1: \documentclass[twocolumn,prd,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}
4: \usepackage{bm}
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{Harmonic oscillator force between heavy quarks}
7: \author{ Stanis{\l}aw D. G{\l}azek }
8: \affiliation{ Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University,
9: ul. Ho{\.z}a 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland }
10: \date{\today}
11: \begin{abstract}
12: A renormalization group procedure for effective particles is applied to quantum
13: chromodynamics of one flavor of quarks with large mass $m$ in order to calculate
14: light-front Hamiltonians for heavy quarkonia, $H_\lambda$, using perturbative
15: expansion in the coupling constant $\alpha_\lambda$. $\lambda$ is the renormalization
16: group parameter with the interpretation of an inverse of the spatial size of the
17: color charge distribution in the effective quarks and gluons. The eigenvalue
18: equation for $H_\lambda$ couples quark-anti-quark states with sectors of a larger
19: number of constituents. The coupling to states with more than one effective gluon,
20: and interactions in the quark-anti-quark-gluon sector, are removed at the price of
21: introducing an ansatz for the gluon mass, $\mu^2$. The simplified equation is used
22: to evaluate a new Hamiltonian of order $\alpha_\lambda$ that acts only in the
23: effective quark-anti-quark sector and in the non-relativistic limit turns out to
24: contain the Coulomb term with Breit-Fermi corrections and spin-independent harmonic
25: oscillator term with frequency $\omega = [(4/3)(\alpha_\lambda/\pi)]^{1/2}\lambda
26: (\lambda/m)^2(\pi/1152)^{1/4}$. The latter originates from the hole excavated in
27: the overlapping quark self-interaction gluon clouds by the exchange of effective
28: gluons between the quarks. The new term is largely independent of the details of
29: $\mu^2$ and in principle can fit into the ball park of phenomenology. The first
30: approximation can be improved by including more terms in $H_\lambda$ and solving
31: the eigenvalue equations numerically.
32: \end{abstract}
33: \pacs{12.38.-t,12.39.-x,12.90.+b,11.15.-q}
34: \maketitle
35:
36: \section{ Introduction }
37: \label{sec:I}
38:
39: The purpose of this article is to describe a procedure that starts from
40: a quantum chromodynamics (QCD) with only one flavor of massive quarks
41: and produces the Schr\"odinger equation for heavy quarkonia in a single
42: formulation of the theory. Only the first approximation for the final
43: Hamiltonian is evaluated. In this simplest version, the procedure involves
44: a guess for the gluon mass term. But the guess appears to have little
45: influence on the result. The procedure itself is not limited to the
46: simplest version and the gluon mass ansatz can be tested in future in
47: refined calculations and phenomenology. The procedure is relativistic and
48: can be used for quarkonia in arbitrary motion, which is a pre-requisite
49: for application in high-energy processes. Chiral symmetry is explicitly
50: broken in the case of heavy quarks and the issue of the spontaneous
51: breaking of the symmetry is ignored.
52:
53: The approach described here stems from the similarity renormalization
54: group procedure for Hamiltonians \cite{similarity}, which has been
55: applied to QCD \cite{long} using the light-front (LF) form of dynamics
56: \cite{front}. A new ingredient is the boost-invariant creation and
57: annihilation operator calculus for effective quarks and gluons (see
58: below). Otherwise, the LF approach is known for a long time, mainly as
59: a candidate for connecting two qualitatively different models of hadrons:
60: the parton model in the infinite momentum frame (IMF) \cite{partons,
61: frontreview1} and the constituent model in the rest frame of a hadron
62: \cite{PDG}. Many contributions in that area \cite{frontreview2} have
63: followed the seminal work on exclusive processes \cite{LB}. Through the
64: boost invariance and precisely defined notion of effective constituents,
65: the approach described here aims at providing a bridge between the two
66: models of hadrons in a single theoretical framework. The case of a heavy
67: quarkonium is chosen here as the simplest one to begin with and test the
68: method.
69:
70: In the LF dynamics, the evolution of states is traced along the direction
71: of a light-like four-vector $n^\mu$, for which $n^2=0$. With the conventional
72: choice of $n = (1,0,0,-1)$, the variable $nx = x^0 + x^3 \equiv x^+$ plays
73: the role of time while $P^- = P^0 - P^3$ is the Hamiltonian. In order to
74: define it for bare particles in QCD, one has to choose a gauge. No serious
75: alternative exists to $nA=A^+=0$. But the equation $D_\mu F^{\mu +} =
76: j^+$ implies a constraint that is analogous to the Gauss law and forces
77: the Fourier components of $A^-$ to contain inverse powers of the kinematical
78: momentum $k^+$. Since $k^+$ ranges from 0 to infinity, the inverse powers
79: of $k^+$ produce singularities in the region around zero.
80:
81: One can impose a lower bound on $k^+$, such as $k^+ > \delta^+$, to
82: regulate the theory \cite{p+1, p+2, long, DLCQ}. The parameter $\delta^+$
83: becomes a smallest unit of momentum that any particle, physical or
84: virtual, can carry in such discretized theories. But the fixed unit
85: breaks the boost invariance required for connection between the IMF
86: and the rest frame of any hadron. Namely, when some physically relevant
87: $P^+$ is made large, the smallest allowed $x = \delta^+/P^+$ becomes
88: small. In the IMF $P^+ \rightarrow \infty$ and the same small-$x$
89: divergences re-appear despite the presence of $\delta^+$. The key singularity
90: is related to the $dx/x$ distribution of gluons in the parton model and
91: seems to require a dynamical mechanism to remove. One cannot just vary
92: $\delta^+$ together with $P^+$ because boosts cannot change the cutoff
93: in a quantum theory constructed {\it ab initio} \cite{Wigner}.
94:
95: There exists a possibility that the small-$k^+$ singularities are related
96: to the properties of the vacuum state. The sum rules for heavy quarkonia
97: \cite{condensates1} include quark and gluon condensates \cite{condensates2}
98: that may participate in the dynamics in the small-$k^+$ region \cite{frontreview1,
99: long, condensates3, csb1, csb2, csb3, z, RozowskiThorn}. In the QCD picture
100: with such nontrivial ground state \cite{th1, cdg}, and relativistic bound-state
101: excitations of this state in the form of $\pi$-mesons, one can hardly hope
102: to resolve the small-$k^+$ singularity easily. The situation simplifies
103: a lot in the case of quarks with mass $m \gg \Lambda_{QCD}$. The small-$x$
104: singularity and a non-perturbative binding mechanism for quarks and gluons
105: can interplay with each other without interference from the vacuum. In the
106: case of light quarks, a similar interplay may be at work and contribute to
107: the saturation mechanism of partons \cite{lip, mue1, mue2, mue3}, but that
108: issue is not addressed here.
109:
110: The gluon mass ansatz is introduced to represent effects of the non-abelian
111: interactions. The ansatz is inserted at the level of solving the eigenvalue
112: equation for the Hamiltonian $H_\lambda$, where $\lambda$ is the renormalization
113: group (RG) parameter. The procedure of introducing the mass ansatz is similar
114: to the one proposed in \cite{long} and later discussed in simplified matrix
115: models \cite{kolleg, modelafbs}. New elements are the limitation of power
116: counting to the relative-motion variables, the exact boost invariance, removal
117: of small-$x$ divergences through the mass ansatz as a function of the relative
118: momenta, and no need for ad hoc potentials in the first approximation. All
119: these features will be described in detail later.
120:
121: In brief, $H_\lambda = T_\lambda + V_\lambda$, where $T_\lambda$ is the
122: kinetic energy operator made of all terms that are bilinear in the creation
123: and annihilation operators for the effective particles, and $V_\lambda$
124: represents all other terms. The parameter $\lambda$ defines the width of
125: momentum-space form factors in $V_\lambda$. For some value of $\lambda =
126: \lambda_0 \sim 1 $ GeV, one can freely add to $H_{\lambda_0}$ a term of
127: the form $[1 - (\alpha_{\lambda_0} /\alpha_s)^n]\mu^2$, where $n \geq 2$.
128: The number 2 ensures that corrections to the first approximation occur
129: first in the fourth-order of expansion of $H_{\lambda_0}$ in powers
130: of $g_0 = g_{\lambda_0}$, $\alpha_0 = g_0^2/(4\pi)$. This is the lowest
131: order at which a perturbative shift in the gluon energy in any state
132: can influence the contribution of that state to the dynamics of any other
133: state in perturbation theory, keeping intact the QED-like small coupling
134: expansion scheme with a Coulomb potential. $\mu^2$ stands for the mass term
135: that one assigns to the effective gluons of the transverse size $1/\lambda_0$.
136: The interpretation of $1/\lambda$ as the spatial size of the color charge
137: distribution in the corresponding effective particles is based on the
138: feature mentioned above that $V_\lambda$ contains vertex form factors of
139: width $\lambda$ in momentum space. The mass ansatz contributes to the
140: invariant masses through $\mu^2/x$, where $x$ is the fraction of the
141: longitudinal momentum carried by the gluon. $\alpha_s$ denotes the large,
142: relativistic value of the coupling constant in QCD at the scale $\lambda_0$
143: with a true $\Lambda_{QCD}$ in this scheme. The term with $\mu^2$ vanishes
144: for $\alpha_0 = \alpha_s$. Nevertheless, only $\mu^2$ counts when the ratio
145: $\alpha_0/\alpha_s$ is small. Thus, in the weak coupling expansion,
146: \begin{eqnarray}
147: \label{ansatz1}
148: H_{\lambda_0} = T_{\lambda_0} + \mu^2 + [V_{\lambda_0} - (\alpha_0/\alpha_s)^n \mu^2]
149: \end{eqnarray}
150: and the term $[V_{\lambda_0} - (\alpha_0/\alpha_s)^n \mu^2]$ is
151: treated as a source of small corrections in comparison to $\mu^2$.
152:
153: The requirement of cancellation of the small-$x$ singularities in the
154: effective dynamics imposes some perturbatively determined constraints
155: on the otherwise non-perturbative ansatz for $\mu^2$. These constraints
156: restrict the behavior of $\mu^2$ as a function of the gluon motion
157: with respect to other constituents. In future, the refined versions
158: of the same procedure may provide constraints that come closer to the
159: actual behavior of gluons. This behavior is hoped to be uncovered in
160: computer simulations that one may build around the first approximation.
161: Then, the extrapolation to $\alpha_0 = \alpha_s$ can recover the original
162: theory from a few terms in the weak-coupling expansion if $\mu^2$
163: approximates the behavior of effective gluons well. Initially, the
164: gluon mass term is viewed as a function of the relative momenta and
165: $\Lambda_{QCD}$. The latter depends on $\alpha_0$ as $\lambda_0 \exp
166: {(-c/\alpha_0)}$ with a positive constant $c$. This means that
167: $\Lambda_{QCD}$ vanishes to all orders in the perturbative expansion,
168: and $\mu^2$ is considered to be on the order of 1. Before one knows more,
169: $\mu$ can only be estimated on the basis of implications for the resulting
170: Schr\"odinger equation. The size of $\mu$ can be compared with four scales:
171: $\Lambda_{QCD}$, $\lambda_0$, $m$, and the Bohr momentum scale, $k_B =
172: \alpha_0 m/2$, which is distinguished non-perturbatively by the Coulomb
173: interaction. But if $\mu^2$ is right, then $[V - (\alpha_0/\alpha_s)^n
174: \mu^2]$ must be a source of only small corrections in the whole range of
175: couplings between 0 and $\alpha_s$. This is taken for granted in the
176: present article. Since the first approximation turns out to be not sensitive
177: to the details of $\mu$, new information can be obtained only in the
178: refined calculations.
179:
180: The value of the weak coupling expansion scheme for Hamiltonians is
181: that it starts from a local theory and leads to $H_\lambda$ that is
182: capable of describing physically relevant non-perturbative dynamics
183: even if $H_\lambda$ is calculated only in low orders. This idea is
184: known to work in the case of QED: the Coulomb potential accounts for
185: highly non-perturbative dynamics of atoms, including the nature of
186: chemical bond, while the Hamiltonian itself is only of the formal order
187: of $\alpha$. Condensed matter physics illustrates this point in still
188: wider domain.
189:
190: But when one applies the weak coupling expansion idea to QCD \cite
191: {long}, one faces the fact that the strong coupling constant rises to
192: 10, 30, or even 100 times larger value than in the case of atoms or
193: positronium in QED. This leads to a complex interplay between the
194: perturbative and non-perturbative parts of the calculation, enhanced
195: dependence of observables on the RG parameter $\lambda$, problems with
196: obtaining the Poincare symmetry in solutions, and amplification of
197: artifacts due to the small-$k^+$ regularization. Most of the problems
198: seem to come from perturbation theory in the RG part of the calculation.
199: An exact RG procedure by definition provides $H_\lambda$ whose structure
200: depends on $\lambda$ but the spectra and $S$-matrix elements do not.
201: However, when one uses expansion in powers of $\alpha_0$ and then
202: extrapolates to $\alpha_0 = \alpha_s$, a considerable dependence of the
203: eigensolutions on $\lambda$ can ensue because of missing many terms. This
204: is visible in models that are asymptotically free and produce bound states
205: \cite{modelafbs, optimization}. One has to find the right value for
206: $\alpha_s$ at given $\lambda_0$ from fits to bound-state observables,
207: and perform consistency checks for whole sets of different observables
208: \cite{optimization1}. In QCD, such checks involve the unknown functions
209: of momenta in the finite parts of the ultraviolet counterterms, unknown
210: terms depending on $\Lambda_{QCD}$, and artifacts of the regularization
211: of small-$k^+$ divergences. So many unknowns suggest the possibility
212: that the approach may never achieve the desired level of predictive
213: power. But the simplicity of the harmonic potential found here in the
214: first approximation illustrates that there is a high degree of order
215: in the rich structure of $H_\lambda$. It is a consequence of preserving
216: all seven kinematical symmetries of the LF scheme in the RG procedure.
217: These symmetries limit the large number of terms that are allowed by the
218: LF power counting using absolute momentum variables \cite{long}, to a
219: much smaller number of terms that depend only on the relative momenta of
220: the constituents. The LF symmetries must also be respected by the initial
221: regularization prescription for the required counterterms to be simple.
222:
223: The renormalization group procedure for effective particles (RGEP), which
224: is employed here, regulates the ultra-violet and small-$k^+$ divergences
225: by vertex factors $r$ that are inserted only in the interaction terms. In
226: the case of the small-$k^+$ singularities, these factors limit only the
227: ratios of momenta $k^+$. The ratios are limited from below by a dimensionless
228: parameter $\delta$. Details of the factors $r_\delta$ are explained later.
229: Every creation or annihilation operator, labeled by momentum $k^+$, enters
230: the initial interaction Hamiltonian together with a corresponding factor
231: $r_\delta(x)$, where $x=k^+/p^+$ and $p^+$ is the sum of all momenta that
232: label all creation operators, or, equivalently, all annihilation operators
233: in the same interaction term (see Appendix \ref{A:H}). In QCD with
234: $r_\delta(x) \sim x^\delta$, $H_\lambda$ contains the coupling constant
235: $g_\lambda$, which depends on the scale $\lambda$ in the same asymptotically
236: free way \cite{g_QCD} that characterizes the running coupling constant
237: dependence on the renormalization scale in the Feynman diagrams \cite{af1, af2}.
238:
239: Hamiltonians $H_{\lambda_0}$ with small $\lambda_0$ are worth studying
240: because their eigenstates can be expanded in the effective particle basis
241: in the Fock space and the wave functions in this expansion are expected
242: to correspond to the constituent picture of hadrons. This is envisioned
243: in analogy to the models based on Yukawa theory \cite{largep}. The
244: interactions are suppressed by the form factors and cannot copiously create
245: new constituents, even if the coupling constant $\alpha_0$ becomes large.
246: Exotic hadron states may have their probability distributions shifted
247: in the number of effective particles above the constituent quark model
248: values of 2 or 3 \cite{exotics}. The effective dynamics can be in agreement
249: with requirements of special relativity even if it is limited to a small
250: number of effective constituents, and the RGEP provides rules for
251: constructing the representation of the Poincare group \cite{algebra}.
252: But the key feature is that the transition between the bare and effective
253: degrees of freedom is made in one and the same formalism. There is no need
254: to match different formulations of the theory, such as in the case of lattice
255: theory and the continuum perturbation theory in the Minkowski space \cite
256: {match1, match2, match3}, with none of the parts meant to cover the whole
257: range of relevant scales on its own.
258:
259: One more comment is required concerning the small-$x$ divergences in
260: the eigenvalue equation for $H_\lambda$. In the initial studies that
261: used $\delta^+$ to limit bare particles' momenta and employed coupling
262: coherence to derive certain $H_\lambda$ \cite{gcoh1, gcoh2, gcoh3, QQgcoh,
263: QQ}, one could keep only a quark-anti-quark sector in the corresponding
264: eigenvalue problem and the resulting equation was finite in the limit
265: $\delta^+ \rightarrow 0$. Similarly, no small-$k^+$ divergences were
266: encountered in the case of gluonium approximated by states of only two
267: gluons \cite{gluonium}. In contrast, the present RGEP approach demands
268: inclusion of states that contain an additional effective gluon which is
269: needed to cancel small-$x$ divergences. For example, if one keeps only
270: a pair of the effective quark and anti-quark, the leading non-relativistic
271: (NR) terms are free from the small-$x$ singularities \cite{RGEP} but
272: relativistic corrections are singular \cite{divx1, divx2}. When the
273: additional gluon is included, the condition of cancellation of the small-$x$
274: divergences becomes a guide in understanding the gluon dynamics. The rules
275: of including the gluons must be brought under quantitative control and the
276: well-known case of heavy quarkonia provides a laboratory for testing the
277: approach based on the gluon mass ansatz. The tests require a first approximation
278: to begin with and a candidate is identified in the next sections.
279:
280: This paper is organized as follows. Section \ref{sec:H} describes the
281: initial Hamiltonian of LF QCD with one heavy flavor and the procedure for
282: deriving an effective $H_\lambda$. Section \ref{sec:E} discusses the
283: eigenvalue equation for a quarkonium, and introduces the ansatz for the
284: gluon mass term. Small-$x$ effects in the dynamics are described in
285: Section \ref{sec:sx}. The resulting potential in the Schr\"odinger
286: equation for a $Q\bar Q$ bound state is described in Section \ref{sec:SE}.
287: Section \ref{sec:C} provides a brief summary and outlook. Appendices
288: contain key details required for completeness.
289:
290: \section{Hamiltonians}
291: \label{sec:H}
292: The regularized canonical Hamiltonian of LF QCD with one heavy flavor
293: of quarks, $H$, is given in Appendix \ref{A:H}. It includes ultraviolet
294: counterterms. This section describes the main features of $H$ and the RGEP
295: derivation of the effective Hamiltonian $H_\lambda$ with a finite width
296: $\lambda$. $H_\lambda$ is independent of the ultraviolet regularization
297: factors $r_\Delta$ in $H$ when $\Delta \rightarrow \infty$. The small-$x$
298: regularization factors $r_\delta$, which are also present in $H$, and their
299: role in $H_\lambda$, will be discussed later.
300:
301: The initial Hamiltonian has the structure
302: \begin{equation}
303: \label{H}
304: H = H_{\psi^2} + H_{A^2} + H_{\psi A \psi} + H_{(\psi\psi)^2} + X
305: \end{equation}
306: where the term $H_{\psi^2}$ denotes the kinetic energy operator
307: for quarks, $H_{A^2}$ the kinetic energy operator for gluons,
308: $H_{\psi A \psi}$ is the interaction term that couples gluons to
309: quarks, $H_{(\psi\psi)^2}$ is the instantaneous interaction between
310: quarks, and $X$ denotes all other terms including the counterterms.
311:
312: In terms of the creation operators for bare particles, $b^\dagger$
313: for quarks, $d^\dagger$ for anti-quarks, $a^\dagger$ for gluons, and
314: the corresponding annihilation operators, the kinetic energy terms
315: are of the form,
316: \begin{equation}
317: \label{tquark}
318: H_{\psi^2} = \sum_{\sigma c} \int [k] {k^{\perp \, 2} + m^2 \over k^+}
319: \left[b^\dagger_{k\sigma c}b_{k\sigma c} +
320: d^\dagger_{k\sigma c }d_{k\sigma c} \right] \, ,
321: \end{equation}
322: and
323: \begin{equation}
324: \label{tgluon}
325: H_{A^2} = \sum_{\sigma c} \int [k] {k^{\perp \, 2} \over k^+} \,
326: a^\dagger_{k\sigma c}a_{k\sigma c} \, ,
327: \end{equation}
328: where $k$ denotes the three kinematical momentum components, $k^+$ and
329: $k^\perp = (k^1,k^2)$. The symbol in a bracket, such as $[k]$, refers
330: to the integration measure,
331: \begin{eqnarray}
332: [k] = {dk^+ d^2 k^\perp \over 16 \pi^3 k^+} \, .
333: \end{eqnarray}
334: The subscript $c$ stands for color and $\sigma$ for spin. The mass $m$
335: is assumed to be very large in comparison to $\Lambda_{QCD}$.
336:
337: The quark-gluon coupling terms in $H_{\psi A \psi}$ that
338: preserve the number of quarks and anti-quarks, have the form
339: \begin{equation}
340: \label{Y}
341: Y = \, g \sum_{123} \, \int[123] \, \tilde r_{3,1}
342: \left[j_{23} \, b^\dagger_2 a^\dagger_1 b_3 -
343: \bar j_{23} \, d^\dagger_2 a^\dagger_1 d_3 + h.c. \right] \, .
344: \end{equation}
345: The regularization factor $\tilde r_{3,1}$ is singled out
346: to indicate its presence. The coefficients $j_{23}$ and $\bar
347: j_{23}$, are functions of the quark and gluon colors, spins,
348: and momenta, with all details provided in the Appendix \ref{A:H}.
349: These coefficients contain the three-momentum conservation
350: $\delta$-function factors, denoted by $\tilde \delta$, color
351: factors $t^1_{23}$, and products of spinors, $j^\mu_{23} =
352: \bar u_2 \gamma^\mu u_3$ and $\bar j^\mu_{32} = \bar v_3
353: \gamma^\mu v_2$. The latter are contracted with polarization
354: vectors for gluons, so that
355: \begin{equation}
356: j_{23} = \tilde \delta \, t^1_{23} \,
357: g_{\mu \nu} \, j^\mu_{23} \, \varepsilon^{\nu \, *}_1 \, ,
358: \end{equation}
359: and
360: \begin{equation}
361: \bar j_{23} = \tilde \delta \, t^1_{32} \,
362: g_{\mu \nu} \, \bar j^\mu_{32} \, \varepsilon^{\nu \, *}_1 \, .
363: \end{equation}
364: The instantaneous term $H_{(\psi\psi)^2}$ contains
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: Z & = & -g^2 \,\sum_{1234}\int[1234] \,\tilde\delta \, t^a_{12} t^a_{43}
367: \left[ j^+_{12} \bar j^+_{34}/ (k^+_1-k^+_2)^2\right]
368: \nonumber \\
369: & \times &
370: [\tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{4,3}+ \tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3,4}]\,
371: b_1^\dagger d_3^\dagger d_4 b_2 \, .
372: \end{eqnarray}
373:
374: The current factors $j$ and the gluon polarization vectors grow
375: with the relative transverse momenta of the interacting particles,
376: $\kappa^\perp$. These can increase to infinity and the regularization
377: factors $r_\Delta$ are introduced to limit the range to a finite one.
378: In addition, there are small-$x$ divergences due to the inverse powers
379: of $x$, especially in the gluon polarization vectors that contain
380: terms proportional to $\kappa^\perp/x$. The small-$x$ singularities
381: are regulated by factors $r_\delta$.
382:
383: The RGEP procedure generates ultraviolet counterterms contained in the
384: operator $X$ in Eq. (\ref{H}) and renders the effective particle
385: Hamiltonian $H_\lambda$ which is independent of $r_\Delta$. The procedure
386: is defined order by order in the formal expansion in powers of the bare
387: coupling constant $g$. This expansion is eventually re-written in terms
388: of the effective coupling constant, $g_\lambda$, which replaces $g$ in
389: $H_\lambda$ and depends on the ratio $\lambda/\Lambda_{QCD}$ \cite{g_QCD}.
390: The procedure is designed so that energy differences in denominators of
391: the perturbative evaluation of $H_\lambda$ are limited from below by
392: $\lambda$. Therefore, no infrared divergences are encountered in the
393: evaluation of $H_\lambda$. Also, no perturbative intrusion into the
394: binding mechanism is generated when $\lambda$ is kept above the scale
395: of typical relative momenta of the bound-state constituents. These
396: features qualify the RGEP as a candidate for providing an answer to the
397: well-known question of how it is possible that a simple two-body Schr\"odinger
398: equation may represent a solution to a theory as complex as QCD \cite{long, Zalewski}.
399:
400: A very brief recapitulation of the RGEP is provided here for completeness.
401: The derivation of $H_\lambda$ begins with a unitary change of the degrees
402: of freedom from the bare quarks and gluons in Eq. (\ref{H}) to the effective
403: ones. Let $q$ commonly denote the bare operators $b^\dagger$, $d^\dagger$,
404: and $a^\dagger$, and their Hermitian conjugates. The operators $q$ are
405: transformed by a unitary operator $\cal U_\lambda$ into operators $q_\lambda$
406: that create or annihilate effective particles with identical quantum numbers.
407: \begin{equation}
408: q_\lambda \,\, = \,\, {\cal U}_\lambda \,\, q \,\, {\cal
409: U}^{\,\dagger}_\lambda \,\, .
410: \end{equation}
411: The bare point-like particles in $H$ of Eq. (\ref{H}) correspond to
412: $\lambda$ equal infinity. One rewrites the Hamiltonian $H$ in terms of
413: $q_\lambda$ and obtains
414: \begin{equation}
415: \label{calH}
416: H = H_\lambda(q_\lambda) \, .
417: \end{equation}
418: Using ${\cal U}_\lambda$, one has
419: \begin{equation}
420: {\cal H}_\lambda \equiv H_\lambda(q) = {\cal U}^{\,\dagger}_\lambda
421: H {\cal U}_\lambda \, .
422: \end{equation}
423: Thus, ${\cal H}_\lambda$ has the same coefficient functions in front
424: of products of $q$s as the effective $H_\lambda$ has in front of the
425: unitarily equivalent products of $q_\lambda$s. Differentiating ${\cal
426: H}_\lambda$ with respect to $\lambda$, one obtains
427: \begin{equation}
428: {\cal H}'_\lambda = - [{\cal T}_\lambda, \, {\cal H}_\lambda] \, ,
429: \end{equation}
430: where ${\cal T}_\lambda = {\cal U}^\dagger_\lambda \,{\cal
431: U}'_\lambda$. ${\cal T}_\lambda$ is constructed using the notion
432: of vertex form factors for effective particles. For example, if an
433: operator without a form factor has the structure
434: \begin{equation}
435: \hat O_{\lambda} = \int [123] \,\, V_\lambda(1,2,3) \,\,
436: q^\dagger_{\lambda 1} q^\dagger_{\lambda 2} q_{\lambda 3} \, ,
437: \end{equation}
438: then the operator with a form factor is written as $f_\lambda {\hat
439: O}_{\lambda}$ and has the structure
440: \begin{equation}
441: f_\lambda {\hat O}_{\lambda} = \int [123] \,\,
442: f_\lambda({\cal M}_{12},{\cal M}_3)\,\, V_\lambda(1,2,3) \,\,
443: q^\dagger_{\lambda 1} q^\dagger_{\lambda 2} q_{\lambda 3} \, .
444: \end{equation}
445: Different choices of the function $f_\lambda$ imply different
446: interactions. The choice adopted in this study is \cite{g_QCD}
447: \begin{equation}
448: \label{f}
449: f_\lambda({\cal M}_{12},{\cal M}_3) = \exp[-({\cal M}_{12}^2 - {\cal
450: M}_3^2)^2/\lambda^4)] \, .
451: \end{equation}
452: For any operator $\hat O$ expressible as a linear combination of products
453: of creation and annihilation operators, $f \hat O$ contains a form factor
454: $f_\lambda({\cal M}_c, {\cal M}_a)$ in front of every product. ${\cal M}_c$
455: and ${\cal M}_a$ stand for the total free invariant masses of the particles
456: created (subscript $c$) and annihilated (subscript $a$) by a given product.
457:
458: The effective Hamiltonian is defined to have the structure
459: \begin{equation}
460: \label{fG}
461: H_\lambda = f_\lambda G_\lambda \, ,
462: \end{equation}
463: where $G_\lambda$ has to be calculated for given $f_\lambda$. One uses
464: ${\cal G}_\lambda = G_\lambda(q)$, which is introduced in the same way as
465: ${\cal H}_\lambda$ in Eq. (\ref{calH}). ${\cal G}_I$ satisfies the
466: differential equation
467: \begin{equation}
468: \label{G}
469: {\cal G}_I'\,\, = \,\, \left[ f{\cal G}_I, \, \left\{ (1-f){\cal
470: G}_I \right\}'_{{\cal G}_0} \right] \,\, ,
471: \end{equation}
472: where ${\cal G}_I = {\cal G} - {\cal G}_0$, ${\cal G}_0$ is the part
473: of $H$ that does not depend on the coupling constant $g$, and the curly
474: bracket with subscript ${\cal G}_0$ denotes ${\cal T}$ that solves \cite{RGEP}
475: \begin{equation}
476: [{\cal T}, \, {\cal G}_0] = [(1 - f) {\cal G}_I]' \, .
477: \end{equation}
478: The initial condition for Eq. (\ref{G}) is that ${\cal G}_\infty = H$,
479: \begin{equation}
480: \label{intG}
481: {\cal G}_\lambda \,\, = \,\, H \,\, + \,\,
482: \int_\infty^\lambda ds \,\left[ f_s{\cal G}_{Is}, \, \left\{(1-f_s){\cal
483: G}_{Is} \right\} _{{\cal G}_0} \right] \, .
484: \end{equation}
485: This equation shows that one can find the counterterms $X$ in $H$ that remove
486: regularization dependence from ${\cal G}_\lambda$. ${\cal H}_\lambda =
487: f_\lambda {\cal G}_\lambda$ and $H_\lambda$ is obtained by replacing $q$ by
488: $q_\lambda$.
489:
490: ${\cal G}_{I \lambda}$ is expanded into a series of terms $\tau_n \sim g^n$,
491: \begin{equation}
492: {\cal G}_I \quad = \quad \sum_{n=1}^\infty \, \tau_n \, .
493: \end{equation}
494: $\tau_1$ is independent of $\lambda$. Only the term $H_{\psi A \psi}$ needs
495: to be discussed here. According to Eq. (\ref{Y}), $\tau_1 = \alpha_{21} +
496: \alpha_{12}$, where $\alpha_{21}$ denotes terms that create a gluon and
497: $\alpha_{12}$ the terms that annihilate a gluon (the left subscript denotes
498: the number of creation and the right subscript the number of annihilation
499: operators). The corresponding effective Hamiltonian interaction term is
500: obtained by multiplying the integrand in Eq. (\ref{Y}) by $f_\lambda$ and
501: transforming $q$s into $q_\lambda$s.
502:
503: When one neglects the terms that change the number of particles by more
504: than one, $\tau_2=\beta_{11} + \beta_{22}$. Equation (\ref{G}) implies
505: \begin{equation}
506: \tau_2' = [\{f'\tau_1\}, f\tau_1] \equiv f_2 \, [\tau_1 \tau_1] \, ,
507: \end{equation}
508: with $f_2 = \{f'\}f - f\{f'\}$. The first factor $f$ in $f_2$ refers
509: to invariant masses in the first $\tau$ in the square bracket, and
510: the second $f$ in $f_2$ is for the second $\tau$. The square bracket
511: denotes all connected terms that result from contractions that replace
512: products $q_i q_j^\dagger$ by commutators $[q_i, q_j^\dagger]$. The
513: solution for $\tau_2$ is then given by
514: \begin{equation}
515: \tau_{2 \lambda} = {\cal F}_{2 \lambda} [\tau_1 \tau_1] + \tau_{2
516: \infty} \, ,
517: \end{equation}
518: where $\tau_{2 \infty}$ includes $H_{(\psi\psi)^2}$ and the second-order
519: mass counterterms from $X$ in Eq. (\ref{H}). ${\cal F}_{2\lambda}$ depends
520: on incoming and outgoing momenta in the two vertices generated by the $\tau$s.
521: If one labels the three successive configurations of particle momenta by
522: $a$, $b$, and $c$, in the sequence $a\tau_{ab} b \tau_{bc} c$, and introduces
523: the symbol $uv = {\cal M}^2_{uv} - {\cal M}^2_{vu}$, where ${\cal M}^2_{uv}$
524: denotes the free invariant mass of a set of particles from the configuration
525: $u$ that are connected to the particles in the configuration $v$ by the
526: interaction $\tau_{uv}$ in the sequence $u \tau_{uv} v$, the vertex form
527: factor of Eq. (\ref{f}) in the interaction $\tau_{uv}$ can be written as
528: \begin{equation}
529: \label{fab}
530: f_\lambda({\cal M}_{ab},{\cal M}_{ba}) = \exp{[-(ab^2/\lambda^4)]}
531: \equiv f_{ab} \, .
532: \end{equation}
533: If one then denotes the parent momentum for the vertex $\tau_{uv}$ by
534: $P_{uv}$, and writes $p_{uv}$ in place of $P^+_{uv}$, while all the minus
535: components of momenta of the virtual quarks and gluons are given by the
536: eigenvalues of ${\cal G}_0 = H_{\psi^2} + H_{A^2}$,
537: \begin{equation}
538: \label{F2}
539: {\cal F}_2 (a, b, c) = { p_{ba} ba + p_{bc} bc \over ba^2 + bc^2 } \,
540: \left[ f_{ab} f_{bc} - 1 \right] \, .
541: \end{equation}
542:
543: The second-order perturbation theory renders
544: \begin{equation}
545: \label{Hl}
546: H_\lambda = T_{q \lambda} + T_{g \lambda}
547: + f_\lambda \left[ Y_{qg \lambda}
548: + V_{q \bar q \lambda} + Z_{q\bar q \lambda} \right] \, .
549: \end{equation}
550: The kinetic energy term for effective quarks is
551: \begin{equation}
552: \label{tql}
553: T_{q \lambda} =
554: \sum_{\sigma c} \int [k] {k^{\perp \, 2} + m^2_\lambda \over k^+}
555: \left[b^\dagger_{\lambda k \sigma c}b_{\lambda k \sigma c} +
556: d^\dagger_{\lambda k \sigma c }d_{\lambda k \sigma c} \right] \, ,
557: \end{equation}
558: where
559: \begin{eqnarray}
560: \label{mlambda}
561: m^2_\lambda & = & m^2_0 + (4/3)\, g^2 \, \int [x\kappa] \,
562: \tilde r^2_\delta(x)\,
563: \sum_{12} |j^\nu_{23} \, \varepsilon^*_{\nu 1}|^2
564: \nonumber \\
565: & \times & \left[{\cal F}_{2 \lambda} (m^2,{\cal M}^2, m^2)
566: -{\cal F}_{2 \lambda_0} (m^2,{\cal M}^2, m^2) \right]/k^+_3 \, .
567: \nonumber \\
568: & &
569: \end{eqnarray}
570: In the order of appearance, $m^2_0$ is the quark mass squared
571: that should be present in $T_{q \lambda_0}$ in order to fit data
572: for quarkonia, $m^2_0 = m^2 + o(g^2)$. Factor 4/3 comes from color,
573: $(N_c^2 - 1)/(2N_c)$. The integration measure is,
574: \begin{equation}
575: [x\kappa] = dx \, d^2 \kappa^\perp /[ 16\pi^3 x(1-x)] \,
576: \end{equation}
577: where $x = k_1^+/k_3^+$ is the fraction of the quark momentum $k_3$
578: carried by the virtual gluon, and $\kappa^\perp = k_1^\perp - x
579: k_3^\perp$ is the relative transverse momentum of the gluon with
580: respect to the quark 2. The effective mass does not depend on the
581: particle motion. This is a unique property of the RGEP in LF dynamics.
582: The small-$x$ regularization factor is
583: \begin{equation}
584: \tilde r_\delta (x) = \, r_\delta (x) \, r_\delta (1-x) \, ,
585: \end{equation}
586: where \cite{g_QCD}
587: \begin{equation}
588: r_\delta(x) = x^\delta \, \theta(x) \, .
589: \end{equation}
590: The middle argument of ${\cal F}_{2 \lambda}$ is
591: \begin{equation}
592: \label{calM}
593: {\cal M}^2 = (m^2 + \kappa^{\perp \, 2})/(1-x) + \kappa^{\perp \, 2}/x \, ,
594: \end{equation}
595: and
596: \begin{equation}
597: {\cal F}_{2 \lambda} (m^2,{\cal M}^2, m^2)/k^+_3 =
598: \left[ f^2_\lambda({\cal M}^2,m^2)-1\right]/({\cal M}^2-m^2) \, .
599: \end{equation}
600: The gluon kinetic energy term reads
601: \begin{equation}
602: \label{tgl}
603: T_{g \lambda} = \sum_{\sigma c} \int [k] {k^{\perp \, 2} + \mu^2_\lambda
604: \over k^+} \, a^\dagger_{\lambda k \sigma c}a_{\lambda k \sigma c} \, .
605: \end{equation}
606: The explicit form of $\mu^2_\lambda$ \cite{RGEP, g_QCD} is not needed here.
607:
608: The next term in Eq. (\ref{Hl}) is $Y_\lambda = f_\lambda Y_{qg \lambda}$,
609: \begin{eqnarray}
610: \label{yl}
611: Y_\lambda & = \, g \sum_{123} \, \int[123]
612: \,r_\delta(x_{1/3})\,r_\delta(x_{2/3})
613: \, f_\lambda({\cal M}^2_{12},m^2) \nonumber \\
614: & \times \left[j_{23} \, b^\dagger_{\lambda 2}
615: a^\dagger_{\lambda 1} b_{\lambda 3} +
616: \bar j_{23} \, d^\dagger_{\lambda 2}
617: a^\dagger_{\lambda 1} d_{\lambda 3} +
618: h.c. \right] \, .
619: \end{eqnarray}
620:
621: The effective potential term, $V_\lambda = f_\lambda V_{q \bar q
622: \lambda}$, originates from the exchange of bare gluons with jumps
623: in the invariant mass of intermediate states above $\lambda$.
624: \begin{equation}
625: \label{vl}
626: V_\lambda = -g^2 \,\sum_{1234}\int[1234]
627: \, \tilde\delta \, t^a_{12} t^a_{43} V_\lambda(13,24)
628: \, b_1^\dagger d_3^\dagger d_4 b_2 \, ,
629: \end{equation}
630: where
631: \begin{eqnarray}
632: V_\lambda(13,24) & = &
633: { d_{\mu \nu}(k_5) \over k^+_5}
634: j^\mu_{12} \bar j^\nu_{43} \,
635: f_\lambda({\cal M}^2_{13}, {\cal M}^2_{24}) \nonumber \\
636: &\times & \left[
637: \theta(z)
638: \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/1}) \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/4}) \,
639: {\cal F}_{2 \lambda} (1, 253, 4) \right. \nonumber \\
640: & + & \left.
641: \theta(-z)
642: \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/3}) \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/2})
643: \,{\cal F}_{2 \lambda} (3, 154, 2)
644: \right] \, . \nonumber \\
645: & &
646: \end{eqnarray}
647: \begin{figure}[htb]
648: \includegraphics[scale=1]{oge.eps}
649: \caption{\label{fig:oge} Momentum labels in the interaction term
650: mediated by the exchange of one high-energy gluon. The same labeling
651: is used in the exchange of effective low-energy gluon in the next
652: section and appendices.}
653: \end{figure}
654:
655: The sum over polarizations of the intermediate gluon reads
656: \begin{equation}
657: \label{dmunu}
658: d_{\mu \nu}(k_5) = - g_{\mu \nu} +
659: { n^\mu k_5^\nu + k_5^\mu n^\nu \over k_5^+ } \, ,
660: \end{equation}
661: where the gluon momentum is
662: \begin{equation}
663: k_5^{+, \perp} = \varepsilon(z)
664: \, (k_1^{+, \perp} - k_2^{+, \perp}) \, ,
665: \end{equation}
666: and $\varepsilon(z) = \theta(z) - \theta(-z)$,
667: \begin{equation}
668: z = (k_1^+ - k_2^+)/(k_1^+ + k_3^+) \, ,
669: \end{equation}
670: while $x_5 = |z| = k_5^+/(k_1^+ + k_3^+)$, and
671: \begin{equation}
672: \label{k5shell}
673: k_5^- = k_5^{\perp \, 2}/ k_5^+ \, .
674: \end{equation}
675:
676: The last term in Eq. (\ref{Hl}) is the instantaneous interaction
677: between effective quarks, $Z_\lambda = f_\lambda Z_{q\bar q \lambda}$.
678: \begin{eqnarray}
679: \label{zl}
680: Z_\lambda = -g^2 \sum_{1234}\int[1234]
681: \tilde\delta t^a_{12} t^a_{43} Z_\lambda(13,24)
682: \, b_{\lambda 1}^\dagger d_{\lambda 3}^\dagger
683: d_{\lambda 4} b_{\lambda 2} , \nonumber \\
684: \end{eqnarray}
685: where
686: \begin{eqnarray}
687: \label{zzl}
688: Z_\lambda(13,24) & = & {1 \over k_5^{+ \, 2}} \,
689: j^+_{12} \bar j^+_{34} \,
690: f_\lambda({\cal M}^2_{13}, {\cal M}^2_{24}) \nonumber \\
691: & \times &
692: [ \theta(z)\tilde r_\delta(x_{5/1}) \tilde r_\delta(x_{5/4})
693: \nonumber \\
694: & + & \theta(-z)\tilde r_\delta(x_{5/3}) \tilde r_\delta(x_{5/2})] \, .
695: \end{eqnarray}
696: \begin{figure}[htb]
697: \includegraphics[scale=1]{sea.eps}
698: \caption{\label{fig:sea} Momentum labels in the
699: instantaneous gluon interaction term.}
700: \end{figure}
701:
702: \section{Eigenvalue equation}
703: \label{sec:E}
704: Once $\lambda$ is lowered in perturbation theory to some value
705: $\lambda_0$ just above the scale of binding mechanism, the resulting
706: $H_{\lambda_0}$ can produce the mass and wave function of a bound
707: state of interest in a numerical diagonalization. The basis states
708: can be limited to only those that have free invariant masses within
709: a range of size about $\lambda$ around the eigenvalue. This has been
710: verified numerically in a matrix model with asymptotic freedom and
711: bound states \cite{modelafbs, optimization, optimization1}. In that
712: calculation, $H_\lambda$ was derived using perturbation theory up to
713: 6th order. A quite small set of effective basis states with energies
714: between 4 MeV and 4 GeV was sufficient to reach accuracy close to
715: 1\% in the computation of the bound-state energy on the order of 1
716: GeV. In great contrast, the initial Hamiltonian of the model coupled
717: all states in the entire range between 0.5 KeV and 65 TeV. Preliminary
718: estimates performed in Yukawa-like theories also indicate that the
719: form factors $f_\lambda$ suppress large momentum changes so strongly
720: that the effective dynamics derived in low-order perturbation theory
721: receives only small corrections from higher order terms, even when
722: the coupling constant is made comparable with 1 \cite{largep}. In
723: the case of heavy quarkonia the same strategy should work even more
724: accurately than in the Yukawa theory because $\alpha_s$ may be very
725: small in comparison to 1. But the weak coupling expansion for
726: $H_{\lambda_0}$ produces new interaction terms already in order
727: $\alpha_0$. These are derived here. An ansatz for the gluon mass
728: allows us then to finesse the structure of the first approximation
729: for the resulting $Q\bar Q$-potential.
730:
731: The eigenvalue problem for $H_\lambda$ reads
732: \begin{equation}
733: \label{evh}
734: H_\lambda |P\rangle \, = \, E |P\rangle \, ,
735: \end{equation}
736: where $|P\rangle$ denotes an eigenstate of the operators $P_\lambda^+$
737: and $P^\perp_\lambda$ with their eigenvalues denoted by $P^+$ and
738: $P^\perp$ (an example of the RGEP construction of the Poincare algebra
739: at scale $\lambda$ in quantum field theory is given in \cite{algebra}).
740: The eigenvalue $E$ has the form
741: \begin{equation}
742: E \, = \, (M^2 + P^{\perp \, 2})/P^+ \, .
743: \end{equation}
744: The center-of-mass motion is separated from the binding mechanism,
745: which is a unique LF-dynamics feature preserved by the RGEP, and
746: $P^+$ and $P^\perp$ drop out of the eigenvalue equation. The state
747: $|P\rangle$ is written in the effective particle basis as
748: \begin{equation}
749: \label{|P>}
750: |P\rangle = |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle +
751: |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle +
752: \, . \, . \, . \, \, .
753: \end{equation}
754: The dots denote components with more than three effective particles. Such
755: expansion does not apply in the case of the bare particles because those
756: interact locally and the interactions disperse probability density to high
757: momentum regions and multi-particle sectors \cite{largep}. The wave function
758: $\psi_{13}(\kappa^\perp_{13},x_1)$ of the effective valence component
759: $|Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle$, is introduced by the formula
760: \begin{eqnarray}
761: \label{QQ}
762: |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle = \int [13] \, P^+\tilde \delta
763: \, \psi_{13}(\kappa^\perp_{13},x_1) b^\dagger_{\lambda 1} d^\dagger_{\lambda 3}
764: |0\rangle \, ,
765: \end{eqnarray}
766: where the quark and anti-quark quantum numbers are labeled with 1 and 3,
767: respectively. $\psi_{13}(\kappa^\perp_{13},x_1)$ must have dimension of
768: $1/\kappa_{13}^\perp$ for the canonical normalization condition to give
769: $\langle P'|P\rangle = P^+\tilde \delta(P-P')$ (quantum numbers of the
770: states $|P\rangle$ and $|P'\rangle$ must be the same). The relative
771: transverse momentum of two particles, $1$ and $3$, is always defined as
772: \begin{equation}
773: \label{kappa}
774: \kappa^\perp_{13} = (k_3^+ k_1^\perp - k_1^+ k_3^\perp)/(k_1^+ + k_3^+) \,,
775: \end{equation}
776: and $x_1 = k_1^+/P^+ = 1-x_3$. The wave function depends on $\lambda$
777: and quickly vanishes for $|\kappa^{\perp}_{13}| > \lambda$. The
778: normalization condition gives,
779: \begin{equation}
780: \langle Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle
781: = N_{Q\bar Q}(\lambda) \, P^+\tilde \delta(P-P')|_{P'=P} \, ,
782: \end{equation}
783: where
784: \begin{equation}
785: N_{Q\bar Q}(\lambda) = \sum_{13}\int[x_1\kappa_{13}]\,
786: |\psi_{13}(\kappa^\perp_{13},x_1)|^2 \, .
787: \end{equation}
788: The probability of finding other components than the $|Q_\lambda
789: \bar Q_\lambda \rangle$ is given by $1 - N_{Q\bar Q}(\lambda)$.
790: The value of $N_{Q\bar Q}(\infty)$ is not known but it may be
791: close to 0. On the other hand, one expects $N_{Q\bar Q}(\lambda)$
792: to be close to 1 when $m \gg \Lambda_{QCD}$ and
793: \begin{equation}
794: \label{weakcl}
795: m \gg \lambda \gg \Lambda_{QCD} \, .
796: \end{equation}
797: When the wave function is negligible for relative momenta much
798: larger than such $\lambda$, the NR approximation must be accurate in
799: description of the relative motion of quarks. In addition, when
800: $\alpha_\lambda \ll 1$, the Coulomb binding mechanism is expected
801: to work and the dominant region of momenta should lie around the
802: Bohr momentum scale $k_B = \alpha_\lambda \, m$, provided that
803: $\lambda \gg k_B$. At the same time, all the fermion spin and
804: relativistic correction factors cannot become large (or diverging
805: \cite{krp}) in the NR expansion because of the presence of $f_\lambda$
806: \cite{largep}. But the dynamics of the dominant $|Q_\lambda \bar
807: Q_\lambda \rangle$ component receives some significant contributions
808: from the $|Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle$ component in
809: the small-$x_5$ region, since the coupling to the gluon sector grows
810: like $\kappa^\perp_5/x_5$ when $x_5 \rightarrow 0$. The gluon component
811: may have a negligible contribution to the norm but has to be accounted
812: for when $x_5$ is small.
813:
814: If one neglected sectors with gluons entirely, the eigenvalue Eq.
815: (\ref{evh}) would read
816: \begin{eqnarray}
817: \label{evqq}
818: \left[ T_{q \lambda} + f_\lambda
819: \left( V_{q \bar q \lambda} + Z_{q\bar q \lambda}\right)
820: \right]|Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle =
821: E |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle \, .
822: \end{eqnarray}
823: This equation is mentioned here because an analogous one was considered
824: before \cite{gcoh3, QQgcoh, QQ} in a scheme using coupling coherence
825: and the absolute lower bound on gluon momenta, $k^+_5 > \delta^+$.
826: The equation found in \cite{gcoh3} had a finite limit when $\delta^+
827: \rightarrow 0$. The resulting dynamics contained a logarithmically
828: rising potential and reproduced some of the characteristic features of
829: the charmonium and bottomonium spectra. This was a considerable success
830: in view of how crude were the approximations and the fact that the
831: potential derived in \cite{gcoh3} and employed in \cite{QQgcoh, QQ}
832: behaved differently in the transverse and longitudinal directions. But
833: that strategy could not work in the RGEP approach.
834:
835: Three reasons can be given now for why the pure $ |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda
836: \rangle $ approximation is not allowed in solving the eigenvalue problem
837: for $H_\lambda$. Two of them are related to the fact that the coupling
838: between the sectors $ |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle $ and $ |Q_\lambda
839: \bar Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle $ is proportional to the first power of
840: the coupling constant $g$, being mediated by the term $Y_\lambda$ of Eq.
841: (\ref{yl}). The first argument is non-perturbative. It is based on the
842: result that the matrix models with asymptotic freedom and bound states lead
843: to a successful approximation to the eigenvalue equation with $H_\lambda$
844: of second order in $g_\lambda$ if and only if all important matrix elements
845: in the properly chosen energy window are accounted for. These certainly
846: include matrix elements on the order of $g$ \cite{modelafbs, optimization}.
847: The second argument is perturbative, and concerns the evaluation of the
848: effective Hamiltonian that acts in the sector $|Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda
849: \rangle$ alone. When the states $|Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle$
850: are lifted in energy by an amount of order 1, quantum transitions in the
851: quark-anti-quark sector that proceed through the states $|Q_\lambda \bar
852: Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle$ are formally of order $g^2$ and must be
853: included when one computes the quark-anti-quark dynamics in a series of
854: powers of $g$ up to terms of the explicit order of $\alpha_\lambda$. The
855: third argument is based on the fact that Eq. (\ref{evqq}) has a finite
856: limit when $\delta \rightarrow 0$ only in the leading NR approximation
857: \cite{RGEP}. Relativistic corrections contain singularities \cite{divx1,
858: divx2} and the additional gluon sector has to be taken into account to
859: remove them.
860:
861: The eigenvalue Eq. (\ref{evh}) implies that the $|Q_\lambda \bar
862: Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle$ component satisfies equation
863: \begin{eqnarray}
864: \label{evqqg}
865: \left[ T_{q \lambda} + T_{g \lambda} +
866: V_{q \bar q g \lambda} - E \right]
867: |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle =
868: - Y_\lambda |Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda \rangle \, . \nonumber \\
869: \end{eqnarray}
870: $V_{q \bar q g \lambda}$ denotes interactions with sectors with more than
871: one gluon and/or additional quark-anti-quark pairs, and the non-abelian
872: gluon-quark and quark-anti-quark potentials of order $\alpha_\lambda$.
873: The interactions cause a shift in the gluon energy and make the eigenvalue
874: equation differ from a similar one for positronium. The idea of seeking
875: an ansatz for the shift and building a corresponding first approximation in
876: the quark-anti-quark sector may seem completely new, but it patterns QED
877: with the exception that there one knows from the outset that the leading
878: approximation to a Hydrogen atom or positronium is given by a two-body
879: Schr\"odinger equation with a Coulomb potential \cite{CasLep, krp, qed}.
880: The NR lattice approach to heavy quarkonia \cite{nrqcd1, nrqcd2} also starts
881: from a two-body picture. The key argument is not theoretical but comes from
882: the phenomenology of hadrons. Theoretically, an ansatz for the energy shift
883: in the sector $|Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda g_\lambda \rangle $ is an attempt
884: to harness the giant eigenvalue problem for $H$ by turning it into the
885: eigenvalue problem for $H_\lambda$ and identifying the corrected Coulomb
886: picture that may apply as a first approximation in QCD.
887:
888: A practical way to increase the invariant mass of the three-body sector
889: and preserve the kinematical symmetries of LF dynamics is to add a mass
890: $\mu^2$ to $T_{g \lambda}$, using the rules outlined in Section \ref{sec:I},
891: see Eq. (\ref{ansatz1}). Since the divergence in the small-$x$ region
892: disappears in the case of positronium when one adds a sector with a
893: massless photon, a gluon mass that approaches zero when $x_5 \rightarrow
894: 0$ can remove the small-$x_5$ divergence in the quarkonium case. The
895: rotational symmetry condition on $\mu^2$ can be imposed by demanding that
896: the resulting potential in the quark-anti-quark sector is a rotationally
897: symmetric function in the center-of-mass variables (see below).
898:
899: Given a gluon mass ansatz, the whole eigenvalue problem for $H_\lambda$
900: is limited to only two coupled equations,
901: \begin{eqnarray}
902: \label{matrix}
903: (T_q + \tilde T_g)\,|Q\bar Qg\rangle \, + \, Y|Q\bar Q\rangle
904: & = & E\,|Q\bar Qg\rangle \, ,\nonumber \\
905: Y\,|Q\bar Qg\rangle \, + \,
906: \left[T_q\, + f\left( V_{q \bar q} + Z_{q\bar q}\right)\right]
907: |Q\bar Q\rangle & = & E\,|Q\bar Q\rangle \, \nonumber \\
908: & &
909: \end{eqnarray}
910: (the subscript $\lambda$ is omitted). $\tilde T_{g \lambda}$ differs
911: from $T_{g \lambda}$ of Eq. (\ref{tgl}) by replacement of the
912: perturbative $\mu^2_\lambda$ by the ansatz $\mu^2$. It is understood
913: that $\mu^2$ may depend on $\lambda$. All terms of order $g^2$ in the
914: three-body sector are ignored because they do not contribute to the
915: dynamics of the $|Q\bar Q\rangle$ component in second-order perturbation
916: theory (see below). This dynamics is described by the Hamiltonian
917: $H_{Q\bar Q}$ that acts only in the quark-anti-quark sector. One should
918: keep in $H_{Q\bar Q}$ terms of formal orders 1, $g$, and $g^2$, when
919: the effective Hamiltonian $H_\lambda$ is calculated up to the terms
920: of order $g^2$, while $\mu^2 \sim 1$. The bare $g$ is understood to go
921: over in higher order calculations to a suitably defined $g_\lambda$
922: \cite{g_QCD, optimization1}. The perturbative expansion is applied only
923: in the evaluation of $H_{Q\bar Q}$. Solution for the bound-state spectrum
924: of $H_{Q\bar Q}$ is not perturbative.
925:
926: To evaluate $H_{Q\bar Q}$ as a power series in $g$, one can introduce an
927: operator $R$ that expresses the 3-body component through the 2-body one,
928: \begin{equation}
929: |Q\bar Qg\rangle = R|Q\bar Q\rangle \, .
930: \end{equation}
931: Since $Y$ is of order $g$, $R$ is expected to be at least of order $g$.
932: If $\hat {\cal P}$ denotes the projector on the $|Q \bar Q \rangle$ sector,
933: one has $R = (1-\hat{\cal P})R = R\hat{\cal P}$ and $\hat{\cal P}R = R
934: (1-\hat{\cal P}) = 0$. The effective Hamiltonian in the $|Q\bar Q\rangle$
935: sector is then given by the formula \cite{Bloch, Wold} (see also \cite{largep}
936: concerning the context of RGEP)
937: \begin{equation}
938: H_{Q\bar Q} = {1 \over \sqrt{\hat{\cal P} + R^\dagger R}}\,
939: (\hat{\cal P}+R^\dagger )H_\lambda(\hat{\cal P}+R)\,
940: {1 \over \sqrt{\hat{\cal P} + R^\dagger R}} \, .
941: \end{equation}
942: In the first order in $g$,
943: \begin{equation}
944: \label{R}
945: R T_q - (T_q + \tilde T_g) R = Y \, .
946: \end{equation}
947: Consequently, the second-order expression for the matrix
948: elements of $H_{Q\bar Q}$ between different states $i$ and $j$ in
949: the $|Q \bar Q \rangle$ sector, is
950: \begin{eqnarray}
951: \label{hqqij}
952: \langle i|H_{Q\bar Q}|j\rangle = \langle i|
953: \left[ T_q\, + f\left( V_{q \bar q} + Z_{q\bar q}\right) \right]
954: |j\rangle \nonumber \\
955: + {1\over 2} \langle i| Y\left( {1\over E_j-T_q -\tilde T_g} +
956: {1\over E_i-T_q -\tilde T_g} \right) Y |j\rangle \, .
957: \end{eqnarray}
958: The effective eigenvalue equation for heavy quarkonia,
959: $H_{Q\bar Q} |Q \bar Q \rangle = E |Q \bar Q \rangle$,
960: takes the form
961: \begin{widetext}
962: \begin{eqnarray}
963: \label{schroedinger}
964: \left[{\kappa^{\perp \, 2}_{13} + m^2_\lambda \over x_1 x_3} + {m_Y^2(1)\over x_1}
965: + {m_Y^2(3)\over x_3} - M^2 \right]
966: \psi(\kappa^\perp_{13},x_1)
967: - {4 \over 3}{ g^2 \over 16 \pi^3 } \int {dx_2 d^2 \kappa^\perp_{24} \over x_2 x_4 }
968: \, v_\lambda(13,24) \, \psi(\kappa^\perp_{24},x_2) = 0 \, ,
969: \end{eqnarray}
970: where
971: \begin{eqnarray}
972: \label{vschroedinger}
973: v_\lambda(13,24) & = & \, V_\lambda(13,24) \, + \, Z_\lambda(13,24) \, + \,
974: \, {1 \over 2 x_5 }\,d_{\mu \nu}(k_5) \, j^\mu_{12} \bar j^\nu_{43} \, w_\lambda(13,24) \, ,
975: \end{eqnarray}
976: and
977: \begin{eqnarray}
978: \label{wlambda}
979: w_\lambda(13,24)
980: & = &
981: \left\{ \left[
982: { \theta(z)\,
983: \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/1}) \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/4}) \,
984: f_\lambda (m^2,{\cal M}^2_{52})
985: f_\lambda ({\cal M}^2_{53},m^2)
986: \over
987: (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_1
988: - [(\kappa_{13}^\perp-\kappa_{24}^\perp)^2 + \mu^2(2,5,3)]/x_5
989: - (\kappa_{24}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_2 }
990: \right. \right. \nonumber \\
991: & + & \left. \left.
992: { \theta(-z)\,
993: \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/3}) \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/2}) \,
994: f_\lambda (m^2,{\cal M}^2_{54})
995: f_\lambda ({\cal M}^2_{51},m^2)
996: \over
997: (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_3
998: - [(\kappa_{24}^\perp-\kappa_{13}^\perp)^2 + \mu^2(1,5,4)]/x_5
999: - (\kappa_{24}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_4 }
1000: \right] \right. \nonumber \\
1001: & + & \left. \left[
1002: { \theta(z)\,
1003: \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/1}) \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/4}) \,
1004: f_\lambda (m^2,{\cal M}^2_{52})
1005: f_\lambda ({\cal M}^2_{53},m^2)
1006: \over
1007: (\kappa_{24}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_4
1008: - [(\kappa_{13}^\perp-\kappa_{24}^\perp)^2 + \mu^2(2,5,3)]/x_5
1009: - (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_3 }
1010: \right. \right. \nonumber \\
1011: & + & \left.\left.
1012: { \theta(-z)\,
1013: \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/3}) \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/2}) \,
1014: f_\lambda (m^2,{\cal M}^2_{54})
1015: f_\lambda ({\cal M}^2_{51},m^2)
1016: \over
1017: (\kappa_{24}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_2
1018: - [(\kappa_{24}^\perp-\kappa_{13}^\perp)^2 + \mu^2(1,5,4)]/x_5
1019: - (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+m^2)/x_1 }
1020: \right] \right\} \, .
1021: \end{eqnarray}
1022: The terms with $\theta(z)$ describe the emission of the gluon by
1023: the quark and absorption by the anti-quark, while the terms with
1024: $\theta(-z)$ describe the gluon emission by the anti-quark and
1025: absorption by the quark, see Fig. \ref{fig:oge}. The first square
1026: bracket corresponds to the first term in the large round bracket in
1027: Eq. (\ref{hqqij}), and the second bracket corresponds to the
1028: second term. The mass terms, $m^2_Y$, originate from the emission
1029: and re-absorption of the effective gluon by the same quark, in which
1030: case both terms in the bracket of Eq. (\ref{hqqij}) are equal. The
1031: mass terms read
1032: \begin{eqnarray}
1033: \label{mY1}
1034: m^2_Y(1) = (4/3)\, g^2 \, \int [x\kappa] \, \tilde r^2_\delta(x)\,
1035: f^2_\lambda (m^2,{\cal M}^2) \, {j^\nu j^{\mu *} \,
1036: d_{\mu \nu}(k)/x_1 \over
1037: (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+ m^2)/x_1
1038: - (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+{\cal M}_1^2)/x_1 } \, ,
1039: \end{eqnarray}
1040: where
1041: \begin{eqnarray}
1042: \label{m1}
1043: {\cal M}_1^2 = [\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ \mu^2(1',5',3)]/x
1044: + (\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ m^2)/(1-x) \, ,
1045: \end{eqnarray}
1046: and,
1047: \begin{eqnarray}
1048: \label{mY3}
1049: m^2_Y(3) = (4/3)\, g^2 \, \int [x\kappa] \, \tilde r^2_\delta(x)\,
1050: f^2_\lambda (m^2,{\cal M}^2) \, {\bar j^\nu \bar j^{\mu *} \,
1051: d_{\mu \nu}(k)/x_3 \over
1052: (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+ m^2)/x_3
1053: - (\kappa_{13}^{\perp \, 2}+{\cal M}_3^2)/x_3 } \, ,
1054: \end{eqnarray}
1055: where
1056: \begin{eqnarray}
1057: \label{m3}
1058: {\cal M}_3^2 = [\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ \mu^2(1,5',3')]/x
1059: + (\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ m^2)/(1-x) \, .
1060: \end{eqnarray}
1061: \end{widetext}
1062: ${\cal M}$ is given by Eq. (\ref{calM}). The subscript $1'$ denotes
1063: the intermediate quark and $5'$ denotes the intermediate gluon in the
1064: self-interaction of the effective quark 1, and, similarly, $3'$ and $5'$
1065: denote the intermediate anti-quark and gluon in the self-interaction of
1066: the effective anti-quark 3.
1067:
1068: The gluon four-momentum $k_5$ in the sum over polarizations, i.e., in
1069: $d_{\mu \nu}(k_5)$ in Eq. (\ref{dmunu}), can be written as
1070: \begin{equation}
1071: k_5^\alpha = \varepsilon(z) q_{ij}^\alpha + n^\alpha \,
1072: \left[ k^-_5 - \varepsilon(z) q_{ij}^-\right ] /2 \, ,
1073: \end{equation}
1074: where $ij$ refers to quarks 1 and 2, or anti-quarks 3 and 4,
1075: \begin{equation}
1076: q_{ij} = k_i - k_j \, .
1077: \end{equation}
1078: The quark momentum four-vectors are on the mass shell. Since the
1079: gluon connects two vertices, one momentum $k_5$ in $d_{\mu\nu}(k_5)$
1080: is contracted with the current carried by the quark, and the other
1081: with the current of the anti-quark. In the self-interactions, both
1082: momenta are contracted with the same current. The momentum $k_5$
1083: contracted with current $j^\alpha_{ij}$ can be expressed through
1084: $q^\alpha_{ij}$. But the current conservation implies that the terms
1085: proportional to $q_{ij}$ give zero. Therefore, one can replace Eq.
1086: (\ref{dmunu}) in the gluon exchange terms by
1087: \begin{eqnarray}
1088: \label{dmn}
1089: & d_{\mu \nu}(k_5) = - g_{\mu \nu} \, + \, n_\mu n_\nu \nonumber \\
1090: & \times \, \left[k_5^- + \varepsilon(z)( k_2^- - k_1^- + k_3^- - k_4^-)/2 \right]
1091: / k_5^+ \, .
1092: \end{eqnarray}
1093: In the quark self-interaction one has
1094: \begin{equation}
1095: \label{dmnself}
1096: d_{\mu \nu}(k_{5'}) = - g_{\mu \nu} \, + \,
1097: n_\mu n_\nu {k_{5'}^- + k_{1'}^- - k_1^-
1098: \over k_{5'}^+ }\, ,
1099: \end{equation}
1100: with an analogous result for the anti-quark.
1101:
1102: The terms with the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ are regular in the small-$x_5$
1103: region, while the terms with $n_\mu n_\nu$ are singular. The metric
1104: terms lead in the well-known way to the Breit-Fermi spin-dependent
1105: terms with a Coulomb potential. A discussion of the Breit-Fermi
1106: terms and gluons in the context of QCD can be found in \cite{condensates1}
1107: and references therein. The singular terms with $n_\mu n_\nu$ are
1108: independent of the quark spin. It is shown below that the latter
1109: generate the harmonic force between quarks when combined with the
1110: fermions' self-interactions, which are also independent of the spin.
1111: Thus, the harmonic force appears without Breit-Fermi terms. This result
1112: sets the RGEP approach apart from the models employed in Refs. \cite
1113: {condensates1, pot1, pot2, pot3, pot4, pot5, pot6, pot7}, where one
1114: had to guess whether a confining potential appeared with or without
1115: Breit-Fermi terms. The spin-independent harmonic force is akin in
1116: this respect to the lattice picture and the original charmonium model
1117: based on the Coulomb force \cite{charm1, charm2, charm3, charm4}.
1118:
1119: In the explicit discussion of singular small-$x$ features of Eq.
1120: (\ref{schroedinger}) in the next section, all the $g_{\mu \nu}$ terms
1121: are omitted. The reader should keep their presence in mind until they
1122: are re-inserted in Section \ref{sec:SE}. The symbols of mass, wave
1123: function, and potential are provided with a tilde as a reminder about
1124: the need to include the $g_{\mu \nu}$ terms. Also, expressions for the
1125: quark masses are simplified by considering from now on only $\lambda
1126: = \lambda_0$. The subscript 0 indicates that $\lambda = \lambda_0$.
1127: The ansatz for $\mu^2$ is understood to correspond to $\lambda_0$.
1128:
1129: With the $g_{\mu \nu}$ terms hidden and $\lambda = \lambda_0$, the
1130: eigenvalue equation reads
1131: \begin{widetext}
1132: \begin{eqnarray}
1133: \label{ev0}
1134: \left({\kappa^{\perp \, 2}_{13} + m^2_0 \over x_1 x_3} +
1135: {\tilde m^2_1\over x_1} + {\tilde m^2_3\over x_3} - M^2 \right)
1136: \tilde \psi(\kappa^\perp_{13},x_1)
1137: - {4 \over 3}{ g^2 \over 16 \pi^3 } \int {dx_2 d^2 \kappa^\perp_{24} \over x_2 x_4 }
1138: \, {j^+_{12} j^+_{43} \over P^{+\, 2} } \, { 1 \over x^2_5 }
1139: \, \tilde v_0(13,24) \, \tilde \psi(\kappa^\perp_{24},x_2) = 0 \, ,
1140: \end{eqnarray}
1141: where
1142: \begin{eqnarray}
1143: \label{v0}
1144: \tilde v_0(13,24) & = &
1145: f_{13,24} \, [k_5^- + \varepsilon (z)(k_2^- - k_1^- + k_3^- - k_4^-)/2] \,
1146: \left[ \theta(z) \tilde r_{5/1} \tilde r_{5/4} \, {\cal F}_{1,253,4}
1147: + \theta(-z) \tilde r_{5/3} \tilde r_{5/2} \, {\cal F}_{3,154,2} \right] \nonumber \\
1148: & + & f_{13,24} \, [ \theta(z) \tilde r_{5/1} \tilde r_{5/4}
1149: + \theta(-z)\tilde r_{5/3} \tilde r_{5,2}]
1150: \, + \, {1\over 2 }\,[k_5^- + \varepsilon (z)(k_2^- - k_1^- + k_3^- - k_4^-)/2]
1151: \, w_0 \, ,
1152: \end{eqnarray}
1153: and the last factor of $w_0 \equiv P^+ w_{\lambda_0}(13,24)$ is abbreviated to
1154: \begin{eqnarray}
1155: w_0 =
1156: { \theta(z) \,
1157: \tilde r_{5/1} \tilde r_{5/4} \, f_{1,52} f_{53,4}
1158: \over k_1^- - \tilde k^-_5(2,5,3) - k_2^-}
1159: +
1160: { \theta(-z)\,
1161: \tilde r_{5/3} \tilde r_{5/2} \, f_{3,54} f_{51,2}
1162: \over k_3^- - \tilde k^-_5(1,5,4) - k_4^-}
1163: +
1164: { \theta(z) \,
1165: \tilde r_{5/1} \tilde r_{5/4} \, f_{1,52} f_{53,4}
1166: \over k^-_4 - \tilde k^-_5(2,5,3) - k_3^- }
1167: +
1168: { \theta(-z)\,
1169: \tilde r_{5/3} \tilde r_{5/2} \, f_{3,54} f_{51,2}
1170: \over k^-_2 - \tilde k^-_5(1,5,4) - k_1^- } .
1171: \nonumber \\
1172: \end{eqnarray}
1173: \end{widetext}
1174: The compact notation includes
1175: \begin{eqnarray}
1176: f_{i,j} \equiv f_{\lambda_0}({\cal M}^2_i,{\cal M}^2_j) \, , \\
1177: \tilde r_{5/i} \equiv \tilde r_\delta (x_{5/i}) \, , \\
1178: {\cal F}_{i, k, j} \equiv {\cal F}_{2 \lambda_0} (i, k, j) \, , \\
1179: \label{k5tilde}
1180: \tilde k^-_5(i,j,k) = [\kappa_5^{\perp \, 2} + \mu^2(i,j,k)]/k^+_5 \, , \\
1181: \kappa^\perp_5 \, = \, \varepsilon(z)\, (\kappa_{13}^\perp - \kappa_{24}^\perp ) \, .
1182: \end{eqnarray}
1183: The mass terms with the $g_{\mu \nu}$ terms suppressed are
1184: \begin{eqnarray}
1185: \label{selfi}
1186: \tilde m^2_i = {4\over 3} g^2\int [x\kappa] \, \tilde r^2_\delta(x)\,
1187: f^2_{i,i'5'} {|j^+|^2 \over k_i^{+ \, 2} }\,{1\over x^2}\,
1188: { x({\cal M}^2 - m^2) \over m^2 - {\cal M}_i^2 } \, , \nonumber \\
1189: \end{eqnarray}
1190: for $i=1,3$. ${\cal M}_1$ is given by Eq. (\ref{m1}) and ${\cal M}_3$
1191: by Eq. (\ref{m3}). In both cases, ${\cal M}^2$ is given by Eq.
1192: (\ref{calM}), and the factor $(j^+/k_i^+)^2 = 4(1-x)$.
1193:
1194: \section{ Small-$\, x$ behavior }
1195: \label{sec:sx}
1196: All small-$x$ singularities of the eigenvalue Eq. (\ref{schroedinger})
1197: are contained in Eqs. (\ref{ev0}), (\ref{v0}), and (\ref{selfi}). We
1198: first discuss the exchange terms, then the mass terms, and finally the
1199: net effect of the interplay between these terms.
1200:
1201: The analysis hinges on the properties of the energy of motion of a gluon
1202: with respect to the parent quark, $p_i^+k^-_5 = x_i\kappa_5^{\perp \, 2}
1203: /x_5$. $p_i$ is the momentum of the parent quark $i$. The momentum $\kappa_5
1204: ^\perp$ ranges under the integrals from 0 to $\infty$, while $x_5$ can
1205: reach 0 (in the mass terms, the integrals are over $\kappa^\perp$ and $x$).
1206: Appendices \ref{A:Q} and \ref{A:M} provide definitions of all variables
1207: used in the description of the integrands. The key difficulty is that the
1208: ratio of two variables of different kinds, $\kappa^\perp$ and $x$, varies
1209: quickly with a change of any one of them. This complexity is related to
1210: the power counting rules for the Hamiltonian densities on the LF \cite{long}.
1211: But the analysis described here concerns only the relative motion of the
1212: effective particles and it is simplified by taking advantage of the NR limit
1213: after the finiteness of the small-$x$ dynamics with the gluon mass ansatz is
1214: established.
1215:
1216: The singularity in the effective gluon exchange term is tempered by the
1217: product of two vertex form factors, $ff$. The form factors vanish
1218: exponentially fast when $\kappa_5^{\perp \, 2}/x_5 \rightarrow \infty$.
1219: This prevents $x_5$ from becoming small unless $\kappa_5^\perp$ vanishes
1220: at least as fast as $\sqrt{x_5}$. Therefore, the measure of integration
1221: over transverse momenta is on the order of $x_5$ when $x_5 \rightarrow 0$
1222: and it reduces the divergence to a logarithmic one. The logarithmic divergence
1223: is taken care of using the gluon mass ansatz. The mechanism of reducing
1224: singularities to only logarithmic ones does not work in the instantaneous
1225: interaction term $Z_\lambda (13,24)$ and in the terms in $V_\lambda
1226: (13,24)$ that come without $ff$ in ${\cal F}_{2\lambda}$. But all the
1227: terms without $ff$ are independent of $\mu^2$ and the $dx_5/x_5^2$ and
1228: $dx_5/x_5$ singularities cancel out in them perturbatively \cite{z}.
1229:
1230: In the fermion self-interactions an analogous pattern of the singularities
1231: occurs. But one has to also consider the size of $m^2_0$. The latter is
1232: determined by the size of the free ultraviolet-finite part of the quark
1233: mass counterterm in the initial Hamiltonian of Eq. (\ref{H}). That size is
1234: related to an ansatz for a gluon mass term in the sectors $|Q g \rangle$
1235: and $|\bar Q g\rangle$ in the eigenvalue equations for states with quantum
1236: numbers of a single fermion, see Appendix \ref{A:M}. Eventually, the gluon
1237: mass ansatz leads to the result that the single-quark eigenvalue diverges
1238: logarithmically in the limit $\delta \rightarrow 0$, while the quark
1239: self-interaction in the quarkonium dynamics becomes finite. The self-interaction
1240: and effective gluon exchange, both finite due to the chosen behavior of the
1241: gluon mass ansatz, lead together to the harmonic potential which is described
1242: in the next section.
1243:
1244: According to the Appendix \ref{A:Q}, the dominant exchange terms in Eq. (\ref{ev0})
1245: read
1246: \begin{eqnarray}
1247: \label{vsimple}
1248: \tilde v_0(13,24) & = & \theta(z) \, \tilde v_{+\, low}
1249: \, + \, \theta(-z) \, \tilde v_{-\, low} \, ,
1250: \end{eqnarray}
1251: where $\tilde v_{+\, low}$ is given in Eq. (\ref{v+low}), and
1252: $\tilde v_{-\, low}$ in Eq. (\ref{v-low}). In the limit $x_5
1253: \rightarrow 0$,
1254: \begin{eqnarray}
1255: \label{limitvplus}
1256: \tilde v_{+\, low} & = & f_{1,52} f_{53,4} \,
1257: { \mu^2(2,5,3) \over q^{\perp \, 2} + \mu^2(2,5,3) } \, ,
1258: \end{eqnarray}
1259: and
1260: \begin{eqnarray}
1261: \label{limitvminus}
1262: \tilde v_{-\, low} & = & f_{3,54} f_{51,2} \,
1263: { \mu^2(1,5,4) \over q^{\perp \, 2} + \mu^2(1,5,4) } \, .
1264: \end{eqnarray}
1265: Since $q^{\perp \, 2}$ is on the order of $|z|$, one obtains the result
1266: that if $\mu^2$ vanishes faster than $q^{\perp \, 2}$, i.e., faster
1267: than $x_5$, the potential produces a finite effect in the limit of
1268: $\delta \rightarrow 0$. In the denominators of Eqs. (\ref{limitvplus})
1269: and (\ref{limitvminus}) there also appears $q_z^2 = (2mz)^2$, which is
1270: negligible in comparison to the leading terms on the order of $z$ but
1271: can be included here on the basis of hindsight to take advantage of the
1272: NR nature of the quarks' motion with respect to each other. The larger
1273: is the quark mass $m$ for fixed $\lambda_0$ and the smaller is $\Lambda_
1274: {QCD}$, the more accurate the NR picture actually becomes after the
1275: small-$x$ divergences are removed. Writing $q_z = q t$, with $q=|\vec q\,|$,
1276: $t = \cos{\theta}$, the singular factor $1/x_5^2$ equals $4m^2/q_z^2 =
1277: (4m^2/q^2) t^{-2}$. The integration measure $d^3 q$ is proportional to $q^2$
1278: and the small-$x$ singularity is actually produced by the angle integration
1279: $dt/t^2$. $\mu^2$ should vanish for $t \rightarrow 0$ in order to remove
1280: the singularity. An example of such behavior is used below to provide a
1281: constructive context for the steps that follow. The final result is not
1282: sensitive to the details of the example. Given that $\mu^2$ vanishes faster
1283: than $q^2$, one can write
1284: \begin{eqnarray}
1285: \label{muq2}
1286: \mu^2(i,5,j) = c^2(i,5,j) \, q^2 \, ,
1287: \end{eqnarray}
1288: and determine behavior of $c(i,5,j)$ from the condition that
1289: \begin{eqnarray}
1290: \label{cv}
1291: \tilde c (i,5,j) = { c^2(i,5,j) \over 1 + c^2(i,5,j) }
1292: \end{eqnarray}
1293: should vanish for $x_5 \rightarrow 0$.
1294:
1295: The only information about the three-particle sector that is available
1296: in the relativistic construction of $\vec q$ and $c(i,5,j)$ are the
1297: $\perp$ and $+$ components of the momenta $k_i$, $k_5$, and $k_j$.
1298: Two physical constraints are used in defining a helpful vector $\vec q$:
1299: the definition must respect all kinematical LF symmetries (to render
1300: a boost-invariant description of quarkonia), and it must reduce to
1301: $q_z = 2mz$ for $z \rightarrow 0$ when $|\vec k_{13}|/m$ and $|\vec
1302: k_{24}|/m$ approach 0 in the NR limit. A geometrically motivated candidate
1303: for $\vec q$ is provided by the difference between the square of the
1304: free invariant mass of three effective particles in the state $|Q\bar
1305: Q g \rangle$ and the square of the invariant mass of the $Q \bar Q$-pair
1306: in this state. The difference reads
1307: \begin{eqnarray}
1308: \label{DeltaM}
1309: {\cal M}^2_{i5j} - {\cal M}^2_{ij} =
1310: {\kappa^{\perp \, 2}_5 + x_5^2 {\cal M}^2_{ij} \over x_5 (1-x_5) } \, .
1311: \end{eqnarray}
1312: Multiplication by $x_5(1-x_5)$ produces an expression that tends in the
1313: limit of $x_5 \rightarrow 0$ to the three-momentum transfer squared that
1314: appears in the energy denominators in the small-$x$ dynamics. The components
1315: of $\vec q$ are therefore defined as $q^\perp = \kappa^\perp_5$ and
1316: \begin{eqnarray}
1317: \label{defqz}
1318: q_z = z {\cal M}_{ij} \, .
1319: \end{eqnarray}
1320: Further analysis of all exchange terms shows that if the ansatz mass $\mu^2$
1321: behaves like
1322: \begin{eqnarray}
1323: \label{dmu}
1324: \mu^2 \sim x_5^{1+\delta_\mu}
1325: \end{eqnarray}
1326: (or like $q^2 x_5^{\delta_\mu}$) with $0 < \delta_\mu < 1/2$, the factors
1327: $\tilde v_{\pm \, low}$ of Eqs. (\ref{v+low}) and (\ref{v-low}) vanish in
1328: the limit $x_5 \rightarrow 0$ as $x_5^{\delta_\mu}$ independently of the
1329: terms in the energy denominators on the order of $x_5^{3/2}$ or smaller.
1330: Thus, the gluon exchange term becomes finite when
1331: \begin{eqnarray}
1332: \label{ci5j}
1333: c(i,5,j) = \, c(t) \,
1334: \end{eqnarray}
1335: and $c(t)$ is a function that behaves as
1336: \begin{eqnarray}
1337: \label{ct}
1338: c(t) = c \, |t|^{\delta_\mu/2} \, ,
1339: \end{eqnarray}
1340: for $t \rightarrow 0$, with $c$ a constant.
1341:
1342: With this ansatz, the quark mass terms also become finite in the limit
1343: $\delta \rightarrow 0$. Appendix \ref{A:M} shows details of how $m_0^2$
1344: is chosen in agreement with the physical picture explained in the
1345: Introduction and at the beginning of this section. Eq. (\ref{selfi})
1346: gives $m^2_0 + \tilde m^2_i = m^2 + \delta m^2_i$ with $i=1,3$ and
1347: \begin{eqnarray}
1348: \label{mstildemi}
1349: \delta m_i^2 &=& {4 \alpha_0 \over 3 \pi^2} \,
1350: \int dx d^2 \kappa^\perp \, \tilde r^2_\delta(x)\, f^2_{\lambda_0}(m^2,{\cal M}^2)\,
1351: \nonumber \\
1352: & \times & {{\cal M}^2 - m^2 \over x^2}\,
1353: \left( {1 \over {\cal M}_0^2 - m^2} - {1 \over {\cal M}_i^2 - m^2} \right)\, .
1354: \nonumber \\
1355: & &
1356: \end{eqnarray}
1357: The function ${\cal M}_0^2$ is given by Eq. (\ref{M0phi}) in terms of
1358: the gluon mass function $\mu_0^2$ that must satisfy the condition
1359: (\ref{massansatzinequality}). The quark self-energies are positive if
1360: \begin{eqnarray}
1361: \label{positivity}
1362: \mu^2(i,5,j) \, > \, \mu_0^2 \, .
1363: \end{eqnarray}
1364: A simple way to satisfy this condition is to set $\mu_0^2=0$. Then,
1365: \begin{eqnarray}
1366: \label{misimple}
1367: \delta m_i^2 &=& {4 \alpha \over 3 \pi^2} \,
1368: \int dx d^2 \kappa^\perp \, f^2_{\lambda_0}(m^2,{\cal M}^2) \, {1 \over x^2}\nonumber \\
1369: & \times &
1370: { \mu^2(i',5',j) \over \mu^2(i',5',j) + (\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+x^2m^2)/(1-x)} \, , \nonumber \\
1371: & &
1372: \end{eqnarray}
1373: where $i=1$ and $j=3$ or vice versa. The factors $r_\delta$ are no longer needed.
1374:
1375: The small-$x$ regularization disappears from the quarkonium dynamics
1376: entirely. Finite phenomenological parameters that describe the small-$x$
1377: behavior of the gluon mass ansatz, such as $\delta_\mu$ in Eq. (\ref{dmu}),
1378: become responsible for the regularization of the exchange and self-interaction
1379: terms, preserving their distinct properties. The mass terms grow when
1380: $\delta_\mu$ decreases, while the effective gluon exchange potential
1381: provides a negative contribution that increases in magnitude at similar
1382: rate and compensates the size of the masses at small momentum transfers.
1383: The net result is described in the next section.
1384:
1385: \section{ The $Q\bar Q$ Schr\"odinger equation }
1386: \label{sec:SE}
1387: The condition (\ref{weakcl}) validates the NR and weak coupling
1388: limits after the small-$x$ divergences are removed by the gluon
1389: mass ansatz. This section then identifies the leading structure
1390: in $H_{Q\bar Q}$ in formal order of $\alpha_0$. The additional
1391: simplification in the case of small $\alpha_0$ is that the dominant
1392: interaction in Eq. (\ref{schroedinger}) becomes equal to the well-known
1393: Coulomb term and one can find the leading correction analytically.
1394:
1395: Equation (\ref{schroedinger}) can be re-written using the relative
1396: three-momentum variables described in Appendix \ref{A:Q}, see Eq.
1397: (\ref{kij}). The integration measure is
1398: \begin{equation}
1399: {dx_{24} d^2 k^\perp_{24} \over x_2 x_4 } =
1400: {4 d^3 \vec k_{24} \over {\cal M}_{24}} \, ,
1401: \end{equation}
1402: and Eq. (\ref{schroedinger}) takes the form
1403: \begin{eqnarray}
1404: \label{evsimple}
1405: \left[4(m^2 + \vec k^{\, 2}_{13}) +
1406: {\delta m^2_1\over x_1} + {\delta m^2_3\over x_3} - (2m+B)^2 \right]
1407: \psi(\vec k_{13}) \nonumber \\
1408: + \int {d^3 k_{24} \over (2\pi)^3\sqrt{m^2+k^2_{24}} }
1409: \, U(\vec k_{13},\vec k_{24})\, \psi(\vec k_{24}) = 0 \, . \nonumber \\
1410: \end{eqnarray}
1411: The mass corrections include now the $g_{\mu\nu}$ terms that were
1412: suppressed in the previous section, $\delta m_i^2 = \delta \tilde m_i^2
1413: + \delta m^2_g$, and the potential is
1414: \begin{eqnarray}
1415: \label{Ur}
1416: &&U(\vec k_{13},\vec k_{24}) = - {4\over 3} f_{13,24} \, 4\pi \alpha \nonumber \\
1417: &\times& \left\{{4\sqrt{x_1x_2x_3x_4} \over x^2_5 } \,
1418: \left[ \theta(z) \, \tilde v_{+\, low}
1419: + \theta(-z) \, \tilde v_{-\, low} \right] \, + v_g \right\} \, \, , \nonumber \\
1420: \end{eqnarray}
1421: where $v_g$ denotes the $g_{\mu\nu}$ contribution in the exchange term.
1422:
1423: Since the form factor $f_{13,24}$ cuts off changes of the relative
1424: momenta above $\lambda_0$ exponentially fast, one can focus on the
1425: eigenstates with lowest $M^2$ and take advantage of the conditions
1426: $|\vec k_{13}| \ll m$ and $|\vec k_{24}| \ll m$ that are satisfied
1427: in the entire domain of physically relevant probability distribution.
1428: For such states, one can expand Eq. (\ref{evsimple}) in powers of
1429: $\vec k/m$, with the exception of the form factors that are needed
1430: for convergence. The Coulomb force defines the momentum scale of the
1431: inverse of the quarkonium Bohr radius, $k_B = r_B^{-1} = \alpha_0 m/2$.
1432: When $\lambda_0 \gg k_B$, the form factor $f_{13,24}$ does not differ
1433: from 1 in the dynamically dominant region; $f_{13,24}$ matters only
1434: when one extends the expansion to high powers of $\vec k/m$. These
1435: would lead to divergent integrals with Coulomb wave functions and
1436: require counterterms \cite{CasLep, krp}. The latter are not needed
1437: here and the lowest terms dominate \cite{largep}. The binding energy,
1438: $B$, is small in comparison to $m$. Writing the quarkonium mass as
1439: $M = 2m + B$ and neglecting $\sim B^2/m$, one obtains
1440: \begin{eqnarray}
1441: \label{evnr}
1442: \left[{\vec k^{\, 2}_{13} \over m} - B
1443: + {\delta m^2_1\over 2m} + {\delta m^2_3\over 2m} \right]
1444: \psi(\vec k_{13}) \nonumber \\
1445: + \int {d^3 k_{24} \over (2\pi)^3 }
1446: \, V_{Q\bar Q}(\vec k_{13}-\vec k_{24})\, \psi(\vec k_{24}) = 0 \, .
1447: \end{eqnarray}
1448: The structure of $V_{Q\bar Q}$ and the size of the mass corrections
1449: $\delta m^2_1$ and $\delta m^2_3$ need explanation.
1450:
1451: The two vertex form factors that appear inside the exchange and mass
1452: terms in Eq. (\ref{schroedinger}), have arguments given in Appendix
1453: \ref{A:Q} in Eqs. (\ref{m52}) to (\ref{m51}). When one writes the
1454: product of the two vertex form factors in the NR limit as $\exp{(-u^2)}$,
1455: $u$ reads
1456: \begin{eqnarray}
1457: \label{defu}
1458: u = \sqrt{2} \, {m \over \lambda_0} \, {1 \over t} \, {q \over \lambda_0} \, .
1459: \end{eqnarray}
1460: The limit $m/\lambda_0 \gg 1$ enforces $q \ll \lambda_0$, the more so the
1461: smaller is $t$. The Coulomb binding mechanism is intact for $\lambda_0$
1462: as small as several times $k_B$ \cite{largep}, which is much smaller than
1463: $m$ in the weak coupling limit. Thus, the momentum transfer $q$ is much
1464: smaller than $k_B$ in all terms that contain $ff$. These terms become then
1465: negligible in comparison to the Coulomb term, unless they have singularly
1466: small denominator factors for small $t$. That is the case for the mass and
1467: exchange terms when $\delta_\mu$ becomes small. In the presence of the
1468: $g_{\mu \nu}$ contributions that were omitted in Section \ref{sec:sx},
1469: these terms are found as follows.
1470:
1471: The Hamiltonian $H_{Q\bar Q}$ has the structure
1472: \begin{eqnarray}
1473: H_{Q\bar Q} & = & m^2 + \delta m^2(ff,g+n,0) - \delta m^2(ff,g+n,\mu) \nonumber \\
1474: & + & f(1-ff)[(g+n,0)+z] \nonumber \\
1475: & + & f(ff)[(g+n,\mu) + z] \, ,
1476: \end{eqnarray}
1477: where $g$ denotes the $g_{\mu \nu}$ terms, $n$ denotes the singular $n_\mu n_\nu$
1478: terms, and $z$ denotes the instantaneous terms. The gluon mass ansatz in
1479: energy denominators is indicated by an extra variable in the brackets, and 0
1480: says that the gluon mass is 0. The last two terms can be re-arranged as
1481: \begin{eqnarray}
1482: f(1-ff)[(g,0)+(n,0)+z] + \nonumber \\
1483: f(ff)[(g,0) + (g,\mu) - (g,0)+ (n,\mu) + z] \, .
1484: \end{eqnarray}
1485: The contribution of $(n,0)+z$ in the first term vanishes in the leading NR
1486: limit, see Appendix \ref{A:Q}. Two of the terms with $(g,0)$ combine to
1487: $f(g,0)$, and reduce to the Coulomb term with the Breit-Fermi spin corrections.
1488: The remaining terms, with $f$ in front also being equivalent to 1,
1489: \begin{eqnarray}
1490: \label{last1}
1491: f(ff)[(g,\mu) - (g,0)+ (n,\mu) + z] \, ,
1492: \end{eqnarray}
1493: add to the Coulomb term and produce together $V_{Q\bar Q}$ in Eq. (\ref{vnr}).
1494: The mass terms can be re-written, in the same fashion, as
1495: \begin{eqnarray}
1496: \label{last2}
1497: (ff)\delta m^2[(g,0) - (g,\mu)+ (n,0) - (n,\mu)] \, .
1498: \end{eqnarray}
1499: Expressions (\ref{last1}) and (\ref{last2}) show that the exchange
1500: potential and the mass terms have similar structures with opposite
1501: signs. A change of variables from $x$ and $\kappa^\perp$ to $q_z = x m$
1502: and $q^\perp = \kappa^\perp$ in the mass terms produces integrals in
1503: which the factor $ff$ ensures that $q=|\vec q \, | \ll m$ and one can
1504: again use the expansion in powers of the ratio of $q/m$. Since the integrands
1505: are symmetric functions of $q_z$, one can extend the integration to negative
1506: $q_z$ and divide the result by 2, which produces the same integrands as in
1507: the exchange terms. Hence,
1508: \begin{eqnarray}
1509: \label{vnr}
1510: V_{Q\bar Q}(\vec q \,) &=& (1 + BF) V_C(\vec q \,) \, + W(\vec q \,) \, ,
1511: \end{eqnarray}
1512: where $BF$ denotes the Breit-Fermi spin-dependent factors,
1513: \begin{eqnarray}
1514: \label{vc}
1515: V_C(\vec q) &=& - \, {4\over 3} \, { 4\pi \alpha \over q^2 } \, , \\
1516: W(\vec q \,) & = & \,{4\over 3} \, 4\pi \alpha\,
1517: \left[{1\over \vec q\,^2} \, - \, {1\over q_z^2}\right] \,
1518: {\mu^2 \over \mu^2 + \vec q^{\, 2} } \, \nonumber \\
1519: & \times &
1520: \exp{\left[-2 \left( {m q^2 \over q_z \lambda_0^2} \right)^2\right]} \, ,
1521: \end{eqnarray}
1522: with $\mu^2 = \theta(z)\,\mu^2(2,5,3) + \theta(-z) \,\mu^2(1,5,4)$, and
1523: \begin{eqnarray}
1524: \label{deltamnr}
1525: {\delta m^2_i \over m} & = & - \, \int {d^3 q \over (2\pi)^3 }\,
1526: W(\vec q \,) \, ,
1527: \end{eqnarray}
1528: with $\mu^2$ equal $\mu^2(1',5',3)$ for $i=1$ and $\mu^2(1,5',3')$ for $i=3$.
1529:
1530: If the gluon mass ansatz is 0, $W=0$ and the quarkonium dynamics
1531: reduces to the same as in QED with additional color charge factor 4/3.
1532: A finite gluon mass ansatz introduces new dynamics which is discussed
1533: in the remaining part of this section.
1534:
1535: $W$ is large and negative when $\delta_\mu$ is small. The exchange term
1536: tends to compensate the positive contribution of the mass terms. This
1537: can be made transparent by re-writing Eq. (\ref{evnr}) as
1538: \begin{eqnarray}
1539: \label{one}
1540: &&\left[{\vec k^{\, 2} \over m} - B\right] \psi(\vec k)
1541: + \int {d^3 q \over (2\pi)^3 }
1542: \, (1 + BF) V_C(\vec q \,) \psi(\vec k- \vec q\,)\nonumber \\
1543: &&+ \int {d^3 q \over (2\pi)^3 }
1544: \, W(\vec q \,)\, \left[\psi(\vec k - \vec q\,)-\psi(\vec k\,) \right] = 0 \, .
1545: \end{eqnarray}
1546: There is no need to trace the small relativistic corrections before the
1547: main NR picture is identified. Only this picture is discussed below.
1548:
1549: Since $|\vec q \,|$ in $W$ is constrained to values much smaller than
1550: $k_B$, one can expand the wave function in the Coulomb region under the
1551: integral in the Taylor series and consider the lowest terms as candidates
1552: for the first approximation,
1553: \begin{eqnarray}
1554: \psi(\vec k - \vec q) &=& \psi(\vec k)
1555: - q_i \, {\partial \over \partial k_i} \, \psi(\vec k) \nonumber \\
1556: &+& {1\over 2} \, q_i q_j \, {\partial^2 \over
1557: \partial k_i \, \partial k_j} \, \psi(\vec k)
1558: + \,.\,.\,.
1559: \end{eqnarray}
1560: The terms with odd powers of $\vec q$ average to 0. The bilinear terms
1561: contain $q^2$ times $(1-t^2)$ times $\cos^2{\cal \phi}$, or $\sin^2{\cal
1562: \phi}$, for $i = j = 1$, 2, respectively, and $t^2$, for $i= 3$. The
1563: integral over $\cal \phi$ produces $\pi$ times a vector
1564: \begin{eqnarray}
1565: \label{vecw}
1566: \vec w(t) = (1-t^2, 1-t^2, 2t^2) \, .
1567: \end{eqnarray}
1568: The variable $q$ can be changed to $u$ of Eq. (\ref{defu}), and introducing
1569: the constant
1570: \begin{eqnarray}
1571: \label{defb}
1572: b = {\sqrt{2} m \over \lambda_0^2} \, ,
1573: \end{eqnarray}
1574: one obtains the vector
1575: \begin{eqnarray}
1576: \label{tau1c}
1577: \vec \tau = \int_0^1 dt \, t (1-t^2) \, \vec w(t) \,\tau (t) \, ,
1578: \end{eqnarray}
1579: \begin{eqnarray}
1580: \label{tau2}
1581: \tau (t) = \int_0^\infty du \, {(b\mu/t)^2 u^2 \over (b\mu/t)^2 + u^2 } \,
1582: e^{-u^2} \, .
1583: \end{eqnarray}
1584: that appears in the resulting interaction term:
1585: \begin{eqnarray}
1586: \label{ho}
1587: W_{Q \bar Q} = - \, {4\over 3}\,{ \alpha \over 2\pi } \,\, b^{-3} \,
1588: \sum_{i=1}^3 \, \tau_i \, {\partial^2 \over \partial k_i^2 } \, .
1589: \end{eqnarray}
1590: The next non-vanishing terms in the Taylor expansion contain the
1591: fourth and higher even powers of $\vec q \, $. They are expected
1592: to be small in the momentum region dominated by the Coulomb dynamics
1593: and do not count around the bottom of the harmonic potential. The
1594: remaining question is if the harmonic approximation can be
1595: rotationally symmetric.
1596:
1597: The interaction $W_{Q \bar Q}$ given by Eq. (\ref{ho}) is rotationally
1598: symmetric when all components of $\vec \tau$ are equal, or
1599: \begin{eqnarray}
1600: \label{rsymmetry}
1601: \int_0^1 {dt} \, t \,(1-t^2)\, (1-3t^2) \, \tau(t) \, = \, 0 \, .
1602: \end{eqnarray}
1603: The function $\tau(t)$ depends on $\mu$ in a limited way because the
1604: integral over $u$ in Eq. (\ref{tau2}) extends only from 0 to about
1605: 1, $b/t$ is large, and $b\mu/t \gg 1$ produces $\tau(t) = \beta$,
1606: \begin{eqnarray}
1607: \beta = \sqrt{\pi}/4 \, .
1608: \end{eqnarray}
1609: Behavior of $\tau(t)$ near $t=0$ does not matter because of the
1610: factor $t$ in Eq. (\ref{rsymmetry}), and the condition (\ref{dmu})
1611: is of little consequence if $\mu^2$ raises quickly from 0 at $t=0$.
1612: For any ansatz of Eq. (\ref{ct}) with a small $\delta_\mu$,
1613: \begin{eqnarray}
1614: \label{muq}
1615: \tau(t) = {c^2(t) \over 1 + c^2(t)}\,\beta \, ,
1616: \end{eqnarray}
1617: which is equivalent to the constant $\beta$ if $c(t) \gg 1$ for $t \neq
1618: 0$. The factorization feature is independent of the shape of the RGEP
1619: form factor $f$ and provides an opportunity to fit $\mu$ analytically
1620: to satisfy Eq. (\ref{rsymmetry}). Suppose that Eq. (\ref{ct}) is valid
1621: and
1622: \begin{eqnarray}
1623: {c^2(t) \over 1 + c^2(t)} \, = c^2 \, t^{\delta_\mu} \, (1 - \rho t^2) \, .
1624: \end{eqnarray}
1625: Eq. (\ref{rsymmetry}) is satisfied when
1626: \begin{eqnarray}
1627: \rho = \delta_\mu (8+\delta_\mu)/(2+\delta_\mu) \, ,
1628: \end{eqnarray}
1629: and
1630: \begin{eqnarray}
1631: c^2(t) = { c^2\,t^{\delta_\mu} \, (1 - \rho t^2) \over
1632: 1 - c^2\, t^{\delta_\mu} \, (1 -\rho t^2) } \, ,
1633: \end{eqnarray}
1634: leads to a rotationally symmetric harmonic oscillator potential.
1635: All components of $\vec \tau$ are equal $\tilde \tau$,
1636: \begin{eqnarray}
1637: \label{tauexample}
1638: \tilde \tau & = & \beta c^2 \left( {1\over 6} \, - \, {\rho \over 12} \right) \, .
1639: \end{eqnarray}
1640: $\rho$ varies between 0 and 17/25 when $\delta_\mu$ varies between
1641: 0 and 1/2 in accord with Eq. (\ref{dmu}). In the limit $\delta_\mu
1642: \rightarrow 0$, $\rho \rightarrow 0$ and $c^2(t) \sim c^2/(1-c^2)$
1643: outside the area of very small $t$. In this example, the size of
1644: the coefficient functions $c(i,5,j)$ depends on the size of the constant
1645: $c$ and grows to large values when $c \rightarrow 1$.
1646:
1647: Every gluon mass ansatz, $\mu^2$, that is large outside the area of small
1648: $t$ and vanishes abruptly for $t \rightarrow 0$, leads to a spherically
1649: symmetric harmonic oscillator potential with the spring constant
1650: \begin{eqnarray}
1651: k = {4\over 3} \, {\alpha \over \pi} \, b^{-3} \,\tilde \tau \, ,
1652: \end{eqnarray}
1653: and
1654: \begin{eqnarray}
1655: \label{taugeneral}
1656: \tilde \tau \sim \beta / 6 \, .
1657: \end{eqnarray}
1658: The number $\beta$ depends on the shape of the RGEP form factor $f$,
1659: which reflects the dependence of the effective dynamics on the RG
1660: scheme, but $\beta$ is stable for $f_{ab}$s of similar shapes as
1661: functions of $ab/\lambda^2$, see Eq. (\ref{fab}).
1662:
1663: The first approximation for heavy quarkonium dynamics in position space
1664: can be defined by the Fourier transform of the eigenvalue equation for
1665: $H_{Q\bar Q}$, with
1666: \begin{eqnarray}
1667: \langle \vec r \, | \vec k \, \rangle = \exp{( i \, \vec k \, \vec r \, )} \, .
1668: \end{eqnarray}
1669: This transform exists only in the relative motion variables, since the
1670: motion of the quarkonium as a whole is described in a relativistic
1671: fashion and the relation between the relative motion of quarks and the
1672: motion of the bound state as a whole does not coincide for large speeds
1673: with the one known in NR theory. The Schr\"odinger equation reads
1674: \begin{eqnarray}
1675: \label{result}
1676: \left[2m - {\Delta_r \over m} - {4 \alpha\over 3} \left({1\over r} + BF\right)
1677: + {k\over 2} r^2 \right]\psi(\vec r) = M \psi(\vec r) ,
1678: \nonumber \\
1679: \end{eqnarray}
1680: where $k = m\omega^2/2$, and
1681: \begin{eqnarray}
1682: \omega &=& \sqrt{ {4\over 3} \, {\alpha \over \pi} } \,\,
1683: \lambda \, \left( \lambda \over m \right)^2 \,
1684: \sqrt{ \beta \over 6 \sqrt{2} }
1685: \end{eqnarray}
1686: The number $[\beta/(6 \sqrt{2})]^{1/2}$ gives $(\pi /1152)^{1/4} \sim
1687: 0.23$, which is large enough for the frequency $\omega$ to fit into
1688: the ball park of phenomenologically plausible scales when one allows
1689: sufficiently large $\lambda$ and $\alpha$ with some choice for $m$.
1690: The observed spectrum of charmonium is known to have an intermediate
1691: character between the Coulomb and harmonic oscillator spectra. But the
1692: key problem is to determine the size and direction of corrections that
1693: need to be included in order to compare the theory with data. The
1694: inclusion of light quarks requires quantitative understanding of the
1695: mechanism of chiral symmetry breaking in the effective particle approach
1696: and a comprehensive phenomenological analysis demands further advance
1697: in the theory.
1698:
1699: \section{Conclusion}
1700: \label{sec:C}
1701: The Coulomb interaction between quarks in heavy quarkonia is corrected
1702: by the potential well that is excavated by the one effective gluon
1703: exchange in the overlapping self-interaction gluon clouds of the quarks.
1704: At the bottom, the well shape is a quadratic function of the distance
1705: between the quarks. The resulting harmonic oscillator force plays the
1706: role of a confining one in a limited range. At distances much larger
1707: than the Bohr radius the quadratic approximation stops working. Emission
1708: of additional gluons and pairs of light quarks will further change the
1709: rate of growth of the potential. The size of these effects should be
1710: computable in the present approach by evaluating effective Hamiltonians
1711: order by order in a weak coupling expansion and solving eigenvalue
1712: problems for them numerically.
1713:
1714: The effective particle approach is of interest because it describes the
1715: relative motion of quarks independently of the speed of the quarkonium
1716: as a whole. This result is obtained at the price of setting up QCD in
1717: its Hamiltonian version in LF dynamics, with a host of difficulties in
1718: the renormalization program that had to be overcome. Further advances in
1719: the RGEP and methods of solving the eigenvalue equations for Hamiltonians
1720: $H_\lambda$ are expected to reflect the well known features of interactions
1721: of relativistic particles. The first approximation for $H_{Q\bar Q}$ can
1722: be expected to work well in the refined calculations because it appears
1723: to be largely independent in its structure from the details of the RGEP
1724: vertex form factors and the gluon mass ansatz. The first approximation
1725: also appears to involve the least possible degree of complexity as a basis
1726: around which a meaningful successive approximation scheme can emerge. A
1727: few percent accuracy in evaluating effective Hamiltonians is known to be
1728: achievable using essentially the same method in the case of elementary
1729: matrix models with asymptotic freedom and bound states.
1730:
1731: Since the approach developed here is boost invariant, it can connect
1732: physical images of hadrons in different frames as soon as the hadron
1733: dynamics is understood in one of them. Although the light quarks are
1734: expected to behave differently from the heavy ones, one should note
1735: that the Schr\"odinger equation with $H_\lambda$ does not lead to the
1736: spread of probability towards large relative momenta and large numbers
1737: of effective particles. The spread is halted because the interaction
1738: terms in $H_\lambda$ contain form factors. These form factors are the
1739: reason for hope that the effective particle expansion may converge.
1740:
1741: Aside from QCD, the same scheme for setting up and solving quantum field
1742: theory should be tested in the case of QED. There, the effective mass
1743: ansatz for virtual photons is much more restricted and small-$x$ effects
1744: are of less significance. On the other hand, QED is not asymptotically
1745: free and its effective nature requires better understanding. The RGEP
1746: approach may help in defining QED as an effective theory. But one needs
1747: to first verify if perturbation theory with $H_\lambda$ can produce
1748: covariant $S$-matrix in QED in orders higher than second.
1749:
1750: \appendix
1751: \section{ Regularized LF Hamiltonian of QCD }
1752: \label{A:H}
1753: The canonical LF Hamiltonians of gauge theories, similar to the
1754: Hamiltonians in the infinite momentum frame \cite{KS, BKS, S}, are
1755: well known \cite{Yan, Banff}, and extensive literature exists on
1756: the light-like axial gauges \cite{Bassetto, SriBro}. The Hamiltonian
1757: given below is further specified by inclusion of the ultraviolet and
1758: small-$x$ regularization factors that render a computable operator.
1759: This means that $H$ does not require a separate regularization
1760: prescription for evaluating loop integrals. The same regularized
1761: Hamiltonian was used in \cite{g_QCD} but the quark terms needed here
1762: were not explicitly given there. $H$ is supplied with counterterms
1763: $H_{\Delta\delta}$. Their structure is known from considerations
1764: similar to \cite{long}. Details can be calculated using RGEP. The
1765: initial Lagrangian is
1766: \begin{equation}
1767: {\cal L} = \bar \psi(i\hspace{-4pt}\not\!\!D - m)\psi -
1768: {1\over 4}F^{\mu\nu a}F_{\mu\nu}^a \, ,
1769: \end{equation}
1770: with one flavor of quarks of mass $m$,
1771: \begin{eqnarray}
1772: F^{\mu\nu} = -i[D^\mu,D^\nu]/g \, ,
1773: \end{eqnarray}
1774: and
1775: \begin{eqnarray}
1776: D_\mu = \partial_\mu + ig A_\mu \, ,
1777: \end{eqnarray}
1778: where $ A = A^a t^a$, $[t^a,t^b] = i f^{abc} t^c $, and $Tr(t^a t^b) =
1779: \delta^{ab}/2$. The classical Nether generator of evolution in $x^+$
1780: takes the form (the Gauss law constraint is formally solved in $A^+=0$
1781: gauge and the counterterms are added as the last term from hindsight),
1782: \begin{eqnarray}
1783: H &=& H_{\psi^2} + H_{A^2} + H_{A^3} + H_{A^4} + H_{\psi A \psi} \nonumber \\
1784: &+& H_{\psi A A \psi} + H_{[\partial A A]^2} + H_{[\partial A A](\psi\psi)}
1785: + H_{(\psi\psi)^2} \nonumber \\
1786: &+& H_{\Delta \delta} \, ,
1787: \end{eqnarray}
1788: where each term is an integral over the LF hyperplane,
1789: \begin{eqnarray}
1790: H_i = \int dx^- d^2 x^\perp {\cal H}_i \, ,
1791: \end{eqnarray}
1792: and,
1793: \begin{eqnarray}
1794: {\cal H}_{\psi^2}
1795: &=& {1\over 2} \bar \psi \gamma^+ {-\partial^{\perp \, 2} +
1796: m^2 \over i\partial^+} \psi \, , \\
1797: {\cal H}_{A^2} &=&
1798: - {1\over 2} A^\perp (\partial^\perp)^2 A^\perp \, , \\
1799: {\cal H}_{A^3} &=&
1800: g \, i\partial_\alpha A_\beta^a [A^\alpha,A^\beta]^a \, , \\
1801: {\cal H}_{A^4} &=&
1802: - {1\over 4} g^2 \, [A_\alpha,A_\beta]^a[A^\alpha,A^\beta]^a \, , \\
1803: {\cal H}_{\psi A \psi} &=&
1804: g \, \bar \psi \hspace{-4pt}\not\!\!A \psi \, , \\
1805: {\cal H}_{\psi A A \psi} &=&
1806: {1\over 2}g^2 \, \bar \psi \hspace{-4pt}\not\!\!A
1807: {\gamma^+ \over i\partial^+} \hspace{-4pt}\not\!\!A \psi \, , \\
1808: {\cal H}_{[\partial A A]^2} &=& {1\over 2}g^2 \,
1809: [i\partial^+A^\perp,A^\perp]^a {1 \over (i\partial^+)^2 }
1810: [i\partial^+A^\perp,A^\perp]^a \, , \nonumber \\
1811: & & \\
1812: {\cal H}_{[\partial A A](\psi\psi)} &=&
1813: g^2 \, \bar \psi \gamma^+ t^a \psi {1 \over (i\partial^+)^2 }
1814: [i\partial^+A^\perp,A^\perp]^a \, , \\
1815: {\cal H}_{(\psi\psi)^2} &=&
1816: {1\over 2}g^2 \,
1817: \bar \psi \gamma^+ t^a \psi {1 \over (i\partial^+)^2 }
1818: \bar \psi \gamma^+ t^a \psi \, .
1819: \end{eqnarray}
1820: A quantum Hamiltonian is introduced by expanding the fields
1821: into Fourier components at $x^+=0$ and imposing commutation
1822: relations on the latter. They define creation and annihilation
1823: operators for bare particles.
1824: \begin{eqnarray}
1825: \psi = \sum_{\sigma c} \int [k]
1826: \left[ \chi_c u_{k\sigma} b_{k\sigma c} e^{-ikx} +
1827: \chi_c v_{k\sigma} d^\dagger_{k\sigma c} e^{ikx}
1828: \right] \, . \nonumber \\
1829: \end{eqnarray}
1830: The integration measure is
1831: \begin{eqnarray}
1832: [k] = { \theta(k^+)\, k^+ \, d^2 \, k^\perp \over 16\pi^3 k^+ } \, .
1833: \end{eqnarray}
1834: \begin{eqnarray}
1835: \{b_{k\sigma c},b^\dagger_{k'\sigma' c'}\}
1836: &=&\{d_{k\sigma c},d^\dagger_{k'\sigma' c'}\} \nonumber \\
1837: &=& 16\pi^3 k^+ \delta_{\sigma_\sigma'} \delta_{cc'}
1838: \delta^3(k-k') \, .
1839: \end{eqnarray}
1840: $ \delta^3(k-k') = \delta(k^+-k'^+) \delta(k^1-k'^1)
1841: \delta(k^2-k'^2) $. The creation and annihilation
1842: operators have the power-counting dimension $1/k^\perp$
1843: (the same result holds for gluons, see below). The spinors
1844: are given by $u_{k\sigma} = B(k,m) u_{\sigma}$, and
1845: $v_{k\sigma} = B(k,m) v_{\sigma}$, where $v_{\sigma} =
1846: C u^*_{\sigma} = i\gamma^2 u^*_{\sigma} $. $u_{\sigma}$ and
1847: $v_{\sigma}$ are the spinors for the fermions at rest
1848: in the arbitrarily chosen frame of reference where the
1849: quantization procedure is introduced. The matrix $B(k,m)$
1850: represents the LF boost that turns a particle with mass $m$
1851: at rest to a moving one that has the momentum $k$, $k^2 = m^2$,
1852: \begin{eqnarray}
1853: B(k,m) = {1\over \sqrt{k^+ m}} \,
1854: [ \Lambda_+ k^+ + \Lambda_- (m + k^\perp \alpha^\perp)] \, ,
1855: \end{eqnarray}
1856: where $\Lambda_\pm = \gamma_0 \gamma^\pm/2$. This matrix mixes
1857: $k^+$ with $m$ and $k^\perp$. But the second term, of the type
1858: $\sqrt{k^\perp/k^+}$ when one counts $m$ and $k^\perp$ as similar,
1859: results only from writing the interaction terms in a way that is
1860: short and convenient in calculations. The independent degrees of
1861: freedom, $\psi_+ = \Lambda_+ \psi$, contain only the parts proportional
1862: to $\sqrt{k^+/m}$. Thus, $\psi_+$ has the dimension of $k^{\perp \, 2}
1863: \sqrt{k^+} b$, which in the position space on the LF leads to
1864: $(x^\perp \sqrt{x^-})^{-1}$ \cite{long} if $b \sim 1/k^\perp$.
1865: The spinors at rest are,
1866: \begin{eqnarray}
1867: u_{\sigma} = \sqrt{2m}\left[ \begin{array}{c} \chi_\sigma \\
1868: 0 \end{array}\right] \, , \\
1869: v_{\sigma} = \sqrt{2m}\left[ \begin{array}{c} 0 \\
1870: \xi_{-\sigma} \end{array}\right] \, ,
1871: \end{eqnarray}
1872: where $\xi_{-\sigma}=-i\sigma_2\chi_\sigma = \sigma\chi_{-\sigma}$.
1873: The gluon field at $x^+ =0$ is
1874: \begin{eqnarray}
1875: A^\mu = \sum_{\sigma c} \int [k] \left[ t^c \varepsilon^\mu_{k\sigma}
1876: a_{k\sigma c} e^{-ikx} + t^c \varepsilon^{\mu *}_{k\sigma}
1877: a^\dagger_{k\sigma c} e^{ikx}\right] \, , \nonumber \\
1878: \end{eqnarray}
1879: and the commutation relations read,
1880: \begin{eqnarray}
1881: \left[ a_{k\sigma c}, a^\dagger_{k'\sigma' c'}\right]
1882: = 16\pi^3 k^+ \delta_{\sigma_\sigma'} \delta_{cc'}
1883: \delta^3(k-k') \, .
1884: \end{eqnarray}
1885: $a$ and $a^\dagger$ have the dimension $1/k^\perp$. The polarization
1886: four-vectors are introduced using LF boosts as for fermions,
1887: \begin{eqnarray}
1888: \varepsilon^\mu_{k\sigma} = (\varepsilon^+_{k\sigma}=0,
1889: \varepsilon^-_{k\sigma}= 2k^\perp \varepsilon^\perp_\sigma/k^+,
1890: \varepsilon^\perp_\sigma) \, ,
1891: \end{eqnarray}
1892: except that the boosts are applied to the polarization vectors
1893: $\varepsilon^\mu_\sigma = (0, 0, \varepsilon^\perp_\sigma)$ that
1894: correspond to the selected state of a gluon moving along the
1895: $z$-axis \cite{Wigner}. Terms that contain the ratio $k^\perp/k^+$,
1896: which mix the transverse and longitudinal momenta, are again only a
1897: shorthand notation for writing interactions. The independent transverse
1898: field $A^\perp$ contains only polarization vectors $\varepsilon
1899: ^\perp_\sigma $ that have dimension 1. $A^\perp$ has dimension of
1900: $k^{\perp \, 2} a$, which matches the required $1/x^\perp$ on the
1901: LF \cite{long} when $a \sim 1/k^\perp$, as promised.
1902:
1903: The kinetic energy operator for quarks, $H_{\psi^2}$, is given
1904: in Eq. (\ref{tquark}), and for gluons, $H_{A^2}$, is given in
1905: Eq. (\ref{tgluon}). The triple-gluon interaction reads
1906: \begin{eqnarray}
1907: H_{A^3} & = & \sum_{123}\int[123]
1908: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p)\,\tilde r_{\Delta\delta}(3,1) \nonumber \\
1909: & \times & \left[g\,Y_{123}\, a^\dagger_1 a^\dagger_2 a_3 +
1910: g\,Y_{123}^*\, a^\dagger_3 a_2 a_1 \right] \, .
1911: \end{eqnarray}
1912: The symbols introduced in this operator occur in all other terms
1913: and require explanation for completeness, see also \cite{g_QCD}.
1914: The conservation of momentum in the interaction vertices is enforced
1915: by the factor
1916: \begin{eqnarray}
1917: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p) = 16 \pi^3 \delta^3
1918: \left[\sum_{a^\dagger}p_{a^\dagger}-\sum_{a}p_{a}\right] \, .
1919: \end{eqnarray}
1920: The regularization factors are given by
1921: \begin{eqnarray}
1922: \tilde r_{\Delta\delta}(p,d) & = & r_{\Delta\delta}(p,d)
1923: \,r_{\Delta\delta}(p,p-d) \, ,
1924: \end{eqnarray}
1925: where
1926: \begin{eqnarray}
1927: r_{\Delta\delta}(p,d) & = & r_\Delta(\kappa^{\perp \, 2}_{d/p})
1928: \,r_\delta(x_{d/p})\,\theta(x_{d/p}) \, .
1929: \end{eqnarray}
1930: The symbol $p$ refers to the parent momentum (half of the sum of
1931: all momenta of all particles coupled in a vertex), and $d$ to the
1932: daughter particle momentum, i.e., the momentum of the particle
1933: emitted or absorbed in the vertex. The arguments of the regularization
1934: factors are defined by
1935: \begin{eqnarray}
1936: \kappa^\perp_{d/p} & = & k^\perp_d - x_{d/p} k^\perp_p \, , \\
1937: x_{d/p} & = & k^+_d/k^+_p \equiv x_d/x_p \, .
1938: \end{eqnarray}
1939: The functions used here are \cite{g_QCD}
1940: \begin{eqnarray}
1941: r_\Delta(\kappa^{\perp \, 2}) & = & \exp{[-\kappa^{\perp \, 2}/\Delta^2]} \, , \\
1942: r_\delta(x) & = & \theta(x - \epsilon) x^\delta \, ,
1943: \end{eqnarray}
1944: and $\epsilon/\delta$ tends to 0 when $\delta \rightarrow 0$.
1945: The gluon spin vertex factor reads
1946: \begin{eqnarray}
1947: Y_{123} & = & i f^{c_1 c_2 c_3} \\
1948: & \times & \left[
1949: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2^* \cdot \varepsilon_3\kappa
1950: -
1951: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_3 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\kappa {1\over x_{2/3}}
1952: -
1953: \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_3 \cdot \varepsilon_1^*\kappa {1\over x_{1/3}}
1954: \right] \, . \nonumber
1955: \end{eqnarray}
1956: The simplified notation means: $\varepsilon \equiv \varepsilon^\perp$,
1957: $\kappa \equiv \kappa^\perp_{1/3}$. The quartic gluon vertex is
1958: \begin{widetext}
1959: \begin{eqnarray}
1960: H_{A^4} = \sum_{1234}\int[1234]
1961: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p)\,{g^2 \over 4}\, \left[
1962: \Xi_{A^4 \, 1234} a^\dagger_1 a^\dagger_2 a^\dagger_3 a_4 +
1963: X_{A^4\,1234} a^\dagger_1 a^\dagger_2 a_3 a_4 +
1964: \Xi^*_{A^4\,1234} a^\dagger_4 a_3 a_2 a_1 \right] \, ,
1965: \end{eqnarray}
1966: where
1967: \begin{eqnarray}
1968: \Xi_{A^4 \, 1234} & = & {2\over 3}[ \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{4,3}\,
1969: (\varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_3^* \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_4 -
1970: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_4 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_3^*)\,
1971: f^{a c_1 c_2}f^{a c_3 c_4} \nonumber \\
1972: & + & \tilde r_{1+3,1} \tilde r_{4,2}\,
1973: (\varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2^* \cdot \varepsilon_3^*\varepsilon_4 -
1974: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_4 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_3^*)\,
1975: f^{a c_1 c_3}f^{a c_2 c_4} \nonumber \\
1976: & + & \tilde r_{3+2,3} \tilde r_{4,1}\,
1977: (\varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_3^* \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_4 -
1978: \varepsilon_3^*\varepsilon_4 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_1^*)\,
1979: f^{a c_3 c_2}f^{a c_1 c_4}] \, ,
1980: \end{eqnarray}
1981: \begin{eqnarray}
1982: X_{A^4 \, 1234} & = & \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{3+4,3}\,
1983: (\varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_3 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_4 -
1984: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_4 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_3)\,
1985: f^{a c_1 c_2}f^{a c_3 c_4} \nonumber \\
1986: & + & [\tilde r_{3,1} \tilde r_{2,4}+\tilde r_{1,3} \tilde r_{4,2}]
1987: (\varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2^* \cdot \varepsilon_3 \varepsilon_4 -
1988: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_4 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_3)\,
1989: f^{a c_1 c_3}f^{a c_2 c_4} \nonumber \\
1990: & + & [\tilde r_{3,2} \tilde r_{1,4} + \tilde r_{2,3} \tilde r_{4,1}] \,
1991: (\varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2^* \cdot \varepsilon_3^*\varepsilon_4 -
1992: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_3 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_4)\,
1993: f^{a c_1 c_4}f^{a c_2 c_3} \, .
1994: \end{eqnarray}
1995: The abbreviated notation for the regularization factors is $\tilde r_{p,d}
1996: \equiv \tilde r_{\Delta\delta}(p,d)$. Denoting $t^a_{ij} \equiv \chi^\dagger_{ic}
1997: t^a \chi_{jc}$, the quark-gluon coupling is given by
1998: \begin{eqnarray}
1999: H_{\psi A \psi} = \sum_{123}\int[123]
2000: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p)\,\tilde r_{3,1}\,g\,
2001: \left[
2002: \bar u_2 \not\!\varepsilon_1^* u_3 \, t^1_{23} \, b^\dagger_2 a^\dagger_1 b_3
2003: - \bar v_3 \not\!\varepsilon_1^* v_2 \, t^1_{32} \, d^\dagger_2 a^\dagger_1 d_3
2004: + \bar u_1 \not\!\varepsilon_3 v_2 \, t^3_{12} \, b^\dagger_1 d^\dagger_2 a_3
2005: + h.c. \right],
2006: \end{eqnarray}
2007: where the spin vertex factors are
2008: \begin{eqnarray}
2009: \bar u_2 \not\!\varepsilon_1^* u_3 & = & \sqrt{x_3/x_2}\,\,
2010: \chi_2^\dagger\,
2011: \left[ i(\kappa^\perp_{1/3} \times \varepsilon_1^{*\perp})^3
2012: \sigma^3 + {x_2 + x_3 \over x_1} \,
2013: \kappa^\perp_{1/3}\varepsilon_1^{*\perp}
2014: - m_3 {x_1\over x_3}\,
2015: \sigma^\perp\varepsilon_1^{*\perp}\,\sigma^3 \right]\chi_3 \, , \\
2016: \bar v_3 \not\!\varepsilon_1^* v_2 & = & \sqrt{x_3/x_2}\,\,
2017: \xi_{-3}^\dagger\,
2018: \left[-i(\kappa^\perp_{1/3} \times \varepsilon_1^{*\perp})^3
2019: \sigma^3 + {x_2 + x_3 \over x_1} \,
2020: \kappa^\perp_{1/3}\varepsilon_1^{*\perp}
2021: - m_3 {x_1\over x_3}\,
2022: \sigma^3 \sigma^\perp\varepsilon_1^{*\perp} \right]\xi_{-2} \, , \\
2023: \bar u_1 \not\!\varepsilon_3 v_2 & = & \sqrt{ x_3/x_1}\sqrt{x_3/x_2}\,\,
2024: \chi_1^\dagger \,
2025: \left[-i(\kappa^\perp_{1/3} \times \varepsilon_3^\perp)^3
2026: + {x_1 - x_2 \over x_3} \,
2027: \kappa^\perp_{1/3}\varepsilon_3^\perp\,\sigma^3
2028: - m_1 \sigma^\perp\varepsilon_3^\perp \right]\xi_{-2} \, .
2029: \end{eqnarray}
2030: The instantaneous fermion interaction reads
2031: \begin{eqnarray}
2032: H_{\psi A A \psi} = \sum_{1234}\int[1234]
2033: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p)\,(g^2/2)\,2\sqrt{x_1 x_4}
2034: \,\, \cdot \,\, \{\} \, ,
2035: \end{eqnarray}
2036: where the curly brackets $\{\}$ contain the operators ordered
2037: according to the rule $b^\dagger d^\dagger a^\dagger a d b$;
2038: \begin{eqnarray}
2039: \{\} \, & = & \, \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{3+4,3}\,
2040: \left[
2041: t^{23}_{14}\,
2042: {\chi_1^\dagger[2^* 3]\chi_4 \over x_1 + x_2}\,
2043: b_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger a_3 b_4
2044: +
2045: t^{23}_{14}\,
2046: {\xi_{-1}^\dagger[2 3^*]\xi_{-4} \over x_1 + x_2}
2047: d_4^\dagger a_3^\dagger a_2 d_1
2048: \right]\, \nonumber \\
2049: & + &
2050: [\tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{4,3} + \tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3,4}]\,
2051: \left[
2052: t^{23}_{14}\,
2053: {\chi_1^\dagger[2 3^*]\chi_4 \over x_1 - x_2}\,
2054: b_1^\dagger a_3^\dagger a_2 b_4
2055: +
2056: t^{23}_{14}\,
2057: {\xi_{-1}^\dagger[2^* 3]\xi_{-4} \over x_1 - x_2}
2058: d_4^\dagger a_2^\dagger a_3 d_1
2059: \right]\, \nonumber \\
2060: & + &
2061: \left[\tilde r_{3,4} \tilde r_{1+2,1}\,
2062: t^{23}_{14}\,
2063: {\chi_1^\dagger[2^* 3]\sigma^3\xi_{-4} \over x_1 + x_2}\,
2064: b_1^\dagger d_4^\dagger a_2^\dagger a_3 + h.c. \right]
2065: +
2066: \left[\tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3+4,3}\,
2067: t^{23}_{14}\,
2068: {\chi_1^\dagger[2 3^*]\sigma*3\xi_{-4} \over x_1 - x_2}\,
2069: b_1^\dagger d_4^\dagger a_3^\dagger a_2 + h.c \right] \nonumber \\
2070: & + &
2071: \left[{1\over 2}\left(
2072: [\tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{3,4} + \tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{4,3}]\,
2073: t^{23}_{14}\,
2074: {\chi_1^\dagger[2 3]\sigma^3\xi_{-4} \over x_1 - x_2} +
2075: [\tilde r_{1,3} \tilde r_{2,4} + \tilde r_{3,1} \tilde r_{4,2}]\,
2076: t^{32}_{14}\,
2077: {\chi_1^\dagger[3 2]\sigma^3\xi_{-4} \over x_1 - x_3}
2078: \right)
2079: b_1^\dagger d_4^\dagger a_2 a_3 + h.c.\right] \nonumber \\
2080: & + &
2081: \left[
2082: {1\over 2}
2083: \left(
2084: \tilde r_{4,3} \tilde r_{1+2,1}\,
2085: t^{23}_{14}\,
2086: {\chi_1^\dagger[2^* 3^*]\chi_4 \over x_1 + x_2}\,
2087: +
2088: \tilde r_{4,2} \tilde r_{1+3,1}\,
2089: t^{32}_{14}\,
2090: {\chi_1^\dagger[3^* 2^*]\chi_4 \over x_1 + x_3}\,
2091: \right)
2092: b_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger a_3^\dagger b_4 + h.c. \right] \nonumber \\
2093: & + &
2094: \left[
2095: {1\over 2}
2096: \left(
2097: \tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{3+4,4}\,
2098: t^{23}_{14}\,
2099: {\xi_{-1}^\dagger[2^* 3^*]\xi_{-4} \over x_1 - x_2}\,
2100: +
2101: \tilde r_{1,3} \tilde r_{2+4,4}\,
2102: t^{32}_{14}\,
2103: {\xi_{-1}^\dagger[3^* 2^*]\xi_{-4} \over x_1 - x_3}
2104: \right)
2105: d_4^\dagger a_2^\dagger a_3^\dagger d_1 + h.c. \right]
2106: \end{eqnarray}
2107: The symbols mean: $t^{ab}_{ij} = \chi_{ic}^\dagger
2108: t^a t^b \chi_{jc}$, and $[\alpha\beta] = \varepsilon_\alpha^\perp
2109: \varepsilon_\beta^\perp + i (\varepsilon_\alpha^\perp
2110: \times \varepsilon_\beta^\perp)^3 \sigma^3$. The star,
2111: $*$, means that the corresponding polarization vector is
2112: complex conjugated: $* \rightarrow \varepsilon^* $.
2113: The quartic gluon term with derivative reads
2114: \begin{eqnarray}
2115: H_{[\partial A A]^2} = \sum_{1234}\int[1234]
2116: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p)\,g^2\, \left[
2117: \left(
2118: \Xi_{[\partial A A]^2 \, 1234} a^\dagger_1 a^\dagger_2 a^\dagger_3 a_4
2119: + h.c. \right) +
2120: X_{[\partial A A]^2\,1234} a^\dagger_1 a^\dagger_2 a_3 a_4 \right] \, ,
2121: \end{eqnarray}
2122: where
2123: \begin{eqnarray}
2124: \Xi_{[\partial A A]^2\, 1234} & = & - {1\over 6}\left[ \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{4,3}\,
2125: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2^* \cdot \varepsilon_3^*\varepsilon_4\,
2126: {(x_1 - x_2)(x_3+x_4)\over (x_1 + x_2)^2}\,
2127: f^{a c_1 c_2}f^{a c_3 c_4} \right.\nonumber \\
2128: & + & \left.
2129: \tilde r_{1+3,1} \tilde r_{4,2}\,
2130: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_3^* \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_4\,
2131: {(x_1 - x_3)(x_2+x_4)\over (x_1 + x_3)^2}\,
2132: f^{a c_1 c_3}f^{a c_2 c_4} \right. \nonumber \\
2133: & + & \left.
2134: \tilde r_{3+2,3} \tilde r_{4,1}\,
2135: \varepsilon_3^*\varepsilon_2^* \cdot \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_4\,
2136: {(x_3 - x_2)(x_1+x_4)\over (x_3 + x_2)^2}\,
2137: f^{a c_3 c_2}f^{a c_1 c_4} \right] \, ,
2138: \end{eqnarray}
2139: \begin{eqnarray}
2140: X_{[\partial A A]^2\, 1234} & = & {1\over 4} \left[ \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{3+4,3}\,
2141: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2^* \cdot \varepsilon_3 \varepsilon_4\,
2142: {(x_1 - x_2)(x_3 - x_4)\over (x_1 + x_2)^2}\,
2143: f^{a c_1 c_2}f^{a c_3 c_4} \right. \nonumber \\
2144: & - & \left.
2145: [\tilde r_{3,1} \tilde r_{2,4}+\tilde r_{1,3} \tilde r_{4,2}]\,
2146: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_3 \cdot \varepsilon_2^* \varepsilon_4\,
2147: {(x_1 + x_3)(x_2 + x_4)\over (x_2 - x_4)^2}\,
2148: f^{a c_1 c_3}f^{a c_2 c_4} \right. \nonumber \\
2149: & - & \left.
2150: [\tilde r_{3,2} \tilde r_{1,4} + \tilde r_{2,3} \tilde r_{4,1}] \,
2151: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_4 \cdot \varepsilon_2^*\varepsilon_4\,
2152: {(x_2 + x_3)(x_1+x_4)\over (x_1 - x_4)^2}\,
2153: f^{a c_1 c_4}f^{a c_2 c_3} \right] \, .
2154: \end{eqnarray}
2155: The instantaneous gluon interaction between quarks and gluons reads
2156: \begin{eqnarray}
2157: H_{[\partial A A](\psi\psi)} & = & \sum_{1234}\int[1234]
2158: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p)\ g^2\,if^{a12}\,t^a_{34} \,2\sqrt{x_3 x_4} \,\, \{\} \, ,
2159: \end{eqnarray}
2160: where the brackets $\{\}$ contain,
2161: \begin{eqnarray}
2162: \{\}\, & = & \, \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2^* \,
2163: {x_2 - x_1 \over 2(x_1+ x_2)^2 } \, \left[
2164: \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{3+4,3}\,
2165: \xi_{-3}^\dagger\sigma^3\chi_4\,
2166: a_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger d_3 b_4
2167: +
2168: \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{4,3}\,
2169: \chi_{3}^\dagger\chi_4\,
2170: b_3^\dagger a_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger b_4
2171: -
2172: \tilde r_{1+2,1} \tilde r_{3,4}\,
2173: \xi_{-3}^\dagger\xi_{-4}\,
2174: d_4^\dagger a_1^\dagger a_2^\dagger d_3
2175: \right] \nonumber \\
2176: & - &
2177: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2 \,
2178: {x_1 + x_2 \over (x_3 + x_4)^2}\,
2179: \tilde r_{3+4,3} \tilde r_{2,1}\,
2180: \chi_3^\dagger\sigma^3\xi_{-4}\,
2181: b_3^\dagger d_4^\dagger a_1^\dagger a_2 \nonumber \\
2182: & + &
2183: \varepsilon_1^*\varepsilon_2 \,
2184: {x_1 + x_2 \over (x_1 - x_2)^2}\,
2185: \left[
2186: \left(\tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{4,3}+ \tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{3,4}\right)\,
2187: \xi_{-3}^\dagger\xi_{-4}\,
2188: d_4^\dagger a_1^\dagger a_2 d_3
2189: -
2190: \left(\tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3,4}+ \tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{4,3}\right)\,
2191: \chi_3^\dagger\chi_4\,
2192: b_3^\dagger a_1^\dagger a_2 b_4
2193: \right] + h.c. \, .
2194: \end{eqnarray}
2195: Finally, the instantaneous gluon interaction between quarks reads
2196: \begin{eqnarray}
2197: H_{(\psi\psi)^2} & = & \sum_{1234}\int[1234]
2198: \tilde\delta(p^\dagger - p)\, {g^2 \over 2}\, 4\sqrt{x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4} \,\,\{\} \, ,
2199: \end{eqnarray}
2200: where the brackets $\{\}$ contain,
2201: \begin{eqnarray}
2202: \{\} & = &
2203: - {1 \over 2} \left[
2204: {\chi_1^\dagger \chi_2 \chi_3^\dagger \chi_4 \over (x_1-x_2)^2}\,
2205: t^a_{12} t^a_{34}\,
2206: [\tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{4,3}+ \tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3,4}]
2207: -{\chi_3^\dagger \chi_2 \chi_1^\dagger \chi_4 \over (x_3-x_2)^2}\,
2208: t^a_{32} t^a_{14}\,
2209: [\tilde r_{3,2} \tilde r_{4,1}+ \tilde r_{2,3} \tilde r_{1,4}]\,
2210: \right]\,
2211: b_1^\dagger b_3^\dagger b_2 b_4 \nonumber \\
2212: & + &
2213: {1 \over 2} \left[
2214: {\xi_{-2}^\dagger \xi_{-1} \xi_{-4}^\dagger \xi_{-3} \over (x_1-x_2)^2}\,
2215: t^a_{21} t^a_{43}\,
2216: [\tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{4,3}+ \tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3,4}]\,
2217: -{\xi_{-2}^\dagger \xi_{-3} \xi_{-4}^\dagger \xi_{-1} \over (x_3-x_2)^2}\,
2218: t^a_{23} t^a_{41}\,
2219: [\tilde r_{3,2} \tilde r_{4,1}+ \tilde r_{2,3} \tilde r_{1,4}]\,
2220: \right]\,
2221: d_1^\dagger d_3^\dagger d_2 d_4 \nonumber \\
2222: & + &
2223: \left(
2224: \left[
2225: {\chi_1^\dagger \chi_2 \chi_3^\dagger \sigma^3 \xi_{-4} \over (x_1-x_2)^2}\,
2226: t^a_{12} t^a_{34}\,
2227: \tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3+4,3}\,
2228: -{\chi_3^\dagger \chi_2 \chi_1^\dagger \sigma^3 \xi_{-4} \over (x_3-x_2)^2}\,
2229: t^a_{32} t^a_{14}\,
2230: \tilde r_{2,3} \tilde r_{1+4,1}\,
2231: \right]\,
2232: b_1^\dagger b_3^\dagger d_4^\dagger b_2 + h.c. \right) \nonumber \\
2233: & - &
2234: \left(
2235: \left[
2236: {\chi_1^\dagger\sigma^3\xi_{-2}\xi_{-4}^\dagger\xi_{-3}\over(x_1+x_2)^2}\,
2237: t^a_{12} t^a_{43}\,
2238: \tilde r_{4,3} \tilde r_{1+2,1}\,
2239: -{\chi_1^\dagger\sigma^3\xi_{-3}\xi_{-4}^\dagger\xi_{-2}\over(x_1+x_3)^2}\,
2240: t^a_{13} t^a_{42}\,
2241: \tilde r_{4,2} \tilde r_{1+3,1}\,
2242: \right]\,
2243: b_1^\dagger d_2^\dagger d_3^\dagger d_4 + h.c. \right) \nonumber \\
2244: & - &
2245: 2\,
2246: {\chi_1^\dagger \chi_2 \xi_{-4}^\dagger \xi_{-3} \over (x_1-x_2)^2}
2247: t^a_{12} t^a_{43}
2248: [\tilde r_{1,2} \tilde r_{4,3}+ \tilde r_{2,1} \tilde r_{3,4}]\,
2249: b_1^\dagger d_3^\dagger d_4 b_2 +
2250: 2\,
2251: {\chi_1^\dagger\sigma^3\xi_{-3}\xi_{-4}^\dagger\sigma^3\chi_2
2252: \over (x_1+x_3)^2}\,
2253: t^a_{13} t^a_{42}\,
2254: \tilde r_{1+3,1} \tilde r_{2+4,2}\,
2255: b_1^\dagger d_3^\dagger d_4 b_2 \, .
2256: \end{eqnarray}
2257: \end{widetext}
2258: Useful color identities are:
2259: $ t^at^bt^a = {- t^a/(2N_c)}$, $t^at^b+t^bt^a = {\delta^{ab}/N_c}
2260: + d^{abc}t^c$, $d^{abc}d^{abd} = [(N_c^2 - 1)/N_c]\delta^{cd}$,
2261: $f^{abc}t^bt^c = i (N_c/2)t^a$.
2262:
2263: \section{$Q_\lambda \bar Q_\lambda$ interaction}
2264: \label{A:Q}
2265: Several factors are needed to estimate the small-$x$ behavior of the
2266: potential kernel $\tilde v_0(13,24)$ in Eq. (\ref{v0}). Momenta are
2267: labeled according to Figs. \ref{fig:oge} and \ref{fig:sea}.
2268: \begin{equation}
2269: f_{13,24} = \exp{\left[ - ({\cal M}^2_{13} -
2270: {\cal M}^2_{24})^2/\lambda^4\right]} \, ,
2271: \end{equation}
2272: where
2273: \begin{eqnarray}
2274: \label{kij}
2275: {\cal M}^2_{ij} & = & 4(m^2 + |{\vec k}_{ij}|^2) \nonumber \\
2276: & = & { \kappa_{ij}^{\perp \, 2} + m^2 \over x_i x_i } \, ,
2277: \end{eqnarray}
2278: with
2279: \begin{eqnarray}
2280: k_{ij}^\perp = \kappa_{ij}^\perp \, , \\
2281: k_{ij}^3 = (x_i-1/2){\cal M}_{ij} \, .
2282: \end{eqnarray}
2283: \begin{eqnarray}
2284: {\cal M}^2_{13} - {\cal M}^2_{24} = 4 ({\vec k}_{13} + {\vec k}_{24})\, \vec q \, ,
2285: \end{eqnarray}
2286: where
2287: \begin{eqnarray}
2288: \label{vecq}
2289: \vec q = {\vec k}_{13} - {\vec k}_{24} \, ,
2290: \end{eqnarray}
2291: is the momentum transfer that goes over to the standard one in the NR limit.
2292: \begin{eqnarray}
2293: \label{13-24}
2294: {\cal M}^2_{13} - {\cal M}^2_{24} =
2295: { 2 \kappa^\perp_{13} q^\perp - q^{\perp \, 2} - z(1-2x_1 + z) {\cal M}_{13}^2
2296: \over (x_1-z)(x_3+z) } \, . \nonumber \\
2297: & &
2298: \end{eqnarray}
2299: In the last term in Eq. (\ref{v0}), the form factors $f_{1,52}f_{53,4}$
2300: have arguments
2301: \begin{equation}
2302: \label{m52}
2303: {\cal M}^2_{52} - m^2 = { x_1 \over x_1 - z } \, {\cal D}_1 \, ,
2304: \end{equation}
2305: where
2306: \begin{equation}
2307: {\cal D}_1 \equiv {x_1 \over |z| } \,
2308: \left(q^\perp - {z \over x_1} \kappa^\perp_{13} \right)^2
2309: + m^2 { |z| \over x_1 } \, ,
2310: \end{equation}
2311: and,
2312: \begin{eqnarray}
2313: \label{m53}
2314: {\cal M}^2_{53} - m^2 & = & {\cal D}_3 \, ,
2315: \end{eqnarray}
2316: where
2317: \begin{eqnarray}
2318: {\cal D}_3 = {x_3 \over |z|} \,
2319: \left(q^\perp + {z \over x_3} \kappa^\perp_{13} \right)^2
2320: + m^2 { |z| \over x_3} \, ,
2321: \end{eqnarray}
2322: while the form factors $f_{3,54}f_{51,2}$ have the arguments,
2323: \begin{equation}
2324: \label{m54}
2325: {\cal M}^2_{54} - m^2 = { x_3 \over x_3 + z}\, {\cal D}_3 \, ,
2326: \end{equation}
2327: and,
2328: \begin{equation}
2329: \label{m51}
2330: {\cal M}^2_{51} - m^2 = {\cal D}_1 \, .
2331: \end{equation}
2332: The last term in Eq. (\ref{v0}) can be written with the coefficient $1 =
2333: (1 - f_{13,24}) + f_{13,24}$ but only the second term counts at small $z$
2334: because $(1 - f_{13,24})$ is proportional to the momentum transfer squared.
2335: The factor $f_{13,24}$ becomes common to all terms in Eq. (\ref{v0}) and
2336: is taken out in front. The LF instantaneous term can be split into the part
2337: $ff$ that joins the low-energy exchange $1-ff$ that goes with the high-energy
2338: exchange. This way one obtains
2339: \begin{widetext}
2340: \begin{eqnarray}
2341: \label{evsmallx}
2342: \left({\kappa^{\perp \, 2}_{13} + m^2_{0} \over x_1 x_3} +
2343: {\tilde m^2_{1}\over x_1} + {\tilde m^2_{3}\over x_3} - M^2 \right)
2344: \tilde \psi(\kappa^\perp_{13},x_1)
2345: - {4 \alpha \over 3\pi^2 } \int dx_2 d^2 \kappa^\perp_{24}
2346: \, \sqrt{x_1 x_3 \over x_2 x_4} \, { f_{13,24} \over x^2_5 }
2347: \, \tilde v_0(13,24) \, \tilde \psi(\kappa^\perp_{24},x_2) = 0 \, ,
2348: \end{eqnarray}
2349: where
2350: \begin{eqnarray}
2351: \label{vsplit}
2352: \tilde v_0(13,24) & = &
2353: \theta(z) \tilde r_{5/1} \tilde r_{5/4} \,
2354: (\tilde v_{+\, high} + \tilde v_{+\, low})
2355: +
2356: \theta(-z) \tilde r_{5/3} \tilde r_{5/2} \,
2357: (\tilde v_{-\, high} + \tilde v_{-\, low}) \, .
2358: \end{eqnarray}
2359: The gluon mass ansatz contributes to the low-energy exchange terms
2360: only. In terms of the invariant masses from Eqs. (\ref{m52} - \ref{m51}),
2361: \begin{eqnarray}
2362: \label{vh+}
2363: \tilde v_{+\, high} & = &
2364: { f_{1,52} f_{53,4} - 1 \over 2 } \, \left\{
2365: {x_1^2 + x_4^2 \over x_1 x_4 } \,
2366: {({\cal M}^2_{52} - m^2 )({\cal M}^2_{53} - m^2)
2367: \over ({\cal M}^2_{52} - m^2 )^2 + ({\cal M}^2_{53} - m^2)^2 }
2368: - 1 \right\} \, ,
2369: \end{eqnarray}
2370: \begin{eqnarray}
2371: \label{vh-}
2372: \tilde v_{-\, high} & = &
2373: { f_{3,54} f_{51,2} - 1 \over 2} \, \left\{
2374: {x_3^2 + x_2^2 \over x_3 x_2 } \,
2375: {({\cal M}^2_{54} - m^2 )({\cal M}^2_{51} - m^2)
2376: \over ({\cal M}^2_{54} - m^2 )^2 + ({\cal M}^2_{51} - m^2)^2 }
2377: - 1 \right\} \, .
2378: \end{eqnarray}
2379: These have the same limit when $z \rightarrow 0$ for fixed $q^\perp$,
2380: \begin{eqnarray}
2381: \lim_{z \rightarrow 0} \tilde v_{+\, high} & = &
2382: \lim_{z \rightarrow 0} \tilde v_{-\, high} \nonumber \\
2383: & = &
2384: { f_{3,54} f_{51,2} - 1 \over 2} \,
2385: {x_1 - x_3 \over x_1 x_3 (x_1^2 + x_3^2) } \,
2386: {(q^\perp - \kappa^\perp_{13})^2 - \kappa^{\perp \, 2}_{13}
2387: \over q^{\perp \, 2} } \,\, z \, + \, o(z^2) \, .
2388: \end{eqnarray}
2389: The terms on the order of $z^2$ and higher are finite when
2390: divided by the square of $x_5 = |z|$. Terms linear in $z$
2391: produce an integral convergent in the sense of principal
2392: value \cite{z, long}. When $q^\perp \sim \sqrt{z} \rightarrow 0$,
2393: $d^2 \kappa^\perp_{24}$ removes one power of $z$ from the denominator
2394: in Eq. (\ref{ev0}), while $\tilde v_{\pm \, high}$ vanish for
2395: $z \rightarrow 0$. The contributions of $\tilde v_{\pm \, high}$
2396: are $\vec k^{\,2}/m^2$ times smaller than the dominant terms
2397: and can be ignored in the first approximation. One can see this
2398: by integrating $\tilde v_{\pm\, high}$ with a Coulomb wave function.
2399:
2400: The low-energy terms read
2401: \begin{eqnarray}
2402: \label{v+low}
2403: \tilde v_{+\, low} & = &
2404: {f_{1,52} f_{53,4} \over 4} \,
2405: \left[ 2
2406: - { ({\cal M}^2_{53} - m^2 )/x_4 - \mu^2(2,5,3)/x_5 \over
2407: ({\cal M}^2_{52} - m^2 )/x_1 + \mu^2(2,5,3)/x_5 }
2408: - { ({\cal M}^2_{52} - m^2 )/x_1 - \mu^2(2,5,3)/x_5 \over
2409: ({\cal M}^2_{53} - m^2 )/x_4 + \mu^2(2,5,3)/x_5 }
2410: \right] \, \, , \nonumber \\
2411: & &
2412: \end{eqnarray}
2413: \begin{eqnarray}
2414: \label{v-low}
2415: \tilde v_{-\, low} & = &
2416: {f_{3,54} f_{51,2} \over 4} \,
2417: \left[ 2
2418: - { ({\cal M}^2_{51} - m^2 )/x_2 - \mu^2(1,5,4)/x_5 \over
2419: ({\cal M}^2_{54} - m^2 )/x_3 + \mu^2(1,5,4)/x_5 }
2420: - { ({\cal M}^2_{54} - m^2 )/x_3 - \mu^2(1,5,4)/x_5 \over
2421: ({\cal M}^2_{51} - m^2 )/x_2 + \mu^2(1,5,4)/x_5 }
2422: \right] \, . \nonumber \\
2423: & &
2424: \end{eqnarray}
2425: \end{widetext}
2426: \section{ Mass terms }
2427: \label{A:M}
2428: The mass terms with $i=1, 3$ in the eigenvalue Eq. (\ref{evsmallx}) are
2429: given in Eq. (\ref{mstildemi}), with ${\cal M}^2_1$ given in Eq. (\ref{m1}),
2430: and ${\cal M}^2_3$ in Eq. (\ref{m3}). $m^2_0$ originates from Eq. (\ref
2431: {mlambda}) with $\lambda = \lambda_0$. Namely, the quark mass counterterm
2432: in $X$ of Eq. (\ref{H}) adds $\delta m^2_{\Delta \delta}$ to the original
2433: mass parameter $m^2$ in Eq. (\ref{tquark}) and the free ultraviolet-finite
2434: part of the counterterm is such that $m^2_0$ appears in Eq. (\ref{ev0}).
2435: The condition on $m_0^2$ that the eigenstates of $H_{\lambda_0}$ with quantum
2436: numbers of a single quark have eigenvalues growing to infinity is fulfilled
2437: below by representing gluon interactions in the case of the single quark state
2438: by a new gluon mass ansatz. The resulting value of $m_0^2$ enters into the
2439: quarkonium dynamics. The determination of the ultraviolet-finite part of the
2440: mass counterterm in $X$ in Eq. (\ref{H}) is thus based on the picture that
2441: comes out from simultaneous consideration of two eigenvalue equations, one for
2442: the state with quantum numbers of a single quark (or an anti-quark, the result
2443: is the same), and another one for the quarkonium. The key physical assumption
2444: made in the comparison is that the binding of effective quarks in the quarkonium
2445: state occurs at the expense of change in their individual structure. While the
2446: buildup of self-interacting clouds of gluons around single quarks leads to the
2447: infinite quark masses, in the case of a colorless pair the main parts of the
2448: gluon clouds can recombine into a colorless object that may fly out of the
2449: region of strong interaction with the quarks, leaving behind only the minimal
2450: remnants of the gluon clouds required to form the quarkonium eigenstate with
2451: a finite mass. The new finite balance is described using the gluon mass ansatz
2452: parameter $\delta_\mu$. The finite balance can be achieved because the
2453: quark-anti-quark state looks neutral from large distances and does not continue
2454: to generate gluons over infinite distances along the LF. This scenario is
2455: partly similar to the one originally developed in the LF dynamics in \cite{gcoh2,
2456: gcoh3}, and studied in \cite{QQgcoh, QQ}. The main differences are related to
2457: the fact that the physical picture that emerges here in the finite effective
2458: theory with the gluon mass ansatz relies on the phenomenological parameter
2459: $\delta_\mu$. A formal cutoff parameter $\delta^+$ of the canonical theory,
2460: the coupling coherence phenomenon that may work over many scales of an ultraviolet
2461: cutoff, and the condition of transverse locality are not employed in the new
2462: picture. Instead, the present scenario can be studied in higher orders of
2463: perturbation theory according to the known rules \cite{g_QCD, optimization1}
2464: that explicitly preserve the boost invariance, cluster decomposition property,
2465: and unitary connection with the initial theory.
2466:
2467: The eigenstate of $H_{\lambda_0}$ with a single quark quantum numbers
2468: and momentum $p$ with components $p^+$ and $p^\perp$, has the eigenvalue
2469: \begin{equation}
2470: \label{qe}
2471: p^- = (p^{\perp \, 2} + \tilde m^2)/p^+ \, ,
2472: \end{equation}
2473: and the decomposition in the effective particle basis,
2474: \begin{equation}
2475: \label{|p>}
2476: |p\rangle = |Q_{\lambda_0} \rangle + |Q_{\lambda_0} g_{\lambda_0} \rangle +
2477: \, . \, . \, . \, .
2478: \end{equation}
2479: The new gluon mass ansatz is introduced in the quark-gluon component.
2480: It is different than in the quarkonium case because the states have
2481: different quantum numbers and are made of different numbers of effective
2482: particles. Dropping the subscript $\lambda_0$ as in Eq.
2483: (\ref{matrix}), the eigenvalue problem is written as
2484: \begin{eqnarray}
2485: \label{Qmatrix}
2486: (T_q + \tilde T_g)\,|Qg\rangle \, + \, Y|Q\rangle
2487: & = & E\,|Qg\rangle \, ,\nonumber \\
2488: Y\,|Qg\rangle \, + \,
2489: T_q\,|Q\rangle & = & E\,|Q\rangle \, .
2490: \end{eqnarray}
2491: The new ansatz enters through the kinetic energy $\tilde T_g$, which contains
2492: \begin{eqnarray}
2493: \label{mul1q}
2494: \tilde \mu^2_{\lambda_0} = \mu^2_{\lambda_0} + \mu_Q^2(x, \kappa^\perp) \, ,
2495: \end{eqnarray}
2496: where $x$ and $\kappa^\perp$ refer to the relative motion of
2497: the effective gluon with respect to the quark. The operator
2498: $R$ from Eq. (\ref{R}) is now replaced by the one with $\hat
2499: {\cal P}$ that projects on the single effective quark basis
2500: state with kinematical momentum components $p^+$ and $p^\perp$.
2501: In the perturbative expansion in $g$, only the second term
2502: on the right-hand side of Eq. (\ref{mul1q}) contributes in
2503: orders up to $g^2$. Thanks to the boost invariance, the resulting
2504: eigenvalue condition reduces to an equation for $\tilde m^2$,
2505: which is independent of $p$,
2506: \begin{eqnarray}
2507: \label{evq}
2508: \tilde m^2 & = &
2509: m^2_{0} - {4 \alpha_0 \over 3 \pi^2} \,
2510: \int dx d^2 \kappa^\perp \, \tilde r^2_\delta(x)\,
2511: \nonumber \\
2512: & \times & f^2_{\lambda_0} (m^2,{\cal M}^2)\,
2513: {1\over x^2}\,
2514: { {\cal M}^2 - m^2 \over {\cal M}_Q^2 - m^2} \, .
2515: \end{eqnarray}
2516: \begin{eqnarray}
2517: {\cal M}_Q^2 = [\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ \mu_Q^2(x, \kappa^\perp)]/x
2518: + (\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ m^2)/(1-x) \, . \nonumber \\
2519: \end{eqnarray}
2520: For $\tilde m^2$ to be positive and growing to infinity when
2521: $\delta \rightarrow 0$, one can write $m_{0}^2$ in the
2522: integral form,
2523: \begin{eqnarray}
2524: \label{resultmu0phi}
2525: m^2_{0} &=& m^2 + {4 \alpha_0 \over 3 \pi^2} \,
2526: \int dx d^2 \kappa^\perp \, \tilde r^2_\delta(x)\,
2527: \nonumber \\
2528: & \times & f^2_{\lambda_0} (m^2,{\cal M}^2)\,
2529: {1\over x^2}\,
2530: { {\cal M}^2 - m^2 \over {\cal M}_{0}^2 - m^2} \, ,
2531: \end{eqnarray}
2532: with some function ${\cal M}_{0}^2$ that satisfies the condition,
2533: \begin{equation}
2534: {\cal M}_Q^2 > {\cal M}_{0}^2 > m^2 \, .
2535: \end{equation}
2536: This condition can be satisfied by writing,
2537: \begin{eqnarray}
2538: \label{M0phi}
2539: {\cal M}_{0}^2 = [\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ \mu_{0}^2(x, \kappa^\perp)]/x
2540: + (\kappa^{\perp \, 2}+ m^2)/(1-x) \, , \nonumber \\
2541: \end{eqnarray}
2542: and assuming that
2543: \begin{equation}
2544: \label{massansatzinequality}
2545: \mu_Q^2 > \mu_{0}^2 \ge 0 \, .
2546: \end{equation}
2547: As long as the difference $\mu_Q^2 - \mu_{0}^2$ does not
2548: vanish for $x \rightarrow 0$, the single quark mass will
2549: tend to $\infty$ when $\delta \rightarrow 0$. But this may
2550: easily happen here because the larger is the gluon mass ansatz
2551: $\mu_Q^2$, the stronger the single quark mass eigenvalue
2552: diverges in the limit $\delta \rightarrow 0$, while $\mu_{0}^2$
2553: remains free to vanish in the limit $x \rightarrow 0$ and lead
2554: to a finite mass contribution in the quarkonium dynamics. Using
2555: Eq. (\ref{resultmu0phi}) for $m_0^2$ one obtains Eq. (\ref{mstildemi}).
2556: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
2557: \bibitem{similarity}
2558: S. D. G\l azek, K. G. Wilson,
2559: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 48}, 5863 (1993);
2560: {\it ibid.} D{\bf 49}, 4214 (1994).
2561: \bibitem{long}
2562: K. G. Wilson et al.,
2563: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 49}, 6720 (1994).
2564: \bibitem{front}
2565: P. A. M. Dirac, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 21}, 392 (1949).
2566: \bibitem{partons}
2567: R. P. Feynman,
2568: {\it Photon-Hadron Interactions}
2569: (Benjamin, New York, 1972).
2570: \bibitem{frontreview1}
2571: J. Kogut, L. Susskind,
2572: Phys. Rep. C{\bf 8}, 75 (1973).
2573: \bibitem{PDG}
2574: K. Hagiwara et al.,
2575: Phys. Rev. D66, 010001 (2002).
2576: \bibitem{frontreview2}
2577: S. J. Brodsky, H. C. Pauli, S. S. Pinsky,
2578: Phys. Rept. {\bf 301}, 299 (1998).
2579: \bibitem{LB}
2580: G. P. Lepage, S. J. Brodsky,
2581: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 22}, 2157 (1980).
2582: \bibitem{p+1}
2583: A. Casher,
2584: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 14}, 452 (1976).
2585: \bibitem{p+2}
2586: C. B. Thorn,
2587: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 20}, 1934 (1979);
2588: cf.
2589: R. J. Perry,
2590: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 300}, 8 (1993).
2591: \bibitem{DLCQ}
2592: H. C. Pauli, S. J. Brodsky,
2593: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 32}, 1993 (1985);
2594: {\it ibid.}, 2001 (1985).
2595: \bibitem{Wigner}
2596: E. Wigner, Ann. of Math. {\bf 40}, 149 (1939).
2597: \bibitem{condensates1}
2598: V. A. Novikov et al., Phys. Rep. {\bf 41}C, 1 (1978).
2599: \bibitem{condensates2}
2600: M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov,
2601: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 147} 385 (1979).
2602: \bibitem{condensates3}
2603: S. D. G\l azek,
2604: Phys. Rev. D 38, 3277 (1988).
2605: \bibitem{z}
2606: S. D. G{\l}azek,
2607: Acta Phys. Polon. B{\bf 24}, 1315 (1993).
2608: \bibitem{csb1}
2609: L. Susskind and M. Burkardt, in {\it Theory of Hadrons and Light-Front
2610: QCD}, edited by St. D. G{\l}azek (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), 5;
2611: hep-ph/9410313.
2612: \bibitem{csb2}
2613: K. G. Wilson and D. G. Robertson,
2614: {\it ibid.} 15; hep-th/9411007.
2615: \bibitem{csb3}
2616: K. G. Wilson and M. M. Brisudova,
2617: {\it ibid.} 166; hep-th/9411008.
2618: \bibitem{RozowskiThorn}
2619: J. S. Rozowsky, C. B. Thorn,
2620: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1614 (2000).
2621: \bibitem{th1}
2622: G. t' Hooft,
2623: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 14}, 3432 (1976);
2624: Erratum-ibid. D{\bf 18}, 2199 (1978).
2625: \bibitem{cdg}
2626: C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, D. J. Gross,
2627: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 17}, 2717 (1978).
2628: \bibitem{lip}
2629: L. N. Lipatov,
2630: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 23} 338 (1976);
2631: Yad. Fiz. {\bf 23}, 642 (1976).
2632: \bibitem{mue1}
2633: A. H. Mueller,
2634: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 335}, 115 (1990).
2635: \bibitem{mue2}
2636: A. H. Mueller,
2637: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 415}, 373 (1994).
2638: \bibitem{mue3}
2639: A. H. Mueller,
2640: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 558}, 285 (1999).
2641: \bibitem{kolleg}
2642: S. D. G\l azek,
2643: Lectures at the {\it Workshop on Flow Equations and Renormalization}
2644: in the Graduate College on {\it Systems with many degrees of freedom
2645: in physics} at the University of Heidelberg, Max-Planck-Haus,
2646: Heidelberg, October 6-11, 1996.
2647: \bibitem{modelafbs}
2648: St. D. G{\l}azek and K. G. Wilson,
2649: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 57}, 3558 (1998).
2650: \bibitem{optimization}
2651: S. D. G\l azek, J. M\l ynik,
2652: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 67}, 045001 (2003).
2653: \bibitem{optimization1}
2654: S. D. G\l azek, J. M\l ynik,
2655: in preparation.
2656: \bibitem{RGEP}
2657: S. D. G{\l}azek,
2658: Acta Phys. Pol. B{\bf 29}, 1979 (1998);
2659: hep-th/9712188; hep-th/9706212.
2660: \bibitem{g_QCD}
2661: S. D. G\l azek,
2662: Phys. Rev. D 63, 116006 (2001).
2663: \bibitem{af1}
2664: D. J. Gross, F. Wilczek,
2665: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 30}, 1343 (1973).
2666: \bibitem{af2}
2667: H. D. Politzer,
2668: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 30}, 1346 (1973).
2669: \bibitem{largep}
2670: S. D. G\l azek, M. Wi\c eckowski,
2671: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 66}, 016001 (2002).
2672: \bibitem{exotics}
2673: S. D. G\l azek, A. P. Szczepaniak,
2674: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 67}, 034019 (2003).
2675: \bibitem{algebra}
2676: S. D. G\l azek, T. Mas\l owski,
2677: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 65}, 065011 (2002).
2678: \bibitem{match1}
2679: R. F. Dashen, D. J. Gross,
2680: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 23}, 2340 (1981).
2681: \bibitem{match2}
2682: A. Hasenfratz, P. Hasenfratz,
2683: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 93}, 165 (1980).
2684: \bibitem{match3}
2685: G. P. Lepage, P. B. Mackenzie,
2686: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 48}, 2250 (1993).
2687: \bibitem{gcoh1}
2688: R. J. Perry and K. G. Wilson,
2689: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 403}, 587 (1993).
2690: \bibitem{gcoh2}
2691: R. J. Perry,
2692: Ann. Phys. {\bf 232}, 116 (1994).
2693: \bibitem{gcoh3}
2694: R. J. Perry, in {\it Proc. of Hadrons 94}, eds. V. Herscovitz and C.
2695: Vasconcellos (World Scientific, 1995); hep-th/9407056.
2696: \bibitem{QQgcoh}
2697: M. Brisudov\'a and R. J. Perry,
2698: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 54}, 1831 (1996).
2699: \bibitem{QQ}
2700: M. Brisudov\'a, R. J. Perry and K. G. Wilson,
2701: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 1227 (1997).
2702: \bibitem{gluonium}
2703: B. H. Allen, R. J. Perry,
2704: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 62}, 025005 (2000).
2705: \bibitem{divx1}
2706: M. Brisudova, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf 108}, 173 (2002).
2707: \bibitem{divx2}
2708: M. Brisudova, Mod. Phys. Lett. A{\bf 17}, 59 (2002).
2709: \bibitem{Zalewski}
2710: K. Zalewski,
2711: Acta Phys. Polon. B{\bf 29}, 2535 (1998).
2712: \bibitem{CasLep}
2713: W. E. Caswell and G. P. Lepage,
2714: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 167}, 437 (1986).
2715: \bibitem{krp}
2716: K. R. Pachucki,
2717: Phys. Rev. A{\bf 56}, 297 (1997).
2718: \bibitem{qed}
2719: B. D. Jones, R. J. Perry, S. D. G{\l}azek,
2720: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 55}, 6561 (1997).
2721: \bibitem{nrqcd1}
2722: B. A. Thacker, G. P. Lepage,
2723: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 43}, 196-208 (1991).
2724: \bibitem{nrqcd2}
2725: G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, and G. P. Lepage,
2726: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 51}, 1125 (1995); {\bf 55}, 5853(E) (1997).
2727: \bibitem{Bloch}
2728: C. Bloch,
2729: Nucl. Phys. {\bf 6}, 329 (1958).
2730: \bibitem{Wold}
2731: K. G. Wilson,
2732: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 2}, 1438 (1970).
2733: \bibitem{pot1}
2734: D. Gromes, I. O. Stamatescu,
2735: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 112}, 213 (1976).
2736: \bibitem{pot2}
2737: W. Fischler,
2738: Nucl. Phys. B{\bf 129}, 157 (1977).
2739: \bibitem{pot3}
2740: J. L. Richardson,
2741: Phys. Lett. B{\bf 82}, 272 (1979).
2742: \bibitem{pot4}
2743: D. P. Stanley, D. Robson,
2744: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 21}, 3180 (1980).
2745: \bibitem{pot5}
2746: E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, T.-M. Yan,
2747: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 17}, 3090 (1978);
2748: Erratum-ibid. D{\bf 21}, 313 (1980).
2749: \bibitem{pot6}
2750: E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, T.-M. Yan,
2751: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 21}, 203 (1980).
2752: \bibitem{pot7}
2753: M. Peter,
2754: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 602 (1997).
2755: \bibitem{charm1}
2756: T. Appelquist and H. D. Politzer,
2757: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 34}, 43 (1975).
2758: \bibitem{charm2}
2759: A. De R\'ujula and S. L. Glashow,
2760: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 34}, 46 (1975).
2761: \bibitem{charm3}
2762: T. Appelquist, A. De R\'ujula, H. D. Politzer, S. L. Glashow,
2763: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 34}, 365 (1975).
2764: \bibitem{charm4}
2765: E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. Kogut, K. D. Lane, T.-M. Yan,
2766: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 34}, 369 (1975).
2767: \bibitem{KS}
2768: J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper,
2769: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 1}, 2901 (1970).
2770: \bibitem{BKS}
2771: J. D. Bjorken, J. B. Kogut, and D. E. Soper,
2772: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 3}, 1382 (1971).
2773: \bibitem{S}
2774: D. E. Soper,
2775: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 4}, 1620 (1971).
2776: \bibitem{Yan}
2777: S.-J. Chang, R. G. Root and T.-M. Yan,
2778: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 7}, 1133 (1973);
2779: S.-J. Chang and T.-M. Yan,
2780: {\it ibid.} {\bf 7}, 1147 (1973);
2781: T.-M. Yan,
2782: {\it ibid.} {\bf 7}, 1760 (1973);
2783: {\it ibid.} {\bf 7}, 1780 (1973);
2784: and references therein.
2785: \bibitem{Banff}
2786: S. J. Brodsky, T. Huang, G. P. Lepage,
2787: in {\it Banff 1981, Proceedings, Particles and Fields 2}, 143-199.
2788: \bibitem{Bassetto}
2789: A. Bassetto, G. Nardelli, R. Soldati,
2790: {\it Yang-Mills theories in algebraic non-covariant gauges}
2791: (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
2792: \bibitem{SriBro}
2793: P. P. Srivastava, S. J. Brodsky,
2794: Phys. Rev. D{\bf 64}, 045006 (2001).
2795: \end{thebibliography}
2796: \end{document}
2797:
2798:
2799: