1: %

2: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

3: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,letterpaper,preprintnumbers,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

4: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,letterpaper,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}

5: 

6: 

7: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files

8: \usepackage{bm} % Include bold math: \bm{} creates bold letters and symbols in math mode

9: %\topmargin 4mm

10: \begin{document}

11: 

12: 

13: 

14: \title{The extremal limits of the C-metric:

15: Nariai, Bertotti-Robinson and anti-Nariai C-metrics}

16: 

17: \author{\'Oscar J. C. Dias}

18: \email{oscar@fisica.ist.utl.pt}

19: \affiliation{ Centro

20: Multidisciplinar de Astrof\'{\i}sica - CENTRA, \\Departamento de

21: F\'{\i}sica, Instituto Superior T\'ecnico, \\Av. Rovisco Pais 1,

22: 1049-001 Lisbon

23: }

24: \author{Jos\'e P. S. Lemos}

25: \email{lemos@physics.columbia.edu} \affiliation{

26: Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027

27: \\ \&\\

28: Centro

29: Multidisciplinar de Astrof\'{\i}sica - CENTRA, Departamento de

30: F\'{\i}sica, Instituto Superior T\'ecnico, Av. Rovisco Pais 1,

31: 1049-001 Lisbon,

32: }

33: 

34: \date{\today}

35: %

36: \begin{abstract}

37: In two previous papers we have analyzed the C-metric in a

38: background with a cosmological constant $\Lambda$, namely the de

39: Sitter (dS) C-metric ($\Lambda>0$), and the anti-de Sitter (AdS)

40: C-metric ($\Lambda<0$), extending thus the original work of

41: Kinnersley and Walker for the C-metric in flat spacetime

42: ($\Lambda=0$). These exact solutions describe a pair of

43: accelerated black holes in the flat or cosmological constant

44: background, with the acceleration $A$ being provided by a strut

45: in-between that pushes away the two black holes or, alternatively,

46: by strings hanging from infinity that pull them in. In this paper

47: we analyze the extremal limits of the C-metric in a background

48: with generic cosmological constant $\Lambda>0,\,\Lambda=0,\,{\rm

49: and}\;\Lambda<0$.  We follow a procedure first introduced by

50: Ginsparg and Perry in which the Nariai solution, a spacetime which

51: is the direct topological product of the 2-dimensional dS and a

52: 2-sphere, is generated from the four-dimensional dS-Schwarzschild

53: solution by taking an appropriate limit, where the black hole

54: event horizon approaches the cosmological horizon.  Similarly, one

55: can generate the Bertotti-Robinson metric from the

56: Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m  metric by taking the limit of the Cauchy

57: horizon going into the event horizon of the black hole, as well as

58: the anti-Nariai by taking an appropriate solution and limit. Using

59: these methods we generate the C-metric counterparts of the Nariai,

60: Bertotti-Robinson and anti-Nariai solutions, among others. These

61: C-metric counterparts are conformal to the product of two

62: 2-dimensional manifolds of constant curvature, the conformal

63: factor depending on the angular coordinate. In addition, the

64: C-metric extremal solutions have a conical singularity at least at

65: one of the poles of their angular surfaces.  We give a physical

66: interpretation to these solutions, e.g., in the Nariai C-metric

67: (with topology $dS_2\times \tilde{S}^2$) to each point in the

68: deformed 2-sphere $\tilde{S}^2$ corresponds a $dS_2$ spacetime,

69: except for one point which corresponds a $dS_2$ spacetime with an

70: infinite straight strut or string. There are other important new

71: features that appear. One expects that the solutions found in this

72: paper are unstable and decay into a slightly non-extreme black

73: hole pair accelerated by a strut or by strings. Moreover, the

74: Euclidean version of these solutions mediate the quantum process

75: of black hole pair creation, that accompanies the decay of the dS

76: and AdS spaces.

77: \end{abstract}

78: 

79: \pacs{04.20.Jb,04.70.Bw,04.20.Gz}

80: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}

81: 

82: \maketitle

83: 

84: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

85: \section{\label{sec:Int}Introduction}

86: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

87: 

88: 

89: 

90: 

91: Three important exact solutions of general relativity are de

92: Sitter (dS) spacetime which is a spacetime with positive

93: cosmological constant ($\Lambda>0$), Minkowski (or flat) spacetime

94: with $\Lambda=0$, and anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime with negative

95: cosmological constant ($\Lambda<0$). These stainless spacetimes,

96: with trivial topology $\mathbb{R}^4$, have nonetheless a rich

97: internal structure best displayed through the Carter-Penrose

98: diagrams \cite{hawkingellis}.  They also serve as the background

99: to spacetimes containing black holes which are then asymptotically

100: dS, flat, or AdS. These black holes in background spacetimes with

101: a cosmological constant - Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordstr\"om,

102: Kerr, and Kerr-Newman -  have a complex causal and topological

103: structure well described in \cite{carter}.

104: 

105: There are other very interesting solutions of general relativity

106: with generic cosmological constant, that are neither pure nor

107: contain a black hole, and somehow can be considered intermediate

108: type solutions. These are the Nariai, Bertotti-Robinson, and

109: anti-Nariai solutions \cite{KramSMH}.  The Nariai solution

110: \cite{Nariai,Nariai2} solves exactly the Einstein equations with

111: $\Lambda>0$, without or with a Maxwell field, and has been

112: discovered by Nariai in 1951 \cite{Nariai}. It is the direct

113: topological product of $dS_2 \times S^2$, i.e., of a

114: (1+1)-dimensional dS spacetime with a round 2-sphere of fixed

115: radius. The Bertotti-Robinson solution \cite{BertRob} is an exact

116: solution of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with any $\Lambda$, and

117: was found independently by Bertotti and Robinson in 1959. It is

118: the direct topological product of $AdS_2 \times S^2$, i.e., of a

119: (1+1)-dimensional AdS spacetime with a round 2-sphere of fixed

120: radius. The anti-Nariai solution, i.e., the AdS counterpart of the

121: Nariai solution, also exists \cite{CaldVanZer} and is an exact

122: solution of the Einstein equations with $\Lambda<0$, without or

123: with a Maxwell field. It is the direct topological product of

124: $AdS_2 \times H_2$, with $H_2$ being a 2-hyperboloid.

125: 

126: Three decades after Nariai's paper, Ginsparg and Perry

127: \cite{GinsPerry} connected the Nariai solution with the

128: Schwarzschild-dS solution. They showed that the Nariai solution

129: can be generated from a near-extreme dS black hole, through an

130: appropriate limiting procedure in which the black hole horizon

131: approaches the cosmological horizon. A similar extremal limit

132: generates the Bertotti-Robinson solution and the anti-Nariai

133: solution from an appropriate near extreme black hole (see, e.g.

134: \cite{CaldVanZer}). One of the aims of Ginsparg and Perry was to

135: study the quantum stability of the Nariai and the Schwarzschild-dS

136: solutions \cite{GinsPerry}.  It was shown that the Nariai solution

137: is in general unstable and, once created, decays through a quantum

138: tunnelling process into a slightly non-extreme black hole pair

139: (for a complete review and references on this subject see, e.g.,

140: Bousso \cite{Bousso60y}, and later discussions on our paper).  The

141: same kind of process happens for the Bertotti-Robinson and

142: anti-Nariai solutions.

143: 

144: There is yet another class of related metrics, the C-metric class,

145: which represent not one, but two black holes, being accelerate

146: apart from each other. These black holes can also inhabit a dS,

147: flat or AdS background.  Following the approach of Kinnersley and

148: Walker \cite{KW}

149: for the $\Lambda=0$ C-metric, we have analyzed in detail,

150: in two previous papers

151: \cite{OscLem_dS-C,OscLem_AdS-C}, the

152: physical interpretation and properties of the dS C-metric, i.e.,

153: the C-metric with $\Lambda>0$ \cite{OscLem_dS-C}, and of the AdS

154: C-metric, i.e., the C-metric with $\Lambda<0$ \cite{OscLem_AdS-C}.

155: As occurs with the flat C-metric,

156: the cosmological  constant C-metric describes a pair of accelerated black

157: holes with the acceleration that drives them away being provided

158: by a strut or by strings (although in the AdS C-metric case, this

159: is true only when the acceleration $A$ and the cosmological

160: constant are related by $A>|\Lambda|/3$ \cite{OscLem_AdS-C}). When

161: the acceleration is zero the C-metric reduces to a single

162: non-accelerated black hole with the usual properties.

163: 

164: It is therefore of great interest to apply the Ginsparg-Perry

165: procedure to these metrics in order to find a new set of exact

166: solutions with a clear physical and geometrical interpretation.  In

167: this paper we address this issue of the extremal limits of the

168: C-metric with a generic $\Lambda$ following \cite{GinsPerry}, in order

169: to generate the C-metric counterparts ($A \neq 0$) of the Nariai,

170: Bertotti-Robinson and anti-Nariai solutions ($A=0$),

171: among others.

172: 

173: 

174: The plan of this paper is as follows. In section

175: \ref{sec:Nariai,BR}, we describe the main features of the Nariai,

176: Bertotti-Robinson and anti-Nariai solutions. In section

177: \ref{sec:ExtLim dS}, we analyze the extremal limits of the dS

178: C-metric. We generate the Nariai C-metric, the Bertotti-Robinson

179: dS C-metric, and the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric. We

180: study the topology and the causal structure of these solutions,

181: and we give a physical interpretation. In section \ref{sec:ExtLim

182: L=0} we present the extremal limits of the flat C-metric and Ernst

183: solution, which are obtained from the solutions of section

184: \ref{sec:ExtLim dS} by taking the direct $\Lambda=0$ limit. The

185: Euclidean version of one of these $\Lambda=0$ solutions has

186: already been used previously, but we discuss two new solutions

187: that have not been discussed previously. In section

188: \ref{sec:ExtLim AdS}, we discuss the extremal limits of the AdS

189: C-metric and, in particular, we generate the anti-Nariai C-metric.

190: Finally, in section \ref{sec:Conc} concluding remarks are

191: presented.

192: 

193: 

194: 

195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

196: \section{\label{sec:Nariai,BR}Extremal limits of black hole solutions in

197: \lowercase{d}S, flat, and A\lowercase{d}S

198: spacetimes: The Nariai, Bertotti-Robinson and anti-Nariai solutions}

199: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

200: In this section we will describe the main features of the Nariai,

201: Bertotti-Robinson and anti-Nariai solutions. The extremal limits

202: of the C-metric that will be generated in later sections reduce to

203: these solutions when the acceleration parameter $A$ is set to

204: zero.

205: 

206: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

207: \subsection{\label{sec:Nariai}The Nariai solution}

208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

209: 

210: The neutral Nariai solution has been first introduced

211: by Nariai \cite{Nariai,Nariai2}. It

212: satisfies the Einstein field

213: equations  in

214: a positive cosmological constant $\Lambda$

215: background, $G_{\mu\nu}+\Lambda

216: g_{\mu\nu}=0$, and is given by

217: \begin{equation}

218: d s^2  = \Lambda^{-1}(- \sin^2\chi\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2

219: +d \theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2)\,,\label{mNariai}

220: \end{equation}

221: where $\chi$ and

222: $\theta$ both run from $0$ to $\pi$, and $\phi$ has period $2\pi$.

223: 

224: The electromagnetic extension of the Nariai solution has been

225: introduced by Bertotti and Robinson \cite{BertRob}.

226: Its gravitational field is given by

227: \begin{equation}

228: d s^2 =  \frac{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}}{ {\cal K}_0}\left (-

229: \sin^2\chi\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2 \right )

230: +{\cal R}_0^{\:2} \left ( d \theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2 \right )\,

231: \label{qNariai}

232: \end{equation}

233: where ${\cal R}_0$ is a positive constant and constant

234: ${\cal K}_0$ satisfies $0<{\cal K}_0\leq 1$, while the electromagnetic

235: field of the Nariai solution is

236: \begin{eqnarray}

237: F=q \sin \theta \, d\theta \wedge d\phi\,

238:  \label{MpotNariai}

239: \end{eqnarray}

240: in the purely magnetic case, and

241: \begin{eqnarray}

242:  F=\frac{q}{{\cal K}_0}\,\sin \chi \,d\tau \wedge d\chi \,

243:  \label{EpotNariai}

244: \end{eqnarray}

245: in the purely electric case, with $q$ being the electric or

246: magnetic charge, respectively. The cosmological constant and the

247: charge of the Nariai solution are related to ${\cal R}_0$ and

248:  ${\cal K}_0$ by

249: \begin{eqnarray}

250: & & \Lambda=\frac{1+{\cal K}_0}{2{\cal R}_0^{\:2}} \,, \nonumber \\

251: & & q^2=\frac{1-{\cal K}_0}{2}\,{\cal R}_0^{\:2}\,.

252: \label{relations}

253: \end{eqnarray}

254: Note that $0<{\cal K}_0\leq 1$, otherwise the charge is a complex

255: number. The charged Nariai solution satisfies the field equations

256: of the Einstein-Maxwell action in a positive cosmological constant

257: background, $G_{\mu\nu}+\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=8\pi T_{\mu\nu}$, with

258: $T_{\mu\nu}$ being the energy-momentum tensor of the Maxwell

259: field. The neutral Nariai solution (\ref{mNariai}) is obtained

260: from the charged solution (\ref{qNariai})-(\ref{MpotNariai}) when

261: one sets ${\cal K}_0=1$. The $\Lambda=0$ limit of the Nariai

262: solution, which is Minkowski spacetime, is taken in the Appendix

263: \ref{sec:lim L=0 Nariai}. Through a redefinition of coordinates,

264: $\sin^2\chi=1-\frac{{\cal K}_0}{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}}\: R^2$ and

265: $\tau=\sqrt{\frac{{\cal K}_0}{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}}} \, T$, the

266: spacetime (\ref{qNariai}) can be rewritten in new static

267: coordinates as

268: \begin{eqnarray}

269: d s^2 = - N(R)\, dT^2 +\frac{dR^2}{N(R)}

270: +{\cal R}_0^{\:2}\left (d \theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2 \right ),

271: \label{qNariai2}

272: \end{eqnarray}

273: with

274: \begin{eqnarray}

275: N(R)=1-\frac{{\cal K}_0}{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}} \:R^2 \, ,

276:  \label{N}

277: \end{eqnarray}

278: and the electromagnetic field changes also accordingly to the

279: coordinate transformation. Written in these coordinates, we

280: clearly see that the Nariai solution is the direct topological

281: product of $dS_2 \times S^2$, i.e., of a (1+1)-dimensional dS

282: spacetime with a round 2-sphere of fixed radius ${\cal R}_0$. This

283: spacetime is homogeneous with the same causal structure as

284: (1+1)-dimensional  dS spacetime, but it is not an asymptotically

285: 4-dimensional dS spacetime since the radius of the 2-spheres is

286: constant (${\cal R}_0$), contrarily to what happens in the dS

287: solution where this radius increases as one approaches infinity.

288: 

289: 

290: Another way \cite{Nariai2,Ortag} to see clearly the topological

291: structure of the Nariai solution is achieved by defining it

292: through its embedding in the flat manifold ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,5}$,

293: with  metric

294: \begin{eqnarray}

295: d s^2 = -dz_0^{\:\:2}+dz_1^{\:\:2}+dz_2^{\:\:2}+

296: dz_3^{\:\:2}+dz_4^{\:\:2}+dz_5^{\:\:2} \,.

297: \label{M1+5}

298: \end{eqnarray}

299: The Nariai 4-submanifold is determined by the two constraints

300: \begin{eqnarray}

301: & & -z_0^{\:\:2}+z_1^{\:\:2}+z_2^{\:\:2}= \ell^2 \:,

302:              \nonumber \\

303: & & z_3^{\:\:2}+z_4^{\:\:2}+z_5^{\:\:2}= {\cal R}_0^{\:2} \:,

304: \label{hypersurface}

305: \end{eqnarray}

306: where $\ell^2=  {\cal R}_0^{\:2}/{\cal K}_0$. The first of these

307: constraints defines the $dS_2$ hyperboloid and the second defines

308: the 2-sphere of radius ${\cal R}_0$. The parametrization of

309: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,5}$ given by $z_0=\sqrt{\ell^2-R^2}\sinh \left (

310: T/\ell \right )$, $z_1=\sqrt{\ell^2-R^2}\,\cosh \left ( T/\ell

311: \right)$, $z_2=R$, $z_3= {\cal R}_0 \sin\theta \cos\phi$, $z_4=

312: {\cal R}_0 \sin\theta \sin\phi$ and $z_5= {\cal R}_0 \cos\theta$,

313: induces the metric (\ref{qNariai2}) on the Nariai hypersurface

314: (\ref{hypersurface}).

315: 

316: 

317: 

318: Quite remarkably, Ginsparg and Perry \cite{GinsPerry} (see also

319: \cite{BoussoHawk}) have shown that the neutral Nariai solution

320: (\ref{mNariai}) can be obtained from the near-extreme

321: Schwarzschild-dS black hole through an appropriate limiting

322: procedure. By extreme we mean that the black hole horizon and the

323: cosmological horizon coincide. Hawking and Ross \cite{HawkRoss},

324: and Mann and Ross \cite{MannRoss} have concluded that a similar

325: limiting approach takes the near-extreme

326: dS$-$Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole into the charged Nariai

327: solution (\ref{qNariai}). In this case, by extreme we mean that

328: the cosmological and outer charged black hole horizons coincide.

329: We will make heavy use of this Ginsparg-Perry procedure later, so

330: we will not sketch it here. These relations between the

331: near-extreme dS black holes and the Nariai solutions are a priori

332: quite unexpected since (i) the dS black holes have a curvature

333: singularity while the Nariai solutions do not, (ii) the Nariai

334: spacetime is homogeneous unlike the dS black holes spacetimes,

335: (iii) the dS black holes approach asymptotically the 4-dimensional

336: dS spacetime while the Nariai solutions do not.

337: The Carter-Penrose diagram of the Nariai solution is equivalent to

338: the diagram of the (1+1)-dimensional dS solution, as will be

339: discussed in subsection \ref{sec:Gen Nariai}.

340: 

341: An important role played by the Nariai solution in physics is at

342: the quantum level (see Bousso \cite{Bousso60y} for a detailed

343: review of what follows). First, there is the issue of the

344: stability of the solution when perturbed quantically. Ginsparg and

345: Perry \cite{GinsPerry}, in the neutral case, and Bousso and

346: Hawking \cite{BoussoHawk} and Bousso \cite{BoussoDil}, in the

347: charged case, have shown that the Nariai solutions are quantum

348: mechanically unstable. Indeed, due to quantum fluctuations, the

349: radius ${\cal R}_0$ of the 2-spheres oscillates along the

350: non-compact spatial coordinate $\chi$ and the degenerate horizon

351: splits back into a black hole and a cosmological horizon. Those

352: 2-spheres whose radius fluctuates into a radius smaller than

353: ${\cal R}_0$ will collapse into the dS black hole interior, while

354: the 2-spheres that have a radius greater than ${\cal R}_0$ will

355: suffer an exponential expansion that generates an asymptotic dS

356: region. Therefore, the Nariai solutions are unstable and, once

357: created, they decay through the quantum tunnelling process into a

358: slightly non-extreme  dS$-$Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole pair.

359: This issue of the Nariai instability against perturbations and

360: associated evaporation process has been further analyzed by Bousso

361: and Hawking \cite{BoussoHawk-T}, by Nojiri and Odintsov

362: \cite{NojOd1}, and by Kofman, Sahni, and Starobinski

363: \cite{ShaKof}. Second, the Nariai Euclidean solution plays a

364: further role as an instanton, in the quantum decay of the dS

365: space. This decay of the dS space is accompanied by the creation

366: of a dS black hole pair, in a process that is the gravitational

367: analogue of the Schwinger pair production of charged particles in

368: an external electromagnetic field. Here, the energy necessary to

369: materialize the black hole pair and to accelerate the black holes

370: apart comes from the cosmological constant background. It is

371: important to note that not all of the dS black holes can be pair

372: produced through this quantum process of black hole pair creation.

373: Only those black holes that have regular Euclidean sections can be

374: pair created (the term regular is applied here in the context of

375: the analysis of the Hawking temperature of the horizons). The

376: Nariai instanton (regular Euclidean Nariai solution, that is

377: obtained from Eqs. (\ref{mNariai}) and (\ref{qNariai}) by setting

378: $\tau=i\bar{\tau}$), belongs to the very restrictive class of

379: solutions that are regular

380: \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BoussoHawk,BooMann,VolkovWipf}, and can

381: therefore mediate the pair creation process in the dS background.

382: In the uncharge case the Nariai instanton is even the only

383: solution that can describe the pair creation of neutral black

384: holes. Another result at the quantum level by Medved \cite{Medv}

385: indicates that quantum back-reaction effects prevent a near

386: extreme dS black hole from ever reach a Nariai state of precise

387: extremality.

388: 

389: Other extensions of the Nariai solution are the dilaton charged

390: Nariai solution found by Bousso \cite{BoussoDil}, the rotating

391: Nariai solution studied by Mellor and Moss \cite{MelMosRom}, and

392: by Booth and Mann \cite{BooMann}, and solutions that describe

393: non-expanding impulsive waves propagating in the Nariai universe

394: studied by Ortaggio \cite{Ortag}.

395: 

396: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

397: \subsection{\label{sec:BR}The Bertotti-Robinson solution}

398: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

399: 

400: The simplest Bertotti-Robinson solution \cite{BertRob} (see also

401: \cite{CaldVanZer,Lap}) is a solution of the $\Lambda=0$

402: Einstein-Maxwell equations. Its gravitational field is given by

403: \begin{eqnarray}

404: & & d s^2  = \frac{1}{q^2}(- \sinh^2\chi\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2)+

405: q^2(d

406: \theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2)\,, \nonumber \\

407: & &

408:  \label{br}

409: \end{eqnarray}

410: where $q$ is the charge of the solution, and $\chi$ is unbounded,

411: $\theta$ runs from $0$ to $\pi$ and $\phi$ has period $2\pi$. The

412: electromagnetic field of the Bertotti-Robinson solution is

413: \begin{eqnarray}

414: F=q \sin \theta \, d\theta \wedge d\phi \,,

415: \label{EpotBRmagnetic}

416: \end{eqnarray}

417: and

418: \begin{eqnarray}

419:  F=-q \,\sinh \chi \,d\tau \wedge d\chi \,,

420:   \label{EpotBRelectric}

421: \end{eqnarray}

422: in the magnetic and electric cases, respectively. Through a

423: redefinition of coordinates, $\sinh^2 \chi=R^2/q^2-1$ and

424: $\tau=T/q$, the spacetime (\ref{br}) can be rewritten in new

425: static coordinates as

426: \begin{eqnarray}

427: d s^2 = - N(R)\, dT^2 +\frac{dR^2}{N(R)}

428:  +q^2(d \theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2),

429:  \label{br2}

430: \end{eqnarray}

431: with

432: \begin{eqnarray}

433: N(R)=R^2/q^2-1 \, ,

434:  \label{N-br2}

435: \end{eqnarray}

436: and the electromagnetic field changes also accordingly to the

437: coordinate transformation. Written in these coordinates, we

438: clearly see that the Bertotti-Robinson solution is the direct

439: topological product of $AdS_2 \times S^2$, i.e., of a

440: (1+1)-dimensional AdS spacetime with a round 2-sphere of fixed

441: radius $q$.  Another way to see clearly the topological structure

442: of the Bertotti-Robinson solution is achieved by defining it

443: through its embedding in the flat manifold ${\mathbb{M}}^{2,4}$,

444: with metric

445: \begin{eqnarray}

446:  d s^2 = -dz_0^{\:\:2}+dz_1^{\:\:2}-dz_2^{\:\:2}+dz_3^{\:\:2}

447:  +dz_4^{\:\:2}+dz_5^{\:\:2} \,.

448:  \label{M1+5-br}

449:  \end{eqnarray}

450: The Bertotti-Robinson 4-submanifold is determined by the two

451: constraints

452: \begin{eqnarray}

453: & & -z_0^{\:\:2}+z_1^{\:\:2}-z_2^{\:\:2}= -q^2 \:,

454:              \nonumber \\

455: & & z_3^{\:\:2}+z_4^{\:\:2}+z_5^{\:\:2}=q^2 \,.

456: \label{hypersurface-br}

457: \end{eqnarray}

458: The first of these constraints defines the $AdS_2$ hyperboloid and

459: the second defines the 2-sphere of radius $q$. The parametrization

460: of ${\mathbb{M}}^{2,4}$,

461:  $z_0=\sqrt{R^2-q^2}\,\sinh \left ( T/q \right)$,

462:  $ z_1=\sqrt{R^2-q^2}\,\cosh \left ( T/q \right )$,

463:  $ z_2= R$,

464:  $ z_3= q \sin\theta \cos\phi$,

465:  $ z_4= q\sin\theta \sin\phi$ and

466: $ z_5= q \cos\theta$, induces the metric (\ref{br2}) on the

467: Bertotti-Robinson hypersurface (\ref{hypersurface-br}). Note that

468: since the parametrization

469:  $z_0=\sqrt{q^2+\tilde{R}^2}\,\sin(\tilde{T}/q)$,

470:  $z_1=\tilde{R}$ and

471:  $z_2=\sqrt{q^2+\tilde{R}^2}\,\cos(\tilde{T}/q)$,

472: also obeys (\ref{M1+5-br}) and the first constraint of

473: (\ref{hypersurface-br}), the Bertotti-Robinson solution

474: (\ref{br2}) can also be written as

475:  $d s^2 = - N(\tilde{R})\, d\tilde{T}^2

476: +d\tilde{R}^2 / N(\tilde{R})

477:  +q^2(d \theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2)\,,$ with

478: $N(\tilde{R})=\tilde{R}^2/q^2+1\,.$

479: 

480: 

481: Following a similar procedure to the one applied in the Nariai

482: solution, the Bertotti-Robinson solution can be obtained from the

483: near-extreme Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole through an

484: appropriate limiting procedure (here,  by extreme we mean that the

485: inner black hole horizon and the outer black hole horizon

486: coincide). Later on, we will make heavy use of the Ginsparg-Perry

487: procedure, so we will not sketch it here. Generalizations of the

488: Bertotti-Robinson solution to include a cosmological constant

489: background also exist \cite{BertRob}, and are an extremal limit of

490: the near-extreme Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black holes with a

491: cosmological constant. The Carter-Penrose diagram of the

492: Bertotti-Robinson solution (with or without $\Lambda$) is

493: equivalent to the diagram of the (1+1)-dimensional AdS solution,

494: as will be discussed in subsection \ref{sec:Gen BR dS}.

495: 

496: 

497: The Hawking effect in the Bertotti-Robinson universe has been

498: studied by Lapedes \cite{Lap}, and its thermodynamic properties

499: have been analyzed by Zaslavsky

500: \cite{Zasl}, and by Mann and Solodukhin \cite{MannSolod}. In

501: \cite{Navarro} the authors have shown that quantum back-reaction

502: effects prevent a near extreme charged black hole from ever reach

503: a Berttoti-Robinson state of precise extremality. Recently,

504: Ortaggio and Podolsk\'y \cite{OrtagPod} have found exact solutions

505: that describe non-expanding impulsive waves propagating in the

506: Bertotti-Robinson universe.

507: 

508: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

509: \subsection{\label{sec:anti-Nariai}The anti-Nariai solution}

510: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

511: The anti-Nariai solution has a gravitational field given by

512: \cite{CaldVanZer}

513: \begin{eqnarray}

514: ds^2  \!\!&=&\!\! \frac{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}}{{\cal K}_0} \left(

515: -\sinh^2\chi\, d\tau^2\!  + \! d\chi^2 \right )\!  + \! {\cal

516: R}_0^{\:2}\!  \left( d\theta^2\! +\! \sinh^2\theta\,d\phi^2

517: \right), \nonumber \\

518: & &

519: \label{qNariai-a}

520: \end{eqnarray}

521: where $\chi$ and $\theta$ are unbounded, $\phi$ has period

522: $2\pi$, ${\cal R}_0$ is a positive constant, and the constant

523: ${\cal K}_0$ satisfies $1 \leq {\cal K}_0 <2$. The electromagnetic

524: field of the anti-Nariai solution is

525: \begin{eqnarray}

526: F=q \sinh \theta \, d\theta \wedge d\phi\,

527:  \label{MpotNariai-a}

528: \end{eqnarray}

529: in the purely magnetic case, and

530: \begin{eqnarray}

531: F=-\frac{q}{{\cal K}_0}\,\sinh \chi \, d\tau \wedge d\chi \,

532: \label{EpotNariai-a}

533: \end{eqnarray}

534: in the purely electric case, with $q$ being the magnetic or

535: electric charge, respectively. The cosmological constant,

536: $\Lambda<0$, and the charge of the anti-Nariai solution are

537: related to ${\cal R}_0$ and ${\cal K}_0$ by

538: \begin{eqnarray}

539: & & \Lambda=-\frac{1+{\cal K}_0}{2{\cal R}_0^{\:2}}<0

540: \,, \nonumber \\

541: & & q^2=\frac{{\cal K}_0-1}{2}\,{\cal R}_0^{\:2}\,.

542: \label{relations-a}

543: \end{eqnarray}

544: The neutral anti-Nariai solution ($q=0$) is obtained from the

545: charged solution (\ref{qNariai-a}) when one sets ${\cal K}_0=1$

546: which implies ${\cal R}_0^{\:2}=|\Lambda|^{-1}$.  The $\Lambda=0$

547: limit of the anti-Nariai solution, which is Minkowski spacetime,

548: is taken in the Appendix \ref{sec:lim L=0 Nariai}. The charged

549: anti-Nariai solution satisfies the field equations of the

550: Einstein-Maxwell action in a negative cosmological constant

551: background. Through a redefinition of coordinates, $\sinh^2\chi=1-

552: \frac{{\cal K}_0}{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}}\: R^2 $ and $\tau=

553: \sqrt{\frac{{\cal K}_0}{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}}} \: T$, the spacetime

554: (\ref{qNariai-a}) can be rewritten in static coordinates as

555: \begin{eqnarray}

556: d s^2 = - N(R)\, dT^2 +\frac{dR^2}{N(R)}

557:  +{\cal R}_0^{\:2}\left (d \theta^2+\sinh^2\theta\,d\phi^2 \right ),

558:   \nonumber \\

559:  \label{qNariai2-a}

560: \end{eqnarray}

561: with

562: \begin{eqnarray}

563: N(R)=-1+\frac{{\cal K}_0}{{\cal R}_0^{\:2}} \:R^2 \,,

564:  \label{N-a}

565: \end{eqnarray}

566: and the electromagnetic field changes also accordingly to the

567: coordinate transformation. Written in these coordinates, we

568: clearly see that the anti-Nariai solution is the direct

569: topological product of $AdS_2 \times H_2$, i.e., of a

570: (1+1)-dimensional AdS spacetime with a 2-hyperboloid of radius

571: ${\cal R}_0$. It is a homogeneous spacetime with the same causal

572: structure as (1+1)-dimensional AdS spacetime, but it is not an

573: asymptotically 4-dimensional AdS spacetime since the size of the

574: 2-hyperboloid is constant (${\cal R}_0$), contrarily to what

575: happens in the AdS solution where this radius increases as one

576: approaches infinity. Another way to see clearly the topological

577: structure of the anti-Nariai solution is achieved by defining it

578: through its embedding in the flat manifold ${\mathbb{M}}^{3,3}$

579: with metric

580: \begin{eqnarray}

581: d s^2 = -dz_0^{\:\:2}+dz_1^{\:\:2}-dz_2^{\:\:2}+dz_3^{\:\:2}

582: +dz_4^{\:\:2}-dz_5^{\:\:2} \,.

583: \label{M1+5-a}

584: \end{eqnarray}

585: The anti-Nariai 4-submanifold is determined by the two constraints

586: \begin{eqnarray}

587: & & -z_0^{\:\:2}+z_1^{\:\:2}-z_2^{\:\:2}= -\ell^2 \, , \nonumber \\

588: & & z_3^{\:\:2}+z_4^{\:\:2}-z_5^{\:\:2}= -{\cal R}_0^{\:2} \,.

589: \label{hypersurface-a}

590: \end{eqnarray}

591: where $\ell^2= {\cal R}_0^{\:2}/{\cal K}_0$. The first of these

592: constraints defines the $AdS_2$ hyperboloid and the second defines

593: the 2-hyperboloid of radius ${\cal R}_0$. The parametrization of

594: ${\mathbb{M}}^{3,3}$, $z_0=\sqrt{R^2-\ell^2}\,\sinh \left ( T/\ell

595: \right)$, $z_1=\sqrt{R^2-\ell^2}\,\cosh \left ( T/\ell \right)$,

596: $z_2=R$, $z_3= {\cal R}_0 \sinh\theta \cos\theta$, $z_4= {\cal

597: R}_0 \sinh\theta \sin\theta$ and $z_5= {\cal R}_0 \cosh\theta$

598: induces the metric (\ref{qNariai2-a}) on the anti-Nariai

599: hypersurface (\ref{hypersurface-a}).

600: 

601: Having in mind the example of the Nariai solution, we may ask if

602: the anti-Nariai solution can be obtained, through a similar

603: limiting Ginsparg-Perry procedure, from a near-extreme AdS black

604: hole. There are black holes whose horizons have topologies

605: different from spherical, such as toroidal horizons \cite{toroidal},

606: and hyperbolical horizons \cite{topological}, also called

607: topological black holes. The AdS black hole that

608: generates the anti-Nariai solution is the hyperbolic one [as

609: is clear from the angular part of Eq. (\ref{qNariai2-a})],

610: and has a cosmological horizon. We will make a further reference to their

611: properties in section \ref{sec:ExtLim AdS}. The anti-Nariai

612: solution can be obtained from the extremal limit of these black

613: holes when the black hole horizon approaches the cosmological

614: horizon.

615: 

616: A further study of the anti-Nariai solution was done in

617: \cite{OrtagPod} where  non-expanding impulsive waves propagating

618: in the anti-Nariai universe are described.

619: 

620: 

621: 

622: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

623: \section{\label{sec:ExtLim dS}Extremal limits of the \lowercase{d}S C-metric}

624: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

625: 

626: In the last section we saw that there is an appropriate extremal

627: limiting procedure, introduced by Ginsparg and Perry

628: \cite{GinsPerry}, that generates from the near-extreme black hole

629: solutions the Nariai, Bertotti-Robinson and anti-Nariai solutions.

630: Analogously, we shall apply the procedure of \cite{GinsPerry} to

631: generate new exact solutions from the near-extreme cases of the dS

632: C-metric. Specifically the C-metric counterparts of the Nariai and

633: Bertotti-Robinson solutions are found using this method. When the

634: acceleration parameter $A$ is set to zero in these new solutions,

635: we will recover the Nariai and Bertotti-Robinson solutions. First

636: we will briefly review the dS C-metric \cite{OscLem_dS-C}.

637: 

638: 

639: 

640: 

641: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

642: \subsection{\label{sec:dS C-metric}The \lowercase{d}S C-metric}

643: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

644: 

645: 

646: The massive charged dS C-metric has been found by Pleba\'nski and

647: Demia\'nski \cite{PlebDem}, and its gravitational field can be

648: written as (see, e.g., \cite{OscLem_dS-C})

649: \begin{equation}

650:  d s^2 = [A(x+y)]^{-2} (-{\cal F}dt^2+

651:  {\cal F}^{-1}dy^2+{\cal G}^{-1}dx^2+

652:  {\cal G}dz^2)\:,

653:  \label{C-metric}

654:  \end{equation}

655:  where

656:  \begin{eqnarray}

657:  & &{\cal F}(y) = -\frac{\Lambda+3A^2}{3A^2}

658:                      +y^2-2mAy^3+q^2A^2y^4, \nonumber \\

659:  & &{\cal G}(x) = 1-x^2-2mAx^3-q^2 A^2 x^4\:,

660:  \label{FG}

661:  \end{eqnarray}

662:  and the Maxwell field

663:  in the magnetic case is given by

664: \begin{eqnarray}

665:  F=-q\, dx\wedge d\phi \:,

666: \label{F-mag}

667: \end{eqnarray}

668: while in the electric case it is given by

669:  \begin{eqnarray}

670:  F=-q\, dt\wedge dy \:.

671: \label{F-el-Lorentz}

672: \end{eqnarray}

673:  This solution depends on four parameters namely, the cosmological

674:  constant $\Lambda$, $A>0$ which

675:  is the acceleration of the black holes, and $m$ and $q$ which are

676:  interpreted  as the ADM mass and electromagnetic charge of the

677:  non-accelerated black hole.  The general shape of ${\cal G}(x)$ and ${\cal

678:  F}(y)$ is represented in Fig. \ref{g3-Nariai}. The physical

679:  properties and interpretation of this solution have been analyzed

680:  by Dias and Lemos \cite{OscLem_dS-C}, and

681:  by  Podolsk\'y and Griffiths \cite{PodGrif2}.

682: 

683: \begin{figure} [t]

684: \includegraphics*[height=1.6in]{g3_nariai.eps}

685: \caption{\label{g3-Nariai} Shape of ${\cal G}(x)$ and ${\cal

686: F}(y)$ for a general non-extremal charged massive dS C-metric

687: studied in section \ref{sec:ExtLim dS}. The allowed range of $x$

688: is between $x_\mathrm{s}$ and $x_\mathrm{n}$ where ${\cal G}(x)$

689: is positive and compact. The permitted range of $y$ is $-x\leq y <

690: +\infty$. The presence of an accelerated horizon is indicated by

691: $y_A$ and the inner and outer charged horizons by $y_-$ and $y_+$.

692: In the Nariai case, $y_+$ and $y_A$ coincide (see section

693: \ref{sec:Gen Nariai}), in the Bertotti-Robinson case, $y_-$ and

694: $y_+$ coincide (see section \ref{sec:Gen BR dS}), and in the

695: Nariai Bertotti-Robinson case, $y_-$, $y_+$ and $y_A$ coincide

696: (see section \ref{sec:Gen Nariai-BR dS}). In the cases studied in

697: this paper, ${\cal G}(x)$ has only two real zeros, $x_\mathrm{s}$

698: and $x_\mathrm{n}$.

699:  }

700: \end{figure}

701: 

702: The solution has a curvature singularity at $y=+\infty$, and $y$

703: must belong to the range $-x\leq y <+\infty$. The point $y=-x$

704: corresponds to a point that is infinitely far away from the

705: curvature singularity, thus as $y$ increases we approach the

706: curvature singularity and $y+x$ is the inverse of a radial

707: coordinate. At most, ${\cal F}(y)$ can have four real zeros which

708: we label in ascending order by $y_{\rm neg}<0<y_A\leq y_+ \leq

709: y_-$. The roots $y_-$ and $y_+$ are respectively the inner and

710: outer charged black hole horizons, and $y_A$ is an acceleration

711: horizon which coincides with the cosmological horizon and has a

712: non-spherical shape, although the topology is spherical.  The

713: negative root $y_{\rm neg}$ satisfies $y_{\rm neg}<-x$ and has no

714: physical significance, i.e., it does not belong to the range

715: accessible to $y$.

716: 

717: We will demand that $x$ belongs to the interval

718: $x_\mathrm{s}\leq x\leq x_\mathrm{n}$,

719: sketched in Fig. \ref{g3-Nariai}

720: where ${\cal G}(x)\geq 0$. By doing this we guarantee that the

721: metric has the correct signature $(-+++)$ [see Eq.

722: (\ref{C-metric})] and that the angular surfaces $t=$const and

723: $y=$const are compact. For a reason that we shall explain soon we

724: will label these surfaces by $\tilde{S}^2$.

725:  In these angular surfaces we now define two

726: new coordinates,

727: \begin{eqnarray}

728:  \theta = \int_{x}^{x_\mathrm{n}}{\cal{G}}^{-1/2}dx \:,

729: \hspace{1cm} \phi &=& z/\kappa \:,

730:                              \label{ang}

731: \end{eqnarray}

732: where $\phi$ ranges between $[0,2\pi]$ and $\kappa$ is an

733: arbitrary positive constant which will be discussed later. The

734: coordinate $\theta$ ranges between the north pole,

735: $\theta=\theta_\mathrm{n}=0$, and the south pole,

736: $\theta=\theta_\mathrm{s}$ (not necessarily at $\pi$). Rewritten

737: as a function of these new coordinates, the angular part of the

738: metric becomes $ds_{\tilde{S}^2}^2=d\theta^2+\kappa^2{\cal

739: G}\,d\phi^2$.  Note that when we set $A=0$ we have

740: $x_\mathrm{s}\leq x\leq x_\mathrm{n}$, with

741: $x_\mathrm{s}=-1$ and $x_\mathrm{n}=1$, $x=\cos \theta$, ${\cal

742: G}=1-x^2=\sin^2 \theta$, and $\kappa=1$. Therefore, in this case

743: the compact angular surface $\tilde{S}^2$ is a round $S^2$ sphere

744: which justifies the label given to the new angular coordinates.

745: When we set $A \neq 0$ the compact angular surface turns into a

746: deformed 2-sphere that we represent onwards by $\tilde{S}^2$.

747: 

748: Recently, the issue of the gravitational radiation emitted

749: by uniformly accelerated sources without horizons has been

750: analyzed by Bi\v c\'ak and Krtou\v s \cite{BicKrt} and the

751: radiative properties of accelerated black holes in dS background

752: have been analyzed by Krtou\v s and Podolsk\' y \cite{KrtPod}.

753: 

754: 

755: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

756: \subsection{\label{sec:Gen Nariai}The Nariai C-metric}

757: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

758: We will generate the Nariai C-metric from a

759: special extremal limit of the

760: dS C-metric. First we will describe this particular

761: near-extreme solution and then we will generate the Nariai

762: C-metric.

763: 

764: We are interested in a particular extreme dS C-metric, for which

765: the size of the acceleration horizon $y_A$ is equal to the size of

766: the outer charged horizon $y_+$. Let us label this degenerated

767: horizon by $\rho$, i.e.,  $y_A=y_+\equiv \rho$ with $\rho < y_-$.

768:  In this case, the function ${\cal F}(y)$ can be written as

769: \begin{eqnarray}

770: {\cal F}(y) =\frac{\rho^2-3\gamma}{\rho^4}

771:  (y-y_{\rm neg})(y-y_-)(y-\rho)^2\:,

772:  \label{Fextreme}

773:  \end{eqnarray}

774: where

775: \begin{eqnarray}

776: \gamma =\frac{\Lambda+3A^2}{3A^2}\:,

777:  \label{gamma}

778:  \end{eqnarray}

779: and the roots $\rho$, $y_{\rm neg}$ and $y_-$ are given by

780: \begin{eqnarray}

781: & & \rho =\frac{3m}{4q^2A}

782:  \left ( 1- \sqrt{1-\frac{8}{9}\frac{q^2}{m^2}} \:\right )

783:  \:,  \label{zerosy1} \\

784: & & y_{\rm neg} =\frac{\gamma \rho}{\rho^2-3\gamma}

785:  \left ( 1- \sqrt{\frac{\rho^2-2\gamma}{\gamma}} \:\right )

786:  \:, \label{zerosy2} \\

787: & & y_- =\frac{\gamma \rho}{\rho^2-3\gamma}

788:  \left ( 1+ \sqrt{\frac{\rho^2-2\gamma}{\gamma}} \:\right )

789:  \:.

790:  \label{zerosy3}

791:  \end{eqnarray}

792: The mass and the charge of the solution are written as functions

793: of $\rho$ as

794: \begin{eqnarray}

795: & &m =\frac{1}{A\rho}

796:  \left ( 1- \frac{2\gamma}{\rho^2} \right )

797:  \:, \nonumber \\

798: & & q^2 =\frac{1}{A^2\rho^2}

799:  \left ( 1- \frac{3\gamma}{\rho^2} \right )

800:  \:.

801:  \label{mq}

802:  \end{eqnarray}

803: The conditions $\rho < y_-$ and $q^2 \geq 0$ require that the

804: allowed range of $\rho$ is

805: \begin{eqnarray}

806:  \sqrt{3\gamma} \leq \rho<\sqrt{6\gamma} \:.

807:  \label{range-gamma}

808: \end{eqnarray}

809: The value of $y_-$ decreases monotonically with $\rho$ and we have

810: $\sqrt{6\gamma}<y_-<+\infty$. The mass and the charge of the

811: Nariai solution, denoted now as

812: $m_{\rm N}$ and $q_{\rm N}$ respectively,

813: are monotonically increasing functions

814: of $\rho$, and as we go from $\rho=\sqrt{3\gamma}$ into

815: $\rho=\sqrt{6\gamma}$ we have

816: \begin{eqnarray}

817: & &  \frac{1}{3}

818:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}}\leq m_{\rm N}< \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}

819:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}}\:, \nonumber \\

820: & & 0 \leq q_{\rm N}< \frac{1}{2}

821:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}}\:,

822:  \label{mq-cNariai}

823:  \end{eqnarray}

824: so the $A\neq 0$ extreme ($y_A=y_+$) solution has a lower maximum

825: mass and charge, and has a lower minimum mass than the

826: corresponding $A=0$ solution \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BooMann},

827: and, for a fixed $\Lambda$, as the acceleration parameter $A$

828: grows these extreme values decrease monotonically. For a fixed

829: $\Lambda$ and for a fixed mass between $\sqrt{1/(9 \Lambda)}\leq

830: m<\sqrt{2/(9 \Lambda)}$, the allowed acceleration varies as

831: $\sqrt{1/(27m^2)-\Lambda/3} \leq A <\sqrt{2/(27m^2)-\Lambda/3}$.

832: 

833: 

834: We are now ready to obtain the Nariai C-metric.

835:  In order to generate it from the above

836: near-extreme dS C-metric we first set

837: \begin{eqnarray}

838:  y_A=\rho-\varepsilon, \:\:\:\:y_+=\rho+\varepsilon,

839:  \:\:\:\:\:\:{\rm with} \:\: \varepsilon<<1\:,

840:  \label{NariaiLimit}

841: \end{eqnarray}

842: in order that $\varepsilon$ measures the deviation from

843: degeneracy, and the limit $y_A\rightarrow y_+$ is obtained when

844: $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$. Now, we introduce a new time

845: coordinate $\tau$ and a new radial coordinate $\chi$,

846:  \begin{eqnarray}

847: t= \frac{1}{\varepsilon {\cal K}}\,\tau \:, \:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:

848: y=\rho+\varepsilon \cos\chi \:,

849:  \label{NariaiCoord}

850: \end{eqnarray}

851: where

852: \begin{eqnarray}

853: {\cal K} = -\frac{\rho^2-3\gamma}{\rho^4} (\rho-y_{\rm

854: neg})(\rho-y_-) =\frac{2(\Lambda+3A^2)}{A^2\rho^2}-1\:, \nonumber

855: \\

856: & &

857:  \label{Kfactor}

858: \end{eqnarray}

859: and condition (\ref{range-gamma}) implies $0<{\cal K}\leq 1$ with

860: $q=0\Rightarrow {\cal K}=1$. In the limit $\varepsilon \rightarrow

861: 0$, from (\ref{C-metric}) and (\ref{Fextreme}), we get the

862: gravitational field of the Nariai C-metric

863: \begin{eqnarray}

864: d s^2 &=& \frac{{\cal R}^2(x)}{{\cal K}} \left (-\sin^2\chi\,

865: d\tau^2 +d\chi^2\right ) \nonumber \\

866: & & + {\cal R}^2(x)\left

867: [{\cal G}^{-1}(x)dx^2+ {\cal G}(x)dz^2 \right ]

868:  \:,

869:  \label{Nariai-C-Metric}

870: \end{eqnarray}

871: where $\chi$ runs from $0$ to $\pi$ and

872: \begin{eqnarray}

873: & {\cal R}^2(x)=\left (Ax+\sqrt{\frac{2(\Lambda+3A^2)}{1+{\cal

874: K}}} \right )^{-2}\:,&

875: \nonumber \\

876: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!& \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!

877:  {\cal G}(x) =1-x^2

878:  -\frac{2A}{3}\sqrt

879: {\frac{(1+{\cal K})(2-{\cal K})^2}{2(\Lambda+3A^2)}}\,x^3 -

880: \frac{A^2}{4}\frac{1-{\cal K}^2}{\Lambda+3A^2} \,x^4\,.&

881:  \nonumber \\

882:  & &

883: \label{Gfactor}

884: \end{eqnarray}

885: ${\cal G}(x)$ has only two real roots, the south pole

886: $x_\mathrm{s}$ and the north pole $x_\mathrm{n}$. The angular

887: coordinate $x$ can range between these two poles, whose values are

888: calculated in Appendix \ref{sec:angular}. Under the coordinate

889: transformation (\ref{NariaiCoord}), the Maxwell field for the

890: magnetic case is still given by Eq. (\ref{F-mag}), while in the

891: electric case, (\ref{F-el-Lorentz}) becomes

892:  \begin{eqnarray}

893:  F=\frac{q}{{\cal K}}\,\sin \chi \,d\tau\wedge d\chi\:.

894: \label{F-el-Nariai}

895: \end{eqnarray}

896:  So, if we give the parameters $\Lambda$, $A$, and $q$ we can

897: construct the Nariai C-metric.

898:  The Nariai C-metric is

899: conformal to the topological product of two 2-dimensional

900: manifolds, $dS_2\times \tilde{S}^2$, with the conformal factor

901: ${\cal R}^2(x)$ depending on the angular coordinate $x$, and

902: $\tilde{S}^2$ being a deformed 2-sphere.

903: 

904:  In order to obtain the $A=0$ limit, we first set

905: $\tilde{\rho}=A\rho$ [see Eq. (\ref{zerosy1})], a parameter that

906: has a finite and well-defined value when $A\rightarrow 0$. Then

907: when $A\rightarrow 0$ we have ${\cal K} \rightarrow {\cal

908: K}_0=2\Lambda/\tilde{\rho}^2-1$ and ${\cal R}^2(x) \rightarrow

909: {\cal R}_0^{\:2}=\tilde{\rho}^{-2}$, with ${\cal R}_0^{\:2}$ and

910: ${\cal K}_0$ satisfying relations (\ref{relations}). This,

911: together with transformations (\ref{ang}), show that the Nariai

912: C-metric transforms into the Nariai solution (\ref{qNariai}) when

913: $A=0$.

914: 

915:  The limiting procedure that has been applied in this

916: subsection has generated a new exact solution that satisfies the

917: Maxwell-Einstein equations in a positive cosmological constant

918: background.

919: 

920: In order to give a physical interpretation to this extremal limit

921: of the dS C-metric, we first recall the physical interpretation of

922: the dS C-metric. This solution describes a pair of uniformly

923: accelerated black holes in a dS background, with the acceleration

924: being provided by the cosmological constant and by a strut between

925: the black holes that pushes them away or, alternatively, by a

926: string that connects and pulls the black holes in. The presence of

927: the strut or of the string is associated to the conical

928: singularities that exist in the C-metric (see, e. g.,

929: \cite{OscLem_dS-C}). Indeed, in general, if we draw a small circle

930: around the north or south pole, as the radius goes to zero, the

931: limit circunference/radius is not $2\pi$. There is a deficit angle

932: at the north pole given by (see \cite{OscLem_AdS-C,OscLem_dS-C}),

933: $\delta_\mathrm{{n}} =

934:  2\pi\left (1- \frac{\kappa}{2} |{\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{n})|\right )$

935: (where the prime means derivative with respect to $x$) and,

936: analogously, a similar conical singularity ($\delta_\mathrm{{s}}$)

937: is present at the south pole. The so far arbitrary parameter

938: $\kappa$ introduced in Eq. (\ref{ang}) plays its important role

939: here. Indeed, if we choose $\kappa^{-1}=\frac{1}{2}|{\cal

940: G}'(x_\mathrm{s})|$ we remove the conical singularity at the south

941: pole ($\delta_\mathrm{s}=0$). However, since we only have a single

942: constant $\kappa$ at our disposal and this has been fixed to avoid

943: the conical singularity at the south pole ($\delta_\mathrm{s}=0$),

944: we conclude that a conical singularity will be present at the

945: north pole with $\delta_\mathrm{n}<0$. This is associated to a

946: strut (since $\delta_\mathrm{n}<0$) that joins the two black holes

947: along their north poles and provides their acceleration. This

948: strut satisfies the relation $p=-\mu>0$, where $p$ and

949: $\mu=\delta_\mathrm{n}/(8\pi)$ are respectively its pressure and

950: its mass density (see \cite{OscLem_AdS-C}). There is another

951: alternative.  We can choose instead $\kappa^{-1}=\frac{1}{2}|{\cal

952: G}'(x_\mathrm{n})|$ and by doing so we avoid the deficit angle at

953: the north pole ($\delta_\mathrm{n}=0$), and leave a conical

954: singularity at the south pole ($\delta_\mathrm{s}>0$). This option

955: leads to the presence of a string (with $p=-\mu<0$) connecting the

956: black holes along their south poles that furnishes the

957: acceleration. Summarizing, when the conical singularity is at the

958: north pole, the pressure of the strut is positive, so it points

959: outwards and pushes the black holes apart, furnishing their

960: acceleration. When the conical singularity is at the south pole,

961: it is associated to a string between the two black holes with

962: negative pressure that pulls the black holes away from each other.

963: 

964: The causal structure of the dS C-metric has been analyzed in

965: detail in \cite{OscLem_dS-C}. The Carter-Penrose diagram of the

966: non-extreme charged dS C-metric is sketched in Fig.

967: \ref{nariai-fig}.(a) (whole figure) and has a structure that,

968: loosely speaking, can be divided into left, middle and right

969: regions. The middle region contains the null infinity, the past

970: infinity, ${\cal I^-}$, and the future infinity, ${\cal I^+}$, and

971: an accelerated Rindler-like horizon, $h_A$ (that coincides with

972: the cosmological horizon). The left and right regions both contain

973: a timelike curvature singularity (the zig-zag line), and an inner

974: ($h_-$) and an outer ($h_+$) horizons associated to the charged

975: character of the solution. This diagram represents two

976: dS$-$Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black holes that approach

977: asymptotically the Rindler-like acceleration horizon (for a more

978: detailed discussion see \cite{OscLem_dS-C}). This is also

979: schematically represented in Fig. \ref{nariai2-fig} (whole

980: figure), where we explicitly show the strut that connects the two

981: black holes and provides their acceleration.

982: 

983: Now, as we have just seen, the Nariai C-metric can be

984: appropriately obtained from the vicinity of the black hole and

985: acceleration horizons in the limit in which the size of these two

986: horizons approach each other.  We now will see that the conical

987: singularity of the dS C-metric survives  the near-extremal

988: limiting procedure that generates the Nariai C-metric. Following

989: an elucidative illustration shown in \cite{MaldStrom} for the

990: Bertotti-Robinson solution (with $\Lambda<0$ and $A=0$), this

991: near-horizon region is sketched in Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(a) as a

992: shaded area, and from it we can identify some of the features of

993: the Nariai C-metric, e.g., the curvature singularity of the

994: original dS black hole is lost in the near-extremal limiting

995: procedure. But, more important, this shaded near-horizon region

996: also allows us to construct straightforwardly the Carter-Penrose

997: diagram of the Nariai C-metric drawn in Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(b).

998: The construction steps are as follows. First, as indicated by

999: (\ref{NariaiLimit}) and the second relation of

1000: (\ref{NariaiCoord}), we let the cross lines that represent the

1001: black hole horizon [$h_+$ in Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(a)] join

1002: together with the cross lines that represent the acceleration

1003: horizon [$h_A$ in Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(a)], and so on, i.e., we

1004: do this joining ad infinitum with all the cross lines $h_+$ and

1005: $h_A$. After this step all that is left from the original diagram

1006: is a single cross line, i.e, all the spacetime that has originally

1007: contained in the shaded area of Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(a) has

1008: collapsed into two mutually perpendicular lines at $45^{\circ}$ at

1009: $y=\rho$. Now, as indicated by the first relation of

1010: (\ref{NariaiCoord}), when $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$ the time

1011: suffers an infinite blow up. To this blow up in the time

1012: corresponds an infinite expansion in the Carter-Penrose diagram in

1013: the vicinity of $y=\rho$. We then get again the shaded area of

1014: Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(a), but now the cross lines of this shaded

1015: area are all identified into a single horizon, and they no longer

1016: have the original signature associated to $h_+$ and $h_A$ that

1017: differentiated them. This is, in the shaded area of Fig.

1018: \ref{nariai-fig}.(a) we must now erase the original labels $h_+$

1019: and $h_A$. The Carter-Penrose diagram of the Nariai C-metric is

1020: then given by Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(b), which is equivalent to

1021: the diagram of the (1+1)-dimensional dS solution. Note that the

1022: diagram of the $A=0$ dS$-$Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m solution is

1023: identical to the one of Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(a), as long as we

1024: replace $h_A$ (acceleration horizon) by $h_c$ (cosmological

1025: horizon). Applying the same construction process described just

1026: above we find that the Carter-Penrose diagram of the Nariai

1027: solution ($A=0$), described in subsection \ref{sec:Nariai}, is

1028: also given by Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}.(b).

1029: \begin{figure} [t]

1030: \includegraphics*[height=2.7in]{nariai.eps}

1031: \caption{\label{nariai-fig}

1032:  (a) The whole figure is the Carter-Penrose

1033: diagram of the dS C-metric.

1034:  The shaded region represents the near-horizon area that, when the black hole

1035:  horizon ($h_+$) approaches the acceleration horizon ($h_+$), gives the $dS_2$

1036:  manifold of the Nariai C-metric solution. See discussion in the

1037:  text.

1038:  (b) Carter-Penrose diagram of the Nariai C-metric.

1039:  }

1040: \end{figure}

1041: \begin{figure} [t]

1042: \includegraphics*[height=2.4in]{nariai_hyp.eps}

1043: \caption{\label{nariai2-fig}

1044:  The whole figure represents schematically the two black holes of

1045:  the dS C-metric approaching asymptotically the Rindler-like acceleration horizon.

1046:  They are accelerated by a strut that joins them along their

1047:  north poles.

1048:  The shaded region represents the near-horizon area that, when the black hole

1049:  horizon approaches the acceleration horizon, gives the Nariai C-metric

1050:  solution (compare with Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}). The strut survives

1051:  to the limiting process.

1052:  }

1053: \end{figure}

1054: 

1055: The Nariai near-horizon region is also sketched in Fig.

1056: \ref{nariai2-fig} as a shaded area. This schematic figure is

1057: clarifying in the sense that it indicates that the strut that

1058: connects the two original black holes along their north pole

1059: directions survives to the near-extremal limiting process and will

1060: be present in the final result of the process, i.e., in the Nariai

1061: C-metric. Indeed, note that the endpoints of the strut are at the

1062: north pole of the event horizons of the two black holes and

1063: crosses the acceleration horizon. As we saw just above, this

1064: region suffers first a collapse followed by an infinite blow up

1065: and during the process the strut is not lost. Thus the Nariai

1066: C-metric (\ref{Nariai-C-Metric})-(\ref{Gfactor}) describes a

1067: spacetime that is conformal to the product $dS_2\times

1068: \tilde{S}^2$. To each point in the deformed 2-sphere corresponds a

1069: $dS_2$ spacetime, except for one point which corresponds a $dS_2$

1070: spacetime with an infinite straight strut. This strut has negative

1071: mass density given by

1072: \begin{equation}

1073:  \mu =\frac{1}{4}{\biggl (}1- {\biggl |}\frac{{\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{{n}})}

1074:  {{\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{{s}})}

1075:  {\biggl |}{\biggr )}\:,

1076:  \label{mass-density}

1077:  \end{equation}

1078: where ${\cal G}'(x)$ is the derivative of Eq. (\ref{Gfactor}), and

1079: with a positive pressure $p=-\mu>0$. Alternatively, if we remove

1080: the conical singularity at the north pole, the Nariai C-metric

1081: describes a string with positive mass density

1082:  $\mu =(1/4) \left ( 1- |{\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{{s}})/

1083:  {\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{{n}})| \right )$

1084: and negative pressure $p=-\mu<0$.

1085: 

1086: 

1087: As we have said in subsection \ref{sec:Nariai}, the Nariai

1088: solution ($A=0$) is unstable and, once created, it decays through

1089: the quantum tunnelling process into a slightly non-extreme black

1090: hole pair. We then expect that the Nariai C-metric is also

1091: unstable and that it will decay into a slightly non-extreme pair

1092: of black holes accelerated by a strut or by a string. The Nariai

1093: C-metric instanton also plays an important role in the decay of

1094: the dS space, since it can mediate the Schwinger-like quantum

1095: process of pair creation of black holes in a dS background

1096: \cite{OscLem-PCdS}. Indeed, as we said in subsection

1097: \ref{sec:Nariai}, the Nariai instanton ($A=0$) has been used

1098: \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BooMann,VolkovWipf} to study the pair

1099: creation of dS black holes materialized and accelerated by the

1100: cosmological background field. Moreover, the Euclidean ``Nariai"

1101: flat C-metric \cite{flatPC} and Ernst solution \cite{ErnstPC}

1102: (also discussed in this paper in section \ref{sec:dS C-metric})

1103: have been used to analyze the process of pair production of

1104: $\Lambda=0$ black holes, accelerated by a string or by an

1105: electromagnetic external field, respectively. Therefore, it is

1106: natural to expect that the Euclidean Nariai limit of the dS

1107: C-metric mediates the process of pair creation of black holes in a

1108: cosmological background, that are then accelerated by a string, in

1109: addition to the cosmological background field. The picture would

1110: be that of the nucleation, in a dS background, of a Nariai C

1111: universe, whose string then breaks down and a pair of dS black

1112: holes is created at the endpoints of the string. This expectation

1113: is confirmed in \cite{OscLem-PCdS}.

1114: 

1115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1116: \subsection{\label{sec:Gen BR dS}The Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric}

1117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1118: 

1119: Now, we are interested in another particular extreme dS C-metric

1120: (usually called cold solution when $A=0$

1121: \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BooMann}) for which the size of the outer

1122: charged black hole horizon $y_+$ is equal to the size of the inner

1123: charged horizon $y_-$. Let us label this degenerated horizon by

1124: $\rho$, such that, $y_+=y_-\equiv \rho$ and $\rho > y_A$. This

1125: solution requires the presence of the electromagnetic charge. In

1126: this case, the function ${\cal F}(y)$ can be written as

1127: \begin{eqnarray}

1128: {\cal F}(y) =\frac{\rho^2-3\gamma}{\rho^4}

1129:  (y-y_{\rm neg})(y-y_A)(y-\rho)^2\:,

1130:  \label{Fextreme-br}

1131:  \end{eqnarray}

1132: with $\gamma$ given by Eq. (\ref{gamma}), the roots $\rho$ and

1133: $y_{\rm neg}$ are defined by Eqs. (\ref{zerosy1}) and

1134: (\ref{zerosy2}), respectively, and $y_A$ is given by

1135: \begin{eqnarray}

1136:  y_A =\frac{\gamma \rho}{\rho^2-3\gamma}

1137:  \left ( 1+ \sqrt{\frac{\rho^2-2\gamma}{\gamma}} \:\right )

1138:  \:.

1139:  \label{zerosy3-br}

1140:  \end{eqnarray}

1141: Eq. (\ref{mq}) defines the mass and the charge of the solution as

1142: a function of $\rho$, and, for a fixed $A$ and $\Lambda$, the

1143: ratio $q/m$ is higher than $1$. The conditions $\rho> y_A$ and

1144: $q^2 > 0$ require that the allowed range of $\rho$ is

1145: \begin{eqnarray}

1146: \rho>\sqrt{6\gamma} \:.

1147:  \label{range-gamma-br}

1148: \end{eqnarray}

1149: The value of $y_A$ decreases monotonically with $\rho$ and we have

1150: $\sqrt{\gamma}<y_A<\sqrt{6\gamma}$. Contrary to the Nariai case,

1151: the mass and the charge of the Bertotti-Robinson solution,

1152: $m_{\rm BR}$ and $q_{\rm BR}$, respectively,

1153: are monotonically

1154: decreasing functions of $\rho$, and as we come from $\rho=+\infty$

1155: into $\rho=\sqrt{6\gamma}$ we have

1156: \begin{eqnarray}

1157: & &  0< m_{\rm BR}< \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}

1158:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}}\:, \nonumber \\

1159: & & 0< q_{\rm BR}< \frac{1}{2}

1160:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}}\:,

1161:  \label{mq-cold}

1162:  \end{eqnarray}

1163: so the $A\neq 0$ extreme ($y_+=y_-$) solution has a lower maximum

1164: mass and charge than the corresponding $A=0$ solution

1165: \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BooMann} and, for a fixed $\Lambda$, as

1166: the acceleration parameter $A$ grows this maximum value decreases

1167: monotonically. For a fixed $\Lambda$ and for a fixed mass below

1168: $\sqrt{2/(9 \Lambda)}$, the maximum value of the acceleration is

1169: $\sqrt{2/(27m^2)-\Lambda/3}$.

1170: 

1171: We are now ready to generate the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric

1172: from the above cold dS C-metric. We first set

1173: \begin{eqnarray}

1174:  y_+=\rho-\varepsilon, \:\:\:\:y_-=\rho+\varepsilon,

1175:  \:\:\:\:\:\:{\rm with} \:\: \varepsilon<<1\:,

1176:  \label{NariaiLimit-br}

1177: \end{eqnarray}

1178: in order that $\varepsilon$ measures the deviation from

1179: degeneracy, and the limit $y_+\rightarrow y_-$ is obtained when

1180: $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$. Now, we introduce a new time

1181: coordinate $\tau$ and a new radial coordinate $\chi$,

1182:  \begin{eqnarray}

1183: t= \frac{1}{\varepsilon {\cal K}}\,\tau \:, \:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:

1184: y=\rho+\varepsilon \cosh\chi \:,

1185:  \label{NariaiCoord-br}

1186: \end{eqnarray}

1187: where

1188: \begin{eqnarray}

1189: {\cal K} =\frac{\rho^2-3\gamma}{\rho^4}

1190:  (\rho-y_{\rm neg})(\rho-y_A)

1191: = 1-\frac{2(\Lambda+3A^2)}{A^2\rho^2}\:, \nonumber \\

1192: & &

1193:  \label{Kfactor-br}

1194: \end{eqnarray}

1195: and condition (\ref{range-gamma-br}) implies $0<{\cal K}<1$. In

1196: the limit $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$, from (\ref{C-metric}) and

1197: (\ref{Fextreme-br}), the metric becomes

1198: \begin{eqnarray}

1199: d s^2 &=& \frac{{\cal R}^2(x)}{{\cal K}}

1200: \left (-\sinh^2\chi\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2\right ) \nonumber \\

1201: &+&

1202:  {\cal R}^2(x)\left [{\cal G}^{-1}(x)dx^2+ {\cal G}(x)dz^2 \right ]

1203:  \:,

1204:  \label{br-ds-C-Metric}

1205: \end{eqnarray}

1206: where $\chi$ is unbounded and

1207: \begin{eqnarray}

1208:  &{\cal R}^2(x)=

1209: \left(Ax+\sqrt{\frac{2(\Lambda+3A^2)}{1-{\cal K}}}\right )^{-2}

1210: \:, & \nonumber \\

1211:  & {\cal G}(x) = 1-x^2

1212:  -\frac{2A}{3}

1213: \sqrt{\frac{(1-{\cal K})(2+{\cal K})^2}{2(\Lambda+3A^2)}}\,x^3

1214:   -\frac{A^2}{4}\frac{1-{\cal K}^2}{\Lambda+3A^2} \,x^4\:.& \nonumber \\

1215: & &

1216:  \label{Gfactor-br}

1217: \end{eqnarray}

1218: ${\cal G}(x)$ has only two real roots, the south pole

1219: $x_\mathrm{s}$ and the north pole $x_\mathrm{n}$. The angular

1220: coordinate $x$ can range between these two poles whose value is

1221: calculated in appendix \ref{sec:angular}. Under the coordinate

1222: transformation (\ref{NariaiCoord-br}), the Maxwell field for the

1223: magnetic case is still given by Eq. (\ref{F-mag}), while in the

1224: electric case, (\ref{F-el-Lorentz}) becomes

1225:  \begin{eqnarray}

1226:  F=-\frac{q}{{\cal K}}\,\sinh \chi \,d\tau\wedge d\chi\:.

1227:  \label{F-el-br}

1228: \end{eqnarray}

1229: So, if we give the parameters $\Lambda$, $A$, and $q$ we can

1230: construct the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric.  This solution is

1231: conformal to the topological product of two 2-dimensional

1232: manifolds, $AdS_2\times \tilde{S}^2$, with the conformal factor

1233: ${\cal R}^2(x)$ depending on the angular coordinate $x$.

1234: 

1235: In order to obtain the $A=0$ limit, we first set

1236: $\tilde{\rho}=A\rho$ [see Eq. (\ref{zerosy1})], a parameter that

1237: has a finite and well-defined value when $A\rightarrow 0$. Then

1238: when $A\rightarrow 0$ we have ${\cal K} \rightarrow {\cal

1239: K}_0=1-2\Lambda/\tilde{\rho}^2$ and ${\cal R}^2(x) \rightarrow

1240: {\cal R}_0^{\:2}=\tilde{\rho}^{-2}$. This, together with

1241: transformations (\ref{ang}), show that the Bertotti-Robinson dS

1242: C-metric transforms into the dS counterpart of the

1243: Bertotti-Robinson solution discussed in subsection \ref{sec:BR},

1244: when $A=0$. The limiting procedure that has been applied in this

1245: subsection has generated a new exact solution that satisfies the

1246: Maxwell-Einstein equations in a positive cosmological constant

1247: background.

1248: 

1249: \begin{figure} [t]

1250: \includegraphics*[height=2.0in]{bert_rob.eps}

1251: \caption{\label{br-fig}

1252:  (a) The whole figure is the Carter-Penrose diagram of the dS C-metric.

1253:  The shaded region represents the near-horizon area that, when the

1254: inner black hole

1255:  horizon ($h_-$) approaches the outer black hole horizon ($h_+$),

1256: gives the $AdS_2$

1257:  manifold of the Bertotti-Robinson C-metric. See discussion in the

1258:  text.

1259:   (b) Carter-Penrose diagram of the Bertotti-Robinson C-metric.

1260:  }

1261: \end{figure}

1262: 

1263: We have just seen that the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric can be

1264: appropriately obtained from the vicinity of the inner and outer

1265: black hole horizons in the limit in which the size of these two

1266: horizons approach each other. This near-horizon region is sketched

1267: in Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(a) as a shaded area, and from it we can

1268: construct straightforwardly the Carter-Penrose diagram of the

1269: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric drawn in Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(b). The

1270: construction steps are as follows. First, as indicated by

1271: (\ref{NariaiLimit-br}) and the second relation of

1272: (\ref{NariaiCoord-br}), we let the cross lines that represent the

1273: black hole Cauchy  horizon [$h_-$ in Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(a)] join

1274: together with the cross lines that represent the  black hole event

1275: horizon [$h_+$ in Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(a)], and so on, i.e., we do

1276: this junction ad infinitum with all the cross lines $h_-$ and

1277: $h_+$. After this step all that is left from the original diagram

1278: is a single cross line, i.e, all the spacetime that has originally

1279: contained in the shaded area of Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(a) has

1280: collapsed into two mutually perpendicular lines at $45^{\circ}$ at

1281: $y=\rho$. Now, as indicated by the first relation of

1282: (\ref{NariaiCoord-br}), when $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$ the time

1283: suffers an infinite blow up. To this blow up in the time

1284: corresponds an infinite expansion in the Carter-Penrose diagram in

1285: the vicinity of $y=\rho$ that generates an $AdS_2$ region. We then

1286: get again the shaded area of Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(a), but now the

1287: cross lines of this shaded area are all identified into a single

1288: line, and they no longer have the original lables associated to

1289: $h_-$ and $h_+$ that differentiated them. This is, in the shaded

1290: area of Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(a) we must now erase the original

1291: labels $h_-$ and $h_+$. The Carter-Penrose diagram of the

1292: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric is then given by Fig.

1293: \ref{br-fig}.(b), which is equivalent to the diagram of the

1294: (1+1)-dimensional AdS solution. Note that the diagram of the $A=0$

1295: Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m$-$dS solution is identical to the one of

1296: Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(a). Therefore, applying the same construction

1297: process described just above we find that the Carter-Penrose

1298: diagram of the Bertotti-Robinson dS solution ($A=0$) is similar to

1299: the one of Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(b). The diagram of the

1300: Bertotti-Robinson solution with $\Lambda=0$ described by

1301: (\ref{br}) is also given by  Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(b).

1302: 

1303: \begin{figure} [t]

1304: \includegraphics*[height=2.0in]{br_hyp.eps}

1305: \caption{\label{br2-fig}

1306:  The whole figure represents schematically the two accelerated black holes of

1307:  the dS C-metric.

1308:  The shaded region represents the near-horizon area that, when the

1309: inner black hole

1310:  horizon approaches the outer black hole horizon, gives

1311:  the Bertotti-Robinson C-metric (compare with Fig. \ref{br-fig}).

1312: The strut does not

1313:  survive to the limiting process.

1314:  }

1315: \end{figure}

1316: 

1317: The Bertotti-Robinson near-horizon region is also sketched in Fig.

1318: \ref{br2-fig} as a shaded area. This schematic figure is

1319: clarifying in the sense that it indicates that the strut that

1320: connects the two original black holes along their north pole

1321: directions does not survive to the near-extremal limiting process

1322: and will not be present in the final result of the process, i.e.,

1323: in the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric. However, a reminiscence of

1324: this strut remains in the final solution. Indeed, the angular

1325: factor of the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric [which, remind,

1326: describes a deformed 2-sphere $\tilde{S}^2$ with a fixed size

1327: ${\cal R}^2(x)$ given by  (\ref{Gfactor-br})] has a conical

1328: singularity at least at one of its poles. We can choose the

1329: parameter $\kappa$, introduced in (\ref{ang}), in order to have a

1330: conical singularity only at the north pole

1331: ($\delta_\mathrm{s}=0$), or only at the south pole

1332: ($\delta_\mathrm{n}=0$), however we cannot eliminate both. When

1333: the parameter $A$ is set to zero, the conical singularities

1334: disappear, the angular factor describes a round 2-sphere with

1335: fixed radius, and the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric reduces into

1336: the Bertotti-Robinson dS solution with topology $AdS_2 \times

1337: S^2$.

1338: 

1339: 

1340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1341: \subsection{\label{sec:Gen Nariai-BR dS}The Nariai Bertotti-Robinson

1342: dS C-metric}

1343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1344: As the previous sections and the label suggest, the Nariai

1345: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric will be generated  from the extremal

1346: limit of a very particular dS C-metric (usually called ultracold

1347: solution  when $A=0$ \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BooMann}) for which

1348: the size of the three horizons ($y_A$, $y_+$ and $y_-$) are equal,

1349: and let us label this degenerated horizon by $\rho$:

1350: $y_A=y_+=y_-\equiv \rho$.

1351:  In this case, the function ${\cal F}(y)$ is given by

1352: Eq. (\ref{Fextreme}) with $y_-=\rho$, and $\gamma$ defined in Eq.

1353: (\ref{gamma}). The negative root $y_{\rm neg}$ is given by Eq.

1354: (\ref{zerosy2}) and

1355: \begin{eqnarray}

1356: \rho=\sqrt{6\gamma} \:.

1357:  \label{range-gamma-N-br}

1358: \end{eqnarray}

1359: The mass and the charge

1360: of the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric solution ,

1361: $m_{\rm NBR}$ and $q_{\rm NBR}$, respectively,

1362: are given by

1363: \begin{eqnarray}

1364: & &m_{\rm NBR} =\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3}

1365:  \sqrt{\frac{1}{\Lambda+3A^2}}

1366:  \:, \nonumber \\

1367: & & q_{\rm NBR} =\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\Lambda+3A^2}}

1368:  \:,

1369:  \label{mq-N-br}

1370: \end{eqnarray}

1371: and these values are the maximum values of the mass and charge of

1372: both the Nariai C and Bertotti-Robinson C solutions, Eqs.

1373: (\ref{mq-cNariai}) and (\ref{mq-cold}), respectively. To clarify

1374: the nature of these solutions, a diagram

1375: $m\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}\times q\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}$ is plotted in

1376: Fig. \ref{nbr-mq-fig}. For a fixed value of $A$ and $\Lambda$, the

1377: allowed range of the mass and charge of the Nariai C-metric, of

1378: the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric, and of the Nariai

1379: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric is shown.

1380: \begin{figure} [t]

1381: \includegraphics*[height=2.1in]{nbr_mq.eps}

1382: \caption{\label{nbr-mq-fig}

1383:  Relation $m\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}\times

1384: q\sqrt{\Lambda+3A^2}$, for a fixed value of $A$ and $\Lambda$, for

1385: the extremal limits of the dS C-metric. $NE$ represents the Nariai

1386: C-metric (with point  $N$ representing the neutral case), $OE$

1387: represents the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric, and point $E$

1388: represents the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric.

1389:  }

1390: \end{figure}

1391: 

1392: 

1393: 

1394: We are now ready to generate the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS

1395: C-metric from the above ultracold dS C-metric. We first set

1396: \begin{eqnarray}

1397:  \rho=\sqrt{6\gamma}-\varepsilon, \:\:\:\:y_-=\sqrt{6\gamma}+\varepsilon \:,

1398:  \:\:\:\:\:\:{\rm with} \:\: \varepsilon<<1\:.

1399:  \label{NariaiLimit-N-br}

1400: \end{eqnarray}

1401: Now, we introduce a new time coordinate $\tau$ and a new radial

1402: coordinate $\chi$,

1403:  \begin{eqnarray}

1404: t= \frac{1}{2 \varepsilon^2 {\cal K}}\,\tau \:,

1405: \:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\: y=\sqrt{6\gamma}+

1406:  \varepsilon \cosh(\sqrt{2\varepsilon{\cal K}}\:\chi) \:,

1407:  \label{NariaiCoord-N-br}

1408: \end{eqnarray}

1409: where

1410: \begin{eqnarray}

1411: {\cal K} &=& \frac{\rho^2-3\gamma}{\rho^4}

1412:  (\rho-y_{\rm neg}) = \frac{1}{3}

1413:  \sqrt{\frac{2A^2}{\Lambda+3A^2}}\:.

1414:  \label{Kfactor-N-br}

1415: \end{eqnarray}

1416:  In the limit $\varepsilon \rightarrow

1417: 0$ the metric (\ref{C-metric}) becomes

1418: \begin{eqnarray}

1419: d s^2 \!\!&=&\!\! {\cal R}^2(x) \left [-\chi^2\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2

1420:  +{\cal G}^{-1}(x)dx^2+ {\cal G}(x)dz^2 \right ],

1421:  \nonumber \\

1422:  \label{Nariai-C-Metric-N-br}

1423: \end{eqnarray}

1424: with

1425: \begin{eqnarray}

1426: & {\cal R}^2(x) = \left (Ax+\sqrt{2(\Lambda+3A^2)}\right )^{-2}\:, &

1427: \nonumber \\

1428:  &  {\cal G}(x) = 1-x^2

1429:  -\frac{2A}{3}\sqrt{\frac{2}{\Lambda+3A^2}}\,x^3

1430:  - \frac{A^2}{4(\Lambda+3A^2)} \,x^4\:.&

1431:  \label{Gfactor-N-br}

1432: \end{eqnarray}

1433: ${\cal G}(x)$ has only two real roots, the south pole

1434: $x_\mathrm{s}$ and the north pole $x_\mathrm{n}$. The angular

1435: coordinate $x$ can range between these two poles whose value is

1436: calculated in appendix \ref{sec:angular}. Notice that the

1437: spacetime factor $-\chi^2\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2$ is just

1438: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}$ in Rindler coordinates. Therefore, under the

1439: usual coordinate transformation

1440: $\chi=\sqrt{\bar{x}^2-\bar{t}^{\,2}}$ and $\tau={\rm

1441: arctanh(\bar{t}/\bar{x})}$, this factor transforms into

1442: $-d\bar{t}^{\,2} +d\bar{x}^2$.

1443:  Under the coordinate transformation (\ref{NariaiCoord-N-br}), the

1444: Maxwell field for the magnetic case is still given by Eq.

1445: (\ref{F-mag}), while in the electric case, (\ref{F-el-Lorentz})

1446: becomes

1447:  \begin{eqnarray}

1448:  F=-q\,\chi \,d\tau\wedge d\chi\:.

1449:  \label{F-el-N-br}

1450: \end{eqnarray}

1451: The Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric is conformal to the

1452: topological product of two 2-dimensional manifolds,

1453: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}\times \tilde{S}^2$, with the conformal factor

1454: ${\cal R}^2(x)$ depending on the angular coordinate $x$.

1455: 

1456: 

1457: In the $A=0$ limit, ${\cal R}^2(x) \rightarrow (2\Lambda)^{-1}$,

1458: and one obtains the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson solution

1459: $ds^2=(2\Lambda)^{-1}(-d\bar{t}^{\,2} +d\bar{x}^2+ d\theta^2+

1460: \sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2)$, which has the topology

1461: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}\times S^2$ \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BooMann}).

1462: 

1463: \begin{figure} [t]

1464: \includegraphics*[height=1.7in]{nar_bert_rob.eps}

1465: \caption{\label{n-br-fig}

1466:  (a) The whole figure is the Carter-Penrose diagram of the dS C-metric.

1467:  The shaded region represents the near-horizon area that, when the

1468:  inner black hole horizon ($h_-$) and the acceleration horizon ($h_A$)

1469:  approach the outer black hole horizon ($h_+$), gives the Rindler manifold of

1470:  the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson C-metric. This shaded region is the

1471:  intersection of the shaded areas of Figs. \ref{nariai-fig}.(a) and

1472:  \ref{br-fig}.(a). See discussion in the text.

1473:  (b) Kruskal diagram of the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric.

1474:  }

1475: \end{figure}

1476: 

1477: We have just seen that the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric

1478: can be appropriately obtained from the vicinity of the accelerated

1479: and black hole horizons in the limit in which the size of these

1480: three horizons approach each other. This near-horizon region is

1481: sketched in Fig. \ref{n-br-fig}.(a) as a shaded area, and can be

1482: viewed as the intersection of the shaded areas of Figs.

1483: \ref{nariai-fig}.(a) and \ref{br-fig}.(a). From it we can

1484: construct straightforwardly, following the construction steps

1485: already sketched in subsections \ref{sec:Gen Nariai} and

1486: \ref{sec:Gen BR dS}, the Kruskal diagram of the Nariai

1487: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric drawn in Fig. \ref{n-br-fig}.(b).

1488: This diagram is equivalent to the Kruskal diagram of the Rindler

1489: solution. The strut that connects the two original black holes

1490: along their north pole directions  survives to the near-extremal

1491: limiting process. Thus the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric

1492: describes a spacetime that is conformal to the product

1493: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1} \times \tilde{S}^2$. To each point in the

1494: deformed 2-sphere corresponds a ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}$ spacetime,

1495: except for one point which corresponds a ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}$

1496: spacetime with an infinite straight strut or string, with a mass

1497: density and pressure satisfying $p=-\mu$. In an analogous way to

1498: the one that occurs with the Nariai C universe (see section

1499: \ref{sec:Gen Nariai L=0}), we expect that the Nariai

1500: Bertotti-Robinson dS C universe is unstable and, once created, it

1501: decays through the quantum tunnelling process into a slightly

1502: non-extreme black hole pair. The picture would be that of the

1503: nucleation, in a dS background, of a Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C

1504: universe, whose string then breaks down and a pair of dS black

1505: holes is created at the endpoints of the string. This expectation

1506: is confirmed in \cite{OscLem-PCdS}. When the parameter $A$ is set

1507: to zero, the conical singularities disappear (and so the strut or

1508: string are no longer present) and the angular factor describes a

1509: round 2-sphere with fixed radius, and the topology of the Nariai

1510: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric reduces into

1511: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}\times S^2$.

1512: 

1513: 

1514: 

1515: 

1516: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1517: \section{\label{sec:ExtLim L=0}Extremal limits of the flat C-metric

1518: and of the Ernst solution}

1519: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1520: The Euclidean version of the ``Nariai"  flat C-metric that will be

1521: discussed in subsection \ref{sec:Gen Nariai L=0} has already been

1522: used previously \cite{flatPC,ErnstPC,DGKT} in the study of the

1523: quantum process of pair creation of black holes. However, as far

1524: as we know, the Bertotti-Robinson  flat C-metric (discussed in

1525: subsection \ref{sec:Gen BR L=0}) and the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson

1526: flat C-metric (discussed in subsection \ref{sec:Gen Nariai-BR

1527: L=0}) have not been written explicitly.

1528: 

1529: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1530: \subsection{\label{sec:L=0 C-metric}The  flat C-metric and the Ernst solution}

1531: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1532: 

1533: %%%%%%

1534: \subsubsection{\label{sec:sub L=0 C-metric}The  flat C-metric}

1535: %%%%%%

1536: The gravitational field and the electromagnetic field of the

1537: massive charged flat C-metric is given by Eqs.

1538: (\ref{C-metric})-(\ref{F-el-Lorentz})  (see \cite{KW}), as long as

1539: we set $\Lambda=0$ in Eq. (\ref{FG}), and therefore we have now

1540: ${\cal F}(y)=-{\cal G}(-y)$ [see Fig. \ref{g3-flat} for the

1541: general shape of ${\cal F}(y)$ and ${\cal G}(x)$]. The discussion

1542: of subsection \ref{sec:dS C-metric} applies then directly also to

1543: the $\Lambda=0$ case. In particular, in general the flat C-metric

1544: has a conical singularity at one of its poles that is interpreted

1545: \cite{KW} as a strut joining the north poles of the two black

1546: holes that accelerates them apart, or alternatively, as two

1547: strings from infinity into the south pole of each one of the black

1548: holes that that pushes them into infinity. For the actual issue of

1549: the gravitational radiative properties of accelerated black holes

1550: described by the flat C-metric see Bi\v c\'ak, and Pravda and

1551: Pravdova \cite{BPP}.

1552: 

1553: \begin{figure} [t]

1554: \includegraphics*[height=1.6in]{g3_flat.eps}

1555: \caption{\label{g3-flat} Shape of ${\cal G}(x)$ and ${\cal F}(y)$

1556: for a general non-extremal charged massive flat C-metric studied

1557: in section \ref{sec:ExtLim L=0}. The allowed range of $x$ is

1558: between $x_\mathrm{s}$ and $x_\mathrm{n}$ where ${\cal G}(x)$ is

1559: positive and compact. The permitted range of $y$ is $-x\leq y <

1560: +\infty$. The presence of an accelerated horizon is indicated by

1561: $y_A$ and the inner and outer charged horizons by $y_-$ and $y_+$.

1562: In the ``Nariai" case, $y_+$ and $y_A$ coincide (see section

1563: \ref{sec:Gen Nariai L=0}), in the Bertotti-Robinson case, $y_-$

1564: and $y_+$ coincide (see section \ref{sec:Gen BR L=0}), and in the

1565: Nariai Bertotti-Robinson case, $y_-$, $y_+$ and $y_A$ coincide

1566: (see section \ref{sec:Gen Nariai-BR L=0}). Note that when $y_+$

1567: and $y_A$ coincide, the same occurs with $x_\mathrm{s}$ and

1568: $x_0$.}

1569: \end{figure}

1570: 

1571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1572: \subsubsection{\label{sec:sub Ernst}The  Ernst solution}

1573: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1574: Ernst \cite{Ernst} has employed a Harrison-type transformation to

1575: the charged flat C-metric in order to append a suitably chosen

1576: external electromagnetic field. With this procedure the Ernst

1577: solution is free of conical singularities at both poles and the

1578: acceleration that drives away the two oppositely charged

1579: Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black holes is provided by the external

1580: electromagnetic field.  The gravitational field of the Ernst

1581: solution is \cite{Ernst}

1582: \begin{eqnarray}

1583:  d s^2 = \frac{\Sigma^2 ( -{\cal F}dt^2+

1584:  {\cal F}^{-1}dy^2+{\cal G}^{-1}dx^2

1585:  +  \Sigma^{-4} {\cal G}\,dz^2 )} {[A(x+y)]^2} \:, \nonumber\\

1586:  \label{Ernst}

1587:  \end{eqnarray}

1588:  where ${\cal F}(y)$ and ${\cal G}(x)$ are given by (\ref{FG}) with

1589: $\Lambda=0$, and

1590:  \begin{eqnarray}

1591:  \Sigma(x,y)={\biggl (}1+\frac{1}{2}\, q \, {\cal E}_0\, x{\biggr )}^2

1592:    + \frac{{\cal E}_0^2 \, {\cal G}(x)}{4A^2 \,(x+y)^2}\:.

1593:  \label{factor}

1594:  \end{eqnarray}

1595: In the electric solution one has $q\equiv e$ and ${\cal E}_0\equiv

1596: E_0$, i.e., $q$ and ${\cal E}_0$  are  respectively the electric

1597: charge and the external electric field. In the magnetic solution

1598: one has $q\equiv g$ and ${\cal E}_0\equiv B_0$, i.e., $q$ and

1599: ${\cal E}_0$ are respectively the magnetic charge and the external

1600: magnetic field. The electromagnetic potential of the magnetic

1601: Ernst solution is \cite{Ernst}

1602: \begin{eqnarray}

1603:  A_{z}=-\frac{2}{\Sigma \, B_0 }{\biggl (}1

1604: +\frac{1}{2}\, g \,B_0\, x{\biggr )}\:.

1605:  \label{pot-Ernst-B}

1606: \end{eqnarray}

1607: while for the electric Ernst solution it is given by \cite{Brown}

1608: \begin{eqnarray}

1609: A_t &=& qy -\frac{E_0}{2A^2} \frac{{\cal F}(y)}{(x+y)^2}

1610:  \left ( 1+e \, E_0 \, x-\frac{1}{2} e \, E_0 \, y \right )

1611:  \nonumber \\

1612:  &-&\frac{E_0}{2A^2}(1+r_- A y)(1+r_+ A y) (1-e\,E_0\,y/2)

1613: \:,  \nonumber \\

1614: & &

1615: \label{pot-Ernst-E}

1616: \end{eqnarray}

1617: with $r_+ r_-=e^2$ and $r_+ +r_-=2m$. This exact solution

1618: describes two oppositely charged Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black

1619: holes accelerating away from each other in a magnetic Melvin or in

1620: an electric Melvin-like background, respectively.

1621: 

1622: Technically, the Harrison-type transformation employed to generate

1623: the Ernst solution introduces, in addition to the parameter $\kappa$,

1624: a new parameter, the external field

1625: ${\cal E}_0$ that when

1626: appropriately chosen allow us to eliminate the conical

1627: singularities at both poles. Indeed, applying a procedure

1628: analogous to the one employed in section \ref{sec:dS C-metric},

1629: but now focused in spacetime (\ref{Ernst}), one introduces the new

1630: angular coordinates

1631: \begin{eqnarray}

1632:  \tilde{\theta} = \int_{x_\mathrm{n}}^{x}\tilde{\cal{G}}^{-1/2}dx \:,

1633:                         \:\:\:\:\:\: \:\:\:\:\:\:

1634: \tilde{\phi} = z/\tilde{\kappa} \:,

1635:                              \label{ang-Ernst}

1636: \end{eqnarray}

1637: where $\tilde{\cal{G}}(x,y)=\Sigma^{-2}(x,y){\cal{G}}(x)$. As

1638: before, the conical singularity at the south pole is avoided by

1639: choosing

1640: \begin{equation}

1641: \tilde{\kappa}^{-1}=\frac{1}{2}\left | \tilde{\cal

1642: G}'(x_\mathrm{s}) \right | \,,

1643:   \label{k-s-Ernst}

1644:  \end{equation}

1645: while the conical singularity at the north pole can now be also

1646: eliminated by choosing the value of the external field

1647:  ${\cal E}_0$ to satisfy

1648: \begin{equation}

1649:  \left | \tilde{\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{n}) \right | =

1650:   \left | \tilde{\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{s}) \right | \:.

1651:   \label{k=Ernst}

1652: \end{equation}

1653: An interesting support to the physical interpretation given to the

1654: Ernst solution is the fact that in the particle limit, i.e.,  for

1655: small values of $mA$, the condition (\ref{k=Ernst}) implies the

1656: classical Newton's law \cite{Ernst}

1657: \begin{equation}

1658: q \, {\cal E}_0 \approx m \, A\:. \label{Lorentz}

1659: \end{equation}

1660: So, in this regime, the acceleration is indeed provided by the

1661: Lorentz force. For a more detailed discussion on the properties of

1662: the C-metric see \cite{DGKT,ErnstPC}.

1663: Note that in a cosmological constant

1664: background  the Harrison transformation does not work, since it

1665: does not leave invariant the

1666: cosmological term in the action. Thus Ernst's trick cannot be used.

1667: 

1668: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1669: \subsection{\label{sec:Gen Nariai L=0}The ``Nariai"  flat C-metric}

1670: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1671: The Nariai solution \cite{Nariai} is originally a solution in the

1672: $\Lambda>0$ background which can be obtained from a near-extremal

1673: limit of the dS black hole when the outer black horizon approaches

1674: the cosmological horizon. Therefore, it would seem not appropriate

1675: to use the name Nariai to label a $\Lambda=0$ solution. However,

1676: in the flat C-metric the acceleration horizon plays the role of

1677: the cosmological horizon. Moreover, the limit $A=0$ of the

1678: solution discussed in this subsection is equal to the limit

1679: $\Lambda=0$ of the Nariai solution (see Appendix \ref{sec:lim L=0

1680: Nariai}). In this context, we find appropriate to label this

1681: solution by ``Nariai" in between commas, in order to maintain the

1682: nomenclature of the paper.

1683: 

1684: This solution can be obtained from a near-extremal limit of the

1685: flat C-metric when the outer black horizon approaches the

1686: acceleration horizon. This is the way it has been first

1687: constructed in \cite{DGKT,ErnstPC}. However, given the Nariai

1688: C-metric ($\Lambda>0$) generated in subsection \ref{sec:Gen

1689: Nariai}, we can construct the ``Nariai"  flat C-metric

1690: ($\Lambda=0$) by taking  directly the $\Lambda=0$ limit of Eqs.

1691: (\ref{Nariai-C-Metric})-(\ref{Gfactor}). The gravitational field

1692: of the ``Nariai"  flat C-metric is then given by Eq.

1693: (\ref{Nariai-C-Metric}) with

1694: \begin{eqnarray}

1695: & {\cal R}^2(x) = A^{-2}\left (x+\sqrt{\frac{6}{1+{\cal K}}}\right

1696: )^{-2}\:,&

1697: \nonumber \\

1698:  & {\cal G}(x) = 1-x^2

1699:  -\sqrt{\frac{2(1+{\cal K})(2-{\cal K})^2}{27}}\,x^3

1700: - \frac{1-{\cal K}^2}{12} \,x^4\:, &

1701:  \label{Gfactor L=0}

1702: \end{eqnarray}

1703: where $0<{\cal K}\leq 1$ and ${\cal K}=1$ when $q=0$. ${\cal

1704: G}(x)$ has only two real roots, the south pole $x_\mathrm{s}$ and

1705: the north pole $x_\mathrm{n}$. The angular coordinate $x$ can

1706: range between these two poles whose value is calculated in

1707: Appendix \ref{sec:angular}.

1708: 

1709: There is a great difference between the Nariai C solution of the

1710: $\Lambda>0$ case and the ``Nariai'' C solution of the $\Lambda=0$

1711: case. In subsection \ref{sec:Gen Nariai} we saw that the Nariai

1712: C-metric ($\Lambda>0$) has a conical singularity at one of the

1713: poles of its deformed 2-sphere. This feature is no longer present

1714: in the ``Nariai"  flat C-metric, i.e., it is free of conical

1715: singularities. Indeed, in the flat C-metric we have ${\cal

1716: F}(y)=-{\cal G}(-y)$. Therefore, if the outer black hole horizon

1717: coincides with the acceleration horizon then the roots  $x_0$ and

1718: $x_\mathrm{s}$ of ${\cal G}(x)$ also coincide (see Fig.

1719: \ref{g3-flat}). This implies that the range of the angular

1720: coordinate $x$ becomes $x_\mathrm{s}<x\leq x_\mathrm{n}$ since the

1721: proper distance between $x_\mathrm{s}$ and $x_\mathrm{n}$ goes to

1722: infinity \cite{DGKT,ErnstPC}. The point $x_\mathrm{s}$ disappears

1723: from the $x,z$ angular section which is no longer compact but

1724: becomes topologically ${\mathbb{R}}\times S^1$ or

1725: ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. So, we have a conical singularity only at

1726: $x=x_\mathrm{n}$ which can be avoided by choosing

1727: $2\kappa^{-1}=|{\cal G}'(x_\mathrm{n})|$. Therefore,  while the

1728: Nariai C-metric ($\Lambda>0$) is topologically conformal to

1729: $dS_2\times \tilde{S}^2$, the ``Nariai"  flat C-metric is

1730: topologically conformal to $dS_2\times {\mathbb{R}}^2$. Its

1731: Carter-Penrose diagram is given by Fig. \ref{nariai-fig}(b). We

1732: could construct the ``Nariai" Ernst solution, however since its

1733: main motivation is related to the removal of the conical

1734: singularities present in the C-metric solution and in this case

1735: our ``Nariai"  flat C-metric is free of conical singularities, we

1736: will not do it.

1737: 

1738: At this point, it is appropriate to find the $A=0$ limit of the

1739: ``Nariai"  flat C-metric. This limit is not direct [see

1740: (\ref{Gfactor L=0})]. To achieve the suitable limit we first make

1741: the coordinate rescales: $\tilde{x}=\chi/A$, $\bar{y}=x/A$, and

1742: $\bar{z}=z/A$. Then, setting $A=0$, the solution becomes

1743: $ds^2=(1+{\cal K})/6\,[{\cal K}^{-1}(-\tilde{x}^2 d\tau^2

1744: +d\tilde{x}^2)+ d\bar{y}^2+ d\bar{z}^2$]. This limit agrees with

1745: the one taken from the $A=0$ Nariai solution (written in

1746: subsection \ref{sec:Nariai}) in the limit $\Lambda=0$ (see

1747: Appendix \ref{sec:lim L=0 Nariai}). Therefore, while the limit

1748: $A=0$ of the Nariai C-metric ($\Lambda>0$) is topologically

1749: $dS_2\times S^2$, the $A=0$ limit of the ``Nariai" flat C-metric

1750: is topologically ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}\times {\mathbb{R}}^2$. This

1751: is a reminiscence of the fact that with $\Lambda=0$ when $A$ goes

1752: to zero there is no acceleration horizon to play the role of

1753: cosmological horizon that supports the extremal limit taken in

1754: this subsection. As a final remark in this subsection, we note

1755: that Horowitz and Sheinblatt \cite{HorowShein} have taken a

1756: different extremal limit, which differs from the one discussed in

1757: this subsection mainly because it preserves the asymptotic

1758: behavior  and topology of the original flat C-metric solution.

1759: 

1760: 

1761: 

1762: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1763: \subsection{\label{sec:Gen BR L=0}The Bertotti-Robinson  flat C-metric}

1764: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1765: Given the Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric  generated in subsection

1766: \ref{sec:Gen BR dS}, we can construct the Bertotti-Robinson  flat

1767: C-metric by taking the direct $\Lambda=0$ limit of Eqs.

1768: (\ref{br-ds-C-Metric})-(\ref{Gfactor-br}). The gravitational field

1769: of the Bertotti-Robinson flat C-metric is then given by

1770: (\ref{br-ds-C-Metric}) with

1771: \begin{eqnarray}

1772:  &{\cal R}^2(x)=\left (Ax+\sqrt{\frac{6A^2}{1-{\cal K}}}\right

1773:  )^{-2}\:,&

1774: \nonumber \\

1775:   &{\cal G}(x) = 1-x^2

1776:  -\sqrt{\frac{2(1-{\cal K})(2+{\cal K})^2}{27}}\,x^3

1777:  -\frac{1-{\cal K}^2}{12} \,x^4\:,&

1778:  \label{Gfactor-br L=0}

1779: \end{eqnarray}

1780: and $0<{\cal K}< 1$. ${\cal G}(x)$ has only two real roots, the

1781: south pole $x_\mathrm{s}$ and the north pole $x_\mathrm{n}$. The

1782: angular coordinate $x$ can range between these two poles whose

1783: value is calculated in Appendix \ref{sec:angular}. As in the

1784: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric, this solution has topology

1785: conformal to  $AdS_2 \times \tilde{S}^2$, and a Carter-Penrose

1786: diagram drawn in Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(b). The solution has a conical

1787: singularity at one of the poles of its deformed 2-sphere

1788: $\tilde{S}^2$. In the $A=0$ limit, we have ${\cal K} \rightarrow

1789: 1$ and ${\cal R}^2(x) \rightarrow q^2$ and we obtain the

1790: Bertotti-Robinson solution (\ref{br}) discussed in subsection

1791: \ref{sec:BR}.

1792: 

1793: From the above solution we can generate the Bertotti-Robinson

1794: Ernst solution whose gravitational field is given by

1795: \begin{eqnarray}

1796: d s^2 &=& \Sigma^2(x)\frac{{\cal R}^2(x)}{{\cal K}}

1797: \left (-\sinh^2\chi\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2\right ) \nonumber \\

1798: &+&

1799:  {\cal R}^2(x)\left [\frac{\Sigma^2(x)}{{\cal G}(x)}dx^2

1800:  +\frac{{\cal G}(x)}{\Sigma^2(x)}\,dz^2 \right ]

1801:  \:.

1802:  \label{br-Ernst}

1803: \end{eqnarray}

1804: with ${\cal R}^2(x)$ and ${\cal G}(x)$ given by Eq.

1805: (\ref{Gfactor-br L=0}), and with

1806:  \begin{eqnarray}

1807:  \Sigma(x)={\biggl (}1+\frac{1}{2}\, q \, {\cal E}_0\, x{\biggr )}^2

1808:    + \frac{1}{4}{\cal E}_0^2 \, {\cal G}(x){\cal R}^2(x)\:.

1809:  \label{factor-br}

1810:  \end{eqnarray}

1811:  Its electromagnetic field is given by  Eq. (\ref{pot-Ernst-B}), in

1812:  the pure magnetic case, and by Eq. (\ref{pot-Ernst-E}), in

1813:  the pure electric case.

1814: Choosing $\tilde{\kappa}$ satisfying Eq. (\ref{k-s-Ernst}), with

1815: $\tilde{\cal{G}}(x)=\Sigma^{-2}(x){\cal{G}}(x)$,  and ${\cal E}_0$

1816: such that condition (\ref{k=Ernst}) is satisfied, the

1817: Bertotti-Robinson Ernst solution is free of conical singularities.

1818: As a final remark in this subsection, we note that Dowker,

1819: Gauntlett, Kastor and Traschen \cite{DGKT} have taken a different

1820: extremal limit, which differs from the one discussed in this

1821: subsection mainly because it preserves the asymptotic behavior and

1822: topology of the original flat C-metric solution.

1823: 

1824: 

1825: 

1826: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1827: \subsection{\label{sec:Gen Nariai-BR L=0}The ``Nariai" Bertotti-Robinson

1828: flat C-metric}

1829: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1830: 

1831: From the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric  generated in

1832: subsection \ref{sec:Gen Nariai-BR dS}, we can construct the

1833: ``Nariai" Bertotti-Robinson  flat C-metric by taking the direct

1834: $\Lambda=0$ limit of Eqs.

1835: (\ref{Nariai-C-Metric-N-br})-(\ref{Gfactor-N-br}). We can also

1836: construct the ``Nariai" Bertotti-Robinson Ernst solution. We do

1837: not do these limits here because they are now straightforward.

1838: 

1839: 

1840: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1841: \section{\label{sec:ExtLim AdS}Extremal limits of

1842: the A\lowercase{d}S C-metric}

1843: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1844: In the AdS background there are three different families of

1845: C-metrics. When we set $A=0$, each one of these families reduces

1846: to a different single AdS black hole. Before we deal with the AdS

1847: C-metric we will then briefly describe the main features of each

1848: one of these black holes.

1849: 

1850: The Einstein equations with $\Lambda<0$ admit a three-family of

1851: black hole solutions whose gravitational field is described by

1852: \begin{eqnarray}

1853: d s^2 = - V(r)\, dt^2 +\frac{dr^2}{V(r)}+r^2 d\Omega_b^2,

1854:  \label{AdS bH}

1855: \end{eqnarray}

1856: with

1857: \begin{eqnarray}

1858: V(R)=b-\frac{2m}{r}+\frac{q^2}{r^2}+\frac{|\Lambda|}{3}r^2 \:,

1859:  \label{N-AdS bh}

1860: \end{eqnarray}

1861: where $b$ can take the values $1,0,-1$ and

1862: \begin{eqnarray} \left\{ \begin{array}{l}

1863: d\Omega_b^2=d \theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2

1864: \:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:{\rm for}\:\: b=1\,,\\

1865: d\Omega_b^2=d \theta^2+d\phi^2

1866: \:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\,{\rm for}\:\: b=0 \,,\\

1867: d\Omega_b^2=d \theta^2+\sinh^2\theta\,d\phi^2 \:\:\:\:\:\: {\rm

1868: for}\:\:  b=-1\,.

1869: \end{array} \right.

1870: \label{angular AdS bh}

1871: \end{eqnarray}

1872: These three solutions describe three different kind of black

1873: holes. The black holes with $b=1$ are the usual AdS black holes

1874: with spherical topology. The black holes with $b=0$ have planar,

1875: cylindrical  or toroidal (with genus $g\geq 1$) topology and were

1876: introduced and analyzed in \cite{toroidal}. The topology of the

1877: $b=-1$ black holes is hyperbolic  or, upon compactification,

1878: toroidal with genus $g\geq 2$, and they have been analyzed in

1879: \cite{topological}. These hyperbolic black holes have negative mass. They

1880: have a cosmological horizon (contrarily to what happens with the

1881: $b=1$ and $b=0$ cases) and their charged version has only one

1882: black hole  horizon (as opposed to the charged $b=1$ and $b=0$

1883: cases which have an inner and an outer black hole horizon). The

1884: hyperbolic topology together with the presence of the cosmological

1885: horizon turn these $b=-1$ black holes into the appropriate

1886: solutions that allow the generation of the anti-Nariai solution

1887: (\ref{qNariai-a}) with the limiting Ginsparg-Perry procedure, when

1888: the black hole horizon approaches the cosmological horizon.

1889: 

1890: 

1891: 

1892: Now, to each one of these families corresponds a different AdS

1893: C-metric which has been found by Pleba\'nski and Demia\'nski

1894: \cite{PlebDem}. In what follows we will then describe each one of

1895: these solutions and, in particular, we will generate a new

1896: solution - the anti-Nariai C-metric.

1897: 

1898: 

1899: 

1900: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1901: \subsection{\label{sec:ExtLim AdS Sphere}Extremal limits of the

1902: AdS C-metric with spherical horizons}

1903: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1904: The gravitational field of the massive charged  AdS C-metric

1905: \cite{PlebDem} is given by Eq. (\ref{C-metric}) with

1906:  \begin{eqnarray}

1907:  & &{\cal F}(y) = \frac{|\Lambda|-3A^2}{3A^2}

1908:                      +y^2-2mAy^3+q^2A^2y^4, \nonumber \\

1909:  & &{\cal G}(x) = 1-x^2-2mAx^3-q^2 A^2 x^4\:,

1910:  \label{FG-spherical}

1911:  \end{eqnarray}

1912: and the electromagnetic field is given by (\ref{F-mag}) and

1913: (\ref{F-el-Lorentz}). This solution describes a pair of

1914: accelerated black holes in the AdS background \cite{OscLem_AdS-C}

1915: when the acceleration $A$ and the cosmological constant are

1916: related by $A>|\Lambda|/3$. When we set $A=0$

1917: \cite{PodEHM,OscLem_AdS-C} we obtain a single non-accelerated AdS

1918: black hole with spherical topology described by Eqs. (\ref{AdS

1919: bH})-(\ref{angular AdS bh}) with $b=1$.

1920: 

1921: In a way analogous to the one described in last sections we can

1922: generate new solutions from the extremal limits of the AdS

1923: C-metric. Since this follows straightforwardly, we do not do it

1924: here. The new relevant feature of this case is the fact that the

1925: Nariai-like extremal solution only exists when $A>|\Lambda|/3$. In

1926: this case, and only in this one, the acceleration horizon is

1927: present in the AdS C-metric and we can have the outer black hole

1928: horizon approaching it.

1929: 

1930: 

1931: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1932: \subsection{\label{sec:ExtLim AdS Toroidal}Extremal limits of the

1933: AdS C-metric with toroidal horizons }

1934: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1935: 

1936: The gravitational field of the massive charged toroidal AdS

1937: C-metric (see \cite{PlebDem,MannAdS}) is given by  Eq.

1938: (\ref{C-metric}) with

1939:  \begin{eqnarray}

1940:  & &{\cal F}(y) = \frac{|\Lambda|-3A^2}{3A^2}

1941:                     -2mAy^3+q^2A^2y^4, \nonumber \\

1942:  & &{\cal G}(x) = 1-2mAx^3-q^2 A^2 x^4\:,

1943:  \label{FG-toroidal}

1944:  \end{eqnarray}

1945: and the electromagnetic field is given by (\ref{F-mag}) and

1946: (\ref{F-el-Lorentz}). When we set $A=0$ we obtain the AdS black

1947: hole with planar, cylindrical or toroidal topology described by

1948: Eqs. (\ref{AdS bH})-(\ref{angular AdS bh}) with $b=0$

1949: \cite{toroidal}.

1950: 

1951: In a way analogous to the one described in section \ref{sec:ExtLim

1952: dS} we can generate new solutions from the extremal limits of the

1953: toroidal AdS C-metric, that are the toroidal AdS counterparts of

1954: the Nariai and Bertotti-Robinson C-metrics. Since this follows

1955: straightforwardly, we do not do it here.

1956: 

1957: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1958: \subsection{\label{sec:ExtLim AdS Topological}Extremal limits of the

1959: AdS C-metric with hyperbolic horizons}

1960: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1961: 

1962: The gravitational field of the massive charged AdS

1963: C-metric with hyperbolic horizons, the hyperbolic AdS C-metric,

1964: is given by  Eq. (\ref{C-metric}) with

1965: \cite{PlebDem,MannAdS}

1966: \begin{eqnarray}

1967: & &{\cal F}(y) = \frac{|\Lambda|+3A^2}{3A^2}

1968:                      -y^2-2mAy^3+q^2A^2y^4, \nonumber \\

1969: & &{\cal G}(x) = -1+x^2-2mAx^3-q^2 A^2 x^4\:

1970: \label{FG-topological}

1971: \end{eqnarray}

1972: (represented in Fig. \ref{g3_topol}), and the electromagnetic

1973: field is given by (\ref{F-mag}) and (\ref{F-el-Lorentz}).

1974: 

1975: This solution depends on four parameters namely, the cosmological

1976: constant $\Lambda<0$, the acceleration parameter $A>0$, and $m$

1977: and $q$ which are mass and electromagnetic charge parameters,

1978: respectively. When $A=0$ this solution reduces to the hyperbolic

1979: black holes [case $b=-1$ discussed in Eqs. (\ref{AdS

1980: bH})-(\ref{angular AdS bh})].

1981: 

1982: \begin{figure} [th]

1983: \includegraphics*[height=1.6in]{g3_topol.eps}

1984: \caption{\label{g3_topol}

1985:  Shape of ${\cal G}(x)$ and ${\cal F}(y)$ for a general non-extremal

1986: charged massive hyperbolic AdS C-metric studied in section

1987: \ref{sec:ExtLim AdS Topological}. The allowed range of $x$ is

1988: between $x_\mathrm{s}$ and $x_\mathrm{n}$ where ${\cal G}(x)$ is

1989: positive and compact. The permitted range of $y$ is $-x\leq y <

1990: +\infty$. The presence of an accelerated horizon is indicated by

1991: $y_A$ and the black hole horizon by $y_+$. In the anti-Nariai case

1992: considered in subsection \ref{sec:Gen antiNariai}, $y_A$ and $y_+$

1993: coincide. [For completeness we comment on a case not represented

1994: in the figure but discussed on the text: when $q=0$, the zero

1995: $x_\mathrm{n}$ of ${\cal G}(x)$ disappears, and ${\cal G}(x)$

1996: grows monotonically from $x=x_\mathrm{s}$ into $x=+\infty$.]

1997:  }

1998: \end{figure}

1999: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2000: \subsubsection{\label{sec:Gen antiNariai}The anti-Nariai C-metric}

2001: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2002: 

2003: 

2004: 

2005: We are interested in a particular extreme  hyperbolic AdS

2006: C-metric, for which $y_A=y_+$ (see Fig. \ref{g3_topol}), and let

2007: us label this degenerated horizon by $\rho$: $y_A=y_+\equiv \rho$.

2008: In this case, the function ${\cal F}(y)$ can be written as

2009: \begin{eqnarray}

2010: {\cal F}(y) =-\frac{\rho^2-3\gamma}{\rho^4}

2011:  (y-y_{\rm neg})(y-y'_{\rm neg})(y-\rho)^2\:,

2012:  \label{Fextreme-a}

2013:  \end{eqnarray}

2014: where

2015: \begin{eqnarray}

2016: \gamma =\frac{|\Lambda|+3A^2}{3A^2}\:,

2017:  \label{gamma-a}

2018:  \end{eqnarray}

2019: and the degenerate root $\rho$, and the negative roots $y_{\rm

2020: neg}$ and $y'_{\rm neg}$ are given by

2021: \begin{eqnarray}

2022: & & \rho =\frac{3m}{4q^2A}

2023:  \left ( 1+ \sqrt{1+\frac{8}{9}\frac{q^2}{m^2}} \:\right )

2024:  \:,  \nonumber \\

2025: & & y_{\rm neg} =-\frac{\gamma \rho}{3\gamma-\rho^2}

2026:  \left ( 1+ \sqrt{\frac{\rho^2-2\gamma}{\gamma}} \:\right )

2027:  \:, \nonumber \\

2028: & & y'_{\rm neg} =-\frac{\gamma \rho}{3\gamma-\rho^2}

2029:  \left ( 1- \sqrt{\frac{\rho^2-2\gamma}{\gamma}} \:\right )

2030:  \:.

2031:  \label{zerosy3-a}

2032:  \end{eqnarray}

2033: The mass parameter and the charge parameter of the solution are

2034: written as a function of $\rho$ as

2035: \begin{eqnarray}

2036: & &m =-\frac{1}{A\rho}

2037:  \left ( 1- \frac{2\gamma}{\rho^2} \right )

2038:  \:,  \nonumber \\

2039: & & q^2 =\frac{1}{A^2\rho^2}

2040:  \left ( \frac{3\gamma}{\rho^2}-1 \right )

2041:  \:.

2042:  \label{mq-a}

2043:  \end{eqnarray}

2044: The requirement that $y_{\rm neg}$ and $y'_{\rm neg}$ are real roots

2045: and the condition $q^2 \geq 0$ require that the allowed range of

2046: $\rho$ is

2047: \begin{eqnarray}

2048:  2\gamma < \rho^2 \leq 3\gamma \:.

2049:  \label{range-gamma-a}

2050: \end{eqnarray}

2051: The mass and the charge of the anti-Nariai type solution,

2052: $m_{\rm aN}$ and $q_{\rm aN}$, respectively,

2053: are both

2054: monotonically decreasing functions of $\rho$, and as one comes from

2055: $\rho=\sqrt{3\gamma}$ into $\rho=\sqrt{2\gamma}$ one has,

2056: \begin{eqnarray}

2057: & &  -\frac{1}{3}

2058:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{|\Lambda|+3A^2}}\leq m_{\rm aN}<0\:, \nonumber \\

2059: & & 0\leq q_{\rm aN}< \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}

2060:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{|\Lambda|+3A^2}}\:.

2061:  \label{mq-antiNariai}

2062:  \end{eqnarray}

2063: 

2064: In order to generate the anti-Nariai C-metric from the

2065: near-extreme topological AdS C-metric we first set

2066: \begin{eqnarray}

2067:  y_A=\rho-\varepsilon, \:\:\:\:y_+=\rho+\varepsilon,

2068:  \:\:\:\:\:\:{\rm with} \:\: \varepsilon<<1\:,

2069:  \label{NariaiLimit-a}

2070: \end{eqnarray}

2071: in order that $\varepsilon$ measures the deviation from

2072: degeneracy, and the limit $y_A\rightarrow y_+$ is obtained when

2073: $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$. Now, we introduce a new time

2074: coordinate $\tau$ and a new radial coordinate $\chi$,

2075:  \begin{eqnarray}

2076: t= \frac{1}{\varepsilon {\cal K}}\,\tau \:, \:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:

2077: y=\rho+\varepsilon \cosh\chi \:,

2078:  \label{NariaiCoord-a}

2079: \end{eqnarray}

2080: where

2081: \begin{eqnarray}

2082: & & \!\!\! {\cal K} = \frac{3\gamma-\rho^2}{\rho^4}

2083:  (\rho-y_{\rm neg})(\rho-y'_{\rm neg})=

2084:  \frac{2(|\Lambda|+3A^2)}{A^2\rho^2}-1\:,  \nonumber \\

2085: & &

2086:  \label{Kfactor-a}

2087: \end{eqnarray}

2088: and $2\gamma < \rho^2 \leq 3\gamma$ implies $1 \leq {\cal K}<2$

2089: with $q=0\Rightarrow {\cal K}=1$. In the limit $\varepsilon

2090: \rightarrow 0$, from Eq. (\ref{C-metric}) and Eq.

2091: (\ref{Fextreme-a}), the metric becomes

2092: \begin{eqnarray}

2093: d s^2 &=& \frac{{\cal R}^2(x)}{{\cal K}}

2094: \left (-\sinh^2\chi\, d\tau^2 +d\chi^2\right ) \nonumber \\

2095: & & +

2096:  {\cal R}^2(x)\left [{\cal G}^{-1}(x)dx^2+ {\cal G}(x)dz^2 \right ]

2097:  \:.

2098:  \label{Nariai-C-Metric-a}

2099: \end{eqnarray}

2100: where

2101: \begin{eqnarray}

2102:  &{\cal R}^2(x)= \left (

2103: Ax+\sqrt{\frac{2(|\Lambda|+3A^2)}{1+{\cal K}}}\right )^{-2}\:,& \\

2104: \label{Rfactor-a}

2105:   &  \!\!\!{\cal G}(x) = -1+x^2

2106: +\frac{A}{3} \sqrt{\frac{2(1+{\cal K})(2-{\cal

2107: K})^2}{(|\Lambda|+3A^2)}}\,x^3

2108:   +\frac{A^2}{4}\frac{{\cal K}^2-1}{|\Lambda|+3A^2} \,x^4\:,&

2109:   \nonumber \\

2110:  \label{Gfactor-a}

2111: \end{eqnarray}

2112: Under the coordinate transformation (\ref{NariaiCoord-a}), the

2113: Maxwell field for the magnetic case is still given by Eq.

2114: (\ref{F-mag}), while in the electric case, (\ref{F-el-Lorentz})

2115: becomes

2116:  \begin{eqnarray}

2117:  F=-\frac{q}{{\cal K}}\,\sinh \chi \,d\tau\wedge d\chi\:.

2118: \label{F-el-antiNariai}

2119: \end{eqnarray}

2120: The Carter-Penrose diagram of the anti-Nariai C-metric is also

2121: given by Fig. \ref{br-fig}.(b).

2122: 

2123: At this point, let us focus our attention on the angular surfaces

2124: with $\tau=$constant and $\chi=$constant. When $q\neq 0$, we

2125: choose $x$ such that it belongs to the range

2126: $[x_\mathrm{s},x_\mathrm{n}]$ (sketched in Fig. \ref{g3_topol})

2127: where ${\cal G}(x)\geq 0$. In this way, the metric has the correct

2128: signature, the angular surfaces are compact, and the allowed range

2129: of $y$ includes the acceleration ($y_A$) and black hole ($y_+$)

2130: horizons (if we had chosen the other possible interval of $x$

2131: where ${\cal G}(x)\geq 0$, sketched in Fig. \ref{g3_topol}, this

2132: last condition would not be satisfied). We unavoidably have a

2133: conical singularity at least at one of the poles of this compact

2134: surface (that we label by $\tilde{S}^2$, say). Thus, the charged

2135: anti-Nariai C-metric has a compact angular surface of fixed size

2136: with a conical singularity at one of its poles. It is

2137: topologically conformal to $AdS_2\times \tilde{S}^2$. When $q=0$,

2138: the zero $x_\mathrm{n}$ of ${\cal G}(x)$ disappears, and ${\cal

2139: G}(x)$ grows monotonically from $x=x_\mathrm{s}$ into $x=+\infty$.

2140: Then, the angular surfaces are not compact, and we have a single

2141: pole ($x=x_\mathrm{s}$) with a conical singularity, which can be

2142: eliminated. Thus, the neutral anti-Nariai C-metric has a

2143: non-compact angular surface of fixed size (a kind of a deformed

2144: 2-hyperboloid that we label by $\tilde{H}_2$, say) which is free

2145: of conical singularities. It is topologically conformal to

2146: $AdS_2\times \tilde{H}_2$.

2147: 

2148: 

2149: In order to obtain the $A=0$ limit, we first set

2150: $\hat{\rho}=A\rho$ [see first relation of (\ref{zerosy3-a})], a

2151: parameter that has a finite and well-defined value when

2152: $A\rightarrow 0$. Then when $A\rightarrow 0$ we have ${\cal K}

2153: \rightarrow {\cal K}_0=2|\Lambda|/\hat{\rho}^2-1$ and ${\cal R}^2

2154: \rightarrow {\cal R}_0^{\:2}=\hat{\rho}^{-2}$, with ${\cal

2155: R}_0^{\:2}$ and ${\cal K}_0$ satisfying relations

2156: (\ref{relations-a}). Moreover, when we set $A = 0$, $m\neq 0$ and

2157: $q\neq 0$, the coordinate transformations $\theta =

2158: \int_{x_\mathrm{s}}^{x}{\cal{G}}^{-1/2}dx$ and $\phi=z$ imply that

2159: $x\in[x_\mathrm{s}=+1,+\infty[$, $x=\cosh \theta$, and ${\cal

2160: G}=-1+x^2=\sinh^2 \theta$. The angular surface then reduces to a

2161: 2-hyperboloid, $H_2$, of fixed size with line element

2162: $d\theta^2+\sinh^2{\theta}\,d\phi^2$. Therefore, when $A=0$ the

2163: anti-Nariai C-metric reduces to the anti-Nariai solution

2164: (\ref{qNariai-a}) described in subsection \ref{sec:anti-Nariai},

2165: with topology $AdS_2 \times H_2$. The limiting procedure that has

2166: been applied in this subsection has generated a new exact solution

2167: that satisfies the Maxwell-Einstein equations in a negative

2168: cosmological constant background.

2169: 

2170: 

2171: 

2172: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2173: \subsubsection{\label{sec:other limits} Other extremal limits}

2174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2175: 

2176: We could also

2177: discuss other extremal limits of the charged topological AdS

2178: C-metric (see Fig. \ref{g3_topol}), but these do not seem to be so

2179: interesting.

2180: 

2181: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2182: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2183: \section{\label{sec:Conc}Conclusions}

2184: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2186: 

2187: Following the limiting approach first introduced by Ginsparg and

2188: Perry \cite{GinsPerry}, we have analyzed the extremal limits of

2189: the dS, flat and AdS C-metrics. Among other new

2190: exact solutions, we have generated the Nariai C-metric, the

2191: Bertotti-Robinson C-metric, the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson C-metric

2192: and the anti-Nariai C-metric. These solutions are the C-metric

2193: counterparts of the well know solutions found in the 1950's. They

2194: are specified by an extra parameter: the acceleration parameter

2195: $A$ of the C-metric from which they are generated. When we set

2196: $A=0$ the solutions found in this paper reduce to the Nariai, the

2197: Bertotti-Robinson, the Nariai Bertotti-Robinson and the

2198: anti-Nariai solutions.

2199: 

2200: One of the features of these $A=0$ solutions is the fact that they

2201: are topologically the direct product of two 2-dimensional

2202: manifolds of constant curvature. Their C-metric counterparts are

2203: conformal to this topology, with the conformal factor depending on

2204: the angular coordinate. Moreover, the angular surfaces of these

2205: new C-solutions have a fixed size, but they lose the symmetry of

2206: the $A=0$ counterparts. For example, while the angular surfaces of

2207: the Nariai and Bertotti-Robinson solutions are round 2-spheres,

2208: the angular surfaces of their C-metric counterparts are deformed

2209: 2-spheres - they are compact but not round. Another important

2210: difference between the $A=0$ and $A \neq 0$ solutions is the fact

2211: that the $A \neq 0$ solutions have, in general, a conical

2212: singularity at least at one of the poles of their angular

2213: surfaces. This conical singularity is a reminiscence of the

2214: conical singularity that is present in the C-metric from which

2215: they were generated. In the C-metric these conical singularities

2216: are associated to the presence of a strut or string that furnishes

2217: the acceleration of the near-extremal black holes. In this

2218: context, we find that the Nariai C-metric generated from a

2219: extremal limit of the dS C-metric describes  a spacetime that is

2220: conformal to the product $dS_2\times \tilde{S}^2$. To each point

2221: in the deformed 2-sphere corresponds a $dS_2$ spacetime, except

2222: for one point which corresponds a $dS_2$ spacetime with an

2223: infinite straight strut or string, with a mass density and

2224: pressure satisfying $p=-\mu$. Analogously, the Nariai

2225: Bertotti-Robinson dS C-metric describes a spacetime that is

2226: conformal to the product ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1} \times \tilde{S}^2$.

2227: To each point in the deformed 2-sphere corresponds a

2228: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}$ spacetime, except for one point which

2229: corresponds a ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}$ spacetime with an infinite

2230: straight strut or string. In the case of the Bertotti-Robinson dS

2231: C-metric (topologically conformal to $AdS_2\times \tilde{S}^2$),

2232: the strut or string does not survive to the Ginsparg-Perry

2233: limiting procedure, and thus in the end of the process we only

2234: have a conical singularity.

2235: 

2236: In what concerns the causal structure, the Carter-Penrose diagrams

2237: of the $A \neq 0$ solutions are equal to those of the $A=0$

2238: solutions. For example, the diagram of the Nariai C-metric is

2239: equal to the one that describes the (1+1)-dimensional dS

2240: solution, the diagram of the Bertotti-Robinson C-metric and of the

2241: anti-Nariai C-metric is equal to the one that describes the

2242: (1+1)-dimensional AdS solution, and the diagram of the

2243: Nariai Bertotti-Robinson C-metric is given by the Rindler diagram.

2244: 

2245: Some of these solutions, perhaps all, are certainly of physical

2246: interest.  Indeed, it is known that the Nariai solution ($A=0$) is

2247: unstable and, once created, it decays through the quantum

2248: tunnelling process into a slightly non-extreme black hole pair

2249: \cite{Bousso60y}. We then expect that the Nariai C-metric is also

2250: unstable and that it will decay into a slightly non-extreme pair

2251: of black holes accelerated by a strut or by a string. The

2252: solutions found in this paper also play an important role in the

2253: decay of the dS or AdS spaces, and therefore can mediate the

2254: Schwinger-like quantum process of pair creation of black holes.

2255: Indeed, the Nariai, and the dS Nariai Bertotti-Robinson instantons

2256: ($A=0$) are one of the few Euclidean solutions that are regular,

2257: and have thus been used

2258: \cite{MelMosRom,MannRoss,BooMann,VolkovWipf} to study the pair

2259: creation of dS black holes materialized and accelerated by the

2260: cosmological constant background field (an instanton is a solution

2261: of the Euclidean field equations that smoothly connects the

2262: spacelike sections of the initial state, the pure dS space in this

2263: case, and the final state, the dS black hole pair in this case).

2264: Moreover, the Euclidean ``Nariai" flat C-metric \cite{flatPC} and

2265: Ernst solution \cite{DGKT,ErnstPC} (also discussed in this paper)

2266: have been used to analyze the process of pair production of

2267: $\Lambda=0$ black holes, accelerated by a string or by an

2268: electromagnetic external field, respectively. Therefore, its

2269: natural to expect that the Euclidean extremal limits of the dS

2270: C-metric and AdS C-metric found in this paper mediate the process

2271: of pair creation of black holes in a cosmological background, that

2272: are then accelerated by a string, in addition to the cosmological

2273: field acceleration. For the Nariai case, e.g., the picture would

2274: be that of the nucleation, in a dS background, of a Nariai C

2275: universe, whose string then breaks down and a pair of dS black

2276: holes is created at the endpoints of the string. This expectation

2277: is confirmed in \cite{OscLem-PCdS}.

2278: 

2279: 

2280: 

2281: 

2282: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2283: 

2284: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2285: \begin{acknowledgments}

2286: 

2287: This work was partially funded by Funda\c c\~ao para a Ci\^encia e

2288: Tecnologia (FCT) through project CERN/FIS/43797/2001 and

2289: PESO/PRO/2000/4014.  OJCD also acknowledges finantial support from the

2290: FCT through PRAXIS XXI programme. JPSL acknowledges finantial support

2291: from ICCTI/FCT and thanks Observat\'orio Nacional do Rio de Janeiro

2292: for hospitality.

2293: 

2294: \end{acknowledgments}

2295: 

2296: 

2297: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2298: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2299: \appendix

2300: \section{\label{sec:lim L=0 Nariai}\bm{$\Lambda=0$}

2301: limit of the Nariai and anti-Nariai solutions}

2302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2303: In this appendix we find the $\Lambda=0$ limit of the Nariai

2304: solution, Eq. (\ref{qNariai}),  and of the anti-Nariai solution,

2305: Eq. (\ref{qNariai-a}). In this limit the line element of both

2306: solutions goes apparently to infinity since ${\cal

2307: R}_0^{\:2}\rightarrow \infty$. To achieve the suitable limit of

2308: the Nariai solution, we first make the coordinate rescales:

2309: $\tilde{x}= ({\cal R}_0/ \sqrt{{\cal K}_0})\chi$, and

2310: $\varrho={\cal R}_0 \,\theta$. Then, taking the $\Lambda=0$ limit,

2311: the solution becomes

2312: \begin{eqnarray}

2313: d s^2 = (-\tilde{x}^2 d\tau^2 +d\tilde{x}^2)+ (d\varrho^2+

2314: \varrho^2\,d\phi^2) \, .

2315:  \label{Lim L=0 Nariai1}

2316: \end{eqnarray}

2317: The spacetime sector is a Rindler factor, and the angular sector

2318: is a cylinder. Therefore, under the usual coordinate

2319: transformation $\tilde{x}=\sqrt{\bar{x}^2-\bar{t}^2}$ and

2320: $\tau={\rm arctanh(\bar{t}/\bar{x})}$, and unwinding the cylinder

2321: ($\bar{y}=\varrho\,\cos\phi $ and $\bar{z}=\varrho\,\sin\phi$), we

2322: have

2323: \begin{eqnarray}

2324: d s^2 = (-d\bar{t}^{\,2} +d\bar{x}^2)+ (d\bar{y}^2+ d\bar{z}^2)\,

2325: .

2326:  \label{Lim L=0 Nariai2}

2327: \end{eqnarray}

2328: Therefore, while the Nariai C-metric is topologically $dS_2\times

2329: S^2$, its $\Lambda=0$ limit  is topologically

2330: ${\mathbb{M}}^{1,1}\times {\mathbb{R}}^2$, i.e.,

2331: ${\mathbb{R}}^4$.

2332: 

2333: A similar procedure shows that taking the $\Lambda=0$ limit of the

2334: anti-Nariai solution (\ref{qNariai-a}) ($AdS_2\times H_2$) leads

2335: to Eq. (\ref{Lim L=0 Nariai2}).

2336: 

2337: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2338: \section{\label{sec:angular}Determination of the north and south poles}

2339: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2340: 

2341: In this appendix we discuss the zeros of the function ${\cal

2342: G}(x)$ that appears in the extremal limits of the dS C-metric, and

2343: in the extremal limits of the flat C-metric. This function ${\cal

2344: G}(x)$ has only two real zeros in the cases discussed in this

2345: paper, namely the Nariai, the Bertotti-Robinson, and the Nariai

2346: Bertotti-Robinson (both for $\Lambda>0$ and $\Lambda=0$). These

2347: two roots are the south pole and the north pole, and are

2348: respectively given by

2349: \begin{eqnarray}

2350: x_\mathrm{s} & = & -p + \frac{h}{2} - \frac{a}{4\,b} < 0\, , \nonumber \\

2351: x_\mathrm{n} & = & +p +

2352:       \frac{h}{2} - \frac{a}{4\,b} > 0 \:,

2353: \label{polos - cold}

2354:     \end{eqnarray}

2355: with

2356: \begin{eqnarray}

2357: p & = &\frac{1}{2}\left (-\frac{s}{3} + \frac{a^2}{2\,b^2} -

2358:  \frac{1 - 12 \,b}{3\,s\,b^2} - \frac{4}{3\, b} + n\right)^{1/

2359:           2} \:, \nonumber \\

2360: n & = &\frac{-a^3 + 4\,a\, b}{4\,h \,b^3} \:, \nonumber \\

2361: h & = &\sqrt{\frac{s}{3} + \frac{a^2}{4 \,b^2} +

2362:    \frac{1 -12\, b}{3\,s\, b^2} - \frac{2}{3\,b}} \:, \nonumber \\

2363: s & = &\frac{1}{2^{1/3}\, b}\left ( \lambda - \sqrt{\lambda^2 -

2364:  4(1-12\, b)^3} \right)^{1/

2365:           3} \:, \nonumber \\

2366:         \lambda & = & 2 - 27 \,a^2 + 72\, b\:,

2367: \label{acess - zeros - ang}

2368:      \end{eqnarray}

2369: where $a$ and $b$ are, respectively, the absolute values of the

2370: coefficients of $x^3$ and $x^4$ in Eqs. (\ref{Gfactor}),

2371: (\ref{Gfactor-br}), (\ref{Gfactor-N-br}), (\ref{Gfactor L=0}), and

2372: (\ref{Gfactor-br L=0}). For the function ${\cal G}(x)$ written in

2373: a different polynomial form that facilitates the determination of

2374: its zeros see Hong and Teo \cite{HongTeo}.

2375: 

2376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2378: \begin{thebibliography}{100}

2379: 

2380: \bibitem{hawkingellis} S. F. Hawking, G. F. R. Ellis, {\it The Large

2381: Scale Structure of Space-Time}, (Cambridge University Press,

2382: 1976).

2383: 

2384: \bibitem{carter} B. Carter, {\it General theory of statinary black

2385: holes}, in {\it Black holes} edited by B. DeWitt and C. DeWitt

2386: (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973).

2387: 

2388: \bibitem{KramSMH}

2389: D. Kramer, H. Stephani, M. MacCallum, E. Herlt, {\it Exact

2390: solutions of  Einstein's   Field Equations}, (Cambridge University

2391: Press, 1980).

2392: 

2393: \bibitem{Nariai} H. Nariai, {\it On some static solutions of

2394: Einstein's gravitational field equations in a spherically

2395: symmetric case}, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. {\bf 34}, 160 (1950); {\it

2396: On a new cosmological solution of Einstein's field equations of

2397: gravitation}, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. {\bf 35}, 62 (1951).

2398: 

2399: \bibitem{Nariai2} H. Nariai, H. Ishihara, {\it On the de Sitter

2400: and Nariai solutions in General Relativity and their extension in

2401: higher dimensional spacetime}, in {\it A Random Walk in Relativity

2402: and Cosmology}, edited by P. N. Dadhich, J. K. Rao, J. V.

2403: Narlikar, C. V. Vishveshwara (John Wiley $\&$ Sons, New York).

2404: 

2405: \bibitem{BertRob} B. Bertotti,  {\it Uniform electromagnetic field

2406: in the theory of general relativity}, Phys. Rev. {\bf 116}, 1331

2407: (1959); I. Robinson, Bull. Acad. Polon. {\bf 7}, 351 (1959).

2408: 

2409: \bibitem{CaldVanZer} M. Caldarelli, L. Vanzo, Z. Zerbini,

2410: {\it The extremal limit of D-dimensional black holes}, in {\it

2411: Geometrical Aspects of Quantum Fields}, edited by A. A. Bytsenko,

2412: A. E. Gon\c calves, B. M. Pimentel (World Scientific, Singapore,

2413: 2001); {\tt hep-th/0008136}; N. Dadhich, {\it On product spacetime

2414: with 2-sphere of constant curvature}, {\tt gr-qc/0003026}.

2415: 

2416: \bibitem{GinsPerry} P. Ginsparg, M. J. Perry, {\it Semiclassical

2417: perdurance of de Sitter space}, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 222}, 245

2418: (1983).

2419: 

2420: \bibitem{Bousso60y}

2421: R. Bousso,  {\it Adventures in de Sitter space}, {\tt

2422: hep-th/0205177}.

2423: 

2424: \bibitem{KW}

2425: W. Kinnersley, M. Walker,  {\it Uniformly accelerating charged

2426: mass in General Relativity}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 2}, 1359 (1970).

2427: 

2428: \bibitem{OscLem_dS-C}  O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos,

2429: {\it Pair of accelerated black holes in de Sitter background: the

2430: dS C-metric}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 084018

2431: (2003).

2432: 

2433: \bibitem{OscLem_AdS-C}  O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos,

2434: {\it Pair of accelerated black holes in an anti-de Sitter

2435: background: the AdS C-metric}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 67}, 064001

2436: (2003).

2437: 

2438: \bibitem{Ortag} M. Ortaggio, {\it Impulsive waves in the Nariai universe},

2439: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 65}, 084046 (2002).

2440: 

2441: \bibitem{BoussoHawk} R. Bousso, S. W. Hawking, {\it The probability

2442: for primordial black holes}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 5659 (1995);

2443: {\it Pair production of black holes during inflation}, Phys. Rev.

2444: D {\bf 54}, 6312 (1996).

2445: 

2446: \bibitem{HawkRoss}

2447: S. W. Hawking, S. F. Ross,  {\it Duality between electric and

2448: magnetic black holes}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 5865 (1995).

2449: 

2450: \bibitem{MannRoss}

2451: R. B. Mann, S. F. Ross,  {\it Cosmological production of charged

2452: black hole pairs}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 2254 (1995).

2453: 

2454: \bibitem{BoussoDil} R. Bousso, {\it Charged Nariai black holes with a

2455: dilaton}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 55}, 3614 (1997).

2456: 

2457: \bibitem{BoussoHawk-T} R. Bousso, S. W. Hawking, {\it (Anti-)evaporation

2458: of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57},

2459: 2436 (1998); R. Bousso, {\it Proliferation of de Sitter space},

2460: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 083511 (1998).

2461: 

2462: \bibitem{NojOd1} S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, {\it Quantum evolution

2463: of Schwarzschild-de Sitter (Nariai) black holes}, Phys. Rev. D

2464: {\bf 59}, 044026 (1999); {\it De Sitter space versus Nariai black

2465: hole: stability in d5 higher derivative gravity}, Phys. Lett. B

2466: {\bf 523}, 165 (2001).

2467: 

2468: \bibitem{ShaKof}

2469: L. A. Kofman, V. Sahni, A. A. Starobinski, {\it Anisotropic

2470: cosmological model created by quantum polarization of vacuum},

2471: Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 58}, 1090 (1983).

2472: 

2473: \bibitem{MelMosRom} F. Mellor, I. Moss, {\it  Black holes and quantum

2474: wormholes}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 222}, 361 (1989); {\it Black holes

2475: and gravitational instantons}, Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 6}, 1379

2476: (1989); L. J. Romans, {\it Supersymmetric, cold and lukewarm black

2477: holes in cosmological Einstein-Maxwell theory}, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf

2478: 383}, 395 (1992).

2479: 

2480: 

2481: 

2482: \bibitem{BooMann} I. S. Booth, R. B. Mann,

2483: {\it Cosmological pair production of charged and rotating black

2484: holes}, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 539}, 267 (1999).

2485: 

2486: \bibitem{VolkovWipf} M. Volkov, A. Wipf, {\it Black hole pair creation

2487: in de Sitter space: a complete one-loop analysis},

2488: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 582}, 313 (2000).

2489: 

2490: \bibitem{Medv}

2491: A. J. M. Medved, {\it Nearly degenerated dS horizons from a 2-D

2492: perpective}, {\tt hep-th/0302058}.

2493: 

2494: \bibitem{Lap}

2495: A. S. Lapedes,  {\it Euclidean quantum field theory and the

2496: Hawking effect}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 17}, 2556 (1978).

2497: 

2498: \bibitem{Zasl}

2499: O. B. Zaslavsky, {\it Geometry of nonextreme black holes near the

2500: extreme state}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56}, 2188 (1997); {\it Entropy

2501: of quantum fields for nonextreme black holes in the extreme

2502: limit}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 6265 (1998).

2503: 

2504: \bibitem{MannSolod} R. B. Mann, S. N. Solodukhin, {\it Universality of

2505: quantum entropy for extreme black holes}, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 523},

2506: 293 (1998).

2507: 

2508: \bibitem{Navarro} D. J. Navarro, J. Navarro-Salas, P. Navarro,

2509: {\it Holography, degenerated horizons and entropy}, Nucl. Phys. B

2510: {\bf 580}, 311 (2000); A. J. M. Medved, {\it

2511: Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m Near extremality  from a Jackiw-Teiltelboim

2512: perpective}, {\tt hep-th/0111091}. A. Barvinsky, S. Das, G.

2513: Kunstatter, {\it Quantum mechanics of charged black holes}, Phys.

2514: Lett. B {\bf 517}, 415 (2001).

2515: 

2516: \bibitem{OrtagPod} M. Ortaggio,  J. Podolsk\'y,  {\it Impulsive waves in

2517: electrovac direct product spacetimes with Lambda}, Class. Quantum

2518: Grav. {\bf 19}, 5221 (2002).

2519: 

2520: \bibitem{toroidal} J. P. S. Lemos, {\it Cylindrical black hole in

2521: general relativity}, Phys. Lett. B{\bf 353}, 46

2522: (1995); J. P. S. Lemos, V. T. Zanchin, {\it Rotating charged black

2523: strings in general relativity}, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 54}, 3840 (1996);

2524: O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos, {\it Magnetic strings in anti-de

2525: Sitter general relativity}, Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 19}, 2265

2526: (2002).

2527: 

2528: \bibitem{topological} S. \AA minnenborg, I. Bengtsson, S. Holst,

2529: P. Peld\'an,

2530: {\it Making anti-de Sitter black holes}, Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf

2531: 13}, 2707 (1996); D. R. Brill, {\it Multi-black holes in 3D and 4D

2532: anti-de Sitter spaces}, Helv. Phys. Acta {\bf 69}, 249 (1996); S.

2533: L. Vanzo, {\it Black holes with unusual topology}, Phys. Rev. D

2534: {\bf 56}, 6475 (1997); D. R. Brill, J. Louko, P. Peld\'an, {\it

2535: Thermodynamics of (3+1)-dimensional black holes with toroidal or

2536: higher genus horizons}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56}, 3600 (1997); R. B.

2537: Mann, {\it Black holes of negative mass}, Class. Quantum Grav.

2538: {\bf 14}, 2927 (1997); S. Holst, P. Peldan, {\it Black holes and

2539: causal structure in anti-de Sitter isometric spacetimes}, Class.

2540: Quantum Grav. {\bf 14}, 3433 (1997).

2541: 

2542: \bibitem{PlebDem}

2543:  J. F. Pleba\'nski, M. Demia\'nski, {\it Rotating, charged and

2544: uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity},  Annals of

2545: Phys. (N.Y.) {\bf 98},  98 (1976).

2546: 

2547: \bibitem{PodGrif2} J. Podolsk\'y,  J.B. Griffiths,

2548:   {\it Uniformly accelerating black holes in a de Sitter universe},

2549:   Phys. Rev. D  {\bf 63}, 024006 (2001).

2550: 

2551: \bibitem{BicKrt}

2552: J. Bi\v c\'ak, P. Krtou\v s, {\it Accelerated sources in de Sitter

2553: spacetime and the insuffiency of retarded fields}, Phys. Rev. D

2554: {\bf 64}, 124020 (2001); {\it The fields of uniformly accelerated

2555: charges in de Sitter spacetime}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 211101

2556: (2002).

2557: 

2558: \bibitem{KrtPod}

2559: P. Krtou\v s, J. Podolsk\' y, {\it Radiation from accelerated

2560: black holes in de Sitter universe}, {\tt gr-qc/0301110}.

2561: 

2562: \bibitem{MaldStrom} J. Maldacena, J. Michelson, A. Strominger,

2563: {\it Anti-de Sitter fragmentation}, JHEP {\bf 9902:11}, (1999);

2564: {\it Vacuum states for $AdS_2$ black holes},  M. Spradlin, A.

2565: Strominger, JHEP {\bf 9911:021}, (1999).

2566: 

2567: \bibitem{OscLem-PCdS}  O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos, {\it Pair creation

2568: of de Sitter black holes on cosmic strings}, to be submitted

2569: (2003).

2570: 

2571: \bibitem{flatPC} S. W. Hawking, S. F. Ross, {\it Pair production of

2572: black holes on cosmic strings}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 3382

2573: (1995); R. Emparan, {\it Pair production of black holes joined by

2574: cosmic strings}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 3386 (1995); D. M.

2575: Eardley, G. T. Horowitz, D. A. Kastor, J. Traschen, {\it Breaking

2576: cosmic strings without monopoles}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 3390

2577: (1995); R. Gregory, M. Hindmarsh, {\it Smooth metrics for snapping

2578: strings}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 5598 (1995); A. Ach\'ucarro, R.

2579: Gregory, K. Kuijken, {\it Abelian Higgs

2580:  hair for black holes}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 5729 (1995).

2581: 

2582: 

2583: \bibitem{ErnstPC} D. Garfinkle, S. B. Giddings, A. Strominger,

2584: {\it Entropy in black hole pair production}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf

2585: 49}, 958 (1994);  H. F. Dowker, J. P. Gauntlett, S. B. Giddings,

2586: G. T. Horowitz, {\it Pair creation of extremal black holes and

2587: Kaluza-Klein monopoles}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 50}, 2662 (1994); S. W.

2588: Hawking, G. T. Horowitz, S. F. Ross, {\it Entropy, area, and black

2589: hole pairs}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 51}, 4302 (1995).

2590: 

2591: \bibitem{DGKT} H. F. Dowker, J. P. Gauntlett, D. A. Kastor, J.

2592: Traschen, {\it Pair creation of dilaton black holes}, Phys. Rev. D

2593: {\bf 49}, 2909 (1994).

2594: 

2595: \bibitem{BPP}

2596: J. Bi\v c\'ak, {\it Gravitational radiation from uniformly

2597: accelerated particles in general relativity},

2598:  Proc. Roy. Soc.  A {\bf 302}, 201 (1968);

2599:  V. Pravda, A. Pravdova, {\it Boost-rotation symmetric spacetimes

2600: - review}, Czech. J. Phys. {\bf 50}, 333 (2000); {\it  On the

2601: spinning C-metric}, in {\it Gravitation: Following the Prague

2602: Inspiration}, edited by O. Semer\'ak, J. Podolsk\'y, M. Zofka

2603: (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002), {\tt gr-qc/0201025}.

2604: 

2605: \bibitem{Ernst}

2606: F. J. Ernst, {\it Removal of the nodal singularity of the

2607: C-metric}, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 17}, 515 (1976).

2608:  \bibitem{Brown} J. D. Brown, {\it Black

2609: hole pair creation and the entropy factor}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 51},

2610: 5725 (1995).

2611: 

2612: 

2613: \bibitem{HorowShein} G. T. Horowitz, H. J. Sheinblatt,

2614: {\it Tests of cosmic censorship in the Ernst spacetime}, Phys.

2615: Rev. D {\bf 55}, 650 (1997).

2616: 

2617: 

2618: \bibitem{PodEHM} R. Emparan, G. T. Horowitz, R. C. Myers,

2619: {\it Exact description of black holes on branes}, JHEP {\bf 0001}

2620: 007 (2000); {\it Exact description of black Holes on branes II:

2621: Comparison with BTZ black holes and black strings}, JHEP {\bf

2622: 0001} 021 (2000); J. Podolsk\' y, {\it Accelerating black holes in

2623: anti-de Sitter universe}, Czech. J. Phys. {\bf 52}, 1 (2002).

2624: 

2625: 

2626: \bibitem{MannAdS} R. Mann, {\it Pair production of topological

2627: anti-de Sitter black holes}, Class. Quantum Grav. {\bf 14}, L109

2628: (1997); {\it Charged topological black hole pair creation}, Nucl.

2629: Phys. B {\bf 516}, 357 (1998).

2630: \bibitem{HongTeo} K. Hong, E. Teo, {\it A new form of the C-metric},

2631: {\tt gr-qc/0305089}.

2632: 

2633: \end{thebibliography}

2634: 

2635: 

2636: \end{document}

2637: 

2638: 

2639: 

2640: 

2641: 

2642: 

2643: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2644: tar -vzcvf nariai.tgz nariai.tex g3_nariai.eps nariai.eps nariai_hyp.eps bert_rob.eps br_hyp.eps nbr_mq.eps nar_bert_rob.eps g3_flat.eps g3_topol.eps