1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %                                                                  % 

3: % ``Branches of $\cN=1$ Vacua and Argyres-Douglas Points''         %

4: %                                                                  %

5: %           T. Eguchi and Y. Sugawara                              %

6: %                                                                  %

7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

8: 

9: 

10: %\documentstyle[12pt,showkeys]{article}

11: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

12: 

13: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}

14: 

15: \def\baselinestretch{1.4}

16: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0pt}

17: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0pt}

18: \setlength{\marginparwidth}{0pt}

19: \setlength{\marginparsep}{10pt}

20: \setlength{\topmargin}{0pt}

21: \setlength{\headheight}{0pt}

22: \setlength{\headsep}{0pt}

23: %\setlength{\footheight}{12pt}

24: \setlength{\footskip}{30pt}

25: \setlength{\textheight}{650pt}

26: \setlength{\textwidth}{475pt}

27: \setlength{\columnsep}{10pt}

28: \setlength{\columnseprule}{0pt}

29: 

30: 

31: 

32: 

33: %%%   NewCommand   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

34: 

35: \newcommand{\Om}{\Omega}

36: \newcommand{\om}{\omega}

37: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}

38: \newcommand{\ep}{\epsilon}

39: \newcommand{\de}{\delta}

40: \newcommand{\la}{\lambda}

41: \newcommand{\La}{\Lambda}

42: 

43: \newcommand{\deebar}{\bar{\partial}}

44: \newcommand{\df}{\stackrel{\rm def}{=}}

45: \newcommand{\co}{{\scriptstyle \circ}}

46: 

47: \newcommand{\lb}{\lbrack}

48: \newcommand{\rb}{\rbrack}

49: \newcommand{\rn}[1]{\romannumeral #1}

50: \newcommand{\msc}[1]{\mbox{\scriptsize #1}}

51: \newcommand{\dsp}{\displaystyle}

52: \newcommand{\scs}[1]{{\scriptstyle #1}}

53: 

54: \newcommand{\bc}{\mbox{{\bf C}}}

55: \newcommand{\br}{\mbox{{\bf R}}}

56: \newcommand{\bz}{\mbox{{\bf Z}}}

57: \newcommand{\bq}{\mbox{{\bf Q}}}

58: \newcommand{\bn}{\mbox{{\bf N}}}

59: \newcommand{\bsz}{\msc{{\bf Z}}}

60: \newcommand{\bsr}{\msc{{\bf R}}}

61: \newcommand{\bsc}{\msc{{\bf C}}}

62: \newcommand{\ba}{\mbox{{\bf a}}}

63: \newcommand{\bsa}{\msc{{\bf a}}}

64: \newcommand{\bm}{\mbox{{\bf m}}}

65: \newcommand{\bsm}{\msc{{\bf m}}}

66: \newcommand{\da}{\dot{a}}

67: \newcommand{\dal}{\dot{\alpha}}

68: \newcommand{\db}{\dot{b}}

69: \newcommand{\dbeta}{\dot{\beta}}

70: \newcommand{\cA}{{\cal A}}

71: \newcommand{\cL}{{\cal L}}

72: \newcommand{\cG}{{\cal G}}

73: \newcommand{\cJ}{{\cal J}}

74: \newcommand{\cT}{{\cal T}}

75: \newcommand{\cO}{{\cal O}}

76: \newcommand{\cN}{{\cal N}}

77: \newcommand{\cM}{{\cal M}}

78: \newcommand{\cF}{{\cal F}}

79: \newcommand{\cP}{{\cal P}}

80: \newcommand{\cH}{{\cal H}}

81: \newcommand{\cC}{{\cal C}}

82: \newcommand{\cU}{{\cal U}}

83: \newcommand{\cS}{{\cal S}}

84: 

85: 

86: \newcommand{\dpsi}{\psi^{\dag}}

87: 

88: \newcommand{\id}{\mbox{\bf I}}

89: \newcommand{\diag}{\mbox{diag}}

90: 

91: \newcommand{\Ttop}{T^{\msc{top}}}

92: \newcommand{\Ttot}{T^{\msc{tot}}}

93: \newcommand{\Gtot}{G_{\msc{tot}}}

94: 

95: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{{|#1\rangle}}

96: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{{\langle#1|}}

97: 

98: \newcommand{\Th}[2]{\Theta_{#1,#2}}

99: %\newcommand{\th}{{\theta}}

100: \newcommand{\tTh}[2]{\widetilde{\Theta}_{#1,#2}}

101: \newcommand{\ch}[2]{\mbox{ch}^{#1}_{#2}}

102: \newcommand{\tch}[2]{\widetilde{\mbox{ch}}^{#1}_{#2}}

103: \newcommand{\tr}{\mbox{Tr}}

104: \newcommand{\mod}{\mbox{mod}}

105: \newcommand{\tchi}{\tilde{\chi}}

106: \newcommand{\tK}{\tilde{K}}

107: \newcommand{\Ch}[1]{\mbox{Ch}^{#1}}

108: 

109: 

110: \newcommand{\NS}{\mbox{NS}}

111: \newcommand{\tNS}{\widetilde{\mbox{NS}}}

112: \newcommand{\R}{\mbox{R}}

113: \newcommand{\tR}{\widetilde{\mbox{R}}}

114: \newcommand{\sNS}{\msc{NS}}

115: \newcommand{\stNS}{\widetilde{\msc{NS}}}

116: \newcommand{\sR}{\msc{R}}

117: \newcommand{\stR}{\widetilde{\msc{R}}}

118: 

119: 

120: \newcommand{\tQ}{\tilde{Q}}

121: \newcommand{\tf}{\tilde{f}}

122: \newcommand{\tq}{\tilde{q}}

123: \newcommand{\tC}{\tilde{C}}

124: \newcommand{\tG}{\tilde{G}}

125: \newcommand{\tN}{\tilde{N}}

126: \newcommand{\tI}{\tilde{I}}

127: \newcommand{\ty}{\tilde{y}}

128: \newcommand{\tk}{\tilde{k}}

129: 

130: \newcommand{\hy}{\hat{y}}

131: 

132: \newcommand{\ctri}{\chi^{\msc{tri}}}

133: \newcommand{\tctri}{\tilde{\chi}^{\msc{tri}}}

134: 

135: \newcommand{\sdprod}

136:   {\hbox{$\hspace{1mm}\rule{0.15mm}{2mm}\hspace{-0.7mm} \times$}}

137: 

138: \newcommand {\eqn}[1]{(\ref{#1})}

139: 

140: \newcommand{\cleqn}{\setcounter{equation}{0}}

141: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection. \arabic{equation}}

142: \makeatletter

143: \@addtoreset{equation}{section}

144: \def\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

145: \makeatother

146: 

147: 

148: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

149: \begin{document}

150: 

151: 

152: %%% Title page %%%%%

153: \begin{titlepage}

154:  \

155:  \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

156:  \font\csc=cmcsc10 scaled\magstep1

157:  {\baselineskip=14pt

158:  \rightline{

159:  \vbox{\hbox{hep-th/0305050}

160:        \hbox{UT-03-14}

161:        }}}

162: 

163:  

164:  \baselineskip=20pt

165: 

166:  \begin{center}

167:  \centerline{\LARGE  Branches of $\cN=1$ Vacua and Argyres-Douglas Points } 

168: 

169:  \vskip2cm

170: \noindent{ \large Tohru Eguchi  and Yuji Sugawara} \\

171: {\sf eguchi@hep-th.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp~,~

172: sugawara@hep-th.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}

173: \bigskip

174: 

175:  \vskip .6 truecm

176:  {\baselineskip=15pt

177:  {\it Department of Physics,  Faculty of Science, \\

178:   University of Tokyo \\

179:   Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}

180:  }

181: \end{center}

182: 

183: \bigskip 

184: 

185: \bigskip

186: 

187: 

188: \begin{abstract}

189: 

190: We study the ${\cal N}=1$ version of Argyres-Douglas (AD) points

191: by making use of the recent developments in understanding 

192: the dynamics of the chiral sector of $\cN=1$ gauge theories. 

193: We shall consider $\cN=1$ $U(N)$ gauge theories with an adjoint matter 

194: and look for the tree-level superpotential $W(x)$ which reproduces the 

195: $\cN=2$ AD points via the factorization equation 

196: relating the $\cN=1$ and $\cN=2$ curves.

197: We find that the following superpotentials generate the $\cN=2$

198: AD points:\\

199: (1) $W'(x)=x^N \pm 2\Lambda^N$, \hskip4mm (2) $W'(x)=x^n, \hskip3mm 

200: N-1\ge n \ge N/2+1$.\\

201: \indent In case (1) the physics is essentially the same as the 

202: $\cN=2$ theory even in the presence of the superpotential. 

203: There seems to be an underlying structure of $N$-reduced KP hierarchy 

204: in the system. 

205: 

206: Case (2) occurs at the intersection of a number of $\cN=1$ vacua 

207: with massless monopoles. This branch of vacua is characterized 

208: by having $s_+=0$ or $s_-=0$ where $s_{\pm}$ denotes the number 

209: of double roots in $P_N(x)\pm 2\Lambda^N$. 

210: It is possible to show that the mass gap in fact vanishes at this AD point.

211: We conjecture that it represents a new class of $\cN=1$

212: superconformal field theory. 

213: 

214: 

215: \end{abstract}

216: 

217: \vfill

218: 

219: \setcounter{footnote}{0}

220: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}

221: \end{titlepage}

222: \baselineskip 18pt

223: 

224: 

225: 

226: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

227: \section{Introduction}

228: 

229: \indent

230: 

231: Recently, there has been remarkable progress in understanding the

232: quantum dynamics of a wide class of $\cN=1$ supersymmetric QCD's, 

233: which share the same field contents as $\cN=2$ SQCD's.    

234: A series of papers by Dijkgraaf and Vafa \cite{DV1,DV2,DV3} 

235: has revealed a beautiful correspondence between the effective 

236: superpotentials in $\cN=1$ SQCD's and the free energies of certain

237: matrix models. This correspondence 

238: has been explained based on the arguments 

239: of geometric transition and topological string theories 

240: \cite{Vafa,CIV,CV}, which is the B-model version 

241: of the duality studied in \cite{GV,OV1,OV2}. 

242: More recently, the correspondence has been proved by means only of field theory

243: analysis without the help from string theory \cite{DGLVZ,CDSW}. 

244: Especially, the technology developed by Cachazo, Douglas, Seiberg and 

245: Witten (CDSW) \cite{CDSW,Seiberg,CSW,CSW2}, based on the anomalous Ward

246: identity of a generalized Konishi anomaly \cite{Konishi}, 

247: provides a powerful machinery for the non-perturbative 

248: analysis on the F-term dynamics of $\cN=1$ SQCD. 

249: There are a number of subsequent works studying

250: models with various gauge groups 

251: and matter contents. A partial list for them is  

252: \cite{Feng,AO,Witten,BINOR,BFHN,NSW2,AC,CT,KRS}.

253: 

254: 

255: In these analyses a crucial role is played by the so-called factorization

256: equation which relates the $\cN=2$ Seiberg-Witten curve \cite{SW} with the 

257: reduced $\cN=1$ curve in the presence of massless monopoles.

258: Let us consider the $\cN=1$ $U(N)$ gauge theory with an adjoint matter field

259: $\Phi$ with a tree-level superpotential 

260: %$\tr \, W(\Phi)$ which is polynomial in $\Phi$ of degree $n+1$.

261: \begin{eqnarray}

262:  \tr\, W(\Phi) \equiv \sum_{m=0}^{n}\, \La^{n-m}\frac{g_m}{m+1}

263: \tr\, \Phi^{m+1}~,~~

264: (g_n= 1)~,

265: \label{tree sp}

266: \end{eqnarray}

267: where $\La$ is the dynamical scale parameter.

268: The factorization equation for the Seiberg-Witten (SW) curve is given by

269: \begin{eqnarray}

270: &&\Sigma_{N=2}:\hskip3mm 

271: y_{N=2}^2=P_N(x)^2-4\Lambda^{2N}=H_{N-n}(x)^2\Big(W'(x)^2+f_{n-1}(x)\Big),

272: \label{factor1}

273: \end{eqnarray}

274: and the $\cN=1$ curve is defined by \cite{CIV,CV} 

275: \begin{eqnarray}

276: &&\Sigma_{N=1}: \hskip3mm y_{N=1}^2=W'(x)^2+f_{n-1}(x).

277: \label{factor2}\end{eqnarray}

278: Here $P_N(x)$ denotes the standard

279: characteristic polynomial 

280: \begin{equation}

281: P_N(x)=\mbox{Det}\big(x\cdot I-\Phi(x)\big)=x^N+\sum_{i=0}^{N-1}s_ix^{i}

282: \end{equation}

283: and $H_{N-n}(x),\,f_{n-1}(x)$ are polynomials of degree $N-n$ and $n-1$, 

284: respectively.

285: 

286: In the $\cN=1$ theory the eigenvalues of the adjoint field $\Phi$ are 

287: distributed at

288: the zeroes of the superpotential $W'(x)$ with multiplicities $N_i, 

289: \,(i=1,\dots,n)$

290: and the $U(N)$ symmetry is classically 

291: broken to $\prod_{i=1}^n U(N_i)$. $N-n$ double 

292: zeroes

293: of (\ref{factor1}) implies the existence of $N-n$ massless monopoles in the 

294: system and the

295: condensation of monopoles generates the mass gap and confines the gauge 

296: theories $U(N_i), (i=1,\dots,n)$. Due to confinement one is left with 

297: $U(1)^n$ unbroken gauge symmetry.

298: 

299: Given the tree-level superpotential $W'(x)$ the factorization equation 

300: (\ref{factor1}),(\ref{factor2}) completely determines all the parameters of 

301: the 

302: polynomials $P_N(x),H_{N-n}(x)$ and $f_{n-1}(x)$. In fact there are $2N$ 

303: equations

304: for $N+(N-n)+n=2N$ unknowns (we are putting the coefficients of the

305: highest order terms of $P_N,H_{N-n},W'$ to 1) and all the unknown parameters 

306: are expressed in terms of those of the superpotential $W'$.    

307: 

308: 

309: Thus we have the structure of a vacuum bundle whose base is given by the 

310: parameter space of the superpotential and the fiber consists of 

311: the solutions of the factorization equation \cite{Ferrari,CSW}.

312: Solutions of the equation are partially classified by the integers $s_+\,,s_-$

313: which describe how the

314: double zeroes of ${H_{N-n}}^2$ in (\ref{factor1}) are shared by the factors

315: $P_N\pm 2\Lambda^N$.

316: $s_+\,,s_-$ denote the degrees of double roots of the polynomials

317: $P_N+2\Lambda^N,\,P_N-2\Lambda^N$, respectively \cite{CSW}.   

318: Obviously $s_+,s_-$ must obey the condition

319: \begin{equation}

320: s_+ + s_-=N-n.

321: \end{equation}

322: 

323: 

324: Let us now recall some properties of the Argyres-Douglas points where the 

325: $\cN=2$ gauge theory exhibits the $\cN=2$ superconformal symmetry 

326: \cite{AD,APSW,EHIY}. 

327: It is known that $\cN=2$ AD points fall into the A-D-E classification 

328: corresponding to the A-D-E degeneration of ALE space in string compactification

329: over Calabi-Yau manifold which is an ALE space fibered 

330: over ${\bf CP}^1$ \cite{GVW,ShV,GKP}.

331:  In the case of $A_{N-1}$ type ($N\ge 3$), AD point is obtained simply by 

332: adjusting the moduli

333: parameters of the characteristic polynomial $P_N(x)$ as

334: \begin{equation}

335: s_i=0~,~~(i=1,\dots,N-1)~, ~~~ s_0=\pm 2\Lambda^N.

336: \end{equation}

337: Thus

338: \begin{equation}

339: P_N(x)=x^N\pm 2\Lambda^N~,

340: \end{equation}

341: and therefore

342: \begin{eqnarray}

343: &&y_{N=2}^2=(P_N(x)+2\Lambda^N)(P_N(x)-2\Lambda^N)=x^N(x^N\pm 4\Lambda^N)

344: \label{AD}\\

345: &&\hskip1cm \approx x^N  \hskip3mm \mbox{at} \hskip3mm x\approx 0~.

346: \nonumber

347: \end{eqnarray}

348: This describes a genus $N-1$ Riemann surface with a half of its dual $A,\,B$ 

349: cycles being degenerate.   

350: 

351: In this paper we look for a superpotential $W(x)$ of $\cN=1$ theory

352: which reproduces the $\cN=2$

353: AD points (\ref{AD}) when substituted into the factorization equation 

354: (\ref{factor1}). We find two classes of superpotentials:

355: \begin{eqnarray}

356: &&(1)\hskip3mm  W'(x)=x^N\pm 2\Lambda^N\\

357: &&(2) \hskip3mm W'(x)=x^n, \hskip3mm N-1\ge n \ge {N\over 2}+1

358: \end{eqnarray}

359: These superpotentials realize the $\cN=1$ analogues of Argyres-Douglas 

360: points. 

361: 

362: In the case (1) $n=N$ and there are no massless monopoles and the system

363: has no mass gap. 

364: Physics is thus essentially the same as the 

365: $\cN=2$ theory even in the presence of the superpotential. 

366: We find some evidence of an 

367: underlying structure of the $N$-reduced KP hierarchy.

368: Since $W(x)=x^{N+1}/(N+1)\pm 2\Lambda^N x$,

369: we obtain a generalized Kontsevich model \cite{GKM}

370: (with the source term proportional to

371: an identity matrix) for the calculation of effective superpotential

372: of the $\cN=1$ theory.   

373: 

374: 

375: On the other hand, the case (2) occurs at the intersection of 

376: ${}_{n}C_{N-n}$ of $\cN=1$ vacua with $N-n$ massless monopoles.

377: This branch of vacua is characterized by having $s_+=0$ or $s_-=0$.

378: Coalescence of phases of different types of monopoles leads to the existence 

379: of mutually non-local ones and the mass gap in fact vanishes at the AD 

380: point. We conjecture that this point represents a novel class of

381: $\cN=1$ superconformal field theory.

382: 

383: 

384: This paper is organized as follows.

385: In section 2 we treat the case (1) using the CDSW method.

386: We find some evidence for the $N$-reduced KP hierarchy behind this

387: system. Especially, it is found that 

388: chiral operators $\langle \tr\, \Phi^m\rangle$ vanishes at 

389: $m=N\times \mbox{integer}$ and those with $1-N\le m\le 0$

390: are identified as the flat coordinates of the system.

391: In section 3 we focus on monomial 

392: superpotentials $W'(x)=x^n$ and clarify how they realize the $\cN=1$ AD points.

393: We also discuss on the case of gauge theories with matter fields $N_f\not =0$.

394: In section 4 we study the scaling behaviors of their chiral ring operators.

395: We present some comments in section 5.  

396: 

397: 

398: 

399: ~

400: 

401: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

402: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

403: 

404: \section{AD points with $W'(x)=x^N\pm2\Lambda^N$}

405: 

406: \indent

407: 

408: Let us first introduce the machinery of CDSW for the calculation

409: of chiral operators \cite{CDSW}

410: \begin{eqnarray}

411: &&T(x)=\left\langle \tr \, \frac{1}{x-\Phi}\right\rangle~,\\

412: &&R(x)= -\frac{1}{32\pi^2}\left\langle \tr \, 

413: \frac{W_{\al}W^{\al}}{x-\Phi}\right\rangle.

414: \end{eqnarray}

415: Here $W_{\alpha}$ is the field strength chiral field.

416: The translation dictionary to the variables of Riemann surfaces is given by

417: \begin{eqnarray}

418: &&T(x)={P_N(x)'\over y_{N=2}(x)}={d \over dx}\log\Big(y_{N=2}(x)+P_N(x)\Big),

419: \label{TRiemann}\\

420: &&R(x)={1\over 2}\Big(W'(x)-y_{N=1}(x)\Big).\label{RRiemann} 

421: \end{eqnarray}

422: $T(x)dx$ and $R(x)dx$ are both interpreted as meromorphic one-forms

423: and are integrated around suitable cycles on the Riemann surface

424: $\Sigma_{N=1}$. While $T(x)$ is defined in terms of quantities

425: only of the SW curve $\Sigma_{N=2}$, 

426: it is well-defined on $\Sigma_{N=1}$ due to the

427: factorization equation \eqn{factor1}.

428: 

429: In the semi-classical approximation $T(x)\approx P_N'(x)/P_N(x)$ and thus

430: its integral around some cycle

431: \begin{equation}

432: \oint_{A_i} T(x)dx =N_i

433: \label{flux}

434: \end{equation}

435: counts the number of eigenvalues of $\Phi$ inside the integration contour.

436: Since each eigenvalue of $\Phi$ corresponds to the location of a fractional

437: $D3$ brane,

438: the integral of $T(x)$ measures the amount of the RR-flux passing through 

439: the integration contour. It is known that the above relation (\ref{flux}) holds

440: also at the quantum mechanical level.

441: 

442: 

443: Expectation values of chiral fields are given by

444: \begin{equation}

445: U_r\equiv \left\langle \tr \,\Phi^r\right\rangle=\oint x^r\,T(x)\,dx

446: \label{Uexp}

447: \end{equation}

448: where the integration contour is around $\infty$.

449: We similarly define

450: \begin{equation}

451: S_r\equiv \left\langle \tr\,\Phi^rW_{\alpha}W^{\alpha}

452: \right\rangle=\oint x^r\,R(x)\,dx

453: \label{Sexp}

454: \end{equation}

455: 

456: Now let us consider the case of the superpotential $W'(x)=x^N-2\Lambda^N$

457: (for definiteness we will fix the sign of the 2nd term).

458: We find

459: \begin{equation}

460: y_{N=1}^2=y_{N=2}^2=x^N(x^N-4\Lambda^N), \hskip3mm H_0(x)=1,\hskip3mm

461: f_{N-1}(x)=-4\Lambda^N.

462: \label{AD N=2curve}\end{equation}

463: Thus the $\cN=1$ curve is the same as the $\cN=2$ and the

464: physics of the system

465: is also expected to coincide with that of 

466: the $\cN=2$ case. In the following we see  evidence that 

467: $\cN=1$ SUSY in the presence of superpotential $W'(x)=x^N-2\Lambda^N$

468: is enhanced to $\cN=2$ SUSY in the IR limit $\Lambda\rightarrow \infty$.

469: 

470: 

471: 

472: For even $N$, the $N$ zeroes of $x^N-4\La^N$ 

473: may be paired up with cuts, and define

474: $N/2$ ``A-cycles'' $\tilde{A}_1,\ldots, \tilde{A}_{N/2}$ on $\Sigma_{N=1}$.

475: We also introduce a small cycle ``$C$'' 

476: encircling the origin $x=0$. In the case of odd $N$ 

477: we likewise obtain the $\left\lb N/2\right\rb$ A-cycles

478: $\tilde{A}_1,\ldots, \tilde{A}_{\lb N/2\rb}$.

479: The remaining zero creates a cut ending at $x=0$, and we 

480: denote the corresponding cycle as $\tilde{A}_{\lb N/2 \rb +1}$.

481: The cycle $C$ can be also defined in a similar manner, 

482: but it must wind around $x=0$ twice, since it passes through the cut associated

483: with the cycle $\tilde{A}_{\lb N/2 \rb +1}$. In the following we mostly

484: concentrate on the $N$=even case for the ease of presentation. 

485: 

486: 

487: 

488: At the AD point $T(x)$ is given by

489: \begin{eqnarray}

490: T(x) = \frac{P_N'(x)}{y_{N=2}(x)} = 

491: \begin{array}{ll}

492: \dsp  \frac{2k x^{k-1}}{\sqrt{x^{2k}-4\La^{2k}}}& ~~ (N=2k) 

493: \end{array}

494: \end{eqnarray}

495: and we obtain the following ``flux distributions'' 

496: %\footnote

497: %    {It may be amazing that $T(x)$ here is formally equal 

498: %     with $2\times \left\lb \mbox{$T(x)$ of the $U(n)$ theory with 

499: %     $P_n(x)=x^n$}\right\rb$ in the even $N$ case. 

500: %     This fact provides the easiest proof of \eqn{flux even N}.};

501: \begin{eqnarray}

502: && \oint_{\tilde{A}_i} T(x)dx =2~,~(i=1,\ldots,N/2)~,~~~

503: \oint_{C} T(x) dx =0~. 

504: \label{flux even N} 

505: \end{eqnarray}

506: 

507: 

508: In the following we consider the IR limit $\La\, \rightarrow \, \infty$,

509: or equivalently, focus on the dynamics at the energy scales much smaller

510: than $\La$. In this limit the cycles $\tilde{A}_i$ become large and move out to

511: $\infty$, and do not influence the IR physics.

512: It is hence natural to expect that the quantities relevant for the IR

513: physics are captured by the integrals around the small contour $C$  which 

514: stays near the singular point as is discussed in \cite{AD}.

515: We consider the expectation values of the chiral fields

516: \begin{eqnarray}

517: && U_r=\oint_{C} x^r \,T(x) \,dx,

518: \label{U AD} \\

519: && S_r= \oint_{C} x^r \,R(x) \,dx

520: \label{S AD}

521: \end{eqnarray}

522: and derive their scaling behaviors.

523: Strictly at the AD point $W'(x)=x^N-2\Lambda^N$ one can show that 

524: \begin{eqnarray}

525: U_r =0~,~~~

526: S_r =0\hskip5mm \mbox{all } \hskip3mm r,

527: \end{eqnarray}

528: which is consistent with the scaling invariance. 

529: 

530: 

531: 

532:  Now we consider a small perturbation away from the AD point

533: \begin{eqnarray}

534: W'(x)=P_N(x)=x^N-2\La^N-\sum_{m=0}^{N-1}g_m x^m \La^{N-m}~,

535: \label{mu deform 2}

536: \end{eqnarray}

537: and compute expectation values of various chiral operators.

538: Scaling dimensions of the coupling constants $\{g_m\}$ and chiral fields

539: $\{U_r,S_r\}$ may be easily evaluated in the following manner:

540: One applies a scale transformation

541: \begin{equation}

542: x\rightarrow \rho^{\gamma}x, \hskip4mm g_m\rightarrow \rho^{\gamma(N-m)}g_m, 

543: \hskip3mm (m=0,\dots,N-1)

544: \end{equation}

545: which transforms $(x^N-\sum_m g_mx^m\La^{N-m})$ 

546: into $\rho^{\gamma N}(x^N-\sum_m g_mx^m\La^{N-m}$).

547: Then by using

548: \begin{equation}

549: U_r\approx \oint_C x^r {(x^N-\sum_mg_mx^m\La^{N-m})'\over 

550: \sqrt{x^N-\sum_mg_mx^m\La^{N-m}}} \, dx

551: \end{equation}

552: we find

553: \begin{equation}

554: U_r(\{\rho^{\gamma(N-m)}g_m\})\approx \rho^{\gamma(r+N/2)}U_r(\{g_m\})

555: \end{equation}

556: Thus the chiral field $U_r$ has the scaling dimension $\Delta=\gamma(r+N/2)$.

557: The value of $\gamma$ is fixed if we assume that

558: the field $\tr \, \Phi$

559: has no anomalous dimension. This is the case of $\cN=2$ SUSY when the field

560: $\Phi$ belongs to the $\cN=2$ vector multiplet. 

561: By imposing $\Delta(U_1)=1$ we find

562: $\gamma=1/(1+N/2)$. Therefore we find

563: \begin{eqnarray}

564: \Delta(g_m)=\frac{2(N-m)}{N+2},\hskip3mm

565: \Delta(U_r)={N+2r\over N+2},

566: \hskip3mm \Delta(S_r)={N+2(r+1)\over N+2}.\label{Delta N=2}

567: \end{eqnarray}

568: Dimensions of the coupling constants $\{g_m\}$  agree with the

569: known results \cite{EHIY}. Note that the dimension of the gaugino 

570: condensation $S_0=\left\langle\tr \,W_{\alpha}W^{\alpha}\right\rangle$ 

571: is equal to 1 and thus

572: $S_0$ may be regarded as the scalar component of some chiral field.

573: 

574: Now we would like to make the following observation:

575: it is easy to see 

576: \begin{eqnarray}

577: \Delta(g_m)\le 1~\Longleftrightarrow~

578: \left\{

579: \begin{array}{ll}

580:  m\ge \frac{N}{2}-1&~~(\mbox{for even $N$}), \\

581:  m\ge \left\lb \frac{N}{2}\right\rb &~~(\mbox{for odd  $N$}).

582: \end{array}

583: \right. 

584: \end{eqnarray}

585: and conversely

586: \begin{eqnarray}

587: \Delta(g_m)> 1~\Longleftrightarrow~

588: \left\{

589: \begin{array}{ll}

590:  m< \frac{N}{2}-1&~~(\mbox{for even $N$}), \\

591:  m< \left\lb \frac{N}{2}\right\rb &~~(\mbox{for odd  $N$}).

592: \end{array}

593: \right.

594: \end{eqnarray}

595: 

596: It is well-known that if $\Delta(g_m)\le 1$, $g_m$ should correspond to

597: a coupling constant in the $\cN=2$ superconformal field theory

598: in 4-dimensions ($\cN=2\,SCFT_4$),

599: while if $\Delta(g_m)>1$, it corresponds to a 

600: VEV of dynamical field  (or the moduli)

601:  (see, for example, \cite{APSW,ShV}).

602: In the context of string theory,

603: $\Delta(g_m)\le 1$ is also interpreted as the non-normalizable vertex

604: operators (or the ``Seiberg states'')

605: in the Liouville theory, while 

606: $\Delta(g_m)>1$ corresponds to the normalizable vertex operators

607: (or the ``anti-Seiberg states'') \cite{GKP,Pelc,Seiberg-L}. 

608: 

609: 

610: General chiral perturbations of an $\cN=2$ $SCFT_4$ action 

611: should have the form

612: \begin{eqnarray}

613: && \Delta S = \int d^4x d^2\theta^+d^2\theta^-\, \sum_{m\,:\,\Delta(g_m)

614: \le 1} 

615: \,g_m \cO_m~,

616: \label{N=2 perturbation} \\

617: && \Delta(g_m)+\Delta(\cO_m) =2~.  \nonumber 

618: \end{eqnarray}

619: %%%%

620: By comparing with \eqn{Delta N=2}, we may identify 

621: the $\cN=2$ chiral operator $\cO_m$ as the one whose lowest component 

622: is given by 

623: \begin{eqnarray}

624: \tr\, \Phi^{m+2-N/2}, \hskip3mm m\ge {N\over 2}-1.

625: \label{O U}

626: \end{eqnarray}

627: %Thus the coupling $g_m$ is paired with $\tr\,\Phi^{m+2-N/2}$

628: %in perturbation theory.

629: %%%%

630: On the other hand,

631: $g_m$ with $\Delta(g_m)>1$ is identified with the VEV of the operator

632: \begin{eqnarray}

633: g_m \Longleftrightarrow  

634:  \,\left\langle\tr \,\Phi^{N/2-m}\right\rangle, \hskip3mm m \le {N\over 2}-1.

635: \end{eqnarray}

636: We have thus two equivalent ways of parameterizing 

637: the ``small phase space'' of $\cN=2$ $SCFT_4$:

638: by  the relevant coupling constants $g_m$ ($0<\Delta(g_m)\le 1$),

639: or the VEV's of relevant operators $\cO_m$ ($1<\Delta(\cO_m)<2$),

640: which are related by the Legendre transformation.

641: 

642: We note that the superpotential $W(x)={1\over N+1}x^N-2\Lambda^Nx-

643: \sum_m{g_m\over m+1}x^{m+1}\Lambda^{N-m}$ itself in not quasi-homogeneous and

644: does not have a well-defined scaling behavior. In the IR limit

645: it will be dominated by the linear term $\Lambda^N x$ and would not

646: affect the low-energy dynamics in an essential manner. Actually the value 

647: \begin{equation}

648: \Delta(g_m)+\Delta(U_{m+1})={3N+2\over N+2}.

649: \end{equation}

650: is not far from 3 expected from

651: the $\cN=1$ superconformal symmetry.

652: 

653: Let us recall the relation (\ref{flux even N}).

654: RR fluxes are carried by the cuts $\tilde{A_i}$ which are close to

655: $\infty$ in the IR limit and the small contour $C$ around the origin 

656: does not carry any flux.

657: Thus the analysis of the physics near the singularity $x=0$ becomes the same 

658: as if there 

659: were no RR-fluxes or superpotential in the system and we expect that

660: the original $\cN=2$ 

661: supersymmetry is restored in the IR limit.   

662: 

663: Let us next specialize to the case of perturbation of the

664: AD point by keeping only $g_0\equiv \mu\not=0$ and setting 

665: all other couplings $g_m$ to zero. Then the singularity at the origin

666: is split into $N$-th roots of unity

667: \begin{equation}

668: x^N-\mu\Lambda^N=0 \hskip3mm \Longrightarrow \hskip3mm

669: x_a=e^{2\pi ia/N}\mu^{1/N}\Lambda,

670: \hskip2mm a=0,\dots,N-1.

671: \end{equation}

672: We may introduce contours $C_{a,b}$ encircling around

673: $x_a$ and $x_b$ for any pair

674: of $a,b$.

675: 

676: It is then easy to show that

677: \begin{equation}

678: \oint x^r \,T(x)\, dx=\oint \,dx {x^r Nx^{N-1}\over\sqrt{-4\Lambda^N

679: (x^N-\mu\Lambda^N)}}=0, \hskip4mm \mbox{for   } r\equiv 0 \hskip2mm 

680: \mbox{mod } N.

681: \label{mod N}\end{equation}

682: The above formula (\ref{mod N}) holds for basic contours $C_{a,a+1}$ and thus

683: for any contours obtained by combining them.

684: 

685: Similarly we have

686: \begin{equation}

687: \oint x^{r-1} \,R(x)\, dx=0, \hskip4mm \mbox{for   } r\equiv 0 \hskip2mm 

688: \mbox{mod } N.

689: \label{mod Nb}\end{equation}

690: These are the first instances where we observe the structure of mod $N$ 

691: reduction in our system.

692: 

693: 

694: If we compute the effective superpotential for our theory 

695: following 

696: Dijkgraaf and Vafa \cite{DV1,DV2,DV3}, we should 

697: introduce a matrix action $S_M$

698: \begin{equation}

699: S_{M}={1\over N+1}\tr\, M^{N+1}-2\Lambda^N \tr\, M,\hskip4mm N\ge 3

700: \end{equation}

701: where $M$ is an $\hat{N}\times \hat{N}$ hermitian matrix.

702: We note that this is exactly the form of a generalized Kontsevich model

703: with its source matrix $J$ being replaced by an identity matrix \cite{GKM}.

704: It is well-known that the free-energy of the generalized Kontsevich model 

705: obeys Virasoro and W constraints and describes the $N$-reduced KP flow.

706: 

707: 

708: In our previous work \cite{ES2} we have studied the string compactification on

709: a singular $CY_3$ manifold defined by $X^N+z_1^2+z_2^2+z_3^2-\mu\Lambda^N=0$

710: and discussed its relation to the AD points.

711: We described this system by an $\cN=2$ 

712: Liouville theory coupled to an $\cN=2$ minimal 

713: model (at level $N-2$) following \cite{GKP}. 

714: The parameter $\mu$ corresponds to the coefficient

715: of the Liouville potential (cosmological constant) term. After eliminating

716: variables $z_i,i=1,2,3$ the holomorphic three-form is reduced to an one-form

717: $\Omega=\sqrt{X^N-\mu\Lambda^N}dX$. Thus $\Omega$ has exactly the same form as

718: $y_{N=1}=\sqrt{x^N-\mu\Lambda^N}$ at the AD point. Note that the

719: integral of $1/2\cdot y_{N=1}(x)=R(x)$ (modulo total derivative)

720: gives the gaugino condensation $S_0$ in gauge theory \eqn{S AD}  while

721: the integral of $\Omega$ gives a central charge 

722: or mass of some BPS states in string theory.

723: 

724: Let us introduce further deformation parameters of $CY_3$ and consider

725: \begin{equation} 

726: \Omega=\sqrt{X^N-\mu\Lambda^N-\sum_{m=1}t_mX^m\Lambda^{n-m}}.

727: \end{equation}

728: and set

729: \begin{equation}

730: \left. \Omega_m\equiv {\partial \Omega\over \partial t_m}\right|_{t_m=0}.

731: \end{equation}

732: We then find the correspondence

733: \begin{eqnarray}

734: \oint_{C_{a,b}} \Omega_m &\Longleftrightarrow &\left. 

735: {\partial\over \partial g_m}\,S_0(C_{a,b})

736: \right|_{g_m=0}

737: %=\left.{\partial \over \partial g_m}\oint_{C_{a,b}}\hskip-1mm R(x)\,dx

738: %\right|_{g_m=0}

739: \\

740: &=&\mbox{const}\times \,\oint_{C_{a,b}}

741: {x^m \over \sqrt{x^N-\mu\Lambda^N}}\, dx,\\

742: &=& \mbox{const}\times\,U_{m+1-N}(C_{a,b})~,

743: \end{eqnarray}

744: where we used the notations 

745: \begin{eqnarray}

746: && S_r(C_{a,b}) \equiv \oint_{C_{a,b}} x^r R(x) dx~,~~~

747: U_r(C_{a,b}) \equiv \oint_{C_{a,b}} x^r T(x) dx~.

748: \end{eqnarray}

749: 

750: 

751: In \cite{ES2} we  have 

752: interpreted this quantity as the disc amplitude for a boundary

753: state $|C_{a,b}\rangle$ with an insertion of 

754: a chiral primary field $\phi_m$ of $\cN=2$

755: minimal model dressed by a Liouville exponential

756: \begin{equation}

757: \int_{C_{a,b}}\Omega_m=\langle 0|\,\phi_m\,e^{p_m\phi}\,|C_{a,b}\rangle

758: \end{equation}

759: where $\langle0|$ denotes the Ramond ground state and $\phi$ is the Liouville 

760: field. Liouville momentum $p_m$ is proportional to $m/N$ due to the charge 

761: integrality condition. Charge integrality allows more general values of

762: the momentum $m/N+s, \,s\in {\bf Z}$ which corresponds to the $s$-th

763: descendant fields.

764: 

765:  

766: We notice a mapping between the deformation parameters of $CY_3$

767: and operators in the chiral ring  

768: \begin{equation}

769: \partial /\partial t_m \Longleftrightarrow U_{m+1-N}.

770: \end{equation}

771: Thus the primary couplings (flat coordinates) 

772: map to chiral operators 

773: with negative

774: exponents or the $-1$ descendants. This is a characteristic feature of 

775: integrable systems. (See, for instance, \cite{Losev,EKYY}.)

776: 

777: 

778: 

779: ~

780: 

781: 

782: 

783: 

784: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

785: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

786: \section{AD Points with $W'(x)=x^n$}

787: 

788: \subsection{Pure Gauge Theory}

789: 

790: \indent

791: 

792: Let us next discuss the AD points realized by the monomial superpotentials

793: \begin{equation}

794: W'(x)=x^n,\hskip5mm {N\over 2}+1\le n\le N-1

795: \label{monomial sp}

796: \end{equation}

797: in $U(N)$ gauge theory with an adjoint matter

798: field. In order to study these theories we 

799: first go back to the factorization equation (\ref{factor1}).

800: \begin{equation} 

801: P_N(x)^2-4\Lambda^{2N}=H_{N-n}(x)^2\Big(W'(x)^2+f_{n-1}(x)\Big),

802: \label{factorization 2}\end{equation}

803: Since $P_N(x)+2\La^N$ and $P_N(x)-2\La^N$ cannot share any zeroes, 

804: we can classify 

805: the solutions of \eqn{factorization 2} according to how  

806:  the zeroes of $H_{N-n}(x)$ are distributed into these two factors.

807: We denote the number of double zeroes in $P_N(x)+2\Lambda^N$,

808: $P_N(x)-2\Lambda^N$ as $s_+$ and $s_-$, respectively \cite{CSW}. 

809: We have three different cases

810: \begin{description}

811:  \item[(1)] $s_-=0:$\hskip4mm All the zeroes of $H_{N-n}(x)$ are those 

812: of $P_N(x)+2\La^N$.

813:  \item[(2)] $s_+=0:$ \hskip4mm All the zeroes of $H_{N-n}(x)$ are those 

814: of $P_N(x)-2\La^N$.

815:  \item[(3)] $s_+s_-\not=0:$ \hskip4mm The cases other than (i) and (ii).

816: \end{description}

817: 

818: 

819: 

820: We will soon find that the cases (1) or (2) are relevant for the 

821: $\cN=1$ AD points. Let us first focus on the case (1).

822: Since $P_N(x)+2\Lambda^N$ must be divisible by $H_{N-n}(x)^2$ in this case,

823: we have the structure

824: \begin{eqnarray}

825: P_N(x)+2\La^N &=& H(x)_{N-n}^2 F_{2n-N}(x) ~, 

826: \label{factorization 3a} \\

827: P_N(x)-2\La^N &=& H(x)_{N-n}^2 F_{2n-N}(x) -4\La^N~,

828: \label{factorization 3b}

829: \end{eqnarray}

830: where $F_{2n-N}(x)$ is some polynomial with degree $2n-N (>0)$.

831: By comparing \eqn{factorization 3a} and \eqn{factorization 3b}

832: with \eqn{factorization 2},

833: we immediately find \cite{CSW}

834: \begin{eqnarray}

835: W'(x)=H(x)_{N-n}F_{2n-N}(x)~,~~~ f(x)=-4\La^NF_{2n-N}(x).

836: \label{sol W f 1}

837: \end{eqnarray}

838: Therefore all the zeroes of the superpotential $W'(x)$ are shared by the

839: polynomials $H_{N-n}(x)$ and $F_{2n-N}(x)$.

840: In the generic case we have a superpotential with zeroes 

841: $\{a_i; \,i=1,\dots,n\}$ which are all distinct

842: \begin{eqnarray}

843: W'(x)=x^n+\sum_{m=0}^{n-1}g_mx^m\La^{n-m}= \prod_{i=1}^{n}(x-a_i)~, ~~~ a_i

844: \neq a_j~~(i\neq j)~

845: \label{W deform}

846: \end{eqnarray} 

847: $H_{N-n}(x)$ and $F_{2n-N}(x)$ split these zeroes into two groups.

848: Let us use the notation $\{p_i;\,i=1,\dots,N-n\}$ for

849: the zeroes of $H_{N-n}(x)$ and $\{q_i;\,i=1,\dots,2n-N\}$

850: for those of $F_{2n-N}(x)$ 

851: \begin{equation}

852: H_{N-n}(x)=\prod_{i=1}^{N-n}(x-p_i),\hskip4mm F_{2n-N}(x)=\prod_{j=1}^{2n-N}

853: (x-q_j).

854: \end{equation}

855: As a set

856: \begin{equation}

857: \{p_1,p_2,\dots,p_{N-n}\}\cup\{q_1,q_2,\dots,q_{2n-N}\}

858: =\{a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n\}.

859: \end{equation}

860: Therefore in general there are 

861: \begin{equation}

862: L\equiv{}_nC_{N-n}

863: \end{equation}

864: different branches of 

865: solutions to the factorization equation.

866: Thus the vacuum bundle of the case (1) has the structure of a 

867: $L$-fold branched cover over the coupling constant space ${\cal S}$.

868: Each sheet has a different semi-classical end in the 

869: limit $\Lambda\rightarrow 0$. As we see by setting $\Lambda=0$ in 

870: \eqn{factorization 3a},\eqn{factorization 3b},

871: the gauge symmetry is given by $U(2)^{N-n}\times U(1)^{2n-N}$

872: at generic points in the semi-classical region. 

873: 

874: By extremizing the effective superpotential of the system it is possible 

875: to show that the magnitude of the monopole condensation at 

876: a double point $x=p_i$

877: is given by \cite{deBO}\footnote{We thank Y. Tachikawa for drawing our 

878: attention to this formula.}

879: \begin{equation}

880: \left\langle \tilde{M}_iM_i\right\rangle=\mbox{const}\times y_{N=1}

881: (x=p_i)~, \hskip4mm i=1,\dots,N-n~,

882: \label{dBO}

883: \end{equation}

884: where $M_i,\tilde{M}_i$ are the scalar components of the $i$-th

885: monopole hypermultiplet. If we use the relation (\ref{factor2})

886: and (\ref{sol W f 1}), we find

887: \begin{equation}

888: \left\langle \tilde{M}_iM_i\right\rangle=\mbox{const}'\times 

889: \prod_{j=1}^{2n-N}(p_i-q_j)^{1/2}~, \hskip3mm i=1,\dots,N-n~.

890: \label{mass gap}

891: \end{equation}

892: At generic points in the parameter space ${\cal S}$, condensates 

893: $\left\langle \tilde{M}_iM_i\right\rangle,\,i=1,\dots,N-n$ are all non-zero

894: and generate the mass gap  and confinement in the system.

895: 

896: 

897: 

898: 

899: Let us now consider the special case of monomial superpotentials

900: $W'(x)=x^n$ ($N/2+1\le n \le N-1$). In this case all the zeroes 

901: $\{a_i,p_{j},q_{\ell}\}$

902: are located at the origin and hence

903: \begin{eqnarray}

904: && P_N(x)^2-4\La^{2N}= x^N(x^N-4\La^N)~, \nonumber \\

905: && H_{N-n}(x)=x^{N-n}~,~~~f_{n-1}(x)=-4\La^N x^{2n-N}~,

906: %F_{2n-N}(x)=x^{2n-N}~,

907: \label{AD 1}

908: \end{eqnarray}

909: which is exactly the AD point of $U(N)$ theory (with the highest criticality).

910: As we approach the AD point at the 

911: origin $O\equiv \{g_m=0,\,({}^{\forall} m=0, \ldots, n-1)\}$ of the base space 

912: $\cal S$, the monopole condensations \eqn{mass gap} all vanish and we expect 

913: to obtain a scale invariant theory (note that we have $n\ge N/2+1$).

914: As we see in the next section, physical observables exhibit scaling 

915: behaviors around this point: thus we conjecture that it represents a new class

916: of $\cN=1$ superconformal field theory.

917: The $\cN=1$ AD singularity in this case 

918: is located at the point where $L$ different 

919: branches of $s_-=0$ vacua collide in the vacuum bundle.

920: Let us call this AD type singularity as the $AD_+$ point. 

921: See Fig.1.

922: 

923: 

924: The analysis of the case (2) is completely parallel. 

925: The monomial superpotential \eqn{monomial sp} generates 

926: a solution  

927: \begin{eqnarray}

928: && P_N(x)^2-4\La^{2N}= x^N(x^N+4\La^N)~, \nonumber \\

929: && H(x)_{N-n}=x^{N-n}~,~~~f_{n-1}(x)=4\La^N x^{2n-N}~,

930: \label{AD 2}

931: \end{eqnarray}

932: which we call as the $AD_-$ point.

933: The vacuum bundle near the $AD_-$ point again becomes an $L$-fold 

934: branched cover, and it defines a different branch

935: from that of $AD_+$.

936: 

937: The case (3), on the other hand, is rather difficult to analyze.

938: Even with a monomial superpotential 

939: we may obtain solutions of factorization equation  

940: which does not develop any singularities at $x=0$.

941: 

942: 

943: As a simple example, we have found the following solution 

944: in the case of $N=5$, $n=3$ with $s_+=s_-=1$

945: (although it is outside of the range of $n$ in \eqn{monomial sp});

946: \begin{eqnarray}

947: && P_5(x)+2\La^5=\left(x+4^{1/5}\La(1+\om)\right)^2

948: \left(x^3-4^{1/5}\La x^2

949: +4^{2/5}\La^2(1+\om)x-4^{3/5}\La^3 \om\right) ~, \nonumber \\

950: && P_5(x)-2\La^5=\left(x+4^{1/5}\La\om\right)^2\left(x^3+4^{1/5}\La x^2

951: -4^{2/5}\La^2\om x-4^{3/5}\La^3(1+\om)\right)  ~, \nonumber \\

952: && P_5(x)^2-4\La^{10} =\left(x+4^{1/5}\La(1+\om)\right)^2

953: \left(x+4^{1/5}\La\om\right)^2

954: \left\{W'(x)^2 +f(x)\right\} ~, \nonumber \\

955: && W'(x)^2 +f(x) =

956: x^6+2\cdot 4^{4/5}\La^4 x^2 + 4\La^5 (-i\sqrt{3})x 

957: -4\cdot 4^{1/5}\La^6~, 

958: \end{eqnarray}

959: where $\om$ is the 3rd root of unity $\om \equiv e^{2\pi i/3}$.

960: Solutions of this kind do not correspond to 

961: any IR fixed point. Due to algebraic complexities we have not yet

962: been able to study the case (3) in detail. 

963: 

964: It seems, however, 

965: what happens is the following: by adjusting parameters it is possible 

966: to generate higher order zeros of the function, for instance, 

967: $P_N(x)+2\Lambda^N$ at some point $x=p_i$. At this point, however, 

968: $P_N(x)-2\Lambda^N$ can not

969: vanish and thus the system is effectively reduced to the case of $s_-=0$

970: with the rank $N$ replaced by some smaller value.

971: Thus the $\cN=1$ AD points

972: which appear on branches with $s_+s_-\not=0$ should be of the same type

973: as those of $AD_{\pm}$ with lower rank gauge group.

974: 

975: 

976: It is worthwhile to note that when $n=N-1$, the case (3) does not occur

977: and hence all the $\cN=1$ vacua of the $U(N)$ gauge theory with an arbitrary

978: degree-$N$ superpotential $W(x)$ are 

979: smoothly connected to the $AD_{\pm}$ points.

980: 

981: 

982: 

983: 

984: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

985: 

986: \subsection{Non-zero Flavor}

987: 

988: \indent

989: 

990: We next consider the system with non-zero flavors $N_f\neq 0$ (i.e. with $N_f$ 

991: chiral fields $Q_i,\, \tilde{Q}_i,\,i=1,\dots,N_f$ 

992: in the fundamental and anti-fundamental representations).

993: For the sake of simplicity we  consider the even flavor case $N_f=2\ell$,

994: and discuss the case of degenerate bare masses $\{m_i=m,\,i=1,\dots,N_f\}$ 

995: in order to study higher singular points.

996: It is convenient to make a constant shift of $\tr \, \Phi$, so that we can 

997: set  $m=0$ without loss of generality.

998: The SW curve is then written as \cite{SW2}

999: \begin{eqnarray}

1000: y_{N=2}^2=C(x)^2 - 4\La^{2(N-\ell)}x^{2\ell}~,

1001: \label{SW curve flavor 1}

1002: \end{eqnarray}

1003: where $C(x)$ is a degree $N$ polynomial of the form 

1004: $C(x)=P_N(x)+\cO(x^{N_f-N})$ ($C(x)=P_N(x)$, in the range $N_f < N$).

1005: 

1006: 

1007: Now the higher singularities are achieved by the following steps:

1008: \begin{enumerate}

1009:  \item Choose the moduli parameters so that the curve \eqn{SW curve flavor 1}

1010: possesses the maximal number of massless squarks 

1011: (``highest non-baryonic branch'' \cite{APS2}). 

1012: In other words we require the factorization

1013: \begin{eqnarray}

1014: y_{N=2}^2 = x^{2\ell} \left(\tC(x)^2-4\La^{2\tN}\right)~,

1015: \label{SW curve flavor 2}

1016: \end{eqnarray}

1017: where we have introduced $\tN=N-\ell$ and $\tC(x)$ is of degree $\tN$. 

1018: Physically this means  

1019: that the Higgsing by the condensation of massless squarks 

1020: breaks the gauge symmetry down

1021: to $U(\tN)$.

1022: %%%

1023: \item We then tune the parameters in $\tC(x)$ so that the 

1024: ``reduced curve'' $\ty_{N=2}^2=\tC(x)^2-4\La^{2\tN}$ describing 

1025: the Coulomb branch of $U(\tN)$ theory

1026: possesses  the higher critical points $\ty^2 \approx x^p$,

1027: which is called the ``class 4 model'' in \cite{EHIY}.

1028: We especially focus on the case of highest criticality

1029: $p=\tN$, which is described by the curve

1030: \begin{eqnarray}

1031: && y_{N=2}^2=x^{\tN+2\ell}\left(x^{\tN} -4\La^{\tN}\right)~.

1032: \label{curve class 4} \\

1033: && (\mbox{or} ~~  y_{N=2}^2=x^{\tN+2\ell}\left(x^{\tN} +4\La^{\tN}\right) .)

1034: \nonumber

1035: %\label{curve class 4b}

1036: \end{eqnarray}

1037: \end{enumerate}

1038: It is obvious that we can work out the similar analysis 

1039: as in the previous subsection by replacing  $N$ with $\tN$.

1040: After turning on the monomial superpotential 

1041: in the range of $n$  

1042: \begin{eqnarray}

1043: \frac{\tN}{2} +1 \leq n \leq \tN-1~,

1044: \label{range k 2}

1045: \end{eqnarray}

1046: we obtain the $\cN=1$ AD points which reproduce the SW curve

1047: \eqn{curve class 4}. The vacuum bundle around this point

1048: is again an $L$-fold branched covering space with 

1049: $\dsp L={}_n C_{\tilde{N}-n}$.

1050: We can readily confirm that the squark condensation vanishes at this point 

1051: \begin{eqnarray}

1052:  \left\langle \tilde{Q}_{\tf}Q^{f}\right\rangle=\mbox{const}\times

1053: y_{N=1}(x=-m=0) =0~, ~~~ ({}^{\forall} f, \tf)~,

1054: \end{eqnarray} 

1055: using the formulas presented in \cite{Seiberg,CSW2}.

1056: 

1057: 

1058: ~

1059: 

1060: 

1061: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1062: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1063: 

1064: 

1065: 

1066: \section{Scaling Behaviors Around the $\cN=1$ AD Points}

1067: 

1068: 

1069: \indent

1070: 

1071: For the sake of simplicity we first consider the case 

1072: of pure Yang-Mills theory.

1073: We introduce the monomial superpotential $W'(x)=x^n$ \

1074: and focus on the $AD_+$ point \eqn{AD 1}. 

1075: %We here assume the color $N$ is even for simplicity. The modification

1076: %for the odd $N$ case is straightforward.

1077: The pair of relevant curves is given by 

1078: \begin{eqnarray}

1079: && \Sigma_{N=2}:~ y_{N=2}^2=x^N(x^N-4\La^N)~, \nonumber \\

1080: && \Sigma_{N=1}:~ y_{N=1}^2 = x^{2n-N}(x^N-4\La^N)~.

1081: \end{eqnarray}

1082: 

1083: 

1084: 

1085: 

1086: Our task is to evaluate the scaling behavior

1087: of the observables under the small perturbation

1088: \begin{eqnarray}

1089: W'(x) = x^n + \sum_{m=0}^{n-1}g_m \La^{n-m}x^m~,~~~ |g_m| \ll 1~.

1090: \label{small perturbation}

1091: \end{eqnarray}

1092: We can again apply the same scaling analysis given in

1093: section 2 and find

1094: \begin{eqnarray}

1095: && U_r(\{\rho^{\Delta(g_m)}g_m\})\approx \rho^{\gamma(N+2r)}U_r(\{g_m\})~, 

1096: \label{scaling U} \\

1097: && S_r(\{\rho^{\Delta(g_m)}g_m\})\approx 

1098: \rho^{\gamma\left\{2(n+r+1)-N\right\}}S_r(\{g_m\})~, 

1099: \label{scaling S} 

1100: \end{eqnarray} 

1101: where we set the scaling dimensions of the coupling constants as

1102: \begin{eqnarray}

1103: \Delta(g_m) = 2\gamma (n-m)~, ~~~ (i=0,\ldots, m-1)~.

1104: \label{Delta g}

1105: \end{eqnarray}

1106: $\gamma$ is a positive real constant to be determined 

1107: below.

1108: 

1109: 

1110: Scaling analysis fixes the ratios of the scaling dimensions

1111: of coupling constants and physical observables, but cannot determine 

1112: the overall normalization constant $\gamma$. To fix it, we 

1113: demand that the effective superpotential 

1114: $\dsp W_{\msc{eff}} \equiv 

1115: \langle \tr\, W(\Phi) \rangle$ should be a marginal operator 

1116: at the AD point\footnote

1117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1118:   {We keep  the ``effective scale parameter'' 

1119: $\La_{\msc{AD}}$ finite, which is defined by 

1120: $\La^{3-(n+1)}\left\langle \tr\, W(\Phi)\right\rangle = \mbox{const.} \times

1121: \La_{\msc{AD}}^3$ in the IR limit $\La\,\rightarrow\,\infty$.

1122: Namely, we rescale as $\La\,\rightarrow\,\La/\ep$,

1123: $g_r\, \rightarrow\, \ep^{\Delta(g_r)}g_r$, where $\Delta(g_r)$

1124: is defined by \eqn{Delta g 2} in the limit $\ep\,\rightarrow\,0$. 

1125: Explicitly, $\La_{\msc{AD}}$ is written as 

1126: $\La_{\msc{AD}} = \mbox{const.}\times \La \mu^{1/\Delta(\mu)}$,  

1127: ($\mu \equiv g_0$).

1128: %Such critical point is characterized by the behaviors of chiral

1129: %operators $\La^{3-r}U_r \propto 

1130: %\La^3\left(\La_{\msc{AD}}/\La \right)^{\Delta(U_r)}$; $U_r$ ($r<n+1$)

1131: %are ``relevant'', while $U_r$ ($r>n+1$) are ``irrelevant''.

1132: }.

1133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1134: This requirement amounts to $\Delta(U_{n+1})=3$,

1135: which implies $\gamma =3/(N+2n+2)$.

1136: In this way we arrive at the following formulas for scaling dimensions

1137: \begin{eqnarray}

1138: &&\Delta(g_m) = \frac{6(n-m)}{N+2n+2},\hskip3mm 

1139: \Delta(U_r)=\frac{3(N+2r)}{N+2n+2}, \hskip3mm \Delta(S_r)=\frac{3\big(2n-N+2(r+1)\big)}{N+2n+2}.

1140: \label{Delta g 2}

1141: \end{eqnarray}

1142: We note that 

1143: \begin{eqnarray}

1144: && W_{\msc{eff}} = \sum_{m=0}^{n} g_m U_{m+1},  

1145: \hskip4mm \Delta(g_m)+\Delta(U_{m+1})=3, \hskip5mm (g_n=1).

1146: \end{eqnarray}

1147: A general chiral perturbation 

1148: to the $SCFT_4$ describing the $\cN=1$ AD point is then given by

1149: \begin{eqnarray}

1150: \Delta S = \int d^4x d^2\theta\, \sum_m g_m \cO_{m}~, \hskip5mm 

1151: \left\langle\cO_m\right\rangle=U_{m+1}

1152: \label{N=1 perturbation}

1153: \end{eqnarray} 

1154: 

1155: 

1156: The deformation \eqn{small perturbation} resolves the singularity at $x=0$, 

1157: creating new cuts inside the circle $C$. See  Fig.2.

1158: These cuts come from the zeroes of $F_{2n-N}(x)$ in the decomposition

1159: \eqn{sol W f 1} and these are paired up to form   

1160: $n-N/2$ new ``$A$-cycles'' on $\Sigma_{N=1}$.

1161: We denote them as $A_i$ $(i=1,\ldots, n-N/2)$.

1162: These cycles together with

1163: $\tilde{A}_j$ $(j=1,\ldots, N/2)$ 

1164: compose the totality of $n$ $A$-cycles on $\Sigma_{N=1}$.

1165: The cycles $\tilde{A}_i$ and $A_i$ are separated by the length scale

1166: $\Lambda$ and describe the physics of different energy scales.

1167: Additional order parameters for the IR dynamics may be given 

1168: by the integrals of $T(x)$ and $R(x)$ along $A_i$ 

1169: (and corresponding $B$-cycles)

1170: as well as $C$ already introduced.  

1171: 

1172: 

1173: 

1174: We can show  that even with a perturbed 

1175: superpotential \eqn{small perturbation}

1176: \begin{eqnarray}

1177: \oint_{A_i} T(x) dx =0~,~~~({}^{\forall}i=1,\ldots,n-N/2)~,

1178: \label{no flux AD}

1179: \end{eqnarray}

1180: thus 

1181: \begin{equation}

1182: U_0=0.

1183: \end{equation}

1184: 

1185: 

1186: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1187: 

1188: It is easy to generalize our analysis to the non-zero flavor case 

1189: \eqn{curve class 4} by replacing the color $N$ with $\tN\equiv N-\ell$.

1190: The non-trivial point is the existence of another chiral operator

1191: $M(x)^{f}_{\tf}=\left\langle\tilde{Q}_{\tf}(x-\Phi)^{-1}Q^f

1192: \right\rangle$. However, in this case we can readily find that

1193: \begin{eqnarray}

1194: \oint_C x^rM(x)^f_{\tf} dx 

1195: = \delta^f_{\tf} \oint_C x^{r-1} \left(R(x)-R(0)\right) dx~,

1196: \end{eqnarray}

1197: based on the formulas given in \cite{Seiberg,CSW2}.

1198: We thus need not introduce new observables describing 

1199: scaling properties.

1200: We also point out the obvious relation\footnote

1201:       {Here $T(x)$ and $\tilde{T}(x)$ are explicitly written as \cite{CSW2} 

1202:     (see also \cite{NSW})

1203:    $$

1204: T(x) = \frac{d}{dx} \log \left(C(x)+y_{N=2}(x)\right)~,~~~

1205: \tilde{T}(x) = \frac{d}{dx} \log \left(\tilde{C}(x)+\ty_{N=2}(x)\right)

1206: \equiv \frac{\tilde{C}'(x)}{\ty_{N=2}(x)}~.

1207:    $$}

1208: \begin{eqnarray}

1209: T(x)=\tilde{T}(x)+\frac{\ell}{x}~,

1210: \end{eqnarray}

1211: where $\tilde{T}(x)$ is  the counterpart of $T(x)$  for 

1212: the pure gauge $U(\tN)$ theory corresponding to the curve 

1213: $\ty_{N=2}^2=\tC(x)^2-4\La^{2\tN}$ defined in the factorization relation 

1214: \eqn{SW curve flavor 2}.

1215: The scaling formulas \eqn{Delta g 2} likewise hold 

1216: with replacing  $N$ by $\tN$. 

1217: 

1218: 

1219: 

1220: ~

1221: 

1222: 

1223: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1224: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1225: \section{Summary and Comments}

1226: 

1227: \indent

1228: 

1229: 

1230: In this paper we have proposed a new class of IR fixed points

1231: with $\cN=1$ supersymmetry which occur in a theory with a

1232: monomial superpotential $W'(x)=x^n, \,N/2+1\le n \le N-1$.

1233: They are located at the ramification points in the vacuum bundle 

1234: over the coupling constant space and have been obtained 

1235: by solving $s_-=0$ or $s_+=0$ branches of the factorization equation.

1236: Turning on small perturbations,  

1237: we have analyzed  the scaling behaviors of chiral ring operators.

1238: Our results strongly suggest that these $\cN=1$ AD points define 

1239: a new universality classes of $\cN=1$ $SCFT_4$.   

1240: 

1241: We have also studied the $\cN=2$ AD points of $A_{N-1}$ type

1242: and confirmed the consistency with the approach of superstring theory 

1243: compactified on the singular CY 3-folds and described 

1244: by an $\cN=2$ minimal model coupled to the $\cN=2$ Liouville theory

1245: \cite{GKP,ES2}.

1246: In particular we have found that higher power

1247: chiral operators in the gauge theory side are identified with the 

1248: gravitational descendants in the Liouville theory. 

1249: We have found some evidence of the structure of the underlying $N$-reduced KP 

1250: hierarchy in this system.

1251: 

1252: ~

1253: 

1254: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1255: 

1256: Finally we would like to present several comments:

1257: 

1258: \noindent

1259: {\bf 1.}

1260: One might suppose that the tree level superpotential 

1261: $W(x)\approx x^{n+1}$ with higher values of $n$ 

1262: could not affect the physics of IR region, since the naive power counting 

1263: tells us that it is an irrelevant operator in the IR.

1264: One thus might guess that our $\cN=1$ AD points 

1265: belongs to the same universality class as the usual 

1266: $\cN=2$ AD points. However, as emphasized in \cite{KSS}, 

1267: these superpotentials are the {\em dangerously irrelevant\/}

1268: operators in the theory of renormalization group. 

1269: They behave as irrelevant operators around the UV fixed point

1270: (Gaussian fixed point), but do not necessarily around the IR fixed point 

1271: when they could gain large anomalous dimensions due to the strong 

1272: quantum effects. 

1273: They could modify the IR physics and generate a new universality class.

1274: Our scaling analysis actually suggests this is indeed the case:

1275: The $\cN=1$ AD points belong to the different universality classes 

1276: from the $\cN=2$ one (note that the dimension of the operator 

1277: $\tr \, \Phi^{n+1}$ is equal $\frac{N+2(n+1)}{N+2}$ \eqn{Delta N=2} 

1278: at the $\cN=2$ AD point, which is less than 3 

1279: when $\frac{N}{2}+1\leq n \leq N-1$, 

1280: and thus it is a relevant perturbation).

1281: 

1282: 

1283: ~

1284: 

1285: %%%%%%%%%

1286: \noindent

1287: {\bf 2.}

1288: We have observed that, when parameters are adjusted near the AD points,

1289: fluxes are localized on the large cycles of order $\Lambda$ 

1290: and hence move out to infinity under 

1291: the IR limit $\La \,\rightarrow\, \infty$. 

1292: This fact is essential for the appearance of non-trivial $SCFT_4$.

1293: Moreover, in the $\cN=2$ case $W'(x)=P_N(x)$,

1294: this phenomenon gives the theoretical justification why we can describe 

1295: the AD points based on the superstring compactified on 

1296: the singular $CY_3$ {\em without flux\/}. 

1297: 

1298: ~

1299: 

1300: \noindent

1301: {\bf 3.}

1302: It may be worthwhile to point out the similarity of our analysis 

1303: to that of the topological Landau-Ginzburg models 

1304: coupled with two-dimensional gravity \cite{Losev,EKYY}. 

1305: The approaches from  the integrable hierarchy \cite{CM,CMMV,IM}

1306: is  presumably useful in order to uncover the precise relation 

1307: among these models.

1308: It is also interesting to look for the string theory description 

1309: for the general $\cN=1$ AD points as in the case of $\cN=2$ points. 

1310: 

1311: 

1312: ~

1313: 

1314: %%%%

1315: \noindent

1316: {\bf 4.}

1317:  We have defined the $\cN=1$ AD points by requiring 

1318: that {\em both\/} of the Riemann surfaces

1319: $(\Sigma_{N=2}, \Sigma_{N=1})$ develop higher isolated singularities 

1320: at the same point. 

1321: If the point $x=0$ is a singular point on

1322: $\Sigma_{N=2}$, but smooth on $\Sigma_{N=1}$,

1323: no interesting IR physics will be obtained.

1324: According to the formula \eqn{dBO}, 

1325: monopole condensation persists if $y_{N=1}\not =0$ at 

1326: $x=0$ and we will be led to the

1327: confinement and mass gap. As is well-known that for $\cN=2$ AD points

1328: one needs $y_{N=2}^2\approx x^p,\,\,p\ge 3$ around the singularity $x=0$. 

1329: We have imposed in this paper a condition $y_{N=1}^2\approx x^q,\,\,q\ge 2$.

1330: %It is interesting to see if one can relax this condition.

1331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1332: In the exceptional case $y_{N=1}^2\approx x$ (where $\Sigma_{N=1}$ has 

1333: no singularity), we still have a gap-less theory. However, 

1334: it is easily found that all the VEV's of chiral operators 

1335: vanish even under the perturbed superpotential \eqn{small perturbation}. 

1336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1337: 

1338: 

1339: ~

1340: 

1341: \noindent

1342: {\bf Note added :}

1343: After the completion of this work we became aware of the papers

1344: \cite{TY,GVY,AGK}, in which $\cN=1$ extensions of Argyres-Douglas 

1345: superconformal theory have also been discussed. 

1346: We would like to thank S. Terashima,  A. Gorsky and K. Konishi 

1347: for bringing our attention to these references.

1348: 

1349: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1351: 

1352: 

1353: 

1354: ~

1355: 

1356: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1357: 

1358: 

1359: \section*{Acknowledgements}

1360: \indent

1361: 

1362: The research of T. E. and Y. S. is partially  supported by 

1363: %a Grant-in-Aid for 

1364: %the Encouragement of Young Scientists 

1365: %($\sharp 15740138$)  from 

1366: Japanese Ministry of Education, 

1367: Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

1368: 

1369: 

1370: 

1371: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1372: \newpage

1373: 

1374: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1375: 

1376: 

1377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1378: % Dijkgraaf-Vafa

1379: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1380: 

1381: \bibitem{DV1}

1382: R.~Dijkgraaf and C.~Vafa,

1383: %``Matrix models, topological strings, and supersymmetric gauge theories,''

1384: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 644}, 3 (2002)

1385: [arXiv:hep-th/0206255].

1386: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0206255;%%

1387: 

1388: \bibitem{DV2}

1389: R.~Dijkgraaf and C.~Vafa,

1390: %``On geometry and matrix models,''

1391: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 644}, 21 (2002)

1392: [arXiv:hep-th/0207106].

1393: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0207106;%%

1394: 

1395: \bibitem{DV3}

1396: R.~Dijkgraaf and C.~Vafa,

1397: %``A perturbative window into non-perturbative physics,''

1398: arXiv:hep-th/0208048.

1399: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0208048;%%

1400: 

1401: 

1402: %\bibitem{DV4}

1403: %R.~Dijkgraaf and C.~Vafa,

1404: %``N = 1 supersymmetry, deconstruction, and bosonic gauge theories,''

1405: %arXiv:hep-th/0302011.

1406: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0302011;%%

1407: 

1408: 

1409: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1410: % geometric transition in B-model

1411: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1412: 

1413: \bibitem{Vafa}

1414: C.~Vafa,

1415: %``Superstrings and topological strings at large N,''

1416: J.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 42}, 2798 (2001)

1417: [arXiv:hep-th/0008142].

1418: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0008142;%%

1419: 

1420: \bibitem{CIV}

1421: F.~Cachazo, K.~A.~Intriligator and C.~Vafa,

1422: %``A large N duality via a geometric transition,''

1423: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 603}, 3 (2001)

1424: [arXiv:hep-th/0103067].

1425: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0103067;%%

1426: 

1427: 

1428: \bibitem{CV}

1429: F.~Cachazo and C.~Vafa,

1430: %``N = 1 and N = 2 geometry from fluxes,''

1431: arXiv:hep-th/0206017.

1432: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0206017;%%

1433: 

1434: 

1435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1436: % Gopakumar-Vafa dualtiy

1437: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1438: 

1439: \bibitem{GV}

1440: R.~Gopakumar and C.~Vafa,

1441: %``On the gauge theory/geometry correspondence,''

1442: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 3}, 1415 (1999)

1443: [arXiv:hep-th/9811131].

1444: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9811131;%%

1445: 

1446: \bibitem{OV1}

1447: H.~Ooguri and C.~Vafa,

1448: %``Knot invariants and topological strings,''

1449: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 577}, 419 (2000)

1450: [arXiv:hep-th/9912123].

1451: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9912123;%%

1452: 

1453: 

1454: \bibitem{OV2}

1455: H.~Ooguri and C.~Vafa,

1456: %``Worldsheet derivation of a large N duality,''

1457: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 641}, 3 (2002)

1458: [arXiv:hep-th/0205297].

1459: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0205297;%%

1460: 

1461: 

1462: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1463: 

1464: \bibitem{DGLVZ}

1465: R.~Dijkgraaf, M.~T.~Grisaru, C.~S.~Lam, C.~Vafa and D.~Zanon,

1466: %``Perturbative computation of glueball superpotentials,''

1467: arXiv:hep-th/0211017.

1468: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0211017;%%

1469: 

1470: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1471: % CDSW

1472: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1473: \bibitem{CDSW}

1474: F.~Cachazo, M.~R.~Douglas, N.~Seiberg and E.~Witten,

1475: %``Chiral rings and anomalies in supersymmetric gauge theory,''

1476: JHEP {\bf 0212}, 071 (2002)

1477: [arXiv:hep-th/0211170].

1478: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0211170;%%

1479: 

1480: \bibitem{Seiberg}

1481: N.~Seiberg,

1482: %``Adding fundamental matter to 'Chiral rings and anomalies in  supersymmetric gauge theory',''

1483: JHEP {\bf 0301}, 061 (2003)

1484: [arXiv:hep-th/0212225].

1485: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0212225;%%

1486: 

1487: \bibitem{CSW}

1488: F.~Cachazo, N.~Seiberg and E.~Witten,

1489: %``Phases of N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theories and matrices,''

1490: JHEP {\bf 0302}, 042 (2003)

1491: [arXiv:hep-th/0301006].

1492: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301006;%%

1493: 

1494: 

1495: 

1496: \bibitem{CSW2}

1497: F.~Cachazo, N.~Seiberg and E.~Witten,

1498: %``Chiral Rings and Phases of Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,''

1499: arXiv:hep-th/0303207.

1500: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303207;%%

1501: 

1502: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1503: % Konhishi anomaly

1504: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1505: \bibitem{Konishi}

1506: K.~Konishi,

1507: %``Anomalous Supersymmetry Transformation Of Some Composite Operators In Sqcd,''

1508: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 135}, 439 (1984).

1509: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B135,439;%%

1510: K.~Konishi and K.~Shizuya,

1511: %``Functional Integral Approach To Chiral Anomalies In Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,''

1512: Nuovo Cim.\ A {\bf 90}, 111 (1985).

1513: %%CITATION = NUCIA,A90,111;%%

1514: 

1515: 

1516: 

1517: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1518: % related works

1519: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1520: 

1521: \bibitem{Feng}

1522: B.~Feng,

1523: %``Note on matrix model with massless flavors,''

1524: arXiv:hep-th/0212274.

1525: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0212274;%%

1526: 

1527: \bibitem{AO}

1528: C.~Ahn and Y.~Ookouchi,

1529: %``Phases of N = 1 supersymmetric SO / Sp gauge theories via matrix model,''

1530: JHEP {\bf 0303}, 010 (2003)

1531: [arXiv:hep-th/0302150].

1532: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0302150;%%

1533: 

1534: \bibitem{Witten}

1535: E.~Witten,

1536: %``Chiral ring of Sp(N) and SO(N) supersymmetric gauge theory in four  dimensions,''

1537: arXiv:hep-th/0302194.

1538: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0302194;%%

1539: 

1540: \bibitem{BINOR}

1541: A.~Brandhuber, H.~Ita, H.~Nieder, Y.~Oz and C.~Romelsberger,

1542: %``Chiral rings, superpotentials and the vacuum structure of N = 1  supersymmetric gauge theories,''

1543: arXiv:hep-th/0303001.

1544: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303001;%%

1545: 

1546: \bibitem{BFHN}

1547: V.~Balasubramanian, B.~Feng, M.~x.~Huang and A.~Naqvi,

1548: %``Phases of N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theories with flavors,''

1549: arXiv:hep-th/0303065.

1550: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303065;%%

1551: 

1552: \bibitem{NSW2}

1553: S.~G.~Naculich, H.~J.~Schnitzer and N.~Wyllard,

1554: %``Cubic curves from matrix models and generalized Konishi anomalies,''

1555: arXiv:hep-th/0303268.

1556: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303268;%%

1557: 

1558: \bibitem{AC}

1559: L.~F.~Alday and M.~Cirafici,

1560: %``Effective superpotentials via Konishi anomaly,''

1561: arXiv:hep-th/0304119.

1562: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0304119;%%

1563: 

1564: \bibitem{CT}

1565: R.~Casero and E.~Trincherini,

1566: %``Quivers via anomaly chains,''

1567: arXiv:hep-th/0304123.

1568: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0304123;%%

1569: 

1570: \bibitem{KRS}

1571: P.~Kraus, A.~V.~Ryzhov and M.~Shigemori,

1572: %``Loop equations, matrix models, and N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theories,''

1573: arXiv:hep-th/0304138.

1574: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0304138;%%

1575: 

1576: 

1577: 

1578: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1579: % SW

1580: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1581: 

1582: \bibitem{SW}

1583: N.~Seiberg and E.~Witten,

1584: %``Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,''

1585: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 426}, 19 (1994)

1586: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 430}, 485 (1994)]

1587: [arXiv:hep-th/9407087];

1588: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9407087;%%

1589: N.~Seiberg and E.~Witten,

1590: %``Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,''

1591: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 431}, 484 (1994)

1592: [arXiv:hep-th/9408099].

1593: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9408099;%%

1594: 

1595: 

1596: 

1597: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1598: % coupling constant space

1599: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1600: \bibitem{Ferrari}

1601: %\bibitem{Ferrari:2002kq}

1602: F.~Ferrari,

1603: %``Quantum parameter space and double scaling limits in N = 1 super  Yang-Mills theory,''

1604: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 085013 (2003)

1605: [arXiv:hep-th/0211069];

1606: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0211069;%%

1607: %F.~Ferrari,

1608: %``Quantum parameter space in super Yang-Mills. II,''

1609: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 557}, 290 (2003)

1610: [arXiv:hep-th/0301157].

1611: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301157;%%

1612: 

1613: 

1614: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1615: % AD SCFT

1616: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1617: 

1618: 

1619: \bibitem{AD}

1620: P.~C.~Argyres and M.~R.~Douglas,

1621: %``New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory,''

1622: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 448}, 93 (1995)

1623: [arXiv:hep-th/9505062].

1624: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9505062;%%

1625: 

1626: \bibitem{APSW}

1627: P.~C.~Argyres, M.~Ronen Plesser, N.~Seiberg and E.~Witten,

1628: %``New N=2 Superconformal Field Theories in Four Dimensions,''

1629: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 461}, 71 (1996)

1630: [arXiv:hep-th/9511154].

1631: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9511154;%%

1632: 

1633: \bibitem{EHIY}

1634: T.~Eguchi, K.~Hori, K.~Ito and S.~K.~Yang,

1635: %``Study of $N=2$ Superconformal Field Theories in $4$ Dimensions,''

1636: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 471}, 430 (1996)

1637: [arXiv:hep-th/9603002].

1638: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9603002;%%

1639: 

1640: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1641: % singular CY

1642: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1643: 

1644: \bibitem{GVW}

1645: S.~Gukov, C.~Vafa and E.~Witten,

1646: %``CFT's from Calabi-Yau four-folds,''

1647: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 584}, 69 (2000)

1648: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 608}, 477 (2001)]

1649: [arXiv:hep-th/9906070].

1650: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9906070;%%

1651: 

1652: \bibitem{ShV}

1653: A.~D.~Shapere and C.~Vafa,

1654: %``BPS structure of Argyres-Douglas superconformal theories,''

1655: arXiv:hep-th/9910182.

1656: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9910182;%%

1657: 

1658: 

1659: \bibitem{GKP}

1660: A.~Giveon, D.~Kutasov and O.~Pelc,

1661: %``Holography for non-critical superstrings,''

1662: JHEP {\bf 9910}, 035 (1999)

1663: [arXiv:hep-th/9907178].

1664: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9907178;%%

1665: 

1666: 

1667: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1668: % Generalized Kontsevich Model

1669: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1670: \bibitem{GKM}

1671: S.~Kharchev, A.~Marshakov, A.~Mironov, A.~Morozov and A.~Zabrodin,

1672: %``Unification of all string models with C < 1,''

1673: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 275}, 311 (1992)

1674: [arXiv:hep-th/9111037];

1675: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9111037;%%

1676: S.~Kharchev, A.~Marshakov, A.~Mironov, A.~Morozov and A.~Zabrodin,

1677: %``Towards unified theory of 2-d gravity,''

1678: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 380}, 181 (1992)

1679: [arXiv:hep-th/9201013];

1680: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9201013;%%

1681: S.~Kharchev, A.~Marshakov, A.~Mironov and A.~Morozov,

1682: %``Generalized Kontsevich model versus Toda hierarchy and discrete matrix models,''

1683: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 397}, 339 (1993)

1684: [arXiv:hep-th/9203043];

1685: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9203043;%%

1686: S.~Kharchev, A.~Marshakov, A.~Mironov and A.~Morozov,

1687: %``Landau-Ginzburg topological theories in the framework of GKM and equivalent hierarchies,''

1688: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 8}, 1047 (1993)

1689: [Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 95}, 571 (1993\ TMFZA,95,280-292.1993)]

1690: [arXiv:hep-th/9208046].

1691: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9208046;%%

1692: 

1693: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1694: 

1695: \bibitem{Pelc}

1696: O.~Pelc,

1697: %``Holography, singularities on orbifolds and 4D N = 2 SQCD,''

1698: JHEP {\bf 0003}, 012 (2000)

1699: [arXiv:hep-th/0001054].

1700: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0001054;%%

1701: 

1702: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1703: 

1704: \bibitem{Seiberg-L}

1705: N.~Seiberg,

1706: %``Notes On Quantum Liouville Theory And Quantum Gravity,''

1707: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\  {\bf 102}, 319 (1990).

1708: %%CITATION = PTPSA,102,319;%%

1709: D.~Kutasov and N.~Seiberg,

1710: %``Number Of Degrees Of Freedom, Density Of States And Tachyons In String Theory And Cft,''

1711: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 358}, 600 (1991).

1712: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B358,600;%%

1713: 

1714: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1715: 

1716: \bibitem{ES2}

1717: T.~Eguchi and Y.~Sugawara,

1718: %``D-branes in singular Calabi-Yau n-fold and N = 2 Liouville theory,''

1719: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 598}, 467 (2001)

1720: [arXiv:hep-th/0011148].

1721: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0011148;%%

1722: 

1723: 

1724: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1725: % topological LG coupled with topological gravity

1726: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1727: \bibitem{Losev}

1728: A.~Losev,

1729: %``Descendants Constructed From Matter Field In Topological Landau-Ginzburg Theories Coupled To Topological Gravity,''

1730: Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 95}, 595 (1993)

1731: [Teor.\ Mat.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 95}, 307 (1993)]

1732: [arXiv:hep-th/9211090].

1733: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9211090;%%

1734: 

1735: 

1736: \bibitem{EKYY}

1737: T.~Eguchi, H.~Kanno, Y.~Yamada and S.~K.~Yang,

1738: %``Topological strings, flat coordinates and gravitational descendants,''

1739: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 305}, 235 (1993)

1740: [arXiv:hep-th/9302048];

1741: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9302048;%%

1742: T.~Eguchi, Y.~Yamada and S.~K.~Yang,

1743: %``Topological field theories and the period integrals,''

1744: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 8}, 1627 (1993)

1745: [arXiv:hep-th/9304121].

1746: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9304121;%%

1747: 

1748: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1749: 

1750: \bibitem{deBO}

1751: J.~de Boer and Y.~Oz,

1752: %``Monopole condensation and confining phase of N = 1 gauge theories via  M-theory fivebrane,''

1753: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 511}, 155 (1998)

1754: [arXiv:hep-th/9708044].

1755: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9708044;%%

1756: 

1757: 

1758: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1759: % SW curve with flavor

1760: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1761: \bibitem{SW2}

1762: A.~Hanany and Y.~Oz,

1763: %``On the quantum moduli space of vacua of N=2 supersymmetric SU(N(c)) gauge theories,''

1764: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 452}, 283 (1995)

1765: [arXiv:hep-th/9505075];

1766: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9505075;%%

1767: P.~C.~Argyres, M.~R.~Plesser and A.~D.~Shapere,

1768: %``The Coulomb phase of N=2 supersymmetric QCD,''

1769: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 75}, 1699 (1995)

1770: [arXiv:hep-th/9505100];

1771: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9505100;%%

1772: J.~A.~Minahan and D.~Nemeschansky,

1773: %``Hyperelliptic curves for supersymmetric Yang-Mills,''

1774: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 464}, 3 (1996)

1775: [arXiv:hep-th/9507032];

1776: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9507032;%%

1777: I.~M.~Krichever and D.~H.~Phong,

1778: %``On the integrable geometry of soliton equations and N = 2  supersymmetric gauge theories,''

1779: J.\ Diff.\ Geom.\  {\bf 45}, 349 (1997)

1780: [arXiv:hep-th/9604199].

1781: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9604199;%%

1782: 

1783: 

1784: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1785: % (non-)baryonic branch

1786: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1787: \bibitem{APS2}

1788: P.~C.~Argyres, M.~Ronen Plesser and N.~Seiberg,

1789: %``The Moduli Space of N=2 SUSY {QCD} and Duality in N=1 SUSY {QCD},''

1790: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 471}, 159 (1996)

1791: [arXiv:hep-th/9603042].

1792: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9603042;%%

1793: 

1794: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1795: 

1796: 

1797: \bibitem{NSW}

1798: %S.~G.~Naculich, H.~J.~Schnitzer and N.~Wyllard,

1799: %``The N = 2 U(N) gauge theory prepotential and periods from a  perturbative matrix model calculation,''

1800: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 651}, 106 (2003)

1801: %[arXiv:hep-th/0211123];

1802: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0211123;%%

1803: S.~G.~Naculich, H.~J.~Schnitzer and N.~Wyllard,

1804: %``Matrix model approach to the N = 2 U(N) gauge theory with matter in the  fundamental representation,''

1805: JHEP {\bf 0301}, 015 (2003)

1806: [arXiv:hep-th/0211254].

1807: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0211254;%%

1808: 

1809: 

1810: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1811: % generalized Seiberg duality

1812: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1813: %\bibitem{Kutasov}

1814: %D.~Kutasov,

1815: %``A Comment on duality in N=1 supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,''

1816: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 351}, 230 (1995)

1817: %[arXiv:hep-th/9503086].

1818: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9503086;%%

1819: 

1820: %\bibitem{KutSch}

1821: %D.~Kutasov and A.~Schwimmer,

1822: %``On duality in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,''

1823: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 354}, 315 (1995)

1824: %[arXiv:hep-th/9505004].

1825: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9505004;%%

1826: 

1827: \bibitem{KSS}

1828: D.~Kutasov, A.~Schwimmer and N.~Seiberg,

1829: %``Chiral Rings, Singularity Theory and Electric-Magnetic Duality,''

1830: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 459}, 455 (1996)

1831: [arXiv:hep-th/9510222].

1832: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9510222;%%

1833: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1834: 

1835: 

1836: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1837: % relation to Whitham hierarchy

1838: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1839: \bibitem{CM}

1840: L.~Chekhov and A.~Mironov,

1841: %``Matrix models vs. Seiberg-Witten/Whitham theories,''

1842: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 552}, 293 (2003)

1843: [arXiv:hep-th/0209085].

1844: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0209085;%%

1845: 

1846: \bibitem{CMMV}

1847: L.~Chekhov, A.~Marshakov, A.~Mironov and D.~Vasiliev,

1848: %``DV and WDVV,''

1849: arXiv:hep-th/0301071.

1850: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301071;%%

1851: 

1852: \bibitem{IM}

1853: H.~Itoyama and A.~Morozov,

1854: %``Experiments with the WDVV equations for the gluino-condensate  prepotential: The cubic (two-cut) case,''

1855: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 555}, 287 (2003)

1856: [arXiv:hep-th/0211259];

1857: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0211259;%%

1858: %H.~Itoyama and A.~Morozov,

1859: %``Gluino-condensate (CIV-DV) prepotential from its Whitham-time  derivatives,''

1860: arXiv:hep-th/0301136.

1861: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301136;%%

1862: 

1863: 

1864: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1865: 

1866: \bibitem{TY}

1867: S.~Terashima and S.~K.~Yang,

1868: %``Confining phase of N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theories and N = 2  massless solitons,''

1869: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 391}, 107 (1997)

1870: [arXiv:hep-th/9607151];

1871: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9607151;%%

1872: %\bibitem{Terashima:1997zv}

1873: %S.~Terashima and S.~K.~Yang,

1874: %``ADE confining phase superpotentials,''

1875: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 519}, 453 (1998)

1876: [arXiv:hep-th/9706076].

1877: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9706076;%%

1878: 

1879: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1880: \bibitem{GVY}

1881: A.~Gorsky, A.~I.~Vainshtein and A.~Yung,

1882: %``Deconfinement at the Argyres-Douglas point in SU(2) gauge theory with  broken N = 2 supersymmetry,''

1883: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 584}, 197 (2000)

1884: [arXiv:hep-th/0004087].

1885: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0004087;%%

1886: 

1887: 

1888: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1889: \bibitem{AGK}

1890: R.~Auzzi, R.~Grena and K.~Konishi,

1891: %``Almost conformal vacua and confinement,''

1892: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 653}, 204 (2003)

1893: [arXiv:hep-th/0211282].

1894: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0211282;%%

1895: 

1896: 

1897: 

1898: 

1899: 

1900: 

1901: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1902: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1903: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1904: 

1905: \end{thebibliography}

1906: 

1907: 

1908: 

1909: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1910: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1911: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1912: 

1913: 

1914: \begin{figure}

1915: \centering

1916: \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}

1917: %\hspace{-1.5cm}

1918: 

1919: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figure1.eps}

1920: 

1921: \caption{{\em Features of the $\cN=1$ vacuum bundle

1922: around the $\cN=1$ $AD$ points:} ~

1923: The thick line at the bottom depicts  the coupling constant space $\cS$.

1924: The $AD_+$, $AD_-$ branches are characterized by $s_-=0$, $s_+=0$

1925: respectively. $AD_{\pm}$ points are on the fiber over (dotted line)

1926: the origin $O$ of $\cS$ and are located at the $L$-fold ramification

1927: points.

1928: % with $L={}_nC_{N-n}$.

1929: The remaining lines depict the branches with $s_+s_-\neq 0$.

1930: % The vacua on them can be smoothly interpolated through the points

1931: % separated from the origin with a large distance,   

1932: % which could be less singular $AD$ points, if they share  

1933: % the same distribution $(s_+,s_-)$.

1934: }

1935: 

1936: 

1937: \end{minipage}

1938: \end{figure}

1939: 

1940: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1941: 

1942: \newpage

1943: 

1944: 

1945: \begin{figure}

1946: \centering

1947: 

1948: 

1949: \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}

1950: 

1951: 

1952: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figure2.eps}

1953: 

1954: \caption{{\em Cycles on the $\cN=1$ curve near the AD point 

1955: in the case $N=8$, $n=6$:} ~

1956: The broken lines depict the cuts. The ``long cycles'' $\tilde{A}_i$ 

1957: correspond to the zeros of $H_{N-n}(x)^2F_{2n-N}(x)-4\La^{2N}$, 

1958: %and have non-vanishing 

1959: %flux $\dsp \oint T(x) dx=2$. 

1960: %They are relevant only for the physics at energy scale 

1961: %comparable with $\La$.

1962: while the  ``short cycles'' $A_i$ correspond to the zeros of $F_{2n-N}(x)$.

1963: %and have vanishing flux  $\dsp \oint T(x) dx =0$. 

1964: Latter cycles are relevant for the IR physics. 

1965: The dotted circle $C$ defines the chiral operators in the 

1966: strong coupling $\cN=1$ $SCFT_4$ by its contour integral. 

1967: }

1968: 

1969: 

1970: 

1971: \end{minipage}

1972: \end{figure}

1973: 

1974: 

1975: 

1976: 

1977: 

1978: 

1979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1980: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1981: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1982: 

1983: 

1984: 

1985: 

1986: \end{document}

1987: 

1988: 

1989: 

1990: 

1991: 

1992: 

1993: 

1994: 

1995: 

1996: 

1997: