1: \section{The Maldacena-Nu\~nez system}
2: \label{MN}
3: \subsection{Review of the background solution}
4: \label{MN:review}
5: %
6: The MN system is obtained by imposing the following relations on the
7: general effective 5-d action obtained in Sec.~\ref{sugratrunc}:\footnote{We
8: correct formula (5.25) of \cite{Papadopoulos:2000gj}.}
9: %
10: \begin{equation}
11: \label{MN:special}
12: \begin{aligned}
13: Q&=0~, \qquad h_1=h_2=0~,\qquad & b&=a~,\\
14: \Phi&= -6p-g- 2 \ln P~, & x&=\frac12 g -3p~.
15: \end{aligned}
16: \end{equation}
17: %
18: Together with \eqref{MN:special}, the constraints \eqref{kconstraint}
19: and \eqref{partialchi} imply also $K=0$ and $\chi=0$. (Notice that a
20: constant in $\chi$ is irrelevant.)
21: It is straightforward to check from the equations of motion in
22: appendix~\ref{construnc} that this truncation is consistent, \ie the
23: equations of motion for $b$, $h_1$, $h_2$, $\Phi$ and $x$ are
24: satisfied or implied by those for $a$, $p$ and $g$.
25: Notice that, having absorbed the constant $P^2$ into $\e{\Phi}$, it
26: has disappeared from the equations of motion.
27: Hence, the effective 5-d action reduces to the form \eqref{action5d},
28: with three scalar fields ($g,a,p$), the sigma model metric
29: %
30: \begin{equation}
31: \label{MN:G}
32: G_{ab} \partial_\mu \phi^a \partial^\mu \phi^b =
33: \partial_\mu g \partial^\mu g
34: + \e{-2g} \partial_\mu a \partial^\mu a
35: + 24 \partial_\mu p \partial^\mu p~,
36: \end{equation}
37: %
38: and the superpotential\footnote{We have adjusted the overall factor of the superpotential of
39: \cite{Papadopoulos:2000gj} to our conventions.}
40: %
41: \begin{equation}
42: \label{MN:W}
43: W = -\frac12 \e{4p} \left[ (a^2-1)^2 \e{-4g} +2(a^2+1) \e{-2g} +1
44: \right]^{1/2}~.
45: \end{equation}
46:
47: Let us briefly summarize the most general Poincar\'e-sliced domain wall
48: background solution \eqref{background1}
49: for this system. It is obtained by solving
50: \eqref{background2} and coincides with the family of
51: solutions found in \cite{Gubser:2001eg}. In the following, $g$, $a$ and
52: $p$ will denote the background fields, while the fluctuations are
53: described by the gauge-invariant variables $\mfa^a$. Introducing a
54: new radial coordinate, $\rho$, by
55: %
56: \begin{equation}
57: \label{MN:rhodef}
58: \partial_\rho = 2 \e{-4p} \partial_r~,
59: \end{equation}
60: %
61: one can show from the equations for $g$ and $a$ that
62: %
63: \begin{equation}
64: \label{MN:auxsol} \left[(a^2-1)^2 +2(a^2+1) \e{2g} +\e{4g}
65: \right]^{1/2} = 4\rho~.
66: \end{equation}
67: %
68: The integration constant arising here has no physical meaning and
69: has been used to fix the origin of $\rho$. Then, one easily obtains
70: %
71: \begin{equation}
72: \label{MN:ahsol}
73: a = \frac{2\rho}{\sinh(2\rho+c)}~,\quad
74: \e{2g} =4\rho\coth(2\rho+c) -(a^2+1)~,
75: \end{equation}
76: %
77: where $c$ is an integration constant with allowed values $0\leq c
78: \leq\infty$. We shall discuss the interpretation of $c$ in
79: the next subsection. The MN solution corresponds to $c=0$ and is the
80: only regular solution. All others suffer from a naked curvature
81: singularity.
82:
83: It is also easy to show from \eqref{background2} that
84: %
85: \begin{equation}
86: \label{MN:pAsol}
87: \e{-2A} \e{-8p} =C^2~,
88: \end{equation}
89: %
90: where the integration constant $C$ determines the 4-d reference
91: scale. We shall set $C^2=1/4$ for later convenience.
92: The explicit solution for $p$ can be found by
93: plugging $\Phi$ from the literature into \eqref{MN:special}, but it
94: will not be needed here.
95:
96: \subsection{The role of $c$}
97: \label{MN:roleofc}
98: %
99: The family of background solutions of the MN system suffers from
100: naked singularities for all $c$ except for the case $c=0$, which is
101: regular. Hence, on the supergravity side the integration constant $c$
102: governs the resolution of the singularity. However, the
103: scalar $a(\rho)$ is the dual of the gluino bilinear $\lambda^2$
104: \cite{Apreda:2001qb}, so $c$, which enters $a(\rho)$ in
105: \eqref{MN:ahsol}, also determines the ``measured'' value of
106: the gluino condensate, $\vev{\lambda^2}$, which is of non-perturbative
107: field theory origin. In other words, $c$ identifies the ``amount'' of
108: non-perturbative physics that is captured by the supergravity
109: solution.
110:
111: In this subsection, we will attempt to flesh out this picture
112: qualitatively,
113: applying Mathur's coarse graining argument \cite{Mathur:2004sv,
114: Mathur:2005zp}, before we analyze the fluctuations in the next subsection.
115: Although only regular solutions
116: qualify as gravity duals of (pure) field theory quantum states,
117: the coarse graining
118: argument indicates that certain singular solutions have a
119: meaning as an approximation to the duals of mixed
120: states.
121: In this point of view,
122: singularities appear because the ``space-time foam''
123: that is dual
124: to the mixture of pure states cannot be resolved by supergravity.
125: (We are using the terminology of \cite{Mathur:2004sv,
126: Mathur:2005zp} here. See also \cite{Gubser:2000nd}
127: for some earlier discussion of the admissibility of singular solutions.)
128: In the case at hand, the possible pure
129: states are naturally identified as the $N$ equivalent vacua of
130: $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM theory, which are distinguished
131: by a phase angle in the gluino condensate.\footnote{In the 10-d MN solution, the location of the Dirac
132: string for the magnetic 2-form $C_2$ is specified by an angular
133: variable $\psi$ that can take $2N$ different values for the same field
134: theory $\theta$-angle, but the solution is symmetric under a shift
135: by $\pi$ of $\psi$, leaving $N$ different configurations.
136: Equivalently, one has $N$ different ways of placing probe $D5$-branes
137: in the background, in order to obtain the same field theory action
138: \cite{Maldacena:2000yy,DiVecchia:2002ks,Muck:2003zf}.}
139: Let us denote these $N$ vacua by $|n\rangle$, where
140: $n=0,1,2,\ldots,N-1$. The gluino condensate in these vacua takes the
141: values
142: %
143: \begin{equation}
144: \label{MN:gluinocond}
145: \langle n| \lambda^2 |n \rangle = \Lambda^3 \e{2\pi i n/N}~,
146: \end{equation}
147: %
148: where we have absorbed the $\theta$ angle of the gauge theory in the
149: phase of $\Lambda^3$.
150:
151: Now, let us form mixed states by defining the density matrix
152: %
153: \begin{equation}
154: \label{MN:dmatrix}
155: \varrho = \sum\limits_{n=0}^{N-1} p_n |n \rangle \langle n|~, \quad
156: \text{with} \, \sum\limits_{n=0}^{N-1} p_n =1~.
157: \end{equation}
158: %
159: Clearly, for equal weights, $p_n=1/N$, we would measure
160: $\vev{\lambda^2} = \Tr(\lambda^2 \varrho) =0$.
161: For a generic mixed state, the measured value $\vev{\lambda^2}$
162: lies somewhere within the $N$-polygon spanned
163: by the $N$ pure-state values \eqref{MN:gluinocond}.
164: Using standard thermodynamics arguments,
165: it is straightforward to determine the unique distribution $\{p_n\}$
166: maximizing the entropy for a given fixed $\vev{\lambda^2}$. Notice,
167: however, that the $N$ vacua are equivalent, and that, for large $N$,
168: which is the regime described by the supergravity approximation, the
169: vacuum values of $\vev{\lambda^2}$ effectively span a circle of radius
170: $|\Lambda^3|$. Thus, up to $1/N$ corrections, the phase of some given
171: $\vev{\lambda^2}$ is irrelevant, making the relevant parameter space
172: for the probability distribution $\{p_n\}$ effectively one-dimensional.
173:
174: Thus, from the point of view advocated in \cite{Mathur:2004sv,
175: Mathur:2005zp}, the integration constant $c$ can be interpreted
176: as a parameter that interpolates between the uniform distribution
177: ($c=\infty$) and a pure state ($c=0$), with fixed phase of
178: $\vev{\lambda^2}$.
179: It would be interesting to make this interpretation
180: precise by attempting to match the statistical entropy of a
181: mixed state with the area of the apparent horizon surrounding the dual
182: ``space-time foam''. We leave such
183: investigations for the future.
184:
185: Instead, let us confirm the role of $c$ in determining the measured value
186: of the gluino condensate from the perspective of holographic
187: renormalization. Being a one-point function, the gluino condensate
188: should appear as a background \emph{response} function in a supergravity
189: field (cf.\ the discussion in Sec.~\ref{adscft}).
190: Thus, consider the background mode \eqref{backgroundmode} of
191: the fluctuation equation for an arbitrary value of $c$.
192: As noted in Sec.~\ref{fieldeq}, the background mode, $W^a/W$,
193: is always a solution of \eqref{eqphi} independent of $x^i$.
194: Let us determine its asymptotic behaviour (large $\rho$) and see
195: whether it is leading or sub-leading. For an arbitrary value
196: of $c$, we obtain
197: %
198: \begin{equation}
199: \label{MN:asymp}
200: \frac{W^a}{W} \sim \left( -\frac1{2\rho}, 8\e{-c}\rho\e{-2\rho} ,
201: \frac16 \right)~.
202: \end{equation}
203: %
204: The first and third components are independent of $c$, \ie universal
205: for all background solutions, and they are leading compared to the
206: general solutions that we shall find in the
207: next subsection. We have, at present, no specific interpretation of their
208: role, although the arguments outlined in Sec.~\ref{adscft} indicate
209: that they should correspond to finite field theory sources
210: (couplings). In contrast, the second
211: component is sub-leading and depends on $c$. Hence, we argue in
212: analogy with AdS/CFT (again, we refer to Sec.~\ref{adscft})
213: that its coefficient represents a
214: response function, so it determines the
215: vacuum expectation value of the dual operator. In this case,
216: the dual operator is the gluino bilinear.
217: Restoring dimensions, this yields
218: %
219: \begin{equation}
220: \label{MN:gluinoc}
221: \vev{\lambda^2} = \Lambda^3 \e{-c}~,
222: \end{equation}
223: %
224: which fits nicely with the preceding discussion involving mixed states.
225:
226:
227: \subsection{Fluctuations and mass spectra}
228: \label{MN:masspectra}
229: %
230: In the following, we shall consider the equation of motion for scalar
231: fluctuations about the singular background with $c=\infty$.
232: Although we argued in the introduction that singular solutions as
233: supergravity duals should be taken with a grain of salt, doing so is
234: quite instructive and serves mainly two purposes:
235: First, this solution elegantly describes the asymptotic
236: region (large $\rho$) of all background solutions, including the
237: regular MN solution, so that we can learn something about the
238: asymptotic behaviour of the field fluctuations, which will be
239: important for the ``dictionary'' and ``renormalization'' problems.
240: Second, the matrix equation for fluctuations becomes diagonal and
241: analytically solvable. Thus, we can hope to get a qualitative glimpse
242: of the particle spectrum of the dual field theory.
243:
244: Consider the equation of motion for scalar fluctuations
245: \eqref{eqphi}. In terms of $\rho$ and going to 4-d momentum space,
246: as well as neglecting the source terms on
247: the right hand side, \eqref{eqphi} becomes
248: %
249: \begin{equation}
250: \label{MN:eqphi}
251: \left[ (\delta^a_b \partial_\rho + 2 M^a_b)
252: (\delta^b_c \partial_\rho - 2 N^b_c) - k^2 \right] \mfa^c =0~,
253: \end{equation}
254: %
255: where we have fixed the 4-d scale by the choice $C^2=1/4$, which will
256: turn out convenient later. The matrices $M^a_b$ and $N^a_b$ are given by
257: %
258: \begin{equation}
259: \label{MN:AB}
260: \begin{split}
261: N^a_b &=\e{-4p} \left(\partial_b W^a -\frac{W^a W_b}{W} \right)~,\\
262: M^a_b &= N^a_b +2 \e{-4p} \left(\G{a}{bc}W^c -W \delta^a_b\right)~.
263: \end{split}
264: \end{equation}
265: %
266: Notice that the $p$-dependence in $M^a_b$ and $N^a_b$ cancels out.
267: For the case $c=\infty$, the matrices $M^a_b$ and $N^a_b$ are
268: diagonal,
269: %
270: \begin{equation}
271: \label{MN:ABasymp}
272: \begin{split}
273: N^a_b &= \diag \left( -\frac1{2\rho}, \frac1{2\rho}-1,0 \right)~,\\
274: M^a_b &= \frac1{4\rho-1} \diag \left( 4\rho -2 +\frac1{2\rho},
275: 1-\frac1{2\rho}, 4\rho \right)~.
276: \end{split}
277: \end{equation}
278:
279: We are mostly interested in the field $\mfa^2$ (the middle component),
280: since its dual operator is the gluino bilinear ($+$ its hermitian
281: conjugate). From \eqref{MN:eqphi} and \eqref{MN:ABasymp}, its
282: equation of motion reads
283: %
284: \begin{equation}
285: \label{MN:eqmot2}
286: \left( \partial_\rho^2 +4\frac{2\rho-1}{4\rho-1} \partial_\rho
287: +\frac{4}{4\rho-1} -k^2 \right) \mfa^2 =0~.
288: \end{equation}
289: %
290: Performing a change of variable by defining
291: %
292: \begin{equation}
293: \label{MN:zdef}
294: \rho-\frac14 = \alpha z~,
295: \end{equation}
296: %
297: with a constant $\alpha$ to be determined later,
298: and using the following ansatz for the solution,
299: %
300: \begin{equation}
301: \label{MN:ansatz2}
302: \mfa^2 = \e{az} z^b f(z)~,
303: \end{equation}
304: %
305: with constant $a$ and $b$, we find that the choices
306: %
307: \begin{equation}
308: \label{MN:constants2}
309: a= -\alpha~, \quad b=\frac14~,\quad \alpha^2 (1+k^2) = \frac14
310: \end{equation}
311: %
312: lead to the equation
313: %
314: \begin{equation}
315: \label{MN:eqmot2z}
316: \left( \partial_z^2 -\frac14 + \frac{3\alpha}{2z} +\frac{5}{16z}
317: \right) f=0~.
318: \end{equation}
319: %
320: This can be recognized as Whittaker's equation, the solutions of which
321: are linear combinations of the two Whittaker functions
322: %
323: \begin{equation}
324: \label{MN:sol2M}
325: f = \left\{ \rmM_{\frac32\alpha,\frac34}(z) ~,~
326: \rmM_{\frac32\alpha,-\frac34}(z) \right\}~.
327: \end{equation}
328: %
329: Hence, using \eqref{MN:ansatz2} and the relation of Whittaker's
330: functions to confluent hypergeometric functions
331: $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ \cite{Gradshteyn,
332: Abramowitz}, we find
333: %
334: \begin{equation}
335: \label{MN:sol2Phi}
336: \mfa^2 \sim \e{-(\alpha+1/2)z}
337: \begin{cases}
338: (\alpha z)^{3/2}\,
339: \Phi\left( \frac54-\frac32\alpha,\frac52;z\right)~,\\
340: \Phi\left(-\frac14-\frac32\alpha,-\frac12;z\right)~.
341: \end{cases}
342: \end{equation}
343: %
344: In standard AdS/CFT, one would impose a regularity condition in the
345: bulk interior in order to obtain a linear combination of the two
346: solutions, which uniquely fixes the relation between the response and
347: the source functions. Here, however, we were not able to find such a
348: condition, probably due to the curvature singularity of the
349: background. However, there is a useful feature that can guide us
350: in the choice of suitable solutions. From \eqref{MN:zdef}, we should
351: demand that the solution be invariant under a simultaneous change of
352: sign of $z$ and $\alpha$. Due to the identity \cite{Gradshteyn}
353: %
354: \begin{equation}
355: \label{MN:Phiident}
356: \Phi(a,b;z) = \e{z} \Phi(b-a,b;-z)~,
357: \end{equation}
358: %
359: the particular solutions \eqref{MN:sol2Phi} are invariant under this
360: symmetry. This implies two things. First, we are free to choose the
361: solution for $\alpha$ in the
362: last equation of \eqref{MN:constants2} such that
363: $\mathrm{Re}\,\alpha>0$, which implies also $\mathrm{Re}\, z
364: >0$. Notice that the square root in the definition
365: of $\alpha$ demands a branch cut in $k^2$-space, which we place at
366: $k^2+1 <0$. This branch cut is an indication for a continuum in the
367: particle spectrum, for $m^2 = -k^2 >1$. (Notice that this is relative to a
368: reference scale, since we are working in dimensionless variables. With
369: the earlier choice $C^2=1/4$ we place the onset of the continuum
370: conveniently at the branch point $k^2=-1$.)
371: Second, linear combinations of the solutions should also reflect this
372: symmetry implying that proportionality factors can
373: depend only on $\alpha^2$. In particular, the choice of the functions
374: $\Psi(a,b;z)$ instead of $\Phi(a,b;z)$ is not allowed, cf.\ \cite{Gradshteyn}.
375:
376: It is instructive to consider the asymptotic behavior of the
377: solutions. Let $\alpha$ be generic and fixed, so that we can
378: consider large $z$. One finds that both solutions in
379: \eqref{MN:sol2Phi}, and any generic linear combination of them,
380: behave as
381: %
382: \begin{equation}
383: \label{MN:asympt2}
384: \mfa^2 \sim \e{(1/2-\alpha)z} z^{1/4-3\alpha/2}~,
385: \end{equation}
386: %
387: but there are notable exceptions. Indeed, the confluent hypergeometric
388: functions $\Phi(a,b;z)$ reduce to polynomials (Laguerre polynomials,
389: to be precise), if the first index, $a$, is zero or a negative
390: integer. In these cases, the generic leading terms \eqref{MN:asympt2}
391: are absent. Generalizing the AdS/CFT argument \cite{Witten:1998zw},
392: we interpret the corresponding values of $-k^2$ as discrete particle
393: masses in the spectrum of the dual field theory.
394:
395: Hence, the two solutions \eqref{MN:sol2Phi} give rise to two
396: different discrete spectra
397: %
398: \begin{equation}
399: \label{MN:spectrum1}
400: m_n^2 = 1-\frac9{(4n+3)^2}~,\quad n=0,1,2,\ldots~,
401: \end{equation}
402: %
403: and
404: %
405: \begin{equation}
406: \label{MN:spectrum2}
407: m_n^2 = 1-\frac9{(4n+5)^2}~,\quad n=0,1,2,\ldots~.
408: \end{equation}
409: %
410: Notice that there is a massless state, for $n=0$ in
411: \eqref{MN:spectrum1}. Moreover, both spectra approach the branch
412: point, $-k^2=1$, for $n\to\infty$.
413:
414: Similarly, we consider the other components. The equation of motion
415: for $\mfa^3$ is
416: %
417: \begin{equation}
418: \label{MN:eqmot3}
419: \left( \partial_\rho^2 +\frac{8\rho}{4\rho-1} \partial_\rho
420: -k^2 \right) \mfa^3 =0~,
421: \end{equation}
422: %
423: for which we obtain the solutions
424: %
425: \begin{equation}
426: \label{MN:sol3Phi}
427: \mfa^3 \sim \e{-(\alpha+1/2)z}
428: \begin{cases}
429: (\alpha z)^{1/2}\,
430: \Phi\left( \frac34+\frac12\alpha,\frac32;z\right)~,\\
431: \Phi\left( \frac14+\frac12\alpha,\frac12;z\right)~.
432: \end{cases}
433: \end{equation}
434: %
435: As before, $z$ and $\alpha$ are defined by \eqref{MN:zdef} and
436: \eqref{MN:constants2}, respectively.
437: Hence, we find again a continuum of states for
438: $-k^2>1$. However, although the solutions \eqref{MN:sol3Phi} are
439: similar to \eqref{MN:sol2Phi}, the sign in front of the $\alpha$-terms
440: in the first index of the confluent hypergeometric functions does not
441: allow them to reduce to polynomials. (Remember that
442: $\mathrm{Re}\,\alpha>0$.) Hence, there is no
443: discrete spectrum of states.
444:
445: We would like to note that the solution \eqref{MN:sol3Phi} is very
446: similar to (3.17) of \cite{Ametller:2003dj}. They considered fluctuations of the dilaton about the MN background and introduced a hard-wall cut-off, and found
447: an unbounded discrete spectrum of glueball masses. This procedure was subsequently criticized in \cite{Caceres:2005yx}.
448: Due to the discussion in the previous paragraph, we
449: do not infer glueball masses from the component $\mfa^3$.
450:
451: The treatment of component $\mfa^1$ is slightly more complicated. Its
452: equation of motion is
453: %
454: \begin{equation}
455: \label{MN:eqmot1}
456: \left( \partial_\rho^2 +\frac{8\rho}{4\rho-1} \partial_\rho
457: -\frac2{\rho^2} +\frac8{4\rho-1} -k^2 \right) \mfa^1 =0~.
458: \end{equation}
459: %
460: The awkward double pole in $\rho$ can be removed by setting
461: $\mfa^1=\rho^{-1}f(\rho)$, which yields the equation
462: %
463: \begin{equation}
464: \label{MN:eqmot1f}
465: \left[ \partial_\rho^2 +
466: \left( 2 +\frac{2}{4\rho-1} -\frac2{\rho} \right) \partial_\rho
467: -k^2 \right] f =0~.
468: \end{equation}
469: %
470: After changing variables to $z$ by using \eqref{MN:zdef} and making
471: the ansatz
472: %
473: \begin{equation}
474: \label{MN:ansatz1}
475: f(z) = \e{cz} \tilde f(z)~,
476: \end{equation}
477: %
478: we find that the choice
479: %
480: \begin{equation}
481: \label{MN:constants1}
482: c = -\frac12 -\alpha~,
483: \end{equation}
484: %
485: where $\alpha$ is defined as before, leads to the equation
486: %
487: \begin{equation}
488: \label{MN:eqmot1z}
489: \left\{ 4\alpha z \left[z \partial_z^2 + \left(-\frac32-z \right)
490: \partial_z + \frac34 +\frac32\alpha \right] +
491: \left[z \partial_z^2 + \left(\frac12-z \right)
492: \partial_z - \frac14 -\frac12\alpha \right] \right\} \tilde f =0~.
493: \end{equation}
494: %
495: The two terms in square brackets represent differential equations for
496: confluent hypergeometric functions, which gives us a nice hint for
497: solving the equation. Indeed, we can explicitly find the solutions,
498: which, combined with \eqref{MN:ansatz1} and $\mfa^1=\rho^{-1} f$,
499: result in
500: %
501: \begin{equation}
502: \label{MN:sol1Phi}
503: \mfa^1 \sim \frac{\e{-(\alpha+1/2)z}}{\alpha z+1/4}
504: \begin{cases}
505: \Phi\left( -\frac34-\frac32\alpha,-\frac32;z\right)
506: -\frac{4\alpha^2-1}3 z^2\,
507: \Phi\left( \frac54-\frac32\alpha,\frac52;z\right)~,\\
508: (\alpha z)^{1/2} \left[
509: \Phi\left( -\frac14-\frac32\alpha,-\frac12;z\right)
510: + \frac{36\alpha^2-1}5 z^2\,
511: \Phi\left( \frac74-\frac32\alpha,\frac72;z\right) \right]~.
512: \end{cases}
513: \end{equation}
514: %
515: Notice that both solutions respect the symmetry of simultaneously
516: changing the signs of $\alpha$ and $z$. The sign of the $\alpha$-terms
517: in the first index of the confluent hypergeometric functions
518: indicates that, in addition to the continuum from the branch cut, we
519: have again a discrete spectrum of states for those values of $\alpha$,
520: where these functions reduce to polynomials. The corresponding spectra
521: are given again by \eqref{MN:spectrum1} and \eqref{MN:spectrum2}, but
522: in \eqref{MN:spectrum1} only values $n=1,2,3,\ldots$ are allowed,
523: which implies that the massless state is absent.
524:
525:
526: To conclude this section, let us discuss whether we can trust the mass
527: spectrum we have found. This question arises since the
528: calculation was performed in the singular background with $c=\infty$,
529: but the true supergravity dual of a field theory vacuum is the MN
530: solution, with $c=0$. Moreover, one typically expects the boundary
531: conditions in the interior to influence the dual IR physics, but we
532: have not directly imposed any conditions except symmetry of
533: simultaneously changing the signs of $\alpha$ and $z$. However, there are only three things that can happen to each particular mass value
534: when the regular background with $c=0$ is considered. First, there
535: could exist a corresponding regular and sub-leading solution for which the mass
536: value changes as we go from $c=\infty$ to $c=0$.
537: Second, there could exist a
538: corresponding regular and sub-leading solution with the same mass.
539: Third, the
540: corresponding sub-leading solution may not be regular at $\rho=0$,
541: in which case that particular mass value would not be in the spectrum.
542: In the following, we will argue that the first of these scenarios is
543: excluded. Remember that the background with
544: $c=\infty$, which we have considered here, correctly
545: describes the asymptotic region of
546: the regular background.
547: Hence, the asymptotic behaviour of the
548: fluctuations we found is valid also for $c=0$,
549: implying that the mass spectra
550: \eqref{MN:spectrum1} and \eqref{MN:spectrum2} are unchanged.
551: One can verify this by a series expansion in
552: $\e{-c}$ of the equations of motion. Also, it is a
553: straightforward but important check that the component $\mfa^3$
554: decouples from the other two for any value of $c$ and, therefore,
555: cannot spoil the sub-leading behaviour. (Remember that the solutions
556: for $\mfa^3$ did not give rise to mass spectra.)
557:
558: However, it might happen that imposing a regularity condition on the
559: fluctuations, which is required to calculate 2-point
560: functions, does not allow for the solution that corresponds to a given
561: mass value. This mechanism can be summarized as follows: For
562: given $k^2$,
563: $\mfa^1$ and $\mfa^2$ give four independent solutions,
564: %(we have two coupled components)
565: two of which give rise to the mass spectrum
566: \eqref{MN:spectrum1}, the other two leading to \eqref{MN:spectrum2}. These
567: solutions evolve as we go from $c=\infty$ to $c=0$, but their
568: asymptotic behaviour does not change. For $c=0$, imposing regularity
569: conditions will select two linear combinations of these four
570: solutions.
571: If such a linear combination involves only the two solutions
572: corresponding to the same mass spectrum, then this spectrum will survive.
573: If, in contrast, the
574: linear combination involves solutions corresponding to different mass
575: spectra, no mass values will result from it. A particularly
576: interesting case is the massless state, which belongs to
577: the spectrum \eqref{MN:spectrum1}, but arises only from the component $\mfa^2$, not
578: from $\mfa^1$, in the analysis above. One does not expect a
579: massless glueball state to exist, and in fact, it is likely to be
580: excluded by this mechanism. It is less likely that only single masses,
581: as opposed to an entire spectum, will survive this mechanism. This is
582: in contrast to the result of \cite{Caceres:2005yx}, where only a
583: single glueball state was found. We will not answer these interesting questions in this paper, but we intend to come back to them.
584:
585:
586:
587:
588:
589:
590:
591:
592: