1:
2: \input harvmac
3: \input epsf
4: \def\p{\partial}
5: \def\ap{\alpha'}
6: \def\half{{1\over 2}}
7: \def\s{\sigma}
8: \def\sh{\hat{\sigma}}
9: \def\Ah{\hat{A}}
10: \def\Xh{\hat{X}}
11: \def\Dh{\hat{D}}
12: \def\lh{\hat{\lambda}}
13: \def\Ap{{A'}}
14: \def\Xp{{X'}}
15: \def\Dp{{D'}}
16: \def\At{\tilde{A}}
17: \def\Xt{\tilde{X}}
18: \def\Dt{\tilde{D}}
19: % \def\lt{\tilde{\lambda}}
20:
21:
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23:
24: \Title{}{\vbox{\centerline{CMB Power Spectrum from Noncommutative Spacetime}}}
25:
26: \centerline{Qing Guo Huang$^{1}$ and Miao Li$^{1,2}$ }
27: \centerline{$^{1}$\it Institute of Theoretical Physics}
28: \centerline{\it Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 2735}
29: \centerline{\it Beijing 100080}
30: \medskip
31: \centerline{$^{2}$\it Department of Physics}
32: \centerline{\it National Taiwan University}
33: \centerline{\it Taipei 10764, Taiwan}
34: \centerline{\tt huangqg@itp.ac.cn}
35: \centerline{\tt mli@itp.ac.cn}
36:
37: \bigskip
38:
39: Very recent CMB data of WMAP offers an opportunity to test inflation
40: models, in particular, the running of spectral index is quite new and
41: can be used to rule out some models. We show that an noncommutative spacetime
42: inflation model gives a good explanation of these new results. In fitting
43: the data, we also obtain a relationship between the noncommutative
44: parameter (string scale) and the ending time of inflation.
45:
46: \Date{April, 2003}
47:
48: \nref\ben{C. L. Bennett et al., astro-ph/0302207.}
49: \nref\sper{D. N. Spergel et al., astro-ph/0302209.}
50: \nref\pei{H. V. P. Peiris et al., astro-ph/0302225.}
51: \nref\sind{B. Feng, M. Li, R.-J. Zhang and X. Zhang, astro-ph/0302479;
52: J. E. Lidsey and R. Tavakol, astro-ph/0304113;
53: M. Kawasaki, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, hep-ph/0304161;
54: L. Pogosian, S.-H. H. Tye, I. Wasserman and M. Wyman, hep-th/0304188.}
55: \nref\bh{R. Brandenberger and P.-M. Ho, hep-th/0203119.}
56: \nref\ss{C-S. Chu, B. R. Greene and G. Shiu, hep-th/0011241;
57: F. Lizzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele and M. Peloso, hep-th/0203099.}
58: \nref\all{A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth, Cosmological Inflation and Large-
59: Scale Structure (Cambridge University Press, 2000).}
60: \nref\ty{T. Yoneya, in ``Wandering in Fields," eds. K. Kawarabayashi, A. Ukawa
61: (World Scientific, 1987); M. Li and T. Yoneya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78,
62: (1997) 1219, hep-th/9611072; T. Yoneya, Prog. Theor. Phys. 103 (2000)
63: 1081, hep-th/0004074.}
64:
65: Recent results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe \refs{\ben-\pei}
66: give further determination of cosmological parameters and constrain properties
67: of inflationary models tightly. Some analysis was done in \pei, and in particular,
68: the new data on the running of the spectral index of the power spectrum of CMB
69: provide good constraints on inflationary models, and some models were analyzed
70: in \sind. In general, models satisfying the slow roll conditions naturally
71: predict too small running of the spectral index. In this note we analyze
72: the model of \bh\ in which spacetime noncommutativity is taken into account,
73: and find that it is rather easy to accommodate WMAP data in this model.
74: It is quite remarkable that the two parameters in this model can be used
75: to fit four data of the spectral index. We determine these two parameters,
76: and the string scale is in turn determined once the termination time
77: of inflation is known. For a typical termination time of inflation $t_*=
78: 10^{-32}\hbox{s}$ \all, the string scale is $l_s=10^{-25}$cm, or $M_s=10^{11}$
79: Gev.
80:
81: Spacetime in general is noncommutative in string theory, this manifests in
82: a general relation $\Delta X\Delta T\ge l_s^2$ \ty. However it is hard to formulate
83: string theory in a fashion to incorporate this relation directly. On a general
84: ground, if inflation reflects physics at a scale close to string scale or
85: a related scale, one expects that spacetime uncertainty must have effects
86: in the CMB power spectrum, observable or to be observable (implications
87: of space-space noncommutativity for inflation were considered in \ss).
88: Lacking a manifest
89: formulation of noncommutativity, we shall be content with a scheme proposed
90: in \bh, in which spacetime noncommutativity is put in by hand for a scalar
91: field (inflaton). Skipping the detailed discussions leading to their action,
92: we copy the free scalar action here
93: \eqn\ncscal{S=V\int d\eta d^3k z_k^2(\eta)(\phi^\prime_k\phi_{-k}^\prime
94: -k^2\phi_k
95: \phi_{-k}),}
96: where
97: \eqn\scaf{\eqalign{z_k^2&=a(\eta)^2y_k^2(\eta), \quad
98: y_k^2=(\beta_k^+\beta_k^-)^{\half},\cr
99: {d\eta\over d\tau}&=\left({\beta_k^-\over \beta_k^+}\right)^\half,\quad
100: \beta_k^\pm =\half (a^{\pm 2}(\tau+\l_s^2k)+a^{\pm 2}(\tau-l_s^2k),}}
101: where $l_s$ is the string length scale, $a(\tau)$ is the scale factor in
102: the metric, and time $\tau$ is defined such that
103: \eqn\metr{ds^2=-a^{-2}(\tau)d\tau^2+a^2(\tau)dx^2.}
104: Unlike in the commuting spacetime, the all important scale factor $z_k$
105: in our case depends on the comoving wave number $k$.
106:
107: We shall consider the power-law inflation, and this can be generated by a
108: scalar potential assuming an exponential form. Let $t$ be the cosmological
109: time, so $a(t)=a_0t^n$, $n>1$. In terms of $\tau={a_0\over n+1}t^{n+1}$,
110: $a=\alpha_0\tau^{{n\over n+1}}$ with
111: \eqn\repa{\alpha_0=a_0^{{1\over n+1}}(n+1)^{{n\over n+1}}.}
112: To simplify relations that will follow, we define a scale $l$ so that
113: $a(\tau)=(\tau/l)^{{n\over n+1}}$ and $a(t)=({{t\over (n+1)l}})^n$.
114: We shall estimate the relationship between the scale $l$ and the termination
115: time $t_*$ later.
116:
117: The scalar power spectrum can be computed in the usual way, and is given by
118: \eqn\powers{P(k)={k^2\over 4\pi^2z_k^2(\eta_k)},}
119: and $\eta_k$ is determined by the condition
120: \eqn\tkd{k^2={z_k''\over z_k}.}
121: Two extremal limits were considered in \bh, namely the UV limit and the IR
122: limit. However, the observed results must lie in between, so we need to calculate
123: the power spectrum again. The interested region is actually UV in terms of
124: the time when the perturbation is created, but this was not discussed in \bh.
125: What we need to compute is
126: \eqn\sind{n_s=1+{d\ln P(k)\over d\ln k},\quad {dn_s\over d\ln k}.}
127:
128: Define
129: \eqn\kcr{k_c=\left({(n+1)^2\over n(2n-1)}\right)^{-{n+1\over 4}}({l_s\over l})^{n-1}
130: l^{-1}.}
131: Naively, $k_c$ is determined by two microscopic scales $l$ and $l_s$, one would
132: expect that $k_c$ is also at the microscopic scale. This is wrong, due to the large
133: exponent $n$. To achieve sufficient number of e-folds, $n$ ought to be large
134: enough, and indeed we will determine it be around 13. Thus, if $l_s$ is smaller
135: than $l$ by a few order, the characteristic wave length $1/k_c$ is macroscopic.
136: The interesting range of $k$ is between $(0.002, 0.05)\hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$, and we
137: assume these length scales be smaller than $1/k_c$, so $k_c/k\ll 1$. In solving
138: the crossing horizon condition \tkd, we will expand everything in $k_c/k$.
139:
140: Without the string spacetime uncertainty, or let $l_s=0$, the crossing horizon
141: time is
142: \eqn\nscr{\tau_k^0=l_s^2k\left({k\over k_c}\right)^{{2\over n-1}},}
143: the dependence on $l_s$ is fictitious, since a factor in $k_c$ cancels $l_s^2$.
144: Since string uncertainty introduces a uncertainty in time $\sigma=l_s^2k$,
145: this ought to be smaller than the time when the perturbation is created,
146: namely, $\sigma/\tau_k^0$ must be small. This ratio is nothing but
147: \eqn\rat{{\sigma\over \tau_k^0}=\left({k_c\over k}\right)^{{2\over n-1}}\ll 1.}
148: For a large enough $n$, $k_c$ is small enough so that the above assumption
149: will be valid.
150:
151: In solving \tkd, not only we need to modify $z_k$ according to \scaf, but also
152: we need to modify the definition of the conformal time according to \scaf.
153: For instance
154: \eqn\deri{{d\over d\eta}=\alpha_0^2\tau^{{2n\over n+1}}(1-{n\over n+1}{\sigma^2
155: \over\tau^2}){d\over d\tau},}
156: where we have truncated to the first nontrivial order in $\sigma/\tau$. After a lengthy
157: but straightforward calculation, we find
158: \eqn\modsca{{z_k''\over z_k}={n(2n-1)\over (n+1)^2}\alpha_0^4\tau^{{2(n-1)\over n+1}}
159: \left(1-{2n(n+1)(2n-5)\over (2n-1)(n+1)^2}{\sigma^2\over\tau^2}\right).}
160: Solving \tkd\ using \modsca, we obtain
161: \eqn\crti{\tau_k=l_s^2k({k\over k_c})^{{2\over n-1}}\left(1+{n(2n-5)\over (n-1)(2n-1)}
162: ({k_c\over k})^{{4\over n-1}}\right).}
163: The power spectrum is readily calculated to be
164: \eqn\pwsp{P(k)\sim k^{-{2\over n-1}}\left(1-{4n^2(n-2)(2n+1)\over (n+1)^2(n-1)
165: (2n-1)}({k_c\over k})^{{4\over n-1}}\right).}
166: Denote the coefficient in the front of $(k_c/k)^{{4\over n-1}}$ in the above formula
167: by $x$ (the positive one), we compute the spectral index and the running of the index
168: \eqn\inrin{\eqalign{n_s-1&=-{2\over n-1}+{4x\over n-1}({k_c\over k})^{{4\over n-1}},\cr
169: {dn_s\over d\ln k}&=-{16x\over (n-1)^2}({k_c\over k})^{{4\over n-1}}.}}
170: Since $x$ is positive, $n_s$ is larger for smaller $k$, the expected behavior.
171: Now, use the WMAP data
172: \eqn\wmap{\eqalign{n_s&=0.93\pm 0.03, \quad {dn_s\over d\ln k}=-0.031^{+0.016}
173: _{-0.017}
174: \quad \hbox{at}\quad k=0.05 \hbox{Mpc}^{-1},\cr
175: n_s&=1.10^{+ 0.07}_{-0.06}, \quad {dn_s\over d\ln k}=-0.042^{+0.021}_{-0.020}
176: \quad \hbox{at}\quad k=0.002 \hbox{Mpc}^{-1}}}
177: to see whether the main formulas in \inrin\ can fit these. There are only two
178: parameters in \inrin, namely $n$ and $k_c$, but there are four independent
179: results from the WMAP. We will adopt the following strategy: we first use the
180: two results at $k=0.05 \hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$ to determine the two parameters, and
181: make a prediction about $n_s$ and its running at $k=0.002 \hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$.
182: Later, we use the results about $n_s$ at two different scales to make a prediction
183: about the running of $n_s$ at the two scales.
184:
185: Using the results at $k=0.05 \hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$, we find
186: \eqn\ffit{n=13.171^{+6.198}_{-2.772},\quad k_c=1.65^{+6.84}_{-1.64}\times 10^{-5}
187: \hbox{Mpc}^{-1}.}
188: Indeed, $k_c/k$ is a small number, and $(k_c/k)^{{4\over n-1}}$ is also small
189: enough so the approximation used in deriving \inrin\ is valid.
190: These parameters together with \inrin\ predict
191: \eqn\irpre{n_s=1.11^{+ 0.14}_{-0.13}, \quad {dn_s\over d\ln k}=-0.089^{+0.059}
192: _{-0.100}
193: \quad \hbox{at}\quad k=0.002 \hbox{Mpc}^{-1}.}
194: The central value of the predicted $n_s$ is quite good compared to that in
195: \wmap, the central value of the predicted running is larger than that in \wmap,
196: but within the error bar, we notice that the tendency of the predicted
197: running is good, it is larger at a larger scale. For $k=0.002\hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$,
198: it is possible that higher orders in $k_c/k$ are not negligible, and may improve
199: our result. We also notice that in \pei\ the central value of the running is
200: estimated to be $-0.077$, much closer to our prediction.
201:
202: Next, using the values of $n_s$ at two different scales in \wmap, we determine
203: \eqn\sfit{n=13.336^{+5.204}_{-2.412},\quad k_c=1.43^{+3.81}_{-1.42}\times 10^{-5}
204: \hbox{Mpc}^{-1},}
205: and the running of the spectral index
206: \eqn\irpree{{dn_s\over d\ln k}(k=0.05\hbox{Mpc}^{-1})=0.030^{+ 0.013}_{-0.011},
207: \quad {dn_s\over d\ln k}(k=0.002\hbox{Mpc}^{-1})=-0.085^{+0.050}
208: _{-0.065}.}
209:
210: We show the spectral index and the running as functions of $\ln k$ in fig.1
211: and fig.2.
212:
213: We have used the WMAP data to determine two parameters $n$ and $k_c$ in
214: the noncommutative inflation model. Next, we want to determine the relation
215: between the ending time of inflation and the string scale. To do so, note
216: that the comoving wave numbers are measured at the present time, so the normalization
217: of the scale factor $a(t)$ at the present $t_0$ is 1. Since the termination
218: of inflation, our universe underwent a radiation dominated epoch and matter
219: dominated epoch (for simplicity we ignore the observed dark energy), so
220: the scale factor was enhanced twice:
221: \eqn\enh{a(t_*)({10^4\times 365\times 24\times 60^2\over t_*})^{\half}
222: ({13.7\times 10^9\over 10^4})^{{2\over 3}}=1,}
223: where $t_*$ is the termination time of inflation and its unit is second.
224: Using $a(t_*)=a_0t_*^n$, we find the parameter $l$
225: \eqn\pasca{l={t_*\over n+1}({4.8\times 10^9\over t_*})^{{1\over 2n}}.}
226: $l$ is larger than $t_*$. Next, using the definition of $k_c$ in \kcr, we get
227: \eqn\strs{l_s=\left[k_cl^n\left({(n+1)^2\over n(2n-1)}\right)^{{n+1\over 4}}
228: \right]^{{1\over n-1}}.}
229: In the end, $l$ and $l_s$ are expressed in terms of $t_*$
230: \eqn\scarel{l=dt_*^{{2n-1\over 2n}},\quad l_s=ct_*^{{2n-1\over 2n-2}},}
231: where in defining $d$ and $c$, we have turned $l$ and $l_s$ in the unit cm.
232:
233: For parameters in \ffit, we have
234: \eqn\fffit{d=1.18^{+1.15}_{-0.71}\times 10^{10},\quad
235: c=2.70^{+0.15}_{-0.35}\times 10^8.}
236: Thus for $t_*=10^{-32}$s, $l\sim 10^{-21}$cm, $l_s\sim 10^{-25}$cm.
237: $l_s$ is larger than the Planck scale by 8 orders.
238: For $t_*=10^{-38}$s, the earliest possibility \all, $l_s\sim 10^{-31}$cm,
239: larger than the Planck scale only by two orders. For parameters in
240: \sfit,
241: \eqn\sffit{d=1.14^{+0.86}_{-0.62}\times 10^{10},\quad
242: c=2.70^{+0.21}_{-0.31}\times 10^8,}
243: not much different from those in \fffit.
244:
245: \bigskip
246: {\vbox{{\epsfxsize=10cm
247: \nobreak
248: \centerline{\epsfbox{graph1.eps}}
249: \nobreak\bigskip
250: {\raggedright\it \vbox{
251: {\bf Figure 1.}
252: {\it $n_s$ as a function of $\ln k$. Parameters are determined using data at
253: $k=0.05\hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$.}
254: }}}}
255: \bigskip}
256:
257:
258: {\vbox{{\epsfxsize=10cm
259: \nobreak
260: \centerline{\epsfbox{graph2.eps}}
261: \nobreak\bigskip
262: {\raggedright\it \vbox{
263: {\bf Figure 2.}
264: {\it ${dn_s\over d\ln k}$ as a function of $\ln k$. Parameters are determined using data at
265: $k=0.05\hbox{Mpc}^{-1}$.}
266: }}}}
267: }
268:
269: To summarize, we have found that the noncommutative inflation model
270: accommodates the recent WMAP data nicely, and if this model possesses
271: any truth about string theory, string theory can already be tested
272: in the observational cosmology, this is very exciting. Although the WMAP
273: results on the spectral index and its running are obtained by combining
274: other experiments and are not yet very conclusive, we believe that
275: future refined results will offer better opportunity for testing whether
276: spacetime uncertainty is a viable physical model for inflation.
277:
278: Acknowledgments.
279: This work was supported by a grant of NSC, and by a
280: ``Hundred People Project'' grant of Academia Sinica and an outstanding
281: young investigator award of NSF of China. This work was done during a
282: string workshop organized by ICTS (Interdisciplinary Center of Theoretical
283: Sciences), its hospitality is gratefully acknowledged.
284:
285:
286:
287:
288:
289: \listrefs
290: \end
291:
292:
293: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
294:
295:
296:
297: