1: \documentstyle[12pt,psfig,epsfig,graphicx,psfrag]{article}
2: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
3: \textwidth 17.5 true cm
4: \textheight 22.0 true cm
5: \headheight 0 cm
6: \headsep 0 cm
7: \topmargin 0.4 true in
8: \oddsidemargin -0.25 true in
9: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
10: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
11: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
12: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
13: \def\L5{\tilde{\Lambda}}
14: \def\Ll{\bar{\Lambda}}
15: \def\N{{\cal N}}
16: \def\aa{{\cal C}_1}
17: \def\b{{\cal C}_2}
18: \def\Mf{M_{(5)}}
19: \def\MM{M_{(4)}}
20: \def\a{a}
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \begin{flushright}
24: hep-th/0311125
25: \end{flushright}
26: \vskip 1cm
27:
28: \begin{center}
29: {\Large {\bf Solutions of
30: multigravity theories\\ and discretized brane worlds
31: }}\\[1cm]
32: C. Deffayet$^{a,c,}$\footnote{deffayet@iap.fr},
33: J. Mourad$^{b,c,}$\footnote{mourad@th.u-psud.fr},
34: \\
35: $^a${\it GReCO/IAP\footnote{FRE2435 du CNRS.} 98 bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France.}\\
36: $^b${\it Laboratoire
37: de Physique
38: Th\'eorique\footnote{
39: UMR8627 du CNRS.
40: %Unit\'e Mixte de Recherche du CNRS (UMR 8627).
41: }, B\^at. 210
42: , Universit\'e
43: Paris XI, \\ 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.}\\
44: $^c${\it F\'ed\'eration de recherche APC, Universit\'e Paris VII,\\
45: 2 place Jussieu - 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France.}
46: \\
47: \end{center}
48: \vskip 0.2cm
49:
50: \noindent
51: \begin{center}
52: {\bf Abstract}
53: \end{center}
54: We determine solutions to 5D Einstein gravity
55: with a discrete fifth dimension.
56: The properties of the solutions depend on the discretization scheme
57: we use and some of them have no continuum counterpart.
58: In particular, we find that the neglect of the lapse field (along the
59: discretized direction) gives rise to
60: Randall-Sundrum type metric with a negative tension brane.
61: However, no brane source is required.
62: We show that this result is robust under
63: changes in the discretization scheme.
64: The inclusion of the lapse field
65: gives rise to solutions whose continuum limit
66: is gauge fixed by the
67: discretization scheme.
68: We find however one particular scheme which leads
69: to an undetermined lapse reflecting the
70: reparametrization invariance of the continuum theory.
71: We also find other solutions, with no continuum counterpart
72: with changes in the metric signature or avoidance of singularity.
73: We show that the models allow a continuous mass spectrum for the
74: gravitons with an effective 4D interaction at small scales.
75: We also discuss some cosmological solutions.
76:
77:
78: \pagebreak
79:
80: \section{Introduction}
81:
82:
83:
84: The possibility that space-time has more than four dimensions
85: has been considered for many years.
86: The Kaluza-Klein approach,
87: widely used in superstring constructions and
88: brane world models, relies on the assumption
89: that each four dimensional space-time point
90: is replaced by a compact internal manifold.
91: Another possibility which
92: was considered recently is to have an infinite fifth
93: dimension with a negative cosmological constant, the four
94: dimensional universe being confined to a 3-brane
95: \cite{RS} on which gravity is localised.
96: A generic feature of such models with continuous extra-dimensions is
97: that the field excitations in the internal manifold are seen by four dimensional observers
98: as a tower of infinitely many
99: massive particles.
100: This holds in particular for excitations of the metric with non zero
101: momentum in the internal dimensions, resulting in a tower of massive
102: gravitons. On the other hand,
103: theories with a single (or a finite
104: number of) massive graviton have also been considered.
105: In particular it is
106: well known, that there is only one ghost-free quadratic action for a massive spin 2 field, first introduced
107: by Pauli and Fierz \cite{Fierz:1939ix}.
108: Going beyond quadratic order, one is lead to theories with
109: several coupled metrics \cite{Isham:gm,Boulware:my}.
110: Such theories, which we will call generically here multigravity,
111: have been investigated in the past
112: in relation to strong interaction \cite{Isham:gm}, and more recently
113: by various authors \cite{Damour:2002ws,Arkani-Hamed:2002sp} in
114: particular in relation with
115: discrete extra-dimensions \cite{Arkani-Hamed:2001ca,Arkani-Hamed:2002sp}.
116: Discrete extra dimensions have also been considered
117: in the spirit of non-commutative geometry \cite{Madore:1989ma}.
118:
119:
120: Theories with massive graviton excitations are
121: likely to suffer in general from several pathologies which could
122: prevent them from being very useful to describe the real world. It
123: includes the celebrated van Dam-Veltman-Zakharov (vDVZ) discontinuity
124: \cite{vDVZ}\footnote{and the more recently discussed, and not unrelated, possible appearance of
125: strong coupling
126: \cite{Arkani-Hamed:2002sp,STRONGDGP}.}, as well as the
127: propagation of
128: ghost-like fields when one considers an action which goes beyond
129: quadratic orders \cite{Boulware:my}. Nonetheless some of these
130: theories have promising phenomenological properties, in particular in
131: relation with cosmology \cite{ACCDGP},
132: and some of the drawbacks mentioned above seem to be curable
133: \cite{CUREVDVZ}.
134: In the perspective of better understanding
135: theories with multiple
136: gravitons, it is interesting to contrast theories obtained from a
137: parent theory which is known to be fully consistent, with the
138: parent theory itself. This has been done in the past using Kaluza-Klein compactification \cite{Dolan:1983aa}.
139: Here we follow
140: a similar path by comparing simple solutions of theories obtained by
141: discretizing one dimension in five dimensional (5D) general relativity to
142: solution of the continuum theory. Namely we consider the extra dimension to be given by a
143: one dimensional lattice, to each point of the lattice
144: is associated a four dimensional space-time
145: with a metric. We determine the coupling
146: of the metrics by the requirement that the continuum
147: limit should be given by five-dimensional gravity.
148: The discrete action should respect as much as possible
149: the symmetries of
150: the 5D action, otherwise new degrees of freedom
151: appear which are in general ghost-like.
152: The actions we shall consider break explicitly the
153: reparametrization invariance along the fifth direction.
154: Although at the linear level the theory is
155: free from ghosts, they may appear at the non linear level
156: \cite{Boulware:my}.
157:
158:
159: The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we rewrite in a way
160: convenient for discretization the 5D Einstein-Hilbert action and
161: accordingly recall different ways to parametrize 5D AdS space-time as
162: sliced by 4D Minkowski space-time. We then (Section 3) turn to a first
163: naive discretization scheme, where the {\it lapse} and {\it shift}
164: fields (see below)
165: are omitted. We
166: show in particular that this allows one to get a brane
167: world bulk solution
168: with no source brane included.
169: However, this solution corresponds to a negative tension brane. We
170: show next how one can also recover the positive tension configuration,
171: at the price of introducing a fine-tuned brane source in the
172: discretized theory. Then we turn to include the lapse in our
173: discretization scheme, and discuss issues related to reparametrization
174: invariance along the discretized dimension. In Section 4
175: we calculate, in the model without lapse field, the static gravitational potential between two pointlike particles and show that it is 4D at small
176: length scales and becomes 5D at large distances.
177: We then comment on the vDVZ discontinuity in this model.
178: In section 5 we discuss cosmological solutions of
179: the discretized theory.
180: Our conclusions are collected in Section 6.
181:
182:
183: \section{Continuum theory: Five dimensional General Relativity}
184: For the purpose of discretizing a space-like dimension,
185: parametrized by
186: coordinate $y$, it is convenient to
187: rewrite the 5D Einstein-Hilbert action
188: \be \label{5DEH}
189: S_{EH}= \Mf^3 \int d^5 X \sqrt{-\tilde{g}} (\tilde{R}-2\L5),
190: \ee
191: using a 4+1 splitting of space time.
192: Above, and in the following, we use expressions
193: with a {\it tilde} for
194: quantities of the 5D continuum theory, like the 5D metric
195: $\tilde{g}_{AB}$, and upper case Latin letters from the beginning of
196: the alphabet, $A,B,C...$ to denote 5D indices, $\tilde{\Lambda}$ is the 5D cosmological constant and $\Mf$ is the 5D reduced Planck mass.
197: After an integration by parts,
198: (\ref{5DEH}) is rephrased into
199: \be \label{ADM} \Mf^3
200: \int d^4x dy \sqrt{-g} {\cal N} \left\{R -2 \tilde{\Lambda} + K_{\mu \nu} K_{\alpha \beta}\left( g^{\mu \nu} g^{\alpha \beta} - g^{\mu \alpha} g^{\nu \beta}\right) \right\},
201: \ee
202: where $K_{\mu \nu}$ is the extrinsic curvature of
203: surfaces ${\cal H}_y$ located at constant $y$, and we have introduced in a standard
204: way\footnote{note however that the surface located at constant $y$
205: are timelike, unlike
206: in the usual ADM splitting.} the {\it lapse}
207: ${\cal N}$, the
208: {\it shift} $N_\mu$, and induced metric $g_{\mu \nu}$ on ${\cal H}_y$
209: whose Ricci scalar is denoted by $R$.
210: Note that here and in the following, lower case Greek letters, $\mu,
211: \nu, \alpha, ...$ will be denoting 4D indices, i.e. indices parallel
212: to ${\cal H}_y$. The extrinsic curvature is defined by
213: \be \label{DEFK}
214: K_{\mu \nu} = \frac{1}{2 {\cal N}}\left(g'_{\mu \nu}
215: - D_\mu N_\nu - D_\nu N_\mu \right),
216: \ee
217: where $D_\mu$ is the covariant derivative associated with the induced
218: metric $g_{\mu \nu}$ and a prime denotes an ordinary derivative with
219: respect to $y$. The fields ${\cal N}$, ${ N}_\mu$ and $g_{\mu \nu}$
220: are simply related to the
221: components of the 5D metric $\tilde{g}_{AB}$
222: by
223: \ba
224: \tilde{g}_{\mu \nu} &=& g_{\mu \nu}, \\
225: \tilde{g}_{\mu y} &=& N_\mu \equiv g_{\mu \alpha} N^\alpha,\\
226: \tilde{g}_{yy} &=& {\cal N}^2 + g_{\mu \nu} N^\mu N^\nu.
227: \ea
228: The equations of motions derived from the action (\ref{ADM}) varying
229: with respect to ${\cal N}$, $N^\mu$ and $g^{\mu \nu}$ yield respectively
230: \ba
231: R -2 \L5&=& K^2 - K^\rho_\sigma K^\sigma_\rho \label{EQMON}\\
232: 0 &=& D^\mu K -D^\nu K^\mu_\nu \label{EQMONN}\\ \label{EQMOG}
233: G_{\mu \nu} + \L5 g_{\mu \nu}&=& \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu \nu} \left(K^2 - K^\rho_\sigma K^\sigma_\rho\right) + \frac{D_\mu D_\nu {\cal N} - g_{\mu \nu} D^\rho D_\rho {\cal N}}{\cal N}
234: - g_{\rho \mu} g_{\sigma \nu} \frac{\partial_y \left\{ \sqrt{-g} \left( K g^{\rho \sigma} - K^{\rho \sigma}\right) \right\}}{{\cal N} \sqrt{-g}} \nonumber \\
235: &&- \frac{2}{N}\left\{D_\nu \left(N_\mu K\right)
236: - D_\rho\left(K^\rho_\nu N_\mu\right) - \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu \nu}
237: D^\rho\left(K N_\rho \right) + \frac{1}{2} D^\rho \left(N_\rho K_{\mu \nu}\right)\right\} \nonumber \\
238: &&+2 \left( K^\rho_\mu K_{\rho \nu} - K K_{\mu \nu}\right),
239: \ea
240: where $G_{\mu \nu}$ is the Einstein tensor for four dimensional metric
241: $g_{\mu \nu}$, and $K$ is defined by $K \equiv K_{\mu \nu} g^{\mu \nu}$.
242: When $N_\mu$ vanishes, equations (\ref{EQMON}) and (\ref{EQMOG}) reduce respectively to
243: \ba
244: R-2 \L5 &=& {1\over 4
245: {\cal N}^2}g'_{\mu\nu}g'_{\alpha\beta}(g^{\mu\nu}g^{\alpha\beta}
246: -g^{\mu\alpha}g^{\nu\beta}), \label{EQN5} \\
247: G_{\mu\nu}+\L5 g_{\mu\nu}&=&
248: {1\over {\cal N}}\left(D_\mu D_\nu {\cal N}
249: -g_{\mu\nu}\ g^{\rho\sigma}
250: D_{\rho}D_{\sigma}{\cal N}\right)\nonumber\\
251: &+& {g_{\mu\nu} \over {\cal N}^2} \left(
252: -{1 \over 8} (g'_{\alpha\beta}g^{\alpha\beta})^2
253: +{3 \over 8} g'_{\alpha\beta}g'_{\lambda\delta}g^{\delta\beta}
254: g^{\lambda\alpha}-{1 \over 2} g"_{\alpha\beta}g^{\alpha\beta}
255: +{1 \over 2} {{\cal N}'\over {\cal N}}g'_{\alpha\beta}g^{\alpha\beta}\right)
256: \nonumber\\
257: &+&{1 \over 4{\cal N}^2} g'_{\mu\nu}(g'_{\alpha\beta}g^{\alpha\beta})
258: +{1 \over 2{\cal N}^2}g"_{\mu\nu}-{{\cal N}' \over 2{\cal N}^3}g'_{\mu\nu}-
259: {1 \over 2{\cal N}^2}g'_{\mu\alpha}
260: g'_{\nu\beta}g^{\alpha \beta}, \label{EQg5}
261: \ea
262: where $G_{\mu \nu}$ is the Einstein tensor of
263: the 4D metric $g_{\mu
264: \nu}$.
265: We then consider simple solutions of the 5D Einstein equations,
266: which are
267: slicings of the 5D space-time by 4D Minkowski space-time.
268: We write accordingly ${\cal
269: N}={\cal N}(y)$,
270: $g_{\mu\nu}(x^\alpha,y)=\Omega(y) \eta_{\mu \nu}$,
271: where $\eta_{\mu \nu}$ is a 4D Minkoswski metric,
272: and we keep $N_\mu=0$.
273: %We demand that $\bar{g}_{\mu \nu}$ be the metric of a 4D
274: %maximally-symmetric space-time with cosmological constant $\Ll$,
275: %so
276: %that one has $G_{\mu\nu}=-\Ll \bar{g}_{\mu\nu} / a$.
277: Then equations (\ref{EQMONN})
278: are identically satisfied and
279: the equations (\ref{EQg5}) and (\ref{EQN5}) reduce to
280: \ba
281: \label{EQgsimp}
282: \frac{1}{\N} \left(\frac{\Omega'}{\N }\right)' &=&
283: -\frac{2}{3}\L5 \Omega,\\
284: \left({\Omega'\over \ \N}\right)^2&=& -{2\over
285: 3}\L5 \Omega^2 \label{EQNsimp}.
286: \ea
287: One notes that the above equations are not independent,
288: the first being a consequence of the second. This is of
289: course a simple consequence of the $y$
290: reparametrization invariance of the 5D Einstein-Hilbert action
291: (\ref{5DEH}) and tells us that we cannot solve both for
292: ${\cal N}$ and $\Omega$ out of the equations of motion.
293: Indeed by choosing a
294: Gaussian Normal gauge, defined here simply
295: by setting ${\cal N}$ to 1, one can get the following
296: solution for the
297: 5D line element
298: \ba
299: ds^2 &\equiv& \tilde{g}_{AB}^{(1)} dX^A dX^B \nonumber \\
300: &=& dy^2 + \exp \left( \epsilon y \sqrt{-\frac{2}{3} \L5}
301: \right)
302: dx^\mu dx^\nu \eta_{\mu \nu}, \label{line1}
303: \ea
304: where we have assumed
305: $\L5$ to be negative.
306: These solutions are well known parametrization of a Poincar\'e patch of
307: $AdS_5$. If one instead puts an absolute value on $y$, in the above
308: line element, and considers then the metric $\tilde{g}_{AB}^{(2)}$
309: given by
310: \ba \label{line2}
311: ds^2 &\equiv& \tilde{g}_{AB}^{(2)} dX^A dX^B \nonumber \\
312: &=& dy^2 + \exp \left( \epsilon |y| \sqrt{-\frac{2}{3} \L5} \right) dx^\mu dx^\nu \eta_{\mu \nu},
313: \ea
314: one obtains the well known
315: Randall-Sundrum \cite{RS} type of metric which are simply given by gluing two
316: identical patches of the space-time parametrized by metric
317: $\tilde{g}_{AB}^{(1)}$ along
318: a brane of positive ($\epsilon = -1$) or negative ($\epsilon = +1$)
319: tension. This requires a fine tuning between the brane tension
320: $\tilde{\sigma}$ and the bulk (negative) cosmological constant $\L5$ given by
321: \ba\label{finetu}
322: \tilde{\sigma}^ 2 = -6 \Mf^6 \L5,
323: \ea
324: where normalization
325: of the brane tension is set by its action,
326: \ba \label{BRANEACT}
327: -\int d^4 x dy \sqrt{-g} 2 \delta(y) \epsilon\tilde{\sigma},
328: \ea
329: that was added to
330: the Einstein-Hilbert action\footnote{Note that we did not include any Gibbons-Hawking term in the brane action, since this term is cancelled by the integration by part to go from (\ref{5DEH}) to (\ref{ADM})} (\ref{ADM}) to get (\ref{line2}).
331: Another parametrization $\tilde{g}^{(3)}_{AB}$
332: of the space time described by the line element (\ref{line1})
333: that we will use in the following, is given by
334: \ba \label{line3}
335: ds^2 &\equiv& \tilde{g}^{(3)}_{AB} dX^A dX^B \\
336: &=& -\frac{3}{2 \tilde \Lambda} \frac{dz^2}{(z+\tilde{z}_0)^2} + Z_0(z+\tilde{z}_0) \eta_{\mu \nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu,
337: \ea
338: where $\tilde{z}_0$ and $Z_0$ are some constants, and
339: $z$ is related to $y$ of equation (\ref{line1})
340: by
341: $Z_0(z+\tilde{z}_0) = \exp \left(\epsilon y \sqrt{-2/3\tilde \Lambda}\right)$.
342:
343:
344: \section{Theories with a discretized extra dimension}
345: We are now turning to the type of theories which will be of interest in this work. Those can be obtained from the
346: Einstein-Hilbert action (\ref{ADM}) where one
347: discretizes the continuuous coordinate $y$ with a spacing $a$ between two adjacent sites (labelled by an index $i$).
348: It was shown in reference \cite{DM1} how to obtain such a discretization, maintaining $y$ dependant 4D gauge invariance on each sites. This can be done by
349: the mean of {\it link fields} $X^\mu(i,i+1;x)$ \cite{Arkani-Hamed:2002sp}, mapping between site $i$ and site $i+1$, which were explicitly build out of the $5D$ metric in reference \cite{DM1}. One can proceed as follows, we first note that the $y$ derivatives arising in action (\ref{ADM}) only appear in the extrinsic curvature $K_{\mu \nu}$ (as defined in Eq. (\ref{DEFK})). The latter can be expressed in term of the Lie derivative ${\cal L}_{D_y}$ along the vector field $D_y$ defined by $D_y = \partial_y - N^\mu \partial_\mu$, such that
350: \be
351: K_{\mu \nu} = \frac{1}{2 {\cal N}} {\cal L}_{D_y} g_{\mu \nu}.
352: \ee
353: To discretize action (\ref{ADM}) in a way which conserve reparametrization invariances on each sites, we then simply replace every Lie derivative ${\cal L}_{D_y}$, acting on a tensor $T(x^\mu,y)$,
354: by its discrete counterpart $\Delta_{\cal L}$ defined as
355: \be \label{DIFFIN}
356: \Delta_{\cal L} T_i={ W(i,i+1)T_{i+1}-T_i \over a},
357: \ee
358: where the action of the transport operator $W(i,i+1)$ on the
359: components of tensor $T$ is given by
360: \be
361: \left[W(i,i+1)T_{i+1}\right]_{\mu_1,\dots \mu_r}(x)=
362: \partial_{\mu_1}X^{\nu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_r}X^{\nu_r}T_{i+1}\left(X^{\mu}(i,i+1;x)\right)_{\nu_1,\dots\nu_r}.
363: \ee
364: The transport operators $W(i,i+1)$ are generated by the shift
365: vector fields \cite{DM1}
366: and at leading order in the transverse lattice
367: spacing $a$, $X^\mu$ is given by
368: \be
369: X^\mu(i,i+1,x) = x^\mu + a N^\mu(y_i,x) + {\cal O}(a^2),
370: \ee
371: where $y_i$ is the $y$ coordinate of site $i$.
372: If one then makes a gauge choice such that $X^\mu(i,i+1,x) = x^\mu$, one is lead to consider theories of a set of 4D metrics $g^i_{\mu \nu}$,
373: and 4D scalar lapse field $\N_i$
374: with actions of the form
375: \ba\label{ACT}
376: S[g_i,\N_i] = \Sigma_i \MM^2 \int d^4x \sqrt{-g_i} \N_i \left( R(g_i) - 2 \Lambda \right)
377: - \int d^4x \frac{\MM^2}{\N_i} V(g_i,g_{i+1}),
378: \ea
379: where $V(g_i,g_{i+1})$ is an interaction term between the metrics
380: $g^i_{\mu \nu}$ and
381: $g^{i+1}_{\mu \nu}$, and $\MM$ is a mass scale which sets the coupling scale between the metric on a given site and matter sources
382: that one may wish to put on the same site. If one insists in keeping the link with the 5D theory,
383: one should verify the equation of motion for $X^\sigma$. The latter read (in the gauge $X^\mu = x^\mu$)
384: \ba \label{EQMONDIS}
385: 0&=&\frac{2 {\cal N}_i}{\sqrt{-g_i}}
386: \partial_\mu\left( \frac{\sqrt{-g_i}}{{\cal N}_i} g_{\sigma \nu}^{i+1}
387: \left(g_{\alpha \beta}^{i+1} - g_{\alpha \beta}^i \right)
388: \left( g^{\mu \nu}_i g_i^{\alpha \beta} - \nonumber
389: g^{\mu \alpha}_i g^{\nu \beta}_i \right) \right) \\&&
390: - \left(\partial_\sigma g_{\mu\nu}^{i+1} \right)
391: \left( g_{\alpha \beta}^{i+1} - g_{\alpha \beta}^i \right)\left(
392: g^{\mu \nu}_i g_i^{\alpha \beta} -
393: g^{\mu \alpha}_i g^{\nu \beta}_i \right)
394: \ea
395: and reduce to equation (\ref{EQMONN}) in the continuum limit.
396: This equation is somehow similar
397: to a Kaluza-Klein consistency
398: condition \cite{KKcons,Duff:1984hn}.
399: Note that the index $i$ can be envisioned as
400: labelling {\it theory space} sites in the spirit of the deconstruction
401: program of Ref. {\cite{Arkani-Hamed:2002sp}, but theories under
402: investigation here can also be considered without an explicit
403: reference to a continuum limit, simply as
404: theories of {\it multigravity}
405: \cite{Isham:gm,Damour:2002ws}. In the latter case, one does
406: not have to consider equation
407: (\ref{EQMONDIS}). We will, for most of the cases discussed
408: in this paper, not include any matter fields so that each of
409: the sites $i$
410: will only be considered endowed with a cosmological
411: constant $\Lambda$
412: and will consider various possible interaction terms given by
413: \ba \label{pot1}
414: V_1(g_i,g_{i+1})&=& -\frac{m^2}{4}
415: \sqrt{-g_i}\left( g_{\mu \nu}^{i+1} -
416: g_{\mu \nu}^i \right)\left( g_{\alpha \beta}^{i+1} -
417: g_{\alpha \beta}^i \right) \left( g_i^{\mu \nu}
418: g_i^{\alpha \beta} - g_i^{\mu \alpha} g_i^{\nu \beta} \right),
419: \\ \label{pot2}
420: V_2(g_i,g_{i+1})&=& -\frac{m^2}{4} \sqrt{-g_i}
421: \left( g^{\mu \nu}_{i+1} - g^{\mu \nu}_i \right)
422: \left( g^{\alpha \beta}_{i+1} - g^{\alpha \beta}_i \right)
423: \left( g^i_{\mu \nu} g^i_{\alpha \beta} - g^i_{\mu \alpha}
424: g^i_{\nu \beta} \right),\\ \label{pot3}
425: V_3(g_i,g_{i+1})&=& \frac{m^2}{4} \sqrt{-g_i}
426: \left( g^{\mu \nu}_{i+1} - g^{\mu \nu}_i \right)
427: \left( g_{\alpha \beta}^{i+1} - g_{\alpha \beta}^i \right)
428: \left( g^i_{\mu \nu} g_i^{\alpha \beta} -
429: \delta^\mu_\alpha \delta^\nu_\beta \right),
430: \ea
431: where $g_i^{\mu \nu}$ is the inverse metric of $g_{\mu \nu}^i$.
432: With such choices of interaction terms, action (\ref{ACT}) is a
433: simple minded discretization of the 5D pure gravity
434: Einstein-Hilbert
435: action (\ref{5DEH}),
436: where one has set $N_\mu$ to zero.
437: This can be seen
438: explicitly using the following identification
439: \ba
440: m^2 &=& \frac{1}{\a^2} \label{mD},\\
441: \MM^2 &=& \Mf^3 \a, \\
442: \Lambda &=& \L5 \label{LD}, \\ \label{gD}
443: g_{\mu \nu}^i(x^\mu) &=& \tilde{g}_{\mu \nu}(x^\mu,y_i),\\
444: \N_i(x^\mu) &=& \N(x^\mu,y_i) \label{Ni},
445: \ea
446: where $\a$ is the size of the discretization step along $y$, and
447: $y_i = i \a$.
448: Note that each of the three potential
449: (\ref{pot1}), (\ref{pot2}) and (\ref{pot3})
450: corresponds to a different way to implement
451: the discretization
452: procedure\footnote{For simplicity,
453: we have written here only the equation
454: of motion (\ref{EQMONDIS}) corresponding to the potential $V_1$}
455: outlined in the beginning of this section,
456: depending on whether one discretizes
457: $K_{\mu \nu} = {\cal L}_{D_y} g_{\mu \nu} / 2 {\cal N}$ or
458: $K^{\mu \nu} = - {\cal L}_{D_y} g^{\mu \nu} / 2 {\cal N}$.
459:
460:
461: \subsection{No lapse field and brane space-time with no brane source} \label{NOBRA}
462: We first set from the beginning the {\it lapse} fields $\N_i$ to one
463: in the multigravity action $S[g_i,\N_i]$ and consider solutions to the
464: equations of motion derived from the simplified action
465: for the metrics
466: $g^i_{\mu \nu}$, $S[g_i,1]$. We wish here to compare these
467: solutions
468: with solutions of the continuum theory defined by action
469: (\ref{ADM})
470: and seek solutions of the form
471: \ba\label{ansatz}
472: g_{\mu \nu}^i = \Omega^i \eta_{\mu \nu},
473: \ea
474: with $\Omega^i$ constants.
475: Let us first consider the case of the
476: interaction term $V_1$. After a straightforward calculation,
477: the equation of motion for the metric $g_i$ reduces to
478: \ba \label{SEQ}
479: -\lambda = -2 + f_i + \left(f_{i-1}\right)^{-1},
480: \ea
481: with $\lambda = {2 \Lambda / 3 m^2}$, and
482: $f_i = \Omega_{i+1} / \Omega_i$.
483: Equation (\ref{SEQ}) defines a sequence
484: (see figure \ref{fig1}) which has two fixed
485: points
486: (for $\lambda$ obeying $\lambda (-1+ \lambda/4 ) >0)$
487: $f_+$ and $f_-$ given by
488: \ba
489: f_{\pm} = \left(1-{\lambda \over 2} \right)
490: \pm \sqrt{\lambda \left({\lambda \over 4} -1 \right)}.
491: \ea
492: These two fixed points are each located on a different side
493: from 1 (for negative $\lambda$) , which is the double
494: root of the
495: fixed point equation for $\lambda = 0$.
496: Let us first consider the solutions ${\cal F}_\pm$ defined by
497: $\forall i, f_i = f_{\pm}$. This translates into
498: \ba
499: \Omega^j_\pm = \Omega^0_\pm \left( f_\pm \right)^{y_j /\a}.\label{sol2}
500: \ea
501: We then look at the limit of this solution when the discretization
502: step $\a$ goes to zero.
503: >From equations (\ref{mD}) and (\ref{LD}), one has
504: $\lambda = \frac{2}{3} \L5 \a^2,$ which gives in the
505: limit of small $\a$
506: \ba
507: f_\pm \sim 1 \pm \sqrt{-\lambda} \sim 1 \pm \sqrt{-\frac{2}{3}
508: \tilde{\Lambda}} \a, \label{FPOINT},
509: \ea
510: leading to,
511: \ba
512: g_{\mu \nu}^{j} \sim \Omega^0_\pm
513: \exp \left( \pm \sqrt{-\frac{2}{3} \tilde{\Lambda}} y_j \right)
514: \eta_{\mu \nu}.
515: \ea
516: This matches the metric (\ref{line1}), and
517: the fixed point solutions
518: ${\cal F}_\pm$, in the limit of
519: small $\a$ thus each corresponds to a discretized version of a
520: Poincar\'e patch of $AdS_5$.
521:
522: However equation (\ref{SEQ}) has more interesting solutions, it can
523: indeed be exactly solved to yield
524: \ba \label{EXACT1}
525: \Omega^j =
526: \left( (f_+)^j + {\cal K} (f_-)^j\right) \frac{\Omega^0}{1+ {\cal K}},
527: \ea
528: where ${\cal K}$ is an integration constant, related to $f_0$ by
529: \ba
530: {\cal K} = -\frac{f_+- f_0}{f_--f_0}.
531: \ea
532: Let us consider the case where ${\cal K}$ is positive,
533: this is true if we
534: choose $f_0$ to lie in between $f_-$ and $f_+$.
535: Note first that, for a fixed value of $\a$ different from zero,
536: one can choose any positive value of ${\cal K}$. One easily finds that the limiting behaviour of the metric on site
537: $i$, when $\a$ is send to zero
538: is given by
539: \ba \label{NEGTEN}
540: g_{\mu \nu}^i \sim \frac{2 \Omega^0 \sqrt{\cal K}}{(1+{\cal K})}
541: {\rm cosh} \left(\sqrt{-\frac{2}{3} \Lambda} (y_i - \Upsilon)\right)
542: \eta_{\mu \nu},
543: \ea
544: where $\Upsilon$ is a constant given by
545: \ba
546: \Upsilon = \sqrt{-{3 \over 8 \Lambda}} {\rm ln}({\cal K}).
547: \ea
548: It turns out that the solution (\ref{NEGTEN}) has exactly
549: the same asymptotics\footnote{Note however, that the exact expression
550: (\ref{EXACT1}) does not approach the asymptotic form given by
551: (\ref{NEGTEN}) uniformly with $i$, i.e., for a fixed value of
552: $\a$, one can make the difference between $a_i$ as given by
553: (\ref{EXACT1}) and the asymptotic form read from
554: (\ref{NEGTEN}) as large as one wishes going to large value of
555: $y_i$. On a given compact interval though, say of the form
556: $[-y_k,y_k]$ ($k$ being fixed), the convergence is uniform.}
557: as $y_i$ goes to $\pm \infty$
558: as the Randall-Sundrum metric (\ref{line2}) with
559: a negative tension brane placed at $y=\Upsilon$.
560: This is a quite remarkable feature since no brane has been
561: considered. In particular no fine tuning of the form
562: (\ref{finetu}) is necessary.
563:
564: One might be concerned about knowing to what extent
565: this result depends on the form of the discretization scheme.
566: We now investigate this question by searching for
567: solutions of the form (\ref{ansatz}) with $V$ taken of the form
568: \be
569: V = {\cal C}_1 V_1 + {\cal C}_2 V_2 + {\cal C}_3 V_3,
570: \ee
571: by changing $m^2$ we can always assume that
572: ${\cal C}_1 + {\cal C}_2 +
573: {\cal C}_3= 1$. This choice also insures that the
574: multigravity action $S[g_i,1]$ has the action (\ref{ADM})
575: for a limit when
576: $\a$ goes to zero, with the same identification as in equations
577: (\ref{mD}-\ref{Ni}). It is then straightforward to
578: work out the equations of motion for the metrics
579: $g_{\mu \nu}^i$ and get for the ansatz (\ref{ansatz})
580: the following expression replacing
581: equation (\ref{SEQ})
582: \be \label{SEQBIS}
583: -\lambda = G_1(f_i) + G_2(f_{i-1}),
584: \ee
585: with
586: \ba
587: G_1(u) &=&-4\aa-3\b +2 + u
588: \left( -\frac{1}{2} + \frac{3}{2}\aa +
589: \frac{1}{2}\b \right) \nonumber \\
590: &&+ \frac{1}{u}
591: \left( -\frac{3}{2} + \frac{3}{2} \aa + \frac{9}{2} \b \right)
592: -\frac{2}{u^2} \b, \\
593: G_2(u) &=& \frac{1}{u}
594: \left( -\frac{1}{2} +\frac{3}{2}\aa + \frac{1}{2}\b \right)
595: + \frac{1}{u^3}
596: \left( \frac{1}{2} -\frac{1}{2}\aa - \frac{3}{2}\b \right)
597: + \frac{\b}{u^4}.
598: \ea
599: It is easy to see that $u=1$ is still a double root to
600: the equation
601: $G_1(u) + G_2(u)=0$. For $\lambda < 0$, this double root
602: degenerates into two root $f_{\pm}$, which are given
603: (for small enough $\lambda$) by
604: \be
605: f_\pm -1 \equiv \delta_{\pm} \sim \pm \sqrt{-\lambda}.
606: \ee
607: Notice that the above expression is independent of $\aa$ and $\b$, as could have been expected, and matches the one found in equation (\ref{FPOINT}).
608: While in the vicinity of these roots the sequence $\delta_i$
609: defined by
610: $f_i = 1 + \delta_i$ verifies
611: \be
612: \delta_i = \delta_{i-1} + \delta_\pm^2 - \delta_{i-1}^2.
613: \ee
614: This leads to the same kind of solution as above:
615: namely a solution
616: with the same asymptotics as the Randall-Sundrum solution with a
617: negative tension brane.
618:
619: There is an easy way to understand these solutions by
620: comparing the
621: equations of motion of the continuum theory
622: (\ref{EQgsimp}-\ref{EQNsimp}) to the ones of the
623: multigravity theory
624: (\ref{SEQ}) (or (\ref{SEQBIS})). Indeed, in the limit where $\a$
625: goes to zero, equation (\ref{SEQ}) (or (\ref{SEQBIS}))
626: reduces to
627: equation (\ref{EQgsimp}). If one then looks for solutions of
628: (\ref{EQgsimp}), with $\N$ set to one, one finds that
629: the most general
630: solution is given by a linear combination of
631: $\exp \left(k y \right)$ and $\exp (-ky)$ with $k$ given by
632: $\sqrt{- 2 \Lambda /3}$. This matches what is found
633: in the discretized
634: theory. However, in the continuum theory,
635: the equation of motion for $\N$, namely
636: equation (\ref{EQNsimp}),
637: allows to keep the decreasing or increasing exponential,
638: but not a combination of the two. This also enables to
639: understand that we did not find the solution
640: with a positive tension brane (which would have been very
641: interesting in many respects). Indeed, a linear combination of
642: exponentials $\exp \pm ky$ (with positive coefficients) is
643: an increasing function for large positive $y$ and a decreasing
644: function for large negative $y$. So that the asymptotic {\it jump} of
645: the first $y$-derivative of the 4D metric across the {\it brane},
646: defined as $[\Omega'(+ \infty)-
647: \Omega'(-\infty)]/[\Omega(+ \infty)+
648: \Omega(-\infty)]$, is necessarily positive.
649: This is turn means that the brane
650: tension has to be negative, as can be seen
651: from the
652: junction conditions.
653: In the next subsection, we show how to recover the
654: positive tension
655: brane solution, introducing a brane source with fine-tuned
656: tension. We
657: then, in the last subsection, turn to investigate the
658: discretized theory
659: where the lapse field $\N$ is kept, which seems to be required if one
660: wants to approach closer solutions to the continuum theory.
661: Let us
662: underline here, however, that the solution (\ref{EXACT1}) is a
663: perfectly honest solution of the multigravity theory defined
664: by action $S[g_i,1]$.
665: To complete this discussion, let us add that the solution
666: (\ref{EXACT1}), and more generally solution of equation
667: (\ref{SEQBIS}), can also differ much more dramatically
668: from solutions
669: of the 5D continuum theory. In particular, the fixed
670: points solutions
671: ${\cal F}_\pm$ are very tuned solutions. Indeed any departure
672: of $f_0$, say as an ``initial'' choice
673: \footnote{The term ``initial''
674: might be somehow misleading here, since the sequence $f_i$
675: is also
676: continued in the ``past'', $i \rightarrow -\infty$, from the
677: ``initial'' value $f_0$.},
678: from $f_\pm$ leads
679: either to the negative brane-like solution, or to other type
680: of solution where the signature of the
681: 4D metric can change (as can be seen from equation (\ref{EXACT1}) with ${\cal K} <0$).
682:
683:
684: \subsection{Positive tension brane and fine tuning} \label{BRA}
685: In this subsection (and only here), we include
686: a brane source\footnote{Namely, in contrast to the previous cases,
687: we are now explicitely breaking the $i$ translation invariance by
688: allowing the "cosmological constant" (or tension)
689: of a given site (or brane) to differ from the one of its
690: neighbours.}, located at fixed $y$, in the discretized theory
691: considered
692: above. We wish to recover the discretized Randall-Sundrum
693: metric with a positive tension brane, and discuss how the
694: fine tuning
695: condition (\ref{finetu}) is translated in the discretized theory. To do so, we simply add to the action
696: $S[g_i,1]$, considered above with the potential $V_1$,
697: the discretized version of the action
698: (\ref{BRANEACT}) which can be simply taken to be
699: \ba
700: -\int d^4 x \sqrt{-g_0} {2 \sigma },
701: \ea
702: with $\sigma = \tilde{\sigma}$, and we have chosen the
703: brane to be
704: located on site $i=0$.
705: The only difference with the analysis done in the
706: previous subsection
707: is that the cosmological constant $\Lambda$ of site $i=0$
708: is now
709: replaced by $\Lambda + \sigma/\MM^2$. We now seek to
710: reproduce the Randall-Sundrum metric (\ref{line2})
711: with $\epsilon = -1$ in the continuum limit. For $i \neq 0$,
712: the equations of motion of
713: $g^i_{\mu \nu}$ lead to the same equation as (\ref{SEQ}) that we
714: rewrite
715: \ba
716: f_i = F_\lambda(f_{i-1}),
717: \ea
718: with $F_\lambda(f_{i-1}) \equiv 2 - \lambda - (f_{i-1})^{-1}$.
719: If we consider first the sequence of $f_i$ with $i \geq 0$,
720: then we
721: need this sequence to lead to a decreasing $a^i$,
722: for large $i$,
723: however the general solution (\ref{EXACT1}) shows this is never the
724: case unless we choose $f_0 = f_-$. Similarly, considering now the
725: sequence of $f_i$, with $i\leq -1$, we need to choose $f_{-1}$
726: to be equal to $f_+$ in order to get an increasing function of $y$, as
727: $y$ becomes large and negative. In order to reproduce
728: the Randall-Sundrum solution, with a positive tension brane, one thus
729: needs to jump from $f_{-1} = f_+$ to $f_0 = f_-$. However $f_{-1}$
730: and $f_0$ are related by the $g_{\mu \nu}^0$ equation of motion
731: leading to
732: \ba
733: f_0 = F_{\lambda + 2\sigma/ 3 m^2 \MM^2}(f_{-1}).
734: \ea
735: Demanding then $f_- = F_{\lambda +2 \sigma/ 3 m^2 \MM^2} (f_+)$ leads to a
736: fine tuned value for $\sigma$ given by (see figure \ref{fig1})
737: \ba
738: \sigma = 3m^2 \MM^2 \sqrt{\lambda\left(\frac{\lambda}{4} -1 \right)}.
739: \ea
740: This in turn, leads back in the small $\a$ limit to the constraint (\ref{finetu}).
741:
742: \begin{figure}
743: \psfrag{a}{{\footnotesize $f_i$}}
744: \psfrag{b}{{\footnotesize $f_{i+1}$}}
745: \psfrag{c}{{\footnotesize $f_{i+2}$}}
746: \psfrag{g}{{\footnotesize $f_+$}}
747: \psfrag{f}{{\footnotesize $f_-$}}
748: \psfrag{l}{{\footnotesize $-\lambda$}}
749: \psfrag{m}{{\footnotesize $2\sigma / 3 m^2 M_P^2 $}}
750: \psfrag{x}{{\footnotesize $u$}}
751: \psfrag{y}{{\footnotesize $v$}}
752: \epsfig{file=plot.eps, width=1.0\textwidth}
753: \caption{Depiction of the resolution of equation (\ref{SEQ}) without
754: (subsection (\ref{NOBRA})) and with (subsection (\ref{BRA})) a brane
755: source included. Equation (\ref{SEQ}) defines a sequence which for
756: $\lambda < 0$ and small, is characterized by the upper solid
757: curve. The latter curve is
758: representing the function $F_\lambda(u)$ which defines the sequence by
759: the recursion relation $f_i = F_\lambda(f_{i-1})$. The solid oblique
760: line is defined by the function $u=v$. One sees that, when no brane
761: is included, one can only flow (black arrow) from the fixed point
762: $f_-$ to the
763: fixed point $f_+$, for an ``initial'' value $f_0$ which lies
764: in between the fixed points. This corresponds to the solution
765: (\ref{EXACT1}) and to the negative tension brane discretized bulk. When a brane
766: source is included, one can go ``backward'' (white arrows and double dashed
767: lines) from the fixed point $f_+$ to the fixed point $f_-$
768: at a given value of the index $i$ corresponding to the brane. For this to happen, the brane tension has to be tuned in
769: order for the curve representing $F_{\lambda +2 \sigma/3 m^2 \MM^2}$, the
770: dashed bottom curve, to go through the point $(u= f_+, v=f_-$). The
771: solution is then the discretized Randall-Sundrum metric with a
772: positive tension brane. The dotted curve represents the function
773: $F_0$. It is tangent to the $u=v$ line at the point $(1,1)$. It also
774: corresponds to the sequence which solution is obtained in equation
775: (\ref{SOL1}) of subsection \ref{REPA}.}
776: \label{fig1}
777: \end{figure}
778:
779: \subsection{Lapse field and reparametrization invariance} \label{REPA}
780: We then turn to another possible discretization of the action
781: (\ref{ADM}) keeping the lapse field ${\cal N}$ on all sites.
782: Starting with $V = V_1$, the equations of motion now read
783: \ba
784: \sqrt{-\lambda} {\cal N}_i &=& \epsilon_i (f_i-1), \label{EQ1}\\
785: -\lambda {\cal N}_i &=& \frac{1}{{\cal N}_i}\left( f_i-1 \right) - \frac{1}{{\cal N}_{i-1}} \left( 1 - \frac{1}{f_{i-1}} \right), \label{EQ2}
786: \ea
787: where $\epsilon_i = \pm 1$. Fixing $\epsilon_i $ independently of $i$, and replacing ${\cal N}_i$ by its expression as a function of $f_i$ given by equation (\ref{EQ1}) into equation (\ref{EQ2}), one finds that $f_i$ verifies equation
788: (\ref{SEQ}) with $\lambda =0$, namely
789: \be
790: -2 + f_i + \left(f_{i-1}\right)^{-1} =0.
791: \ee
792: This can be straightforwardly solved to yield
793: \ba
794: g_{\mu \nu}^i&=& I_0(i + i_0) \eta_{\mu \nu} , \label{SOL1}\\
795: {\cal N}_i^2 &=& \frac{1}{-\lambda (i+i_0)}, \label{SOL2}
796: \ea
797: with
798: $i_0$ and $I_0$ some constants. This exactly reproduces the metric $\tilde{g}_{AB}^{(3)}$, of equation (\ref{line3}) sampled at
799: successive sites $i$ parametrized by their coordinate $z_i \equiv \a i$ along the $z$ direction. Indeed $g_{\mu \nu}^i$ and ${\cal N}_i$ as defined by equations
800: (\ref{SOL1}) and (\ref{SOL2}) are given by $g_{\mu \nu}^i =
801: \tilde{g}^{(3)}_{\mu \nu} (z_i, x^\mu)$ and ${\cal N}_i^2 = \tilde{g}^{(3)}_{yy} (z_i, x^\mu)$
802: with the identifications
803: $\tilde{z}_0 = i_0 \a$ and $Z_0 = I_0 /\a$. This means in
804: particular that our discretization scheme reproduces,
805: when the discretization step is send to zero,
806: solutions of the 5D continuum theory in a given gauge. This is of
807: course not a surprise, since our discretized action $S[g_i,\N_i]$
808: explicitly breaks reparametrization invariance along the $y$
809: direction. It can also be seen by noticing that, in contrast to the
810: continuum case, the equation of motion of the metric (\ref{EQ2})
811: cannot be obtained from the equation of motion for the lapse field
812: (\ref{EQ1}). This very fact was indeed used to solve for $\N_i$ and
813: $g_{\mu \nu}^i$. However, note that both equations reduce to equations
814: (\ref{EQgsimp}) and (\ref{EQNsimp}) in the leading order in
815: $\a$. So that once the solution
816: for $\N_i$ (respectively $g_{\mu \nu}^i$) of equations (\ref{EQ1}-\ref{EQ2}) is known, which can be
817: considered from the point of view of the continuum theory as setting
818: the gauge, as far as $y$ reparametrization is concerned,
819: then the solution for the $g_{\mu \nu}^i$ (respectively $\N_i$) agrees with the
820: solution of the continuum in the small $\a$ limit.
821:
822: Another property of the solution (\ref{SOL1},\ref{SOL2})
823: is that the parameter $i_0$ allows one to avoid the
824: potential singularity which exists in the continuum.
825: In fact if $i_0$ is not an integer than the scale factor $a_i$
826: does
827: not vanish for all $i$. This is a generic feature of discretized
828: models.
829:
830: One can ask whether one can restore the arbitrariness in $\N_i$ by
831: changing the discretization scheme. It turns out indeed to be
832: possible choosing the interaction potential $V$ of $S[g_i, \N_i]$ to
833: depend on metrics on three adjacent sites, and reading
834: \be \label{POT}
835: V(g_{i-1},g_i,g_{i+1}) =-
836: { m^2 \over 16}\sqrt{-g_i}\left( g_{\mu \nu}^{i+1} -
837: g_{\mu \nu}^{i-1} \right)
838: \left( g_{\alpha \beta}^{i+1} - g_{\alpha \beta}^{i-1} \right)
839: \left( g_i^{\mu \nu} g_i^{\alpha \beta} - g_i^{\mu \alpha}
840: g_i^{\nu \beta} \right).
841: \ee
842: With this interaction term, the action $S[g_i,\N_i]$ also
843: agrees with
844: action (\ref{ADM}) in the continuum limit.
845: The equations for $\Omega_i$ and $\N_i$ now read
846: \ba
847: \Lambda \N_i &=& \frac{3m^2}{8} \left( {\Omega_i-
848: \Omega_{i+2} \over \Omega_i \N_{i+1} }
849: +{ \Omega_i-\Omega_{i-2} \over \Omega_i \N_{i-1} }
850: \right) \label{di1}\\
851: \sqrt{{-\frac{8}{3} \Lambda}} \N_i&=& \epsilon_i m
852: \left({\Omega_{i+1}-\Omega_{i-1} \over
853: \Omega_i}\right). \label{di2}
854: \ea
855: If one chooses the same value of $\epsilon_i$ for all $i$, then
856: the first equation is a consequence of the second.
857: It is thus possible to ``choose a gauge" by fixing ${\cal N}_i$
858: and then to find $\Omega_i$ by solving (\ref{di2}),
859: the resulting
860: solution will automatically satisfy (\ref{di1}). Let us choose,
861: for instance, ${\cal N}_i=1=\epsilon_i$, then (\ref{di2}) can be
862: readily solved
863: to give
864: a solution depending on two parameters
865: \be
866: \Omega_i=\alpha x_+^i+\beta x_-^i,
867: \ee
868: where
869: \be
870: x_{\pm}=\sqrt{-\lambda}\pm\sqrt{1-\lambda}.
871: \ee
872: Notice that $x_-$ is negative so that the solution with
873: $\alpha=0$ has $\Omega^i$ with alternating signs: neighboring
874: spacetimes $i$ and $i+1$ have opposite signatures.
875: This behavior has no continuum counterpart where a
876: singularity is
877: reached before the signature change takes place.
878: When $\beta=0$ the solution coincides, to the first order in
879: $\a$ with the solution we found previousely in (\ref{sol2})
880: and so it tends to the $AdS_5$ metric in the continuum.
881: Notice that had we started to solve (\ref{di1}) with $\N_i=1$
882: than we would have obtained the analog of the more general
883: solution (\ref{EXACT1}) but equation (\ref{di2}) would not have been
884: satisfied.
885:
886: To summarize, the inclusion of $\N_i$ allows to
887: recover just the continuum solutions
888: if we do not insist on having an $\N_i$ undetermined by the
889: equations of motion\footnote{and we
890: do only consider solutions which are continuous in the continuum limit};
891: and if we do insist, we get extra solutions with no
892: continuum counterpart.
893:
894: \section{Effective 4D gravity}
895: We turn now to determine the gravitational potential
896: without the lapse field, and
897: consider the discretisation
898: scheme
899: given in the previous subsection. We assume here that the
900: cosmological constant vanishes and so we can perturb around flat
901: space-time.
902: To quadratic order in the
903: metric perturbation $h_{\mu \nu}^i$, the potential
904: (\ref{POT}) reads
905: \be \label{QUAD}
906: V(h_{i-1},h_i,h_{i+1}) =-
907: { m^2 \over 16}\left( h_{\mu \nu}^{i+1} - h_{\mu \nu}^{i-1} \right)
908: \left( h_{\alpha \beta}^{i+1} - h_{\alpha \beta}^{i-1} \right)
909: \left( \eta^{\mu \nu} \eta^{\alpha \beta} - \eta^{\mu \alpha}
910: \eta^{\nu \beta} \right).
911: \ee
912: In order to diagonalize this interaction, we define
913: $\check{h}_{\mu \nu}$ by
914: \ba
915: \check{h}_{\mu \nu}\left(x^\alpha,\theta \right) =
916: \sum_{n} h^n_{\mu \nu}(x^\alpha)e^{in\theta}.
917: \ea
918: The quadratic action is then an integral over $\theta$
919: of Pauli-Fierz actions with a continuous mass spectrum given by
920: \be
921: m^2(\theta)={\sin^2\theta \over \a^2}.
922: \ee
923: And the gravitational potential
924: $\Psi_j(r)$, between two
925: unit masses separated by $r$ and placed at sites $i$ and $i+j$,
926: can be obtained
927: summing over Pauli-Fierz propagators.
928: The outcome of the calculation can also be simply understood
929: from discretizing
930: the Laplacian equation with the same discretization scheme as
931: above.
932: The discretized equation reads
933: \be
934: \partial^2 \Psi_j+{{(\Psi_{j+2}+\Psi_{j-2}-2\Psi_j)}\over 4\a^2}
935: =4\pi G_N\delta(\bf r)\delta_{j,0},\label{dis1}
936: \ee
937: where we have reintroduced the Newton constant $G_N$.
938: The Fourier transform $\check{\Psi}$, as defined above, verifies
939: \be
940: \partial^2 \check{\Psi}(r,\theta)-m^2(\theta)\check{\Psi}
941: (r,\theta)=4\pi G_{N}
942: \delta(\bf r).
943: \ee
944: Notice that the mass spectrum is bounded from above by
945: the inverse
946: lattice spacing $\a^{-1}$. A continuous mass spectrum is
947: reminiscent of the infinite dimensional models of
948: {\cite{Gregory:2000jc,Dvali:2000rv}. The gravitational
949: potential can now be
950: readily put in the form
951: \be
952: \Psi_j(r)=-{G_N \over r}
953: \int_{0}^{\pi}{d\theta \over {\pi}}
954: e^{-{r \over \a}\sin\theta}
955: \cos j\theta.
956: \ee
957: When $r<<\a$ then the integral can be approximated by
958: $\delta_{j,0}$ and the potential reduces to the 4D Newtonian
959: potential
960: \be
961: \Psi_j(r)=-{G_N \over r}\left(\delta_{j,0}+
962: O({r \over \a})\right),
963: \ \ \ r<<\a.
964: \ee
965: When $r>>\a$, then the integral
966: can be approached by
967: \be \nonumber
968: \int_{0}^{\pi/2}{d\theta \over {\pi}}
969: e^{-{r \over \a}\theta}
970: \cos j\theta+\int_{\pi/2}^{\pi}{d\theta \over {\pi}}
971: e^{-{r \over \a}(\pi-\theta)}
972: \cos j\theta={1\over \pi\a}{r \over
973: {r^2+\a^2j^2}}(1+(-1)^j+O(e^{-r\over \a})),
974: \ee
975: so that the gravitational potential is of the form of a 5D
976: potential
977: \be
978: \Psi_j(r)=-{G_5 \over r^2+(j\a)^2},
979: \ee
980: if $j$ is even,
981: with the 5D gravitational constant being given by
982: \be
983: G_5={2G_N \over{\pi \a}}.
984: \ee
985: When $j$ is odd the gravitational potential is exponentially
986: small.
987: Gravity is thus four dimensional at small length scales and
988: five dimensional at large scales. Choosing $\a$ very large
989: (of the order of the Hubble scale) allows a very simple
990: modification of gravity at large scales in the spirit of
991: the models of references \cite{{Kogan:1999wc},{Gregory:2000jc},
992: {Dvali:2000rv},{Kogan:2000cv}}.
993: Note that we could have started from a finite
994: number $N$ of sites. This corresponds to an extra dimension which
995: is compact with a length scale $R=N\a$.
996: The graviton spectrum
997: would have been discrete with a spacing of order $1/N$
998: and would have remained bounded. In this case,
999: the four dimensional regime is obtained both for small scales
1000: $r<<\a$ and large scales $r>>R$, the intermediate scales
1001: being five dimensional $\a<<r<<R$.
1002: The qualitative features of
1003: this potential are not sensitive
1004: to the particular form of the discretization scheme we have used.
1005: On the other hand, it is well known
1006: that the tensorial structure of the propagator
1007: of massive spin 2 fields differs dramatically from
1008: the massless one. This leads to the vDVZ discontinuity
1009: at the linearized level which is manifested by,
1010: e.g.,
1011: an order one difference in light
1012: bending.
1013: In this respect, when $R$ is infinite we
1014: expect the discontinuity to be present since
1015: we have a continuous spectrum of massive gravitons.
1016: This is similar to the brane models with an extra infinite
1017: dimension \cite{{Kogan:1999wc},{Gregory:2000jc},
1018: {Dvali:2000rv},{Kogan:2000cv}}. When $R$ is finite,
1019: however, the spectrum is discrete and there is no discontinuity.
1020:
1021:
1022: \section{Cosmological solutions}
1023: The discussion of preceeding subsections enables to find
1024: easily some cosmological solutions for the type of models
1025: considered here. It is the purpose of this last section to
1026: discuss those solutions. We look for solutions where the line
1027: element of site $i$ takes the form \be
1028: ds^2_i=-B_i^2(t)dt^2+A_i^2(t)d\vec{x}^2. \ee The equations
1029: of motion
1030: derived from action (\ref{ACT}) (where we consider ${\cal
1031: N}_i$ as a non dynamical field set to $1$) with the potential
1032: $V_1$ read \ba 3{\dot A_i^2\over A_i^2}-\tilde
1033: \Lambda B_i^2
1034: &=&
1035: -\frac{3 B_i^2}{2 \a^2} \left\{1 + \frac{B^2_{i+1}}{2 B^2_i} -
1036: \frac{A^2_{i+1}B^2_{i+1}}{2 A^2_i B^2_i}\nonumber-
1037: \frac{3 A^2_{i+1}}{2 A^2_i} + \frac{A_{i+1}^4}{2 A^4_i}
1038: \right\} \\
1039: &&-\frac{3 B_i^2}{2 \a^2} \left\{ \frac{B_i}{A_i}
1040: \frac{A_{i-1}}{B_{i-1}}
1041: \left(\frac{A^2_i-A^2_{i-1}}{A^2_i} \right) \right\}
1042: + M_{(4)}^{-2} B^2_i \rho_i, \\
1043: -{\dot A_i^2\over A_i^2}-2{\ddot A_i\over A_i}+2 \nonumber
1044: {\dot A_i\dot B_i\over A_i B_i}+\tilde \Lambda B_i^2&=&
1045: -\frac{ B_i^2}{2 a^2 A_i^2}
1046: \left\{
1047: -\frac{B^2_{i+1} A^2_{i+1}}{2 B_i^2} + \frac{A_{i+1}^4}{2 A^2_i}
1048: + \frac{3}{2} A^2_{i+1} - 3 A_i^2 +
1049: \frac{3 B_{i+1}^2 A^2_i}{2 B^2_i}\right. \\
1050: && \left.
1051: - A_i^2 \frac{A_{i-1}B_{i-1}}{A_i B_i}\left(\frac{B^2_i}
1052: {B^2_{i-1}} + 2
1053: \frac{A^2_i}{A^2_{i-1}}-3 \right)\right\}+M_{(4)}^{-2}
1054: p_i B_i^2,
1055: \ea
1056: where we have included the possibility for each site $i$ to
1057: host matter with energy density $\rho_i$ and pressure $p_i$
1058: (that is to say, matter, in the form of a perfect fluid, is assumed to be confined on each site).
1059: We then look for factorized solutions of the form
1060: \ba
1061: A^2_i(t)&=&\alpha_i A^2(t), \nonumber\\
1062: B_i^2(t)&=&\beta_i B^2(t), \label{ANSATZ} \ea where $\alpha_i$ and
1063: $\beta_i$ are time-idependent, we also set $B$ to one by a suitable
1064: time redefinition.
1065: We then further simplify the problem by letting $\alpha_i =
1066: \beta_i$, and look for solution where the metric on each site
1067: is de Sitter, and the sites are only endowed with a cosmological constant $\sigma$. This means $\rho_i$ obeyes $\rho_i = - p_i=\sigma$ and does not depend on $i$. In this case,
1068: the equations of motion reduce to \ba
1069: \frac{\dot{A}^2}{A^2} &=& H^2, \nonumber\\
1070: \frac{3}{2a^2} \left(\alpha_{i+1}+ \alpha_{i-1}-2 \alpha_i \right)
1071: &=& 3 H^2 - \left(\tilde{\Lambda}+ M_{(4)}^{-2} \sigma
1072: \right).\label{EQCOSMOBIS} \ea These equations can easily be
1073: solved. Let us first discuss the case where $(\tilde{\Lambda} +M_{(4)}^{-2} \sigma)$ does not vanish. In this case, defining $\gamma$ by
1074: $\gamma = 3 H^2 /\left( \tilde{\Lambda} + M_{(4)}^{-2} \sigma \right)$,
1075: the sequence $f_i \equiv (\alpha_{i+1} -
1076: \gamma)/(\alpha_{i}-\gamma)$ obeyes equation (\ref{SEQ}) with
1077: $\lambda$ given by $\lambda \equiv 2( \tilde{\Lambda} + M_{(4)}^{-2}
1078: \sigma)a^2/3$. So that the solutions are readily obtained from
1079: those of section 3. In the case where $(\tilde{\Lambda} + M_{(4)}^{-2}
1080: \sigma)$ vanishes, on the other hand, the solution to equation
1081: (\ref{EQCOSMOBIS}) is given by \ba\alpha_i = \alpha_0 +
1082: \label{SOLCOS}
1083: \tilde{\alpha}_0 i + H^2 a^2 i^2,\ea where $\alpha_0$ and
1084: $\tilde{\alpha}_0$ are some arbitrary constants.
1085: Interestingly, this solution has de Sitter 4D space-time on
1086: each sites, but vanishing cosmological constants.
1087: This is in analogy with what is happening in the brane-induced
1088: gravity model
1089: \cite{Dvali:2000hr,ACCDGP} as is the behavior of the
1090: Newtonian gravitationnal potential that was discussed
1091: in the preceeding section. However in contrast to
1092: brane-induced gravity, the curvature of de Sitter
1093: space-time is here arbitrary.
1094: Note that, had we kept the $X^\mu_i$ fields as a dynamical
1095: variables,
1096: one should have also considered their equations of
1097: motion. The latter, for the ansatz (\ref{ANSATZ}), reduce to
1098: \be { \dot A \over
1099: A}\left(2{ \alpha_{i+1} \over \alpha_i}-3\right) \left({
1100: \alpha_{i+1} \over \alpha_i}-{ \beta_{i+1} \over \beta_i}\right)
1101: =0
1102: .\label{xx} \ee
1103: This equation is satisfied for our choice
1104: $\alpha_i = \beta_i$. However, in a similar way as was discussed
1105: previously,
1106: solution (\ref{SOLCOS}) does not verify (for $H \neq 0$)
1107: the equations of motion for ${\cal N}_i$ which reads
1108: (for ${\cal N}_i =1$)
1109: \ba
1110: \frac{6}{\alpha_i}\left(\frac{\dot{A}^2}{A^2}+
1111: \frac{\ddot{A}}{A}\right) = \frac{3}{a^2}\left
1112: ( \frac{\alpha_{i+1}-\alpha_i}{\alpha_i}\right)^2.
1113: \ea
1114: Indeed in the continuum theory, there is no solution
1115: equivalent to
1116: (\ref{SOLCOS}) with arbitrary $\alpha_0$ and
1117: $\tilde{\alpha}_0$; rather one finds a related solution
1118: describing a slicing
1119: of 5D Minkowski space-time by 4D de Sitter space-times
1120: which reads
1121: \ba
1122: ds^2 = (1 + H y)^2\left( -dt^2 + e^{2Ht} d\vec{x}\right) + dy^2.
1123: \ea
1124: This solution is conveniently used to described
1125: the space-time on one side of a domain-wall,
1126: which entire space time is given by the above
1127: solution where $y$ is replaced by $|y|$ \cite{DW}.
1128:
1129:
1130:
1131:
1132: \section{Conclusions}
1133: In this paper, we have investigated some exact solutions of 5D General
1134: Relativity with a discrete fifth dimension,
1135: and compared them
1136: to solutions of the continuum theory. Depending
1137: on the discretization
1138: scheme used, we have shown that some of the solutions of the
1139: discrete theory exactly match those of the continuum,
1140: while others do
1141: not.
1142: In general, the discretization
1143: explicitly breaks reparametrization along the discrete
1144: dimension.
1145: This gets reflected in the fact that for solution we have
1146: considered, corresponding to slicing of $AdS_5$ by Minkowski space,
1147: the equations of motion of the discrete theory enable
1148: in general to
1149: determine both the lapse field and the 4D metric.
1150: This is to be contrasted
1151: with the continuum theory, where the lapse field cannot
1152: be determined
1153: by the equations of motion.
1154: However, we have
1155: shown that one can find a given discretization scheme
1156: in which it
1157: remains undetermined.
1158: More importantly, some of the solutions of the discrete
1159: theory exibit very dramatic differences with those of the
1160: continuum. As shown here, one can find signature change
1161: of the 4D
1162: metric but also avoidance of singularities
1163: which would be present in the continuum. In addition we
1164: have also
1165: found a brane world looking bulk space time, with no brane
1166: source in
1167: the equation of motion and no fine tuning. This solution would
1168: correspond in the
1169: continuum theory to a negative tension brane.
1170: We investigated the static gravitational
1171: potential and found it realistic when the lattice spacing is
1172: very
1173: large. Last, we also discussed some cosmological solutions.
1174:
1175:
1176: We can look at our results from two different perspectives.
1177: On one hand, they exemplify the difficulties which arise
1178: upon deconstruction of gravity even at the classical level:
1179: the neglect of the lapse fields leads to spurious solutions,
1180: while their inclusion only partially solves this problem,
1181: as we showed in section 3.
1182: %the inclusion of the lapse fields leads to instabilities and
1183: %their neglect introduces spurious solutions.
1184: On the other hand, they point out interesting directions
1185: in multigravity theories: they allow, as we showed,
1186: simple modifications of gravity at large scales
1187: and brane-like solutions with no branes.
1188: One can speculate on the possibility to reproduce
1189: these results,
1190: in some
1191: more complex multigravity, without the various
1192: drawbacks mentioned in the introduction.
1193: It would also be interesting to find a solution
1194: corresponding to
1195: the discretization of RS type - gravity localizing - metric
1196: \cite{RS},
1197: and at the same time avoiding fine
1198: tuning conditions.
1199:
1200: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1201: We thank E. Dudas and S. Pokorski for
1202: helpful discussions.
1203: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1205: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1206: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1207: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1208:
1209: \bibitem{RS}
1210:
1211: %\cite{Randall:1999ee}
1212: %\bibitem{Randall:1999ee}
1213: L.~Randall and R.~Sundrum,
1214: %``A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,''
1215: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83} (1999) 3370
1216: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905221].
1217: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905221;%%
1218: %\cite{Randall:1999vf}
1219: %\bibitem{Randall:1999vf}
1220: L.~Randall and R.~Sundrum,
1221: %``An alternative to compactification,''
1222: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83} (1999) 4690
1223: [arXiv:hep-th/9906064].
1224: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9906064;%%
1225: for a review see
1226: %\cite{Rubakov:2001kp}
1227: %\bibitem{Rubakov:2001kp}
1228: V.~A.~Rubakov,
1229: ``Large and infinite extra dimensions: An introduction,''
1230: Phys.\ Usp.\ {\bf 44}, 871 (2001)
1231: [Usp.\ Fiz.\ Nauk {\bf 171}, 913 (2001)]
1232: [arXiv:hep-ph/0104152].
1233:
1234:
1235: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104152;%%
1236: %\cite{Fierz:1939ix}
1237: \bibitem{Fierz:1939ix}
1238: M.~Fierz and W.~Pauli,
1239: %``On Relativistic Wave Equations For Particles Of Arbitrary Spin In An Electromagnetic Field,''
1240: Proc.\ Roy.\ Soc.\ Lond.\ A {\bf 173} (1939) 211.
1241: %%CITATION = PRSLA,A173,211;%%
1242:
1243:
1244:
1245:
1246: %\cite{Isham:gm}
1247: \bibitem{Isham:gm}
1248: C.~J.~Isham, A.~Salam and J.~Strathdee,
1249: %``F-Dominance Of Gravity,''
1250: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 3} (1971) 867.
1251: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D3,867;%%
1252: %\cite{Salam:1976as}
1253: %\bibitem{Salam:1976as}
1254: A.~Salam and J.~Strathdee,
1255: %``A Class Of Solutions For The Strong Gravity Equations,''
1256: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 16}, 2668 (1977).
1257: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D16,2668;%%
1258: %\cite{Isham:1977rj}
1259: %\bibitem{Isham:1977rj}
1260: C.~J.~Isham and D.~Storey,
1261: %``Exact Spherically Symmetric Classical Solutions For The F-G Theory Of Gravity,''
1262: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 18}, 1047 (1978).
1263: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D18,1047;%%
1264: %\cite{Chamseddine:2003ft}
1265: %\bibitem{Chamseddine:2003ft}
1266: A.~H.~Chamseddine,
1267: %``Spontaneous symmetry breaking for massive spin-2 interacting with gravity,''
1268: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 557}, 247 (2003)
1269: [arXiv:hep-th/0301014].
1270: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0301014;%%
1271:
1272: %\cite{Boulware:my}
1273: \bibitem{Boulware:my}
1274: D.~G.~Boulware and S.~Deser,
1275: %``Can Gravitation Have A Finite Range?,''
1276: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 6} (1972) 3368.
1277: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D6,3368;%%
1278:
1279:
1280:
1281: %\cite{Damour:2002ws}
1282: \bibitem{Damour:2002ws}
1283: T.~Damour and I.~I.~Kogan,
1284: %``Effective Lagrangians and universality classes of nonlinear bigravity,''
1285: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 104024
1286: [arXiv:hep-th/0206042].
1287: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0206042;%%
1288: %\cite{Damour:2002wu}
1289: %\bibitem{Damour:2002wu}
1290: T.~Damour, I.~I.~Kogan and A.~Papazoglou,
1291: %``Non-linear bigravity and cosmic acceleration,''
1292: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 104025 (2002)
1293: [arXiv:hep-th/0206044].
1294: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0206044;%%
1295: %\cite{Damour:2002gp}
1296: %\bibitem{Damour:2002gp}
1297: T.~Damour, I.~I.~Kogan and A.~Papazoglou,
1298: %``Spherically symmetric spacetimes in massive gravity,''
1299: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 064009 (2003)
1300: [arXiv:hep-th/0212155].
1301: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0212155;%%
1302:
1303: %\cite{Arkani-Hamed:2002sp}
1304: \bibitem{Arkani-Hamed:2002sp}
1305: N.~Arkani-Hamed, H.~Georgi and M.~D.~Schwartz,
1306: %``Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space,''
1307: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 305} (2003) 96
1308: [arXiv:hep-th/0210184].
1309: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0210184;%%
1310: %\cite{Arkani-Hamed:2003vb}
1311: %\bibitem{Arkani-Hamed:2003vb}
1312: N.~Arkani-Hamed and M.~D.~Schwartz,
1313: %``Discrete gravitational dimensions,''
1314: arXiv:hep-th/0302110;
1315: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0302110;%%
1316: %\cite{Schwartz:2003vj}
1317: %\bibitem{Schwartz:2003vj}
1318: M.~D.~Schwartz,
1319: %``Constructing gravitational dimensions,''
1320: arXiv:hep-th/0303114.
1321: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303114;%%
1322:
1323: %\cite{Arkani-Hamed:2001ca}
1324: \bibitem{Arkani-Hamed:2001ca}
1325: N.~Arkani-Hamed, A.~G.~Cohen and H.~Georgi,
1326: %``(De)constructing dimensions,''
1327: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86} (2001) 4757
1328: [arXiv:hep-th/0104005].
1329: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0104005;%%
1330: %\cite{Hill:2000mu}
1331: %\bibitem{Hill:2000mu}
1332: C.~T.~Hill, S.~Pokorski and J.~Wang,
1333: %``Gauge invariant effective Lagrangian for Kaluza-Klein modes,''
1334: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 105005
1335: [arXiv:hep-th/0104035].
1336: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0104035;%%
1337:
1338: %\cite{Madore:1989ma}
1339: \bibitem{Madore:1989ma}
1340: J.~Madore,
1341: %``On A Modification Of Kaluza-Klein Theory,''
1342: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 41}, 3709 (1990);
1343: J.~Madore and J.~Mourad,
1344: %``Algebraic Kaluza-Klein Cosmology,''
1345: Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ {\bf 10} (1993) 2157.
1346: %%CITATION = CQGRD,10,2157;%%
1347: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D41,3709;%%
1348: J. Madore and J.Mourad,
1349: ``Noncommutative Kaluza-Klein Theory,''
1350: arXiv:hep-th/9601169 and references therein.
1351: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9601169;%%
1352:
1353: \bibitem{vDVZ}
1354: %\cite{vanDam:1970vg}
1355: %\bibitem{vanDam:1970vg}
1356: H.~van Dam and M.~J.~Veltman,
1357: %``Massive And Massless Yang-Mills And Gravitational Fields,''
1358: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 22} (1970) 397.
1359: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B22,397;%%
1360: %\bibitem{ZAK}
1361: V.I.Zakharov, JETP Lett {\bf 12}, 312 (1970).
1362: %\cite{Iwasaki:uz}
1363: %\bibitem{Iwasaki:uz}
1364: Y.~Iwasaki,
1365: %``Consistency Condition For Propagators,''
1366: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 2} (1970) 2255.
1367: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D2,2255;%%
1368:
1369: \bibitem{STRONGDGP}
1370: %\cite{Luty:2003vm}
1371: %\bibitem{Luty:2003vm}
1372: M.~A.~Luty, M.~Porrati and R.~Rattazzi,
1373: %``Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model,''
1374: arXiv:hep-th/0303116.
1375: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303116;%%
1376: %\cite{Rubakov:2003zb}
1377: %\bibitem{Rubakov:2003zb}
1378: V.~A.~Rubakov,
1379: %``Strong coupling in brane-induced gravity in five dimensions,''
1380: arXiv:hep-th/0303125.
1381: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0303125;%%
1382:
1383:
1384: %\cite{ACCDGP}
1385: \bibitem{ACCDGP}
1386: C.~Deffayet,
1387: %``Cosmology on a brane in Minkowski bulk,''
1388: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 502} (2001) 199
1389: [arXiv:hep-th/0010186].
1390: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0010186;%%.
1391: C.~Deffayet, G.~R.~Dvali and G.~Gabadadze,
1392: %``Accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions,''
1393: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 044023
1394: [arXiv:astro-ph/0105068].
1395: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0105068;%%
1396:
1397:
1398: \bibitem{CUREVDVZ}
1399: %\cite{Vainshtein:sx}
1400: %\bibitem{Vainshtein:sx}
1401: A.~I.~Vainshtein,
1402: %``To The Problem Of Nonvanishing Gravitation Mass,''
1403: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 39} (1972) 393.
1404: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B39,393;%%
1405: %\bibitem{Deffayet:2001uk}
1406: C.~Deffayet, G.~R.~Dvali, G.~Gabadadze and A.~I.~Vainshtein,
1407: %``Nonperturbative continuity in graviton mass versus perturbative discontinuity,''
1408: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 044026
1409: [arXiv:hep-th/0106001].
1410: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0106001;%%
1411: %\bibitem{ARTHUR}
1412: A.~Lue,
1413: %``Cosmic strings in a brane world theory with metastable gravitons,''
1414: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66} (2002) 043509
1415: [arXiv:hep-th/0111168].
1416: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0111168;%%
1417: %\cite{Gruzinov:2001hp}
1418: %\bibitem{ANDRE}
1419: A.~Gruzinov,
1420: %``On the graviton mass,''
1421: arXiv:astro-ph/0112246.
1422: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0112246;%%
1423: %\cite{Porrati:2002cp}
1424: %\bibitem{MASSIMO}
1425: M.~Porrati,
1426: %``Fully covariant van Dam-Veltman-Zakharov discontinuity, and absence thereof,''
1427: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 534} (2002) 209
1428: [arXiv:hep-th/0203014].
1429: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0203014;%%
1430: %\cite{Tanaka:2003zb}
1431: %\bibitem{Tanaka:2003zb}
1432: T.~Tanaka,
1433: %``Weak gravity in DGP braneworld model,''
1434: arXiv:gr-qc/0305031.
1435: %%CITATION = GR-QC 0305031;%%
1436:
1437: %\cite{Dolan:1983aa}
1438: \bibitem{Dolan:1983aa}
1439: L.~Dolan and M.~J.~Duff,
1440: %``Kac-Moody Symmetries Of Kaluza-Klein Theories,''
1441: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 52} (1984) 14.
1442: %%CITATION = PRLTA,52,14;%%
1443: %\cite{Aulakh:1985un}
1444: %\bibitem{Aulakh:1985un}
1445: C.~S.~Aulakh and D.~Sahdev,
1446: %``The Infinite Dimensional Gauge Structure Of Kaluza-Klein Theories. 1. D = 1+4,''
1447: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 164} (1985) 293.
1448: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B164,293;%%
1449: %\cite{Nappi:1989ny}
1450: %\bibitem{Nappi:1989ny}
1451: C.~R.~Nappi and L.~Witten,
1452: %``Interacting Lagrangian For Massive Spin Two Field,''
1453: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 40} (1989) 1095.
1454: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D40,1095;%%
1455:
1456: \bibitem{DM1}
1457: C.~Deffayet, J.~Mourad, Multigravity from a discete extra
1458: dimension
1459: hep-th/0311124
1460:
1461: \bibitem{KKcons}
1462: P.~Jordan, Ann.~Phys. (Leipzig 1947). Y.~Thiry, CRAS, 216 (1948).
1463:
1464: %\cite{Duff:1984hn}
1465: \bibitem{Duff:1984hn}
1466: M.~J.~Duff, B.~E.~Nilsson, C.~N.~Pope and N.~P.~Warner,
1467: %``On The Consistency Of The Kaluza-Klein Ansatz,''
1468: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 149} (1984) 90.
1469: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B149,90;%%
1470:
1471:
1472:
1473:
1474: %%\cite{Binetruy:1999ut}
1475: \bibitem{BDL}
1476: P.~Bin\'etruy, C.~Deffayet and D.~Langlois,
1477: %``Non-conventional cosmology from a brane-universe,''
1478: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 565} (2000) 269
1479: [arXiv:hep-th/9905012].
1480: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 9905012;%%
1481:
1482:
1483:
1484: %\cite{Kogan:1999wc}
1485: \bibitem{Kogan:1999wc}
1486: I.~I.~Kogan, S.~Mouslopoulos, A.~Papazoglou, G.~G.~Ross and J.~Santiago,
1487: %``A three three-brane universe: New phenomenology for the new millennium?,''
1488: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 584}, 313 (2000)
1489: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912552].
1490: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912552;%%
1491:
1492: %\cite{Gregory:2000jc}
1493: \bibitem{Gregory:2000jc}
1494: R.~Gregory, V.~A.~Rubakov and S.~M.~Sibiryakov,
1495: %``Opening up extra dimensions at ultra-large scales,''
1496: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84}, 5928 (2000)
1497: [arXiv:hep-th/0002072].
1498: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0002072;%%
1499:
1500: %\cite{Dvali:2000rv}
1501: \bibitem{Dvali:2000rv}
1502: G.~R.~Dvali, G.~Gabadadze and M.~Porrati,
1503: %``Metastable gravitons and infinite volume extra dimensions,''
1504: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 484}, 112 (2000)
1505: [arXiv:hep-th/0002190].
1506: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0002190;%%
1507:
1508:
1509: %\cite{Kogan:2000cv}
1510: \bibitem{Kogan:2000cv}
1511: I.~I.~Kogan and G.~G.~Ross,
1512: %``Brane universe and multigravity: Modification of gravity at large and small distances,''
1513: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 485}, 255 (2000)
1514: [arXiv:hep-th/0003074].
1515: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0003074;%%
1516:
1517: %\cite{Dvali:2000hr}
1518: \bibitem{Dvali:2000hr}
1519: G.~R.~Dvali, G.~Gabadadze and M.~Porrati,
1520: %``4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space,''
1521: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 485}, 208 (2000)
1522: [arXiv:hep-th/0005016].
1523: %%CITATION = HEP-TH 0005016;%%
1524:
1525: \bibitem{DW}
1526: A.~Vilenkin,
1527: %``Gravitational Field Of Vacuum Domain Walls,''
1528: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 133} (1983) 177.
1529: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B133,177;%%
1530: %\cite{Ipser:1983db}
1531: J.~Ipser and P.~Sikivie,
1532: %``The Gravitationally Repulsive Domain Wall,''
1533: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 30}, 712 (1984).
1534: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D30,712;%%
1535:
1536:
1537:
1538: \end{thebibliography}
1539: \end{document}
1540:
1541:
1542:
1543:
1544:
1545:
1546: