1: \documentstyle[12pt,a4wide]{article}

2: \input epsf

3: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

4: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

5: \newcommand{\pr}{\partial}

6: \newcommand{\I}{{\cal I}}

7: \newcommand{\bpsi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\psi$}}

8: \newcommand{\bpi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\pi$}}

9: \newcommand{\pauli}{\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}}

10: %%%%%%%If you do not have the msbm fonts, delete the following 10 lines

11: \font\mybb=msbm10 at 11pt

12: \font\mybbb=msbm10 at 17pt

13: \def\bb#1{\hbox{\mybb#1}}

14: \def\bbb#1{\hbox{\mybbb#1}}

15: \def\bZ {\bb{Z}}

16: \def\bR {\bb{R}}

17: \def\bE {\bb{E}}

18: \def\bT {\bb{T}}

19: \def\bM {\bb{M}}

20: \def\bC {\bb{C}}

21: \def\bA {\bb{A}}

22: \def\bP {\bb{P}}

23: \def\e  {\epsilon}

24: \def\bbC {\bbb{C}}

25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

26: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}

27: \newcommand{\news}{\setcounter{equation}{0}}

28: %\newcommand{\newss}{\setcounter{equation}{0}}

29: \def\ben{\begin{equation}}

30: \def\een{\end{equation}}

31: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}

32: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}

33: %\input amssym.def

34: %\input amssym.tex

35: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.67}

36: \begin{document}

37: 

38: \title{\vskip -1cm

39: %\bf \large \bf SPINNING SKYRMIONS AND THE SKYRME PARAMETERS\\[30pt]

40: \bf \large \bf Spinning Skyrmions and the Skyrme Parameters\\[30pt]

41: \author{Richard A. Battye$^{1}$, Steffen Krusch$^{2}$

42: and Paul M. Sutcliffe$^{2}$\\[10pt]

43: \\{\normalsize $^{1}$

44: {\sl Jodrell Bank Observatory, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL U.K.}}

45: \\{\normalsize {\sl $\&$  School of Physics and Astronomy,

46: Schuster Laboratory,}}

47: \\{\normalsize {\sl University of Manchester, Brunswick St,

48:  Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.}}

49: \\{\normalsize {\sl Email : rbattye@jb.man.ac.uk}}\\

50: \\{\normalsize $^{2}$  {\sl Institute of Mathematics,

51: University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, U.K.}}\\

52: {\normalsize{\sl Email : S.Krusch@kent.ac.uk}}\\

53: {\normalsize{\sl Email : P.M.Sutcliffe@kent.ac.uk}}\\[0.5cm]}}

54: \date{July 2005}

55: \maketitle

56: 

57: \begin{abstract}

58: The traditional approach to fixing the parameters of the Skyrme

59: model requires the energy of a spinning Skyrmion to reproduce

60: the nucleon and delta masses. The standard Skyrme parameters, which are

61: used almost exclusively, fix the pion mass to its experimental value

62: and fit the two remaining Skyrme parameters by approximating the

63: spinning Skyrmion as a rigid body. In this paper we remove the rigid

64: body approximation and perform numerical calculations which allow

65: the spinning Skyrmion to deform and break spherical symmetry.

66: The results show that if the pion mass is set to its experimental value

67: then the nucleon and delta masses can not be reproduced for any values

68: of the Skyrme parameters; the commonly used Skyrme parameters are simply

69: an artifact of the rigid body approximation. However, if the pion mass

70: is taken to be substantially larger than its experimental value then

71: the nucleon and delta masses can be reproduced. This result has a 

72: significant effect on the structure of multi-Skyrmions.

73: \end{abstract}

74: 

75: \newpage

76: 

77: \section{Introduction}\news

78: The Skyrme model \cite{Sk} is a nonlinear theory of pions which is

79: an approximate, low energy effective theory of quantum chromodynamics,

80: obtained in the limit of a large number of quark colours \cite{Wi}.

81: Skyrmions are topological soliton solutions of the model and

82: are candidates for an effective description of nuclei, with an identification

83: between soliton and baryon numbers.

84: 

85: The Lagrangian of the Skyrme model contains only three free parameters;

86: two of these set the energy and length units and the third corresponds

87: to the (tree-level) pion mass. In Ref.\cite{ANW} the energy and length

88: units were calculated by fitting to the masses of the nucleon and delta

89: resonance assuming massless pions, and in Ref.\cite{AN} this calculation

90: was repeated using the experimental value for the pion mass. This set

91: of parameters is invariably used in the study of the Skyrme model,

92: and so we shall refer to them as the standard values.

93: 

94: Recently \cite{BS10} the properties of classical multi-Skyrmions have been

95: investigated for a range of Skyrme parameters and it has been found that

96: important qualitative differences arise as the Skyrme parameters are

97: varied. In particular, setting the pion mass to be substantially

98: larger than its experimental value yields multi-Skyrmions whose qualitative

99: features appear to be closer to those of real nuclei. For example, the size of

100: nuclei scales with mass number $A$ like $A^{1/3}$ rather than like $\sqrt{A}$,

101: and the stability properties of small nuclei with $A=5$ and $A=8$ 

102: also seem more realistic. These results provide motivation to re-examine the

103: original work in Refs.\cite{ANW,AN} where the standard Skyrme parameters were

104: first calculated.

105: 

106: The approach of Refs.\cite{ANW,AN} involves the zero-mode quantization

107: of a single Skyrmion as a rigid body.

108: This is effectively a study of spinning Skyrmions which assumes

109: that a Skyrmion does not deform as it spins. Early papers

110: \cite{BR,RSWW} pointed out the limitations of this approximation

111: and improved upon it by allowing the Skyrmion to deform within

112: a spherically symmetric hedgehog ansatz. Including only this deformation

113: already reveals that with the experimental value of the pion mass

114: there are now no values of the Skyrme parameters that can fit the masses

115: of both the nucleon and delta. Thus, the standard Skyrme parameters are simply

116: an artifact of the rigid body approximation.

117: 

118: The need to take into account the deformation of a spinning Skyrmion,

119: and in particular to allow deformations which break spherical symmetry,

120: has been noted by several authors \cite{Sc,DHM} using a range of

121: different physical perspectives. In this paper we address this issue

122: by performing numerical computations of spinning Skyrmions in the full

123: field theory assuming only an axial symmetry. We compute the energies

124: of spinning Skyrmions for a range of Skyrme parameters and pion masses,

125: and find that the nucleon and delta masses can be fit to the experimental

126: values only if the pion mass is taken to be larger than twice the

127: experimental value. A larger value for the tree-level pion mass  

128: is not necessarily in conflict with the smaller experimental value,

129: as we discuss in the next section.

130: 

131: 

132: \section{Spinning Skyrmions}\news

133: %\subsection{Rigid body approximation}

134: The field of the Skyrme model \cite{Sk} is an $SU(2)$-valued scalar

135: $U.$ It is convenient to introduce the $su(2)$-valued current

136:  $R_\mu=(\partial_\mu U)U^\dagger$ and write the Lagrangian as

137: \be L=\int \left\{-\frac{F_\pi^2}{16}\mbox{Tr}(R_\mu

138: R^\mu)+\frac{1}{32e^2}

139: \mbox{Tr}([R_\mu,R_\nu][R^\mu,R^\nu])+\frac{m_\pi^2F_\pi^2}{8}\mbox{Tr}(U-1)

140: \right\} \, d^3x. \label{skylag} \ee Here $F_\pi$, $e$ and $m_\pi$

141: are parameters, whose values are fixed by comparison with

142: experimental data. 

143: $F_\pi$ may be interpreted as the pion decay

144: constant, $e$ is a dimensionless constant and $m_\pi$ 

145: has the interpretation of the tree-level pion mass 

146: (we use units in which $\hbar$ is one). The experimental values for the

147: pion decay constant and pion mass are $F_\pi=186\mbox{ MeV}$

148: and $m_\pi=138\mbox{ MeV}$ respectively.

149: 

150: The approach of Refs.\cite{ANW,AN} is to fix $F_\pi$ and $e$ by fitting

151: the energies of a quantized Skyrmion to the masses of the nucleon

152: and delta resonance, assuming either massless pions \cite{ANW} or the

153: experimental value for the pion mass \cite{AN}, yielding

154: the standard values $m_\pi=138\mbox{ MeV},$

155: $F_\pi=108\mbox{ MeV}$ and $e=4.84.$ 

156: Note that this value of $F_\pi$ is substantially lower than

157: the experimental value, but

158: if $F_\pi$ and $m_\pi$ are both fixed to the experimental values 

159:  then the only free parameter is

160: $e,$ and this does not allow a simultaneous fit for both the nucleon

161: and delta masses. 

162: 

163: The quantization of the Skyrme model is difficult due to the fact that

164: it is a non-renormalizable field theory. One optimistic approach is

165: that these effects can be partially modeled by a renormalization of

166: the Skyrme parameters, in which case $F_\pi$ and $m_\pi$ could be 

167: interpreted as the renormalized pion decay constant and the 

168: renormalized pion mass. Therefore values which differ from the

169: experimental values are not necessarily a contradiction.

170: Furthermore, we are mainly interested in reproducing the

171: properties of nuclei for all nucleon numbers and are willing to 

172: place less emphasis on matching the pion physics if  

173: necessary.

174: In this paper we shall treat the three Skyrme parameters 

175: $F_\pi,$ $e$ and $m_\pi$ all as free parameters, and indeed

176: we find that neither $F_\pi$ nor $m_\pi$ can be set to their experimental

177: value if the nucleon and delta masses are to be fit, once the deformation

178: of a spinning Skyrmion is taken into account.

179: 

180: 

181: It is useful to rescale the spacetime coordinates by

182: $x_\mu\mapsto 2x_\mu /({eF_\pi})$ so that the relative coefficient

183: between the first two terms in (\ref{skylag}) is independent of the Skyrme

184: parameters. After applying this rescaling the Lagrangian becomes

185: \be

186: L=\frac{F_\pi}{4e}\int \left\{-\frac{1}{2}\mbox{Tr}(R_\mu R^\mu)

187: +\frac{1}{16}

188: \mbox{Tr}([R_\mu,R_\nu][R^\mu,R^\nu])+m^2\mbox{Tr}(U-1)

189: \right\} \, d^3x

190: \label{skylag2}

191: \ee

192: where we have introduced the rescaled pion mass $m=2m_\pi/(F_\pi e).$

193: From this form of the Lagrangian it is now clear that the parameter

194: combinations

195: $F_\pi/(4e)$ and $2/(eF_\pi)$ merely determine the energy and length units

196:  of classical static Skyrmions. However, the rescaled pion mass $m$

197: can not be scaled away and so can have an effect on Skyrmion structure.

198: A recent study \cite{BS10} has demonstrated that

199: significant qualitative differences arise for multi-Skyrmions

200: as the parameter $m$ is varied, so the determination of the parameters

201: of the Skyrme model (and in particular $m$) is important.

202: Note that, in the quantization of a Skyrmion we must consider its spin, and

203: then the parameters $F_\pi$ and $e$ can not simply be scaled away.

204: 

205: For a classical static Skyrmion the energy derived from the Lagrangian

206: (\ref{skylag2}) is

207:  \be

208: E_0=\frac{F_\pi}{4e}\int \left\{-{1 \over 2}\mbox{Tr}(R_iR_i)-{1 \over 16}

209: \mbox{Tr}([R_i,R_j][R_i,R_j])+m^2\mbox{Tr}(1-U)\right\} \, d^3x\,.

210: \label{skyenergy0}

211: \ee

212: The standard approach of Refs.\cite{ANW,AN} is to quantize the rotational

213: zero modes of the Skyrmion as a rigid body, which yields multiplets

214: with equal spin and isospin in each multiplet. The details are as follows.

215: 

216: In spherical polar coordinates ($r,\theta,\phi$) the ansatz for a

217: hedgehog Skyrmion rigidly rotating around the $\phi$-axis is

218: \be

219: U=\cos f+i\sin f(\tau_3 \cos\theta +\sin\theta

220: (\tau_1\cos(\phi+\omega t)+\tau_2\sin(\phi+\omega t)))

221: \ee

222: where $\tau_i$ denote the Pauli matrices, $f(r)$ is the

223: radial profile function (with boundary conditions

224: $f(0)=\pi$ and $f(\infty)=0$) and $\omega$ is the rotation

225: frequency in the rescaled coordinates; note that the

226: rotation frequency in physical units is given by $\Omega=\omega eF_\pi/2.$

227: 

228: Substituting this ansatz into the Lagrangian (\ref{skylag2}) gives

229: \be

230: L=\frac{1}{2}\Lambda \Omega^2 - E_0,

231: \label{lag2}

232: \ee

233: where $E_0$ is the static energy

234: \be

235: E_0=\frac{\pi F_\pi}{e}\int_0^{\infty}\left\{

236: r^2f'^2+2\sin^2f \, (1+f'^2)+\frac{\sin^4f}{r^2}

237: +2m^2r^2(1-\cos f)\right\} \, dr,

238: \label{hhenergy}

239: \ee

240: and $\Lambda$ is the moment of inertia

241: \be

242: \Lambda=\frac{16\pi}{3e^3F_\pi}\int_0^\infty\left\{

243: \sin^2f\, \left(r^2(1+f'^2)+\sin^2f\right)\right\} \, dr\,.

244: \ee

245: The equation for the profile function which follows from the Lagrangian

246: (\ref{lag2}) can equivalently be obtained my minimizing the total energy

247: \be

248: E=E_0+\frac{J^2}{2\Lambda},

249: \label{energy2}

250: \ee

251: where $J=\Omega \Lambda$ is the spin, which is a conserved quantity.

252: 

253: The classical Skyrmion is quantized within the Bohr framework by requiring

254: the spin to be quantized as $J^2=j(j+1),$ where $j$

255: is the spin quantum number taking values $j=\frac{1}{2}$ for the nucleon

256: and $j=\frac{3}{2}$ for the delta. Thus, within the classical picture,

257: the nucleon and delta are simply spinning Skyrmions with a particular

258: rotation frequency.

259: 

260: In the above discussion we have assumed that the spinning Skyrmion

261: remains spherically symmetric. In the treatment of

262: Refs.\cite{ANW,AN} a further approximation is employed, namely that

263: the Skyrmion does not deform at all when it spins. In this approach

264: the profile function is not determined by minimization of the total

265: energy (\ref{energy2}), but rather by minimization of only the static

266: energy $E_0.$ The additional contribution to the energy due to the

267: spin is then calculated given the static energy minimizing profile

268: function. A crucial point is that this rigid body approximation

269: allows any value of the spin to be obtained for a spinning Skyrmion,

270: since one simply

271:  sets the rotation frequency to be $\Omega=J/\Lambda,$ where $\Lambda$

272: is the moment of inertia of the static Skyrmion.

273: 

274: Setting the pion mass to its experimental value ($m_\pi=138\mbox{

275: MeV}$) leaves the remaining parameters $F_\pi$ and $e$ to be

276: determined by fixing the energy of the $j=\frac{1}{2}$ and

277: $j=\frac{3}{2}$ spinning Skyrmions to the masses of the nucleon

278: ($M_N=939\mbox{ MeV}$) and delta ($M_\Delta=1232\mbox{ MeV}$). In

279: Fig.~\ref{fig-one} we plot, for a range of $e,$ the value of $F_\pi$

280: required to fit the nucleon mass (solid curve) and the value of

281: $F_\pi$ required to fit the delta mass (dashed curve) using the

282: rigid body approximation. These two curves cross at the value

283: $e=4.84$ with $F_\pi= 108 \mbox{ MeV},$ which are the standard

284: parameter values obtained in Ref.\cite{AN} and produce a rescaled

285: pion mass $m=0.526.$

286: 

287: The limitations of the rigid body approximation were highlighted in

288: the papers \cite{BR,RSWW} and a first improvement was made by allowing

289: the Skyrmion to deform within a spherically symmetric hedgehog

290: ansatz. In this approach the profile function $f(r)$ is determined

291: by minimization of the total energy (\ref{energy2}). An analysis of

292: the ordinary differential equation for the profile function reveals

293: that a localized finite energy solution exists only if the rotation

294: frequency satisfies the constraint $\Omega^2\le \frac{3}{2}m_\pi^2.$

295: Furthermore, at the maximal rotation frequency

296: $\Omega=\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}m_\pi$ the moment of inertia $\Lambda$ is

297: finite so there is an upper bound on the spin $J.$ As the Skyrme

298: parameter $e$ is increased there is a point at which the required

299: spin for the delta (or nucleon) exceeds the upper bound, so there is

300: no spinning Skyrmion that describes the delta (or nucleon). In

301: Refs.~\cite{BR,RSWW} it was found that with the experimental value of

302: the pion mass the standard values for $e$ and $F_\pi$ are in the

303: region for which there is no spinning Skyrmion solution for the

304: delta, so the standard Skyrme parameters are simply an artifact of

305: the rigid body approximation and there are no Skyrme parameters that

306: can be chosen to fit the masses of both the nucleon and delta.

307: 

308: Physically one expects the constraint on the spin to be $\Omega^2\le

309: m_\pi^2,$ since this expresses the fact that the Skyrmion can only

310: spin at a frequency upto the pion mass before it begins to radiate

311: pions. The extra factor of $\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}$ in the constraint

312: for the spinning hedgehog field reflects the fact that the radiation

313: is assumed to be a spherical wave in the hedgehog approximation. A

314: consistent ansatz for a spinning Skyrmion can have at most an axial

315: symmetry and will radiate differently in the directions orthogonal

316: and parallel to the symmetry axis. Thus, although the deformed

317: hedgehog approximation captures the qualitative feature that there

318: is a maximal spin, the quantitative details require the computation

319: of spinning Skyrmions with axial symmetry.

320: 

321: A limited numerical study (using small grids) of axially

322: symmetric spinning Skyrmions has been performed \cite{WWS}, but for only

323: one set of Skyrme parameters, so the dependence on the Skyrme

324: parameters that we wish to address in this study has not been investigated.

325: 

326: Introducing cylindrical polar coordinates $\rho,\chi,z$ the ansatz

327: for an axially symmetric spinning Skyrmion is a simple generalization

328: of the one introduced in Ref.\cite{KS} and is given by

329: \be

330: U=\psi_3

331: +i\psi_2\tau_3+i\psi_1(\tau_1\cos(\chi+\omega

332: t)+\tau_2\sin(\chi+\omega t))

333: \label{axial}

334: \ee

335: where $\bpsi(\rho,z)=(\psi_1,\psi_2,\psi_3)$ is a three-component unit

336: vector that is independent of $\chi.$

337: The boundary conditions on $\bpsi$ are that

338: $\bpsi\rightarrow (0,0,1)$ as $\rho^2+z^2\rightarrow \infty,$

339: and on the symmetry axis $\rho=0$ we require $\psi_1=0$ and

340: $\partial_\rho\psi_2=\partial_\rho\psi_3=0.$

341: 

342: With the axial ansatz (\ref{axial}) the expressions for the static

343: energy and moment of inertia become 

344: \be E_0=\frac{\pi F_\pi}{2e}\int

345: \{ (\partial_\rho\bpsi\cdot\partial_\rho \bpsi +

346: \partial_z\bpsi\cdot\partial_z \bpsi) (1+\frac{\psi_1^2}{\rho^2})

347: +|\partial_\rho\bpsi \times \partial_z\bpsi|^2

348: +\frac{\psi_1^2}{\rho^2} +2m^2(1-\psi_3) \}\ \rho\,d\rho\,dz

349: \label{axialenergy} 

350: \ee 

351: \be \Lambda=\frac{4\pi}{e^3F_\pi} \int

352: \{\psi_1^2 (\partial_\rho\bpsi\cdot\partial_\rho \bpsi +

353: \partial_z\bpsi\cdot\partial_z \bpsi+1) \}\ \rho\,d\rho\,dz\,.

354: \label{axialinertia} \ee 

355: For a given spin $J=\sqrt{j(j+1)}$ the

356: configuration which minimizes the total energy (\ref{energy2}) needs

357: to be computed, with $E_0$ and $\Lambda$ given by

358: (\ref{axialenergy}) and (\ref{axialinertia}). This minimization is

359: performed numerically using a simulated annealing algorithm on a

360: grid in the $(\rho,z)$-plane containing $250\times 500$ grid points

361: and a lattice spacing of 0.06.

362: 

363: With the pion mass set to its experimental value

364: of $m_\pi=138\mbox{ MeV},$ we calculate, for a range of the Skyrme

365: parameter $e,$ the value of $F_\pi$ required to match the energy

366: of a $j=\frac{1}{2}$ spinning Skyrmion to the nucleon mass and

367: also the value of $F_\pi$ required to match the $j=\frac{3}{2}$ spinning

368: Skyrmion energy to the delta mass.

369: 

370: The results of the simulated annealing minimization are displayed in

371: Fig.~\ref{fig-one}, where circles denote the values required for the

372: nucleon fit and squares denote the delta fit. Note that the results

373: of the axial calculation (circles and squares) are extremely close

374: to those of the rigid body approximation (solid and dashed curves),

375: indicating that for this value of the pion mass there is little

376: deformation of the spinning Skyrmion. However, the crucial point is

377: that the spinning Skyrmion exists only if the parameter $e$ is less

378: than a critical value, which is why the axial data in

379: Fig.~\ref{fig-one} terminates. At the termination point, the rotation

380: frequency $\Omega,$ which we calculate as $J/\Lambda,$ is equal to

381: the pion mass $m_\pi$ and therefore the Skyrmion has attained its

382: maximal value of the spin. If $e$ is increased beyond this value the

383: Skyrmion can not be spun fast enough to reach the required spin $J$

384: with the new parameters, and so the required spinning Skyrmion

385: solution does not exist. Clearly, since the spin of the delta is

386: greater than that of the nucleon the termination point for the delta

387: is at a lower value of $e$ than for the nucleon.

388: \begin{figure}[ht]

389: \begin{center}

390: \leavevmode \vskip -3.5cm \epsfxsize=15cm\epsffile{mass1.ps} \vskip

391: -10cm \caption{For $m_\pi=138\mbox{ MeV}$, the graph displays, as a

392: function of the Skyrme parameter $e$, the value of $F_\pi$ required

393: to fit the nucleon mass (solid curve for rigid body approximation

394: and circles for axial deformation) and delta mass (dashed curve for

395: rigid body approximation and squares for axial deformation).

396: Note that the data for the axial deformation of the nucleon and 

397: delta do not cross.}

398: \label{fig-one} \vskip 0cm

399: \end{center}

400: \end{figure}

401: 

402: \begin{figure}[ht]

403: \begin{center}

404: \leavevmode \vskip -3.5cm \epsfxsize=15cm\epsffile{mass2.ps} \vskip

405: -10cm \caption{As Fig.~\ref{fig-one} but with $m_\pi=276\mbox{

406: MeV}$. Note that the data for the axial deformation of the nucleon and 

407: delta still do not cross.} \label{fig-two} \vskip 0cm

408: \end{center}

409: \end{figure}

410: 

411: \begin{figure}[ht]

412: \begin{center}

413: \leavevmode \vskip -3.5cm \epsfxsize=15cm\epsffile{mass2.5.ps}

414: \vskip -10cm \caption{As Fig.~\ref{fig-one} but with

415: $m_\pi=345\mbox{ MeV}$.

416: Note that the data for the axial deformation of the nucleon and 

417: delta now cross.} \label{fig-three} \vskip 0cm

418: \end{center}

419: \end{figure}

420: 

421: 

422: 

423: A linearization of the $\psi_1$ field equation yields

424: \be

425: \partial_i\partial_i\psi_1-(m^2-\omega^2)\psi_1=0

426: \ee so a finite energy solution exists only if the effective mass is

427: non-negative ie. $\omega^2\le m^2,$ or in physical units

428: $\Omega^2\le m_\pi^2,$ which is the criterion we have used to

429: identify the termination point of the spinning Skyrmion. On a finite

430: numerical grid all configurations have finite energy so care has to

431: be taken in determining the termination point. It would be easy to

432: mistakenly compute a configuration with a rotation frequency which

433: is apparently greater than $m_\pi,$ but one can check that for such

434: a configuration the computed energy is not independent of the size

435: of the numerical grid, which signals that this is not a finite energy

436: solution.

437: 

438: The crucial point about the axial data in Fig.~\ref{fig-one} is that

439: there is no crossing point of the nucleon and delta data, so there

440: are no values of $e$ and $F_\pi$ that fit both the nucleon and delta

441: masses. The crossing point within the rigid body approximation is

442: well beyond the termination points of the axial data, so the

443: standard values are an artifact of the approximation and do not

444: correspond to any spinning Skyrmion solutions.

445: 

446: If the nucleon and delta masses are to be matched to the energies of

447: spinning Skyrmions then the only possibility is to increase the pion

448: mass beyond its experimental value. Increasing $m_\pi$ allows the

449: Skyrmion to spin at a greater frequency, so larger values of $e$ can

450: be attained, and it may be possible that both masses can be fit

451: simultaneously.

452: 

453: It is of interest to note that several other studies, from different

454: perspectives, have indicated that a pion mass larger than the

455: experimental value yields Skyrmion results that agree better with

456: experimental data. For example, studies of the Roper resonance

457: \cite{BrN} and comparisons between vibrational frequencies of 

458: multi-Skyrmions and nuclear gamma ray spectra \cite{BBT}, 

459: produce improved results with a larger pion mass.

460: 

461: In Fig.~\ref{fig-two} we display (using the same notation as in

462: Fig.~\ref{fig-one}) the results of both the rigid body and axial

463: calculations with the pion mass set at twice the experimental value

464: $m_\pi=276\mbox{ MeV}.$ Note that now the axial computations show 

465: some differences from the rigid body approximation when the delta

466: spins close to its allowed limit, indicating an increased

467: deformation from the static Skyrmion. Although the nucleon and delta

468: data are now closer to an intersection, they still do not cross, so

469: again there are no values of the Skyrme parameters to fit both

470: masses.

471: 

472:  An examination of the spinning Skyrmion configuration

473: reveals that most of the deformation can be captured within a

474: hedgehog ansatz, so the leading correction is associated with a

475: deformation of the size of the Skyrmion. However, if the deformed

476: hedgehog approximation of Refs.\cite{Sc,DHM} is implemented the

477: nucleon and delta curves actually cross for this value of the pion

478: mass, as the termination points are not correctly predicted.

479: 

480: Increasing the pion mass a little more, to two and a half times the

481: experimental value $m_\pi=345\mbox{ MeV}$, produces the data shown

482: in Fig.~\ref{fig-three}. Now the axial delta data is substantially

483: different from the rigid body approximation, and the nucleon and

484: delta curves intersect. With this value of the pion mass the Skyrme

485: parameters can be determined by fitting to the nucleon and delta

486: masses and the parameters are found to be $e=4.90$ and

487: $F_\pi=90.5.$ This corresponds to a rescaled pion mass of $m=1.56,$

488: which is remarkably close to the value required in the study of the

489: Roper resonance \cite{BrN}.

490: 

491: It is interesting that the above values of $e$ and $F_\pi$ are

492: similar to those of the standard parameters, but now require a pion

493: mass which is more than twice the experimental value. There is

494: clearly a critical pion mass in the range $276\mbox{ MeV }\le m_\pi

495: \le 345\mbox{ MeV}$ above which a fit to the nucleon and delta

496: masses is possible and below which it is not, but we have not

497: computed this since 

498: it requires a substantial number of simulations

499: and is probably not the best way to fit the Skyrme parameters. The values of

500: $e$ and $F_\pi$ at the crossing point (when it exists) appear to be

501: fairly stable to changes in the pion mass, so the above set of

502: values seems a suitable set for further investigations.

503: 

504: In comparing our results with previous studies, we note that

505: Skyrmions spin rather slowly in the sense that the deformation from

506: the static Skyrmion is quite small even when the rotational

507: frequency takes its maximal value. Only for a large pion mass (which

508: sets the maximal rotation frequency) and then only for the delta, is

509: a significant deformation found. This agrees with the findings of

510: Ref.\cite{WWS} in the sense that there it was also found that substantial

511: axial deformations occur only for large values of the spin.

512: However, we find that such solutions can not exist as finite

513: energy spinning Skyrmions unless the Skyrme parameters are

514: substantially different from the standard values. 

515: 

516: Our results should be contrasted with similar studies on planar baby

517: Skyrmions \cite{PSZ2}, where the important difference is that the

518: moment of inertia of a baby Skyrmion is infinite as the maximal

519: rotation frequency is reached, thus allowing any spin to be

520: attained. In this case the deformation close to the allowed maximal

521: spin is substantial, as one would expect from a diverging moment of

522: inertia.

523: 

524: \section{Conclusion}\news

525: In this paper we have used an axially symmetric numerical code to

526: compute the energies of spinning Skyrmions and have determined the

527: parameters of the Skyrme model to fit these energies to the masses

528: of the nucleon and delta. We have described how the standard Skyrme

529: parameters are obtained in a region which is not physical and are an

530: artifact of the rigid body approximation. Moreover, we have shown

531: that the nucleon and delta masses can be matched only if the pion

532: mass is set at more than twice its experimental value. This result

533: supports recent work \cite{BS10} on multi-Skyrmions, which finds

534: that setting the pion mass to be substantially larger than its

535: experimental value yields multi-Skyrmions whose qualitative features

536: are closer to those of real nuclei.

537: 

538: A valid criticism of fitting the Skyrme parameters to the nucleon

539: and delta masses is that the delta is an unstable resonance, which

540: nevertheless must be modeled as a stable spinning Skyrmion. 

541: Note that using the rigid body approximation,

542: or the axial ansatz with a rotation frequency above the pion mass,

543: does not model the delta as an unstable solution since there is

544: simply no solution, rather than an unstable one. It would therefore

545: seem that a better approach to fixing the Skyrme parameters is to

546: use properties of multi-Skyrmions, and these appear to favour a

547: larger pion mass \cite{BS10}. 

548: The main result of the present paper

549: is to conclude that a large pion mass is not incompatible with studies of the

550: single Skyrmion, and indeed the nucleon and delta calculations

551: support this view.

552: 

553: Finally, the parameter $m_\pi$ is interpreted as the pion mass but

554: there are all kinds of quantization issues beyond the zero-mode

555: quantization, such as the calculation of the Casimir energy \cite{MeWa},

556: which are difficult to resolve due to the fact that the Skyrme model

557: is a non-renormalizable field theory. 

558: As we have mentioned earlier, one optimistic approach is

559: that these effects can be partially modeled by a renormalization of

560: the Skyrme parameters, in which case $m_\pi$ could be interpreted as

561: a renormalized pion mass, and therefore a larger value is not

562: necessarily in conflict with the smaller experimental value.

563: 

564: \section*{Acknowledgements}

565: Many thanks to Juan Ponciano, Bernd Schroers and Nick Manton for useful

566: discussions. This work was supported by the PPARC special purpose

567: grant ``Classical Lattice Field Theory''. SK acknowledges the EPSRC

568: for a postdoctoral fellowship GR/S29478/01.

569: 

570: 

571: \begin{thebibliography}{100}

572: 

573: \bibitem{AN} G.~S. Adkins and C.~R. Nappi,

574: The Skyrme model with pion masses,

575: \textit{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{B233}, 109 (1984).

576: 

577: \bibitem{ANW} G.~S. Adkins, C.~R. Nappi and E. Witten,

578: Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model,

579: \textit{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{B228}, 552 (1983).

580: 

581: \bibitem{BBT} C. Barnes, W. Baskerville and N. Turok,

582: Normal modes of the $B=4$ Skyrme soliton,

583: \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{79}, 367 (1997);

584: Normal mode spectrum of the deuteron in the Skyrme model,

585:  \textit{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B411}, 180 (1997).

586: 

587: \bibitem{BS10} R.~A. Battye and P.~M. Sutcliffe,

588: Skyrmions and the pion mass,

589: \textit{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{B705}, 384 (2005).

590: 

591: \bibitem{BR} E. Braaten and J.~P. Ralston,

592: Limitations of a semiclassical treatment of the Skyrme soliton,

593: \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D31}, 598 (1985).

594: 

595: \bibitem{BrN} J.~D. Breit and C.~R. Nappi,

596: Phase shifts of the Skyrmion breathing mode,

597: \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{53}, 889 (1984).

598: 

599: \bibitem{DHM} N. Dorey, J. Hughes and M.~P. Mattis,

600: Skyrmion quantization and the decay of the delta,

601: \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D50}, 5816 (1994).

602: 

603: \bibitem{KS} S. Krusch and P.~M. Sutcliffe,

604: Sphalerons in the Skyrme model,

605: \textit{J. Phys.} \textbf{A37}, 9037 (2004).

606: 

607: \bibitem{MeWa} F. Meier and H. Walliser,

608: Quantum corrections to baryon properties in chiral

609: soliton models,

610: \textit{Phys. Reports} \textbf{289}, 383 (1997).

611: 

612: \bibitem{PSZ2}

613: B.~M.~A.~G. Piette, B.~J. Schroers and W.~J. Zakrzewski, 

614: Dynamics of baby Skyrmions,

615: \textit{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{B439}, 205 (1995).

616: 

617: \bibitem{RSWW} R. Rajaraman, H.~M. Sommermann, J. Wambach and H.~W. Wyld,

618: Stability of the rotating Skyrmion,

619: \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D33}, 287 (1986).

620: 

621: \bibitem{Sc} B.~J. Schroers,

622: Dynamics of moving and spinning Skyrmions,

623: \textit{Z. Phys.} \textbf{C61}, 479 (1994).

624: 

625: \bibitem{Sk} T.~H.~R. Skyrme,

626: A nonlinear field theory,

627: \textit{Proc. R. Soc. Lond.} \textbf{A260}, 127 (1961).

628: 

629: \bibitem{WWS} J. Wambach, H.~W. Wyld and H.~M. Sommermann,

630: Axially deformed Skyrmions in a constrained variational approach,

631: \textit{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B186}, 272 (1987).

632: 

633: \bibitem{Wi} E. Witten,

634: Global aspects of current algebra,

635: \textit{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{B223}, 422 (1983);

636: Current algebra, baryons, and quark confinement,

637: {\it ibid} \textbf{B223}, 433 (1983).

638: 

639: 

640: \end{thebibliography}

641: 

642: \end{document}

643: