1: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx,epsfig}
4: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
5: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
6: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
7: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
8: \usepackage{amssymb}
9: \usepackage{amsmath}
10:
11: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
12: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
13: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
14: \usepackage{epsfig}
15: \usepackage{graphics}
16:
17: %\nofiles
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: %\preprint{APS/123-QED}
22:
23: \title{Scattering of a Klein-Gordon particle by a
24: Woods-Saxon potential}
25:
26: \author{Clara Rojas}
27: \affiliation{Centro de F\'{\i}sica IVIC Apdo 21827, Caracas 1020A,
28: Venezuela
29: }%
30: \author{V\'{\i}ctor M. Villalba}
31: \email{villalba@ivic.ve} \affiliation{Centro de F\'{\i}sica IVIC
32: Apdo 21827, Caracas 1020A, Venezuela
33: }%
34:
35:
36: \date{\today}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: We solve the Klein-Gordon equation in the presence of a spatially
40: one-dimensional Woods-Saxon potential. The scattering solutions are
41: obtained in terms of hypergeometric functions and the condition for
42: the existence of transmission resonances is derived. It is shown how
43: the zero-reflection condition depends on the shape of the potential.
44: \end{abstract}
45:
46: \pacs{03.65.Pm, 03.65.Nk}
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: Recently, the Woods-Saxon potential and their supersymmetric
51: extensions have been extensively discussed in the literature
52: \cite{Guo,Petrillo,Chen,Guo2,Alhaidari}. Among the advantages of
53: working with the Woods-Saxon potential we have to mention that, in
54: the one-dimensional case, the Klein-Gordon as well as the Dirac
55: equations are solvable in terms of special functions and therefore
56: the study of bound states and scattering processes becomes more
57: tractable. It should be mentioned that the Woods saxon potential is,
58: for some values of the shape parameters, a smoothed out form of the
59: potential barrier.
60:
61: The study of low momentum scattering in the Schr\"odinger equation
62: in one-dimensional even potentials shows that, as momentum goes to
63: zero, the reflection coefficient goes to unity unless the potential
64: $V(x)$ supports a zero energy resonance \cite{Newton}. In this case
65: the transmission coefficient goes to unity, becoming a transmission
66: resonance \cite{Bohm}. Recently, this result has been generalized to
67: the Dirac equation \cite{Dombey}, showing that transmission
68: resonances at $k=0$ in the Dirac equation take place for a potential
69: barrier $V=V(x)$ when the corresponding potential well $V=-V(x)$
70: supports a supercritical state. The situation for short range
71: potentials in the Klein-Gordon equation is completely different,
72: here there are particle-antiparticle creation processes but no
73: supercritical states
74: \cite{Schiff,Snyder,greiner,Greiner2,Rafelski,Popov}. The absence of
75: supercritical states in the Klein-Gordon equation in the presence of
76: short-range potential interactions does not prevent the existence of
77: transmission resonances for given values of the potential.
78:
79:
80: The presence of transmission resonances in relativistic scalar wave
81: equations in external potentials has been extensively discussed in
82: the literature \cite{greiner,Fulling}. As a result of this
83: phenomenon we have that, for given values of the energy and of the
84: shape of the effective barrier, the probability of the transmission
85: coefficient reaches a maximum such as those obtained in the study of
86: quasinormal modes and superradiance in black hole physics.
87:
88: Despite its relative simplicity, scattering processes of
89: relativistic scalar particles by one-dimensional potentials exhibit
90: the same physical properties that $s$ waves in the presence of
91: radial potentials, therefore the results reported in this article
92: can be straightforwardly extended to the radial Woods-Saxon
93: potential.
94:
95: It is the purpose of the present article to compute the scattering
96: solutions of the one-dimensional Klein-Gordon equation in the
97: presence of a Woods-Saxon potential and show that one-dimensional
98: scalar wave solutions exhibit transmission resonances with a
99: functional dependence on the shape and strength of the potential
100: similar to the obtained for the Dirac equation \cite{kennedy}.
101:
102:
103: The one-dimensional Klein-Gordon equation, minimally coupled to a
104: vector potential $A^{\mu}$ can be written as
105:
106: \begin{equation}
107: \eta ^{\alpha \beta }(\partial _{\alpha }+ieA_{\alpha })(\partial
108: _{\beta }+ieA_{\beta })\phi +\phi =0 \label{ws0}
109: \end{equation}
110: where the metric $\eta ^{\alpha \beta }=diag(1,-1)$ and here and thereafter
111: we choose to work in natural units $\hbar =c=m=1$ \cite{greiner}
112:
113: \begin{equation}
114: \frac{d^{2}\phi (x)}{dx^{2}}+\left[ \left( E-V(x)\right) ^{2}-1\right] \phi
115: (x)=0.
116: \end{equation}
117: The Woods-Saxon potential is defined as \cite{kennedy}
118:
119: \begin{equation}
120: V(x)=V_{0}\left[ \frac{\Theta (-x)}{1+e^{-a(x+L)}}+\frac{\Theta (x)}{%
121: 1+e^{a(x-L)}}\right] ,
122: \end{equation}
123: where $V_{0}$ is real and positive; $a>0$ and $L>0$ are also real
124: and positive. $\Theta (x)$ is the Heaviside step function. The form
125: of the Woods-Saxon potential is shown in the Fig. \ref{f1}.
126:
127: \begin{figure}[tbp]
128: \begin{center}
129: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{ws_scattering.eps}
130: \end{center}
131: \caption{{Woods-Saxon potential for $L=2$ with $a=10$ (solid line) and $a=3$
132: (dotted line).}}
133: \label{f1}
134: \end{figure}
135: From Fig. \ref{f1} one readily notices that, for a given value of the width
136: parameter $L$, as the shape parameter $a$ increases, the Woods-Saxon
137: potential reduces to a square barrier with smooth walls.
138:
139: In order to consider the scattering solutions for $x<0$ with
140: $E^{2}>1$, we proceed to solve the differential equation
141:
142: \begin{equation}
143: \frac{d^{2}\phi _{L}(x)}{dx^{2}}+\left[ \left( E-\frac{V_{0}}{1+e^{-a(x+L)}}%
144: \right) ^{2}-1\right] \phi _{L}(x)=0. \label{ws2}
145: \end{equation}
146: On making the substitution $y=-e^{-a(x+L)}$ , Eq. (\ref{ws2}) becomes
147:
148: \begin{equation}
149: a^{2}y\frac{d}{dy}\left[ y\frac{d\phi _{L}(y)}{dy}\right] +\left[ \left( E-%
150: \frac{V_{0}}{1-y}\right) ^{2}-1\right] \phi _{L}(y)=0. \label{ws3}
151: \end{equation}
152: Putting $\phi _{L}(y)=y^{\mu }(1-y)^{-\lambda _{1}}h(y)$, Eq.
153: (\ref{ws3}) reduces to the hypergeometric equation
154:
155: \begin{equation} \label{ws4}
156: y(1-y)h^{\prime\prime}+[(1+2\mu)-(2\mu-2\lambda_1+1)y]h^{\prime}-(\mu-%
157: \lambda_1+\nu)(\mu-\lambda_1-\nu)h=0,
158: \end{equation}
159:
160: \noindent where the primes denote derivatives with respect to $y$
161: and the parameters $\nu ,$ $k,$ $\mu ,$, $\lambda$ and $\lambda
162: _{1}$ are:
163:
164: \begin{equation} \label{ws5}
165: \nu=\frac{ik}{a}, \hspace{1cm} k=\sqrt{E^2-1,} \hspace{1cm}\mu=\frac{\sqrt{%
166: 1-(E-V_0)^2}}{a},
167: \end{equation}
168:
169: \begin{equation}
170: \lambda =\frac{\sqrt{a^{2}-4V_{0}^{2}}}{2a},\hspace{1cm}\lambda _{1}=-\frac{1%
171: }{2}+\lambda . \label{ws6}
172: \end{equation}
173: The general solution of Eq. (\ref{ws4}) can be expressed in terms of
174: Gauss hypergeometric functions ${_{2}F_{1}}\left( \mu ,\nu, \lambda
175: ;y\right)$ as \cite{abra}
176:
177: \begin{eqnarray}
178: h(y) &=&D_{1}\hspace{0.05cm}{_{2}F_{1}}\left( \mu -\nu -\lambda
179: _{1},\mu
180: +\nu -\lambda _{1},1+2\mu ;y\right) \nonumber \label{ws7} \\
181: &+&D_{2}\hspace{0.05cm}y^{-2\mu }{_{2}F_{1}}\left( -\mu -\nu
182: -\lambda _{1},-\mu +\nu -\lambda _{1},1-2\mu ;y\right) ,
183: \end{eqnarray}
184: so
185:
186: \begin{eqnarray} \label{ws71}
187: \phi_L(y)&=&D_1 y^\mu(1-y)^{-\lambda_1} \hspace{0.05cm}_2F_1\left(\mu-\nu-%
188: \lambda_1,\mu+\nu-\lambda_1,1+2\mu;y\right) \nonumber \\
189: &+&D_2 y^{-\mu}(1-y)^{-\lambda_1} \hspace{0.05cm}_2F_1\left(-\mu-\nu-%
190: \lambda_1,-\mu+\nu-\lambda_1,1-2\mu;y\right).
191: \end{eqnarray}
192:
193: As $x\rightarrow -\infty $, we have that $y\rightarrow -\infty $,
194: and the asymptotic behavior of the solutions (\ref{ws71}) can be
195: determined using the asymptotic behavior of the Gauss hypergeometric
196: functions \cite{abra}
197:
198: \begin{equation} \label{ws8}
199: _2F_1(a,b,c;y)=\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(b-a)}{\Gamma(b)\Gamma(c-a)}(-y)^{-a}+%
200: \frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(a-b)}{\Gamma(a)\Gamma(c-b)}(-y)^{-b}.
201: \end{equation}
202:
203: Using Eq. (\ref{ws8}) and noting that in the limit $x\rightarrow
204: -\infty $, $(-y)^{\mp \nu }\rightarrow e^{\pm ik(x+L)}$ \ we have
205: that the asymptotic behavior of $\phi _{L}(x)$ can be written as
206:
207: \begin{equation} \label{ws9}
208: \phi_L(x) \rightarrow A e^{ik(x+L)}+ B e^ {-ik(x+L)},
209: \end{equation}
210:
211: \noindent where the coefficients $A$ and $B$ in Eq. (\ref{ws9}) can be
212: expressed in terms of $D_{1}$ and $D_{2}$ as:
213:
214: \begin{equation} \label{ws10}
215: A=D_1 \frac{\Gamma(1-2\mu)\Gamma(-2\nu)(-1)^{-\mu}}{\Gamma(-\mu-\nu-%
216: \lambda_1)\Gamma(1-\mu-\nu+\lambda_1)}+D_2 \frac{\Gamma(1+2\mu)\Gamma(-2%
217: \nu)(-1)^\mu}{\Gamma(\mu-\nu-\lambda_1)\Gamma(1+\mu-\nu+\lambda_1)}.
218: \end{equation}
219:
220: \begin{equation} \label{ws11}
221: B=D_1 \frac{\Gamma(1-2\mu)\Gamma(2\nu)(-1)^{-\mu}}{\Gamma(-\mu+\nu-%
222: \lambda_1)\Gamma(1-\mu+\nu+\lambda_1)}+D_2 \frac{\Gamma(1+2\mu)\Gamma(2%
223: \nu)(-1)^\mu }{\Gamma(\mu+\nu-\lambda_1)\Gamma(1+\mu+\nu+\lambda_1)}.
224: \end{equation}
225:
226: Now we consider the solution for $x>0$. \ In this case, the
227: differential equation to solve is
228:
229: \begin{equation} \label{ws12}
230: \frac{d^2\phi_R(x)}{dx^2}+\left[\left(E-\frac{V_0}{1+e^{a(x-L)}} \right)^2-1 %
231: \right]\phi_R(x)=0.
232: \end{equation}
233:
234: The analysis of the solution can be simplified making the substitution $%
235: z^{-1}=1+e^{a(x-L)}$. Eq. (\ref{ws12}) can be written as
236:
237: \begin{equation} \label{ws13}
238: a^2 z (1-z)\frac{d}{dz}\left[z(1-z)\frac{d\phi_R(z)}{dz}\right]+\left[%
239: \left(E-V_0z \right)^2-1 \right]\phi_R(z)=0.
240: \end{equation}
241:
242: Putting $\phi _{R}(z)=z^{-\nu }(1-z)^{-\mu }g(z)$, Eq. (\ref{ws13}) reduces
243: to the hypergeometric equation
244:
245: \begin{equation} \label{ws14}
246: z(1-z)g^{\prime\prime}+[(1-2\nu)-2(1-\nu-\mu)z]g^{\prime}-\left({%
247: \scriptstyle \frac 1 2} -\nu-\mu-\lambda\right)\left({\scriptstyle \frac 1 2}
248: -\nu-\mu+\lambda\right)g=0,
249: \end{equation}
250:
251: \noindent where the primes denote derivatives with respect to $z.$ The
252: general solution of Eq. (\ref{ws14}) is \cite{abra}
253:
254: \begin{eqnarray}
255: g(z) &=&d_{1}\hspace{0.05cm}_{2}F_{1}\left( {\scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}-\nu
256: -\mu -\lambda ,{\scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}-\nu -\mu +\lambda ,1-2\nu ;z\right)
257: \nonumber \label{ws15} \\
258: &+&d_{2}z^{2\nu }\hspace{0.05cm}_{2}F_{1}\left( {\scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}%
259: +\nu -\mu -\lambda ,{\scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}+\nu -\mu +\lambda ,1+2\nu
260: ;z\right) ,
261: \end{eqnarray}
262: so, the solution of Eq. (\ref{ws12}) can be written as:
263:
264: \begin{eqnarray}
265: \phi _{R}(z) &=&d_{1}z^{-\nu }(1-z)^{-\mu }\hspace{0.05cm}_{2}F_{1}\left( {%
266: \scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}-\nu -\mu -\lambda ,{\scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}-\nu
267: -\mu +\lambda ,1-2\nu ;z\right) \nonumber \label{ws151} \\
268: &+&d_{2}z^{\nu }(1-z)^{-\mu }\hspace{0.05cm}_{2}F_{1}\left( {\scriptstyle%
269: \frac{1}{2}}+\nu -\mu -\lambda ,{\scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}+\nu -\mu +\lambda
270: ,1+2\nu ;z\right) .
271: \end{eqnarray}
272: Keeping only the solution for the transmitted wave, $d_{2}=0$ in Eq.
273: (\ref {ws151}), we have that in the limit $x\rightarrow \infty $,
274: $z$ goes to zero and $z^{-1}\rightarrow e^{a(x-L)}$. $\phi _{R}(x)$
275: can be written as
276:
277: \begin{equation}
278: \phi _{R}(x)\rightarrow d_{1}e^{ik(x-L)} \label{ws17}
279: \end{equation}
280: The electrical current density for the one-dimensional Klein-Gordon
281: equation (\ref{ws0}) is given by the expression:
282: \begin{equation}
283: \vec{j}=\frac{i}{2}\left( \phi ^{\ast }\vec{\nabla}\phi -\phi \vec{\nabla}%
284: \phi ^{\ast }\right) \label{ws18}
285: \end{equation}
286: The current as $x \rightarrow -\infty$ can be decomposed as
287: $j_{L}=j_{in}-j_{refl}$ where $j_{in}$ is the incident current and
288: $j_{refl}$ is the reflected one. Analogously we have that, on the
289: right side, as $x \rightarrow \infty$ the current is
290: $j_{R}=j_{trans}$, where $j_{trans}$ is the transmitted current.
291:
292:
293: Using the reflected $j_{refl}$ and transmitted $j_{trans}$ currents,
294: we have that the reflection coefficient $R$, and the transmission
295: coefficient $T$ can be expressed in terms of the coefficients $A$,
296: $B$ and $d_{1}$ as:
297:
298: \begin{equation} \label{ws19}
299: R=\frac{j_{refl}}{j_{inc}}=\frac{|B|^2}{|A|^2},
300: \end{equation}
301:
302: \begin{equation} \label{ws20}
303: T=\frac{j_{trans}}{j_{inc}}=\frac{|d_1|^2}{|A|^2}
304: \end{equation}
305:
306: Obviously, $R$ and $T$ are not independent, they are related via the
307: unitarity condition
308:
309: \begin{equation}
310: R+T=1
311: \end{equation}
312:
313: In order to obtain $R$ and $T$ we proceed to equate at $x=0$ the
314: right $\phi_{R}$ and left $\phi_{L}$ wave functions and their first
315: derivatives. From the matching condition we derive a system of
316: equations governing the dependence of coefficients $A$ and $B$ on
317: $d_{1}$ that can be solved numerically. Fig. \ref{f2}, \ref{f3},
318: show the transmission coefficients $T$, for $a=2$, $L=2$, Fig.
319: \ref{f4} and \ref{f5} show the transmission coefficients $T$, for
320: $a=10$ and $L=2$.
321:
322: \begin{figure}[tbp]
323: {\includegraphics[width=12cm]{V0=4,a=2,L=2.eps}} \caption{The
324: transmission coefficient for the relativistic Woods-Saxon potential
325: barrier. The plot illustrates $T$ for varying energy, $E$ with
326: $a=2$, $L=2$, $m=1$ and $V_0=4$.} \label{f2}
327: \end{figure}
328:
329:
330: \begin{figure}[tbp]
331: {\includegraphics[width=12cm]{E=2,a=2,L=2.eps}} \caption{The
332: transmission coefficient for the relativistic Woods-Saxon potential
333: barrier. The plot illustrates $T$ for varying barrier height, $V_0$
334: with $a=2$, $L=2$, $m=1$ and $E=2m$.} \label{f3}
335: \end{figure}
336:
337: \begin{figure}[tbp]
338: {\includegraphics[width=12cm]{V0=4,a=10,L=2.eps}} \caption{The
339: transmission coefficient for the relativistic Woods-Saxon potential
340: barrier. The plot illustrates $T$ for varying energy, $E$ with
341: $a=10$, $L=2$, $m=1$ and $V_0=4$. } \label{f4}
342: \end{figure}
343:
344:
345: \begin{figure}[tbp]
346: {\includegraphics[width=12cm]{E=2,a=10,L=2.eps}} \caption{The
347: transmission coefficient for the relativistic Woods-Saxon potential
348: barrier. The plot illustrates $T$ for varying barrier height, $V_0$
349: with $a=10$, $L=2$, $m=1$ and $E=2m$.} \label{f5}
350: \end{figure}
351:
352:
353: From Fig. \ref{f2} and Fig. \ref{f4} we can see that, analogous to
354: the Dirac particle, the Klein-Gordon particle exhibits transmission
355: resonances in the presence of the one-dimensional Woods-Saxon
356: potential. Fig. \ref{f2} and Fig. \ref{f4} also show that the width
357: of the transmission resonances depend on the shape parameter $a$
358: becoming wider as the Woods-Saxon potential approaches to a square
359: barrier.
360:
361: Fig. \ref{f3} and Fig. \ref{f5} show that, as in the Dirac case, the
362: transmission coefficient vanishes for values of the potential
363: strength $E-m<V_{0}<E+m$ and transmission resonances appear for
364: $V_{0}>E+m$. Fig. \ref{f3} and Fig. \ref{f5} also show that the
365: width of the transition resonances decreases as the parameter $a$
366: decreases. We also conclude that, despite the fact that the behavior
367: of supercritical states for the Klein-Gordon equation in the
368: presence of short-range potentials is qualitatively different from
369: the one observed for Dirac particles \cite{Popov}, transmission
370: resonances for the one-dimensional Klein-Gordon equation possess the
371: same rich structure that we observe for the Dirac equation.
372:
373: \acknowledgments
374:
375: This work was supported by FONACIT under project G-2001000712.
376:
377: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
378: \bibitem{Guo} J. Y. Guo, X. Z. Fang, F. X. Xu, Phys. Rev. A. \textbf{66},
379: 062105 (2003).
380:
381: \bibitem{Petrillo} V. Petrillo and D. Janner, Phys. Rev. A. \textbf{67},
382: 012110 (2003).
383:
384: \bibitem{Chen} G. Chen, Phys. Scripta \textbf{69}, 257 (2004).
385:
386: \bibitem{Guo2} J. Y. Guo, J. Meng, and F. X. Xu, Chinese Phys. Lett.
387: \textbf{20}, 602 (2003).
388:
389: \bibitem{Alhaidari} A. D. Alhaidari, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{87}, 210405
390: (2001); Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{88}, 189901 (2002).
391:
392: \bibitem{Newton} R. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles
393: (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1982).
394:
395: \bibitem{Bohm} D. Bohm, Quantum Mechanics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
396: NJ, 1951).
397:
398: \bibitem{Dombey} N. Dombey, P. Kennedy and A. Calogeracos, Phys. Rev. Lett,
399: \textbf{85} 1787 (2000).
400:
401: \bibitem{greiner} W. Greiner, \textit{Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. Wave
402: equations} (Springer, 1987).
403:
404: \bibitem{Rafelski} J. Rafelski, L. Fulcher, and A. Klein, Phys. Rep.
405: \textbf{38}, 227 (1978).
406:
407: \bibitem{Popov} V. S. Popov, Sov. Phys. JETP \textbf{32}, 526 (1971).
408:
409: \bibitem{Schiff} L. I. Schiff, H. Snyder, and J. Weinberg Phys. Rev. 57,
410: 315 (1940).
411:
412: \bibitem{Snyder} H. Snyder and J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 57 307 (1940).
413:
414: \bibitem{Greiner2} W. Greiner, B. M\"{u}ller and J. Rafelski, Quantum
415: Electrodynamics of Strong Fields, (Springer 1985).
416:
417: \bibitem{Fulling} S. A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved
418: Space-Time (Cambridge, 1991).
419:
420: \bibitem{kennedy} P. Kennedy, \textit{J. Phys. A} \textbf{35}, 689
421: (2002).
422:
423: \bibitem{abra} M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, \textit{Handbook of
424: Mathematical Functions} (Dover, 1965).
425:
426: \end{thebibliography}
427:
428: \end{document}
429: