1: \documentclass[a4paper,dvips,12pt]{article}
2: \input{axodraw.sty}
3: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,exscale}
4: \usepackage{array,multicol}
5: \usepackage{afterpage,float,flafter}
6: \usepackage{epsfig,rotating,pifont,fancybox}
7: \usepackage{cite}
8: %\usepackage{showkeys}
9: %\usepackage{draftcopy}
10: \textheight=232mm
11: \textwidth=160mm
12: \setlength{\hoffset}{-1in}
13: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{2cm}
14: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{2cm}
15: \setlength{\voffset}{-.5in}
16: \setlength{\headheight}{0cm}
17: \setlength{\headsep}{0cm}
18: \setlength{\topmargin}{2cm}
19: \setlength{\columnseprule}{0pt}
20: \makeatletter
21: \@addtoreset{equation}{section}
22: \makeatother
23: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
26: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
27: \newcommand{\ov}{\overline}
28: \newcommand{\NPB}[3]{\emph{ Nucl.~Phys.} \textbf{B#1} (#2) #3}
29: \newcommand{\PLB}[3]{\emph{ Phys.~Lett.} \textbf{B#1} (#2) #3}
30: \newcommand{\PRD}[3]{\emph{ Phys.~Rev.} \textbf{D#1} (#2) #3}
31: \newcommand{\PRL}[3]{\emph{ Phys.~Rev.~Lett.} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
32: \newcommand{\ZPC}[3]{\emph{ Z.~Phys.} \textbf{C#1} (#2) #3}
33: \newcommand{\PTP}[3]{\emph{ Prog.~Theor.~Phys.} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
34: \newcommand{\IJMP}[3]{\emph{ Int.~J.~Mod.~Phys.} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
35: \newcommand{\MPL}[3]{\emph{ Mod.~Phys.~Lett.} \textbf{A#1} (#2) #3}
36: \newcommand{\PR}[3]{\emph{ Phys.~Rep.} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
37: \newcommand{\RMP}[3]{\emph{ Rev.~Mod.~Phys.} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
38: \newcommand{\HPA}[3]{\emph{ Helv.~Phys.~Acta} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
39: \newcommand{\AP}[3]{\emph{ Ann.~Phys.} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
40: \newcommand{\EPJC}[3]{\emph{ Eur.~Phys.~J.} \textbf{C#1} (#2) #3}
41: \newcommand{\JHEP}[3]{\emph{ JHEP} \textbf{#1} (#2) #3}
42: \newcommand{\Tr}{\mathop{\rm Tr}}
43: \newcommand{\und}{\underline}
44: \newcommand{\dalpha}{{\dot\alpha}}
45: \newcommand{\dbeta}{{\dot\beta}}
46: \newcommand{\drho}{{\dot\rho}}
47: \newcommand{\dsigma}{{\dot\sigma}}
48: \newcommand{\crbig}{\\\noalign{\vspace {3mm}}}
49: \newcommand{\bigint}{{\displaystyle\int}}
50: \newcommand{\Fcomp}{{\theta\theta}}
51: \newcommand{\Fbarcomp}{\ov{\theta\theta}}
52: \newcommand{\Dcomp}{{\theta\theta\ov{\theta\theta}}}
53: \newcommand{\Dint}{{\bigint d^2\theta d^2\ov\theta\,}}
54: \newcommand{\Fint}{{\bigint d^2\theta\,}}
55: \newcommand{\Fbarint}{{\bigint d^2\ov\theta\,}}
56: \newcommand{\ex}{{\rm exp}}
57: \def\simlt{\stackrel{<}{{}_\sim}}
58: \def\simgt{\stackrel{>}{{}_\sim}}
59:
60:
61: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62: \title{
63: \vspace*{-0.8cm}
64: \begin{flushright}
65: \normalsize{
66: IEM-FT-228/02\\
67: \texttt{hep-th/0210181}}\\
68: \end{flushright}
69: %\normalsize
70: \vspace{1cm}
71: %
72: \Large{\sc Brane-assisted Scherk-Schwarz supersymmetry breaking in
73: orbifolds~\footnote{Work supported in part by CICYT, Spain, under
74: contracts FPA 2001-1806 and FPA 2002-00748, by EU under contracts
75: HPRN-CT-2000-00152 and HPRN-CT-2000-00148, and by NSF under grants
76: P420D3620414350 and P4203620434350.}}
77: %\vspace*{-0.5cm}
78: \vspace*{.5cm} \author{\large {\sc A.~Delgado~$^a$,
79: G.~v.~Gersdorff~$^b$ and M.~Quir{\'o}s~$^b$}\\ \\
80: \emph{~$^a$Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins
81: University}\\ \emph{3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD
82: 21218-2686, USA}\\ \emph{~$^b$Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (CSIC),
83: Serrano 123}\\ \emph{E-28006-Madrid, Spain}} } \date{}
84: \begin{document}
85: \maketitle
86: \thispagestyle{empty}
87: \vspace*{.5cm}
88:
89: \begin{abstract}\noindent
90: We have analyzed the interplay between Scherk-Schwarz supersymmetry
91: breaking and general fermion (gaugino or gravitino) mass terms
92: localized on the fixed point branes of the $S^1/\mathbb{Z}_2$
93: orbifold. Analytic solutions for eigenfunctions and eigenvalues are
94: found in all cases. All results are checked by numerical calculations
95: that make use of regularized $\delta$-functions. Odd and generically
96: also even fermions are discontinuous at the brane fixed points, but in
97: all cases the combination that couples to the brane is continuous.
98: For CP-even brane mass terms supersymmetry restoration can take place
99: when their effects are cancelled by those of Scherk-Schwarz
100: compactification. However such a cancellation can not occur for CP-odd
101: brane mass terms.
102: \end{abstract}
103: \vspace{2.cm}
104:
105: \begin{flushleft}
106: October 2002 \\
107: \end{flushleft}
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: \newpage
110: \section{\sc Introduction}
111: \label{introduction}
112:
113: Extra dimensions at the TeV scale~\cite{ignas} have become a popular
114: feature in nowadays model building. They can provide possible
115: explanations to some of the present problems within the minimal
116: supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM) like
117: supersymmetry breaking, the flavour structure, electroweak symmetry
118: breaking, or even unification with gravity. In particular, one of the
119: most appealing possibilities to break supersymmetry in theories with
120: extra dimensions is the Scherk-Schwarz (SS) mechanism~\cite{SS}, based
121: on non-trivial twists that generate a mass term through
122: compactification~\cite{matter,UV}. This mechanism appears to be
123: natural in any locally supersymmetric five-dimensional (5D) theory,
124: since it has been proven that the SS mechanism can be seen as a
125: spontaneous breaking of the $SU(2)_R$ via some off-shell auxiliary
126: fields~\cite{SSH1,SSH2,radionF}. Being spontaneous this kind of supersymmetry
127: breaking is quite desirable since it will not generate any quadratic
128: divergences~\cite{one}.
129:
130: The most common way of compactifying extra-dimensional theories is by using
131: orbifolds~\cite{orbifolds} which allow for chirality and partial
132: breaking of supersymmetry; this is needed because theories in extra
133: dimensions are in general non-chiral and have extended
134: supersymmetry. Orbifolds introduce fixed points in the theory, where
135: translational invariance is broken.
136: Therefore terms localized at those points can arise without spoiling
137: the higher dimensional Poincare invariance in the bulk. This type of
138: localized interactions can be used to break supersymmetry dynamically,
139: e.g.~via gaugino condensation, or by any other kind of mechanism that
140: could generate a brane mass term for gravitinos. The possibility of
141: supersymmetry restoration between the SS mechanism and brane localized
142: supersymmetry breakdown was already proposed in the context of the
143: heterotic Horava-Witten M-theory~\cite{AQ}. Also, this kind of
144: interactions have been studied in the past in the context of
145: generalized SS mechanism~\cite{fabio1}, since these terms completely
146: change the spectrum and moreover any fermion mass term localized on a
147: brane will generate discontinuities in the wavefunctions. The aim of
148: this paper is to generalize previous
149: results~\cite{fabio1,fabio2,SSH2,nilles,feruglio} and make a
150: systematic analysis of a very general class of models that could shed
151: light on the mechanism of supersymmetry breaking.
152:
153: In this paper we will study a 5D theory compactified on $S^1/
154: \mathbb{Z}_2$ with SS supersymmetry breaking plus the most general
155: fermion mass terms on the brane, which do not necessarily have to
156: respect $SU(2)_R$ since the latter is broken by the
157: compactification. We will perform a fully analytic study of both the
158: CP-even and the CP-odd brane mass terms and find out the cases where
159: there are massless states in the spectrum, corresponding to situations
160: where there is cancellation of supersymmetry breaking between the
161: different sources. We will also show how the discontinuities of the
162: fields are treated consistently and are independent of any
163: regularization of the brane. We will perform all explicit calculations
164: for the case of gauginos that are symplectic Majorana spinors
165: transforming as doublets with respect to $SU(2)_R$. Our results will
166: be straightforwardly generalized to the case of symplectic Majorana 5D
167: gravitinos that also transform as doublets of $SU(2)_R$. All our
168: analytic results have been numerically checked using regularized
169: $\delta$-functions.
170:
171: The layout of the paper is as follows. In section 2 we will present
172: the model with both the bulk Lagrangian plus possible mass terms
173: localized on the brane that will be classified according to its
174: transformation properties under the four-dimensional CP-invariance.
175: Section 3 will be devoted to the full analysis of the CP-even brane
176: whereas section 4 contains the CP-odd case. Finally our conclusions
177: will be drawn on section 5.
178:
179:
180: \section{\sc Fermion bulk Lagrangian and brane-mass terms}
181: We will consider a five-dimensional model compactified on the orbifold
182: $S^1/\mathbb{Z}_2$ where $\mathbb{Z}_2$ transforms the fifth
183: coordinate $x^5\equiv y$ into $-y$. Fermions in five dimensions can be
184: described by a pair of symplectic Majorana spinors $\lambda^i$ that
185: transform as a doublet under $SU(2)_R$ and such that
186: %
187:
188: \begin{equation}
189: \label{symplectic}
190: \lambda^i=\left(
191: \begin{array}{c}
192: \lambda^i_L\\
193: \epsilon^{ij}\bar{\lambda}_{L\,j}
194: \end{array}
195: \right)
196: \end{equation}
197: %
198: where $\lambda^i_L$ are the two-component spinors $\lambda_L\equiv
199: \lambda_\alpha$ and $\bar{\lambda}_L\equiv
200: \bar\lambda^{\stackrel{\cdot}{\alpha}}$. Under $\mathbb{Z}_2$ the
201: transformation law of $\lambda$ is
202: %
203: \begin{equation}
204: \label{law}
205: \lambda(y)\to \mathcal{P}_\lambda \sigma^3 i\gamma^5 \lambda(-y)
206: \end{equation}
207: %
208: where $\mathcal{P}_\lambda=\pm$ is the intrinsic parity of the spinor
209: $\lambda$, the matrix $\sigma^3$ is acting on $SU(2)_R$ indices,
210: $\gamma^5=diag(-i,i)$ and we are using the metric
211: $\eta_{MN}=diag(1,-1,-1,-1,-1)$. Then for a spinor with intrinsic
212: parity $\mathcal{P}_\lambda=+$ it turns out that $\lambda^1_L(y)$ is
213: an even and $\lambda^2_L(y)$ an odd two-component spinor.
214:
215: We will find it convenient to define 4D Majorana spinors as
216: %
217: \begin{equation}
218: \label{Majorana}
219: \psi^i=\left(
220: \begin{array}{c}
221: \lambda^i_L\\
222: \bar{\lambda}_{L\,i}
223: \end{array}
224: \right)
225: \end{equation}
226: %
227: although obviously they do not transform irreducibly under $SU(2)_R$
228: nor are they covariant under the 5D Lorentz
229: group. Under $\mathbb{Z}_2$ parity $\psi^1(y)$ is even and $\psi^2(y)$
230: odd.
231:
232: The Lagrangian for $\lambda$ in the bulk contains
233: %
234: \begin{equation}
235: \label{bulk}
236: \mathcal{L}_{\rm bulk}=i\, \bar\lambda \gamma^M \mathcal{D}_M \lambda
237: \end{equation}
238: %
239: where $\mathcal{D}_M$ is the covariant derivative with respect to
240: local Lorentz and gauge transformations and summation over the
241: $SU(2)_R$ indices is always understood. The kinetic Lagrangian is
242: obtained from the 4D covariant derivative $\mathcal{D}_\mu$ as
243: %
244: \begin{equation}
245: \label{kin}
246: \mathcal{L}_{\rm kin}=i\, \bar\lambda \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu
247: \lambda=i\, \bar\psi \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi
248: \end{equation}
249: %
250: while the KK-mass bulk term comes from the $\partial_5$ term in
251: $\mathcal{D}_5$ as
252: %
253: \begin{equation}
254: \label{KKmass}
255: \mathcal{L}_{\rm KK-mass}=i\, \bar\lambda \gamma^5
256: \partial_5\lambda=\bar\psi_2\partial_5
257: \psi^1-\bar\psi_1\partial_5\psi^2
258: \end{equation}
259: %
260:
261: In the off-shell formulation of 5D supergravity~\cite{zucker,kugo} it was
262: proven that $\mathcal{D}_M$ also contains the covariant derivative
263: with respect to local $SU(2)_R$ tansformations,
264: $-i\vec{\sigma}\vec{V}_M$, where $\vec{V}_M$ are auxiliary fields in
265: the minimal supergravity multiplet. This fact was used in
266: Refs.~\cite{SSH1,SSH2} to interpret the Scherk-Schwarz SS breaking
267: of supersymmetry as the background configuration
268: $\langle\vec{\sigma}\vec{V}_M\rangle=\delta_{M5}\sigma^2 \langle
269: V_5^2\rangle\equiv \delta_{M5}\sigma^2 \omega$~\footnote{We are using
270: units where the compactification radius $R\equiv 1$. Restoring the
271: $R$-dependence at any stage should be a trivial task.}. This gives
272: rise to the SS-Lagrangian
273: %
274: \begin{equation}
275: \label{SS}
276: \mathcal{L}_{\rm SS}=i\, \omega \bar\lambda\gamma^5\sigma^2
277: \lambda=-\omega\left(\bar\psi_1\psi^1+\bar\psi_2\psi^2\right)
278: \end{equation}
279: %
280: The bulk Lagrangian can then be written as
281: %
282: \begin{equation}
283: \label{bulk2}
284: \mathcal{L}_{\rm bulk}=i\,\bar\psi_i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu
285: \psi^i+
286: \bar\psi_2\partial_5\psi^1-\bar\psi_1\partial_5\psi^2-
287: \omega(\bar\psi_1\psi^1+\bar\psi_2\psi^2)
288: \end{equation}
289: %
290:
291: In the brane the different possible $\mathbb{Z}_2$-even mass terms can
292: be either $CP$-even or $CP$-odd. $CP$-even mass terms on the brane are
293: provided by the following contributions
294: %
295: \begin{equation}
296: \label{CP1}
297: \bar\lambda\,\sigma^2\gamma^5\lambda=-(\bar\psi_1\psi^1+\bar\psi_2\psi^2)
298: \end{equation}
299: %
300: and
301: %
302: \begin{equation}
303: \label{CP2}
304: \bar\lambda\,\sigma^1\lambda=-(\bar\psi_1\psi^1-\bar\psi_2\psi^2)
305: \end{equation}
306: %
307: or an arbitrary linear combination of (\ref{CP1}) and (\ref{CP2}). We
308: will then consider possible mass terms localized at one of the branes,
309: e.g. $y=0$, as
310: %
311: \begin{equation}
312: \label{CPeven}
313: \mathcal{L}_{\rm brane,\,
314: CP-even}=-2\Lambda\delta(y)\left[\bar\psi_1\psi^1+\rho\,\bar\psi_2\psi^2\right]
315: \end{equation}
316: %
317: where $\rho$ is an arbitrary real parameter.
318:
319: $CP$-odd mass terms on the brane can be provided by the contributions
320: %
321: \begin{equation}
322: \label{noCP1}
323: \bar\lambda\,\sigma^1\gamma^5\lambda=-
324: (\bar\psi_1\gamma^5\psi^1-\bar\psi_2\gamma^5\psi^2)
325: \end{equation}
326: %
327: and
328: %
329: \begin{equation}
330: \label{noCP2}
331: \bar\lambda\,\sigma^2\lambda=\bar\psi_1\gamma^5\psi^1+\bar\psi_2\gamma^5\psi^2
332: \end{equation}
333: %
334: or any arbitrary linear combination of (\ref{noCP1}) and (\ref{noCP2}). We
335: can then consider the brane Lagrangian
336: %
337: \begin{equation}
338: \label{CPodd}
339: \mathcal{L}_{\rm brane,\,
340: CP-odd}=-2\Lambda\delta(y)\left[\bar\psi_1\gamma^5\psi^1-
341: \rho\,\bar\psi_2\gamma^5\psi^2\right]
342: \end{equation}
343: %
344: where $\rho$ is an arbitrary real parameter.
345:
346: Five-dimensional theories where brane mass terms (\ref{CP1}) and
347: (\ref{CP2}), or (\ref{noCP1}) and (\ref{noCP2}), appear can be found
348: in the recent literature. On the other hand solving theories where the
349: brane Lagrangians (\ref{CPeven}) and (\ref{CPodd}) interfere with the
350: Scherk-Schwarz breaking has been done only for some cases. In
351: particular the Lagrangian (\ref{CPeven}) for
352: $\rho=0,1$~\cite{fabio1,nilles} and the Lagrangian (\ref{CPodd}) for
353: $\rho=0$~\cite{SSH2}. In the following sections we will analyze the
354: general cases both for (\ref{CPeven}) and (\ref{CPodd}).
355:
356: \section{\sc CP-even brane mass terms}
357: The Lagrangian in this case is given by (\ref{bulk2}) and
358: (\ref{CPeven}), i.e.
359: %
360: \begin{equation}
361: \label{Lageven}
362: \mathcal{L}_{\rm CP-even}=i\,\bar\psi_i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu \psi^i+
363: \bar\psi_2\partial_5\psi^1-\bar\psi_1\partial_5\psi^2-
364: \omega(\bar\psi_1\psi^1+\bar\psi_2\psi^2)-
365: 2\Lambda\delta(y)\left[\bar\psi_1\psi^1+\rho\,\bar\psi_2\psi^2\right]
366: \end{equation}
367: %
368:
369: The equations of motion (EOM) from the Lagrangian (\ref{Lageven}) are
370: given by
371: %
372: \begin{align}
373: \label{EOM0}
374: \left(-i\, \gamma^\mu\partial_\mu+\omega\right)\psi^1_n+\partial_y
375: \psi^2_n+2\phantom{\rho}\Lambda\delta(y)\psi^1_n=&0\nonumber\\
376: \left(-i\, \gamma^\mu\partial_\mu+\omega\right)\psi^2_n-\partial_y
377: \psi^1_n+2\rho\,\Lambda\delta(y)\psi^2_n=&0
378: \end{align}
379: %
380: We can now decompose the fields $\psi^i_n(x,y)$ in plane waves as
381: $\psi^i_n(x,y)=\exp(-ip\cdot x)\psi^i_n(p,y)$ where $p^2=M_n^2$, $M_n$
382: being the mass eigenvalues and $\psi^i_n(p,y)$ the mass
383: eigenfunctions. In the rest frame $p^\mu=(M_n,\vec{0})$
384: Eq.~(\ref{EOM0}) is written as
385: %
386: \begin{align}
387: \label{EOM1}
388: \left(-M_n\gamma^0+\omega\right)\psi^1_n+\partial_y
389: \psi^2_n+2\phantom{\rho}\Lambda\delta(y)\psi^1_n=&0\nonumber\\
390: \left(-M_n\gamma^0+\omega\right)\psi^2_n-\partial_y
391: \psi^1_n+2\rho\,\Lambda\delta(y)\psi^2_n=&0\ .
392: \end{align}
393: %
394: where $\psi^i_n=\psi^i_n(M_n,y)$ are the mass eigenstates in the rest
395: frame.
396:
397: We define now Majorana spinors as
398: %
399: \begin{equation}
400: \label{Majorana2}
401: \psi^i_n=\left(
402: \begin{array}{c}
403: \phi^i_n(y)\ \xi_n \vspace{.25cm}\\
404: \bar\phi_{i\,n}(y)\ \xi_n
405: \end{array}
406: \right)
407: \end{equation}
408: %
409: where $\xi_n$ are constant real spinors and $\phi^i_n(y)$ complex functions.
410: We can then write the EOM (\ref{EOM1}) as
411: %
412: \begin{align}
413: \label{EOM2}
414: -M_n\bar\phi^1_n+\omega\phi^1_n+\partial_y
415: \phi^2_n+2\phantom{\rho}\Lambda\delta(y)\phi^1_n=&0\nonumber\\
416: -M_n\bar\phi^2_n+\omega\phi^2_n-\partial_y
417: \phi^1_n+2\rho\,\Lambda\delta(y)\phi^2_n=&0
418: \end{align}
419: %
420: where the constant two-component spinors $\xi_n$ factorize out of the
421: EOM (\ref{EOM2}) and play no role in what follows.
422:
423: An explicit analytic solution of equations (\ref{EOM2}) with real
424: functions $\bar{\phi}^i_n(y)=\phi^i_n(y)$ can be obtained in the
425: region $-2\pi<y<2\pi$, for initial conditions
426: %
427: \begin{align}
428: \label{initialeven}
429: \phi^1_n(0)=&1\nonumber\\
430: \phi^2_n(0)=&0,
431: \end{align}
432: %
433: as
434: %
435: \begin{equation}
436: \label{solutioneven}
437: \left(
438: \begin{array}{c}
439: \phi^1_n(y)\vspace{.25cm}\\
440: \phi^2_n(y)
441: \end{array}
442: \right)=\sqrt{\frac{1+t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}
443: {1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}}
444: \left(
445: \begin{array}{c}
446: \cos\left[(M_n-\omega)y-
447: \arctan\,t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)\right] \vspace{.25cm}\\
448: \sin\left[(M_n-\omega)y-
449: \arctan\,t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)\right]
450: \end{array}
451: \right)
452: \end{equation}
453: %
454: where $\varepsilon(y)={\rm sign}(y)$ is the sign function and we use
455: the notation,
456: %
457: \begin{equation}
458: \label{notation}
459: t_\rho(x)= \tan(\sqrt{\rho}\,x)/\sqrt{\rho}
460: \end{equation}
461: %
462: For the typical values of $\rho=1,0,-1$ this function is given by:
463: %
464: \begin{align}
465: \label{values1}
466: t_1(x)=&\tan(x)\\
467: \label{values0}
468: t_0(x)=&x\\
469: \label{values-1}
470: t_{-1}(x)=&\tanh(x)
471: \end{align}
472:
473: In the region $-2\pi<y<2\pi$ the functions (\ref{solutioneven}) are
474: periodic provided the condition
475: %
476: \begin{equation}
477: \label{periodiceven}
478: M_n=n+\omega+\frac{1}{\pi}\arctan\, t_\rho(\Lambda)
479: \end{equation}
480: %
481: holds. Notice that supersymmetry can be restored if $\omega$ and
482: $\Lambda$ are such that $\omega\pi+\arctan\, t_\rho(\Lambda)=n\pi$,
483: where $n$ is any integer number in which case there is always a
484: massless mode in the spectrum.
485:
486: The solution (\ref{solutioneven}) near the brane, i.e. for
487: $|y|<\epsilon$ where $\epsilon\to 0$, is given by
488: %
489: \begin{equation}
490: \label{evenbrane}
491: \left(
492: \begin{array}{c}
493: \phi^1_n(y) \vspace{.25cm}\\
494: \phi^2_n(y)
495: \end{array}
496: \right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{
497: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}}
498: \left(
499: \begin{array}{c}
500: 1 \vspace{.25cm} \\
501: -t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)
502: \end{array}
503: \right)
504: \end{equation}
505: %
506: From (\ref{evenbrane}) we see that $\phi^2_n$ is an odd function that
507: makes a jump at the brane $\Delta\phi^2_n$ given by
508: %
509: \begin{equation}
510: \label{jumpeven}
511: \left|\Delta\phi^2_n\right|=\frac{2 t_\rho(\Lambda)}{\sqrt{
512: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\right)}}
513: \end{equation}
514: %
515: while $\phi^1_n$ has a discontinuity on the brane
516: %
517: \begin{equation}
518: \label{disceven}
519: \lim_{y\to 0}\phi^1_n(y)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{
520: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2(\Lambda)}}
521: \end{equation}
522: %
523: Which in general is different from $\phi^1_n(0)=1$. Only for the
524: particular case $\rho=0$ is the function $\phi^1_n(y)$ continuous. However one can check that near the brane
525: %
526: \begin{equation}
527: \label{conteven}
528: \lim_{y\to
529: 0}\left[(\phi^1_n(y))^2+\rho\,(\phi^2_n(y))^2\right]=
530: (\phi^1_n(0))^2+\rho\,(\phi^2_n(0))^2
531: \end{equation}
532: %
533: and so the term in the Lagrangian (\ref{Lageven}) coupled to the brane
534: is continuous.
535:
536: In Fig.~\ref{cpevenplot} we present a numerical solution to
537: Eq.~(\ref{EOM2}) obtained by regularizing the $\delta$-function with a
538: gaussian of width $\sigma=10^{-3}$ (we have checked our results using
539: other regularizations as well). The solutions precisely coincide with
540: the analytic ones, Eqs.~(\ref{solutioneven}) and
541: (\ref{periodiceven}). We display in detail the discontinuities found
542: in Eq.~(\ref{jumpeven}) and Eq.~(\ref{disceven}). Furthermore we plot
543: in Fig.~\ref{cpevencont} the combination
544: $(\phi^1_n(y))^2+\rho\,(\phi^2_n(y))^2$. Note that the scales used in
545: Fig.~\ref{cpevencont} and in Fig.~\ref{cpevenplot} (right panel) are
546: identical and the continuity of
547: $(\phi^1_n(y))^2+\rho\,(\phi^2_n(y))^2$ is explicit.
548: \begin{figure}[htb]
549: %\vspace{.8cm}
550: \centering
551: \epsfig{file=bafig1.eps,width=.45\linewidth}
552: \epsfig{file=bafig2.eps,width=.45\linewidth}
553: \epsfig{file=bafig3.eps,width=.45\linewidth}
554: \epsfig{file=bafig4.eps,width=.45\linewidth}
555: \caption{\it
556: %
557: The numerical solution of Eq.~(\ref{EOM2}) for $\Lambda=1$ and
558: $\omega=0.2$. We show three different values of $\rho$,
559: $\rho=-1$ (solid line), $\rho=1$ (dashed line) and $\rho=0$
560: (dashed-dotted line). In the right plot we display in detail the
561: different discontinuities.
562: %
563: }
564: \label{cpevenplot}
565: \end{figure}
566: \begin{figure}[htb]
567: %\vspace{.8cm}
568: \centering
569: \epsfig{file=bafig5.eps,width=.45\linewidth}
570: \caption{\it
571: %
572: The quantity $(\phi^1_n(y))^2+\rho\,(\phi^2_n(y))^2$ taken from the
573: numerical solution with a gaussian-regularized $\delta$-function near
574: the origin. Again, we diplay the cases $\rho=-1$ (solid line),
575: $\rho=1$ (dashed line) and $\rho=0$ (dashed-dotted line). In all cases
576: the quantity is continous in accordance with the analytical solution.
577: %
578: }
579: \label{cpevencont}
580: \end{figure}
581:
582:
583: If we replace $\delta(y)\to \sum_k \delta(y-2\pi k)$ in
584: (\ref{Lageven}) the solution (\ref{solutioneven}) can be generalized
585: to one periodic for $y\in\mathbb{R}$ as
586: %
587: \begin{equation}
588: \label{pereven}
589: \left(
590: \begin{array}{c}
591: \phi^1_n(y) \vspace{.25cm}\\
592: \phi^2_n(y)
593: \end{array}
594: \right)=\sqrt{\frac{1+t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\beta(y)\right)}
595: {1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\beta(y)\right)}}
596: \left(
597: \begin{array}{c}
598: \cos\left[(M_n-\omega)y-\widetilde{\eta}(y)\right] \vspace{.25cm}\\
599: \sin\left[(M_n-\omega)y-\widetilde{\eta}(y)
600: \right]
601: \end{array}
602: \right)
603: \end{equation}
604: %
605: where
606: %
607: \begin{equation}
608: \label{beta}
609: \beta(y)=
610: \lim_{\kappa\rightarrow\infty}
611: \sum_{k=-\kappa}^\kappa
612: (-)^k\varepsilon(y-2\pi k)
613: =\left\{\begin{array}{rl}
614: +1 &2n<\frac{y}{2\pi}<(2n+1)\\
615: 0 &\frac{y}{2\pi}=n\\
616: -1 &2n+1<\frac{y}{2\pi} <(2n+2)
617: \end{array}\right.
618: \end{equation}
619: %
620: is an odd function that makes the prefactor periodic along the whole
621: real axis. The function $\widetilde{\eta}(y)$ is given by
622: %
623: \begin{equation}
624: \label{eta}
625: \widetilde{\eta}(y)=
626: \lim_{\kappa\rightarrow\infty}
627: \sum_{k=-\kappa}^\kappa
628: \arctan\
629: t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y-2\pi k)\right).
630: \end{equation}
631: %
632: Notice that the function (\ref{eta}) has the same shape as
633: %
634: $$\eta(y)\arctan t_\rho(\Lambda)$$
635: %
636: where $\eta(y)$ is the staircase function
637: %
638: \begin{equation}
639: \label{beta2}
640: \eta(y)=
641: \lim_{\kappa\rightarrow\infty}
642: \sum_{k=-\kappa}^\kappa
643: \varepsilon(y-2\pi k)=\left\{
644: \begin{array}{cl}
645: 2n & \frac{y}{2\pi}=n\\
646: 2n+1 & n<\frac{y}{2\pi}<n+1
647: \end{array}
648: \right.
649: \end{equation}
650: %
651: that steps by two units every $2\pi$. However obviously both functions
652: differ by their derivatives on the brane (in the special case $\rho=1$
653: the two functions are indeed identical,
654: $\widetilde\eta(y)=\Lambda\eta(y)$).
655:
656: It is a simple matter to prove that the functions (\ref{pereven}) are
657: periodic in the real axis $\mathbb{R}$ provided that condition
658: (\ref{periodiceven}) holds.
659:
660:
661:
662:
663:
664: \section{\sc CP-odd brane mass terms}
665: The Lagrangian in this case is given by (\ref{bulk2}) and
666: (\ref{CPodd}), i.e.
667: %
668: \begin{equation}
669: \label{Lagodd}
670: \mathcal{L}_{\rm CP-odd}=i\,\bar\psi_i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu \psi^i+
671: \bar\psi_2\partial_5\psi^1-\bar\psi_1\partial_5\psi^2-
672: \omega(\bar\psi_1\psi^1+\bar\psi_2\psi^2)-
673: 2\Lambda\delta(y)\left[\bar\psi_1\gamma^5\psi^1-\rho\,\bar\psi_2
674: \gamma^5\psi^2\right]
675: \end{equation}
676: %
677: We can then write the EOM in the rest frame $p^\mu=(M_n,\vec{0})$
678: as
679: %
680: \begin{align}
681: \label{EOModd1}
682: \left(-M_n\gamma^0+\omega\right)\psi^1_n+\partial_y
683: \psi^2_n+2\phantom{\rho}\Lambda\delta(y)\gamma^5\psi^1_n=&0\nonumber\\
684: \left(-M_n\gamma^0+\omega\right)\psi^2_n-\partial_y
685: \psi^1_n-2\rho\,\Lambda\delta(y)\gamma^5\psi^2_n=&0\ .
686: \end{align}
687: %
688: where $\psi^i_n$ are the mass eigenstates corresponding to the mass
689: eigenvalues $M_n$. If we define now the Majorana spinors as in
690: (\ref{Majorana2}) we can write the EOM (\ref{EOModd1}) as
691: %
692: \begin{align}
693: \label{EOModd2}
694: -M_n\bar\phi^1_n+\omega\phi^1_n+\partial_y
695: \phi^2_n+2i\phantom{\rho}\Lambda\delta(y)\phi^1_n=&0\nonumber\\
696: -M_n\bar\phi^2_n+\omega\phi^2_n-\partial_y
697: \phi^1_n-2i\rho\,\Lambda\delta(y)\phi^2_n=&0
698: \end{align}
699: %
700:
701: Unlike Eqs.~(\ref{EOM2}), Eqs.~(\ref{EOModd2}) do not admit real
702: solutions. In fact by decomposing
703: %
704: \begin{equation}
705: \label{decomp}
706: \phi^i_n=\varphi^i_n+i\,\chi^i_n
707: \end{equation}
708: %
709: Eqs.~(\ref{EOModd2}) lead to
710: %
711: \begin{align}
712: \label{EOModd}
713: -(M_n-\omega)\varphi^1_n+\partial_y\, \varphi^2_n+
714: 2\phantom{\rho}\Lambda \delta(y)\chi^1_n=&0 \nonumber\\
715: %
716: \phantom{-}(M_n+\omega)\chi^1_n+\partial_y\,\chi^2_n-
717: 2\phantom{\rho}\Lambda \delta(y)\varphi^1_n=&0 \nonumber\\
718: %
719: -(M_n-\omega)\varphi^2_n-\partial_y\,\varphi^1_n-
720: 2\rho\,\Lambda \delta(y)\chi^2_n=&0 \nonumber\\
721: %
722: \phantom{-}(M_n+\omega)\chi^2_n-\partial_y\,\chi^1_n+
723: 2\rho\,\Lambda \delta(y)\varphi^2_n=&0
724: \end{align}
725:
726: Eqs.~(\ref{EOModd}) can be solved analytically. We choose the most
727: general initial conditions consistent with parity (and up to a global
728: normalization factor):
729: %
730: \begin{align}
731: \label{initialodd}
732: \phi^1_n(0)=&\zeta, \nonumber\\
733: \chi^1_n(0)=&1, \nonumber\\
734: \phi^2_n(0)=&0, \nonumber\\
735: \chi^2_n(0)=&0.
736: \end{align}
737: %
738: In the interval $-2\pi<y<2\pi$ an analytic solution is then given by
739: %
740: \begin{equation}
741: \label{soloddphi}
742: \left(
743: \begin{array}{c}
744: \phi^1_n(y) \vspace{.25cm}\\
745: \phi^2_n(y)
746: \end{array}
747: \right)=\sqrt{\frac{\zeta^2+t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}
748: {1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}}
749: \left(
750: \begin{array}{c}
751: \cos\left[(M_n-\omega)y-
752: \arctan\left\{ t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)/\zeta \right\}\right] \vspace{.25cm}\\
753: \sin\left[(M_n-\omega)y-
754: \arctan\left\{ t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)/\zeta \right\}\right]
755: \end{array}
756: \right)
757: \end{equation}
758: %
759: %
760: \begin{equation}
761: \label{soloddchi}
762: \left(
763: \begin{array}{c}
764: \chi^1_n(y) \vspace{.25cm}\\
765: \chi^2_n(y)
766: \end{array}
767: \right)=\sqrt{\frac{1+\zeta^2\, t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}
768: {1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}}
769: \left(
770: \begin{array}{c}
771: \cos\left[(M_n+\omega)y-
772: \arctan\left\{ \zeta\,\,t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)\right\}\right] \vspace{.25cm} \\
773: -\sin\left[(M_n+\omega)y
774: -\arctan\left\{ \zeta\,\,t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)\right\}\right]
775: \end{array}
776: \right)
777: \end{equation}
778: %
779: where both $\zeta$ and $M_n$ are to be determined by imposing periodicity
780: of the solution.
781:
782: Periodicity condition of (\ref{soloddphi}) and (\ref{soloddchi}) is
783: implemented by
784: %
785: \begin{equation}
786: \label{periododd}
787: M_n=n+\frac{1}{\pi}\,\arctan\sqrt{\frac{\tan^2(\omega\pi)+t_\rho^2(\Lambda)}
788: {1+\tan^2(\omega\pi)\,t_\rho^2(\Lambda)}}
789: \end{equation}
790: %
791: and the initial condition is fixed by
792: %
793: \begin{equation}
794: \label{initodd}
795: \zeta=\frac{\tan(M_n+\omega)\pi}{t_\rho(\Lambda)}=
796: \frac{t_\rho(\Lambda)}{\tan(M_n-\omega)\pi}
797: \end{equation}
798: %
799: where the last equality is implied by (\ref{periododd}) and $\zeta$
800: turns out to be independent of $n$. Notice that, unlike the case with
801: $CP$-even brane masses, when $CP$-odd brane masses are present
802: supersymmetry restoration is not possible for non-trivial values of
803: the parameters $\omega$ and $\Lambda$.
804:
805: The solutions (\ref{soloddphi}) and (\ref{soloddchi}) near the brane,
806: $|y|<\epsilon$ where $\epsilon\to 0$, are given by,
807: %
808: \begin{equation}
809: \label{oddphibrane}
810: \left(
811: \begin{array}{c}
812: \phi^1_n(y) \vspace{.25cm}\\
813: \phi^2_n(y)
814: \end{array}
815: \right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{
816: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}}
817: \left(
818: \begin{array}{c}
819: \zeta \vspace{.25cm} \\
820: -t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)
821: \end{array}
822: \right)
823: \end{equation}
824: %
825: %
826: \begin{equation}
827: \label{oddchibrane}
828: \left(
829: \begin{array}{c}
830: \chi^1_n(y) \vspace{.25cm}\\
831: \chi^2_n(y)
832: \end{array}
833: \right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{
834: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)}}
835: \left(
836: \begin{array}{c}
837: 1 \vspace{.25cm}
838: \\
839: \zeta\,t_\rho\left(\Lambda\varepsilon(y)\right)
840: \end{array}
841: \right)
842: \end{equation}
843: %
844:
845: From (\ref{oddphibrane}) and (\ref{oddchibrane}) we see that
846: $\phi^2_n$ and $\chi^2_n$ are odd functions that make jumps at the
847: brane $\Delta\phi^2_n$, $\Delta\chi^2_n$ given by
848: %
849: \begin{equation}
850: \label{jumpphi}
851: \left|\Delta\phi^2_n\right|=\frac{2 t_\rho(\Lambda)}{\sqrt{
852: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\right)}}
853: \end{equation}
854: %
855: %
856: \begin{equation}
857: \label{jumpchi}
858: \left|\Delta\chi^2_n\right|=\frac{2\zeta\, t_\rho(\Lambda)}{\sqrt{
859: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2\left(\Lambda\right)}}
860: \end{equation}
861: %
862: while $\phi^1_n$ and $\chi^1_n$ have discontinuities on the brane
863: %
864: \begin{equation}
865: \label{disphi}
866: \lim_{y\to 0}\phi^1_n(y)=\frac{\zeta}{\sqrt{
867: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2(\Lambda)}}
868: \end{equation}
869: %
870: %
871: \begin{equation}
872: \label{discchi}
873: \lim_{y\to 0}\chi^1_n(y)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{
874: 1+\rho\ t_\rho^2(\Lambda)}}
875: \end{equation}
876: %
877: Only for the particular case $\rho=0$ are the functions $\phi^1_n(y)$
878: and $\chi^1_n(y)$ continuous. However one can check that near the
879: brane
880: %
881: \begin{equation}
882: \label{contodd}
883: \lim_{y\to
884: 0}\left[\phi^1_n(y)\,\chi^1_n(y)-\rho\,\phi^2_n(y)\,\chi^2_n(y)\right]=
885: \phi^1_n(0)\,\chi^1_n(0)-\rho\,\phi^2_n(0)\,\chi^2_n(0)
886: \end{equation}
887: %
888: and so the term coupled to the brane in the Lagrangian (\ref{Lagodd})
889: is continuous.
890:
891: If we replace $\delta(y)\to \sum_k \delta(y-2\pi k)$ in (\ref{Lagodd})
892: the solution (\ref{soloddphi}) and (\ref{soloddchi}) can be
893: generalized to one periodic for $y\in\mathbb{R}$ by replacing
894: $\varepsilon(y)\to\beta(y)$ in the prefactors of (\ref{soloddphi}) and
895: (\ref{soloddchi}) and by replacing
896: %
897: \begin{align}
898: \label{replacing}
899: \arctan\, \zeta\, t_\rho[\Lambda\varepsilon(y)]\to&
900: \lim_{\kappa\rightarrow\infty}
901: \sum_{k=-\kappa}^\kappa
902: \arctan\, \zeta\,
903: t_\rho[\Lambda\varepsilon(y-2\pi k)]\nonumber\\
904: \arctan\, \frac{1}{\zeta}\, t_\rho[\Lambda\varepsilon(y)]\to&
905: \lim_{\kappa\rightarrow\infty}
906: \sum_{k=-\kappa}^\kappa
907: \arctan\, \frac{1}{\zeta}\,
908: t_\rho[\Lambda\varepsilon(y-2\pi k)]
909: \end{align}
910: %
911: in the corresponding arguments of the trigonometric functions.
912: Using (\ref{periododd}) and (\ref{initodd}) one can check that the new
913: functions are periodic along the real axis.
914:
915: As in the case of $CP$-even mass terms we have checked our solution
916: numerically with a regularized $\delta$-function. We find perfect agreement
917: with our analytical solution, Eqs.~(\ref{soloddphi})--(\ref{initodd}).
918:
919: \section{\sc Conclusions}
920:
921: In this paper we have studied the compactification of a 5D theory on
922: $S^1/\mathbb{Z}_2$ with SS supersymmetry breaking and the most general
923: brane mass term. We have focussed on the case of bulk symplectic
924: Majorana fermions and so our results apply to the case of both
925: gauginos and gravitinos. In all cases fermions obey first order
926: differential equations and brane terms correspond to discontinuities
927: on the fields.
928:
929: We have studied in full detail both the CP-even and CP-odd brane mass
930: cases. It has been shown that in the former case there can be a
931: cancellation between the contribution of the standard SS and the brane
932: terms and so supersymmetry can be restored whereas in the latter case
933: this is not possible. Although in most cases there is a discontinuous
934: behaviour for the even fermions near the brane, we have checked that
935: the combination that couples to the brane is continuous throughout the
936: orbifold fixed points. The generalization of this mechanism to a more
937: general framework with brane fields, or to warped scenarios is left
938: for future investigation.
939:
940: \section*{\sc Acknowledgments}
941: We would like to thank J.~Bagger and M.~Redi for discussions. One of
942: us (AD) wants to thank the Aspen Center for Physics where part of this
943: work was done. GG thanks the DAAD for financial support.
944:
945: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
946: %
947: %
948: \bibitem{ignas}
949: I.~Antoniadis, \PLB{246}{1990}{377};
950: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B246,377;%%
951: I.~Antoniadis, C.~Mu\~noz and M.~Quir\'os, \NPB{397}{1993}{515};
952: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9211309;%%
953: I.~Antoniadis and K.~Benakli, \PLB{326}{1994}{69};
954: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9310151;%%
955: I.~Antoniadis, K.~Benakli and M.~Quir\'os, \PLB{331}{1994}{313};
956: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403290;%%
957: I.~Antoniadis and M.~Quir\'os, \PLB{392}{1997}{61}.
958: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9609209;%%
959: %
960: %
961: \bibitem{SS}
962: J.~Scherk and J.H.~Schwarz, \PLB{82}{1979}{60}; \NPB{153}{1979}{61};
963: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B82,60;%%
964: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B153,61;%%
965: P.~Fayet, \PLB{159}{1985}{121}; \NPB{263}{1986}{649}.
966: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B159,121;%%
967: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B263,649;%%
968: %
969: %
970: \bibitem{matter}
971: A.~Pomarol and M.~Quir\'os, \PLB{438}{1998}{255};
972: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806263;%%
973: I.~Antoniadis, S.~Dimopoulos, A.~Pomarol and M.~Quir\'os,
974: \NPB{544}{1999}{503};
975: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810410;%%
976: A.~Delgado, A.~Pomarol and M.~Quir\'os, \PRD{60}{1999}{095008}.
977: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812489;%%
978: %
979:
980: \bibitem{UV}
981: R.~Barbieri, L.J.~Hall and Y.~Nomura, \PRD{63}{2001}{105007};
982: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011311;%%
983: N.~Arkani-Hamed, L.J.~Hall, Y.~Nomura, D.~Smith and N.~Weiner,
984: \NPB{605}{2001}{81};
985: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102090;%%
986: A.~Delgado, and M.~Quir\'os, \NPB{607}{2001}{99}.
987: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103058;%%
988: %
989: \bibitem{SSH1}
990: G.~von Gersdorff and M.~Quiros,
991: \PRD{65}{2002}{064016}.
992: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0110132;%%
993: %
994: \bibitem{SSH2}
995: G.~von Gersdorff, M.~Quiros and A.~Riotto,
996: \NPB{634}{2002}{90}.
997: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0204041;%%
998: %
999: \bibitem{radionF}
1000: Z.~Chacko and M.A.~Luty, \JHEP{0105}{2001}{067};
1001: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008103;%%
1002: T.~Kobayashi and K.~Yoshioka,
1003: \PRL{85}{2000}{5527};
1004: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008069;%%
1005: D.~Mart\'{\i} and A.~Pomarol,
1006: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} {\bf D64} (2001) 105025;
1007: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0106256;%%
1008: D.E.~Kaplan and N.~Weiner,
1009: \texttt{hep-ph/0108001}.
1010: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108001;%%
1011: %
1012: \bibitem{one}
1013: A.~Delgado, G.v.~Gersdorff, P.~John and M.~Quir\'os, \PLB{517}{2001}{445};
1014: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104112;%%
1015: R.~Contino, L.~Pilo, R.~Ratazzi and A.~Strumia, \JHEP{0106}{2001}{005};
1016: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103104;%%
1017: R.~Contino and L.~Pilo, \PLB{523}{2001}{347};
1018: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104130;%%
1019: Y.~Nomura, \texttt{hep-ph/0105113};
1020: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105113;%%
1021: N.~Weiner, \texttt{hep-ph/0106021};
1022: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106021;%%
1023: A.~Delgado, G.v.~Gersdorff and M.~Quir\'os, \NPB{613}{2001}{49};
1024: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107233;%%
1025: V.D.~Clemente, S.F.~King and D.A.~Rayner, \NPB{617}{2001}{71};
1026: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107290;%%
1027: R.~Barbieri, L.J.~Hall and Y.~Nomura, \NPB{624}{2002}{63};
1028: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0107004;%%
1029: V.D.~Clemente and Y.A.~Kubyshin, \NPB{636}{2002}{115};
1030: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0108117;%%
1031: H.~D.~Kim,
1032: %``Softness of Scherk-Schwarz supersymmetry breaking,''
1033: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 105021.
1034: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0109101;%%
1035: %
1036: \bibitem{orbifolds}
1037: L.~J.~Dixon, J.~A.~Harvey, C.~Vafa and E.~Witten,
1038: \NPB{261}{1985}{678};
1039: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B261,678;%%
1040: %
1041: L.~J.~Dixon, J.~A.~Harvey, C.~Vafa and E.~Witten,
1042: \NPB{274}{1986}{285}.
1043: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B274,285;%%
1044: %
1045: \bibitem{AQ}
1046: I.~Antoniadis and M.~Quiros,
1047: \NPB{505}{1997}{109};
1048: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9705037;%%
1049: %
1050: I.~Antoniadis and M.~Quiros,
1051: \PLB{416}{1998}{327};
1052: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9707208;%%
1053: %
1054: I.~Antoniadis and M.~Quiros,
1055: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 62} (1998) 312.
1056: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9709023;%%
1057: %
1058: \bibitem{fabio1}
1059: J.~A.~Bagger, F.~Feruglio and F.~Zwirner,
1060: \PRL{88}{2002}{101601}.
1061: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0107128;%%
1062: %
1063: \bibitem{fabio2}
1064: J.~Bagger, F.~Feruglio and F.~Zwirner,
1065: \JHEP{0202}{2002}{010};
1066: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0108010;%%
1067: T.~Gherghetta and A.~Riotto,
1068: %``Gravity-mediated supersymmetry breaking in the brane-world,''
1069: {\it Nucl.\ Phys.} {\bf B623} (2002) 97.
1070: %%CITATION = HEP-TH/0110022;%%
1071: %
1072: \bibitem{nilles}
1073: K.~A.~Meissner, H.~P.~Nilles and M.~Olechowski,
1074: \texttt{hep-th/0205166}.
1075: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0205166;%%
1076: %
1077: \bibitem{feruglio}
1078: C.~Biggio and F.~Feruglio,
1079: %``Symmetry breaking for bosonic systems on orbifolds,''
1080: {\it Annals Phys.} {\bf 301} (2002) 65;
1081: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0207014;%%
1082: C.~Biggio, F.~Feruglio, A.~Wulzer and F.~Zwirner,
1083: \texttt{hep-th/0209046}.
1084: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0209046;%%
1085: %
1086: %
1087: \bibitem{zucker}
1088: M.~Zucker, \NPB{570}{2000}{267};
1089: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9907082;%%
1090: %
1091: \JHEP{08}{2000}{016};
1092: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9909144;%%
1093: %
1094: \PRD{64}{2001}{024024}.
1095: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0009083;%%
1096: %
1097:
1098: \bibitem{kugo}
1099: T.~Kugo and K.~Ohashi,
1100: %``Supergravity tensor calculus in 5D from 6D,''
1101: {\it Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.} {\bf 104} (2000) 835;
1102: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006231;%%
1103: T.~Kugo and K.~Ohashi,
1104: %``Off-shell d = 5 supergravity coupled to matter-Yang-Mills system,''
1105: {\it Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.} {\bf 105} (2001) 323;
1106: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010288;%%
1107: T.~Fujita, T.~Kugo and K.~Ohashi,
1108: %``Off-shell formulation of supergravity on orbifold,''
1109: {\it Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.} \textbf{106} (2001) 671;
1110: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0106051;%%
1111: T.~Kugo and K.~Ohashi,
1112: %``Superconformal Tensor Calculus on Orbifold in 5D,''
1113: {\it Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.} {\bf 108}, 203 (2002).
1114: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0203276;%%
1115:
1116:
1117: \end{thebibliography}
1118: \end{document}
1119:
1120:
1121:
1122:
1123:
1124:
1125:
1126:
1127:
1128:
1129:
1130:
1131:
1132:
1133:
1134:
1135: