1: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}%
2: \usepackage{amssymb}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage{espcrc2}
5: \usepackage{amsfonts}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}%
7: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
8: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
9: %TCIDATA{Version=5.00.0.2607}
10: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=espcrc.cst}
11: %TCIDATA{Created=Sunday, October 02, 2005 13:41:27}
12: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Wednesday, October 12, 2005 16:21:32}
13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
14: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="SaveForMode" CONTENT="1">}
15: %TCIDATA{BibliographyScheme=Manual}
16: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="Articles\SW\Elsevier CRC Two-column">}
17: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
18: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
19: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}
20: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}
21: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}
22: \newtheorem{case}[theorem]{Case}
23: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}
24: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}
25: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}
26: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
27: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
28: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}
29: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
30: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
31: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}
32: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
33: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}
34: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}
35: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
36: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
37: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}
38: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}
39: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\noindent\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}
40: \begin{document}
41:
42: \title{\textbf{Mass singularity and confinement in QED}$_{3}$}
43: \author{Yuichi Hoshino\\Kushiro National College of Tehnology,Otanoshike nishi2-32-1,Kushiro City,Hokkaido,084-0916,Japan}
44:
45: \begin{abstract}
46: Infrared behaviour of the fermion propagator is examined by spectral
47: representation.Assuming asymptotic states and using LSZ reduction formula we
48: evaluate the the lowest order spectral function by definition.After
49: exponentiation of it we derive the non perturbative propagator.It shows
50: confinement and dynamical mass generation explicitly.
51:
52: \end{abstract}
53: \maketitle
54:
55: \section{Introduction}
56:
57: To search the infrared behaviour of the propagator in three dimensional QED
58: ordinary perturbative method is not appropriate because of its bad infrared
59: divergences[4].Assuming spectral representation and LSZ reduction formula,we
60: evaluate the infrared behaviour or the mass singularity of the fermion
61: propagator in three dimensional QED as in four dimension.In quenched case with
62: bare photon mass we obtain the Coulomb energy and Dynamical mass by lowest
63: intermediate state.After exponentiation of this leads the non-perturbative
64: propagator. Including massless vacuum polarization the short distance part of
65: the propagator has a logarithmic correction.In the long distance Coulomb force
66: is screened to suppress mass generation.Confining property and renormalization
67: constants are discussed.
68:
69: \section{Position space propagator}
70:
71: \subsection{\bigskip spectral function}
72:
73: Here we assume spectral representation of the propagator which is defined by%
74: \begin{align}
75: {\normalsize S}_{F}(p) & {\normalsize =}\int d^{3}x\exp(-ip\cdot
76: x)\left\langle {\normalsize \Omega|T\psi(x)}\overline{{\normalsize \psi}%
77: }{\normalsize (0)|\Omega}\right\rangle \nonumber\\
78: & \mathbf{=}\int{\normalsize ds}\frac{\gamma\cdot p{\normalsize \rho}%
79: _{1}(s){\LARGE +{\normalsize \rho}}_{2}(s)}{{\normalsize p}^{2}-s{\LARGE +}%
80: {\normalsize i\epsilon}},\\
81: \frac{{\normalsize 1}}{{\normalsize \pi}}{\normalsize \Im S}_{F}(p) &
82: {\normalsize =}\int d{\normalsize s\delta(p}^{2}-s)[{\normalsize \gamma\cdot
83: p\rho}_{{\normalsize 1}}{\LARGE ({\normalsize s})+}{\normalsize \rho}%
84: _{2}{\normalsize (s)]}\nonumber\\
85: & {\normalsize =\gamma\cdot p\rho}_{{\normalsize 1}}{\normalsize (p)+\rho
86: }_{2}{\normalsize (p)}{\LARGE .}%
87: \end{align}
88: {\LARGE \ }%
89: \begin{align}
90: {\normalsize \rho(p)}{\normalsize =(2\pi)} & ^{2}\sum_{{\LARGE N}%
91: }{\normalsize \delta(p-p}_{{\LARGE N}}{\normalsize )}\int{\normalsize d}%
92: ^{{\LARGE 3}}{\normalsize x}\exp{\normalsize (ip\cdot x)}\nonumber\\
93: & {\LARGE \times}\left\langle {\normalsize \Omega|\psi(x)|N}\right\rangle
94: \left\langle {\normalsize N|}\overline{{\normalsize \psi}}%
95: {\normalsize (0)|\Omega}\right\rangle .
96: \end{align}
97: {\normalsize Total three-momentum of the state }$|N\rangle${\normalsize \ is
98: }$p_{N}^{\mu}.${\normalsize The only intermediates }$N${\normalsize \ contain
99: one spinor and an arbitrary number of photons.Setting}%
100: \begin{equation}
101: |N\rangle=|r;k_{1},...,k_{n}\rangle,
102: \end{equation}
103: {\normalsize where }$r${\normalsize \ is the momentum of the spinor }%
104: $r^{2}=m^{2},${\normalsize and }$k_{i}${\normalsize \ is the momentum of }%
105: $i${\normalsize th soft photon,we have}%
106: \begin{align}
107: \rho(p) & =\int d^{3}x\exp(-ip\cdot x)\int\frac{md^{2}r}{r^{0}}\nonumber\\
108: \times\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!} & (\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}}%
109: \theta(k_{0})\delta(k^{2})\sum_{\epsilon})_{n}\delta(p-r-\sum_{i=1}^{n}%
110: k_{i})\nonumber\\
111: & \times\left\langle \Omega|\psi(x)|r;k_{1},..,k_{n}\right\rangle
112: \left\langle r;k_{1},..k_{n}|\overline{\psi}(0)|\Omega\right\rangle .
113: \end{align}
114: {\normalsize Here the notations }%
115: \begin{equation}
116: (f(k))_{0}=1,(f(k))_{n}=\prod_{i=1}^{n}f(k_{i})
117: \end{equation}
118: {\normalsize have been introduced to denote the phase space integral of each
119: photon.The initial sum over }$\epsilon${\normalsize \ is a sum over
120: polarization of photon.To evaluate the contribution of the soft-photons,we
121: consider when only the }$n$ {\normalsize th photon is soft.Our main problem is
122: the detemination of the matrix element.Here we define the following matrix
123: element}%
124: \begin{align}
125: T_{n} & =\left\langle \Omega|\psi|r;k_{1},..k_{n}\right\rangle \nonumber\\
126: & =\left\langle \Omega|\psi a_{in}^{+}(k_{n})|r;k_{1},..k_{n-1}\right\rangle
127: .
128: \end{align}
129: {\normalsize We consider }$T_{n}${\normalsize \ for }$k_{n}^{2}\neq
130: 0,${\normalsize we continue off the photon mass-shell by
131: Lehmann-Symanzik-Zimmermann(LSZ)formula:}%
132: \begin{align}
133: T_{n} & =\epsilon_{n}^{\mu}T_{n\mu},\nonumber\\
134: \epsilon_{n}^{\mu}T_{n}^{\mu} & =\frac{i}{\sqrt{Z_{3}}}\int d^{3}y\exp
135: (ik_{n}\cdot y)\nonumber\\
136: & \times\square_{y}\left\langle \Omega|T\psi(x)\epsilon^{\mu}A_{\mu
137: }(y)|r;k_{1},...,k_{n-1}\right\rangle \nonumber\\
138: & =-\frac{i}{\sqrt{Z_{3}}}\int d^{3}y\exp(ik_{n}\cdot x)\nonumber\\
139: & \times\left\langle \Omega|T\psi(x)\epsilon^{\mu}j_{\mu}(y)|r;k_{1}%
140: ,...,k_{n-1}\right\rangle ,
141: \end{align}
142: provided%
143: \begin{align}
144: \square_{x}T(\psi A_{\mu}(x) & =T\psi\square_{x}A_{\mu}(x)\nonumber\\
145: & =T\psi(-j_{\mu}(x)+\frac{d-1}{d}\partial_{\mu}^{x}(\partial\cdot A(x)),\\
146: \partial\cdot A^{(+)}|phys & >=0,
147: \end{align}
148: {\normalsize where the electromagnetic current is}%
149: \begin{equation}
150: j^{\mu}(x)=-e\overline{\psi}(x)\gamma_{\mu}\psi(x).
151: \end{equation}
152: {\normalsize From the definition (8) }$T_{n}^{\mu}${\normalsize \ is seen to
153: satisfies Ward-Takahashi-identity:}%
154: \begin{equation}
155: k_{n\mu}T_{n}^{\mu}(r,k_{1},..k_{n})=eT_{n-1}(r,k_{1},..k_{n-1}),r^{2}=m^{2},
156: \end{equation}
157: {\normalsize provided the equal-time commutation relations}%
158: \begin{align}
159: \partial_{\mu}^{x}T(\psi j_{\mu}(x)) & =-e\psi(x),\nonumber\\
160: \partial_{\mu}^{x}T(\overline{\psi}j_{\mu}(x)) & =e\overline{\psi}(x).
161: \end{align}
162: {\normalsize In the Bloch-Nordsieck approximation we have most singular
163: contributions of photons which are emitted from external lines.In perturbation
164: theory one photon matrix element }$T_{1}$ {\normalsize is given}%
165: \begin{align}
166: & \left\langle in|T(\psi_{in}(x),ie\int d^{3}y\overline{\psi}_{in}%
167: (y)\gamma_{\mu}\psi_{in}(y)A_{in}^{\mu}(y))|r;k\text{ }in\right\rangle \\
168: & =ie\int d^{3}yd^{3}zS_{F}(x-y)\gamma_{\mu}\delta^{(3)}(y-z)\nonumber\\
169: & \times\exp(i(k\cdot y+r\cdot z))\epsilon^{\mu}(k,\lambda)U(r,s)\nonumber\\
170: & =-ie\frac{(r+k)\cdot\gamma+m}{(r+k)^{2}-m^{2}}\gamma_{\mu}\epsilon^{\mu
171: }(k,\lambda)\exp(i(k+r)\cdot x)U(r,s),
172: \end{align}
173: {\normalsize where }$U(r,s)${\normalsize \ is a four-component free particle
174: spinor with positive energy.}$U(r,s)${\normalsize \ satisfies the relations}%
175: \begin{align}
176: (\gamma\cdot r-m)U(r,s) & =0,\nonumber\\
177: \sum_{S}U(r,s)\overline{U}(r,s) & =\frac{\gamma\cdot r+m}{2m}.
178: \end{align}
179: {\normalsize In this case the Ward-Takahasi-identity follows}%
180: \begin{align}
181: k_{\mu}T_{1}^{\mu} & =-ie\frac{1}{\gamma\cdot(r+k)-m}(\gamma\cdot
182: k)U(r,s)\nonumber\\
183: & =-ieU(r,s)=eT_{0}.
184: \end{align}
185: {\normalsize For general }$T_{n}${\normalsize \ low-energy theorem determines
186: the structure of non-singular terms in }$k_{n}.${\normalsize \ Detailed
187: dicussions are given in ref [1] and non-singular terms are irrelevant for the
188: single particle singularity in four-dimension.Under the same assumption in
189: three-dimension we have}%
190: \begin{equation}
191: T_{n}|_{k_{n}^{2}=0}=e\frac{\gamma\cdot\epsilon}{\gamma\cdot(r+k_{n}%
192: )-m}T_{n-1}.
193: \end{equation}
194: {\normalsize From this relation the }$n${\normalsize -photon matrix element}%
195: \begin{equation}
196: \left\langle \Omega|\psi(x)|r;k_{1},..,k_{n}\right\rangle \left\langle
197: r;k_{1},..k_{n}|\overline{\psi}(0)|\Omega\right\rangle
198: \end{equation}
199: {\normalsize is reduced to the product of lowest-order one-photon matrix
200: element}%
201: \begin{equation}
202: T_{n}\overline{T_{n}}=%
203: %TCIMACRO{\dprod \limits_{j=1}^{n}}%
204: %BeginExpansion
205: {\displaystyle\prod\limits_{j=1}^{n}}
206: %EndExpansion
207: T_{1}(k_{j})T_{1}^{+}(k_{j})\gamma_{0}.
208: \end{equation}
209: {\normalsize In this case the spectral function }$\rho${\normalsize \ in (5)
210: is given by exponentiation of one-photon matrix element,which yields an
211: infinite ladder approximation for the propagator.Thus we obtain the spectral
212: function and the propagator in the followings forms}%
213: \begin{align}
214: \rho(p) & =\int d^{3}x\exp(-ip\cdot x)\int\frac{md^{2}r}{r^{0}}\nonumber\\
215: & \times\exp(ir\cdot x)\exp(F),\\
216: F & =\sum_{\text{one photon}}\left\langle \Omega|\psi(x)|r;k\right\rangle
217: \left\langle r;k|\overline{\psi}(0)|\Omega\right\rangle \nonumber\\
218: & =\int\frac{d^{2}k}{(2\pi)^{2}}\delta(k^{2})\theta(k_{0})\exp(ik\cdot
219: x)\sum_{\lambda,S}T_{1}\overline{T_{1}},\\
220: \sum_{\lambda,S}T_{1}T_{1} & =e^{2}[\frac{(r+k)\cdot\gamma+m}{(r+k)^{2}%
221: -m^{2}}\gamma^{\mu}\frac{r\cdot\gamma+m}{2m}\nonumber\\
222: & \times\gamma^{\nu}\frac{(r+k)\cdot r+m}{(r+k)^{2}-m^{2}}\Pi_{\mu\nu}].
223: \end{align}
224:
225:
226: {\normalsize Here }$\Pi_{\mu\nu}${\normalsize \ is the polarization sum}%
227: \begin{equation}
228: \Pi_{\mu\nu}=\sum_{\lambda}\epsilon_{\mu}(k,\lambda)\epsilon_{\nu}%
229: (k,\lambda)=-g_{\mu\nu}-(d-1)\frac{k_{\mu}k_{\nu}}{k^{2}},
230: \end{equation}
231: {\normalsize and the free photon propagator is}%
232: \begin{equation}
233: D_{0}^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{k^{2}+i\epsilon}[g_{\mu\nu}+(d-1)\frac{k_{\mu}k_{\nu}%
234: }{k^{2}}].
235: \end{equation}
236: {\normalsize We get}%
237: \begin{align}
238: F & =-e^{2}\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{2}}\exp(ik\cdot x)\theta(k^{0}%
239: )\nonumber\\
240: & \times\lbrack\delta(k^{2})(\frac{m^{2}}{(r\cdot k)^{2}}+\frac{1}{(r\cdot
241: k)})\nonumber\\
242: & +(d-1)\frac{\delta(k^{2})}{k^{2}}].
243: \end{align}
244: {\normalsize The second term }$\delta(k^{2})/k^{2}${\normalsize \ equals to
245: }$-\delta^{\prime}(k^{2}).${\normalsize Our calculation is the same with the
246: imaginary part of the photon propagator.To avoid infrared divergence which
247: arises in the phase space integral we must introduce small photon mass }$\mu
248: ${\normalsize \ as an infrared cut-off.Therefore (22) is modified to}%
249: \begin{align}
250: F & =-e^{2}\int\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{2}}\exp(ik\cdot x)\theta(k^{0}%
251: )\nonumber\\
252: & \times\lbrack\delta(k^{2}-\mu^{2})(\frac{m^{2}}{(r\cdot k)^{2}}+\frac
253: {1}{(r\cdot k)})\nonumber\\
254: & -(d-1)\frac{\partial}{\partial k^{2}}\delta(k^{2}-\mu^{2})].
255: \end{align}
256: {\normalsize It is helpful to use function }$D_{+}(x)${\normalsize \ to
257: determine }$F${\normalsize \ }%
258: \begin{align}
259: D_{+}(x) & =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}i}\int\exp(ik\cdot x)d^{3}k\theta
260: (k^{0})\delta(k^{2}-\mu^{2})\nonumber\\
261: & =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{2}i}\int_{0}^{\infty}J_{0}(kx)\frac{\pi kdk}{2\sqrt
262: {k^{2}+\mu^{2}}}=\frac{\exp(-\mu x)}{8\pi ix}.
263: \end{align}
264: {\normalsize If we use parameter trick(exponential cut-off) }%
265: \begin{align}
266: \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow0}\int_{0}^{\infty}d\alpha\exp(i(k+i\epsilon
267: )\cdot(x+\alpha r)) & =i\frac{\exp(ik\cdot x)}{k\cdot r},\\
268: \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow0}\int_{0}^{\infty}\alpha d\alpha\exp(i(k+i\epsilon
269: )\cdot(x+\alpha r)) & =-\frac{\exp(ik\cdot x)}{(k\cdot r)^{2}},
270: \end{align}
271: %
272:
273: \begin{align}
274: F_{1} & =ie^{2}m^{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}d\alpha\alpha D_{+}(x+\alpha
275: r)\nonumber\\
276: & =\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}(\frac{\exp(-\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )}{\mu
277: }+\left\vert x\right\vert \operatorname{Ei}(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )),\\
278: F_{2} & =-ie^{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}d\alpha D_{+}(x+\alpha r)\nonumber\\
279: & =-\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi m}\operatorname{Ei}(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert ),\\
280: F_{g} & =ie^{2}(d-1)\frac{\partial}{\partial\mu^{2}}D_{+}(x)\nonumber\\
281: & =\frac{(d-1)e^{2}}{8\pi\mu}\exp(-\mu\left\vert x\right\vert ).
282: \end{align}
283: {\normalsize where the function }$\operatorname{Ei}(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert
284: )${\normalsize \ is defined }%
285: \begin{equation}
286: \operatorname{Ei}(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )=\int_{1}^{\infty}\frac
287: {\exp(-\mu\left\vert x\right\vert t)}{t}dt.
288: \end{equation}
289: {\normalsize It is understood that all terms which vanishes with }%
290: $\mu\rightarrow0${\normalsize \ are ignored.The leading non trivial
291: contributions to }$F${\normalsize \ are }%
292: \begin{equation}
293: \operatorname{Ei}(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )=-\gamma-\ln(\mu\left\vert
294: x\right\vert )+O(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert ),
295: \end{equation}
296: %
297:
298: \begin{align}
299: F_{1} & =\frac{e^{2}m^{2}}{8\pi r^{2}}\left( -\frac{1}{\mu}+\left\vert
300: x\right\vert (1-\ln(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )-\gamma)\right)
301: +O(\mu),\nonumber\\
302: F_{2} & =\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi\sqrt{r^{2}}}(\ln(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert
303: )+\gamma)+O(\mu),\nonumber\\
304: F_{g} & =\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}(\frac{1}{\mu}-\left\vert x\right\vert
305: )(d-1)+O(\mu),
306: \end{align}%
307: \begin{align}
308: F & =\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi\mu}(d-2)+\frac{\gamma e^{2}}{8\pi\sqrt{r^{2}}%
309: }\nonumber\\
310: & +\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi\sqrt{r^{2}}}\ln(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )\nonumber\\
311: & -\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}\left\vert x\right\vert \ln(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert
312: )-\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}\left\vert x\right\vert (d-2+\gamma),
313: \end{align}
314: {\normalsize where }$\gamma${\normalsize \ is Euler's constant.We set }%
315: $r^{2}=m^{2}${\normalsize \ in the phase space integral; }%
316: \begin{align}
317: \rho(p) & =F.T\int\frac{md^{2}r}{\sqrt{r^{2}+m^{2}}}\exp(ir\cdot
318: x)\exp(F(m,\left\vert x\right\vert ))\nonumber\\
319: & =F.T\frac{\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}{4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert
320: }\exp(F(m,\left\vert x\right\vert )),\\
321: \overline{\rho(x)} & =\frac{\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}{4\pi\left\vert
322: x\right\vert }\exp(F(m,\left\vert x\right\vert )).
323: \end{align}
324: {\normalsize Here }$\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )/4\pi\left\vert
325: x\right\vert ,\left\vert x\right\vert =\sqrt{-x^{2}}${\normalsize \ is a free
326: scalar propagator with physical mass }$m${\normalsize \ and }$\exp
327: (F)${\normalsize \ denotes the quantum correction for the propagator involving
328: infinite numbers of photons in our approximation.}
329:
330: \subsection{{\protect\normalsize Confining property}}
331:
332: {\normalsize \bigskip Here we mention the confining property of the propagator
333: }$S_{F}(x)${\normalsize \ in position space}%
334: \begin{equation}
335: S_{F}(x)=(\frac{i\gamma\cdot\partial}{m}+1)[\frac{m\exp(-m\left\vert
336: x\right\vert )}{4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert }(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert
337: )^{D(1-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}].
338: \end{equation}
339: {\normalsize The }$S_{F}${\normalsize \ dumps strongly at large }%
340: $x${\normalsize \ provided }%
341: \begin{equation}
342: \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-Dm\left\vert
343: x\right\vert }=0.
344: \end{equation}
345: {\normalsize The profiles of the }$\overline{\rho(x)}${\normalsize \ for
346: various values of }$D\geq1${\normalsize \ are shown in Fig.1.The effect of
347: }$(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-Dm\left\vert x\right\vert }$%
348: {\normalsize \ in position space is seen to decrease the value of the
349: propagator at low energy and shown in Fig.2.}%
350:
351: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.2952in}{2.2952in}{0pt}{\Qcb{$\overline{\rho(x)}$ for
352: %$D=1,1.5,m=\mu=unit$}}{\Qlb{f1}}{fig.1.eps}%
353: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
354: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
355: %width 2.2952in; height 2.2952in; depth 0pt; original-width 5.5564in;
356: %original-height 5.5564in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
357: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig.1.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
358: %BeginExpansion
359: \begin{figure}
360: [ptb]
361: \begin{center}
362: \includegraphics[
363: height=2.2952in,
364: width=2.2952in
365: ]%
366: {fig.1.eps}%
367: \caption{$\overline{\rho(x)}$ for $D=1,1.5,m=\mu=unit$}%
368: \label{f1}%
369: \end{center}
370: \end{figure}
371: %EndExpansion%
372: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.1274in}{2.1274in}{0pt}{\Qcb{$\left( \mu\left\vert
373: %x\right\vert \right) ^{-Dm\left\vert x\right\vert },D=1,m=\mu=unit$}%
374: %}{\Qlb{f2}}{fig2.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
375: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
376: %width 2.1274in; height 2.1274in; depth 0pt; original-width 5.5564in;
377: %original-height 5.5564in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
378: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig2.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
379: %BeginExpansion
380: \begin{figure}
381: [ptb]
382: \begin{center}
383: \includegraphics[
384: height=2.1274in,
385: width=2.1274in
386: ]%
387: {fig2.eps}%
388: \caption{$\left( \mu\left\vert x\right\vert \right) ^{-Dm\left\vert
389: x\right\vert },D=1,m=\mu=unit$}%
390: \label{f2}%
391: \end{center}
392: \end{figure}
393: %EndExpansion
394: {\normalsize In section IV and V we discuss dynamical mass,the renormalization
395: constant,and bare mass in connection of each terms in }$F${\normalsize .}
396:
397: {\normalsize After angular integration of (38),we get the propagator}%
398:
399: \begin{align}
400: S_{F}(p) & =(\frac{\gamma\cdot p}{m}+1)\rho(p),\\
401: \rho(p) & =\frac{m}{2\pi\sqrt{-p^{2}}}\int_{0}^{\infty}d\left\vert
402: x\right\vert \sin(\sqrt{p^{2}x^{2}})\nonumber\\
403: & \times\exp(A-(m_{0}+B)\left\vert x\right\vert )(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert
404: )^{-C\left\vert x\right\vert +D},
405: \end{align}
406: {\normalsize where }%
407: \begin{align}
408: A & =\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi\mu}(d-2)+\frac{\gamma e^{2}}{8\pi m},B=\frac{e^{2}%
409: }{8\pi}(d-2+\gamma),\nonumber\\
410: C & =\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi},D=\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi m}.
411: \end{align}
412: {\normalsize If we discuss the Euclidean or off-shell propagator we can omitt
413: the linear infrared divergent part in }$A.${\normalsize In this case }%
414: $m${\normalsize \ denotes a physical mass }%
415: \begin{equation}
416: m=|m_{0}+\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}(d-2+\gamma)|.
417: \end{equation}
418:
419:
420: \section{Analysis in momentum space}
421:
422: {\normalsize To search the infrared behaviour we expand the propagator in the
423: powers of the coupling constant }$e^{2}${\normalsize \ and obtained the
424: Fourier transform of }$\overline{\rho}(x)${\normalsize \ [2,3].In that case it
425: is not enough to see the structure of infrared behaviour which can be compared
426: to the well-known four dimensional QED[7].Instead we make Laplace
427: transformation of }$(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-Dm\left\vert x\right\vert
428: },${\normalsize which }{\normalsize leads the general spectral representation
429: of the propagator in momentum space.After that we show the roles of Coulomb
430: energy and position dependent mass.The former determines the dimension of the
431: propagator and the latter acts to change mass.Let us begin to study the effect
432: of position dependent mass(Self-energy),Coulomb energy in momentum space}%
433: \begin{align}
434: \exp(-\left\vert x\right\vert M(x)) & =\exp(-\left\vert x\right\vert
435: \frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}\ln(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert ),\\
436: \exp(-Coulomb\text{ }energy/m) & =\exp(-\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi m}\ln
437: (\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )).
438: \end{align}
439: {\normalsize Similar discussion was given to study the effects of self-energy
440: and bare potential in the stabilty of massless }$e^{+}e^{-}$%
441: {\normalsize composite in lattice simulation[8].The position space free
442: propagator }%
443: \begin{equation}
444: S_{F}(x,m_{0})=-(i\gamma\cdot\partial+m_{0})\frac{\exp(-m_{0}\left\vert
445: x\right\vert )}{4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert }%
446: \end{equation}
447: {\normalsize is modified by these two terms which are related to dynamical
448: mass and wave function renormalization.To see this let us think about position
449: space propagator}%
450: \begin{equation}
451: \overline{\rho(x)}=\frac{\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}{4\pi\left\vert
452: x\right\vert }(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-C\left\vert x\right\vert }%
453: (\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{D}.
454: \end{equation}
455: {\normalsize It is easy to see that the probability of particles which are
456: separated with each other in the long distance is suppressed by the factor
457: }$(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-C\left\vert x\right\vert },${\normalsize and
458: the Coulomb energy modifies the short distance behaviour from the bare
459: }$1/\left\vert x\right\vert ${\normalsize \ to }$1/\left\vert x\right\vert
460: ^{1-D}${\normalsize .The effect of Coulomb energy for the infrared behaviour
461: of the free particle with mass }$m${\normalsize \ can be seen by its fourier
462: transform[2,9] }%
463: \begin{align}
464: & 4\pi\int_{0}^{\infty}x^{2}\frac{\sin(\sqrt{p^{2}x^{2}})}{\sqrt{p^{2}x^{2}}%
465: }\frac{\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}{4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert }%
466: (\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{D}d\left\vert x\right\vert \nonumber\\
467: & =\mu^{D}\frac{\Gamma(D+1)\sin((D+1)\arctan(\sqrt{-p^{2}}/m))}{\sqrt{-p^{2}%
468: }(-p^{2}+m^{2})^{(1+D)/2}}\\
469: & \sim\mu^{D}(\sqrt{-p^{2}}-m)^{-1-D}\text{ near }p^{2}=-m^{2}.
470: \end{align}
471: {\normalsize Above formula shows the structure in momentum space is modified
472: for both infrared and ultraviolet regions.Usually constant }$D$%
473: {\normalsize \ represents the coefficent of the leading infrared divergence
474: for fixed mass in four dimension.Therefore Coulomb energy in three dimension
475: has the same effects as in four dimension but change the ultraviolet behaviour
476: since the coupling constant }$e^{2}${\normalsize \ is not renormalized.Now we
477: consider the role of }$M(x)${\normalsize \ as the dynamical mass at low
478: momentum.First we define Fourier transform of the scalar part of the
479: propagator; }%
480: \begin{equation}
481: \rho(p)=F.T(\frac{m\exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )}{4\pi\left\vert
482: x\right\vert }(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-C\left\vert x\right\vert +D}).
483: \end{equation}
484: {\normalsize \ If we use Laplace transformation }%
485: \[
486: F(s)=\int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(-s\left\vert x\right\vert )(m\left\vert
487: x\right\vert )^{-C\left\vert x\right\vert }d\left\vert x\right\vert
488: \]
489: {\normalsize we easily see that }$(m\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-C\left\vert
490: x\right\vert }${\normalsize \ acts as mass changing operator }$m\rightarrow
491: m-s$%
492: \begin{align}
493: & \exp(-m\left\vert x\right\vert )(m\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-C\left\vert
494: x\right\vert }\nonumber\\
495: & =\int dsF(s)\exp(-(m-s)\left\vert x\right\vert ).
496: \end{align}
497: {\normalsize To separate the }$\mu${\normalsize \ dependence we define
498: }$m^{\ast}=m(1+D\ln(\mu/m)).F(s)$ {\normalsize is shown in Fig.4.}%
499:
500: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.1274in}{2.1274in}{0pt}{\Qcb{$\rho(p)$ for
501: %$D=0(u),1(m),1.5(l),p=n/2$}}{\Qlb{f3}}{fig3.eps}%
502: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
503: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
504: %width 2.1274in; height 2.1274in; depth 0pt; original-width 5.5564in;
505: %original-height 5.5564in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
506: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig3.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
507: %BeginExpansion
508: \begin{figure}
509: [ptb]
510: \begin{center}
511: \includegraphics[
512: height=2.1274in,
513: width=2.1274in
514: ]%
515: {fig3.eps}%
516: \caption{$\rho(p)$ for $D=0(u),1(m),1.5(l),p=n/2$}%
517: \label{f3}%
518: \end{center}
519: \end{figure}
520: %EndExpansion%
521: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{2.1274in}{2.1274in}{0pt}{\Qcb{$F(s)$ for
522: %$m=\mu=unit,s=n/20$}}{\Qlb{f4}}{fig4.eps}%
523: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
524: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "USEDEF"; valid_file "F";
525: %width 2.1274in; height 2.1274in; depth 0pt; original-width 5.5564in;
526: %original-height 5.5564in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
527: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig4.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
528: %BeginExpansion
529: \begin{figure}
530: [ptb]
531: \begin{center}
532: \includegraphics[
533: height=2.1274in,
534: width=2.1274in
535: ]%
536: {fig4.eps}%
537: \caption{$F(s)$ for $m=\mu=unit,s=n/20$}%
538: \label{f4}%
539: \end{center}
540: \end{figure}
541: %EndExpansion
542:
543:
544: {\normalsize \bigskip}
545:
546: {\normalsize We have the complete the expression of the spectral function}%
547: \begin{equation}
548: \overline{\rho(x)}=\frac{m\mu^{D}\exp(-m^{\ast}\left\vert x\right\vert )}%
549: {4\pi\left\vert x\right\vert ^{1-D}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\exp(s\left\vert
550: x\right\vert )F(s)ds,
551: \end{equation}%
552: \begin{align}
553: & \rho(p)\nonumber\\
554: & =m\mu^{D}\Gamma(D+1)\int_{0}^{\infty}dsF(s)\nonumber\\
555: & \times\frac{\sin((D+1)\arctan(\sqrt{-p^{2}}/(m-s)))}{\sqrt{-p^{2}}%
556: (-p^{2}+(m-s)^{2})^{(1+D)/2}}%
557: \end{align}
558:
559:
560: \section{{\protect\normalsize Bare mass and vacuum expectation value
561: }$\left\langle \overline{\psi}\psi\right\rangle $}
562:
563: {\normalsize In this section we examine the renormalization constant and bare
564: mass and study the condition of vanishing bare mass based on spectral
565: representation.The spinor propagator in position space is expressed in the
566: following for }$\rho_{1}=\rho_{2}=\rho$ {\normalsize which is the case in our
567: model[2].The equation for the renormalization constant in terms of the
568: spectral functions read}%
569:
570: \begin{align}
571: m_{0}Z_{2}^{-1} & =m\int\omega\rho_{2}(\omega)d\omega=\frac{1}{4}%
572: \lim_{p\rightarrow\infty}tr[p^{2}S_{F}(p)],\\
573: Z_{2}^{-1} & =\int\rho_{1}(\omega)d\omega=\frac{1}{4}\lim_{p\rightarrow
574: \infty}tr[\gamma\cdot pS_{F}(p)].
575: \end{align}
576: {\normalsize we obtain }%
577: \begin{align}
578: m_{0}Z_{2}^{-1} & \sim\lim_{p^{2}\rightarrow\infty}\sqrt{-p^{2}}%
579: ^{-D}=\left[
580: \begin{array}
581: [c]{cc}%
582: 0 & (0<D)\\
583: m & (0=D)
584: \end{array}
585: \right] ,\\
586: Z_{2}^{-1} & =\lim_{p^{2}\rightarrow\infty}\sqrt{-p^{2}}^{-D}=\left[
587: \begin{array}
588: [c]{cc}%
589: 0 & (0<D)\\
590: 1 & (0=D)
591: \end{array}
592: \right] .
593: \end{align}
594: {\normalsize This means that propagator in the high energy limit has no part
595: which is proportional to the free one.Usually mass is a parameter which
596: appears in the Lagrangean.For example chiral symmetry is defined for the bare
597: quantity.In ref[6] the relation between bare mass and renormalized mass of the
598: fermion propagator in QED is discussed based on renormalization group equation
599: with the assumption of ultraviolet stagnant point and shown that the bare mass
600: vanishes in the high energy limit even if we start from the finite bare mass
601: in the theory.It suggests that symmetry properties can be discussed in terms
602: of renormalized quantities.In QCD bare mass vanishes in the short distance by
603: asymptotic freedom.And the dynamical mass vanishes too[5].In our apprximation
604: this problem is understood that at short distance propagator in position space
605: tends to }%
606: \begin{equation}
607: \overline{\rho(x)}_{x\rightarrow0}\rightarrow\left\vert x\right\vert
608: ^{D-1}(\mu\left\vert x\right\vert )^{-C\left\vert x\right\vert },
609: \end{equation}
610: {\normalsize where we have }$\overline{\rho(0)}=finite$ {\normalsize at }$D=1$
611: {\normalsize case which is independent of the bare mass }$m_{0}$%
612: {\normalsize .Thus we have a same effect as vanishing bare mass in four
613: dimensional model.Of course we have a dynamical mass generation which is
614: }$m=|\frac{e^{2}}{8\pi}(d-2+\gamma)+M(x)|$ {\normalsize for }$m_{0}=0$
615: {\normalsize in our approximation}$.${\normalsize There is a chiral symmetry
616: at short distance where the bare or dynamical mass vanishes in momentum space
617: but its breaking must be discussed in terms of the values of the order
618: parameter.Therefore it is interesting to study the possibility of pair
619: condensation in our approximation.The vacuum expectation value of pair
620: condensate is evaluated }%
621: \begin{align}
622: \left\langle \overline{\psi}\psi\right\rangle & =-trS_{F}(x)=-2\int
623: _{0}^{\infty}\frac{p^{2}d\sqrt{p^{2}}}{2\pi^{2}}\frac{\Gamma(D+1)\mu^{D}%
624: }{(D+1)2\sqrt{p^{2}}}\nonumber\\
625: & \times\int_{0}^{\infty}dsG(s)\frac{\sin((D+1)\arctan(\sqrt{p^{2}}%
626: /(m-s))}{\sqrt{((m-s)^{2}+p^{2})^{D+1}}},
627: \end{align}
628: {\normalsize is finite for }$D\geq1$ {\normalsize for finite cut-off }$\mu
629: .${\normalsize In the weak coupling limit we obtain }$Z_{2}=1,m_{0}=m$
630: {\normalsize and }$\left\langle \overline{\psi}\psi\right\rangle =\infty
631: ${\normalsize .If we introduce chiral symmetry as a global }$U(2n)$%
632: {\normalsize ,it breaks dynamically into }$SU(n)\times SU(n)\times U(1)\times
633: U(1)$ {\normalsize as in QCD[9,11] for }$D=1$ {\normalsize for finite infrared
634: cut-off.Our model may be applicable to relativistic model of super fluidity in
635: three dimension.Usually we do not find the critical coupling }$D=1$
636: {\normalsize in the analysis of the Dyson-Schwinger equation in momentum space
637: where only continuum contributions are taken into account and we do not define
638: physical mass.Finally we notice the effects of vacuum
639: polarization[4,10,11,12].In the presence of vacuum polarization with
640: }${\normalsize N}$ massless fermion {\normalsize the mass shift and dynamical
641: mass we find in the quenched case are decreased by screening at short
642: distance.In the long distance mass shitft is strongly suppresd and we have
643: only wave renormalization as in four dimension.We have an infrared behaviour
644: of the propagator in the Landau gauge }%
645: \begin{equation}
646: S_{F}(p)\simeq(\frac{\mu}{m})^{D^{\prime}}\frac{\gamma\cdot p+m}{2m^{2}%
647: }(1-\frac{p^{2}}{m^{2}})^{-(1+D^{\prime})},D^{\prime}=\frac{8}{N\pi^{2}}.
648: \end{equation}
649:
650:
651: \section{{\protect\normalsize References}}
652:
653: {\normalsize \noindent\lbrack1]R.Jackiw,L.Soloviev,Phys.Rev.\textbf{173}%
654: (1968)1458;}
655:
656: {\normalsize L.D.Landau and E.M.Lifzhits,Quantum Electrodynamics,Pergamon
657: Press,Oxford(1982);}
658:
659: {\normalsize C.Itzykson,J-BZuber,QuantumField Theory,McGRAW-HILL.\newline%
660: [2]Y.Hoshino,\textbf{JHEP}09(2004)048.\newline%
661: [3]Conrand.J.Burden,Justin.Praschika,Craig.D.Roberts,}
662:
663: {\normalsize Phys.Rev.\textbf{D46}(1992)2695;ibid,Phys.Rev.\textbf{D47}%
664: (1993)5581; A.Bashir,A.Raya,Phys.Rev.\textbf{D64}(2001)105001.\newline%
665: [4]A.B.Waites,R.Delbourgo,Int.J.Mod.Physics.\textbf{A7}(1992)6857.}%
666: \newline{\normalsize [5]H.D.Politzer,Nucl.Phys.\textbf{B117}(1976)397.\newline%
667: [6]K.Nishijima,Prog.Theor.Phys.81(1989)878;83(1990)1200.\newline%
668: [7]L.S.Brown,QuantumFieldTheory,CambridegeUniversityPres(1992);}%
669: \newline%
670: [8]{\normalsize E.Dagotto,J.B.Kogut,A.Kocic,Phys.Rev.Lett.62(1988)1083.}%
671: \newline[9]{\normalsize M.Koopman,DynamicalMassGenerationinQED}$_{3}%
672: ,${\normalsize Ph.D thesis,Groningen University(1990),Chapter4;}
673:
674: {\normalsize Y.Hoshino,Il.Nouvo.Cim.\textbf{112A}(1999)335.\newline%
675: [10]YuichiHoshino,preprint,hep-th/0506045.}\newline[11]T.Appelquist,D.Nash,L.C.R.Wijewardhana,
676:
677: Phys.Rev.Lett.\textbf{60}{\normalsize (1988)2575.}\newline%
678: [12]K.-I.Kondo,H.Nakatani,Prog.Theor.Phys.87:193-206(1992).\newline
679:
680:
681: \end{document}