1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%% REVTEX  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: %%%% REVTEX  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

6: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}

7: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps,epsfig,tighten]{revtex}

8: \documentclass[aps,prd,draft,showpacs]{revtex4}

9: \usepackage[final]{graphicx}

10: \begin{document}

11: 

12: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

13: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

14: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray}}

15: \newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray}}

16: 

17: \newcommand{\la}{{\lambda}}

18: \newcommand{\Om}{{\Omega}}

19: \newcommand{\ta}{{\tilde a}}

20: \newcommand{\bg}{{\bar g}}

21: \newcommand{\bh}{{\bar h}}

22: \newcommand{\si}{{\sigma}}

23: %\newcommand{\th}{{\theta}}

24: \newcommand{\C}{{\cal C}}

25: \newcommand{\D}{{\cal D}}

26: \newcommand{\cA}{{\cal A}}

27: \newcommand{\cT}{{\cal T}}

28: \newcommand{\cO}{{\cal O}}

29: \newcommand{\eeo}{\cO ({1 \over E})}

30: \newcommand{\G}{{\cal G}}

31: \newcommand{\cL}{{\cal L}}

32: \newcommand{\T}{{\cal T}}

33: \newcommand{\M}{{\cal M}}

34: 

35: \newcommand{\p}{\partial}

36: \newcommand{\na}{\nabla}

37: \newcommand{\ssum}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^3}

38: \newcommand{\dssum}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^2}

39: \newcommand{\tal}{{\tilde \alpha}}

40: 

41: \newcommand{\tp}{{\tilde \phi}}

42: \newcommand{\tPhi}{\tilde \Phi}

43: \newcommand{\tpsi}{\tilde \psi}

44: \newcommand{\tim}{{\tilde \mu}}

45: \newcommand{\tr}{{\tilde \rho}}

46: \newcommand{\tir}{{\tilde r}}

47: \newcommand{\rp}{r_{+}}

48: \newcommand{\hr}{{\hat r}}

49: \newcommand{\rv}{{r_{v}}}

50: \newcommand{\dr}{{d \over d \hr}}

51: \newcommand{\dR}{{d \over d R}}

52: 

53: \newcommand{\hhf}{{\hat \phi}}

54: \newcommand{\hhM}{{\hat M}}

55: \newcommand{\hhQ}{{\hat Q}}

56: \newcommand{\hht}{{\hat t}}

57: \newcommand{\hhr}{{\hat r}}

58: \newcommand{\hhS}{{\hat \Sigma}}

59: \newcommand{\hhD}{{\hat \Delta}}

60: \newcommand{\hhm}{{\hat \mu}}

61: %\newcommand{\hht}{{\hat t}}

62: \newcommand{\hro}{{\hat \rho}}

63: \newcommand{\hhz}{{\hat z}}

64: 

65: \newcommand{\tD}{{\tilde D}}

66: \newcommand{\tB}{{\tilde B}}

67: \newcommand{\tV}{{\tilde V}}

68: \newcommand{\hT}{\hat T}

69: \newcommand{\tF}{\tilde F}

70: \newcommand{\tT}{\tilde T}

71: \newcommand{\hC}{\hat C}

72: \newcommand{\ep}{\epsilon}

73: \newcommand{\bep}{\bar \epsilon}

74: \newcommand{\ppp}{\varphi}

75: \newcommand{\Ga}{\Gamma}

76: \newcommand{\ga}{\gamma}

77: \newcommand{\hth}{\hat \theta}

78: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

79: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

81: \title{Thick Domain Walls and Charged Dilaton Black Holes}

82: 

83: \author{Rafa{\l} Moderski}

84: 

85: \affiliation{N.Copernicus Astronomical Center \protect \\

86: Polish Academy of Sciences, \protect \\

87: 00-716 Warsaw, Bartycka 18, Poland \protect \\

88: moderski@camk.edu.pl}

89: 

90: \author{Marek Rogatko}

91: 

92: \affiliation{Institute of Physics \protect \\

93: Maria Curie-Sklodowska University \protect \\

94: 20-031 Lublin, pl.Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej 1, Poland \protect \\

95: rogat@tytan.umcs.lublin.pl \protect \\

96:  rogat@kft.umcs.lublin.pl}

97: 

98: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

99: \date{\today}

100: \pacs{ 04.50.+h, 98.80.Cq.}

101: %{\bf Key words:} Cosmic strings, vortex, dilaton black holes.\\

102: \bigskip

103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ABSTRACT %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

104: \begin{abstract}

105: We study a black hole domain wall system in dilaton gravity which is

106: the low-energy limit of the superstring theory. We solve numerically

107: equations of motion for real self-interacting scalar field and

108: justify the existence of static axisymmetric  field configuration 

109: representing the thick domain wall in the background of a charged

110: dilaton black hole. It was also confirmed that the extreme dilaton black 

111: hole always expelled the domain wall.

