1: %% LyX 1.1 created this file.  For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.

2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.

3: \documentclass[a4paper,english]{article}

4: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

5: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}

6: \usepackage{babel}

7: \usepackage{graphics}

8: \usepackage{epsf,epsfig,psfrag}

9: \usepackage{amssymb}

10: 

11: \textheight=23.5cm      % for A4 paper

12: \textwidth=14cm         %     ,,

13: \topmargin=-1cm         %     ,,

14: \oddsidemargin=1cm      %     ,,

15: 

16: \makeatletter

17: 

18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.

19: \providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}

20: 

21: \makeatother

22: \begin{document}

23: 

24: 

25: \baselineskip 14pt

26: 

27: \title{\begin{flushright}

28: {\normalsize IPPP/03/13\\

29: DCPT/03/26\\}

30: \end{flushright}\vspace{1cm}

31: Interactions in Intersecting Brane Models}

32:   \author{S.A.Abel and A.W.Owen}

33:  \date{\textit{IPPP, Centre for Particle Theory, Durham

34:   University, DH1 3LE, Durham, U.K.}}

35:   

36: \maketitle

37: 

38: 

39: 

40: 

41: 

42: \begin{abstract}

43: \end{abstract}

44: We discuss tree level three and four point scattering

45: amplitudes in type II string models with matter fields localized at the

46: intersections of D-brane wrapping cycles. Using conformal field theory

47: techniques we calculate the four fermion amplitudes. These give

48: "contact" interactions that can lead to flavour changing effects. We show

49: how in the field theory limit the amplitudes can be interpreted as the

50: exchange of Kaluza-Klein excitations, string oscillator states and stretched

51: heavy string modes. 

52: 

53: \section{Introduction}

54: 

55: The discovery of D-branes as non-perturbative objects in any theory of open

56: and closed strings has led to great progress in our understanding of the

57: structure of string theory. Furthermore, with the correspondence between

58: D-branes and gauge theories their status as objects of fundamental importance

59: to string phenomenology has been well established.

60: 

61: The requirement of chirality has led to a number of scenarios involving

62: D-branes. These include D-branes on orbifold singularities~\cite{botup} and

63: more recently intersecting brane models~\cite{ralph1,ibws}, which exploit

64: the fact that chiral fermions can arise at brane

65: intersections~\cite{bangles}. The spectrum is then determined by the

66: intersection numbers of the D-branes which wrap some compact

67: space. This gives a simple topological explanation of family replication 

68: which is rather attractive. 

69: 

70: The success of the intersecting brane scenario in producing semi-realistic

71: models has been well documented, for

72: example 

73: refs.\cite{ralph1,chiral,ralph2,ralph4,ralph5,ralph6,smcomp,moresm,bai,hugetitle}.

74: It is possible to construct models similar to the standard

75: model~\cite{just,ralph3,just2,exsm2,cvetic3,exsm1} and also models with N=1

76: supersymmetry~\cite{cvetic1,cvetic2,susy,susyorient}, although this latter possibility is more difficult to achieve.

77: Recently, attention has been

78: diverted to a more detailed analysis of the phenomenology of such

79: models~\cite{deform,gthresholds}. In particular, computation of yukawa couplings~\cite{paper1,qmass,yukawa}

80: and flavour changing neutral currents~\cite{ams}. This paper details the computation of the three point and

81: four point functions of string states localised at intersecting branes. These results

82: allow the estimation of other important constraints on viable configurations of

83: intersecting branes.

84: 

85: Much of our analysis will be aided by the technology discussed

86: in~\cite{hamidi,dixon} for closed strings on orbifolds. This is due to an

87: analogy between twisted closed string states on orbifolds and open strings at

88: brane intersections. This analogy is the subject of our first section. As a

89: warm up we

90: then proceed to a determination of the classical part of the three point function, for which the

91: computation runs along similar lines to the closed string cases

92: in~\cite{munoz,het}. The complete calculation of the four point function follows. We

93: will consider the four point function on only 2 sets of intersecting branes, so that

94: the classical part is actually somewhat easier to deal with than the three point 

95: function. The quantum part we evaluate using CFT techniques.

96: 

97: \section{Remarks on closed and open string twisted states}

98: In order to calculate the three point and four point functions, we will make use of the

99: analogy between open string states that are stretched between branes at

100: angles and closed string twisted states on orbifolds. This analogy allows us to

101: make use of the CFT technology first discussed in ref.\cite{dixon,hamidi}. 

102: Hence, this first section will be devoted to a description of this 

103: correspondence.

104: 

105: Let us first consider string states at an intersection with branes at right

106: angles, in a pair of dimensions \( X_{1} \), \( X_{2} \). The set

107: up is as shown in figure~\ref{90degrees}.

108: \begin{figure}

109: {\centering \resizebox*{0.6\textwidth}{0.3\textheight}{\includegraphics{90.eps}} \par}

110: \caption{intersections at right angles\label{90degrees}}

111: \end{figure}

112: We will refer to the complex world sheet coordinate as \( \tilde{z} \)

113: and map the space-time coordinates onto it directly, \( X_{1}+iX_{2}=\tilde{z} \).

114: Consider the Green function at a point in the plane for \( X_{1} \).

115: To calculate this we can use the method of images as shown in the

116: figure. The boundary condition is Neumann on the \( X_{1} \) axis

117: and Dirichlet on the \( X_{2} \) axis, so to take account of this

118: we need 3 images with the Green functions of those at negative \( X_{2} \)

119: being added negatively. The total Green function is given by 

120: \begin{eqnarray}

121: G(\tilde{z},\tilde{w}) & = & G_{0}(\tilde{z},\tilde{w})+G_{0}(\tilde{z},\overline{\tilde{w}})-G_{0}(\tilde{z},-\overline{\tilde{w}})-G_{0}(\tilde{z},-\tilde{w})\\

122:  & = & -\frac{\alpha '}{2}\ln \frac{|\tilde{z}-\tilde{w}|}{|\tilde{z}+\tilde{w}|}\frac{|\tilde{z}-\overline{\tilde{w}}|}{|\tilde{z}+\overline{\tilde{w}}|}

123: \end{eqnarray}

124: Now map the world-sheet to the usual upper half plane by making the

125: conformal transformation \( z^{2}=\tilde{z} \). In these coordinates

126: the Green function becomes 

127: \begin{equation}

128: G(z,w)=-\frac{\alpha '}{2}\ln

129: \frac{|\sqrt{z}-\sqrt{w}|}{|\sqrt{z}+\sqrt{w}|}-\frac{\alpha '}{2}\ln

130: \frac{|\sqrt{z}-\sqrt{\overline{w}}|}{|\sqrt{z}+\sqrt{\overline{w}}|},

131: \end{equation}

132: which can be recognized as the Green function of the original point

133: in the upper half plane, plus its image at \( \overline{w} \) in

134: the lower half plane, in the presence of a \( Z_{2} \) twist operator,

135: \( \sigma _{+} \) , placed at the origin~\cite{mansfield,fairlie,hamidi}. Consequently vertex operators

136: involving states with ND boundary conditions must include such operators.

137: Note that if the string has a Neumann condition at both ends (e.g.

138: if only one end was attached to the \( X_{1} \) brane with the second

139: end free) we would add all the images and find the usual untwisted

140: Green function 

141: \begin{equation}

142: G(z,w)=-\frac{\alpha '}{2}\ln |z-w|-\frac{\alpha '}{2}\ln |z-\overline{w}|.

143: \end{equation}

144:  

145: 

146: For more general angles one expects the appropriate twisted Greens

147: functions to appear. Indeed, writing the complex boson as \( X=X_{1}+iX_{2} \),

148: we can proceed in a similar manner, as shown in figure~\ref{60} for

149: \( \pi /3 \). 

150: \begin{figure}

151: {\centering \resizebox*{0.6\textwidth}{0.4\textheight}{\includegraphics{60.eps}} \par}

152: 

153: 

154: \caption{The images for branes at \protect\( \pi /3\protect \), where \protect\( \rho =e^{2\pi i/3}\protect \).\label{60}}

155: \end{figure}

156: The total contribution to the Green function is given by the sum of

157: the images;

158: \begin{equation}

159: G(\tilde{z},\tilde{w})=\sum _{l=0}^{m-1}\, \rho ^{l}G_{0}(\tilde{z},\rho

160: ^{l}\tilde{w})+\rho ^{l}G_{0}(\tilde{z},\rho ^{l}\overline{\tilde{w}})

161: \end{equation}

162: where \( \rho =e^{\frac{2\pi il}{m}} \) and the intersection angle

163: is taken to be \( \pi /m \). Again transforming to the upper half

164: plane with \( z=\tilde{z}^{m} \) we find

165: \begin{equation}

166: G(z,w)=\sum _{l=0}^{m-1}\, \rho ^{l}G_{0}(z^{\frac{1}{m}},\rho

167: ^{l}w^{\frac{1}{m}})+\rho ^{l}G_{0}(z^{\frac{1}{m}},\rho

168: ^{l}\overline{w}^{\frac{1}{m}})

169: \end{equation}

170: (where the \( \frac{1}{m} \) roots are the trivial ones) which we

171: recognize as the Green function of the original point in the upper

172: half plane, plus its image at \( \overline{w} \) in the lower half

173: plane, in the presence of a \( Z_{m} \) twist operator, \( \sigma _{+} \)

174: , at the origin~\cite{hamidi}. 

175: 

176: This is of course entirely consistent with the fractional mode expansion of

177: string states stretched between branes. In particular, consider a string

178: stretched between two D-branes intersecting at an angle $\pi \vartheta$, as depicted in figure~\ref{stringpic}. The boundary conditions are,

179: \begin{equation}

180: \label{bc}

181: \begin{array}{l}

182: \partial_{\tau}X^{2}(0)=\partial_{\sigma}X^{1}(0)=0, \\

183: \partial_{\tau}X^{1}(\pi)+\partial_{\tau}X^{2}(\pi)\cot(\pi\vartheta)=0, \\

184: \partial_{\sigma}X^{2}(\pi)-\partial_{\sigma}X^{1}(\pi)\cot(\pi\vartheta)=0,

185: \end{array}

186: \end{equation}

187: which determine the holomorphic solutions to the string equation of motion to be,

188: \begin{equation}

189: \label{modeexp}

190: \begin{array}{l}

191: \partial X(z)=\sum_{k}\alpha_{k-\vartheta}z^{-k+\vartheta-1},\\

192: \partial \bar{X}(z)=\sum_{k}\bar{\alpha}_{k+\vartheta}z^{-k-\vartheta-1}.

193: \end{array}

194: \end{equation}

195: We can define the  worldsheet coordinate, $z=-e^{\tau-i\sigma}$, which has domain the upper-half

196: complex plane. This can be extended to the entire complex plane using the

197: `doubling trick', i.e. we define,

198: \begin{equation}

199: \partial X(z)= \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}

200:                          \partial X(z) & \mbox{Im}(z) \geq 0 \\

201:                          \bar{\partial}\bar{X}(\bar{z}) & \mbox{Im}(z) <

202:                          0

203:                         \end{array} \right.,

204: \end{equation}

205: and similarly for $\partial \bar{X}(z)$.

206: 

207: \begin{figure}

208: \begin{center}

209:  \epsfig{file=twisted.eps,height=70mm,width=90mm}

210: \put(-183,87){\large{$\pi\vartheta$}}

211: \caption{A `twisted' open string state}

212: \label{stringpic}

213: \end{center}

214: \end{figure}

215: 

216: The mode expansion in~(\ref{modeexp}) is identical to that of a

217: closed string state in the presence of a $\mathbb{Z}_{N}$ orbifold twist

218: field (with the replacement $\frac{1}{N}=\vartheta$). Thus

219: an open string stretched between intersecting D-branes is analogous

220: to a twisted closed string state on an orbifold and to take account of 

221: this we introduce a twist field $\sigma_\vartheta

222: (w,\bar{w})$ that changes the boundary conditions of

223: $X$ to be those of eq.(\ref{bc}), 

224: where the intersection point of the two D-branes

225: is at $X(w,\bar{w})$. Then, in an identical  manner to the closed string

226: case, we obtain the OPEs,

227: \begin{equation}

228: \label{opes}

229: \begin{array}{l}

230: \partial X(z) \sigma_{\vartheta}(w,\bar{w}) \sim

231: (z-w)^{-(1-\vartheta)}\tau_{\vartheta}(w,\bar{w}), \\

232: \partial \bar{X}(z) \sigma_{\vartheta}(w,\bar{w}) \sim

233: (z-w)^{-\vartheta}\tau'_{\vartheta}(w,\bar{w}),

234: \end{array}

235: \end{equation}

236: where $\tau'_{\vartheta}$ and $\tau_{\vartheta}$ are excited twists. Also,

237: the local monodromy conditions for transportion

238: around $\sigma_{\vartheta}(w,\bar{w})$ are,

239: \begin{equation}

240: \label{mono}

241: \begin{array}{l}

242: \partial X(e^{2 \pi i}(z-w))=e^{2\pi i\vartheta}\partial X(z-w), \\

243: \partial \bar{X}(e^{2 \pi i}(z-w))=e^{-2\pi i\vartheta }\partial \bar{X}(z-w).

244: \end{array}

245: \end{equation}

246: The mode expansion for $X$ is then,

247: \begin{equation}

248: X(z,\bar{z})=\sqrt{\frac{\alpha'}{2}}\sum_{k}\left( \frac{\alpha_{k-\vartheta}}{k-\vartheta}z^{-k+\vartheta}+\frac{\tilde{\alpha}_{k+\vartheta}}{k+\vartheta}\bar{z}^{-k-\vartheta}\right),

249: \end{equation}

250: with the right and left moving modes being mapped into upper and lower

251: half planes. A similar mode expansion is obtained for the fermions with

252: the obvious addition of \( \frac{1}{2} \) to the boundary conditions

253: for NS sectors.  

254: 

255: \section{Three point functions}

256: Now we proceed to calculate the classical part of the three point function, which in

257: particular includes the yukawa interactions. We will consider the case

258: of a compactified space which is factorizable into 2 tori, $T_{2} \times T_{2}

259: \times T_{2}$, and in which branes $A,B,C$ wrap one cycles 

260: $L_{A,B,C}$. As shown in figure~\ref{IB}, the string states are localised at

261: the vertices of a triangle whose boundary consists of the D-branes which wrap

262: the internal space. One would expect the amplitude to be dominated by an

263: instanton, and to be 

264: proportional to $e^{-\frac{1}{2\pi \alpha}A}$ where $A$ is the area of the

265: triangle worldsheet 

266: (also, due to the toroidal geometry we would expect a contribution

267: from wrapped triangles). This expectation is born out in the 

268: following calculation.

269: 

270: \begin{figure}

271: \begin{center}

272:  \epsfig{file=3pt.eps,height=50mm,width=60mm}

273: \caption{three point interaction}

274: \end{center}

275: \label{IB}

276: \end{figure}

277: 

278: Denote the spacetime coordinates of our torus subfactor by $X=X^{1}+iX^{2}$

279: and $ \bar{X}=X^{1}-iX^{2}$. The bosonic

280: field $X$ can be split up into a classical piece, $X_{cl}$, and a quantum

281: fluctuation, $X_{qu}$. The amplitude then 

282: factorises into classical and quantum contributions,

283: \begin{equation}

284: Z=\sum_{\langle X_{cl} \rangle}e^{-S_{cl}}Z_{qu}.

285: \end{equation}

286: $X_{cl}$ must satisfy the string equation of motion and possess the correct

287: asymptotic behaviour near the triangle vertices. 

288: 

289: The three point function requires 3 twist vertices,

290: $\sigma_{\vartheta_{i}}(z_{i},\bar{z}_{i})$, corresponding to the three relevant

291: intersections of the D-branes. These vertices are attached to the boundary of

292: the tree-level disc diagram which can be conformally mapped to the upper-half

293: plane. Then our classical solution $\partial X_{cl}$ is determined, up to a

294: constant, by its holomorphicity and asymptotic 

295: behaviour at each D-brane intersection,

296: which is given by the OPEs in eq.(\ref{opes}). 

297: Hence, mapping the spacetime coordinates $X$ and $\bar{X}$

298: into the worldsheet coordinate z, we obtain,

299: \begin{equation}

300: \begin{array}{ll}

301: \partial X_{cl}(z)= a\omega(z), & \partial \bar{X}_{cl}(z)=\bar{a}

302: \omega'(z), \\

303: \bar{\partial} X_{cl}(\bar{z})= b\bar{\omega}'(\bar{z}), & \bar{\partial} \bar{X}_{cl}(\bar{z})=\bar{b}\bar{\omega}(\bar{z}),

304: \end{array}

305: \end{equation}

306: where,

307: \begin{equation}

308: \begin{array}{ll}

309: \omega(z)=\prod_{i=1}^{3} (z-z_{i})^{-(1-\vartheta_{i})} &

310: \omega'(z)=\prod_{i=1}^{3} (z-z_{i})^{-\vartheta_{i}},

311: \end{array}

312: \end{equation}

313: and $a,\bar{a},b,\bar{b}$ are normalisation constants. Here we have used the

314: doubling trick which also requires that $a^{*}=\bar{b}$ and $\bar{a}=b^{*}$ (upto a phase). We can therefore write,

315: \begin{equation}

316: \label{action}

317: S_{cl}=\frac{1}{4 \pi \alpha}\left( |a|^{2}\int d^{2}z |\omega(z)|^{2}

318:   +|\bar{a}|^{2}\int d^{2}z |\omega'(z)|^{2} \right),

319: \end{equation}

320: The contribution to $S_{cl}$ from $|\omega'(z)|$ diverges, hence we set $\bar{a}=0$.

321: 

322: The normalisation constants are determined from the global

323: monodromy conditions, i.e. the transformation of $X$ as it is transported

324: around more than one twist operator, such that the net twist is zero. We determine this from the action of a

325: single twist operator, $\sigma_{\vartheta}(w,\bar{w})$. In the 

326: closed string case this field acts to rotate and shift $X(z,\bar{z})$;

327: \begin{equation}

328: X(e^{2\pi i}z,e^{-2\pi i}\overline{z})=\theta X(z,\overline{z})+v

329: \end{equation}

330: where \( \theta  \) is a complex phase factor

331: with phase \( \pi \vartheta  \), and \( v \) is over a coset of

332: the  toroidal compactification lattice \( \Lambda  \) which depends on the

333: fixed point \( f \); 

334: \begin{equation}

335: v=(1-\theta )(f+\Lambda ).

336: \end{equation}

337: Ignoring the lattice for the moment, the equivalent statement for open strings at intersections is that 

338: \begin{equation}

339: \label{trans}

340: X(e^{2\pi i}z,e^{-2\pi i}\overline{z})= e^{2\pi i\vartheta}X +(1-e^{2\pi i\vartheta})f,

341: \end{equation}

342: where f is the intersection point of the two D-branes. This can be seen from

343: the local monodromy conditions~(\ref{mono}) and the fact that $f$ must be left

344: invariant. The global monodromy of $X$ is then simply a product of such actions.

345: On integrating around 2 twist fields, the strings are embedded in the target

346: space as shown in figure~\ref{target}. The portion of integration around each

347: vertex takes $X(z,\bar{z})$ from one brane to another, while integrating

348: between two vertices introduces a shift along that particular brane.

349: 

350: \begin{figure}

351: \centering

352: \epsfig{file=loops3.eps, height=100mm,width=100mm}

353: \caption{Transporting $X(z,\bar{z})$ around two twist fields}

354: \label{target}

355: \end{figure}

356: 

357: To determine the shifts, we must consider triangles that wrap the torus and

358: whose vertices are at the same intersection points. (Other shifts would contribute to other three point functions.)  

359: Keeping $f_{1}$ fixed and extending the

360: triangle as shown in figure~\ref{triangle}, we obtain a contribution to the

361: same three point function provided, 

362: \begin{equation}

363: \begin{array}{ll}

364: x_{A}=k_{A}L_{AB}|I_{AB}| & x_{C}=k_{A}L_{CB}|I_{CB}|,

365: \end{array}

366: \end{equation}

367: where $k_{A},k_{B} \in \mathbb{Z}$, $I_{ij}$ is the intersection number of

368: branes $i$ and $j$ and $L_{ij}$ is the displacement between

369: successive $i,j$ intersections along the $i^{th}$ brane. 

370: Using congruency of the triangle we obtain,

371: \begin{equation}

372: \begin{array}{ll}

373: k_{A}=l \frac{|I_{CB}|}{gcd(|I_{CB}|,|I_{AB}|)} & k_{C}=l

374: \frac{|I_{AB}|}{gcd(|I_{CB}|,|I_{AB}|)},

375: \end{array}

376: \end{equation}

377: where $l \in \mathbb{Z}$. On the other hand, if we instead keep $f_{2}$ fixed

378: we obtain,

379: \begin{equation}

380: \begin{array}{ll}

381: k_{A}=l' \frac{|I_{CB}|}{gcd(|I_{CB}|,|I_{AC}|)} & k_{B}=l'

382: \frac{|I_{AC}|}{gcd(|I_{CB}|,|I_{AC}|)},

383: \end{array}

384: \end{equation}

385: where $l'$ is a different integer. 

386: Hence our lattice shifts must be of the form,

387: \begin{equation}

388: x_{A}(l)=l\frac{|I_{CB}| L_{A}}{gcd(|I_{CB}|,|I_{AB}|,|I_{AB}|)},

389: \end{equation}

390: and similar for $x_{B,C}$ with the obvious replacment of indices, but with the 

391: same $l$. This is similar to the case discussed in ref.\cite{yukawa}.

392: \begin{figure}

393: \centering

394: \epsfig{file=triangle.eps, height=60mm,width=80mm}

395: \caption{Wrapping triangles}

396: \label{triangle}

397: \end{figure}

398: 

399: Considering all closed curves,

400: $C_{i}$, with net twist zero, we obtain the global monodromy conditions,

401: \begin{equation} 

402: \label{globmono}

403: \Delta _{C_{i}}X=\oint _{C_{i}}dz\partial X(z)+\oint

404: _{C_{i}}d\overline{z}\bar{\partial}X(\bar{z})=v_{i},

405: \end{equation}

406: In our case there is only one independent, net twist zero, closed curve. This

407: is shown in figure~\ref{curve}. We have set $z_{1}=0, z_{2}=1$ and

408: $z_{3} \rightarrow \infty$ using $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ invariance and the dashed

409: lines denote branch cuts. Evaluating the contour integral we get,

410: \begin{equation}

411: \label{B}

412: \oint_{C} dz \omega(z)=-(-z_{\infty})^{-(1-\vartheta_{3})}4\sin

413:   \pi \vartheta_{2}\sin \pi\vartheta_{1} e^{\pi i \vartheta_{1}}

414:   \frac{\Gamma(\vartheta_{1})\Gamma(\vartheta_{2})}{\Gamma(1-\vartheta_{3})} ,

415: \end{equation} 

416: where phases from branch cuts are determined by starting at S, which we

417: assume is in the principal branch of each factor in the integrand. The

418: global monodromy condition~(\ref{globmono}) is independent of this convention provided we

419: order the transformations~(\ref{trans}) according to the path taken around

420: the curve C, again starting at S. This gives,

421: \begin{equation}

422: \label{A}

423: \Delta_{C}X_{cl}=4 \sin \pi \vartheta_{1} \sin \pi \vartheta_{2} e^{-i(\vartheta_{1}-\vartheta_{2})}(f_{1}-f_{2}+x_{A}(l)),

424: \end{equation}

425: substituting~(\ref{A}) and~(\ref{B}) into~(\ref{globmono}) we then

426: determine,

427: \begin{equation}

428: \label{a}

429: |a|^{2}=|-z_{\infty}|^{2(1-\vartheta_{3})}|f_{1}-f_{2}+x_{A}(l)|^{2}\frac{\Gamma(1-\vartheta_{3})}{\Gamma(\vartheta_{1})\Gamma(\vartheta_{2})}.

430: \end{equation}

431: We also require the integral,

432: \begin{equation}

433: \label{integral}

434: \int d^{2}z|\omega(z)|^{2}=|-z_{\infty}|^{-2(1-\vartheta_{3})}\sin \pi\vartheta_{2} (\Gamma(\vartheta_{2}))^{2}\frac{\Gamma(\vartheta_{3})\Gamma(\vartheta_{1})}{\Gamma(1-\vartheta_{3})\Gamma(1-\vartheta_{1})},

435: \end{equation}

436:  which can be performed using the method of~\cite{kawai} to relate open and

437:  closed string amplitudes. Finally, substituting~(\ref{integral})

438:  and~(\ref{a}) into~(\ref{action}) we obtain, 

439: \begin{equation}

440: S_{cl}=\sum_{l \in \mathbb{Z}}\frac{1}{2 \pi \alpha'}\left( \frac{\sin

441:       \pi \vartheta_{1} \sin \pi \vartheta_{2}}{2 \sin \pi \vartheta_{3}}|f_{1}-f_{2}+x_{A}(l)|^{2}\right).

442: \end{equation}

443: This is, as expected, the area of the triangle (and wrappings) defined by the intersecting D-branes that is swept out by the string worldsheet.

444: 

445: \begin{figure}[h]

446: \centering

447: \epsfig{file=ant.eps, height=50mm, width=100mm}

448: \caption{Closed curve with net twist zero required for global monodromy condition.}

449: \label{curve}

450: \end{figure}

451: 

452: \section{Four point functions}

453: Having confirmed the efficacy of the conformal field theory techniques, 

454: let us now turn to the four point function on two sets of branes 

455: intersecting at angles. Processes involving contact interactions between

456: 4 fermions have previously only been considered for orthogonal D branes

457: in ref.\cite{benakli}. For theories with branes at angles

458: these processes are particularly important because the sector of chiral

459: fermions is rather independent of the general set up, whereas the

460: scalars are more model dependent and may be tachyonic. As for the

461: orthogonal case, we shall see that the processes get contributions

462: from intermediate Kaluza-Klein excitations, winding modes and string

463: excitations. 

464: 

465: The massless fermions of interest appear in the Ramond

466: sector with charges, \( q_{i=0..3} \) for the 4 complex transverse

467: fermionic degrees of freedom given by one of the following; 

468: \begin{equation}

469: \begin{array}{lll}

470: q & = & (+\frac{1}{2},\, \, \vartheta _{1}-\frac{1}{2},\vartheta _{2}-\frac{1}{2},\vartheta _{3}-\frac{1}{2})\\

471: q & = & (\pm \frac{1}{2},\pm \frac{1}{2},\, \, \vartheta _{2}-\frac{1}{2},\vartheta _{3}-\frac{1}{2})\\

472: q & = & (\pm \frac{1}{2},\pm \frac{1}{2},\pm \frac{1}{2},\, \, \vartheta _{3}-\frac{1}{2})

473: \end{array}

474: \end{equation}

475: depending on the type of intersection. For example \( D_{6} \) branes

476: intersecting in \( (T_{2})^{3} \) are of the first kind. The GSO

477: projection leaves only one 4D spinor, and the theory is chiral. For

478: special values of angles (0 for example) supersymmetry may be restored,

479: but generally supersymmetry is completely broken, and the scalars

480: can be heavy or tachyonic. Fermions for \( D5 \) branes intersecting

481: in \( (T_{2})^{2}\times C/Z_{N} \) are of the second kind. Initially

482: the GSO projection will leave only half the space time spinor degrees

483: of freedom leaving a non-chiral theory. Hence a further orbifolding

484: on the 1st complex dimension is required to get a chiral theory. Finally

485: \( D_{4} \) branes intersecting in \( T_{2}\times C_{2}/Z_{N} \)

486: correspond to the last choice. Again the GSO projection leaves 4 states

487: which need to be further projected out by orbifolding in the \( C_{2} \)

488: dimensions. The particular orbifoldings do not effect the Ramond charges

489: above so the quantum part of the amplitude will be unaffected by it.

490: The classical part of the amplitude depends purely on the world sheet

491: areas. However as the orbifolding is orthogonal to the space in which

492: the branes are wrapping, it will not affect the classical part either.

493: The only affect of the orbifolding is therefore in projecting

494: out the chiralitites above. In addition we shall not consider orientifolding 

495: which does not effect the quantum part of the inetraction, except in so 

496: far as it determines the gauge groups. For the classical part, one would 

497: expect complication due to the presence of image branes, but these could be 

498: treated as essentially separate branes for the present discussion. Hence 

499: our results can be easily adapted to those cases as well. 

500: 

501: The four fermion scattering amplitude is given by a disc diagram with

502: 4 fermionic vertex operators in the $-1/2$ picture, 

503: \( V^{(a)} \) on the boundary. The diagram is

504: then mapped to the upper half plane with vertices on the boundary.

505: The positions of the vertices ($x_1\ldots x_4$) will eventually be 

506: fixed by $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ invariance

507: to \( 0,x,1,\infty  \) (where \( x \) is real), so that

508: the 4 point ordered amplitude can be written 

509: \begin{equation}

510: (2\pi )^{4}\delta ^{4}(\sum _{a}k_{a})\,

511: A(1,2,3,4)=\frac{-i}{g_{s}l_{s}^{4}}\int ^{1}_{0}dx\langle

512: V^{(1)}(0,k_{1})V^{(2)}(x,k_{2})V^{(3)}(1,k_{3})V^{(4)}

513: (\infty ,k_{4})\rangle .

514: \end{equation}

515: To get the total amplitude we sum over all possible orderings;

516: \begin{eqnarray}

517: A_{total}(1,2,3,4)&=&A(1,2,3,4)+A(1,3,2,4)+A(1,2,4,3) \nonumber \\

518: &+& A(4,3,2,1)+A(4,2,3,1)+A(4,3,1,2).

519: \end{eqnarray}

520: The vertex operators for the fermions are of the form 

521: \begin{equation}

522: V^{(a)}(x_{a},k_{a})=const\, \lambda ^{a}\, u_{\alpha }S^{\alpha }\prod

523: _{i}\sigma_{\vartheta_i}\, e^{-\phi /2}e^{ik_{a}.X}(x_{a}).

524: \end{equation}

525: Here \( u_{\alpha } \) is the space time spinor polarization, and

526: \( S^{\alpha } \) is the so called spin-twist operator of the form

527: \begin{equation}

528: S^{\alpha }=\prod _{i}:\exp (iq_{i}H_{i}):

529: \end{equation}

530: with conformal dimension 

531: \begin{equation}

532: h=\sum _{i}\frac{q_{i}^{2}}{2},

533: \end{equation}

534: and \( \sigma_{\vartheta_i} \) is the \( \vartheta  \) 

535: twist operator acting

536: on the \( i \)'th complex dimension, with conformal dimension

537: \begin{equation}

538: h_{i}=\frac{1}{2}\vartheta _{i}(1-\vartheta _{i}).

539: \end{equation}

540: The calculation of the 4-point function of the bosonic twist operators

541: can be done analogously to the closed string case~\cite{dixon}, 

542: with only minor modifications to take account of the image Green function and 

543: the fact that the vertices are on the real axis. 

544: 

545: For completeness we now outline the derivation. Consider the contribution

546: from a single complex dimension in which the branes intersect with angle $\vartheta \pi$. We begin with the asymptotic behaviour of the 

547: Green function in the vicinity of the twist operators. As we saw earlier, 

548: we take account of the world-sheet boundary by adding an image charge.

549: The Green function can then be written

550: \begin{equation}

551: G(z,w;z_i)=g(z,w;z_i)+g(z,\overline{w};z_i)

552: \end{equation}

553: where $g(z,w;z_i)$ is the usual Green function for the 

554: closed string. It has the following asymptotics 

555: \begin{eqnarray}

556: g(z,w;z_i)

557: &\sim & \frac{1}{(z-w)^2}+finite \hspace{0.7cm}  z\rightarrow w 

558: \nonumber \\ 

559: &\sim & \frac{1}{(z-x_{1,3})^{-\vartheta}} \hspace{1.6cm}  z\rightarrow x_{1,3} 

560: \nonumber \\ 

561: &\sim & \frac{1}{(z-x_{2,4})^{-(1-\vartheta )}} \hspace{1cm}  z\rightarrow x_{2,4} 

562: \nonumber \\ 

563: &\sim & \frac{1}{(w-x_{1,3})^{-(1-\vartheta)}} \hspace{1cm}  w\rightarrow x_{1,3} 

564: \nonumber \\ 

565: &\sim & \frac{1}{(w-x_{2,4})^{-\vartheta}} \hspace{1.6cm}  w\rightarrow x_{2,4} 

566: \nonumber \\ 

567: \end{eqnarray}

568: and as we have seen the holomorphic fields are 

569: \begin{eqnarray}

570: \partial X(z) & \equiv & \omega_\vartheta(z) =

571: [(z-x_1)(z-x_3)]^{-\vartheta}

572: [(z-x_2)(z-x_4)]^{-(1-\vartheta)}

573: \nonumber \\

574: \partial \overline{X}(z) & \equiv & \omega_{1-\vartheta}(z) =

575: [(z-x_1)(z-x_3)]^{-(1-\vartheta)}

576: [(z-x_2)(z-x_4)]^{-\vartheta}.

577: \end{eqnarray}

578: This half of the Green 

579: function may now be determined upto an additional term usually

580: denoted $A$ by inspection;

581: \begin{eqnarray}

582: g(z,w;z_i) &=& \omega_\vartheta(z)\omega_{1-\vartheta}(w)

583: \left\{ \vartheta 

584: \frac{(z-x_1)(z-x_3)

585: (w-x_2)(w-x_4) }{(z-w)^2} \right. \nonumber \\

586: &&

587: + \left. (1-\vartheta)

588: \frac{(z-x_2)(z-x_4)

589: (w-x_1)(w-x_3) }{(z-w)^2}+A

590: \right\}.

591: \end{eqnarray}

592: Next one considers 

593: \begin{eqnarray}

594: \frac

595: {\langle T(z)\sigma_-\sigma_+\sigma_-\sigma_+ \rangle}

596: {\langle \sigma_-\sigma_+\sigma_-\sigma_+ \rangle}

597: &=&

598: \lim_{w\rightarrow z}[g_(z,w)-\frac{1}{(z-w)^2}] \nonumber \\

599: &=& \frac{1}{2}\vartheta (1-\vartheta)

600: \left( 

601: (z-x_1)^{-1}

602: +(z-x_3)^{-1}

603: -(z-x_2)^{-1}

604: -(z-x_4)^{-1}\right)^2\nonumber \\

605: &&

606: +\frac{A}{(z-x_1)

607: (z-x_2)

608: (z-x_3)

609: (z-x_4)}

610: \end{eqnarray}

611: where for shorthand we denote $\sigma_\pm \equiv \sigma_{\vartheta^{\pm 1}}$,

612: and compares it to the OPE of $T(z)$ with the twist operator

613: \begin{equation}

614: T(z)\sigma_+(x_2) \sim \frac{h_i}{(z-x_2)^2}+\frac{\partial_{x_2}\sigma_+(x_2)}{(z-x_2)}+\ldots

615: \end{equation}

616: Equating coefficients of $(z-x_2)^{-1}$, and then using $SL(2,R)$ invariance 

617: to fix $(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)= (0,x,1,x_\infty)$ yields a differential 

618: equation for ${\langle \sigma_-\sigma_+\sigma_-\sigma_+ \rangle}$ of the form 

619: \begin{equation}

620: \label{differ}

621: \partial_x \ln \left[ 

622: x^{\vartheta(1-\vartheta)}_\infty

623: {\langle \sigma_-\sigma_+\sigma_-\sigma_+ \rangle}

624:       \right]

625: =

626: \partial_x \ln \left[ (x(1-x))^{-\vartheta(1-\vartheta)} \right] 

627: -\frac{A(x)}{x(1-x)}

628: \end{equation}

629: where 

630: \begin{equation}

631: A(x)=-x_\infty^{-1} A(0,x,1,x_\infty).

632: \end{equation}

633: All that remains is to determine $A(x)$ which can be done using

634: monodromy conditions for $\partial_z X \partial_w \overline{X}$.

635: We proceed along the same lines as in the three point calculation and consider

636: the two independent loops \( C_{i} \) around combinations of twists that add up

637: to zero (again using the doubling trick), 

638: applying the global monodromy conditions~(\ref{globmono}).

639: On encircling a twist \( \sigma ^{+}_{f_{1}} \) associated with

640: states at intersection \( f_{1} \), plus antitwist, \( \sigma ^{-}_{f_{2}} \),

641: at intersection \( f_{2} \) the quantum part of $\partial X$ should be 

642: invariant. There are two independent pairs of twists and integrating 

643: around the the corresponding closed loops yields

644: \begin{equation}

645: A(x)=\frac{x(1-x)}{2}\partial_x \ln \left[ F(x)F(1-x) \right]

646: \end{equation}

647: where \( F(x) \) is the hypergeometric function

648: \begin{equation}

649: F(x)=F(\vartheta ,1-\vartheta ;1;x)=\frac{1}{\pi }\sin (\vartheta \pi )\int

650: ^{1}_{0}dy\, y^{-\vartheta }(1-y)^{-(1-\vartheta )}(1-xy)^{-\vartheta }

651: \end{equation}

652: Inserting this into eq.(\ref{differ}), 

653: we find a contribution from the product of \( \vartheta_i  \)

654: twisted bosons of 

655: \begin{equation}

656: \prod_i \langle \sigma _{+}(x_{\infty })\sigma _{-}(1)\sigma _{+}(x)\sigma

657: _{-}(0)\rangle =const\, \frac{(x_{\infty }x(1-x))^{-\vartheta .(1-\vartheta

658:     )}}{[F(1-x).F(x)]^{1/2}}.

659: \end{equation}

660: In this expression we use a dot to indicate the product of the contributions from each complex dimension. 

661: When we collect all the contribution together the dependence on \( \vartheta _{i} \)

662: cancels between the bosonic twist fields and the spin-twist fields giving

663: \begin{equation}

664: \begin{array}{lll}

665: A(1,2,3,4) & = & -g_{s}\alpha '(\lambda ^{1}\lambda ^{2}\lambda ^{3}\lambda ^{4}+\lambda ^{4}\lambda ^{3}\lambda ^{2}\lambda ^{1})\, \int ^{1}_{0}dx\, x^{-1-\alpha 's}(1-x)^{-1-\alpha 't}\frac{1}{[F(1-x).F(x)]^{1/2}}\\

666:  &  & \times \left[ \overline{u}^{(1)}\gamma _{\mu }u^{(2)}\overline{u}^{(4)}\gamma ^{\mu }u^{(3)}\right]\sum e^{-S_{cl}(x)}

667: \end{array}

668: \end{equation}

669: where \( s=-(k_{1}+k_{2})^{2} \), \( t=-(k_{2}+k_{3})^{2} \), \( u=-(k_{1}+k_{3})^{2} \)

670: are the usual Mandlestam variables. We can check this expression against that 

671: in ref.\cite{benakli} where the branes considered 

672: were orthogonal D7 branes and D3 branes. 

673: The quantum part of the above expression with

674: intersections in two complex subplanes should agree with that from 

675: four ND fermions attached to two sets of coincident D3 

676: branes and a stack of D7 branes.

677: We find agreement upto a factor of $F(1-x)/F(x) $ in the integrand.

678: 

679: We now turn to the classical contribution to the four point function which 

680: can be calculated as for the three point function. On integrating around the 

681: closed loops we again can have arbitrary shifts $v_i$ along the D-branes.

682: Consider encircling a twist \( \sigma ^{+}_{f_{1}} \) associated with

683: states at intersection \( f_{1} \), plus antitwist, \( \sigma ^{-}_{f_{2}} \),

684: at intersection \( f_{2} \). The corresponding open strings can encircle

685: one of the branes appearing at the intersection 

686: determined by the relative positions of \( \sigma _{f_{1}}^{+} \)

687: and \( \sigma _{f_{2}}^{-} \) with respect to the branch cuts in

688: the field \( X \). The two possibilities are shown in figure~\ref{loops}.

689: A twisted state at \( f_{2} \) followed by an anti-twisted state

690: at \( f_{1} \) corresponds to a shift \( (1-\theta )(f_{1}-f_{2}+\Lambda _{A}) \)

691: where \( \Lambda _{A} \) is an integer number of shifts along the

692: \( A \)-brane. Note that $f_{1}-f_{2}$ is in this case a vector along the 

693: $A$ brane as well. An anti-twisted state at \( f_{1} \) followed by

694: twisted state at \( f_{2} \) causes a shift \( (1-\theta )(f_{1}-f_{2}+\Lambda _{B}) \) where now \( \Lambda _{B} \) is an integer shift along the \( B \)

695: brane and $f_{1}-f_{2}$ is now the displacement between the points along the 

696: $B$-brane.

697: \begin{figure}

698: {\centering \resizebox*{0.8\textwidth}{0.4\textheight}{\includegraphics{loops.eps}} \par}

699: 

700: 

701: \caption{Joined pairs of twisted/antitwisted states. \label{loops} }

702: \end{figure}

703: The vertex ordering in the disc diagram means that in the amplitude

704: the factor \( \sum e^{-S_{cl}} \) now splits into separate sums over

705: \( \Lambda _{A} \) or \( \Lambda _{B} \),\( \sum \equiv \sum _{\Lambda _{A},\Lambda _{B}} \). The classical action is then found to be 

706: \begin{equation}

707: S_{cl}=\frac{\sin \vartheta \pi }{4\pi \alpha '\tau }\left( |v'_{A}|^{2}+\tau

708:   ^{2}|v'_{B}|^{2}\right), 

709: \end{equation}

710: where in the sums over \( \Lambda _{A} \) we have 

711: \begin{equation}

712: v'_{A,B}=\Delta_{A,B}^i f+nL_{A,B},

713: \end{equation}

714: Here \( n\in Z \), and \( L_{A,B} \) are vectors in the two torus describing

715: the wrapped D-branes. We have defined $\Delta_{A,B}^{i} f$ to be the displacement 

716: between the intersections involved in the $C_i$ loop taken along the $A,B$ 

717: brane, and we include both combinations (i.e. $i=1,2$ going respectively 

718: with $A,B$ or $B,A$). In addition we have defined 

719: \( \tau (x)=\frac{F(1-x)}{F(x)} \)

720: for convenience. (For \( Z_{2} \) twists, i.e. intersections at right-angles,

721: this would be the modular parameter of a {}``fake'' annulus but

722: it has no such interpretation for more general intersections.) 

723: 

724: \begin{figure}

725: {\centering \resizebox*{0.8\textwidth}{0.4\textheight}{\includegraphics{generic.eps}} \par}

726: \caption{The leading contribution to a generic four point diagram.\label{generic}}

727: \end{figure}

728: 

729: To illustrate, consider the generic open string four point diagram, 

730: shown in fig~\ref{generic}.

731: In this case one expects the action to go as the area. To show this

732: we can use a saddle point approximation for the \( x \) integral

733: in \( A(1,2,3,4). \) This gives \( \tau (x_{s})=|v'_{A}|/|v'_{B}| \)

734: where, for strings stretched between \( f_{1} \) and \( f_{2} \)

735: propagating along the \( A \)-brane direction

736: we choose \( \Delta_A f = f_{3}-f_{2} \) and \( \Delta_B f=f_{1}-f_{2} \).

737: This is the leading contribution, but there 

738: is an additional contribution to the amplitude where the displacement is

739: \( \Delta_A f = f_{1}-f_{2} \) measured along the $A$-brane

740: and \( \Delta_B f =f_{2}-f_{3} \) measured along the $B$-brane. This 

741: corresponds to diagrams where

742: a string stretched between \( f_{2} \) and \( f_{3} \) propagates

743: in the \( f_{1}-f_{2} \) direction, as shown in fig.\ref{generic2}.

744: 

745: The accuracy of the saddle approximation

746: is a function of the width of the saddle, 

747: given by \( \sqrt{4\pi \alpha '/R_{c}}\sim \frac{l_{s}}{R_{c}} \),

748: where \( R_{c} \) is the compactification scale (\( R_{c}\sim L_{A},L_{B} \)).

749: Thus, as expected the approximation of world-sheet instanton suppression

750: breaks down when the size of the world sheet is comparable to the

751: D-brane thickness. 

752: \begin{figure}

753: {\centering 

754: \resizebox*{0.8\textwidth}{0.4\textheight}

755: {\includegraphics{generic2.eps}} \par}

756: \caption{The first 

757: subleading contribution to the same amplitude. \label{generic2} }

758: \end{figure}

759: Substituting back into the action we find 

760: \begin{equation}

761: A(1,2,3,4)\sim \sum _{\Lambda _{A},\Lambda _{B}}\, fermion-factors\times

762: \left( \frac{4\pi \alpha '}{R_{c}}\right) ^{2}\exp \left( -\frac{1}{2\pi

763:     \alpha '}\sin \vartheta \pi \, |v'_{A}||v'_{B}|\right) .

764: \end{equation}

765:  We find the expected suppression from the mass of the intermediate

766: stretched string state, times by an instanton suppression factor again 

767: given by the area of the world sheet. As pointed out in ref.\cite{ams}

768: diagrams such as this can lead to large flavour changing 

769: processes such as \( \tau \mu \rightarrow \mu e \) if the compactification 

770: scale is too small. 

771: 

772: Diagrams which do not

773: explicitly violate flavour, 

774: such as \( \mu ^{+}\mu ^{-}\rightarrow e^{+}e^{-} \) cannot be completely 

775: approximated this way.

776: For such processes the intersection separation in the leading term

777: \( v'_{B}=\Delta_B f_{ee} \) for one pair of twist operators is zero,

778: and so this term cannot be treated as above. Consider the summation

779: over \( \Lambda _{A} \) in \( v'_{A} \) for the other pair, whose

780: separation is \( v'_{A}=\Delta_A f_{e\mu }+nL_{A} \). Poisson resumming

781: we find 

782: \begin{equation}

783: \sum e^{-S_{cl}}=\sum _{p_{A}\in \Lambda _{A}^{*}}\sqrt{\frac{4\pi ^{2}\alpha

784:     '\tau }{L^{2}_{A}\sin \vartheta \pi }}\, \exp \left[ -\frac{4\pi

785:     ^{3}\alpha '\tau }{\sin \vartheta \pi }p_{A}^{2}\right] \, \exp \left[

786:   2\pi i\Delta f_{e\mu }.p_{A}\right] +subleading

787: \end{equation}

788: where \( p_{A}\in \Lambda ^{*}_{A} \)is summed over the dual lattice;

789: \begin{equation}

790: p_{A}=\frac{n_{A}}{|L_{A}|^{2}}L_{A}.

791: \end{equation}

792: This expression describes the leading exchange of gauge bosons plus

793: their KK modes along the \( A \) brane. (The subleading terms (those

794: with \( v'_{B}=n_{B}L_{B} \) with integer \( n_{B}\neq 0 \)) can

795: still be treated using the saddle point approximation above.)  

796: To obtain the field

797: theory result, we take the limit of coincident vertices; \( x\rightarrow 0 \)

798: or \( x\rightarrow 1 \). For example the former contribution can

799: be evaluated using the asymptotics 

800: \begin{equation}

801: F(x)\sim 1\, ,\, \, \, \, \, \tau \sim F(1-x)\sim \frac{1}{\pi }\sin

802: \vartheta \pi \, \ln \frac{\delta }{x}

803: \end{equation}

804: where \( \delta  \) is given by the digamma function \( \psi (z)=\Gamma '(z)/\Gamma (z); \)

805: \begin{equation}

806: \delta =\exp (2\psi (1)-\psi (\vartheta )-\psi (1-\vartheta )).

807: \end{equation}

808: We find \begin{eqnarray}

809: A(1,2,3,4) & = & g_{s}\left[ \overline{u}^{(1)}\gamma _{\mu }u^{(2)}\overline{u}^{(4)}\gamma ^{\mu }u^{(3)}\right] \frac{2\pi \sqrt{\alpha ' }}{L_{A}\sqrt{\sin \vartheta \pi} }\\

810:  &  & \times \, \left( \frac{1}{s}+2\sum ^{\infty }_{n=1}\frac{\cos \left( 2\pi \Delta f_{e\mu }.p_{n}\right) \, \delta ^{-\alpha 'M_{n}^{2}}}{s-M_{n}^{2}}\right) ,

811: \end{eqnarray}

812: where \( M_{n}=n/2\pi L_{A} \), and \( p_{n}=nL_{A}/|L_{A}|^{2} \).

813: This result agrees with a naive field theory calculation as shown in 

814: ref.\cite{ams}, provided that \( \alpha 'M_{1}^{2}\ll 1 \).

815: (That is, the brane separation should again be larger than the brane

816: thickness.) This can lead to severe flavour changing effects due

817: to the KK mode contribution which is flavour non-universal. 

818: We should note here that this is not in contradiction with the 

819: fact that there is an overall translational $U(1)$ 

820: symmetry on the torus, since the result is a function of the {\em relative} 

821: displacement. The leading term corresponds to massless gauge boson exchange so 

822: that we can normalize the coupling to the measured Yang-Mills couplings in 

823: the obvious way.

824: 

825: The extension to higher dimensional intersecting branes

826: follows straightforwardly, and we now find 

827: that the form factor \( \, \delta ^{-\alpha 'M_{n}^{2}} \)

828: naturally provides the UV cut-off which in the field theory has to

829: be added by hand. Physically the cut-off arises because the intersection

830: itself has thickness \( \sim \sqrt{\alpha '} \), and thus cannot

831: emit modes with a shorter wavelength. 

832: 

833: \section{Conclusion}

834: 

835: In summary, we have discussed the calculation of 

836: three point amplitudes for open strings

837: localised at D-brane intersections. We 

838: computed the four point ``contact interaction'' 

839: at tree level for diagrams involving fermions living at

840: two sets of intersecting D-branes. For the four point functions we 

841: were able to adapt the techniques of ref.\cite{dixon}

842: to the open string case, so that by considering the 

843: conformal field theory we obtained the required information to

844: compute the entire contact interaction. It receives contributions from both

845: KK modes and heavy string modes.

846: The obvious extension of this work 

847: would be to calculate the four 

848: point functions on three sets of intersecting branes. 

849: This would allow us to factorize the four point functions on the three 

850: point Yukawa couplings yielding additional information about the latter. 

851: In addition we considered only the simplest kind of toroidal 

852: compactification, and it would be interesting to contemplate the same 

853: process in more complicated set-ups, and also to apply it to a 

854: ``realistic'' SM-like model. 

855: 

856: More generally these 

857: calculations may be used to discuss or support more generic field theoretic 

858: ideas in set-ups with fermions localized in extra dimensions. 

859: For example, in a parallel work \cite{ams}, it has been demonstrated 

860: in that very low (TeV) 

861: string scales are incompatible with the experimental absence of FCNCs. 

862: When the compactification scale is small we encounter subleading 

863: flavour changing diagrams involving stretched strings. When it is 

864: large it is instead the KK modes which contribute to FCNCs. 

865: Taken together these two 

866: contributions constrain the string scale. There

867: are many conceptual problems when discussing that type of effect 

868: that cannot be addressed in field

869: theory. For example, sums over Kaluza-Klein modes can diverge, so that

870: it is generally necessary to provide a UV cut-off. As is well known,

871: in the string calculation such a divergence should always be naturally 

872: regulated at the string scale, and this indeed happens automatically 

873: for the interactions discussed here. This has already been seen in the 

874: literature in for example \cite{ghilencea}. 

875: 

876: \bigskip 

877: 

878: \noindent {\bf Note Added} 

879: 

880: \noindent Whilst this paper was in the final stages of preparation we received 

881: ref.\cite{mirjam} which also discusses the calculation of 

882: both 3 and 4 point functions.

883: 

884: \section*{Acknowledgements}

885: It is a pleasure to thank David Fairlie, Paul Mansfield, Manel Masip and Jose

886: Santiago for discussions. We also thank Igor Klebanov for correcting an error

887: in an earlier version of this paper.

888: This work was funded by a PPARC studentship, and by Opportunity 

889: Grant PPA/T/S/1998/00833. 

890: 

891: \bibliography{CPbib}

892: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}

893: \end{document}