1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: %#!latex -src p
5: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
6: %\usepackage{showkeys}
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: \usepackage{graphicx}
9: %\usepackage{hyperref}
10: \usepackage{type1cm, amsmath, amssymb}
11: \usepackage{cite}
12:
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% page format %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: \setlength{\textwidth}{ 17truecm}
15: \setlength{\textheight}{ 24truecm}
16: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{ 16truecm}
17: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{ -\textwidth}
18: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{ 0.5\oddsidemargin}
19: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{\oddsidemargin}
20: \setlength{\topmargin}{-2.0 truecm}
21: \setlength{\jot}{3ex}
22:
23: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.3}
24: \numberwithin{equation}{section}
25:
26:
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% caption %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: %\setlength{\captionwidth}{15cm}
29: %\renewcommand{\caption}{\isucaption}
30:
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% macros %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32:
33: %%%%%%%%%%%%% short hands %%%%%%%%%%%%
34: \newcommand{\Cb}{\mathbb{C}}
35: \newcommand{\Rb}{\mathbb{R}}
36: \newcommand{\Ncal}{{\cal N}}
37: \newcommand{\del}{\partial}
38: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
39: \newcommand{\deldel}[2]{\frac{\del #1}{\del #2}}
40: \newcommand{\ox}{\otimes}
41: \newcommand{\id}{\mathbf{1}}
42: \newcommand{\Fcal}{{\cal F}}
43: \newcommand{\Ga}[1]{\Gamma_{\langle #1 \rangle}}
44: \newcommand{\Gi}{G_{\text{ind}}}
45: \newcommand{\vol}{{\rm vol}\,}
46: \newcommand{\im}{{\rm Im}\,}
47: \newcommand{\re}{{\rm Re}\,}
48: \newcommand{\FR}{F^{(5)}}
49: \begin{document}
50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% title page %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51: \thispagestyle{empty}
52: \begin{flushright}
53: \parbox{3.5cm}{UT-03-12 \\
54: {\tt hep-th/0305007}}
55: \end{flushright}
56:
57: \vspace*{2cm}
58: \begin{center}
59: {\LARGE
60: %%% title %%%
61: AdS Branes Corresponding to Superconformal Defects
62: }
63: \end{center}
64:
65: \vspace*{3cm}
66: %%%%%% author %%%%%%
67: \begin{center}
68: \noindent
69: {\large Satoshi Yamaguchi}
70:
71: \vspace{5mm}
72: \noindent
73: \hspace{0.7cm} \parbox{130mm}{\it
74: Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo,\\
75: Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.\\
76: E-mail: {\tt yamaguch@hep-th.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
77: }
78: \end{center}
79:
80:
81: \vspace{3cm}
82: \hfill{\bf Abstract\ \ }\hfill\ \\
83: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
84: We investigate an $AdS_4 \times L_2$ D5-brane in $AdS_5\times X_5$ space-time,
85: in the context of AdS/dCFT correspondence.
86: Here, $X_5$ is a Sasaki-Einstein manifold and $L_2$ is a submanifold of $X_5$.
87: This brane has the same supersymmetry as the 3
88: dimensional $\Ncal=1$ superconformal symmetry if $L_2$ is a {\em special
89: Legendrian submanifold} in $X_5$. In this case, this brane is supposed to
90: correspond to a superconformal wall defect in
91: 4-dimensional $\Ncal=4$ super Yang-Mills theory.
92: We construct these new string backgrounds
93: and show they have the correct supersymmetry, also in
94: the case with non-trivial gauge flux on $L_2$. The simplest new example is
95: $AdS_4\times T^2$ brane in $AdS_5\times S^5$.
96: We construct the brane solution expressing the RG flow between two
97: different defects.
98: We also perform similar analysis for an $AdS_3\times L_3$ M5-brane
99: in $AdS_4 \times X_7$, for a weak $G_2$ manifold $X_7$ and its
100: submanifold $L_3$. This system has the same supersymmetry as 2-dimensional
101: $\Ncal=(1,0)$ global superconformal symmetry, if $L_3$ is an
102: {\em associative submanifold}.
103:
104: \newpage
105: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end of title page %%%%%%%%%%%%%
106: \section{Introduction}
107:
108: Defect field theories appear in various fields in physics, and
109: an interesting problem.
110: Defect quantum field theories are useful in impurity
111: problem in condensed matter physics.
112: Boundary conformal field theories are special class of defect field theories,
113: and provide the celebrated worldsheet description of D-branes
114: \cite{Polchinski:1995mt}.
115: In the string theory space-time, defect field theories
116: appear as the world-volume low energy theories in the intersecting brane systems
117: \cite{Sethi:1998zz,Ganor:1998jx,Kapustin:1998pb}.
118:
119: AdS brane/defect CFT (AdS/dCFT) correspondence
120: proposed in \cite{Karch:2000ct,Karch:2000gx}
121: is the approach from the AdS/CFT correspondence to these defect field theories.
122: Various aspects of the AdS/dCFT
123: correspondence have been investigated in
124: \cite{Bachas:2001vj,DeWolfe:2001pq,Erdmenger:2002ex,Skenderis:2002vf,%
125: Karch:2002sh,Mateos:2002bu,Yamaguchi:2002pa,Constable:2002xt,%
126: Constable:2002vt,Aharony:2003qf,Suryanarayana:2003}.
127: The most typical example of the AdS/dCFT is the type IIB one. The string theory
128: side of the correspondence is the IIB supergravity on $AdS_5\times S^5$
129: with $AdS_4 \times S^2$ brane whose effective theory is the Dirac-Born-Infeld
130: action. The field theory side is $\Ncal=4$ super
131: Yang-Mills theory with the wall defect on which the fundamental hyper-multiplet
132: lives \cite{Sethi:1998zz,Ganor:1998jx,Kapustin:1998pb,DeWolfe:2001pq}.
133:
134: Until now, the $AdS_m \times S^{n}$ branes
135: and their corresponding defects have been mainly investigated,
136: but $AdS_{m} \times L_{n}$ branes with non-spherical $L_{n}$
137: have been less investigated. An $AdS_m \times L_n$ brane seems to correspond
138: to a nontrivial conformal fixed point of the defect field theory.
139: The RG flows between these fixed points and their brane pictures
140: are good phenomena to see the correspondence.
141:
142: We study, in this paper, rather general $AdS_{m} \times L_{n}$ type branes.
143: In IIB string theory, we consider an $AdS_4\times L_2$ brane
144: in $AdS_5\times X_5$ space-time, where $X_5$ is a Sasaki-Einstein manifold.
145: We show that if $L_2$ is a special Legendrian submanifold in $X_5$, the
146: background preserves the same supersymmetry as 3-dimensional $\Ncal=1$
147: superconformal symmetry, as expected.
148: In this analysis, we treat a bent D-brane in AdS
149: part with appropriate gauge flux in $L_2$.
150: These are treated in \cite{Karch:2000gx,Skenderis:2002vf}
151: in the $L_2=S^2$ case. In the case with non-zero flux,
152: the ambient theories of left and right side of the defect are distinct.
153:
154: The most simple non-trivial example of the special Legendrian submanifold
155: is appropriately embedded $T^2$.
156: We investigate $AdS_4\times T^2$ brane and its corresponding
157: defect CFT. Especially, this CFT can flow to the corresponding CFT
158: of $AdS_4\times S^2$ brane. We construct the solution of the flow in the
159: brane picture.
160:
161: We also consider $AdS_3\times L_3$ M5-brane in $AdS_4\times X_7$ space-time,
162: where $X_7$ is a weak $G_2$ manifold. We show that if $L_3$ is an associative
163: submanifold, this background has the same supersymmetry as 2-dimensional global
164: superconformal symmetry, as expected. In this analysis, the D-brane can bend
165: in $AdS_4$ and admit appropriate 3-form flux at the same time.
166: In this system, the ambient theories of left and right
167: of the defect are distinct as suggested in
168: \cite{Karch:2000gx} in the case with $L_3=S^3$ in $AdS_4 \times S^7$.
169:
170: The construction of this paper is as follows: Section \ref{IIB} discuss
171: the supersymmetry of IIB $AdS_4\times L_2$ brane
172: in $AdS_5\times X_5$. In section \ref{T2}, we treat the $AdS_4\times T^2$ brane,
173: and its flow to $AdS_4\times S^2$ brane.
174: In section \ref{M}, we consider the supersymmetry of $AdS_3\times L_3$
175: M5-brane in $AdS_4\times X_7$ background of M-theory.
176: Section \ref{Conclusion} is devoted to conclusions and discussions.
177: We write some definitions and the proof of some
178: formulas in the appendix.
179:
180:
181: \section{IIB $AdS_4\times L_2$ D5-brane in $AdS_5\times X_5$}
182: \label{IIB}
183: In this section, we study the remaining supersymmetry in the presence of
184: the $AdS_4\times L_2$ D5-brane in $AdS_5\times X_5$ space-time of IIB theory.
185: In this paper, we consider the general Sasaki-Einstein manifold $X_5$,
186: and the general special Legendrian submanifold $L_2$ in $X_5$. We also
187: includes the gauge flux on the brane in $L_2$ that makes the AdS brane bend.
188: We show that there are the same amount of the supersymmetry as 3-dimensional
189: superconformal symmetry as expected, by using the probe approximation.
190: The analysis in this section is generalisation of
191: the analysis of $AdS_4\times S^2$ brane in \cite{Skenderis:2002vf} to
192: general special Legendrian submanifold $L_2$.
193:
194: In order to perform this analysis, we first review the construction of
195: the Killing spinors in $AdS_5\times X_5$ background.
196: This type of backgrounds have been investigated in
197: \cite{Romans:1985an,Klebanov:1998hh,Gubser:1998vd,Acharya:1998db,Morrison:1998cs}.
198: Next, we use the kappa symmetry projection to determine
199: the surviving supersymmetry in the presence of $AdS_4\times L_2$ D5-brane.
200:
201: \subsection{Supersymmetry of the closed string background}
202:
203: Let us first describe the $AdS_5\times X_5$ solution in 10 dimensional
204: IIB supergravity and
205: fix the convention. We only turn on the metric and the 5-form
206: field strength $\FR$ in IIB supergravity.
207: The Einstein equation can be written as
208: \begin{align}
209: R_{MN}=\frac14 \FR_{MPQRS}\FR_{N}{}^{PQRS},\qquad M,N,\dots=0,\dots, 9.
210: \end{align}
211: The Bianchi identity for $\FR$ and self-duality are also required.
212: The metric for the $AdS_5\times X_5$ is described as
213: \begin{align}
214: & ds^{2}=dr^2+e^{-2r}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}\eta_{\mu\nu}+g_{mn}dy^{m}dy^{n},\nn\\
215: & \mu,\nu=0,1,2,3,\qquad m,n=5,6,7,8,9,\qquad
216: \eta_{MN}={\rm diag}(-1,1,1,\dots),\label{IIB-metric}
217: \end{align}
218: where $g_{mn}$ is the Sasaki-Einstein metric of $X_5$ normalised as
219: \begin{align}
220: R_{mn}=4g_{mn}.\label{Unity}
221: \end{align}
222: We can always rescale $g_{mn}$ so that Eq.(\ref{Unity}) is satisfied, if
223: $X_5$ is an Einstein manifold with a positive cosmological constant.
224: We set the vielbein $e^{a'},\ a'=0,1,2,3,4$ of $AdS_5$ space-time as
225: \begin{align}
226: e^{p}:=e^{-r}dx^{p},\ (p=0,1,2,3),\qquad e^{4}:=dr,
227: \end{align}
228: and we denote by $e^{a},\ (a=5,\dots,9)$
229: the vielbein for the metric $g_{mn}$ of
230: $X_5$ space. In this notation, the solution of 5-form can be written as
231: \begin{align}
232: \FR=4(e^{0}e^{1}e^{2}e^{3}e^{4} + e^{5}e^{6}e^{7}e^{8}e^{9}). \label{IIB-5-form}
233: \end{align}
234: Actually, the solution (\ref{IIB-metric})(\ref{IIB-5-form}) can have a parameter;
235: the radius of $AdS_5$ (or $X_5$). In this paper, however, we set the radius
236: to be $1$ because it is irrelevant in the analyses below.
237:
238: Next, we turn to the Killing spinors. The supersymmetry condition of
239: the gravitino in the background of the metric and the 5-form is expressed as
240: \begin{align}
241: \del_{A}\epsilon+\frac14 \omega_{A}{}^{BC}\Gamma_{BC}\epsilon
242: +\frac{i}{2^4\times 5!}\FR_{BCDEF}\Gamma^{BCDEF}\Gamma_{A}\epsilon=0,\qquad
243: \del_{A}:=(e^{-1})^{M}_{A}\deldel{}{x^{M}},\nn\\
244: (A,B,\dots=0,1,\dots,9),\label{Killing-spinor1}
245: \end{align}
246: where $\epsilon=\epsilon_{L}+i\epsilon_{R}$ is the parameter of the
247: supersymmetry, and $\epsilon_{L,R}$ 's are Majorana-Weyl spinors with positive
248: chirality. The dilatino condition is trivially satisfied in this case.
249: If we insert the form (\ref{IIB-5-form}) to eq.(\ref{Killing-spinor1}),
250: we obtain the form
251: \begin{align}
252: \del_{A}\epsilon+\frac14 \omega_{A}{}^{BC}\Gamma_{BC}\epsilon
253: +\frac{i}{2}\Gamma^{01234}\Gamma_{A}\epsilon=0. \label{Killing-spinor2}
254: \end{align}
255: In this equation, the torsionless spin connection of $AdS_5$ becomes
256: $\omega^{p4}=-\omega^{4p}=-e^{p},\ (p=0,1,2,3)$ and other components are $0$.
257: We also denote the spin connection of $X_5$ by $\omega^{ab},\ (a,b=5,\dots,9)$
258: which satisfies $de^{a}+\omega^{ab}e^{b}=0$.
259:
260: To solve the equation (\ref{Killing-spinor2}), we decompose $\epsilon$ in the
261: same way as \cite{Claus:1998yw}
262: \begin{align}
263: \epsilon=\epsilon_{+}+\epsilon_{-},\qquad
264: i\Gamma^{0123}\epsilon_{\pm}=\pm \epsilon_{\pm}.
265: \end{align}
266: Then, eq.(\ref{Killing-spinor2}) becomes
267: \begin{align}
268: &\deldel{}{r}\epsilon_{\pm}\pm \frac12 \epsilon_{\pm}=0,\nn\\
269: &\deldel{}{x^p}\epsilon_{+}+e^{-r} \Gamma_{4p}\epsilon_{-}=0,\qquad
270: \deldel{}{x^p}\epsilon_{-}=0,\qquad p=0,1,2,3, \nn\\
271: &\del_{a}\epsilon_{\pm}+\frac14 \omega_{a}{}^{bc}\Gamma_{bc}\epsilon_{\pm}
272: \pm\frac 12 \Gamma_{4a}\epsilon_{\pm}=0,\qquad a,b,c=5,\dots,9.
273: \label{Killing-spinor3}
274: \end{align}
275: It is convenient to take the 10 dimensional gamma matrices $\Gamma_A,\ \{\Gamma_A,\Gamma_B\}=2\eta_{AB}$ as the
276: following form.
277: \begin{align}
278: \Gamma^{a'}=\gamma^{a'}\ox \id \ox \sigma_{1},
279: \qquad \Gamma^{a}=\id \ox \gamma^{a} \ox \sigma_{2},
280: \qquad \Gamma^{11}=\id \ox \id \ox \sigma_{3},
281: \label{IIB-gamma}
282: \end{align}
283: where $\gamma^{a'},\ a'=0,1,2,3,4$ are $4\times 4$ gamma matrices for SO(4,1),
284: and $\gamma^{a},\ a=5,\dots,9$ are $4\times 4$ gamma matrices for SO(5). These
285: gamma matrices satisfy the relations
286: \begin{align}
287: \{\gamma^{a'},\gamma^{b'}\}=\eta^{a'b'},\qquad
288: \{\gamma^{a},\gamma^{b}\}=\delta^{ab},\qquad
289: \gamma^{4}=i\gamma^{0123},\qquad \gamma^{56789}=\id.
290: \end{align}
291: In eqs.(\ref{IIB-gamma}), we also use the Pauli matrices $\sigma_{j},\ j=1,2,3$.
292: By using these notations, the equation (\ref{Killing-spinor3}) can be solved as
293: \begin{align}
294: &\epsilon=\lambda \ox \chi_{-} \ox \binom{1}{0},\\
295: &\lambda=e^{\frac12 r}\zeta_{-}+e^{-\frac12 r}\left(x^{p} \gamma_{p4} \zeta_{-}
296: +\zeta_{+}\right),\qquad p=0,1,2,3,\\
297: &\zeta_{\pm}: (\text{4 component constant spinor}),\qquad
298: i\gamma^{0123}\zeta_{\pm}=\pm \zeta_{\pm},\\
299: &\del_{a}\chi_{-}+\frac14 \omega_{a}{}^{bc}\gamma_{bc}\chi_{-}
300: +\frac{i}{2}\gamma_{a}\chi_{-}=0. \label{Real-Killing-spinor}
301: \end{align}
302: Eq.(\ref{Real-Killing-spinor}) implies that $\chi_{-}$ is a real Killing spinor
303: in $X_5$.
304: It is known that if and only if $X_5$ is a Sasaki-Einstein manifold, there is
305: a real Killing spinor \cite{Bar:1993}.
306:
307: In summary, we write down the Killing spinors of $AdS_5\times X_5$ in this
308: subsection. These Killing spinors exist only when $X_5$ is a Sasaki-Einstein
309: manifold. We consider $AdS_4\times L_2$ D5-branes in this background
310: and their supersymmetry in the next subsection.
311:
312: \subsection{Supersymmetry of D-brane background}
313:
314: Let us introduce an $AdS_4\times L_2$ D5-brane into the background
315: considered in the previous subsection. We show that this system has
316: the same amount of the supersymmetry as the 3-dimensional $\Ncal=1$
317: superconformal symmetry, as expected.
318:
319: As in \cite{Cederwall:1997pv,Aganagic:1997pe,Cederwall:1997ri,%
320: Bergshoeff:1997tu,Aganagic:1997nn,Bergshoeff:1997kr,Skenderis:2002vf},
321: the surviving Killing spinors when we put the
322: D-brane should satisfy
323: \begin{align}
324: \Gamma \epsilon = \epsilon,
325: \end{align}
326: where $\Gamma$ is the matrix used for the kappa symmetry
327: projection. The matrix $\Gamma$ for a IIB D$p$-brane can be written as
328: \begin{align}
329: &d^{p+1}\xi \Gamma = -e^{-\Phi}(-\det(\Gi + \Fcal))^{-1/2} e^{\Fcal}
330: {\cal X}|_{(p+1)\text{-form}}, \label{Gamma1}\\
331: &{\cal X}:=\sum_{n} \frac{1}{(2n)!}d\xi^{i_{2n}}\dots d\xi^{i_{1}}
332: \Ga{i_1i_2\dots i_{2n}} K^{n} (-i),\\
333: &\Ga{i_1i_2\dots i_{s}}:=\deldel{X^{M_1}}{\xi^{i_1}}\dots \deldel{X^{M_{s}}}{\xi^{i_{s}}}
334: e_{M_1}^{A_1}\dots e_{M_{s}}^{A_{s}}\Gamma_{A_{1}\dots A_{s}},\label{Gamma2}
335: \end{align}
336: where $\xi^{i}$ are the world-volume coordinates, $\Phi$ is the dilaton,
337: $\Gi$ is the
338: induced metric, $\Fcal=F-B$ is the linear combination of the NSNS B-field and
339: the world-volume gauge field, and $K$ is the charge conjugation
340: $K\epsilon=\epsilon^{c}$.
341:
342: The brane configuration treated here is described as follows. First, we set
343: the world-volume coordinate as $\xi^{i},\ i=0,1,2,4,5,6$, and take the
344: static gauge (use the space-time coordinate in eq.(\ref{IIB-metric}))
345: \begin{align}
346: x^{j}=\xi^{j},\quad (j=0,1,2),\qquad r=\xi^{4}. \label{IIB-static-gauge}
347: \end{align}
348: We use $x^{0,1,2},r$ as both space-time and world-volume coordinates.
349: Secondly, we consider the situation where the $AdS$ part of the D-brane
350: bend as $x^{3}=M e^{r}$, where $M$ is a constant. Thirdly, the
351: immersion $(\xi^5,\xi^6)\to X_5$ is a special Legendrian immersion, and
352: its image is $L_2$.
353: Then the induced metric becomes
354: \begin{align}
355: & (\Gi)_{ij}d\xi^{i}d \xi^{j}
356: =(1+ M^2) dr^2 + e^{-2r} dx^{\alpha}dx^{\beta}\eta_{\alpha\beta}
357: + G_{pq}d\xi^{p} d\xi^{q},\qquad(\alpha,\beta=0,1,2,\quad p,q=5,6),\nn\\
358: &G_{pq}:=g_{mn}\deldel{y^m}{\xi^{p}}\deldel{y^n}{\xi^{q}},
359: \end{align}
360: where $G_{pq}$ is the induced metric of $L_2$. Note that
361: through this section, we use $G$ as the induced metric of $L_2$. The total
362: induced metric are denoted by $\Gi$.
363: Finally, we introduce the world-volume gauge field excitation
364: $\Fcal=f \sqrt{\det G}d\xi^{5}d\xi^{6}$ , where $f$ is a constant.
365: Then the DBI determinant becomes
366: \begin{align}
367: -\det(\Gi + \Fcal)=(1+M^2)e^{-6r}\det (G+\Fcal)
368: =(1+M^2)(1+f^2) e^{-6r} \det G.
369: \end{align}
370: In the above D-brane configuration, the matrix $\Gamma$ in
371: eq.(\ref{Gamma1})-(\ref{Gamma2}) becomes
372: \begin{align}
373: \Gamma=\left[
374: (1+M^2)(1+f^2) \det G\right]^{-1/2}
375: i\Gamma_{012}(\Gamma_{4}+M\Gamma_{3})\left[
376: \Ga{56} K
377: + f\sqrt{\det G}
378: \right].
379: \end{align}
380:
381: Now, let us consider the equation $\Gamma \epsilon=\epsilon$ for the Killing
382: spinors $\epsilon$. We will show that half of the $\epsilon$ satisfy this
383: equation when we set appropriate relation between $f$ and $M$. The key
384: formula for this analysis is
385: \begin{align}
386: \deldel{y^m}{\xi^{5}}\deldel{y^n}{\xi^{6}} e^{a}_{m}e^{b}_{n}\gamma_{ab}\chi_{-}^{c}
387: =\sqrt{\det G}\chi_{-},\label{IIB-key-formula}
388: \end{align}
389: for a special Legendrian submanifold $L_2$ and a real Killing spinor
390: $\chi_{-}$ of $X_5$ with certain phase. We will show
391: eq.(\ref{IIB-key-formula}) in appendix \ref{app-IIB-key-formula}.
392: If we use eq.(\ref{IIB-key-formula}), what we should show is
393: \footnote{We use here the convention
394: $(\gamma_{a'}\zeta)^{c}=-\gamma_{a'}\zeta^{c}$ for SO(3,1) spinor $\zeta$.}
395: \begin{align}
396: &\lambda=\Gamma'\lambda := \frac{1}{\sqrt{
397: (1+M^2)(1+f^2)}}(\gamma_3-\gamma_4M)(\lambda^{c}+ f \lambda),\nn\\
398: &\lambda:=e^{-\frac12 r}(-x^{\alpha}\gamma_{\alpha}\zeta_{-}+ \zeta_{+})
399: +e^{+\frac12 r}(1-M\gamma_{3})\zeta_{-},\nn\\
400: &\lambda^{c}:=e^{-\frac12 r}(x^{\alpha}\gamma_{\alpha}\zeta_{-}^{c}
401: + \zeta_{+}^{c})
402: +e^{+\frac12 r}(1+M\gamma_{3})\zeta_{-}^{c}.
403: \end{align}
404:
405: $\Gamma'\lambda$ can be expanded as
406: \begin{align}
407: \Gamma'\lambda=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(1+M^2)(1+f^2)}}
408: \Bigg[&
409: e^{-\frac12 r}\Big\{
410: -x^{\alpha}\gamma_{\alpha}(\gamma_3\zeta_{-}^{c} - M \zeta_{-}^{c}
411: -f \gamma_{3} \zeta_{-} - f M \zeta_{-})\nn\\
412: &\qquad\qquad
413: +(\gamma_3\zeta_{+}^{c}+M\zeta_{+}^{c}+f\gamma_3\zeta_{+}-fM\zeta_{+})
414: \Big\}\nn\\
415: &+e^{\frac12 r}(1+M^{2})(\gamma_3 \zeta_{-}^{c}+f \gamma_{3}\zeta_{-})
416: \Bigg].
417: \end{align}
418: From this equation, we obtain the following results. First, if we want a
419: supersymmetry, the bending $M$ and the gauge flux $f$ must satisfy the relation
420: $f=-M$. Next, if this relation is satisfied, the surviving Killing spinors
421: are the ones with
422: $ \gamma_{3}\zeta_{-}^{c}=\zeta_{-},\quad \gamma_{3}\zeta_{+}^{c}=\zeta_{+}$.
423: The number of remaining supercharges is $4$ in general. This is the same
424: number as the 3-dimensional $\Ncal=1$ superconformal symmetry.
425:
426: Let us check this brane configuration actually satisfies the field equation.
427: The bosonic part of the D5-brane action on this background is
428: \begin{align}
429: I=-\int d^6\xi \sqrt{-\det(\Gi+\Fcal)}-\int \Fcal \wedge C^{(4)},
430: \end{align}
431: where $C^{(4)}$ is the RR 4-form potential $d C^{(4)}=\FR$.
432: If we take the static gauge (\ref{IIB-static-gauge}), the remaining fields are
433: $x^{3},\ y^{m},\ {\cal A}$; ${\cal A}$ is the world-volume gauge field
434: $\Fcal=d{\cal A}$. The $y^m$ and ${\cal A}$ are easily checked to satisfy
435: the field equation. Note that we use here the fact that a special Legendrian
436: submanifold is a minimal submanifold
437: \footnote{By the term ``minimal submanifold'',
438: we express that the variation of the volume vanishes under
439: small fluctuation. It is not necessarily a submanifold with minimal volume.}.
440: The equation of motion for $x^3$,
441: after we insert the solution $\Fcal$ and $y^m$ and anzats $x^{3}=x^{3}(r)$,
442: becomes
443: \begin{align}
444: \deldel{}{r}\left[\sqrt{(1+M(r)^2)(1+f^2)\det G} e^{-5r}(1+M(r)^2)^{-1}\deldel{x^3}{r}\right]
445: -4f\sqrt{\det G}e^{-4r}=0,\\
446: M(r):=e^{-r}\deldel{x^3}{r}.
447: \end{align}
448: We can easily check that $x^{3}(r)=-fe^{r}$ is a solution
449: of this equation of motion.
450:
451:
452: \section{$AdS_4\times T^2$ brane and its flow to $AdS_4\times S^2$}
453: \label{T2}
454: In this section, we explain a nontrivial
455: example of special Legendrian submanifolds in $S^5$:
456: appropriately embedded $T^2$.
457: Many examples of special Legendrian submanifolds in $S^5$ (which has one to one
458: correspondence to special Lagrangian cones in $\Cb^3$) are shown in
459: \cite{Hearvey:1982,Joyce:2001xt}. Among them, we consider here the simplest
460: non-trivial one. In this section, we limit ourselves to the case with
461: $M=f=0$ for simplicity.
462:
463: The precise immersion of this $T^2 \to S^5$ are described as follows.
464: We parametrise $S^{5}$ by $(z_1,z_2,z_3)\in \Cb^3,\quad
465: |z_1|^2+|z_2|^2+|z_3|^2=1$. Then, the special Legendrian $T^2$ can be expressed
466: as
467: \begin{align}
468: z_j=\frac{1}{\sqrt 3}e^{i\theta_j},\quad j=1,2,3,\qquad
469: \theta_1+\theta_2+\theta_3 \equiv 0 \mod{2\pi}.
470: \end{align}
471:
472: The corresponding defect CFT is expected as follows. First consider D3-D5 system
473: described in table \ref{table1}.
474: \begin{table}
475: \begin{center}
476: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
477: &0 &1 &2 &3 &4--9 \\ \hline
478: D3 &$\bigcirc$ &$\bigcirc$ &$\bigcirc$ &$\bigcirc$ & $\times$ \\ \hline
479: D5 &$\bigcirc$ &$\bigcirc$ &$\bigcirc$ &$\times$ & $\tilde L$\\ \hline
480: \end{tabular}
481: \end{center}
482: \caption{The D3-D5 configuration considered here. ``$\bigcirc$''
483: means ``extended'' and ``$\times$''
484: means ``not extended''. The D5-brane is wrapped on the special
485: Lagrangian submanifold $\tilde L$ in 4--9 directions.}
486: \label{table1}
487: \end{table}
488: The number of D3-branes is $N$, and that of D5-brane is one.
489: In 4--9 directions, the D5-brane is wrapped on a special Lagrangian
490: submanifold $\tilde L$; This $\tilde L$ is described
491: as the cone over the special Legendrian $T^2$.
492: On the other hand, all $N$ D3-branes sit at the tip (singularity) of $\tilde L$
493: in 4--9 direction. Consider the near horizon region of the
494: supergravity solution of D3-branes in this configuration.
495: In this region, the space-time becomes
496: $AdS_5\times S^5$ and the D5-brane (treated as a probe)
497: becomes $AdS_4\times T^2$ brane in this
498: space-time. This is the background of
499: the string theory side of the correspondence.
500:
501: Next, the theory of the field theory side will be
502: obtained as the low energy theory
503: on the D3-branes. This theory includes 2 sectors: 3-3 string sector and 3-5
504: string sector. Low energy theory of 3-3 string sector is 4-dimensional $\Ncal=4$
505: U($N$) super Yang-Mills theory as usual.
506: The 3-5 string sector and its coupling to 3-3
507: string sector characterise the defect conformal field theory. Because
508: the D3-branes sit at the singularity of the D5-brane, the theory of 3-5 string
509: is singular. This makes it difficult to describe the low energy theory.
510: We postpone this analysis to the future work.
511:
512: Now, we have two kinds of defects in the ambient theory $\Ncal=4$ super
513: Yang-Mills theory; one (we call it ``$S^2$ defect'')
514: corresponds to $AdS_4\times S^2$ brane, and the other (we call it ``$T^2$
515: defect'') corresponds to $AdS_4\times T^2$ brane. Let us consider here
516: the relation between $S^2$ defect and $T^2$ defect. If there is
517: some relation between these two defects, it might give a hint on
518: the description of $T^2$ defect since the theory of $S^2$ defect
519: is known \cite{Sethi:1998zz,Ganor:1998jx,Kapustin:1998pb,DeWolfe:2001pq}.
520:
521: In order to see the renormalization group flow of $S^2$ defect and $T^2$ defect,
522: we consider here the g-function in the point of view of the $AdS$
523: brane\cite{Yamaguchi:2002pa}. In the present case, the g-function at
524: each fixed point is proportional to the area of $S^2$ or $T^2$.
525: The ratio of g-function of $T^2$ defect ($g_{T^2}$) and that of $S^2$ defect
526: ($g_{S^2}$) becomes
527: \begin{align}
528: \frac{\ln g_{T^2}}{\ln g_{S^2}}=\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{3}} > 1.
529: \end{align}
530: Therefore, $g_{T^2} > g_{S^2}$ is satisfied and the RG flow from $S^2$ defect
531: to $T^2$ defect is forbidden. On the other hand, the RG flow from $T^2$ defect
532: to $S^2$ defect may exist. In the rest of this section, we show that
533: this $T^2 \to S^2$ flow can be described in the $AdS$ brane side.
534:
535: The key of this flow is the existence of the
536: special Lagrangian manifold which is non-singular and asymptotically $T^2$ cone.
537: This special Lagrangian submanifold $\tilde L_{\mu}$
538: in $\Cb^3=\{(z_1,z_2,z_3)\}$ can be described as
539: \begin{align}
540: z_2=\bar{z}_1 e^{-i\alpha},\qquad
541: z_3=\sqrt{|z_1|^2+\mu^2}e^{i\alpha}-\mu,\qquad
542: z_1\in \Cb,\qquad e^{i\alpha} \in S^1,
543: \label{SL}
544: \end{align}
545: where $\mu$ is a real positive deformation parameter.
546: In the region $|z_1| \gg \mu$, $\tilde L_{\mu}$ asymptotically reach $\tilde L
547: = \tilde L_{\mu=0}$. On the other hand, around the origin, this submanifold
548: is smooth and can be approximated by a plane.
549:
550: Let us introduce large number of D3-branes at the origin of $\tilde L_{\mu}$ and
551: a D5-brane extended to the direction 0,1,2 and $\tilde L_{\mu}$.
552: Consider the near horizon geometry D3-branes. The bulk geometry is
553: $AdS_5\times S^5$ described by the metric
554: \begin{align}
555: ds^{2}=t^{2}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}\eta_{\mu\nu} + t^{-2}(\sum_{j=1}^{3}|dz_j|^2),
556: \label{AdSxS}
557: \end{align}
558: where $t=\sqrt{\sum_{j=1}^{3}|z_j|^2}$. If we define $t=e^{-r}$ and
559: introduce $S^5$ coordinates $y^{m}$, the metric is expressed by
560: eq.(\ref{IIB-metric}). In the UV region (negatively large
561: $r$ or large $t$), $\tilde L_{\mu}$ becomes
562: the cone over $T^2$, and the D5-brane
563: in eq.(\ref{AdSxS}) looks like $AdS_4\times T^{2}$.
564: In the IR region (positively large
565: $r$ or small $t$), $\tilde L_{\mu}$ becomes a plane (cone over $S^2$),
566: and the D5-brane in eq.(\ref{AdSxS}) looks like $AdS_4\times S^{2}$.
567: Consequently, this brane configuration expresses the flow from
568: $T^2$ defect to $S^2$ defect. The image of this flow is illustrated in
569: figure \ref{fig1}.
570: \begin{figure}
571: \begin{center}
572: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
573: \includegraphics{uv.eps}
574: &\includegraphics{intermediate.eps}
575: &\includegraphics{ir.eps}\\
576: (a) & (b) & (c)
577: \end{tabular}
578: \end{center}
579: \caption{The image of the flow from $T^2$-brane to $S^2$-brane.
580: (a) UV limit: The D3-branes are sitting at the tip of the $T^2$ cone.
581: In the near horizon limit, the D5-brane becomes $AdS_4\times T^{2}$ and
582: corresponds to $T^2$ defect.
583: (b) Intermediate scale: The defect theory has the RG flow.
584: (c) IR limit: The D3-branes are sitting on a flat D5-brane.
585: In the near horizon limit, the D5-brane becomes $AdS_4\times S^{2}$ and
586: corresponds to $S^2$ defect.
587: }
588: \label{fig1}
589: \end{figure}
590:
591: We can show that there is expected amount of supersymmetry in
592: the $AdS_5 \times S^5$ geometry of eq.(\ref{AdSxS})
593: with D5-brane described with eq.(\ref{SL}) and extending to 012 direction.
594:
595: \section{$AdS_3\times L_3$ M5-brane in $AdS_4\times X_7$}
596: \label{M}
597: In this section, we perform the similar analysis as section \ref{IIB}
598: for the $AdS_3\times L_3$ M5-brane in $AdS_4\times X_7$ space-time
599: of M-theory.
600: The M-theory background $AdS_4\times X_7$ is a typical example of Freund-Rubin
601: compactifications \cite{Freund:1980xh}. If $X_7$ is a weak $G_2$ manifold,
602: this background has the supersymmetry. For a review of this type of
603: compactifications, see \cite{Duff:1986hr}.
604: These backgrounds have been also investigated in
605: \cite{Acharya:1998db,Morrison:1998cs} in the context of AdS/CFT correspondence.
606:
607: In this paper, we consider M5-brane wrapped on $AdS_3\times L_3$ in above
608: background. This brane background corresponds to a defect CFT: 3-dimensional
609: CFT with scale invariant wall defect. We show that if $L_3$ is an associative
610: submanifold in $X_7$, the brane background has the same supersymmetry as
611: 2-dimensional $\Ncal=(1,0)$ global superconformal symmetry, as expected.
612:
613: \subsection{Supersymmetry of the supergravity background}
614:
615: In this section, we review the construction of the Killing spinors
616: of the background $AdS_4\times X_7$ when $X_7$ is a weak $G_2$ manifold.
617:
618: Let us begin with the 11 dimensional supergravity field equations.
619: If we set gravitino to be $0$, the field equation becomes
620: \begin{align}
621: & R_{MN}=\frac{1}{2\times 3!}F_{MPQR}F_{N}{}^{PQR}
622: -\frac{1}{6\times 4!}g_{MN}F_{PQRS}F^{PQRS},\nn\\
623: & \del_{M}\sqrt{-g}F^{MNPQ}+\frac{1}{2\times (4!)^2}\epsilon^{M_1\dots
624: M_8NPQ}F_{M_1\dots M_4}F_{M_5\dots M_8}=0,\nn\\
625: & (M,N,P,Q,\dots=0,1,\dots,10), \label{M-field-eq}
626: \end{align}
627: where $F$ is the 4-form field strength. The metric of $AdS_4\times X_7$
628: can be written as
629: \begin{align}
630: ds^{2}=dr^{2}+e^{-4r}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}\eta_{\mu\nu}
631: +g_{mn}dy^{m}dy^{n}, \quad (\mu,\nu=0,1,2,3,\quad m,n=4,\dots,10),
632: \label{M-metric}
633: \end{align}
634: where $g_{mn}$ is the weak $G_2$ metric of $X_7$ which is normalised as
635: $R_{mn}=6g_{mn}$. We set the vielbein $e^{a'},\ a'=0,1,2,3$
636: of $AdS_4$ space-time as
637: \begin{align}
638: e^{3}=dr ,\ e^{p}=e^{-2r}dx^{p},\qquad (p=0,1,2),
639: \end{align}
640: and we denote the vielbein of $X_7$ as $e^{a},\ (a=4,\dots,10)$.
641: The solution of the 4-form can be written with these notations as
642: \begin{align}
643: F=6e^{0}e^{1}e^{2}e^{3}.\label{M-4-form}
644: \end{align}
645: The solution (\ref{M-metric}),(\ref{M-4-form}) can have a parameter (``radius''),
646: but we set it $1$ as in the IIB case.\footnote{
647: Actually, we set the radius of $AdS_4$ to $\frac12$ in the metric
648: (\ref{M-metric}) for convenience. While, the ``radius'' of $X_7$ is $1$, which
649: means the normalisation $R_{mn}=6g_{mn}$.}
650:
651: Now, let us turn to the Killing spinor analysis. The gravitino condition of
652: the SUSY parameter (Majorana spinor) $\epsilon$ in a bosonic background can be
653: expressed as
654: \begin{align}
655: \del_{A}\epsilon + \frac14 \omega_{A}{}^{BC}\Gamma_{BC}\epsilon
656: + \frac{1}{288}F_{BCDE}\Gamma_{A}{}^{BCDE}\epsilon
657: -\frac{1}{36}F_{ABCD}\Gamma^{BCD}\epsilon=0,\label{M-Killing1}
658: \end{align}
659: where $A,B,C,\dots=0,1,\dots,10$ is the 11 dimensional local Lorents indices,
660: and $\omega_{A}{}^{BC}$ is the torsion-free spin connection.
661:
662: It is convenient to express the 11 dimensional gamma matrices $\Gamma^{A}$
663: as the form
664: \begin{align}
665: \Gamma_{a'}=\gamma_{a'} \ox \id,\qquad (a'=0,1,2,3),\qquad
666: \Gamma_{a}=\gamma_{(5)} \ox \gamma_{a},\qquad (a=5,\dots,11),
667: \end{align}
668: where $\gamma_{a'}\ a'=0,1,2,3$ are the $4 \times 4$ gamma matrices of SO(3,1)
669: and $\gamma_{a}\ a=4,\dots,11$ are the $8 \times 8$ gamma matrices of SO(7).
670: Here we also use the SO(3,1) chirality operator $\gamma_{(5)}:=i\gamma^{0123}$.
671: If we write the Killing spinor as $\epsilon=\lambda \ox \chi$,
672: the Killing spinor equation (\ref{M-Killing1}) reduces to
673: \begin{align}
674: &\del_{a'}\lambda+\frac14 \omega_{a'}{}^{b'c'}\gamma_{b'c'}\lambda
675: + i\gamma_{a'}\gamma_{(5)}\lambda = 0,\quad (a',b',c'=0,1,2,3),
676: \label{AdS4-Killing}\\
677: &\del_{a}\chi+\frac14 \omega_{a}{}^{bc}\gamma_{bc}\chi -\frac{i}{2}\gamma_{a}
678: \chi =0,\quad (a,b,c=4,\dots,10).\label{real-Killing}
679: \end{align}
680: Eq.(\ref{real-Killing}) implies that $\chi$ is a real Killing spinor of
681: $X_7$. $X_7$ admits a real Killing spinor
682: if and only if $X_7$ is a weak $G_2$ manifold.
683:
684:
685: We need the $AdS_4$ part of the spin connection
686: $\omega^{a'b'}=\omega_{c'}{}^{a'b'} e^{c'}$ in order to solve
687: eq.(\ref{AdS4-Killing}).
688: The non-zero components of this spin connection are
689: $\omega^{3p}=-\omega^{p3}=2e^{p},\ p=0,1,2$. As in the IIB case, it is
690: convenient to decompose $\lambda=\lambda_+ + \lambda_-$ with
691: $i\gamma_3\gamma_{(5)}\lambda_{\pm}=\pm \lambda_{\pm}$. By using these notations,
692: the $AdS_4$ part of the Killing spinor equation (\ref{AdS4-Killing}) becomes
693: \begin{align}
694: \frac{\del}{\del r} \lambda_{\pm}=\mp\lambda_{\pm},\qquad
695: \frac{\del}{\del x^{p}} \lambda_{-}=0,\qquad
696: \frac{\del}{\del x^{p}} \lambda_{+}+ 2 e^{-2r}\gamma_{3p}\lambda_{-} =0,\qquad
697: p=0,1,2.
698: \end{align}
699: These equations are easily solved as
700: \begin{align}
701: \lambda_{+}=e^{-r}(2x^{p}\gamma_{p3}\zeta_{-}+\zeta_{+}),\qquad
702: \lambda_{-}=e^{r}\zeta_{-},\nn\\ \zeta_{\pm}:(\text{constant 4-component
703: spinor}),\qquad i\gamma_{3}\gamma_{(5)}\zeta_{\pm}=\pm\zeta_{\pm}.
704: \end{align}
705:
706: In summary, we obtained the Killing spinors in $AdS_4\times X_7$
707: \begin{align}
708: &\epsilon=\lambda \ox \chi,\qquad
709: \lambda=e^{-r}(2x^{p}\gamma_{p3}\zeta_{-}+\zeta_{+})
710: + e^{r}\zeta_{-},
711: \end{align}
712: where $\zeta_{\pm}$ is constant 4-component spinors with
713: $i\gamma_{3}\gamma_{(5)}$ eigenvalues $(\pm)$,
714: and $\chi$ is a real Killing spinor in the weak $G_2$ manifold $X_7$.
715: We consider M5-branes in this background in the next subsection.
716:
717: \subsection{Supersymmetry of the brane background}
718: Let us introduce $AdS_3\times L_3$ M5-brane to the background considered above
719: for an associative submanifold $L_3$ of the weak $G_2$ manifold $X_7$.
720: For the supersymmetry in the presence of M5-brane, the associated Killing
721: spinors $\epsilon$ must satisfy
722: \begin{align}
723: \Gamma \epsilon = \epsilon,
724: \end{align}
725: where $\Gamma$ is the matrix for the kappa symmetry projection.
726: This gamma is expressed as
727: \cite{Howe:1997fb,Aganagic:1997zq,Pasti:1997gx,%
728: Bandos:1997ui,Cederwall:1998gg,Bandos:1997gm}
729: \begin{align}
730: \Gamma:=\frac{1}{6!\sqrt{-\det \Gi}}\varepsilon^{j_1\dots j_6}\left[
731: \Ga{j_1\dots j_6}+40\Ga{j_1j_2j_3}
732: h_{j_4 j_5 j_6}\right].
733: \end{align}
734: We denote here by $h_{j_1j_2j_3}$ the 3-form field strength on the world-volume
735: which is self-dual with respect to the induced metric $\Gi$. We also use
736: the notation $\Ga{j_1\dots j_p}$ defined in eq.(\ref{Gamma2}).
737:
738: The brane configuration considered here is as follows. We set the
739: world-volume coordinates as $\xi^{i},\ i=0,1,3,4,5,6$, and the configuration
740: is
741: \begin{align}
742: & x^{\alpha}=\xi^{\alpha},\quad (\alpha=0,1),\qquad r=\xi^{3},\qquad
743: x^{2}=\frac12 Me^{2r},\quad (M:\text{ constant}),\\
744: & y^{m}=y^{m}(\xi^4,\xi^5,\xi^6),\quad (\text{associative immersion}).
745: \end{align}
746: In this case, the induced metric becomes
747: \begin{align}
748: & ds^{2}_{\text{ind}}=(1+M^2)dr^2+e^{-4r}(-(dx^0)^2+(dx^1)^2)+
749: G_{jk}d\xi^{j}d\xi^{k},\\
750: & G_{jk}=g_{mn}\deldel{y^{m}}{\xi^j}\deldel{y^{n}}{\xi^k},\qquad
751: (j,k=4,5,6).
752: \end{align}
753: We also introduce the world-volume self dual 3-form field strength
754: \begin{align}
755: & h= \frac12 f (1+*_{\text{ind}})
756: \sqrt{\det G}d\xi^{4}d\xi^{5}d\xi^{6},
757: \end{align}
758: where $f$ is a constant and $*_{\text{ind}}$ is
759: the Hodge dual with respect to the induced metric.
760:
761: In this brane background, the matrix $\Gamma$ becomes
762: \begin{align}
763: \Gamma=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+M^2}}\Gamma_{01}(M\Gamma_{2}+\Gamma_{3})\frac{1}{\sqrt
764: {\det G}}\Ga{456}-f\left[
765: \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+M^2}}\Gamma_{01}(M\Gamma_{2}+\Gamma_{3})
766: -\frac{1}{\sqrt{\det G}}\Ga{456}\right]. \label{M-Gamma1}
767: \end{align}
768: The key formula for the analysis of this equation is
769: \begin{align}
770: \deldel{y^{m_1}}{\xi^{4}}\deldel{y^{m_2}}{\xi^{5}}\deldel{y^{m_3}}{\xi^{6}}
771: e^{a_1}_{m_1}e^{a_2}_{m_2}e^{a_3}_{m_3}\gamma_{a_1a_2a_3}\chi
772: =-i\sqrt{\det G} \chi,
773: \label{M-key-formula}
774: \end{align}
775: for an associative immersion $(\xi^{4},\xi^{5},\xi^{6})\to X_7$
776: and a real Killing spinor $\chi$ of $X_7$. The formula
777: (\ref{M-key-formula}) is proved in appendix \ref{app-M-key-formula}.
778: If we use eq.(\ref{M-key-formula}), the relation
779: $ \Ga{456}\epsilon=-i\sqrt{\det G} \gamma_{(5)}\epsilon $
780: is satisfied. Then, $\Gamma \epsilon$ reads
781: \begin{align}
782: \Gamma \epsilon = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+M^2}}i\Gamma_{01}(M\Gamma_{2}+\Gamma_{3})
783: \gamma_{(5)}\epsilon - f\left[
784: \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+M^2}}\Gamma_{01}(M\Gamma_{2}+\Gamma_{3})+
785: i\gamma_{(5)}\right]\epsilon.
786: \end{align}
787: At this stage, the problem is reduced to the $AdS_4$ part.
788: The relation eq.(\ref{M-Gamma1}) is equivalent to
789: \begin{align}
790: & \Gamma'\lambda=\lambda,\\
791: & \Gamma' =\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+M^2}}(M\gamma_3 - \gamma_2)
792: + f \left[\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+M^2}}(M+\gamma_{32})-\gamma_{3}
793: \right]i\gamma_{3}\gamma_{(5)},\\
794: &\lambda=e^{-r}(2x^{\alpha}\gamma_{\alpha 3}\zeta_{-}+\zeta_{+})
795: + e^{r}(1+M\gamma_{23})\zeta_{-},\qquad (\alpha=0,1).
796: \end{align}
797: The Killing spinors satisfying this equation exist only when
798: $f$ and $M$ satisfy the relation
799: \begin{align}
800: f=\frac{M}{1+\sqrt{1+M^2}}.
801: \end{align}
802: In this case, the surviving Killing spinors are parametrised by
803: 4-component spinors $\zeta_{\pm}$ satisfying
804: \begin{align}
805: \gamma_2 \zeta_{\pm}=-\zeta_{\pm}.
806: \end{align}
807: Consequently, the number of the remaining supercharges are the same as expected;
808: half of the number of the ones of 3-dimensional $\Ncal=1$
809: superconformal symmetry.
810:
811: \section{Conclusion and Discussion}
812: \label{Conclusion}
813: In this paper, we analyse supersymmetric AdS branes in the context of
814: AdS/dCFT correspondence.
815: We construct the string backgrounds for superconformal defects.
816: Especially, we consider the $AdS_4 \times T^2$ brane background and
817: the corresponding defect CFT. We show that there are the RG flow from
818: $T^2$ defect to $S^2$ defect. We also construct the M-theory AdS/dCFT
819: backgrounds.
820:
821: Describing the corresponding defect CFT to the $AdS_4\times T^{2}$ brane is an
822: interesting problem. This defect CFT will be obtained by
823: considering the low energy theory on the D3-brane at the singularity of
824: the special Lagrangian D5-brane cone. The singular nature of the D5-brane cone
825: is essential in this case. However, it also make this problem difficult.
826: One possible approach is to describe the $T^2$ defect as the low energy
827: theory of a known defect. A candidate for this high energy theory is
828: the defect field theory with a certain number of hyper multiplets.
829: This high energy theory corresponds to $AdS_4\times (S^2\cup S^2 \cup \dots)$.
830: Consider a set of special Lagrangian planes intersecting
831: at the origin, and deform it so that the tangent cone of the remaining
832: singularity is the $T^2$ cone. If one can do this, one find
833: the high energy conformal defect and the operator of the appropriate
834: relevant deformation.
835:
836: It will be interesting to consider the AdS brane in the decoupling limit from
837: the gravity theory \cite{Berman:2001fs,Suryanarayana:2003}.
838: This produces the AdS/CFT correspondence only in open strings
839: (or open membranes). Especially, in the case of $AdS_3 \times L_3$ M5-brane,
840: the resulting CFT becomes 2-dimensional one, and the conformal
841: symmetry will enhance to infinite dimensions like in
842: the case of ref. \cite{Brown:1986nw}.
843:
844: Another interesting related problem is the string theory in AdS in the
845: small radius limit\cite{Tseytlin:2002gz,Karch:2002vn,Dhar:2003fi,Clark:2003wk}.
846: In this limit, the defect CFT becomes weak coupling and perturbation can be
847: used. In contrast,
848: the supergravity or DBI description becomes wrong in this limit,
849: and the string correction is essential.
850: To consider AdS/dCFT correspondence in this limit will be
851: useful for understanding the strong stringy effect of the string theory.
852:
853: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% acknowledgement %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
854: \subsection*{Acknowledgement}
855: I would like to thank Tohru Eguchi, Yosuke Imamura and Yuji Sugawara for useful
856: discussions and comments.
857:
858: This work is supported in part by JSPS Research Fellowships
859: for Young Scientists.
860:
861: \appendix
862:
863: \section{Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and special Legendrian submanifolds}
864: \subsection{Definitions and properties}
865: Let us consider a $(2k-1)$-dimensional Sasaki-Einstein manifold $X$
866: with metric $g_{mn},\quad
867: (m,n=2,3,\dots,2k)$. We denote the coordinates of $X$ by $y^{m},\ (m=2,3,\dots,2k)$.
868: We fix the normalisation of the metric as
869: \begin{align}
870: R_{mn}=(2k-2)g_{mn}.
871: \end{align}
872:
873: $X$ has 3 special differential forms:
874: 1-form $\theta$, $(k-1)$-form $A$ and $B$.
875: These forms satisfy
876: \begin{align}
877: & \nabla_{m} \theta_{n}+\nabla_{n} \theta_{m}=0,\qquad
878: g^{mn}\theta_m\theta_n=1,\qquad
879: \nabla_{p}(d\theta)_{mn}=-2g_{pm}\theta_{n}+2g_{pn}\theta_{m},\\
880: &\nabla_{m}(A+iB)_{npq}=\nabla_{[m}(A+iB)_{npq]},
881: \qquad d(A+iB)=i^k k*(A+iB).
882: \end{align}
883:
884: The cone $C(X)$ over a Sasaki-Einstein manifold $X$ is a Calabi-Yau manifold.
885: We introduce the radial coordinate $r$,
886: and write the metric of the Calabi-Yau manifold as
887: \begin{align}
888: ds_{CY}^2=dr^2+r^2 g_{mn}dy^{m}dy^{n}.
889: \end{align}
890: Then K\"ahler form $J_{MN}$ and holomorphic $k$-form
891: $\Omega_{MN\dots}$, $(M,N,\dots=1,2,\dots,2k)$ are expressed as
892: \begin{align}
893: J = r dr \theta+\frac12 r^2 d\theta,\qquad
894: \Omega=r^{k-1}dr (A+iB) + \frac{1}{k}r^{k} d (A+iB),
895: \end{align}
896: where $*_{2k-1}$ means $(2k-1)$ dimensional Hodge dual with respect to
897: the metric $g_{mn}$.
898:
899: Sasaki-Einstein manifold $X$ has two linearly independent real Killing spinors.
900: A Real Killing spinor $\chi$ satisfies
901: \footnote{The difference of the appearance of the
902: definition of ``real'' Killing spinor between this paper and \cite{Bar:1993}
903: is due to the convention of gamma matrices.}
904: \begin{align}
905: & \del_{c}\chi +\frac14 \omega_{c}{}^{ab}\gamma_{ab} \chi
906: -\frac{i}{2}\alpha \gamma_{c} \chi=0,\qquad \alpha=\pm 1,\label{RK1}\\
907: & \del_{c}\epsilon:=(e^{-1})^{m}_{c}\deldel{}{y^m},\qquad
908: e^{a}_{m}:(\text{vielbein}),\qquad (e^{-1})^{m}_{c}e^{a}_{m}=\delta^{a}_{c},\\
909: &\omega_{c}{}^{ab}:\text{(spin connection)},\qquad
910: \gamma_{c}:\text{(gamma matrices)},\qquad \{\gamma_{a},\gamma_{b}\}=2\delta_{ab}.
911: \end{align}
912: If $k=$(odd), one real Killing spinor $\chi_{+}$ satisfies (\ref{RK1})
913: for $\alpha=+1$ and the other $\chi_{-}$ satisfies (\ref{RK1})
914: for $\alpha=-1$. If $k=$(even), both of the real Killing spinors satisfy
915: (\ref{RK1}) for $\alpha=+1$. This $\alpha=\pm 1$ corresponds to the chirality
916: of the parallel spinor in the Calabi-Yau cone $C(X)$.
917:
918: The $(k-1)$-dimensional submanifold $L$ in $X$ is
919: called special Legendrian submanifold if
920: \begin{align}
921: A|_{L}=\vol L, \label{SLeg}
922: \end{align}
923: where $A|_{L}$ is the pullback of $A$ to $L$, and ${\rm vol} L$ is the volume
924: form of $L$. The definition (\ref{SLeg}) is equivalent to
925: \begin{align}
926: B|_{L}=\theta|_{L}=0.
927: \end{align}
928: There is another equivalent definition. Consider the cone $\tilde L$ of $L$.
929: \begin{align}
930: \tilde L=\{(r, y)\in C(X)|r \in \Rb_{+}, y\in L \subset X\}.
931: \end{align}
932: $L$ is a special Legendrian submanifold in $X$, if and only if $\tilde L$
933: is a special Lagrangian submanifold in $C(X)$.
934:
935: Some properties of special Legendrian submanifolds are also explained in recent
936: papers \cite{Mikhailov:2002ya, Wang:2002}.
937:
938: \subsection{Proof of the formula (\ref{IIB-key-formula})}
939: \label{app-IIB-key-formula}
940:
941: We denote the vielbein of $C(X)$ by $E^{A},\ A=1,\dots,2k$ and gamma matrices
942: $\Gamma^{A}$.
943: Let us first prove the formula
944: \begin{align}
945: \frac{1}{k!}E^{A_1}\dots E^{A_k}\Gamma_{A_1 \dots A_k} \psi_{\pm}^{c}|_{\tilde L}
946: =\psi_{\pm} \vol \tilde L,
947: \label{CYkey}
948: \end{align}
949: for a special Lagrangian submanifold $\tilde L$ in
950: a Calabi-Yau manifold $C(X)$, and parallel spinors $\psi_{\pm}$, when we adjust
951: the phase of these spinors appropriately.
952: Since, the formula (\ref{CYkey}) is invariant under the
953: local rotation, we can show eq.(\ref{CYkey}) in the convenient local frame.
954: We set the local frame so that the holomorphic $k$-form and K\"ahler form
955: can be written as
956: \begin{align}
957: \Omega=(E^{1}+iE^{k+1})(E^{2}+iE^{k+2})\dots(E^{k}+iE^{2k}),\qquad
958: J=\sum_{j=1}^{k}E^{j}E^{k+j}.
959: \label{Omega}
960: \end{align}
961: In this frame, the two linearly independent parallel spinors $\psi_{\pm}$
962: is constant spinors defined by
963: \begin{align}
964: &(\Gamma^{j}-i\Gamma^{j+k})\psi_{+}=0,\quad (j=1,\dots,k)
965: \qquad \psi_{-}=(\Gamma^{1}+i\Gamma^{k+1})(\Gamma^{2}+i\Gamma^{k+2})\dots
966: (\Gamma^{k}+i\Gamma^{2k})\psi_{+}.
967: \end{align}
968: By the explicit calculation, we can show
969: \begin{align}
970: & \frac{1}{k!}E^{A_1\dots A_k} \Gamma_{A_1\dots A_k}\psi_{+}=
971: \psi_{-}\Omega+(\text{terms proportional to } J), \label{CYvol1}\\
972: & \frac{1}{k!}E^{A_1\dots A_k} \Gamma_{A_1\dots A_k}\psi_{-}=
973: (-1)^{k(k-1)/2} \psi_{+}\bar{\Omega}+(\text{terms proportional to } J).
974: \label{CYvol2}
975: \end{align}
976: Since the charge conjugation satisfies $(\psi^{c})^{c}=(-1)^{k(k-1)/2}\psi$,
977: we can adjust the phase of $\chi_{+}$ so that
978: the charge conjugation becomes
979: \begin{align}
980: \psi_{+}^{c}=(-1)^{k(k-1)/2}\psi_{-},\qquad \psi_{-}^{c}=\psi_{+}.
981: \label{CYcc}
982: \end{align}
983: If we use the equations (\ref{CYvol1}),(\ref{CYvol2}),(\ref{CYcc}),
984: and the facts $J|_{\tilde L}=\im \Omega|_{\tilde L}=0$,
985: $\re \Omega |_{\tilde L}=\vol L$
986: for a special Lagrangian submanifold $\tilde L$,
987: we obtain the formula (\ref{CYkey}).
988:
989: In order to prove the formula (\ref{IIB-key-formula}) from (\ref{CYkey}),
990: let us introduce the following form of the vielbein and gamma matrices.
991: \begin{align}
992: & E^{1}=dr,\quad E^{a}=r e^{a},\quad (a=2,\dots,2k),\nn\\
993: &\Gamma_{1}=1\ox \sigma_{1},\qquad
994: \Gamma_{a}=\gamma_{a}\ox \sigma_{2},\qquad
995: \Gamma_{(5)}=1 \ox \sigma_{3},\nn\\
996: &\gamma_{a}:((2k-1)\text{dimensional gamma matrices}),\qquad \sigma_{1,2,3}:
997: (\text{Pauli matrices}). \label{cone-gamma}
998: \end{align}
999: We consider $k=3$ case (which is relevant to our case) below in this section.
1000: The parallel spinors $\psi_{\pm}$ of $C(X)$ can be written in
1001: terms of the real Killing spinors $\chi_{\pm}$ as
1002: $\psi_{-}=\chi_{-}\ox \binom{0}{1},\ \psi_{+}=\chi_{+}\ox \binom{1}{0}$.
1003: This definition and eq.(\ref{CYkey}) read
1004: \begin{align}
1005: \frac12 e^{a}e^{b}\gamma_{ab} \chi_{-}^{c}|_{L}
1006: =\chi_{-} \vol L.
1007: \end{align}
1008: If we write this equation by the world-volume coordinate $\xi^{5,6}$,
1009: we obtain the formula (\ref{IIB-key-formula}) (We write in this appendix
1010: $L$ and $X$ instead of $L_2$ and $X_5$).
1011:
1012: \section{Weak $G_2$ manifolds and associative submanifolds}
1013:
1014: \subsection{Definitions and properties}
1015: Let us consider a 7-dimensional weak $G_2$ manifold $X_7$
1016: with metric $g_{mn},\quad
1017: (m,n=2,3,\dots,8)$. We denote the coordinates of $X_7$
1018: by $y^{m},\ (m=2,3,\dots,8)$.
1019: We fix the normalisation of the metric as
1020: \begin{align}
1021: R_{mn}=6 g_{mn}.
1022: \end{align}
1023:
1024: Weak $G_2$ manifold $X_7$ has a special 3-form $\Phi$, which satisfies
1025: \begin{align}
1026: d\Phi=4 *\Phi.
1027: \end{align}
1028:
1029: The cone of $X_7$ becomes a Spin(7) holonomy manifold $C(X_7)$. The metric is
1030: \begin{align}
1031: ds_{\rm Spin (7)}^{2}=dr^2+r^2g_{mn}dy^m dy^n.
1032: \end{align}
1033: The Cayley 4-form $\Psi$ of Spin(7) holonomy manifold $C(X_7)$ becomes
1034: \begin{align}
1035: \Psi=r^3dr \Phi+\frac14 r^4 d\Phi
1036: \end{align}
1037:
1038: The weak $G_2$ manifold $X_7$ has a real Killing spinor $\chi$ which satisfies
1039: \begin{align}
1040: & \del_{c}\chi +\frac14 \omega_{c}{}^{ab}\gamma_{ab} \chi
1041: -\frac{i}{2}\gamma_{c} \chi=0, \qquad\label{RKG}
1042: \end{align}
1043: where we use the same notation as eq.(\ref{RK1}).
1044:
1045: A 3-dimensional submanifold $L_3$ of $X_7$ called associative submanifold
1046: if
1047: \begin{align}
1048: \Phi|_{L_3}=\vol L_3.
1049: \end{align}
1050: An associative submanifold in $X_7$
1051: is related to a Cayley submanifold in $C(X_7)$.
1052: Consider the cone $\tilde L_4$ of $L_3$ in $C(X_7)$. Then,
1053: $L_3$ is an associative submanifold in $L_3$ if and only if $\tilde L_4$ in
1054: $C(X_7)$ is an Cayley submanifold.
1055:
1056: \subsection{Proof of the formula (\ref{M-key-formula})}
1057: \label{app-M-key-formula}
1058: We denote the vielbein of $C(X_7)$ by $E^{A},\ A=1,\dots,8$ and gamma matrices
1059: $\Gamma^{A}$.
1060: Let us first prove the formula
1061: \begin{align}
1062: \frac{1}{4!}E^{ABCD}\Gamma_{ABCD} \psi|_{\tilde L_4}
1063: =\psi \vol \tilde L_{4},
1064: \label{7key}
1065: \end{align}
1066: for a Cayley submanifold $\tilde L_4$ in
1067: a Spin(7) holonomy manifold $C(X_7)$, and a parallel spinor $\psi$.
1068: We use in eq.(\ref{7key}) the notation $E^{AB\cdots}=E^{A}E^{B}\cdots$.
1069: Since, the formula (\ref{7key}) is invariant under
1070: local rotation, we can show eq.(\ref{7key}) in the convenient local frame.
1071: We take the local frame in which the Cayley 4-form $\psi$ can be written in
1072: the standard form
1073: \begin{align}
1074: \Psi=&E^{1234}+E^{1256}+E^{1278}+E^{1357}-E^{1368}
1075: -E^{1458}-E^{1467} \nn\\& -E^{2358}-E^{2367}-E^{2457}
1076: +E^{2468}+E^{3456}+E^{3478}+E^{5678},\label{74}
1077: \end{align}
1078: where $E^{ABCD}:=E^{A}E^{B}E^{C}E^{D}$. In this frame, the parallel
1079: spinor $\psi$ is the constant spinor satisfying
1080: \begin{align}
1081: \psi=\Gamma^{1234}\psi=\Gamma^{1256}\psi
1082: =\Gamma^{1357}\psi=\Gamma^{12345678}\psi.\label{7S}
1083: \end{align}
1084: By local Spin(7) transformation, we can take the frame in which
1085: the tangent space of Cayley submanifold $\tilde L_4$ is spanned by
1086: $E^1,E^2,E^3,E^4$. Note that local Spin(7) transformation does not change
1087: the form (\ref{74}) and (\ref{7S}). In this frame, left hand side of (\ref{7key})
1088: becomes
1089: \begin{align}
1090: \frac{1}{4!}E^{ABCD}\Gamma_{ABCD} \psi|_{\tilde L_4}&
1091: =E^{1234}\Gamma_{1234} \psi
1092: =\psi \vol \tilde L_4.
1093: \end{align}
1094: This is the formula (\ref{7key}).
1095:
1096: In order to show eq.(\ref{M-key-formula}) from (\ref{7key}), we take
1097: the frame and gamma matrices of (\ref{cone-gamma}).
1098: The parallel spinor $\psi$ can be written with the real Killing spinor $\chi$
1099: as $\psi=\chi\otimes \binom{1}{0}$ in these notations.
1100: Then, eq.(\ref{7key}) reduces to
1101: \begin{align}
1102: \frac{1}{3!}e^{a}e^{b}e^{c}\gamma_{abc}\chi|_{L_3}
1103: =-i\chi \vol L_3.
1104: \end{align}
1105: If we rewrite this equation by world-volume coordinate,
1106: we obtain the formula (\ref{M-key-formula}).
1107: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% bibliography %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1108:
1109: \providecommand{\href}[2]{#2}\begingroup\raggedright\begin{thebibliography}{10}
1110:
1111: \bibitem{Polchinski:1995mt}
1112: J.~Polchinski, {\it ``{D}irichlet-branes and {R}amond-{R}amond charges,''}
1113: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75} (1995) 4724--4727,
1114: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9510017}{{\tt hep-th/9510017}}].
1115:
1116: \bibitem{Sethi:1998zz}
1117: S.~Sethi, {\it ``The matrix formulation of type {IIB} five-branes,''} Nucl.
1118: Phys. {\bf B523} (1998) 158--170,
1119: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9710005}{{\tt hep-th/9710005}}].
1120:
1121: \bibitem{Ganor:1998jx}
1122: O.~J. Ganor and S.~Sethi, {\it ``New perspectives on {Y}ang-{M}ills theories
1123: with sixteen supersymmetries,''} JHEP {\bf 01} (1998) 007,
1124: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9712071}{{\tt hep-th/9712071}}].
1125:
1126: \bibitem{Kapustin:1998pb}
1127: A.~Kapustin and S.~Sethi, {\it ``The {H}iggs branch of impurity theories,''}
1128: Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 2} (1998) 571--591,
1129: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9804027}{{\tt hep-th/9804027}}].
1130:
1131: \bibitem{Karch:2000ct}
1132: A.~Karch and L.~Randall, {\it ``Locally localized gravity,''} JHEP {\bf 05}
1133: (2001) 008, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011156}{{\tt
1134: hep-th/0011156}}].
1135:
1136: \bibitem{Karch:2000gx}
1137: A.~Karch and L.~Randall, {\it ``Open and closed string interpretation of {SUSY
1138: CFT's} on branes with boundaries,''} JHEP {\bf 06} (2001) 063,
1139: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0105132}{{\tt hep-th/0105132}}].
1140:
1141: \bibitem{Bachas:2001vj}
1142: C.~Bachas, J.~de~Boer, R.~Dijkgraaf and H.~Ooguri, {\it ``Permeable conformal
1143: walls and holography,''} JHEP {\bf 06} (2002) 027,
1144: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111210}{{\tt hep-th/0111210}}].
1145:
1146: \bibitem{DeWolfe:2001pq}
1147: O.~DeWolfe, D.~Z. Freedman and H.~Ooguri, {\it ``Holography and defect
1148: conformal field theories,''} Phys. Rev. {\bf D66} (2002) 025009,
1149: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111135}{{\tt hep-th/0111135}}].
1150:
1151: \bibitem{Erdmenger:2002ex}
1152: J.~Erdmenger, Z.~Guralnik and I.~Kirsch, {\it ``Four-dimensional superconformal
1153: theories with interacting boundaries or defects,''} Phys. Rev. {\bf D66}
1154: (2002) 025020, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0203020}{{\tt
1155: hep-th/0203020}}].
1156:
1157: \bibitem{Skenderis:2002vf}
1158: K.~Skenderis and M.~Taylor, {\it ``Branes in {AdS} and pp-wave spacetimes,''}
1159: JHEP {\bf 06} (2002) 025, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0204054}{{\tt
1160: hep-th/0204054}}].
1161:
1162: \bibitem{Karch:2002sh}
1163: A.~Karch and E.~Katz, {\it ``Adding flavor to {AdS/CFT},''} JHEP {\bf 06}
1164: (2002) 043, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0205236}{{\tt
1165: hep-th/0205236}}].
1166:
1167: \bibitem{Mateos:2002bu}
1168: D.~Mateos, S.~Ng and P.~K. Townsend, {\it ``Supersymmetric defect expansion in
1169: {CFT} from {AdS} supertubes,''} JHEP {\bf 07} (2002) 048,
1170: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207136}{{\tt hep-th/0207136}}].
1171:
1172: \bibitem{Yamaguchi:2002pa}
1173: S.~Yamaguchi, {\it ``Holographic {RG} flow on the defect and g-theorem,''}
1174: JHEP {\bf 10} (2002) 002, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207171}{{\tt
1175: hep-th/0207171}}].
1176:
1177: \bibitem{Constable:2002xt}
1178: N.~R. Constable, J.~Erdmenger, Z.~Guralnik and I.~Kirsch, {\it ``Intersecting
1179: {D3}-branes and holography,''}
1180: \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211222}{{\tt hep-th/0211222}}.
1181:
1182: \bibitem{Constable:2002vt}
1183: N.~R. Constable, J.~Erdmenger, Z.~Guralnik and I.~Kirsch, {\it
1184: ``({D}e)constructing intersecting {M5}-branes,''}
1185: \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0212136}{{\tt hep-th/0212136}}.
1186:
1187: \bibitem{Aharony:2003qf}
1188: O.~Aharony, O.~DeWolfe, D.~Z. Freedman and A.~Karch, {\it ``Defect conformal
1189: field theory and locally localized gravity,''}
1190: \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0303249}{{\tt hep-th/0303249}}.
1191:
1192: \bibitem{Suryanarayana:2003}
1193: N.~V. Suryanarayana, {\it ``The holographic dual of a {SUSY} vector model and
1194: tensionless open strings,''} \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0304208}{{\tt
1195: hep-th/0304208}}.
1196:
1197: \bibitem{Romans:1985an}
1198: L.~J. Romans, {\it ``New compactifications of chiral {$N=2$ $d = 10$}
1199: supergravity,''} Phys. Lett. {\bf B153} (1985) 392.
1200:
1201: \bibitem{Klebanov:1998hh}
1202: I.~R. Klebanov and E.~Witten, {\it ``Superconformal field theory on threebranes
1203: at a {C}alabi-{Y}au singularity,''} Nucl. Phys. {\bf B536} (1998) 199--218,
1204: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807080}{{\tt hep-th/9807080}}].
1205:
1206: \bibitem{Gubser:1998vd}
1207: S.~S. Gubser, {\it ``Einstein manifolds and conformal field theories,''} Phys.
1208: Rev. {\bf D59} (1999) 025006,
1209: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807164}{{\tt hep-th/9807164}}].
1210:
1211: \bibitem{Acharya:1998db}
1212: B.~S. Acharya, J.~M. Figueroa-O'Farrill, C.~M. Hull and B.~Spence, {\it
1213: ``Branes at conical singularities and holography,''} Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.
1214: {\bf 2} (1999) 1249--1286, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9808014}{{\tt
1215: hep-th/9808014}}].
1216:
1217: \bibitem{Morrison:1998cs}
1218: D.~R. Morrison and M.~R. Plesser, {\it ``Non-spherical horizons. {I},''} Adv.
1219: Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 3} (1999) 1--81,
1220: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9810201}{{\tt hep-th/9810201}}].
1221:
1222: \bibitem{Claus:1998yw}
1223: P.~Claus and R.~Kallosh, {\it ``Superisometries of the {AdS $\times$ S}
1224: superspace,''} JHEP {\bf 03} (1999) 014,
1225: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9812087}{{\tt hep-th/9812087}}].
1226:
1227: \bibitem{Bar:1993}
1228: C.~B{\"a}r, {\it ``Real {K}illing spinors and holonomy,''} Commun. Math. Phys.
1229: {\bf 154} (1993) 509--521.
1230:
1231: \bibitem{Cederwall:1997pv}
1232: M.~Cederwall, A.~von Gussich, B.~E.~W. Nilsson and A.~Westerberg, {\it ``The
1233: {D}irichlet super-three-brane in ten-dimensional type {IIB} supergravity,''}
1234: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B490} (1997) 163--178,
1235: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9610148}{{\tt hep-th/9610148}}].
1236:
1237: \bibitem{Aganagic:1997pe}
1238: M.~Aganagic, C.~Popescu and J.~H. Schwarz, {\it ``{D}-brane actions with local
1239: kappa symmetry,''} Phys. Lett. {\bf B393} (1997) 311--315,
1240: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9610249}{{\tt hep-th/9610249}}].
1241:
1242: \bibitem{Cederwall:1997ri}
1243: M.~Cederwall, A.~von Gussich, B.~E.~W. Nilsson, P.~Sundell and A.~Westerberg,
1244: {\it ``The {D}irichlet super-p-branes in ten-dimensional type {IIA} and {IIB}
1245: supergravity,''} Nucl. Phys. {\bf B490} (1997) 179--201,
1246: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9611159}{{\tt hep-th/9611159}}].
1247:
1248: \bibitem{Bergshoeff:1997tu}
1249: E.~Bergshoeff and P.~K. Townsend, {\it ``Super {D}-branes,''} Nucl. Phys. {\bf
1250: B490} (1997) 145--162, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9611173}{{\tt
1251: hep-th/9611173}}].
1252:
1253: \bibitem{Aganagic:1997nn}
1254: M.~Aganagic, C.~Popescu and J.~H. Schwarz, {\it ``Gauge-invariant and
1255: gauge-fixed {D}-brane actions,''} Nucl. Phys. {\bf B495} (1997) 99--126,
1256: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9612080}{{\tt hep-th/9612080}}].
1257:
1258: \bibitem{Bergshoeff:1997kr}
1259: E.~Bergshoeff, R.~Kallosh, T.~Ortin and G.~Papadopoulos, {\it ``Kappa-symmetry,
1260: supersymmetry and intersecting branes,''} Nucl. Phys. {\bf B502} (1997)
1261: 149--169, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9705040}{{\tt hep-th/9705040}}].
1262:
1263: \bibitem{Hearvey:1982}
1264: R.~Harvey and H.~B. Lawson, Jr., {\it ``Calibrated geometries,''} Acta Math.
1265: {\bf 148} (1982) 47--157.
1266:
1267: \bibitem{Joyce:2001xt}
1268: D.~Joyce, {\it ``Lectures on {C}alabi-{Y}au and special {L}agrangian
1269: geometry,''} \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/math.DG/0108088}{{\tt
1270: math.DG/0108088}}.
1271:
1272: \bibitem{Freund:1980xh}
1273: P.~G.~O. Freund and M.~A. Rubin, {\it ``Dynamics of dimensional reduction,''}
1274: Phys. Lett. {\bf B97} (1980) 233--235.
1275:
1276: \bibitem{Duff:1986hr}
1277: M.~J. Duff, B.~E.~W. Nilsson and C.~N. Pope, {\it ``{K}aluza-{K}lein
1278: supergravity,''} Phys. Rept. {\bf 130} (1986) 1--142.
1279:
1280: \bibitem{Howe:1997fb}
1281: P.~S. Howe, E.~Sezgin and P.~C. West, {\it ``Covariant field equations of the
1282: {M}-theory five-brane,''} Phys. Lett. {\bf B399} (1997) 49--59,
1283: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9702008}{{\tt hep-th/9702008}}].
1284:
1285: \bibitem{Aganagic:1997zq}
1286: M.~Aganagic, J.~Park, C.~Popescu and J.~H. Schwarz, {\it ``World-volume action
1287: of the {M}-theory five-brane,''} Nucl. Phys. {\bf B496} (1997) 191--214,
1288: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9701166}{{\tt hep-th/9701166}}].
1289:
1290: \bibitem{Pasti:1997gx}
1291: P.~Pasti, D.~P. Sorokin and M.~Tonin, {\it ``Covariant action for a {$D = 11$}
1292: five-brane with the chiral field,''} Phys. Lett. {\bf B398} (1997) 41--46,
1293: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9701037}{{\tt hep-th/9701037}}].
1294:
1295: \bibitem{Bandos:1997ui}
1296: I.~Bandos, K.~Lechner, A.~Nurmagambetov, P.~Pasti, D.~P. Sorokin and M.~Tonin,
1297: {\it ``Covariant action for the super-five-brane of {M}-theory,''} Phys.
1298: Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} (1997) 4332--4334,
1299: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9701149}{{\tt hep-th/9701149}}].
1300:
1301: \bibitem{Cederwall:1998gg}
1302: M.~Cederwall, B.~E.~W. Nilsson and P.~Sundell, {\it ``An action for the
1303: super-5-brane in {$D = 11$} supergravity,''} JHEP {\bf 04} (1998) 007,
1304: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9712059}{{\tt hep-th/9712059}}].
1305:
1306: \bibitem{Bandos:1997gm}
1307: I.~Bandos, K.~Lechner, A.~Nurmagambetov, P.~Pasti, D.~P. Sorokin and M.~Tonin,
1308: {\it ``On the equivalence of different formulations of the {M} theory
1309: five-brane,''} Phys. Lett. {\bf B408} (1997) 135--141,
1310: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9703127}{{\tt hep-th/9703127}}].
1311:
1312: \bibitem{Berman:2001fs}
1313: D.~S. Berman and P.~Sundell, {\it ``{$AdS_3$} {OM} theory and the self-dual
1314: string or membranes ending on the five-brane,''} Phys. Lett. {\bf B529}
1315: (2002) 171--177, [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0105288}{{\tt
1316: hep-th/0105288}}].
1317:
1318: \bibitem{Brown:1986nw}
1319: J.~D. Brown and M.~Henneaux, {\it ``Central charges in the canonical
1320: realization of asymptotic symmetries: An example from three-dimensional
1321: gravity,''} Commun. Math. Phys. {\bf 104} (1986) 207--226.
1322:
1323: \bibitem{Tseytlin:2002gz}
1324: A.~A. Tseytlin, {\it ``On limits of superstring in {$AdS_5 \times S^5$},''}
1325: Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 133} (2002) 1376--1389,
1326: [\href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0201112}{{\tt hep-th/0201112}}].
1327:
1328: \bibitem{Karch:2002vn}
1329: A.~Karch, {\it ``Lightcone quantization of string theory duals of free field
1330: theories,''} \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0212041}{{\tt
1331: hep-th/0212041}}.
1332:
1333: \bibitem{Dhar:2003fi}
1334: A.~Dhar, G.~Mandal and S.~R. Wadia, {\it ``String bits in small radius {AdS}
1335: and weakly coupled {$N = 4$} super {Y}ang-{M}ills theory. {I},''}
1336: \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0304062}{{\tt hep-th/0304062}}.
1337:
1338: \bibitem{Clark:2003wk}
1339: A.~Clark, A.~Karch, P.~Kovtun and D.~Yamada, {\it ``Construction of bosonic
1340: string theory on infinitely curved anti-de {S}itter space,''}
1341: \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0304107}{{\tt hep-th/0304107}}.
1342:
1343: \bibitem{Mikhailov:2002ya}
1344: A.~Mikhailov, {\it ``Special contact {W}ilson loops,''}
1345: \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211229}{{\tt hep-th/0211229}}.
1346:
1347: \bibitem{Wang:2002}
1348: S.~H. Wang, {\it ``Compact special {L}egendrian surfaces in {$S^5$},''}
1349: \href{http://arXiv.org/abs/math.DG/0211439}{{\tt math.DG/0211439}}.
1350:
1351: \end{thebibliography}\endgroup
1352:
1353: \end{document}
1354: