1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage {graphicx}
3: \textwidth=165mm \textheight=220mm
4:
5: \newcommand{\dfrac}{\displaystyle\frac}
6: \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum}
7: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
8: \newcommand{\lb}{\linebreak}
9: \newcommand{\q}{\quad}
10: \newcommand{\qq}{\qquad}
11:
12: \title{ON THE THEORY OF INTERACTING FIELDS\\
13: IN FOLDY-WOUTHUYSEN REPRESENTATION\footnote{This paper was written
14: by the author in 1988 and executed as a report of RFNC-VNIIEF. It
15: is the author's view that the results of the efforts continue to
16: be
17: topical, so they are offered to the reader in the form of paper.}}
18: \author{V. P. Neznamov}
19: \begin{document}
20: \maketitle
21:
22: %\section*{ABSTRACT}
23: \begin{abstract}
24: The paper considers quantum electrodynamics (QED) and weak
25: interaction of elementary particles in the lower orders of the
26: perturbation theory using nonlocal Hamiltonian $H_{FW}$ in the
27: Foldy-Wouthuysen ($FW$) representation. Feynman rules in the $FW$
28: representation are specified, specific QED processes are
29: calculated. Cross sections of Coulomb scattering of electrons,
30: M\"oller scattering, Compton effect, electron self-energy, vacuum
31: polarization, anomalous magnetic moment of electron, Lamb shift of
32: atomic energy levels are calculated. The possibility of the
33: scattering matrix expansion in powers of the coupling constant, in
34: which matrix elements $S_{fi}$ contain no terms with fermion
35: propagators, is demonstrated for external fermion lines
36: corresponding to real particles (antiparticles).
37:
38: It is shown that a method to include the interaction of real
39: particles with antiparticles in the $FW$ representation is to
40: introduce negative mass particles and antiparticles to the theory.
41: The theory is degenerate with respect to the particle
42: (antiparticle) mass sign, however the masses of the particle and
43: antiparticle interacting with each other should be of opposite
44: sign.
45:
46: QED in the $FW$ representation is invariant under $C$, $P$, $T$
47: inversions. The weak interaction breaks the $C$ and $P$
48: invariance, but preserves the combined $CP$ parity. In the theory
49: there is a possibility to relate the break of $CP$ invariance to
50: total or partial removal of the degeneracy in particle
51: (antiparticle) mass sign.
52: \end{abstract}
53: \newpage
54: %\section*{ANNOTATION}
55:
56: %Quantum electrodynamics and weak interaction of elementary
57: %particles in the lower orders of the perturbation theory are
58: %considered using nonlocal Hamiltonian \textit{H}$_{FW}$ in the
59: %Foldy-Wouthuysen (\textit{FW}) representation. Specific QED
60: %processes are calculated. The possibility of the scattering matrix
61: %expansion in powers of the coupling constant with elements
62: %\textit{S}$_{fi}$ without fermion propagators is demonstrated for
63: %external fermion lines corresponding to real particles
64: %(antiparticles). It is shown that a method to include the
65: %interaction of real particles with antiparticles in the
66: %\textit{FW} representation is to introduce negative mass particles
67: %and antiparticles to the theory. In this case the theory is
68: %symmetric about the particle (antiparticle) mass sign, but the
69: %mass signs in the particle and antiparticle interacting with each
70: %other should be opposite. QED in the \textit{FW} representation is
71: %invariant under \textit{C, P, T} inversions. The weak interaction
72: %does not preserve the \textit{C} and \textit{P} parities, but does
73: %preserve the combined \textit{C P} parity. In the theory there is
74: %a possibility to relate the break of \textit{CP} symmetry to total
75: %or partial removal of the degeneracy in particle (antiparticle)
76: %mass sign.
77:
78:
79: \section*{INTRODUCTION}
80:
81: Historically, the first equation describing the $\dfrac12$-spin
82: particle with electromagnetic field has been non-relativistic
83: Pauli equation
84: \begin{equation}
85: \label{eq1} p_{0} \varphi \left( {x} \right) = \left[
86: {\dfrac{{\left( {\vec {p} - e\vec {A}\left( {x} \right)}
87: \right)^{2}}}{{2m}} - \dfrac{{e\vec {\sigma} \vec {B}}}{{2m}} +
88: eA_{0} \left( {x} \right)} \right] \varphi \left( {x} \right)
89: \end{equation}
90:
91: In (\ref{eq1}) and hereinafter the system of units $\hbar = c = 1$
92: is used; $x$, $p$, $A$ are 4-vectors; $xy =\lb= x^{\mu} y_{\mu}
93: = x^{0}y^{0} - x^{k}y^{k}$, $\mu = 0,1,2,3$, $k = 1,2,3$ as
94: usual; $p^{\mu} = i\dfrac{{\partial} }{{\partial x^{\mu} }}$;
95: $\vec {B} = rot\vec {A}$; $\sigma ^{k}$ are Pauli matrices;
96: $\varphi \left( {x} \right)$ is a two-component wave function.
97:
98: Then Dirac derived his famous relativistic equation describing the
99: $\dfrac{1}{2}$-spin particle motion. Given the interaction with
100: magnetic field, the Dirac equation takes the form:
101: \begin{equation}
102: \label{eq2} p_{0} \psi _{D} \left( {x} \right) = \left[ {\vec
103: {\alpha} \left( {\vec {p} - e\vec {A}\left( {x} \right)} \right) +
104: \beta m + eA_{0} \left( {x} \right)} \right] \psi _{D} \left( {x}
105: \right),
106: \end{equation}
107: $\psi _{D} \left( {x} \right)$ --- is the four-component wave function,
108: $\alpha ^{i} = \left( {\begin{array}{cc}
109: 0 &\sigma ^{i} \\
110: \sigma ^{i} &0
111: \end{array}}\right)$,
112: $\beta = \left( {\begin{array}{cc}
113: I &0 \\
114: 0 &-I
115: \end{array}} \right)$ are the Dirac matrices. The Dirac
116: equation, unlike equation (\ref{eq1}), is linear in components of
117: impulse $p^{\mu} $ and is readily representable in the explicitly
118: covariant form. The Pauli equation is a nonrelativistic limit of
119: the Dirac equation for the upper components of the wave function
120: $\psi _{D} \left( {x} \right)$.
121:
122: In principle, the relativistic generalization of the Pauli
123: equation could be performed in a different way with using the
124: relativistic relation between energy and particle impulse as a
125: basis when there are no external fields. This was actually done by
126: Foldy and Wouthuysen in their classic paper \cite{1}. The
127: Foldy-Wouthuysen equation for free motion is
128: \begin{equation}
129: \label{eq3} p_{0} \psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = \left( {H_{0}}
130: \right)_{FW} \Psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = \beta E\Psi _{FW}
131: \left( {x} \right)
132: \end{equation}
133:
134: In (\ref{eq3}) $E = \sqrt {\vec {p}^{\,2} + m^{2}} $.
135:
136: Solutions to (\ref{eq3}) are plane waves of positive and negative
137: energies
138: \begin{equation}
139: \label{eq4} \psi _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} \left( {x,s} \right)
140: = \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3/2}}}U_{s} e^{ - ipx},\q
141: \psi _{FW}^{\left( { -} \right)} \left( {x,s} \right) =
142: \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3/2}}}V_{s} e^{ipx},\q p_{0}
143: = \left( {\vec {p}^{\,2} + m^{2}} \right)^{1/2}
144: \end{equation}
145:
146: In (\ref{eq4})
147: $U_{s} = \left( \begin{array}{c}
148: \chi_{s}\\
149: 0
150: \end{array}\right)$, $V_s=\left( \begin{array}{c}
151: 0\\[-2pt]
152: \chi_{s}
153: \end{array} \right)$, $\chi_s$ are two-component normalized Pauli
154: spin functions.
155:
156: The following orthonormalization-completeness relationships are
157: valid for $U_{s} $ and $V_{s} $:
158: \begin{equation}
159: \label{eq5}
160: \begin{array}{l}
161: U_{s}^{ +} U_{s^{'}} = V_{s}^{ +} V_{s^{'}} = \delta _{ss^{'}} ;\q U_{s}^{
162: +} V_{s^{'}} = V_{s}^{ +} U_{s^{'}} = 0; \\
163: \dsum\limits_{s} {} \left( {U_{s}} \right)_{\gamma} \left( {U_{s}^{ +} }
164: \right)_{\delta} = \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta}
165: \right)_{\gamma \delta} ;\quad \dsum\limits_{s} {} \left( {V_{s}}
166: \right)_{\gamma} \left( {V_{s}^{ +} } \right)_{\delta} =
167: \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I-\beta} \right)_{\gamma \delta}. \\
168: \end{array}
169: \end{equation}
170:
171: In (\ref{eq4}), (\ref{eq5}) $\gamma ,\delta $ refer to the spinor
172: subscripts, $s$ to the spin ones. In (\ref{eq5}) and below the
173: summation symbol and the subscripts themselves are omitted in the
174: summation over the spinor subscripts.
175:
176: Hamiltonian $\left( {H_{0}} \right)_{FW} $ is related with free
177: Dirac Hamiltonian $\left( {H_{0}} \right)_{D} $ by the unitary
178: transformation. In equation (\ref{eq3}) definite asymmetry of
179: space coordinates and time is seen, although it is
180: Lorentz-invariant by itself.
181:
182: In the general case of the interaction with external
183: electromagnetic field $A^{\mu} \left( {x} \right)$ there is no
184: exact unitary transformation that would transform Dirac equation
185: (\ref{eq2}) to Foldy-Wouthuysen $\left( {FW} \right)$
186: representation. In this case Foldy and Wouthuysen found
187: Hamiltonian $\left( {H_{FW}} \right)$ in the form of series in
188: terms of powers of $1/m$ \cite{1}.
189:
190: Blount \cite{2} found Hamiltonian $\left( {H_{FW}} \right)$ in
191: the form of series in terms of powers of the smallness of fields
192: and their time and space derivatives. Case \cite{3} obtained an
193: accurate transformation in the presence of time-independent
194: external magnetic field $\vec {B} = rot\vec {A}$. In this case the
195: Dirac equation is transformed to equation
196: \begin{equation}
197: \label{eq6} p_{0} \psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = H_{FW} \psi
198: _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = \beta \sqrt {\left( {\vec {p} - e\vec
199: {A}} \right)^{2} - e\vec {\sigma} \vec {B} + m^{2}} \cdot \psi
200: _{FW} \left( {x} \right).
201: \end{equation}
202:
203: The author obtains the relativistic Hamiltonian $\left( {H_{FW}}
204: \right)$ in the form of series in terms of powers of charge $e$ in
205: the general case of interaction with external field $A^{\mu}
206: \left( {x} \right)$ \cite{4}.
207:
208: In all the cases considered, in the Foldy-Wouthuysen
209: representation the equations for wave functions are of
210: noncovariant form and their Hamiltonians are nonlocal. In the $FW$
211: representation there is no relation between the upper and lower
212: wave function components, that is, $H_{FW} $ is essentially a
213: two-component Hamiltonian.
214:
215: With the advent of the relativistic Hamiltonian $\left( {H_{FW}}
216: \right)$ obtained in ref. \cite{4}, it became possible to consider
217: the $FW$ representation of quantum-field processes in the context
218: of the perturbation theory. Why is it interesting irrespective of
219: the non-covariance of the Dirac equation in the Foldy-Wouthuysen
220: representation, nonlocality, and relative complexity of the
221: expressions for Hamiltonian?
222:
223: First, a number of paradoxes characteristic of the Dirac
224: representation are resolved in the $FW$ representation. In the
225: $FW$ representation, in the free case, the velocity operator is of
226: habitual form $\vec {V} = \dfrac{{\vec {p}}}{{E}}$, which is close
227: to the classic form (in the Dirac representation, $\vec {V} = \vec
228: {\alpha} $), there is no electron "jitter" (Zitterbewegung), the
229: spin operator remains unchanged in time \cite{1}.
230:
231: Second, since in Hamiltonian $H_{FW} $ there is no relation of the
232: initial (final) states to positive energy and of final (initial)
233: states to negative energy, in the quantum field theory there will
234: be no interactions of real particle-antiparticle pairs. To include
235: these processes, additional terms must be introduced to the
236: Hamiltonian $H_{FW} $.
237:
238: In this connection the consideration of the quantum field theory
239: in the $FW$ representation can lead to new physical consequences
240: and re-interpretation of the habitual terms in the Dirac
241: representation.
242:
243: Section 1 of this paper is devoted to quantum electrodynamics in
244: the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation. Here Hamiltonian $H_{FW} $ is
245: given in the form of series in terms of powers of $e$, Feynman
246: rules in the$FW$ representation are specified, results of
247: calculations of specific QED processes are discussed. For the
248: case, where the external fermion lines correspond to real
249: particles (antiparticles), the possibility of the scattering
250: matrix expansion in powers of $e$, in which scattering matrix
251: elements \textit{S}$_{fi}$ contain no terms with electron-positron
252: propagators, is demonstrated.
253:
254: The formulas for vertex operators are therewith close in their
255: structure to those of the "old", noncovariant perturbation theory
256: developed by Heitler \cite{5}.
257:
258: Next, Section 1 demonstrates that a method to include the external
259: electron-positron pair interaction in the $FW$ representation is
260: to introduce the relationship between the solutions to the
261: $FW$-transformed Dirac equations with positive and negative
262: particle (antiparticle) mass. In so doing the positive-mass
263: particles (antiparticles) interact with one another and with
264: negative-mass antiparticles (particles). Conversely, negative-mass
265: particles (antiparticles) interact with one another and with
266: positive-mass antiparticles (particles). The theory is degenerate
267: with respect to the particle (antiparticle) mass sign, however the
268: masses of the particle and antiparticle interacting with each
269: other should be of opposite signs. It should be particularly
270: emphasized that in the context under discussion the particle mass
271: sign is an internal quantum number not related by the author in
272: this paper to the gravitational interaction sign. Of course, the
273: negative-mass particle energy is therewith positive. Note that
274: previously the conclusion of the opposite signs in the particle
275: and antiparticle masses was made by Recami and Ziino \cite{6} when
276: analyzing the special relativity theory and conditions of
277: reversibility "particle $ \leftrightarrow $ antiparticle". The
278: suggested form of QED in the $FW$ representation is invariant
279: under $P,C,T$ transformations.
280:
281: Section 2 is devoted to the theory of weak interaction in the
282: $FW$representation. The weak interaction is considered in the
283: lower order of the perturbation theory, in the $V$-$A$ form of the
284: four-fermion interaction. The weak current in the $FW$
285: representation is determined explicitly. Like in the Dirac
286: representation, weak interactions break the $P$ and $C$
287: invariance, but preserve the combined $CP$ parity. In the theory
288: there is a possibility to relate the $CP$ invariance break to the
289: partial removal of the degeneracy in particle (antiparticle) mass
290: sign.
291:
292: \section{QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS IN THE\\
293: FOLDY-WOUTHUYSEN REPRESENTATION\\ \cite{4}, \cite{7}, \cite{8}}
294: \subsection {Interaction Hamiltonian in the $FW$ representation}
295:
296: In notation of ref. \cite{4} Dirac equation for quantized
297: electron-positron field in the $FW$ re\-presentation is written as
298: \begin{equation}\label{eq7}
299: \begin {array}{l}
300: p_{0} \psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = H_{FW} \psi
301: _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = \left( {\beta E + K_{1} + K_{2} + K_{3}
302: + \ldots} \right)\psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right),\\ K_{1} \sim e,\q
303: K_{2} \sim e^{2},\q K_{3} \sim e^{3}.
304: \end{array}
305: \end{equation}
306:
307: In the impulse representation, with electromagnetic field
308: expansion in plane waves
309: \[
310: A_{\mu} \left( {\vec {x},t} \right) = \sum\limits_{\nu = \pm 1} {} \int
311: {A_{\mu k}^{\left( {\nu} \right)} e^{i\nu k_{o} t}e^{ - i\vec {k}\vec
312: {x}}d\vec {k}}
313: \]
314: \noindent matrix elements of interaction Hamiltonian terms $K_{1}
315: ,K_{2} $ can be written as
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: \label{eq8} && \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| {K_{1}} \right|{\kern
318: 1pt} \vec {p}'' \rangle = \sum\limits_{\nu = \pm 1} {}
319: \dfrac{{\beta E^{''} - \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0} }}{{R^{'} +
320: R^{''}}}\left( { - \dfrac{{1}}{{\beta E^{'} + \beta E^{''} - \nu
321: k_{0}} } \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| {RLN} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''}
322: \rangle -} \right. \nn\\
323: &&\left. - \dfrac{{1}}{{\beta E^{'} + \beta E^{''} + \nu k_{0}} } \langle \vec
324: {p}^{\,'}\left| {NLR} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle
325: \right)+ \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}
326: \left| C \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle;\\
327: %\end{eqnarray}
328: %\begin{eqnarray}
329: \label{eq9} && \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| {K_{2}} \right|\vec
330: {p}^{\,''} \rangle = \sum\limits_{\nu ,\nu ^{'} = \pm 1} {} \int
331: {d\vec {p}^{\,'''}\left\{ {\dfrac{{\beta E^{''} - \beta E^{'} -
332: \nu k_{0} - \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} }{{R^{'} + R^{''}}} \times}
333: \right.} \nn\\ && \times\left[ \dfrac{1}{\left( {\beta E^{'} +
334: \beta E^{'''} - \nu k_{0}} \right)\left( {\beta E^{''} - \beta
335: E^{'''} - \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)}\right. \langle \vec
336: {p}^{\,'}\left| R\left( {C + \xi} \right) \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''}
337: \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| K_{1} \right|\vec
338: {p}^{\,''} \rangle + \nn\\ && + \dfrac{1}{\left( {\beta E^{''} +
339: \beta E^{'''} + \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)\left( {\beta E^{'''} -
340: \beta E^{'} - \nu ^{}k_{0}^{}} \right)} \langle \vec
341: {p}^{\,'}\left| K_{1} \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec
342: {p}^{\,'''}\left| \left( {C + \xi ^{ +} } \right)\left. {R}
343: \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \right. \rangle - \nn\\ &&
344: - \dfrac{1}{\left( {\beta E^{''} + \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0} - \nu
345: ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)\left( {\beta E^{''} + \beta E^{'''} - \nu
346: ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| R\left( {N +
347: \varphi} \right) \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec
348: {p}^{\,'''}\left| N \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle + \nn\\ && +
349: \dfrac{1}{\left( {\beta E^{''} + \beta E^{'} + \nu k_{0} + \nu
350: ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)\left( {\beta E^{'''} + \beta E^{'} + \nu
351: ^{}k_{0}^{} } \right)} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| N \right|\vec
352: {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| \left( {N +
353: \varphi ^{ +} } \right)R \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle - \nn\\
354: &&
355: - \dfrac{1}{\left( {\beta E^{''} + \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0} - \nu
356: ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)\left( {\beta E^{''} - \beta E^{'''} - \nu
357: ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| R\left( {C +
358: \xi} \right) \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec
359: {p}^{\,'''}\left| C \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle - \nn\\ &&
360: \left. - \dfrac{1}{\left( {\beta E^{''} + \beta E^{'} + \nu k_{0}
361: + \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)\left( {\beta E^{'''} - \beta E^{'} -
362: \nu ^{}k_{0}^{} } \right)} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| C
363: \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left|
364: \left( {C + \xi ^{ +} } \right)R \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle
365: \right] + \nn\\
366: &&+\dfrac{1}{R^{'} + R^{''}}\left[ -
367: \dfrac{{\beta E^{''} - \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0} - \nu
368: ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} }{{\left( {\beta E^{'''} - \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0}}
369: \right)\left( {\beta E^{''} - \beta E^{'''} - \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}}
370: \right)}} \right. \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| RC \right|\vec
371: {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| K_{1} \right|
372: \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle + \nn\\ && + \dfrac{\beta E^{''} - \beta
373: E^{'} - \nu k_{0} - \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'} }{\left( {\beta E^{'''} -
374: \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0}} \right)\left( {\beta E^{''} - \beta
375: E^{'''} - \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \right)} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left|
376: K_{1} \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec
377: {p}^{\,'''}\left| CR \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle + \nn\\ && +
378: \dfrac{1}{\beta E^{'''} - \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0}} \langle \vec
379: {p}^{\,'}\left| RK_{1} \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle
380: \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| K_{1} \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle -
381: \nn\\ && - \dfrac{1}{\beta E^{''} - \beta E^{'''} - \nu
382: ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| K_{1} \right|\vec
383: {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| K_{1} R \right|
384: \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle + \nn\\ && + \dfrac{1}{\beta E^{''} -
385: \beta E^{'''} - \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| RC
386: \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left|C
387: \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle - \nn\\ && - \dfrac{1}{\beta
388: E^{'''} - \beta E^{'} - \nu k_{0}} \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| C
389: \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| CR
390: \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle + \nn\\ && + \dfrac{1}{\beta
391: E^{''} + \beta E^{'''} - \nu ^{'}k_{0}^{'}} \langle \vec
392: {p}^{\,'}\left| RN \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec
393: {p}^{\,'''}\left| N \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle + \nn\\ &&
394: \left.\left. + \dfrac{1}{\beta E^{'''} + \beta E^{'} + \nu k_{0}}
395: \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| N \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle
396: \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| NR \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle
397: \right]\right\}.
398: \end{eqnarray}
399: In (\ref{eq9})
400: $\xi = - \dfrac{{1}}{{R}}\left( {A_{0} + \vec
401: {\alpha} \vec {A}\dfrac{{\beta \vec {\alpha} \vec {p}}}{{E + m}}}
402: \right) R,\qq
403: \varphi = \dfrac{{1}}{{R}}\left( {A_{0} \dfrac{{\beta \vec {\alpha} \vec
404: {p}}}{{E + m}} + \vec {\alpha} \vec {A}} \right) R$,\\ \noindent
405: $\xi ^{ +} ,\varphi ^{ +} $ are operators Hermitean conjugate to
406: $\xi ,\varphi $.
407:
408: In (\ref{eq8}) and (9) operators $C,\,N,\,L,\,R$ are
409: \[
410: \begin{array}{l}
411: C = eR\left( {A_{0} - L A_{0} L} \right)R - eR\left( {L
412: \vec {\alpha} \vec {A} - \vec {\alpha} \vec {A} L} \right)R,
413: \\
414: N = eR\left( {LA_{0} - A_{0} L} \right)R - eR\left( {\vec {\alpha
415: }\vec {A} - L\vec {\alpha} \vec {A} L} \right)R, \\
416: L = \dfrac{{\beta \vec {\alpha} \vec {p}}}{{E + m}}, \quad R = \sqrt {\dfrac{{E
417: + m}}{{2E}}} .
418: \end{array}
419: \]
420:
421: The expressions for $C,\,R$ are even operators, that is the
422: operators not relating the upper and lower components of wave
423: functions $\Psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right)$; accordingly, the
424: expressions for $N,L$ are odd operators. The interaction
425: Hamiltonian terms $K_{1} ,K_{2}, \ldots$, as they must, are even
426: operators.
427:
428: An algorithm for determination of the $K_{1} ,K_{2} $ and the
429: following terms of the expansion in powers of $e$ is given in ref.
430: \cite{4}. Appendix 1 of this paper briefly presents the algorithm
431: for determination of Hamiltonian terms $K_{1}$, $K_{2}$, $K_{3}$.
432:
433:
434: \subsection{Feynman rules in the $FW$ representation}
435:
436: The Feynman propagator of the Dirac equation in the
437: Foldy-Wouthuysen representation is
438: \begin{eqnarray}
439: \label{eq10} && S_{FW} \left( {x - y} \right) =
440: \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{4}}}\int {d^{4}p\dfrac{{e^{ -
441: i\rho \left( {x - y} \right)}}}{{\rho _{0} - \beta E}}} =
442: \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{4}}}\int {d^{4}p } e^{ -
443: i\rho \left( {x - y} \right)} \dfrac{{p_{0} + \beta E}}{{p^{2} -
444: m^{2} + i\varepsilon} } = \nn\\ && = - i\theta \left( {x_{0} -
445: y_{0}} \right)\int {d\vec {p}\sum\limits_{s} {\psi _{FW}^{\left(
446: { +} \right)} \left( {x,s} \right) \left( {\psi _{FW}^{\left( {
447: +} \right)} \left( {y,s} \right)} \right)}} ^{ +} + \nn\\ && +
448: i\theta \left( {y_{0} - x_{0}} \right)\int {d\vec
449: {p}\sum\limits_{s} {\psi _{FW}^{\left( { -} \right)} \left( {x,s}
450: \right) \left( {\psi _{FW}^{\left( { -} \right)} \left( {y,s}
451: \right)} \right)}} ^{ +}.
452: \end{eqnarray}
453:
454: Eq. (\ref{eq10}) implies the Feynman rule of pole bypass;
455: $
456: \theta \left( {x_{0}} \right) = \left\{\begin{array}{ll} 1, &
457: x_{0}> 0;\\ 0, & x_{0}<0. \end{array}\right. $
458:
459: The integral equation for $\psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right)$ is
460: \begin{equation}
461: \label{eq11} \psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = \psi _{0} \left( {x}
462: \right) + \int {d^{4}yS_{FW} \left( {x - y} \right) \left( {K_{1}
463: + K_{2} + \ldots} \right) \psi _{FW} \left( {y} \right)}.
464: \end{equation}
465:
466: In (\ref{eq11}) $\psi _{0} \left( {x} \right)$ is the solution to
467: the Dirac equation in the $FW$representation in the absence of
468: electromagnetic field $\left( {A^{\mu} = 0} \right).$
469:
470: Expressions (\ref{eq10}), (\ref{eq11}) allow us to formulate the
471: Feynman rules for recording elements of scattering matrix $S_{fi}
472: $ and calculating QED processes. In contrast to the Dirac
473: representation, in the \textit{FW} representation there is an
474: infinite set of types of photon interaction vertices depending on
475: the perturbation theory order: the vertex of interaction with one
476: photon is correspondent with factor $\left( { - i(K_{1})_\mu }
477: \right)$, the vertex of interaction with two photons with factor
478: $\left( { - i(K_{2})_{\mu \nu} } \right)$ and so on. For
479: convenience the corresponding parts of the terms of interaction
480: Hamiltonian $K_{1} ,K_{2},\ldots$ without electromagnetic
481: potentials $A^{\mu} ,A^{\mu} A^{\nu} ,\ldots$ are denoted by
482: $(K_{1})_\mu ,(K_{2})_{\mu \nu} ,\ldots$.
483:
484: Each external fermion line is correspondent with one of functions
485: (\ref{eq4}). As usually, positive energy solutions correspond to
486: particles, negative energy solutions to antiparticles. The other
487: Feynman rules remain the same as those in the spinor
488: electrodynamics in the Dirac representation.
489:
490: \subsection{Calculations of QED processes in the
491: $FW$ representation}
492:
493: The formulated Feynman rules have been used to consider some QED
494: processes in the first and second orders of the perturbation
495: theory. Cross sections of Coulomb scattering of electrons,
496: M\"oller scattering, Compton effect, electron self-energy, vacuum
497: polarization, anomalous magnetic moment of electron, Lamb shift of
498: atomic energy levels have been calculated. Below are given the
499: Feynman diagrams of the processes considered. The brief details of
500: the calculations can be found in Appendix 2.
501:
502: The final results of calculations of the QED processes, whose
503: diagrams are presented in Figs. 1---5, agree with the relevant
504: data calculated in the Dirac representation. The radiation
505: corrections to the electron scattering in the external field (Fig.
506: 6) in the mass and charge renormalization provide a proper value
507: of the anomalous magnetic electron and Lamb shift of energy
508: levels.
509:
510: A feature of the theory is that in the terms of the interaction
511: Hamiltonian $K_{n} $ (except $K_{1} $) there is an even number
512: \textit{N} of odd operators relating the initial and final states
513: of positive energy to the intermediate states of negative energy
514: and vice versa. Thanks to this, for example, the diagram of Fig.~5
515: appears that relates to the electron-positron vacuum polarization.
516: In this theory there is no habitual diagram for the vacuum
517: polarization with two vertices of the first order in $e$ because
518: operator $K_{1} $ is even.
519:
520: When the external fermion line impulses lie on the mass surface
521: $\left( {p^{2} = m^{2}} \right)$, an interesting feature of the
522: theory is the compensation of the contribution of the fermion
523: propagator diagrams with that of the relevant terms in the
524: diagrams with vertices of the higher order of the expansion in
525: \textit{e}. Thus, in Fig. 3 the contribution of diagrams {\em a)}
526: and {\em c)} is compensated with the relevant parts of the
527: contribution of diagrams {\em b)} and {\em d)}; the contribution
528: of diagram {\em a)} in Fig. 4 is cancelled with the contribution
529: of the corresponding part of diagram {\em b)}; in Fig. 6 the
530: contribution of diagrams {\em a), b), c)} is cancelled with that
531: of the corresponding part of diagram {\em d)}, a similar
532: compensation occurs for diagrams {\em e), f), g)} and {\em h); i),
533: j), k)} and {\em l)}, respectively. For the real external fermions
534: under discussion the vertex operators $K_{n} $ get therewith
535: simplified significantly because of the law of conservation of
536: energy-momentum (see, e. g., (\ref{eq8}), (\ref{eq9})).
537:
538: In view of the aforesaid, the scattering matrix can be expanded in
539: powers of \textit{e} so, that the matrix elements $S_{fi} $
540: contain no terms with electron-positron propagators. In so doing
541: the vertex operator matrix elements alter as follows:
542: \begin{eqnarray}
543: && \label{eq12}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left|
544: {K_{1}} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle \to \langle \vec
545: {p}^{\,'}\left| {C} \right| \vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle;\\ &&
546: \label{eq13}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left|
547: {K_{2}} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle \to \sum\limits_{\nu
548: _{2} = \pm 1} {\int {d\vec {p}^{\,'''}\left\{ {\dfrac{{1}}{{\beta
549: E^{''} - \beta E^{'''} - \nu _{2} k_{2}^{0}} } \langle \vec
550: {p}^{\,'}\left| {C} \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec
551: {p}^{\,'''}\left| {C} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle +} \right.}}
552: \nn\\ &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! + \left.\dfrac{{1}}{{\beta E^{''} +
553: \beta E^{'''} - \nu _{2} k_{2}^{0}} } \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left|
554: {N} \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left|
555: {N} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle
556: \right\};\\
557: && \label{eq14}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left|
558: {K_{3}} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle \to \sum\limits_{\nu _{1}
559: \nu _{2} = \pm 1} {\int {d\vec {p}^{\,'''}d\vec
560: {p}^{\,IV}\dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {\beta E^{IV} - \beta E^{'} - \nu
561: _{1} k_{1}^{0} - \nu _{2} k_{2}^{0}} \right) \left( {\beta
562: E^{'''} - \beta E^{'} - \nu _{1} k_{1}^{0}} \right)}}} \times} \nn
563: \\ &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \times \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| {C}
564: \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| {C}
565: \right| \vec {p}^{\,IV}\!\! \rangle \langle \vec
566: {p}^{\,IV}\!\!\left| {C} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle -
567: \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {\beta E^{IV} + \beta E^{'} + \nu _{1}
568: k_{1}^{0} + \nu _{2} k_{2}^{0}} \right) \left( {\beta E^{'''} -
569: \beta E^{'} - \nu _{1} k_{1}^{0}} \right)}} \times \nn\\ &&
570: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\times \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| {C}
571: \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| {N}
572: \right| \vec {p}^{\,IV}\!\! \rangle \langle \vec
573: {p}^{\,IV}\!\!\left| {N} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle +
574: \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {\beta E^{IV} + \beta E^{'} + \nu _{1}
575: k_{1}^{0} + \nu _{2} k_{2}^{0}} \right) \left( {\beta E^{'''} +
576: \beta E^{'} + \nu _{1} k_{1}^{0}} \right)}} \times \nn\\ &&
577: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\times \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| {N}
578: \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| {C}
579: \right| \vec {p}^{\,IV}\!\! \rangle \langle \vec
580: {p}^{\,IV}\!\!\left| {N} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle -
581: \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {\beta E^{IV} - \beta E^{'} - \nu _{1}
582: k_{1}^{0} - \nu _{2} k_{2}^{0}} \right) \left( {\beta E^{'''} +
583: \beta E^{'} + \nu _{1} k_{1}^{0}} \right)}} \times\nn\\
584: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \times \langle \vec {p}^{\,'}\left| {N}
585: \right|\vec {p}^{\,'''} \rangle \langle \vec {p}^{\,'''}\left| {N}
586: \right| \vec {p}^{\,IV}\!\! \rangle \langle \vec
587: {p}^{\,IV}\!\!\left| {C} \right|\vec {p}^{\,''} \rangle.
588: \end{eqnarray}
589:
590: Relations (\ref{eq13}), (\ref{eq14}) are close in their structure
591: to the formulas of the ``old'', noncovariant perturbation theory
592: developed by Heitler in the Dirac representation \cite{5}.
593: Expressions (\ref{eq13}), (\ref{eq14}) can be derived from the
594: relations of the Heitler's perturbation theory, if the \textit{FW}
595: transformation is performed for the free case of $A^{\mu} \left(
596: {x} \right) = 0$ in the matrix elements of the Heitler's
597: quantities $\left( {K_{n}}\right)_{Í}$ (therewith $\alpha _{\mu}
598: A^{\mu} \left( {x} \right)\, \to \,\left( {C + N} \right)$) and
599: nonzero terms (even in the upper and lower components of states $
600: \langle \left. {A_{FW}} \right|$ and $\left| {B_{FW} \rangle}
601: \right.$) are left in products $ \langle A_{FW} \left| {\left( {C
602: + N} \right)\left( {C + N} \right)\ldots} \right|B_{FW} \rangle $
603: that have appeared. It seems that this rule can be extended to the
604: higher terms of the expansion in \textit{e} as well.
605:
606: A significant difference of expressions (\ref{eq13}),
607: (\ref{eq14}), etc. from the formulas of ref. \cite{5} is absence
608: of any interaction between real electrons and positrons because
609: the Hamiltonian in the \textit{FW} representation is even.
610: In this representation the electron-positron interaction can be
611: only between the real and intermediate virtual states.
612:
613: \begin{figure}[p]
614: \noindent
615: \begin{minipage}[c]{75mm}
616: \includegraphics[width=75mm,height=55mm]{n1.eps}
617: \caption{Electron scattering in Coulomb field}
618: \end{minipage}\hfill\noindent
619: \begin{minipage}[c]{90mm}
620: \includegraphics[width=90mm,height=55mm]{n2.eps}
621: \caption{Electron scattering on Dirac proton (M\"oller
622: scattering)}
623: \end{minipage}
624: %\end{figure}
625: %\begin{figure}[hbt]
626: \includegraphics[width=170mm,height=50mm]{n3.eps}
627: \caption{Compton effect}
628: %\end{figure}
629: %\begin{figure}[hbt]
630: \includegraphics[width=170mm,height=35mm]{n4.eps}
631: \caption{Electron self-energy}
632: %\end{figure}
633: %\begin{figure}[hbt]
634: \begin{center}
635: \includegraphics[width=60mm,height=35mm]{n5.eps}
636: \caption{Vacuum polarization}
637: \end{center}
638: \end{figure}
639: \begin{figure}[p]
640: \includegraphics[width=160mm,height=210mm]{n6.eps}
641: \caption{Radiation corrections to the electron scattering in the
642: external field}
643: \end{figure}
644: \newpage
645: \subsection{Inclusion of electron-positron pair interactions\\ in the
646: $FW$ representation}
647:
648: To construct real particle-antiparticle pair interaction processes
649: in the theory, additional terms must be introduced to Hamiltonian
650: \textit{H}$_{FW}$. A method to include processes with real
651: electron-positron pairs that would ensure proper results in the
652: calculation of QED effects (for example, electron-positron pair
653: annihilation cross section) is to introduce interaction between
654: positive-energy (negative-energy) states of equation (\ref{eq7})
655: and negative-energy (positive-energy) states of equation
656: (\ref{eq15}) derived by the \textit{FW} transformation of Dirac
657: equation (\ref{eq2}) with negative particle mass.
658: \begin{equation}
659: \label{eq15} p_{0} \psi _{1FW} \left( {x} \right) = \left[ {\beta
660: E + K_{1} \left( { - m} \right) + K_{2} \left( { - m} \right) +
661: \ldots} \right] \psi _{1FW} \left( {x} \right).
662: \end{equation}
663:
664: Equation (\ref{eq7}) with the additional interaction can be
665: written as
666: \begin{equation} \label{eq16}
667: \begin{array}{l}
668: p_{0} \psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = \beta E \psi _{FW}
669: \left( {x} \right) + \Bigg[ {K_{1} \left( {m,I,m} \right)}
670: + \\+\left. \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}K_{2} \left( {m,I,m; m,I,m} \right) +
671: \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}K_{2} \left( {m,\gamma _{5} , - m; - m,\gamma _{5}
672: ,m} \right) + \ldots \right] \psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) +
673: \\
674: + \left[ K_{1} \left( m,\gamma _{5} , - m \right) +
675: \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}K_{2} \left( {m,\gamma _{5} , - m; - m,I, - m}
676: \right) + \right. \\ \left. + \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}K_{2} \left(
677: {m,I,m; m,\gamma _{5} , - m} \right) + \ldots \right] \psi _{1FW}
678: \left( {x} \right)
679: \end{array}
680: \end{equation}
681:
682: In equation (\ref{eq16}), the notation of terms $K_{1},
683: K_{2},\ldots$ indicates the presence or absence of matrix $\gamma
684: _{5} $ near potentials $A^{\mu} \,\left( {x} \right)$ and the mass
685: sign on the left or on the right of fields $A^{\mu} \,\left( {x}
686: \right)$. Factor $\dfrac12$ of terms \textit{K}$_{2}$ is
687: introduced because of two possible ways of transition to the final
688: state of mass \textit{+m}. Similar to (\ref{eq16}), the additional
689: terms of interaction with field $\psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right)$
690: can be introduced to equation (\ref{eq15}) with negative mass.
691:
692: The considered interaction between equations (\ref{eq7}),
693: (\ref{eq15}) can be formalized as follows. Introduce
694: eight-component field $\Phi _{FW} \left( {x} \right)$, in which
695: the four upper components are solutions to equation (\ref{eq7})
696: with positive mass $\left( { + m} \right)$ and the lower
697: components are solutions to equation (\ref{eq15}) with negative
698: mass $\left( { - m} \right)$. In the case under discussion
699: solutions (\ref{eq4}) for free motion are written as
700: %\begin{equation}
701: $$\label{eq17a} \Phi _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} \left( {x,s, +
702: m} \right) = \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3/2}}}\left(
703: {\begin{array}{c}
704: {U_{s}} \\
705: {0}
706: \end{array}} \right)e^{-ip x};\eqno{(17a)}$$
707: %\end{equation}
708: %\begin{equation}
709: $$\label{eq17b} \Phi _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} \left( {x,s, -
710: m} \right) = \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3/2}}}\left(
711: {\begin{array}{c}
712: {0} \\
713: {U_{s}}
714: \end{array}} \right)e^{-ip x};\eqno{(17b)}$$
715: %\end{equation}
716: %\begin{equation}
717: $$\label{eq17c} \Phi _{FW}^{\left( { -} \right)} \left( {x,s, +
718: m} \right) = \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3/2}}}\left(
719: {\begin{array}{c}
720: {V_{s}} \\
721: {0}
722: \end{array}}\right)e^{ip x};\eqno{(17c)}$$
723: %\end{equation}
724: %\begin{equation}
725: $$\label{eq17d} \Phi _{FW}^{\left( { -} \right)} \left( {x,s, -
726: m} \right) = \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3/2}}}\left(
727: {\begin{array}{c}
728: {0} \\
729: {V_{s}}
730: \end{array}} \right)e^{ip x}.\eqno{(17d)}$$
731: %\end{equation}
732:
733: The extension of orthonormalization and completeness relations
734: (\ref{eq5}) to eight dimensions is quite evident.
735:
736: Next, introduce matrices $8\times8$:
737: \begin{eqnarray*}
738: && \beta _{1} = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
739: I & 0 \\
740: 0 &- I
741: \end{array} \right),
742: \q\rho =\left(
743: \begin{array}{cc}
744: 0 & \gamma _5 \\ \gamma _5 & 0
745: \end{array}
746: \right) , \\ &&\alpha ^k=\left(
747: \begin{array}{cc}
748: \alpha ^k & 0 \\ 0 & \alpha ^k
749: \end{array}
750: \right) ,\q \sigma ^k=\left(
751: \begin{array}{cc}
752: \sigma ^k & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma ^k
753: \end{array}
754: \right) ,\q \beta =\left(
755: \begin{array}{cc}
756: \beta & 0 \\ 0 & \beta
757: \end{array}
758: \right).\\
759: &&\beta_1^2=\rho^2=I;\q[\beta_1,\rho]_+=[\beta,\rho]_+=0;\\
760: &&[\beta_1,\alpha^k]_-=[\beta_1,\sigma^k]_-=[\beta_1,\beta]_-=0;\\
761: &&[\rho,\alpha^k]_-=[\rho,\sigma^k]_-=0.
762: \end{eqnarray*}
763: \setcounter{equation}{17}
764:
765: Having substituted $m \to \beta _{1} m$, equations (\ref{eq7}),
766: (\ref{eq15}) can be combined using the matrices $8\times8$ as
767: \begin{eqnarray}
768: \label{eq18} && p_{0} \Phi _{FW} \left( {x} \right) = \Big[\beta
769: E+K_1
770: \left( {\beta _1 m,\left( {I+\rho} \right),\beta _1 m} \right) +
771: \nn\\
772: && + \dfrac{1}{2}K_2 \left( {\beta _1 m ,\left( {I+\rho} \right),
773: \beta_1 m; \beta _1 m ,\left( {I+\rho} \right) ,\beta _1 m}
774: \right) + \nn\\ &&\left. + \dfrac{1}{4}K_3 \left( {\beta _1 m_
775: ,\left( {I+\rho} \right) ,\beta _1 m; \beta _1 m ,\left( {I +
776: \rho} \right) ,\beta _1 m; \beta _1 m ,\left( {I+\rho} \right)
777: ,\beta _1 m} \right) + \ldots
778: \right] \Phi_{FW}
779: \left( {x} \right)
780: \end{eqnarray}
781:
782: Equation (\ref{eq18}) contains equation (\ref{eq16}) for field
783: $\psi _{FW} \left( {x} \right)$ and relevant equation for field
784: $\psi _{1FW} \left( {x} \right)$. Interaction $\left( {I+\rho}
785: \right) A^{\mu} \left( {x} \right)$ allows coupling between
786: solutions (17$a$) and (17$d$), (17$b$) and (17$c$), while there
787: is, as previously, no coupling between the other pairs of
788: solutions, (17$a$) and (17$c$), (17$b$) and (17$d$), as well as
789: (17$a$) and (17$b$), (17$c$) and (17$d$).
790:
791: The calculation of the electron-positron pair annihilation cross
792: section in the second order of the perturbation theory with
793: inclusion of the introduced coupling between the solutions to
794: equations (\ref{eq7}) and (\ref{eq15}) is presented in Appendix 2.
795:
796: The analysis shows that coupling $\left( {I+\rho} \right) A^{\mu
797: }$, along with inclusion of interactions of real electron-positron
798: pairs, does not affect the physical QED results discussed in
799: Section 3. Processes with real negative-mass fermions appear in
800: the theory.
801:
802: Thus, with the coupling $\left( {I+\rho} \right) A^{\mu} $, the
803: theory in the $FW$ representation is symmetric about the particle
804: (antiparticle) mass sign, however, the signs in masses of the
805: particle and antiparticle interacting with each other should be
806: opposite.
807:
808: In the theory of processes with real particle-antiparticle pairs,
809: another possible method of inclusion is to introduce the coupling
810: between equations of motion for electron and positron in field
811: $A^{\mu} \left( {x} \right)$. The analysis of the coupling
812: introduction is not discussed in this review paper.
813:
814:
815: \subsection{$C$, $P$, $T$-symmetries in the
816: $FW$ representation}
817:
818: The Hamiltonian of equation (\ref{eq18}) is invariant under
819: spatial reflections $\vec {x} \to \vec {x}^{'} = - \vec {x}$.
820: Hence, the solutions to equation (\ref{eq18}) are preserved in
821: $P$-inversion with an accuracy to phase factor and matrices
822: commutating with operator $p_{0} $ and generalized Hamiltonian
823: \textit{H}$_{FW} $.
824:
825: Consider two cases:
826: \begin{equation}\label{eq19}
827: 1.\q\Phi _{FW}^{'} \left(
828: {\vec {x}^{'},t} \right) = P \Phi _{FW}^{} \left( {\vec {x},t}
829: \right) = e^{i\varphi} \beta \Phi _{FW}^{} \left( {\vec {x},t}
830: \right).\qq\qq\qq\qq\qq\qq\qq
831: \end{equation}
832: In this case, like in the Dirac representation, the particles and
833: antiparticles have opposite internal parity, which corresponds to
834: the existing experimental data.
835:
836: $$\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! 2. \q\Phi _{FW}^{'}
837: \left( {\vec {x}^{'},t} \right) = P \Phi _{FW}^{} \left( {\vec
838: {x},t} \right) = e^{i\varphi} \Phi _{FW}^{} \left( {\vec {x}^{},t}
839: \right).\qq\qq\qq\qq\qq\qq\qq$$ For this case, which is also
840: admitted by this theory, the particles and antiparticles in the
841: $FW$representation have the same internal parity.
842:
843: In $C$-conjugation equation (\ref{eq18}) transforms to the
844: equation for charge-conjugate spinor $\Phi _{FW}^{C} $ with
845: changed charge and mass signs.
846: \begin{eqnarray}
847: \label{eq20} && P_{0} \Phi _{FW}^{C} \left( {x} \right) = \left[
848: {\beta E - K_{1} \left( { - \beta _{1} m; A^{0}; A^{k}} \right) +}
849: \right. \nn\\ && + K_{2} \left( { - \beta _{1} m; A^{0}; A^{k}}
850: \right) - K_{3} \left( { - \beta _{1} m; A^{0}; A^{k}} \right) +
851: \ldots\left. {} \right]\Phi _{FW}^{C} \left( {x} \right).
852: \end{eqnarray}
853:
854:
855: It is easy to show using (\ref{eq8}), (\ref{eq9}), (\ref{eq18})
856: that the theory is $C$-invariant, if
857: \begin{equation}
858: \label{eq21} \Phi _{FW}^{C} \left( {x} \right) = C \Phi
859: _{FW}^{\ast} \left( {x} \right) = \rho \sigma ^{\left( {2}
860: \right)}\Phi _{FW}^{\ast} \left( {x} \right).
861: \end{equation}
862:
863: Now consider time inversion $t \to {t}' = - t$. Equation
864: (\ref{eq18}) transforms to the equation for function $\Phi
865: _{FW}^{'} \left( {t^{'}} \right)$ with a changed sign in potential
866: vectors $A^{k}$
867: \begin{equation}
868: \label{eq22} P_{0} ^{\prime} {\Phi} '_{FW} \left( {t^{'}} \right)
869: = \left[ {\beta E + K_{1} \left( {\beta _{1} m; A^{0}; - A^{k}}
870: \right) + K_{2} \left( {\beta _{1} m; A^{0}; - A^{k}} \right) +
871: \ldots} \right] \Phi _{FW}^{'} \left( {t^{'}} \right).
872: \end{equation}
873:
874: It can be shown that for the $T$-invariance it is necessary that
875: \begin{equation}
876: \label{eq23} \Phi _{FW}^{'} \left( {t^{'}} \right) = T\Phi
877: _{FW}^{\ast} \left( {t^{}} \right) = \sigma ^{\left( {2}
878: \right)}\Phi _{FW}^{\ast} \left( {t^{}} \right).
879: \end{equation}
880:
881: Relations (\ref{eq19})---(\ref{eq23}) suggest that, like in the
882: Dirac representation, quantum electrodynamics in the
883: $FW$representation is invariant under the $P,C,T$-transformations.
884: %\newpage
885:
886: \section{WEAK INTERACTION\\ IN THE $FW$ REPRESENTATION}
887:
888: For illustration this paper considers the weak interaction in the
889: $V$-$A$ form of current-current four-fermion interaction in the
890: lower order of the perturbation theory. The study of features of
891: the electroweak theory in the $FW$ representation will be a
892: subject of the following publications.
893:
894: As seen from the M\"oller scattering consideration (diagram in
895: Fig.~2) with taking into account (\ref{eq12}), for the external
896: lines corresponding to real fermions the electromagnetic vector
897: current in the \textit{FW} representation, in the first order in
898: \textit{e}, is
899: \begin{equation}
900: \label{eq24} \left( {j_{FW}^{V}} \right)^{\mu} = \Phi _{FW}^{ +}
901: \left( {x} \right) C_{el}^{\mu} \Phi _{FW} \left( {x} \right)
902: \end{equation}
903:
904: In (\ref{eq24}), according to (\ref{eq18}), $C_{el}^{\mu} $ is of
905: structure $C_{el}^{\mu} \,\left( {\beta _{1} m,\,\left( {I+\rho}
906: \right),\,\beta _{1} m} \right)$. Thus, with the accuracy to the
907: first order in \textit{e},
908: \[
909: \left( {j_{D}^{V}} \right)^{\mu} = \psi _{D}^{ +} \left( {x}
910: \right) \alpha ^{\mu} \psi _{D} \left( {x} \right) \to \left(
911: {j_{FW}^{V}} \right)^{\mu} = \Phi _{FW}^{ +} \left( {x} \right)
912: C_{el}^{\mu} \Phi _{FW} \left( {x} \right).
913: \]
914:
915: Similarly, axial current in the \textit{FW} representation can be
916: obtained with the same accuracy using the methods of ref.
917: \cite{4}:
918: \begin{equation}
919: \label{eq25} \left( {j_{D}^{A}} \right)^{\mu} = \psi _{D}^{ +}
920: \left( {x} \right)\alpha ^{\mu} \gamma ^{5}\psi _{D} \left( {x}
921: \right) \to \left( {j_{FW}^{A}} \right)^{\mu} = \Phi _{FW}^{ +}
922: \left( {x} \right) \left( {N_{el}^{'}} \right)^{\mu} \Phi _{FW}
923: \left( {x} \right).
924: \end{equation}
925:
926: In (\ref{eq25}) $\left( {N_{el}^{'}} \right)^{\mu} $ differs from
927: the previously introduced vector $N^{\mu} $ in the extension to
928: eight dimensions and the $8\times8$ matrix
929: $\gamma _{5} =
930: \left( {\begin{array}{cc}
931: \gamma _{5} &0 \\
932: 0 &\gamma _{5}
933: \end{array}} \right)$, located near the matrix
934: $\left( {I+\rho} \right)$.
935: \begin{equation}
936: \label{eq26}
937: \begin{array}{l}
938: \left( {N_{el}^{'}} \right)^{0} = eR\left( {L \left( {I+\rho}
939: \right) \gamma _{5} - \left( {I+\rho} \right) \gamma _{5}^{}
940: L} \right) R; \\
941: \left( {N_{el}^{'}} \right)^{k} = - eR\left( {\alpha ^{k}\left( {I +
942: \rho} \right) \gamma _{5} - L \alpha ^{k}\left( {I+\rho}
943: \right) \gamma _{5}^{} L} \right) R.
944: \end{array}
945: \end{equation}
946:
947: In view of (\ref{eq24}), (\ref{eq25}), weak \textit{V-A} current
948: can be written as
949: \begin{equation}
950: \label{eq27} \left( {j_{FW}^{weak}} \right)^{\mu} = \Phi _{FW}^{
951: +} \left( {x} \right) \left( {C_{weak}^{\mu} - \left(
952: {N_{weak}^{'}} \right)^{\mu} } \right)\Phi _{FW} \left( {x}
953: \right)
954: \end{equation}
955: with substitution $C_{el}^{\mu} $ and $\left( {N_{el}^{'}}
956: \right)^{\mu} \quad e^{2} \to \dfrac{{G}}{{\sqrt {2}} }$ where
957: \textit{G} is the Fermi constant of weak interaction.
958:
959: The amplitudes of weak-interaction processes in the $FW$
960: representation are
961: \begin{equation}
962: \label{eq28} M = \left( {j_{FW}^{weak}} \right)^{\mu} \left(
963: {j_{FW}^{weak}} \right)_{\mu} ^{ +}.
964: \end{equation}
965:
966: The amplitude $M$ can be shown to be nonvariant taken separately
967: under $P$ and $C$ reflections, but invariant under the combined
968: $CP$-inversion.
969:
970: Expressions (\ref{eq27}), (\ref{eq28}) allow us to calculate
971: amplitudes of specific weak-interaction processes in the
972: Foldy-Wouthuysen representation in the lower order of the
973: perturbation theory. The final results of the calculations agree
974: with those in the Dirac representation.
975:
976: The amplitude of weak processes in the $FW$ representation in form
977: (\ref{eq28}) are degenerate relative to mass signs in particles
978: and antiparticles. Particles of mass $ + m$ interact with each
979: other and antiparticles of mass $ - m$. Conversely, particles of
980: mass $ - m$ interact with each other and with antiparticles of
981: mass $ + m$.
982:
983: An interesting feature of the theory is the possibility to
984: associate the break of $CP$-invariance with total or partial
985: removal of the degeneracy in the particle (antiparticle) mass
986: sign.
987:
988: In fact, if $I+\rho $ is substituted for $\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left(
989: {I+\beta _{1}} \right)\left( {I+\rho} \right)$ in terms
990: $C_{weak}^{\mu} ,\left( {{N}'_{weak}} \right)^{\mu} $ in
991: expression for weak current (\ref{eq27}), then, on the one hand,
992: the $CP$-invariance of the theory is broken because of
993: anticommutation of matrices $\beta _{1} ,\rho $ and, on the other
994: hand, operator $\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta _{1}} \right)$
995: chooses solutions with particle and antiparticle mass $ + m$ from
996: (17), which makes the theory asymmetric about the mass sign. The
997: degeneracy in mass sign can be removed completely, if difference
998: $C_{weak}^{\mu} - \left( {{N}'_{weak}} \right)^{\mu} $ in
999: (\ref{eq27}) is multiplied, for example, from the left by
1000: $\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta} \right) \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left(
1001: {I+\beta _{1}} \right)$. In this case the theory is also
1002: $CP$-nonvariant, and the only solution (17$a$) with particle mass
1003: $ + m$ is chosen from (17). In this case particles of mass $ + m$
1004: can interact with one another and, due to multiplier $I+\rho $ in
1005: $C_{weak}^{\mu} $ and $\left( {{N}'_{weak} } \right)^{\mu} $,
1006: with antiparticles of mass $\left( { - m} \right)$. Upon the
1007: $CP$-inversion, conversely, only particles of mass $ - m$ can
1008: interact with one another and there is a possibility of the
1009: interaction with antiparticles of mass $ + m$.
1010:
1011: The theory admits incomplete removal of the degeneracy in mass
1012: sign, if $\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta} \right)\times\lb\times
1013: \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta _{1}} \right)$ is replaced by
1014: $\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I + \varepsilon \beta} \right)
1015: \dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I + \varepsilon _{1} \beta _{1} }
1016: \right)$, where $|\varepsilon| \le 1$, $|\varepsilon _{1}| \le
1017: 1$. The $CP$-invariance break extent depends on $\varepsilon$,
1018: $\varepsilon _{1} $.
1019:
1020: \section*{CONCLUSION}
1021:
1022: From the results of this review it follows that the interacting
1023: field theory version under discussion in the $FW$ representation
1024: has some new physical consequences in comparison with the Dirac
1025: representation. When the interaction of real particles with
1026: antiparticles is included, negative-mass (but positive-energy)
1027: fermions appear in the theory. The theory is symmetric about the
1028: mass sign, but the particle and antiparticle masses should be of
1029: opposite signs. In the theory there is a possibility to associate
1030: the break of $CP$-symmetry with the break of symmetry in particle
1031: (antiparticle) mass sign.
1032:
1033: The above consequences foster further theoretical studies of the
1034: Foldy-Wouthuysen representation and comparison of their results to
1035: experimental data. In particular, it is necessary to consider
1036: electroweak theory and quantum chromodynamics in the $FW$
1037: representation to detect and analyze new resulting physical
1038: consequences.
1039:
1040: \newpage
1041: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1042: \renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
1043: \begin{flushright}
1044: {\bf APPENDIX 1}
1045: \end{flushright}
1046:
1047: \section*{DERIVATION OF HAMILTONIAN $H_{FW}$\\ OF DIRAC
1048: EQUATION IN THE\\
1049: FOLDY-WOUTHUYSEN REPRESENTATION}
1050:
1051: In notation of ref. \cite{4},
1052: \begin{equation}\label{S1}
1053: H_{FW} = U_{FW} H_{D} U_{FW}^{ +} - iU_{FW} \dfrac{{\partial
1054: }}{{\partial t}}\left( {U_{FW}^{ +} } \right).
1055: \end{equation}
1056:
1057: In (A.1) $U_{FW} = \left( {1 + \delta _{1} + \delta _{2} + \delta
1058: _{3} + \ldots} \right) U_{0} ,$
1059: $\delta _{1} \sim e,\quad \delta _{2} \sim e^{2},\quad \delta _{3}\sim e^{3},\quad
1060: U_{0} = R\left( {1 + L} \right)$ is the Foldy-Wouthuysen
1061: transformation matrix at $A^{\mu} \left( {x} \right) = 0$. For
1062: Dirac Hamiltonian of free motion $\left( {H_{0}} \right)_{D} $,
1063: $U_{0} \left( {H_{0}} \right)_{D} U_{0}^{ + } = \beta E$ is
1064: valid.
1065:
1066: From the condition of unitarity $U_{FW}^{ +} U_{FW} = 1$ it
1067: follows that
1068: \begin{equation} \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
1069: {\delta _{1}^{ +} = - \delta _{1}}; \\
1070: {\delta _{2}^{ +} = - \delta _{2} + \delta _{1} \delta _{1}}; \\
1071: {\delta _{3}^{ +} = - \delta _{3} + \delta _{2} \delta _{1} + \delta
1072: _{1} \delta _{2} - \delta _{1} \delta _{1} \delta _{1}};
1073: \\
1074: {..................................................................}
1075: \end{array} \right.
1076: \end{equation}
1077:
1078: In view of (A.2),
1079: \begin{equation}
1080: \begin{array}{l}
1081: H_{FW} = \beta E + K_{1} + K_{2} + K_{3} + \ldots, \\
1082: K_{1} = \delta _{1} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{1} +
1083: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{1}} }{{\partial t}} + C + N, \\[+10pt]
1084: K_{2} = \delta _{2} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{2} +
1085: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{2}} }{{\partial t}} - K_{1} \delta _{1}
1086: + \delta _{1} \left( {C + N} \right), \\[+10pt]
1087: K_{3} = \delta _{3} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{3} +
1088: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{3}} }{{\partial t}} - K_{1} \delta _{2}
1089: - K_{2} \delta _{1} + \delta _{2} \left( {C + N} \right).
1090: \end{array}
1091: \end{equation}
1092:
1093: Introduce the notions of even (with superscript $e$) and odd (with
1094: superscript $o$) operators that do not relate and relate,
1095: respectively, the upper and lower wave function components. Ref.
1096: \cite{4} establishes the following relation between the even and
1097: odd operators $\delta _{i} $.
1098: \begin{equation}
1099: \begin{array}{l}
1100: \delta _{1}^{e} R + R \delta _{1}^{e} = R L \delta
1101: _{1}^{o} - \delta _{1}^{o} L R; \\
1102: \delta _{2}^{e} R + R \delta _{2}^{e} = R L \delta
1103: _{2}^{o} - \delta _{2}^{o} L R - RL\left( {\delta _{1} \delta
1104: _{1}} \right)^{o} + R\left( {\delta _{1} \delta _{1}}
1105: \right)^{e}; \\
1106: \delta _{3}^{e} R + R \delta _{3}^{e} = R L \delta
1107: _{3}^{o} - \delta _{3}^{o} L R - RL \left( {\delta _{2} \delta
1108: _{1} + \delta _{1} \delta _{2} - \delta _{1} \delta _{1} \delta
1109: _{1}} \right)^{o} + \\
1110: + R\left( {\delta _{2} \delta _{1} + \delta _{1} \delta _{2} -
1111: \delta _{1} \delta _{1} \delta _{1}} \right)^{e}.
1112: \end{array}
1113: \end{equation}
1114:
1115: As by definition $K_{1} , K_{2} , K_{3} \ldots$ are even
1116: operators, in (A.3) the odd terms must be set equal to zero,
1117: \begin{equation}
1118: \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
1119: {\delta _{1}^{o} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{1}^{o} +
1120: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{1}^{o}} }{{\partial t}} + N = 0};
1121: \\[+10pt]
1122: {\delta _{2}^{o} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{2}^{o} +
1123: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{2}^{o}} }{{\partial t}} - K_{1} \delta
1124: _{1}^{o} + \delta _{1}^{o} C + \delta _{1}^{e} N = 0};
1125: \\[+10pt]
1126: {\delta _{3}^{o} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{3}^{o} +
1127: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{3}^{o}} }{{\partial t}} - K_{1} \delta
1128: _{2}^{o} - K_{2} \delta _{1}^{o} + \delta _{2}^{o} C + \delta
1129: _{2}^{e} N = 0}; \\
1130:
1131: {.........................................................................................................}
1132: \end{array} \right.
1133: \end{equation}
1134:
1135: Then the Hamiltonian expansion terms $K_{1} ,K_{2} , K_{3} \ldots$
1136: are determined as
1137: \begin{equation}\left\{ {\begin{array}{l}
1138: {K_{1} = \delta _{1}^{e} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{1}^{e} +
1139: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{1}^{e}} }{{\partial t}} + C} ;\\[+10pt]
1140: {K_{2} = \delta _{2}^{e} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{2}^{e} +
1141: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{2}^{e}} }{{\partial t}} - K_{1} \delta
1142: _{1}^{e} + \delta _{1}^{e} C + \delta _{1}^{o} N};
1143: \\[+10pt]
1144: {K_{3} = \delta _{3}^{e} \beta E - \beta E \delta _{3}^{e} +
1145: i\dfrac{{\partial \delta _{3}^{e}} }{{\partial t}} - K_{1} \delta
1146: _{2}^{e} - K_{2} \delta _{1}^{e} + \delta _{2}^{e} C + \delta
1147: _{2}^{o} N}. \\
1148:
1149: {..............................................................................................................}
1150: \end{array}} \right.
1151: \end{equation}
1152:
1153: Operator equalities (A.6) simultaneously with (A.4), (A.5) allow
1154: us to determine Hamiltonian $H_{FW} $ as a series in terms of
1155: powers of $e$.
1156:
1157: For the external lines corresponding to real electrons
1158: (positrons), the first three terms in (A.6) vanish in the matrix
1159: elements due to the law of conservation of energy. In this case,
1160: in the impulse representation, the matrix elements $K_{1} , K_{2}
1161: ,K_{3} \ldots$ are determined by relations (\ref{eq12}),
1162: (\ref{eq13}), (\ref{eq14}).
1163: %\newpage
1164: \bigskip
1165: \begin{flushright}
1166: {\bf APPENDIX 2}
1167: \end{flushright}
1168: \section*{CALCULATIONS OF QED PROCESSES\\ IN THE $FW$ REPRESENTATION}
1169:
1170: \subsection*{1\quad Electron scattering in Coulomb field ${A_{0} \left(
1171: {x} \right) = - \dfrac{{Ze}}{{4\pi \left| \vec x \right|}}}$}
1172: \begin{eqnarray*} && S_{fi} = - i\int d^{4}x\Psi
1173: _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} \left( {x,p_{f} ,s_{f}}
1174: \right)K_{1}^{0} A_{0} \Psi _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} \left(
1175: {x,p_{i} ,s_{i}} \right) = \\ && = - \dfrac{{i\delta \left(
1176: {E_{f} - E_{i}} \right)}}{{\left( {2\pi}
1177: \right)^{2}}}U_{s_{_{\!\!f}}} ^{ +} \langle \vec {p}_{f} \left|
1178: {C} \right.^{0}A_{0} \left| {\vec {p}_{i}} \right. \rangle
1179: U_{s_{i}} =
1180: \\ && = i\dfrac{{Ze^{2}}}{{\vec {q}^{\,2}}}\dfrac{{\delta \left(
1181: {E_{f} - E_{i}} \right)}}{{\left( {2\pi}
1182: \right)^{2}}}U_{s_{_{\!\!f}}} ^{ +} \dfrac{{1}}{{2E_{i} }}\left(
1183: {E_{i} + m + \dfrac{{1}}{{E_{i} + m}}\vec {\sigma} } \vec {p}_{f}
1184: \vec {\sigma} \vec {p}_{i} \right)U_{s_{i}} , \\
1185: &&\vec {q} = \vec {p}_{f} - \vec {p}_{i} .
1186: \end{eqnarray*}
1187:
1188: Notation $K_{1}^{0} A_{0} $ made for convenience actually means
1189: $K_{1}^{0} A_{0} \equiv K_{1} $ at $\vec {A}\left( {x} \right) =
1190: 0$. That is, $A_{0} \left( {x} \right)$ gets into the places
1191: determined by expression (\ref{eq8}). The same is true for
1192: notation $C^{0} A_{0} $. The transition from $K_{1}^{0} A_{0} $
1193: to $C^{0} A_{0} $ is performed in accordance with (\ref{eq12}).
1194:
1195: Then ordinary methods in conjunction with matrix element $S_{fi} $
1196: can be used to obtain Mott differential scattering cross section
1197: that transfers to Rutherford one in the nonrelativistic case.
1198:
1199:
1200: \subsection*{2\quad Electron scattering on Dirac proton (M\"oller scattering)}
1201:
1202: \begin{eqnarray*}
1203: && S_{fi} = - i\int d^{4}xd^{4}y\Psi _{FW}^{\left( + \right)}
1204: \left( {x,p_{f} ,s_{f}} \right)K_{1}^{\alpha} \Psi
1205: _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} \left( {x,p_{i} ,s_{i}} \right) D_{F}
1206: \left( {x - y} \right) \times\\ && \times \Psi _{FW}^{\left( { +}
1207: \right)} \left( {y,P_{f} ,S_{f}} \right)\left( { - K_{1}}
1208: \right)_{\alpha} \Psi _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} \left(
1209: {y,P_{i} ,S_{i}} \right) = \\ && = - \dfrac {i\delta ^{4}\left(
1210: {P_{f} - P_{i} + p_{f} - p_{i}} \right)} {\left( {p_{f} - p_{i}}
1211: \right)^{2}} 2\pi \left( {U_{s_{_{\!\!f}}} ^{ + } \langle \vec
1212: {p}_{f} \left| {C^{\alpha} }\right| {\vec {p}_{i}} \rangle
1213: U_{s_{i}} } \right)\left( {U_{S_{f}} \langle \vec {P}_{f} \left|
1214: {C_{\alpha }} \right| {\vec {P}}_{i} \rangle U_{S_{i}} } \right)
1215: \end{eqnarray*}
1216: Matrix element $S_{fi}$ determines M\"oller electron scattering
1217: cross section.
1218: %\newpage
1219: \subsection*{3\quad Compton effect}
1220: \begin{eqnarray*}
1221: && S_{fi} = - i\left( {\chi _{s_{_{\!\!f}}} ^{ +}\quad 0}
1222: \right)\left\{
1223: {\int} \dfrac{{d^{4}zd^{4}yd^{4}p_{1} ^{_{}}
1224: }}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{7}\sqrt {2k_{0}^{'} 2k_{0}} } }\left(
1225: {e^{ip_{f} y} (K_{1})_\mu \varepsilon ^{'\mu}
1226: e^{ik^{'}y}\dfrac{{e^{ - ip_{1} y}}}{{p_{1}^{0} - \beta E\left(
1227: {\vec {p}_{1}} \right)}} e^{ip_{1} z} (K_{1})_{\nu}
1228: \times}\right.\right.
1229: \\
1230: &&\left.\times \varepsilon ^{\nu} e^{ - ikz} e^{ip_{i} z} +
1231: e^{ip_{f} y} (K_{1})_\mu \varepsilon ^{\mu} e^{ -
1232: iky}\dfrac{{e^{ - ip_{1} y}}}{{p_{1}^{0} - \beta E\left( {\vec
1233: {p}_{1}} \right)}}e^{ip_{1} z} (K_{1})_\nu {\varepsilon}^{'\nu}
1234: e^{ik'z} e^{ - ip_{i} z} \right) +
1235: \\
1236: &&+ \int d^{4}y\dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3}\sqrt {2k_{0}^{'}
1237: 2k_{0}} } }\left( {e^{ip_{f} y} (K_{2})_{\mu \nu}
1238: \varepsilon ^{'\mu} e^{ik'y} \varepsilon ^{\nu}
1239: e^{ - iky} e^{ - ip_{i} y} + }\right.\\
1240: &&\left.+ e^{ip_{f} y} (K_{2})_{\mu \nu} \varepsilon ^{\mu} e^{ -
1241: iky} {\varepsilon} ^{'\nu} e^{ik'y}\right) \Bigg\} \left(
1242: {{\begin{array}{c}
1243: {\chi_{s_{i}} } \\
1244: {0}
1245: \end{array}} } \right).
1246: \end{eqnarray*}
1247:
1248: The first integral combines the contribution made by diagrams {\em
1249: a)} and {\em c)} in Fig.~3, the second one combines that made by
1250: diagrams {\em b)} and {\em d)}.
1251:
1252: By record $(K_{1})_\mu \varepsilon ^{\mu} e^{ - iky}$,
1253: $(K_{2})_{\mu \nu} \varepsilon ^{\mu} e^{ - iky} {\varepsilon
1254: }^{'\nu} e^{ik'y}$, etc. is meant the same as specified in item
1255: 1 of Appendix 2.
1256:
1257: From the law of conservation of energy-momentum, the contribution
1258: of the terms in the first square bracket of expression (\ref{eq9})
1259: for $K_{2} $ to matrix element $S_{fi} $ is zero. For the same
1260: reason the contribution of the first two terms in the second
1261: square bracket vanishes. Then, the third and fourth terms in the
1262: second square bracket are compensated by the terms in the first
1263: integral in the expression for $S_{fi} $ that correspond to the
1264: contribution of diagrams $a$) and $c$) in Fig.~3. Thus, a
1265: contribution to the matrix element $S_{fi} $ is made only by the
1266: last four terms in expression (\ref{eq9}). The above facts are
1267: general in calculations of the second-order processes of the
1268: perturbation theory with impulses of electron lines lying on the
1269: mass surface. In view of the aforesaid,
1270: $S_{fi} = \dfrac{{ - i\left( {2\pi} \right)^{4} \delta ^{4}\left(
1271: {p_{i} + k - p_{f} - k'} \right)}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3}\sqrt
1272: {2k_{0} 2k_{0}^{'}} } }\left( {\chi _{s_{_{\!\!f}}} ^{ +}\quad 0}
1273: \right) A\left( {{\begin{array}{c}
1274: {\chi_{s_{i}} } \\
1275: {0}
1276: \end{array}} } \right),\quad $ where
1277: \begin{eqnarray*}
1278: && A = C_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}}
1279: \right) \varepsilon ^{'\mu} \dfrac{{\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I +
1280: \beta} \right)}}{{\beta E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) + k_{0} -
1281: E\left( {\vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}} \right)}}C_{\mu} \left( {\vec
1282: {p}_{i} + \vec {k}; \vec {p}_{i}} \right) \varepsilon ^{\mu} +
1283: \\
1284: && + N_{\mu} {\left( {\vec
1285: {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}} \right) \varepsilon ^{'\mu}
1286: \dfrac{{\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I-\beta} \right)}}{{ - \beta
1287: E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) + k_{0} + E\left( {\vec {p}_{i} +
1288: \vec {k}} \right)}}N_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}; \vec
1289: {p}_{i}} \right) \varepsilon ^{\mu} + }\\ && + C_{\mu} \left(
1290: {\vec {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{i} - {\vec {k}}'} \right) \varepsilon
1291: ^{\mu} \dfrac{{\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta} \right)}}{{\beta
1292: E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) - {k}'_{0} - E\left( {\vec
1293: {p}_{i} - {\vec {k}}'} \right)}}C_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} -
1294: {\vec {k}}'; \vec {p}_{i}} \right) {\varepsilon} ^{'\mu} +
1295: \\ && + N_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}'}
1296: \right) \varepsilon ^{\mu} \dfrac{{\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left(
1297: {I-\beta} \right)}}{{ - \beta E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) -
1298: {k}'_{0} + E\left( {\vec {p}_{i} - {\vec {k}}'} \right)}}N_{\mu}
1299: \left( {\vec {p}_{i} - {\vec {k}}'; \vec {p}_{i}} \right)
1300: {\varepsilon} ^{'\mu}
1301: \end{eqnarray*}
1302:
1303: \begin{eqnarray*}
1304: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! C^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{i}
1305: + \vec {k}} \right) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
1306: {e R_{f} R_{1} \left( {1 + \dfrac{{\vec {\alpha} \vec {p}_{f}
1307: }}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{f}} \right) + m}} \dfrac{{\vec {\alpha}
1308: \left( {\vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}} \right)}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}
1309: + \vec {k}} \right) + m}}} \right),\quad \mu = 0}; \\
1310: { - e R_{f} R_{1} \beta \left( {\dfrac{{\vec {\alpha} \vec
1311: {p}_{f}} }{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{f}} \right) + m}}\alpha ^{k}\! +
1312: \alpha ^{k}\!\dfrac{{\vec {\alpha} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} + \vec
1313: {k}} \right)}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}} \right) + m}}}
1314: \right)\!,\quad \mu = k,\; k = 1 ,2, 3}; \\
1315: \end{array} \right.\\
1316: &&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!N^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{i} + \vec
1317: {k}} \right) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} { e R_{f} R_{1} \beta
1318: \left( {\dfrac{{\vec {\alpha} \vec {p}_{f}} }{{E\left( {\vec
1319: {p}_{f}} \right) + m}}} - \dfrac{{\vec {\alpha }\left( {\vec
1320: {p}_{i} + \vec {k}} \right)}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}}
1321: \right) + m}}\right),\quad \mu = 0;} \\ { - R_{f} R_{1} \left(
1322: {\alpha ^{k} - \dfrac{{\vec {\alpha} \vec {p}_{f}} }{{E\left(
1323: {\vec {p}_{f}} \right) + m}}\alpha ^{k}\dfrac{{\vec {\alpha}
1324: \left( {\vec {p}_{i} + \vec {k}} \right)}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}
1325: + \vec {k}} \right) + m}}} \right),\quad \mu = k,\; k = 1,2,3;}
1326: \end{array} \right. \end{eqnarray*}
1327: $R_{f} \equiv R_{p_{f}}$, $R_{1} \equiv R_{p_{i} + k} $
1328: etc. Functions (\ref{eq4}) with relations (\ref{eq5}) were used to
1329: obtain $S_{fi}$ in the impulse representation.
1330:
1331: If a special gauge is taken, in which the initial and final
1332: photons are transversely polarized in the laboratory frame $\left(
1333: {\vec {p}_{i} = 0;\quad \varepsilon ^{0} = \varepsilon ^{'0} =
1334: 0;\quad \vec {\varepsilon }\vec {k} = \vec {\varepsilon} '\vec
1335: {k}' = 0} \right)$, then the expression for $S_{fi}$
1336: is simplified:
1337: \[ A = \dfrac{{e^{2}}}{{m}} R_{f} \left( \vec {\varepsilon}
1338: {\vec {\varepsilon} }^{\,'} + \dfrac{{\vec {\sigma} \left(
1339: {\vec {k} - {\vec {k}}^{'}} \right) \vec {\sigma} {\vec
1340: {\varepsilon} }^{\,'} \vec {\sigma} \vec {k} \vec {\sigma} \vec
1341: {\varepsilon}}}{2k_{0}\left( {2m + k_{0} - k_{0}^{\prime} }
1342: \right)} + \dfrac{{\vec {\sigma} \left( {\vec {k} - {\vec
1343: {k}}^{'}} \right) \vec {\sigma} \vec {\varepsilon} \vec {\sigma
1344: }{\vec {k}}^{'} \vec {\sigma} {\vec {\varepsilon}
1345: }^{\,'}}}{2k_{0}^{\prime }\left( {2m + k_{0} - k_{0}^{\prime} }
1346: \right)}\right).\]
1347:
1348: Then Klein-Nishina-Tamm formula for Compton effect differential
1349: cross section can be obtained with routine methods.
1350:
1351: \subsection*{4\quad Electron self-energy}
1352: \begin{eqnarray*}
1353: && - i\sum {^{\left( {2} \right)}}\left( {p} \right) = - \int
1354: \dfrac{{d^{4}k}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{4} k^{2}}}\times\\
1355: &&\times \left[ {K_{1}^{\mu }} \left( {\vec {p}; \vec {p} - \vec
1356: {k}; \nu = - 1} \right)\dfrac{{1}}{{p_{0} - k_{0} - \beta E\left(
1357: {\vec {p} - \vec {k}} \right)}}(K_{1})_\mu \left( {\vec {p} -
1358: \vec {k}; \vec {p};{\nu}^{'} = 1} \right) - \right.\\
1359: &&- K_{1}^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}; \vec {p} - \vec {k}; \nu = - 1}
1360: \right)\dfrac{{\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta} \right)}}{{\beta
1361: E\left( {\vec {p}} \right) - k_{0} - E\left( {\vec {p} - \vec {k}}
1362: \right)}} (K_{1})_\mu \left( {\vec {p} - \vec {k}; \vec {p};
1363: {\nu}^{'} = 1} \right) +
1364: \\
1365: && + C^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}; \vec {p} - \vec {k}}
1366: \right)\dfrac{{\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I+\beta} \right)}}{{\beta
1367: E\left( {\vec {p}} \right) - k_{0} - E\left( {\vec {p} - \vec {k}}
1368: \right)}} C_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p} - \vec {k};\vec {p}} \right)
1369: + \\
1370: && \left.+ N^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}; \vec {p} - \vec {k}}
1371: \right)\dfrac{{\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}\left( {I-\beta} \right)}}{{ -
1372: \beta E\left( {\vec {p}} \right) - k_{0} + E\left( {\vec {p} -
1373: \vec {k}} \right)}}N_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p} - \vec {k}; \vec {p}}
1374: \right) \right].
1375: \end{eqnarray*}
1376:
1377: For $p^{2} = m^{2}$, with taking into account that for electrons
1378: $\beta \psi _{FW}^{\left( { +} \right)} =
1379: \psi _{FW}^{\left( { + } \right)} $, we obtain $ - i\dsum {^{\left(
1380: {2} \right)}\left( {p} \right) = } - \dfrac{{2e^{2}}}{{E\left(
1381: {\vec {p}} \right)}}\int {\dfrac{{d^{4}k}}{{\left( {2\pi}
1382: \right)^{4} k^{2}}}} \dfrac{{p k + m^{2}}}{{\left[ {\left( {p -
1383: k} \right)^{2} - m^{2}} \right]}}$, which is the same as the
1384: expression for the mass operator in the Dirac representation with
1385: taking into consideration the normalization of spinors in the
1386: external electron lines.
1387:
1388: \subsection*{5\quad Vacuum polarization}
1389:
1390: The diagram in Fig.~5 is correspondent with the following
1391: expression for the polarization operator:
1392: \begin{eqnarray*}
1393: && \Pi^{\mu \nu} \left( {q} \right) = i\int {\dfrac{{d\vec
1394: {p}}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3}}}} \left\{
1395: {Sp\dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}} \right) - q^{0} + E\left( {\vec
1396: {p} - \vec {q}} \right)}}} N^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p} - \vec {q};
1397: \vec {p}} \right)\dfrac{{I+\beta} }{{2}}N^{\nu} \left( {\vec {p};
1398: \vec {p} - \vec {q}} \right) +\right. \\ && + \left.
1399: Sp\dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}} \right) + q^{0} + E\left( {\vec
1400: {p} - \vec {q}} \right)}}N^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p} - \vec {q}; \vec
1401: {p}} \right)\dfrac{{I-\beta} }{{2}}N^{\nu} \left( {\vec {p}; \vec
1402: {p} - \vec {q}} \right) \right\}
1403: \end{eqnarray*}
1404:
1405: On the spur calculation the expression for $\left( { - i}
1406: \right)\Pi^{\mu \nu }$ is the same as Heitler induction tensor
1407: $L^{\mu \nu} $ \cite{5}.
1408:
1409: %\newpage
1410: \subsection*{6\quad Radiation corrections to electron scattering\\
1411: in the external field}
1412:
1413: When calculating radiation corrections from the diagrams of
1414: Fig.~6, it turns out that the matrix elements $S_{fi} $
1415: corresponding to the electron-positron propagator diagrams cancel
1416: out with the matrix element parts corresponding to the
1417: propagatorless diagrams $d)$, $h)$, $l)$ in Fig.~6. As a result,
1418: with account for the limiting Heitler process for singular
1419: denominators \cite{5}, the matrix element for the desired
1420: radiation corrections is
1421: \begin{eqnarray*}
1422: && S_{fi} = \dfrac{{1}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3}}}\left( {\chi
1423: _{s_{f}} ^{ + }\quad 0} \right)\left\{ \int\dfrac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4
1424: k^2} \int {\dfrac{d\varepsilon \delta \left( {\varepsilon}
1425: \right)}{\vec {p}_{f}^{2} \varepsilon \left( {2 + \varepsilon}
1426: \right)}}\right. \Bigg[ C_\mu \left( \vec p_f;\vec p_f\left(
1427: 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec k\right) \times \\
1428: &&\times\dfrac{E\left( \vec p_f\right) +E(\vec p_f(1+\varepsilon
1429: ))}{E\left( \vec p_f\right) -k_0-E(\vec p_f\left( 1+\varepsilon
1430: \right) -\vec k)}C^\mu (\vec p_f\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec
1431: k;\vec p_f\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) )+ N_\mu (\vec p_f;\vec
1432: p_f\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec k)\times \\ &&\times \left.
1433: \dfrac{E\left( \vec p_f\right) +E(\vec p_f(1+\varepsilon
1434: ))}{E\left( \vec p_f\right) -k_0+E(\vec p_f\left( 1+\varepsilon
1435: \right) -\vec k)}N^\mu (\vec p_f\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec
1436: k;\vec p_f\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) )\right] C^\nu \left(
1437: \vec p_f;\vec p_i\right) A_\nu \left( q\right) + \\ &&+\int
1438: \dfrac{d^4k}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^4 k^2}\int \dfrac{d\varepsilon
1439: \delta \left( \varepsilon \right) }{\vec p_i^{\,2}\varepsilon
1440: \left( 2+\varepsilon \right) }\Bigg[ C_\mu \left( \vec p_i\left(
1441: 1+\varepsilon \right) ;\vec p_i\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec
1442: k\right) \times \\ &&\times\dfrac{E\left( \vec p_i\right) +E(\vec
1443: p_i(1+\varepsilon ))}{E\left( \vec p_i\right) -k_0-E(\vec
1444: p_i\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec k)} C^\mu (\vec p_i\left(
1445: 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec k;\vec p_i)+ N_\mu (\vec
1446: p_i(1+\varepsilon );\vec p_i\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec
1447: k)\times\\ &&\times \left. \dfrac{E\left( \vec p_i\right) +E(\vec
1448: p_i(1+\varepsilon ))}{E\left( \vec p_i\right) -k_0+E(\vec
1449: p_i\left( 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec k)} N^\mu (\vec p_i\left(
1450: 1+\varepsilon \right) -\vec k;\vec p_i)\right] C^\nu \left( \vec
1451: p_f;\vec p_i\right) A_\nu \left( q\right) - \\ &&-\int
1452: \dfrac{d^4k}{\left( 2\pi \right) ^4 k^2}\dfrac 1{2E\left( \vec
1453: p_f\right) }\left[ \dfrac 1{E\left( \vec p_f\right) -k_0+E(\vec
1454: p_f-\vec k)}N_\mu \left( \vec p_f;\vec p_f-\vec k\right) C^\mu
1455: \left( \vec p_f-\vec k;\vec p_f\right) +\right. \\ &&+\left.
1456: \dfrac 1{E\left( \vec p_f\right) -k_0-E(\vec p_f-\vec k)}C_\mu
1457: \left( \vec p_f;\vec p_f-\vec k\right) N^\mu \left( \vec p_f-\vec
1458: k;\vec p_f\right) \right] N^\nu \left( \vec p_f;\vec p_i\right)
1459: A_\nu \left( q\right) - \\&& -\int \dfrac{d^4k}{\left( 2\pi
1460: \right) ^4 k^2}\dfrac 1{2E\left( \vec p_i\right) }N^\nu \left(
1461: \vec p_f;\vec p_i\right) A_\nu \left( q\right) \left[ \dfrac
1462: 1{E\left( \vec p_i\right) -k_0-E(\vec p_i-\vec k)}\right. \times\\
1463: &&\times N_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} ;\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}}
1464: \right) C^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}_{i} ;\vec {p}_{i}}
1465: \right) + \dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) - k_{0} +
1466: E\left( {\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)}} \times \\
1467: &&\times C_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} ; \vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}}
1468: \right)N^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}_{i} ; \vec
1469: {p}_{_{i}} } \right) \Bigg] - \\
1470: &&- \int {\dfrac{{d^{4}k}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{4} k^{2}}}} \left[
1471: {C^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}}
1472: \right)\dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{f}} \right) - k_{0} -
1473: E\left( {\vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}} \right)}}} \right.C^{\nu} \left(
1474: {\vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}; \vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)A_{\nu}
1475: \left( {q} \right) \times \\
1476: &&\times \dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) - k_{0} - E\left( {\vec
1477: {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)}}C_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k};\vec
1478: {p}_{i}} \right) + \\
1479: &&+ N^{\nu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ;\vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}}
1480: \right)\dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{f}} \right) - k_{0} +
1481: E\left( {\vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}} \right)}} C^{\nu}\left( {\vec
1482: {p}_{f} - \vec {k}; \vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)A_{\nu} \left(
1483: {q} \right) \times \\
1484: &&\times \dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) - k_{0} + E\left( {\vec
1485: {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)}}N_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k};\vec
1486: {p}_{i}} \right) + \\
1487: &&+ N^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ;\vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}}
1488: \right)\dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{f}} \right) - k_{0} +
1489: E\left( {\vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}} \right)}} N^{\nu}\left( {\vec
1490: {p}_{f} - \vec {k}; \vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)A_{\nu} \left(
1491: {q} \right) \times \\
1492: &&\times \dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) - k_{0} - E\left( {\vec
1493: {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)}}C_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k};\vec
1494: {p}_{i}} \right) + \\
1495: &&+ C^{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ; \vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}}
1496: \right)\dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{f}} \right) - k_{0} -
1497: E\left( {\vec {p}_{f} - \vec {k}} \right)}}N^{\nu}\left( {\vec
1498: {p}_{f} - \vec {k}; \vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)A_{\nu} \left(
1499: {q} \right) \times \\
1500: &&\times \left. {\dfrac{{1}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{i}} \right) - k_{0} +
1501: E\left( {\vec {p}_{i} - \vec {k}} \right)}} N_{\mu} \left( {\vec
1502: {p}_{i} - \vec {k}; \vec {p}_{i}} \right)} \right] - \\ && -
1503: C_{\mu} \left( {\vec {p}_{f} ;\vec {p}_{i}}
1504: \right)\left.\dfrac{{\Pi^{\mu \nu }\left( {q} \right)}}{{q^{2}}}
1505: A_{\nu} \left( {q} \right)\right\} \left( \begin{array}{c}
1506: {\chi _{s_{i}} } \\
1507: {0}
1508: \end{array}\right).
1509: \end{eqnarray*}
1510:
1511: Upon the electron mass and charge renormalization, the written
1512: matrix element $S_{fi} $ can be used to calculate anomalous
1513: magnetic moment of the electron and Lamb shift of energy atomic
1514: levels. The final results of the calculations agree with those in
1515: the Dirac representation.
1516: %\newpage
1517: \subsection*{7\quad Electron-positron pair annihilation}
1518:
1519: In the second order of the perturbation theory the
1520: electron-positron pair annihilation is correspondent with the
1521: diagrams of Fig.~3 with substitution $\varepsilon ,k \to
1522: \varepsilon _{1}, - k_{1}$; ${\varepsilon} ',{k}' \to \varepsilon
1523: _{2} ,k_{2}$; $p_{i} ,s_{i} \to p_{ -} ,s_{ -}$; $p_{f} ,s_{f}
1524: \to - p_{ + } ,s_{ +} $.
1525:
1526: With account for the extension to eight dimensions, matrix element
1527: $S_{ + - } $ of the process is $$ S_{ + -} = \dfrac{{ - i\left(
1528: {2\pi} \right)^{4}\delta ^{4}\left( {p_{ -} + p_{ +} - k_{1} -
1529: k_{2}} \right)}}{{\left( {2\pi} \right)^{3} \sqrt {2k_{1}^{0}
1530: 2k_{2}^{0}} } }\left( {0\quad V_{s_{ +} }^{ +} }
1531: \right)\dfrac{{1}}{{2}}A_{1} \left(
1532: \begin{array}{c}
1533: {U_{s_{ -} } } \\
1534: {0}
1535: \end{array}\right).
1536: $$
1537:
1538: With account for the above substitution, operator $A_{1} $ is the
1539: same in its structure as operator $A$ in the expression of $S_{fi}
1540: $ for Compton effect, with $C^{\mu} \to C_{1}^{\mu} , N^{\mu}
1541: \to N_{1}^{\mu} ,$
1542: \begin{eqnarray*}
1543: &&C_{1}^{\mu} ( { - \vec {p}_{ +} ; \vec {p}_{ -} - \vec
1544: {k}_{1}} ) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l}
1545: {e R_{p_{ +} }}
1546: \left(I+\rho-\dfrac{\beta\vec{\alpha}(-\vec{p}_{+})}
1547: {E\left( { - \vec {p}_{ +} } \right) + \beta _{1} m}
1548: {\left( {I + \rho} \right)}\right.\times\\
1549: \qq\qq\times\left.\dfrac{{\beta \vec {\alpha} \left(
1550: {\vec {p}_{ -} - \vec {k}_{1}} \right)}}{{E\left( {\vec {p}_{ -}
1551: - \vec {k}_{1}} \right) + \beta _{1} m}} \right)R_{p_{-}-k_1},\q
1552: \mu =0;
1553: \\
1554: -eR_{p_{+}}\left( \dfrac{\beta \vec \alpha \left( -\vec p_{+}\right) }{%
1555: E\left( -\vec p_{+}\right) +\beta _1 m}\alpha ^k\left( I+\rho
1556: \right) -\left( I+\rho \right) \alpha ^k\times\right.\\
1557: \qq\qq\times\left.\dfrac{\beta \vec \alpha \left( \vec
1558: p_{-}-\vec k_1\right) }{E\left( \vec p_{-}-\vec k_1\right) +\beta _1 m}%
1559: \right) R_{p_{-}-k_1},\q\mu =k,\;k=1,2,3;
1560: \end{array}\right.\\
1561: &&N_1^\mu (-\vec p_{+};\vec p_{-}-\vec k_1)=\left\{
1562: \begin{array}{l}
1563: eR_{p_{+}}\left( \dfrac{\beta \vec \alpha \left( -\vec
1564: p_{+}\right) }{E\left( -\vec p_{+}\right) +\beta _1 m}\left(
1565: I+\rho \right) -\left( I+\rho \right) \times\right.\\
1566: \qq\qq\times\left.\dfrac{\beta \vec \alpha \left( \vec p_{-}-\vec
1567: k_1\right) }{E\left( \vec p_{-}-\vec k_1\right) +\beta _1
1568: m}\right) R_{p_{-}-k_1},\q\mu =0; \\
1569: -eR_{p_{+}}\left( \alpha
1570: ^k\left( I+\rho \right) -\dfrac{\beta \vec \alpha
1571: \left( -\vec p_{+}\right) }{E\left( -\vec p_{+}\right) +\beta _1 m}%
1572: \left( I+\rho \right) \alpha ^k\times\right.\\
1573: \qq\qq\times\left.\dfrac{\beta \vec \alpha \left( \vec p_{-}-\vec
1574: k_1\right) }{E\left( \vec p_{-}-\vec k_1\right) +\beta _1
1575: m}\right) R_{p_{-}-k_1},\q\mu =k,\;k=1,2,3.
1576: \end{array}
1577: \right.
1578: \end{eqnarray*}
1579:
1580: The expression for $S_{ + -} $ allows us to obtain the
1581: differential cross section of the electron-positron pair
1582: annihilation, which is the same as that in the Dirac
1583: representation.
1584: %\newpage
1585: \begin{thebibliography}{8}
1586: \bibitem{1}
1587: Foldy L.L., Wouthuysen S.A. // Phys. Rev. 1950. V. 78. P. 29.
1588: \bibitem{2}
1589: Blount E.I. // Phys. Rev. 1962. V. 128 P. 2454.
1590: \bibitem{3}
1591: Case K.M. // Phys. Rev. 1954. V. 95. P. 1323.
1592: \bibitem{4}
1593: Neznamov V.P. // Voprosy Atomnoy Nauki i Tekhniki. Ser.:
1594: Teoreticheskaya i Prikladnaya Fizika. 1988. No. 2. P. 21.
1595: \bibitem{5}
1596: Heitler V. Quantum theory of radiations. Moscow, Inostrannaya
1597: Literatura Publishers, 1956.
1598: \bibitem{6}
1599: Recami E., Ziino G. // Nuovo Cim. 1976. V. 33A. P. 205
1600: \bibitem{7}
1601: Neznamov V.P. // Voprosy Atomnoy Nauki i Tekhniki. Ser.:
1602: Teoreticheskaya i Prikladnaya Fizika. 1989. No. 1. P. 3.
1603: \bibitem{8}
1604: Neznamov V.P. // Voprosy Atomnoy Nauki i Tekhniki. Ser.:
1605: Teoreticheskaya i Prikladnaya Fizika. 1990. No. 1. P. 30.
1606: \end{thebibliography}
1607: \end{document}
1608: