1: \documentclass[aps,12pt,notitlepage,final,oneside,onecolumn,nobibnotes,
2: nofootinbib,superscriptaddress,noshowpacs,centertags,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \title{Generalized lagrangian of the Rarita--Schwinger field }
7: \author{\firstname{A.E.} \surname{Kaloshin}}
8: \email{kaloshin@physdep.isu.ru}
9: \author{\firstname{V.P.} \surname{Lomov}}
10: \email{lomov@physdep.isu.ru}
11: \author{\firstname{A.M.} \surname{Moiseeva}}
12: % \email{}
13: \affiliation{Russia, Irkutsk State University}
14:
15: \begin{abstract}
16: We derive the most general lagrangian of the free massive
17: Rarita--Schwinger field, which generalizes the previously known
18: ones. The special role of the reparameterization transformation is
19: discussed.
20: \end{abstract}
21:
22: \maketitle
23:
24: \section{Introduction}
25:
26: The Rarita-Schwinger (R.-S.) vector-spinor field $\Psi^\mu (x)$ is
27: used for description of the spin-3/2 particles in QFT \cite{Rar}.
28: But this field has too many degrees of freedom for spin-3/2 and
29: contains in fact also two spin-1/2 representations.
30: These "extra" spin-1/2 components are usually supposed to
31: be unphysical, but the control of this property becomes not so
32: evident after inclusion of interactions.
33:
34: In this paper we derive the most general form of the R.-S.
35: lagrangian without additional assumption about the nature of
36: spin-1/2 components. Depending on the choice of parameters the
37: $s=1/2$ components may have the poles in the complex energy plane
38: or not. The purpose of such construction is twofold. First of all,
39: it may be useful at renormalization of the dressed R.-S. field
40: propagator even if we require the spin-1/2 components to be
41: unphysical. Another aim may be related with properties of the
42: hypothetical R.-S. multiplet, corresponding to $\Psi^\mu $ field
43: and consisting of particles $J^P=3/2^+, 1/2^+, 1/2^-$.
44:
45:
46: There exist some examples of generalized lagrangians
47: \cite{Hab,Kir04,Pil} which are constructed by different methods
48: (usually with using of artificial methods) and for different
49: purposes. In contrast to previous works our deriving of the
50: generalized R.-S. lagrangian is a straightforward: we investigate
51: the propagator instead of equations of motion and utilize
52: different bases \cite{KL1} to control its properties. Such
53: approach is more transparent at any step but needs some technical
54: details, which are collected in Appendix.
55:
56: \section{Lagrangian}
57:
58: Free lagrangian of the Rarita-Schwinger field is defined by
59: differential operator $S^{\mu\nu}$, which is in fact the inverse
60: propagator
61: \begin{flalign}
62: \Lagr=&\overline{\Psi}\vphantom{\Psi}^{\mu}S_{\mu\nu}\Psi^{\nu}.
63: \label{lagr}
64: \end{flalign}
65: Let us recall the standard choice \cite{Mol} for $S^{\mu\nu}$:
66: \begin{flalign}
67: S^{\mu\nu}=&(\hat{p}-M)g^{\mu\nu}+A(\gamma^{\mu}p^{\nu}+
68: \gamma^{\nu}p^{\mu})+\frac{1}{2}(3A^2+2A+1)\gamma^{\mu}
69: \hat{p}\gamma^{\nu}+M(3A^2+3A+1)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}.
70: \label{stand}
71: \end{flalign}
72: Here $M$ is the mass of R.-S. field, $p_{\mu}=i
73: \partial_{\mu}$ and $A$ is an arbitrary real parameter.
74: Equations of motion, following from \eqref{stand}, lead to
75: constrains $p\Psi=\gamma\Psi=0$, and therefore to exclusion of the
76: spin-1/2 degrees of freedom. In other words, the corresponding
77: terms in propagator should not have poles in energy.
78:
79: Let us formulate the main requirements for lagrangian:
80: \begin{enumerate}
81: \item The fermion lagrangian is linear in derivatives.
82: \item It should be hermitian $\Lagr^\dag=\Lagr$ \ or \ \
83: $\gamma^0 (S^{\mu\nu})^\dag\gamma^0=S^{\nu\mu}$.
84: \item The spin-3/2 contribution has standard pole form
85: (to be specified below).
86: \item Lagrangian should not be singular at $p\to 0$. This point is rather
87: evident but it happens that some rough methods generate
88: singularities in a propagator, see, e.g. discussion in \cite{BDM}.
89: \end{enumerate}
90:
91: The suitable starting point to construct the generalized lagrangian
92: is the most general decomposition of $S^{\mu\nu}$ in
93: $\gamma$-matrix basis\footnote{We use conventions of Bjorken and
94: Drell textbook \cite{Bjo}: $\varepsilon_{0123}=1$,
95: $\gamma^5=\gamma_5=i\gamma^0\gamma^1\gamma^2\gamma^3$ except
96: that $\sigma^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}[\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}]$.}
97: \eqref{app:eq1}. The first requirement remains 6 complex
98: coefficients in (\ref{app:eq1})
99: \begin{eqnarray}
100: \label{sec1:eq4} S^{\mu\nu}&=&g^{\mu\nu}\cdot s_{1} +
101: \hat{p}g^{\mu\nu}\cdot s_{4} + p^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\cdot s_{5} +
102: \gamma^{\mu}p^{\nu}\cdot s_{6} + \sigma^{\mu\nu}\cdot s_{7} + i
103: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}\gamma_{\lambda}\gamma^{5}
104: p_{\rho}\cdot s_{10}= \\
105: &=&g^{\mu\nu}(s_{1}-s_{7}) + \hat{p}g^{\mu\nu}(s_{4}-s_{10}) +
106: p^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}(s_{5}+s_{10}) + \gamma^{\mu}p^{\nu}
107: (s_{6}+s_{10}) + \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} s_{7} - \gamma^{\mu}
108: \hat{p} \gamma^{\nu} s_{10}. \nonumber
109: \end{eqnarray}
110: If we start from the $\gamma$-matrix decomposition with
111: nonsingular coefficients the fourth requirement is fulfilled
112: automatically.
113:
114: This expression satisfies the condition $\gamma^0
115: (S^{\mu\nu})^\dag\gamma^0=S^{\nu\mu}$,\ if $s_{1}$, $s_{4}$,
116: $s_{7}$, $s_{10}$ are real parameters while $s_{5}$ and
117: $s_{6}=s_{5}^{*}$ may be complex. It is convenient to introduce
118: the new notations
119: \begin{equation*}
120: s_{1}=r_{1},\quad s_{4}=r_{4},\quad s_{7}=r_{7},\quad
121: s_{10}=r_{10},\quad s_{5}=r_{5}+ i a_{5},\quad s_{6}=r_{5}- i
122: a_{5},
123: \end{equation*}
124: where all parameters are real.
125:
126: To take into account the third requirement, we need to
127: recognize the spin-$3/2$ part of inverse propagator. It is easy to
128: do in the $\hat{p}$-basis (see Appendix A for details)
129: \begin{equation}
130: \label{sec1:eq5}
131: S^{\mu\nu}=
132: (\hat{p}-M)\left(\operP^{3/2}\right)^{\mu\nu}+(\text{spin-$1/2$
133: contributions}).
134: \end{equation}
135: Reversing the Eq.(\ref{sec1:eq5}), we obtain propagator with the
136: standard pole behavior of spin-3/2 contribution
137: \begin{equation}
138: \label{sec1:eq6}
139: G^{\mu\nu}= \frac{1}{\hat{p}-M}
140: \left(\operP^{3/2}\right)^{\mu\nu}+(\text{spin-$1/2$
141: contributions}).
142: \end{equation}
143: Eq.\eqref{sec1:eq5} gives\footnote{We need to use different bases,
144: so to distinguish them we use different notations:
145: $s_i, S_i, \bar{S}_i$ for coefficients
146: in $\gamma$-, $\hat{p}$- and $\Lambda$-basis respectively.}
147: (using formulae \eqref{app:eq4}, \eqref{app:eq5} for transition
148: from one basis to another)%
149: \begin{equation}
150: S_1=s_1-s_7=-M, \quad S_2=s_4-s_{10}=1 .
151: \end{equation}
152: So the $r_{7}, r_{10}$ are dependent values
153: \begin{equation*}
154: \begin{split}
155: r_{7}=M + r_{1}, \quad
156: r_{10}=r_{4}-1
157: \end{split}
158: \end{equation*}
159: and we come to four-parameter ($r_{1},r_{4},r_{5},a_{5}$)
160: lagrangian, which satisfies all the necessary requirements.
161: \begin{equation}\label{mostl}
162: S^{\mu\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}(\hat{p}-M) + p^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}(r_{5}+
163: r_{4}-1 + i a_{5}) +p^{\nu}\gamma^{\mu}(r_{5}+r_{4}-1 - i a_{5})
164: +\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}(M+r_{1})-
165: \gamma^{\mu}\hat{p}\gamma^{\nu}(r_{4}-1).
166: \end{equation}
167:
168: Other bases may be useful, so let us write down the corresponding
169: decomposition coefficients (here $E=\sqrt{p^2}$):
170: \begin{table}[h]
171: \begin{tabular}{>{$}l<{$}>{$}l<{$}>{$}l<{$}}
172: \text{$\gamma$-basis:} &\quad \text{$\hat{{p}}$-basis:} &\quad \text{$\Lambda$-basis:}\\
173: s_{1}=r_{1}, &\quad S_{1}=-M, &\quad \bar{S}_{1}=-M+E,\\
174: s_{2}=s_{3}=0, &\quad S_{2}=1, &\quad \bar{S}_{2}=-M-E, \\
175: s_{4}=r_{4}, &\quad S_{3}=2M+3r_{1}, &\quad \bar{S}_{3}=(2M+3r_{1})+E(3r_{4}-2),\\
176: s_{5}=r_{5}+i a_{5}, &\quad S_{4}=3r_{4}-2, &\quad \bar{S}_{4}=(2M+3r_{1})-E(3r_{4}-2),\\
177: s_{6}=r_{5}-i a_{5}, &\quad S_{5}=r_{1}, &\quad \bar{S}_{5}=r_{1}+E(2r_{5}+r_{4}),\\
178: s_{7}=M + r_{1}, &\quad S_{6}=r_{4}+2r_{5}, &\quad \bar{S}_{6}=r_{1}-E(2r_{5}+r_{4}),\\
179: s_{8}=s_{9}=0, &\quad S_{7}=\sqrt{3}\ E(r_{5}-i a_{5}), &\quad \bar{S}_{7}=\sqrt{3}\ \big[-(M+r_{1})+E(r_{5}-i a_{5})\big],\\
180: s_{10}=r_{4}-1, &\quad S_{8}=-\sqrt{3}\ (M+r_{1})/E, &\quad \bar{S}_{8}=\sqrt{3}\ \big[(M+r_{1})+E(r_{5}-i a_{5})\big],\\
181: &\quad S_{9}=\sqrt{3}\ E(r_{5}+i a_{5}), &\quad \bar{S}_{9}=\sqrt{3}\ \big[(M+r_{1})+E(r_{5}+i a_{5})\big],\\
182: &\quad S_{10}=\sqrt{3}\ (M+r_{1})/E, &\quad \bar{S}_{10}=\sqrt{3}\ \big[-(M+r_{1})+E(r_{5}+i a_{5})\big].
183: \end{tabular}
184: \end{table}
185:
186:
187: \section{Propagator of the Rarita-Schwinger field}
188:
189: To build the propagator of the Rarita-Schwinger field we need to
190: reverse \eqref{mostl}
191: \begin{equation}\label{}
192: G^{\mu\nu}(p) = \big(S^{-1}\big)^{\mu\nu},
193: \end{equation}
194: and the $\Lambda$-basis is convenient here. Reversing of the
195: spin-tensor leads to set of equations for the scalar coefficients
196: $\bar{G}_{i}$ \cite{KL1,KL2}.
197: \begin{gather}
198: \begin{array}{ccc}
199: \bar{G}_1 \bar{S}_1 &=& 1, \\
200: \bar{G}_2 \bar{S}_2 &=& 1,
201: \end{array}
202: \notag\\
203: \begin{array}{ccc}
204: \bar{G}_3 \bar{S}_3 + \bar{G}_7 \bar{S}_{10} &=& 1, \\
205: \bar{G}_{3} \bar{S}_{7} + \bar{G}_{7} \bar{S}_{6} &=& 0,
206: \end{array}
207: \qquad
208: \begin{array}{ccc}
209: \bar{G}_4 \bar{S}_4 + \bar{G}_8 \bar{S}_{9} &=& 1, \\
210: \bar{G}_{4} \bar{S}_{8} + \bar{G}_{8} \bar{S}_{5} &=& 0,
211: \end{array}
212: \\
213: \begin{array}{ccc}
214: \bar{G}_5 \bar{S}_5 + \bar{G}_9 \bar{S}_{8} &=& 1, \\
215: \bar{G}_{5} \bar{S}_{9} + \bar{G}_{9} \bar{S}_{4} &=& 0,
216: \end{array}
217: \qquad
218: \begin{array}{ccc}
219: \bar{G}_6 \bar{S}_6 + \bar{G}_{10} \bar{S}_{7} &=& 1, \\
220: \bar{G}_{6} \bar{S}_{10} + \bar{G}_{10} \bar{S}_{3} &=& 0 .
221: \end{array}
222: \notag
223: \end{gather}
224:
225: The equations are easy to solve:
226: \begin{flalign}
227: \label{solve}
228: \bar{G}_1&=\frac{1}{\bar{S}_1},\quad \bar{G}_2=\frac{1}{\bar{S}_2},\notag\\
229: %
230: \bar{G}_3&=\frac{\bar{S}_6}{\Delta_1},\quad
231: \bar{G}_4=\frac{\bar{S}_5}{\Delta_2},\quad
232: \bar{G}_5=\frac{\bar{S}_4}{\Delta_2},\quad
233: \bar{G}_6=\frac{\bar{S}_3}{\Delta_1},\\
234: %
235: \bar{G}_7&=\frac{-\bar{S}_7}{\Delta_1},\quad
236: \bar{G}_8=\frac{-\bar{S}_8}{\Delta_2},\quad
237: \bar{G}_9=\frac{-\bar{S}_9}{\Delta_2},\quad
238: \bar{G}_{10}=\frac{-\bar{S}_{10}}{\Delta_1},\notag
239: \end{flalign}
240: where
241: \begin{equation}
242: \Delta_1=\bar{S}_{3}\bar{S}_{6}-\bar{S}_{7}\bar{S}_{10},\qquad
243: \Delta_2=\bar{S}_{4}\bar{S}_{5}-\bar{S}_{8}\bar{S}_{9}.
244: \label{denom}
245: \end{equation}
246: R.-S. propagator in the spin-3/2 sector ($\bar{G}_1, \bar{G}_2$
247: coefficients) is similar to usual Dirac propagator. As for
248: spin-1/2 sector ($\bar{G}_3$ -- $\bar{G}_{10}$), it looks like
249: mixing of two bare propagators with non-diagonal transitions.
250: Zeros of denominators $\Delta_1, \Delta_2$ are the poles of R.-S.
251: propagator with quantum numbers $s=1/2$.
252:
253: Let us write down the denominators following from our lagrangian
254: \eqref{mostl}:
255: \begin{align*}
256: \Delta_{1}(E)&=-M(3M+4r_{1})+
257: 2E(Mr_{5}-Mr_{4}-r_{1})+E^2(-3a_{5}^2-3(r_{4}+r_{5})^2+4r_{5}+2r_{4}),\\
258: \Delta_{2}(E)&=\Delta_{1}(E\to-E).
259: \end{align*}
260: If we want the spin-1/2 contributions to be unphysical, it
261: requires $\Delta_{1}=const$ and we come to conditions:
262: \begin{equation}
263: \begin{split}
264: M(r_{5}-r_{4})-r_{1}=0&,\\
265: 3a_{5}^2+3(r_{4}+r_{5})^2-4r_{5}-2r_{4}=0&.
266: \end{split}
267: \label{nonph}
268: \end{equation}
269: One can rewrite it in terms of sum and difference
270: $\sigma=r_{5}+r_{4}$,\ $\delta=r_{5}-r_{4}$:
271: \begin{equation}
272: \label{nonph'}
273: \begin{split}
274: r_{1}&=M \delta,\\
275: \delta&=3(\sigma^2-\sigma+a_{5}^2) .
276: \end{split}
277: \end{equation}
278: Let us consider some particular cases of our lagrangian
279: \eqref{mostl}
280: \begin{itemize}
281: \item To obtain unphysical spin-1/2 sector we should require the
282: conditions \eqref{nonph}. If these relations are
283: fulfilled, we can return to the standard R.-S. lagrangian
284: \eqref{stand}, if to put $a_{5}=0$ and denote $\sigma=A+1$.
285: \item Generalization of the standard lagrangian \eqref{stand}
286: was suggested by Pilling \cite{Pil}. His lagrangian corresponds to
287: unphysical $s=1/2$ sector, has two parameters and may be obtained
288: (in $d=4$ space) from our lagrangian \eqref{mostl} after imposing
289: of the conditions \eqref{nonph} and changing of notations. Note
290: that the procedure of deriving \cite{Pil} is used some trick
291: \cite{AU} and looks not too transparent.
292: \item Lagrangian suggested by Kirchbach and Napsuciale \cite{Kir04}
293: \begin{equation*}
294: S^{\mu\nu}=i\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}\gamma^5
295: \gamma_{\lambda}p_{\rho} - M g^{\mu\nu}
296: \end{equation*}
297: corresponds to the choice
298: \begin{equation*}
299: r_4 = r_5 = a_5 = 0, \quad\quad r_1 = -M .
300: \end{equation*}
301: It leads to poles in $s=1/2$ sector
302: \begin{equation*}
303: \Delta_1= M(M+2E), \quad \Delta_1= M(M-2E)
304: \end{equation*}
305: and presence of these poles contradicts to further analysis
306: \cite{Kir04} of this lagrangian.
307: \end{itemize}
308:
309: \section{Reparametrization}
310:
311: There exists the well-known transformation of R.-S. field
312: \begin{equation}
313: \label{Field:repar}
314: \Psi_{\mu}\to\Psi^{\prime}_{\mu}:\quad \Psi_{\mu}=\theta_{\mu\nu}(B)\Psi^{\prime\nu},
315: \end{equation}
316: where $\theta_{\mu\nu}(B)=g_{\mu\nu}+B\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{\nu}$
317: and $B=b+i\beta$ is a complex parameter.
318:
319: This transformation doesn't touch the spin-3/2 because
320: $(\operP^{3/2})^{\mu\nu}$ operator is orthogonal to
321: $\gamma^\alpha$. So if to apply it to our inverse propagator
322: \eqref{mostl}
323: \begin{equation}\label{trS}
324: S_{\mu\nu}\to S^{\ \prime}_{\mu\nu}=\theta_{\mu\alpha}(B^*)
325: S^{\alpha\beta} \theta_{\beta\nu}(B) ,
326: \end{equation}
327: one can see that $S^{\ \prime}_{\mu\nu}$ keeps all the properties
328: of $S_{\mu\nu}$ \eqref{mostl}. It means that in fact we have
329: reparametrization -- after transformation of the \eqref{mostl} we
330: obtain the same operator with changed parameters
331: \begin{equation}
332: \label{sec1:eq10}
333: \theta_{\mu\alpha}(B^*)S^{\alpha\beta}(r_{1},r_{4},r_{5},a_{5})
334: \theta_{\beta\nu}(B)=S_{\mu\nu}(r_{1}^{'},r_{4}^{'},r_{5}^{'},a_{5}^{'}).
335: \end{equation}
336: Direct calculations confirm it, the transformed parameters are the
337: following:
338: \begin{equation}
339: \begin{split}
340: r_{1}^{'}&=r_{1}+2(3M+4r_{1})(2b^2+b+\beta^2),\\
341: a_{5}^{'}&=a_{5}(1+4b)+2\beta(2r_{4}+2r_{5}-1),\\
342: r_{4}^{'}&=r_{4}+2b^2(4r_{4}-4r_{5}-3)+
343: 2b(3r_{4}-r_{5}-2)+2\beta^2(4r_{4}-4r_{5}-3)-2\beta a_{5},\\
344: r_{5}^{'}&=r_{5}-2b^2(4r_{4}-4r_{5}-3)-2b(r_{4}-
345: 3r_{5}-1)-2\beta^2(4r_{4}-4r_{5}-3)-2\beta a_{5},
346: \end{split}
347: \label{repa}
348: \end{equation}
349: or, for sum and difference ($\sigma=r_{5}+r_{4}$,\
350: $\delta=r_{5}-r_{4}$):
351: \begin{equation*}
352: \begin{split}
353: \sigma^{'}&=\sigma+2b(2\sigma-1)-4\beta a_{5},\\
354: \delta^{'}&=\delta+2(3+4\delta)(2b^2+b+2\beta^2),\\
355: a^{'}_{5}&=a_{5}(1+4b)+2\beta(2\sigma-1).
356: \end{split}
357: \label{repa1}
358: \end{equation*}
359:
360: Not so evident but important property of the
361: $\theta$-transformation is that it doesn't change the pole
362: positions (masses) of spin-1/2 representations. It may be seen
363: from the transformation law of denominators $\Delta_1, \Delta_2$
364: \eqref{denom} of the propagator:
365: \begin{equation}\label{denomt}
366: \Delta_i (E) \to \Delta_i^{\prime}(E)=\Delta_i(E)\cdot \mid 1+4B \mid^2 .
367: \end{equation}
368: It means that not all parameters are essential for spectrum of
369: $s=1/2$ and this fact may be useful for simplification. Applying
370: the $\theta$-transformation to our $S^{\mu\nu}$ operator
371: \eqref{sec1:eq10} we can eliminate two of four parameters
372: \begin{equation*}
373: \sigma^{\prime}=0, \quad\quad a_5^{\prime}=0.
374: \end{equation*}
375: After some bit of algebra one can find the transformation
376: parameters
377: \begin{equation*}
378: 2b= - \dfrac{\sigma(2\sigma-1)+2a_5^2}{(2\sigma-1)^2+a_5^2},
379: \quad\quad 2\beta= \dfrac{a_5}{(2\sigma-1)^2+a_5^2},
380: \end{equation*}
381: under the condition
382: \begin{equation*}
383: (2\sigma-1)^2+a_5^2 \neq 0 .
384: \end{equation*}
385: Then it is useful to renormalize the R.-S. field\footnote{Recall
386: that $\theta(a)\theta(b)=\theta(a+b+4ab)$, so inverse
387: transformation $\theta(a)\theta(\bar{a})=I$ is defined by
388: parameter $\bar{a}=-a/(1+4a)$.}
389: \begin{equation}\label{renor}
390: \Lagr=\overline{\Psi}\vphantom{\Psi}^{\mu}S_{\mu\nu}\Psi^{\nu}=
391: \overline{\Psi}^{\mu}\theta_{\mu\alpha}(\bar{B}^{*})\cdot\theta^{\alpha\beta}(B^{*})
392: S_{\beta\rho} \theta^{\rho\lambda}(B)\cdot
393: \theta_{\lambda\nu}(\bar{B})\Psi^{\nu}=\overline{\Psi}
394: \vphantom{\Psi}^{\prime\alpha}S_{\prime\alpha\lambda}\Psi^{\prime\lambda},
395: \end{equation}
396: where $S^{\prime\alpha\beta}$ contains only two parameters
397: \begin{equation*}
398: S^{\prime\alpha\beta}=S^{\alpha\beta}(r_{1}^{'},\delta^{'},\sigma^{'}=0,a_{5}^{'}=0)
399: \end{equation*}
400: and renormalized field is
401: \begin{equation}\label{renor1}
402: \Psi^{\prime\lambda}=\theta^{\lambda\nu}(\bar{B})\Psi_{\nu}.
403: \end{equation}
404: After field renormalization \eqref{renor1} we have two-parameter
405: free lagrangian, but now the $\theta$-factor will appear in the
406: interaction lagrangian through \eqref{Field:repar}. Such
407: $\theta$-factor with arbitrary parameter (so called "off-shell"
408: parameter) traditionally exists in interaction lagrangian.
409: Nevertheless, the meaning of this parameter and its choice is rather
410: controversial, see, e.g. discussion in \cite{Nat}.
411:
412:
413: \section{Conclusion}
414:
415: We obtained the four-parametric lagrangian which satisfies all
416: general requirements and generalizes all known lagrangians for
417: Rarita-Schwinger field. We used a straightforward procedure for
418: its deriving which utilize different bases for spin-tensor
419: $S^{\mu\nu}(p)$ and studying of propagator instead of equation of
420: motion. The corresponding propagator has standard form of the
421: spin-3/2 contribution. As for spin-1/2 terms, they can have poles
422: in the energy plane which positions and residues depends on the
423: parameters.
424:
425: We found that the $\theta$-transformation plays some special role
426: in our lagrangian: this is a reparametrization which doesn't move
427: the spin-1/2 poles. We suppose that the meaning of this
428: degree of freedom may be more clear in case of physical spin-1/2
429: sector.
430:
431: We suppose that investigation of the phenomenology of
432: Rarita-Schwinger multiplet may be interesting and present work is
433: a necessary step in this direction.
434:
435: The work was supported in part by RFBR grant 05-02-17722a.
436:
437:
438: \appendix
439: \section{Decomposition of spin-tensor}
440:
441: Propagator or self-energy of the R.-S. field has two spinor and
442: two vector indices and depends on momentum $p$. We will denote
443: such object as $S^{\mu\nu}(p)$, omitting spinor indices, and will
444: call it shortly as a spin-tensor. In our consideration we need to
445: use different bases for this object.
446: \begin{enumerate}
447: \item
448: Most evident is a $\gamma$-matrix decomposition. It's easy to
449: write down all possible $\gamma$-matrix structures with two vector
450: indices. Altogether there are 10 terms in decomposition of
451: spin-tensor, if parity is conserved.
452: \begin{equation}
453: \begin{split}
454: S^{\mu\nu}(p)=&g^{\mu\nu}\cdot s_1+p^{\mu}p^{\nu}\cdot s_2
455: +\hat{p}p^{\mu}p^{\nu}\cdot s_3+\hat{p}g^{\mu\nu}\cdot
456: s_4+p^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\cdot s_5+
457: \gamma^{\mu}p^{\nu}\cdot s_6+ \\
458: &+\sigma^{\mu\nu}\cdot s_7+\sigma^{\mu\lambda}p_{\lambda}p^{\nu}\cdot s_8+
459: \sigma^{\nu\lambda}p_{\lambda}p^{\mu}\cdot s_9+
460: \gamma_{\lambda}\gamma^{5}\imath\varepsilon^{\lambda\mu\nu\rho}p_{\rho}\cdot s_{10}.
461: \end{split}
462: \label{app:eq1}
463: \end{equation}
464: Here $s_{i}(p^2)$ are the Lorentz-invariant coefficients and
465: $\sigma^{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}[\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}]$.
466:
467: This is a good starting point of any consideration, since this
468: basis is complete, nonsingular and free of kinematical constrains.
469: But this basis is not convenient at multiplication (e.g. in Dyson
470: summation) because elements of basis are not orthogonal to each
471: other.
472: \item
473: There is another basis (e.g. \cite{Pas95}) for $S^{\mu\nu}$,
474: which we call as $\hat{p}$-basis. Decomposition of any spin-tensor
475: in this basis has the form
476: \begin{eqnarray}
477: \label{app:eq2}
478: S^{\mu\nu}(p)&=&(S_{1}+\hat{p}S_{2})\big(\operP^{3/2}\big)^{\mu\nu}+(S_{3}+
479: \hat{p}S_{4})\big(\operP^{1/2}_{11}\big)^{\mu\nu}
480: +(S_{5}+\hat{p}S_{6})\big(\operP^{1/2}_{22}\big)^{\mu\nu}+
481: \nonumber \\
482: &&+(S_{7}+\hat{p}S_{8})\big(\operP^{1/2}_{21}\big)^{\mu\nu}+
483: (S_{9}+\hat{p}S_{10})\big(\operP^{1/2}_{12}\big)^{\mu\nu},
484: \end{eqnarray}
485: where appeared the well-known tensor operator
486: \cite{Nie,BDM,Pas95}
487: \begin{equation}
488: \label{app:eq3}
489: \begin{split}
490: \big(\operP^{3/2}\big)^{\mu\nu}&=g^{\mu\nu}-\big(\operP^{1/2}_{11}\big)^{\mu\nu}-
491: \big(\operP^{1/2}_{22}\big)^{\mu\nu},\\
492: \big(\operP^{1/2}_{11}\big)^{\mu\nu}&=3\pi^{\mu}\pi^{\nu},\\
493: \big(\operP^{1/2}_{22}\big)^{\mu\nu}&=\frac{p^{\mu}p^{\nu}}{p^2},\\
494: \big(\operP^{1/2}_{21}\big)^{\mu\nu}&=\sqrt{\frac{3}{p^2}}\cdot\pi^{\mu}p^{\nu},\\
495: \big(\operP^{1/2}_{12}\big)^{\mu\nu}&=\sqrt{\frac{3}{p^2}}\cdot p^{\mu}\pi^{\nu},
496: \end{split}
497: \end{equation}
498: which are written here in a non-standard form. Here we introduced
499: the "vector"
500: \begin{equation}
501: \pi^{\mu}=\frac{1}{3p^2}(-p^{\mu}+\gamma^{\mu}\hat{p})\hat{p}
502: \end{equation}
503: with the following properties:
504: \begin{equation}
505: (\pi p)=0,\quad (\gamma\pi)=(\pi\gamma)=1,\quad (\pi\pi)=\frac{1}{3},
506: \quad \hat{p}\pi^{\mu}=-\pi^{\mu}\hat{p}.
507: \end{equation}
508: \item
509: The most convenient at multiplication basis is build by combining
510: the $\operP^{i}_{\mu\nu}$ operators (\ref{app:eq3}) and the
511: off-shell projection operators
512: $\Lambda^{\pm}$
513: \begin{equation}
514: \Lambda^{\pm}=\frac{1}{2} \left(1 \pm \frac{\hat{p}}{\sqrt{p^2}} \right),
515: \label{project}
516: \end{equation}
517: where we assume $\sqrt{p^2}$ to be the first branch of analytical
518: function. Ten elements of this basis look as
519: \begin{flalign}
520: \mathcal{P}_{1}=&\Lambda^{+}\mathcal{P}^{3/2},\,&
521: \mathcal{P}_{3}=&\Lambda^{+}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{11},\,&
522: \mathcal{P}_{5}=&\Lambda^{+}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{22},\,&
523: \mathcal{P}_{7}=&\Lambda^{+}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{21},\,&
524: \mathcal{P}_{9}=&\Lambda^{+}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{12},\notag\\
525: \mathcal{P}_{2}=&\Lambda^{-}\mathcal{P}^{3/2},\,&
526: \mathcal{P}_{4}=&\Lambda^{-}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{11},\,&
527: \mathcal{P}_{6}=&\Lambda^{-}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{22},\,&
528: \mathcal{P}_{8}=&\Lambda^{-}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{21},\,&
529: \mathcal{P}_{10}=&\Lambda^{-}\mathcal{P}^{1/2}_{12},
530: \label{app:eq6}
531: \end{flalign}
532: where tensor indices are omitted. Decomposition in this basis:
533: \begin{equation}
534: \label{app:lambda}
535: S^{\mu\nu}(p)= \sum_{A=1}^{10}\bar{S}_{A} \operP_{A}^{\mu\nu}.
536: \end{equation}
537:
538: \end{enumerate}
539:
540: Coefficients of $S^{\mu\nu}$ in $\hat{p}$- and $\gamma$-bases are
541: related by
542: \begin{gather}
543: \begin{array}{ll}
544: \label{app:eq4}
545: s_{1}=\dfrac{1}{3}(2 S_{1} + S_{3}), \quad\quad &
546: s_{2}=\dfrac{1}{3p^2}( -2 S_{1} - S_{3} + 3 S_{5} ),\\
547: s_{3}=\dfrac{1}{3p^2}\big( -2S_{2} - S_{4} + 3S_{6} -
548: \sqrt{\dfrac{3}{p^2}} (S_{7}+S_{9}) \big), \quad\quad &
549: s_{4}=\dfrac{1}{3}(2 S_{2} + S_{4}),\\
550: s_{5}=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3p^2}}S_{9}, \quad\quad &
551: s_{6}=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3p^2}}S_{7}, \\
552: s_{7}=\dfrac{1}{3}( - S_{1} + S_{3}), \quad\quad &
553: s_{8}=\dfrac{1}{3p^2}\big( S_{1} - S_{3} -
554: \sqrt{3 p^2} S_{8}\big),\\
555: s_{9}=\dfrac{1}{3p^2}\big( -S_{1} + S_{3} -
556: \sqrt{3 p^2} S_{10}\big), \quad\quad &
557: s_{10}=\dfrac{1}{3}( - S_{2} + S_{4}).
558: \end{array}
559: \end{gather}
560:
561: Reversed relations:
562: \begin{gather}
563: \label{app:eq5}
564: \begin{array}{ll}
565: S_{1}=s_{1}-s_{7}, \quad\quad &
566: S_{2}=s_{4}-s_{10}, \\
567: S_{3}=s_{1}+2s_{7}, \quad\quad &
568: S_{4}=s_{4}+2s_{10}, \\
569: S_{5}=s_{1}+p^2s_{2}, \quad\quad &
570: S_{6}=p^2s_{3}+s_{4}+s_{5}+s_{6}, \\
571: S_{7}=\sqrt{3p^2}s_{6}, \quad\quad &
572: S_{8}=-\sqrt{\dfrac{3}{p^2}}( s_{7} + p^2 s_{8}),\\
573: S_{9}=\sqrt{3p^2}s_{6}, \quad\quad &
574: S_{10}=\sqrt{\dfrac{3}{p^2}}( s_{7}+ p^2 s_{8}).
575: \end{array}
576: \end{gather}
577: Transition from $\hat{p}$- to $\Lambda$-basis:
578: \begin{flalign}
579: \label{app:eq7}
580: \bar{S}_{1}&=S_{1}+E S_{2},
581: &\bar{S}_{3}&=S_{3}+E S_{4},
582: &\bar{S}_{5}&=S_{5}+E S_{6},
583: &\bar{S}_{7}&=S_{7}+E S_{8},
584: &\bar{S}_{9}&=S_{9}+E S_{10},\notag\\
585: \bar{S}_{2}&=S_{1}-E S_{2},
586: &\bar{S}_{4}&=S_{3}-E S_{4},
587: &\bar{S}_{6}&=S_{5}-E S_{6},
588: &\bar{S}_{8}&=S_{7}-E S_{8},
589: &\bar{S}_{10}&=S_{9}-E S_{10}.
590: \end{flalign}
591: Let us note that $\hat{p}$- and $\Lambda$-bases are singular at
592: point $p^2=0$. As for branch point $\sqrt{p^2}$ appearing in
593: different terms, it is canceled in total expression. But poles
594: $1/p^2$ don't cancel automatically, if we work in $\hat{p}$- or
595: $\Lambda$-basis. First of all, one can see from \eqref{app:eq5}
596: that the $S_{7}-S_{7}$ should have kinematical $\sqrt{p^2}$
597: factors:
598: \begin{equation}\label{kinfac}
599: S_{7}=\sqrt{p^2}\tilde{S}_{7},\quad
600: S_{8}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{p^2}}\tilde{S}_{7},\quad
601: S_{9}=\sqrt{p^2}\tilde{S}_{9},\quad
602: S_{10}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{p^2}}\tilde{S}_{10},
603: \end{equation}
604: and $\tilde{S}_{i}$ don't have branch point at origin. After it we
605: see from \eqref{app:eq4} conditions of absence of $1/p^2$ poles:
606: \begin{equation}
607: \begin{split}
608: 2S_{1}(0)+S_{3}(0)-3S_{5}(0)&=0,\\
609: S_{1}(0)-S_{3}(0)-\sqrt{3}\tilde{S}_{8}(0)&=0,\\
610: 2S_{2}(0)+S_{4}(0)-3S_{6}(0)-\sqrt{3}(\tilde{S}_{7}(0)+\tilde{S}_{9}(0))&=0,\\
611: \tilde{S}_{8}(0)-\tilde{S}_{10}(0)&=0.\\
612: \end{split}
613: \end{equation}
614:
615: \section{Equations of motion}
616:
617: Usually the equations of motion are used for analysis of
618: Rarita-Schwinger field content. In this approach the "extra"
619: spin-1/2 components are excluded by additional conditions
620: $p_{\mu}\Psi^{\mu}=0$, $\gamma_{\mu}\Psi^{\mu}=0$ which should be
621: the consequences of equations of motion. Let us analyze the
622: equations of motion, which result from our four-parameter
623: lagrangian \eqref{mostl}.
624:
625: Contracting the equations of motion with $p_{\mu}$ and
626: $\gamma_{\mu}$ one can get
627: \begin{align*}
628: p_{\mu}S^{\mu\nu}\Psi_{\nu}&=0,\\
629: \gamma_{\mu}S^{\mu\nu}\Psi_{\nu}&=0.
630: \end{align*}
631: Our lagrangian \eqref{mostl} leads to the following secondary
632: constrains:
633: \begin{equation}
634: \label{sec1:eq7}
635: \begin{split}
636: \Big[(r_{4}+r_{5}-i a_{5})\hat{p}-M\Big]&(p\Psi)+
637: \Big[p^2(r_{5}+i a_{5})+(M+r_{1})\hat{p}\Big](\gamma\Psi)=0,\\
638: 2\Big[2r_{4}+2r_{5}-1+2i a_{5}\Big]&(p\Psi)+\Big[(3M+4r_{1}) +
639: (-3r_{4}+r_{5}+2+i a_{5})\hat{p}\Big](\gamma\Psi)=0.
640: \end{split}
641: \end{equation}
642: This is a system of linear equations (with matrix coefficients) in
643: $(p\Psi)$, $(\gamma\Psi)$. One can find conditions when this
644: system has only trivial solution $(p\Psi)=(\gamma\Psi)=0$. Let us
645: express $(p\Psi)$ from the second equation and substitute to the
646: first. It gives the equation in $(\gamma\Psi)$:
647: \begin{equation}
648: \label{wave}
649: \Delta(p) (\gamma\Psi)=0,
650: \end{equation}
651: where $\Delta(p)$ is operator of the form
652: \begin{multline*}
653: \Delta(p) = -M (3M+4r_{1}) + \hat{p}\cdot 2 \Big( r_{1}+Mr_{4}-M
654: r_{5} \Big)+ p^2\Big(-3(r_{4}+r_{5})^2 - 3a_{5}^2 +
655: 2r_{4}+4r_{5}\Big).
656: \end{multline*}
657: Eq. \eqref{wave} is in fact some wave equation in the spinor
658: $(\gamma\Psi)$. This equation has only trivial solution if
659: $\Delta(p)=const$, or
660: \begin{equation}
661: \label{sec1:eq9}
662: \begin{split}
663: r_{1}+Mr_{4}-M r_{5}=0,\\
664: 3a_{5}^2+3(r_{4}+r_{5})^2-2r_{4}-4r_{5}=0.
665: \end{split}
666: \end{equation}
667:
668: These relations provide the constrains $(p\Psi)=0$,
669: $(\gamma\Psi)=0$ and the we can see that the same conditions
670: \eqref{nonph} guarantee the absence of poles $s=1/2$.
671:
672:
673:
674: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
675:
676: \bibitem{Rar}
677: W.~Rarita and J.~Schwinger. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{60}
678: (1941) 61.
679:
680: \bibitem{Hab}
681: H.~Haberzettl. nucl-th/9812043.
682:
683: \bibitem{Kir04}
684: M.~Kirchbach and M.~Napsuciale. hep-ph/0407179.
685:
686: \bibitem{Pil}
687: T. Pilling. \journal{Int.J.Mod.Phys.} \textbf{A20} (2005) 2715.
688:
689: \bibitem{KL1}
690: A. E. Kaloshin and V. P. Lomov. \journal{Mod.Phys.Lett.}
691: \textbf{A19} (2004) 135.
692:
693: \bibitem{Mol}
694: P. A. Moldauler and K. M. Case. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{102}
695: (1956) 102.
696:
697: \bibitem{BDM}
698: M.~Benmerrouche, R.~M.~Davidson and N.~C.~Mukhopadhyay.
699: \journal{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{C39} (1989) 2339.
700:
701: \bibitem{Bjo}
702: J.D.Bjorken and S.D.Drell. Relativistic quantun mechanics.
703: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964.
704:
705: \bibitem{KL2}
706: A. E. Kaloshin and V. P. Lomov. hep-ph/0409052
707:
708: \bibitem{AU}
709: A.~Aurilia, H.~Umezava. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{182} (1969)
710: 1686.
711:
712: \bibitem{Nat}
713: L.~M.~Nath,B.~Etemadi and J.~D.~Kimel. \journal{Phys. Rev.}
714: \textbf{D3} (1971) 2153.
715:
716: \bibitem{Pas95} V. Pascalutsa and O. Scholten.
717: \journal{Nuc. Phys.} \textbf{A591} (1995) 658.
718:
719: \bibitem{Nie}
720: P.~van~Nieuwenhuizen. \journal{Phys. Rep.} \textbf{68} (1981) 189.
721:
722: \end{thebibliography}
723:
724: \end{document}
725:
726: % These bibliography are useful but not related to the document
727: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
728: \bibitem{Kor}
729: C. L. Korpa. \journal{Heavy Ion Phys.} \textbf{5} (1997) 77.
730:
731: \bibitem{AKS}
732: A. N. Almaliev, I. V. Kopytin and M. A. Shehalev. \journal{J.
733: Phys. G.} \textbf{28} (2002) 233.
734:
735: \bibitem{Kir} M. Kirchbach and D. V. Ahluwalia.
736: \journal{Phys. Lett} \textbf{B529} (2002) 124.
737:
738: \bibitem{Dir}
739: P. A. M. Dirac. \journal{Proc.R.Soc.London} \textbf{A155} (1936)
740: 447.
741:
742: \bibitem{Fie}
743: M. Fierz and W. Pauli. \journal{Proc.R.Soc.London} \textbf{A173}
744: (1939) 221.
745:
746: \bibitem{JohnSud61}
747: K. Johnson and E.~C.~G. Sudarshan. \journal{Ann. Phys.} (N.Y.)
748: \textbf{13} (1961) 126.
749:
750: \bibitem{VeZw69}
751: G.~Velo and D.~Zwanzinger. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{186}
752: (1969) 267, 1337.
753:
754: \bibitem{Kob}
755: M.~Kobayashi and Y.~Takahashi. \journal{J.Phys. A} \textbf{20}
756: (1987) 6581.
757:
758: \bibitem{Pas98}
759: V.~Pascalutsa. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D58} (1998) 096002.
760:
761: \bibitem{Pas01}
762: V. Pascalutsa. \journal{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B503} (2001) 86.
763:
764: \bibitem{Cas} G. Lopez Castro and A. Mariano.
765: \journal{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B517} (2001) 339.
766:
767: \bibitem{KS}
768: S.~Kondratyuk and O.~Scholten. \journal{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{C62}
769: (2000) 025203.
770:
771: \bibitem{KL2}
772: A. E. Kaloshin and V. P. Lomov. hep-ph/0409052
773:
774: \bibitem{MaRo}
775: P. Maris and C. D. Roberts. \journal{Int. J. Mod. Phys.}
776: \textbf{E12} (2003) 297.
777:
778: \bibitem{Baz} A. I. Baz', Ya. B. Zel'dovich and A. M. Perelomov.
779: Rasseyanie, reaktsii i raspady v nerelativistskoy kvantovoy
780: mehanike. Moscow: Nauka, 1971.
781:
782: \bibitem{Pas99} V. Pascalutsa and R. Timmermans.
783: \journal{Phys.Rev.} \textbf{C60} (1999) 042201.
784:
785: \end{thebibliography}