112: \end{abstract}

113: \maketitle

114: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

115: %{\bf Key words:} Cosmic strings, vortex, dilaton black holes.

116: \baselineskip=18pt

117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

118: \section{Introduction}

119: It is believed that the early universe undergoes a series of vacuum

120: phase transitions which led to several types of topological

121: defects \cite{vil}. Topological defects arising in the early universe could

122: envisage the high-energy phenomena that were beyond the range of our accelerators.

123: The studies

124: of topologically nontrivial field configurations in the 

125: background of a black hole attract great interest in recent years.

126: In Refs.\cite{abh} it was shown both analitycally and numerically that

127: an Abelian-Higgs vortex could act as a long hair for the

128: Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstr\"om (RN) black hole solution.

129: \par

130: The problem of dilaton black hole cosmic string system was

131: considered in Refs.\cite{dil,san00}.

132: It was revealed that the horizon of a charged dilaton black hole 

133: could support a long-range fields of the Nielsen-Olesen type, which one

134: could consider as black hole hair. If the dilaton black hole approached 

135: to extremality one could show that the vortex was always expelled from it.

136: \par

137: De Villier {\it et al.} \cite{vil98} studied the dynamics of the scattering

138: and capturing process of an infinitely thin cosmic string in the background of

139: Schwarzschild black hole spacetime.\\

140: The domain wall in the black hole background was considered by Christiensen

141: {\it et al.} \cite{chr98}, showing that there exists family of infinitely thin walls

142: intersecting black hole event horizon. 

143: \par

144: In Ref.\cite{hig00} the stability of a Nambu-Goto membrane at the equatorial

145: plane in the background of RN-de Sitter spacetime was studied. It was shown

146: that  a membrane intersecting charged black hole is unstable and the positive

147: cosmological constant strengthens this instability.\\

148: The gravitational interaction of a

149: thick domain wall in the Schwarzschild black hole background was studied in 

150: Ref.\cite{mor00}.

151: Bonjour {\it et al.} \cite{bon99} have investigated the spacetime of thick gravitating

152: domain wall with local  planar symmetry and reflection symmetry around

153: the wall's core. They revealed that the domain wall spacetime has a

154: cosmological horizon as in the de Sitter case.\\

155: Recently, the interaction of black holes and extended objects attracts the attention

156: in the context of superstring/M-theory and the brane world scenario \cite{hor96}.

157: It is argued that in this scenario black holes on the gravitating membrane 

158: are realized as {\it black cigars} in the bulk spacetime intersecting membrane.

159: In Ref.\cite{emp01} the problem of black hole on a topological domain wall

160: (including the gravitational back-reaction) was considered. In \cite{rog01}

161: the behaviour of the domain wall in the spacetime of a dilaton black hole

162: was analyzed and it was shown analytically that the extreme dilaton black 

163: hole always expelled the domain wall.

164: \par

165: In our paper we shall 

166: provide some continuity with the previous work \cite{rog01} and we shall

167: consider the interaction between a domain wall and a

168: charged dilaton black hole taking into account

169: the thickness of the domain wall and the potential

170: of the scalar field of $\varphi^4$ and sine-Gordon forms.

171: \par

172: The outline of the paper is as follows. Sec.II is devoted to the general 

173: analytic considerations of the domain wall in the spacetime of the

174: charged dilaton black hole. In Sec.III we presented the numerical analysis of the

175: equation of motion for two cases of potentials with discrete set

176: of degenerate minima, i.e., the $\varphi^4$ and sine-Gordon potentials.

177: In Sec.IV we finish with the general summarizing of our work.

178: 

179: 

180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

181: \section{The basic equations of the problem}

182: In this section we shall consider a static thick domain wall in 

183: the background of a charged dilaton black hole. This black hole is

184: a static spherically symmetric solution of Einstein-dilaton gravity being 

185: the low-energy limit of the superstring theory. In our considerations

186: we assume that the domain wall is constructed by means of a self-interacting

187: scalar field in the considered background.

188: The metric of a charged dilaton black hole may be written as

189: \cite{gar91}

190: %

191: \be

192: ds^2 = - \left ( 1 - {2 M \over r} \right ) dt^2 +

193: { d r^2 \over \left ( 1 - {2 M \over r} \right ) } + r \left ( 

194: r - {Q^2

195: \over M} \right ) (d \theta^2

196: + \sin^2 \theta  d \ppp^2),

197: \ee

198: %

199: where we define $r_{+} = 2M$ and $r_{-} = {Q^2 \over M}$ which are

200: related to the mass $M$ and charge $Q$ by the relation $Q^2 = {r_{+}

201: r_{-} \over 2} e^{2 \phi_{0}}$. The charge of the dilaton black hole

202: $Q$, couples to the field $F_{\alpha \beta}$.  The dilaton field is

203: given by $e^{2\phi} = \left ( 1 - {r_{-} \over r} \right )

204: e^{-2\phi_{0}}$, where $\phi_{0}$ is the dilaton's value at $r

205: \rightarrow \infty$. The event horizon is located at $r = r_{+}$. For

206: $r = r_{-}$ is another singularity, one can however ignore it because

207: $r_{-} < r_{+}$. The extremal black hole occurs when $r_{-} = r_{+}$,

208: when $Q^2 = 2M^2 e^{2\phi_{0}}$.

209: \par

210: 

211: We consider a general matter Lagrangian with real Higgs field and the

212: symmetry breaking potential of the form as follows:

213: %

214: \be

215: {\cal L}_{dw} = - {1 \over 2} \na_{\mu} \varphi \na^{\mu} \varphi

216: - U(\varphi).

217: \ee

218: %

219: The symmetry breaking potential $U(\varphi)$ has a discrete set of

220: degenerate minima.  The energy-momentum tensor for the domain wall

221: yields

222: %

223: \be

224: T_{ij}(\varphi) = - {1 \over 2} g_{ij} \na_{m} \varphi \na^{m} \varphi

225: - U(\varphi) g_{ij} + \na_{i} \varphi \na_{j} \varphi.

226: \label{ten}

227: \ee

228: %

229: For the convenience we scale out parameters via transformation $ X =

230: {\varphi / \eta}$ and $\ep = 8 \pi G \eta^2$.  The parameter $\ep$

231: represents the gravitational strength and is connected with the

232: gravitational interaction of the Higgs field.  Defining $V(X) =

233: {U(\varphi) \over V_{F}}$, where $V_{F} = \lambda \eta^4$ we arrive at

234: the following expression:

235: %

236: \be

237: 8 \pi G {\cal L}_{dw} = - {\ep \over w^2} \bigg[

238: w^2 {\na_{\mu} X \na^{\mu} X \over 2} + V(X) \bigg],

239: \label{dw}

240: \ee

241: %

242: where $w = \sqrt{{\ep \over 8 \pi G V_{F}}}$ represents the inverse

243: mass of the scalar after symmetry breaking, which also characterize

244: the width of the wall defect within the theory under consideration.

245: Having in mind (\ref{dw}) the equations for $X$ field may be written

246: as follows:

247: %

248: \be

249: \na_{\mu} \na^{\mu} X - {1 \over w^2}{ \p V \over \p X} = 0.

250: \ee

251: %

252: In the background of the dilaton black hole spacetime the

253: equation of motion for the scalar field $X$ implies

254: %

255: \be

256: {1 \over r \left ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \right )}

257: \p_{r} \bigg[ \big ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \big) \big( r - 2 M \big)

258: \p_{r} X \bigg] + 

259: {1 \over r \left ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \right ) \sin \theta }

260: \p_{\theta} \bigg[ \sin \theta \p_{\theta} X \bigg] =

261: {1 \over w^2}

262: { \p V \over \p X}.

263: \label{motion}

264: \ee

265: %

266: Having in mind relation (\ref{ten}) one can define the energy

267: density of scalar fields $\varphi$ in the form

268: %

269: \be

270: E = {T_{t}{}{}^{t} \over \la \eta^4} =

271: \bigg[

272: - {1 \over 2} \big( X_{,r} \big)^2 \bigg( 1 - {2M \over r} \bigg)

273: -{ 1 \over 2} \big( X_{,\theta} \big)^2

274: {1 \over r \big(r - {Q^2 \over M} \big)}

275:  \bigg] { w^2} - V(X).

276: \label{energy}

277: \ee

278: In our considerations we take into account

279: for two cases of potentials with a discrete set

280: of degenerate minima, namely

281: 

282: \noindent

283: -- the $\varphi^4$ potential

284: %

285: \be

286: U_1(\varphi) = {\lambda \over 4} (\varphi^2 - \eta^2)^2,

287: \label{phi4}

288: \ee

289: %

290: -- the sine-Gordon potential

291: %

292: \be

293: U_2(\varphi) = \lambda \eta^4 \left [ 1 + \cos(\varphi/\eta) \right ].

294: \label{sinG}

295: \ee

296: 

297: 

298: 

299: 

300: 

301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

302: 

303: \section{Boundary conditions and numerical integration.}

304: \subsection{Boundary conditions for $\varphi^4$ potential}

305: %

306: Because of the fact that the charged dilaton black hole is asymptotically

307: flat, the asymptotic boundary solution of equation of motion

308: for potential (\ref{phi4}) is the solution of equation of motion in flat

309: spacetime, namely

310: %

311: \be

312: \varphi_1(z) = \eta \tanh ( \sqrt{\lambda/2} \eta z).

313: \label{solphi4}

314: \ee

315: %

316: In our units this gives

317: %

318: \be

319: X(r,\theta) = \tanh \bigg( {r \cos \theta \over \sqrt{2} w }\bigg )

320: \ee

321: %

322: In this case $V(X) = {1 \over 4} (X^2-1)^2$ and $\p V/\p X = X(X^2-1)$

323: so the equation of motion (\ref{motion}) takes the form

324: %

325: \be

326: {1 \over r \left ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \right )}

327: \p_{r} \bigg[ \big ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \big) \big( r - 2 M \big)

328: \p_{r} X \bigg] + 

329: {1 \over r \left ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \right ) \sin \theta }

330: \p_{\theta} \bigg[ \sin \theta \p_{\theta} X \bigg] - {1 \over w^2}

331: X(X^2-1) = 0.

332: \label{motphi4}

333: \ee

334: %

335: while the energy density is equal to the following expression:

336: %

337: \be

338: E = \bigg[

339: - {1 \over 2} \big( \p_r X \big)^2 \bigg( 1 - {2M \over r} \bigg)

340: -{ 1 \over 2} \big( \p_\theta X \big)^2

341: {1 \over r \big(r - {Q^2 \over M} \big)}

342:  \bigg] {w^2} - {1 \over 4} (X^2-1)^2.

343: \label{enphi4}

344: \ee

345: %

346: On the horizon relation (\ref{motphi4}) gives the boundary condition

347: %

348: \be

349: {1 \over 2 M} \p_r X  \big|_{r=2M} = {- 1 \over 2M \left (2M - {Q^2

350: \over M} \right ) \sin \theta} \p_\theta \left [ \sin \theta \p_\theta

351: X \right ] + {1 \over w^2}

352: X(X^2-1).

353: \label{bhor}

354: \ee

355: %

356: Because we consider here only the case when the core of the wall is

357: located in the equatorial plane $\theta = \pi/2$ of the black hole we

358: impose the Dirichlet boundary condition at the equatorial plane

359: %

360: \be

361: X \big|_{\theta = \pi/2} = 0.

362: \label{beq}

363: \ee

364: %

365: The regularity of the scalar field on the symmetric axis requires the

366: Neumann boundary condition on the z-axis:

367: %

368: \be

369: {\p X \over \p \theta} \bigg|_{\theta=0} = 0.

370: \label{bz}

371: \ee

372: %

373: Far from the black hole we want to obtain flat spacetime solution

374: (\ref{solphi4}). Because our computational grid is finite this

375: requires the following boundary condition to be imposed on the outer

376: boundary of the grid:

377: %

378: \be

379: X \big|_{r=r_{max}} = \tanh \bigg({ r_{max} \cos \theta \over \sqrt{2} w} \bigg).

380: \label{brmax}

381: \ee

382: 

383: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

384: \subsection{Boundary conditions for the sine-Gordon potential.}

385: %

386: For the sine-Gordon potential (\ref{sinG}) the flat spacetime solution

387: is given by

388: %

389: \be

390: \varphi_2(z) = \eta \left \{ 4 \arctan \left [ \exp (\sqrt{\lambda}

391: \eta z ) \right ] - \pi \right \}.

392: \label{sinGsol}

393: \ee

394: %

395: In our units this is equivalent to following:

396: %

397: \be

398: X(r,\theta) = 4 \arctan \bigg [ \exp \bigg({r \cos \theta \over w}\bigg) \bigg ] - \pi.

399: \label{XsinG}

400: \ee

401: %

402: In this case $V(X) = 1 + \cos(X)$ and $\p V / \p X = - \sin(X)$, and

403: thus the equation of motion (\ref{motion}) takes the form

404: %

405: \be

406: {1 \over r \left ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \right )}

407: \p_{r} \bigg[ \big ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \big) \big( r - 2 M \big)

408: \p_{r} X \bigg] + 

409: {1 \over r \left ( r - {Q^2 \over M} \right ) \sin \theta }

410: \p_{\theta} \bigg[ \sin \theta \p_{\theta} X \bigg] + 

411: {1 \over w^2} \sin(X) = 0,

412: \label{motsinG}

413: \ee

414: %

415: while the energy density is given by the relation

416: %

417: \be

418: E = \bigg[

419: - {1 \over 2} \big( \p_r X \big)^2 \bigg( 1 - {2M \over r} \bigg)

420: -{ 1 \over 2} \big( \p_\theta X \big)^2

421: {1 \over r \big(r - {Q^2 \over M} \big)}

422:  \bigg] {w^2} - 1 - \cos(X).

423: \label{ensinG}

424: \ee

425: On the horizon from Eq.(\ref{motsinG}) one has the boundary condition as follows:

426: %

427: \be

428: {1 \over 2 M} \p_r X  \big|_{r=2M} = {- 1 \over 2M \left (2M - {Q^2

429: \over M} \right ) \sin \theta} \p_\theta \left [ \sin \theta \p_\theta

430: X \right ] - {1 \over w^2} \sin(X).

431: \label{bhorsinG}

432: \ee

433: %

434: Of course, this must be accompanied by the Dirichlet boundary conditions at the equatorial

435: plane of the black hole (\ref{beq}), and the Neumann

436: boundary condition on the symmetry axis (\ref{bz}),

437: and at the outer edge of the grid

438: %

439: \be

440: X \big|_{r=r_{max}} = 4 \arctan \bigg[ \exp \bigg({r_{max}\cos \theta \over w}\bigg)

441: \bigg ] - \pi.

442: \ee

443: %

444: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

445: \subsection{Numerical integration.}

446: %

447: In order to solve numerically

448: Eq.(\ref{motion}) we used the numerical method previously

449: used in Refs.\cite{dil}.

450: Namely, we use overrelaxation method slightly modified to

451: handle boundary conditions on the black hole horizon. We solve the

452: equation of motion on uniformly spaced polar grid $(r_i,\theta_i)$

453: with boundaries at $r_{min} = 2M$, outer radius $r_{max} \gg 2M$

454: (usually we use $r_{max} = 20M$), and $\theta$ ranging from $0$ to

455: $\pi/2$. The rest of the solution is obtained from symmetry of the scalar

456: field -- $X(r,-\theta) = X(r,\theta)$ and $X(r,\theta>\pi/2) =

457: -X(r,\pi-\theta)$.

458: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

459: 

460: Figure~\ref{figphi4} presents the results of numerical integration of

461: equation of motion (\ref{motphi4}). On the same plot we show also the

462: energy (\ref{enphi4}) for this scalar field configuration. The mass of the

463: black hole is taken to be

464: $M=1$ and the charge $Q=0.1$, the domain wall thickness $w = 1$.

465: Fig.\ref{figphi4max} depicts the field $X$ and the energy $E$ for the extreme 

466: dilaton black hole with parameters $M = 1$, $Q = \sqrt{2}$ and the domain width

467: $w = 1$. For this case one has the expulsion of the domain wall from the

468: exteremal dilaton black hole. The so-called {\it Meissner effect} was analytically

469: predicted in Ref.\cite{rog01}.

470: Figs.\ref{figphi410} - \ref{figphi410max} were plotted for the same 

471: black hole parameters but we changed the domain wall width and put it

472: $w = 10$. Then for this width of the domain wall the dilaton black hole

473: is enveloped in the core region of the wall.

474: Figs.\ref{figsing} - \ref{figsingmax} show the values 

475: of $X$ field and the energy for the dilaton and extremal dilaton black holes

476: and the domain width $w = 1$. For this kind of potential one observes also the 

477: {\it Meissner effect} for the extreme black hole. 

478: In Figs.\ref{figsing10} - \ref{figsing10max} we take into account the domain width

479: $w = 10$. In this case we have also enveloping of the black hole in the core 

480: region of the considered domain wall.

481: 

482: 

483: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

484: \section{Conclusions}

485: In our paper we studied the problem of the domain wall in the vicinity

486: of a charged dilaton black hole, being the static spherically symmetric

487: solution of Einstein-dilaton gravity. We solve numerically Eqs. of motion

488: for real scalar field with $\varphi^4$ and sine-Gordon potentials. We use

489: the modified overrelation method modified to comprise the boundary 

490: conditions on the black hole event horizon. In our considerations we also use

491: the parameter $w = 1/\sqrt{\la} \eta$, which characterizes the thickness 

492: of the domain wall.

493: \par

494: We have justified the existence of static axisymmetric field configuration

495: representing thick domain wall in the nearby of dilaton black hole

496: for both $\varphi^4$ and sine-Gordon potential cases.

497: We studied the specific black hole domain wall configuration, 

498: when the core of

499: the domain wall is located at the equatorial plane of the black hole.

500: As in Ref. \cite{mor00} we assumed that the gravitational effect of the

501: domain wall is negligible compared to the effect caused by a

502: charged dilaton black hole.

503: In the case of the extreme dilaton black hole we find that the domain wall

504: is always expelled from the considered black hole, justifying the analytical

505: predictions presented in Ref. \cite{rog01}. This behaviour envisages the analog

506: of the so-called {\it Meissner effect} for the extreme dilaton black hole.

507: This effect was also revealed in the case of another topological defect,

508: i.e., cosmic string which was also expelled from the extremal dilaton

509: black hole \cite{dil,san00}.

510: 

511: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

512: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

513: %

514: \def\cmp#1#2#3{{ Commun. Math. Phys.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

515: \def\lmp#1#2#3{{ Lett. Math. Phys.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

516: \def\hpa#1#2#3{{ Hell. Phys. Acta} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

517: \def\grg#1#2#3{{ Gen. Rel. Grav.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

518: \def\pr#1#2#3{{ Phys. Rev.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

519: \def\prl#1#2#3{{ Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

520: \def\prd#1#2#3{{ Phys. Rev. D} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

521: \def\pl#1#2#3{{ Phys. Lett} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

522: \def\pla#1#2#3{{ Phys. Lett. A} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

523: \def\plb#1#2#3{{ Phys. Lett. B} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

524: \def\prep#1#2#3{{ Phys. Reports} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

525: \def\phys#1#2#3{{ Physica} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

526: \def\jcp#1#2#3{{ J. Comput. Phys.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

527: \def\jmp#1#2#3{{ J. Math. Phys.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

528: \def\jpm#1#2#3{{ J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

529: \def\cpr#1#2#3{{ Computer Phys. Rept.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

530: \def\cqg#1#2#3{{ Class. Quantum Grav.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

531: \def\cma#1#2#3{{ Computers Math. Applic.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

532: \def\mc#1#2#3{{ Math. Compt.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

533: \def\apj#1#2#3{{ Astrophys. J.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

534: \def\apjs#1#2#3{{ Astrophys. J. Suppl.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

535: \def\acta#1#2#3{{ Acta Astronomica} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

536: \def\apl#1#2#3{{Ann. Physik. (Leipzig)} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

537: \def\sa#1#2#3{{ Sov. Astro.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

538: \def\sia#1#2#3{{ SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

539: \def\aa#1#2#3{{ Astron. Astrophys.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

540: \def\mnras#1#2#3{{ Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc.} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

541: \def\npb#1#2#3{{ Nucl. Phys. B} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

542: \def\prsla#1#2#3{{ Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

543: \def\jhep#1#2#3{{ JHEP} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

544: \def\nuc#1#2#3{{Nuovo Cimento B } {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

545: \def\ijmp#1#2#3{{Int. J. Mod. Phys. D} {\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

546: %

547: 

548: \def\hepth#1#2{{ hep-th }{\bf #1} (#2)}

549: \def\grqc#1#2{{ gr-qc }{\bf #1} (#2)}

550: %\def\ibid#1#2{{ {\it ibid.} }{\bf #1}, #2 (#3)}

551: %

552: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

553: \begin{thebibliography}{}

554: \bibitem{vil}A.Vilenkin and E.P.S.Shellard, {\it Cosmic Strings and Other Topological

555: Defects} (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994).

556: \bibitem{abh}

557: F.Dowker, R.Gregory, and J.Trashen, \prd{45}{2762}{1992},\\

558: A.Achucarro, R.Gregory, and K.Kuijken, \prd{52}{5729}{1995},\\

559: A.Chamblin, J.M.A.Asbourn-Chamblin, R.Emparan, and A.Sornborger, 

560: \prd{58}{124014}{1998}; \prl{80}{4378}{1998},\\

561: F.Bonjour, R.Emparan, and R.Gregory, \prd{59}{084022}{1999}.

562: \bibitem{dil}

563: R.Moderski and M.Rogatko, \prd{58}{124016}{1998},\\

564: R.Moderski and M.Rogatko, \prd{60}{104040}{1999}.

565: \bibitem{san00}

566: C.Santos and R.Gregory, \prd{61}{024006}{2000}.

567: \bibitem{vil98}

568: J.De Villiers and V.Frolov, \ijmp{7}{957}{1998},\\

569: J.De Villiers and V.Frolov, \prd{58}{105018}{1998}.

570: \bibitem{chr98}

571: M.Christensen, V.P.Frolov, and A.L.Larsen, \prd{58}{085008}{1998}.

572: \bibitem{hig00}

573: S.Higaki, A.Ishibashi, and D.Ida, \prd{63}{025002}{2001}.

574: \bibitem{mor00}

575: Y.Morisawa, R.Yamazaki, D.Ida, A.Ishibashi, and K.Nakao,

576: \prd{62}{084022}{2000}.

577: \bibitem{bon99}

578: F.Bonjour, C.Charmousis, and R.Gregory, \cqg{16}{2427}{1999}.

579: \bibitem{hor96}

580: P.Horava and E.Witten, \npb{475}{94}{1996},\\

581: A.Lukas, B.A.Ovrut, K.S.Stelle, and D.Waldram, \prd{59}{086001}{1999},\\

582: A.Lukas, B.A.Ovrut, and D.Waldram, \prd{60}{086001}{1999}.

583: \bibitem{emp01}

584: R.Emparan, R.Gregory, and C.Santos, \prd{63}{104022}{2001}.

585: \bibitem{rog01}

586: M.Rogatko, \prd{64}{064014}{2001}.

587: \bibitem{gar91}

588: D.Garfinkle, G.T.Horowitz, and A.Strominger, \prd{43}{3140}{1991},\\

589: and Erratum \prd{45}{3888}{1992}.

590: \end{thebibliography}

591: 

592: 

593: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

594: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figures %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

595: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

596: 

597: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

598: \pagebreak

599: 

600: \begin{figure}

601: \begin{center}

602: %\leavevmode

603: %\epsfxsize=440pt

604: %\epsfysize=540pt

605: %\epsfbox{phi401.ps, angle=-90}

606: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{phi401.ps}

607: \end{center}

608: \caption{

609:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

610:   $\phi^4$ potential. Isolines on bottom panels are drawn for $0.2$,

611:   $0.4$, $0.6$ and $0.8$ for the field X and for $-0.1$, $-0.2$,

612:   $-0.3$ and $-0.4$ for the energy. Inlets in bottom plots show the

613:   value of the fields on the black hole horizon. Black hole has

614:   $M=1.0$, $Q=0.1$ and the domain width is $w=1.0$.}

615: \label{figphi4}

616: \end{figure}

617: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

618: %\vfill

619: %\eject

620: %

621: \begin{figure}

622: \begin{center}

623: %\leavevmode

624: %\epsfxsize=400pt

625: %\epsfysize=540pt

626: %\epsfbox{phi4max.ps}

627: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{phi4max.ps}

628: \end{center}

629: \caption{

630:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

631:   $\phi^4$ potential and extreme black hole. Isolines on bottom panels

632:   are drawn for $0.2$, $0.4$, $0.6$ and $0.8$ for the field X and for

633:   $-0.1$, $-0.2$, $-0.3$ and $-0.4$ for the energy. Inlets in bottom

634:   plots show the value of the fields on the black hole z-axis. Black

635:   hole has $M=1.0$, $Q=\sqrt{2}$ and the domain width is $w=1.0$.}

636: \label{figphi4max}

637: \end{figure}

638: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

639: %\vfill

640: %\eject

641: %

642: \begin{figure}

643: \begin{center}

644: %\leavevmode

645: %\epsfxsize=440pt

646: %\epsfysize=540pt

647: %\epsfbox{phi41001.ps}

648: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{phi41001.ps}

649: \end{center}

650: \caption{

651:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

652:   $\phi^4$ potential. Isolines on bottom panels are drawn for $0.2$,

653:   $0.4$, $0.6$ and $0.8$ for the field X and for $-0.1$, $-0.2$,

654:   $-0.3$ and $-0.4$ for the energy. Black hole has

655:   $M=1.0$, $Q=0.1$ and the domain width is $w=10.0$.} 

656: \label{figphi410}

657: \end{figure}

658: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

659: %\vfill

660: %\eject

661: %

662: \begin{figure}

663: \begin{center}

664: %\leavevmode

665: %\epsfxsize=440pt

666: %\epsfysize=540pt

667: %\epsfbox{phi410max.ps}

668: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{phi410max.ps}

669: \end{center}

670: \caption{

671:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

672:   $\phi^4$ potential and extreme black hole. Isolines on bottom panels

673:   are drawn for $0.2$, $0.4$, $0.6$ and $0.8$ for the field X and for

674:   $-0.1$, $-0.2$, $-0.3$ and $-0.4$ for the energy. The energy isoline

675:   around the black hole is $-0.3$. Black hole has $M=1.0$,

676:   $Q=\sqrt{2}$ and the domain width is $w=10.0$.}

677: \label{figphi410max}

678: \end{figure}

679: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

680: %\vfill

681: %\eject

682: %

683: \begin{figure}

684: \begin{center}

685: %\leavevmode

686: %\epsfxsize=440pt

687: %\epsfysize=540pt

688: %\epsfbox{sing01.ps}

689: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{sing01.ps}

690: \end{center}

691: \caption{

692:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

693:   sine-Gordon potential. Isolines on bottom panels are drawn for $0.2\pi$,

694:   $0.4\pi$, $0.6\pi$ and $0.8\pi$ for the field X and for $-0.5$, $-1.5$,

695:   $-2.5$ and $-3.5$ for the energy. Inlets in bottom plots show the

696:   value of the fields on the black hole horizon. Black hole has

697:   $M=1.0$, $Q=0.1$ and the domain width is $w=1.0$.}

698: \label{figsing}

699: \end{figure}

700: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

701: %\vfill

702: %\eject

703: %

704: \begin{figure}

705: \begin{center}

706: %\leavevmode

707: %\epsfxsize=440pt

708: %\epsfysize=540pt

709: %\epsfbox{singmax.ps}

710: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{singmax.ps}

711: \end{center}

712: \caption{

713:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

714:   sine-Gordon potential. Isolines on bottom panels are drawn for $0.2\pi$,

715:   $0.4\pi$, $0.6\pi$ and $0.8\pi$ for the field X and for $-0.5$, $-1.5$,

716:   $-2.5$ and $-3.5$ for the energy. Inlets in bottom plots show the

717:   value of the fields on the black hole z-axis. Black hole has

718:   $M=1.0$, $Q=\sqrt{2}$ and the domain width is $w=1.0$.}

719: \label{figsingmax}

720: \end{figure}

721: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

722: %\vfill

723: %\eject

724: %

725: \begin{figure}

726: \begin{center}

727: %\leavevmode

728: %\epsfxsize=440pt

729: %\epsfysize=440pt

730: %\epsfbox{sing1001.ps}

731: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{sing1001.ps}

732: \end{center}

733: \caption{

734:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

735:   sine-Gordon potential. Isolines on bottom panels are drawn for

736:   $0.2\pi$, $0.4\pi$, $0.6\pi$ and $0.8\pi$ for the field X and for

737:   $-0.5$, $-1.5$, $-2.5$ and $-3.5$ for the energy. Black hole has

738:   $M=1.0$, $Q=0.1$ and the domain width is $w=10.0$.}

739: \label{figsing10}

740: \end{figure}

741: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

742: %\vfill

743: %\eject

744: %

745: \begin{figure}

746: \begin{center}

747: %\leavevmode

748: %\epsfxsize=440pt

749: %\epsfysize=540pt

750: %\epsfbox{sing10max.ps}

751: \includegraphics[width=330pt]{sing10max.ps}

752: \end{center}

753: \caption{

754:   The field X (left panels) and the energy E (right panels) for the

755:   sine-Gordon potential. Isolines on bottom panels are drawn for

756:   $0.2\pi$, $0.4\pi$, $0.6\pi$ and $0.8\pi$ for the field X and for

757:   $-0.5$, $-1.5$, $-2.5$ and $-3.5$ for the energy. The energy isoline

758:   around the black hole is $-2.5$. Black hole has $M=1.0$,

759:   $Q=\sqrt{2}$ and the domain width is $w=10.0$.}

760: \label{figsing10max}

761: \end{figure}

762: %

763: %\vfill

764: %\eject

765: 

766: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%FIGURES%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

767: 

768: 

769: 

770: 

771: 

772: 

773: 

774: \end{document}

775: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

776: