1: \documentclass[nofootinbib,preprint]{revtex4}%
2: \usepackage{hyperref}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage{amsfonts}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}%
7: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
8: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
9: %TCIDATA{Version=5.00.0.2552}
10: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex4.cst}
11: %TCIDATA{Created=Thursday, February 05, 2004 15:27:58}
12: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:31:20}
13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
14: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="SaveForMode" CONTENT="1">}
15: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
16: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
17: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}
18: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}
19: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}
20: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}
21: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}
22: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}
23: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
24: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
25: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}
26: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
27: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
28: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}
29: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
30: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}
31: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}
32: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
33: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
34: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}
35: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}
36: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\noindent\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}
37: \begin{document}
38: \title{Semiclassical Analysis of String/Gauge Duality\\on Non-commutative Space}
39: \author{R. C. Rashkov}
40: \email{rash@phys.uni-sofia.bg}
41: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Sofia University, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria}
42: \author{K. S. Viswanathan}
43: \email{kviswana@sfu.ca}
44: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, Canada}
45: \author{Yi Yang}
46: \email{yiyang@mail.nctu.edu.tw}
47: \affiliation{Department of Electrophysics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.}
48: \date{\today }
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: We use semiclassical methods to study closed strings in the modified
52: $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background with constant $B$ fields. The point-like
53: closed strings and the stretched closed strings rotating around the big circle
54: of $S^{5}$ are considered. Quantization of these closed string leads to a
55: time-dependent string spectrum, which we argue corresponds to the RG-flow of
56: the dual noncommutative Yang-Mills theory.
57:
58: \end{abstract}
59: \maketitle
60:
61:
62: \section{Introduction}
63:
64: AdS/CFT duality \cite{9711200} is a powerful method to study field theories by
65: studying their dual string theories. Usually, full string theories in the
66: curved background, such as $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$, are not solvable. We have to
67: study their low energy effective theories, i.e. supergravity theories.
68: According to IR/UV duality, the low energy region in the string theories is
69: dual to the high energy region in the corresponding field theories side.
70: However, the low energy region of the field theory is more attractive for
71: practical reason. To study the low energy region of these field theories, we
72: need to solve the full string theory. It was shown that by taking Penrose
73: limit, $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ geometry reduces to a pp-wave geometry
74: \cite{0202021}, which is solvable for the full string theory.
75:
76: The success of pp-wave method for $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background led many
77: authors to use it to study some more complicated geometry backgrounds e.g.
78: \cite{0308024}. For example, the near horizon geometry of NS5-branes is the
79: linear dilaton background. String theory in this background was conjectured to
80: be dual to a non-local field theory \cite{9705221}, so called Little String
81: Theory (LST). It was shown that the pp-wave limit of this background is the
82: Nappi-Witten background. String theory in Nappi-Witten background is again
83: exactly solvable and has been widely studied, see for example
84: \cite{0205258,0305028}. A more complicated example is the pp-wave limit of the
85: near horizon geometry of non-extremal NS5-branes, which leads to a time
86: dependent background. Luckily, strings in this time dependent background is
87: also exactly solvable and has been studied in \cite{0205258,0211289}. Another
88: non-local gauge theory example is non-commutative Yang-Mills theories (NCYM),
89: which are conjectured to be dual to the near horizon geometry of $N$ coincide
90: D$p$-branes in the presence of the background constant $B$ fields. Geometries
91: with different number $p$ have been studied in \cite{9910092,0205258} and more
92: extensively in \cite{0209054}, in which the authors claimed that only for
93: D6-brane, the pp-wave limit of the geometry leads to a \textit{time
94: independent} background and is solvable. In this work, we will show that for
95: general D$p$-branes, pp-wave limit of the geometry leads to time dependent
96: backgrounds which are solvable in certain limit. Studying string theories in
97: these backgrounds will enable us to understand more about the dual theory -
98: noncommutative Yang-Mills theory, such as IR/UV mixing, non-local behavior
99: etc.. In addition, through the holography relationship, we can use the time
100: dependent pp-wave background to study the features of RG flow in NCYM.
101:
102: In the next section, we study the supergravity solution with constant NS $B$
103: fields. In section 3, semiclassical method is used to study the first order
104: fluctuation around some classical string configurations. The Hamiltonian will
105: be obtained for the fluctuation. We then quantize the model to get the string
106: spectrum in section 4. Section 5 contains discussion on the results.
107:
108: \section{Supergravity solution with constant $B$ fields}
109:
110: In this section we consider a system of $Dp$-branes with a constant NS $B$
111: along their world-volume directions.. For simplicity, we consider the $B$
112: field only along the directions of $x_{B}^{2}$ and $x_{B}^{3}$ in the
113: $D$-brane, the supergravity solution can be obtained by performing a T-duality
114: along $x^{3}$ and then T-dualize back. The solution in string metric is
115: \cite{9907166,9908134}
116: \begin{equation}
117: ds_{B}^{2}=f^{-1/2}\left[ -dx_{0}^{2}+dx_{1}^{2}+h\left( dx_{B2}^{2}%
118: +dx_{B3}^{2}\right) \right] +f^{1/2}\left( dr^{2}+r^{2}d\Omega_{5}%
119: ^{2}\right) ,
120: \end{equation}
121: where
122: \begin{align}
123: f & =1+\dfrac{\alpha^{\prime2}R^{4}}{r^{4}},\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }%
124: h^{-1}=\sin^{2}\theta f^{-1}+\cos^{2}\theta,\nonumber\\
125: B_{23} & =\dfrac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}f^{-1}h,\text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }%
126: e^{2\phi}=g^{2}h,\nonumber\\
127: F_{01r} & =\dfrac{1}{g}\sin\theta\partial_{r}f^{-1},\text{ \ \ }%
128: F_{0123r}=\dfrac{1}{g}\cos\theta h\partial_{r}f^{-1}. \label{transfer1}%
129: \end{align}
130: To study the dual noncommutative Yang-Mills theory on the boundary, we need to
131: take the background $B$ field to infinity $B_{23}\rightarrow\infty$. Following
132: the procedure in \cite{9907166,9908134}, we first rescale the parameters as
133: follows
134: \begin{align}
135: x_{0,1} & \rightarrow x_{0,1},\text{ \ }x_{B2,3}\rightarrow\left(
136: \dfrac{\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\right) ^{-1}x_{B2,3},\text{ \ \ }B_{23}%
137: \rightarrow\left( \dfrac{\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\right) ^{2}B_{23}\nonumber\\
138: \tan\theta & =\dfrac{b}{\alpha^{\prime}},\text{ \ \ }r=\alpha^{\prime}%
139: R^{2}u,\text{ \ \ \ \ }g\rightarrow\dfrac{\alpha^{\prime}}{b}g,
140: \label{transfer2}%
141: \end{align}
142: then we take the decoupling limit $\alpha^{\prime}\rightarrow0$ with $b$
143: fixed. The metric now can be written on as
144: \begin{equation}
145: ds_{B}^{2}=\alpha^{\prime}R^{2}\left[ u^{2}\left( -dx_{0}^{2}+dx_{1}%
146: ^{2}\right) +\dfrac{u^{2}}{1+a^{4}u^{4}}\left( dx_{B2}^{2}+dx_{B3}%
147: ^{2}\right) +\dfrac{du^{2}}{u^{2}}+d\Omega_{5}^{2}\right] , \label{metric}%
148: \end{equation}
149: where%
150: \begin{align}
151: a^{2} & =bR^{2},\text{ \ \ }B_{23}=\dfrac{\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\dfrac
152: {a^{4}u^{4}}{1+a^{4}u^{4}},\text{ \ \ }e^{2\phi}=\dfrac{g^{2}}{1+a^{4}u^{4}%
153: },\nonumber\\
154: & A_{01}=\alpha^{\prime}\dfrac{b}{g}u^{4}R^{4},\text{ \ \ }F_{0123u}%
155: =\dfrac{\alpha^{\prime2}\partial_{u}\left( u^{4}R^{4}\right) }{g\left(
156: 1+a^{4}u^{4}\right) }. \label{transfer3}%
157: \end{align}
158: We will consider sigma model in the above background%
159: \begin{equation}
160: S=\frac{1}{4\pi\alpha^{\prime}}\int d^{2}\sigma\left( \sqrt{h}h^{ab}%
161: G_{mn}\partial_{a}X^{m}\partial_{b}X^{n}+\epsilon^{ab}B_{ij}\partial_{a}%
162: X_{B}^{i}\partial_{b}X_{B}^{j}\right) , \label{sigma action}%
163: \end{equation}
164: where the metric $G_{mn}$\ and the constant $B_{ij}$ are given by equation
165: (\ref{metric}) and (\ref{transfer3}) respectively. Let's make some
166: transformations to bring the metric to a more convenient form. First of all,
167: we set $R=1$ for simplify and define the variables
168: \begin{equation}
169: x_{B}^{i}=\sqrt{1+a^{4}u^{4}}x^{i},i=2,3. \label{xB-x}%
170: \end{equation}
171: In these notations the metric can be written as
172: \begin{equation}
173: ds_{B}^{2}=ds^{2}+\dfrac{4a^{8}x^{i2}u^{8}}{\left( 1+a^{4}u^{4}\right) ^{2}%
174: }du^{2}+\dfrac{4a^{4}u^{5}x^{i}}{1+a^{4}u^{4}}dx^{i}du \label{modified metric}%
175: \end{equation}
176: where
177: \begin{equation}
178: ds^{2}=u^{2}\left( -dx_{0}^{2}+dx_{1}^{2}+dx_{2}^{2}+dx_{3}^{2}\right)
179: +\dfrac{du^{2}}{u^{2}}+d\Omega_{5}^{2} \label{new1}%
180: \end{equation}
181: is the standard $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ metric. We call the above metric
182: (\ref{modified metric}) modified $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ metric because the only
183: deviation of \ref{new1} from the standard $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ metric is
184: given by some $B$ field dependent terms. Later we will consider the case of
185: $a\rightarrow0$, where the modification from the standard $AdS_{5}\times
186: S^{5}$ metric is small provided $u$ is not too large.
187:
188: Next, to write the above metric in \textquotedblleft global\textquotedblright%
189: \ coordinates, we use the transformations
190: \begin{align}
191: u & =\cosh\rho\cos t-\sinh\rho\Omega_{4},\nonumber\\
192: x^{0} & =\dfrac{\cosh\rho\sin t}{\cosh\rho\cos t-\sinh\rho\Omega_{4}%
193: },\nonumber\\
194: x^{\mu} & =\dfrac{\sinh\rho\Omega_{\mu}}{\cosh\rho\cos t-\sinh\rho\Omega
195: _{4}}, \label{globle}%
196: \end{align}
197: where the four-vector $\Omega$ satisfies the normalization condition
198: $\Omega^{2}=1$ and the explicit form of its components is
199: \begin{align}
200: \Omega_{1} & =\cos\beta_{1}\cos\beta_{2}\cos\beta_{3},\nonumber\\
201: \Omega_{2} & =\cos\beta_{1}\cos\beta_{2}\sin\beta_{3},\nonumber\\
202: \Omega_{3} & =\cos\beta_{1}\sin\beta_{2},\nonumber\\
203: \Omega_{4} & =\sin\beta_{1}.
204: \end{align}
205: The metric now takes the form as
206: \begin{align}
207: ds_{B}^{2} & =-\cosh^{2}\rho dt^{2}+d\rho^{2}+\sinh^{2}\rho d\Omega_{3}%
208: ^{2}\nonumber\\
209: & \text{ \ \ }+d\psi_{1}^{2}+\cos^{2}\psi_{1}\left( d\psi_{2}^{2}+\cos
210: ^{2}\psi_{2}d\Omega_{3}^{\prime2}\right) \nonumber\\
211: & \text{ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{8}x^{i2}u^{8}}{\left( 1+a^{4}u^{4}\right) ^{2}%
212: }du^{2}+\dfrac{4a^{4}u^{5}x^{i}}{1+a^{4}u^{4}}dx^{i}du, \label{globle metric}%
213: \end{align}
214: where
215: \begin{align}
216: d\Omega_{3}^{2} & =d\beta_{1}^{2}+\cos^{2}\beta_{1}\left( d\beta_{2}%
217: ^{2}+\cos^{2}\beta_{2}d\beta_{3}^{2}\right) ,\nonumber\\
218: d\Omega_{3}^{\prime2} & =d\psi_{3}^{2}+\cos^{2}\psi_{3}\left( d\psi_{4}%
219: ^{2}+\cos^{2}\psi_{4}d\psi_{5}^{2}\right) .
220: \end{align}
221: In the final form of the metric (\ref{globle metric}), to keep the metric
222: neat, we did not write $dx^{i}$ and $du$ in terms of the new coordinates
223: explicitly in the last two terms. Reader should be careful that there are only
224: 10 independent coordinates in the metric (\ref{globle metric}) since $u$ and
225: $x^{i}$ $\left( i=2,3\right) $ are not independent coordinates.
226:
227: \section{Semiclassical analysis}
228:
229: In this section we will study two classical solutions of the sigma model
230: (\ref{sigma action}) in the modified $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background
231: (\ref{globle metric}) which we discussed in the previous section. One
232: classical solution corresponds to point-like closed strings rotating around
233: the big circle of $S^{5}$, and the other corresponds to stretched closed
234: strings rotating around the big circle of $S^{5}$. We then consider the first
235: order fluctuations around these classical solutions to get the transverse Hamiltonian.
236:
237: \subsection{Point-like closed string rotating in $S^{5}$}
238:
239: It is easy to verify that
240: \begin{align}
241: t & =\nu\tau,\text{ \ \ }\rho=0,\text{ \ \ }\beta_{l}=0\left(
242: l=1,2,3\right) ,\text{ \ \ }\nonumber\\
243: & \varphi\left( \equiv\psi_{5}\right) =\nu\tau,\text{ \ \ }\psi
244: _{s}=0\left( s=1,2,3,4\right) , \label{point-like solution}%
245: \end{align}
246: is a solution of the sigma model (\ref{sigma action}) corresponding to the
247: metric (\ref{globle metric}). This solution describes a point like ($\rho=0$)
248: closed string boosting around the big circle of $S^{5}$.
249:
250: To find\ 1-loop approximation, we will consider the fluctuations around the
251: above classical solution and expand them to the first order. It is useful to
252: replace $\left( \rho,\beta_{l}\right) $ by four Cartesian coordinates
253: $\eta_{k}\left( k=1,2,3,4\right) $ as in \cite{0204226,0209116}
254: \begin{equation}
255: \eta_{k}=2r\Omega_{k},\text{ \ \ }\dfrac{2r}{1-r^{2}}=\sinh\rho.
256: \end{equation}
257: Written in these Cartesian coordinates, the metric reads
258: \begin{align}
259: ds_{B}^{2} & =-\left( \dfrac{1+\eta^{2}/4}{1-\eta^{2}/4}\right) ^{2}%
260: dt^{2}+\dfrac{1}{\left( 1-\eta^{2}/4\right) ^{2}}d\eta_{k}^{2}\nonumber\\
261: & \text{ \ \ }+d\psi_{1}^{2}+\cos^{2}\psi_{1}\left( d\psi_{2}^{2}+\cos
262: ^{2}\psi_{2}d\Omega_{3}^{\prime2}\right) \nonumber\\
263: & \text{ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{8}x^{i2}u^{8}}{\left( 1+a^{4}u^{4}\right) ^{2}%
264: }du^{2}+\dfrac{4a^{4}u^{5}x^{i}}{1+a^{4}u^{4}}dx^{i}du,
265: \end{align}
266: and the transformations (\ref{globle}) become
267: \begin{align}
268: u & =\dfrac{1+\eta^{2}/4}{1-\eta^{2}/4}\cos t-\dfrac{\eta_{4}}{1-\eta^{2}%
269: /4},\nonumber\\
270: x^{0} & =\dfrac{1+\eta^{2}/4\sin t}{\left( 1+\eta^{2}/4\right) \cos
271: t-\eta_{4}},\nonumber\\
272: x^{\mu} & =\dfrac{\eta_{\mu}}{\left( 1+\eta^{2}/4\right) \cos t-\eta_{4}}.
273: \end{align}
274: Now, we are ready to consider the fluctuations around the above classical
275: solution (\ref{point-like solution}) with large sigma model coupling constant
276: $\lambda$,
277: \begin{equation}
278: t=\nu\tau+\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{t},\text{ \ \ }\varphi=\nu\tau
279: +\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{\varphi},\text{ \ \ }\eta_{k}=\dfrac
280: {1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{\eta}_{k},\text{ \ \ }\psi_{s}=\dfrac{1}%
281: {\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{\psi}_{s}.
282: \end{equation}
283: Up to quadratic fluctuations, the Virasoro constraints of the sigma model can
284: be written as
285: \begin{align}
286: T_{aa} & =G_{mn}\partial_{a}X^{m}\partial_{a}X^{n}\nonumber\\
287: & =\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\left[ -2\lambda^{1/4}\nu\partial_{\tau}\left(
288: \tilde{t}-\tilde{\varphi}\right) -\partial_{a}\tilde{t}\partial^{a}\tilde
289: {t}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\varphi}\partial^{a}\tilde{\varphi}-\nu^{2}\left(
290: \tilde{\eta}^{2}+\tilde{\psi}_{s}^{2}\right) +\partial_{a}\tilde{\eta}%
291: _{k}\partial^{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\partial
292: ^{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\right. \nonumber\\
293: & \text{ \ \ \ }\left. -\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left(
294: 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}-\dfrac
295: {4a^{4}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{3}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\nu\tilde{\eta}%
296: _{i}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\right] =0. \label{constrain}%
297: \end{align}
298: The energy and angular momentum then are given as
299: \begin{align}
300: E & =P_{t}=2\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[ \sqrt{\lambda}%
301: \nu+\lambda^{1/4}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{t}+\nu\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right.
302: \nonumber\\
303: & \text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau
304: }{\left( 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}%
305: +\dfrac{2a^{4}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{3}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\tilde{\eta
306: }_{i}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\nonumber\\
307: & \text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }\left. +\frac{4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac
308: {a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta
309: }^{2}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}^{3}\partial_{\sigma}%
310: \tilde{\eta}^{2}\right) \right] \\
311: & \nonumber\\
312: J & =P_{\varphi}=2\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[ \sqrt{\lambda
313: }\nu+\lambda^{1/4}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi}-\nu\tilde{\psi}_{s}%
314: ^{2}\right] ,
315: \end{align}
316: and the difference between the energy and angular momentum can be obtained as
317: \begin{align}
318: E-J & =\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[ \lambda^{1/4}%
319: \partial_{\tau}\left( \tilde{t}-\tilde{\varphi}\right) +\nu\left(
320: \tilde{\eta}^{2}+\tilde{\psi}_{s}^{2}\right) \right. \nonumber\\
321: & \text{ \ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left(
322: 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}+\dfrac{2a^{4}%
323: \sin\nu\tau\cos^{3}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}%
324: \partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\nonumber\\
325: & \text{ \ \ \ }\left. +\frac{4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau
326: \cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}%
327: \partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde
328: {\eta}^{2}\right) \right] . \label{e-j}%
329: \end{align}
330: Now we can solve for $\partial_{\tau}\left( \tilde{t}-\tilde{\varphi}\right)
331: $ from the constraint (\ref{constrain}), and plug it into the above expression
332: (\ref{e-j}). After rescaling the fields by $\sqrt{2}\lambda^{1/4}$, we end up
333: with
334: \begin{align}
335: E-J & =\dfrac{1}{2\nu}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[
336: -\partial_{a}\tilde{t}\partial^{a}\tilde{t}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\varphi
337: }\partial^{a}\tilde{\varphi}+\nu^{2}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}+\tilde{\psi}%
338: _{s}^{2}\right) +\partial_{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}\partial^{a}\tilde{\eta}%
339: _{k}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\partial^{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\right.
340: \nonumber\\
341: & \text{ \ \ \ }\left. +\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left(
342: 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}+\frac
343: {4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}%
344: \nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta
345: }^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right) \right] \nonumber\\
346: & \equiv\dfrac{1}{\nu}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\mathcal{H}%
347: ^{\left( 2\right) }.
348: \end{align}
349: Thus $E-J$ is given by the expectation value of the transverse Hamiltonian
350: \begin{align}
351: \mathcal{H}^{\left( 2\right) } & =\dfrac{1}{2}\left[ -\partial_{a}%
352: \tilde{t}\partial^{a}\tilde{t}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\varphi}\partial^{a}%
353: \tilde{\varphi}+\nu^{2}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}+\tilde{\psi}_{s}^{2}\right)
354: +\partial_{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}\partial^{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}+\partial_{a}%
355: \tilde{\psi}_{s}\partial^{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\right. \nonumber\\
356: & \left. +\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left( 1+a^{4}%
357: \cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}+\frac{4\alpha
358: ^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau
359: }\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}%
360: ^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right) \right] . \label{H2}%
361: \end{align}
362: It is clear that there are 8 massive bosonic coordinates with two of them
363: ($\tilde{\eta}_{i},i=2,3$) time dependent. Defining $\tilde{x}^{\pm}=\tilde
364: {t}\pm\tilde{\varphi}$, the transverse Hamiltonian in equation (\ref{H2}) can
365: be written in \textquotedblleft light-cone\textquotedblright\-like form
366: \begin{align}
367: \mathcal{H}^{\left( 2\right) } & =\dfrac{1}{2}\left[ -\partial_{a}%
368: \tilde{x}^{+}\partial^{a}\tilde{x}^{-}-\frac{1}{4}\left( \tilde{\eta}%
369: ^{2}+\tilde{\psi}_{s}^{2}\right) \partial_{a}\tilde{x}^{+}\partial^{a}%
370: \tilde{x}^{+}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}\partial^{a}\tilde{\eta}%
371: _{k}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\partial^{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\right.
372: \nonumber\\
373: & \left. +\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left( 1+a^{4}%
374: \cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}+\frac{4\alpha
375: ^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau
376: }\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}%
377: ^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right) \right] .
378: \end{align}
379: A similar Hamiltonian can be also obtained by taking the Penrose limit as in
380: \cite{0205258}.
381:
382: \subsection{Closed string rotating in $S^{5}$}
383:
384: In this section we will consider another classical solution of a closed string
385: whose center of mass is not moving on $S^{5}$, but spins around that point and
386: is correspondingly stretched. Again, it is easy to verify that the ansatz
387: \begin{align}
388: t & =\nu\tau,\text{ \ \ }\rho=0,\text{ \ \ }\beta_{l}=0\left(
389: l=1,2,3\right) \nonumber\\
390: \theta\left( \equiv\psi_{1}\right) & =\theta\left( \sigma\right) ,\text{
391: \ \ }\varphi\left( \equiv\psi_{5}\right) =\nu\tau,\text{ \ \ }\psi
392: _{s}=0\left( s=2,3,4\right) , \label{solution}%
393: \end{align}
394: is a solution for the sigma model (\ref{sigma action}) associated with the
395: modified $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background (\ref{globle metric}).
396:
397: The constraint for $\theta$ can be found from the Virasoro constraints
398: $T_{ab}=0$, which is
399: \begin{equation}
400: \left( \theta^{\prime}\right) ^{2}=\nu^{2}-\nu^{2}\cos^{2}\theta=\nu^{2}%
401: \sin^{2}\theta\label{constr}%
402: \end{equation}
403:
404:
405: Now we would like to repeat the analysis of the previous section in the case
406: of the more general solution (\ref{solution}). To determine the quantum string
407: spectrum to the leading order in the large sigma model coupling constant
408: $\lambda$, we consider the quantum fluctuation around the classical solution
409: (\ref{solution})
410: \begin{align}
411: t & =\nu\tau+\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{t},\text{ \ \ }\varphi=\nu
412: \tau+\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{\varphi},\text{ \ \ }\theta=\theta\left(
413: \sigma\right) +\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{\theta},\nonumber\\
414: & \text{ }\eta_{k}=\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{\eta}_{k},\text{ \ \ }%
415: \psi_{s}=\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{1/4}}\tilde{\psi}_{s}(s=2,3,4).
416: \end{align}
417: Up to quadratic fluctuations, the constraints of the sigma model can be
418: written as
419: \begin{align}
420: T_{aa} & =G_{mn}\partial_{a}X^{m}\partial_{a}X^{n}\nonumber\\
421: & =\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda}}\left[ -2\lambda^{1/4}\nu\left( \partial_{\tau
422: }\tilde{t}-\cos^{2}\theta\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi}\right) -\partial
423: _{a}\tilde{t}\partial^{a}\tilde{t}+\cos^{2}\theta\partial_{a}\tilde{\varphi
424: }\partial^{a}\tilde{\varphi}\right. \nonumber\\
425: & \text{ \ \ \ }+2\lambda^{1/4}\nu\sin\theta\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\theta
426: }-2\lambda^{1/4}\nu^{2}\sin\theta\cos\theta\cdot\tilde{\theta}-4\nu\sin
427: \theta\cos\theta\cdot\tilde{\theta}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi}\nonumber\\
428: & \text{ \ \ \ }-\nu^{2}\left( \cos^{2}\theta-\sin^{2}\theta\right)
429: \tilde{\theta}^{2}-\nu^{2}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}+\cos^{2}\theta\cdot
430: \tilde{\psi}_{s}^{2}\right) \nonumber\\
431: & \text{ \ \ \ }+\partial_{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}\partial^{a}\tilde{\eta}%
432: _{k}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\theta}\partial^{a}\tilde{\theta}+\cos^{2}%
433: \theta\partial_{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\partial^{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\nonumber\\
434: & \text{ \ \ \ }\left. -\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left(
435: 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}-\dfrac
436: {4a^{4}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{3}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\nu\tilde{\eta}%
437: _{i}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\right] \nonumber\\
438: & =0, \label{constrain2}%
439: \end{align}
440: where we have used the constraint (\ref{constr}) to eliminate $\theta^{\prime
441: }$.
442:
443: The energy and angular momentum are correspondingly
444: \begin{align}
445: E & =P_{t}=2\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[ \sqrt{\lambda}%
446: \nu+\lambda^{1/4}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{t}+\nu\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right.
447: \nonumber\\
448: & \text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau
449: }{\left( 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}%
450: +\dfrac{2a^{4}\sin v\tau\cos^{3}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\tilde{\eta
451: }_{i}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\nonumber\\
452: & \text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }\left. +\frac{4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac
453: {a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta
454: }^{2}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}^{3}\partial_{\sigma}%
455: \tilde{\eta}^{2}\right) \right] ,\\
456: & \nonumber\\
457: J & =P_{\varphi}=2\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[ \sqrt{\lambda
458: }\nu\cos^{2}\theta+\lambda^{1/4}\cos^{2}\theta\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi
459: }-2\lambda^{1/4}\nu\sin\theta\cos\theta\cdot\tilde{\theta}\right. \nonumber\\
460: & \text{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }\left. -2\sin\theta\cos\theta\cdot\tilde{\theta
461: }\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi}-\nu\left( \cos^{2}\theta-\sin^{2}%
462: \theta\right) \tilde{\theta}^{2}-\nu\cos^{2}\theta\tilde{\psi}_{s}%
463: ^{2}\right] ,
464: \end{align}
465: therefore the difference between energy and angular momentum can be easily
466: calculated
467: \begin{align}
468: E-J & =\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[ \sqrt{\lambda}\nu\sin
469: ^{2}\theta+\lambda^{1/4}\left( \partial_{\tau}\tilde{t}-\cos^{2}%
470: \theta\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi}\right) \right. \nonumber\\
471: & \text{ \ \ }+2\lambda^{1/4}\nu\sin\theta\cos\theta\cdot\tilde{\theta}%
472: +2\sin\theta\cos\theta\tilde{\theta}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi}\nonumber\\
473: & \text{ \ \ }+\nu\left( \cos^{2}\theta-\sin^{2}\theta\right) \tilde
474: {\theta}^{2}+\nu\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}+\cos^{2}\theta\tilde{\psi}_{s}%
475: ^{2}\right) \nonumber\\
476: & \text{ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left(
477: 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}+\dfrac{2a^{4}%
478: \sin\nu\tau\cos^{3}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}%
479: \partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\nonumber\\
480: & \text{ \ \ }\left. +\frac{4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau
481: \cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}%
482: \partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde
483: {\eta}^{2}\right) \right] . \label{e-j2}%
484: \end{align}
485: As before, we can solve for $\left( \partial_{\tau}\tilde{t}-\cos^{2}%
486: \theta\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\varphi}\right) $ from the constrain
487: (\ref{constrain2}), and plug it into the above expression (\ref{e-j2}). After
488: rescaling the fields by $\sqrt{2}\lambda^{1/4}$, we obtain
489: \begin{align}
490: E-J & =\dfrac{1}{2\nu}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[
491: -\partial_{a}\tilde{t}\partial^{a}\tilde{t}+\cos^{2}\theta\partial_{a}%
492: \tilde{\varphi}\partial^{a}\tilde{\varphi}+\nu^{2}\left( \cos^{2}\theta
493: -\sin^{2}\theta\right) \tilde{\theta}^{2}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\theta}%
494: \partial^{a}\tilde{\theta}\right. \nonumber\\
495: & \text{ \ \ \ }+\cos^{2}\theta\left( \nu^{2}\tilde{\psi}_{s}^{2}%
496: +\partial_{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\partial^{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\right) +\nu
497: ^{2}\tilde{\eta}^{2}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}\partial^{a}\tilde{\eta}%
498: _{k}\nonumber\\
499: & \text{ \ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left(
500: 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}+\frac
501: {4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}%
502: \nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta
503: }^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right) \nonumber\\
504: & \text{ \ \ \ }\left. +2\nu^{2}\sin\theta\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\theta
505: }+2\nu^{2}\sin\theta\cos\theta\cdot\tilde{\theta}+2\nu^{2}\sin^{2}%
506: \theta\right] \nonumber\\
507: & \equiv\dfrac{1}{\nu}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\mathcal{H}%
508: ^{\left( 2\right) }.
509: \end{align}
510: Thus, $E-J$ is given by the expectation value of the transverse Hamiltonian
511: \begin{align}
512: \mathcal{H}^{\left( 2\right) } & =-\partial_{a}\tilde{t}\partial^{a}%
513: \tilde{t}+\cos^{2}\theta\partial_{a}\tilde{\varphi}\partial^{a}\tilde{\varphi
514: }+\nu^{2}\left( \cos^{2}\theta-\sin^{2}\theta\right) \tilde{\theta}%
515: ^{2}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\theta}\partial^{a}\tilde{\theta}\nonumber\\
516: & \text{ \ \ }+\cos^{2}\theta\left( \nu^{2}\tilde{\psi}_{s}^{2}+\partial
517: _{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\partial^{a}\tilde{\psi}_{s}\right) +\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta
518: }^{2}+\partial_{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}\partial^{a}\tilde{\eta}_{k}\nonumber\\
519: & \text{ \ \ }+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left(
520: 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}+\frac
521: {4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}%
522: \nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta
523: }^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right) \nonumber\\
524: & \text{ \ \ }+2\nu^{2}\sin\theta\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\theta}+2\nu^{2}%
525: \sin\theta\cos\theta\cdot\tilde{\theta}+2\nu^{2}\sin^{2}\theta.
526: \end{align}
527: The following transformation
528: \begin{equation}
529: \bar{t}=\tilde{t},\text{ \ \ }\bar{\varphi}=\cos\theta\tilde{\varphi},\text{
530: \ \ }\bar{\psi}_{s}=\cos\theta\tilde{\psi}_{s}\left( s=2,3,4\right) ,\text{
531: \ \ }\bar{\theta}=\tilde{\theta},\text{ \ \ }\bar{\eta}_{k}=\tilde{\eta}%
532: _{k}\left( k=0,1,2,3\right) ,
533: \end{equation}
534: will bring the kinetic terms to canonical form. The resulting Hamiltonian is
535: \begin{align}
536: \mathcal{H}^{\left( 2\right) } & =-\partial_{a}\bar{t}\partial^{a}\bar
537: {t}+\partial_{a}\bar{\varphi}\partial^{a}\bar{\varphi}+\partial_{a}\bar
538: {\theta}\partial^{a}\bar{\theta}+\partial_{a}\bar{\eta}_{k}\partial^{a}%
539: \bar{\eta}_{k}+\partial_{a}\bar{\psi}_{s}\partial^{a}\bar{\psi}_{s}\nonumber\\
540: & \text{ \ \ }+m_{\varphi}^{2}\bar{\varphi}^{2}+m_{\theta}^{2}\bar{\theta
541: }^{2}+m_{\psi}^{2}\bar{\psi}_{s}^{2}+m_{\lambda}^{2}\bar{\eta}_{\lambda}%
542: ^{2}+m_{i}^{2}\bar{\eta}_{i}^{2}\nonumber\\
543: & \text{ \ \ }+\frac{4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau\cos^{5}%
544: \nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}\partial_{\sigma
545: }\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{2}\right)
546: \nonumber\\
547: & \text{ \ \ }+\dfrac{2\nu\sin^{2}\theta}{\cos\theta}\left( \bar{\varphi
548: }\partial_{\sigma}\bar{\varphi}+\bar{\psi}_{s}\partial_{\sigma}\bar{\psi}%
549: _{s}\right) +2\nu^{2}\sin\theta\left( 1+\cos\theta\cdot\bar{\theta}%
550: +\partial_{\sigma}\bar{\theta}\right) , \label{H2 - string}%
551: \end{align}
552: where
553: \begin{align}
554: m_{\varphi}^{2} & =\dfrac{\nu^{2}\sin^{4}\theta}{\cos^{2}\theta},\\
555: m_{\theta}^{2} & =\nu^{2}\left( \cos^{2}\theta-\sin^{2}\theta\right) ,\\
556: m_{\psi}^{2} & =\nu^{2}\left( 1+\dfrac{\sin^{4}\theta}{\cos^{2}\theta
557: }\right) ,\\
558: m_{\lambda}^{2} & =\nu^{2},\lambda=0,1,\\
559: m_{i}^{2} & =\nu^{2}\left( 1+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau
560: }{\left( 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau\right) ^{2}}\right) ,\text{ \ \ }i=2,3.
561: \end{align}
562: It is clear that when $\theta\left( \sigma\right) =0$, which correspond the
563: point-like closed string case in the previous section, the Hamiltonian
564: (\ref{H2 - string}) reduces to the Hamiltonian (\ref{H2}) as expected.
565:
566: \section{Quantization}
567:
568: In this section, we will quantize the classical systems we studied in the
569: previous sections to compute the full closed string spectrum. We see that when
570: $a=0$, which corresponds to the case of the vanishing background $B$ field,
571: the Hamiltonians (\ref{H2}) and (\ref{H2 - string}) will reduce to the closed
572: strings moving in the standard $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background. The
573: quantization of the closed strings moving in the standard $AdS_{5}\times
574: S^{5}$ background has been widely studied by many authors, for example in
575: \cite{0204226,0209116}. To quantize the classical closed string systems in the
576: modified $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background (\ref{globle metric}), we need to
577: solve the equations of motion corresponding to the Hamiltonians (\ref{H2}) and
578: (\ref{H2 - string}) respectively. Since the difference between our current
579: case and the case of the closed strings moving in the standard $AdS_{5}\times
580: S^{5}$ background is the $a$ dependent terms, we only need to solve for the
581: fields whose equations of motion\ are affected by $a$. It is easy to see in
582: the Hamiltonians (\ref{H2}) and (\ref{H2 - string}) that all the fields have
583: the exactly same equations of motion as the case without the background $B$
584: field except for the fields $\tilde{\eta}_{i}$, $i=2,3,$ which are the fields
585: along the directions with the $B$ field turned on. The Hamiltonians for the
586: fields $\tilde{\eta}_{i}$, $i=2,3$ coming from (\ref{H2}) and
587: (\ref{H2 - string}) turn out to be in the same form, which is
588: \begin{align}
589: \mathcal{H}_{\tilde{\eta}} & =\dfrac{1}{2}\int\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[
590: \partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}+\partial
591: _{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}_{i}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}_{i}+\left(
592: 1+\dfrac{4a^{4}\sin^{2}\nu\tau\cos^{2}\nu\tau}{\left( 1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu
593: \tau\right) ^{2}}\right) \nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}\right. \nonumber\\
594: & \text{ \ \ \ }\left. +\frac{4\alpha^{\prime}}{b}\frac{a^{8}\sin\nu\tau
595: \cos^{5}\nu\tau}{1+a^{4}\cos^{4}\nu\tau}\left( \tilde{\eta}^{2}%
596: \partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}^{3}-\tilde{\eta}^{3}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde
597: {\eta}^{2}\right) \right] . \label{H eta}%
598: \end{align}
599: It is hard to solve the equations of motion corresponding to the above
600: Hamiltonian (\ref{H eta}) because of the complicated time-dependent
601: coefficient. To proceed, we make an approximation by letting $a\rightarrow0$
602: but still \emph{finite}. Notice that according to decoupling limit we took in
603: (\ref{transfer2}) and the definition (\ref{transfer1}) and (\ref{transfer3}),
604: any \emph{finite} value of $a$, no matter how small it is, corresponds to the
605: infinite value of the background $B$ field, i.e. $B_{23}\rightarrow\infty$.
606: This is important for us because only for the infinite background $B$ field
607: the dual field theory on the boundary is noncommutative field theory. Under
608: the limit $a\rightarrow0$, we expand the Hamiltonian (\ref{H eta}) in $a$ and
609: keep the lowest order. The Hamiltonian now is simplified to the form
610: \begin{equation}
611: \mathcal{H}_{\tilde{\eta}}=\int\dfrac{d\sigma}{2\pi}\left[ \partial_{\tau
612: }\tilde{\eta}_{i}\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}_{i}+\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta
613: }_{i}\partial_{\sigma}\tilde{\eta}_{i}+\left( 1+a^{4}\sin^{2}2\nu\tau\right)
614: \nu^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}\right] . \label{HB}%
615: \end{equation}
616: It it easy to get the equations of motion for the fields $\tilde{\eta}_{i}$
617: \begin{equation}
618: \partial_{\tau}^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{i}+\partial_{\sigma}^{2}\tilde{\eta}%
619: _{i}+\left( 1+a^{4}\sin^{2}2\nu\tau\right) \nu\tilde{\eta}_{i}^{2}=0.
620: \end{equation}
621: We expand\footnote{We ignore the sub-index $i(=2,3)$ from now for neat
622: expression.} the field $\tilde{\eta}$ in the different modes as $\tilde{\eta
623: }=\sum\tilde{\eta}_{n}e^{in\sigma}$, the equation of motion for each mode
624: $\tilde{\eta}_{n}$ can be obtained as
625: \begin{equation}
626: \dfrac{\partial^{2}\tilde{\eta}_{n}}{\partial z^{2}}+\left( \lambda
627: _{n}-2q\cos2z\right) \tilde{\eta}_{n}=0, \label{mathieu}%
628: \end{equation}
629: where
630: \begin{equation}
631: \lambda_{n}=\dfrac{1}{4\nu^{2}}\left( n^{2}+\nu^{2}+\dfrac{\nu^{2}}{2}%
632: a^{4}\right) ,\text{ \ }q=\dfrac{a^{4}}{16},\text{ \ }z=2\nu\tau.
633: \end{equation}
634: Equation (\ref{mathieu}) is a typical Mathieu equation. It is worth noting
635: that the similar Mathieu equation has been obtained when people studied the
636: scalar field in the same NS $B$ field background, but here we are considering
637: the full closed string fields. We refer reader to \cite{9805140,9908134} for
638: the general method to solve Mathieu equation.
639:
640: Let us define $Z_{n}^{\pm}$ as the two independent solutions of the equation
641: (\ref{mathieu}). Then the mode expansion for the field $\tilde{\eta}$ can be
642: written as
643: \begin{equation}
644: \tilde{\eta}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left[ C_{n}Z_{n}^{-}\left( \alpha
645: _{n}e^{in\sigma}+\tilde{\alpha}_{n}e^{-in\sigma}\right) +C_{-n}Z_{n}%
646: ^{+}\left( \alpha_{n}^{+}e^{-in\sigma}+\tilde{\alpha}_{n}^{+}e^{in\sigma
647: }\right) \right] , \label{string solution}%
648: \end{equation}
649: where $\alpha_{n}/\tilde{\alpha}_{n}$'s and $\alpha_{n}^{+}/\tilde{\alpha}%
650: _{n}^{+}$'s are annihilation and creation operators, $C_{n}/C_{-n}$'s are
651: constant coefficients.
652:
653: To quantize the field $\tilde{\eta}$, we define the conjugate momentum
654: \begin{equation}
655: \Pi_{\tilde{\eta}}=\partial_{\tau}\tilde{\eta}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left[
656: C_{n}\dot{Z}_{n}^{-}\left( \alpha_{n}e^{in\sigma}+\tilde{\alpha}%
657: _{n}e^{-in\sigma}\right) +C_{-n}\dot{Z}_{n}^{+}\left( \alpha_{n}%
658: ^{+}e^{-in\sigma}+\tilde{\alpha}_{n}^{+}e^{in\sigma}\right) \right] .
659: \end{equation}
660: and impose the quantization condition
661: \begin{equation}
662: \left[ \tilde{\eta}^{i}\left( \sigma,\tau\right) ,\Pi_{\tilde{\eta}}%
663: ^{j}\left( \sigma^{\prime},\tau\right) \right] =i\pi\delta^{ij}%
664: \delta\left( \sigma-\sigma^{\prime}\right) . \label{quantization}%
665: \end{equation}
666: The constants $C_{n}$ can be determined using the quantization condition
667: (\ref{quantization}) as normalization condition
668: \begin{equation}
669: C_{n}=C_{-n}=\sqrt{\dfrac{i}{\left( Z_{n}^{-}\dot{Z}_{n}^{+}-Z_{n}^{+}\dot
670: {Z}_{n}^{-}\right) }}, \label{Wronskian}%
671: \end{equation}
672: where $\left( Z_{n}^{-}\dot{Z}_{n}^{+}-Z_{n}^{+}Z_{n}^{-}\right) $ is the
673: Wronskian of the Mathieu equation and therefore it is a constant.
674:
675: The substitution of the solution (\ref{string solution}) into the Hamiltonian
676: (\ref{HB}) leads to the expression
677: \begin{align}
678: \mathcal{H}_{\tilde{\eta}} & =\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}C_{n}^{2}\left\{ \left[
679: \left( n^{2}+\nu^{2}+\nu^{2}a^{4}\sin^{2}2\nu\tau\right) Z_{n}^{-}Z_{n}%
680: ^{+}+\dot{Z}_{n}^{-}\dot{Z}_{n}^{+}\right] \left( \alpha_{n}^{\dag}%
681: \alpha_{n}+\tilde{\alpha}_{n}^{\dag}\tilde{\alpha}_{n}\right) \right.
682: \nonumber\\
683: & \text{ \ \ }+\left[ \left( n^{2}+\nu^{2}+\nu^{2}a^{4}\sin^{2}2\nu
684: \tau\right) Z_{n}^{-}Z_{n}^{-}+\dot{Z}_{n}^{-}\dot{Z}_{n}^{-}\right]
685: \alpha_{n}\tilde{\alpha}_{n}\nonumber\\
686: & \text{ \ \ }+\left. \left[ \left( n^{2}+\nu^{2}+\nu^{2}a^{4}\sin^{2}%
687: 2\nu\tau\right) Z_{n}^{+}Z_{n}^{+}+\dot{Z}_{n}^{+}\dot{Z}_{n}^{+}\right]
688: \alpha_{n}^{\dag}\tilde{\alpha}_{n}^{\dag}\right\} .
689: \end{align}
690: It is easy to verify that when $a=0$ the last two terms vanish and the above
691: Hamiltonian reduces to the original one without the background $B$ field.
692:
693: To understand the Hamiltonian better, we need the explicit expression of the
694: functions $Z_{n}^{\pm}$. But in general, the solutions of Mathieu equation can
695: not be written as any known function which is easy to work with. However, in
696: the limit of $a\rightarrow0$, we can use WKB approximation. In this case the
697: solutions have a very simple form
698: \begin{equation}
699: Z_{n}^{\pm}=\exp\left\{ \pm i\sqrt{\lambda_{n}}\left( z-\dfrac{q}%
700: {2\lambda_{n}}\sin2z\right) \right\} . \label{WKB approximation}%
701: \end{equation}
702: The constant $C_{n}$ can then be determined as\footnote{Directly putting the
703: solutions (\ref{WKB approximation}) into (\ref{Wronskian}) will produce a
704: time-dependent $C_{n}$ since (\ref{WKB approximation}) are not exact solutions
705: of the equation of motion (\ref{mathieu}). We need to use the fact that when
706: $\tau\rightarrow0$, the solutions should reduce to the ones without background
707: $B$-field to determine $C_{n}$.}%
708: \begin{equation}
709: C_{n}^{2}=\dfrac{\sqrt{n^{2}+\nu^{2}+\dfrac{\nu^{2}a^{4}}{2}}}{2\left(
710: n^{2}+\nu^{2}+\dfrac{\nu^{2}a^{4}}{4}\right) }\approx\frac{1}{2\sqrt
711: {n^{2}+\nu^{2}}}.
712: \end{equation}
713: With these functions $Z_{n}^{\pm}$ at hand, the Hamiltonian can be expressed
714: as
715: \begin{equation}
716: \mathcal{H}_{\tilde{\eta}}=2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}C_{n}^{2}\left( n^{2}+\nu
717: ^{2}+\nu^{2}a^{4}\sin^{2}2\nu\tau\right) \left( \alpha_{n}^{\dag}\alpha
718: _{n}+\tilde{\alpha}_{n}^{\dag}\tilde{\alpha}_{n}\right) .
719: \end{equation}
720: Finally, the difference between energy and angular momentum $E-J$ is given by
721: the expectation value of the above Hamiltonian , which is
722: \begin{align}
723: E-J & =\dfrac{1}{\nu}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left( \sqrt{n^{2}+\nu^{2}}%
724: +\dfrac{\nu^{2}a^{4}\sin^{2}2\nu\tau}{2\sqrt{n^{2}+\nu^{2}}}\right) \left(
725: N_{n}+\tilde{N}_{n}\right) \nonumber\\
726: & =\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left( \sqrt{1+\dfrac{\lambda n^{2}}{J^{2}}}%
727: +\dfrac{a^{4}\sin^{2}2\nu\tau}{2\sqrt{1+\dfrac{\lambda n^{2}}{J^{2}}}}\right)
728: \left( N_{n}+\tilde{N}_{n}\right) \nonumber\\
729: & =\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left( \sqrt{1+\dfrac{\lambda n^{2}}{J^{2}}}%
730: +\dfrac{2a^{4}u^{2}\left\vert 1-u^{2}\right\vert }{\sqrt{1+\dfrac{\lambda
731: n^{2}}{J^{2}}}}\right) \left( N_{n}+\tilde{N}_{n}\right) ,
732: \label{quantized e-j}%
733: \end{align}
734: where we used $J=\sqrt{\lambda}\nu$ and $u=\cos\nu\tau\in\left[ -1,1\right]
735: $.
736:
737: \section{Holographic Noncommutativity}
738:
739: String field in the modified $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ background (\ref{metric})
740: is conjectured to be dual to the noncommutative Yang-Mills theory on the
741: boundary \cite{9907166,9908134}. Thus, similar to the analysis in
742: \cite{0202021}, the string spectrum should correspond one-to-one to certain
743: operators in the noncommutative Yang-Mills theory. However, the closed string
744: spectrum (\ref{quantized e-j}), which we found in the previous section, is
745: time dependent. At first glance it seems strange that the spectrum depends on
746: time. In fact, this kind of time dependent spectrum has been studied in
747: \cite{0211289,0205258} when the authors tried to quantize the string fields in
748: the non-extremal $NS5$-brane background. The crucial point is that the time
749: $\tau$ in the string spectrum (\ref{quantized e-j}) is not the space-time time
750: $t$, but the world-sheet time. Actually, the world-sheet time $\tau$ is
751: related to the space-time $u$ direction, which measures the energy scale in
752: the holographic description of the boundary field theory
753: \cite{9912012,0205258}. Therefore, the world-sheet time dependent string
754: spectrum corresponds to the operators at the different energy scales and can
755: be interpreted as the RG flow in the dual field theories.%
756:
757: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{7.7591in}{1.7417in}{0pt}{\Qcb{Closed string
758: %fluctuation about the classical solution: (a) without the background $B$
759: %field, the fluctuated string state $a^{\dag}|0\rangle$ is independent of the
760: %world-sheet time $\tau$; (b) with the background $B$ field, the fluctuated
761: %string state $a^{\dag}\left( \tau\right) |0\rangle$ dependents on the
762: %world-sheet time.}}{\Qlb{fig1}}{fig1.eps}%
763: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
764: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
765: %width 7.7591in; height 1.7417in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.6942in;
766: %original-height 1.7037in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "0.9993";
767: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig1.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}} }%
768: %BeginExpansion
769: \begin{figure}
770: [ptb]
771: \begin{center}
772: \includegraphics[
773: trim=0.000000in 0.000000in 0.005386in 0.000000in,
774: height=1.7417in,
775: width=7.7591in
776: ]%
777: {fig1.eps}%
778: \caption{Closed string fluctuation about the classical solution: (a) without
779: the background $B$ field, the fluctuated string state $a^{\dag}|0\rangle$ is
780: independent of the world-sheet time $\tau$; (b) with the background $B$ field,
781: the fluctuated string state $a^{\dag}\left( \tau\right) |0\rangle$
782: dependents on the world-sheet time.}%
783: \label{fig1}%
784: \end{center}
785: \end{figure}
786: %EndExpansion
787:
788:
789: When we consider the closed string states created by the string fluctuation
790: around the classical solution, a string state $a^{\dag}|0\rangle$ corresponds
791: to a operator $\mathcal{O}$\ in the dual field theory (at certain energy scale
792: $\Lambda$) \cite{0202021}. In the absence of background $B$ field, the
793: Hamiltonians of the quadratic fluctuations are time independent, so that the
794: corresponding string state is the same at different world-sheet time $\tau$
795: along the classical path, as in (a) of Fig. \ref{fig1}. Thus the string state
796: corresponds to an operator at the same energy scale in the dual field theory.
797: In the presence of $B$ field , however, the Hamiltonians of the quadratic
798: fluctuations (\ref{H2}) or (\ref{H2 - string}) are time dependent. The string
799: state could absorb or lose energy to change to another string state over time,
800: so that the string state $a^{\dag}\left( \tau\right) |0\rangle$ is different
801: at different time $\tau$ along the classical path, as indicated in (b) of Fig.
802: \ref{fig1}. The claim is that a string state varying with the world-sheet time
803: $a^{\dag}\left( \tau\right) |0\rangle$ corresponds to a scale dependent
804: operator $\mathcal{O}\left( \Lambda\right) $ in the dual field theory
805: running over varying energy scales $\Lambda(\tau)$, i.e. the RG flow in the
806: dual field theory. The correlation functions of the operators $\mathcal{O}%
807: \left( \Lambda\right) $ should satisfy the standard Callan-Symanzik
808: equations. In our case, the dual field theory is conjectured to be
809: noncommutative Yang-Mills theory \cite{9907166,9908134}.
810:
811: For small $u$ the spectrum (\ref{quantized e-j}) reduces to the string
812: spectrum without the background $B$ field , which corresponds to the IR regime
813: of the gauge theory. This is consistent with the expectation that
814: noncommutative Yang-Mills theory reduces to ordinary Yang-Mills theory at long
815: distances. The other important regime of the dual gauge theory is the UV
816: regime. Unfortunately, our result is not able to make any prediction about the
817: UV regime due to the feature of the string spectrum (\ref{quantized e-j}) that
818: $u$ has a finite range and the energy oscillates between $u_{\text{min}}=-1$
819: and $u_{\text{max}}=1$, so that the strings never get to the boundary at
820: $u\rightarrow\infty$ in our configuration. This is because of the special
821: classical solution (\ref{point-like solution}) and (\ref{solution}) we used in
822: our analysis. Both of these solutions only cover the region $\left[
823: -1,1\right] $ in the $u$ direction. To study the UV regime of the dual gauge
824: theory, we need to find other classical path which reaches the boundary of
825: $AdS$ space at $u\rightarrow\infty$. However, we can read some information
826: around $u\rightarrow\infty$ directly from the original metric (\ref{metric}).
827: The coefficient of the terms along the $B$-field directions is invariant under
828: the transformation $u\rightarrow1/\left( a^{2}u\right) $. Thus the physics
829: at $u\rightarrow\infty$ is equivalent to the physics at $u\rightarrow0$. This
830: suggests that we can not reach the boundary of $AdS$ at $u\rightarrow\infty
831: $\ and are not able to define the UV fixed point in the dual noncommutative
832: Yang-Mills theory. This makes perfect sense since a local field theory is
833: defined at short distances, and in terms of the $AdS/CFT$ correspondence this
834: means that the microscopic structure of the theory is encoded on the boundary
835: of the $AdS$ space; on the other hand, the noncommutative Yang-Mills theory is
836: a non-local theory with UV/IR mixing, which implies that we should not be able
837: to define the theory at short distances.
838:
839: \section{Discussion}
840:
841: We studied closed strings in the background $D3$-brane with constant $NS$ $B$
842: field, which is conjectured to be dual to the noncommutative Yang-Mills
843: theory. The closed string spectrum $E-J$ has been computed in the limit
844: $a\rightarrow0$, where $a$ is a noncommutativity parameter. When $a=0$,
845: (\ref{quantized e-j}) reduces to the standard BMN formula corresponding to a
846: $D3$-brane without the background $B$ field as expected. When $a\neq0$, the
847: fluctuation string spectrum becomes time dependent and can be interpreted as
848: the RG flow in the dual noncommutative Yang-Mills theory.
849:
850: A direct check of this duality would be to compare the closed string spectrum
851: (\ref{quantized e-j}) with the anomalous dimension of certain operators in the
852: dual noncommutative Yang-Mills theory. In the case of $\mathcal{N}=4$
853: Yang-Mills theory, the dual operators are \cite{0202021}%
854: \begin{equation}
855: \mathcal{O}\left( x\right) =\text{Tr}\left( Z^{J}\right) \text{,
856: \ Tr}\left( \phi Z^{J}\right) \ldots\label{dual op}%
857: \end{equation}
858: The naive guess of the dual operators in the noncommutative theory would be to
859: replace the ordinary products in the operators (\ref{dual op}) by the Moyal
860: star products as%
861: \begin{equation}
862: \mathcal{O}_{\text{NC}}\left( x\right) =\text{Tr}\left( Z^{\ast J}\right)
863: \text{, \ Tr}\left( \phi^{r}\ast Z^{\ast J}\right) \ldots\label{NC dual op}%
864: \end{equation}
865: where%
866: \begin{equation}
867: \text{Tr}Z^{\ast J}\equiv\text{Tr}\underset{J}{\underbrace{\left( Z\ast
868: Z\ast\cdots\ast Z\right) }},
869: \end{equation}
870: and $Z=\phi^{5}+i\phi^{6}$, $\phi^{r}$, $r=1,2,3,4$ are 6 transverse scalars
871: in the field theory on the $D$ brane.
872:
873: However, the operators in (\ref{NC dual op}) are not gauge invariant. To
874: construct gauge-invariant operators in coordinate space, we define
875: \cite{0008075}%
876: \begin{equation}
877: \mathcal{\hat{O}}_{\text{NC}}\left( k\right) =\int d^{4}x\mathcal{O}%
878: _{\text{NC}}\left( x\right) \ast W\left( x,C\right) \ast e^{ik\cdot x},
879: \label{op k}%
880: \end{equation}
881: where%
882: \begin{equation}
883: W(x,C)=P_{\ast}\exp\left( ig\int_{C}d\sigma\frac{d\zeta^{\mu}}{d\sigma}%
884: A_{\mu}\left( x+\zeta\left( \sigma\right) \right) \right) .
885: \end{equation}
886: Such an operator will be gauge invariant.
887:
888: Gauge invariant operators in coordinate space can also be defined by a
889: noncommutative Fourier transformation as\footnote{However, the above procedure
890: of defining gauge invariant operators in coordinate space is not so clear
891: since these operators require momentum dependent regularization in
892: perturbation theory \cite{0008075}.} \cite{0008144,0102158,0201161}
893: \begin{equation}
894: \mathcal{\hat{O}}_{\text{NC}}\left( \hat{x}\right) =\int d^{4}%
895: y\mathcal{O}_{\text{NC}}\left( y\right) \delta^{\left( 4\right) }\left(
896: \hat{x}-y\right) , \label{op x}%
897: \end{equation}
898: where the noncommutative $\delta$-function%
899: \begin{equation}
900: \delta^{\left( 4\right) }\left( \hat{x}-y\right) \equiv\int\frac{d^{4}%
901: k}{\left( 2\pi\right) ^{4}}e^{-ik\cdot y}e^{ik\cdot\hat{x}}=\int\frac
902: {d^{4}k}{\left( 2\pi\right) ^{4}}e^{-ik\cdot y}W\left( x,C\right) \ast
903: e^{ik\cdot x}.
904: \end{equation}
905: The next job is to calculate the correlation function of the operators
906: $\mathcal{\hat{O}}_{\text{NC}}$ in (\ref{op k}) or (\ref{op x}) to get their
907: anomalous dimensions, and compare them to the string spectrum
908: (\ref{quantized e-j}). We will postpone this to future work.
909:
910: \begin{acknowledgments}
911: Y.Y. would like thank H. Dorn, K. Furuta, Y. Kitazawa, F. Lin, Y. Sekino and
912: C. Zhu for discussions, and also thank the Physics division of National Center
913: for Theoretical Sciences (NCTS) of Taiwan and High Energy Accelerators
914: Research Organization (KEK) of Japan for kind hospitality. This work was
915: supported in part by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and
916: Engineering Research Council of Canada. Y.Y. is also partially supported by a
917: postdoc fellowship from the National Science Council of Taiwan.
918: \end{acknowledgments}
919:
920: \begin{thebibliography}{99} %
921:
922:
923: \bibitem {9711200}J. Maldacena, \emph{The Large N Limit of Superconformal
924: Field Theories and Supergravity}, hep-th/9711200, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 2
925: (1998) 231.
926:
927: \bibitem {0202021}D. Berenstein, J. Maldacena and H. Nastase, \emph{Strings in
928: flat space and pp waves from }$N=4$\emph{\ Super Yang Mills}, hep-th/0202021,
929: JHEP 0204 (2002) 013.
930:
931: \bibitem {0308024}Masako Asano, Yasuhiro Sekino and Tamiaki Yoneya,
932: \emph{PP-Wave Holography for Dp-Brane Backgrounds}, hep-th/0308024, Nucl.Phys.
933: B678 (2004) 197
934:
935: \bibitem {9705221}N. Seiberg, \emph{New Theories in Six Dimensions and Matrix
936: Description of M-Theory on }$T^{5}$\emph{\ and }$T^{5}/Z_{2}$, hep-th/9705221,
937: Phys. Lett. 408B (1997) 98.
938:
939: \bibitem {0205258}V. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and E. Verlinde, \emph{Penrose
940: Limits and Non-local theories}, hep-th/0205258, JHEP 0210 (2002) 020.
941:
942: \bibitem {0305028}P. Matlock, R. Parthasarathy, K. S. Viswanathan and Y. Yang,
943: \emph{NS5 Brane and Little String Duality in the pp-wave Limit},
944: hep-th/0305028, Phys.Rev. D68 (2003) 086001.
945:
946: \bibitem {0211289}G. Papadopoulos, J. Russo and A. Tseytlin, \emph{Solvable
947: model of strings in a time-dependent plane-wave background}, hep-th/0211289,
948: Class.Quant.Grav. 20 (2003) 969.
949:
950: \bibitem {9910092}R.-G. Cai and N. Ohta, \emph{Thermodynamics of Large
951: }$\emph{N}$\emph{ Noncommutative Super Yang-Mills Theory}, hep-th/9910092,
952: Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 124012. \emph{Noncommutative and Ordinary Super
953: Yang-Mills on (D}$\emph{(p-2)}$\emph{, D}$\emph{p}$\emph{) Bound States},
954: hep-th/0001213, JHEP 0003 (2000) 009. \emph{(F1, D1, D3) Bound States, Its
955: Scaling Limits and }$\emph{SL(2,}Z\emph{)}$\emph{ Duality}, hep-th/0007106,
956: Prog. Theor. Phys. 104 (2000) 1073. \emph{Lorentz Transformation and
957: Light-Like Noncommutative SYM}, hep-th/0008119, JHEP 0010 (2000) 036.
958:
959: \bibitem {0209054}S. Bhattacharya, S. Roy, \emph{Penrose limit and NCYM
960: theories in diverse dimensions}, hep-th/0209054, \textbf{\textrm{\textit{\ }}%
961: }JHEP 0303 (2003) 053.
962:
963: \bibitem {9907166}Akikazu Hashimoto, \emph{Non-Commutative Yang-Mills and The
964: AdS/CFT Correspondence}, hep-th/9907166, Phys.Lett. B465 (1999) 142.
965:
966: \bibitem {9908134}J. Maldacena and J. Russo, \emph{Large N Limit of
967: Non-commutative Gauge theories}, hep-th/9908134, JHEP 9909 (1999) 025.
968:
969: \bibitem {0204226}S. Frolov and A. Tseytlin, \emph{Semiclassical quantization
970: of rotating superstring in }$AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$, hep-th/0204226, JHEP 0206
971: (2002) 007.
972:
973: \bibitem {0209116}A. Tseytlin, \emph{Semiclassical quantization fo
974: superstrings: }$AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$\emph{\ and beyond}, hep-th/0209116,
975: Int.J.Mod.Phys. A18 (2003) 981.
976:
977: \bibitem {9805140}S. Gubser and A. Hashimoto, \emph{Exact absorption
978: probabilities for the D3 brane}, hep-th/9805140, Cmmun. Math. Phys. 203 (1999) 325.
979:
980: \bibitem {9912012}Jan de Boer, Erik Verlinde and Herman Verlinde, \emph{On the
981: Holographic Renormalization Group}, hep-th/9912012, JHEP 0008 (2000) 003.
982:
983: \bibitem {0008075}David J. Gross, Akikazu Hashimoto, and N. Itzhaki,
984: \emph{Observables of Non-Commutative Gauge Theories}, hep-th/0008075,
985: Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 4 (2000) 893.
986:
987: \bibitem {0008144}A. Dhar and S. Wadia, \emph{A Note on Gauge Invariant
988: Operators in Noncommutative Gauge Theories and the Matrix Model},
989: hep-th/0008144, Phys.Lett. B495 (2000) 413.
990:
991: \bibitem {0102158}David Berenstein and Robert G. Leigh, \emph{Observations on
992: non-commutative field theories in coordinate space}, hep-th/0102158.
993:
994: \bibitem {0201161}Harald Dorn, \emph{Gauge invariant operators in field
995: theories on non-commutative spaces}, hep-th/0201161, Fortsch.Phys. 50 (2002) 884.
996: \end{thebibliography}
997:
998:
999: \end{document}