1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{amssymb}
4: \DeclareGraphicsRule{.tif}{png}{.png}{`convert #1 `dirname #1`/`basename #1 .tif`.png}
5:
6:
7: \textwidth=6.5in
8: \hoffset=0in
9: \oddsidemargin=0in
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \newcommand{\Mvariable}[1]{{#1}}
14: \newcommand{\Mfunction}[1]{{#1}}
15: \newcommand{\Muserfunction}[1]{{#1}}
16: \newcommand{\overbar}[1]{{\bar{#1}}}
17: \newcommand{\imag}{i}
18:
19: \input{macros}
20:
21: \begin{titlepage}
22: \rightline{}
23:
24: \rightline{hep-th/0408072}
25:
26: \vskip 2cm
27: \begin{center}
28: \Large{{\bf A note on the non-commutative\\ dynamics of spinning D0 branes}}
29: \end{center}
30:
31: \vskip 2cm
32: \begin{center}
33: Duane Loh\footnote{\texttt{Duane\_Loh@hmc.edu}\ Address after September 2004: Cornell University}\ ,\ Kit Rodolfa\footnote{\texttt{Kit\_Rodolfa@hmc.edu}\ Address after September 2004: Cambridge University} and \ Vatche Sahakian\footnote{\texttt{sahakian@hmc.edu}}
34: \end{center}
35: \vskip 12pt
36: \centerline{\sl Keck Laboratory}
37: \centerline{\sl Harvey Mudd}
38: \centerline{\sl Claremont, CA 91711, USA}
39:
40: \vskip 2cm
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43: Rotational dynamics is known to polarize D0 branes into higher dimensional fuzzy D$p$-branes: the tension forces between D0 branes provide the centripetal acceleration,
44: and a puffed up spinning configuration stabilizes. In this work, we consider a rotating cylindrical
45: formation of finite height, wrapping a compact cycle of the background space along the axis of rotation. We find an intriguing
46: relation between the angular speed, the geometry of the
47: cylinder, and the scale of non-commutativity; and we point out a critical radius corresponding to the case where the area of the cylinder is proportional to the number of D0 branes - reminiscent of Matrix black holes.
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \end{titlepage}
51: \newpage
52: \setcounter{page}{1}
53:
54: \section{Introduction and results}
55: \label{intro}
56:
57: D0 branes are natural probes of Planckian dynamics~\cite{Douglas:1996yp}. In a particularly interesting regime, D0 brane coordinates are represented by non-commuting matrices; and
58: one's intuition stemming from a notion of smooth spacetime quickly falters. Non-commutative dynamics
59: entails rich new physics, exotic conclusions, and is a testing ground for quantum gravity\cite{Banks:1997hz}-\cite{Chen:2004jz}. It is then
60: useful to study toy systems involving configurations of D0 branes.
61:
62: A particularly interesting phenomenon of D0 brane dynamics involves a higher dimensional
63: D$p$-brane being dynamically weaved out of polarized D0 branes. Typically, background
64: Ramond-Ramond (RR) fluxes are used to polarize the D0 brane network~\cite{Myers:1999ps,Patil:2004nf}. More recently, Harmark and
65: Savvidy~\cite{Harmark:2000na} have demonstrated that spinning a spherical lump of D0 branes
66: can also lead to a puffed up fuzzy system. In a dual picture, one would talk about a rotating ellipsoidal
67: D2 brane with magnetic flux on the worldvolume. The basic stabilization mechanism involves
68: balancing the tension of strings stretching between the D0 branes with the centripetal
69: acceleration. In~\cite{Savvidy:2000td}, it was shown that such a system is indeed classically stable. These configurations
70: can be interesting settings for black brane computations. Similar structures had inspired the modeling
71: of Matrix black holes whose thermodynamic properties had been shown to agree with that of black holes in Matrix theory~\cite{Banks:1997hz,Horowitz:1997fr,Banks:1997cm,Banks:1997tn}. Yet another interest in D0 brane fuzz-balls arises in brane-world
72: discussions. The worldvolume theory of the resulting higher dimensional D$p$-brane
73: is inherently non-commutative and provides for interesting new phenomena at high
74: energies, when the scale of non-commutativity is probed~\cite{Seiberg:1999vs}.
75:
76: In this work, we consider a cylindrical configuration of D0 branes stabilized by spin. The cylinder
77: is wrapped along its axis of rotation onto a compact cycle of the background space.
78: Finite height cylinders are interesting since they allow one to explore the
79: mixing of several length scales
80: in a non-commutative setting: the size of the background compact
81: cycle or the height of the cylinder, the radius of the cylinder, and the scale of non-commutativity. The size of the compact cycle may also be imagined to be infinite so as to generate an infinite cylinder, as in~\cite{Bak:2001kq}. We would then have a non-commutative worldvolume theory with one non-compact and one compact direction; and
82: the compact direction is stabilized dynamically through rotation.
83:
84: Our problem is described by the following parameters (see Figure~\ref{cylinder}): $N$ is the number of D0
85: \begin{figure}
86: \centerline {
87: \includegraphics[height=3in]{figcylinder.eps}
88: }
89: \caption{The coordinates system used to describe the fuzzy cylinder. The direction labeled $3$ is compact of size $L$.}\label{cylinder}
90: \end{figure}
91: branes; $L$ is the
92: size of the compact cycle; $R$ is the radius of the cylinder; $\omega$ is
93: the angular frequency of rotation;
94: $w$ and $k_1$ are respectively the winding number along the compact cycle and
95: the lateral winding number; finally, the string length $l_s$ sets the scale for lengths, and the string coupling $g_s$
96: is assumed to be small. To simplify matters, we fix $g_s$, $N$, $w$, and $k_1$ to convenient values, and think of the problem in terms of varying $L$, $R$, and $\omega$. The limit $L\rightarrow\infty$,
97: $N\rightarrow \infty$ presumably
98: corresponds to the infinite cylinder, which has been studied in the literature in various
99: settings~\cite{Bak:2001kq,Hashimoto:2004fa,Patil:2004nf,Patil:2004nq}.
100:
101: To study the dynamics, we use the Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) action of~\cite{Tseytlin:1997cs,Myers:1999ps}.
102: We summarize the highlights of our results whereas the details are left to the main text:
103:
104: \begin{itemize}
105: \item We find that the angular speed $\omega$ is related to the other parameters by
106: \bb\label{eq1}
107: \omega=-\frac{4\pi w k_1 L}{\lambda N}\ .
108: \ee
109: The scale of non-commutativity on the
110: worldvolume of the cylinder is $4\pi/N$ in string units. Our analysis is valid if
111: \bb
112: \Omega\equiv \omega R\ll 1\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \omega l_s\ll 1
113: \ee
114: which still leaves $R$ a free parameter. Hence, we now have a two parameter problem.
115:
116: \item In previous works~\cite{Bak:2001kq,Hashimoto:2004fa}, the case of the
117: infinite cylinder was studied and
118: identified as BPS stable, with the radial extent $R$ being a flat direction free
119: to be chosen at no cost in energy\footnote{For other work on related configurations see~\cite{Mateos:2001qs,Hyakutake:2003px,Patil:2004nf,Patil:2004nq,Huang:2004uy,Janssen:2003ri,Janssen:2004jz,Ohta1,Ohta2,Ohta3}}. In our work, we adopt a different representation of the algebra that can accommodate a wrapped
120: cylinder of finite height; with $N$, the number of D0 branes, being finite as well. This involves the mixing of infinite and finite dimensional representations in a delicate recipe.
121:
122: \item We argue for the existence of a critical radius $R_{cr}$ given by
123: \bb
124: R_{cr}=\frac{1}{\omega}\ ,
125: \ee
126: corresponding to the case where the D0 branes are moving with the speed of light. If one
127: considers
128: the possibility that the conjectured symmetrized trace prescription
129: of~\cite{Tseytlin:1997cs,Myers:1999ps} is valid to all orders in the DBI expansion for the simple matrix
130: algebra we have\footnote{In general, the validity has been checked to quadratic order in $\lambda$; discrepancies have been identified in general at the third order~\cite{Taylor:1999gq,Taylor:1999pr,Bilal:2001hb,Koerber:2001uu,deBoer:2003cp}. More validation of the possibility that such corrections are not relevant to our analysis may be found in the Discussion section.}, the action vanishes at this critical radius. This is reminiscent of giant graviton dynamics
131: arising in a different context~\cite{Brodie:2000yz,Janssen:2003ri,Janssen:2004jz}. Furthermore, at $R_{cr}$, we have
132: \bb
133: \mbox{Cylinder area}= \frac{\lambda N}{2}\ .
134: \ee
135: With entropy $S\sim N$
136: for Matrix black holes~\cite{Banks:1997hz,Horowitz:1997fr,Banks:1997tn} - which are
137: qualitatively similar configurations - this is very suggestive of a holographic statement arising
138: in a non-commutative theory at weak string
139: coupling.
140: \end{itemize}
141:
142: These conclusions lend themselves to interesting future directions that we discuss in the last section, where we also comment on the issue of classical radiation from the configuration.
143: In Section 2, we setup the problem and present the solution to the equations of
144: motion. In Section 3, we discuss the critical radius and the dynamics of perturbation modes. And some details
145: of the perturbation analysis may be found in Appendix A.
146:
147: \vspace{0.3in}
148: {\bf Note Added:}
149: In the original version of the preprint, a numerical perturbation analysis was also presented, leading to the identification of unstable modes for certain ratios of the cylinder height to its radius. As pointed out in~\cite{Bak:2001kq}, the algebra describing the cylinder in question saturates a BPS bound, where the central charge is the cylinder's angular momentum, the latter being proportional to the Casimir of the algebra. Hence, the expectation is that the cylinder must be stable in all regions of the parameter space and for all representations of the algebra. In the current version of the preprint, the numerical part of the perturbation analysis has been removed as it apparently leads to unreliable conclusions.
150:
151: \vspace{0.5in}
152: \section{The fuzzy rotating cylinder}
153:
154: We start from the DBI action of~\cite{Tseytlin:1997cs,Myers:1999ps}
155: \bb\label{DBI}
156: S_{DBI}=-T_p\int d^{p+1}\sigma\, \mbox{STr}\lk[
157: e^{-\phi}\sqrt{-\mbox{det}\lk[\mbox{P}\lk[E_
158: {ab}+E_{ai} (Q^{-1}-\delta)^{ij}E_{jb}\re]+\lambda F_{ab}\re]}\sqrt{\mbox{det} Q^i_j}\re]\ ,
159: \ee
160: where
161: \bb
162: Q^{i}_j\equiv\delta^i_j+i\lambda\lk[\Phi^i,\Phi^j\re]\ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \lambda\equiv 2\pi l_s^2\ ,
163: \ee
164: while the nine $\Phi^i$'s are $N\times N$ hermitian matrices representing
165: the non-commutative coordinates of $N$ D$p$-branes.
166: The tension of a D$p$ brane is given by
167: \bb
168: T_p=\frac{2\pi}{g_s \lk(2\pi l_s\re)^{p+1}}\ ,
169: \ee
170: $\mbox{P}[]$ denotes the pullback to the D-brane worldvolume, and $\mbox{STr}$ stands for the symmetrized trace~\cite{Tseytlin:1997cs,Myers:1999ps}.
171: For the task at hand, we consider $N$ D0 branes and zero background fields. In particular, we have
172: in~\pref{DBI}
173: \bb
174: E_{\mu\nu}\equiv G_{\mu\nu}+B_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow\eta_{\mu\nu}\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \phi\rightarrow 0\ ,
175: \ee
176: and the Chern-Simons term is vanishing.
177: This leads to the action
178: \bb\label{action}
179: S_{DBI}=-T_0\int dt\ \mbox{STr} \sqrt{1-\lambda^2 {{\dot{\Phi^i}}}^2}\sqrt{\mbox{det} \lk[\delta^i_j+i\lambda \lk[\Phi^i,\Phi^j\re]\re]}
180: \ee
181: where we have dropped a term of the form
182: \bb
183: \dot{\Phi}^i \dot{\Phi}^j \lk[\Phi_i,\Phi_j\re]\rightarrow 0
184: \ee
185: because of the symmetrized trace prescription\footnote{For the configuration we will write, this term is in fact zero irrespective of the symmetrized trace prescription.}, and we have chosen the non-dynamical gauge field on the worldline to be zero
186: at the expense of imposing the constraint
187: \bb\label{constraint}
188: \lk[\dot{\Phi}^i,\Phi_i\re]=0\ .
189: \ee
190: If we were interested in an approximate form of the dynamics, we can focus on the regime where\footnote{The
191: D0 brane coordinates $\Phi^i$ have dimension of inverse length in these units; in particular,
192: these variables are related to space coordinates by $x\rightarrow \lambda \Phi$.}
193: \bb\label{cond1}
194: \dot{\Phi}^i\ll\frac{1}{l_s^2}\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \ \lk[\Phi^i,\Phi^j\re]\ll\frac{1}{l_s^2}\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \ddot{\Phi}^i\ll\frac{1}{l_s^3}\ .
195: \ee
196: We then arrive at the simpler expression
197: \bb\label{approxaction}
198: S_{DBI}\simeq=-T_0\int dt\ \mbox{STr} \lk[1-\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \lk({D_0{\Phi^i}}\re)^2-\frac{\lambda^2}{4}\lk[\Phi^i,\Phi^j\re]^2+\cdots\re]\ ,
199: \ee
200: where the covariant derivative has been reintroduced
201: \bb\label{theD}
202: D_0\Phi^i=\dot{\Phi}^i+i\lk[A_0,\Phi^i\re]
203: \ee
204: for future reference. For now, we set $A_0=0$ as mentioned above.
205: The equations of motion are
206: \bb\label{eom}
207: \ddot{\Phi}^i=\lk[\Phi^j,\lk[\Phi^i,\Phi_j\re]\re]\ .
208: \ee
209: supplemented by the constraint~\pref{constraint}.
210:
211: \vspace{0.5in}
212: \subsection{A time-dependent solution}
213:
214: Next, our goal is to find a solution to the equations of motion~\pref{eom} subject to the
215: constraint~\pref{constraint} representing $N$ D0 branes forming a fuzzy cylinder of finite height and rotating
216: about its axis of symmetry. We start by singling out three of the space dimensions for
217: embedding the cylinder. We label these three directions by $\Phi^i$, with $i=1,2,3$.
218: Furthermore, we compactify the direction $i=3$ on a circle of circumference $L$ on which
219: we intend to wrap the longitudinal extent of the cylinder (see Figure~\ref{cylinder}).
220: The remaining six transverse polarizations will be denoted by $\Phi^a$.
221:
222: Consider a hermitian matrix $\hat{Y}$, and another matrix $\hat{Z}$ with its complex conjugate $\hat{Z}^\dagger$, satisfying
223: the closed algebra
224: \bb\label{algebra}
225: \lk[\hat{Z},\hat{Z}^\dagger\re]=0\ \ \ ,\ \ \
226: \lk[\hat{Z},\hat{Y}\re]=\omega \hat{Z}\ \ \ ,\ \ \
227: \lk[\hat{Z}^\dagger,\hat{Y}\re]=-\omega \hat{Z}^\dagger\ ,
228: \ee
229: where $\omega$ is a real constant.
230: We will talk about the representation of this algebra in the next section.
231: We construct two new matrices from $\Phi^1$ and $\Phi^2$
232: \bb
233: Z\equiv \Phi^1+i \Phi^2\ \ \ ,\ \ \ Z^\dagger=\Phi^1-i \Phi^2\ .
234: \ee
235: And we write
236: \bb
237: Z=z(t) \hat{Z}\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \Phi^3=\frac{w L}{\lambda}\hat{Y}\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \ \Phi^a=0\ .
238: \ee
239: We have arranged for the cylinder to wind the $3$ direction $w$ times, with $w$ being
240: an arbitrary integer.
241: It is then easy to check that this ansatz satisfies the constraint~\pref{constraint} and
242: the equations~\pref{eom} provided we have
243: \bb
244: z(t)=\frac{R}{\lambda} e^{i\omega t}\ .
245: \ee
246: Here, $R$ is the radius of the rotating cylinder as shown in Figure~\ref{cylinder}.
247:
248: \newpage
249: \subsection{Algebra representation}
250:
251: To proceed with analyzing the properties and perturbations of the solution we found in the
252: previous section, we need to identify a representation of the algebra~\pref{algebra}.
253: The representation we adopt is worked out in detail in~\cite{Uehara:2004vp}, custom designed to depict
254: a wrapped fuzzy cylinder. We first introduce two new operators $\rho$
255: and $\sigma$
256: \bb\label{an}
257: \hat{Y}=\rho\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \hat{Z}=e^{i k_1 \sigma}\ ,
258: \ee
259: satisfying the infinite dimensional algebra.
260: \bb
261: \lk[\sigma,\rho\re]=\frac{4\pi i}{N}\ .
262: \ee
263: $k_1$ is an integer that appears to represent the number of lateral windings of the cylinder.
264: Given the compactification in the $\rho$ direction, we may partially truncate this
265: representation as described in~\cite{Uehara:2004vp}. We focus on $N$ being an odd integer with
266: $N=2 M+1$. A basis of $N\times N$ matrices that describes a wrapped non-commutative cylinder is
267: \bb
268: e(k')\equiv e^{{k'}_1 \sigma + i {k'}_2 \rho}\ .
269: \ee
270: where ${k'}=({k'}_1,{k'}_2)$ represents a pair of integers
271: \bb\label{par1}
272: {k'}_1=p' N+q'\ \ \ \ \mbox{with}\ \ \ q'\in \lk(-M, M\re)\ \ \ \mbox{and}\ \ \ p'\in\lk(-\infty, \infty\re)\ ;
273: \ee
274: \bb\label{par2}
275: {k'}_2=m'\ \ \ \ \mbox{with}\ \ \ m'\in \lk(-M, M\re)\ .
276: \ee
277: Note in particular that the modes for ${k'}_2$ have been truncated.
278: The algebra satisfied by these basis matrices is
279: \bb
280: \lk[ e(k'),e(k'')\re]=-2 i \sin \lk(\frac{2\pi}{N} k'\times k''\re) e(k'+k'')\ ,
281: \ee
282: where $k'\times k''={k'}_1 {k''}_2-{k'}_2 {k''}_1$. And
283: \bb\label{alg1}
284: \lk[\rho, e(k')\re]=\frac{4\pi {k'}_1}{N} e(k')\ .
285: \ee
286: The explicit forms are given by~\cite{Uehara:2004vp}
287: \bbb\label{rep1}
288: \rho\rightarrow
289: -2\pi i \del_\theta \lk(
290: \begin{array}{ccccc}
291: 1 & & & & \\
292: & 1 & & & \\
293: & & 1 & & \\
294: & & & \ddots & \\
295: & & & & 1
296: \end{array}
297: \re)
298: +4\pi\lk(
299: \begin{array}{ccccc}
300: \frac{M}{N} & & & & \\
301: & \frac{M-1}{N} & & & \\
302: & & \frac{M-2}{N} & & \\
303: & & & \ddots & \\
304: & & & & -\frac{M}{N}
305: \end{array}
306: \re)\ .
307: \eee
308: \bbb\label{rep2}
309: & &e^{i(p' N+q')\sigma+i m' \rho}\rightarrow \nonumber \\
310: & &\lk\{
311: \begin{array}{cl}
312: \tau^{p'} \gamma^{-m' (q'+1)}
313: \lk(
314: \begin{array}{cccccc}
315: \overbrace{0\ \ \cdots\ \ 0}^{q'} & 1 & & & & \\
316: & 0 & \gamma^{-2 m'} & & & \\
317: & & \ddots & \ddots & & \\
318: & & & & 0 & \gamma^{-2(N-q'-1)m'} \\
319: \gamma^{-2(N-q')m'}\tau & & & & & 0 \\
320: \ddots & & & & & \vdots \\
321: \underbrace{0\ \ \cdots\ \ 0}_{q'-1} & \gamma^{-2(N-1)m'}\tau & & & & 0
322: \end{array}
323: \re) & q'>0\\
324: \tau^{p'} \gamma^{-m'}
325: \lk(
326: \begin{array}{ccccc}
327: 1 & & & & \\
328: & \gamma^{-2 m'} & & & \\
329: & & \gamma^{-4 m'} & & \\
330: & & & \ddots & \\
331: & & & & \gamma^{-2(N-1)m'}
332: \end{array}
333: \re) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ q'=0& \\
334: \tau^{p'-1}\gamma^{-m'(q'+1)}
335: \lk(
336: \begin{array}{cccccc}
337: \overbrace{0\ \ \cdots\ \ 0}^{N+q'} & 1 & & & & \\
338: & 0 & \gamma^{-2 m'} & & & \\
339: & & \ddots & \ddots & & \\
340: & & & & 0 & \gamma^{-2(-q'-1)m'} \\
341: \gamma^{-2(-q')m'}\tau & & & & & 0 \\
342: \ddots & & & & & \vdots \\
343: \underbrace{0\ \ \cdots\ \ 0}_{N+q'-1} & \gamma^{-2(N-1)m'}\tau & & & & 0
344: \end{array}
345: \re) & q'<0
346: \end{array}
347: \re.
348: \eee
349: Here, we have defined
350: \bb
351: \tau=e^{2\,i \theta}\ \ \ ,\ \ \ \gamma=e^{\frac{2\pi i}{N}}\ ,
352: \ee
353: where $\theta$ is a parameter used to label the infinite dimensional sector of the
354: representation.
355:
356: Tracing in this representation becomes
357: \bb
358: \mbox{Tr}\rightarrow \int d\theta\ \mbox{Tr}\ .
359: \ee
360: We then have the orthogonality statement
361: \bb
362: \mbox{Tr}\lk[e(k') e(k'')\re]=e^{-\frac{2\pi i}{N} k'\times k''}\mbox{Tr}\lk[e(k'+k'')\re]=
363: N \delta_{k',-k''}\ ;
364: \ee
365: and we also get
366: \bb\label{zz}
367: \hat{Z}\hat{Z^\dagger}=\mbox{1}\ \ \ \,\ \ \ {\hat{Z}}^N=\tau^{k_1}\ .
368: \ee
369:
370: With these expressions at hand, we may now verify that
371: \bb
372: {\Phi^1}^2+{\Phi^2}^2=\frac{R^2}{\lambda^2}\mbox{{\bf 1}}\ .
373: \ee
374: It is also easy to check that our solution carries angular
375: momentum in the 3 direction given by
376: \bb
377: M_{12}\equiv T_0\lambda^2\mbox{Tr}\lk[\dot{\Phi}^2\Phi^1-\dot{\Phi}^1\Phi^2\re]=T_0 N R^2 \omega\ ;
378: \ee
379: while the other components are zero. $\omega$ is obviously the angular speed about the $3$ axis.
380: More interestingly, we find from~\pref{alg1} that we need
381: \bb\label{omega}
382: \omega=-\frac{4\pi w L k_1}{\lambda N}\ .
383: \ee
384: Note that $w$ is the number of windings of the cylinder in the $3$ directions, $k_1$ is the
385: number of windings in the lateral direction, and $4\pi/N$ is the scale of
386: non-commutativity on the cylinder's worldvolume in string units.
387: Hence, the angular speed is fixed once the
388: representation is fixed. We may make the intuitive statement that the angular speed in units of $R$ is
389: the ratio of the area of the cylinder to the number of D0 branes $N$.
390:
391: \vspace{0.5in}
392: \section{A critical radius and perturbations of the cylinder}
393:
394: Our solution is parameterized by the following constants: $N$, the number of D0 branes; $R$, the radius of the cylinder; $L$, the
395: compact size of the $3$ direction; $\omega$, the angular speed; and two integers $w$ and $k_1$
396: representing windings. $\omega$ however was fixed in the previous section (see equation~\pref{omega}). For fixed $N$, $w$ and $k_1$, we are then dealing
397: with a two parameter problem, $R$ and $L$.
398:
399: The solution is valid provided the conditions~\pref{cond1} are satisfied. This translates to
400: \bb\label{regime}
401: \Omega=\omega R\ll 1\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \ \omega l_s\ll 1\ .
402: \ee
403: Hence, $R$ is unrestricted. We also note that
404: $\omega\ll 1/l_s$ may be independently achieved by making either $L$ small or $N$ large.
405:
406: First, we observe that one can now write
407: \bb
408: \mbox{det}\lk[\delta^i_j+i\lambda\lk[\Phi^i,\Phi^j\re]\re]=1+\lambda^2 \omega^2 |z|^2\ .
409: \ee
410: Substituting our solution in~\pref{action}, the full form of the action, we get
411: \bb\label{o4}
412: S_{DBI}=-T_0 N \int dt\ \sqrt{1-\Omega^4}\ .
413: \ee
414: However, this assumes that the
415: symmetrized trace prescription is good for arbitrary order in the expansion of the square
416: roots in~\pref{action}. While it is possible that, for this particular simple algebra, additional
417: corrections to the DBI - as well as corrections to the symmetrized trace prescription - may vanish\footnote{More about this issue in the Discussion section.}, this assumption is generally incorrect. For now, our goal however is to use the guess to the extent of
418: corroborating the existence of a critical maximum radius for which the D0 branes are moving with the speed of light.
419: And indeed as confirmed from equation~\pref{o4}, this radius is
420: \bb
421: R_{cr}=\frac{1}{\omega}\ ,
422: \ee
423: for which the potential (and action) vanishes. Furthermore, we then have
424: \bb
425: \lk(2\pi R_{cr}\re) L=\frac{\lambda N}{2}\ .
426: \ee
427: Hence, the area of the cylinder equals $\lambda N/2$, an interesting holographic statement
428: as eluded to in the Introduction.
429:
430: Next, we consider the dynamics of perturbations of the cylinder for $\Omega\ll 1$. We would then write
431: \bb\label{expansion}
432: \Phi^1=\Phi^1_0+{\hat{\phi}}^1\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \
433: \Phi^2=\Phi^2_0+{\hat{\phi}}^2\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \
434: \Phi^3=\Phi^3_0+{\hat{\phi}}^3\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \
435: \Phi^a={\hat{\phi}}^a\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \
436: A_0=\hat{a}\ ,
437: \ee
438: where the $0$ subscripts refer to the solution of the previous sections. Note that we fluctuate
439: the gauge field $A_0$ of~\pref{theD} as well. We will then use the equation of motion arising from
440: varying $a$ to restrict
441: perturbation modes to physical degrees of freedom.
442: It is more
443: convenient to parameterize some of these perturbations differently. We write instead\footnote{To see this, first write formally (\ie\ no matrix
444: structure necessarily implied)
445: \bb
446: \Phi^1=(R+r) \cos (\Theta+\theta)\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \
447: \Phi^2=(R+r) \sin (\Theta+\theta)\ .
448: \ee
449: Then, expand for small $r$ and $\epsilon$ and elevate things back to matrices while symmetrizing over
450: ambiguous orderings.
451: We then relabel things in terms of dimensionless parameters $\theta\rightarrow\hat{\epsilon}_\theta$
452: and $r\rightarrow\hat{\epsilon}_r$.}
453: \bb
454: {\hat{\phi}}^1=-(\Phi^2_0 \hat{\epsilon}_\theta+\hat{\epsilon}_\theta \Phi^2_0)+(\Phi^1_0 \hat{\epsilon}_r+\hat{\epsilon}_r \Phi^1_0)\ .
455: \ee
456: \bb
457: {\hat{\phi}}^2=(\Phi^1_0 \hat{\epsilon}_\theta+\hat{\epsilon}_\theta \Phi^1_0)+(\Phi^2_0 \hat{\epsilon}_r+\hat{\epsilon}_r \Phi^2_0)\ .
458: \ee
459: Now, we expand the
460: small perturbations in the matrix basis of the previous section
461: \bb
462: \hat{\epsilon}_\theta=\sum_{k'}\theta_{k'} e(k')\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \ \
463: \hat{\epsilon}_r=\sum_{k'}r_{k'} e(k')\ .
464: \ee
465: \bb
466: {\hat{\phi}}^3=\sum_{k'} \frac{\epsilon^3_{k'}}{R} e(k')\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \ \ {\hat{\phi}}^a=\sum_{k'} \frac{\epsilon^a_{k'}}{R} e(k')\ \ \ \ ,\ \ \ \ \hat{a}=\sum_{k'} {a_{k'}} e(k')\ .
467: \ee
468: Note that we have made sure that $\epsilon^3_{k'}$ and $\epsilon^a_{k'}$ are
469: dimensionless for convenience; and we have reality conditions relating modes of opposite signs, such as
470: $r_{k'}^*=r_{-k'}$. We also
471: use the shorthand (see equations~\pref{par1} and~\pref{par2})
472: \bb
473: \sum_{k'}\equiv \sum_{p'=-\infty}^{\infty}\sum_{q'=-M}^{M}\sum_{m'=-M}^{M}\ ,
474: \ee
475: To assure that an expansion in the $\varepsilon$'s makes sense, we require
476: \bb\label{conditions}
477: r_{k'} , \theta_{k'}\ll 1\ \ \ ,\ \ \ {{\varepsilon}}^3_{k'}\ll \frac{N\omega R}{4\pi k_1}\ .
478: \ee
479: Substituting~\pref{expansion} into~\pref{approxaction}, and using the commutation relations
480: \bb
481: \lk[\Phi^3_0, e(k')\re]=\frac{w L}{\lambda} \frac{4\pi {k'}_1}{N} e(k')\ ;
482: \ee
483: \bb
484: \lk[Z_0,e(k')\re]=-2 i \frac{R}{\lambda} e^{i\omega t} \sin\lk(\frac{2\pi}{N} k\times k'\re) e(k+k')\ ;
485: \ee
486: \bb
487: \lk[Z^\dagger_0,e(k')\re]=2 i \frac{R}{\lambda} e^{-i\omega t} \sin\lk(\frac{2\pi}{N} k\times k'\re) e(-k+k')\ ,
488: \ee
489: one can write the worldvolume theory of small perturbations. We emphasize that this analysis is restricted to the regime prescribed by~\pref{regime}.
490:
491: As far as perturbation modes in the six transverse directions are concerned, we find that all these modes are diagonal with mass squared given by
492: \bb\label{transverse}
493: m_{trans}^2=
494: {\frac{4 R^2}{\lambda^2}
495: {\sin^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,{k_1}\,{l_2}}{N}\re)}
496: +{\omega }^2\,
497: \frac{{{l_1}}^2}{k_1^2}} >0\ ,
498: \ee
499: where $l_1$ and $l_2$ are integers to be described below.
500:
501: The interesting physics occurs in the 1-2-3 subspace where there are two physical
502: degrees of freedom (due to the constraint in the system). The details of this analysis are collected in Appendix A. The final action is given by $S_1+S_2+S_3$, where $S_1$, $S_2$, and $S_3$ are defined in~\pref{s1}, \pref{s2}, and \pref{s3} respectively.
503:
504: \vspace{0.5in}
505: \section{Discussion}
506:
507: We end with a few comments about the matter of classical radiation. In the dual picture, the system is to be described by a cylindrical
508: D2 brane with magnetic and electric fields on the worldvolume accounting for the dissolved D0 branes
509: and rotation.
510: It is easy to see that, from this static viewpoint, one expects zero radiation from the RR 1-form
511: gauge field.
512: In the picture involving the D0 branes explicitly, zero 1-form radiation is a much more non-trivial
513: statement. Yet, it is expected that the conclusion agrees with the dual picture, presumably the two being
514: related by some Seiberg-Witten map~\cite{Seiberg:1999vs}. Considering the Chern-Simons coupling from~\cite{Myers:1999ps},
515: one easily finds
516: \bb
517: C_i= \frac{J_i(k,\omega)}{{\vec{k}}^2-\omega^2}\ ,
518: \ee
519: where $C_i(k,\omega)$ is the Fourier mode of the 1-form RR gauge field.
520: The source is identified as~\cite{Myers:1999ps}
521: \bb\label{}
522: J_i(k,\omega)\simeq \int dt\ e^{-i\omega t} \mbox{STr} \lk[e^{-i\lambda \Phi^j k_j} {\dot{\Phi}}^i\re]\ .
523: \ee
524: Considering linear order in $\lambda$, it is easy to check that
525: $\mbox{STr} [\Phi^j {\dot{\Phi}}^i]$ is time independent resulting in zero radiated power.
526: Indeed, one can see that this pattern repeats to all orders: we have $\dot{Z}=\omega Z$
527: and ${\dot{Z}}^\dagger=-\omega Z^\dagger$; and hence terms of the form
528: $\mbox{STr } x\cdots x$ where $x$ stands for a $Z$ or a $Z^\dagger$ (wavefronts cannot
529: have a component in the 3 direction by symmetry). The number of
530: $Z$'s and $Z^\dagger$'s must equal so that the trace does not vanish (see in particular equation~\pref{zz}). But this also
531: cancels all time dependences from the source leaving zero radiated power through the
532: RR 1-form. This suggests that the symmetrized trace prescription and the DBI action seem to be working well
533: for our solution to all orders in $\lambda$. It would also be interesting to see what conclusions are reached with
534: regards to gravitational and RR 3-form radiation.
535:
536: \vspace{0.5in}
537: \section{Appendix A: Some details of the perturbation analysis}
538:
539: In this appendix, we collect some of the details of the perturbation analysis.
540: For notational convenience, we relabel some of the
541: perturbations as $\theta_{k'}\equiv \epsilon_{k'}^1$ and $r_{k'}\equiv \epsilon_{k'}^2$.
542: Expanding our action to quadratic order (for
543: $\epsilon_{k'}^1 , \epsilon_{k'}^2\ll 1$, ${{\epsilon}}^3_{k'}\ll {N\omega R}/{4\pi k_1}$) in the small perturbations, one finds three
544: pieces
545: after a bit of algebra: from the kinetic term without the gauge field fluctuations
546: taken into account, we get
547: \bbb\label{s1}
548: S_1&=&N\,R^2\,{\omega }^2 + 4\,N\,R^2\,{\omega }^2\,{\epsilon }_0^2 +
549: 4\,N\,R^2\,\omega \,{{\dot{\epsilon}
550: }_0}^1 \nonumber \\ &+& 4\,N\,R^2\,{\cos^2 (\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}
551: {N})}\,\left( {{\dot{\epsilon}}^1_{-l}}+\omega \,{\epsilon}_{-l}^2
552: \right)
553: \,\left({{\dot{\epsilon}}^1_l}+ \omega \,{\epsilon}_{l}^2
554: \right) \nonumber \\ &+&
555: 4\,N\,R^2\,{\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,
556: \left( {{\dot{\epsilon}}^2_{-l}}-\omega \,{\epsilon}_{-l}^1
557: \right)
558: \,\left({{\dot{\epsilon}}^2_l} -\omega \,{\epsilon}_{l}^1
559: \right) \nonumber \\ &+&
560: N\,{\lambda }^2\,{{\dot{\epsilon}}^3_
561: {-l}}\,{{\dot{\epsilon}}^3_l}
562: + N\,{\lambda }^2\,{{{\dot{\epsilon}}^a
563: }_{-l}}\,{{\dot{\epsilon}}^a_
564: l}\ .
565: \eee
566: From the quartic potential, we obtain
567: \bbb\label{s2}
568: S_2&=&-N\,R^2\,{\omega }^2 -
569: 4\,N\,R^2\,{\omega }^2\,{\epsilon }_0^2 -
570: {4\,N\,R^2\,{\omega }^2\,
571: {\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,
572: {\left( 1 + \frac{{{l_1}}^2}{{{k_1}}^2} \right)} \,{\epsilon}_{-l}^1\,
573: {\epsilon}_{l}^1} \nonumber \\ &-&
574: { 8\,\imag \,N\,R^2\,{\omega }^2\,
575: {\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,\frac{l_1}{k_1}\,
576: {\epsilon}_{-l}^2\,{\epsilon}_{l}^1} +
577: {8\,\imag \,N\,R^2\,{\omega }^2\,
578: {\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,\frac{l_1}{k_1}\,
579: {\epsilon}_{-l}^1\,{\epsilon}_{l}^2} \nonumber \\
580: &+&
581: {4\,N\,R^2\,{\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,
582: \left( -2\,\frac{R^2}{\lambda^2} - {\omega }^2 +
583: 2\,\frac{R^2}{\lambda^2}\,\cos \lk(\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)\,
584: - \,{\omega }^2\,\frac{{{l_1}}^2}{k_1^2} \right) \,
585: {\epsilon}_{-l}^2\,{\epsilon}_{l}^2} \nonumber \\ &-&
586: {2\,N\,R^2\,\omega \,\sin (\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}
587: {N})\,\frac{{{l}}_1}{k_1}\,{\epsilon}_{-l}^3\,{\epsilon}_{l}^1}
588: - {2\,N\,R^2\,\omega \,
589: \sin \lk(\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)\,\frac{{{l}}_1}{k_1}\,
590: {\epsilon}_{-l}^1\,{\epsilon}_{l}^3}\nonumber \\ &+&
591: 4\,\imag \,N\,R^2\,\omega \,
592: \sin \lk(\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)\,{\epsilon}_{-l}^3\,
593: {\epsilon}_{l}^2 -
594: 4\,\imag \,N\,R^2\,\omega \,
595: \sin \lk(\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)\,{\epsilon}_{-l}^2\,
596: {\epsilon}_{l}^3 \nonumber \\ &-& 4\,N\,R^2\,
597: {\sin^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,
598: {\epsilon}_{-l}^3\,{\epsilon}_{l}^3 -
599: {N\,\left( 4\,R^2\,{\sin^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}
600: + {\lambda }^2\,{\omega }^2\,\frac{{{l_1}}^2}{k_1^2} \right) \,
601: {\epsilon }_{-l}^a\,{\epsilon }_l^a}
602: \ .
603: \eee
604: Finally, we solve the equations of motion for the gauge field fluctuation modes $a_{l}$
605: \bbb
606: a_l&=&-\frac{2\, \imag \,{k_1^2}\, R^2}{4\,R^2\,{\sin^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,
607: {{k_1}}^2 + {\lambda }^2\,{\omega }^2\,{{l_1}}^2} \nonumber \\
608: &\times & \left( 2\,\omega \,
609: {\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,
610: {\epsilon}_{l}^1 -\sin \lk(\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)\, \lk({{\dot{\epsilon} }_l}^1+
611: 2\,\,\omega \,
612: {\epsilon}_{l}^2
613: \re) +
614: {\lambda }^2\,\frac{\omega}{2\,R^2} \,\frac{l_1}{k_1}\,
615: {{\dot{\epsilon}}^3_l} \right)
616: \eee
617: and substitute back into the action; this gives the additional piece
618: \bbb\label{s3}
619: S_3&=&-\frac{N\,R^4}{4\,R^2\,{\sin^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,
620: {{k_1}}^2 + {\lambda }^2\,{\omega }^2\,{{l_1}}^2} \nonumber \\
621: &\times & \,\left(
622: \frac{{\lambda }^2}{R^2}\,\omega \,{l_1}\,
623: {{\dot{\epsilon}}^3_{-l}}+4\,\omega \,
624: {\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,{k_1}\,
625: {\epsilon}_{-l}^1 -2\,{{{k}}_1}\,\sin \lk(\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)\,\lk(
626: {{ \dot{\epsilon} }_{-l}^1}+2\, \omega \,
627: {\epsilon}_{-l}^2
628: \re)
629: \right) \nonumber \\
630: &\times &\left(
631: \frac{{\lambda }^2}{R^2}\,\omega \,{l_1}\,
632: {{\dot{\epsilon}}^3_l} +4\,\omega \,
633: {\cos^2 \lk(\frac{2\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)}\,{k_1}\,
634: {\epsilon}_{l}^1 -2\,{{{k}}_1}\,\sin \lk(\frac{4\,\pi \,k\times l}{N}\re)\,\lk({{\dot{\epsilon}}_l^1}+2\,\omega \,
635: {\epsilon}_{l}^2
636: \re)\right)
637: \eee
638: Our system is now given by $S_1+S_2+S_3$.
639: %\bibliographystyle{hplain}
640: %\bibliography{biblio}
641:
642: \newpage
643: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
644:
645: \bibitem{Bak:2001kq}
646: Dongsu Bak and Ki-Myeong Lee.
647: \newblock Noncommutative supersymmetric tubes.
648: \newblock {\em Phys. Lett.}, B509:168--174, 2001, hep-th/0103148.
649:
650: \bibitem{Banks:1997cm}
651: Tom Banks, W.~Fischler, and Igor~R. Klebanov.
652: \newblock Evaporation of schwarzschild black holes in matrix theory.
653: \newblock {\em Phys. Lett.}, B423:54--58, 1998, hep-th/9712236.
654:
655: \bibitem{Banks:1997hz}
656: Tom Banks, W.~Fischler, Igor~R. Klebanov, and Leonard Susskind.
657: \newblock Schwarzschild black holes from matrix theory.
658: \newblock {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}, 80:226--229, 1998, hep-th/9709091.
659:
660: \bibitem{Banks:1997tn}
661: Tom Banks, W.~Fischler, Igor~R. Klebanov, and Leonard Susskind.
662: \newblock Schwarzschild black holes in matrix theory. II.
663: \newblock {\em JHEP}, 01:008, 1998, hep-th/9711005.
664:
665: \bibitem{Bilal:2001hb}
666: Adel Bilal.
667: \newblock Higher-derivative corrections to the non-abelian Born- Infeld action.
668: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B618:21--49, 2001, hep-th/0106062.
669:
670: \bibitem{Brodie:2000yz}
671: John~H. Brodie, Leonard Susskind, and N.~Toumbas.
672: \newblock How Bob Laughlin tamed the giant graviton from Taub-Nut space.
673: \newblock {\em JHEP}, 02:003, 2001, hep-th/0010105.
674:
675: \bibitem{Chen:2004jz}
676: Yi-Fei Chen and J.~X. Lu.
677: \newblock Dynamical brane creation and annihilation via a background flux.
678: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0405265.
679:
680: \bibitem{deBoer:2002we}
681: Jan de~Boer, Eric Gimon, Koenraad Schalm, and Jeroen Wijnhout.
682: \newblock Evidence for a gravitational Myers effect.
683: \newblock 2002, hep-th/0212250.
684:
685: \bibitem{deBoer:2003cp}
686: Jan de~Boer, Koenraad Schalm, and Jeroen Wijnhout.
687: \newblock General covariance of the non-abelian DBI-action: Checks and
688: balances.
689: \newblock 2003, hep-th/0310150.
690:
691: \bibitem{Dijkgraaf:1997vv}
692: Robbert Dijkgraaf, Erik Verlinde, and Herman Verlinde.
693: \newblock Matrix string theory.
694: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B500:43--61, 1997, hep-th/9703030.
695:
696: \bibitem{Douglas:1996yp}
697: Michael~R. Douglas, Daniel Kabat, Philippe Pouliot, and Stephen~H. Shenker.
698: \newblock D-branes and short distances in string theory.
699: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B485:85--127, 1997, hep-th/9608024.
700:
701: \bibitem{Gregory:1993vy}
702: R.~Gregory and R.~Laflamme.
703: \newblock Black strings and p-branes are unstable.
704: \newblock {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}, 70:2837--2840, 1993, hep-th/9301052.
705:
706: \bibitem{Harmark:2000na}
707: Troels Harmark and Konstantin~G. Savvidy.
708: \newblock Ramond-Ramond field radiation from rotating ellipsoidal membranes.
709: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B585:567--588, 2000, hep-th/0002157.
710:
711: \bibitem{Hashimoto:2004fa}
712: Koji Hashimoto.
713: \newblock The shape of non-abelian D-branes.
714: \newblock {\em JHEP}, 04:004, 2004, hep-th/0401043.
715:
716: \bibitem{Horowitz:1997fr}
717: Gary~T. Horowitz and Emil~J. Martinec.
718: \newblock Comments on black holes in matrix theory.
719: \newblock {\em Phys. Rev.}, D57:4935--4941, 1998, hep-th/9710217.
720:
721: \bibitem{Huang:2004uy}
722: Wung-Hong Huang.
723: \newblock Condensation of tubular D2-branes in magnetic field background.
724: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0405192.
725:
726: \bibitem{Hyakutake:2003px}
727: Yoshifumi Hyakutake.
728: \newblock Notes on the construction of the D2-brane from multiple D0- branes.
729: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B675:241--269, 2003, hep-th/0302190.
730:
731: \bibitem{Janssen:2003ri}
732: Bert Janssen, Yolanda Lozano, and Diego Rodriguez-Gomez.
733: \newblock A microscopical description of giant gravitons. ii: The AdS(5) x S(5)
734: background.
735: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B669:363--378, 2003, hep-th/0303183.
736:
737: \bibitem{Ohta1}
738: N.~Ohta and J.-G.~Zhou,
739: \newblock Nucl. Phys. {\bf B522} (1998) 125, hep-th/9801023,
740:
741: \bibitem{Ohta2}
742: D.~Bak and N.~Ohta,
743: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B527} (2002) 131, hep-th/0112034,
744:
745: \bibitem{Ohta3}
746: Y.~Hyakutake and N.~Ohta,
747: \newblock Phys. Lett. {\bf B539} (2002) 153, hep-th/0204161.
748:
749: \bibitem{Janssen:2004jz}
750: Bert Janssen, Yolanda Lozano, and Diego Rodriguez-Gomez.
751: \newblock Giant gravitons in AdS(3) x S(3) x T**4 as fuzzy cylinders.
752: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0406148.
753:
754: \bibitem{Koerber:2001uu}
755: Paul Koerber and Alexander Sevrin.
756: \newblock The non-abelian born-infeld action through order alpha'**3.
757: \newblock {\em JHEP}, 10:003, 2001, hep-th/0108169.
758:
759: \bibitem{Li:1998jy}
760: Miao Li, Emil~J. Martinec, and Vatche Sahakian.
761: \newblock Black holes and the SYM phase diagram.
762: \newblock {\em Phys. Rev.}, D59:044035, 1999, hep-th/9809061.
763:
764: \bibitem{Mateos:2001qs}
765: David Mateos and Paul~K. Townsend.
766: \newblock Supertubes.
767: \newblock {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}, 87:011602, 2001, hep-th/0103030.
768:
769: \bibitem{Motl:1997th}
770: Lubos Motl.
771: \newblock Proposals on nonperturbative superstring interactions.
772: \newblock 1997, hep-th/9701025.
773:
774: \bibitem{Myers:1999ps}
775: Robert~C. Myers.
776: \newblock Dielectric-branes.
777: \newblock {\em JHEP}, 12:022, 1999, hep-th/9910053.
778:
779: \bibitem{Tseytlin:1997cs}
780: A.~A. Tseytlin.
781: \newblock On non-abelian generalisation of the Born-Infeld action in string
782: theory.
783: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B501:41--52, 1997, hep-th/9701125.
784:
785: \bibitem{Patil:2004nf}
786: Subodh~P. Patil.
787: \newblock D0 matrix mechanics: New fuzzy solutions at large N.
788: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0406219.
789:
790: \bibitem{Patil:2004nq}
791: Subodh~P Patil.
792: \newblock D0 matrix mechanics: Topological dynamics of fuzzy spaces.
793: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0407182.
794:
795: \bibitem{Ramgoolam:2004gw}
796: S.~Ramgoolam, B.~Spence, and S.~Thomas.
797: \newblock Resolving brane collapse with 1/N corrections in non- abelian DBI.
798: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0405256.
799:
800: \bibitem{Sahakian:2000bg}
801: Vatche Sahakian.
802: \newblock Transcribing spacetime data into matrices.
803: \newblock {\em JHEP}, 06:037, 2001, hep-th/0010237.
804:
805: \bibitem{Savvidy:2000td}
806: Konstantin~G. Savvidy and George~K. Savvidy.
807: \newblock Stability of the rotating ellipsoidal D0-brane system.
808: \newblock {\em Phys. Lett.}, B501:283--288, 2001, hep-th/0009029.
809:
810: \bibitem{Seiberg:1999vs}
811: Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten.
812: \newblock String theory and noncommutative geometry.
813: \newblock {\em JHEP}, 09:032, 1999, hep-th/9908142.
814:
815: \bibitem{Taylor:1999gq}
816: IV~Taylor, Washington and Mark Van~Raamsdonk.
817: \newblock Multiple D0-branes in weakly curved backgrounds.
818: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B558:63--95, 1999, hep-th/9904095.
819:
820: \bibitem{Taylor:1999pr}
821: IV~Taylor, Washington and Mark Van~Raamsdonk.
822: \newblock Multiple Dp-branes in weak background fields.
823: \newblock {\em Nucl. Phys.}, B573:703--734, 2000, hep-th/9910052.
824:
825: \bibitem{Uehara:2004vp}
826: Shozo Uehara and Satoshi Yamada.
827: \newblock Wrapped membranes, matrix string theory and an infinite dimensional
828: Lie algebra.
829: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0402012.
830:
831: \bibitem{ring1}
832: Vitor Cardoso and Jos'{e} Lemos.
833: \newblock New instability for rotating black branes and strings.
834: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0412078.
835:
836: \bibitem{ring2}
837: Giovanni Arcioni and Ernesto Lozano-Tellechea.
838: \newblock Stability and Critical Phenomena of Black Holes and Black Rings.
839: \newblock 2004, hep-th/0412118.
840:
841: \end{thebibliography}
842:
843:
844: \end{document}
845:
846: