1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{article}

2: %\usepackage{feynmf}

3: \usepackage{amsmath}

4: %\usepackage{amssymbol}

5: \usepackage{graphics}

6: \usepackage{epsfig}

7: %\usepackage{psfig}

8: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{{\bf #1}}

9: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2}\normalsize

10: \setlength{\baselineskip}{20mm}

11: \textwidth 15.0 true cm

12: \textheight 22.0 true cm

13: \headheight 0 cm

14: \headsep 0 cm

15: \topmargin 0.4 true in

16: \oddsidemargin 0.25 true in

17: \newcommand{\eqb}{\begin{equation}}

18: \newcommand{\eqe}{\end{equation}}

19: \newcommand{\dmb}{\begin{displaymath}}

20: \newcommand{\dme}{\end{displaymath}}

21: \newcommand{\pd}{\partial}

22: \newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon}

23: \newcommand{\eab}{\begin{eqnarray}}

24: \newcommand{\eae}{\end{eqnarray}}

25: \newcommand{\ra}{\right\rangle}

26: \newcommand{\la}{\left\langle}

27: \newcommand{\e}{\mbox{e}}

28: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

29: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

30: \newcommand{\sgn}{\text{sgn}\,}

31: \newcommand{\munu}{{\mu\nu}}

32: \newcommand{\ad}{{\dot{\alpha}}}

33: \newcommand{\bd}{{\dot{\beta}}}

34: \newcommand{\La}{\Lambda}

35: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}

36: 

37: \begin{document}

38: \begin{titlepage}

39: \begin{flushright} 

40: \end{flushright}

41: \vspace{0.6cm}

42: 

43: \begin{center}

44: \Large{Yang-Mills thermodynamics: The deconfining phase}

45: 

46: \vspace{1.5cm}

47: 

48: \large{Ralf Hofmann}

49: 

50: \end{center}

51: \vspace{1.5cm}

52: 

53: \begin{center}

54: {\em Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik\\ 

55: Universit\"at Frankfurt\\ 

56: Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Universit\"at\\ 

57: Robert-Mayer-Str. 10\\ 

58: 60054 Frankfurt, Germany}

59: \end{center}

60: \vspace{1.5cm}

61: 

62: \begin{abstract}

63: We summarize recent nonperturbative results obtained for the 

64: thermodynamics of an SU(2) and an SU(3)

65: Yang-Mills theory being in its 

66: deconfining (electric) phase. Emphasis is 

67: put on an explanation of the concepts involved. 

68: The presentation of technical 

69: details is avoided.  

70: 

71: \end{abstract} 

72: 

73: \end{titlepage}

74: 

75: \noindent{\sl Introduction.} The purpose of a series of three articles, of which the

76: present one is the first, is to give a compact, abbreviated presentation of 

77: nonperturbative results obtained in 

78: \cite{Hofmann2005,HerbstHofmannRohrer2004,HerbstHofmann2004}. 

79: The objective of these papers is the 

80: thermodynamics of an SU(2) or an SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. 

81: Our goal is to provide the essential ideas and concepts avoiding 

82: technical detail. The discussion focuses on the 

83: case SU(2) for which we quote results 

84: explicitly. The steps needed to generalize to SU(3) and associated 

85: results are mentioned in passing only. The present paper discusses the 

86: deconfining or electric phase.

87: 

88: The key problem in addressing the quantum dynamics 

89: of an SU(N) Yang-Mills theory is to derive a mass 

90: gap in its spectrum, supposedly created by 

91: highly nontrivial ground-state dynamics. Although 

92: insightful in other circumstances diagrammatic approaches 

93: to this problem, which start out with a trivial ground state \cite{NP2004}, 

94: are probably hopeless since perturbation theory at best is an {\sl asymptotic} 

95: expansion in the coupling constant \cite{LargeOrderPT}. 

96: 

97: One-loop expressions for the quantum weight of isolated 

98: topological defects allow for the identification of certain nonperturbative 

99: mechanisms contributing to the ground-state physics 

100: \cite{SemiclassicalApprox}. 

101: Despite heroic efforts and partial successes a rigorous derivation 

102: of the Yang-Mills spectrum or of the complete spectrum of 

103: Quantum Chromodynamics seems to be out of reach within such a microscopic 

104: approach, see for example \cite{spectrum}. 

105: 

106: A more macroscopic but seemingly feasible approach to the 

107: problem of the mass gap is to consider a thermalized version of the 

108: theory, subjected to an appropriate spatial 

109: coarse-graining \cite{Hofmann2005,HerbstHofmannRohrer2004,HerbstHofmann2004}. 

110: One analyses the theory at high temperatures such that an evaluation of the 

111: partition function $Z$ in terms of the gauge fields appearing in the 

112: {\sl classical} action is suggestive. After a total 

113: gauge fixing one has 

114: %*********

115: \eqb

116: \label{partfunc}

117: Z=\sum_{A_\mu,\atop{A_\mu(\tau=0,\vec{x})=A_\mu(\tau=\beta,\vec{x})}}\,

118: \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2g^2}\int_0^\beta d\tau\int d^3x\,\,\mbox{tr}\,

119: F_{\rho\kappa}F_{\rho\kappa}[A_\mu]\right)

120: \eqe

121: %*********

122: where $\beta\equiv 1/T$, and $g$ is the gauge coupling. Instead of summing over all 

123: fluctuations in the field variables $A_\mu$ at once an approach 

124: roughly sketched in the following and made more explicit below is advantageous: 

125: 

126: First, eliminate the correlations mediated by noninteracting, 

127: classical saddle points of nontrivial 

128: topology (calorons and anticalorons) but trivial holonomy 

129: \cite{HarringtonShepard1977} in favor of a spatial average. (The term holonomy refers 

130: to the behavior of the Polyakov loop when evaluated on a 

131: gauge-field configuration at spatial infinity. A configuration is associated with a 

132: trivial holonomy if its Polyakov loop is in the center of the group ($Z_2$ for SU(2) and 

133: $Z_3$ for SU(3)) and associated with a nontrivial holonomy otherwise.) This 

134: is completely in line with Polyakov's early prophecy that certain classical 

135: solutions may cure the infrared catastrophe in Yang-Mills theory \cite{Polyakov1975}. 

136: (Recall, that in the limit 

137: $T\to 0$ a trivial-holonomy caloron approaches the BPST instanton in 

138: singular gauge \cite{BPST1976} and that the 

139: latter is interpreted as a large quantum 

140: fluctuation, that is, a topology-changing tunneling process. 

141: Recall also, that these processes can not 

142: be mimicked by a perturbative series 

143: due to the existence of an essential 

144: singularity in the associated 

145: weight at zero coupling. Since coarse-graining amounts to 

146: an average over {\sl all} quantum fluctuations it is imperative 

147: to include such large fluctuations in addition to 

148: the usual off-shell, plane-wave fluctuations considered in 

149: perturbation theory.) A spatially homogeneous, composite, and adjointly transforming 

150: scalar field $\phi$ emerges as a result of 

151: the applied spatial coarse-graining. This suggests the concept of a 

152: hypothetical energy- and pressure-free (BPS saturated)

153: thermal ground state composed of finite-action but 

154: energy- and pressure-free (BPS saturated) and 

155: noninteracting gauge-field configurations: 

156: trivial-holonomy calorons and anticalorons.  

157: 

158: Second, having derived an  

159: effective action for $\phi$ in a unique way establish the statistical and quantum mechanical 

160: inertness of this field: A spatial and partial moduli-space average over 

161: classical caloron and anticaloron configurations generates a 

162: classical (nonfluctuating) field $\phi$. 

163: 

164: Third, add the sector with 

165: trivial topology in a minimal fashion. In the emerging full effective theory 

166: quantum fluctuations, which deform the calorons and anticalorons and 

167: mediate interactions between them, 

168: are averaged over down to a spatial 

169: resolution of the order of the modulus $|\phi|$. 

170: Notice that $|\phi|^{-1}$ sets the linear size of the volume needed 

171: to perform the spatial average. Averaged-over quantum fluctuations 

172: with trivial topology occur in terms of a pure-gauge configuration $a_\mu^{bg}$ solving 

173: the effective Yang-Mills equations in the 

174: background of the field $\phi$. Together $\phi,a_\mu^{bg}$ comprise 

175: the full thermal ground state whose pressure $P^{gs}=-4\pi\Lambda_E^3 T$ is negative. On 

176: the microscopic level this can be understood as follows: Pairs of a BPS 

177: magnetic monopole and its antimonopole \cite{BPSmon} are contained within calorons or anticalorons of 

178: {\sl nontrivial} holonomy \cite{Nahm1984,LeeLu1998,KraanvanBaal1998}. The 

179: nontrivial holonomy is locally excited by gluon exchanges between 

180: calorons and anticalorons. A magnetic monopole and 

181: its antimonopole much more often attract 

182: than repulse each other as a result of quantum fluctuations 

183: around them \cite{Diakonov2004}. The spatial average over 

184: an attractive potential between a monopole and its antimonopole being 

185: in equilibrium with respect to their 

186: annihilation and recreation {\sl is} nothing but negative pressure. 

187: 

188: Fourth, compute the spectrum of 

189: propagating quasiparticle modes by virtue 

190: of the adjoint Higgs mechanism. The latter is the coarse-grained 

191: manifestation of off-Cartan gluons (unitary gauge) scattering 

192: off calorons and anticalorons along a zig-zag like path. An emerging, temperature dependent 

193: mass characterizes the propagation of such modes on distances 

194: larger than $|\phi|^{-1}$. This mass gap resolves the problem of 

195: the magnetic instability encountered in perturbation theory. Namely, the loop expansion of 

196: thermodynamical quantities converges very rapidly even though the gap approaches 

197: zero as $T^{-1/2}\propto |\phi|$ for $T\to\infty$. 

198: The rapid convergence is also due to residual quantum 

199: fluctuations being softer than $|\phi|$. (Only tiny corrections to the 

200: free-quasiparticle-gas approximation to thermodynamical quantities 

201: are induced by two-loop effects \cite{HerbstHofmannRohrer2004}.) 

202: 

203: Fifth, impose the requirement that the Legendre transformations between 

204: thermodynamical quantities are invariant under the applied 

205: spatial coarse-graining. This yields a first-order differential 

206: equation governing the evolution of the {\sl effective} gauge coupling 

207: with temperature. The identification 

208: of the phase boundary, where isolated monopoles become massless and thus 

209: condense, and the temperature dependence of thermodynamical quantities 

210: follow from this evolution. Let us now discuss 

211: each step in more detail.\vspace{-0.3cm}\\ 

212: 

213: \noindent{\sl The field $\phi$.} The color orientation 

214: $\hat{\phi}$ (phase) of the field $\phi$ is computed as a spatial and incomplete moduli-space 

215: average over the contributions of a trivial-holonomy 

216: caloron and a trivial-holonomy anticaloron in singular gauge \cite{HerbstHofmann2004}. 

217: While the definition of the associated 

218: dimensionless quantity 

219: %*********

220: \eab

221: \label{defphi}

222: \hat{\phi}^a\equiv\frac{\phi^a}{|\phi|}(\tau)\sim \int d^3x\,\int d\rho\,\,\frac{\lambda^a}{2}& F_{\mu\nu}[A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)]\left((\tau,0)\right)\,

223: \left\{(\tau,0),(\tau,\vec{x})\right\}[A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)]\times

224: \nonumber\\ 

225: &F_{\mu\nu}[A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)]\left((\tau,\vec{x})\right)\,

226: \left\{(\tau,\vec{x}),(\tau,0)\right\}[A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)]

227: \eae

228: %*********

229: is unique [no explicit $\beta$ dependence because the 

230: (anti)caloron action is $\beta$ independent; Wilson lines 

231: $\left\{(\tau,0),(\tau,\vec{x})\right\}[A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)]$, 

232: $\left\{(\tau,\vec{x}),(\tau,0))\right\}[A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)]$ are evaluated as 

233: functionals of the configuration $A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)$ 

234: along a straight path and no spatial shift $0\to \vec{z}$ because 

235: no associated mass scale available on the classical level; 

236: only trivial-holonomy calorons or anticalorons $A_\alpha(\rho,\beta)$ 

237: of topological charge modulus $|Q|=1$ are allowed 

238: because otherwise the larger number of dimensionful 

239: parameters in the moduli spaces would generate forbidden explicit $\beta$ dependences; 

240: no higher $n$-point contributions because they also would generate explicit $\beta$ dependences; 

241: flat measure for integration over scale parameter $\rho$ because the ratio of field and 

242: modulus is taken in Eq.\,(\ref{defphi})] a number of ambiguities 

243: emerge when evaluating the expression on the right-hand 

244: side in (\ref{defphi}): undetermined normalizations and shifts in the $\tau$ 

245: dependence of the caloron and anticaloron contribution and 

246: a global gauge ambiguity associated with the plane spanned by two unit vectors involved in 

247: an angular regularization \cite{HerbstHofmann2004} of the 

248: expression on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{defphi}). For a given angular-regularization 

249: plane (or, equivalently, for a given global gauge fixing) these ambiguities 

250: span the solution space of the differential equation ${\cal D} \phi=0$ where 

251: ${\cal D}\equiv\pd_\tau^2+\left(\frac{2\pi}{\beta}\right)^2$. Thus the linear 

252: operator $\cal D$ and therefore $\phi$'s 

253: second-order equation of motion is {\sl uniquely} defined by the right-hand 

254: side in (\ref{defphi}). A requirement on $\phi$ is that its 

255: energy-momentum tensor vanishes in the effective theory 

256: because it emerges as an average over noninteracting field configurations 

257: whose (microscopic) energy-momentum tensor vanishes 

258: due to their (anti)selfduality. Since the $\tau$ 

259: dependence of the field $\phi=|\phi|\hat{\phi}$ resides in 

260: its phase $\hat{\phi}$ and since $\cal D$ is a {\sl linear} operator 

261: this is equivalent to requiring $\hat{\phi}$'s BPS saturation. Thus we have 

262: %***********

263: \eqb\label{1orderbps}

264: \pd_\tau \hat{\phi}=\pm\frac{2\pi i}{\beta}\lambda_3\,\hat{\phi}\,

265: \eqe

266: %**********

267: where $\lambda_3$ is the third Pauli matrix. Because of the afore-mentioned 

268: global gauge ambiguity $\lambda_3$ can be replaced by any 

269: normalized linear combination of Pauli matrices. The solutions to Eq.\,(\ref{1orderbps}) 

270: are given as 

271: %***********

272: \eqb\label{sol1orderbps}

273: \hat{\phi} = C \, \lambda_1 \, 

274: \exp\left(\mp \frac{2\pi i}{\beta} \lambda_3 (\tau -\tau_0)\right)\,.

275: \eqe

276: %**********

277: Evidently, 

278: the number of ambiguities has reduced from four to two after requiring 

279: BPS saturation for the trajectory within a given angular regularization plane. 

280: The parameter $\tau_0$ can globally be gauged to zero. However, the normalization $C$ is 

281: undetermined on the classical level. (Recall, 

282: that we have not yet considered interactions between 

283: calorons and anticalorons.) This is a consequence of the unbroken 

284: symmetry of the classical Yang-Mills action 

285: under spatial dilations. 

286: 

287: After plane-wave quantum 

288: fluctuations are integrated out down to a resolution $|\phi|$ this symmetry is broken by 

289: dimensional transmutation \cite{NP2004}. To determine the ($\tau$ independent) 

290: modulus $|\phi|$ we assume that the corresponding mass scale $\Lambda_E$ 

291: is externally provided such that calorons and anticalorons remain free of 

292: interactions. (Together, $\beta$ and $\Lambda_E$ set the spatial length 

293: scale $|\phi|^{-1}$ over which the coarse-graining involving a single 

294: caloron and a single anticaloron of topological charge modulus $|Q|=1$ ought to be carried out.) 

295: Then the entire field $\phi$ satisfies a BPS equation with a right-hand 

296: side whose 'square' uniquely defines the potential 

297: appearing in the effective action: Since the latter is an average 

298: over noninteracting calorons down to a resolution set by the modulus $|\phi|$ itself 

299: the potential (and its square root) 

300: ought not depend on $\beta$ explicitly. To reproduce the 

301: known $\tau$ dependence of the phase $\hat\phi$ the right-hand side of 

302: $\phi$'s BPS equation must be linear in $\phi$. 

303: At the same time it should be an analytic 

304: function of $\phi$. Then, up to global gauge rotations, 

305: the only viable possibility is \cite{HerbstHofmann2004}

306: %*******

307: \eqb\label{bps14}

308: \pd_\tau\phi=\pm i\,\Lambda_E^3\,\lambda_3\,\phi^{-1}\,

309: \eqe

310: %**********

311: where $\phi^{-1}\equiv \frac{\phi}{|\phi|^2}$. 

312: Substituting $\phi=|\phi|\hat{\phi}$ into 

313: Eq.\,(\ref{bps14}) with $\hat{\phi}$ given in Eq.\,(\ref{sol1orderbps}), 

314: we have $|\phi|(\beta,\Lambda)=\sqrt{\frac{\beta\Lambda_E^3}{2\pi}}$. 'Squaring' 

315: the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{bps14}) one 

316: obtains the unique potential $V_E=\mbox{tr}\frac{\La_E^6}{\phi^2}$. (Shifts $V_E\to V_E+\mbox{const}$ 

317: are forbidden by Eq.\,(\ref{bps14})!) Because at a given temperature $T$ the mass squared 

318: $\pd^2_{|\phi|}\,V_E(|\phi|)$ of possible fluctuations $\delta\phi$ is much 

319: larger than the resolution squared $|\phi|^2$ and also 

320: than $T^2$ one concludes that $\phi$ is an inert background in the effective 

321: theory \cite{Hofmann2005}: Quantum and statistical fluctuations $\delta\phi$ are absent! Notice 

322: that both Eq.\,(\ref{sol1orderbps}) and 

323: Eq.\,(\ref{bps14}) are not invariant under 

324: Lorentz boosts but invariant under spatial rotations and spacetime shifts. 

325: This is a manifestation of the fact 

326: that the isotropic and spacetime homogeneous heat bath defines a 

327: preferred rest frame. \vspace{-0.3cm}\\ 

328: 

329: \noindent{\sl The full ground state.} 

330: After a minimal extension of $\phi$'s action involving the coarse-grained sector 

331: with trivial topology one derives the associated equation of motion 

332: %*******

333: \eqb\label{eomts}

334: D_\mu G_{\mu\nu}=ie[\phi,D_\nu \phi]

335: \eqe

336: %*******

337: where $e$ is the {\sl effective} gauge coupling. 

338: Notice that no gauge-field configuration with localized action 

339: density exists as a solution to the classical field equations 

340: in the effective theory due to the 

341: spatial homogeneity of the field $\phi$. In particular, 

342: no topologically nontrivial configuration of finite action exists. 

343: The pure-gauge configuration $a_\mu^{bg}=\frac{\pi}{e}\,T \delta_{\mu 4}\,\lambda_3$ 

344: solves  Eq.\,(\ref{eomts}) by virtue of $D_\mu \phi=0=G_{\mu\nu}$: A remarkable 

345: thing has happened. Coarse-grained interactions, mediated by 

346: off-shell gluons mediating a resolution large than $|\phi|$, emerge 

347: as a pure-gauge configuration $a_\mu^{bg}$. The latter induces a finite ground-state 

348: energy density $\rho^{gs}$ and a finite ground-state pressure 

349: $P^{gs}$ as $\rho^{gs}=-P^{gs}=4\pi\Lambda_E^3 T$. This makes the 

350: so-far hidden scale $\Lambda_E$ (gravitationally) detectable. A 

351: microscopic interpretation of this result is 

352: available owing to the heroic work in \cite{Diakonov2004}.   

353:  

354: The one-loop quantum weight for an SU(2) caloron or anticaloron  

355: with nontrivial holonomy, topological charge modulus $|Q|=1$, and 

356: no net magnetic charge \cite{Nahm1984,LeeLu1998,KraanvanBaal1998} was computed 

357: in \cite{Diakonov2004}. 

358: Depending on the holonomy is was shown that the magnetic 

359: monopole-antimonopole constituents either attract (small holonomy) or repulse (large holonomy) 

360: each other implying that a semiclassical argument excluding these (instable) 

361: saddle points from the partition function 

362: by a vanishing quantum weight in the 

363: thermodynamical limit is flawed \cite{GPY1981}. Since the 

364: small-holonomy solution collapses 

365: back to trivial holonomy (attracting and annihilating monopole and antimonopole) 

366: its quantum weight essentially coincides with the one for zero holonomy. The latter, however, 

367: is finite in the thermodynamical limit. The likelihood for exciting a large 

368: holonomy, which facilitates a life in isolation for 

369: monopoles and antimonopoles by quantum induced repulsion \cite{Diakonov2004} and subsequent 

370: screening \cite{KorthalsAltes}, is roughly given by $e^{-40}\ll 1$ \cite{Hofmann2005}. So the local 

371: creation of a small holonomy by gluon exchanges between trivial-holonomy 

372: calorons is the by-far dominating situation: At high temperatures the 

373: ground state of the Yang-Mills theory is characterized 

374: by an equilibrium with respect to annihilation and recreation of attracting 

375: monopoles and antimonopoles, and a negative ground-state 

376: pressure emerges from spatially averaged attraction between monopoles and antimonopoles. 

377: 

378: An important observation concerning the deconfining nature of the electric phase 

379: is the $Z_2$ degeneracy of the coarse-grained Polyakov loop $\cal P$. 

380: This can be seen by identifying the singular, periodic transformation to unitary gauge, 

381: which maps ${\cal P}[a_\mu^{bg}=\frac{\pi}{e}\,T \delta_{\mu 4}\,\lambda_3]=-{\bf 1}$ 

382: to ${\cal P}[a_\mu^{bg}=0]={\bf 1}$ on tree-level, by showing the invariance of the periodicity of 

383: a gauge-field fluctuation $\delta a_\mu$ under this transformation, 

384: and by recalling that the field $\phi$ breaks the gauge symmetry 

385: SU(2) to U(1) after coarse-graining. An immediate consequence of the latter fact is that 

386: there are massless modes in the effective theory assuring the qualitative validity of 

387: the tree-level result for $\cal P$ also on the 

388: level of the full expectation. For SU(3) the field $\phi$ 

389: winds in each SU(2) subalgebra for one third of the 

390: extent $\beta$ of the time interval. Along the same lines as in the SU(2) case 

391: the $Z_3$ degeneracy of the Polyakov-loop expectation follows after an identification of 

392: the irreducible representation of this group in 

393: terms of possible tree-level values of $\cal P$.\vspace{-0.3cm}\\ 

394: 

395: \noindent{\sl Almost free quasiparticles.} 

396: Propagating, topologically 

397: trivial excitations $\delta a_\mu$ are affected 

398: by the ground state in two ways. 

399: 

400: First, a part of the 

401: spectrum acquires mass by the adjoint Higgs mechanism (thermal quasiparticle modes). For 

402: SU(2) two directions in color space (off-Cartan in unitary gauge) 

403: acquire the same mass $m=2e|\phi|$. For SU(3), 

404: where coarse-graining breaks the gauge symmetry SU(3) to U(1)$^2$, the common 

405: mass $m_2=2e|\phi|$ emerges for two color directions, and four directions acquire 

406: the same mass $m_4=e|\phi|$ \cite{Hofmann2005}. 

407: It is known for a long time that the nonconvergence of the perturbation series for infrared 

408: sensitive thermodynamical quantities arises from the 

409: weakly screened magnetic sector, that is, 

410: from the absence of an infrared cutoff \cite{Linde1980}. 

411: This problem is resolved in the effective theory. 

412: 

413: Second, residual plane-wave quantum fluctuations only probe 

414: distances larger than $|\phi|^{-1}$. In a physical gauge 

415: (unitary-Coulomb) this imposes a cutoff 

416: on the maximal off-shellness for quantum fluctuations in the gauge field (ultraviolet cutoff). 

417: 

418: To summarize, the spatial coarse-graining over 

419: {\sl all} quantum fluctuations causes the simultaneous emergence of 

420: tree-level masses (infrared cutoffs) 

421: and constraints on the maximal off-shellness 

422: of plane-wave quantum fluctuations (ultraviolet cutoff). 

423: In the deconfining phase this renders the excitations of an SU(2) and of an SU(3) 

424: Yang-Mills theory to form a gas of very weakly interacting quasiparticles 

425: \cite{HerbstHofmannRohrer2004}. \vspace{-0.3cm}\\ 

426: 

427: \noindent{\sl Evolution of the effective coupling.} 

428: There are two undetermined parameters in the effective theory, the Yang-Mills 

429: scale $\Lambda_E$ and the effective gauge coupling $e$. While the former represents 

430: a constant mass scale, which embodies the coarse-grained manifestation 

431: of dimensional transmutation, the latter may well depend 

432: on temperature. The temperature evolution of $e$ is governed by 

433: the invariance of Legendre transformations between thermodynamical quantities 

434: under the spatial coarse-graining applied. One has \cite{GorensteinYang1995}

435: %*******

436: \eqb\label{tsc}

437: \pd_m P=0

438: \eqe

439: %******* 

440: where $m$ is 

441: the mass gap in the quasiparticle spectrum, and $P$ denotes the total 

442: pressure (excitations plus ground state). For many practical purposes it suffices 

443: to use the one-loop expression for $P$. Eq.\,(\ref{tsc}) implies a first-order 

444: evolution equation for temperature as a function of mass whose solution 

445: can be inverted to extract the dependence of the effective 

446: gauge coupling $e$ on temperature. 

447: %***********************

448: \begin{figure}

449: \begin{center}

450: \leavevmode

451: %\epsfxsize=9.cm

452: \leavevmode

453: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}

454: \vspace{5.5cm}

455: \special{psfile=Fig-1.ps angle=0 voffset=-170

456:          hoffset=-130 hscale=60  vscale=50}

457: \end{center}

458: \caption{The temperature evolution of the gauge 

459: coupling $e$ in the electric phase for 

460: SU(2) (grey line) and SU(3) (black line). The gauge coupling 

461: diverges logarithmically, $e\propto -\log(\lambda_{E}-\lambda_{c,E})$, at 

462: $\lambda_{c,E}=13.867$ (SU(2)) and $\lambda_{c,E}=9.475$ SU(3) 

463: where $\lambda_{E}\equiv \frac{2\pi T}{\Lambda_E}$. 

464: The respective plateau values are $e=8.89$ and $e=7.26$.\label{Fig1}}      

465: \end{figure}

466: %************************

467: In Fig.\,\ref{Fig1} this dependence is 

468: depicted for SU(2) and SU(3). It is a striking result that the downward evolution at low 

469: temperatures, where $e$ approaches a plateau and subsequently runs into a 

470: logarithmic divergence, $e\sim -\log(T-T_{c,E})$, is {\sl independent} 

471: of the boundary condition imposed at a high temperature. This is the celebrated 

472: ultraviolet-infrared decoupling property which so far was only shown 

473: in perturbation theory. Naively seen, the plateau values $e=8.89$ (SU(2)) 

474: and $e=7.26$ (SU(3)) render the effective 

475: theory strongly coupled and the one-loop analysis useless. This conclusion is 

476: incorrect, however, since interactions are mediated by severely constrained 

477: gluon exchanges. Thus spatially coarse-grained gluons interact only very weakly and 

478: one-loop expressions are reliable on the 0.1\%-level \cite{HerbstHofmannRohrer2004}. 

479: The constancy of the coupling $e$ for temperatures well 

480: above $T_{c,E}$ on average expresses the conservation of the magnetic charge 

481: of isolated, screened, and nonrelativistic 

482: monopoles ($g=\frac{4\pi}{e}$ for a single monopole) 

483: inside the spatial volume of typical size $|\phi|^{-3}$, and the behavior 

484: $e\sim -\log(T-T_{c,E})$ signals the vicinity of a phase 

485: transition where coarse-grained off-Cartan modes decouple and 

486: isolated magnetic monopoles become massless and thus condense.\vspace{-0.3cm}\\ 

487: 

488: \noindent{\sl Results and summary.} 

489: In Fig.\,\ref{Fig-2} we present results for the temperature 

490: evolution of the total pressure $P$ and the total 

491: energy density $\rho$. 

492: %***********************

493: \begin{figure}

494: \begin{center}

495: \leavevmode

496: %\epsfxsize=9.cm

497: \leavevmode

498: %\epsffile[80 25 534 344]{}

499: \vspace{5.5cm}

500: \special{psfile=Fig-2.ps angle=0 voffset=-180

501:          hoffset=-232 hscale=60  vscale=50}

502: \end{center}

503: \caption{The ratios of energy density $\rho$ and pressure 

504: $P$ with $T^4$ for SU(2) (grey lines) and 

505: SU(3) (black lines). The vertical, dashed lines indicate 

506: the critical temperature for the onset of 

507: magnetic monopole condensation.\label{Fig-2}}      

508: \end{figure}

509: %************************

510: Notice the rapid (power-like) approach 

511: to the asymptotic regime, which up to a small mismatch in 

512: the number of polarizations, coincides with the naive Stefan-Boltzmann 

513: limit (gas of massless gluons with two polarizations each). Notice also the 

514: dip in $\rho$ at $\lambda_{c,E}$. (Towards 

515: the magnetic side of the phase boundary the energy density jumps 

516: up due to an increase of the number of polarizations 

517: for the propagating gauge modes: A coupling to averaged-over, 

518: condensed magnetic monopoles renders these modes massive 

519: and breaks the dual gauge symmetry U(1)$_D$ (SU(2)) and U(1)$^2_D$ (SU(3)) 

520: down to its discrete subgroup.) If the U(1)$_Y$ factor in the 

521: Standard Model is an effective manifestation of SU(2) 

522: dynamics subject to a Yang-Mills scale $\Lambda_{\tiny\mbox{CMB}}$, which is 

523: comparable to the temperature $T_{\tiny\mbox{CMB}}$ of the cosmic microwave background, then 

524: this dip is experimentally determined to be 

525: at $T_{\tiny\mbox{CMB}}=\frac{\lambda_{c,E}}{2\pi}\Lambda_{\tiny\mbox{CMB}}$ \cite{Hofmann2005}. 

526: (Only at $T_{\tiny\mbox{CMB}}$ is the photon entirely 

527: unscreened and are (stable) off-Cartan modes entirely decoupled). 

528: The dip dynamically stabilizes $T_{\tiny\mbox{CMB}}$ 

529: against (accelerated) cosmological expansion dominantly induced by 

530: another matter source (slowly 

531: rolling Planck-scale axion \cite{Hofmann2005,Wilczek2004}).  

532:  

533: 

534: 

535: \section*{Acknowledgements}

536: The author would like to thank Mark Wise for useful conversations 

537: and for the warm hospitality extended to him during his 

538: visit to Caltech in May 2005. Financial support by 

539: Kavli Institute at Santa Barbara and by 

540: the physics department of UCLA is thankfully acknowledged. 

541:  

542: 

543: 

544: \begin{thebibliography}{10}

545: 

546: \bibitem{Hofmann2005}

547: R. Hofmann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, in press [hep-th/0504064].

548: 

549: \bibitem{HerbstHofmannRohrer2004}

550: U. Herbst, R. Hofmann, and J. Rohrer, Acta Phys. Pol. B {\bf 36}, 881 (2005).

551: 

552: \bibitem{HerbstHofmann2004}

553: U. Herbst and R. Hofmann, submitted to Phys. Rev. D [hep-th/0411214].

554: 

555: \bibitem{NP2004}

556: D. J. Gross and Frank Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 8}, 3633 (1973).\\  

557: D. J. Gross and Frank Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 30}, 1343 (1973).\\  

558: H. David Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 30}, 1346 (1973).\\  

559: H. David Politzer, Phys. Rept. {\bf 14}, 129 (1974). 

560: 

561: \bibitem{LargeOrderPT}

562: F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. {\bf 85}, 631 (1952).\\ 

563: C. A. Hurst, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. {\bf 48}, 625 (1952).\\ 

564: W. Thirring, Helv. Phys. Acta {\bf 26}, 33 (1953).\\ 

565: A. Peterman, Helv. Phys. Acta {\bf 26}, 291 (1953).\\ 

566: L. S. Brown and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 45}, 398 (1992).\\  

567: V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 385}, 452 (1992).\\ 

568: A. H. Mueller, in QCD: 20 Years later. Aachen, 

569: Germany, 1992, ed. P. M. Zerwas and H. A. Kastrup 

570: (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).

571: 

572: \bibitem{SemiclassicalApprox}

573: G. 't Hooft, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 14}, 3432 (1976), 

574: Erratum-ibid. D {\bf 18}, 2199 (1978).\\ 

575: L. Brown, R. Carlitz, and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 16}, 417 (1977).\\ 

576: L. Brown, R. Carlitz, D. Creamer, and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 17}, 1583 (1978).\\ 

577: L. Brown and D. Creamer, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 18}, 3695 (1978).\\  

578: D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 53}, 43 (1981).\\ 

579: D. Diakonov, N. Gromov, V. Petrov, and S. Slizovskiy, 

580: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 036003 (2004). 

581: 

582: \bibitem{spectrum}

583: E. Shuryak, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 319}, 521 (1989); Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 319}, 541 (1989); 

584: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 328}, 85 (1989); Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 328}, 102 (1989). 

585: 

586: \bibitem{HarringtonShepard1977}

587: B. J. Harrington and H. K. Shepard, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 17}, 2122 (1978). 

588: 

589: \bibitem{Polyakov1975}

590: A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B {\sl 59}, 82 (1975).  

591: 

592: \bibitem{BPST1976}

593: A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. S. Shvarts, and 

594: Yu. S. Tyupkin, Phys. Lett. B {\sl 59}, 85 (1975). 

595: 

596: \bibitem{BPSmon}

597: G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 79}, 276 (1974).\\ 

598: A. M. Polyakov, JETP Letters {\bf 20}, 194 (1974).\\ 

599: M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 35}, 760 (1975).\\ 

600: E. B. Bogomol'nyi, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 24}, 449 (1976). 

601: 

602: \bibitem{Nahm1984} 

603: W. Nahm, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 90}, 413 (1980).\\ 

604: W. Nahm, Lect. Notes in Physics. 201, eds. G. Denaro, e.a. (1984) p. 189.

605: 

606: \bibitem{LeeLu1998}

607: K.-M. Lee and C.-H. Lu, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 58}, 025011 (1998).

608: 

609: \bibitem{KraanvanBaal1998}

610: T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 533}, 627 (1998).\\  

611: T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 428}, 268 (1998).\\ 

612: T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 435}, 389 (1998).

613: 

614: \bibitem{Diakonov2004}

615: D. Diakonov, N. Gromov, V. Petrov, and S. Slizovskiy, 

616: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 70}, 036003 (2004).

617: 

618: \bibitem{GPY1981}

619: D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski, and L. G. Yaffe, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 53}, 43 (1981).

620: 

621: \bibitem{KorthalsAltes}

622: C. P. Korthals Altes, hep-ph/0406138, hep-ph/0408301.\\ 

623: C. P. Korthals Altes, Acta Phys. Polon. B {\bf 34}, 5825 (2003).\\ 

624: P. Giovannangeli and C. P. Korthals Altes, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 608}, 203 (2001).\\  

625: C. Korthals-Altes, A. Kovner, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 469}, 205 (1999).

626: 

627: \bibitem{Linde1980}

628: A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 96}, 289 (1980).

629: 

630: \bibitem{GorensteinYang1995}

631: M. I. Gorenstein and S.-N. Yang, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 5206 (1995).

632: 

633: \bibitem{Wilczek2004}

634: F. Wilczek, contribution to 

635: book 'Universe or Multiverse', ed. B. Carr, 

636: based in part on talk given at the Anthropic Workshop, Cambridge Univ., Jun 2001 

637: [hep-ph/0408167]. 

638: 

639: 

640: \end{thebibliography} 

641: 

642: \baselineskip25pt

643: \end{document}

644: