hep-th0505276/sg.tex
1: \documentclass[12pt] {article}
2: \usepackage{psfrag}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{latexsym,amsfonts}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \pagestyle{plain}
7: \textwidth=16truecm
8: \textheight=23.6truecm
9: \topmargin-1.7cm
10: \hoffset-1.2cm
11: \baselineskip=24pt
12: 
13: %
14: \begin{document}
15: \setcounter{page}{1}
16: \def\theequation{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
17: \def\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
18: \setcounter{section}{0}
19: 
20: \title{On the renormalization of the sine--Gordon model}
21: 
22: \author{H. Bozkaya\,\thanks{E--mail: hidir@kph.tuwien.ac.at, Tel.:
23: +43--1--58801--14262, Fax: +43--1--58801--14299}\,, M. Faber\,\thanks{E--mail: 
24: faber@kph.tuwien.ac.at, Tel.:
25: +43--1--58801--14261, Fax: +43--1--58801--14299}\,,
26: A. N. Ivanov\,\thanks{E--mail: ivanov@kph.tuwien.ac.at, Tel.:
27: +43--1--58801--14261, Fax: +43--1--58801--14299}~\thanks{Permanent
28: Address: State Polytechnic University, Department of Nuclear
29: Physics, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation}\,, 
30: M. Pitschmann\,\thanks{E--mail: pitschmann@kph.tuwien.ac.at, Tel.:
31: +43--1--58801--14263, Fax: +43--1--58801--14299}}
32: 
33: \date{\today}
34: 
35: \maketitle
36: \vspace{-0.5in}
37: \begin{center}
38: {\it Atominstitut der \"Osterreichischen Universit\"aten,
39: Arbeitsbereich Kernphysik und Nukleare Astrophysik, Technische
40: Universit\"at Wien, \\ Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10/142, A-1040 Wien,
41: \"Osterreich }
42: \end{center}
43: 
44: \begin{center}
45: \begin{abstract}
46:   We analyse the renormalizability of the sine--Gordon model by the
47:   example of the two--point causal Green function up to second order
48:   in $\alpha_r(M^2)$, the dimensional coupling constant defined at the
49:   normalization scale $M$, and to all orders in $\beta^2$, the
50:   dimensionless coupling constant. We show that all divergences can be
51:   removed by the renormalization of the dimensional coupling constant
52:   using the renormalization constant $Z_1$, calculated in (J. Phys. A
53:   {\bf 36}, 7839 (2003)) within the path--integral approach. We show
54:   that after renormalization of the two--point Green function to first
55:   order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$ all higher
56:   order corrections in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and arbitrary orders in
57:   $\beta^2$ can be expressed in terms of $\alpha_{\rm ph}$, the
58:   physical dimensional coupling constant independent on the
59:   normalization scale $M$. We calculate the Gell--Mann--Low function
60:   and analyse the dependence of the two--point Green function on
61:   $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ and the running coupling constant within the
62:   Callan--Symanzik equation. We analyse the renormalizability of
63:   Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton solution.  We show that
64:   Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton solution are renormalized
65:   like quantum fluctuations around the trivial vacuum to first orders
66:   in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and $\beta^2$ and do not introduce any
67:   singularity to the sine--Gordon model at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$. The
68:   finite correction to the soliton mass, coinciding with that
69:   calculated by Dashen {\it et al.} (Phys.  Rev.  D {\bf 10}, 4130
70:   (1974)), appears in our approach to second order in $\alpha_{\rm
71:     ph}$ and to first order in $\beta^2$.  This is a perturbative
72:   correction, which provides no singularity for the sine--Gordon model
73:   at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$.  We calculate the correction to the soliton
74:   mass, caused by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton, within the
75:   discretization procedure for various boundary conditions and find
76:   complete agreement with our result, obtained in continuous
77:   space--time.
78: \end{abstract}
79: \end{center}
80: PACS: 11.10.Ef, 11.10.Gh, 11.10.Hi, 11.10.Kk
81: 
82: \newpage
83: 
84: \section{Introduction}
85: \setcounter{equation}{0}
86: 
87: The sine--Gordon model we describe by the Lagrangian \cite{SC75,FI6}
88: %
89: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.1}
90: {\cal L}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
91: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) +
92: \frac{\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)}{\beta^2}\,(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1),
93: \end{eqnarray}
94: %
95: where the field $\vartheta(x)$ and the coupling constant $\beta$ are
96: unrenormalizable, $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$ is a dimensional {\it bare}
97: coupling constant and $\Lambda$ is an ultra--violet cut--off. As has
98: been shown in \cite{FI6} the coupling constant $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$
99: is multiplicatively renormalizable and the renormalized Lagrangian
100: reads \cite{FI6}
101: %
102: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.2}
103: {\cal L}(x) &=& \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
104: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) +
105: \frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{\beta^2}(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1) + (Z_1 -
106: 1)\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{\beta^2}(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1) =
107: \nonumber\\ &=& \frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
108: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) +
109: Z_1\,\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{\beta^2}\,(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1),
110: \end{eqnarray}
111: %
112: where $Z_1 = Z_1(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2, M^2; \Lambda^2)$ is the
113: renormalization constant \cite{FI6}--\cite{SW96} depending on the
114: normalization scale $M$. The renormalization constant relates the
115: renormalized coupling constant $\alpha_r(M^2)$, depending on the
116: normalization scale $M$, to the {\it bare} coupling constant
117: $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$ \cite{FI6}--\cite{SW96}:
118: %
119: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.3}
120:   \alpha_r(M^2) = Z^{-1}_1(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2, M^2;\Lambda^2)\,
121: \alpha_0(\Lambda^2).
122: \end{eqnarray}
123: %
124: As has been found in \cite{FI6} the renormalization constant
125: $Z_1(\alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2, M^2; \Lambda)$ is equal to
126: %
127: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.4}
128: Z_1(\alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2, M^2; \Lambda^2) =
129: \Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}.
130: \end{eqnarray}
131: %
132: This result is valid to all orders of perturbation theory developed
133: relative to the coupling constant $\beta^2$ and $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$
134: \cite{FI6}.  Since the normalization constant does not depend on
135: $\alpha_r(M^2)$, we write below $Z_1 = Z_1(\beta^2,M^2; \Lambda^2)$.
136: 
137: For the analysis of the renormalizability of the sine--Gordon model
138: with respect to quantum fluctuations around the trivial vacuum we
139: expand the Lagrangian (\ref{label1.2}) in powers of $\vartheta(x)$.
140: This gives
141: %
142: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.5}
143: {\cal L}(x) &=& \frac{1}{2}\,[\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
144: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) - \alpha_r(M^2)\,\vartheta^2(x)] 
145: + {\cal L}_{\rm int}(x),
146: \end{eqnarray}
147: %
148: where ${\cal L}_{\rm int}(x)$ describes the self--interactions of the
149: sine--Gordon field
150: %
151: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.6}
152: {\cal L}_{\rm int}(x) &=&  \alpha_r(M^2)\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2
153: }\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}\beta^{2(n -
154:   1)}\vartheta^{2n}(x)\nonumber\\ 
155: &+&  (Z_1 -
156: 1)\,\alpha_r(M^2)\sum^{\infty}_{n = 1}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}
157: \beta^{2(n -
158:   1)}\vartheta^{2n}(x).
159: \end{eqnarray}
160: %
161: It is seen that the coupling constant $\alpha_r(M^2)$ has the meaning of
162: a squared mass of free quanta of the sine--Gordon field
163: $\vartheta(x)$.  The causal two--point Green function of free
164: sine--Gordon quanta with mass $\alpha_r(M^2)$ is defined by
165: %
166: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.7}
167:   -i\,\Delta_F(x; \alpha_r(M^2)) = 
168: \langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)\vartheta(0))|0\rangle = 
169:   \int \frac{d^2k}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{\displaystyle
170:  e^{\textstyle -i\,k\cdot x}}{\alpha_r(M^2) - k^2 -i\,0}.
171: \end{eqnarray}
172: %
173: At $x = 0$ the Green function $-i\,\Delta_F(0;
174: \alpha_r(M^2))$ is equal to \cite{FI6}
175: %
176: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.8}
177:   -i\,\Delta_F(0; \alpha_r(M^2)) = \frac{1}{4\pi}\,{\ell n}
178: \Big[\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_r(M^2)}\Big],
179: \end{eqnarray}
180: %
181: where $\Lambda$ is a cut--off in Euclidean 2--dimensional momentum
182: space \cite{FI6}.
183: 
184: The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we analyse the
185: renormalizability of the sine--Gordon model by means of power
186: counting.  In Sections 3 we investigate the renormalizability of the
187: two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field. Quantum
188: fluctuations are calculated relative to the trivial vacuum up to
189: second order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$. We
190: show that after renormalization of the two--point Green function to
191: first order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$ all
192: higher order corrections in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and all orders in
193: $\beta^2$ can be expressed in terms of $\alpha_{\rm ph}$, the physical
194: dimensional coupling constant independent on the normalization scale
195: $M$. We derive the effective Lagrangian of the sine--Gordon model,
196: taking into account quantum fluctuations to second order in
197: $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$. We show that the
198: correction of second order in $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ and first order in
199: $\beta^2$, i.e.  $O(\alpha^2_{\rm ph}\beta^2)$, reproduces the finite
200: contribution $-\,\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}/\pi$ to the soliton mass
201: coinciding with that calculated by Dashen {\it et al.}
202: \cite{RD74,RD75}.  In our approach this is a perturbative correction,
203: which does not lead to a singularity of the sine--Gordon model at
204: $\beta^2 = 8\pi$.  This confirms the absence of a singularity of the
205: renormalized sine--Gordon model at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$ conjectured by
206: Zamolodchikov and Zamolodchikov \cite{AZ79} and proved in \cite{FI6}.
207: In Section 4 we analyse the renormalizability of the sine--Gordon
208: model within the Renormalization Group approach.  We use the
209: Callan--Symanzik equation for the derivation of the total two--point
210: Green function of the sine--Gordon field in the momentum
211: representation.  We show that the two--point Green function depends on
212: the running coupling constant $\alpha_r(p^2) = \alpha_{\rm
213:   ph}(p^2/\alpha_{\rm ph})^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi}$, where
214: $\tilde{\beta}^2 = \beta^2/(1 + \beta^2/8\pi) < 1$ for all $\beta^2$.
215: In Section 5 we investigate the renormalizability of the sine--Gordon
216: model with respect to Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton solution.
217: We show that Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton solution lead to
218: the same renormalized Lagrangian of the sine--Gordon model as quantum
219: fluctuations around the trivial vacuum taken into account to first
220: order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and $\beta^2$.  In Section 6 we discuss the
221: correction to the soliton mass induced by quantum fluctuations.  We
222: show that Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton solution reproduce
223: the same correction as the quantum fluctuations around the trivial
224: vacuum, calculated to first orders in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and $\beta^2$.
225: This correction does not contain the non--perturbative finite quantum
226: correction obtained by Dashen {\it et al.}  \cite{RD74,RD75}. In our
227: analysis of the sine--Gordon model such a finite correction appears
228: only to second order in $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ and to first order in
229: $\beta^2$ (see Section 3). In Section 7 we discuss the calculation of
230: the correction to the soliton mass $\Delta M_s$, induced by Gaussian
231: fluctuations, within a discretization procedure for various boundary
232: conditions. We show that the result of the calculation of $\Delta M_s$
233: does not depend on the boundary conditions and agrees fully with that
234: obtained in continuous space--time.  In the Conclusion we summarize
235: the obtained results and discuss them.  In the Appendix we adduce the
236: solutions of the differential equation related to the calculation of
237: Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton.
238: 
239: \section{Power counting and renormalization of the sine--Gordon 
240: model }
241: \setcounter{equation}{0}
242: 
243: As usual the general analysis of renormalizability of a quantum field
244: theory is carried out in the form of {\it power counting}, the concept
245: of the superficial degree of divergence of momentum integrals based on
246: dimensional considerations \cite{IZ80}--\cite{SW96}.
247: 
248: The analysis of the convergence of a given Feynman diagram $G$ within
249: {\it power counting} is done by scaling all internal momenta with a
250: common factor $\lambda$, $k_{\ell} \to \lambda k_{\ell}$, and looking
251: at the behaviour $I_G \sim \lambda^{\omega(G)}$ at $\lambda \to
252: \infty$.  Since we deal with a quantum field theory of a
253: (pseudo)scalar field, the propagator of such a field behaves as
254: $\lambda^{-2}$ at $\lambda \to \infty$.
255: 
256: Let a given Feynman diagram $G$ contain $L$ independent loops, $I$
257: internal boson lines and $V_{2n}$ vertices with $2n$ lines. Since we
258: have no vertices with derivatives of the sine--Gordon field, the
259: superficial degree of divergence $\omega(G)$ of a diagram $G$ is
260: \cite{IZ80}--\cite{SW96}
261: %
262: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.1}
263: \omega(G) = 2L - 2 I.
264: \end{eqnarray}
265: %
266: The number of independent loops $L$ is defined by \cite{IZ80}--\cite{SW96}
267: %
268: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.2}
269: L = I + 1 - \sum_{\{n\}}V_{2n},
270: \end{eqnarray}
271: %
272: where the sum extends over all vertices defining the Feynman diagram
273: $G$.  Substituting (\ref{label2.2}) into (\ref{label2.1}) we can
274: express the superficial degree of divergence $\omega(G)$ in terms of
275: vertices only
276: %
277: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.3}
278: \omega(G) = 2 - 2\sum_{\{n\}}V_{2n}.
279: \end{eqnarray}
280: %
281: This testifies the complete renormalizability of the sine--Gordon
282: model.  
283: 
284: Indeed, the vacuum energy density is quadratically divergent, since it
285: corresponds to the ``Feynman diagram without vertices''.  Such a
286: quadratic ultra--violet divergence of the vacuum energy density of the
287: sine--Gordon model has been recently shown in \cite{FI6}. Such a
288: quadratic divergence of the vacuum energy density can be removed by
289: normal--ordering the operator of the Hamilton density of the
290: sine--Gordon model \cite{FI6}. 
291: 
292: All Feynman diagrams with one vertex diverge logarithmically, and any
293: Feynman diagram with more than one vertex converges.  As has been
294: shown in \cite{FI6} by using the path--integral approach, all
295: logarithmic divergences can be removed by the renormalization of the
296: dimensional coupling constant $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$.
297: 
298: 
299: \section{Renormalization of  causal two--point Green function}
300: \setcounter{equation}{0}
301: 
302: 
303: The causal two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field is defined
304: by
305: %
306: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.1}
307: -i\,\Delta(x) = \frac{1}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta
308: J(x)}\frac{1}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta J(0)}Z[J]_{J = 0},
309: \end{eqnarray}
310: %
311: where $Z[J]$ is a generating functional of Green functions
312: %
313: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.2}
314:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&Z[J] = \int {\cal D}\vartheta\,
315:   \exp\Big\{\,i\int d^2y\,[{\cal L}(y)
316:   + \vartheta(y)J(y)]\Big\} = \nonumber\\
317:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&=\int {\cal D}\vartheta\,
318:   \exp\Big\{\,i\int d^2y\,\Big[\frac{1}{2}\,\Big(\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(y)
319:   \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(y) - \alpha_r(M^2)\,\vartheta^2(y)\Big) + 
320:   {\cal L}_{\rm int}(y) + \vartheta(y)J(y)\Big]\Big\},\quad\quad
321: \end{eqnarray}
322: %
323: normalized by $Z[0] = 1$, $J(x)$ is the external source of the
324: sine--Gordon field $\vartheta(x)$. 
325: 
326: Substituting (\ref{label3.2}) into (\ref{label3.1}) we get
327: %
328: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.3}
329:   -i\,\Delta(x) &=& \int {\cal D}\vartheta\,\vartheta(x)
330:   \vartheta(0)\,\exp\Big\{\,i\int d^2y\,{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y)\Big\} 
331:   \nonumber\\
332:   &\times&
333:   \exp\Big\{\,\frac{i}{2}\int d^2y\,\Big[\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(y)
334:   \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(y) - \alpha_r(M^2)\,\vartheta^2(y) \Big]\Big\},
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: %
337: where ${\cal L}_{\rm int}(y)$ is given by (\ref{label1.6}).  The
338: r.h.s. of (\ref{label3.3}) can be rewritten in the form of a vacuum
339: expectation value of a time--ordered product
340: %
341: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.4}
342:   -i\,\Delta(x) = \langle 0|{\rm T}\Big(\vartheta(x)\vartheta(0)\,
343: \exp\Big\{\,i\int d^2y\,:{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y):\Big\}\Big)
344: |0\rangle_{c},   
345: \end{eqnarray}
346: %
347: where the index $c$ means the {\it connected} part, $:\ldots:$ denotes
348: normal ordering, $\vartheta(x)$ is the free sine--Gordon field
349: operator with mass $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and the causal two--point Green
350: function $\Delta_F(x,\alpha_r(M^2))$  defined by (\ref{label1.7}).
351: 
352: In the momentum representation the two--point Green function
353: (\ref{label3.4}) reads
354: %
355: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.5}
356:   -i\,\tilde{\Delta}(p) &=& -i\int d^2x\,e^{\textstyle +ip\cdot x}\Delta(x) = 
357:   \nonumber\\
358:   &=&\int d^2x\,e^{\textstyle +ip\cdot x}\,\langle 0|{\rm T}\Big(\vartheta(x)
359:   \vartheta(0)\,\exp\Big\{\,i\int d^2y\,:{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y):\Big\}\Big)
360:   |0\rangle_{c}.   
361: \end{eqnarray}
362: %
363: For the analysis of the renormalizability of the sine--Gordon model we
364: propose to calculate the corrections to the two--point Green function
365: (\ref{label3.4}) (or to (\ref{label3.5})), induced by quantum
366: fluctuations around the trivial vacuum.  Expanding the r.h.s.  of
367: Eq.(\ref{label3.4}) in powers of $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and $\beta^2$ we
368: determine
369: %
370: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.6}
371:   -i\,\Delta(x)= \sum^{\infty}_{m = 0}(- i)\,\Delta^{(m)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)),
372: \end{eqnarray}
373: %
374: where $(- i)\,\Delta^{(m)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2))$ is defined by
375: %
376: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.7}
377:   -i\,\Delta^{(m)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) = \frac{i^m}{m!}\int
378:   \prod^{m}_{k = 1}d^2y_k\langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
379:   \vartheta(0):{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y_k):)|0\rangle_{c}.   
380: \end{eqnarray}
381: %
382: The Green function $(-i)\,\Delta^{(0)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2))$ coincides
383: with the Green function (\ref{label1.7}) of the free sine--Gordon
384: field.
385: 
386: In the momentum representation the correction to the two--point Green
387: function $(- i)\,\Delta^{(m)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2))$ can be written as
388: %
389: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.8}
390:  && -i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(m)}(p,\alpha_r(M^2)) =  \int d^2x\,
391: e^{\textstyle +ip\cdot x}\,(-i)\,\Delta^{(m)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) = \nonumber\\
392: &&= \frac{i^m}{m!}\int d^2x\,e^{\textstyle +ip\cdot x}\int
393:   \prod^{m}_{k = 1}d^2y_k\langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
394:   \vartheta(0):{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y_k):)|0\rangle_{c}.   
395: \end{eqnarray}
396: %
397: The momentum representation is more convenient for the perturbative
398: analysis of the renormalization of the two--point Green function of
399: the sine--Gordon field.
400: 
401: 
402: \subsection{Two--point Green function to first order in
403:   $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$}
404: 
405: 
406: The correction to the two--point Green function to first order in
407: $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$ is defined by
408: %
409: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.9}
410:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&-i\,\Delta^{(1)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) = i\int
411:   d^2y_1\langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
412:   \vartheta(0):{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y_1):)|0\rangle_{c}=\nonumber\\
413: \hspace{-0.3in}&&=  i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2
414:   }\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}\beta^{2(n -
415:     1)}\int d^2y\,\langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
416:   \vartheta(0):\vartheta^{2n}(y):)|0\rangle_{c}\nonumber\\
417:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&+  i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,(Z_1 - 1)\sum^{\infty}_{n = 1
418:   }\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}\beta^{2(n -
419:     1)}\int d^2y\,\langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
420:   \vartheta(0):\vartheta^{2n}(y):)|0\rangle_{c}.
421: \end{eqnarray}
422: %
423: Making all contractions we arrive at the expression
424: %
425: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.10}
426:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&-i\,\Delta^{(1)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2))  = i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2
427:   }\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}\beta^{2(n -
428:     1)}[2n\,(2n-1)!!][-i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))]^{n-1
429:   }\nonumber\\ 
430:    \hspace{-0.3in} &&\times\int d^2y\,[-i\Delta_F(x - y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
431:   [-i\Delta_F(-y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
432:   \nonumber\\
433:    \hspace{-0.3in}&&+  
434:   i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,(Z_1 - 1)\sum^{\infty}_{n = 1
435:   }\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}\beta^{2(n -
436:     1)}[2n\,(2n-1)!!][-i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))]^{n-1
437:   }\nonumber\\ 
438:    \hspace{-0.3in} &&\times\int d^2y\,[-i\Delta_F(x - y,\alpha_r(M^2))
439:   ][-i\Delta_F(-y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
440: \end{eqnarray}
441: %
442: The sums over $n$ are equal to
443: %
444: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.11}
445:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}[2n\,(2n-1)!!]
446:   [\beta^2(-i)\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))]^{n-1} =  1 - \exp\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\,
447:   \beta^2 i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))\Big\},\nonumber\\
448:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\sum^{\infty}_{n = 1
449:   }\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!}\beta^{2(n -
450:     1)}[2n\,(2n-1)!!][-i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))]^{n-1
451:   } = - \exp\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\,
452:   \beta^2 i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))\Big\}.\nonumber\\
453:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&
454: \end{eqnarray}
455: %
456: Substituting (\ref{label3.11}) into (\ref{label3.10}) we get
457: %
458: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.12}
459:   -\,i\,\Delta^{(1)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) &=&i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
460: \Big[1 - \exp\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\,
461:   \beta^2 i \Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))\Big\}\Big]\nonumber\\ 
462:   &\times& \int d^2y\,[-i\Delta_F(x - y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
463:   [-i\Delta_F(-y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
464:   \nonumber\\
465:   &-& 
466:   i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,(Z_1 - 1)\,\exp\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\,
467:   \beta^2 i \Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))\Big\}\nonumber\\
468:   &\times&\int d^2y\,[-i\Delta_F(x - y,\alpha_r(M^2))
469:   ][-i\Delta_F(-y,\alpha_r(M^2))].
470: \end{eqnarray}
471: %
472: The r.h.s. of (\ref{label3.12}) can be transcribed into the form
473: %
474: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.13}
475:   -\,i\,\Delta^{(1)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) &=& i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
476:   \Big[1 - Z_1\,\exp\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\,
477:   \beta^2 i \Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))\Big\}\Big]\nonumber\\
478:   &\times&\int d^2y\,[-i\Delta_F(x - y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
479:   [-i\Delta_F(-y,\alpha_r(M^2))].
480:   \end{eqnarray}
481: %
482:   Using the normalization constant $Z_1$, given by (\ref{label1.4}),
483:   and the definition (\ref{label1.8}) of the two--point Green function
484:   we remove the cut--off $\Lambda$
485: %
486: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.14}
487:   -\,i\,\Delta^{(1)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) &=&  i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
488:   \Big[1 - \Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}\Big]\nonumber\\
489:   &\times&\int d^2y\,[-i\Delta_F(x - y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
490:   [-i\Delta_F(-y,\alpha_r(M^2))].
491:   \end{eqnarray}
492: %
493:   Thus, the renormalized causal two--point Green function of the
494:   sine--Gordon field, defined to first order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to
495:   all orders in $\beta^2$ is given by
496: %
497: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.15}
498:   -\,i\,\Delta(x) &=& -\,i\,\Delta_F(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) +  i\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
499:   \Big[1 - \Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}\Big]\nonumber\\
500:   &\times&\int d^2y\,[-i\Delta_F(x - y,\alpha_r(M^2))]
501:   [-i\Delta_F(-y,\alpha_r(M^2))].
502:   \end{eqnarray}
503: %
504:   In the momentum representation the two--point Green function
505:   (\ref{label3.15}) reads
506: %
507: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.16}
508:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&-\, i\, \tilde{\Delta}(p) = 
509:   \frac{(-i)}{\alpha_r(M^2) - p^2} +  
510:   \frac{(-i)}{\alpha_r(M^2) - p^2}\, i\, \alpha_r(M^2)\,
511:   \Big[1 - \Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}\Big]
512:   \frac{(-i)}{\alpha_r(M^2) - p^2}.\nonumber\\
513:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&
514:   \end{eqnarray}
515: %
516: The second term defines the correction to the mass of the sine--Gordon field
517: %
518: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.17}
519: \delta \alpha_r(M^2) = -\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
520:   \Big[1 - \Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}\Big].
521:   \end{eqnarray}
522: %
523:   Thus, the two--point Green function, calculated to first order in
524:   $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$ is equal to
525: %
526: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.18}
527:   \hspace{-0.3in}-\,i\,\tilde{\Delta}(p)= \frac{(-i)}{\alpha_r(M^2) + 
528: \delta \alpha_r(M^2)  - p^2} = \frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph}  - p^2},
529:   \end{eqnarray}
530: %
531:   where $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ is determined by
532: %
533: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.19}
534:   \alpha_{\rm ph} = \alpha_r(M^2) + \delta \alpha_r(M^2) = \alpha_r(M^2)\,
535: \Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}.
536:   \end{eqnarray}
537: %
538: This gives  also $\alpha_r(M^2)$ in term of $M$ and $\alpha_{\rm ph}$:
539: %
540: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.20}
541:  \alpha_r(M^2) = \alpha_{\rm ph} 
542: \Big(\frac{M^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big)^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi}\quad,\quad \tilde{\beta}^2 = \frac{\beta^2}{\displaystyle 1 + \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}}.
543:   \end{eqnarray}
544: %
545:   The Green function (\ref{label3.18}) can be obtained to leading
546:   order in $\beta^2$ from the Lagrangian
547: %
548: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.21}
549:   {\cal L}_{\rm eff}(x) &=& \frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
550:   \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) + 
551:   \frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{\beta^2}\Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}
552:   \,(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1) = \nonumber\\
553:   &=&\frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
554:   \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) + 
555:   \frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{\beta^2}
556:   \,(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1). 
557:   \end{eqnarray}
558: %
559:   We argue that higher order corrections to the two--point Green
560:   function in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$ should
561:   depend on the physical coupling constant $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ only
562: %
563: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.22}
564:   -i\,\Delta^{(m)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) &=& \,\frac{i^m}{m!}\int
565:   \prod^{m}_{k = 1}d^2y_k\langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
566:   \vartheta(0):{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y_k):)|0\rangle_{c} =\nonumber\\
567:   &=&  -i\,\Delta^{(m)}(x,
568:   \alpha_{\rm ph})\quad ({\rm for} \quad m \ge 2).  
569: \end{eqnarray}
570: %
571: In order to prove this assertion it is sufficient to analyse the
572: renormalization of the causal two--point Green function to second
573: order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$.
574: 
575:   \subsection{Two--point Green function to second order in
576:     $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$}
577: 
578:   The correction to the two--point Green function to second order in
579:   $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$ is defined by
580: %
581: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.23}
582:   -i\,\Delta^{(2)}(x,\alpha_r(M^2)) &=&  -\,\frac{1}{2}\int\!\!\!\int 
583: d^2y_1d^2y_2\,
584:   \langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
585:   \vartheta(0):{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y_1)::{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y_2):)|0\rangle_{c}=
586: \nonumber\\
587: &=& -\,\frac{1}{2}\,\alpha^2_r(M^2)\sum^{\infty}_{n_1 = 2
588:   }\frac{(-1)^{n_1}}{(2n_1)!}\beta^{2(n_1 -
589:     1)}\sum^{\infty}_{n_2 = 2
590:   }\frac{(-1)^{n_2}}{(2n_2)!}\beta^{2(n_2 -
591:     1)}\nonumber\\
592: &\times&\int\!\!\!\int d^2y_1d^2y_2\,
593:   \langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
594:   \vartheta(0):\vartheta^{2n_1}(y_1)::\vartheta^{2n_2}(y_2):)|0\rangle_{c}\nonumber\\
595: &-&\alpha^2_r(M^2)(Z_1 - 1)\sum^{\infty}_{n_1 = 2
596:   }\frac{(-1)^{n_1}}{(2n_1)!}\beta^{2(n_1 -
597:     1)}\sum^{\infty}_{n_2 = 1
598:   }\frac{(-1)^{n_2}}{(2n_2)!}\beta^{2(n_2 -
599:     1)}\nonumber\\
600: &\times&\int\!\!\!\int d^2y_1d^2y_2\,
601:   \langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
602:   \vartheta(0):\vartheta^{2n_1}(y_1)::\vartheta^{2n_2}(y_2):)|0\rangle_{c}\nonumber\\
603: &-&\frac{1}{2}\,\alpha^2_r(M^2)(Z_1 - 1)^2\sum^{\infty}_{n_1 = 1
604:   }\frac{(-1)^{n_1}}{(2n_1)!}\beta^{2(n_1 -
605:     1)}\sum^{\infty}_{n_2 = 1
606:   }\frac{(-1)^{n_2}}{(2n_2)!}\beta^{2(n_2 -
607:     1)}\nonumber\\
608: &\times&\int\!\!\!\int d^2y_1d^2y_2\,
609:   \langle 0|{\rm T}(\vartheta(x)
610:   \vartheta(0):\vartheta^{2n_1}(y_1)::\vartheta^{2n_2}(y_2):)|0\rangle_{c}.
611: \end{eqnarray}
612: %
613: This expression can be described in terms of two classes of
614: topologically different Feynman diagrams depicted in Fig.1.
615: %
616: \begin{figure}[h]
617:  \centering
618:  \psfrag{p}{$p$}
619:  \psfrag{0}{$x$}
620:  \psfrag{x}{$0$}
621:   \psfrag{y1}{$y_1$}
622:   \psfrag{y2}{$y_2$}
623:   \psfrag{q1}{$q_1$}
624:   \psfrag{qi}{$q_i$}
625:   \psfrag{qi+1}{$q_{i+1}$}
626:   \psfrag{qi+2}{}
627:   \psfrag{qi+3}{}
628:   \psfrag{qj-1}{}
629:   \psfrag{qj-2}{}
630:   \psfrag{qj}{$q_{j}$}
631:   \psfrag{qj+1}{$q_{j+1}$}
632:   \psfrag{q2n}{$q_{2n}$}
633:    \includegraphics[scale=0.25]{figsg1.eps} \hspace{1.5cm}
634:    \includegraphics[scale=0.25]{figsg2.eps}
635:    \caption{Feynman diagrams for corrections to the two--point Green
636:      function to second order in $\alpha$ and to arbitrary order in
637:      $\beta^2$.  The left diagrams correspond to a non--vanishing
638:      expectation value for an even number of internal lines between
639:      the two vertices only, while the right diagrams describe a
640:      non--vanishing contribution for an odd number of internal lines
641:      between two vertices.}
642: \end{figure}
643: %
644: In the momentum representation this correction is equal to
645: %
646: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.24}
647:   && -i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(2)}(p,\alpha_r(M^2)) = 
648:   i\,\Big[\alpha_r(M^2) Z_1 \exp\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\,
649:   \beta^2 i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))
650:   \Big\}\Big]^2\,\Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_r(M^2) - p^2}\Big]^2\nonumber\\
651:   &&\times \Big\{\sum^{\infty}_{n = 1}\beta^{4n}
652:   \int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_1}
653:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_2}\ldots \nonumber\\
654:   &&\times 
655:   \int \frac{d^2q_{2n}}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_{2n}}
656:   \frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - (p - q_1 - q_2 - \ldots - q_{2n})^2}\nonumber\\
657:   &&+\sum^{\infty}_{n = 0}\beta^{4n + 2}\int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_1}
658:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_2}\ldots \nonumber\\
659:   &&\times 
660:   \int \frac{d^2q_{2n + 1}}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_{2n + 1}}
661:   \frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - (q_1 + q_2 + \ldots + q_{2n + 1})^2}\Big\} = \nonumber\\
662:   &&= 
663:   i\,\Big[\alpha_r(M^2)\Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}\Big]^2\,
664:   \Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_r(M^2) - p^2}\Big]^2\nonumber\\
665:   &&\times \Big\{\sum^{\infty}_{n = 1}\beta^{4n}
666:   \int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_1}
667:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_2}\ldots \nonumber\\
668:   &&\times 
669:   \int \frac{d^2q_{2n}}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_{2n}}
670:   \frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - (p - q_1 - q_2 - \ldots - q_{2n})^2}\nonumber\\
671:   &&+\sum^{\infty}_{n = 0}\beta^{4n + 2}\int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_1}
672:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_2}\ldots \nonumber\\
673:   &&\times 
674:   \int \frac{d^2q_{2n + 1}}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - q^2_{2n + 1}}
675:   \frac{1}{\alpha_r(M^2) - (q_1 + q_2 + \ldots + q_{2n + 1})^2}\Big\}. 
676: \end{eqnarray}
677: %
678: The common factor $[\alpha_r(M^2) Z_1 \exp\{ \beta^2
679: i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2)/2)\}]^2$ is caused by the summation of the
680: infinite series of one--vertex--loop diagrams. Using (\ref{label1.4})
681: and (\ref{label3.19}) one can show that it is equal to $\alpha^2_{\rm
682:   ph}$:
683: \[\Big[\alpha_r(M^2) Z_1 \exp\Big\{ \frac{1}{2}\,\beta^2\,
684: i\Delta_F(0,\alpha_r(M^2))\Big\}\Big]^2 = \Big[\alpha_r(M^2)\Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}\Big]^2 = \alpha^2_{\rm ph}.\]
685: Thus, we have shown that after renormalization the correction to the
686: two--point Green function to second order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to
687: all orders in the $\beta^2$ is proportional to $\alpha^2_{\rm ph}$.
688: Then, since the two--point Green function, calculated to first in
689: $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$, is given by
690: (\ref{label3.18}), in the correction of the second order
691: $\alpha_r(M^2)$ we can replace the two--point Green functions of the
692: free sine--Gordon fields in the r.h.s. of (\ref{label3.24}) by
693: (\ref{label3.18}). This gives
694: %
695: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.25}
696:   \hspace{-0.3in}&& -i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(2)}(p,\alpha_r(M^2)) =
697:  i\,\alpha^2_{\rm ph}\,
698:   \Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2}\Big]^2\Big\{\sum^{\infty}_{n = 1}
699: \beta^{4n}
700:   \int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_1}
701:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_2}
702:   \ldots \nonumber\\
703:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times 
704:   \int \frac{d^2q_{2n}}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_{2n}}
705:   \frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - (p - q_1 - q_2 - \ldots - q_{2n})^2}\nonumber\\
706:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&+\sum^{\infty}_{n = 0}\beta^{4n + 2}
707:   \int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}
708:   \,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_1}
709:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_2}
710:   \ldots \nonumber\\
711:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times 
712:   \int \frac{d^2q_{2n + 1}}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_{2n + 1}}
713:   \frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - (q_1 + q_2 + \ldots + q_{2n + 1})^2}\Big\}.
714: \end{eqnarray}
715: %
716: In the momentum representation this proves relation (\ref{label3.22})
717: to second order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$:
718: %
719: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.26}
720: -i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(2)}(p,\alpha_r(M^2))  = -i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(2
721: )}(p,\alpha_{\rm ph}).
722: \end{eqnarray}
723: %
724: The proof of relation (\ref{label3.22}) to arbitrary orders in
725: $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and $\beta^2$ demands only patience and perseverance.
726: 
727: \subsection{Non--trivial finite corrections to the dimensional
728:   coupling constant $\alpha_{\rm ph}$}
729: 
730: As has been shown above quantum fluctuations around the trivial
731: vacuum, calculated to first order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders
732: in $\beta^2$, lead to the renormalization of the dimensional coupling
733: constant $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$, which reduces to the replacement
734: $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2) \to \alpha_{\rm ph}$, where $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ is
735: the physical (observable) dimensional coupling constant independent on
736: both the cut--off $\Lambda$ and the normalization scale $M$. In turn,
737: quantum fluctuations around the trivial vacuum, calculated to second
738: order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$, induce
739: non--trivial perturbative finite corrections to the physical coupling
740: constant $\alpha_{\rm ph}$.
741: 
742: The simplest correction of this kind is of order $O(\alpha^2_{\rm
743:   ph}\beta^2)$. It leads to the perturbative finite correction to the
744: soliton mass, coinciding with that calculated by Dashen {\it et al.}
745: \cite{RD74,RD75}.
746: 
747: Keeping only the terms of order $O(\beta^2)$ in (\ref{label3.25}) we get 
748: %
749: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.27}
750:    -i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(2,1)}(p,\alpha_r(M^2)) &=&
751:   i\,\alpha^2_{\rm ph} \,
752:   \Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2 -i\,0}\Big]^2\,\beta^2
753:   \int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{(\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_1 - i\,0)^2} 
754:   =\nonumber\\
755:   &=& i\,\alpha_{\rm ph}\,\frac{\beta^2}{4\pi} \,
756:   \Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2 -i\,0}\Big]^2,
757: \end{eqnarray}
758: %
759: where we have taken into account that the integral over $q_1$ is equal
760: to $1/(4\pi \alpha_{\rm ph})$.
761: 
762: The two--point Green function calculated to second order in
763: $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ and to first order in $\beta^2$ is equal to
764: %
765: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.28}
766:   -i\,\tilde{\Delta}(p) = \frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2 -i\,0} + 
767: i\,\alpha_{\rm ph}\,\frac{\beta^2}{4\pi} \,
768:   \Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2 -i\,0}\Big]^2 = 
769: \frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm eff} - p^2 -i\,0},
770: \end{eqnarray}
771: %
772: where $\alpha_{\rm eff}$ is defined by
773: %
774: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.29}
775: \alpha_{\rm eff} = \alpha_{\rm ph}\,\Big(1 -\frac{\beta^2}{4\pi}\Big).
776: \end{eqnarray}
777: %
778: The effective Lagrangian of the sine--Gordon model defining the
779: two--point Green function (\ref{label3.28}) to leading order in
780: $\beta^2$ takes the form
781: %
782: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.30}
783: {\cal L}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
784: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) +
785: \frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}}{\beta^2}\,
786: (\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1).
787: \end{eqnarray}
788: %
789: The soliton mass, calculated for the effective Lagrangian
790: (\ref{label3.30}), is equal to \cite{RD74,RD75}(see also \cite{FI6})
791: %
792: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.31}
793:   M_s = \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm eff}}}{\beta^2} = 
794: \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}}{\beta^2} - 
795: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}}{\pi}.
796: \end{eqnarray}
797: %
798: This result coincides with that obtained by Dashen {\it et al.}
799: \cite{RD74,RD75}. 
800: 
801: We would like to remind that the finite correction
802: $-\,\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}/\pi$ has been interpreted in the literature
803: as a singularity of the sine--Gordon model at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$ (see
804: also \cite{LD78}).  However, as has been conjectured by Zamolodchikov
805: and Zamolodchikov \cite{AZ79}, such a singularity of the sine--Gordon
806: model is superficial and depends on the regularization and
807: renormalization procedure. This conjecture has been corroborated in
808: \cite{FI6}.
809: 
810: In our present analysis of the sine--Gordon model the finite
811: correction $-\,\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}/\pi$ is a perturbative one.  It
812: is valid only for $\beta^2 \ll 8\pi$ and introduces no singularity to
813: the sine--Gordon model at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$.
814: 
815: \subsection{Non--trivial momentum dependent corrections to the
816:   two--point Green function}
817: 
818: Quantum fluctuations around the trivial vacuum, calculated to second
819: order in $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ and to second order in $\beta^2$
820: inclusively, lead to the non--trivial momentum dependence of the
821: two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field.  From
822: (\ref{label3.25}) we find the correction to the two--point Green
823: function to order $O(\alpha^2_{\rm ph}\beta^4)$ inclusively. This
824: reads
825: %
826: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.32}
827:   &&-i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(2,2)}(p,\alpha_{\rm ph}) = i\,\alpha^2_{\rm ph}\,
828:   \Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2}\Big]^2\Big\{\beta^2 
829:   \int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{(\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_1)^2} \nonumber\\
830:   &&+ \beta^4\int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_1}
831:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_2}\,
832:   \frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - (p - q_1 - q_2 )^2}\Big\}.
833: \end{eqnarray}
834: %
835: The momentum integral of the contribution of order $O(\beta^2)$ is
836: equal to $1/(4\pi \alpha_{\rm ph})$. For the calculation of the
837: momentum integrals of the term of order $O(\beta^4)$ we apply the
838: Feynman parameterization technique. This gives
839: %
840: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.33}
841:   &&\int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_1}
842:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_2}\,
843:   \frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - (p - q_1 - q_2 )^2} =\nonumber\\
844:   &&= \frac{1}{16\pi^2}\int^1_0\int^1_0\int^1_0
845:   \frac{d\eta_1d\eta_2d\eta_3\delta(1 -
846:     \eta_1 - \eta_2 - \eta_3)}{\alpha_{\rm ph}(\eta_1\eta_2 + \eta_2\eta_3 + 
847:     \eta_3\eta_1)+ (-p^2\,)\eta_1\eta_2\eta_3} =\nonumber\\
848:   &&= \frac{1}{16\pi^2}\int^1_0d\eta\int^1_0d\xi\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph}\eta + 
849:     (\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\,\eta)\,(1 - \eta)\,\xi\,(1 - \xi)} =\nonumber\\
850:   && = -\,\frac{1}{8\pi^2}\int^1_0\frac{d\eta }{
851:     \sqrt{(\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\eta)(1 - \eta)(4\alpha_{\rm ph}\eta 
852: + (\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\eta)(1 - \eta)})}\nonumber\\
853:   &&\times\,
854:   {\ell n}\Big(\frac{\sqrt{(\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\eta)(1 - \eta)} +
855:     \sqrt{4\alpha_{\rm ph}\eta + (\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\eta)(1 - \eta)}}{
856:       \sqrt{(\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\eta)(1 - \eta)} - 
857: \sqrt{4\alpha_{\rm ph}\eta + (\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\eta)(1 - \eta)}}\Big).
858: \end{eqnarray}
859: %
860: We propose to analyse the behaviour of this integral in the asymptotic
861: regime $p^2 \to \infty$, where it can be calculated analytically. In
862: this limit the main contribution to the integral over $\eta$ comes
863: from the domain $\eta \sim \alpha_{\rm ph}/p^2$.  Therefore, the
864: integrand can be transcribed into the form
865: %
866: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.34}
867:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\int \frac{d^2q_1}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,
868:   \frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_1}
869:   \int \frac{d^2q_2}{(2\pi)^2 i}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - q^2_2}\,
870:   \frac{1}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - (p - q_1 - q_2 )^2} =\nonumber\\ 
871:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&=-\,\frac{1}{8\pi^2}\int^1_0\frac{d\eta }{
872:     (\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2\eta)}\,
873:   {\ell n}\Big(\frac{p^2\eta - \alpha_{\rm ph}}{\alpha_{\rm ph}\eta}\Big) = 
874:   \frac{1}{16\pi^2}\,\frac{1}{p^2}\,{\ell n}^2
875: \Big(\frac{p^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big) + \ldots\,.
876:   \end{eqnarray}
877: %
878:   The correction to the two--point Green function of order
879:   $O(\alpha^2_{\rm ph}\beta^4)$ inclusively, taken in the asymptotic
880:   regime $p^2\to \infty$, is equal to
881: %
882: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.35}
883:   -i\,\tilde{\Delta}^{(2,2)}(p,\alpha_{\rm ph}) = i\,\alpha_{\rm ph}\,
884:   \Big[\frac{(-i)}{\alpha_{\rm ph} - p^2}\Big]^2\,\frac{\beta^2}{4\pi}\,
885: \Big[1 + \frac{\beta^2 }{4\pi}\,\frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{p^2}\,
886: {\ell n}^2\Big(\frac{p^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big) + \ldots\Big].
887: \end{eqnarray}
888: %
889: Hence, the two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field,
890: accounting for the contributions of order $O(\alpha^2_{\rm
891:   ph}\beta^4)$ inclusively, takes the form
892: %
893: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.36}
894:   \tilde{\Delta}^{-1}(p) = \alpha_{\rm ph}
895:   \Big[1 -\frac{\beta^2}{4\pi}- \frac{\beta^4 }{16\pi^2}\,
896:   \frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{p^2}\,{\ell n}^2
897:   \Big(\frac{p^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big) + \ldots \Big] - p^2.
898: \end{eqnarray}
899: %
900: This shows that (i) all divergences can be removed by the
901: renormalization of the dimensional coupling constant
902: $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$, (ii) the renormalized expressions are defined
903: in terms of the physical coupling constant $\alpha_{\rm ph}$, (iii)
904: higher order corrections in $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ introduce a non--trivial
905: momentum dependence and (iv) in the asymptotic limit $p^2 \to \infty$
906: the two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field behaves as
907: $\tilde{\Delta}(p) \to 1/( - p^2)$. Such a behaviour is confirmed by
908: the analysis of the two--point Green functions with the
909: Callan--Symanzik equation (see Section 4).
910: 
911: \subsection{Physical renormalization of the sine--Gordon model}
912: 
913: Using the results obtained above we can formulate a procedure for the
914: renormalization of the sine--Gordon model dealing with physical
915: parameters only.  Starting with the Lagrangian (\ref{label1.1}) and
916: making a renormalization at the normalization scale $M^2 = \alpha_{\rm
917:   ph}$ we deal with physical parameters only
918: %
919: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.37}
920: \alpha_{\rm ph} = Z^{-1}_1(\beta^2, \alpha_{\rm ph};\Lambda^2)\,
921: \alpha_0(\Lambda^2),
922: \end{eqnarray}
923: %
924: where the renormalization constant $Z_1( \beta^2, \alpha_{\rm ph};
925: \Lambda^2)$ is equal to
926: %
927: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.38}
928: Z_1(\beta^2,\alpha_{\rm ph}; \Lambda^2) =
929: \Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big)^{\beta^2/8\pi}.
930: \end{eqnarray}
931: %
932: The renormalized Lagrangian is defined by
933: %
934: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.39}
935: {\cal L}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\,(\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
936: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) + \frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{\beta^2}\,
937: (\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1) + (Z_1 - 1)\,\frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{\beta^2}\,
938: (\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1)
939: \end{eqnarray}
940: %
941: with the renormalization constant given by Eq.(\ref{label3.37}). From
942: the relation (\ref{label3.20}) at $M^2 = \alpha_{\rm ph}$ one can
943: obtain that
944: %
945: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.40}
946:  \alpha_r(\alpha_{\rm ph}) = \alpha_{\rm ph}.
947: \end{eqnarray}
948: %
949: The calculation of perturbative corrections to the two--point Green
950: function of the sine--Gordon model shows that the first order
951: correction in $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ vanishes in accordance with
952: Eq.(\ref{label3.17}). Non--trivial corrections appear only to second
953: and higher orders in $\alpha_{\rm ph}$.
954: 
955: 
956: \section{Renormalization group analysis}
957: \setcounter{equation}{0}
958: 
959: In this Section we discuss the renormalization group approach
960: \cite{IZ80}--\cite{SW96} to the renormalization of the sine--Gordon
961: model. We apply the Callan--Symanzik equation to the analysis of the
962: Fourier transform of the two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon
963: field.
964: 
965: The Callan--Symanzik equation for the Fourier transform of the
966: two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field
967: (\ref{label3.5}), which we denote below as $-i\,\tilde{\Delta}(p;
968: \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2)$, is equal to \cite{IZ80}
969: %
970: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.1}
971:   \Big[- p\cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial p} + \beta(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2)\,
972:   \frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha_r(M^2)} - 2\Big]\tilde{\Delta}(p;
973:   \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2) = F(0,p;\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2),
974: \end{eqnarray}
975: %
976: where $\beta(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2)$ is the Gell--Mann--Low
977: function
978: %
979: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.2}
980:  M\,\frac{\partial \alpha_r(M^2)}{\partial M} =  \beta(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2). 
981: \end{eqnarray}
982: %
983: The term $\gamma(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2)$ \cite{IZ80}, describing an
984: anomalous dimension of the sine--Gordon field, does not appear in the
985: Callan--Symanzik equation (\ref{label4.1}) due to unrenormalizability
986: of the sine--Gordon field $\vartheta(x)$. The r.h.s. of
987: (\ref{label4.1}) is defined by
988: %
989: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.3}
990:   F(0,p;\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2) = \int\!\!\!\int  
991:   d^2x d^2y\,e^{\textstyle+ip \cdot x}\,
992:   \langle 0|
993:   {\rm T}\Big(\Theta^{\mu}_{\mu}(y)\vartheta(x)\vartheta(0)\,
994: e^{\textstyle i\int d^2y\,{\cal L}_{\rm int}(y)}\Big)|0\rangle_c,
995: \end{eqnarray}
996: %
997: where ${\cal L}_{\rm int}(y)$ is equal to \cite{FI6}
998: %
999: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labe4.4}
1000:   {\cal L}_{\rm int}(y) = \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1).
1001: \end{eqnarray}
1002: %
1003: Then, $\Theta^{\mu}_{\mu}(y)$ is the trace of the energy--momentum
1004: tensor $\Theta_{\mu\nu}(x)$. For a (pseudo)scalar field
1005: $\vartheta(x)$, described by the Lagrangian ${\cal L}(x)$, it is
1006: defined by \cite{IZ80}
1007: %
1008: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.5}
1009:   \Theta_{\mu\nu}(x) = \frac{\partial {\cal L}(x)}{\partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x)}\,
1010: \partial_{\nu}\vartheta(x) - g_{\mu\nu}\,{\cal L}(x).
1011: \end{eqnarray}
1012: %
1013: Using the Lagrange equation of motion one can show that 
1014: %
1015: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.6}
1016:   \partial^{\mu}\Theta_{\mu\nu}(x) = 0.
1017: \end{eqnarray}
1018: %
1019: For the sine--Gordon model the energy--momentum tensor
1020: $\Theta_{\mu\nu}(x)$ reads
1021: 
1022: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.7}
1023:   \Theta_{\mu\nu}(x) = \partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x) \partial_{\nu}\vartheta(x) - 
1024: g_{\mu\nu}\,\Big[\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\lambda}\vartheta(x) \partial^{\lambda}
1025: \vartheta(x) + \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,(\cos\beta \vartheta(x) - 1)\Big].
1026: \end{eqnarray}
1027: %
1028: The trace of the energy--momentum tensor $\Theta_{\mu\nu}(x)$ is equal to
1029: %
1030: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.8}
1031:   \Theta^{\mu}_{\mu}(x) = -\,\frac{2\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,
1032: (\cos\beta \vartheta(x) - 1) = 2\,V[\vartheta(x)],
1033: \end{eqnarray}
1034: %
1035: where $V[\vartheta(x)]$ is the potential density functional of the
1036: sine--Gordon field $\vartheta(x)$.
1037: 
1038: Since the trace of the energy--momentum tensor is proportional to the
1039: potential energy density, the Fourier transform
1040: $F(0,p;\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2)$ can be related to the two--point Green
1041: function as
1042: %
1043: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.9}
1044:   && F(0,p;\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2) = 2\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
1045: \frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha_r(M^2)} 
1046:   \tilde{\Delta}(p;\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2),
1047: \end{eqnarray}
1048: %
1049: where we have used the definition of the trace $\Theta^{\mu}_{\mu}(y)$
1050: of the energy--momentum tensor Eq.(\ref{label4.8}) and the relation
1051: $\alpha_0 = \alpha_r(M^2)\,Z_1(\beta^2, M^2;
1052: \Lambda^2)$.
1053: 
1054: Substituting (\ref{label4.9}) into (\ref{label4.1}) we arrive
1055: at the Callan--Symanzik equation for the Fourier transform of the
1056: two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field
1057: %
1058: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.10}
1059:   \Big[- p^2\frac{\partial}{\partial p^2} + \Big(\frac{1}{2}\,
1060: \beta(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2) - 
1061:   \alpha_r(M^2)\Big)\,\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha_r(M^2)} - 
1062:   1\Big]\tilde{\Delta}(p^2;
1063:   \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2) = 0,
1064: \end{eqnarray}
1065: %
1066: where we have taken into account that $\tilde{\Delta}(p;
1067: \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2)$ should depend on $p^2$ due to Lorentz
1068: covariance.
1069: 
1070: For the solution of (\ref{label4.10}) we have to determine the
1071: Gell--Mann--Low function (\ref{label4.2}). For the coupling constant
1072: $\alpha_r(M^2)$, defined by (\ref{label3.20}), the Gell--Mann--Low
1073: function is
1074: %
1075: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.11}
1076:  \beta(\alpha_r(M^2),\beta^2) = \frac{\tilde{\beta}^2}{4\pi}\,\alpha_r(M^2),
1077: \end{eqnarray}
1078: %
1079: where $\tilde{\beta}^2 = \beta^2/(1 + \beta^2/8\pi)$
1080: (\ref{label3.20}). This gives the Callan--Symanzik equation 
1081: %
1082: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.12}
1083:   \Big[p^2\frac{\partial}{\partial p^2} +  \Big(1 - 
1084:   \frac{\tilde{\beta}^2}{8\pi}\Big)\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
1085: \frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha_r(M^2)} + 
1086:   1\Big]\tilde{\Delta}(p^2;
1087:   \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2) = 0.
1088: \end{eqnarray}
1089: %
1090: Setting $\tilde{\Delta}(p^2;
1091: \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2)= D(p^2; \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2)/p^2$ we get
1092: %
1093: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.13}
1094:   \Big[ p^2\frac{\partial}{\partial p^2} + 
1095:   \Big(1 - \frac{\tilde{\beta}^2}{8\pi}\Big)\,\alpha_r(M^2)\,
1096:   \frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha_r(M^2)}\Big]D(p^2;
1097:   \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2) = 0.
1098: \end{eqnarray}
1099: %
1100: Due to dimensional consideration the function $D(p^2; \alpha_r(M^2),
1101: \beta^2)$ should be dimensionless, depending on the dimensionless
1102: variables $\tilde{p}^2 = p^2/M^2$ and $\tilde{\alpha} =
1103: \alpha_r(M^2)/M^2$, where $M$ is a normalization scale. This gives
1104: %
1105: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.14}
1106:   \Big[ \tilde{p}^2\frac{\partial}{\partial \tilde{p}^2} + 
1107:   \Big(1 - \frac{\tilde{\beta}^2}{8\pi}\Big)\,\tilde{\alpha}\,
1108:   \frac{\partial}{\partial \tilde{\alpha}}\Big]D(\tilde{p}^2;
1109:   \tilde{\alpha}, \beta^2) = 0.
1110: \end{eqnarray}
1111: %
1112: According to the general theory of partial differential equations of
1113: first order \cite{RC62}, the solution of (\ref{label4.14}) is an
1114: arbitrary function of the integration constant
1115: %
1116: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.15}
1117:   C = \frac{\tilde{\alpha}}{\tilde{p}^2}\,(\tilde{p}^2)^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi},
1118: \end{eqnarray}
1119: %
1120: which is the solution of the characteristic differential equation
1121: %
1122: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.16}
1123:  \Big(1- \frac{\tilde{\beta}^2}{8\pi}\Big)\frac{d \tilde{p}^2}{\tilde{p}^2} = \frac{d \tilde{\alpha}}{\tilde{\alpha}}. 
1124: \end{eqnarray}
1125: %
1126: Hence, the Fourier transform of the two--point Green
1127: function of the sine--Gordon field is equal to
1128: %
1129: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.17}
1130:   \tilde{\Delta}(p^2;
1131:   \alpha_r(M^2), \beta^2) = \frac{1}{p^2}\,D\Big[\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{p^2}\,
1132: \Big(\frac{p^2}{M^2}\Big)^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi}\Big].
1133: \end{eqnarray}
1134: %
1135: The argument of the $D$--function can be
1136: expressed in terms of the running coupling constant $\alpha_r(p^2)$:
1137: %
1138: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.18}
1139:   \alpha_r(p^2) = \alpha_r(M^2)\Big(\frac{p^2}{M^2}\Big)^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi} = 
1140: \alpha_{\rm ph}\Big(\frac{M^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big)^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi}
1141:  \Big(\frac{p^2}{M^2}\Big)^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi} = \alpha_{\rm ph}
1142: \Big(\frac{p^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big)^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi}. 
1143: \end{eqnarray}
1144: %
1145: The solution of the Callan--Symanzik equation for the Fourier
1146: transform of the two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field
1147: is
1148: %
1149: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.19}
1150:   \tilde{\Delta}(p^2; \alpha_{\rm ph}, \beta^2) = \frac{1}{p^2}\,
1151: D\Big[\frac{\alpha_r(p^2)}{p^2}\,\Big].
1152: \end{eqnarray}
1153: %
1154: This proves that the total renormalized two--point Green function of
1155: the sine--Gordon field depends on the physical coupling constant
1156: $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ only. 
1157: 
1158: A perturbative calculation of the two--point Green function, carried
1159: out in Section 3, gives the following expression for the function
1160: $D[\alpha_r(p^2)/p^2]$ in the asymptotic region $p^2 \to \infty$:
1161: %
1162: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.20}
1163:    D\Big[\frac{\alpha_r(p^2)}{p^2}\,\Big] = 
1164: \Big\{\frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{p^2}\Big[1 -\frac{\beta^2}{4\pi} - 
1165: \frac{\beta^4 }{16\pi^2}\,\frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{p^2}\,{\ell n}^2
1166: \Big(\frac{p^2}{\alpha_{\rm ph}}\Big) + \ldots\Big] - 1\Big\}^{-1}.
1167: \end{eqnarray}
1168: %
1169: Unfortunately, this is not able to reproduce the non--perturbative
1170: expression of the two--point Green function $ \tilde{\Delta}(p^2;
1171: \alpha_{\rm ph}, \beta^2)$.
1172: 
1173: 
1174: \section{Renormalization of Gaussian fluctuations around solitons}
1175: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1176: 
1177: We apply the renormalization procedure expounded above to the
1178: calculation of the contribution of quantum fluctuations around a
1179: soliton solution. We start with the partition function
1180: %
1181: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.1}
1182: Z_{\rm SG} &=& \int {\cal D}\vartheta\,\exp\Big\{i\int
1183: d^2x\,\Big[\frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
1184: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) +
1185: \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,(\cos\beta\vartheta(x) -
1186: 1)\Big]\Big\}=\nonumber\\ &=&\int {\cal D}\vartheta\,\exp\Big\{i\int
1187: d^2x\,{\cal L}[\vartheta(x)]\Big\}.
1188: \end{eqnarray}
1189: % 
1190: Following Dashen {\it et al.}  \cite{RD74,RD75} (see also \cite{JR70})
1191: we treat the quantum fluctuations of the sine--Gordon field
1192: $\vartheta(x)$ around the classical solution $\vartheta(x) =
1193: \vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) + \varphi(x)$, where $\varphi(x)$ is the
1194: field fluctuating around $\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)$, the single
1195: soliton solution of the classical equation of motion
1196: %
1197: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.2}
1198: \Box\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) +
1199: \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta}\,\sin\beta\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) = 0
1200: \end{eqnarray}
1201: % 
1202: equal to \cite{RD74,LD78,JR70}
1203: %
1204: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.3}
1205: \vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) = \frac{4}{\beta}\,\arctan(\exp(
1206: \sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\gamma (x^1 - ux^0)) =
1207: \frac{4}{\beta}\,\arctan(\exp(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\sigma)), 
1208: \end{eqnarray}
1209: %
1210: where $u$ is the velocity of the soliton, $\sigma = \gamma (x^1 -
1211: ux^0)$ and $\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - u^2}$\,\footnote{In analogy with the
1212:   ``spatial'' variable $\sigma$ we can define the ``time'' variable
1213:   for the soliton moving with velocity $u$ as $\tau = \gamma (x^0 - u
1214:   x^1)$. In variables $(\tau,\sigma)$ an infinitesimal element of the
1215:   2--dimensional volume $d^2x$ is equal to $d^2x = d\tau d\sigma$ and
1216:   the d'Alembert operator $\Box$ is  defined by $\Box =
1217:   \partial^2/\partial \tau^2 - \partial^2/\partial \sigma^2$.}.
1218: 
1219: Substituting $\vartheta(x) = \vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) + \varphi(x)$
1220: into the exponent of the integrand of (\ref{label5.1}) and using the
1221: equation of motion for the soliton solution $\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)$
1222: we get
1223: %
1224: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.4}
1225: &&Z_{\rm SG} = \exp\Big\{i\int d^2x\,{\cal L}[\vartheta_{\rm
1226: c\ell}(x)]\Big\}\int {\cal D}\varphi\,\exp\Big\{i\int
1227: d^2x\,\Big[\frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\varphi(x)
1228: \partial^{\mu}\varphi(x)\nonumber\\ &&+
1229: \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,\sin\beta\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)\,(\beta
1230: \varphi(x) - \sin \beta \varphi(x)) + \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,
1231: \cos\beta\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)(\cos\beta\varphi(x) - 1)\Big]\Big\}.
1232: \end{eqnarray}
1233: %
1234: Substituting (\ref{label5.3}) into (\ref{label5.4}) we obtain
1235: %
1236: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.5}
1237: \hspace{-0.3in}{\cal L}[\varphi(x)] &=&
1238: \frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\varphi(x) \partial^{\mu}\varphi(x) +
1239: \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,(\cos\beta\varphi(x) - 1)\nonumber\\
1240: \hspace{-0.3in}&-&
1241: \frac{2\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,\frac{1}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\gamma
1242: (x^1 - u x^0))}(\cos\beta\varphi(x) - 1)\nonumber\\ \hspace{-0.3in}&-&
1243:  \frac{2\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,\frac{\sinh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\gamma(x^1 -
1244: u x^0))}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\gamma (x^1 - u x^0))}\,(\beta
1245: \varphi(x) - \sin\beta\varphi(x)).
1246: \end{eqnarray}
1247: %
1248: In terms of $\sigma$ and $\tau$ the exponent of the partition function
1249: (\ref{label5.4}) reads
1250: %
1251: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.6}
1252: \hspace{-0.3in}&&Z_{\rm SG} = \exp\Big\{i\int d^2x\,{\cal
1253: L}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)]\Big\}\nonumber\\ \hspace{-0.3in}&& \int
1254: {\cal D}\varphi\,\exp\Big\{i\int d\tau
1255: d\sigma\,\Big[\frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\varphi(\tau,\sigma)
1256: \partial^{\mu}\varphi(\tau,\sigma) + \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,(\cos
1257: \beta \varphi(\tau,\sigma) - 1)\nonumber\\ \hspace{-0.3in}&& -
1258: \frac{2\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,\frac{1}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}
1259: (\cos\beta\varphi(x) - 1) - \frac{2\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,
1260: \frac{\sinh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\,
1261: (\beta \varphi(\tau, \sigma) - \sin\beta\varphi(\tau,
1262: \sigma))\Big]\Big\},\quad\quad
1263: \end{eqnarray}
1264: %
1265: where we have denoted
1266: %
1267: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.7}
1268: \partial_{\mu}\varphi(\tau,\sigma) \partial^{\mu}\varphi(\tau,\sigma)
1269: = \Big(\frac{\partial \varphi(\tau,\sigma)}{\partial \tau}\Big)^2 -
1270: \Big(\frac{\partial \varphi(\tau,\sigma)}{\partial \sigma}\Big)^2.
1271: \end{eqnarray}
1272: %
1273: The equation of motion for the fluctuating field
1274: $\varphi(\tau,\sigma)$ is equal to
1275: %
1276: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.8}
1277:   \Box \varphi(\tau,\sigma) + \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta}\,\sin\beta
1278:   \varphi(\tau,\sigma) &=& +
1279:   2\,\frac{\alpha_0}{\beta}\,\frac{1}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\,
1280:   \sin\beta\varphi(\tau,\sigma)\nonumber\\ && -
1281:   2\,\frac{\alpha_0}{\beta}\,
1282:   \frac{\sinh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\,(1
1283:   - \cos\beta\varphi(\tau,\sigma)).
1284: \end{eqnarray}
1285: %
1286: Dealing with Gaussian fluctuations only \cite{RD74,RD75} and keeping
1287: the squared terms in the Lagrangian (\ref{label5.5}) in the
1288: fluctuating field $\varphi(x)$ expansion only, we transcribe the
1289: partition function (\ref{label5.6}) into the form
1290: %
1291: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.9}
1292: \hspace{-0.3in}&&Z_{\rm SG} = \exp\Big\{i\int d^2x\,{\cal
1293: L}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)]\Big\}\nonumber\\ \hspace{-0.3in}&& \times
1294: \int {\cal D}\varphi\,\exp\Big\{\,-\,i\,\frac{1}{2}\int d\tau
1295: d\sigma\,\varphi(\tau,\sigma) \Big[\Box + \alpha_0 -
1296: \frac{2\alpha_0}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\Big]
1297: \varphi(\tau,\sigma) \Big\}.
1298: \end{eqnarray}
1299: %
1300: It is seen that $\sqrt{\alpha_0}$ has the distinct meaning of the mass
1301: of the quanta of the Klein--Gordon field $\varphi(\tau,\sigma)$
1302: coupled to an external force described by a scalar
1303: potential\,\footnote{The parameter $\alpha_0$ should enter with the
1304:   imaginary correction $\alpha_0 \to \alpha_0 -i\,0$. This is required
1305:   by the convergence of the path integral \cite{MP95a}.}.
1306: 
1307: 
1308: Integrating over the fluctuating field $\varphi(\tau,\sigma)$ we
1309: transcribe the r.h.s. of (\ref{label5.9}) into the form
1310: %
1311: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.10}
1312: \hspace{-0.3in}&&Z_{\rm SG} = \exp\Big\{i\int d^2x\,{\cal
1313: L}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)] + i\delta {\cal S}[\vartheta_{\rm
1314: c\ell}]\Big\}.
1315: \end{eqnarray}
1316: %
1317: We have denoted
1318: %
1319: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.11}
1320:   \hspace{-0.3in} \exp\{i\delta {\cal S}[\vartheta_{\rm
1321: c\ell}]\} &=& \exp\{ i\int d^2x\,\delta
1322:   {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)]\} = \sqrt{\frac{{\rm Det}( \Box + \alpha_0)}{\displaystyle 
1323:       {\rm Det}\Big( \Box + \alpha_0 -
1324:       \frac{2\alpha_0}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\Big)}} = \nonumber\\
1325:   \hspace{-0.3in}&=&
1326:   \exp\Big\{-\frac{1}{2}\sum_n{\ell n}\,\lambda_n + \frac{1}{2}
1327:   \int d^2x\int 
1328:   \frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - p^2)\Big\},
1329: \end{eqnarray}
1330: %
1331: where $p$ is a 1+1--dimensional momentum. The second term in the
1332: exponent corresponds to the subtraction of the vacuum contribution.
1333: The effective action, caused by fluctuations around a soliton
1334: solution, is defined by
1335: %
1336: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.12}
1337:   \delta {\cal S}[\vartheta] = \int d^2x\,
1338: \delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)] =
1339:   i\,\frac{1}{2}\sum_n{\ell n}\,\lambda_n + \frac{1}{2}\int d^2x\int 
1340:   \frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2i}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - p^2),
1341: \end{eqnarray}
1342: %
1343: where $\lambda_n$ are the eigenvalues of the equation
1344: %
1345: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.13}
1346:   \Big(\Box + \alpha_0 -
1347:   \frac{2\alpha_0}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\Big)\,\varphi_n(\tau,\sigma) =
1348:   \lambda_n\,\varphi_n(\tau,\sigma)
1349: \end{eqnarray}
1350: %
1351: and $\varphi_n(\tau,\sigma)$ are eigenfunctions. The quantum number
1352: $n$ can be both discrete and continuous. This implies that the product
1353: over $n$ in (\ref{label5.11}) should contain both the summation over
1354: the discrete values of the quantum number $n$ and integration over the
1355: continuous ones.
1356:  
1357: According to the Fourier method \cite{NN65}, the solution of equation
1358: (\ref{label5.13}) should be taken in the form
1359: %
1360: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.14}
1361: \varphi_n(\tau,\sigma)= e^{\textstyle\,- i\,\omega\tau
1362: }\,\psi_n(\sigma),
1363: \end{eqnarray}
1364: %
1365: where $-\,\infty \le \omega \le +\,\infty$ and $\psi_n(\sigma)$ is a
1366: complex function\,\footnote{Since $\varphi_n(\tau,\sigma)$ is a real
1367:   field, we have to take the real part of the solution
1368:   (\ref{label5.14}) only, i.e. $\varphi(\tau,\sigma) = {\cal
1369:     R}e\,(e^{\textstyle\,- i\,\omega\tau}\, \psi(\sigma))$. Though
1370:   without loss of generality one can also use complex eigenfunctions
1371:   \cite{RD75,LD78,JR70}.}.
1372: 
1373: Substituting (\ref{label5.14}) into (\ref{label5.13}) we get
1374: %
1375: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.15}
1376: \Big(\frac{d^2}{d \sigma^2} + k^2 +
1377: \frac{2\alpha_0}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\sigma)}\Big)\,
1378: \psi_n(\tau,\sigma) = 0,
1379: \end{eqnarray}
1380: %
1381: where we have denoted 
1382: %
1383: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.16}
1384: k^2 = \lambda_n + \omega^2 - \alpha_0.
1385: \end{eqnarray}
1386: %
1387: This defines eigenvalues $\lambda_n$ as functions of $\omega$ and $k$
1388: %
1389: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.17}
1390: \lambda_n= \alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2.
1391: \end{eqnarray}
1392: %
1393: The parameter $k$ has the meaning of a spatial momentum $-\infty < k <
1394: + \infty$. The solutions of equation (\ref{label5.15})
1395: are\,\footnote{The solutions of the equation (\ref{label5.15}) are
1396:   well--known \cite{JR70} (see also \cite{RD75,LD78}). Nevertheless,
1397:   we adduce the solution of this equation in the Appendix.}
1398: %
1399: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.18}
1400: \psi_b(\sigma) &=& \sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}}\,
1401: \frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)},\nonumber\\ \psi_k(\sigma) &=&
1402: \frac{i}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,\frac{-ik +
1403: \sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}{\sqrt{k^2 +
1404: \alpha_0}}\,e^{\textstyle\,+ ik\sigma},
1405: \end{eqnarray}
1406: %
1407: where the eigenfunction $\psi_b(\sigma)$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_n =
1408: -\omega^2$ and the eigenfunctions $\psi_k(\sigma)$ have eigenvalues
1409: $\lambda_n = \alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2$.  In the asymptotic region
1410: $\sigma \to \infty$ the function $\psi_k(\sigma)$ behaves as
1411: %
1412: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.19}
1413:   \psi_k(\sigma) \to \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,e^{\textstyle + ik\sigma + 
1414: i\,\frac{1}{2}\,\delta(k)},
1415: \end{eqnarray}
1416: %
1417: where $\delta(k)$ is a phase shift defined by \cite{JR70}
1418: %
1419: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.20}
1420: \delta(k) = 2\arctan\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{k}.
1421: \end{eqnarray}
1422: %
1423: The solutions (\ref{label5.18}) satisfy the completeness condition
1424: \cite{JR70} (see Appendix)
1425: %
1426: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.21}
1427: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dk\,\psi^*_k(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_k(\sigma) +
1428: \psi_b(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_b(\sigma) = \delta(\sigma\,' - \sigma).
1429: \end{eqnarray}
1430: %
1431: The fluctuating field $\varphi(\tau,\sigma)$ is equal to (see ({\rm
1432: A}.12))
1433: %
1434: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.22}
1435:   \hspace{-0.3in}\varphi_{\omega b}(\tau,\sigma) &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,e^{\textstyle -i\omega \tau}\psi_b(\sigma)  = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,
1436: \sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}}\,
1437:   \frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\,e^{\textstyle -i\omega \tau},\nonumber\\
1438:    \hspace{-0.3in}\varphi_{\omega k}(\tau,\sigma) &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,e^{\textstyle -i\omega \tau}\psi_k(\sigma) = \frac{i}{2\pi}\,\frac{-ik +
1439:     \sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}{\sqrt{k^2 +
1440:       \alpha_0}}\,e^{\textstyle\,-i\omega \tau + ik\sigma}. 
1441: \end{eqnarray}
1442: %
1443: In terms of the eigenvalues $\lambda_n = -\,\omega^2$ and $\lambda_n =
1444: \alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2$ and eigenfunctions (\ref{label5.22}) the
1445: effective action $\delta {\cal S}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}]$ is
1446: determined by
1447: %
1448: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.23}
1449: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\delta {\cal S}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}] = -
1450: \frac{1}{2}\int d^2x\,\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi
1451: i}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dk\,|\psi_k(x)|^2\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 -
1452: \omega^2 + k^2)\nonumber\\
1453: \hspace{-0.3in}&& - \frac{1}{2}\int
1454: d^2x\,\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi
1455: i}\,|\psi_b(x)|^2\,{\ell n}(- \omega^2)  + \frac{1}{2}\int d^2x\int 
1456:   \frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2i}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - p^2).
1457: \end{eqnarray}
1458: %
1459: Using the explicit expressions for the eigenfunctions $\psi_k(x)$ and
1460: $\psi_b(x)$ we reduce the r.h.s. of (\ref{label5.23}) to the form
1461: %
1462: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.24}
1463: \hspace{-0.7in}&&\delta {\cal S}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}] = -
1464: \frac{1}{2}\int d^2x\,\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i
1465: }\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{k^2 +
1466: \alpha_0\tanh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}{k^2 + \alpha_0}\,{\ell
1467: n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2)\nonumber\\
1468: \hspace{-0.7in}&&- \frac{1}{2}\int
1469: d^2x\,\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi
1470: i}\,\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}\,\frac{1}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}
1471: \,{\ell n}(- \omega^2) + \frac{1}{2}\int d^2x\int 
1472:   \frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2i}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - p^2).
1473: \end{eqnarray}
1474: %
1475: Introducing the notation
1476: %
1477: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.25}
1478: \frac{1}{\cosh^2(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)} = \frac{1}{2}\,(1 - \cos\beta
1479: \vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)) = 
1480: \frac{\beta^2}{2\alpha_0}\,V[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)]
1481: \end{eqnarray}
1482: %
1483: we obtain the effective Lagrangian $\delta {\cal L}_{\rm
1484:   eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)]$. It is equal to\,\footnote{In the
1485:   contribution of the mode $\lambda_n = - \omega^2$ we have used the
1486:   integral representation \[\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\alpha_0}} =
1487:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{1}{k^2 +
1488:     \alpha_0}.\]}
1489: %
1490: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.26}
1491:  \delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)] &=&
1492:   -\frac{1}{4}\beta^2V[\vartheta_{\rm
1493:     c\ell}(x)]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i
1494:   }\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\frac{1}{k^2 +
1495:     \alpha_0} [{\ell n}(- \omega^2) - {\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 +
1496:   k^2)]\nonumber\\
1497:  &-&
1498:   \frac{1}{2} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i
1499:   }\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi} {\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2) 
1500: + \frac{1}{2}\int 
1501:   \frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2i} {\ell n}(\alpha_0 - p^2). 
1502: \end{eqnarray}
1503: %
1504: The two last terms cancel each other. This gives
1505: %
1506: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.27}
1507: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)] =
1508:   -\frac{1}{4}\beta^2V[\vartheta_{\rm
1509:     c\ell}(x)]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i
1510:   }\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\frac{1}{k^2 +
1511:     \alpha_0} [{\ell n}(- \omega^2) - {\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 +
1512:   k^2)].\nonumber\\
1513: \hspace{-0.3in} &&
1514: \end{eqnarray}
1515: %
1516: After the integration by parts over $\omega$ the effective Lagrangian
1517: $\delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)]$ is defined by
1518: %
1519: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.28}
1520: \delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)] = 
1521: \frac{1}{2}\,\beta^2V[\vartheta_{\rm
1522:     c\ell}(x)]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1523: \frac{d\omega}{2\pi
1524:     i }\frac{1}{\alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2 - i\,0}.
1525: \end{eqnarray}
1526: %
1527: The appearance of the imaginary correction $-i\,0$ is caused by the
1528: convergence of the path integral (\ref{label5.9}) \cite{MP95a}.
1529: 
1530: Integrating over $\omega$ we reduce the r.h.s. of (\ref{label5.28})
1531: to the form
1532: %
1533: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.29}
1534:   \delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)] &=& 
1535:   \frac{1}{2}\,\beta^2V[\vartheta_{\rm
1536:     c\ell}(x)]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{4\pi}
1537:   \frac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha_0 + k^2}} = \nonumber\\
1538: &=&-\,\frac{\beta^2}{4\sqrt{\alpha_0}}\,
1539: V[\vartheta_{\rm
1540:     c\ell}(x)]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{4\pi}\,\sqrt{\alpha_0 + k^2}
1541:   \,\frac{d\delta(k)}{dk},
1542: \end{eqnarray}
1543: %
1544: where $\delta(k) $ is a phase shift defined in Eq.(\ref{label5.20}).
1545: We discuss this expression in Section 7 in connection with the
1546: correction to the soliton mass caused by  Gaussian fluctuations.
1547: 
1548: For the analysis of the renormalizability of the sine--Gordon model
1549: the momentum integral in the effective Lagrangian $\delta {\cal
1550:   L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)]$ should be taken in a Lorentz
1551: covariant form (\ref{label5.28}) and regularized in a covariant way.
1552: Making a Wick rotation $\omega \to i\,\omega$ and passing to Euclidean
1553: momentum space we define the integral over $\omega$ and $k$ in
1554: (\ref{label5.28}) as \cite{FI6}
1555: %
1556: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.30}
1557: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}
1558: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i }\,\frac{1}{\alpha_0 -
1559: \omega^2 + k^2 - i\,0} = \frac{1}{4\pi}\,{\ell
1560: n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_0}\Big),
1561: \end{eqnarray}
1562: %
1563: where $\Lambda$ is an Euclidean cut--off \cite{FI6}. The effective
1564: Lagrangian, induced by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton
1565: solution, is equal to
1566: %
1567: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.31}
1568: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x)] =
1569: \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,\Big[- \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}\,{\ell
1570: n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_0}\Big)\Big]\,
1571: (\cos\beta\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) - 1).
1572: \end{eqnarray}
1573: %
1574: The Lagrangian (\ref{label5.31}) has the distinct form of the
1575: correction, caused by quantum fluctuations around the trivial vacuum
1576: calculated to first orders in $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$ and $\beta^2$.
1577: 
1578: The total Lagrangian, accounting for Gaussian  fluctuations
1579: around the soliton  solution amounts to
1580: %
1581: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.32}
1582: {\cal L}_{\rm eff}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\vartheta_{\rm
1583: c\ell}(x)\partial^{\mu}\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) +
1584: \frac{\alpha_0}{\beta^2}\,\Big[1 - \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}\,{\ell
1585: n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_0}\Big)\Big]\,(\cos\beta\vartheta_{\rm
1586: c\ell}(x) - 1).
1587: \end{eqnarray}
1588: %
1589: This coincides with Eq.(6.7) of Ref.\cite{FI6}. 
1590: 
1591: As has been shown in \cite{FI6}, the dependence of the effective
1592: Lagrangian (\ref{label5.32}) on the cut--off $\Lambda$ can be removed
1593: by renormalization with the renormalization constant (\ref{label1.4})
1594: %
1595: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.33}
1596:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\alpha_0\Big[1 - \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}\,{\ell
1597:     n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_0}\Big)\Big] = \alpha_r(M^2) Z_1
1598:   \Big[1 - \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi} {\ell
1599:     n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_r(M^2) Z_1}\Big)\Big] = \nonumber\\
1600:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&= \alpha_r(M^2) \Big[1 + 
1601:   \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}{\ell n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{M^2}\Big) - 
1602:   \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}{\ell
1603:     n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_r(M^2)}\Big)\Big] = \alpha_r(M^2)\Big[1 + 
1604:   \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi} {\ell n}\Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)\Big],
1605: \quad\quad
1606: \end{eqnarray}
1607: %
1608: where we have kept terms of order $O(\beta^2)$  in the
1609: $\beta^2$--expansion of the renormalization constant (\ref{label1.4}).
1610: This gives the effective Lagrangian
1611: %
1612: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.34}
1613: {\cal L}_{\rm eff}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\vartheta_{\rm
1614: c\ell}(x)\partial^{\mu}\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) +
1615: \frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{\beta^2}\,\Big[1 + \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}\,{\ell
1616: n}\Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)\Big]\,(\cos\beta\vartheta_{\rm
1617: c\ell}(x) - 1).
1618: \end{eqnarray}
1619: %
1620: We can replace the coupling constant $\alpha_r(M^2)$ by the physical
1621: coupling constant $\alpha_{\rm ph}$, related to $\alpha_r(M^2)$ by
1622: (\ref{label3.19})
1623: %
1624: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.35}
1625: \alpha_{\rm ph} = \alpha_r(M^2)\Big[1 + \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}\,{\ell
1626: n}\Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)\Big],
1627: \end{eqnarray}
1628: %
1629: where we have kept terms of order $O(\beta^2)$ only. Substituting
1630: (\ref{label5.35}) in (\ref{label5.34}) we get
1631: %
1632: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.36}
1633: {\cal L}^{(r)}_{\rm eff}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\vartheta_{\rm
1634:   c\ell}(x)\partial^{\mu}\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x) +
1635: \frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{\beta^2}\,
1636: (\cos\beta\vartheta_{\rm
1637:   c\ell}(x) - 1).
1638: \end{eqnarray}
1639: %
1640: The effective Lagrangian (\ref{label5.36}) coincides with the
1641: Lagrangian, renormalized by the quantum fluctuations around the
1642: trivial vacuum (\ref{label3.21}), and corroborates the result obtained
1643: in \cite{FI6}.
1644: 
1645: We would like to emphasize that analysing the renormalization of the
1646: sine--Gordon model, caused by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton,
1647: one can see that Gaussian fluctuations are perturbative fluctuations
1648: of order $O(\alpha_r(M^2)\beta^2)$ valid for $\beta^2 \ll 8\pi$, which
1649: cannot be responsible for non--perturbative contributions to the
1650: soliton mass at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$.
1651: 
1652: 
1653: \section{Renormalization of the soliton mass by Gaussian fluctuations
1654:   in continuous space--time}
1655: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1656: 
1657: Using the effective Lagrangian Eq.(\ref{label5.29}) one can calculate
1658: the soliton mass corrected by quantum fluctuations. It
1659: reads 
1660: %
1661: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.1}
1662:  M_s = \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{\beta^2} + \Delta M_s,
1663: \end{eqnarray}
1664: %
1665: where $\Delta M_s$ is defined by
1666: %
1667: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.2}
1668:   \Delta M_s = -\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dx^1\,
1669: \delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x^1)] = 
1670: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{4\pi}\,\sqrt{\alpha_0 + k^2}
1671:   \,\frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}.
1672: \end{eqnarray}
1673: %
1674: This corresponds to the correction to the soliton mass, induced by
1675: Gaussian fluctuations, without a {\it surface term}
1676: $-\,\sqrt{\alpha_0}/\pi$ \cite{RR82,AR97}.
1677: 
1678: In the Lorentz covariant form the correction to the soliton mass reads 
1679: %
1680: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.3}
1681:   &&\Delta M_s = -\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dx^1\,
1682:   \delta {\cal L}_{\rm eff}[\vartheta_{\rm c\ell}(x^1)] =\nonumber\\
1683:   &&= \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i
1684:   }\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{k^2 +
1685:     \alpha_0} [{\ell n}(- \omega^2) - {\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 +
1686:   k^2)]\nonumber\\
1687:   &&=- 
1688:   2\sqrt{\alpha_0}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}
1689:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi
1690:     i }\frac{1}{\alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2 - i\,0},
1691: \end{eqnarray}
1692: %
1693: where we have taken the effective Lagrangian defined by
1694: (\ref{label5.27}) and integrated over $\omega$ by parts.  Using the
1695: result of the calculation of the integral (\ref{label5.30}) we get the
1696: following expression for the soliton mass corrected by Gaussian
1697: fluctuations
1698: %
1699: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.4}
1700:   M_s = \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)}}{\beta^2} - 
1701: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)}}{2\pi}\,{\ell
1702:     n}\Big[\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)}\Big].
1703: \end{eqnarray}
1704: %
1705: The removal of the dependence on the cut--off $\Lambda$ should be
1706: carried out within the renormalization procedure.
1707: 
1708: Replacing $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$ in (\ref{label6.4}) by
1709: $\alpha_r(M^2) Z_1(\beta^2,M^2; \Lambda^2)$, where the renormalization
1710: constant $Z_1(\beta^2,M^2; \Lambda^2)$ is defined by Eq.(\ref{label1.4}), we get
1711: %
1712: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.5}
1713:   M_s = \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_r(M^2) Z_1}}{\beta^2} - 
1714: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_r(M^2)\,Z_1}}{2\pi}\,{\ell
1715:     n}\Big[\frac{\Lambda^2}{\alpha_r(M^2) Z_1}\Big].
1716: \end{eqnarray}
1717: %
1718: The renormalization constant $Z_1$ should be expanded in power of
1719: $\beta^2$ to order $O(\beta^2)$. This gives
1720: %
1721: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.6}
1722:  Z_1 = 1 + \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}\,{\ell n}\Big(\frac{\Lambda^2}{M^2}\Big).
1723: \end{eqnarray}
1724: %
1725: Substituting (\ref{label6.6}) into (\ref{label6.5}) and keeping
1726: only the leading terms in $\beta^2$ we get 
1727: %
1728: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.7}
1729:   M_s = \frac{8}{\beta^2}\,\sqrt{\alpha_r(M^2)\,\Big[1 +
1730: \frac{\beta^2}{8\pi}\,{\ell
1731:     n}\Big(\frac{\alpha_r(M^2)}{M^2}\Big)\Big]}.
1732: \end{eqnarray}
1733: %
1734: Using Eq.(\ref{label5.35}) we can rewrite the r.h.s. of
1735: (\ref{label6.7}) in terms of $\alpha_{\rm ph}$:
1736: %
1737: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.8}
1738:   M_s = \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}}{\beta^2}.
1739: \end{eqnarray}
1740: %
1741: The mass of a soliton $M_s$ depends on the physical coupling constant
1742: $\alpha_{\rm ph}$.  Hence, the contribution of Gaussian fluctuations
1743: around a soliton solution is absorbed by the renormalized coupling
1744: constant $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ and no singularities of the sine--Gordon
1745: model appear at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$. 
1746: 
1747: This result confirms the assertion by Zamolodchikov and Zamolodchikov
1748: \cite{AZ79}, that the singularity of the sine--Gordon model induced by
1749: the finite correction $-\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}/\pi$ to the soliton
1750: mass, caused by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton solution, is
1751: completely due to the regularization and renormalization procedure.
1752: This has been  corroborated in \cite{FI6}.
1753: 
1754: As has been shown in Section 3, a non--trivial finite correction to
1755: the soliton mass   appears due to non--Gaussian quantum fluctuations
1756: of order of $\alpha^2_{\rm ph}\beta^2$ (see Eq.(\ref{label3.31})): 
1757: 
1758: $$
1759: M_s = \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}}{\beta^2} -
1760: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}}{\pi}. \eqno(3.31) 
1761: $$
1762: 
1763: \noindent The second term in Eq.(\ref{label3.31}) coincides with that
1764: obtained by Dashen {\it et al.} \cite{RD74,RD75}. However, it is
1765: meaningful only as a perturbative correction for $\beta^2 \ll 8\pi$,
1766: which cannot produce any non--perturbative singularity of the
1767: sine--Gordon model at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$.
1768: 
1769: We have obtained that the soliton mass $M_s$ does not depend on the
1770: normalization scale $M$.  This testifies that the soliton mass $M_s$
1771: is an observable quantity.
1772: 
1773: \section{Renormalization of soliton mass by Gaussian fluctuations.
1774:   Space--time discretization technique}
1775: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1776: 
1777: Usually the correction to the soliton mass is investigated in the
1778: literature by a discretization procedure \cite{RR82} (see also
1779: \cite{AR97}). The soliton with Gaussian fluctuations is embedded into
1780: a spatial box with a finite volume $L$ and various boundary conditions
1781: for Gaussian fluctuations at $x = \pm L/2$. In such a discretization
1782: approach time is also discrete with a period $T$, which finally has to
1783: be taken in the limit $T \to \infty$. The frequency spectrum is
1784: $\omega_m = 2\pi m/T$ with $m = 0, \pm 1,\ldots$. For various boundary
1785: conditions spectra of the momenta of Gaussian fluctuations around a
1786: soliton and of Klein--Gordon quanta, corresponding to vacuum
1787: fluctuations, are adduced in Table 1.
1788: %
1789: \begin{table}\caption{The spectra of the momenta of Gaussian
1790:     fluctuations around a soliton  and the Klein--Gordon
1791:     quanta. The modes, denoted by $(*)$ are due to the bound state.}
1792: 
1793: \vspace{0.2in}
1794: 
1795: \begin{tabular}{llll}
1796:   \hline\hline&&&\\
1797:   {\bf PERIODIC BC:}&&&\\&&&\\
1798:   {\bf Soliton Sector} && {\bf Vacuum Sector}&\phantom{xxxx}\\&&&\\
1799:   $k_nL+\delta(k_n)=2n\pi$ && $q_nL=2n\pi$&\\
1800:   $n=0:(\ast)$ &$\leftarrow1\times\rightarrow$\phantom{xxx}& $n=0:q_0=0$&\\
1801:   $n=1:q_1=\frac{\pi}{L}+\mathcal{O}(L^{-2})$ &$\leftarrow2\times\rightarrow$&
1802:  $n=1:q_1=\frac{2\pi}{L}$&\\
1803:   $\cdots$ &$\leftarrow2\times\rightarrow$& $\cdots$&\\&&&\\
1804:   $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\rightarrow\int_{\frac{\pi}{L}+\mathcal{O}(L^{-2})}^\infty
1805:   \frac{dk}{2\pi}\Bigl(L + 
1806:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\Bigr)$ &&
1807:   $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\rightarrow\int_{\frac{2\pi}{L}}^\infty\frac{dq}{2\pi}L$&\\&&&\\ 
1808:   \hline\hline&&&\\
1809:   {\bf ANTI-PERIODIC BC:}&&&\\&&&\\ 
1810:   {\bf Soliton Sector} && {\bf Vacuum Sector}&\\&&&\\
1811:   $k_nL+\delta(k_n)= (2 n-1)\pi$ && $q_nL= (2 n-1)\pi$&\\
1812:   $n=1:(\ast) + k_1=0$ &\hspace{-5mm}$\leftarrow(1+1)\times\rightarrow$& 
1813: $n=1:q_1=\frac{\pi}{L}$&\\
1814:   $\cdots$ &$\leftarrow2\times\rightarrow$& $\cdots$&\\&&&\\
1815:   $\sum_{n=2}^\infty\rightarrow\int_{\frac{2\pi}{L}+\mathcal{O}(L^{-2})}^\infty
1816:   \frac{dk}{2\pi}\Bigl(L + 
1817:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\Bigr)$ &&
1818:   $\sum_{n=2}^\infty\rightarrow\int_{\frac{3\pi}{L}}^\infty\frac{dq}{2\pi}L$&\\&&&\\ 
1819:   \hline\hline&&&\\
1820:   {\bf RIGID WALLS:}&&&\\&&&\\
1821:   {\bf Soliton Sector} && {\bf Vacuum Sector}&\\&&&\\
1822:   $k_nL+\delta(k_n)=n\pi$ && $q_nL=n\pi$&\\
1823:   $n=1:(\ast)$ &$\leftarrow1\times\rightarrow$& $n=1:q_1= \frac{\pi}{L}$&\\
1824:   $\cdots$ &$\leftarrow1\times\rightarrow$& $\cdots$&\\&&&\\
1825:   $\sum_{n=2}^\infty\rightarrow\int_{\frac{\pi}{L}+\mathcal{O}(L^{-2})}^\infty
1826: \frac{dk}{\pi}\Bigl(L + 
1827:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\Bigr)$ &&
1828:   $\sum_{n=2}^\infty\rightarrow\int_{\frac{2\pi}{L}}^\infty\frac{dq}{\pi}L$&\\&&&\\ 
1829:   \hline\hline
1830: \end{tabular}
1831: \end{table}
1832: %
1833: According to Table 1, for various boundary conditions the corrections
1834: to the soliton mass are given by
1835: %
1836: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.1}
1837:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s = \lim_{T \to \infty}\lim_{L \to \infty}\frac{1}{2iT}
1838:   \Big\{2\sum^\infty_{m=-\infty}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\Big[{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - 
1839:   \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + k^2_n\Big) -
1840:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + q_n^2\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
1841:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&+ \sum^\infty_{m=-\infty}
1842:   \Big[{\ell n}\Big( - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + \Delta^2(L)\Big) - 
1843:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]
1844:   \Big\},\nonumber\\
1845:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\Delta M^{(\rm ap)}_s = \lim_{T \to \infty}\lim_{L \to \infty}
1846: \frac{1}{2iT}\Big\{2
1847: \sum^\infty_{m=-\infty}\sum_{n=2}^\infty\Big[{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - 
1848:   \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} +k^2_n\Big) -
1849:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + q_n^2\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
1850:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&+ \sum^\infty_{m=-\infty}
1851:   \Big[{\ell n}\Big( - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + \Delta^2(L)\Big) +  
1852:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2}\Big) - 2 {\ell n}
1853: \Big(\alpha_0 - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + q^2_1\Big)\Big]
1854:   \Big\}, \nonumber\\
1855:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\Delta M^{(\rm rw)}_s = \lim_{T \to \infty}\lim_{L \to \infty}
1856: \frac{1}{2iT}\Big\{
1857: \sum^\infty_{m=-\infty}\sum_{n=2}^\infty\Big[{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - 
1858:   \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + k^2_n\Big) -
1859:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + q_n^2\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
1860:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&+ \sum^\infty_{m=-\infty}
1861:   \Big[{\ell n}\Big( - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + \Delta^2(L)\Big) - 
1862:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 - \frac{4\pi^2 m^2}{T^2} + q^2_1\Big)\Big]
1863:   \Big\},
1864: \end{eqnarray}
1865: %
1866: where $\Delta^2(L) \sim \alpha_0\,e^{\textstyle -\sqrt{\alpha_0}\,L}$
1867: at $L \to \infty$, and the abbreviations (p), (ap) and (rw) mean  periodic,
1868: anti--periodic boundary conditions and rigid walls, respectively.  
1869: 
1870: For the summation over $m$ we use the formula, derived by Dolan and
1871: Jackiw \cite{RJ74}:
1872: %
1873: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.2}
1874:   \sum^{+\infty}_{m = -\,\infty}\Big[{\ell n}\Big(\frac{4m^2\pi^2}{-T^2} 
1875:   +  a^2\Big) - {\ell n}\Big(\frac{4m^2\pi^2}{-T^2} +  b^2\Big)\Big] = 
1876:   i\,(a - b)\,T + 2\,{\ell n}\Bigg(\frac{\displaystyle 
1877:     1 - e^{\textstyle\,-i\,a\,T}}{\displaystyle 1 - e^{\textstyle\,-i\,b\,T}}
1878: \Bigg).\quad
1879: \end{eqnarray}
1880: %
1881: Taking the limit $T \to \infty$ we arrive at the expression 
1882: %
1883: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.3}
1884:  \hspace{-0.03in} \Delta M_s = - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} +
1885:  \lim_{L \to \infty}\left\{\begin{array}{r@{\quad,\quad}l}
1886: {\displaystyle \sum^{\infty}_{n = 1}
1887:       (\sqrt{\alpha_0 + k^2_n} - 
1888:       \sqrt{\alpha_0 + q^2_n}\,) }& {\rm periodic~BC}\\
1889: {\displaystyle \sum^{\infty}_{n = 2}
1890:       (\sqrt{\alpha_0 + k^2_n} - 
1891:       \sqrt{\alpha_0 + q^2_n}\,) }& {\rm anti-periodic~BC}\\
1892:       {\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\sum^{\infty}_{n = 2}
1893:       (\sqrt{\alpha_0 + k^2_n} - 
1894:       \sqrt{\alpha_0 + q^2_n}\,)} &{\rm rigid~walls},
1895: \end{array}\right.
1896: \end{eqnarray}
1897: %
1898: where ${\rm BC}$ is the abbreviation of {\it boundary conditions}.
1899: 
1900: The aim of our analysis of $\Delta M_s$ within the discretization
1901: procedure is to show that the discretization procedure gives $\Delta
1902: M_s$ in the form of (\ref{label6.3}).
1903: 
1904: The subsequent analysis of $\Delta M_s$ we carry out for periodic
1905: boundary conditions only. One can show that for anti--periodic
1906: boundary conditions and rigid walls the result is the same.
1907: 
1908: For the next transformation of the r.h.s. of (\ref{label7.3}) we
1909: propose to use the following integral representation
1910: %
1911: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.4}
1912:   \hspace{-0.05in}\sqrt{\alpha_0 + k^2_n} - 
1913:   \sqrt{\alpha_0 + q^2_n} = \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1914:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\,
1915:   {\ell n}\Big[\frac{\alpha_0 + k^2_n - \omega^2 -i 0}{\alpha_0 +
1916:  q^2_n - \omega^2 -i 0}\Big].
1917: \end{eqnarray}
1918: %
1919: This gives
1920: %
1921: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.5}
1922:   \Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s &=& - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + 
1923: \lim_{L \to \infty}\sum^{+\infty}_{n = 1}
1924:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1925:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\;
1926:   {\ell n}\Big[\frac{\alpha_0 + k^2_n - \omega^2 -i\,0}{ \alpha_0 
1927:     + q^2_n - \omega^2 -i\,0}\Big] =\nonumber\\
1928:   &=& - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + 
1929:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1930:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}\sum^{+\infty}_{n = 1}
1931:   {\ell n}\Big[\frac{\alpha_0 + k^2_n - \omega^2 -i\,0}{ \alpha_0 
1932:     + q^2_n - \omega^2 -i\,0}\Big]. 
1933: \end{eqnarray}
1934: %
1935: To the regularization of the sum over $n$ we apply the {\it
1936:   mode--counting} regularization procedure \cite{AR97}:
1937: %
1938: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.6}
1939:   \hspace{-0.5in}  \Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s = - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + 
1940: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1941:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}\lim_{N\to\infty}\sum^N_{n = 1}
1942:   {\ell n}\Big[\frac{\alpha_0 + k^2_n - \omega^2 -i\,0}{
1943: \alpha_0 + q^2_n - \omega^2 -i\,0}\Big].
1944: \end{eqnarray}
1945: %
1946: Passing to the continuous momentum representation \cite{AR97} and using
1947: the spectra of the momenta of Gaussian fluctuations and the
1948: Klein--Gordon fluctuations (the vacuum fluctuations) adduced in Table
1949: 1 we transcribe the r.h.s of (\ref{label7.6}) into the form
1950: %
1951: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.7}
1952:   \hspace{-0.3in}\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s &=& - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + 
1953:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1954:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}\lim_{N\to\infty}
1955:   \Big[\int^{k_N}_{k_1}dk\,\frac{dn(k)}{dk}\,
1956:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\  
1957:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&- \int^{q_N}_{q_1}dq\,\frac{dn(q)}{dq}{\ell n}(\alpha_0 + q^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\Big] =\nonumber\\  
1958:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&
1959:   - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + 
1960:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1961:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}\lim_{N\to\infty}
1962:   \Big[\int^{k_N}_{k_1}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
1963:   \Big(L + \frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\Big)\,\nonumber\\
1964:   \hspace{-0.3in}&& \times\,
1965:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0) -  
1966:   L\int^{q_N}_{q_1}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2
1967:   -i\,0)\Big], 
1968: \end{eqnarray}
1969: %
1970: where the limits are equal to (see Table 1):
1971: %
1972: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.8}
1973:  k_1 &=& \frac{\pi}{L}\quad,\quad  k_N = q_N - \frac{\delta(q_N)}{L} =  q_N - 
1974: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{\pi N},\nonumber\\
1975:  q_1 &=& \frac{2\pi}{L}\quad,\quad q_N = \frac{2\pi N}{L}.
1976: \end{eqnarray}
1977: %
1978: Rearranging the limits of integrations we get 
1979: %
1980: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.9}
1981:   \hspace{-0.3in}\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s &=& - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + 
1982:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1983:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}
1984:   \lim_{N\to \infty}\int^{k_N}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
1985:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\,
1986:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\
1987:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&  + \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1988:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\,\lim_{L \to \infty}L\int^{2\pi/L}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}
1989:   \,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\
1990:   \hspace{-0.3in}&& - \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1991:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}\lim_{N\to\infty}L\int^{q_N}_{k_N}
1992:   \frac{dk}{2\pi}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0) = \nonumber\\
1993:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&= - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1994:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\,\lim_{L \to \infty}\int^{\infty}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
1995:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\,
1996:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\
1997:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&  + \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
1998:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\,\lim_{L \to \infty}L\int^{2\pi/L}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
1999:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\
2000:   \hspace{-0.3in}&& - \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2001:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}
2002:   \lim_{N\to\infty}L\,\frac{k_N - q_N}{2\pi}\,
2003:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^{*\,2} - 
2004:   \omega^2 -i\,0).
2005: \end{eqnarray}
2006: %
2007: For the last term we have applied the {\it mean value theorem} with
2008: $q_N - \delta(q_N)/L < k^* < q_N$.  Since the difference $k_N - q_N =
2009: \delta(q_N)/L = \sqrt{\alpha_0}/\pi N$ is of order $O(1/N)$, this term
2010: vanishes in the limit $N \to \infty$\,\footnote{We would like to
2011:   emphasize that exactly the term of this kind leads to the
2012:   contribution of the finite {\it surface term}
2013:   $-\,\sqrt{\alpha_0}/\pi$ in a regularization procedure using the
2014:   expressions (\ref{label7.3}) without turning to the
2015:   integral representation (\ref{label7.4}).}. As a result we get
2016: %
2017: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.10}
2018:   \hspace{-0.3in}\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s &=& - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + 
2019: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2020:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\lim_{L \to \infty}\int^{\infty}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2021: \frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\,
2022:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\
2023:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&  + \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2024:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\,\lim_{L \to \infty}L\int^{2\pi/L}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2025: {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0).
2026: \end{eqnarray}
2027: %
2028: Taking the limit $L \to \infty$ and applying to the last term the {\it
2029:   mean value theorem} we arrive at the expression
2030: %
2031: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.11}
2032:   \Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s &=& - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} +  \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2033:   \frac{d\omega}{4\pi i}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\
2034:   &&+ \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2035:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\,
2036:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0),
2037: \end{eqnarray}
2038: %
2039: which we transcribe into the form
2040: %
2041: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.12}
2042:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s = - \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2} + \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2043:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\,
2044:   {\ell n}( -\omega^2 -i\,0) +  \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2045:   \frac{d\omega}{4\pi i}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 -i\,0)\nonumber\\
2046:   \hspace{-0.3in}&&+ 
2047:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2048:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\,
2049:   [{\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2 -i\,0) - {\ell n}( -\omega^2 -i\,0)].
2050: \end{eqnarray}
2051: %
2052: The next steps of the reduction of the r.h.s. of (\ref{label7.12}) to
2053: the form (\ref{label6.3}) are rather straightforward. First, one can
2054: easily show that
2055: %
2056: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.13}
2057:   &&\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2058:   \frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{d\delta(k)}{dk}\,
2059:   {\ell n}( -\omega^2 -i\,0) +  \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2060:   \frac{d\omega}{4\pi i}\,{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 -i\,0) = \nonumber\\
2061:   &&= \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{4\pi i}\,
2062:   [{\ell n}(\alpha_0 - \omega^2 -i\,0) -  {\ell n}( -\omega^2 -i\,0)] =  
2063:   \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}
2064: \end{eqnarray}
2065: %
2066: and, second, integrating over $\omega$ by parts the last integral in
2067: (\ref{label7.12}) can be reduced to the form
2068: %
2069: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.14}
2070:  \Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s =  - 
2071:   2\sqrt{\alpha_0}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}
2072:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi
2073:     i }\frac{1}{\alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2 - i\,0}.
2074: \end{eqnarray}
2075: %
2076: Thus, we have shown that the correction to the soliton mass, induced
2077: by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton and calculated by means of
2078: the discretization procedure, agrees fully with that we have obtained
2079: in continuous space--time (\ref{label6.3}). 
2080: 
2081: Hence, the renormalization of the soliton mass, caused by Gaussian
2082: fluctuations calculated within the space--time discretization
2083: technique, coincides with the renormalization of the soliton mass in
2084: continuous space--time. We would like to emphasize that the obtained
2085: result (\ref{label7.14}) does not depend on the boundary conditions.
2086: 
2087: The calculation of the functional determinant within the
2088: discretization procedure has confirmed the absence of the correction
2089: $-\,\sqrt{\alpha_0}/\pi$. This agrees with our assertion that such a
2090: correction does not appear due to Gaussian fluctuations around a
2091: soliton, corresponding to quantum fluctuations to first orders in
2092: $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$ and $\beta^2$. 
2093: 
2094: The reduction of $\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s$ of Eq.(\ref{label7.1}) to the expression
2095: (\ref{label6.3}) can be carried out directly. First, summing over $n$
2096: within the {\it mode--counting} regularization procedure and taking
2097: the limit $L\to \infty$ we arrive from $\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s$ of
2098: Eq.(\ref{label7.1}) at
2099: %
2100: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.15}
2101:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_s = \lim_{T \to \infty}\frac{1}{iT}
2102:   \sum^{\infty}_{m = -\infty}\lim_{L\to \infty}\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\,
2103:   \Big[{\ell n}\Big( -\frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} + \Delta^2(L)\Big) - 
2104:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  -\frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
2105:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&+ \lim_{N\to \infty}\sum^N_{n = 1}
2106:   \Big[{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  + k^2_n - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big) - 
2107:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + q^2_n  - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]\Big\} =
2108:   \nonumber\\
2109:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&= \lim_{T \to \infty}\frac{1}{iT}
2110:   \sum^{\infty}_{m = -\infty}\lim_{L\to \infty}\Big\{\frac{1}{2}
2111:   \Big[{\ell n}\Big( -\frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} + \Delta^2(L)\Big) 
2112:   - {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
2113:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&+
2114:   \lim_{N\to \infty}\Big[\int^{k_N}_{k_1}dk\frac{dn(k)}{d k}
2115:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + k^2  - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big) -
2116:   \int^{q_N}_{q_1}dq \frac{dn(q)}{d q} 
2117: {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  + q^2 - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]\Big\} =\nonumber\\
2118:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&= \lim_{T \to \infty}\frac{1}{iT}
2119:   \sum^{\infty}_{m = -\infty}\lim_{L\to \infty}\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\Big[{\ell n}
2120:   \Big( -\frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} 
2121:   + \Delta^2(L)\Big) - {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  - 
2122:   \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
2123:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&+ \lim_{N\to \infty}\Big[\int^{k_N}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2124:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{d k}\,{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + k^2  - 
2125:   \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)+ L\int^{2\pi/L}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  + k^2 - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)
2126:   \nonumber\\
2127:   \hspace{-0.3in} && - L\int^{q_N}_{k_N}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2128:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} + k^2\Big)\Big] = \nonumber\\
2129:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&= \lim_{T \to \infty}\frac{1}{iT}
2130:   \sum^{\infty}_{m = -\infty}\lim_{L\to \infty}\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\Big[{\ell n}\Big( -\frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} 
2131:   + \Delta^2(L)\Big) - {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  - 
2132:   \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
2133:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&+ \int^{\infty}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2134:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{d k}\,{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + k^2  -
2135:   \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big) + L\int^{2\pi/L}_{\pi/L}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2136: {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + k^2  - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big\}=\nonumber\\
2137:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&= \lim_{T \to \infty}\frac{1}{iT}
2138:   \sum^{\infty}_{m = -\infty}\Big\{\frac{1}{2}
2139: \Big[{\ell n}\Big( -\frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big) 
2140: - {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)\Big]\nonumber\\
2141:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&+\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2142:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{d k}\,{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + k^2  - 
2143:   \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big)
2144:   + \frac{1}{2}\,{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0  - \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} \Big)\Big\}=
2145:   \nonumber\\
2146:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&= \lim_{T \to \infty}\frac{1}{iT}
2147:   \sum^{\infty}_{m = -\infty}\Big\{\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2148:   \frac{d\delta(k)}{d k}\,{\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + k^2  - 
2149:   \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big) + \frac{1}{2}\,
2150:   {\ell n}\Big(- \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} \Big)\Big\}.
2151: \end{eqnarray}
2152: %
2153: Now we  use the integral representation ${^5}$ and get
2154: %
2155: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.16}
2156:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&\Delta M^{(\rm p)}_S = \lim_{T \to \infty}\frac{1}{iT}
2157:   \sum^{\infty}_{m = -\infty}\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,
2158: \frac{2\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{\alpha_0 + k^2}\,
2159: \Big[{\ell n}\Big(- \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2} \Big) -
2160:   {\ell n}\Big(\alpha_0 + k^2  - 
2161:   \frac{4\pi^2m^2}{T^2}\Big) \Big] =
2162:   \nonumber\\
2163:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&=\lim_{T\to \infty}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{iT}\,
2164:   \frac{dm(\omega)}{d\omega}\int^{\infty}_0\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{2\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{\alpha_0 + k^2}\,[{\ell n}(- \omega^2) - 
2165:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2)]=\nonumber\\
2166:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&=\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\int^{\infty}_0
2167:   \frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{2\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{\alpha_0 + k^2}\,
2168:   [{\ell n}(- \omega^2) - 
2169:   {\ell n}(\alpha_0 + k^2 - \omega^2)] =\nonumber\\
2170:   \hspace{-0.3in} &&= - 2\sqrt{\alpha_0}
2171:   \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{d\omega}{2\pi i}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}
2172:   \frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{1}{\alpha_0 - \omega^2 + k^2 -i\,0}.
2173: \end{eqnarray}
2174: %
2175: For the other boundary conditions we get the same result.
2176: 
2177: Thus, we have shown that the discretized version of the correction to
2178: the soliton mass reduces to the continuum result if one transcribes
2179: first the sum over the quantum number $n$ of the momenta of Gaussian
2180: and vacuum fluctuations into the corresponding integral over the
2181: momentum $k$.
2182: 
2183: \section{Conclusion}
2184: 
2185: We have investigated the renormalizability of the sine--Gordon model.
2186: We have analysed the renormalizability of the two--point Green
2187: function to second order in $\alpha$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$.
2188: We have shown that the divergences appearing in the sine--Gordon model
2189: can be removed by the renormalization of the dimensional coupling
2190: constant $\alpha_0(\Lambda^2)$.  We remind that the coupling constant
2191: $\beta^2$ is not renormalizable. This agrees well with a possible
2192: interpretation of the coupling constant $\beta^2$ as $\hbar$
2193: \cite{SC75,FI1}. The quantum fluctuations calculated to first order in
2194: $\alpha_r(M^2)$, the renormalized dimensional coupling constant
2195: depending on the normalization scale $M$, and to arbitrary order in
2196: $\beta^2$ after removal of divergences form a physical coupling
2197: constant $\alpha_{\rm ph}$, which is finite and does not depend on the
2198: normalization scale $M$. We have argued that the total renormalized
2199: two--point Green function depends on the physical coupling constant
2200: $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ only. In order to illustrate this assertion (i) we
2201: have calculated the correction to the two--point Green function to
2202: second order in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and to all orders in $\beta^2$ and
2203: (ii) we have solved the Callan--Symanzik equation for the two--point
2204: Green function with the Gell--Mann--Low function, defined to all
2205: orders in $\alpha_r(M^2)$ and $\beta^2$. We have found that the
2206: two--point Green function of the sine--Gordon field depends on the
2207: running coupling constant $\alpha_r(p^2) = \alpha_{\rm
2208:   ph}(p^2/\alpha_{\rm ph})^{\tilde{\beta}^2/8\pi}$, where
2209: $\tilde{\beta}^2 = \beta^2/(1 + \beta^2/8\pi) < 1$ for any $\beta^2$.
2210: 
2211: We have shown that the finite contribution of the quantum
2212: fluctuations, calculated to second order in $\alpha_{\rm ph}$ and to
2213: first order in $\beta^2$, leads to an effective Lagrangian
2214: 
2215: $$
2216: {\cal L}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
2217: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) + \frac{\alpha_{\rm eff}}{\beta^2}\,
2218: (\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1)\eqno(3.30)
2219:  $$
2220: 
2221: \noindent with the effective coupling constant $\alpha_{\rm eff} =
2222: \alpha_{\rm ph}\,(1 - \beta^2/4\pi)$, which defines the soliton  mass
2223: 
2224: $$
2225:   M_s = \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm eff}}}{\beta^2} = 
2226: \frac{8\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}}{\beta^2} - 
2227: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}}{\pi}.\eqno(3.31)
2228: $$
2229: 
2230: \noindent The term $-\,\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm ph}}/\pi$ is a perturbative
2231: finite correction to the soliton mass, which coincides with the result
2232: obtained by Dashen {\it et al.} \cite{RD74,RD75}. Such a correction
2233: has been interpreted in the literature as a non--perturbative
2234: contribution leading to a singularity of the sine--Gordon model at
2235: $\beta^2 = 8\pi$ (see also \cite{LD78}).  However, in our approach
2236: such a correction is a perturbative one valid for $\beta^2 \ll 8\pi$
2237: and does not provide any singularity for the sine--Gordon model in the
2238: non--perturbative regime $\beta^2 \sim 8\pi$. This confirms the
2239: conjecture by Zamolodchikov and Zamolodchikov \cite{AZ79} that a
2240: singularity of the sine--Gordon model at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$
2241: \cite{RD74,RD75,LD78} is a superficial one and depends on the
2242: regularization and renormalization procedure. This has been
2243: corroborated in \cite{FI6}.
2244: 
2245: 
2246: In addition to the analysis of the renormalizability of the
2247: sine--Gordon model with respect to quantum fluctuations relative to
2248: the trivial vacuum, we have analysed the renormalizability of the
2249: sine--Gordon model with respect to quantum fluctuations around a
2250: soliton.  Following Dashen {\it et al.}  \cite{RD74,RD75} and Faddeev
2251: and Korepin \cite{LD78} we have taken into account only Gaussian
2252: fluctuations. 
2253: 
2254: For the calculation of the effective Lagrangian, induced by Gaussian
2255: fluctuations, we have used the path--integral approach and integrated
2256: over the field $\varphi(x)$, fluctuating around a soliton.  This has
2257: allowed to express the effective Lagrangian in terms of the functional
2258: determinant.  For the calculation of the contribution of the
2259: functional determinant we have used the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues
2260: of the differential operator, describing the evolution of the field
2261: $\varphi(x)$. We have shown that the renormalized effective
2262: Lagrangian, induced by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton,
2263: coincides completely with the renormalized Lagrangian of the
2264: sine--Gordon model, caused by quantum fluctuations around the trivial
2265: vacuum to first order in $\alpha_0$ and to second order in $\beta^2$.
2266: After the removal of divergences the total effective Lagrangian,
2267: caused by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton, is equal to
2268: (\ref{label3.21})
2269: 
2270: $$
2271: {\cal L}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\,\partial_{\mu}\vartheta(x)
2272: \partial^{\mu}\vartheta(x) +
2273: \frac{\alpha_{\rm ph}}{\beta^2}\,
2274: (\cos\beta\vartheta(x) - 1).\eqno(3.21)
2275: $$
2276: 
2277: \noindent This implies that Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton do
2278: not produce any quantum corrections to the soliton mass.  After the
2279: removal divergences the soliton mass is equal to the mass of a
2280: soliton, calculated without quantum corrections, with the replacement
2281: $\alpha_0 \to \alpha_{\rm ph}$.  Hence, no non--perturbative
2282: singularities of the sine Gordon model at $\beta^2 = 8\pi$ can be
2283: induced by Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton.
2284: 
2285: For the confirmation of our results, obtained in continuous
2286: space--time, we have calculated the functional determinant caused by
2287: Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton within the discretization
2288: procedure with periodic and anti--periodic boundary conditions and
2289: rigid walls. We have shown that the result of the calculation of the
2290: functional determinant (i) coincides with that we have obtained in
2291: continuous space--time and (ii) does not depend on the boundary
2292: conditions.
2293: 
2294: \newpage
2295: 
2296: \section*{Appendix. Solutions of the differential equation for
2297:   Gaussian fluctuations around a soliton }
2298: 
2299: Making a change of variables $\xi = \tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)$ we
2300: reduce (\ref{label5.15}) to the form \cite{LL65}
2301: 
2302: $$
2303: \frac{d}{d\xi}\Big[(1 - \xi^2)\frac{d\psi(\xi)}{d \xi}\Big] +\Big[s(s
2304: + 1) - \frac{\epsilon^2}{1 - \xi^2}\Big]\psi(\xi) = 0,\eqno({ \rm
2305: A}.1)
2306: $$
2307: 
2308: \noindent where $s(s + 1) = 2$ and $\epsilon^2 = - k^2/\alpha_0 = 1 -
2309: \omega^2/\alpha_0$ \cite{LL65}.
2310: 
2311: Substituting $\psi(\xi) = (1 - \xi^2)^{\epsilon/2}\,w(\xi)$ and
2312: denoting $u = (1 - \xi)/2$ we arrive at the equation \cite{LL65}
2313: 
2314: $$
2315: u(1 - u)w\,'' + (\epsilon + 1)(1 - 2u)\,w\,' - (\epsilon - s)(\epsilon
2316: + s + 1)\,w = 0.\eqno({ \rm A}.2)
2317: $$
2318: 
2319: \noindent The solution of this equation can be given in terms of hypergeometric
2320: functions $F(a,b; c; z)$ \cite{NL73} (see also \cite{HMF72}). It reads
2321: 
2322: $$
2323: w(\xi) = w^{(1)}(\xi) + w^{(2)}(\xi) = C_1\,F\Big(\epsilon - s, \epsilon + s
2324: + 1; \epsilon + 1;\frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big)
2325: $$
2326: $$
2327: + C_2\,\Big(\frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big)^{-\epsilon} \,F\Big( - s, s + 1; 1
2328: - \epsilon; \frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big),\eqno({ \rm A}.3)
2329: $$
2330: 
2331: \noindent where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are the integration constants.
2332: 
2333: The parameter $s$ acquires two values $s = -2, + 1$, which are
2334: solutions of the equation $s(s + 1) = 2$. Since for both case the
2335: hypergeometric functions coincide \cite{NL73}, setting $s = 1$ we
2336: obtain
2337: 
2338: $$
2339: w(\xi) = w^{(1)}(\xi) + w^{(2)}(\xi) = C_1\,
2340: F\Big(\epsilon - 1, \epsilon + 2; \epsilon + 1;\frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big)
2341: $$
2342: $$
2343: + C_2\,\Big(\frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big)^{-\epsilon} \,F\Big( - 1, 2;
2344: 1 - \epsilon; \frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big).\eqno({ \rm A}.4) 
2345: $$
2346: 
2347: \noindent For arbitrary $\epsilon$ the solution $w^{(2)}(\xi)$ can be
2348: reduced to the polynomial \cite{NL73}
2349: 
2350: $$
2351: w^{(2)}(\xi) = C_2\,\Big(\frac{1 -
2352:   \xi}{2}\Big)^{-\epsilon}\,F\Big( 2, -1; 1 - \epsilon; \frac{1 -
2353:   \xi}{2}\Big) = 
2354: $$
2355: $$
2356: = C_2\,\Big(\frac{1 -
2357:   \xi}{2}\Big)^{-\epsilon}\,F\Big( - 1, 2; 1 - \epsilon; \frac{1 -
2358:   \xi}{2}\Big) = C_2\,\Big(\frac{1 -
2359:   \xi}{2}\Big)^{-\epsilon}\,\frac{\xi - \epsilon}{1 -
2360:   \epsilon}.\eqno({ \rm A}.5) 
2361: $$
2362: 
2363: \noindent One can show that the solution $w^{(1)}(\xi)$ can be reduced
2364: to a polynomial too. For this aim we suggest to use the following
2365: relation for hypergeometric functions \cite{HMF72,NL73}
2366: 
2367: $$
2368: F\Big(a,b;c;\frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big) =
2369: \frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(c - a - b)}{\Gamma(c - a) \Gamma(c -
2370:   b)}\,F\Big(a,b;a + b - c + 1; \frac{1 + \xi}{2}\Big) 
2371: $$
2372: $$
2373: +
2374: \Big(\frac{1 + \xi}{2}\Big)^{c - a - b}\,\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(a + b -
2375:   c)}{\Gamma(a) \Gamma( b)}\,F\Big(c - a, c - b; c - a - b + 1;
2376: \frac{1 + \xi}{2}\Big).\eqno({ \rm A}.6) 
2377: $$
2378: 
2379: \noindent For the solution
2380: $w^{(1)}(\xi)$ we get 
2381: 
2382: $$
2383: w^{(1)}(\xi) = C_1\,F\Big(\epsilon - 1,
2384: \epsilon + 2; \epsilon + 1;\frac{1 - \xi}{2}\Big) =
2385: C_1\,\frac{\Gamma(\epsilon + 1)\Gamma(-\,\epsilon)}{\Gamma(-1)
2386: }\,F\Big(\epsilon - 1, \epsilon + 2; \epsilon + 1; \frac{1 +
2387:   \xi}{2}\Big) 
2388: $$
2389: $$
2390: + C_1\,\frac{\Gamma(\epsilon +
2391:   1)\Gamma(\epsilon)}{\Gamma(\epsilon - 1) \Gamma(\epsilon + 2)}\,\Big(\frac{1 +
2392:   \xi}{2}\Big)^{-\epsilon}\,F\Big(2, - 1; 1 - \epsilon; \frac{1 +
2393:   \xi}{2}\Big) = C_1\,\Big(\frac{1 +
2394:   \xi}{2}\Big)^{-\epsilon}\,\frac{\epsilon + \xi}{1 +
2395:   \epsilon}.\eqno({ \rm A}.7) 
2396: $$
2397: 
2398: \noindent Thus, the fluctuating field
2399: $\psi(\xi)$ is equal to 
2400: 
2401: $$
2402: \psi(\xi) =
2403: C_1\,2^{\,\epsilon}\,\Big(\frac{1 - \xi}{1 +
2404:   \xi}\Big)^{\epsilon/2}\,\frac{\epsilon + \xi}{1 + \epsilon} +
2405: C_2\,2^{\,\epsilon}\,\Big(\frac{1 + \xi}{1 -
2406:   \xi}\Big)^{\epsilon/2}\,\frac{ \xi - \epsilon }{1 -
2407:   \epsilon}.\eqno({ \rm A}.8) 
2408: $$
2409: 
2410: \noindent In terms of $\sigma$ the classical
2411: solution for the fluctuating field reads 
2412: 
2413: $$
2414: \psi(\sigma) =
2415: C_1\,(\epsilon + \tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma))\,e^{\textstyle\,-
2416:   \epsilon \sqrt{\alpha_0} \sigma} + C_2\,(- \epsilon +
2417: \tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma))\,e^{\textstyle\,+ \epsilon
2418:   \sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma},\eqno({ \rm A}.9) 
2419: $$
2420: 
2421: \noindent where we have redefined
2422: the integration constants.  These solutions describe a bound state for
2423: $\epsilon = \pm 1$ and a scattering state for $\epsilon = \pm
2424: ik/\sqrt{\alpha_0}$. They are
2425: 
2426: $$
2427: \psi_b(\sigma) = \sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}}\,
2428: \frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}, 
2429: $$
2430: $$
2431: \psi_k(\sigma) =
2432: \frac{i}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,\frac{-ik +
2433:   \sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}{\sqrt{k^2 +
2434:     \alpha_0}}\,e^{\textstyle\,+ ik\sigma}.\eqno({ \rm A}.10) 
2435: $$
2436: 
2437: \noindent The wave functions $\psi_k(\sigma)$, given by ({\rm A}.10),
2438: are normalized to the $\delta$--function as 
2439: 
2440: $$
2441: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}d\sigma\, \psi^*_{k\,'}(\sigma)
2442: \psi_{k}(\sigma) = \frac{1}{k\,'\,^2 -
2443:   k^2}\,\Big(\psi^*_{k\,'}(\sigma) \frac{d}{d\sigma}\psi_{k}(\sigma) -
2444: \psi_{k}(\sigma)\frac{d}{d \sigma}
2445: \psi^*_{k\,'}(\sigma)\Big)\Big|^{+\infty}_{-\infty} =\delta(k\,' -
2446: k).\eqno({ \rm A}.11) 
2447: $$
2448: 
2449: \noindent The fluctuating field $\varphi(\tau,\sigma)$
2450: is equal to 
2451: 
2452: $$
2453: \varphi_{\omega b}(\tau,\sigma) =
2454: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\,\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}}\,
2455: \frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}\, e^{\textstyle\,-i\omega \tau
2456: }, 
2457: $$
2458: $$
2459: \varphi_{\omega k}(\tau,\sigma) = \frac{i}{2\pi}\,\frac{-ik +
2460:   \sqrt{\alpha_0}\,\tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}{\sqrt{k^2 +
2461:     \alpha_0}}\,e^{\textstyle\,-i\omega \tau + ik\sigma}. \eqno({ \rm
2462:   A}.12) 
2463: $$
2464: 
2465: \noindent They are normalized by 
2466: 
2467: $$
2468: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}d\tau\varphi^*_{\omega\,'
2469:   b}(\tau,\sigma)\varphi_{\omega b}(\tau,\sigma) = \delta(\omega\,' -
2470: \omega), 
2471: $$
2472: $$
2473: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}d\tau
2474: d\sigma\, \varphi^*_{\omega\,' k\,'}(\tau,\sigma) \varphi_{\omega
2475:   k}(\tau,\sigma) = \delta(\omega\,' - \omega)\delta(k\,' - k).\eqno({
2476:   \rm A}.13) 
2477: $$
2478: 
2479: \noindent The eigenfunction $\psi_b(\sigma)$ has the eigenvalue zero,
2480: $\omega = 0$. This corresponds to the bound state \cite{JR70}. The
2481: eigenfunction $\psi_b(\sigma)$ is normalized to unity
2482: 
2483: $$
2484: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}d\sigma\,|\psi_b(\sigma)|^2 = 1.\eqno({ \rm
2485:   A}.14) 
2486: $$
2487: 
2488: \noindent The solutions ({\rm A}.10) satisfy the completeness
2489: condition \cite{JR70} 
2490: 
2491: $$
2492: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dk\,\psi^*_k(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_k(\sigma) +
2493: \psi_b(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_b(\sigma) = \delta(\sigma\,' - \sigma).
2494: \eqno({ \rm A}.15) 
2495: $$
2496: 
2497: \noindent The proof of the completeness condition ({\rm
2498:   A}.15) 
2499: 
2500: $$
2501: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dk\,\psi^*_k(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_k(\sigma) +
2502: \psi_b(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_b(\sigma) =
2503: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,e^{\textstyle ik(\sigma -
2504:   \sigma\,')} 
2505: $$
2506: $$
2507: + \sqrt{\alpha_0}\,[\tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma) -
2508: \tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma\,'\,)]\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}
2509: \frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{ik}{k^2
2510:   + \alpha_0}\,e^{\textstyle ik(\sigma - \sigma\,')} 
2511: $$
2512: $$
2513: +
2514: \alpha_0\, [\tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma\,'\,)
2515: \tanh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma) - 1]
2516: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\,\frac{1}{k^2 +
2517:   \alpha_0}\,e^{\textstyle ik(\sigma - \sigma\,')} 
2518: $$
2519: $$
2520: +
2521: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}\,\frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma\,'\,)}\,\frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}.
2522: \eqno({\rm A}.16) 
2523: $$
2524: 
2525: \noindent Integrating over $k$ we get 
2526: 
2527: $$
2528: \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dk\,\psi^*_k(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_k(\sigma) +
2529: \psi_b(\sigma\,'\,)\psi_b(\sigma) = \delta(\sigma\,' - \sigma) -
2530: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}\,\frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma\,'\,)}\,\frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}
2531: $$
2532: $$
2533: \times\,e^{\textstyle\,-\sqrt{\alpha_0}|\sigma -
2534:   \sigma\,'\,|}\,[\varepsilon(\sigma -
2535: \sigma\,'\,)\,\sinh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}(\sigma - \sigma\,'\,)) +
2536: \cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}(\sigma - \sigma\,'\,))] 
2537: $$
2538: $$
2539: +
2540: \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_0}}{2}\,\frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}
2541: \sigma\,'\,)}\,\frac{1}{\cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}\sigma)}
2542: = \delta(\sigma\,' - \sigma),\eqno({ \rm A}.17) 
2543: $$
2544: 
2545: \noindent where $\varepsilon(\sigma - \sigma\,'\,)$ is the
2546: sign--function. The term, proportional to
2547: $e^{\textstyle\,-\sqrt{\alpha_0}|\sigma - \sigma\,'\,|}$, is given by
2548: the contributions of the second and the third terms of the r.h.s. of
2549: ({\rm A}.16). For the derivation of ({\rm A}.17) we have used the
2550: relation
2551: 
2552: $$
2553: \varepsilon(\sigma - \sigma\,'\,)\,\sinh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}((\sigma -
2554: \sigma\,'\,)) + \cosh(\sqrt{\alpha_0}(\sigma - \sigma\,'\,)) =
2555: e^{\textstyle\,+ \sqrt{\alpha_0}|\sigma - \sigma\,'\,|}.\eqno({ \rm
2556:   A}.17)
2557:  $$
2558: 
2559: \noindent Thus, the contribution of the second and the third terms
2560: in the r.h.s. of ({\rm A}.16) cancel the contribution of the
2561: zero--mode $\psi_b(\sigma)$. This completes the proof of the
2562: completeness condition ({\rm A}.15).
2563: 
2564: 
2565: \newpage
2566: 
2567: 
2568: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
2569: \bibitem{SC75} 
2570: S. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 11}, 2088 (1975).
2571: \bibitem{FI6}
2572: M. Faber and A. N. Ivanov,
2573: J. Phys. A {\bf 36}, 7839 (2003) and references therein.
2574: \bibitem{IZ80}
2575: C. Itzykson and J.--B. Zuber,
2576: in {\it QUANTUM FIELD THEORY}, McGraw--Hill, New York, 1980.
2577: \bibitem{MP95}
2578: M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,
2579: in {\it QUANTUM FIELD THEORY}, Perseus Books,
2580: Reading, Massachusetts, 1995.
2581: \bibitem{SW96}
2582: S. Weinberg,
2583: in {\it THE QUANTUM THEORY OF FIELDS},  Vol. II {\it Modern Applications},
2584: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
2585: \bibitem{RD74}
2586: R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu,
2587: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 10}, 4130 (1974).
2588: \bibitem{RD75} R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D
2589:   {\bf 11}, 3424 (1975).
2590: \bibitem{AZ79}
2591: Alexander B. Zamolodchikov and Alexey B. Zamolodchikov,
2592: Ann. of Phys. {\bf 120}, 253 (1979).
2593: \bibitem{LD78}
2594: L. D. Faddeev and V. E. Korepin,
2595: Phys. Rep. {\bf 42}, 1 (1978).
2596: \bibitem{RC62}
2597: R. Courant and D. Hilbert,
2598: in {\it METHODS OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, Partial Differential Equations},  
2599: Vol. II, Interscience Publishers, John Wiley $\&$ Sons, New York, 1962.
2600: \bibitem{JR70}
2601: J. Rubinstein,
2602: J. of Math. Phys. {\bf 11}, 258 (1970).
2603: \bibitem{NN65}
2604: N. N. Lebedev, I. P. Slalskaya, and Y. S. Uflyand,
2605: in {\it Problems of Mathematical Physics},
2606: Prentice--Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1965, pp.55--102.
2607: \bibitem{MP95a}
2608: (see \cite{MP95} p.286)
2609: \bibitem{RR82}
2610: R. Rajaraman,
2611: in {\it Solitons and Instantons},
2612: North--Holland, 1982.
2613: \bibitem{AR97}
2614: A. Rebhan and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,
2615: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 508}, 449 (1997).
2616: \bibitem{RJ74}
2617: L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,
2618: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 9}, 3320 (1974)
2619: \bibitem{FI1} 
2620: M. Faber and A. N. Ivanov, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 20}, 723 (2001); 
2621: hep-th/0105057.
2622: \bibitem{LL65}
2623: L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,
2624: in {\it QUANTUM MECHANICS}, Pergamon Press, New York, 1965.
2625: \bibitem{NL73}
2626: N. N. Lebedew,
2627: in {\it SPEZIELLE FUNKTIONEN UND IHRE ANWENDUNG},
2628: Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim,
2629: 1973.
2630: \bibitem{HMF72} 
2631: {\it HANDBOOK OF MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS, with Formulas,
2632: Graphs, and Mathematical Tables}, ed. by M. Abramowitz and
2633: I. E. Stegun, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of
2634: Standards, Applied Mathematics Series $\bullet$ 55, 1972.
2635: \end{thebibliography}
2636: 
2637: \end{document}
2638: 
2639: 
2640: 
2641: 
2642: 
2643: 
2644: 
2645: 
2646: 
2647: 
2648: 
2649: 
2650: 
2651: 
2652: 
2653: 
2654: 
2655: 
2656: 
2657: 
2658: 
2659: 
2660: 
2661: 
2662: 
2663: 
2664: 
2665: 
2666: 
2667: 
2668: