1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2: \usepackage{atmp}
3: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
4: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
5: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha'}
6: \newcommand{\de}{\partial}
7: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
8: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
9: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
10: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
11: \newcommand{\db}{\bar{\partial}}
12: \newcommand{\we}{\wedge}
13: \newcommand{\ca}{\mathcal}
14: \newcommand{\lr}{\leftrightarrow}
15: \newcommand{\f}{\frac}
16: \newcommand{\s}{\sqrt}
17: \newcommand{\vp}{\varphi}
18: \newcommand{\hvp}{\hat{\varphi}}
19: \newcommand{\tvp}{\tilde{\varphi}}
20: \newcommand{\ti}{\tilde}
21: \newcommand{\ap}{\alpha}
22: \newcommand{\pr}{\propto}
23: \newcommand{\mb}{\mathbf}
24: \newcommand{\ddd}{\cdot\cdot\cdot}
25: \newcommand{\no}{\nonumber \\}
26: \newcommand{\la}{\langle}
27: \newcommand{\lb}{\rangle}
28: \newcommand{\ep}{\epsilon}
29: \newcommand{\ddbp}{\mbox{D}p-\overline{\mbox{D}p}}
30: \newcommand{\ddbt}{\mbox{D}2-\overline{\mbox{D}2}}
31: \newcommand{\ov}{\overline}
32: \renewcommand{\ss}{\scriptscriptstyle}
33: \copyrightnotice{2003}{7}{369}{379}
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \title{Correlators in Timelike Bulk Liouville Theory}
38:
39: \url{hep-th/0303221} %% Everything after http://xxx.lanl.gov/
40:
41: \author{Andrew Strominger and Tadashi Takayanagi}
42: \address{Jefferson Physical Laboratory\\
43: Harvard University\\
44: Cambridge, MA 02138}
45: \addressemail{andy@planck.harvard.edu}
46: \addressemail{takayana@wigner.harvard.edu}
47:
48: \markboth{\it Correlators in Timelike Bulk Liouville Theory}
49: {\it Strominger and Takayanagi}
50:
51:
52: \begin{abstract}
53: Liouville theory with a negative norm boson and no screening
54: charge corresponds to an exact classical solution of closed
55: bosonic string theory describing time-dependent bulk tachyon
56: condensation. A simple expression for the two point function is
57: proposed based on renormalization/analytic continuation of the
58: known results for the ordinary (positive-norm) Liouville theory.
59: The expression agrees exactly with the minisuperspace result for
60: the closed string pair-production rate (which diverges at finite
61: time). Puzzles concerning the three-point function are presented
62: and discussed.
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65:
66:
67:
68:
69:
70: \cutpage
71:
72: \section{Introduction}
73: \setcounter{equation}{0}
74:
75: The endpoint - if any - of tachyon condensation in closed string
76: theories with tachyons is a major unsolved problem. A relatively
77: complete picture has recently been obtained of the condensation of
78: certain $localized$ closed string tachyons
79: \cite{Adams:2001sv,Vafa:2001ra,Harvey:2001wm,David:2001vm}, as
80: have some insights into the non-localized bulk case
81: \cite{Gutperle:2001mb}.
82:
83:
84: It is
85: interesting in this regard that there are exact, time dependent
86: classical solutions of tachyonic string theories describing
87: homogenous tachyon condensation. We refer to the corresponding
88: worldsheet CFT for the case of the bosonic string as the timelike
89: Liouville theory. It is governed by the the action (suppressing
90: spatial dimensions and setting $\al =1$) \ba S=\f{1}{4\pi}\int
91: d^2\sigma \left( -(\de X^0)^2 +4\pi \mu e^{2\beta X^0}\right),
92: \label{TLB} \ea which has a negative norm boson and central charge
93: $c=1-6q^2\ \ (q\equiv\beta-1/\beta)$. This corresponds to a real
94: dilaton with timelike slope $q$, but we will mainly be interested
95: in $q=0$ and $\beta=1$. The potential term in (\ref{TLB}) can be
96: interpreted a closed string tachyon field which grows
97: exponentially in time. At early times $X^0\to -\infty$ the tachyon
98: field is very small and flat space is recovered.
99:
100: Because this is a time dependent background, there is closed
101: string pair production. In section 2 we compute the rate of pair
102: production in a minisuperspace approximation
103: \cite{Braaten:np,Polchinski:1990mh} and find that it diverges
104: exponentially (see also \cite{daCunha:2003fm}). This divergence is
105: much stronger
106: than that found in an analogous computation of open
107: string pair production \cite{St,GS,Maloney:2003ck}
108: during open string tachyon
109: condensation\cite{Sen:2002nu,Sen:2002in} (the related phenomenon
110: of closed string emission was analyzed
111: in\cite{Okuda:2002yd,Larsen:2002wc,Lambert:2003zr,Mi}).
112: This result implies
113: that the gas of pair produced closed strings will reach the string
114: density and string perturbation theory will break down in a time
115: of order one in string units.
116:
117: This work began in as an attempt to compute the two and three
118: point functions of the timelike Liouville theory. This sounds like
119: a simple task but in fact the analytic continuation involved is
120: quite subtle. Our strategy will parallel that adopted for the
121: timelike boundary Liouville theory in \cite{GS}. After some
122: renormalization and analytic continuation we will produce a
123: reasonable expression for the exact two point function in section
124: 3 which agrees exactly with the minisuperspace particle production
125: rate. We also discuss the three point function. We present a
126: natural analytic continuation procedure which encounters
127: singularities and yields a puzzling result, not obviously
128: compatible with conformal invariance, as discussed in section 4.
129:
130: The basic source of the difficulty is that the action (\ref{TLB})
131: is not positive definite, and hence does not fully define the
132: associated functional integral or CFT. It is natural to try to
133: define the timelike theory\footnote{We assume here that such an exact
134: CFT indeed exists, although it has yet to be demonstrated.}
135: by analytic continuation $\phi=-iX^0$
136: and $b=i\beta$ from the ordinary spacelike Liouville theory with
137: the positive definite worldsheet action \ba S=\f{1}{4\pi}\int
138: d^2\sigma \left( (\de\phi)^2 +4\pi \mu e^{2b \phi }\right), \ea
139: and background charge $Q=b+1/b$. The central charge here is
140: $c=1+6Q^2$ and $Q$ is the (spacelike) slope of the dilaton. The
141: analytic continuation from real to pure imaginary $b$ however, for
142: the three point function, leads to an infinite accumulation of
143: singularities. A similar analytical continuation was discussed in
144: \cite{Runkel:2001ng}, where it was argued that the $b=i$
145: singularity is related to the accumulation of minimal models at
146: $c=1$. It was also discussed in \cite{GS} (whose treatment we
147: closely follow) in the closely related context of timelike
148: boundary Liouville theory\cite{FZZ,Teschner:2000md}.\footnote{For
149: the boundary theory, the singularities accumulate already for the
150: two point function, while for the bulk theory this difficulty
151: first arises for the three point function.}
152:
153:
154:
155:
156: \section{The Minisuperspace Approximation}
157: \setcounter{equation}{0}
158:
159: In this section we apply the minisuperspace approximation
160: \cite{Braaten:np,Polchinski:1990mh} to the time-like bulk
161: Liouville theory with constant dilaton ($q=0$).\footnote{Recently
162: the paper \cite{daCunha:2003fm} appeared which also analyzes the
163: minisuperspace approximation and obtains the same results.} The
164: analysis here is mathematically quite similar (though the final
165: conclusion differs) to that given for the boundary tachyon
166: interaction considered in \cite{St}. We shall accordingly be
167: brief. In the minisuperspace approximation we retain only the zero
168: mode $x^0$ of $X^0$. The on-shell condition for the closed string
169: excitations is then the Klein-Gordon equation with time dependent
170: mass \ba \Bigl[\f{\de^2}{(\de x^0)^2}+{2\pi\mu} e^{2x^0}+\vec{p}^2
171: +{2}(N_{L}+N_{R}-2)\Bigr]\psi_{\vec{p}}(x^0)=0. \ea Below we
172: define the energy by
173: $\omega=\s{\vec{p}^2+2(N_{L}+N_{R}-2)}$, and $N_{L,R}$ are the left and
174: right-moving oscillator contributions.
175: $in$ and $out$ wave
176: function $\psi^{in}_{\vec{p}}(x^0)$ and
177: $\psi^{out}_{\vec{p}}(x^0)$ asymptotically obeying
178: $\psi^{in}_{\vec{p}}(x^0)\sim e^{-i\omega
179: x^0+i\vec{p}\cdot\vec{x}}$ and $\psi^{out}_{\vec{p}}(x^0)\sim
180: e^{-\f{x^0}{2} -2i\s{\pi\mu}e^{x^0}+i\vec{p}\cdot\vec{x}}$ are
181: given by Bessel and Hankel functions. This leads to the Bogolubov
182: coefficients \ba \gamma^{in}_{\vec{p}}
183: =\f{\beta_{\vec{p}}^{in*}}{\alpha_{\vec{p}}^{in}}=-ie^{-\pi\omega},
184: \ea where the Bogolubov transformation is \ba
185: &&\psi^{out}_{\vec{p}}=\alpha_{\vec{p}}\psi^{in}_{\vec{p}}
186: +\beta_{\vec{p}}\psi^{in*}_{-\vec{p}}\no
187: &&\psi^{in}_{\vec{p}}=\alpha^*_{\vec{p}}\psi^{out}_{\vec{p}}
188: -\beta_{\vec{p}}\psi^{out*}_{-\vec{p}}.\no \ea According to the
189: conjecture of \cite{GS} this is related to the two point function
190: by \ba |\la e^{-i\omega x^0}e^{-i\omega x^0} \lb|=|\gamma^{in}_{\vec{p}}|
191: =e^{-\pi\omega}.
192: \label{tpf} \ea In the following section we shall recover this
193: result from an exact CFT analysis.
194:
195: The rate of closed string pair production is determined from the
196: Bogolubov transformations. At high frequencies $\omega$ this rate
197: behaves as \ba \rho(\omega)|\gamma^{in}_{\vec{p}}|^2 \sim
198: e^{\omega/T_{H}}e^{-2\pi\omega}. \ea Recalling the value of the
199: Hagedorn temperature $T_{H}=\f{1}{4\pi}$, we see that this
200: expression diverges exponentially. The closed string pair
201: production is much more rapid than in the corresponding open
202: string case \cite{St}, where the exponentials cancelled and the
203: divergence was at most power law.
204:
205:
206:
207: \section{The Two Point Function}
208: \setcounter{equation}{0} \hspace{5mm} In this section we define
209: the two point function in timelike Liouville theory by analytic
210: continuation from the spacelike Liouville theory.
211:
212: The two point function in the space-like theory is given by
213: \cite{Dorn:1992at}\cite{ZZ}\ba D(\ap)\equiv \la
214: e^{2\ap\phi}e^{2\ap\phi}\lb = (\pi\mu\gamma(b^2))^{\f{Q-2\ap}{b}}
215: \cdot \f{\gamma(2b\ap-b^2)}{b^2\cdot
216: \gamma(2-\f{2\ap}{b}+\f{1}{b^2})}, \ea where
217: $\gamma(x)=\Gamma(x)/\Gamma(1-x)$. This is related to the
218: reflection coefficient \ba &&\psi(\phi)\sim
219: e^{2ip\phi}+d(2ip)e^{-2ip\phi},\no &&d(2ip)\equiv
220: D(ip+\f{Q}{2})=-(\pi\mu \gamma(b^2))^{-2ip/b}
221: \cdot\f{\Gamma(1+2ip/b)\Gamma(1+2ipb)}{\Gamma(1-2ip/b)\Gamma(1-2ipb)}.
222: \no
223: \ea
224:
225: We wish to analytically continue to $\phi=-iX_0$ and
226: $p=-i\omega/2$. We further take $b\equiv i\beta$ to be purely
227: imaginary since we are ultimately interested in the bulk time-like
228: Liouville theory with a real linear dilaton. The reflection
229: coefficient for bulk time-like Liouville theory is then \ba
230: d(\omega)=\la e^{-i(\omega +Q)X^0}e^{-i(\omega+Q)X^0} \lb =
231: -(\pi\mu\gamma(-\beta^2))^{i\f{\omega}{\beta}}
232: \cdot\f{\Gamma(1-i\omega/\beta)\Gamma(1+i\omega\beta)}
233: {\Gamma(1+i\omega/\beta)\Gamma(1-i\omega\beta)}. \no \ea Its
234: magnitude, which appears in the particle creation rate, is simply
235: \ba |d(\omega)|=e^{-\f{\pi\omega}{\beta}}. \ea This agrees
236: exactly with the $\beta=1$ minisuperspace result (\ref{tpf}).
237: Taking the limit $\beta\to 1$
238: with $\beta^2=1-\epsilon$ and
239: $\epsilon\to 0+$, we find \ba d(\omega)\to
240: -(\pi\mu_{R})^{i\omega}\cdot e^{-\pi \omega}. \label{rrr}\ea where
241: we have identified the renormalized coupling
242: $\mu_{R}=|\mu\gamma(\beta^2)|$ from the expected invariance of the
243: two point function (for $Q=0$) under $X^0\to X^0+C,~~~ \mu_R \to
244: e^{2i\omega C}\mu_R$. Note that we must take $\mu \to 0$ to keep
245: $\mu_R$ finite in the limit $\beta\to 1$. We will see in the next
246: section that this renormalization procedure also removes a similar
247: divergence in the three (and presumably higher) point function.
248:
249:
250:
251:
252:
253:
254: \section{The Three Point Function}
255: \setcounter{equation}{0} \hspace{5mm} In this section we use the
256: same analytic continuation to obtain a candidate three point
257: functions for timelike Liouville theory. However subtleties are
258: encountered along the way. The result has some puzzling behavior
259: and may not be the correct three-point function.
260:
261: The three point
262: function in the spacelike theory is given by \cite{Dorn:1992at,ZZ}
263: (we use the conventions of the latter reference)\ba &&
264: C(\ap_1,\ap_2,\ap_3)\equiv \la
265: e^{2\ap_1\phi}e^{2\ap_2\phi}e^{2\ap_3\phi}\lb =[\pi
266: \mu\gamma(b^2)b^{2-2b^2}]^{(Q-\ap_1-\ap_2-\ap_3)/b}\times \no &&
267: \f{\Upsilon_0\Upsilon(2\ap_1)\Upsilon(2\ap_2)\Upsilon(2\ap_3)}
268: {\Upsilon(\ap_1+\ap_2+\ap_3-Q)
269: \Upsilon(\ap_1+\ap_2-\ap_3)\Upsilon(\ap_2+\ap_3-\ap_1)
270: \Upsilon(\ap_1+\ap_3-\ap_2)},\no \label{csl} \ea where
271: $\Upsilon_0=\f{d\Upsilon(x)}{dx}|_{x=0}$ and the function
272: $\Upsilon(x)$ is defined by \ba
273: \log\Upsilon(x)=\int^{\infty}_0\f{dt}{t}\left[(Q/2-x)^2 e^{-2t}
274: -\f{\sinh^2(Q/2-x)t}{\sinh(bt)\sinh(t/b)}\right]. \label{up} \ea
275:
276: The analytic continuation of the prefactor in (\ref{csl}) to
277: $b=i\beta$ is given by \ba \left[e^{\pi i(\beta^2-1)}\cdot
278: (\pi\mu_R\beta^{2(1+\beta^2)})^{\f{i(\ap_1+\ap_2+\ap_3)}{\beta}}
279: \right]\!\cdot\! (\pi\mu_R\beta^{2(1+\beta^2)})^{1-1/\beta^2}\!\! \cdot\!
280: e^{-\pi\beta(\ap_1+\ap_2+\ap_3)}\!, \ea where all of the phase
281: factors are in the first parenthesis. Taking the limit $\beta\to
282: 1$ yields the following expression for the prefactor \ba
283: (\pi\mu_{R})^{i(\ap_1+\ap_2+\ap_3)}\cdot
284: e^{-\pi(\ap_1+\ap_2+\ap_3)}. \ea
285:
286:
287: The non-trivial part is the analytic continuation of the function
288: $\Upsilon(x)$ appearing in (\ref{csl}), which acquires an infinite
289: accumulation of poles for purely imaginary $b$. This difficulty
290: was already encountered at the level of the two-point function for
291: timelike boundary Liouville theory, and our mathematical treatment
292: will follow the one given in \cite{GS}. We would like to perform
293: an analytical continuation from the real value of $b$ to the
294: imaginary value of $b=i\beta$ by a $\pi/2$ rotation. In deforming
295: the contour of integration of (\ref{up}) along the real axis into
296: one along the imaginary axis, we encounter poles at $t=\f{n\pi
297: i}{b}\ \ (n=1,2,\ddd)$. Hence one may write the integral over the
298: real axis as an integral $I$ along the imaginary axis plus a sum
299: of poles $P$ \ba \log\Upsilon(x)=I(x)+P(x). \ea
300:
301:
302:
303: The convergent integral $I(x)$ along the imaginary axis $t=i\tau$
304: is given by \ba I(x)=\int^{\infty}_{0}
305: \f{d\tau}{\tau}\Bigl[(Q/2-x)^2e^{-2i\tau}
306: -\f{\sin^2((Q/2-x)\tau)}{\sin(b\tau)\sin(\tau/b)}\Bigr]\no
307: =\int^{\infty}_{0} \f{d\tau}{\tau}\Bigl[(iq/2-x)^2e^{-2i\tau}
308: -\f{\sin^2((iq/2-x)\tau)}{\sinh(\beta
309: \tau)\sinh(\tau/\beta)}\Bigr], \label{ix1} \ea where we set
310: $b=i\beta$ and $Q=i(\beta-1/\beta)=iq$. It follows from
311: (\ref{csl}) that we are interested in the linear combination
312: \ba
313: I(\ap_1,\ap_2,\ap_3)&=&-I(\ap_1+\ap_2+\ap_3)-I(\ap_1+\ap_2-\ap_3)
314: -I(\ap_1-\ap_2+\ap_3)\no &&-I(-\ap_1+\ap_2+\ap_3) \ \
315: +I(2\ap_1)+I(2\ap_2)+I(2\ap_3).\label{dec} \ea in which the linear
316: and quadratic terms with respect to the argument $x$ cancel. Hence
317: we can omit\footnote{This leads to the divergence due to the pole
318: $\tau=0$ in (\ref{ix1}). However, it is cancelled in the ratio
319: (\ref{csl}).} the first term in (\ref{ix1}). Setting $\beta=1$ one
320: finds \ba
321: I(x)&=&-\int^{\infty}_{0}\f{d\tau}{\tau}\f{\sin^2(x\tau)}{\sinh^2\tau}\no
322: &=&\f{1}{2}\int^{\infty}_{0}\f{d\tau}{\tau}\f{\cos(2x\tau)}{\sinh^2\tau}
323: +const.\label{ix2} \ea To derive this we neglect the imaginary
324: part of $I$ since it is proportional to $x^2$. Note that
325: $e^{I(x)}$ has no zero or poles for real $x$. However, for e.g.
326: $x=\pm i\beta$, it has a zero.
327:
328:
329:
330: The sum of poles is given by \ba
331: P(x)&=&-2i\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{(-1)^n \sin^2(\f{\pi
332: n}{b}(Q/2-x))} {n\sin(\f{\pi n}{b^2})}\no
333: &=&-i\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{(-1)^n}{n\sin(\f{\pi n}{b^2})}
334: +i\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{1}{n}\Biggl(\f{\cos(\f{\pi n}{b^2})
335: \cos(\f{2\pi nx}{b})}{\sin(\f{\pi n}{b^2})}+\sin(\f{2\pi
336: nx}{b})\Biggr).\no \ea The first term is constant and can be
337: neglected. We drop this term and analytically continue defining
338: $\f{1}{b^2}=-\f{1}{\beta^2}-i\ep$ and $x=-iby$ and taking $y$ to
339: be real. The real part $\mbox{Re}P$ of $P(x)$ is
340: \ba
341: \mbox{Re}P&=&\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{1}{n}\Biggl(\sinh(2\pi ny)+
342: \mbox{Im}\Bigl(\cot(\f{n\pi}{\beta^2}+in\pi\ep)\Bigr)\cosh(2\pi
343: ny) \Biggr). \ \ \ \ \label{real1} \ea The first term can be resummed by
344: using the
345: analytic continuation\footnote{
346: This follows from
347: \ba &&\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{\sin(nz)}{n}=(\pi-z)/2,\no
348: &&\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{\cos(nz)}{n}=-\log(2\sin(z/2)), \ea by
349: substituting $z=2\pi i y$.} \ba \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{1}{2n}e^{2\pi
350: ny} -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{1}{2n}e^{-2\pi ny}
351: =-\f{1}{2}\log(1-e^{2\pi y})+\f{1}{2}\log(1-e^{-2\pi y})=-\pi
352: y+\f{\pi i}{2}. \no \ea These terms cancel one another in the ratio
353: (\ref{csl}) and can be neglected
354: except that it leads to a constant factor $-\pi$
355: in $\Upsilon_{0}$.
356: The second term in (\ref{real1}) can be rewritten as
357: \ba -\f{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \f{\cosh(2\pi ny)}{n}
358: \cdot\f{\sinh(2\pi n\ep)}{\sinh^2(\pi
359: n\ep)+\sin^2(\f{n\pi}{\beta^2})}. \ea Assuming $\beta^2$ is
360: irrational as in \cite{GS} we find that this contribution vanishes
361: in the limit $\ep\to 0$.
362:
363: The imaginary part of the pole sum is
364: \ba
365: \mbox{Im}P&=&-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{1}{n}
366: \mbox{Re}\Bigl(\cot(\f{n\pi}{\beta^2}+in\pi\ep)\Bigr)\cosh(2\pi
367: ny). \ea If the $\beta^2$ is rational such that $\beta^2=q/p$,
368: then \ba
369: \mbox{Re}\Bigl(\cot(\f{n\pi}{\beta^2}+in\pi\ep)\Bigr)=\f{1}{2}
370: \f{\sin(2np\pi/q)}{\sinh^2(\pi n\ep)+\sin^2(\f{np\pi}{q})}. \ea
371: The second term can also be rewritten after we take the limit
372: $\ep\to 0$ \ba -\sum_{n_0=1}^{q-1}\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\f{\cosh(2\pi
373: ny)}{mq+n_0} \cot(n_0\pi\f{p}{q}). \ea
374: For the specific value $\beta=1$ this contribution also vanishes.\\
375:
376: Putting this all together leads to the very simple formula for the
377: three-point function at $\beta=1$ ($Q=0$) \ba
378: C(\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3)&\equiv&
379: \la e^{-i\omega_1X^0}e^{-i\omega_1X^0}e^{-i\omega_1X^0} \lb \no
380: &=&-\pi(\pi\mu_{R})^{i(\omega_1+\omega_2+\omega_3)}\cdot
381: e^{-\pi(\omega_1+\omega_2+\omega_3)/2}
382: \cdot e^{I(\omega_1/2,\omega_2/2,\omega_3/2)}.
383: \no \label{vbn}\ea As a check
384: we note that (\ref{vbn}) reduces to the two-point
385: function (\ref{rrr}) up to a constant when we set $\omega_3=0$ and
386: $\omega_1=\omega_2=\omega$.
387:
388: However the candidate three point function has a disturbing
389: feature which leads us to suspect its validity. Conformal
390: invariance would lead us to expect that it should vanish for
391: $\omega_3=0$ and $\omega_1\neq \omega_2$, but it does not do so.
392: It can be seen that the original three point function (\ref{csl})
393: indeed vanishes for such momenta when Re$b ~>0$.
394:
395: How is it possible that such correlators vanish for all $\ep \neq
396: 0$, but not at $\ep =0$? The answer lies in the order of limits
397: used in defining the continued expressions. Suppose that we do not
398: take the limit $\ep\to 0$ before $n\to \infty$ in (\ref{real1}).
399: In this case we can write \ba &&\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{1}{n}
400: \mbox{Im}\Biggl(\cot(\f{n\pi}{\beta^2}+in\pi\ep)\Biggr)\cosh(2\pi
401: ny)\no &&\ \ \ =\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\f{1}{n}\mbox{Re}
402: \Biggl(\f{e^{in\pi/\beta^2-n\pi\ep}+e^{-in\pi/\beta^2+n\pi\ep}}
403: {e^{in\pi/\beta^2-n\pi\ep}-e^{-in\pi/\beta^2+n\pi\ep}}\Biggr)
404: \cosh(2\pi ny).\label{alm} \ea Since we can replace the fraction
405: with -1 for large $n$ and $\ep>0$,
406: we expect that the sum at $y=0$ is divergent
407: even though the value at non-zero $y$ is zero in the $\ep\to 0$
408: limit. Thus we could have
409: $\mbox{Re}P\to -\infty$ at $y=0$,
410: producing the expected zero in the three-point correlator.
411:
412: This raises the possibility that the mathematical continuation
413: procedure used to compute the three point correlator (\ref{vbn})
414: is not the physically correct one. However we have not been able
415: to find an alternate procedure which yields correlators that are
416: analytic functions of the momenta and vanish at the expected
417: places. We hope that future work will either provide an
418: explanation of the unusual behavior of (\ref{vbn}) or an alternate
419: expression.
420:
421:
422: \bigskip
423: \begin{center}
424: \noindent{\large \bf Acknowledgments}
425: \end{center}
426: We are grateful to M. Gutperle, S. Minwalla, L. Motl and N. Toumbas
427: for useful conversations. This
428: work was supported in part by DOE grant DE-FG02-91ER40654.
429:
430:
431: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
432: \baselineskip=13pt
433:
434: \bibitem{Adams:2001sv}
435: A.~Adams, J.~Polchinski and E.~Silverstein,
436: ``Don't panic! Closed string tachyons in ALE space-times,''
437: JHEP {\bf 0110} (2001) 029
438: [arXiv:hep-th/0108075].
439: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0108075;%%
440:
441: \bibitem{Vafa:2001ra}
442: C.~Vafa,
443: ``Mirror symmetry and closed string tachyon condensation,''
444: arXiv:hep-th/0111051.
445: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0111051;%%
446:
447: \bibitem{Harvey:2001wm}
448: J.~A.~Harvey, D.~Kutasov, E.~J.~Martinec and G.~Moore,
449: ``Localized tachyons and RG flows,''
450: arXiv:hep-th/0111154.
451: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0111154;%%
452:
453: \bibitem{David:2001vm}
454: J.~R.~David, M.~Gutperle, M.~Headrick and S.~Minwalla,
455: ``Closed string tachyon condensation on twisted circles,''
456: JHEP {\bf 0202} (2002) 041
457: [arXiv:hep-th/0111212].
458: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0111212;%%
459:
460: \bibitem{Gutperle:2001mb}
461: M.~Gutperle and A.~Strominger,
462: ``Fluxbranes in string theory,''
463: JHEP {\bf 0106} (2001) 035
464: [arXiv:hep-th/0104136].
465: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0104136;%%
466:
467: \bibitem{Braaten:np}
468: E.~Braaten, T.~Curtright, G.~Ghandour and C.~B.~Thorn,
469: ``Nonperturbative Weak Coupling Analysis Of The Quantum
470: Liouville Field Theory,''
471: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 153} (1984) 147.
472: %%CITATION = APNYA,153,147;%%
473:
474: \bibitem{Polchinski:1990mh}
475: J.~Polchinski,
476: ``Remarks On The Liouville Field Theory,''
477: UTTG-19-90,
478: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=uttg-19-90}
479: %{SPIRES entry}
480: {\it Presented at Strings '90 Conf., College Station, TX, Mar 12-17, 1990}
481:
482: \bibitem{daCunha:2003fm}
483: B.~C.~da Cunha and E.~J.~Martinec,
484: ``Closed string tachyon condensation and worldsheet inflation,''
485: arXiv:hep-th/0303087.
486: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303087;%%
487:
488: \bibitem{St}
489: A.~Strominger,
490: ``Open string creation by S-branes,''
491: arXiv:hep-th/0209090.
492: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0209090;%%
493:
494:
495: \bibitem{GS}
496: M.~Gutperle and A.~Strominger,
497: ``Timelike boundary Liouville theory,''
498: arXiv:hep-th/0301038.
499: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301038;%%
500:
501:
502: \bibitem{Maloney:2003ck}
503: A.~Maloney, A.~Strominger and X.~Yin,
504: ``S-brane thermodynamics,''
505: arXiv:hep-th/0302146.
506: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0302146;%%
507:
508:
509: \bibitem{Sen:2002nu}
510: A.~Sen,
511: ``Rolling tachyon,''
512: JHEP {\bf 0204} (2002) 048
513: [arXiv:hep-th/0203211].
514: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0203211;%%
515:
516: \bibitem{Sen:2002in}
517: A.~Sen,
518: ``Tachyon matter,''
519: JHEP {\bf 0207} (2002) 065
520: [arXiv:hep-th/0203265].
521: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0203265;%%
522:
523: \bibitem{Okuda:2002yd}
524: T.~Okuda and S.~Sugimoto,
525: ``Coupling of rolling tachyon to closed strings,''
526: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 647} (2002) 101
527: [arXiv:hep-th/0208196].
528: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0208196;%%
529:
530: \bibitem{Larsen:2002wc}
531: F.~Larsen, A.~Naqvi and S.~Terashima,
532: ``Rolling tachyons and decaying branes,''
533: JHEP {\bf 0302} (2003) 039
534: [arXiv:hep-th/0212248].
535: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0212248;%%
536:
537: \bibitem{Lambert:2003zr}
538: N.~Lambert, H.~Liu and J.~Maldacena,
539: ``Closed strings from decaying D-branes,''
540: arXiv:hep-th/0303139.
541: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303139;%%
542:
543:
544: \bibitem{Mi}
545: S.~Minwalla and K.~Pappododimas, unpublished.
546:
547: \bibitem{Runkel:2001ng}
548: I.~Runkel and G.~M.~Watts,
549: ``A non-rational CFT with c = 1 as a limit of minimal models,''
550: JHEP {\bf 0109} (2001) 006
551: [arXiv:hep-th/0107118].
552: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0107118;%%
553:
554: \bibitem{FZZ}
555: V.~Fateev, A.~B.~Zamolodchikov and A.~B.~Zamolodchikov,
556: ``Boundary Liouville field theory. I: Boundary state and boundary
557: two-point fun
558: ction,''
559: arXiv:hep-th/0001012.
560: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0001012;%%
561:
562:
563: \bibitem{Teschner:2000md}
564: J.~Teschner,
565: ``Remarks on Liouville theory with boundary,''
566: arXiv:hep-th/0009138.
567: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0009138;%%
568:
569:
570: \bibitem{Dorn:1992at}
571: H.~Dorn and H.~J.~Otto,
572: ``On correlation functions for noncritical strings with $c \leq 1\
573: \ \ d\geq 1$,''
574: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 291} (1992) 39
575: [arXiv:hep-th/9206053];
576: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9206053;%%
577: ``Two and three point functions in Liouville theory,''
578: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 429} (1994) 375
579: [arXiv:hep-th/9403141].
580:
581:
582: \bibitem{ZZ}
583: A.~B.~Zamolodchikov and A.~B.~Zamolodchikov,
584: ``Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory,''
585: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 477} (1996) 577
586: [arXiv:hep-th/9506136].
587: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9506136;%%
588:
589:
590: \end{thebibliography}
591:
592:
593: \end{document}
594: