1: %

2: % Same as sd8.tex plus the following changes: affiliatioa/email of SD added; 

3: % last sent of abs modified; sent after (47) modified

4: % Version to appear in CQG. Resub to archives on 24.01.04

5: %

6: %

7: \documentstyle[multicol,epsfig,aps]{revtex}

8: %\usepackage{epsfig}

9: \def\be {\begin{equation}}

10: \def\ee {\end{equation}}

11: \def\ba {\begin{eqnarray}}

12: \def\ea {\end{eqnarray}}

13: \def\nn {\nonumber}

14: %

15: %{alphabets}

16: %

17: \def\a  {\alpha}

18: \def\b  {\beta}

19: \def\c  {\gamma}

20: \def\C  {\Gamma}

21: \def\C  {\Gamma}

22: \def\d  {\delta}

23: \def\D  {\Delta}

24: \def\e  {\epsilon}

25: %\def\fi {\phi}

26: \def\F  {\Phi}

27: \def\k  {\kappa}

28: \def\l  {\lambda}

29: \def\L  {\Lambda}

30: \def\m  {\mu}

31: \def\n  {\nu}

32: \def\o  {\omega}

33: \def\O  {\Omega}

34: \def\p  {\pi}

35: \def\P  {\Pi}

36: \def\r  {\rho}

37: \def\th {\theta}

38: \def\s {\sigma}

39: \def\t  {\tau}

40: %

41: \def\la {\label}

42: \def\le {\left}

43: \def\ri {\right}

44: \def\pa {\partial}

45: \def\f {\frac}

46: \def\sq {\sqrt}

47: \def\no {\noindent}

48: \def\bi {\begin{itemize}}

49: \def\ei {\end{itemize}}

50: %\def\it {\item}

51: \def\np {\newpage}

52: \def\ra {\rangle}

53: \def\vs {\vspace}

54: \def\hs {\hspace}

55: \def\llra {\Longleftrightarrow}

56: \def\ul {\underline}

57: \def\ub {\underbrace}

58: %

59: %SPECIAL

60: \def\cals {{\cal S}}

61: \def\sbh  {\f{4S_{BH}}{\O_{d-2} R^{d-2}} }

62: %

63: %\pagestyle{empty}

64: %\textheight22cm

65: %\textwidth17cm

66: %\topmargin-1.2cm

67: %

68: \begin{document}

69: \draft

70: \title{Entropy Corrections for Schwarzschild and

71: Reissner-Nordstr\"om Black Holes}

72: \author{M. M. Akbar$^\flat$,~Saurya Das$^\sharp$

73: \footnote{Address from August 2003: Dept. of Physics, University 

74: of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge,

75: Alberta T1K 3M4, CANADA. EMail: saurya.das@uleth.ca  }}

76: \address{\hs{-8.6cm}${}_\flat$}

77: \address{Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics,}

78: \address{Centre for Mathematical Sciences,}

79: \address{University of Cambridge,}

80: \address{Wilberforce Road,}

81: \address{Cambridge CB3 0WA, U.K.}

82: \address{EMail: M.M.Akbar@damtp.cam.ac.uk}

83: %

84: \address{\hs{-6.1cm}${}_\sharp$}

85: \address{Department of Mathematics and Statistics, }

86: \address{University of New Brunswick,}

87: \address{Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, CANADA }

88: \address{EMail: saurya@math.unb.ca   }

89: 

90: %\address{  }

91: \maketitle

92: 

93: 

94: \begin{abstract}

95: Schwarzschild black hole being thermodynamically unstable, corrections

96: to its entropy due to small thermal fluctuations cannot be

97: computed. However, a thermodynamically stable Schwarzschild solution

98: can be obtained within a cavity of any finite radius by immersing it

99: in an isothermal bath. For these boundary conditions, classically

100: there are either two black hole solutions or no solution. In the

101: former case, the larger mass solution has a positive specific heat and

102: hence is locally thermodynamically stable.  We find that the entropy

103: of this black hole, including first order fluctuation corrections is

104: given by: ${\cal S} = S_{BH} - \ln[\f{3}{R} (S_{BH}/4\p)^{1/2}

105: -2]^{-1} + (1/2) \ln(4\p)$, where $S_{BH}=A/4$ is its

106: Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and $R$ is the radius of the cavity. We

107: extend our results to four dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om black

108: holes, for which the corresponding expression is: ${\cal S} = S_{BH} -

109: \f{1}{2} \ln [ { (S_{BH}/\p R^2) ( {3S_{BH}}/{\p R^2} -

110: 2\sqrt{{S_{BH}}/{\p R^2 -\a^2}} ) \le( \sqrt{{S_{BH}}/{\p R^2}} - \a^2

111: \ri) }/ {\le( {S_{BH}}/{\p R^2} -\a^2 \ri)^2 } ]^{-1} +(1/2)\ln(4\p).$

112: Finally, we generalise the stability analysis to Reissner-Nordstr\"om

113: black holes in arbitrary spacetime dimensions, and compute their

114: leading order entropy corrections. 

115: In contrast to previously studied examples, we find that 

116: the entropy corrections in these cases have a different character.

117: 

118: \end{abstract}

119: 

120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

121: %\vs{1cm}

122: \begin{multicols} {2}

123: 

124: \section{Introduction}

125: It is well-known that the specific heat of a Schwarzschild black hole

126: is negative:

127: %

128: \be

129: C = \f{dM}{dT} = -8 \p M^2 < 0~. \label{specificheat}

130: \ee

131: %

132: Thus it is thermodynamically unstable, and corrections to thermodynamic

133: quantities of this black hole, e.g. entropy and temperature, are not

134: well-defined. This is seen when one considers for instance

135: the corrected entropy

136: of any thermodynamic system (including black holes) due to

137: small thermal fluctuations of the system, which is given by

138: \cite{dmb,saurya}:

139: %

140: \ba

141: {\cal S} &=& S_0 - \f{1}{2} \ln \le( <E^2> - <E>^2 \ri) + \cdots \nn \\

142: &=& S_0 - \f{1}{2} \ln \le( CT^2 \ri) + \dots~~~.

143: \la{master0}

144: \ea

145: %

146: When relation (\ref{master0}) is applied to

147: black holes, one substitutes $S_0 \rightarrow S_{BH}$,

148: the Bekenstein-Hawking

149: entropy of the black hole, and calculates $C$ for the particular

150: black hole under consideration.

151: Note that in using (\ref{master0}) in the context of black holes, one is 

152: simply assuming that the black hole behaves as an ordinary thermodynamic

153: system, following usual laws of thermodynamics. 

154: Then starting from a continuum partition function and performing an 

155: inverse Laplace transform gives the density of states, whose logarithm 

156: yields Eq.(\ref{master0}) above.

157: In addition, if one assumes

158: that the black hole (more precisely, its horizon) is built up of more

159: fundamental entities, such as quanta of area, or that observables such as

160: horizon area and mass are quantised in a certain way, 

161: then as shown in refs.\cite{gmed} and \cite{btd},

162: there could be additional terms in (\ref{master0}).   

163: 

164: It may also be noted that there could be other corrections to black hole

165: entropy due to a variety of other sources. For instance, quantum fluctuations

166: of matter fields in black hole backgrounds, as well as fluctuations of 

167: spacetime geometry itself in the canonical quantum gravity framework 

168: give rise to corrections which are also logarithmic in nature. Details of 

169: these calculations can be found in 

170: \cite{fursaev,solo1,other,nojiri,qg,obregon,carlip,jy,qg1,bss,gks,k,ms,medved,k2,medved2,gour1,cm,husain}.

171: Since our analysis is not tied to any specific model of quantum gravity, it 

172: remains valid as long as the black hole is large.

173: On the other hand, the other corrections may become important

174: as the size of the black hole approaches the Planck scale. 

175: 

176: One sees that the formula breaks down for $C<0$.

177: However, as was first shown by York \cite{york1}, a positive specific

178: heat solution can be obtained by considering Schwarzschild black holes

179: within a {\it finite} $S^2$ cavity immersed in an isothermal bath. In

180: fact for such canonical boundary conditions there are either two or no

181: solutions depending on whether the temperature of the bath is above or

182: below a minimum value. The larger mass of the solutions has a positive

183: heat and the other has a negative specific heat. When one takes

184: the cavity radius to infinity keeping the wall-temperature of the

185: cavity fixed (i.e., not changing the temperature of the bath) the

186: positive specific heat solution disappears and only the negative

187: specific solution survives giving the known black hole solution. This

188: holds for higher dimensions as well \cite{mm}. In this article, we

189: consider the positive specific heat solution and compute leading order

190: corrections to its entropy. As we will see the logarithmic correction

191: term due to small thermal fluctuation is of a different nature unlike

192: in several other cases studied before

193: \cite{fursaev,solo1,other,nojiri,qg,obregon,carlip,jy,qg1,bss,gks,k,ms,medved,k2,medved2,gour1,cm,husain}.

194: %unlike all known cases where formula (\ref{master0}) was applied

195: In this case, the mass and specific heat of the black hole are

196: functions of the temperature {\it and} cavity radius, and the entropy

197: correction is more interesting and non-trivial, as we will see

198: below. The case of charged black hole, i.e., Reissner-Nordstr\"om

199: black holes, within a cavity was first studied in \cite{york2} and we

200: will find correction for their entropy as well for thermal

201: fluctuation. See also \cite{louko} for related work on thermodynamics

202: of Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstr\"om-AdS black holes. 

203: This paper is arranged in the following way. In the next

204: section, we briefly review the thermodynamics of Schwarzschild black

205: holes within a cavity and compute the entropy correction. In section

206: (\ref{secrn}), we extend our results to Reissner-Nordstr\"om black

207: holes in arbitrary spacetime dimensions.  Finally, we end with a

208: summary of our results and some further directions in sections

209: (\ref{secdis}).  We use units in which $G=c=\hbar=k_B=1$.

210: 

211: 

212: \section{Schwarzschild Black Hole in a Box: Entropy corrections}

213: Let us first consider a Schwarzschild black hole of mass $M$. Wick

214: rotating the Lorentzian time $t \rightarrow i \t$ one obtains

215: %and confining the black hole in a box of radius $R$, the

216: %metric can be written as \cite{mm,york1}, we get:

217: %

218: \ba

219: ds^2 &=& \le( 1 - \f{2M}{r} \ri) d\t^2 \nn \\

220: &+& \le( 1 - \f{2M}{r} \ri)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 d\O_2^2~, \label{Sch}

221: \ea

222: %

223: where $d\O_{2}^2$ is the metric on unit $S^{2}$. The metric (\ref{Sch}) is

224: singular at $r=2M$. The singularity can be removed by periodically

225: identifying $\t$ with a period $8\pi M$. Hence the resulting metric is

226: complete and regular for $2M\leq r < \infty$. The fixed point set of

227: the Killing vector $\partial/\partial \t$ is a regular bolt of the

228: metric \cite{GH}. The inverse of the periodicity of the $\t$

229: coordinate gives the temperature of the hole measured at infinity.

230: 

231: 

232: \subsection{\it Isothermal Cavity}

233: Next, consider a spherical $S^2$ cavity of radius $R$ concentric with

234: the black hole horizon. The black hole temperature measured at

235: infinity is shifted by $(g_{00})^{-\frac{1}{2}}$, as one moves towards

236: the black hole. The local temperature of the $S^2$ cavity is therefore

237: given by

238: %In addition to fixing the radius of the

239: %box, let us also fix the temperature on the surface of the box, which

240: %is the Hawking temperature of the black hole, red-shifted to the

241: %box-boundary:

242: %

243: \be

244: \b =  T^{-1}= 8\p M \sqrt{1 - \f{2M}{R} }~.

245: \la{b1}

246: \ee

247: %

248: Now we ask the reverse question. Given a spherical cavity for radius

249: $R$ held at a temperature $\b^{-1}$, what are the black hole

250: solutions?  In other words what are possible solutions for $M$? This

251: was first considered by York \cite{york1} for four

252: dimensions. Recently this has been discussed for higher dimensions in

253: \cite{mm}. For the purpose of exposition we deal with the case of four

254: dimensions here and discuss generalisation to arbitrary dimensions in

255: the next section. It is not difficult to see that there are in fact

256: two black hole solutions or no solutions by considering Eq.(\ref{b1})

257: which can be written in the following form :

258: %

259: \be M^3 - \f{1}{2} R M^2 + \f{R\b^2}{128 \p^2} = 0~.  \la{cube} \ee

260: This is a cubic equation in $M$ and always admits a negative root and

261: a pair of positive or complex roots depending on the coefficients. The

262: coefficients are determined by the boundary variables $R$ and $\b$.

263: Defining new variables $x \equiv 2M/R$ and $\s = \b/4\p R$,

264: Eq.(\ref{cube}) can be cast in the following simple form:

265: %

266: \be

267: x^3 - x^2 + \s^2 = 0~. \label{tri}

268: \ee

269: %

270: When positive solutions exist, larger and smaller solutions of $x$

271: give larger and smaller hole respectively. Note that the positive

272: roots take values from zero to one (see figure 1).  It can be shown that

273: two positive roots occurs if and only if \cite{york1}

274: %

275: \be

276: \s \leq \f{2}{\sqrt{27}} ~.

277: \la{ineq1}

278: \ee

279: %

280: %\be

281: %\f{\b}{\a} \leq  \f{8\p}{\sqrt{27}}~.

282: %\la{ineq1}

283: %\ee

284: %

285: Thus one requires the temperature $T$ of the bath to be

286: \begin{equation}

287: T \geq \frac{\sqrt{27}}{8\pi}\frac{1}{R}. \label{ineq2}

288: \end{equation}

289: At the equality of (\ref{ineq1}) or (\ref{ineq2}) the two roots are

290: degenerate.  The larger solution therefore takes value within the

291: closed interval $[\frac{2}{3},1]$.  For completeness we mention

292: here the explicit solutions of (\ref{tri}) here. The exact solutions are:

293: %For completeness we here mention

294: %the exact solutions of two masses although we would not need them in

295: %the rest of the paper. They are

296: %

297: \ba

298: x_1 &=& \f{1}{3} \le[ 1 - 2\cos \le( \f{\a}{3} + \f{\p}{3}\ri) \ri]~,

299: \la{x1} \\

300: %

301: x_2 &=& \f{1}{3} \le[ 1 + 2\cos \le( \f{\a}{3} \ri) \ri]~,

302: \la{x2}

303: \ea

304: %

305: which translate in terms of black hole mass as:

306: %

307: \ba

308: M_1 &=& \f{R}{6} \le[ 1 - 2\cos \le( \f{\a}{3} + \f{\p}{3}\ri) \ri]~,

309: \la{m1} \\

310: %

311: M_2 &=& \f{R}{6} \le[ 1 + 2\cos \le( \f{\a}{3} \ri) \ri]~,

312: \la{m2}

313: \ea

314: where

315: %

316: \be

317: \cos\a = 1 - \f{27}{2} \s^2 ~.

318: \ee

319: %%

320: %

321: Evidently at the equality of (\ref{ineq1}), $\a = \p$,

322: the solutions coincide, and

323: %

324: \be

325: x = \f{2}{3}~~\Leftrightarrow~~M = \f{R}{3}~.

326: \ee

327: %

328: By calculating the Euclidean action of the solution it was shown in

329: \cite{york1} that the entropy of the black hole is unaffected by the

330: presence of the box and is given by the usual relationship \be S_{BH}

331: = 4\p M^2~.  \la{s1} \ee

332: 

333: The specific heat is defined as

334: \be

335: C_R = T \le(\f{\pa S_{BH}}{\pa T} \ri)_{R}~,

336: \ee

337: %and is evaluated at a constant radius of the box $R$ for either of the

338: %two solutions.

339: From (\ref{b1}) and (\ref{s1}), one obtains:

340: %

341: \be

342: C = 8\p M^2 \le( \f{R-2M}{3M-R} \ri)

343: = 4\p R^2 x^2 \le( \f{1-x}{3x-2} \ri)~.

344: \la{sp1}

345: \ee

346: %

347: From its form it is apparent that the specific heat is positive in the range

348: %

349: \be

350: \f{2}{3} \leq x \leq 1~~\Leftrightarrow~

351: 2M \leq R \leq 3M~~,

352: % \f{2}{3} \leq x \leq 1~,

353: \la{xrange}

354: \ee

355: %

356: which is possible only for the larger hole ($M_2$ above).  This can be

357: also observed from Figure 1.  For constant value of $R$, Figure 1 is a

358: relation between (inverse of) temperature and the masses of the two

359: Schwarzschild black holes. The mass of the larger solution increases

360: with increasing temperature. For the smaller hole it is just the

361: opposite. Also note that in the $R \rightarrow \infty$ limit, the

362: larger mass solutions do not exist meaningfully (it fills in the

363: cavity) irrespective of the temperature. Only the smaller solution

364: $x_1$ exists with $M=\frac{\beta}{8\pi}$ since $x_1\equiv

365: \frac{2M}{R}=\frac{\beta}{4\pi R}$ in this limit.

366: %Thus

367: %\be \lim_{R\rightarrow \infty} C

368: %= -8\p M^2~.  \ee

369: \begin{figure}[!h]

370: {\includegraphics[width=.42\textwidth]{AkbarDasN.eps}}

371: %\begin{center}

372: %\epsfig{figure=AkbarDasN.eps,width=12cm}

373: %\epsfig{figure=AkbarDasN.eps,width=8cm}

374: %\end{center}

375: %\caption{\slabel{isocorr}

376: \\

377: \caption{For every value of $\sigma^2 \equiv 1/(4\pi

378: RT)^2<\frac{4}{{27}}$ there are two values of $x$, i.e., two black

379: holes. For the larger black hole $x\in [\frac{2}{3},1]$.}

380: 

381: \end{figure}

382: \subsection{\it Logarithmic Correction}

383: Substituting (\ref{sp1}) and (\ref{b1}) in (2), we obtain the

384: leading corrections to the entropy of the larger black hole:

385: %

386: \ba

387: && \cals = S_{BH} -  \f{1}{2} \ln\left((3x-2)^{-1}\right)

388: + \f{1}{2} \ln (4\pi) \cdots \nn  \\

389: %

390:       &=& S_{BH} -  \f{1}{2}

391: \ln\le[ \f{3}{R} \le( \f{S_{BH}}{4\p} \ri)^{1/2} -2 \ri]^{-1}

392: +\f{1}{2} \ln (4\p) + \cdots

393: \la{corr2}

394: \ea

395: %

396: Note that the first correction term is negative. This is because,

397: since $x \in [2/3,1]$, the argument of the logarithm is always greater

398: than unity.  Also, note that the corrections here is of a somewhat

399: different type than those found in the different applications of

400: (\ref{master0}). First, the correction depends on the value of $x$

401: which is a function of the product $RT$. When $RT \rightarrow

402: \frac{\sqrt{27}}{8\pi}$ the correction is enormous irrespective of the

403: value of $R$ alone (the horizon radius is $\frac{2R}{3}$). As one

404: increases the temperature, keeping the radius of the cavity fixed, the

405: infilling black hole becomes larger and fills in the whole cavity at

406: infinite temperature. However, the correction term decreases with

407: increasing temperature and still remains finite and non-zero

408: approaching $\ln (4\pi)$ at the infinite temperature limit. For small

409: cavity radius the correction term is therefore given by the first term

410: and is always appreciable and overpowers $S_{BH}$ if the temperature

411: is not high enough (signaling breakdown of formalism).  For large

412: cavity radius it is more appreciable at lower temperatures and becomes

413: negligible, albeit non-zero, at high temperature. Again, if $T$ is

414: near $\frac{\sqrt{27}}{8\pi R}$ it overpowers $S_{BH}$ even if the

415: latter is large (again signaling a breakdown).

416: 

417: Another way to see the different nature of the correction terms is to

418: note the coefficient of the correction term. The coefficient in front

419: of either of the two terms (which can be combined together) is $1/2$,

420: in contrast to BTZ of Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter black holes for

421: example, where the coefficients are $-3/2$ and $-d/2(d-2)$

422: respectively \cite{dmb}. However note that this $1/2$ is not in the

423: same footing as the coefficients in those cases as the correction term

424: here is not of the type $-k \ln(S_{BH})$. Rather, if we are to write

425: it in terms of $S_{BH}$ it takes the form given by the second equation

426: of (\ref{corr2}) which involves the cavity radius as well.

427: 

428: \subsection{\it Higher Dimensions}

429: Higher dimensional Schwarzschild black holes and their thermodynamics

430: within a finite isothermal cavity have been studied in \cite{mm}. For

431: $d$-dimensions the inverse temperature at the $(d-2)$-dimensional

432: boundary is given by:

433: %

434: \be

435: \b = T^{-1} = \f{4\p x R}{d-3} \sqrt{1 - x^{d-3}}

436: \equiv \f{4\p R\s}{d-3}~,

437: \la{scd}

438: \ee

439: %

440: from which one obtains:

441: %

442: \be

443: x^{d-1} - x^2 + \s^2 = 0~.

444: \ee

445: %

446: This equation cannot be solved using ordinary algebraic

447: methods. However, analytic solution is still possible \cite{mm}. This

448: would be needed if one requires the entropy correction as a function

449: of cavity radius and temperature. However, as in the above case of

450: four dimensions the general properties of the corrections to entropy

451: can be studied without requiring the explicit solutions by studying

452: how the correction term varies with $x$. (Again note that $x$ takes

453: value within the interval $[0,1]$.)  This will be done in the next

454: section as a special case of $d$-dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om. As

455: we will see there entropy corrections to $d$-dimensional

456: Reissner-Nordstr\"om (and hence Schwarzschild) black holes can be

457: exactly evaluated.

458: 

459: \section{Reissner-Nordstr\"om Black Holes}

460: \la{secrn}

461: We now extend the above analysis for the Reissner-Nordstr\"om

462: black holes which have a charge. This means we would have to specify

463: suitable electrostatic potential at the boundary. We first discuss

464: the case of four dimensions.

465: \subsection{\it Four dimensions}

466: The Euclideanised  Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole metric is:

467: %

468: \ba

469: ds^2 &=&  \le( 1 - \f{2M}{r} + \f{Q^2}{r^2} \ri) d\t^2 \nn \\

470: &+&  \le( 1 - \f{2M}{r} + \f{Q^2}{r^2} \ri)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 d\O_2^2~,

471: \ea

472: %

473: with inverse temperature at boundary \cite{york2}:

474: %

475: \ba

476: \b = T^{-1} &=& 4\p r_+ \le( 1 - \f{Q^2}{r_+^2} \ri)^{-1}

477: \le(1 - \f{r_+}{R} \ri)^{1/2} \le(1 - \f{Q^2}{r_+ R} \ri)^{1/2} \nn \\

478:  &=& \f{4\p R x^{5/2}}{x^2-\a^2}  \sqrt{(1-x)(x-\a^2)} ~,

479: \ea

480: %

481: where $r_+ = M + \sqrt{M^2-Q^2}$ is the radius of the outer horizon and

482: $$ \a = \f{Q}{R} ~.$$

483: The counterpart of Eq.(\ref{cube}) is:

484: %

485: \be

486: (1-\Phi^2)x^3 - x^2

487: + (1-\Phi^2)^2 \s^2 = 0 ~,

488: %\le( \f{\b}{4\p R} \ri)^2 = 0~,

489: \la{equil1}

490: \ee

491: %

492: where $x$ and $\s$ has identical definitions in terms of $r_+$ and

493: $\b$ as before.

494: %

495: %\ba

496: %x &\equiv&  \f{r_+}{R}~,  \nn \\

497: %\&~~\s &=& \f{\b}{4\p R}

498: %\ea

499: %

500: %Note that $x=2M/R$ for vanishing charge.

501: Here, $\Phi$ is the potential difference between $r_+$ and $R$,

502: suitably red-shifted:

503: %

504: \ba

505: \Phi &=& \f{Q}{r_+} \le(1- \f{r_+}{R} \ri)^{1/2}

506: \le( 1 - \f{Q^2}{Rr_+} \ri)^{-1/2} \nn \\

507: &=& \a~\sqrt{\f{1-x}{x^2 - \a^2 x}}~,

508: \ea

509: %

510: Now, the two positive solutions of $x$ are:

511: %

512: \ba

513: %

514: x_1 &=& \f{1}{3(1-\Phi^2)}

515: \le( 1 - 2 \cos \le( \f{\a}{3}  + \f{\p}{3} \ri) \ri)  \\

516: x_2 &=& \f{1}{3(1-\Phi^2)} \le( 1 + 2 \cos\f{\a}{3} \ri)  \\

517: %x_2 &=& \f{1}{3(1-\Phi^2)}

518: %\le( 1 - 2 \cos \le( \f{\a}{3}  + \f{\p}{3} \ri) \ri)  \\

519: \cos\a &=& 1 - \f{27}{2} \s^2 (1-\Phi)^4 ~,

520: \ea

521: %

522: of which only the second one is thermodynamically stable. The entropy is,

523: in this case:

524: %

525: \be

526: S_{BH} = \p r_+^2 = \p R^2 x^2 ~.

527: \ee

528: %

529: (where we have dropped the subscript $2$ from $x_2$).

530: The specific heat at constant $\Phi$ and $R$ can now be computed

531: by using the relation:

532: %

533: \be

534: C_{\Phi,R} = \le(\f{\pa E}{\pa T }\ri)_{\Phi,R}

535: = - \le( \f{\pa S/\pa x}{\pa \ln\s/\pa x} \ri)_{\Phi,R}

536: \la{easy1}

537: \ee

538: %

539: with $\s$ obtained from Eq.(\ref{equil1}). This yields:

540: %

541: \be

542: C_{\Phi,R} = \f{4\p R^2 x^3 (1-x)}{3x^2 - 2x - \a^2}~,

543: \ee

544: %

545: where now the specific heat is non-negative in the range:

546: %

547: \be

548: r_+ \leq R \leq  \f{3}{2}r_+ - \f{1}{2} \f{Q^2}{r_+}~,

549: \ee

550: %

551: Equivalently:

552: %

553: \ba

554: x &\leq& 1 ~,\\

555: 3x^2 - 2x - \a^2 &\geq& 0 ~.

556: \ea

557: %

558: In the above range, the corrected entropy assumes the form:

559: %

560: \ba

561: {\cal S} &=& S_{BH} -

562: \f{1}{2} \ln\le( \f{x^2 (3x^2-2x-\a^2)(x-\a^2)}

563: {(x^2-\a^2)^2} \ri)^{-1} \nn \\

564: &+& \f{1}{2} \ln (4\p) + \cdots

565: \ea

566: %

567: This can be expressed in terms of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as:

568: %

569: \ba

570: &&{\cal S} = S_{BH} \nn \\

571: &-& \f{1}{2}

572: \ln\le( \f{

573: %\le( \f{S_{BH}}{\p R^2} \ri)

574: \le( \f{3S_{BH}}{\p R^2}  - 2\sqrt{\f{S_{BH}}{\p R^2}} - \a^2 \ri)

575: \le( \sqrt{\f{S_{BH}}{\p R^2}} - \a^2 \ri) }

576: {

577: %\le( \sqrt{\f{S_{BH}}{\p R^2}} - \a^2 \ri)

578: \le( \f{\p R^2}{S_{BH}} \ri)

579: \le(  \f{S_{BH}}{\p R^2}  -\a^2  \ri)^2 }  \ri)^{-1} \nn\\

580: &+& \f{1}{2} \ln (4\p) + \cdots

581: \ea

582: %

583: As expected, the above reduces to Eq.(\ref{corr2}) for $\a = 0$.

584: 

585: \subsection{\it Higher dimensions}

586: For the $d$-dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole the Euclidean metric

587: is given by

588: %

589: \ba

590: &ds&^2 =

591: \le(  1 - \f{16\p M}{(d-2) \O_{d-2} r^{d-3}}

592: + \f{16\p Q^2}{(d-2)(d-3) r^{2(d-3)}} \ri) d\t^2 \nn \\

593: &+& \le(  1 - \f{16\p M}{(d-2) \O_{d-2} r^{d-3}}

594: + \f{16\p Q^2}{(d-2)(d-3) r^{2(d-3)}} \ri)^{-1} dr^2  \nn \\

595: && + r^2 d\O_{d-2}^2 ~,

596: \ea

597: where $d\O_{d-2}^2$ is a unit $S^{d-2}$ sphere with the standard round

598: metric on it. The inverse temperature is given by:

599: %

600: \ba

601: \b &=& T^{-1} \nn \\

602: &=& \f{4\p r_+}{d-3}  \le( 1 - \f{2Q^2}{(d-2)(d-3) r_+^{2(d-3)}} \ri)^{-1}

603: ~\times \nn\\

604: && \le( 1 - \le(\f{r_+}{R}   \ri)^{d-3} \ri)^{\f{1}{2}}

605: \le(1  - \f{2Q^2}{(d-2)(d-3) (r_+ R)^{d-3}}  \ri)^{\f{1}{2}} \\

606: &=& \f{4\p R x^{1 + 3(d-3)/2}}{d-3} \le(  x^{2(d-3)} - \a^{2(d-3)}\ri)^{-1}

607: ~\times \nn \\

608: &{}& \le( 1 - x^{d-3} \ri)^{1/2} \le( x^{d-3} - \a^{2(d-3)}\ri)^{1/2}~,

609: \la{rndtemp}

610: \ea

611: %

612: where $x=r_+/R$ as before, and now $\a$ is defined as:

613: $$ \le(\a R \ri)^{2(d-3)} = \f{2Q^2}{(d-2)(d-3)}~. $$

614: Similarly, the the potential difference is:

615: %

616: \ba

617: \Phi &=& \f{Q}{r_+^{d-3}}

618: \sqrt{\f{1 - (r_+/R)^{d-3}}{ 1 - 2Q^2/(d-2)(d-3)(r_+R)^{d-3}} } \\

619: &=& \sqrt{\f{2}{(d-2)(d-3)}}~{\a^{d-3}}

620: \sqrt{\f{1-x^{d-3}}{x^{2(d-3)} - \a^{2(d-3)} x^{d-3}}}

621: \ea

622: %

623: and Eq.(\ref{equil1}) is generalised to:

624: %

625: \ba

626: && \le( 1- \f{(d-2)(d-3)}{2} \Phi^2 \ri)x^{d-1} - x^2  \nn \\

627: &+& \le(1-\f{(d-2)(d-3)}{2} \Phi^2 \ri)^2 \s^2 = 0 ~,

628: \la{equil2}

629: \ea

630: %

631: where $\s$ has been defined as in Eq.(\ref{scd}).

632: Using (\ref{easy1}), the specific heat at constant

633: $R$ and $\Phi$ can now be computed as:

634: %

635: \be

636: C_{\Phi,R} = \f{(d-2) \O_{d-2} R^{d-2}~x^{2d-5} \le( 1 - x^{d-3} \ri)}

637: {(d-1) x^{2(d-3)} - 2x^{d-3} - (d-3) \a^{2(d-3)}}~.

638: \la{rndc}

639: \ee

640: %

641: Stability is now guaranteed if the parameters lie in a range such that:

642: %

643: \be

644: (d-1) x^{2(d-3)} - 2x^{d-3} - (d-3) \a^{2(d-3)} \geq 0 ~.

645: \ee

646: %

647: Explicit evaluation of $x(M,Q)$ and $R (M,Q)$ from the above

648: is complicated for

649: higher dimensions though, because of the higher powers of $x$.

650: Eq.(\ref{rndc}), along with (\ref{rndtemp}) now

651: gives the corrected entropy as:

652: %

653: \ba

654: \cals &=& S_{BH} \nn \\

655: &-& \f{1}{2}

656: \ln [~x^{d-2} \le( (d-1) x^{2(d-3)} - 2x^{d-3} - (d-3) \a^{2(d-3)} \ri)

657: \nn \\

658: && \times~\f{ x^{d-3} - \a^{2(d-3)} }

659: { R^{d-4} \le( x^{2(d-3)} - \a^{2(d-3)} \ri)^2 }~]^{-1}  \nn \\

660: &+& \f{1}{2} \ln \le[\f{(d-2)\O_{d-2}}{(4\p)^2} \ri]+ \cdots

661: \ea

662: %

663: which can be expressed in terms of $S_{BH}$ as:

664: %

665: \ba

666: && \cals = S_{BH} \nn \\

667: &-& \ln [ (\sbh) ~\times \nn \\

668: && \{ (d-1) (\sbh)^{2(d-3)/(d-2)} \nn \\

669: && - 2 (\sbh)^{(d-3)/(d-2)}

670: - (d-3) \a^{2(d-3)}  \} \times  \nn \\

671: && \f{\{ (\sbh)^{(d-3)/(d-2)} - \a^{2(d-3)}  \}}

672: {\{ (\sbh)^{2(d-3)/(d-2)} - \a^{2(d-3)} \}^2} ~]^{-1} \nn \\

673: &+& \f{1}{2} \ln \le[\f{(d-2)\O_{d-2}}{(4\p)^2} \ri]+ \cdots

674: %

675: \ea

676: %

677: For zero-charge, that is for $d$-dimensional Schwarzschild

678: black holes, the corresponding expression is:

679: %

680: \ba

681: \cals &=& S_{BH}

682: - \f{1}{2} \ln\le[

683: \f{(d-1)(\sbh)^{(d-3)/(d-2) -2 }  }{R^{d-4} (\sbh)^{(d-4)/(d-2)} }

684: \ri]^{-1} \nn \\

685: &+& \f{1}{2} \ln \le[\f{(d-2)\O_{d-2}}{(4\p)^2} \ri]+ \cdots

686: \ea

687: %

688: In each case, the entropy correction is different in nature than 

689: in previously studied examples.

690: 

691: \section{Discussions}

692: \la{secdis}

693: 

694: In this article, we have shown how leading order corrections due to

695: thermal fluctuations can be obtained for Schwarzschild and

696: Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes within a finite cavity. With

697: appropriate boundary data, within a cavity thermodynamically stable

698: solutions are possible. Normally, such corrections cannot be computed

699: for Schwarzschild owing to its negative specific heat.

700: %

701: For Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes, corrections of this type were

702: computed in \cite{dmb} for a very small range of parameters near

703: extremality, and that too in a perturbative approach (with

704: perturbation parameter $Q/M$). Here, the result is non-perturbative,

705: and holds for any parameter range.

706: %, so long as the box-size lies in the

707: %prescribed range.

708: Finally, we generalised the stability analysis to

709: higher dimensional Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes, and computed its

710: leading order entropy corrections.  

711: %

712: We found that the leading logarithmic corrections come with a negative

713: signature.

714: %

715: This means

716: that the corrected dimensionality of the Hilbert space of the black

717: holes under consideration, which is ${\cal N} = \exp(\cals)$, is smaller

718: than the uncorrected dimension.  It would be interesting to

719: explore implications of this result.  It would also be interesting to

720: do the generalisation to other types of black holes, e.g. Kerr-Newmann

721: as well as black holes which are not asymptotically flat, e.g.  those

722: that are asymptotically anti-de Sitter or de-Sitter. The implications

723: of the latter to $AdS/CFT$ and the $dS/CFT$ correspondence may turn

724: out to be interesting. We hope to report on this elsewhere.

725: 

726: 

727: 

728: 

729: \vs{.4cm} \no {\bf Acknowledgements} SD thanks R. K. Bhaduri and

730: P. Majumdar for useful correspondence and interesting discussions.

731: This work is supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering

732: Research Council of Canada. MMA would like to thank the Overseas

733: Research Scheme, the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust and DAMTP for

734: financial support.

735: 

736: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

737: 

738: \bibitem{dmb} S. Das, P. Majumdar, R. K. Bhaduri,

739: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 19} (2002) 2355 (hep-th/0111011).

740: 

741: \bibitem{saurya} S. Das, in {\it Talk given at 

742: Canadian Association of Physics Annual Congress,

743: Quebec City, June 2-5, 2002} (hep-th/0207072).

744: 

745: \bibitem{gmed} G. Gour, A. J. M.

746: Medved, Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 20} (2003) 3307 (gr-qc/0305018). 

747: 

748: \bibitem{btd} R. K. Bhaduri, M. N. Tran, S. Das, 

749: gr-qc/0312023. 

750: 

751: %\bibitem{york1} J. W. York, Phys. Rev. {\bf D33} (1986)

752: %2092.

753: %%%CITATION = PHRVA,D33,2092;%%

754: %

755: %\bibitem{mm} M. M. Akbar, G. W. Gibbons, 

756: %Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 20} (2003) 1787 (hep-th/0301026).

757: %%%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301026;%%

758: %

759: 

760: \bibitem{fursaev}

761: D. Fursaev, Phys. Rev. {\bf D51} (1995) 5352 (hep-th/9412161).

762: 

763: \bibitem{solo1} S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57} (1998) 2410

764: (hep-th/9701106).

765: 

766: \bibitem{other} R. B. Mann, S. N. Solodukhin, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B523}

767: (1998) 293 (hep-th/9709064);

768: A. J. M. Medved, G. Kunstatter, Phys. Rev. {\bf D60} (1999) 104029

769: (hep-th/9904070);

770: A. J. M. Medved, G. Kunstatter, Phys. Rev. {\bf D63} (2001) 104005

771: (hep-th/0009050).

772: 

773: \bibitem{nojiri} S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, 

774: Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A 15} (2000) 989 (hep-th/9905089). 

775: 

776: \bibitem{qg} R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84} (2000)

777: 5255 (gr-qc/0002040).

778: 

779: \bibitem{obregon} O. Obregon, M. Sabido, V. I. Tkach,

780: Gen. Rel. Grav. {\bf 33} (2001) 913 (gr-qc/0003023).

781: 

782: \bibitem{carlip} S. Carlip, Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 17} (2000) 4175

783: (gr-qc/0005017).

784: 

785: \bibitem{jy} J. Jing, M-L Yan, Phys. Rev. {\bf D63} (2001) 24003

786: (gr-qc/0005105).

787: 

788: \bibitem{qg1}

789: S. Das, R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar,

790: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 63} (2001) 044019 (hep-th/0006211);

791: P. Majumdar, Pramana {\bf 55} (2000) 511 (hep-th/0009008),

792: hep-th/0011284, hep-th/0110198.

793: 

794: \bibitem{bss} D. Birmingham, S. Sen, Phys. Rev. {\bf D63} (2001) 47501

795: (hep-th/0008051); D. Birmingham, I. Sachs, S. Sen, Int. J. Mod. Phys.

796: {\bf D10} (2001) 833 (hep-th/0102155).

797: 

798: \bibitem{gks} T. R. Govindarajan, R. K. Kaul, V. Suneeta,

799: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 18} (2001) 2877 (gr-qc/0104010).

800: 

801: \bibitem{k} K. S. Gupta, S. Sen,

802: Phys. Lett. {\bf 526} (2002) 121 (hep-th/0112041),

803: hep-th/0203094; K. S. Gupta, hep-th/0204137.

804: 

805: \bibitem{ms} S. A. Major, K. L. Setter,

806: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 18} (2001) 5125 (gr-qc/0101031);

807: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 18} (2001) 5293 (gr-qc/0108034).

808: 

809: \bibitem{medved} A. J. M. Medved,

810: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 19} (2002) 2503 (hep-th/0201079)

811: and gr-qc/0211004.

812: 

813: \bibitem{k2} K. S. Gupta, hepth/0204137.

814: 

815: \bibitem{medved2} A. J. M. Medved, 

816: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 20} (2003) 2147 (hep-th/0210017).

817: 

818: \bibitem{gour1} G. Gour, Phys. Rev. {\bf D66} (2002) 104022

819: (gr-qc/0210024).

820: 

821: \bibitem{cm} A. Chatterjee, P. Majumdar, gr-qc/0303030.

822: 

823: \bibitem{husain} S. Das, V. Husain, 

824: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 20} (2003) 4387 (hep-th/0303089).

825: 

826: \bibitem{york1} J. W. York, Phys. Rev. {\bf D33} (1986)

827: 2092.

828: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D33,2092;%%

829: 

830: \bibitem{mm} M. M. Akbar, G. W. Gibbons, 

831: Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 20} (2003) 1787 (hep-th/0301026).

832: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301026;%%

833: 

834: \bibitem{york2}

835: H.~W.~Braden, J.~D.~Brown, B.~F.~Whiting and J.~W.~York,

836: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 42} (1990) 3376.

837: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D42,3376;%%

838: 

839: \bibitem{louko}

840: J. Louko, B. F. Whiting, 

841: Phys. Rev. {\bf D51} (1995) 5583 (gr-qc/9411017); 

842: J. Louko, S. N. Winters-Hilt, 

843: Phys. Rev. {\bf D54} (1996) 2647 (gr-qc/9602003). 

844: 

845: \bibitem{GH}

846: G.~W.~Gibbons and S.~W.~Hawking,

847: Commun.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 66} (1979) 291.

848: %%CITATION = CMPHA,66,291;%%

849: 

850: 

851: 

852: \end{thebibliography}

853: 

854: \end{multicols}

855: 

856: \end{document}

857: 

858: 

859: