9802150;%%
643:
644:
645: \bibitem{MAC}
646: %\cite{Dabholkar:yf}
647: %\bibitem{Dabholkar:yf}
648: A.~Dabholkar, G.~W.~Gibbons, J.~A.~Harvey and F.~Ruiz Ruiz,
649: %``Superstrings And Solitons,''
650: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 340}, 33 (1990).
651: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B340,33;%%
652:
653: \bibitem{Jerome}
654: %\cite{Gauntlett:1997cv}
655: %\bibitem{Gauntlett:1997cv}
656: J.~P.~Gauntlett,
657: {\it ``Intersecting branes,''}
658: arXiv:hep-th/9705011.\\
659: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9705011;%%
660: %\cite{Tseytlin:1996bh}
661: %\bibitem{Tseytlin:1996bh}
662: A.~A.~Tseytlin,
663: %``Harmonic superpositions of M-branes,''
664: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 475}, 149 (1996)
665: [arXiv:hep-th/9604035].\\
666: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9604035;%%
667: %\cite{Gauntlett:1996pb}
668: %\bibitem{Gauntlett:1996pb}
669: J.~P.~Gauntlett, D.~A.~Kastor and J.~Traschen,
670: %``Overlapping Branes in M-Theory,''
671: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 478}, 544 (1996)
672: [arXiv:hep-th/9604179].\\
673: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9604179;%%
674: %\cite{Tseytlin:1997cs}
675: %\bibitem{Tseytlin:1997cs}
676: A.~A.~Tseytlin,
677: %``Composite BPS configurations of p-branes in 10 and 11 dimensions,''
678: Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ {\bf 14}, 2085 (1997)
679: [arXiv:hep-th/9702163].\\
680: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9702163;%%
681: %\cite{Bergshoeff:1997tt}
682: %\bibitem{Bergshoeff:1997tt}
683: E.~Bergshoeff, M.~de Roo, E.~Eyras, B.~Janssen and J.~P.~van der Schaar,
684: %``Intersections involving monopoles and waves in eleven dimensions,''
685: Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ {\bf 14}, 2757 (1997)
686: [arXiv:hep-th/9704120].
687: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9704120;%%
688:
689:
690: \bibitem{NH}
691: %\cite{Itzhaki:1998uz}
692: %\bibitem{Itzhaki:1998uz}
693: N.~Itzhaki, A.~A.~Tseytlin and S.~Yankielowicz,
694: %``Supergravity solutions for branes localized within branes,''
695: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 432}, 298 (1998)
696: [arXiv:hep-th/9803103].\\
697: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9803103;%%
698: %\cite{Hashimoto:1998ug}
699: %\bibitem{Hashimoto:1998ug}
700: A.~Hashimoto,
701: %``Supergravity solutions for localized intersections of branes,''
702: JHEP {\bf 9901}, 018 (1999)
703: [arXiv:hep-th/9812159].\\
704: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9812159;%%
705: %\cite{Fayyazuddin:2000em}
706: %\bibitem{Fayyazuddin:2000em}
707: A.~Fayyazuddin and D.~J.~Smith,
708: %``Warped AdS near-horizon geometry of completely localized
709: % intersections of M5-branes,''
710: JHEP {\bf 0010}, 023 (2000)
711: [arXiv:hep-th/0006060].\\
712: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0006060;%%
713: %\cite{Brinne:2000nf}
714: %\bibitem{Brinne:2000nf}
715: B.~Brinne, A.~Fayyazuddin, T.~Z.~Husain and D.~J.~Smith,
716: %``N = 1 M5-brane geometries,''
717: JHEP {\bf 0103}, 052 (2001)
718: [arXiv:hep-th/0012194].
719: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0012194;%%
720:
721: \bibitem{LINT}
722: %\cite{Youm:ti}
723: %\bibitem{Youm:ti}
724: D.~Youm,
725: %``Partially Localized Intersecting Bps Branes,''
726: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 556}, 222 (1999).
727: [hep-th/9902208]\\
728: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B556,222;%%
729: %\cite{Fayyazuddin:1999zu}
730: %\bibitem{Fayyazuddin:1999zu}
731: A.~Fayyazuddin and D.~J.~Smith,
732: %``Localized intersections of M5-branes and four-dimensional SCFT;s,''
733: JHEP {\bf 9904}, 030 (1999)
734: [arXiv:hep-th/9902210].\\
735: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9902210;%%
736: %\cite{Loewy:1999mn}
737: %\bibitem{Loewy:1999mn}
738: A.~Loewy,
739: %``Semi localized brane intersections in SUGRA,''
740: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 463}, 41 (1999)
741: [arXiv:hep-th/9903038].\\
742: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9903038;%%
743: %\cite{Rajaraman:2000ws}
744: %\bibitem{Rajaraman:2000ws}
745: A.~Rajaraman,
746: %``Supergravity solutions for localised brane intersections,''
747: JHEP {\bf 0109}, 018 (2001)
748: [arXiv:hep-th/0007241].
749: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0007241;%%
750:
751: \bibitem{bald}
752: %\cite{Surya:1998dx}
753: %\bibitem{Surya:1998dx}
754: S.~Surya and D.~Marolf,
755: %``Localized branes and black holes,''
756: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 124013 (1998)
757: [arXiv:hep-th/9805121].
758: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9805121;%%
759: %\cite{Marolf:1999uq}
760: %\bibitem{Marolf:1999uq}
761: D.~Marolf and A.~Peet,
762: %``Brane baldness vs. superselection sectors,''
763: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 105007 (1999)
764: [arXiv:hep-th/9903213].
765: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9903213;%%
766:
767: \bibitem{split}
768: %\cite{Eardley:1995au}
769: %\bibitem{Eardley:1995au}
770: D.~M.~Eardley, G.~T.~Horowitz, D.~A.~Kastor and J.~Traschen,
771: %``Breaking cosmic strings without monopoles,''
772: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 3390 (1995)
773: [arXiv:gr-qc/9506041].\\
774: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9506041;%%
775: %\cite{Emparan:1995je}
776: %\bibitem{Emparan:1995je}
777: R.~Emparan,
778: %``Pair creation of black holes joined by cosmic strings,''
779: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 3386 (1995)
780: [arXiv:gr-qc/9506025].\\
781: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9506025;%%
782: %\cite{Hawking:1995zn}
783: %\bibitem{Hawking:1995zn}
784: S.~W.~Hawking and S.~F.~Ross,
785: %``Pair production of black holes on cosmic strings,''
786: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 3382 (1995)
787: [arXiv:gr-qc/9506020].
788: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9506020;%%
789:
790: \bibitem{smooth}
791: %\cite{Gregory:1995hd}
792: %\bibitem{Gregory:1995hd}
793: R.~Gregory and M.~Hindmarsh,
794: %``Smooth metrics for snapping strings,''
795: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 5598 (1995)
796: [arXiv:gr-qc/9506054].
797: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9506054;%%
798:
799: \bibitem{AETW}
800: %\cite{Achucarro:nc}
801: %\bibitem{Achucarro:nc}
802: A.~Achucarro, J.~M.~Evans, P.~K.~Townsend and D.~L.~Wiltshire,
803: %``Super P-Branes,''
804: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 198}, 441 (1987).
805: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B198,441;%%
806:
807: \bibitem{KKBH}
808: %\cite{Dobiasch:1981vh}
809: %\bibitem{Dobiasch:1981vh}
810: P.~Dobiasch and D.~Maison,
811: %``Stationary, Spherically Symmetric Solutions Of Jordan's
812: %Unified Theory Of Gravity And Electromagnetism,''
813: Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ {\bf 14}, 231 (1982).\\
814: %%CITATION = GRGVA,14,231;%%
815: %\cite{Chodos:1980df}
816: %\bibitem{Chodos:1980df}
817: A.~Chodos and S.~Detweiler,
818: %``Spherically Symmetric Solutions In Five-Dimensional General Relativity,''
819: Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ {\bf 14}, 879 (1982).\\
820: %%CITATION = GRGVA,14,879;%%
821: %\cite{Gibbons:ac}
822: %\bibitem{Gibbons:ac}
823: G.~W.~Gibbons and D.~L.~Wiltshire,
824: %``Black Holes In Kaluza-Klein Theory,''
825: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 167}, 201 (1986)
826: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 176}, 393 (1987)].
827: %%CITATION = APNYA,167,201;%%
828:
829: \bibitem{KKM}
830: %\cite{Gross:hb}
831: %\bibitem{Gross:hb}
832: D.~J.~Gross and M.~J.~Perry,
833: %``Magnetic Monopoles In Kaluza-Klein Theories,''
834: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 226}, 29 (1983).\\
835: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B226,29;%%
836: %\cite{Sorkin:ns}
837: %\bibitem{Sorkin:ns}
838: R.~d.~Sorkin,
839: %``Kaluza-Klein Monopole,''
840: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 51}, 87 (1983).
841: %%CITATION = PRLTA,51,87;%%
842:
843: \bibitem{BGr}
844: %\cite{Bachas:1997sc}
845: %\bibitem{Bachas:1997sc}
846: C.~Bachas and M.~B.~Green,
847: %``A classical manifestation of the Pauli exclusion principle,''
848: JHEP {\bf 9801}, 015 (1998)
849: [arXiv:hep-th/9712187].
850: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9712187;%%
851:
852: \bibitem{wrap}
853: %\cite{Matsuo:1999es}
854: %\bibitem{Matsuo:1999es}
855: T.~Matsuo and T.~Yokono,
856: %``String creation in D6-brane background,''
857: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 14}, 1175 (1999)
858: [arXiv:hep-th/9903081].\\
859: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9903081;%%
860: %\cite{Marolf:2000ci}
861: %\bibitem{Marolf:2000ci}
862: D.~Marolf,
863: %``Half-branes, singular brane intersections, and Kaluza-Klein reduction,''
864: JHEP {\bf 0009}, 024 (2000)
865: [arXiv:hep-th/0007171].
866: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0007171;%%
867:
868: \bibitem{WY}
869: %\cite{Wu:es}
870: %\bibitem{Wu:es}
871: T.~T.~Wu and C.~N.~Yang,
872: %``Concept Of Nonintegrable Phase Factors And
873: %Global Formulation Of Gauge Fields,''
874: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 12}, 3845 (1975).
875: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D12,3845;%%
876:
877: \bibitem{AGK}
878: %\cite{Achucarro:1995nu}
879: %\bibitem{Achucarro:1995nu}
880: A.~Achucarro, R.~Gregory and K.~Kuijken,
881: %``Abelian Higgs hair for black holes,''
882: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 5729 (1995)
883: [arXiv:gr-qc/9505039].
884: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9505039;%%
885:
886: \bibitem{KW}
887: %\cite{Kinnersley:zw}
888: %\bibitem{Kinnersley:zw}
889: W.~Kinnersley and M.~Walker,
890: %``Uniformly Accelerating Charged Mass In General Relativity,''
891: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 2}, 1359 (1970).
892: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D2,1359;%%
893:
894: \bibitem{PW}
895: %\cite{Poletti:ff}
896: %\bibitem{Poletti:ff}
897: S.~J.~Poletti and D.~L.~Wiltshire,
898: %``The Global Properties Of Static Spherically Symmetric
899: %Charged Dilaton Space-Times With A Liouville Potential,''
900: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 7260 (1994)
901: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 52}, 3753 (1995)]
902: [arXiv:gr-qc/9407021].
903: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9407021;%%
904:
905: \bibitem{DGKT}
906: %\cite{Dowker:bt}
907: %\bibitem{Dowker:bt}
908: F.~Dowker, J.~P.~Gauntlett, D.~A.~Kastor and J.~Traschen,
909: %``Pair Creation Of Dilaton Black Holes,''
910: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 2909 (1994)
911: [arXiv:hep-th/9309075].
912: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9309075;%%
913:
914: \bibitem{RG}
915: %\cite{Gregory:1996dd}
916: %\bibitem{Gregory:1996dd}
917: R.~Gregory,
918: %``Non-singular global strings,''
919: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 4955 (1996)
920: [arXiv:gr-qc/9606002].\\
921: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9606002;%%
922: %\cite{Gregory:1999gv}
923: %\bibitem{Gregory:1999gv}
924: R.~Gregory,
925: %``Nonsingular global string compactifications,''
926: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84}, 2564 (2000)
927: [arXiv:hep-th/9911015].
928: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9911015;%%
929:
930: \bibitem{DKS}
931: %\cite{Dvali:2000bz}
932: %\bibitem{Dvali:2000bz}
933: G.~R.~Dvali, I.~I.~Kogan and M.~A.~Shifman,
934: %``Topological effects in our brane world from extra dimensions,''
935: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 106001 (2000)
936: [arXiv:hep-th/0006213].
937: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0006213;%%
938:
939: \bibitem{GS}
940: %\cite{Santos:1999if}
941: %\bibitem{Santos:1999if}
942: C.~Santos and R.~Gregory,
943: %``Vortices and black holes in dilatonic gravity,''
944: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 024006 (2000)
945: [arXiv:gr-qc/9906107].\\
946: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9906107;%%
947: %\cite{Gregory:1997wk}
948: %\bibitem{Gregory:1997wk}
949: R.~Gregory and C.~Santos,
950: %``Cosmic strings in dilaton gravity,''
951: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 1194 (1997)
952: [arXiv:gr-qc/9701014].
953: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9701014;%%
954:
955: \bibitem{BEG}
956: %\cite{Bonjour:1998rf}
957: %\bibitem{Bonjour:1998rf}
958: F.~Bonjour, R.~Emparan and R.~Gregory,
959: %``Vortices and extreme black holes: The question of flux expulsion,''
960: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 084022 (1999)
961: [arXiv:gr-qc/9810061].
962: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9810061;%%
963:
964: \bibitem{CK}
965: %\cite{Cohen:1988sg}
966: %\bibitem{Cohen:1988sg}
967: A.~G.~Cohen and D.~B.~Kaplan,
968: %``The Exact Metric About Global Cosmic Strings,''
969: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 215}, 67 (1988).\\
970: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B215,67;%%
971: %\cite{Gregory:1988xc}
972: %\bibitem{Gregory:1988xc}
973: R.~Gregory,
974: %``Global String Singularities,''
975: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 215}, 663 (1988).\\
976: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B215,663;%%
977: %\cite{Gibbons:1988pe}
978: %\bibitem{Gibbons:1988pe}
979: G.~W.~Gibbons, M.~E.~Ortiz and F.~R.~Ruiz,
980: %``Existence Of Global Strings Coupled To Gravity,''
981: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 39}, 1546 (1989).
982: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D39,1546;%%
983:
984: \bibitem{GS2}
985: %\cite{Gregory:2002tp}
986: %\bibitem{Gregory:2002tp}
987: R.~Gregory and C.~Santos,
988: {\it ``Spacetime structure of the global vortex,''}
989: arXiv:hep-th/0208037.
990: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0208037;%%
991:
992: \bibitem{plot}
993: %\cite{Gomberoff:1999ps}
994: %\bibitem{Gomberoff:1999ps}
995: A.~Gomberoff, D.~Kastor, D.~Marolf and J.~Traschen,
996: %``Fully localized brane intersections: The plot thickens,''
997: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 024012 (2000)
998: [arXiv:hep-th/9905094].
999: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9905094;%%
1000:
1001: \bibitem{NO}
1002: %\cite{Nielsen:cs}
1003: %\bibitem{Nielsen:cs}
1004: H.~B.~Nielsen and P.~Olesen,
1005: %``Vortex-Line Models For Dual Strings,''
1006: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 61}, 45 (1973).
1007: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B61,45;%%
1008:
1009:
1010: \end{thebibliography}
1011:
1012: \end {document}
1013: