1: \documentclass[12pt]{ronbun}
2: %\pagestyle{myheadings}\markright{updated 2005/Sep/24/22:59:14
3: %}
4:
5: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
6: \usepackage{graphicx,color}
7: \usepackage{cite}
8: \usepackage{bm}
9: \usepackage{dcolumn}
10:
11: \newcommand{\hx}{\hat{x}}
12: \newcommand{\hxm}{\hat{x}^{\mu}}
13: \newcommand{\hxn}{\hat{x}^{\nu}}
14: \newcommand{\tmn}{\theta^{\mu\nu}}
15: \newcommand{\hD}{\hat{\Delta}}
16: \newcommand{\mo}{\mathcal{O}}
17: \newcommand{\mL}{\mathcal{L}}
18: \newcommand{\pd}{\partial}
19: \newcommand{\vp}{\varphi}
20: \newcommand{\bR}{\mathbb{R}}
21: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
22: \newcommand{\e}{{\rm e}}
23: \newcommand{\tr}{\rm Tr}
24: \newcommand{\del}{\delta}
25: \newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}
26: \newcommand{\la}{\langle}
27: \newcommand{\rar}{\rightarrow}
28: \newcommand{\lar}{\leftarrow}
29: \newcommand{\lra}{\longrightarrow}
30: \newcommand{\lla}{\longleftarrow}
31: \newcommand{\pdm}{\partial_{\mu}}
32: \newcommand{\pdn}{\partial_{\nu}}
33: \newcommand{\fmn}{F_{\mu\nu}}
34: \newcommand{\am}{A_{\mu}}
35: \newcommand{\an}{A_{\nu}}
36: \newcommand{\dg}{\dagger}
37: \newcommand{\db}{\delta_{\rm B}}
38: \newcommand{\bdb}{\bar{\delta}_{\rm B}}
39: \newcommand{\bx}{\bar{x}}
40: \newcommand{\fx}{x_{f}}
41: \newcommand{\ix}{x_{i}}
42: \newcommand{\vph}{\vec{\phi}}
43: \newcommand{\ph}{\phi}
44: \newcommand{\hphi}{\hat{\phi}}
45: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}
46: \newcommand{\be}{\beta}
47: \newcommand{\fr}{\frac}
48: \newcommand{\bfx}{{\bf x}}
49: \newcommand{\lam}{\lambda}
50: \newcommand{\lag}{{\mathcal L}}
51: \newcommand{\cpn}{\mathbb{C}P^N}
52: \newcommand{\bfn}{{\bf n}}
53: \newcommand{\Dm}{D_{\mu}}
54: \newcommand{\Dn}{D_{\nu}}
55: \newcommand{\ep}{\epsilon}
56: \newcommand{\bfw}{{\bf w}}
57: \newcommand{\epmn}{\epsilon_{\mu\nu}}
58: \newcommand{\cp}{\mathbb{C}P}
59: \newcommand{\bz}{\bar{z}}
60: \newcommand{\bpd}{\bar{\pd}}
61: \newcommand{\sig}{\sigma}
62: \newcommand{\emn}{\eta_{\mu\nu}}
63: \newcommand{\iemn}{\eta^{\mu\nu}}
64: \newcommand{\mN}{\mathcal{N}}
65: \newcommand{\slD}{\not{\! \mbox{D}}}
66: \newcommand{\da}{a^{\dagger}}
67: \renewcommand{\th}{\theta}
68: \newcommand{\xmu}{x^{\mu}}
69: \newcommand{\xnu}{x^{\nu}}
70: \newcommand{\bth}{\bar{\theta}}
71: \newcommand{\delb}{\delta_{\rm B}}
72: \newcommand{\bdelb}{\bar{\delta}_{\rm B}}
73: \newcommand{\red}{\textcolor{red}}
74: \newcommand{\green}{\textcolor{green}}
75: \newcommand{\magenta}{\textcolor{magenta}}
76: \newcommand{\cyan}{\textcolor{cyan}}
77: \newcommand{\blue}{\textcolor{blue}}
78: \newcommand{\black}{\textcolor{black}}
79: \newcommand{\tg}{\tilde{\gamma}}
80: \newcommand{\s}{\scriptscriptstyle}
81: \newcommand{\hu}{\hat{u}}
82: \newcommand{\hv}{\hat{v}}
83: \newcommand{\I}{\bf 1}
84: \newcommand{\up}{\uparrow}
85: \newcommand{\down}{\downarrow}
86: \newcommand{\Rb}{\mathbb{R}}
87: \newcommand{\Cb}{\mathbb{C}}
88: \newcommand{\non}{\nonumber\\}
89: \newcommand{\dis}{\displaystyle}
90: \newcommand{\1}{\mathbb I}
91: \newcommand{\CC}{\mathcal C}
92: \newcommand{\CM}{\mathcal M}
93: \newcommand{\CO}{\mathcal O}
94: \newcommand{\CP}{\mathcal P}
95: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.4}
96: \newcommand\Tr{{\rm Tr}}
97:
98:
99: \setlength{\jot}{3pt}
100: \setlength{\voffset}{-2.4cm}
101: \setlength{\textwidth}{17cm}
102: \setlength{\textheight}{23cm}
103: \setlength{\hoffset}{-1.9cm}
104:
105: \numberwithin{equation}{section}
106: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
107:
108: \setcounter{figure}{0}
109:
110: \begin{document}
111:
112: \begin{flushright}
113: \parbox{4.2cm}
114: {KEK-TH-1009 \hfill \\
115: {\tt hep-th/0503057}
116: }
117: \end{flushright}
118:
119: \vspace*{2cm}
120:
121: \begin{center}
122: \Large\bf
123: Bubbling 1/2 BPS Geometries and Penrose Limits
124: \end{center}
125: \vspace*{1.2cm}
126: \begin{center}
127: {\large Yastoshi Takayama$^{\ast\dagger a}$
128: and Kentaroh Yoshida$^{\ast b}$}
129: \end{center}
130: \vspace*{0.5cm}
131: \begin{center}
132: $^{\ast}$\emph{Theory Division,
133: Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, \\
134: High Energy Accelerator Research
135: Organization (KEK),\\
136: Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan.} \\
137: $^{\dagger}$\emph{
138: Department of Particle and Nuclear Physics, \\
139: The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, \\
140: Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan.}
141:
142: \vspace*{0.3cm}
143: %E-mail:~~
144: $^a${\tt takaya@post.kek.jp} \quad
145: $^b${\tt kyoshida@post.kek.jp}
146: \end{center}
147:
148: \vspace*{1.5cm}
149:
150: \centerline{\bf Abstract}
151:
152: \vspace*{0.5cm}
153: We discuss how to take a Penrose limit in bubbling 1/2 BPS geometries at the stage of a single function $z(x_1,x_2,y)$\,.
154: By starting from the $z$ of the AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ we can directly derive that of the pp-wave via the Penrose limit.
155: In course of the calculation the function $z$ for the pp-wave with $1/R^2$-corrections is obtained.
156: We see that it surely reproduces the pp-wave with $1/R^2$ terms.
157: We also investigate the pp-wave with higher order $1/R^2$-corrections.
158: In addition the Penrose limit in the configuration of the concentric rings is considered.
159:
160: \vspace*{0.5cm}
161:
162: \vfill \noindent {\bf Keywords:}~~{\footnotesize Bubbling, pp-wave,
163: Penrose limit}
164:
165: \thispagestyle{empty}
166: \setcounter{page}{0}
167:
168: \newpage
169:
170:
171: \section{Introduction}
172: Recently we have a renewed interest in the AdS/CFT duality \cite{M} in
173: the 1/2 BPS sector. Kaluza-Klein gravitons, giant gravitons \cite{giant}
174: and dual giant gravitons \cite{dual}, who correspond to 1/2 BPS states
175: in the Super Yang-Mills (SYM) side, are well described by using the free fermion
176: description \cite{Jevicki}. An application of the free fermion
177: description to study the AdS/CFT duality is recently discussed by
178: Berenstein \cite{Berenstein}. (The free fermion description of giant
179: gravitons in this direction is further studied in \cite{Silva}.) The
180: supergravity description of the phase space of the free fermion is
181: clarified by Lin-Lunin-Maldacena (LLM) \cite{LLM}. The 1/2 BPS solutions
182: of type IIB supergravity preserving an isometry $R\times SO(4)\times
183: SO(4)$ are characterized by a single function satisfying a differential
184: equation. The function can be obtained by giving a boundary condition in
185: a two-dimensional subspace in ten-dimensional spacetime. The phase
186: space of the free fermion may be identified with the two-dimensional
187: plane in which droplets are drawn for each of boundary conditions
188: \cite{LLM}. The Pauli exclusion principle in the free fermion is
189: intimately related to the causality in the supergravity solutions
190: \cite{Pauli}. The single function parameterizing the 1/2 BPS geometries
191: is also related to the Wigner phase-space distribution \cite{Mandal}.
192: In addition, topological transitions in bubbling 1/2 BPS geometries are
193: also discussed in \cite{Horava}.
194:
195: The description of bubbling 1/2 BPS geometries is extended in various
196: directions. The generalizations to other dimensions or backgrounds are
197: considered in \cite{other-dim}. Some semiclassical strings \cite{GKP2}
198: on the geometries for the configuration of concentric rings \cite{LLM}
199: are studied in \cite{FJ,EM}. The tiny giant graviton matrix approach is
200: considered in \cite{tiny}. The extension to the finite temperature case
201: is discussed in \cite{finite}.
202:
203: In this paper we discuss how to take a Penrose limit \cite{P} in bubbling 1/2 BPS geometries at the stage of function $z(x_1,x_2,y)$\,.
204: As discussed in \cite {LLM}, the Penrose limit is interpreted as the magnification of a part of the droplet.
205: This interpretation is quite natural since the Penrose limit implies the magnification around a certain null geodesics.
206: Following LLM's observation, we directly show that the function $z$ for the AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ is reduced to the one for the pp-wave \cite{BFHP1} via the Penrose limit.
207: In course of the calculation we obtain the $z$ for the pp-wave with $1/R^2$-corrections as a byproduct.
208: This $z$ surely gives the pp-wave metric with $1/R^2$ terms discussed in \cite{Schwarz}.
209: It should be noted that this $z$ has the same boundary as the pp-wave without $1/R^2$ corrections at the $1/R^2$ order level.
210: This result implies a subtlety to take account of $1/R^2$-corrections at the level of a single function $z$\,, and so it seems difficult to obtain the function $z$ with $1/R^2$-corrections by directly carrying out the integral for $z$ under a boundary condition.
211: We also investigate higher order $1/R^2$-corrections.
212: It is found that the higher order corrections do {\it not} modify the half-filling configuration and such a subtlety is not improved.
213: Moreover we consider the Penrose limit in the geometries for the configuration of the concentric rings.
214:
215: This paper is organized as follows:
216: In section 2 we briefly introduce 1/2 BPS geometries obtained by LLM.
217: In section 3 we discuss how to take a Penrose limit in bubbling 1/2 BPS geometries and obtain the single function $z$ with $1/R^2$-corrections.
218: In section 4 the higher order $1/R^2$-corrections are investigated.
219: In section 5 the result in the section 3 is applied to the concentric ring case.
220: Section 6 is devoted to a conclusion and discussions.
221:
222:
223:
224:
225: \section{Setup}
226:
227: All 1/2 BPS geometries of type IIB supergravity preserving the
228: isometry $R\times SO(4)\times SO(4)$ are obtained by Lin-Lunin-Maldacena
229: \cite{LLM}. The 1/2 BPS geometries are given by
230: \begin{eqnarray}
231: && ds^2 = -h^{-2}\left(dt + \sum_{i=1}^2V_{i}dx^i\right)^2
232: + h^2 \left(dy^2 + \sum_{i=1}^2dx^idx^i\right) + y\e^{G}d\Omega^2_3 + y\e^{-G}d\widetilde{\Omega}^2_3\,, \label{metric} \qquad \\
233: && \qquad
234: h^{-2} = 2y\cosh G\,, \quad z\equiv \frac{1}{2}\tanh G\,, \quad
235: \e^{G} = \sqrt{\frac{1+\tilde{z}}{-\tilde{z}}}\,,
236: \quad
237: \tilde{z} \equiv z - \frac{1}{2}\,,
238: \nn \\
239: && \qquad y\partial_yV_i = \epsilon_{ij}\partial_j z\,, \quad
240: y(\partial_iV_j-\partial_jV_i) = \epsilon_{ij}\partial_yz\,, \label{z-v} \\
241: && \qquad
242: B_t = - \frac{1}{4}y^2\e^{2G}\,, \quad \widetilde{B}_t
243: = - \frac{1}{4}y^2\e^{-2G}\,,\nn \\
244: && \qquad F = dB_t\wedge (dt+V)+B_tdV + d\widehat{B}\,, \quad
245: \widetilde{F} = d\widetilde{B}_t\wedge(dt+V) + \widetilde{B}_t dV
246: +d\widehat{\widetilde{B}}\,, \nn \\
247: && \qquad
248: d\widehat{B} = -\frac{1}{4}y^3\ast_3d
249: \left(\frac{z+\frac{1}{2}}{y^2}\right)\,,
250: \quad d\widehat{\widetilde{B}} = - \frac{1}{4}y^3\ast_3 d\left(
251: \frac{z-\frac{1}{2}}{y^2}\right)\,, \nn
252: \end{eqnarray}
253: where a single function $z(x^1,x^2,y)$ satisfies the following
254: differential equation:
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: \partial_i\partial_i z + y\partial_y\left(\frac{\partial_y z}{y}\right) = 0\,.
257: \label{diff-eq}
258: \end{eqnarray}
259: Remarkably, the single function $z$ determines the solution of type IIB
260: supergravity preserving an isometry $R\times SO(4)\times SO(4)$\,. If
261: one would impose an appropriate boundary condition, then one can solve
262: the differential equation and obtain the solution $z$\,. That is, when
263: we give a boundary condition the solution of the supergravity is
264: determined. The possible boundary conditions are severely restricted by
265: requiring the smoothness of the solution.
266: This requiring allows the function $z$ to take two values $z= \pm 1/2$ at $y=0$.
267: When we assign white
268: and black to $z=1/2$ and $z=-1/2$\,, respectively, the droplet
269: configurations can be drawn in the $(x_1,x_2)$-plane. This plane is
270: identified with the phase space of the free fermion discussed by
271: Berenstein \cite{Berenstein}. In particular, the configuration of a
272: single black disk corresponds to the AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ case and the
273: configuration that lower half-plane is filled describes the pp-wave
274: background. Then the Penrose limit is interpreted as the magnification
275: of a part of the geometry for the AdS. These are depicted in
276: Fig.\,\ref{pp-wave:fig}.
277:
278: \begin{figure}
279: \begin{center}
280: \includegraphics[scale=.8]{pp-wave.eps}
281: \end{center}
282: \caption{AdS, pp-wave and Penrose limit.}
283: \label{pp-wave:fig}
284: \end{figure}
285:
286:
287: \section{Penrose Limit of $z$ for AdS$_5\times$S$^5$}
288: \label{sec3}
289:
290: To begin with, we shall consider the Penrose limit of the
291: function $z$ for the AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ case:
292: \begin{eqnarray}
293: \tilde{z}(r,y;r_0)
294: = \frac{r^2-r^2_0+y^2}{2\sqrt{(r^2+r^2_0+y^2)^2-4r^2r^2_0}} -\frac{1}{2}\,.
295: \end{eqnarray}
296: The coordinate system of the LLM background for this $z$ is different
297: from the standard global coordinates of the AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ background.
298: In order to obtain the standard expression of the AdS$_5\times$S$^5$
299: we need to perform the change of coordinates as follows:
300: \begin{eqnarray}
301: y = r_0\sinh\rho\,\sin\theta\,, \quad
302: r = r_0\cosh \rho\,\cos\theta\,, \quad \widetilde{\phi} = \phi -t\,.
303: \end{eqnarray}
304: Here the radius $r_0$ is identified with the AdS radius $R$ via $r_0 =
305: R^2$\,.
306:
307: Let us recall how to take the Penrose limit in the metric.
308: The AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ metric with global coordinates is given by
309: \begin{eqnarray}
310: ds^2 = R^2 \left[-\cosh^2\rho \, dt^2 + d\rho^2 + \sinh^2\, \rho d\Omega_3^2
311: + \cos^2\th\, d\widetilde{\phi}^2 + d\th^2 +\sin^2\th\, d\widetilde{\Omega}_3^2\right]\,.
312: \end{eqnarray}
313: Here we introduce the following parameterization utilized by Callan et.al
314: \cite{Schwarz}:
315: \begin{eqnarray}
316: \cosh\rho = \frac{1 + r_1^2/4}{1 - r_1^2/4}\,,
317: \qquad \cos\th = \frac{1-r^2_2/4}{1+r^2_2/4}\,.
318: \end{eqnarray}
319: When we will take a limit $R\rightarrow\infty$ by rescaling $r_1$ and
320: $r_2$ as $r_1 \rightarrow r_1/R$ and $r_2 \rightarrow r_2/R$,
321: respectively, the resulting function $z$\,, up to and including $1/R^2$\,, is
322: \begin{eqnarray}
323: z = \frac{r_1^2 -r_2^2}{2(r_1^2+r_2^2)} + \frac{r_1^2r_2^2}{2(r_1^2+r_2^2)}
324: \frac{1}{R^2} + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,.
325: \label{z-ex}
326: \end{eqnarray}
327: In order to obtain the function $z$ in terms of $x_1,x_2,y$\,,
328: we need to perform a coordinate transformation from $(r_1,r_2)$ to
329: $(r,y)$\,. In course of the calculation $1/R^2$ corrections appear and so we have to
330: be careful to do it.
331:
332: We firstly expand $y$ and $r$ with respect to $r_1$ and $r_2$ (after the
333: rescaling) as
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: \label{eq1}
336: && y = r_1 r_2 + \frac{1}{4R^2}r_1r_2(r_1^2 - r_2^2) + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)
337: \,, \\
338: && r = r_0 + \frac{1}{2}(r_1^2 - r^2_2) + \frac{r_0}{8R^2}(r_1^2-r_2^2)^2
339: + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,. \label{eq2}
340: \end{eqnarray}
341: From (\ref{eq1}) and (\ref{eq2}) we obtain
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \frac{1}{2R^2}(r_1^2 - r_2^2) = -1\pm \sqrt{\frac{2r}{r_0}-1}\,, \qquad
344: r_1r_2 = \frac{2y}{1\pm \sqrt{\frac{2r}{r_0}-1}}\,. \label{rs}
345: \end{eqnarray}
346: We have two choices to take a pair of $r_1$ and $r_2$ due to the sign
347: $\pm$ that appears when we solved the quadratic algebraic equation
348: (\ref{eq2})\,. But we should choose the ``$+$'' sign that leads to
349: $y=r_1r_2$ at the zero-th order of $1/R^2$\,. The relation $y=r_1r_2$ is
350: utilized in \cite{LLM}. By using (\ref{rs}) we can rewrite the first
351: term in (\ref{z-ex}) as
352: \begin{eqnarray}
353: \frac{r_1^2 - r^2_2}{2(r_1^2+r_2^2)} = \frac{r-r_0}{
354: 2\sqrt{\left(r-r_0 \right)^2 + y^2}}\,.
355: \end{eqnarray}
356: Now let us introduce a new variable $x_2' = x_2 - r_0$\,. This shift of
357: $x_2$ corresponds to that of the origin in the 2-plane. That is, the
358: origin in the system of coordinates
359: %of the $x_2$-axis (the center of a single black disk)
360: for the AdS
361: is shifted to the north-pole of the disk, and the resulting origin is
362: nothing but the origin in 2-plane for the pp-wave (see
363: Fig.\,\ref{pp-wave:fig}). Then it is possible to expand $r^2 = x_1^2 +
364: x_2^2$ as
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: r = \sqrt{x_1^2 + (x_2'+r_0)^2} = (x_2' + r_0)
367: + \frac{x_1^2}{2(x_2'+r_0)} + \cdots\,.
368: \label{expan}
369: \end{eqnarray}
370: By using (\ref{expan}), we can express the first term
371: in (\ref{z-ex}) in terms of $(x_1,x'_2)$:
372: \begin{eqnarray}
373: \frac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{2(r_1^2+r_2^2)} = \frac{x_2'}{2\sqrt{x_2'{}^2+y^2}} +
374: \frac{x_1^2\,y^2}{4 R^2 (x_2'{}^2+y^2)^{3/2}} +\mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,.
375: \end{eqnarray}
376: Thus the first term in (\ref{z-ex}) has been decomposed into
377: the leading term and the sub-leading term. As a matter of course, the
378: leading term agrees with the result of LLM \cite{LLM}.
379:
380: In order to finish evaluating the $1/R^2$-corrections it is necessary to
381: investigate the second term in (\ref{z-ex})\,. It is easy to show that
382: \begin{eqnarray}
383: \frac{r_1^2r_2^2}{2R^2(r_1^2 + r_2^2)} = \frac{y^2}{4R^2\sqrt{x_2'{}^2+y^2}}
384: + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,,
385: \end{eqnarray}
386: and so the resulting function $z$ with $1/R^2$ contributions is given by
387: \begin{eqnarray}
388: && z(x_1,x_2',y)
389: = \frac{r_1^2 -r_2^2}{2(r_1^2+r_2^2)} + \frac{r_1^2r_2^2}{2(r_1^2+r_2^2)}
390: \frac{1}{R^2} + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4) \nn \\
391: && \qquad \qquad~~ = \frac{x_2'}{2\sqrt{x_2'{}^2 +y^2}}
392: + \frac{1}{4R^2}\left[
393: \frac{x_1^2\,y^2}{(x_2'{}^2+y^2)^{3/2}} + \frac{y^2}{\sqrt{x_2'{}^2+y^2}}
394: \right] + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,. \label{z}
395: \end{eqnarray}
396: It is an easy task to show directly that the function $z$ given in
397: (\ref{z}) satisfies the differential equation (\ref{diff-eq})\,. Hence
398: the pp-wave with $1/R^2$ terms may be contained in the context of
399: bubbling 1/2 BPS geometries.
400:
401: We shall next consider the Penrose limit of the $V_r$ and $V_{\phi}$
402: for the AdS:
403: \begin{eqnarray}
404: V_r =0\,, \qquad V_{\phi} = -\frac{1}{2}\left(
405: \frac{r^2 + r_0^2 + y^2}{\sqrt{(r^2+r^2_0+y^2)^2-4r^2r^2_0}}-1\right)\,.
406: \end{eqnarray}
407: For the pp-wave case the Cartesian coordinates $(x_1,x_2)$ are more
408: suitable than the polar coordinates $(r,\phi)$ since the droplet
409: configuration is the lower-half plane rather than a disk.
410: Through the coordinate transformations we can find the following $V_1$ and $V_2$ for the pp-wave with $1/R^2$ terms:
411: \begin{eqnarray}
412: && V_1 = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x_1} V_{\phi}
413: + \frac{\partial r}{\partial x_1}V_r
414: = - \frac{\sin\phi}{r}V_{\phi}
415: = - \frac{x'_2 + r_0^2}{x_1^2 + (x'_2+r_0)^2}V_{\phi} \nn \\
416: && \quad\,\, = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x'_2{}^2 + y^2}} - \frac{1}{R^2}\left[
417: \frac{1}{2} + \frac{x'_2(x_1^2+x'_2{}^2 + y^2)}{4(x'_2{}^2 + y^2)^{3/2}}
418: \right] + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4) \label{v1} \\
419: && \quad\,\,
420: = \frac{1}{r_1^2 + r_2^2} - \frac{r_1^2}{R^2(r_1^2 + r_2^2)}
421: + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,, \nn \\
422: && V_2 = \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x_2} V_{\phi}
423: + \frac{\partial r}{\partial x_2}V_r = \frac{\cos\phi}{r}V_{\phi}
424: = \frac{x_1}{x_1^2 + (x'_2 + r_0)^2}V_{\phi} \nn \\
425: && \quad\,\, = - \frac{x_1}{2R^2\sqrt{x'_2{}^2 + y^2}} + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)
426: = - \frac{x_1}{R^2(r_1^2 +r_2^2)} + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,. \label{v2}
427: \end{eqnarray}
428: The above $V_1$ and $V_2$ satisfy the differential equations (\ref{z-v})
429: with the function $z$ given in (\ref{z})\,. As a remark, the constant
430: term $1/2R^2$ in the expression of $V_1$ (\ref{v1}) would not be
431: determined by solving the differential equation but it is properly
432: determined by carefully considering the Penrose limit.
433: It is also worth remaking that the relation $z = x_2' V_1 - x_1 V_2 $, mentioned in \cite{Horava}, begins to fail at the $1/R^2$-order:
434: \begin{eqnarray*}
435: x_2' V_1 - x_1 V_2
436: &=&
437: \frac{{x_2'}}{2 {\sqrt{y^2 + {{x_2'}}^2}}}
438: - \frac{1}{4 R^2}
439: \Bigg[{2 {x_2'} + \frac{{{x_2'}}^2 \left( y^2 + {{x_2'}}^2 \right) -
440: {{x_1}}^2 \left( 2 y^2 + {{x_2'}}^2 \right) }{{\left( y^2 + {{x_2'}}^2 \right) }^{\frac{3}{2}}}}\Bigg]
441: +{\cal O}(1/R^4)\,.
442: \end{eqnarray*}
443:
444: \par
445: By putting the functions (\ref{z}), (\ref{v1}) and (\ref{v2}) into the
446: metric (\ref{metric}), we can derive the metric:
447: \begin{eqnarray}
448: && ds^2 = -2dtdx_1 -(r_1^2 +r_2^2) dt^2 + d\vec{r_1}^2 + d\vec{r_2}^2 \\
449: && \qquad \qquad + \frac{1}{R^2}
450: \Bigl[dx_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}(r_1^2 d\vec{r_1}^2 - r_2^2 d\vec{r_2}^2)
451: + \frac{1}{2}(r_2^4 - r_1^4) dt^2 \nn \\
452: && \qquad \qquad + dt dx_1 (r_1^2 + r_2^2)
453: + 2x_1(r_1dr_1dt - r_2dr_2 dt)
454: \Bigr] + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,, \nn
455: \end{eqnarray}
456: where we have written down the metric in terms of the coordinates
457: $(r_1,r_2)$ rather than $(y,x_2)$\,. We also used the following expansions
458: of $y\e^{G}$ and $y\e^{-G}$\,:
459: \begin{eqnarray}
460: && y\e^{G} =
461: \frac{y^2}{-x'_2 + \sqrt{x'_2{}^2 + y^2}}
462: + \frac{y^2(x_1^2 +x'_2{}^2 + y^2)}{2R^2(x'_2{}^2 + y^2 -x'_2
463: \sqrt{x'_2{}^2 +y^2})}
464: + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4) \nn \\
465: &&
466: \qquad = r_1^2 + \frac{r_1^4}{2R^2} + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,, \nn \\
467: &&
468: y\e^{-G} =
469: -x'_2 + \sqrt{x'_2{}^2 + y^2}
470: - \frac{(x_1^2+x'_2{}^2 + y^2)
471: \left(x'_2{}^2+y^2 -x'_2\sqrt{x'_2{}^2+y^2}\right)}{2R^2 (x'_2{}^2 + y^2)}
472: + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4) \nn \\
473: &&
474: \qquad\,\,\, = r_2^2 - \frac{r_2^4}{2R^2} + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,. \nn
475: \end{eqnarray}
476: Furthermore performing the shift of $x_1$\, as $ x_1 = x'_1 + x'_1 x_2'/R^2\,, $ and identifying as $t \equiv x^+$ and $x'_1 \equiv - x^-$ gives the pp-wave metric with $1/R^2$ corrections considered in
477: \cite{Schwarz}:
478: \begin{eqnarray}
479: && \hspace*{-0.5cm}
480: ds^2 = 2 dx^+dx^- + d\vec{r_1}^2 + d\vec{r_2}^2 - (r_1^2 +r_2^2)(dx^+)^2 \\
481: && \quad~
482: + \frac{1}{R^2}\left[-2y^2dx^-dx^+ + \frac{1}{2}(r_2^4-r_1^4)(dx^+)^2
483: + (dx^-)^2
484: + \frac{1}{2}r_1^2d\vec{r_1}^2 - \frac{1}{2}r_2^2d\vec{r_2}^2\right]
485: + \mathcal{O}\left(1/R^4\right)\,. \nn
486: \end{eqnarray}
487: Here the convention of the light-cone coordinates is absorbed into the
488: identification between $x^-$ and $x'_1$\,. As an additional remark, the
489: shift of $x_1$ does not change the expression of $z$, $V_1$, and
490: $V_2$ at the order of $1/R^2$\,.
491:
492:
493: \vspace*{0.3cm}
494:
495: Finally we should note that the function $z$ including the $1/R^2$-corrections has the same boundary condition at $y=0$ as in the case of $z$ {\it without} $1/R^2$-corrections, although the $V_2$ becomes non-zero due to the $1/R^2$-correction.
496: That is, $1/R^2$-corrections are irrelevant to the droplet.
497:
498:
499: \section{Higher Order $1/R^2$-Corrections}
500: In this section we further investigate higher order $1/R^2$-corrections at the order of $1/R^6$\,.
501: Using the relation (\ref{expan}) found in the section 3, the higher order $1/R^2$-corrections of the $z$ can be computed as
502: \begin{eqnarray}
503: z(x_1,x_2',y)
504: &=&
505: \frac{x_2^\prime}{2\,{\sqrt{{x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2}}} +
506: \frac{y^2\,\left( {x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2 + {{x_1}}^2 \right) }
507: {4\,R^2\,{\left( {x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2 \right) }^{\frac{3}{2}}} -
508: \frac{3\,x_2^\prime\,y^2\,{\left( {x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2 + {{x_1}}^2 \right) }^2}
509: {16\,R^4\,{\left( {x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2 \right) }^{\frac{5}{2}}} \nonumber\\
510: &&\quad
511: -\frac{ y^2\,\left( y^2 - 4\,x_2^{\prime 2} \right) \,
512: {\left( y^2 + {{x_1}}^2 + x_2^{\prime 2} \right) }^3 }{32\,R^6\,
513: {\left( y^2 + x_2^{\prime 2} \right) }^{\frac{7}{2}}}
514: +{\cal O}(1/R^8). \label{z6-1}
515: \end{eqnarray}
516: %
517: We can explicitly check that the function $z$ obeys the differential equation (2.3).
518: It is worth while noting that the droplet configuration $z(x_1,x_2',y=0)$ of (\ref{z6-1}) is the same as the pp-wave one (the right hand side in Fig.\,\ref{pp-wave:fig}) even at the order of $1/R^6$.
519: Hence it is expected that the droplet configuration would be the same as the pp-wave one even if we include {\it any finite} $1/R^2$-corrections.
520: As a matter of course, when we include all order $1/R^2$-corrections, the droplet configuration would become the AdS$_5$$\times$S$^5$ one (the left hand side in Fig.\,\ref{pp-wave:fig}).
521: One possible reason why the different geometries give the same droplet configuration is that the size of the droplet for the pp-wave is infinite in comparison to the finite size droplet for the AdS case.
522: Hence it might be necessary to give more boundary conditions at infinity as in the argument given in the case of pp-wave (with no corrections) \cite{LLM}, when we consider the $1/R^2$-corrections.
523: Another possible explanation is that the two limits $ R \to \infty$ and $ y \to 0$ do not commute.
524: When we first take the limit $R\to \infty$, the droplet boundary goes to infinity.
525: This limit would hide the behavior of $z$ near the boundaries at infinity.
526: Then the limit of $ y \to 0$ would give the same droplet configuration as the one without $1/R^2$-corrections.
527:
528:
529:
530: In order to obtain $z$ as a function of $(r_1,r_2,x_1)$ we expand $y$ and $x_2'$ in terms of $r_1$ and $r_2$,
531: \begin{eqnarray*}
532: y
533: &=&
534: r_1 r_2 +\frac{r_1r_2}{4R^2}(r_1^2-r_2^2)
535: +\frac{{r_1}{r_2}}{16 R^4} \left( r_1^4 - r_1^2 r_2^2 + r_2^4 \right)
536: +\frac{r_1 r_2}{64 R^6}\left(r_1^2 - r_2^2 \right)\left( r_1^4 + r_2^4 \right)
537: +{\cal O}(1/R^8),
538: \\
539: x_2'
540: &=&
541: \frac{1}{2}(r_1^2-r_2^2)+\frac{1}{8R^2}[(r_1^2-r_2^2)^2- 4 x_1^2]
542: +\frac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{32 R^4} \left({{r_1}}^4 - {{r_1}}^2 {{r_2}}^2 + {{r_2}}^4 + 8 {{x_1}}^2 \right) \\
543: && +\frac{{\left( {{r_1}}^2 - {{r_2}}^2 \right) }^2 \left( {{r_1}}^4 + {{r_2}}^4 \right) -
544: 8 {\left( {{r_1}}^2 - {{r_2}}^2 \right) }^2 {{x_1}}^2 - 16 {{x_1}}^4}{128 R^6}
545: +{\cal O}(1/R^8).
546: \end{eqnarray*}
547: By using these relations, we can rewrite (\ref{z6-1}) in terms of $r_1$ and $r_2$ as follows:
548: \begin{equation}
549: z=
550: \frac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{2(r_1^2+r_2^2)}+\frac{r_1^2 r_2^2}{2R^2(r_1^2+r_2^2)}
551: +\frac{r_1^2 r_2^4 - r_1^4 r_2^2 }
552: {16 R^4 \left(r_1^2 + r_2^2 \right) }
553: -\frac{ r_1^4 r_2^4 }{32 R^6 \left(r_1^2 + r_2^2 \right) }
554: +{\cal O}(1/R^8). \label{z6-2}
555: \end{equation}
556:
557: \par
558: In order to obtain the metric including the $1/R^6$-corrections we compute $V_1$, $V_2$, $ye^G$ and $ye^{-G}$ in terms of $x_1$, $r_1$ and $r_2$.
559: The results for $V_1$ and $V_2$ are
560: \begin{eqnarray}
561: V_1 &=&
562: \frac{1}{2 {\sqrt{y^2 + x_2^{\prime 2}}}}
563: - \frac{{x_2'} \left( y^2 + x_1^2 + {x_2'}^2 \right) }
564: {4 { ( y^2 + {{x_2'}}^2 ) }^{{3}/{2}} R^2}
565: -\frac{1}{2R^2} +\frac{x_2'}{2 R^4} \label{V1R6}\\
566: &&
567: +\frac{1}{16 R^4
568: {({x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2)}^{5/2}}
569: \left[{{ ({x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2 ) }^2
570: ( 6 {x_2^\prime}^2 + 3 y^2 )
571: - 6 y^2 ( {x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2 )
572: {{x_1}}^2 + ( 2 {x_2^\prime}^2 - y^2 ) x_1^4} \right] \nonumber\\
573: &&
574: +\frac{1}{32 R^6 ( y^2 + {x_2'}^2 )^4}
575: \bigg\{-x_2' \sqrt{y^2 + x_2^{\prime 2}}
576: \bigg[ x_1^4 ( y^2 + {x_2'}^2 ) ( -13 y^2 + 2 {{x_2'}}^2)
577: +x_1^6 ( -3 y^2 + 2 {x_2'}^2 ) \nonumber\\
578: &&\quad
579: - 3 x_1^2 ( y^2 + {{x_2'}}^2 )^2
580: ( 11 y^2 + 6 {x_2'}^2 )
581: +( y^2 + {x_2'}^2 )^3 ( 9 y^2 + 14 {x_2'}^2 ) \bigg]\bigg\}
582: +\frac{x_1^2-{x_2'}^2}{2 R^6}
583: +{\cal O}(1/R^8)
584: \nonumber\\
585: &=&
586: \frac{1}{r_1^2 + r_2^2} - \frac{r_1^2}{R^2 ( r_1^2 + r_2^2 ) }
587: -\frac{ r_2^4 + r_1^2 r_2^2 -7 r_1^4 + 8 x_1^2 }
588: {16 R^4 ( r_1^2 + r_2^2 ) }
589: +\frac{r_1^2(16 x_1^2 -2 r_1^4 + r_2^4) -r_2^2(8x_1^2-r_1^4)}
590: {16 R^6 ( r_1^2 + r_2^2 ) } \nonumber\\
591: && +{\cal O}(1/R^8), \nonumber
592: \end{eqnarray}
593: \begin{eqnarray}
594: V_2
595: &=&
596: -\frac{{x_1}}{2 R^2 {\sqrt{y^2 + x_2^{\prime 2}}}}
597: +\frac{x_1 x_2^\prime}{4 R^4}
598: \frac{ x_1^2 + 3 ({x_2^\prime}^2 + y^2)}{{(x_2^{\prime 2} + y^2) }^{{3}/{2}}}
599: +\frac{x_1}{2 R^4} -\frac{x_2'}{R^6} \label{V2R6} \\
600: &&\quad
601: +\frac{ x_1 \left\{ x_1^4 ( y^2 - 2 x_2^{\prime 2})
602: - 3 ( y^2 + x_2^{\prime 2} )^2 ( y^2 + 6 x_2^{\prime 2})
603: + x_1^2 ( 6 y^4 + 2 y^2 x_2^{\prime 2} - 4 x_2^{\prime 4} ) \right\}}
604: {16 R^6 {\left( y^2 + {{x_2'}}^2 \right) }^{\frac{5}{2}}}
605: +{\cal O}(1/R^8)
606: \nonumber\\
607: &=&
608: -\frac{{x_1}}{R^2 \left( {{r_1}}^2 + {{r_2}}^2 \right) }
609: +\frac{\left( 3 {{r_1}}^2 - {{r_2}}^2 \right) {x_1}}
610: {2 R^4 \left( {{r_1}}^2 + {{r_2}}^2 \right) }
611: -\frac{ \left( 17 {{r_1}}^4 - 13 {{r_1}}^2 {{r_2}}^2 + {{r_2}}^4 \right) {x_1}
612: }{16 R^6 \left( {{r_1}}^2 + {{r_2}}^2 \right) }
613: +{\cal O}(1/R^8). \nonumber
614: \end{eqnarray}
615: We can check that $V_1$ and $V_2$ obey the equations (\ref{z-v}).
616: It is worth noting again that the $y$-independent terms in (\ref{V1R6}) and (\ref{V2R6}) would not be completely determined from the differential equations (\ref{z-v}), although they constrain the relation between the undetermined terms in $V_1$ and the ones in $V_2$.
617:
618: \par
619: Using Eq. (\ref{z6-2}) the results for $ye^G$ and $y e^{-G}$ are
620: \begin{eqnarray*}
621: y e^G
622: &=&
623: r_1^2
624: + \frac{r_1^4}{2 R^2}
625: +\frac{3 r_1^6}{16 R^4}
626: +\frac{r_1^8}{16 R^6}
627: +{\cal O}(1/R^8),
628: \\
629: y e^{-G}
630: &=&
631: r_2^2 - \frac{r_2^4}{2 R^2} + \frac{3 r_2^6}{16 R^4}
632: -\frac{r_2^8}{16 R^6} +{\cal O}(1/R^8).
633: \end{eqnarray*}
634:
635: \par
636: Thus the resulting metric is
637: \begin{eqnarray*}
638: ds^2
639: &=&
640: 2dx^+ dx^- -(r_1^2+r_2^2)(dx^+)^2 +d\vec{r}_1{}^2 +d\vec{r}_2{}^2 \nonumber\\
641: &&
642: +\frac{1}{R^2}\bigg[
643: 2 r_2^2 dx^+ dx^- + (dx^-)^2 - (r_1^4 - r_2^4)(dx^+)^2
644: + \frac{1}{2}r_1^2d\vec{r}_1{}^2 -\frac{1}{2} r_2^2 d\vec{r}_2{}^2 \bigg] \nonumber\\
645: &&
646: +\frac{1}{R^4}
647: \bigg[ - r_2^4 dx^+ dx^-
648: - r_2^2 (dx^-)^2
649: -\frac{3}{16} ( r_1^6 + r_2^6 ) (dx^+)^2
650: + \frac{3}{16} r_1^4 {{{{d\vec{r}}}_1}}^2 + \frac{3}{16} r_2^4 {{{{d\vec{r}}}_2}}^2 \bigg] \nonumber\\
651: &&
652: +\frac{1}{16 R^6}
653: \bigg[ 6 r_2^6 dx^+ dx^- +8r_2^4 (dx^-)^2
654: -( r_1^8 - r_2^8 ) (dx^+)^2
655: + r_1^6 {{{{d\vec{r}}}_1}}^2 - r_2^6 {{{{d\vec{r}}}_2}}^2 \bigg]
656: +{\cal O}(1/R^8)
657: \end{eqnarray*}
658: where we have used the coordinate-transformation from $x_1$ to $x_1'$ defined as
659: \begin{eqnarray*}
660: x_1
661: &\equiv&
662: x_1'+\frac{x_1' x_2'}{R^2} +\frac{x_1'{}^3}{2 R^4}
663: +\frac{x_1'{}^3 x_2'}{3 R^6}
664: +{\cal O}(1/R^8)
665: \nonumber \\
666: &=& x_1'+ \frac{x_1'(r_1^2-r_2^2)}{2R^2}
667: -\frac{x_1^{\prime 3}}{6 R^4} + \frac{x_1'}{8 R^4} (r_1^2 -r_2^2)^2 %\\
668: -\frac{{x_1'}^3 ( r_1^2 - r_2^2 ) }{12 R^6} +
669: \frac{x_1'(r_1^2-r_2^2)}{32 R^6}
670: \left[r_1^4 -r_1^2 r_2^2 +r_2^4 \right] \\
671: && \quad
672: +{\cal O}(1/R^8),
673: \end{eqnarray*}
674: and the same identifications in section 3 : $t \equiv x^+$ and $x_1' \equiv -x^-$ \,.
675:
676:
677: \section{Concentric Rings}
678:
679: As a simple extension of the discussion in section \ref{sec3}, let us
680: consider the geometry characterized by a family of concentric rings
681: \cite{LLM} (see Fig.\,\ref{con-ring:fig}). This solution is given by the
682: following $z,V_r,V_\phi$:
683: \begin{eqnarray}
684: && \tilde{z} = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^N(-1)^{n+1}\left(
685: \frac{r^2-r^2_n+y^2}{\sqrt{(r^2+r^2_n+y^2)^2 -4r^2r^2_n}} -1
686: \right)\,, \nn \\
687: && V_r = 0\,, \quad V_{\phi} = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^N (-1)^n
688: \left(\frac{r^2+r^2_n +y^2}{\sqrt{(r^2 + r^2_n +y^2)^2 -4 r^2 r^2_n}}
689: -1 \right)\,, \nn
690: \end{eqnarray}
691: where we have used the polar coordinates $(r,\phi)$ instead of
692: $(x_1,x_2)$\,. The $r_1$ is the radius of the outermost circle, $r_2$
693: the next one and so on. This background is time-independent and in
694: certain limits can be thought of as a configuration of smeared S$^5$
695: giants and/or their AdS$_5$ duals.
696:
697: It is easy to apply the previous analysis to this case. All we have to
698: do is to introduce the shifts of variables as follows:
699: \begin{eqnarray}
700: x_2 - r_n = (x_2 - r_0) - (r_n - r_0) \equiv x'_2 - x_2^{(n)} \,.
701: \end{eqnarray}
702: Then the radius coordinate $r$ is expanded as
703: \begin{eqnarray}
704: r = \sqrt{x_1^2 + (x_2'- x_2^{(n)} + r_n)^2} = (x_2'-x_2^{(n)} +r_n) +
705: \frac{x_1^2}{2(x_2'-x_2^{(n)} + r_n)} + \cdots\,.
706: \end{eqnarray}
707: In addition we assume that $r_0$ is much bigger than $x_2^{(n)}$ (thin
708: ring approximation) and expand $r_n$ as
709: \[
710: r_n = r_0\left(1 + \frac{x_2^{(n)}}{r_0}\right) \equiv r_0
711: \left(1 + \epsilon^{(n)} \right)\,.
712: \]
713: The remaining part of the analysis is similar to that in the
714: AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ ($N=1$ case) and the $1/R^2$ corrections in this case
715: can be also evaluated. The resulting function $z$ after taking the
716: Penrose limit in the configuration of the concentric rings is
717: \begin{eqnarray}
718: z = \frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^N (-1)^{n+1}\left\{
719: \frac{x'_2 - x_2^{(n)}}{\sqrt{(x'_2-x_2^{(n)})^2 + y^2}}
720: + \frac{y^2\left[(x'_2-x_2^{(n)})^2
721: + x_1^2 + y^2 \right]}{2R^2\left[(x'_2-x_2^{(n)})^2 +y^2 \right]^{3/2}}
722: \right\}
723: + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,. \label{z:strip}
724: \end{eqnarray}
725: Then $V_1$ and $V_2$ are given by
726: \begin{eqnarray}
727: && V_1 = \sum_{n=1}^N (-1)^{n-1}\Biggl\{
728: \frac{1}{2\sqrt{(x'_2-x_2^{(n)})^2 + y^2}} \\
729: && \hspace*{3.3cm} - \frac{1}{R^2}\Biggl[
730: \frac{1}{2} + \frac{(x'_2 - x_2^{(n)})\bigl[x_1^2 + (x'_2-x_2^{(n)})^2 +y^2
731: \bigr]}{4\bigl[(x'_2-x_2^{(n)})^2 + y^2\bigr]^{3/2}}
732: \Biggr]
733: \Biggr\} + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,, \nn \\
734: && V_2 = \sum_{n=1}^N (-1)^{n}\frac{x_1}{2R^2\sqrt{(x'_2-x_2^{(n)})^2 +y^2}}
735: + \mathcal{O}(1/R^4)\,.
736: \end{eqnarray}
737: The droplet configurations at $y=0$ are a set of stripes as noted by LLM
738: \cite{LLM} (see Fig.\,\ref{con-pp:fig}). The leading part of the above
739: result agrees with the one in \cite{EM}. We have plotted two graphs
740: (Figs.\,\ref{con-ring:fig} and \ref{con-pp:fig}) by using the
741: contour plot in the Mathematica with the data: $r_1 = R^2,~r_2 = 0.99
742: R^2,~r_3 = 0.96 R^2,~r_4=0.95 R^2, ~r_5=0.92 R^2,~r_6=0.91 R^2,~r_7 =
743: 0.6 R^2,~R=2$\,. Our result (\ref{z:strip}) surely reproduces a set of
744: strips from the concentric rings via the Penrose limit.
745:
746: \begin{figure}[hbtp]
747: \begin{tabular}{cc}
748: \hspace*{-7mm}
749: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
750: \begin{center}
751: \resizebox{65mm}{!}{\includegraphics{con-ring.eps}}
752: \end{center}
753: \vspace*{-9mm}
754: \caption{Configuration of concentric rings.}\label{con-ring:fig}
755: \end{minipage}
756: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
757: \begin{center}
758: \resizebox{65mm}{!}{\includegraphics{con-pp.eps}}
759: \end{center}
760: \vspace*{-9mm}
761: \caption{Penrose limit of concentric rings.}\label{con-pp:fig}
762: \end{minipage}
763: \end{tabular}
764: \end{figure}
765:
766: \par
767: In a similar way we can compute the higher order corrections for concentric rings.
768:
769: \section{A Conclusion and Discussions}
770:
771: We have discussed how to take a Penrose limit in bubbling 1/2 BPS
772: geometries at the stage of a single function $z(x_1,x_2,y)$\,. Taking
773: the Penrose limit for the function $z$ for the AdS, we can directly
774: obtain the $z$ for the pp-wave with $1/R^2$-corrections. It satisfies
775: the differential equation and leads to the pp-wave metric with
776: $1/R^2$-corrections. In particular, our result reproduces the pp-wave
777: metric used in \cite{Schwarz}.
778:
779: It should be however noted that the function with $1/R^2$-corrections
780: has the same boundary condition at $y=0$ as the $z$ without the
781: corrections. Hence the $1/R^2$-corrections are not determined by
782: naively imposing a boundary condition at $y=0$\,, and it would be necessary
783: to take more careful treatments. But, by considering the Penrose limit at the stage of the single function $z$ for the AdS space (or metrics of other spacetimes), it is possible to properly take $1/R^2$-corrections into account in bubbling 1/2 BPS geometries.
784:
785: We also considered the higher $1/R^2$-contributions to the $z$\,.
786: We saw that higher-order corrections do not modify the half-filling configuration as well as the second order corrections.
787: That is, the $z$ has the same boundary condition at $y=0$ as the $z$ with no correction.
788: One possible reason why the different geometries give the same droplet configuration is that the size of the droplet for the pp-wave is infinite in comparison to the finite size droplet for the AdS case.
789: It might be necessary to give more boundary conditions at infinity as in the argument given in the case of pp-wave (with no corrections) \cite{LLM}, when we consider the $1/R^2$-corrections.
790: It was also found that the $y$-independent terms in $V_1$ and $V_2$ would not be completely determined from the differential equations (\ref{z-v}),
791: although they constrain the relation between the undetermined terms in $V_1$ and the ones in $V_2$\,.
792: It would be nice to apply our discussion to other metrics (for example, \cite{other-dim}) and derive the corresponding function $z$ (with $1/R^2$-corrections).
793: On the other hand, it is interesting to consider the description of $1/R^2$-corrections in terms of the free fermion in the SYM side.
794: In this direction it would be valuable to comment on the work of Horava and Shepard \cite{Horava}.
795: They also considered the Penrose limit of LLM geometries, and in particular, showed that the Penrose limit towards the (nearly) singular null geodesic of the geometry (nearly) at topological transition is equivalent to the well-known double-scaling limit of the matrix model that defines two-dimensional noncritical string theory (in fact, the Type 0 version of it \cite{0B}, since both sides of the Fermi sea are filled).
796: Hence the $1/R^2$-corrections in the Penrose limit would correspond to the corrections to the double scaled matrix model.
797: It is also worthwhile to say that the non-relativistic free fermions would become relativistic in the Penrose limit according to the LLM's observation \cite{LLM}.
798: Then it would be expected that the $1/R^2$-corrections interpolate between the non-relativistic fermions and relativistic ones in the Penrose limit.
799:
800:
801:
802: \section*{Acknowledgments}
803: We would like to thank H.~Fuji, Y.~Susaki, A.~Tsuchiya and A.~Yamaguchi for useful
804: discussion. The work of K.~Y.\ is supported in part by JSPS Research
805: Fellowships for Young Scientists.
806:
807: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
808:
809: \bibitem{M}
810: J.~M.~Maldacena,
811: ``The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,''
812: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2} (1998) 231
813: [Int.\ J.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 38} (1999) 1113] [arXiv:hep-th/9711200];
814: S.~S.~Gubser, I.~R.~Klebanov and A.~M.~Polyakov,
815: ``Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,''
816: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 428} (1998) 105 [arXiv:hep-th/9802109];
817: E.~Witten, ``Anti-de Sitter space and holography,''
818: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 2} (1998) 253 [arXiv:hep-th/9802150].
819:
820: \bibitem{giant}J.~McGreevy, L.~Susskind and N.~Toumbas,
821: ``Invasion of the giant gravitons from anti-de Sitter space,''
822: JHEP {\bf 0006} (2000) 008 [arXiv:hep-th/0003075].
823:
824: \bibitem{dual}
825: M.~T.~Grisaru, R.~C.~Myers and O.~Tafjord,
826: ``SUSY and Goliath,''
827: JHEP {\bf 0008} (2000) 040 [arXiv:hep-th/0008015]. \\
828: A.~Hashimoto, S.~Hirano and N.~Itzhaki,
829: ``Large branes in AdS and their field theory dual,''
830: JHEP {\bf 0008} (2000) 051 [arXiv:hep-th/0008016].
831:
832: \bibitem{Jevicki}
833: S.~Corley, A.~Jevicki and S.~Ramgoolam,
834: ``Exact correlators of giant gravitons from dual N = 4 SYM theory,''
835: Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {\bf 5} (2002) 809
836: [arXiv:hep-th/0111222]. \\
837: The description of particles and holes in this reference
838: is given in the c=1 context in,
839: A.~Jevicki, ``Nonperturbative collective field theory,''
840: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 376} (1992) 75.
841:
842:
843: \bibitem{Berenstein}D.~Berenstein,
844: ``A toy model for the AdS/CFT correspondence,''
845: JHEP {\bf 0407} (2004) 018 [arXiv:hep-th/0403110].
846:
847: \bibitem{Silva}
848: M.~M.~Caldarelli and P.~J.~Silva,
849: ``Giant gravitons in AdS/CFT. I: Matrix model and back reaction,''
850: JHEP {\bf 0408} (2004) 029
851: [arXiv:hep-th/0406096].
852:
853: \bibitem{LLM}H.~Lin, O.~Lunin and J.~Maldacena,
854: ``Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries,''
855: JHEP {\bf 0410} (2004) 025 [arXiv:hep-th/0409174].
856:
857: \bibitem{Pauli}
858: M.~M.~Caldarelli, D.~Klemm and P.~J.~Silva,
859: ``Chronology protection in anti-de Sitter,'' arXiv:hep-th/0411203.
860:
861: \bibitem{Mandal}
862: G.~Mandal,
863: ``Fermions from half-BPS supergravity,''
864: arXiv:hep-th/0502104.
865:
866: \bibitem{Horava}
867: P.~Horava and P.~G.~Shepard,
868: ``Topology changing transitions in bubbling geometries,''
869: arXiv:hep-th/0502127.
870:
871: \bibitem{other-dim}
872: J.~T.~Liu, D.~Vaman and W.~Y.~Wen,
873: ``Bubbling 1/4 BPS solutions in type IIB and supergravity reductions
874: on S$^n$$\times$S$^n$,''
875: arXiv:hep-th/0412043. \\
876: D.~Martelli and J.~F.~Morales,
877: ``Bubbling AdS$_3$,''
878: arXiv:hep-th/0412136. \\
879: N.~V.~Suryanarayana, ``Half-BPS giants, free fermions and microstates
880: of superstars,'' arXiv:hep-th/0411145. \\
881: Z.~W.~Chong, H.~Lu and C.~N.~Pope, ``BPS geometries and AdS bubbles,''
882: arXiv:hep-th/0412221. \\
883: J.~T.~Liu and D.~Vaman,
884: ``Bubbling 1/2 BPS solutions of minimal six-dimensional supergravity,''
885: arXiv:hep-th/0412242. \\
886: O.~Lunin and J.~Maldacena,
887: ``Deforming field theories with U(1)$\times$U(1) global symmetry
888: and their gravity duals,'' arXiv:hep-th/0502086.
889:
890: \bibitem{GKP2}
891: S.~S.~Gubser, I.~R.~Klebanov and A.~M.~Polyakov,
892: ``A semi-classical limit of the gauge/string correspondence,''
893: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 636} (2002) 99 [arXiv:hep-th/0204051]. \\
894: S.~Frolov and A.~A.~Tseytlin,
895: ``Semiclassical quantization of rotating superstring in AdS$_5\times$S$^5$,''
896: JHEP {\bf 0206} (2002) 007 [arXiv:hep-th/0204226].
897:
898: \bibitem{FJ}V.~Filev and C.~V.~Johnson, ``Operators with large quantum
899: numbers, spinning strings, and giant gravitons,''
900: arXiv:hep-th/0411023.
901:
902: \bibitem{EM}
903: H.~Ebrahim and A.~E.~Mosaffa,
904: ``Semiclassical String Solutions on 1/2 BPS Geometries,'' JHEP {\bf
905: 0501} (2005) 050 [arXiv:hep-th/0501072]
906:
907: \bibitem{tiny}
908: M.~M.~Sheikh-Jabbari,
909: ``Tiny graviton matrix theory: DLCQ of IIB plane-wave string theory,
910: a conjecture,'' JHEP {\bf 0409} (2004) 017 [arXiv:hep-th/0406214]. \\
911: M.~M.~Sheikh-Jabbari and M.~Torabian,
912: ``Classification of all 1/2 BPS solutions of the tiny graviton matrix
913: theory,'' arXiv:hep-th/0501001.
914:
915: \bibitem{finite}
916: A.~Buchel, ``Coarse-graining 1/2 BPS geometries of type IIB
917: supergravity,'' arXiv:hep-th/0409271.
918:
919: \bibitem{P} R.~Penrose, ``Any spacetime has a plane wave as a limit,''
920: Differential geometry and relativity, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976,
921: pp.~271-275. \\ R.~Gueven, ``Plane wave limits and T-duality,'' Phys.\
922: Lett.\ B {\bf 482} (2000) 255 [arXiv:hep-th/0005061].
923:
924: \bibitem{BFHP1}
925: M.~Blau, J.~Figueroa-O'Farrill, C.~Hull and G.~Papadopoulos,
926: ``A new maximally supersymmetric background of IIB superstring theory,''
927: JHEP {\bf 0201} (2002) 047 [arXiv:hep-th/0110242].
928:
929: \bibitem{Schwarz}
930: C.~G.~.~Callan, H.~K.~Lee, T.~McLoughlin, J.~H.~Schwarz, I.~Swanson
931: and X.~Wu, ``Quantizing string theory in AdS$_5\times$S$^5$:
932: Beyond the pp-wave,'' Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 673} (2003) 3
933: [arXiv:hep-th/0307032].
934:
935: \bibitem{0B}T.~Takayanagi and N.~Toumbas,
936: ``A matrix model dual of type 0B string theory in two dimensions,''
937: JHEP {\bf 0307} (2003) 064 [arXiv:hep-th/0307083]. \\
938: M.~R.~Douglas, I.~R.~Klebanov, D.~Kutasov, J.~Maldacena, E.~Martinec and
939: N.~Seiberg, ``A new hat for the c = 1 matrix model,''
940: arXiv:hep-th/0307195.
941:
942:
943: \end{thebibliography}
944:
945: \end{document}
946: