1: %%%\documentstyle[preprint,aps,floats,epsfig,subeqn,amssymb]{revtex}

2: 

3: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,epsfig,floats]{revtex}

4: 

5: 

6: 

7: 

8: 

9: 

10: 

11: % Uncomment next two lines for A4 paper size, comment for letter size

12: 

13: %\addtolength{\textheight}{17.6mm}

14: 

15: 

16: 

17: %%%%% number equations by section %%%%%%%%

18: 

19: %\makeatletter

20: 

21: %\@addtoreset{equation}{section}

22: 

23: %\makeatother

24: 

25: 

26: 

27: % Command Definitions

28: 

29: 

30: 

31: \def\real{I\negthinspace R}

32: 

33: \def\zed{Z\hskip -3mm Z }

34: 

35: \def\half{\textstyle{1\over2}}

36: 

37: \def\quarter{\textstyle{1\over4}}

38: 

39: \def\sech{\,{\rm sech}\,}

40: 

41: \def\ie{{\it i.e.,}}

42: 

43: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

44: 

45: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

46: 

47: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

48: 

49: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

50: 

51: \newcommand{\bml}{\begin{mathletters}}

52: 

53: \newcommand{\eml}{\end{mathletters}}

54: 

55: %\newcommand{\bml}{\begin{subequations}}

56: 

57: %\newcommand{\eml}{\end{subequations}}

58: 

59: %

60: 

61: \def\aprle{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}

62: 

63: \def\aprge{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}

64: 

65: 

66: 

67: \begin{document}

68: 

69: 

70: 

71: \tighten

72: 

73: 

74: 

75: \preprint{DCPT-03/07}

76: 

77: \draft

78: 

79: 

80: 

81: %\twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname @twocolumnfalse\endcsname

82: 

83: 

84: 

85: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

86: 

87: 

88: 

89: %\wideabs{                       % Uncomment this line for two-column output

90: 

91: 

92: 

93: \title{Strings in de Sitter space  }

94: 

95: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

96: 

97: 

98: 

99: \author{Eug\^enio R. Bezerra de Mello\footnote{emello@fisica.ufpb.br}}

100: \address{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica-CCEN, Universidade Federal da 

101: Para\'{\i}ba, 58.059-970, J. Pessoa, PB, C. Postal 5.008, Brazil}

102: \author{ Yves Brihaye\footnote{Yves.Brihaye@umh.ac.be}}

103: \address{Facult\'e des Sciences, Universit\'e de Mons-Hainaut,

104:  B-7000 Mons, Belgium}

105: \author{Betti Hartmann\footnote{Betti.Hartmann@durham.ac.uk}}

106: \address{Department of Mathematical Sciences, University

107: of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K.}

108: \date{\today}

109: 

110: \setlength{\footnotesep}{0.5\footnotesep}

111: 

112: 

113: 

114: \maketitle

115: 

116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

117: 

118: \begin{abstract}

119: 

120: We study both global as well as local (Nielsen-Olesen) strings

121: in de Sitter space. While these type of topological defects

122: have been studied in the background of a de Sitter metric previously, we study

123: here the full set of coupled equations.

124: We find only ``closed'' solutions. The behaviour of the metric tensor

125: of these solutions resembles that of ``supermassive'' strings with a curvature

126: singularity at the cosmological horizon.

127: For global strings (and the composite defect) we are able to construct 

128: solutions which are regular on the interval from the origin to

129: the cosmological horizon if the global string core lies completely inside the

130: horizon.

131: \end{abstract}

132: 

133: 

134: 

135: \pacs{PACS numbers: 04.20.Jb, 04.40.Nr, 11.27.+d  }

136: 

137: 

138: 

139: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

140: 

141: %\newpage

142: 

143: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}

144: 

145: \section{Introduction}

146: A number of different topological defects \cite{shell} are thought to have been 

147: formed during the phase transitions in the early universe. Depending on the topology

148: of the vacuum manifold ${\cal M}$ these are domain walls, strings, monopoles and textures corresponding

149: to the homotopy groups $\pi_0({\cal M})$, $\pi_1({\cal M})$, $\pi_2({\cal M})$ and $\pi_3({\cal M})$, respectively.

150: Cosmic strings \cite{shell,kibble} have always gained a lot of interest since they are thought

151: to be important for the structure formation in the universe due to their huge

152: energy per unit length (roughly $10^{21}\frac{kg}{m}$ for a string formed at

153: GUT scale $\approx 10^{16} GeV$).

154: 

155: A classical field theory model which has string-like solutions is the Abelian Higgs model \cite{no}. These solutions, also sometimes called ``vortices'', correspond to 

156: infinitely long objects. They have a core radius inverse proportional

157: to the Higgs boson mass and magnetic flux tubes with radius proportional to the 

158: inverse of the gauge boson mass.  Coupling the Abelian Higgs model minimally to gravity, the influence of the vortex on the geometry of space-time was investigated analytically \cite{Gar}. It was shown that far away from the core

159: of the string the space-time is Minkowski minus a wedge. It was 

160: also realised \cite{laguna} that if the vacuum expectation value of

161: the Higgs field is sufficiently large (corresponding

162: to strings having formed at a phase transition with energy scale much higher

163: than the GUT scale), then a different type of solution

164: is possible. These so-called ``supermassive strings'' exist only on a

165: finite interval of the radial coordinate and have a curvature singularity at

166: the maximal value of the radial coordinate. 

167: The existence of further solutions was investigated in a detailed numerical

168: analysis \cite{Christensen,yves}. It was found that the parameter space

169: is indeed divided by the curve of maximal angular deficit $2\pi$. 

170: If the deficit is smaller than $2\pi$, so-called ``open'', 

171: i.e. infinitely extended solutions were found. One is the above mentioned

172: cosmic string solution \cite{Gar} which however has a ``shadow'' solution

173: of Melvin-type for all values of the coupling constants. 

174: For deficit large than $2\pi$, only the ``supermassive'',

175: ``closed'' solutions exist \cite{laguna}.

176: 

177: The static solutions of the model without gauge field, so-called global

178: strings, have also been studied \cite{cohen,harari,Gibbons,gregory1}. Like all global defects, the global string has a

179: long-range Goldstone field which leads to a divergent energy.

180: Moreover, the global string is characterised by a logarithmically

181: divergent deficit angle in contrast to the local

182: string which has a constant deficit angle. The coupling to gravity in the case

183: of the static global monopole leads to a singularity-free monopole solution

184: \cite{vilenkin} in the sense that while the energy is still

185: linearly divergent, the solid deficit angle is now finite. For

186: the static global string the corresponding singularity can not be removed 

187: by coupling the system

188: to gravity and only the assumption that the metric be time-dependent

189: removes the singularity \cite{gregory2}.

190: 

191: Since a number of astrophysical observations like e.g. the measurement of

192: redshifts of Type Ia supernovae \cite{super} has led scientists to believe that we live in a universe with positive cosmological constant, the study of topological

193: defects in de Sitter (dS) space seems interesting.

194: But it also is of interest from another point of view, namely the dS/CFT

195: correspondence \cite{strominger}. This correspondence 

196: suggests a holographic duality between gravity in a $d$-dimensional

197: dS space and a conformal field theory (CFT) ``living''

198: on the boundary of the dS spacetime and thus being $d-1$-dimensional.

199: 

200: Recently,  Nielsen-Olesen strings in the background 

201: of a $4$-dimensional de Sitter spacetime $dS_4$ have been studied \cite{GM}. 

202: However, to our knowledge, the {\it full} system of coupled matter and metric

203: field equations has not been studied yet. One of the aims of this

204: paper is the investigation of exactly this point.

205: 

206: Motivated by some recent work on

207: a composite system of a 

208: global and local monopole in curved space-time \cite{bbh,by,spi},

209: we investigate the composite system of a global and 

210: Nielsen-Olesen string in a curved space-time with cosmological constant

211: as well.

212: 

213: Our paper is organised as follows: we give the model and static, cylindrically

214: symmetric Ansatz in Section 2. We give the equations of motion in

215: Section 3. We discuss the pure Nielsen-Olesen solutions

216: in Section 4, the global string solutions

217: in Section 5 and the composite system of a global and Nielsen-Olesen

218: string in Section 6. We give our summary in Section 7.

219: 

220: 

221: \section{The Model}

222: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

223: The model which describes a gravitating Nielsen-Olesen string interacting with

224: a global one in the presence of a non-vanishing cosmological constant is 

225: given by the following action:

226: 

227: \begin{equation}

228: \label{action}

229: S=\int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} \left( \frac{1}{16\pi G} (R-2\Lambda) + {\cal L}_{NO}+ 

230: {\cal L}_{global} + {\cal L}_{inter} \right)

231: \end{equation}

232: where $R$ is the Ricci scalar, $G$ denotes Newton's constant and $\Lambda$ is the 

233: cosmological constant. The Lagrangian of the  Abelian Higgs model is given by 

234: \cite{no}:

235: \begin{equation}

236: {\cal L}_{NO}=\frac{1}{2}D_{\mu} \phi (D^{\mu} \phi)^*-\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu}

237: -\frac{\lambda_1}{4}\left(\phi\phi^*-\eta^2_1\right)^2

238: \end{equation} 

239: with the covariant derivative $D_\mu=\nabla_{\mu}-ieA_{\mu}$ and the

240: field strength $F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu$  of the U(1) gauge potential $A_{\mu}$ with coupling constant $e$.

241: $\phi$ is a complex scalar field (the Higgs field) with vacuum expectation value $\eta_1$ and self-coupling constant $\lambda_1$.

242: The Lagrangian of the global string reads \cite{shell}:

243: \begin{equation}

244: {\cal L}_{global}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu} \chi \partial^{\mu} \chi^* - \frac{\lambda_2}{4}\left(\chi\chi^*-\eta^2_2\right)^2

245: \end{equation} 

246: where $\chi$ is a complex scalar field (the Goldstone field) with vacuum expectation value $\eta_2$ and self-coupling $\lambda_2$.

247: Finally, following \cite{bbh} we introduce an extra potential which couples (with coupling constant $\lambda_3$)

248: the two sectors of the model directly to each other:

249: \begin{equation}

250: {\cal L}_{inter}=-\frac{\lambda_3}{4}\left(\phi\phi^*-\eta^2_1\right)\left(\chi\chi^*-\eta^2_2\right)

251: \end{equation}

252: Without this term, the global and local string would be coupled only indirectly 

253: over gravity. In this paper we will use units which $\hbar=c=1.$

254: 

255: 

256: 

257: \subsection{The Ansatz}

258: 

259: In the following we shall analyse the classical equations of motion associated

260: with the above system. In order to do that,

261: let us write down the matter and gravitational fields as shown below.

262: The most general, cylindrically symmetric line element invariant under boosts

263: along the $z-$direction is:

264: \begin{equation}

265: ds^2=N^2(\rho)dt^2-d\rho^2-L^2(\rho)d\varphi^2-N^2(\rho)dz^2 \ .

266: \end{equation}

267: The non-vanishing components of the Einstein tensor $G_{\mu\nu}$ then read:

268: \begin{eqnarray}

269: & & G_{tt}=-G_{zz}=\frac{N}{L}\left(L\partial_{\rho\rho}N + \partial_{\rho}N \partial_{\rho}L+

270: N\partial_{\rho\rho}L \right), \nonumber \\

271: & & G_{rr}=\frac{\partial_{\rho}N}{N^2L}\left(2\partial_{\rho}L N+\partial_{\rho}N L\right)\ \ ,

272: \ \ G_{\varphi\varphi}=\frac{L^2}{N^2}\left(2N\partial_{\rho\rho}N+(\partial_{\rho} N)^2\right) \ ,

273: \end{eqnarray}

274: where $\partial_{\rho}$ denotes the derivative with respect to $\rho$. 

275: 

276: For the matter and gauge fields, we have:

277: \begin{equation}

278: \phi(\rho,\varphi)=\eta_1 h(\rho)e^{i n\varphi} \ ,

279: \end{equation}

280: \begin{equation}

281: \chi(\rho,\varphi)=\eta_1 f(\rho)e^{i m\varphi} \ ,

282: \end{equation}

283: \begin{equation}

284: A_{\mu}dx^{\mu}=\frac {1}{e}(n-P(\rho)) d\varphi \ .

285: \end{equation}

286: $n$ and $m$ are integers indexing the vorticity of the Higgs and Goldstone fields, respectively,  around the $z-$axis.

287: 

288: Substituting the above configurations into the matter Lagrangian density 

289: ${\cal L}_{M}={\cal L}_{NO}+ {\cal L}_{global} + {\cal L}_{inter}$, we obtain:

290: \begin{eqnarray}

291: {\cal L}_M&=&-\frac{\eta_1^2}2(\partial_{\rho}h(\rho))^2-

292: \frac{\eta_1^2}2(\partial_{\rho}f(\rho))^2-\frac{n^2}

293: {2e^2L^2(\rho)}(\partial_{\rho}P(\rho))^2\nonumber\\

294: &-&\frac{\eta_1^2n^2}{2L^2(\rho)}h^2(\rho)P^2(\rho)-

295: \frac{\eta_1^2m^2}{2L^2(\rho)}f^2(\rho)-

296: \frac{\lambda_1\eta_1^4}4(h^2(\rho)-1)^2\nonumber\\

297: &-&\frac{\lambda_2\eta_1^4}4(f^2(\rho)-q^2)^2

298: -\frac{\lambda_3\eta_1^4}2 (h^2(\rho)-1)(f^2(\rho)-q^2) \  .

299: \end{eqnarray}

300: 

301: \section{Equations of Motion}

302: 

303: We define the following dimensionless variable and function:

304: \begin{equation}

305: x=\sqrt{\lambda_1}\eta_1 \rho \ \ \ , \ \ \ L(x)=L(\rho)\eta_1\sqrt{\lambda_1} \ .

306: \end{equation}

307: Then, the total Lagrangian only depends on the following dimensionless coupling constants

308: \begin{equation}

309: \gamma=8\pi G\eta_1^2 \ \ , \ \alpha=e^2/\lambda_1 \ \ , \ \ 

310: q=\frac{\eta_2}{\eta_1} \ \ , \ \ {\bar\Lambda}=

311: \frac\Lambda{\lambda_1\eta_1^2} \ \ , \ \

312: \beta_i^2=\frac{\lambda_i}{\lambda_1} \ \ , \ \ i=1,2,3 \ .

313: \end{equation}

314: 

315: Varying (\ref{action}) with respect to the matter fields and metric functions, we obtain a system of five non-linear differential equations. The Euler-Lagrange equations for the matter field functions read:

316: \begin{equation}

317: \frac{(N^2Lh')'}{N^2L}=\frac{n^2}{L^2} hP^2+h(h^2-1)+\beta_3^2h(f^2-q^2) \ ,

318: \end{equation}

319: \begin{equation}

320: \frac{(N^2Lf')'}{N^2L}=\frac{m^2f}{L^2}+\beta_2^2f(f^2-q^2)+\beta_3^2

321: f(h^2-1) \  ,

322: \label{eqf}

323: \end{equation}

324: \begin{equation}

325: \frac{L}{N^2}\left(\frac{N^2P'}{L}\right)'=\alpha h^2P \ ,

326: \end{equation}

327: while the Einstein equations

328: \begin{equation}

329: G_{\mu\nu}+\bar\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=\gamma T_{\mu\nu} \ \ , \ \ \mu,\nu=t,x,\varphi,z

330: \end{equation}

331: read:

332: \begin{eqnarray}

333: \label{N1}

334: \frac{(LNN')'}{N^2 L}&=&-{\bar\Lambda}+\gamma\left[\frac{n^2(P'(x))^2}

335: {2\alpha L^2}-\frac14(h^2(x)-1)^2-\frac{\beta_2^2}4(f^2(x)-q^2)^2\right.

336: \nonumber\\

337: &-&\left.\frac{\beta_3^2}2

338: (h^2(x)-1)(f^2(x)-q^2)\right]

339: \end{eqnarray}

340: and

341: \begin{eqnarray}

342: \label{N2}

343: \frac{(N^2L')'}{N^2L}&=&-{\bar\Lambda}-\gamma\left[\frac{n^2h^2(x)P^2(x)}

344: {L^2(x)}+\frac{m^2f^2(x)}{L^2(x)}+\frac{n^2(P'(x))^2}{2\alpha L^2(x)}+

345: \frac14(h^2(x)-1)^2

346: \right.\nonumber\\

347: &+&\left.\frac{\beta_2^2}4(f^2(x)-q^2)^2+\frac{\beta_3^2}2

348: (h^2(x)-1)(f^2(x)-q^2)\right]

349: \end{eqnarray}

350: Moreover, defining $u=\sqrt{-g}=N^2L$ we get the following equation:

351: \begin{eqnarray}

352: \label{ueq}

353: \frac{u''(x)}{u(x)}&=&-3{\bar\Lambda}-\gamma\left[\frac{n^2h^2(x)P^2(x)}

354: {L^2(x)}+\frac{m^2f^2(x)}{L^2(x)}-\frac{n^2(P'(x))^2}{2\alpha L^2(x)}\right.

355: \nonumber\\

356: &+&\frac34(h^2(x)-1)^2+\frac{3\beta_2^2}4(f^2(x)-q^2)^2\nonumber\\

357: &+&\left.\frac{3\beta_3^2}2(h^2(x)-1)(f^2(x)-q^2)\right] \ .

358: \end{eqnarray}

359: The prime now denotes the derivatives with respect to $x$.

360: 

361: \subsection{Boundary Conditions}

362: 

363: The requirement of regularity at the origin leads to the  following boundary 

364: conditions:

365: \begin{equation}

366: h(0)=0, \ f(0)=0 \ , \ P(0)=n \ 

367: \end{equation}

368: for the matter fields and 

369: \begin{equation}

370: \label{zero}

371: N(0)=1, \ N'(0)=0, \ L(0)=0 \ , \ L'(0)=1 \ .

372: \end{equation}

373: for the metric fields. Since a cosmological horizon appears naturally in de Sitter 

374: space, we integrate the equations only up to this value of the coordinate $x$,

375: $x=x_0$. In order for the core of the local string to lie

376: completely within the horizon we require:

377: \begin{equation}

378: h(x=x_0)=1, \ f(x=x_0)=q \ , \ P(x=x_0)=0 \ .

379: \end{equation}

380: Note that due to the fact that the $x$ interval is finite, this is not (like in asymptotically

381: flat space) a necessary condition for finite energy solutions. However, we have chosen

382: these boundary conditions such that the energy-momentum tensor vanishes at $x=x_0$.

383: In addition, the limit $\bar{\Lambda}\rightarrow 0$ which leads to $x_0\rightarrow \infty$ 

384: can be taken with these boundary conditions. 

385: 

386: \section{Nielsen-Olesen strings in de Sitter space}

387: 

388: First, we are interested in the case of the pure Nielsen-Olesen string.

389: This corresponds to setting $f(x)\equiv 0$ and $q\equiv 0$ in the previous equations.

390: \subsection{Vacuum solution}

391: 

392: For the case of the pure gauge string, there is a vacuum solution of the equations.

393: Setting $P(x)=0$ and $h(x)=1$, we find from (\ref{ueq}), that:

394: \begin{equation}

395: N^2(x)L(x)=A\sin(\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}x)+B\cos(\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}x) \ , \ \ A, B \ \ {\rm constants} \ .

396: \end{equation}

397: Using the boundary conditions (\ref{zero}), we find the following solution:

398: \begin{equation}

399: N^2(x)L(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}}\sin(\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}x) \ .

400: \end{equation}

401: This then can be put into (\ref{N1}) and (\ref{N2}) and we find the solutions:

402: \begin{equation}

403: N(x)=\cos^{2/3}(\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}\frac x2)

404: \label{NON}

405: \end{equation}

406: and

407: \begin{equation}

408: L(x)=\frac{2^{2/3}}{\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}}

409: [\sin(\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda} x)]^{1/3}[\tan(\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}

410: \frac{x}{2})]^{2/3}

411: \label{NOL}

412: \end{equation}

413: where the coefficients again result from the

414: boundary conditions (\ref{zero}). The first zero of $N(x)$ lies at

415: $x^v_0=\pi/\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}$. At the same time, 

416: $L(x\rightarrow x^v_0)\rightarrow \infty$. This is the cosmological horizon

417: of the vacuum solution. If we expand the metric functions around this horizon, we obtain:

418: \begin{equation}

419: N(x\rightarrow x^v_0)\approx(-\frac{\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}}{2})^{2/3} (x-x^v_0)^{2/3}+...

420: \end{equation}

421: and

422: \begin{equation}

423: L(x\rightarrow x^v_0)\approx(\frac{\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}}{2})^{-4/3} (x-x^v_0)^{-1/3}+..  \ .

424: \end{equation}

425: This has the behaviour of a so-called Kasner solution \cite{kramer}:

426: \begin{equation}

427: ds^2=(k\rho)^{2a}dt^2-d\rho^2-C^2(k\rho)^{2(b-1)}\rho^2 d\varphi^2-(k\rho)^{2c}dz^2

428: \end{equation}

429: with $a=c=2/3$, $b=-1/3$, $k=\frac{\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}}{2}$, $C=1$.

430: These type of ``closed'' solutions have been found previously \cite{laguna} for the case $\bar\Lambda=0$

431: and were called ``supermassive'' strings. When calculating

432: the Kretschmann scalar $K=R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ one obtains \cite{laguna} that $K\propto (x-x^v_0)^{-4}$ and thus the solution has indeed a curvature singularity at $x=x^v_0$. Remarkable is that in the case of  $\bar\Lambda=0$, these type of solutions only appear for

433: sufficiently high vacuum expectation values (vev) of the Higgs field corresponding

434: to strings having formed at energy scales much higher than the 

435: GUT scale \cite{laguna}. For smaller values of the vev no singularity appears

436: and the solutions exist on the full interval $[0:\infty[$.  

437: Accordingly, the numerical study showed \cite{yves} that these solutions

438: exist for a $\gamma > \gamma_{cr}$.

439: 

440: 

441: \subsection{Numerical results}

442: 

443: Subject to the boundary conditions (\ref{zero}), we have studied the coupled 

444: system of equations numerically.

445: 

446: First, we fixed $\alpha$ and $\bar\Lambda$ to study the influence of

447: the gravitational coupling $\gamma$ on the solutions.

448: We determined the  value of $x$ at which the metric function $N(x)$ vanishes, i.e. $N(x=x_0)=0$. Our results for $\alpha=1.0$, $\bar\Lambda=0.005$ and $n=1$, $2$ are shown in Fig.~1. As expected the value of $x_0$ decreases with increasing gravitational coupling $\gamma$. Moreover, we observe a steep decrease in $x_0$ for a relatively small range of $\gamma$. We have only plotted results for $\gamma$'s corresponding to $x_0 \geq 5$ since for large $\gamma$'s the numerics

449: becomes increasingly difficult. The reason for this is indicated in Fig.~2, where we 

450: show the profiles of the metric functions $N(x)$, $L(x)$ as well as those of the matter field functions $P(x)$ and $h(x)$ for $\alpha=1.0$, $\bar\Lambda=0.005$, $n=1$ 

451: and two different

452: choices of $\gamma$. For $\gamma=1.5$, the value of $x$ at which the matter field functions reach their asymptotic values $0$ and $1$, respectively, is much smaller than the value of $x_0$. 

453: This means that the horizon clearly lies outside the core of the string. For $\gamma=1.7$, however, the situation is different. The value of $x$ at which $h(x)$ reaches $1$ is roughly equal to $x_0$, while $P(x)$ seems to be still greater than $0$ on the plot we present. This is due to the fact that the ``real'' solution would have a slightly higher $x_0$ at which $P(x=x_0)=0$. However, since

454: $L(x\rightarrow x_0)\rightarrow \infty$, it is numerically impossible to reach the final solution. Nevertheless, the plot indicates that -like $h(x)$- $P(x)$ just reaches its asymptotic value $0$ at $x=x_0$. Thus the horizon lies very close to the core of the string.  

455: 

456: 

457: Then, we fixed $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ and determined $x_0$ in dependence on $\bar\Lambda$. Our results for $\alpha=\gamma=0.5$ and $n=1$, $2$ together with the location 

458: of the cosmological horizon of the vacuum solution, $x^v_0$, are given in Fig.~3. 

459: 

460: We clearly observe that the value of the cosmological horizon

461: decreases with the increase of the cosmological constant, as expected.

462: Moreover, an increase in the vorticity $n$ leads to a decrease of $x_0$ for

463: the same $\bar\Lambda$. For small $\bar\Lambda$, $x_0$ of both the 

464: $n=1$ and the $n=2$ solution is very close to the corresponding $x^v_0$.

465: This can again be explained by studying the behaviour of the

466: matter field functions for varying $\bar{\Lambda}$. 

467: As observed previously \cite{GM}, we find that for fixed $\alpha$ and $\gamma$

468: and increasing $\bar{\Lambda}$, the value of the coordinate $x$

469: at which the matter field functions reach their asymptotic values

470: also increases, e.g. for $\alpha=\gamma=0.5$, $n=2$ we find

471: that for $\bar{\Lambda}=0.001$ the value of $x$, where the gauge field function

472: reaches $P(x^{0.1})=0.1$ is $x^{0.1}(\bar{\Lambda}=0.001)\approx 6.2$,

473: while for $\bar{\Lambda}=0.005$, we find 

474: $x^{0.1}(\bar{\Lambda}=0.005)\approx 6.45$. This can be interpreted

475: as representing  a thicker string core due to an increased cosmological expansion.

476: Thus the cosmological horizon lies closer and closer to the core of the string

477: for increasing $\bar\Lambda$ and so only for small $\bar\Lambda$

478: the solution close to the cosmological horizon can be described by the

479: vacuum solution. In Fig.~4, we show the profiles of $N(x)$ and $L(x)$

480: for $\bar\Lambda=0.01$, $\alpha=\gamma=0.5$ and $n=2$ both for the Nielsen-Olesen string and the vacuum solution. Clearly, the solutions differ quite strongly.  

481: 

482: \section{Global strings in de Sitter space}  

483: 

484: 

485: 

486: This is the case of setting $P(x)\equiv n$ and $h(x)\equiv 0$ (which implies $\eta_1\equiv 0$). The global string without a cosmological constant, i.e. $\bar\Lambda=0$ has been studied extensively \cite{cohen,harari,Gibbons,gregory1}. To have a good starting solution for the construction of dS global strings, we have reconstructed the global string  without cosmological constant. We find that the metric function $N(x)$ deviates very little from one, but that the quantity $|N(x=0)-N(x^*)|$ is increasing

487: with $x^*\rightarrow\infty$. Moreover, $L(x)$ grows approximately linearly with $x$.

488: This is the behaviour found in \cite{harari}, namely that outside the core of the global string the metric functions behave like

489: $N^2=1-\frac{\gamma}{2}\ln(\frac{x}{x_{gc}})$, $L^2=x^2(1-\gamma\ln(\frac{x}{x_{gc}}))$ with $x_{gc}\propto (q\beta_2)^{-1}$ being the core of the global string in our rescaled coordinates. Moreover, we recover the behaviour of the Goldstone field function $f(x\rightarrow \infty)=q-O(x^{-2})$.

490: 

491: \subsection{Numerical results}

492: 

493: 

494: 

495: For non-vanishing cosmological constant we find that the behaviour of  $N(x)$ and 

496: $L(x)$ resembles that of the metric functions in the case of the Nielsen-Olesen

497: string in de Sitter space (see previous section). Again, for all 

498: constants fixed and $\bar\Lambda$ varied, we find that

499: the value at which $N(x=x_0)=0$ decreases with increasing

500: $\bar\Lambda$, e.g. for $\beta_2=1$, $q=0.1$, $\gamma=0.1$, we find that

501: $x_0(\bar\Lambda=10^{-4})\approx 180$, while $x_0(\bar\Lambda=10^{-3})\approx 57$.

502: At the same time, the value of $x$ at which the function $f(x)$ reaches its

503: vev increases with increasing $\bar\Lambda$ which is due to 

504: the increased cosmological expansion thus leading to an extended string core.

505: The behaviour of the function $f(x)$ depends crucially on the

506: cosmological constant which determines the cosmological horizon

507: and the parameters $\beta_2$ and $q$, which determine the radius of the string core.

508: We will discuss these features in more detail in the context of composite topological

509: defects in the next section.

510: 

511: 

512: 

513: \section{Composite system of global and Nielsen-Olesen string}

514: Unlike in the case of the ``pure'' Nielsen-Olesen string, a complete analytical analysis 

515: of the composite system seems to be impossible.

516: However, some additional information can  be gained by analysing the energy density per unit 

517: length. Before discussing our numerical results, we make some remarks on this point in the

518: following section.

519: 

520: 

521: 

522: The energy density per unit length of the composite defect is given by \cite{Christensen,yves}:

523: \begin{equation}

524: {\cal E}=\int \sqrt{-g_3} T^0_0 dx_1 dx_2

525: \end{equation}

526: where $g_3$ is the determinant of the $2+1$ dimensional metric

527: $ds^2=N^2(\rho)dt^2-d\rho^2-L^2(\rho)d\varphi^2$ and $T^0_0=-{\cal L}_M$ is the 

528: $00$-component of the energy-momentum tensor. In the cylindrical coordinates,

529: we get:

530: \begin{eqnarray}

531: \label{E}

532: {\cal E}&=&\pi\eta_1^2\int_0^{x_0}d x N(x)L(x)\left[

533: \frac{n^2}{\alpha L^2(x)}(P'(x))^2+(h'(x))^2+(f'(x))^2\right.\nonumber\\

534: &+&\frac{n^2h^2(x)P^2(x)}{L^2(x)}+\frac{m^2f^2(x)}{L^2(x)}+

535: \frac12(h^2(x)-1)^2+\frac{\beta_2^2}2(f^2(x)-q^2)^2\nonumber\\

536: &+&\left.\beta_3^2(h(x)^2-1)(f^2(x)-q^2)\right] \ .

537: \end{eqnarray}

538: From this, we can observe that the composite defect 

539: has a finite energy density. There are two different scenarios now. If the product 

540: $\beta_2 q$ is large enough the core of the global string is small and

541: the cores of both strings lie within the cosmological horizon $x_0$. We can then 

542: assume that $f(x_0)=q$, $f^{'}(x_0)=0$, $P(x_0)=0$, $h(x_0)=1$.

543: From before, we know that $L(x)$ goes to infinity close to the horizon, while

544: $N(x)L(x)$ remains finite. Thus the integrand of (\ref{E}) tends to zero like

545: $m^2q^2\frac{N(x)}{L(x)}$. If the product $\beta_2 q$ is small, the

546: core of the global string extends to outside the horizon $x_0$. 

547: Then the integrand of (\ref{E}) becomes 

548: $N(x)L(x)\left[(f'(x))^2+\frac{m^2f^2(x)}{L^2(x)}+\frac{\beta_2^2}2(f^2(x)-q^2)^2\right]$. 

549: Since close to the horizon, the product $N(x)L(x)$ tends to

550: zero, this is finite. We have indeed confirmed numerically that this is the case. 

551: 

552: 

553: \subsection{Numerical Results}

554: 

555: Assuming that the behaviour of the metric functions $N(x)$ and $L(x)$ persists in the presence 

556: of all (non-trivial) matter fields (which indeed our numerical analysis confirms),

557: we can insert (\ref{NON}) and (\ref{NOL}) into (\ref{eqf}). We obtain that:

558: \begin{equation}

559: f(x\rightarrow x_0)\sim q+ C(x-x_0)^{8/3} \ \ , \ \ \ C \ \ {\rm constant}

560: \end{equation}

561: 

562: We have construct the composite model solution

563: by starting from the Nielsen-Olesen (NO) string and increasing the parameter

564: $q$ gradually from zero.

565: Our numerical analysis confirms the assumption that the radius of the NO

566: string core is smaller than that of the global string. Moreover, we find

567: that the NO string always resides inside 

568: the horizon.

569: As for the global string, we find that when the coupling constant $\beta_2$ is small

570: the function $f(x)$ 

571: reaches the imposed expectation value  $f(x_0) = q$ with a positive

572: concavity, in particular the derivative $f'|_{x=x_0}$ is non zero

573: and our numerical solution clearly suggests that the behaviour

574: $f(x\rightarrow x_0) \sim q + C (x - x_0)^{8/3}$ is not fulfilled.

575: This is demonstrated in Fig.~5, where we show $f(x)$ of the composite 

576: defect for $\beta_2^2=1$, $\alpha=\gamma=\beta_1^2=1$, $q=0.1$, $\beta_3^2=0$ and

577: $\bar\Lambda=0.001$. 

578: This suggests that for small values of the product $\beta_2 q$, the argument demonstrated

579: above doesn't hold.

580: 

581: Increasing the value of $\beta_2$ we were able to 

582: produce solutions which seem to have the expected behaviour, i.e. 

583: $f(0) =0$, $f(x=x_0)=q$ and $f'|_{x=x_0}=0$. This is shown in Fig.~5

584: for $\alpha=\gamma=\beta_1^2=1$, $q=0.1$, $\beta_3^2=0$,

585: $\bar\Lambda=0.001$ and $\beta_2^2=5$, $10$, $20$, $50$, respectively.

586: Of course, the occurrence

587: of the singularity at $x = x_0$ renders the interpretation of the numerical results 

588: not hundred percent certain but we are rather confident that

589: composite string defects which are regular inside the horizon

590: exist for large enough $\beta_2$.

591: 

592: All these results are obtained for the case of $\beta_3=0$, i.e. the two defects

593: interact with each other only indirectly over gravity.

594: We have also attempted to construct solutions with $\beta_3\neq 0$.

595: We find that only for large enough values of the quotient $\beta_2^2/\beta_3^2$,

596: the solutions seem well behaved. If $\beta_2^2/\beta_3^2$ is roughly of the order

597: of $10^2$ (for $\alpha=\gamma=\beta_1^2=1$, $q=0.1$ and $\bar\Lambda=0.001$),

598: the behaviour of the functions is 

599: very similar to that in the case of $\beta_3=0$. For $\beta_2^2/\beta_3^2$

600: smaller than that, however, the functions $f(x)$ and $h(x)$ start to develop

601: oscillations close to the cosmological horizon. The number of oscillations

602: increases with the decrease of the quotient $\beta_2^2/\beta_3^2$.

603: Thus, we conclude that directly interacting 

604: composite defects without the global string singularity only 

605: exist if the self-interaction of the global string

606: is much larger than the interaction between the two defects.

607:  

608:  

609: 

610: \section{Conclusion}

611: 

612: In this paper we have analysed both Nielsen-Olesen and global strings as

613: well as the composite system of both defects in de Sitter space. 

614: When the matter fields are set equal to their vacuum expectation

615: values (vev) in the case of the ``pure'' Nielsen-Olesen string, 

616: we were able to construct analytic solutions of the Einstein equations

617: in terms of trigonometric functions. The metric tensor resembles that

618: of so-called ``supermassive'' strings which exist in asymptotically

619: flat space only for sufficiently high enough values of the

620: vev of the Higgs field \cite{laguna}. These were considered as being ``unphysical''

621: since they should have formed at energy scales high above the GUT scale. Since recent

622: observations indicate that we live in a universe with positive cosmological constant,

623: and since we find that the existence of our solutions is not restricted to

624: values of the Higgs field's vev being large enough, these solutions might well

625: be of relevance.

626: 

627: Our numerical analysis suggests that the general behaviour of the vacuum metric

628: persists in the presence of the matter fields. E.g.  comparing the location of the

629: cosmological horizon $x_0$ in dependence on the coupling constants for the ``pure'' Nielsen-Olesen

630: string  and that of the vacuum solution, $x^v_0$, we find that for small $\bar\Lambda$ and/or $\gamma$,

631: $x_0$ and $x^v_0$ are nearly equal. For increasing $\bar\Lambda$ and/or $\gamma$, the difference

632: between the two increases. The reason for this is that the radius of the string core

633: becomes comparable to the radius of the cosmological horizon and thus the assumption of a ``vacuum''

634: at the cosmological horizon is not valid any longer.

635: 

636: Constructing the global string and the composite defect of Nielsen-Olesen and global string,

637: we find that the existence of  solutions without a singularity resulting from the

638: global string itself depends crucially

639: on the product $\beta_2 q$ which (in our rescaled coordinates) is inverse proportional to

640: the radius of the global string's core. If (for fixed $q$) $\beta_2$ is too small, the core

641: of the global string extends to outside the cosmological horizon and the

642: function $f$ reaches its vev with positive concavity. For large enough values of $\beta_2$,

643: the core of the global string lies inside the horizon and

644: our numerical results seem to indicate that a global string/composite

645: defect without the normal singularity of the global string exists. 

646: However, note that

647: the removal of the global string

648: singularity which exists in asymptotically flat space

649: can be achieved only by introducing a ``new'' singularity, the curvature singularity

650: at the horizon.

651: \\

652: \\

653: \\

654: \\

655: \\

656: {\bf Acknowledgement} YB acknowledges the Belgian FNRS

657: for financial support. BH was supported by an EPSRC grant.\\

658: \\

659: \\

660: {\bf Note added} After finishing the manuscript, B. Linet has brought to our intention

661: his paper ``The static, cylindrically symmetric strings in general relativity with cosmological

662: constant'' [J. Math. Phys. {\bf 27} (1986), pp. 1817-1818], in which he discusses the vacuum

663: solutions (\ref{NON}) and (\ref{NOL}) ``re-found'' by us.

664: 

665: 

666: 

667: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

668: \bibitem{shell} A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, {\it Cosmic strings and other topological

669: defects}, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994.

670: \bibitem{kibble} T. W. B. Kibble and M. Hindmarsh, Rep. Progr. Phys. {\bf 58}, 477 (1995). 

671: \bibitem{no} H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B61}, 45 (1973). 

672: \bibitem{Gar} D. Garfinkle, Phys. Rev. {\bf D32}, 1323 (1985).

673: \bibitem{laguna} P. Laguna and D. Garfinkle, Phys. Rev. {\bf D40}, 1011 (1989).

674: \bibitem{Christensen} M. Christensen, A. L. Larsen and Y. Verbin, Phys. Rev. 

675: {\bf D60}, 125012 (1999).

676: \bibitem{yves} Y. Brihaye and M. Lubo, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}, 085004 (2000).

677: \bibitem{cohen} A. G. Cohen and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. {\bf B215}, 67 (1988).

678: \bibitem{harari} D. Harari and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. {\bf D37}, 3438 (1988).

679: \bibitem{Gibbons} G. W. Gibbons, M. E. Ortiz and F. Ruiz Ruiz, Phys. Rev. 

680: {\bf D39}, 1546 (1989).

681: \bibitem{gregory1} R. Gregory, Phys. Lett. {\bf B215}, 663 (1988).

682: \bibitem{vilenkin} M. Barriola and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 63}, 341 (1989);

683: D. Harari and C. Lousto, Phys. Rev. {\bf D42}, 2626 (1990).

684: \bibitem{gregory2} R. Gregory, Phys. Rev. {\bf D54}, 4955 (1996).

685: \bibitem{super} S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. {\bf 517}, 565 (1999);

686: A. G. Riess et al., Astron. J. {\bf 116}, 1009 (1998).

687: \bibitem{strominger} A. Strominger, JHEP {\bf 0110}, 034 (2001);

688: JHEP {\bf 0111}, 049 (2001).

689: \bibitem{GM} A. M. Gezelbash and R. B. Mann, Phys. Lett  {\bf B537}, 329 (2002).

690: \bibitem{bbh} E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Y. Brihaye and B. Hartmann, 

691: Phys. Rev. {\bf D67}, 045015 (2003).

692: \bibitem{by} Y. Brihaye and B. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. {\bf D66}, 064018 (2002).

693: \bibitem{spi} J. Spinelly, U de Freitas and E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Phys. Rev.

694: {\bf D66}, 024018 (2002).

695: \bibitem{kramer} D. Kramer, H. Stephani, E. Herlt and M. MacCallum, {\it Exact solutions of Einstein's field equations}, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1980.

696:  

697: \end{thebibliography}

698: 

699: 

700: 

701: 

702: 

703: 

704: 

705: \newpage

706: 

707: \begin{figure}

708: 

709: \centering

710: 

711: \epsfysize=10cm

712: 

713: \mbox{\epsffile{bbh3.ps}}

714: 

715: \caption{The value of the dimensionless coordinate $x$ at which a cosmological

716: horizon appears, $x=x_0$, is given for the Nielsen-Olesen string as function 

717: of $\gamma$ for $n=1$ (dashed) and $n=2$ (solid) with $\alpha=1.0$ and $\bar\Lambda=0.005$. }

718: 

719: \end{figure}

720: 

721: 

722: 

723: \newpage

724: 

725: \begin{figure}

726: 

727: \centering

728: 

729: \epsfysize=10cm

730: 

731: \mbox{\epsffile{bbh4.ps}}

732: 

733: \caption{The profiles of the metric functions $N(x)$, $L(x)$ and the profiles of

734: the matter field functions $P(x)$ and $h(x)$ are shown for $\alpha=1.0$,

735: $\bar\Lambda=0.005$, $n=1$ and $\gamma=1.5$ (dashed) and $\gamma=1.7$ (solid), respectively. }

736: 

737: \end{figure}

738: 

739: 

740: 

741: \newpage

742: 

743: \begin{figure}

744: 

745: \centering

746: 

747: \epsfysize=10cm

748: 

749: \mbox{\epsffile{bbh1.ps}}

750: 

751: \caption{The value of the dimensionless coordinate $x$ at which a cosmological

752: horizon appears, $x=x_0$, is given for the Nielsen-Olesen string

753: as function  of $\bar\Lambda$ for 

754: $n=1$ and $n=2$ with $\alpha=\gamma=0.5$. For comparison, also the value 

755: $x^v_0=\pi/\sqrt{3\bar\Lambda}$ for the vacuum solution is given. }

756: 

757: \end{figure}

758: 

759: 

760: 

761: \newpage

762: 

763: \begin{figure}

764: 

765: \centering

766: 

767: \epsfysize=10cm

768: 

769: \mbox{\epsffile{bbh2.ps}}

770: 

771: \caption{The profiles of the metric functions $N(x)$ and $L(x)$ 

772:  are shown for $\alpha=\gamma=0.5$,

773: $\bar\Lambda=0.01$ and vorticity $n=2$. We compare the Nielsen-Olesen solution

774: (solid) with the corresponding vacuum solution (dashed).}

775: \end{figure}

776: 

777: \newpage

778: \begin{figure}

779: \centering

780: \epsfysize=10cm

781: \mbox{\epsffile{bbh5.ps}}

782: \caption{The profile of the Goldstone field function $f(x)$  

783: is shown for the composite defect with $\alpha=\gamma=\beta_1^2=1$, $\beta_3^2=0$, $\bar\Lambda=0.001$, $q=0.1$,

784: vorticity $n=1$ and different values of $\beta_2^2$.}

785: \end{figure}

786: 

787: 

788: 

789: 

790: 

791: 

792: \end{document}

793: 

794: 

795: