1:
2: \documentstyle[11pt]{article}
3:
4: \textheight 9in
5: \textwidth 6.5in
6: \begin{document}
7: \oddsidemargin .3in
8: \evensidemargin 0 true pt
9: \topmargin -.4in
10:
11: %Abbreviations %
12: %***************%
13:
14: \def\ra{{\rightarrow}}
15: \def\a{{\alpha}}
16: \def\b{{\beta}}
17: \def\l{{\lambda}}
18: \def\eps{{\epsilon}}
19: \def\T{{\Theta}}
20: \def\t{{\theta}}
21: \def\co{{\cal O}}
22: \def\car{{\cal R}}
23: \def\caf{{\cal F}}
24: \def\cs{{\Theta_S}}
25: \def\pr{{\partial}}
26: \def\tri{{\triangle}}
27: \def\na{{\nabla }}
28: \def\S{{\Sigma}}
29: \def\s{{\sigma}}
30: \def\sp{\vspace{.15in}}
31: \def\hs{\hspace{.25in}}
32:
33: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}} \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
34: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}\newcommand{\eea}
35: {\end{eqnarray}}
36:
37: %********************************************************************%
38:
39: \begin{titlepage}
40: \topmargin= -.2in
41: \textheight 9.5in
42:
43: %\begin{flushright}
44: %{hep-th/0501}
45: %\end{flushright}
46: \begin{center}
47: \baselineskip= 17 truept
48:
49: \vspace{.3in}
50:
51: \noindent
52: {\Large\bf Scattering of Noncommutative Strings : A Note on Signature Change
53: at Planck Scale}
54:
55: \vspace{.4in}
56:
57: \noindent
58: {{{\Large Supriya Kar}\footnote{skkar@physics.du.ac.in }}
59: {{\Large and Sumit Majumdar}\footnote{sumit@physics.du.ac.in}}}
60:
61: \vspace{.2in}
62:
63: \noindent
64: {\large Department of Physics \& Astrophysics\\
65: Faculty of Science, University of Delhi\\
66: Delhi 110 007, India}
67:
68: \vspace{.2in}
69:
70: {\today}
71: \thispagestyle{empty}
72:
73: \vspace{.6in}
74: {\bf Abstract}
75:
76: \end{center}
77: \vspace{.2in}
78:
79:
80: We compute the S-matrix, for the scattering of two string states, on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane
81: in a path integral formalism. Our analysis attempts to resolve the issue of ``imaginary string'', originally
82: raised by 't Hooft in a point-particle scattering at Planck energy, by incorporating a notion of
83: signature change on an emerging semi-classical D-string in the theory.
84:
85:
86:
87: \baselineskip= 14 truept
88:
89:
90: \vspace{.3in}
91:
92: %\noindent PACS: 11.25.-w; 11.15.-q%
93:
94: %\noindent Keywords: bst, dbr, bdg, ncg, Thermal string,%
95: %Hagedorn temperature%
96:
97:
98: %\thispagestyle{empty}%
99:
100: \end{titlepage}
101:
102: \baselineskip= 18 truept
103:
104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
105: \section{Introduction}
106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
107:
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: \subsection{Motivation}
110: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
111:
112: The notion of signature change in our space-time was originally motivated by Hartle and Hawking
113: \cite{hartle-hawking}, in a path integral formalism to quantum gravity. The idea was
114: also independently perceived by Sakharov \cite{sakharov} at the same time. Subsequently, the novel idea involving
115: a transition from Euclidean space-time to Lorentzian or vice-versa was carried forward in literatures
116: over the last two decades.
117:
118: \sp
119:
120: In the recent past, the issue has revived interest on a brane world-volume \cite{mars-senovilla-vera}. It is
121: believed that a signature change forbids the occurrence of curvature singularities in general theory of
122: relativity due to the fact that the Lorentzian signature is replaced by an Euclidean.
123: As a result, a signature change is thought of as an effective classical description, which incorporates a
124: quantum tunneling from Euclidean space-time to Lorentzian. Interestingly, the idea of signature change on a
125: Dirichlet (D-) brane from various different perspectives has been addressed in the current literatures
126: \cite{gibbons-herdeiro}-\cite{darabi}.
127:
128: \sp
129:
130: In the context one of us, in collaboration \cite{kar-panda}, has
131: investigated a plausible signature change scenario on a
132: $D_3$-brane world-volume, in its gravity decoupling limit, when the electric ({\bf E}-) field is greater than
133: its critical value, $i.e.$ ${\bf E}>{\bf E}_c$. It was argued that the $D_3$-brane world-volume
134: changes its space-time signature from Lorentzian to
135: Euclidean in the gravity decoupled theory, when ${\bf E}\rightarrow {\bf E}^+_c>{\bf E}_c$.
136: This in turn sets up the notion of temperature
137: at the expense of genuine time in the frame-work. It was shown that an increase in temperature leads to a series
138: of successive second order phase transitions, which decouple the light gauge strings from the effective theory.
139: Finally the effective gauge theory on the $D_3$-brane undergoes a first order Hagedorn transition, which
140: is accompanied by a further flip in signature from Euclidean to Lorentzian.
141:
142: \sp
143:
144: In this article, our primary focus is on the signature of an emerging $D$-string world-sheet, in a formulation for
145: a noncommutative $D_3$-brane \cite{seiberg-witten}, in the regime ${\bf E}\le {\bf E}_c$. The frame-work possesses an
146: underlying gravitational uncertainty principle. We develop the frame-work, systematically,
147: in a open bosonic string theory in presence of an uniform two-form field in the bulk. We attempt to resolve a
148: conceptual issue originally raised by 't Hooft \cite{thooft}, while considering the Planckian scattering of point
149: particles in a gravitational theory. Subsequently, the issue was again put-forward by Verlinde and Verlinde \cite{ver-2}
150: using scaling analysis for Planck scale physics in Einstein's theory.
151: Importantly, it was shown that the two-point particle amplitude resembles to that of a string with an imaginary
152: string tension. It leads to an unphysical string at the Planck scale. We re-formulate the problem by
153: generalizing the point particle scattering at Planck energy to that of open strings.
154:
155: \sp
156:
157: Our motivation behind
158: the mentioned generalization is multi-fold. Firstly, it is
159: a natural frame-work as the quantum gravitational effects are unavoidable at Planck scale and string theory
160: is a candidate for a perturbative quantum theory of gravity. Though in principle, one urges for an
161: ultimate nonperturabtive formulation of quantum gravity, we will see that a perturbative
162: string theory is good enough as a tool to explore some of the quantum gravitational nonperturbative effects.
163: It is due to the fact that a string theory admits extended dynamical, nonperturbative, objects such as D-branes
164: \cite{polchinski}. Secondly, the
165: open string frame-work uniformly treats the scattering of two string states, namely tachyons, in a ($3+1$)-dimensional
166: world-volume corresponding to a noncommutative $D_3$-brane. Finally, we will see that the effective noncommutative
167: frame-work on the $D_3$-brane naturally simplifies the scattering problem to that of forward scattering due to the
168: additional {\bf E}-string scale in the theory. In particular, we consider an arbitrary ${\bf E}$- and
169: magnetic ({\bf B}-) fields (other than $\perp$-fields) configuration on a $D_3$-brane world-volume.
170: We shall see that the frame-work incorporates two length scales, one of the order of Planck scale along the
171: longitudinal space and the other is a large length scale in the transverse space. Above all, our analysis
172: attempts to resolve the issue of ``unphysical" string amplitude \cite{thooft,ver-2} by incorporating a plausible
173: signature change on an emerging $D$-string world-sheet in an effective noncommutative $D_3$-brane description.
174: In other words, the ``unphysical'' $D$-string with an Euclidean world-sheet is correctly interpreted as a physical
175: $D$-string with the Lorentzian signature. However, the Lorentzian signature of the effective space-time on the
176: $D_3$-brane remains unaffected in the process.
177:
178: \sp
179:
180: The plan of this article is as follows. In section 1.2, we begin with the open bosonic string dynamics and for self-sufficiency
181: revisit the mixed boundary conditions in theory. The set up for the two string state scattering on a $D_3$-brane is developed in
182: section 2.1. and the corresponding S-matrix is obtained in 2.2. The essential theme of this article is described in section 3,
183: which characterizes a phase of quantum gravity using an underlying gravitational uncertainty principle in the formulation. We keep
184: a note on signature change on the emerging $D$-string world-sheet and attempt to resolve an issue of imaginary string observed in
185: a scattering phenomena for point-particles at Planck scale in section 3.3. Finally we conclude with some remarks in section 4.
186:
187:
188:
189: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
190: \subsection{Open string modes in presence of a ${\cal B}$-field}
191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
192:
193: Consider the propagation of an Euclidean open bosonic string in $26$-dimensional Euclidean
194: space-time ($\mu,\nu=1,2,\dots 26$). The unitary property of S-matrix urges a closed string
195: propagation along with a open string in the theory. An arbitrary dynamics of a open string takes place
196: in presence of closed string backgrounds in its bulk, such as gravitational field
197: ${\cal G}_{\mu\nu}$, an antisymmetric field ${\cal B}_{\mu\nu}$ and a
198: scalar field. In addition, a open string is associated
199: with an $U(1)$ gauge field ${\cal A}_{\mu}$ at its boundary. The propagation of a open string $X^{\mu}(\tau,\s)$,
200: in a conformal gauge and for a constant dilaton is described by the nonlinear sigma model action
201: \be
202: S =\ {1\over{4\pi\a'}}\int_{\S}\ d^2\s \ \left (
203: {\cal G}_{\mu\nu} \pr^{\tilde a} X^{\mu}\pr^{\tilde b}X^{\nu} \
204: \delta_{{\tilde a}{\tilde b}}\ -\ i
205: {\cal B}_{\mu\nu}\pr_{\tilde a}X^{\mu}\pr_{\tilde b}
206: X^{\nu} \ \eps^{{\tilde a}{\tilde b}}\ \right ) + i \int_{\pr\S}
207: d\tau\ {\cal A}_{\mu}\pr_{\tau} X^{\mu} \ . \label{action-1}
208: \ee
209: Importantly, for an uniform antisymmetric closed string background, the
210: ${\cal B}_{\mu\nu}$ field moves to the boundary of the open string and
211: introduces a significant geometrical difference to the open string dynamics.
212: For simplicity, we restrict to a slowly varying gauge field
213: ${\cal A}_{\mu}(X)= - {1\over2} {\caf}_{\mu\nu}X^{\nu}$.
214: A variation of the action (\ref{action-1}), for a constant metric ${\cal G}_{\mu\nu} =
215: {\cal G} \delta_{\mu\nu}$, is performed to obtain the bulk equation of motion and the boundary conditions.
216: In a gauge choice ${\caf}_{\mu\nu}=0$, they are respectively
217: given by
218: \be
219: \pr^2 X^{\mu} = 0 \qquad\quad {\rm and} \quad {\cal G}_{\mu\nu} \pr_{\sigma} X^{\nu} +
220: i {\cal B}_{\mu\nu}\pr_{\tau}X^{\nu} \ = 0\ , \label{action-4}
221: \ee
222: where $\partial_n$ is a normal derivative and
223: ${\cal B}_{\mu\nu}={\cal B} \eps_{\mu\nu}$ is an invertible matrix.
224: The string coordinates satisfying the bulk and the boundary equations (\ref{action-4})
225: become
226: \be
227: X^{\mu}(\tau,\s) =\ X_c^{\mu}(\tau,\s)\ +\ X_m^{\mu}(\tau,\s)\ ,\label{action-5}
228: \ee
229: where $X_c^{\mu}$ and $X_m^{\mu}$, respectively, denote the conventional string coordinates and
230: its modification due to the $B$-field. Explicitly, with two perturbation parameters $\a'$ and
231: $\big ({\cal B}^{-1}\big )^{\mu\nu}$, they are given by
232: \bea
233: &&X_c^{\mu}(\tau,\s) =\ x^{\mu} + 2\a' \ p^{\mu}\tau\ + \ i {\sqrt{2\a'}}
234: \sum_{n\neq 0} {{e^{-in\tau}}\over{n}} \a^{\mu}_n\ \cos n\sigma \nonumber\\
235: {\rm and} &&
236: X_{m}^{\mu}(\tau,\s) =\ - i\big ({\cal B}^{-1}\big )^{\mu\nu}\Big ( 2\a' p_{\nu}\s
237: \ +\ {\sqrt{2\a'}}
238: \sum_{n\neq 0} {{e^{-in\tau}}\over{n}} \a_{{\nu}n}\
239: \sin n\s \Big )\ .\label{action-6}
240: \eea
241: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
242: \section{Scattering of tachyons on a $D_3$-brane}
243: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
244:
245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
246: \subsection{Path-integral formalism}
247: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
248:
249: We begin with the setup to characterize an arbitrary $D_3$-brane embedded in a $26$-dimensional
250: space-time. A $D_3$-brane world-volume describes a ($3+1$)-dimensional space-time ($a,b=0,1,2,3$).
251: Since a open string end points lie on a $D_3$-brane, its dynamics can be derived in a string theory
252: \cite{kar-1}. We consider a disk topology ($z = r e^{i\theta}$) for the
253: open string world-sheet. The unit disk boundary
254: is parametrized by a polar angle ($0\le \theta \le 2\pi$). If $Y^{\mu}(y^a)$ denote the $D_3$-brane
255: coordinates, the required Lorentz covariant condition on the disk boundary becomes
256: \be
257: X^{\mu}(\theta)=Y^{\mu}\big ( y^a[\theta]\big )\ ,\label{tach-1}
258: \ee
259: where $y^a(\theta)$ are arbitrary functions on the disk boundary and defines the $D_3$-brane world-volume.
260:
261: \sp
262: We adopt a path integral formalism, developed by one of us in collaboration \cite{kar-kazama}, to compute the disk amplitude
263: for the scattering of two tachyons on a $D_3$-brane world-volume in presence of a ${\cal B}$-field.
264: Considering Dirichlet boundary conditions $i.e.$ $\pr_{\tau}X^{\mu'}=0$, for $\mu'=4,5, \dots 25$,
265: we reduce the $26$-dimensional tachyon interactions to that on a ($3+1$)-dimensional world-volume.
266: Then the problem reduces to the computation of a 2-point amplitude, for the scattering of two tachyons,
267: in a path-integral formalism {\cite{kar-kazama} for a $D_3$-brane. The relevant path integral for the disk amplitude
268: becomes
269: \be
270: {\cal V}\big ( Y^{\mu};p_1,p_2\big ) = {1\over{g_s}}\int {\cal D}X^{\mu}(z,{\bar z}) {\cal D}y^a(\theta)\
271: \ \delta\big ( X^{\mu}-Y^{\mu}\big )\ \exp \big (-S\big )\ \ V_1(p_1) V_2(p_2)\ ,\label{tach-2}
272: \ee
273: where $g_s$ is the string coupling constant and $S$ is the action (\ref{action-1}) with a gauge choice
274: ${\caf}_{\mu\nu}=0$. The vertex operators for the closed string, $V_1(p_1) =
275: \int d^2z_1 \exp\big ({ip_1\cdot X(z_1)}\big )$ and $V_2(p_2) = \int d^2z_2 \exp\big ({ip_2\cdot X(z_2)}\big )$,
276: define the tachyon states with incoming momenta $p_1$
277: and $p_2$. The evaluation of path-integrals are performed uniformly over the bulk and boundary fields. The computation of
278: 2-point amplitude, for the scattering of tachyons, on a $D_3$-brane (\ref{tach-2}) finally turns out to become
279: \be
280: {\cal V}\big ( Y^{\mu};p_1,p_2\big )= T_{D_3}\int d^3y\ dt \ {\sqrt{- \det \big (g + b \big )}}\
281: e^{ip_{\mu}Y^{\mu}}\ \int d^2z_1 d^2z_2\ \ V_{12}\ ,\label{tach-4}
282: \ee
283: where $T_{D_3}= 1/g_s (2\pi)^3\a'^2$ is the $D_3$-brane tension and $V_{12}$ is the phase factor.
284: In principle, the induced metric signature on a $D_3$-brane can be different from that of
285: the $26$-dimensional space-time. For our purpose, we consider the metric with Lorentzian signature on the $D_3$-brane.
286: The induced fields $g_{ab}$ and $b_{ab}$ are
287: given by $g_{ab}= {\cal G}_{\mu\nu}\pr_a X^{\mu} \pr_b X^{\nu}$ and $b_{ab}= {\cal B}_{\mu\nu}\pr_a X^{\mu} \pr_b X^{\nu}$.
288: The appropriate phase factor on the $D_3$-brane may be obtained from that in the bulk and is given by
289: \bea
290: V_{12}&=&\exp \Big ( {1\over2} p_{1\mu} p_{2\nu} \ {\hat e}^{\mu}_a{\hat e}^{\nu}_b\ \triangle^{ab}
291: \big (z_1,z_2\big ) +
292: {1\over2} p_{1\nu} p_{2\mu} \ {\hat e}^{\nu}_a{\hat e}^{\mu}_b\ \triangle^{ab}
293: \big (z_2,z_1\big ) + p_{1\mu} p_{2\nu}\
294: {\hat e}^{\mu}_{a'} {\hat e}^{\nu}_{b'}\ D^{a'b'}\big ( z_1,z_2\big )\
295: \Big )\nonumber\\
296: &=&\exp \Big ({1\over2} p_{1a} p_{2b}\ \triangle^{ab}\big ( z_1,z_2\big )\ +\
297: {1\over2} p_{1b} p_{2a}\ \triangle^{ab}\big ( z_2,z_1\big )\ +\
298: p_{1a'} p_{2b'}\ \delta^{a'b'} D\big (z_1,z_2\big )\Big )\ ,\label{tach-6}
299: \eea
300: where ${\hat e}^{\mu}_a$ and ${\hat e}^{\mu}_{a'}$ are the orthonormal unit vectors, respectively,
301: in the $D_3$-brane and in the transverse space to it. The
302: matrix propagator $\triangle^{\mu\nu}(z_1,z_2)= \left < X^{\mu}(z_1)X^{\nu}(z_2)\right >$ satisfies the bulk
303: equation and the boundary conditions (\ref{action-4}). They are
304: \bea
305: &&\pr^2 \triangle^{ab}\big ( z_1,z_2\big ) = \big ( 2\pi\a'\big ) g^{ab}\ \delta^{(2)}\big
306: (z_1-z_2\big ) \qquad {\rm in\; the\; bulk}\nonumber\\
307: {\rm and}\; && g_{ab}\ \pr_n\triangle^{ab}(z_1,z_2) - b \eps_{ab}\ \pr_t\triangle^{ab}(z_1,z_2) = 0
308: \quad {\rm on\; the\; boundary,}
309: \label{tach-7}
310: \eea
311: where $\pr_n$ and $\pr_t$ are, respectively, the normal and tangential derivatives to the world-sheet.
312: The second term in the phase factor (\ref{tach-6}) is a Dirichlet function $D\big (z_1,z_2\big )
313: =\ln |z_1-z_2| -\ln |1 - z_1{\bar z}_2|$.
314: The (inverse) matrix propagator satisfying the eqs.(\ref{tach-7}) for its diagonal elements is given by
315: \be
316: \triangle^{ab}\big ( z_1,z_2\big )|_{a=b} = \a'g^{ab}\ln |z_1-z_2| + \ {\a'}
317: \left ( {1\over{g-b}}\cdot \big ( g+bg^{-1}b\big )\cdot {1\over{g+b}}\right )^{ab}\
318: \ln \left |1-{1\over{z_1{\bar z}_2}}\right |
319: \ .\label{tach-10}
320: \ee
321: The off-diagonal elements are worked out to yield
322: \be
323: \triangle^{ab}\big ( z_1,z_2\big )|_{a\neq b} = {\a'}
324: \left ( {1\over{g-b}}\cdot b\cdot {1\over{g+b}}\right )^{ab}\
325: \ln \left ({{z_1-{\bar z}_2}\over{{\bar z}_1- z_2}} \right )
326: \ .\label{tach-11}
327: \ee
328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
329: \subsection{S-matrix}
330: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
331:
332: Now consider a conformal map from the disk topology to an upper-half of the complex plane.
333: Then the disk boundary is parametrized by its real value $\tau$. On the boundary,
334: $i.e.$ on a $D_3$-brane, the diagonal (\ref{tach-10}) and off-diagonal (\ref{tach-11}) elements are simplified
335: to yield a generalized matrix propagator. It is given by
336: \be
337: \triangle^{ab}\big ( y,y'\big )= \left < Y^a(y) Y^b(y')\right >
338: = 2\a'G^{ab}\ \ln (y-y')\ +\ {i\over2} \Theta^{ab}\ \eps \big ( y -y'\big ) \ ,\label{tach-12}
339: \ee
340: where $\eps(y-y')$ is step function, $G^{ab}$ and $\Theta^{ab}$ are respectively the modified metric and a simplectic two-form
341: on the $D_3$-brane. They are given by
342: \be
343: G^{ab} = \left ( {1\over{g-b}}\cdot g\cdot {1\over{g+b}}\right )^{ab} \qquad
344: {\rm and}\quad \Theta^{ab}= (2\pi\alpha') \left ( {1\over{g-b}} \cdot b \cdot {1\over{g+b}}\right )^{ab}\ .\label{tach-13}
345: \ee
346: Since $D(\tau,\tau')=0$, the scattering matrix (\ref{tach-6}) on the $D_3$-brane becomes
347: \bea
348: V_{12}(p_{1},p_{2};y^1,y^2)&=&\exp \Big ( 2\a'\ p_{1a} p_{2b}\ G^{ab} \ln \big (y^1-y^2\big ) + {i\over2} p_{1a}p_{2b}
349: \ \Theta^{ab} \ \eps\big (y^1-y^2\big )\Big )\nonumber\\
350: &=&\big (y^1-y^2\big )^{2\a'p_1\cdot p_2}\ \exp \Big ({i\over2} p_{1a}p_{2b}
351: \ \Theta^{ab} \ \eps\big (y^1-y^2\big )\Big )
352: \ .\label{tach-14}
353: \eea
354: The effective space-time geometry on the $D_3$-brane world-volume may be derived using the matrix
355: propagator in eq.(\ref{tach-12}). It is a simple check to note that the space-time coordinates
356: are noncommutative, $i.e.$ $\big [ Y^a(y) , Y^b(y')\big ] = i \Theta^{ab} \eps ( y-y')$.
357:
358:
359: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
360: \section{Nonperturbative effects}
361: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
362:
363: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
364: \subsection{Effective dynamics on a $D_3$-brane}
365: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
366:
367: The action describing the dynamics of a $D_3$-brane may be derived from the
368: scattering amplitude (\ref{tach-4}) for $p_1=0=p_2$. It is straight-forward to see that the $D_3$-brane
369: dynamics is governed by the Born-Infled (BI-) action and with a Lorentzian signature the action
370: becomes
371: \be
372: S_{D_3}= T_{D_3}\int dt\ d^3y \ {\sqrt{-\Big (g + b + {\bar F}\Big )}}\ ,\label{np-1}
373: \ee
374: where ${\bar F}_{ab}=(2\pi\a') F_{ab}$. In addition to an induced metric $g_{ab}$, the $D_3$-brane world-volume
375: admits an $U(1)$ gauge theory. The electromagnetic (EM-)
376: field strength in ($3+1$)-dimensions is expressed in terms of its electric $E_s={\caf}_{0s}$
377: and magnetic $B_{s_1} =\eps_{s_1s_2s_3} {\caf}_{s_2s_3}$ components.
378: Since the direction of {\bf E}-field is all along the open string,
379: an electric stretch is either parallel or anti-parallel to that of its orientation.
380: The stretch builds up a string tension. It introduces the notion of an ${\bf E}$- or
381: EM-string \cite{kar-panda}, which is independent of the conventional open string in the theory.
382: This phenomenon is unlike to the one due to the magnetic field, since a {\bf B}-field rather
383: introduces a width transverse to the direction of propagation. So a magnetic field does not
384: contribute to the string tension. Thus the effective string tension for the noncommutative
385: $D_3$-brane becomes ${T}^2_{\rm eff}=T^2_{D_3}- {\bf E}^2$.
386:
387: \sp
388:
389: In this article, we focus on the effective noncommutative space-time
390: description on the $D_3$-brane. Seiberg-Witten map \cite{seiberg-witten} is used to write the BI-action
391: (\ref{np-1}) in terms of an $U(1)$ noncommutative gauge field for a fixed $\Theta$.
392: Under the map, the closed string
393: parameters are transformed to that of the noncommutative open string, $i.e.$ $g_s\rightarrow G_s$ and
394: $g_{ab}\rightarrow G_{ab}$. In addition the $b_{ab}$ is used to define the noncommutative geometry
395: with $\Theta^{ab}$ parameter in the effective $D_3$-brane dynamics. As a result, the gauge field
396: strength is transformed to that of a noncommutative, $i.e.$ $F_{ab}\rightarrow {\hat F}_{ab}$.
397: Then the $D_3$-brane dynamics (\ref{np-1}) is governed by the corresponding noncommutative BI-action.
398: It is given by
399: \be
400: S_{D_3}= {\hat T}_{D_3}\int d^3y\ dt \ {\sqrt{-\Big (G + (2\pi\a') {\hat F}\Big )}}\ ,\label{np-51}
401: \ee
402: where ${\hat T}_{D_3}= (g_s/G_s)T_{D_3}$. The $U(1)$ noncommutative field strength is expressed as
403: ${\hat F}_{ab}=\pr_a{\hat A}_b - \pr_b{\hat A}_a - i\big [{\hat A}_a , {\hat A}_b\big ]$. At this point,
404: it may be interesting to analyze the scattering phenomenon for the gauge particles at Planck scale
405: \cite{kar-maharana} on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane. However, the detail analysis is beyond the scope of
406: this article.
407:
408:
409: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
410: \subsection{Two different length scales}
411: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
412:
413: Now let us consider an arbitrary field configuration ${\bf E}=
414: (0,E_2,E_3)$ and ${\bf B}=(0,B_2,B_3)$. For simplicity, we take
415: $E_2=E_3=E$ and $B_2= B_3=B$. The mode expansion for the open string
416: coordinates (\ref{action-6}) ending on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane world-volume is worked out.
417: Using the Lorentz covariant condition (\ref{tach-1}), the $D_3$-brane coordinates are given by
418: \bea
419: &&Y^0\big (y^a[\tau]\big ) = \ y^0 + 2\a'\ p_0 \tau + i{\sqrt{2\a'}} \sum_{n\neq 0}\
420: {{e^{-in\tau}}\over{n}} (-1)^n\ \a_{0n} \ +\ \theta_E \big ( p_2 + p_3\big ) \ ,
421: \nonumber\\
422: &&Y^1\big (y^a[\tau]\big ) = \ y^1 + 2\a'\ p_1 \tau + i{\sqrt{2\a'}} \sum_{n\neq 0}\
423: {{e^{-in\tau}}\over{n}} (-1)^n\ \a_{1n} \ -\ \theta_B\big ( p_2 - p_3\big ) \ ,
424: \nonumber\\
425: &&Y^2\big (y^a[\tau]\big ) = \ y^2 + 2\a'\ p_2 \tau + i{\sqrt{2\a'}} \sum_{n\neq 0}\
426: {{e^{-in\tau}}\over{n}} (-1)^n\ \a_{2n} \ +\ \big (\theta_E p_0 + \theta_B p_1\big )
427: \nonumber\\
428: {\rm and}\quad
429: &&Y^3\big (y^a[\tau]\big ) = \ y^3 + 2\a'\ p_3 \tau + i{\sqrt{2\a'}} \sum_{n\neq 0}\
430: {{e^{-in\tau}}\over{n}} (-1)^n\ \a_{3n} \ +\ \big (\theta_E p_0 - \theta_B p_1\big ) \ ,
431: \label{np-8}
432: \eea
433: where $\theta_E= - E^{-1}$ and $\theta_B= -B^{-1}$ are, respectively, the electric and
434: magnetic noncommutative parameters. They may be
435: obtained in the limit $g\rightarrow 0$ from $\Theta^{ab}$ in eq.(\ref{tach-13}).
436: Using notations in eq.(\ref{action-5}), these modes may be re-expressed as
437: \bea
438: &&Y^0 =\ Y_c^0 \ -\ \theta_E \big ( p_2+p_3\big ) \ ,\nonumber\\
439: &&Y^1 =\ Y_c^1 \ -\ \theta_{\cal B}\big (p_2-p_3\big ) \ ,\nonumber\\
440: &&Y^2 =\ Y_c^2 \ +\ \big ( \theta_E p_0 + \theta_B p_1\big )\nonumber\\
441: {\rm and}\quad
442: &&Y^3 = \ Y_c^3 \ +\ \big (\theta_E p_0 - \theta_B p_1\big ) \ .
443: \label{np-9}
444: \eea
445: It implies that the $D_3$-brane coordinates receive corrections only from the constant momentum modes
446: associated with the noncommutative parameters $\theta_E$ and $\theta_B$ in the theory. In other words,
447: the trajectory of a open string on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane receives a constant shift. The hamiltonian may be seen to receive corrections due to the additional momentum modes in the theory. It may be given by
448: \be
449: L^b_0=\a'p^2 - \a' \big ( bg^{-1}b\big )_{ab} p^ap^b + N_{\rm osc}
450: \ ,\label{np-10}
451: \ee
452: where $N_{\rm osc}$ is the number operator with its eigen values ($0,1,2,\dots $) in the theory.
453: The mass-shell condition $\big (L^b_0-1\big )\left |
454: {\rm phy}\right >=0$ is worked out for a single winding state to
455: show that the radius of time-like coordinate $Y^0$ is of
456: the order of string or Planck scale $R={\sqrt{\a'}}=l_s$ \cite{kar-panda}.
457: Though the result is natural in the frame-work, it helps us to comment on the nature of other
458: $3$-space like coordinates on the$D_3$-brane using the inherent noncommutativity in the
459: theory. In fact, one may argue to show that the radii of the transverse
460: coordinates, $Y^2$ and $Y^3$, specified by a length scale $l_{\perp}$ are large $i.e.$ $l_{\perp}>>l_s$.
461: For instance, a non-vanishing $\Theta_E$ in the commutation relations
462: confirms the above assertion. Taking into account the presence of $\Theta_{\cal B}$, assures that
463: the radius for $Y^1$ is also small (order of $l_s$). The presence of two distinct scales ($l_s>>l_{\perp}$)
464: on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane is natural in our frame-work. In fact, the noncommutativity, among the space-time coordinates,
465: apparently incorporates a gravitational uncertainty principle. In the context, t'Hooft has proposed the construction of
466: S-matrix for the black hole formation and evaporation using the above underlying principle \cite{thooft}. A schematic
467: view of space-time on a $D_3$-brane world-volume is depicted in fig.\ref{kmfig1}.
468:
469: %\ref{kmfig1}
470: \begin{figure}[ht]
471: \begin{center}
472: \vspace*{3in}
473: \relax{\special{psfile=kmfig1.eps}}
474: \end{center}
475: \vspace*{-.1in}
476: \caption{Space-time on a $D_3$-brane in presence of an EM-field. Fig.(a) illustrates an ordinary or commutative
477: space-time. Fig.(b) a noncommutative space-time obtained by a
478: Seiberg-Witten map from (a). Different length scales $i.e.$ small scales on the longitudinal
479: plane ($y^0$ and $y^1$) and large scales on the transverse space ($y^2$ and $y^3$) are schematically shown in fig.(b).}
480: \label{kmfig1}
481: \end{figure}
482:
483: \sp
484:
485: Now let us characterize the ($3+1$)-dimensional space-time on the $D_3$-brane in terms of longitudinal space
486: ($\a,\beta=0,1$) and transverse space ($i,j=2,3$). The small length scale on the longitudinal space introduces a
487: periodicity among its coordinates, $i.e.$ $Y^0\rightarrow Y^0+ m(2\pi R_0)$ and $Y^1\rightarrow Y^1 + n(2\pi R_1)$,
488: for integer values of $m,n$. It generates a time-like killing vector ($\pr/\pr Y^0$) in addition to
489: a space-like ($\pr/\pr Y^1$) one. In other words, the continuity along the longitudinal coordinates $Y^{\a}$ are
490: approximated by a large number ($m,n\rightarrow \infty$) of tiny intervals ($2\pi R_0$) and ($2\pi R_1$). It
491: leads to translation symmetries along $y^0$ and $y^1$ on the $D_3$-brane world-volume, $i.e.$
492: $Y^a\big (y^{\a}y^i\big )\rightarrow Y^a\big (y^2,y^3\big )$. The periodic time like coordinate implies that
493: the very notion of time looses its identity \cite{atick-witten}. Naively, a signature flip from Lorentzian to
494: Euclidean is advocated in the theory, without any loss of dimension of space-time. However the Euclidean signature
495: is achieved in the usual way, $i.e.$ by Wick rotating the time coordinate. We will see that the signature change is
496: enforced on the emerging $D$-string world-sheet by the consistency of the theory, though the signature on the noncommutative
497: $D_3$-brane world-volume remains unaffected.
498:
499: \sp
500: \noindent
501: Then the matrix propagator (\ref{tach-12}) in the effective description becomes
502: \be
503: \triangle^{ab}\big ( y^2,y^3\big ) = 2\a' G^{ab} \ln \big (y^2 -y^3\big ) \ +\
504: {i\over2} \Theta^{ab} \eps \big (y^2-y^3\big )\ .\label{np-11}
505: \ee
506: It means that the
507: noncommutative $D_3$-brane wraps the small dimensions $Y^0$ and $Y^1$ around the transverse space ($Y^2,Y^3$) and
508: leaves behind a semi-classical $D$-string, with a large winding number. Since $\Theta^{23}=0$, the emerging $D$-string in the
509: transverse space possesses an ordinary geometry with an induced metric $h_{ij}$. Interestingly, the $D$-string in the context
510: is identical to that obtained for the point-particle scattering at Planck energy \cite{thooft,ver-2}. It corresponds to a
511: gauge choice $G_{\a i}=0$ for the ($3+1$)-dimensional effective metric
512: \be
513: G_{ab}= \pmatrix {{{\bar h}_{\a\beta}} & {0} \cr {0} & {h_{ij}}}\ ,\label{np-12}
514: \ee
515: where ${\bar h}_{\a\beta}$ is the metric on the longitudinal space.
516: In addition to $h_{ij}$, the $D$-string describes the dynamics of an U(1) gauge field $A_i$.
517:
518: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
519: \subsection{Signature change on the emerging $D$-string}
520: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
521:
522:
523: Now the propagator (\ref{np-11}) in the transverse space on the $D$-string becomes
524: \be
525: \triangle^{ij}\big ( y^2,y^3\big ) = 2\a' \ h^{ij} \ \ln \big (y^2 -y^3\big ) \ .\label{np-13}
526: \ee
527: The S-matrix (\ref{tach-14}) for the two-tachyon scattering on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane takes a final
528: form
529: \be
530: V_{12}\big ( p_1,p_2;y^2,y^3\big )=\exp \Big (p_{1i}p_{2j}\ \triangle^{ij}\big ( y^2,y^3\big )\Big )\ .\label{np-14}
531: \ee
532: At this point we re-emphasize that our frame-work is a natural one at Planck scale and is a stringy generalization
533: of two-particle scattering amplitude obtained by Verlinde and Verlinde \cite{ver-2}.
534: The small length scale $l_s$ along $Y^0$ and $Y^1$ naturally invokes a forward scattering of two tachyons in a
535: ($3+1$)-dimensional noncommutative space time on a $D_3$-brane world-volume. Since the mass of the interacting
536: particles is very small in comparison to that of the Planck scale, they may be treated as
537: left (L) and right (R) moving tachyons in the theory. Then the trajectory for the tachyons or string states
538: (\ref{np-9}) may be given by
539: \bea
540: &&Y^{L}_{\rm in} =\ Y_c^L \ -\ p_L^{\perp}\ \theta^L\ \eps \big (y-y_L\big ) \nonumber\\
541: {\rm and} &&Y^R_{\rm in} =\ Y_c^R \ -\ p_R^{\perp}\ \theta^R\ \eps \big (y-y_R\big )\ ,
542: \label{np-14}
543: \eea
544: where $p_L^{\perp}=(p_2-p_3)_L$ and $p_R^{\perp}=(p_2-p_3)_R$ are, respectively, the small transverse momenta
545: of $L$- and $R$- moving tachyons. $\theta^L= \big (\theta_E +\theta_B\big )$ and $\theta^R= \big (\theta_E -\theta_B\big )$
546: are the effective noncommutative parameters in the theory. The trajectories (\ref{np-14}) for both the tachyons contain
547: a discontinuity. They may be interpreted as a generalization of the shock wave solutions in
548: Einstein equations obtained in \cite{ver-2}. A schematic view of the scattering of two string states in the frame-work
549: is shown in fig.\ref{kmfig2}.
550:
551: %\ref{kmfig2}
552: \begin{figure}[ht]
553: \begin{center}
554: \vspace*{2.6in}
555: \relax{\special{psfile=kmfig2.eps}}
556: \end{center}
557: \vspace*{-.1in}
558: \caption{Nontrivial shifts ($dY^L$ and $dY^R$)
559: in the trajectories for the scattering of $L$- and $R$- moving strings in an effective ($3+1$)-dimensional
560: noncommutative space-time on a $D_3$-brane. It describes a simultaneous shock wave geometry
561: due to the discontinuities along its stringy trajectory.}
562: \label{kmfig2}
563: \end{figure}
564:
565: The shift in geodesics for both the $L$- and $R$- moving conventional strings is a new phenomenon in the frame-work.
566: It shows that the world-sheet for both the strings at the interaction vertex
567: receives an instantaneous shift (\ref{np-14}) simultaneously along the internal directions, $i.e.$ transverse to the
568: longitudinal space. The incoming string momenta are worked out to yield
569: \bea
570: &&P^L_{\rm in} = p^L\ \delta \big (y-y^L\big )\nonumber\\
571: {\rm and} &&P^R_{\rm in} = p^R\ \delta \big (y-y^R\big )\ .\label{np14}
572: \eea
573: Though the phenomenon is a generalization to that of the point-particle, the resulting
574: simultaneous shock wave geometry is new in the frame-work. A semi-classical $D$-string is argued to propagate
575: in the transverse space on an effective noncommutative $D_3$-brane (\ref{np-51}) with the metric signature ($ - + + + $).
576: The small and large length scales in the theory lead to a quantum gravity
577: phase in the longitudinal space ($y^0,y^1$) and a semi-classical gravity dynamics in the transverse space. Since the
578: genuine time looses its identity in presence of an {\bf E}-field, the metric signature may also be viewed either as
579: ($+ + + -$) or ($+ + - +$) without any change in signature on the $D_3$-brane. The apparent degeneracy in the metric
580: signature is consistent with the quantum gravity phase in the effective theory. In other words, the string scale radius
581: for the a priori time-like coordinate $Y^0$ may be viewed intuitively as internal flips: $Y^0\rightarrow Y^4$ and $Y^3$
582: (or $Y^2)\rightarrow {\tilde Y}^0$ a time-like coordinate. Then the action (\ref{np-51}) in the effective description
583: reduces to that for a $D$-string with windings. It takes the form
584: \bea
585: S_{D_3}&=&T_{D_3}\int dy^4 dy^1 \int dy^2 d{\tilde y}^0\ {\sqrt{\det\Big ({\tilde h} + {\bar F}\Big )_{\a\beta}}}
586: \ {\sqrt{- \det \Big (h+{\bar F}\Big )_{ij}}}
587: \nonumber\\
588: &\equiv & T_{D_1}\int dt\ dy^2 \ {\sqrt{-\det \Big (h+{\bar F}\Big )_{ij}}}\ .\label{np-141}
589: \eea
590: The $D$-string world-sheet possesses a Lorentzian metric signature ($- +$) in the frame-work. As can be seen from eq.(\ref{np-141}),
591: a simple physical tool leads to a change in signature from the Euclidean to Lorentzian on the $D$-string. The intuitive interpretation
592: possibly resolves the issue of imaginary string tension discussed in the literatures \cite{thooft,ver-2} while investigating
593: the point-particle scattering phenomenon at Planck scale. It was pointed out that a 2-point scattering
594: amplitude in Einstein's theory when raised to Planck scale apparently resembles to that obtained in a string theory with
595: an unusual factor of $i$ in front of the string action with an Euclidean signature.
596:
597: \sp
598:
599: Naively, the signature change appears as a trick. However, we will see that it requires an intuitive
600: understanding of the complete scenario. In fact, it is due to the ${\bf E}$-string, which
601: is associated with some of the unusual features unlike to that of a conventional string.
602: It means that the time coordinate on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane mixes with the space coordinates \cite{kar-panda} and
603: one needs to re-define all four coordinates. The signature change is provocative to understand the small radius
604: for the time-like coordinate on the noncommutative $D_3$-brane.
605:
606:
607: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
608: \section{Concluding remarks}
609: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
610:
611: In this article, we have systematically investigated the scattering of two strings on a noncommutative $D_3$-brane. In
612: particular, we have considered the scattering of two tachyons in a open bosonic string theory with appropriate Dirichlet
613: boundary conditions. Our frame-work provides a natural forum to study a forward scattering phenomenon in quantum
614: gravity. The noncommutative $D_3$-brane coordinates in the theory set up a gravitational uncertainty principle, which is
615: shown to incorporate two independent length scales in the theory. The emergence of a small length scale dictate
616: a nonperturbative quantum gravity phase in the theory which is governed by a strong coupling constant. The large length
617: scale in the theory elopes in the transverse space and is shown to describe a semi-classical $D$-string. It is argued that
618: the $D$-string world-sheet undergoes a change in signature from Euclidean to Lorentzian without changing the overall signature
619: of ($3+1$)-dimensional space-time. The degenerate metric signature on the transverse space is enforced by the quantum gravity
620: phase in the theory.
621:
622: \sp
623:
624: Our frame-work was primarily motivated to resolve an issue of ``imaginary string''
625: originally raised by t'Hooft \cite{thooft} and subsequently by Verlinde and Verlinde \cite{ver-2} while investigating the
626: Planckian scattering of point-particles in Einstein's theory. The string set up provides a general and a natural frame to investigate
627: the forward scattering in quantum gravity. Our result for the scattering amplitude is in agreement with that obtained for the point
628: particles. In the process, we noticed that the trajectories of two string states
629: receive simultaneous constant shifts, which is not possible in a point-particle scattering phenomenon. The reason being that
630: the shifts causing gravitational shock waves in the frame-work are transverse to the propagation of incoming strings. Our analysis
631: is an attempt to resolve the issue of ``imaginary string'' by conjecturing a change in signature on the emerging $D$-string in a
632: noncommutative $D_3$-brane. Since the set up is described with an inherent gravitational uncertainty principle, it may allow a
633: forum to construct an appropriate S-matrix by taking into account the succesive black hole creation and evaporation.
634:
635:
636: \sp
637: \sp
638:
639: \noindent
640: {\large\bf Acknowledgments}
641:
642: \sp
643:
644: We acknowledge the discussions with the participants in the International workshop on Strings,
645: 15-23 December 2004, at Khajuraho, India, where an initial version of this work was presented. In particular,
646: we are grateful to Gary W. Gibbons, Bala Sathiapalan, Ashoke Sen and Erik Verlinde for their helpful comments.
647: S.K. acknowledges a partial support, under SERC fast track young scientist PSA-09/2002, from the
648: D.S.T, Govt.of India. The work of S.M. is partly supported by a C.S.I.R. research fellowship.
649:
650: \vfil\eject
651:
652: %**********************************************************%
653: \def\anp{Ann. of Phys.}
654: \def\prl{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
655: \def\prd#1{{Phys. Rev.} {\bf D#1}}
656: \def\jhep{J.High Energy Phys.}
657: \def\cqg#1{{Class. \& Quantum Grav.}}
658: \def\plb#1{{Phys. Lett.} {\bf B#1}}
659: \def\npb#1{{Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B#1}}
660: \def\mpl#1{{Mod. Phys. Lett} {\bf A#1}}
661: \def\ijmpa#1{{Int. J. Mod. Phys.} {\bf A#1}}
662: \def\rmp#1{{Rev. Mod. Phys.} {\bf 68#1}}
663:
664: %**********************************************************%
665:
666: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
667:
668: \baselineskip= 18 truept
669:
670:
671: \bibitem{hartle-hawking}J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, \prd{\bf 28} (1983) 2960.
672:
673: \bibitem{sakharov}A.D. Sakharov, Sov.Phys.-JETP {\bf 60} (1984) 214.
674:
675: \bibitem{mars-senovilla-vera}M. Mars, J.M.M. Senovilla and R. Vera, \prl{\bf 86} (2001) 4219.
676:
677: \bibitem{gibbons-herdeiro}G.W. Gibbons and C.A.R. Herdeiro \prd{\bf 63} (2001) 064006;
678: G.W. Gibbons and A. Ishibashi, {\cqg \bf 21} (2004) 2919.
679:
680: \bibitem{kar-panda}S. Kar and S. Panda, \jhep{\bf 11} (2002) 052.
681:
682: \bibitem{hashimoto-ho-wang}K. Hashimoto, P-M. Ho and J.E. Wang, \prl{\bf 90} (2003) 141601;
683: K. Hashimoto, P-M. Ho, S. Nagaoka and J. E. Wang, \prd{\bf 68} (2003) 026007.
684:
685: \bibitem{darabi}F. Darabi, gr-qc/0405081 (2004); F. Darabi and A. Rastkar, gr-qc/0411133 (2004).
686:
687: \bibitem{seiberg-witten}N. Seiberg and E. Witten, \jhep{\bf 09} (1999) 032.
688:
689: \bibitem{thooft}G. 't Hooft, \plb{\bf 198} (1987) 61; \npb{\bf 304} (1988) 867;
690: \npb{\bf 335} (1990) 138.
691:
692: \bibitem{ver-2}E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, \npb{\bf 371} (1992) 246.
693:
694: \bibitem{polchinski}J. Polchinski, \prl{\bf 75} (1995) 4724.
695:
696: \bibitem{kar-1}S. Kar, \npb{\bf 554} (1999) 163; \ijmpa{\bf 1} (2001) 41.
697:
698: \bibitem{kar-kazama}S. Kar and Y. Kazama, \ijmpa{\bf 14} (1999) 1531.
699:
700: \bibitem{kar-maharana}S. Kar and J. Maharana, \ijmpa{\bf 10} (1995) 2733.
701:
702: \bibitem{atick-witten}J.J. Atick and E. Witten, \npb{\bf 310} (1998) 291.
703:
704: \end{thebibliography}
705:
706: \end{document}
707:
708:
709:
710:
711:
712:
713:
714:
715:
716:
717:
718:
719: